Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 17, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:42:10

Justin Trudeau Regime ON THE VERGE OF COLLAPSE! And Some More Fun Law Stuffs! Viva Frei

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	2024. I don't know if anybody can hear me.
	I'm not listening to myself yet, but let's see.
	My mic is on.
	You want me scared, you want me weak, you want me brain dead in asleep.
	You want us trapped while you are left behind the scenes.
	You want us sick, you think we're dumb.
	You want us blinded, you want us drugged.
	You want us poor while you get more of everything.
	But you don't get...
	Tell me what to think and what to do.
	You don't get to tell me what is true.
	You're just liars, teens and crooks.
	Change the rules and you burn the books.
	And so I don't believe a single word you say.
	You're all liars, fakes and cons.
	watch out we watch you gone so don't believe this time you'll get away wanna treat you wanna see no wanna scare you wanna stop wanna shop you wanna spot in every way
	Time! We're
	going to cut the intro music a little early just because I was running late.
	And I know the mic is working now as well.
	In case you haven't been able to surmise, you don't get to tell me what to think or what to do.
	Why? Because you're all liars, chiefs, and crooks.
	All right, the song is amazing, people.
	I know that the audio is working now that I've double-checked.
	I was just on with Charlie Kirk, and it would have been funny if the audio isn't working between Charlie Kirk and now.
	This song, I'm asymmetrical here, and I don't like this.
	You want to know why this is here?
	Let's see if this thing's still working.
	Yes. If the microphone's not working...
	Oh, God.
	That's terrible.
	I don't know why that's there, so I'll just put that on the ground.
	Liars, Cheats, and Crooks by...
	You can take it.
	Five times August.
	It's available on Apple Tunes.
	Out. And close it up.
	Get out.
	Close the door.
	Good afternoon, everybody.
	Not running late.
	Today was a bit of a different schedule because Charlie Kirk wanted to have me on to talk about what's going on in Canada, which we are going to be talking about today.
	Yesterday, people thought...
	The Justin Trudeau regime was going to crumble and there would be elections triggered yesterday and there'd be voting today and tomorrow would be a brighter future in Canada under the so-called conservative government.
	Not yet there.
	We will get there.
	Donald Trump suing Ann Seltzer.
	I mean, have no mercy.
	Have no mercy and make them live by their own rules.
	Trump is suing Ann Seltzer and the Des Moines Register for that.
	For that inexplicable election interference poll that Ann Seltzer put out showing Iowa had swung 12 points for, what's her face, Kamala Harris and some other good stuff.
	Let me make sure.
	So we are live across all platforms.
	Actually, I remember what I have to do because I was so late getting this stream started that when I used Studio, I forgot to add YouTube.
	And now I need to go there.
	And I need to click a button because I don't want to get into trouble in terms of...
	Hold on.
	I'm going to go here.
	I've got to go make sure to check the box because they will not let us make mistakes.
	This stream contains a paid promotion.
	They will not let us make mistakes and then they expect us to forgive them for theirs, which I probably would because I'm a bit of a...
	If we're being honest, you all know that.
	Good afternoon.
	that is it.
	So that everybody who wants to come over and watch it on Free Speech Rumble can and should.
	And I'm going to make sure here.
	Link to Rumble.
	And my brother, by the way, I believe might be popping on at some point during the stream.
	So keep an eye out for Daniel Freiheit.
	Viva, I know that you paid money for the rights to use that song, but it's ear bleeding.
	Jay Louie.
	First of all, here, let me bring it up.
	I didn't pay money for the rights.
	I paid so that I could use it with a clean conscience.
	Because some people would say, hey, dude, can I play your music on my show and it'll give you exposure and that'll be the...
	No. I love that song.
	I love Five Times August.
	It's naughty or bleeding.
	If you don't like it, maybe a Q-tip your ear.
	I love that song.
	And I love Five Times August.
	In a platonic, freedom-loving...
	Constitutional sense.
	All right, now that I've checked off the box, people, and speaking of the Constitution, and speaking of loving things, coffee, 1775, and speaking of supporting freedom and freedom-loving companies, people, it is time to make mornings great again.
	If your coffee tastes like it's been passed through the same filter as the mainstream media headlines, you deserve better.
	Enter 1775 Vitality Coffee.
	Not just coffee.
	Brain fuel for anyone who refuses to settle for mediocrity.
	I refuse to settle for mediocrity.
	Lion's Mane.
	Reishi. Sharpen your focus faster than a Twitter argument with a blue checkmark.
	Cordyceps. Power your energy without the crash.
	And the hand-picked Bolivian beans flavor so bold it makes corporate coffee look like decaf at a Biden fundraiser.
	Weak, pointless, and pardoning.
	Criminals. We're going to get into that too today.
	Commuting the sentences of criminals.
	No fillers.
	No woke nonsense.
	Just coffee that is unapologetically rebellious, just like you and just like me.
	Proudly backed by Rumble, the platform that stands for freedom.
	Head over to 1775coffee.com.
	Use promo code VIVA for 15% off.
	Make mornings great again and drink coffee that is as bold and uncompromising and demanding of quality as all of us out there.
	Join the fight for freedom on Rumble.
	1775 coffee.
	We're going to start with the Biden corruption, I guess.
	The biggest day commutation pardoning of...
	They call it clemency.
	Such a beautiful word.
	Who could disagree with clemency?
	And I tend to be someone who believes in forgiving and forgetting.
	But the biggest day of clemency in modern history, I don't know if it's the biggest ever, Biden has pardoned thus far.
	Who has he pardoned thus far?
	Apparently there was somebody...
	Oh, yes.
	Not that it matters.
	I think he was an Asian dude.
	And I think it does matter only not because he's Asian, but because there's going to be questions about affiliation to the Chinese Communist Party.
	He pardoned or commuted the sentence of some Asian guy who had a lot of CP on his computer.
	And the CP does not stand for Communist Party material.
	It stands for child pornography, people.
	Pardons a pedophile.
	He pardoned, who were the other one there?
	The judge out of Pennsylvania who locked up children.
	And today, or at least part of this pardon, a woman, I've never heard of her.
	But it's outrageous.
	Illinois community outraged after Biden commutes sentence of fraudster behind $53 million embezzlement scandal.
	Leniency for Rita Crundwell, 71, leaves Whirltown in disbelief.
	Remember, the leniency for the judge there, what was his name?
	Conahan, who locked up children so that he could line his pockets by getting kickbacks from the juvenile detention centers that he had a hand in building and that he got financed basically to keep occupied with...
	Juveniles that he would send to that facility so the state would pay for rent and it would be a very profitable enterprise at the expense of children.
	Joe Biden's done it again.
	He added a woman behind the largest municipal embezzlement scandal in U.S. history to the list of clemency controversies outraging a small town in Illinois.
	Former Dixon, Illinois, Comptroller Rita Crundle, 71. How the...
	I know my brother's in the backdrop and he might not want to hear me swear.
	How the fuck does someone steal $54 million?
	I don't know anything about this case.
	Does it happen all at once?
	Or does it happen slowly over time, like the pennies scandal in office space?
	Listen to this.
	She stole $54 million over 22 years and pled guilty to the crime in 2012.
	Had her sentence commuted as part of a broader commutation last Thursday, making her $1,500 the most ever granted by a president in a single day.
	And I'm not going to go back and harp on those jackasses who said, Biden's only pardoned his son.
	Trump pardoned 166 people.
	Local officials and some state lawmakers aren't happy to see her off getting scot-free.
	I'll say the only steel man is she didn't get off scot-free.
	It sounds like she was in jail for a decade.
	Rita's crime absolutely shocks the conscience at her sentencing in February 2013.
	The judge said that a significant prison sentence was essential to reestablish public trust and confidence so that we've seen...
	So what we've seen here over the last week is just unbelievably and really complex betrayal of the federal criminal justice system.
	Dixon City Manager, he said on Tuesday.
	Okay, there's a lot of jokes in here.
	Biden's blanket move also commuted the prison sentence of a corrupt judge.
	So it's good.
	He's got his pardons, commutations, and forgiveness for people affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party and the other CP, child pornography, judges who locked up children.
	And I try to look for any, like...
	Steelman reason.
	What would explain this away?
	Was she treated unfairly?
	Was it a politicized prosecution?
	Was it a politicized sentence?
	If I'll steel man this, she's just an old lady.
	She might be sick.
	I mean, she'll die in prison by the sounds of it.
	But apparently she doesn't deserve to die in prison, whereas a great many other people, you know.
	All right.
	Well, that's it.
	But I do want to go look back and see what the deal is on that case, because I don't know.
	I mean, I knew of the Cash for Kids case a little bit better, but I'm totally unfamiliar with that, but it's part and parcel.
	Biden burning down the system on his way out.
	Daniel, do you want to pop your face in?
	Oh, look!
	There we go.
	I'm at a secret off-site location.
	Don't ask.
	Your hair looks like...
	Silver flaccid.
	It's beautiful.
	Yeah. Beautiful beard.
	It makes your job look good.
	Yeah, Dan.
	Okay. This is my brother, everybody.
	If anybody doesn't know, he's actually my brother.
	My brother from our same mother.
	Daniel Freyheit.
	Lie in law.
	Dan, okay, we're going to talk Canadian stuff for a second, but what's going on?
	Yeah, well, those pardons are interesting.
	I guess we don't have the similar kind of political parachute escape system for Canadian convicts, do we?
	We have a pardon system and clemency stuff?
	Well, Duro says, can there still be a civil case with the pardon?
	Yeah, the pardon is for federal crimes.
	It's not for civil, and it's not for state.
	So I think in the case of the judge, he still has to pay back $200 million, so he'll be bankrupt and living.
	Right. One of my questions was, if someone's pardoned in the states, can they still plead the fifth?
	Did you talk about this?
	So we've talked about it.
	Well, the rule is at the federal level, they can no longer plead the fifth, but that there's a way to circumvent it by saying, well, if I'm susceptible to state charges...
	Then I'm still exposed so I can plead the fifth, even if it's wrong.
	Because we expect Hunter Biden to be pleading the fifth.
	Who's adopted, man.
	Your comments are so mean.
	No, he wasn't adopted.
	He's the mailman's son.
	You look at my oldest brother, and you'll undoubtedly know that he and I are brothers.
	You look at my second oldest brother, he's a little skinnier than me now, but no question.
	You look at my sister compared to my dad, no question.
	You look at Dan compared to the mailman back, because they were Greek mailmen back in the day.
	People are going to think I'm serious here.
	That is a private channel, private stream, right?
	For anybody who's meeting you for the first time, tell them who you are.
	Corporate commercial lawyer turned kind of...
	Well, I'm still doing the corporate commercial thing, but the alarm bells went off early 2022 when I started getting strange calls from people getting fired, remote workers who didn't get the jab.
	So that's when I realized...
	I mean, in addition to everything that happened in 2021 and 2020, that's when I kind of...
	Something was amiss.
	Because I don't think mandates really came into effect until early 2022.
	Everything else was just kind of...
	My brother has joined the dark side, people.
	Well, it's been a wonder...
	Look, my transition, ideological-political transition, occurred a little earlier, but it was great to see one...
	I won't get into too much family stuff, but some members of the family have come around, but Dan is definitely...
	He was a little later, but not too late, and now he's fighting the good fight for people who are vaccine-injured, seeking claims.
	Well, that fight, that's going to be...
	See, the legal, that's more of a political fight at this point, is what I've come to conclude.
	A lot of these fights are political.
	And I started realizing that early on.
	The legal system was too slow.
	Lawfare was just...
	And I'm in Ontario, for the record.
	My brother is still a practicing attorney in Toronto.
	He stayed in the armpit of Canada.
	And I have gone to the...
	You're now hiding in the bunker.
	It's beautiful.
	I walk in the morning.
	It's already back to being too hot now in December.
	And then I'm thinking, we're going to be up in...
	Up in Commie Canada in a week, and it's going to be back to the miserable four hours of sunlight a day.
	So yeah, it'll be interesting to what you're coming back to, see what form of government we have at that point.
	Okay, so we're going to talk about a bunch of stuff, and just the most obvious of the day, were you glued to CPAC yesterday?
	I wasn't.
	I had it going on in the background.
	I thought there was going to be an announcement at 2 p.m., but no, I was on CBC.
	I prefer state-funded media.
	Well, no, CPAC is still state-funded, I think.
	Oh, is it?
	Okay. I don't know.
	It's a conservative political...
	Actually, no, hold on.
	Hold on, but let me bring this up.
	Okay, the context for anybody who doesn't know what's going on in Canada, Trudeau has been wildly unpopular for a very, very long time.
	He started...
	When I say literally buying votes, or at least trying to, it's so literal and so transparently in your face.
	He recently announced, Dan, there's no...
	In Quebec, for those Americans watching, we have...
	GST, in Quebec, we have QST, Quebec Sales Tax.
	In the rest of Canada, is it called the HST?
	HST, Harmonized Sales Tax.
	Harmonized Sales Tax.
	And that means both provincial and federal tax on goods and services that you purchase.
	Right. And depending on the province, it's more or less.
	I think in Quebec, I think it's 9.5%.
	And the federal sales tax is 6.5%.
	Does that make sense?
	No, 5.5%.
	It gets to about 15%.
	So that is to say, everybody, understand this.
	You make your money.
	If you make $100,000 a year, you're netting, say, $55,000, maybe $58,000.
	Everything you buy after having paid your 40-some-odd percent income tax, you're paying 15% tax on everything you buy, pretty much.
	You pay property tax.
	You pay license fees for your passport, license.
	You're lucky if you're left with...
	30 cents on your dollar for every dollar you make.
	And so Justin Trudeau recently announced that they would, for two months starting January, suspend the sales tax on groceries and foods.
	Oh, gosh.
	Yeah. Certain groceries, certain food, and certain toys.
	The list was like a whole...
	I couldn't even...
	But the irony is 9.975%.
	It's so...
	Americans have sales tax, too, don't they?
	In Florida, I think it's like...
	I want to say...
	5% maybe?
	4.5%?
	On a $20 breakfast, it was $2.
	I mean, it's less.
	Interesting. And there's no state income tax in Florida.
	Did you know that, Daniel?
	No. That's pretty wild.
	Yeah. But then you realize what you're paying the feds, and you realize what the feds are laundering over to Ukraine, and I can really pretty much put a dollar figure on what I've been compelled to finance by way of Ukraine.
	Wars. But also, in terms of the suspension of the tax on foods, there was already no GST and QST on food items, correct?
	Yeah, the various items already did not have HST or GST on them, so I'm not exactly sure which items.
	The whole point is it's a total and utter distraction.
	There's a guy on Twitter who does the...
	He's part of an association for the restaurant and food business.
	Or the retail, I forgot.
	Anyhow, the point is, this tax is such an administrative pain in the butt for retailers to reprogram their cash machines and have to resubmit their...
	It's great for the accountants and lawyers or whatever, but for the mom-and-pop shops that are trying to operate, this more administrative nonsense, it's almost like it's a total distraction intended to clutter our thinking, because it's crazy.
	In Florida, it's 6%.
	And apparently, this is going to get into allegedly what might have been at the root of Chrystia Freeland resigning.
	Apparently, it was going to cost the budget, or it was going to cost the government like $1.6 billion, and they were already going to be...
	Have you been following the budget issue?
	They were going to be $40 billion in deficit?
	$62 billion or something?
	Yeah, they were...
	So, okay.
	I'm presuming everybody knows what's going on in Canada.
	Justin Trudeau's been wildly unpopular.
	The most unpopular prime minister I think ever.
	He's at like 20-some-odd percent approval rating, down from 60 when he first got elected in 2015.
	There's been talk for him to resign, step down, allow a new leader to come up.
	People were hypothesizing that it might be Chrystia Freeland.
	So he's been wildly unpopular.
	They need to call an election in 2025 legislatively unless there's an act of war or what's the other one?
	Insurrection. Or martial law, they have to hold elections in 2025, not to jinx anything.
	And so there's been a massive turmoil in terms of calls for him to step down, etc.
	In order to buy the vote, in order to sway low-information, smooth-grained voters, he's going to put a pause on GST and QST, or HST, on items that, by and large, didn't have it.
	So they can only harp on diapers for some reason.
	And there was a second attempt to buy the votes.
	Oh, yes!
	Every family making under $150,000 a year is going to get a check for $250.
	Did you hear that, Dan?
	I heard.
	Are you going to get the check?
	Can you imagine?
	You make $150,000.
	Let's just say you make $148,000.
	You're paying about $65,000.
	It might even be more because it's a sliding scale in terms of the taxes you pay.
	You're paying $65,000 in taxes.
	They give you $250,000, which might cover a parking ticket in Toronto.
	Sorry, so that's him trying to buy the roads.
	Better than a hole in the head, I guess.
	And by the way, the provinces did that too.
	A couple of provinces jumped on with that.
	Yeah, Quebec, I think, did it the last time.
	And they're just shuffling it.
	Even the carbon tax is the worst because there, it's literally, it's like not even doing what it's supposed to do, which is like invest in Kleetech, really.
	You know, they're just using the money to like put it into eight of ten.
	Explain the carbon tax for those who don't know, because Pierre Poilier is campaigning off Axe, the carbon tax.
	What is the carbon tax?
	Carbon tax is a tax on the total carbon footprint of emissions of various products and things.
	So you're going to pay a lot of carbon tax on your natural gas bill and I guess on gasoline too.
	And yeah, I guess the idea is to reduce consumption of those items, right?
	Save the planet.
	And the joke is always like, you know, there's no clear cause and effect between the tax and what it's intended to do.
	Maybe if the money is used to invest in more clean tech, but there's no accountability for the money.
	So it almost seems like it's a slush fund that's being totally abused.
	At best, that's what it is.
	You know what percentage of global emissions Canada contributes to?
	You know, it's like under 3% or something?
	It's under 2%.
	I think it was one and a quarter percent.
	Global emissions from Canada.
	I think it was one and a quarter percent.
	1.5% of total global CO2 emissions.
	And the mother effer is crippling Canada and Canadians.
	But He's an idiot, and he's burning the country to the ground.
	They need to hold elections in 2025, but they're pushing it off through this unholy alliance, which in theory no longer exists, except the NDP hasn't called a new election because Jagmeet Singh needs his pension, and I think he has to get it like mid...
	I think it's June, July 2025.
	He's eligible for his pension so they can call elections after.
	And so what happened yesterday is Chris Freeland is supposed to table the budget.
	And it's going to exceed their deficit by...
	It exceeds it by 50%, but by 20-some-odd billion.
	And so she resigns two hours before they're supposed to table the budget, which is going to show that the projected budget is going to throw Canada into an even wilder deficit.
	She resigns.
	There's a little bit of some of the details after this I'm not totally up to speed with, but someone else who was supposed to replace her for that position legally didn't want to, so they were going to go to one of the Randys.
	Did you watch any of the debate, Dan?
	No, no.
	Did you hear that they were calling them the Randys?
	Yeah, I don't know.
	And then Ferguson, the Speaker of the House, comes out and says, rule of protocol is you don't call other parliamentarians by their first name.
	Fuck you.
	I would get...
	My ass kicked out of there so fast.
	I can't call you by your first...
	I'm sorry, Your Highness.
	This is Parliament.
	Parliamentary etiquette.
	And so she resigns.
	Someone else doesn't take her place.
	And then there's a whole debate as to whether or not they just call elections now.
	Conservatives are pushing, but not too hard.
	NDP is pushing, but certainly fighting.
	And that's where it seems to have stopped.
	The leader of the opposition, Pierre Polyev...
	Future Prime Minister, most likely.
	He went through the list.
	Apparently nobody wanted this job because I guess people don't want to get thrown under the bus.
	Trudeau classic.
	So yeah, it was basically the only person he can get, LeBlanc.
	Which is his best friend from childhood.
	Let me see if I can find the video.
	Let's see if this is the good one.
	There's so many.
	By the way, you all know the way, everybody knows the way I feel about the Conservatives and Pierre, but Pierre is good in some respects.
	When he was grilling Trudeau on how much?
	How much money has your family taken from the W?
	How much?
	I gladly provide you the papers.
	How much?
	How much money?
	I mean, he's good.
	But the Conservatives are like, you know, this is O'Toole's Conservative Party.
	They're not much better.
	Listen to this.
	Not only does the incompetent finance minister not know the inflation target, she doesn't know that you lock in low rates when you have the chance.
	Remember when the Prime Minister was saying, don't worry, we can double the national debt because interest rates are low.
	Oh, this is not the right one.
	This is old.
	I'll see if I can find it.
	Yeah, so the bottom line, he goes through all the people who didn't want the position.
	Because it's going to be a position where they're going to get destroyed in terms of defending this budget, which makes absolutely no sense, which will plunge Canada into Venezuela-type crippled economy.
	Right. It's going to be painful.
	But I think the general numbers, I thought they did, $63 billion.
	But in terms of who's getting what and how that plays out, yeah, don't know the details.
	Let me see if in our local screen, if anybody has that link.
	This isn't O'Toole's Conservative Party, though, says Stephen Britton.
	No, it's Pierre Poilier, and he's sort of like O'Toole.
	He's a little bit more conservative than O'Toole, but, you know.
	There's another video I'm looking for where Christopher Fleer can't pronounce the budget, like she misses up.
	Do you remember that one?
	A while ago.
	I'll bring up the good one, the one that I know that is good from yesterday, which is, I was watching this, and it's like watching...
	The stereotype of a Latin American soap opera at three in the morning.
	It's so cheap, corny, lame politics.
	Is this it?
	Here, listen to this.
	This one I know because I clipped it yesterday.
	Mr. Speaker, just to underline the chaos we're faced with here, the finance minister resigned the day she was to present the fall budget, which was going to contain a massive deficit overrun.
	The job then went automatically to the industry minister, who immediately resigned, like on the spot, which then went down the line, and the next person in order was the famous two Randys.
	And they're not available to the job either.
	We're now less than two hours away from the fall economic update.
	Why won't the Prime Minister have the courage to come in here, present it himself, and put it for a confidence vote tonight?
	A bunch of buffoons!
	No, I didn't think of that.
	That's cool.
	Think of what?
	Putting pressure on the Prime Minister to present himself and then put a confidence vote right on the spot.
	I like that.
	Sorry, I happen to have a thing for TV.
	Wait, what did you just say?
	I have a thing for Pierre Polyev.
	I have a thing for PP.
	Clip it, people running, my brothers in the golden showers.
	So what's happened today?
	Has there been any, there's been no development?
	They're not proroguing parliament that we know of?
	I haven't heard of that.
	But that'd be kind of cool if they did prorogue because apparently all the bills die on the spot.
	Yeah. And there's a couple out there that are pissing off a lot of people, especially...
	Bill 63, C63 there?
	Okay, well, you have to, so I'll explain this to everybody as well.
	They're breaking for Christmas regardless.
	It's a recess for holidays.
	A recess doesn't start in the parliamentary session from scratch.
	This is all new to me.
	I learned this when they had Brexit and they were proroguing Parliament in the context of that political turmoil.
	And I was like, what's proroguing Parliament?
	And I make a video about it and then the comments are like, Viva, you idiot.
	You live in a parliamentary system.
	You don't know what proroguing Parliament is.
	So you can have a recess, which doesn't end the parliamentary session.
	It's a ministerial decision.
	Pro-rogue Parliament, which means end the current parliamentary session, and then you take a bigger break, you reassess, you regroup, and then you call a new session, and everything starts from scratch.
	All of the bills that were left on the table are dead.
	This is how Bill C...
	I think it was Bill C-10 at the time initially died on the vine.
	Then they start a new parliamentary session.
	They've got to bring back the legislation, bring back the debates, and revive everything.
	So the discussion yesterday was whether or not they were going to...
	Either, you know, trigger a non-confidence vote and hold new elections earlier, which would screw Jugmeet and whoever else is looking for their pension, or pro-Roll Parliament, they have a longer break over Christmas and come back and start from scratch.
	What bills are currently, because there were a number, the Online Streaming Act passed.
	Which ones are currently pending that are meaningful for us?
	Well, the biggest one, I think, the biggest one that they're trying to sell is the Online Harms Act, which his Minister of Justice has been, you know, doing a roadshow on for the past four or five months, heavy, promoting this bill, which is the bill that allows, basically sets up an appointed committee to kind of monitor online comments that can be considered hateful or whatever other, you know.
	This is the one, I talked about this This is the one that added life imprisonment as a potential punishment for denying or advocating genocide?
	Yeah. Okay.
	This is the overview, but just to make sure it's the...
	Bill C-63 known as the Online Harms Act, and I said there's nothing in this bill that actually creates a law that doesn't already exist.
	Proposed Canadian law aiming to regulate online platforms by requiring them to actively remove harmful content like hate speech.
	Well, there we have that.
	Child exploitation, non-consensual...
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Well, non-consensual...
	Intimate images.
	They mean revenge porn.
	That's going to be abused thoroughly.
	Essentially holding social media companies accountable for content shared on their platforms.
	It also establishes the Digital Safety Commission to enforce those regulations and support victims of online harm.
	The setting up of that commission is the biggest flag for those of us who have concerns about executive control of judicial features.
	Someone's drinking coffee.
	Who is it?
	Yeah, that's what that is.
	That's the Nespresso machine.
	I'm going to put that on mute.
	Oh, don't worry about that.
	And by the way, it is the one that I remember talking about this at the time.
	The Online Harm Act states that any person who advocates for or promotes genocide, they need to put genocide in quotes as well, is, quote, liable to imprisonment for life.
	It defines lesser hate crimes as including online speech that is likely to foment detestation or vilification.
	This is, for those who are not aware, It's communism.
	Yeah, so that was the risk.
	In theory, the commission could rule that anyone who had misgendered someone in their historical feeds or any on social media could be considered some type of form of hate, and that account could be suspended.
	Like, it's a disaster.
	So pro-rogue, if all these bills get killed on the floor, so to speak, there would be silver lining to that.
	What's interesting, by the way, is that Harper pro-rogue parliament twice.
	I don't know if you...
	This is the previous prime minister, conservative.
	Did the same trick when he was kind of getting pressured.
	And the second time, it was interesting, I was reading up on this, how then the, what do you call it, the Governor General kind of didn't exactly comply with the request.
	She kind of dragged her feet on indulging in the prorogation at that time.
	So that was interesting.
	I'm trying to find the portion of Bill C-63, which also said that...
	If you have access to delete what would otherwise be a contravening tweet or a post and you don't and someone else reposts it after the implementation of the Act, that would be considered republishing for the purposes of the Act.
	Not to steal the credit because it was Jordan Peterson and or Ezra Levant from Rebel News who highlighted that portion of the law.
	I'll see if I can find it.
	It's actually the case.
	If you have access to delete it and you don't and it gets republished, you're back.
	In violation of the law.
	It's like not just thought crime, retroactive thought crime.
	Yep. And you see it now, by the way, the way these tribunals are set up and they can be politicized very readily.
	So this happened in a small town in Ontario where the mayor apparently had a bank account garnered for $5,000.
	Yep, for not celebrating Pride Month.
	I think it was specifically because he made a comment comparing the Pride flag to those who are...
	It was a comment he made on the record that they didn't like that got him dinged.
	But you can see now, it could very well get overturned on appeal to the Superior Court or the Court of Appeal.
	But that whole process, he's now just mired in these legal costs.
	This is lawfare in action.
	Ontario mayor reportedly has bank account garnished after fined for refusing to celebrate Pride Month.
	Borderland Pride mocked the mayor on social media after reportedly garnishing his bank account.
	A mayor of a township of Ontario, Canada.
	Where is it?
	I mean, I know where it is, but what's...
	So he had his bank account garnished, reportedly, after he refused to pay a $5,000 fine after a tribunal ruled he had discriminated against an LGBT...
	So this is a...
	This is one of the human rights tribunals.
	These are the...
	These are the...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	The Soviet-style tribunals.
	Expertise tribunals.
	Just commie tribunals.
	Specialty tribunals that the courts have to show deference to because they are specialty tribunals.
	Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario ruled that the township of Emo...
	Okay, that's hilarious.
	And its mayor, Harold McQuaker, had discriminated against an LGBTQ group under the Ontario Human Rights Code by denying its request to proclaim June as Pride Month.
	Borderland Pride had requested Emo.
	It's funny.
	There's a town in Ontario called Emo and another one called Swastika.
	No joke.
	They make the Pride Month declaration to request of the township to fly the 2SLGBTQ plus flag, yada, yada, yada.
	McQuaker further found to have violated the Human Rights Code by making a, quote, discriminatory remark, end quote, during the town's...
	Read his remark.
	The flag request saying that there were no flag for the, quote, other side of the coin for straight people.
	Holy... I was on Charlie Kirk then, right before we started, and he asked me a question, which might get me into trouble with Canadians.
	Like, do I plan on moving back?
	Who the hell would...
	If you're not born in Canada, would you move to a place like that?
	And if the answer is going to be no, if you were born in Canada, do you stay there?
	If you have the option.
	I saw, it's the same thing, like I saw some of the city council meetings, even the states, like what they're doing to, like they banned a flag, the American flag in one of the council meetings, I think it was in New Jersey.
	I mean, I haven't, oh no, no, that's right, it was outside a fire station, because I think they deemed it to be something of a political statement, and they said we don't, it's crazy.
	So you have, I don't know that you can so readily get around it, I don't, it's, you know, the federal level determines a bit of it, and then it goes to the provincial, but like.
	You know, it's hard to figure out exactly who's steering the ship of some of these smaller agencies, tribunals, whatever, committees.
	Let me read this.
	Sorry, please go ahead.
	No, I was just going to say, I think funding has a lot to do with it.
	So I think what the federal government has done for the past nine years is really allocated a significant amount of resources towards political causes that are, you know, in some ways be divisive.
	I don't think it's achieving the unifying goal a lot of these causes are designed to achieve.
	I think there's different ways to achieve unity.
	So that's what it's doing.
	The money is ultimately dividing a lot of these groups that really share a lot of fundamental values, I think, at the end of the day.
	So Bill C-63 abandoned.
	But they'll just bring it back up.
	It'll be C-64 in the next section.
	I mean, unless the conservatives get a wild majority, but I actually have to go check to see what the conservative support or opposition to that bill is.
	They had a very lackluster opposition to Bill C-10 before it even got passed.
	Dan, I'm going to read a super chat on the commie tube side, speaking of communism.
	Cynic in chief says, rest in peace, legal vices.
	He was a great man, father, and friend of many on YouTube.
	He knew how to enjoy life and be entertaining.
	He is greatly missed.
	Dan, there was one of the law tube lawyers who died of heart failure, 51 years old.
	I'm not much, I don't do the...
	I mean, I feel weird making these condolences public.
	I reached out to everybody I could reach out to privately and express my condolences and see if they need any help with his dogs.
	He was in South Korea.
	I know that he had dogs and I don't know what's going to happen with the family.
	He died suddenly.
	All right.
	Okay, we'll move on to a happier note.
	Here. Dovi Koto says, Hey Viva, not to be that, but I have a cool design proposition for you.
	Anywhere I can send you a link to run it by you.
	Keep up the great work.
	Dovi, if you have...
	I'm on Twitter, but my DMs are not open.
	But tag me.
	Or let me know where I can...
	How do I do it?
	I can't give my email out because it goes...
	You close your DMs?
	They were only opened by accident when I think I got the paid blue and then I think it opened them.
	I don't get really meaningful death threats or anything like that.
	I was just getting people giving a lot of information.
	About legal situations that they're in.
	I'm like, A, I can't answer it.
	And B, I don't even want to know these details unsolicited.
	So I did close it.
	But specifically for that, it's just like, I don't want people thinking that I'm now their attorney or telling me something that I don't want them telling me because I might know something else that I don't want to know that for.
	Plus, if there's things that I want to know and expose, I don't want to have gotten it from an individual or now not be able to talk about something because I heard it from a person who unsolicited offered that information to me.
	Dan, hold on.
	Let's do this here.
	On local side, how do I do this?
	My fat fingers can't bring this up.
	Is Pierre Poilievre the real thing or the Canadian version of a rhino?
	Dan, what do you think?
	By the way, I have no animosity to anybody who likes him.
	He gets a lot of flack for being a rhino.
	I think that's not my sentiment, but I think at the end of the day, you've got to get in.
	At this point, anything's better than Trudeau.
	I mean, except for the NDP.
	So, yeah.
	Is Pierre Poiliev perfect?
	Probably not.
	Does he have to cater to, you know, for votes that will secure him a majority, supermajority?
	Probably. But at the end of the day, I mean, at this point, beggars can't be choosers.
	Trudeau's got to go.
	Steelman Pierre Poiliev, he's not Trump.
	Period. Full stop.
	Definitely. That may or may not be a good thing, depending on what you want in politics.
	The problem is that there's not the same populist conservative movement in Canada that there is in the States.
	There's the trucker movement, but let's just say even that that represents the 600,000 people who voted for the PPC.
	It's by no means the same momentum and the same size as it is in America.
	The Conservative Party of Canada, I would say, is like the reasonable Democrats in the US.
	Pierre is very much a fair-weather politician, which is both good and bad.
	He can be swayed by public opinion, but he doesn't seem to stand on any meaningful principles of his own belief system.
	Conservative Party, I mean, if you want to go identity politics, they've got culturally diverse members, they've got sexual identity diverse members, but it's nothing like MAGA.
	He's nothing like Trump, and Conservatives of Canada are nothing like MAGA.
	Trump supporters in America, for good or for bad, depending on how you feel about that.
	Yeah, like if you just look at the popular vote from the NDP and the Liberals, they still got a pretty good chunk.
	I mean, but I guess even in the States, the Democrats still got a pretty big percentage of the popular vote.
	Yeah, but it's so stupid.
	They just, they'll vote 40. What was it at now?
	She's at 75 million, so she was at like 46%, 47%, and Trump was at 50. No matter what.
	I mean, she could be a braindead, cackling idiot, and 47% of America is going to vote for her.
	Flip side, they'll say, he can be a convicted rapist, an adjudicated rapist, and 50% will vote for him.
	Oh, we'll talk about that in a second.
	And then, let's see, over here in Locals, Florida Gaterman says, I think he's a rhino.
	He never stood up against the VACs or had the balls to stand with the truckers.
	He stood with them for breakfast once, when it was cool, and then he quickly stopped standing with them when it was no longer cool.
	You know, it was hard for someone like that to stand with the truckers because the intelligence was being really distorted.
	Like, you're getting information that was misleading.
	So it's like if you're too out there and you support the wrong people within the combo, you know, like...
	It was hard to get information.
	And again, to steelman it for Pierre's benefit, the criticism is that Trump didn't stand strongly enough with the Jan Sixers on Jan 6, or at least on Jan 7, because at the time, the intelligence was that it was an insurrection and violence, and even Trump had to come out and denounce the violence.
	It's analogous to what Pierre had to do with the truckers because at the time, the reports were that they were pissing on war monuments, defacing Terry Fox, threatening to rape women.
	I mean, this is what the liar, liar Mendicino said.
	And that they were funded by the Russians.
	So it was very difficult for anybody without the moral fortitude to say, I'm standing with this because I know that these are lies.
	He came around, and then he came back around a little bit afterwards.
	But I appreciate it.
	It's similar to what Trump did with Jan 6, and now the time is for Trump to pardon all Jan Sixers.
	Is there any chance that Canada would get rid of the Human Rights Tribunals in the next 10 years?
	Zero. Zero.
	Yeah, that would be very unpopular.
	It has a good purpose.
	It's good.
	It's there for people.
	I mean, it's slow, and it's under...
	It's there for basic human rights violations that have nowhere else to go.
	Well, that's the vicious circle.
	They have nowhere else to go because they pulled them from the court system.
	In my view, there's zero reason to have these bullshit specialty tribunals.
	Add more judges to the Court of Quebec or the Superior Court.
	Add more judges.
	Some of these people have never been judges.
	Some of them have never been lawyers.
	they're pure administrative clerical bureaucrats who are now in in the role of a judge with no legal training and no judicial experience but they're part of the they're part of the fabric of canadian society they're going nowhere ever they're the part of the constitution are they not part of the the tribute i don't know about that i think they're part of the charter of rights and not the part of charter rights they're part of the 1982 constitution if i'm not mistaken i'll have to check that scratch that in case it's wrong um yeah so not not going anywhere what were you
	No, I actually have to take off, but...
	I guess to the overall hope going forward, whether it's election resignation or pro-Rogue.
	Today's the day.
	I think they're in recess.
	When does Canadian Parliament recess?
	Is it for?
	Yeah, I think today's...
	I think they're adjourning today, if I'm not mistaken.
	Unfortunately, I think if we would have heard news, we would have heard it by now, but I'll keep following up on this.
	Who knows?
	The greatest Christmas gift would be elections in January or February.
	To me, it's just amazing that he's gone on for this long.
	It'll be a decade of terror.
	It's almost a decade of...
	No, it is a decade!
	He was in 2015!
	It's impressive.
	What... It can be done when you mobilize all your MPs together.
	It's been 10 years of Trudeau rule in Canada.
	The last four have been minority government.
	Minority government coalesced with the NDP.
	Amazing. Dan, I'm going to see you sooner than later.
	Good stuff.
	Follow us on Twitter.
	Lion advocacy.
	Lion Advocacy on Twitter.
	You are still practicing law if people have an Ontario Canadian question at the risk of maybe...
	Overloading the system?
	Overloading the system.
	How can people reach you?
	Go through, yeah, for my legal stuff, you can go through Lion Law Professional Corporation.
	That's also on the Twitters.
	You can DM me there, but don't give me any confidential information until I know that there's no conflict.
	You can hear it.
	Yep. Okay.
	Good stuff, man.
	Go. Yep.
	Talk to you soon.
	Godspeed. Take care.
	Bye-bye.
	That's my brother, people.
	There was, okay, in here, Lutka over in Rumble's documentary on the embezzlement.
	I'm absolutely going to watch that, especially before.
	Well, I don't know that we're going to have a show on Sunday because apparently it's Christmas-ish and I'm not allowed doing it.
	We'll see.
	All right, people.
	I wanted to do one more thing before we head on over to YouTube.
	Before we abandon YouTube and head on over to Rumble.
	Let me see what's going on in here.
	They will bankrupt Canada, says RevenUPL6.
	Buddy1205 says the government and CBC slander and demonize on public dole and resources to encourage lunatics to attack opponents who call out their nonsense.
	QED. I forget what that means, but I remember I asked before.
	And Seferdine Squibb says advocating for lions.
	Good stuff.
	It'd be nice if Trump came out and said something against that piece of shit and using mounted police to beat up citizens, says Joe Ragu.
	Yeah, what's funny is he keeps making the jokes about Trudeau being the governor of Canada and people are flipping their shit like they don't have a sense of humor and like they don't also appreciate that on the international scene, Canada is, you know, it is what it is, but on the North American scheme, Canada also is what it is.
	You know, it's a country with an economy smaller than that of California and the population of that of California, of one of the states of America.
	It's a funny joke and everyone's got to quit getting their panties in a twist over it.
	What we're going to do right now, by the way, because we're going to go over the lawsuit that Trump is filing against Des Moines.
	Bill Brown says, what the F?
	Christmas is on Wednesday, not Sunday.
	Yes, but you have to have your Sunday night dinner.
	I know what Christmas is.
	Apparently Hanukkah starts on the same day as Christmas this year.
	Let me get all the tip questions over in Locals.
	I did.
	I got all the tip questions in Locals.
	I'm going to watch that documentary.
	I'm going to give everybody the link on Commitube.
	Come on over to Link to Rumble and come on over to Locals if you're so inclined.
	I'll give everyone the link to Locals.
	Oh, that might have been the link, locals.
	Link? The link to Rumble is in the pinned comment.
	And let me just read some of the chat over here.
	Here, locals.
	Oh, and there's one more.
	My goodness, I'm an idiot.
	Rumble is what I'm looking for here.
	I see Biltong is in the house.
	Let me bring this one up before we head on over as the segue.
	Get your coffee, people.
	1775 coffee.
	Forward slash Viva.
	King of Biltong says need some healthy...
	No, hold on a second.
	A paid promotion.
	They will not.
	That's better.
	Okay. Need some healthy high-protein snacks?
	Biltong is packed with B12, iron, zinc, creatine, and more.
	Perfect for carnivore keto diets.
	Available at BiltongUSA.com.
	Code VIVA10 for 10% off.
	King of Biltong also says we stream Friday and Sundays, 4 p.m., 3 p.m.
	Central. Shit's talking.
	Whilst cooking real food.
	Follow our channel.
	Eat at Anton's and join in on the fun.
	And shameless self-promotion because I'm an idiot and always forget to do it.
	Viva Frye, people.
	Get your merch.
	Let's see if the new line is in because I'm not sure if it is yet.
	It isn't, but you can get your shirt.
	Friends, don't let friends vote Democrat in the nifty little girl shirt there, as they call them.
	Fight, fight, fight.
	All the other good stuff.
	VivaFrye.com for all of your merch needs if you want to support the channel and get something cool in the process.
	Don't vote for an idiot, although that shirt's now outdated.
	It should say, congrats!
	Many of you did not vote for an idiot, but some of you did.
	All right.
	All right, peeps, get your butts on over to Rumble, abandon Commitube, vote with your eyes, vote with your feet, vote with your dollars, and support Free Speech now.
	The entire stream, or at least the portions that were not aired on YouTube, will be aired on YouTube later.
	And all streams are available also on podcast format.
	I think it's called Viva Fry Recovering Litigator or something like that.
	All right.
	Done. Updated.
	And now, Pete's Wall, let me just go do one thing.
	I'm going to go over to the content over here and live.
	And I can't believe I can't find where the stream is.
	Details here.
	Customization. Jeez, I just want to end the stream on YouTube.
	End stream now.
	Okay, done.
	End. Alright, so you guys heard that Trump is suing Ann Seltzer.
	Do not let them arrest.
	Do not let them regroup.
	Destroy. It's all fair, people.
	They play by their rules.
	We shall play by their rules.
	I don't think I would do it.
	Only because I'm a big sissy.
	Trump... Sues Des Moines Register and pollster over the election interference.
	I had to pull up the actual lawsuit.
	If you're in our locals community, I shared the actual PDF.
	We'll look at it.
	Because I'm trying to think, like, okay, fine.
	Sue them.
	Sue them for what?
	It's not defamation.
	Is it election interference?
	Okay. What statute is he alleging that they violated?
	And if it's civil, what standing does he have to do it?
	Let's hear this.
	President Trump has filed a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register and its leader.
	Its lead pollster, J.Ann Seltzer, accusing them of brazen election interference and fraud related to their final 2024 There you have it.
	The lawsuit alleges misconduct by the Des Moines Register, Seltzer, and associated parties.
	It claims the poll released on November 2 was, quote, manipulated, end quote, to favor Harris and described it as, quote, an attempt to influence the outcome of the 2024 presidential election, end quote.
	The lawsuit also argues that the poll was intentionally leaked to create, quote, a false narrative of inevitability for Harris.
	Harris. This is from the lawsuit.
	Contrary to reality and defying credulity, as anybody who saw it knew.
	The whole thing is you're going to say, contrary to reality, defying credulity, but it's interference, even though nobody believed it and everyone thought it was ridiculous.
	I'll play Steelman the other side.
	Although they're going to say this is the most reputable pollster with the reputable Des Moines Register.
	They've been doing this for decades.
	And people believed it.
	Defendant's Harris poll was published three days before Election Day and purported to show Harris leading President Trump in Iowa by three points.
	President Trump ultimately won Iowa by over 13 points.
	We talked about the dramatic shift.
	The Harris poll was no miss, but rather an attempt to influence the outcome of the 2024 presidential election, the lawsuit alleges.
	It further claims that Democrats used the poll to, quote, create a false narrative of inevitability for Harris, end quote, in an election they ultimately lost decisively.
	I take it a different way.
	To piss people off when she would lose.
	So they would then say, this is stolen because there was a poll from the most reputable pollster, polling company, whatever the hell it is, Des Moines.
	It was to piss off the people for what they knew would be the result so that when the result came around, there might be violence.
	Sue the mother effers.
	Story time, flashback to my childhood.
	My best friend, we used to go watch the Super Bowl at his family's place.
	And his dad was my surrogate father growing up.
	And, you know, we'd get very much into the football game.
	And whenever there'd be a massive hit, he would go, hit the fuckers!
	And this was like, it was awesome for life.
	And then we did this child adolescent, and then we did it into adulthood, and then we did it into parenthood.
	And I brought my kids over one time, and he's going, hit the fucker!
	I couldn't care less.
	So he turned it into hit the trucker.
	And then I go back and look at my daughter's diary who was keeping a description account of that Super Bowl.
	I forget when it was.
	It was about eight years ago now.
	And then she's got Hit the Trucker written in her diary.
	Bottom line?
	Sue the fuckers.
	It's not a question of malice.
	It's not a question of abusive process.
	It's a question of applying their rules to them very much in the Saul Alinsky rules for radicals kind of way.
	But not just that.
	For accountability.
	Who was it that said?
	He said, there will never be accountability until there's accountability.
	They run these bullshit polls.
	They're not going to change what's going to happen.
	That outlier of a horse crap poll coming out of Iowa, everyone with half a brain knew that it was bull crap.
	What it does is to those without half a brain, which might actually be...
	The 47% who still voted for Kamala, it gives them the fodder for their rage in the aftermath of what they then believe to be a stolen election.
	We now basically know...
	Who was it?
	You're talking about 2020.
	Oh, it was...
	That's right.
	I'll get to this in a bit.
	Destiny. Strawmanning the 2020 election.
	This gives the thugs the political permission slip that they need in order to carry out their political violence.
	And had the poll come out and said, no, he's going to lose Iowa.
	People's expectations would be lower.
	And when he goes ahead and loses Iowa, nobody's going to get violent and start burning shit down in the streets.
	Or they're going to not think that they have the political permission slip to do it because they don't have any evidence to hang their stupid hats on.
	You know the amount of people who are still calling Trump an adjudicated rapist?
	Because they have their political permission slip.
	They have their evidence to call him a rapist.
	That was the only purpose of it.
	So sue the effers.
	And if you can prove the fraud, Godspeed.
	And if you can't and it gets tossed, that's litigation.
	Don't take frivolous suits where you're going to get slapped with sanctions, but sue them.
	Here, check this out.
	25 pages.
	Let me just see how far we're going to go down.
	I'm interested in the causes of action because we know the facts.
	The shock pulls, yada, yada, yada.
	The causes of action, because it's under the Consumer Fraud Act.
	So claims for relief, count one, violation of Iowa Consumer Fraud Act, Iowa, yada, yada, yada.
	Reallege the things.
	Okay, the Iowa Code, Section 714H.31 provides.
	You want to know why they draft shit like this?
	It's so that people...
	Can't understand the law.
	A person shall not engage in a practice or act the person knows or reasonably should know is an unfair practice, deception, fraud, false pretense, or false promise, or the misrepresentation, concealment, suppression, or omission of a material fact with intent that others rely upon the unfair practice, deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, concealment, suppression, or omission in connection with the advertisement, sale, or lease of consumer merchandise.
	humor, merchandise.
	Now, you can see the problem here is going to be, is a poll consumer merchandise.
	Iowa Code defines consumer as a natural person, a person, or a legal representative.
	It defines deception as an act or practice that is likely to mislead.
	Merchandise defines the same as the definition contained in the Iowa Code, which the term includes, quote, any objects, wares, goods, commodities, intangibles, securities, bonds, and debenture stocks.
	Real estates or services.
	Emphasis added because they're going to argue that it's a service.
	Unfair practice, same definition as in the other code, means an act or practice which causes substantial unavoidable injury to consumers that is not outweighed by any consumer or competitive benefit which the practice produces.
	Provides the private right for consumers damaged by the violations to sue.
	The question is going to be whether or not this is covered by election laws.
	Or whether or not anybody involved in this equation is a consumer of the contents of that poll.
	President Trump, together with all Iowa and American voters, is a, quote, consumer within the meaning of the statute.
	Defendants furnished merchandise, the poll, within the broad meaning of the statute since they provided a service, physical newspapers, online newspapers, and other content that contained the Harris poll.
	They engaged in deception because the Harris poll was, quote, likely to mislead a substantial number of consumers as to material fact or facts, to quit the actual position of the respective candidates in the Iowa...
	Okay, so this is where...
	I'm thinking out loud here because this is where, if we're going to agree with the theory of the case, this same argument would authorize anybody and everybody to sue news outlets.
	For misinformation, propaganda, disinformation.
	I mean, it would allow outlets to be sued for, say, misleading people on the number of children that were hospitalized with COVID.
	Just thinking of the New York Times article.
	Which would seem to be a pretty broad...
	Application of this.
	A broad interpretation for the purposes of application of this act.
	They engaged in unfair act or practice because the publication released the Harris Poll.
	It caused substantial unavoidable injury to consumers that was not outweighed by the benefit.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, is there a second cause of action?
	No, just one.
	Additionally, because Iowa Fraud Act is equitable in nature, President Trump is entitled to injunctive relief.
	Well, what's the injunctive relief?
	The poll is over.
	Including an order enjoining defendants and their associates from publishing or releasing any further deceptive polls designed to influence the outcome of an election and requiring defendants to disclose all data and information upon which they rely.
	Well, that's the kicker right there.
	Pull up those tabs, Ann Seltzer!
	Here, I'll give everybody the link if you want to go read it.
	So it's interesting.
	I mean, it seems like a very...
	I think it's going to be potentially a problematically broad interpretation of the act, which would, in theory, be able to be applied to any story that they get wrong that you argue they got wrong on purpose or through negligence or whatever.
	Why wouldn't it apply to the Sandman case?
	Instead of suing for defamation, you can sue under the Consumer Fraud Act of whatever state.
	Didn't she retire...
	After her big survey miss, says Heartland Denison.
	She most certainly did.
	She didn't really retire.
	I think she retired from the pollster polling title at Des Moines Register, but it sounded like she was keeping her firm for polling.
	It said that she was going to keep some of her clients, which means that she's going to become a political...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Political henchman?
	Henchwoman? It sounded like she was retiring strictly from the pollster aspect.
	of the Des Moines Register and not by any means from her firm, her private firm, which still seems to want to be working with clients.
	Hack might be the word.
	Did I say whack?
	What did I say?
	Henchman? Okay, whatever.
	It might have been a hack, but it might also be a henchman.
	So that's it.
	Slapsuit. Do they get slapped down and say, we were exercising our constitutional right?
	Oh, we'll talk about it.
	We'll talk about it eventually.
	Maybe not this Sunday.
	We'll see if maybe Barnes and I schedule a non-Sunday to make up for what we're going to miss.
	Crack is whack, says soothing energy.
	That's not what I meant to say there.
	So that's that.
	All right.
	What else, people?
	Let me go over to...
	No, we're not on Commitube anymore.
	Let me go over to Rumble and see what's going on in the chat over here.
	Who or what compelled her to publish the poll, says Chad Forrest?
	I'm thinking it was a little bit of Franklin.
	Who's on the money?
	Franklin, Jackson.
	What was the thing from The Mask?
	What compelled her?
	It was undoubtedly money.
	Undoubtedly. I don't know how or what.
	How is Barnes, hyphen says.
	He's good as far as I know, hyphen.
	Okay, I'm not reading that.
	I'm not reading that.
	Okay. What else did I have on the backdrop that I wanted to bring up?
	Oh, yeah, no, I was going to talk about Jan 6. I'll read it out loud, and then we're going to...
	Let me see.
	I'm not sure that I actually brought it up.
	Jeez Louise, why do I have 13 notifications over in Twitter?
	Okay, fine.
	There's a discussion that I'm not involved in.
	I want to bring up a debunking of a statement that was made.
	By someone who apparently then invited me for a debate that I didn't know about and one of his followers came out and in a rather impolite manner called me an effing coward.
	Here. I love it.
	It's Destiny, people.
	Destiny. I don't know what his real name is.
	Who put out a tweet and it drives me nuts.
	And some people say, why do you engage?
	Don't give them any light of day.
	And I firmly believe sometimes the purpose Is not to speak to them, but to speak to people who might be listening to them.
	And if you reach just one person with the truth, and I think I reach a lot more, just one, it's a day worth living.
	All right, here we go.
	Destiny, is his name Stephen Bonnell?
	The omni-liberal Stephen Bonnell.
	Is that his name?
	Whatever, okay.
	Destiny puts out a tweet that reads as follows, for those who are listening on podcasts, can someone explain how maggots, it's very funny, reducing people to insect terminology, whereas if anybody were to do that, for any other demographic, you'd get called a Nazi.
	Maggots are able to simultaneously believe in so many diametrically opposed conspiracy theories.
	The first one, how was COVID a Chinese bioweapon that leaked from a lab, but also supposedly harmless at the same time?
	How was Jan 6 an insurrection that was instigated by multiple feds on the ground, but also a Does everybody appreciate the sophistry that's going on here?
	And sophistry is not a good thing.
	Like, this works on low information and low IQ people.
	And I say that respectfully.
	It's not a very nice thing to say, but this works on people who are unintelligent or who are untrained to dissect bullshit.
	How was the election too big to rig in 2024 but less people voted than in 2020?
	How is Trump going to negotiate against Mexico and Canada who are killing us on trade when he literally renegotiated NAFTA into the USMCA United States?
	I'll have to remember what that acronym is.
	How has Biden weaponized the DOJ that also simultaneously convicted his son while Trump fired Barr for not taking orders?
	Why is Biden responsible for the New York State prosecutors, what they do, but Trump isn't responsible in any way for the COVID response, lockdowns, and BLM riots?
	Okay. Good question, Aguada.
	Let's take it one by one, shall we?
	And you have to appreciate this here.
	The first one is the strongest of the shits that he threw against the wall in the hopes that something stuck and in the hopes that you got confused and thought it all must be true.
	There are people out there.
	Let me take this out.
	There are people out there and I get the same messages from people who listen to certain people speak on certain podcasts and I don't judge anybody for it.
	COVID doesn't exist.
	It's never been isolated.
	Okay. And I don't think anybody saying that truly understands what it means.
	I think many people think they understand what it means, which is why they're convinced that the viruses don't exist.
	Because at one point there was some...
	You know, theory that viruses don't exist, and that's fine.
	The people who are saying that COVID didn't exist are certainly not the same ones who are saying it leaked from a lab in China.
	It's an amazing thing, a Venn diagram, and you can have COVID conspiracy that viruses don't exist, and COVID conspiracy that it leaked from a lab in China, and they won't overlap because they're mutually incompatible.
	There are people out there who say, yeah, COVID exists.
	It is the result of gain-of-function research.
	It originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, from illegal activity that Fauci lied about, but it was no more lethal than an ordinary flu season.
	And then there are others out there who say, yes, it was a bioweapon, originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, and it was worse than an ordinary flu season, but it was still that.
	So it's a very...
	The Zenonian paradox way of falsifying the debate by making them sound like the same people saying those things are saying them at the same time when in fact they're not the same people and they're not saying them at the same time because they're not saying the same thing.
	All right.
	How was the Jan 6th insurrection instigated by multiple feds on the ground but also a peaceful protest where nothing happened?
	Nobody says it was a peaceful protest in its entirety.
	There were pockets of violence.
	What people say is it was not an insurrection.
	Period. What people also undoubtedly understand by now, it was instigated by feds, fed agitators, agit props, fed agents.
	It was facilitated by Nancy Pelosi, by Yogananda Pittman.
	It was allowed to happen so that it could then be weaponized specifically for the purposes of, we all know all of this, trying to impeach Trump a second time, trying to get him disqualified from the ballot a second time, justifying a wholesale...
	Weaponization of all things prosecutorial, criminalizing protest, criminalizing political speech, spying on your political adversaries, and destroying the American way of life as anybody knew it.
	What do you want?
	Oh, give me a second, because there's poop in front of the door, and she can't navigate.
	No, wait, there were poop!
	Don't do it!
	Don't do it!
	Stop, stop, stop.
	Go. Okay, sorry, that's gross.
	If any of you knew what I had to live with, you would either feel sorry for me or say, why didn't you put that dog down eight years ago?
	Okay, so there's that.
	One by one.
	I'm going to skip it.
	I'll skip all this crap here.
	How was the election too big to rig in 2024?
	The margin of defeat was too big to rig.
	That's what it means.
	It doesn't have to do with anything with the number of votes.
	It has to do with the margin of victory.
	And by the way, the reason why they stole 2020 was specifically because of the number of votes they throwed into the ether that allowed for ballot harvesting, that allowed for mail-in voting, that allowed for changing of all the...
	It was specifically because of the number of votes that they managed to surpass the margin that would be too big.
	Too big to rig in terms of a margin of victory.
	Forget that, forget that, forget that.
	Oh, the DOJ.
	This is the one I love.
	How has Biden weaponized the DOJ that has simultaneously convicted his son while Trump fired Barr for not taking his orders?
	The second has nothing to do with the first.
	But it's just amazing.
	The DOJ, A, didn't convict Hunter Biden.
	But the DOJ did drag its feet on certain charges that allowed the most serious of the charges to become time-barred.
	The DOJ then did try to strike a sweetheart, unheard-of deal with Hunter Biden that was discovered by and destroyed by a judge.
	I forget her name.
	It wasn't Cannon.
	It wasn't Cannon.
	I forget her name.
	The DOJ certainly did everything it could.
	To get Hunter Biden out of the mess that he got himself into.
	And it was a jury that convicted him.
	And then even then, Biden comes in after justice has played his role and pardoned his son.
	And then apparently someone said...
	Let's see here.
	Well, okay.
	They deleted their post.
	Someone said it's not even available anymore.
	They deleted it.
	They said, hey, you fucking coward.
	Why don't you debate destiny?
	I'll show my reply.
	Doesn't matter.
	I don't mind.
	I get called worse.
	I hadn't heard that Destiny made the request and you sounded about as pleasant as Destiny.
	Can you show me where he asked?
	And as a general rule, I don't engage with people who are sincerely awful people, apparently genuinely stupid, maliciously dishonest, and only looking for attention.
	There might be exceptions, people.
	We'll see.
	But I hadn't heard that Destiny wanted to debate.
	And I don't think that anybody's going to accuse me of avoiding debate with toxic people.
	And I'm not saying that Pastor Ben is toxic, although I think a lot of you...
	Look, his tweets are certainly toxic.
	But I had a fun discussion with Pastor Ben.
	Many of you complained about it, and yet the complaints seem to be commensurate with the viewership, because that stream, a lot of people watched that stream, and it was fun.
	It might drive you crazy, but it's important to understand how your ideological adversaries think.
	In order to flesh out where their flawed reasoning is.
	And I think we did that with Pastor Ben.
	Respectfully submitted Pastor Ben, if you're watching.
	Although, I still think part of it is, in fact, performative.
	And I think that we actually fleshed that out.
	During the stream.
	We've got over in our locals community, as you're discussing Trump's lawsuit against Anselst, the revelations from James O'Keefe on how MSNBC was trying to get Kamala elected should be grounds for a lawsuit.
	It would certainly put the media on notice even more so than the ABC settlement.
	Is it ABC or NBC?
	It was George Stephanopoulos.
	Let me just make sure I get that right.
	Stephanopoulos settlement.
	Who was it?
	ABC. Okay, that's ABC.
	But Marcus, 1776, Kripe.
	Kripe, can you let me know what the James O'Keefe...
	If you can post the link to the O'Keefe thing in Locals, we'll look at it during the after party.
	And I'm not interested in Destiny, having a discussion with him.
	There's limits of civility that even I have in terms of what I will not discourse with.
	I'll have a discussion with a bona fide.
	I would have a discussion with a bona fide neo-Nazi, a bona fide, you know, anybody.
	But reveling in murder and making jokes about it is, even I've got my threshold.
	Now, hold on a second.
	Close this up here.
	Oh, it's like a treasure trail.
	She's left a treasure trail of love across my studio floor.
	Libby Edmonds, Libby Emmons.
	And if you don't know her, she's awesome.
	Just to bring this one up here.
	Put out a tweet.
	Make sure that we're looking at the same thing.
	And she said, is it cancel culture?
	Is this cancel culture?
	Libby Emmons.
	Check her out if you don't know her.
	Post-millennial human events.
	She's amazing.
	Is it cancel culture?
	DC waitress fired after claiming she would refuse to serve Trump admin officials.
	Let me just see one thing now.
	I think it's relevant to know.
	Where she made this statement?
	And you in the chat, let us know, is it cancel culture or not?
	I have a hard answer on the subject, and I'm firmly convinced I'm right.
	Where did she make this statement?
	A Washington, D.C. restaurant has fired a waitress after she stated she would refuse to serve individuals associated with Donald Trump's administration.
	Susanna Van Ruy, who worked at Bukit's Saloon.
	Well, Hill made the comments in an interview with Washingtonian.
	There you go.
	You're fired.
	Van Ruy said that she would refuse to serve any person in office who I know of as being a sex trafficker or trying to deport millions of people.
	Well, there goes Hunter Biden.
	And there goes Obama.
	They're so stupid.
	They're so stupid.
	In addition to being prone to lashing out, they're stupid.
	Let me just make sure that I'm right about this before I get too far in.
	Obama deported more than Trump.
	Obama deportations versus Trump context.
	Why it matters.
	Did Obama deport more people than Trump?
	We're going to go to a fact check, and the answer is...
	I am not signing into your crap thing.
	Let me see here.
	Okay, political fact.
	Obama deported more people than Trump did.
	Okay. So they're stupid.
	Like, it's above and being, what's the word I'm looking for?
	When you are prone to lashing out, they are just stupid because, A, you want to talk sex trafficking, you're already looking at, allegedly, Hunter Biden and the Biden administration.
	You want to talk about deportations, you're looking at, you're looking at Obama.
	No, they'll serve him.
	His deportations were good deportations.
	And my ultimate conclusion, hold on, is it cancel culture or is it not?
	Let me go see.
	We need the...
	There are not the shoes you are looking for.
	No. James Bowder is a Canadian hero.
	Viva selling shoes now.
	No, I'm not selling shoes yet.
	Although Murph's kicks.
	Murph's kicks on Instagram.
	He's the one who sent me a few shoes.
	They're amazing.
	Okay, I got iJamesnondescript says no.
	And that is the right answer.
	End of debate.
	Viva Fry, I'm available to pop in.
	If there's time, thanks.
	Hold on.
	Oh my goodness!
	Oh my goodness, I'm an idiot.
	I forgot what day it was.
	We're doing this.
	Oh, I'm so sorry.
	Copy link.
	Hold on, people.
	Oh, I'm so stupid.
	It's coming.
	Give me two seconds.
	Do not think I meant anything by that.
	I absolutely forgot what day it was.
	Okay, chance.
	It's coming into the stream.
	Speaking of January 6th, I'm such a freaking idiot.
	Okay, guys, we have a guest, and thank goodness.
	Chance, thank you.
	Chance, when you pop on that link, you're going to be live in the stream right away unless you disable your camera.
	So just get ready to be popping into the stream live while we do this.
	And by the way, as Chance comes into the stream, we're going to talk Jan 6th.
	The correct answer was no.
	It's not cancel culture to publicly announce you are not going to do the job you are hired to do.
	Okay? Cancel culture might have been.
	If they had accept and accept.
	The cancel culture might have been if she made the statement 10 years ago.
	Cancel culture might have been if she made something of an unrelated statement on an unrelated platform.
	But cancel culture is not, yeah, I'm a waitress and I'm going to fuck up your business by not serving your customers based on political affiliation.
	Get the F out.
	Let's pull the Jeremy Piven.
	Or what is his name?
	Jeremy Piven?
	Get the F out.
	All right, Chance, I see you in the backdrop.
	Whenever you're ready, enable your camera, enable your mic, and we're going to talk about your January 6th experience.
	Let's see if...
	Give him a second.
	Oh, I hear something now.
	But I don't see anything.
	While Chance does this, there's one of those...
	Oh, I definitely hear clicking now.
	And now I see.
	How you doing?
	Not bad, sir.
	First of all, I'm sorry.
	Thank goodness.
	I'm a senile buffoon, but I blame the kids.
	There we go.
	Sorry. Go ahead.
	Go ahead.
	That's much better.
	No, I say I'm a senile buffoon, but thank you for my goodness.
	It's a fortuitous reading through the chat.
	Chance, tell people who you are so that I know what I'm allowed to disclose and what I'm not allowed to disclose.
	Yeah, so I was a January 6th Capitol rioter, and I got some unique charges from it.
	And I feel that my charges will be overlooked unless I get my story out there.
	And Viva's so graciously allowed me to come on this platform and try and get my story out there.
	Well, Chance, let me back it up.
	Let's say you were a January 6th protester, not a January 6th rioter.
	Yeah, you know, I was going to say January 6th insurrectionist because that's what I've been labeled for the last four years.
	Well, no, I say even go with that because that highlights the absurdity.
	That is so absurd that everyone's going to know it's sort of like a tongue-in-cheek.
	A rioter, people are not going to necessarily know to take that as hyperbole or...
	And if you say a protester, that would just be the most accurate.
	So you were there on January 6th, and your life was turned into a living hell as a result of it.
	Just back it up a little bit.
	If you don't mind, just roughly, you seem very young.
	I think I know roughly how old you are, but you're a young dude.
	How did you end up at the Capitol building on January 6th?
	Yeah, so January 6th is actually my birthday.
	I saw that there was the Stop the Steal rally, and it was on my birthday, and I'm a big Trump supporter, and I thought the election was rigged.
	So I was like, you know what?
	I'm going to fly up there and protest.
	How old were you at the time?
	I would have been 24. Son of a beast.
	My 24th birthday.
	Babyface at 28, you're doing good.
	And so 24, you know, it doesn't even matter.
	Ordinarily, I like to dive into upbringing and all that stuff.
	24, you go down.
	Where are you getting in from?
	How are you traveling?
	I flew out from Texas.
	I live in Texas.
	I just took a flight and showed up the day before.
	This is so wild.
	You show up January 5th.
	What do you do on January 5th when you get there?
	We got there so late that I was up there with my dad.
	We both went into the capital and we both got capital charges.
	When we arrived, we just went to the hotel.
	And passed out.
	And you wake up the next day and you get going to the...
	So you wake up in the morning.
	It's fascinating because I wish I could have been there, but probably thankful I wasn't.
	You wake up...
	What happens January 6th in the morning?
	You wake up at 8 o'clock, start walking around, eat breakfast, and then you go to here where Trump is going to speak?
	Yeah, so basically I wasn't too caught up on like...
	The Trump speech and when or where everyone was meeting up.
	So I think I ended up seeing somewhere on Twitter that I didn't even think I knew Trump was doing a speech.
	I thought it was just like a protest.
	So I think I walked over probably around 10 a.m. to the White House and waited for the speech to start.
	The times are blurry because it was so long ago, but it's somewhere in that area.
	And you hear Trump speak for a bit.
	Yeah, so I heard him speak for probably 30 minutes.
	There were so many people, and the speakers were really muffled, so I couldn't even hear or see them.
	So I sat there for as long as I could, and I was like, this isn't worth it.
	Let me just go to the Capitol.
	People don't appreciate how many people were there.
	Do you have any idea how many were there?
	Oh my gosh.
	I saw that they were saying there was only 50,000 people.
	But I did the math based on square footage of the area I was seeing and how many people were shoulder to shoulder.
	I would say, if you're being ultra-conservative, 150,000, but probably closer to two.
	200,000.
	What the fuck?
	I mean, it's so amazing.
	And there is, not to say a crowd mentality, there is a vibe.
	It's like going to a rock concert and everybody's chanting the same thing at the same time.
	It's molecular.
	Okay, so you hear Trump speak for a bit.
	You leave before he's done speaking.
	You head down to the Capitol.
	How did you get, I mean, just, you know, you've already been fully charged and everything's over, so I don't know if you can incriminate yourself again, but tell us what happened.
	I mean, I know that there was no violence.
	How did you get into the restricted area where you got, and how did you get arrested?
	Yeah, so like I said, I left the speech probably 30 minutes before it was done.
	Funnily enough, I left before he said the peacefully march to the Capitol.
	So the whole idea that we went in there because he said that is a joke, because I was, In order to get into the Capitol, I had to be at the front of the crowd by leaving early, which means I couldn't have heard the speech, that part of the speech.
	So that makes me laugh.
	But so basically, I left it on the way up.
	It's probably a 15 minute to 30 minute walk from the White House to the Capitol.
	Along the way, I saw a group of people that I want to touch up on.
	Maybe later on this, but a specific group of people that I thought was really interested that they were all dressed the same and starting chants and had walkie-talkies.
	But anyway, so on the walk over there, I get to the Capitol and I started hearing what I thought was fireworks.
	And I thought there was like a celebration or something.
	Turns out it was tear gas canisters going off.
	So I walk up and to get into the Capitol, it's on a giant concrete foundation.
	It's about 20 foot tall.
	So for about 30 minutes or so, I was sitting at the bottom of this kind of watching as the crowd of people were trying to push up a staircase past like one or two cops.
	There's probably 40 people at the bottom of the staircase, two to four cops at the top.
	And then eventually they broke through that line and that's when we started walking up.
	So we walked up the staircase onto the foundation that the Capitol's on.
	And then I sat around or, you know, walked around there, recorded some stuff.
	And then I was at the doorway where, I don't know if you've seen the CCTV footage where the cops were letting people in.
	I was at that doorway and at that point I looked in and I saw a row of cops and I saw, you know, people, protesters in front of them.
	And then I walked off and I was like, all right, I guess this is it.
	You know, I don't know how I got to this point, but I'm up on this foundation and this has been interesting.
	And then I look back in, and I see that the cops have moved to the side, and they're patting people on the shoulder and waving them in and stuff.
	So at that point, I was like, okay, I guess we're going in.
	I guess we can go in.
	And then from that point, I walked in, walked around for 15 minutes.
	I went to the Senate side, right outside the doors of the Senate chamber.
	And, you know, I got some footage in there and just kind of experienced, you know, there was violence happening.
	Funnily enough, I got deplatformed by Facebook for mentioning that the violence was nowhere near what it was being reported to be.
	It was very isolated situations, and in every situation, if someone was being violent, there was 10 or 15 of us saying, bro, calm down.
	You know, you're going about this the wrong way.
	But yeah, and then from there, I made my way out and then sat on the staircase right outside and, you know, just kind of...
	Took it all in and then headed out.
	How do you get arrested?
	So I had posted pictures of me in an outfit.
	I had commented on people that were talking crap about it.
	I commented that the way you're looking at this is completely wrong.
	It didn't go down like that.
	And then someone ratted on me.
	So take those three things into account and the FBI will know where you live within two weeks.
	Shut the fuck up.
	And they show up at your house in Texas?
	Yes, yes.
	So I believe two weeks after the Capitol, they show up in the morning, raid my house.
	Probably a six-hour process of just sitting outside talking to them while other agents are inside.
	They show up at your house.
	You have no idea that they're coming?
	No, no idea.
	Are there plainclothes?
	They didn't come with the...
	I think there was one or two plainclothes.
	There was people in...
	You know, military-type gear, like SWAT gear, and they had ARs.
	They kind of ran up on me with their ARs as I was getting out of the car because I had just gone to get some tea, and I showed back up at my house, and I guess they were waiting for me to get back.
	So they showed up with ARs, and I kind of put my hands up, and I was like, whoa, you've got the wrong idea.
	You have no idea why they're there.
	I had an idea.
	As soon as I saw it coming, it was all so surreal because you don't...
	You think, little old me, I'm never going to get raided by the FBI.
	I walked into a building, why would I get raided?
	It just doesn't seem correct.
	So when they show up, immediately it was still surreal, but I was like, okay, this is happening.
	Because you had heard over the last two weeks that they were coming down on everybody.
	Did you ask to see a warrant or did they show you a warrant?
	Yeah, they showed a warrant.
	And it's a piece of paper.
	Yeah, they showed the warrant.
	They were real professional about...
	About trampling your rights.
	You're lucky they didn't shoot you.
	Unreal. This is where the crux of your...
	When we were talking, I don't know if anybody else has similar circumstances to their legal situation.
	And if I may, they go and raid your house for six hours.
	They go search your house because you're a violent protester.
	You're an insurrectionist.
	You committed no violence and went on Capitol Hill.
	Six hours, and when they go to your house to raid you, And rummage through your shit because of your participation in Jan 6. That's when they find other incidental stuff for which you ultimately also face charges.
	And that's the uniqueness of your story here.
	Yeah, so they ended up finding...
	I had weed and psilocybin mushrooms and edibles and hash oil.
	And then obviously bongs and stuff to smoke weed.
	You can't take that without...
	I'm sorry, I say this as a joke.
	I have nothing against this stuff.
	I just would never touch it.
	Ever again in my entire life.
	Yeah, no, I'm in the same spot now.
	But at that time, like a lot of Americans, I was a heavy smoker.
	And they also had my dad's gun, because I was living at my dad's house at the time.
	And so my dad's gun was in my bedside nightstand, because for years it had been in his room.
	And then one day I thought someone was breaking in and it turned out to be a raccoon.
	That's a whole other story.
	But I saw the shadow of a raccoon dropping down the fence and thought it was someone robbing us.
	So I grabbed the gun.
	And then from that point on, I just left it in the bedside table and forgot it was even there.
	I'd never fired the gun or anything like that.
	Not even that.
	It wouldn't even be more suspicious if you had.
	I just say like when you have kids, that's not, you know, then it's a different world.
	But you have drugs and a firearm.
	Yes. As they raid you for other stuff related to...
	What the hell are they raiding you for, for evidence for Jan 6?
	What did they take your cell phone and your computers?
	Yeah, they took my cell phone, took my...
	any cell phone I could find.
	They actually took my cryptocurrency wallet and they held onto that for...
	Did you get it back?
	I ended up getting it back, yes.
	At least you were forced not to sell.
	Did you make some good accrual of value in that time?
	Oh yeah, I made some and lost some.
	If you look back during those two years right after the capital is when there was the big run and then it kind of fell off.
	So I'm still holding those, still diamond hands over here.
	I'm not too worried about it.
	But yeah, so they took the crypto and then I think they were looking for Nancy Pelosi's laptop is what I was told.
	It's funny because it happened to somebody else.
	It's so ridiculous.
	It's a comedy of a movie.
	You have Nancy Pelosi's laptop.
	Someone took her laptop.
	So they're looking for stuff.
	Cellular stuff for further evidence of video and whatever of what happened on Jan 6. But they also come across totally unrelated to Jan 6 some recreational drugs that you have and a firearm which put the two and two together.
	You got a Hunter Biden charge.
	Yeah, so I ended up getting charged with the same statute as Hunter Biden, the user of a controlled substance in possession of a firearm.
	And from my research, it's not a very commonly used charge.
	And in the case of the United States First Daniels, it was actually overturned by the Fifth Circuit, and they ruled it unconstitutional.
	So it's making its way up to the Supreme Court.
	So as of right now, I'm charged with the same charge that Hunter Biden was pardoned for, and one that's already been overturned by the Fifth Circuit.
	And we discussed this as well.
	We've talked about the Hunter Biden charge on the show, and there's good argument to argue for its unconstitutionality, because if someone's using recreational drugs, they have just as much right to own a firearm as anybody else.
	Just the hypocrisy with the pussyfoot charges against Hunter, and then the pardon at the end of the day from the party that wants more rules and regulations as relates to firearms.
	So you get charged with this, and then it's independent of Jan 6. What happened with your Jan 6 charges?
	Yeah, so for that I ended up getting the, I think it's the most common charge.
	A majority of us, they hit us with four separate charges, and then if you pled, you pled guilty to one, which is parading in a capital building, basically.
	It's like trespassing.
	So I got a misdemeanor trespassing charge.
	You serve any time for it?
	Yeah, I did 30 days for that.
	I'm sorry, okay.
	This I didn't think I knew.
	When you were originally arrested, how long did they detain you for, or did they detain you?
	For the arraignment, yeah, they detained me.
	I think I was there for a day and a half.
	Okay, not so bad.
	You spent 30 days in jail?
	Yeah, I spent 30 days in jail in a, it's basically like a federal holdings jail, where you've got, normally in the federal system, there's four levels of security.
	You've got camp, low, medium, and then the pen.
	So someone with a misdemeanor like me, if I was to serve out my time, ideally, they would put me in a low or a camp because it's a nonviolent charge.
	I was in a place that held all levels.
	So it had, you know, people that were coming off 20 year sentences.
	It had, you know, cop killers.
	It had child porn people and all this kind of stuff.
	And I was supposed to go to the lowest level of that, the lowest security pod or group of people.
	There's pods of 128 of us.
	Well, since it was during COVID, those were all booked up because they had to close down one of their floors for a wing for people to go for a week before they go.
	I was told by the people there I was in the worst pod to be in at that place.
	I was surrounded by gang members and all this stuff.
	Luckily enough, I was a little scared at first.
	I guess it turns out when you have a charge that's, you know, protesting against the government, the criminals don't really have a problem with you.
	That's wild.
	And you do 30 days.
	What was that like?
	You know, it was all right.
	It was rough and it was a learning experience.
	It was extremely boring.
	You know, I made some friends and, you know, talked to some people and everyone was cool with me and, you know, it wasn't as bad as it was for most of the J6ers, that's for sure.
	And so you get out, you do your time, you get out, life goes on, except you're dealing with the other Hunter Biden gun charge.
	Yes, yes.
	Yeah, so I get out, and that's one of the reasons.
	It was really tough for me because I had that felony that came as a result of the Capitol where ideally I would have liked to fight these things.
	You know, I ended up taking my gun charge to trial, but I would have wanted to take the...
	Misdemeanor to trial, but there's kind of just, there's too much at stake.
	But it's the federal, it's the felony gun charge that has nothing to do with the Jan 6 versus the misdemeanor, which was your Jan 6 charge.
	Yes, yes.
	Okay, and so you pleaded on the misdemeanor, you took the gun charge to trial, and from what I understand you, no, actually I forget what happened now.
	What happened with the, I think I do not forget, but what happened with the gun charge?
	In what respect?
	Well, what was the outcome?
	You pleaded on the gun charge, ultimately?
	No, so I actually took it to trial.
	I was found guilty.
	It was a bench trial.
	And then at my sentencing, I pled guilty to the charge.
	Bench trial before a judge.
	The judge was, I remember the judge was a relevant judge.
	So for the gun charge, the judge wasn't really relevant.
	His name was...
	That doesn't matter.
	It wasn't the judge.
	The misdemeanor judge was one of the ones whose name we saw come up time and time again.
	The Trump judge who was not very kind on the Jan Sixers.
	Yes, yes.
	I can't remember his name, but he was the judge that was giving people dual sentences, misdemeanor.
	For a federal misdemeanor, you can either get probation or you can get jail time.
	And he was giving both.
	So that's kind of where he...
	His name was all over the media for trying this experimental sentence that was not constitutional.
	Okay. So the judge on the gun charge finds you guilty.
	You plead guilty.
	That's to basically not circumvent but get more leniency on the sentencing.
	That's the goal.
	And what was the sentence?
	I ended up getting no jail time for the gun charge, which is very, very rare.
	This is after you served 30 days for the misdemeanor, correct?
	Or is this before?
	Does the judge know you're going to jail for 30 days or had you already done your 30 days?
	Oh, no, no.
	Yes. So this was before the 30 days.
	Okay. Did the judge know that you were going to be doing 30 days for the misdemeanor?
	No. No.
	So you got lucky.
	But the bottom line now is you get convicted of a felony gun charge.
	Even though you serve no time, you do your 30 days for the misdemeanor Jan 6 crap because they got to make examples out of those.
	Those violent criminals.
	The bottom line to this is you're stuck with a felony conviction and all of these civil rights manners in which that impacts you going forward?
	Yeah, yeah.
	So, you know, back when I got busted, I didn't have a kid at that point.
	So I've never been a big gun person.
	I've never gone to the shooting range or gone.
	I went hunting a bit when I was younger, but never was huge on guns.
	But now that I have a son, it sucks knowing that I...
	I can't really have a firearm in my possession to defend my son if someone was to break in.
	So that's, I would say, of all the things that it's going to affect me, it's going to affect me with getting a job and government contracts if I was to run a business and this and that.
	But the main thing that worries me is knowing that if someone breaks in and I don't own a firearm, I can't defend my son.
	And that's the hardest part.
	And the issue...
	This is why your situation is unique and we were talking.
	I'm like, I'm thinking that...
	Watch out!
	Tell them to go away.
	I'll tell them that you're not here.
	Give me one second, Chance.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Okay, tell them I'm not here.
	Don't tell them I'm not here.
	Just tell them...
	Okay, someone's at the door.
	Okay, so the issue here now is that...
	Forget your misdemeanor for the Jan 6, although if there's a pardon for that, I don't know what going forward consequences or impediments there on civil rights for the misdemeanor.
	When we were talking, the issue is that you got stuck on a felony gun charge as a result of the, what's the word, when the FBI comes, as a result of the Jan 6 raid.
	But if there's a blanket pardon for the nonviolence, and even if you're encompassed in that, you're still stuck with a felony conviction for what was incidental or ancillary to the FBI raid.
	But might not get covered by a pardon depending on how broadly it's...
	If they say pardon for all misdemeanors related to the events of January 6th, that wouldn't cover the felony.
	And if they say covering all felonies, all everything, blanket for all Jan Sixers, would it cover a felony that might not be directly related to Jan Six?
	Yeah, exactly.
	So the uphill battle I've realized that I have is that the...
	The charge that I will get pardoned for, if I do get pardoned, does not affect my life.
	The felony that I have affects my life.
	And since that's not directly tied, I worry that I could kind of, you know...
	Fall through the cracks.
	Yeah, I could fall through the cracks.
	It's even like, because when we were discussing, it's like, operate on the assumption that Trump comes through with what I believe is the only thing here.
	Full pardon for all misdemeanors and felonies, period.
	Not going to parse through who someone thinks...
	Deserves to stay in jail despite not having gotten a fair trial.
	A blanket pardon for any and all charges related to Jan 6, misdemeanor or felony.
	Even if we live in that, if we get that Christmas gift in January, you might still be screwed in that.
	I don't know if there's anybody else in your circumstances where they found other stuff.
	And I could steal the argument as to why it should be or shouldn't be.
	Specifically, you're more of an innocuous nature of the felony charge than imagine if they could have found some other Really bad stuff, which no one would say pardon under a Jan 6 pardon.
	But it's an interesting dilemma.
	Even if there is a full blanket pardon, what happens to somebody who, as a result of what would be a raid for which there was a pardon, an abuse of the process, they found other stuff in that abuse of the process, and you might be stuck with this felony even if you get a pardon for Jan 6. Oh, and I think he might have frozen.
	I was so boring right there that either he is still thinking about what I said, Chance, if you can see me, I think you may have frozen, but now that I say it, it might be.
	No, that's definitely him.
	People, that's the dilemma.
	He's going to come back in.
	Felons are not even allowed to have a weapon in their household, no matter if it's their wife, says Shannon the Cannon.
	He's just thinking real hard, says Korn Macabre.
	Well, first thing first, if he gets disconnected for good, at least we got that story.
	That is the dilemma, people.
	If there's a blanket pardon for everything, does someone still get screwed because in the context of that abusive Jan 6 raid, they found something else that they prosecuted someone for and now that guy's chances is screwed for life.
	We'll see if he comes back.
	Let me see if he's going to come back.
	Go back to my DMs here.
	Hold on one second.
	Let me see.
	Did they get you again?
	Did the feds get you again?
	Question mark.
	Smiley face.
	See if he comes back.
	If he doesn't come back, he got the story out.
	That's the story that I wanted to highlight because it's a very interesting story and a real dilemma.
	Did any other Jan Sixer get arrested and get charged with something that wasn't actually related to the initial purpose for which they were there?
	I don't know of any examples.
	I'm trying to think of...
	Can't think of any.
	But that's it.
	Now, just in the event it doesn't come back, locals, there won't be an after party because I have to go tend to a lot of crap solo parenting all week.
	Let me bring this one up here.
	It's a $5 chat.
	It says, Hey Viva, sent a rant yesterday about a tech I've developed to help hyperboost reach to build audience that I want to give you and other Rumble podcasts.
	Thank you.
	And don't be offended, but no thank you.
	If I can't do it organically through the quality of my content, I don't want shortcuts.
	Or things that actually potentially could also violate terms of service in terms of artificial promotion.
	So thank you, but no thank you.
	Thanks for the rant.
	All right, now let me see something else here.
	Chance, I don't know if you...
	I hope nothing bad happened to him.
	I shouldn't make...
	His computer might have gone dead, which is why he's not able to get to me here.
	Watch out!
	Who's that?
	Is there somebody here?
	Yeah. Okay.
	Okay, I don't know if Chance is coming back.
	I hope nothing bad happened.
	That's Chance's story, people.
	So when we're pushing, promoting the blanket pardon for Jan Sixes, which is the only fair outcome here, and now Biden...
	You know, maybe I'm thinking we're going to go full circle back to the beginning.
	Dark Brandon is doing Trump a favor with his grotesque...
	Unjust pardons and commutation of sentences.
	He's making it easier for Trump to do it to the Jan Sixers.
	Let's think that Joe Biden has actually taken a hit for the team so that he can help MAGA get those pardons that the Jan Sixers deserve.
	Smash that thumbs up, peeps, as neurodivergent one.
	Please do.
	I think I'm going to wait two more minutes to see if chance gets here.
	If he doesn't, at least we got that story.
	I'm glad.
	What day is it today?
	I don't even know what day of the week it is anymore.
	It's Tuesday.
	I don't know what month it is.
	It's December.
	Got to go back to Canada.
	Everybody, thank you all for being here.
	You know what?
	We're going to go do an after party on Locals.
	And if Chance comes back, that'll be it.
	Hunter has taken a hit for the team as well, but his hit is on the crack pipe, says Gordon McCumber.
	All right.
	Everybody, come on over to Locals.
	We'll have a bit of an after party there.
	Hopefully the kids are going to keep themselves entertained and I will not get into too much trouble.
	Link to Locals.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	There it is.
	And everyone, thank you for being here.
	So I'll be live tomorrow at some point.
	Going to do an episode of The Unusual Suspects.
	So I don't know when I'm going to get to go live.
	What else?
	That is it.
	Thank you all for being here.
	It's been good to see you again.
	I'll leave the...
	I think I can leave the chat open and rumble.
	But come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com if you are so inclined.
	If you are not, I shall see you tomorrow on the flip side, Dude Meisters.
	Thank you, Chase, for coming if you're still watching and can't get back in.
	And go and enjoy the day.

▲