Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 30, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:20:35

The FBI and Secret Service are COMPLICIT in the MIHOP and Cover-Up! Viva Frei Live!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	that we received.
	We're wondering if these donors are victims of what appears to be a money laundering scheme.
	Cindy Noe of Annapolis, Maryland, who in the year 2022 allegedly contributed over 1,000 times to Act Blue, totaling $18,849.
	dollars and selling A lot of money.
	That means Cindy would have had to donate three times a day every day for the whole year.
	Maybe she did.
	My name is James O'Keefe and we're doing a story on the number of people that have donated.
	You did donate to ActBlue, right?
	Once in a while.
	What about $18,850?
	No, I don't think so.
	You know people are using your address?
	I don't think so.
	Hmm. Don't think so, eh?
	Well, let me just see if I can bring myself...
	Oh, I don't want to play it again.
	Hold on.
	I'm going to put on pause and I'm going to share this.
	I'm trying to get James back on to talk about this ActBlue fraud because this is the second time James...
	It's the second expose.
	I mean, I remember him doing one a while back.
	Let me just stop screen share.
	Let me make sure that I'm in focus.
	Yeah, I look dirty and grubby because I am.
	We've been on the road for how long now?
	Well, we drove yesterday Montreal to the Harper's Ferry tri-state region where we went back to our very favorite spot on the Potomac River to lift up rocks and find beautiful crayfish.
	And there are big-ass crayfish in the Potomac River.
	They didn't quite draw blood, but they certainly hurt.
	And before we get too far into this stream, I want to make sure that we are in fact live across the various interweb platforms.
	Okay, let me refresh on Rumble.
	Make sure we're live there currently.
	Looking good.
	Let me see here.
	Go back to refresh my face.
	We are live on Twitter.
	Very good.
	Let me make sure that we are successfully live on Viva Barnes Law.
	Dotlocals.com.
	There was something of a glitch, mailed it in to them, and I think we are live.
	You know what I'm going to do right now?
	I'm just going to double check something.
	So I'm going to just test audio.
	This is the built-in audio because I haven't set up my good microphone because it's in the car and a big pain in the neck to set up.
	But let me see if I...
	No, not disable.
	I'm going to test.
	This is the Instagram versus...
	Oh, that is the InstaMac.
	You know what?
	I'm just going to leave it here.
	I'm using the microphone inside this InstaLink camera, which is good.
	Everybody, we're good?
	Yes, we are.
	I'm looking in the chat.
	Okay, good.
	Everyone share the link around because, again, it was a short notice live stream.
	We're supposed to go to...
	We are not supposed to.
	I'm going to be on Tim Pool tonight.
	I'm here with a kid who's been nagging me all day, wants to go to Tim Pool's place, and I wanted to go early as well.
	And we're going to get there earlier before the show, but we needed to go see history.
	Get exercise.
	Get some sunlight.
	And we hiked up the Harper's Ferry.
	It's the...
	Oh, cripe.
	I forget the name of it.
	We hiked up to the top of that mountain that overlooks Harper's Ferry.
	And it's glorious.
	And it's the type of thing here, I'll show you this, where...
	You know, when I say...
	I can never say that I've never lied.
	Because I have lied.
	And when my kid says, how much longer are we almost there?
	And I said, not much longer, we're almost there.
	That might have been a lie.
	Look, I knew how long the hike was, and for adult standards, we were almost there, and it wasn't that far.
	But for a kid hiking up the West Virginian, or I'm not sure what state that might have been in Virginia, hiking up the mountains, it was good.
	It was hot.
	I gave him the water, and we made it to the top.
	We got the most beautiful lookout in the world.
	I'm not from here, but this place feels like I spiritually connect with it for some reason.
	The Potomac and the Shenandoah River meet up, and one is a little bit darker than the other right now for whatever the reason, so when they meet up, it's sort of like one side's a little darker green than the other.
	You're sitting there looking at Harper's Ferry, this town built on a bluff leading into where they marry these rivers, and it's simply glorious.
	The bug life, the foliage is amazing, not quite as diverse as Florida, but we look at a tree.
	Look at the trunk of this tree.
	Other than the fact that it's recently blown my mind, that you look at a tree, the mightiest of oak trees, and it was born from a tiny seed.
	And you imagine all the energy that goes into growing that massive, multi-ton.
	The creation of God from a tiny little sea, the energy, the sunlight, the transformation of sunlight into water, nutrients.
	So we look at the trunk of the tree, and there are these wild red black beetles on them.
	There are these little flying things.
	We saw a couple of skinks.
	It's amazing.
	So we hiked up to the top.
	We did that.
	We're disgusting, sweaty, salty.
	Then we went back down to the Potomac, and we're picking up crayfish, and it was fantastic.
	Look at the kid.
	feet behind.
	Well, okay, thank you for noticing in the chat.
	All right, so we're hiking up the mountain today, and all this to say it's a long-winded way of saying we're hiking up, and I realized that the congressional hearings of the deputy director of the Secret Service, his name is, they're calling him Abate, which is ironic.
	Let me just see what his actual name is.
	Deputy... Deputy Director Secret Service.
	Is it Abate or is it...
	His name is...
	Well, you got Rowe.
	What's the other guy's name?
	Acting. The guy whose name is Abate.
	Yeah, what's this guy's name?
	Secret Service.
	So his name is...
	Oh, his name was Ronald Rowe.
	Hold on.
	Abate? But who's the guy named...
	There was a guy named Abate.
	Ah, whatever.
	So I'm listening to this hearing as we're hiking up the mountain and it's enraging.
	It's enraging because you have a let it happen on purpose and you have a made it happen on purpose.
	And I'm going to create a new term and I'm going to call it a with.
	A with.
	W-I-T-H.
	Wanted it to happen.
	This was a with.
	A with might be a me-hop.
	A me-hop is you made it happen.
	This is sort of like maybe they were a little bit more hands-off.
	They didn't actively make it happen, but they did and we're going to go over it.
	A with.
	it to happen.
	It's inexcusable.
	And I picked together some highlights as we're hiking up.
	I hear something, go record it, screen grab, and then put it on the interwebs.
	We're going to go over the highlights today, people, because everybody needs to hear this.
	If you haven't heard it, it was a couple hours long.
	I think it's still going on now, but not sure what's going on right now.
	The highlights.
	We'll get there in a second.
	Now, before we even get started, yesterday I put out a vlog talking about we are on the verge of a 1776 moment.
	As we're driving down here, I'm giving my kid a bit of a history lesson.
	We go by Fort Ticonderoga and look into the history.
	I won't repeat everything I said in the video yesterday.
	We go and we see Fort Ticonderoga, and I'm like, I've been saying that.
	I've been passing that all the time.
	Ticonderoga! What's the history?
	I forgot the history.
	And then we discover that Fort Ticonderoga used to be a French fort.
	It used to be called Fort Carillon.
	And then it was taken over by the British.
	And there was fighting between America and Britain when America was fighting for its independence.
	There was back and forth at Fort Ticonderoga.
	And then the British at one point recoiled into Canada, and then the American patriots tried to invade Canada.
	That didn't work, and we ended up with the history that we have today.
	So I said we're on the verge of a 1776 moment, and what better way to celebrate that than with our 1775 coffee sponsor.
	If you're an average Joe, you probably don't know that every sip...
	Of that big, woke corporation coffee you're drinking right now is literally killing you.
	That's because the USA does not only have the worst border policy in the world, it also has the worst and lowest standards for coffee quality imports in the world.
	Meanwhile, even the coffee bean China and Russia reject.
	You drink.
	Yes, let that sink in.
	Most coffee is full of mold and beans sprayed with pesticides.
	Oh, and if you drink the decaf, oh my goodness, the decaf.
	I don't know if anybody knows how decaf is made.
	Look into it.
	You'll never drink it again.
	It's no wonder why you always feel tired, jittery, laggy, and foggy.
	And I can say this.
	I had a non-1775 iced coffee.
	It's not good.
	It's not good.
	That's why at Rumble we drink a lot of coffee.
	We sought to produce the very best high-quality source beans in the world.
	We found them, and we have brought them to you.
	And for a limited time, you can try Rumble 1775 coffee on a subscription.
	And save 40% off your first bag today.
	Support freedom of speech, build a parallel economy, and support a company that actually values you and the platform on which we dialogue right now.
	Go to 1775coffee.com forward slash Viva.
	That is the promo code.
	Pick up your first bag.
	Use promo code Viva for 40% off your first subscription order.
	Thank you.
	Fine folks at...
	1775coffee.com forward slash Viva.
	Lehop, let it happen on purpose.
	Mehop, made it happen on purpose.
	And today we are introducing into the lexicon, width.
	Wanted it to happen.
	I'm sure I could put a width in there, like a W-I.
	Wanted it damn well to happen.
	A width.
	So let's go over the highlights of the day today.
	First of all, now that I can do this and we're successfully live on all platforms, Encryptus says, exciting update.
	Thanks to your support.
	We've developed a new website and enhanced the...
	We're nearly ready to launch with new features, test political leanings through text uploads, videos, YouTube links, and a public person search.
	Each entry provides a detailed assessment of political biases and a new emotional versus rational content gauge.
	Oh, it doesn't show the whole thing.
	Help us make the final push.
	Donate here.
	And it's at givesendgo.com forward slash PC.
	And let me just show this to everybody here.
	I'll put it up here.
	This is one of our amazing members of our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community in cryptos.
	Here we go.
	This is the give, send, go, and I'll share it around.
	All right, so the hearing is on today.
	I don't know their names.
	If someone in the chat can clarify their names, that's fine.
	I was listening to Bongino yesterday as we're driving up, and...
	What's amazing, and I forgot to mention it in my video yesterday, when we're talking about how this is a fight for independence, this is a fight against a tyrannical, corrupt government that acts like elitist tyrants, takes our money, funds foreign conflict, suppresses our rights.
	We're at the 1770s.
	I forgot to mention this.
	And it drove me nuts.
	And now, did I just forget what I was about to say?
	Oh my goodness, no.
	The censorship online.
	The big tech oligarchs.
	Did you see this story?
	That Google admits.
	Was it Google or Facebook?
	Facebook. It's amazing.
	I shared the highlight on Twitter.
	Facebook admits censoring photo Trump assassination.
	I shared the video of Google.
	Actively suppressing search results when it comes to the failed assassination on Trump.
	Actively suppressing it because, you know, the algorithm...
	First of all, some people out there don't understand what the video was or they do understand that they're filthy trolls trying to distract from meaningful conversation.
	Everyone's like, oh, when I put it in, I get the right search results.
	I put in Donald Trump attempted assassination and I get...
	A ton of search results.
	That was never what the issue was.
	And if you thought that was the issue, you've misunderstood.
	And if you know that that's not the issue, you're a bonafide troll seeking to confuse rational discourse.
	The issue is not that it didn't generate the search results when you put in the prompt to produce the search results.
	The issue is that on Google search engines, for those of you who don't know this, when you start typing something in, it will auto-populate based on what letters you have.
	Guessing based on what the most common search for those terms are.
	So as you start putting in attempted assassination, it will prompt to fill in the rest of that search query in theory based on that which is the most popular search for those terms based on that.
	And so what you had for a brief moment in time, we'll see if it's still the same thing today, was Google auto-populating Assassination attempt, not with Donald Trump, but with Adolf Hitler, because I'm sure that's what everyone's Googling these days.
	And then when you put an assassination attempt on T, as in Trump, it was auto-populating it with assassination attempt on Truman.
	No one was searching that.
	There is no way that the algorithm would have auto-populated the search results with those terms unless it was being tinkered with.
	Like they tinkered with the election back in 2020 by censoring the Hunter Biden laptop.
	Like Alex Jones always says, it's the same thing over and over again, just a different iteration of the same play.
	Online internet censorship, Hunter Biden 2020, which had a determinate impact on the outcome of the election.
	And now they're doing it again with the search results for Donald Trump's failed assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
	And the iconic...
	That's Gary Vaynerchuk?
	Okay, well, he's an expert on online marketing.
	And with results to that iconic photo, which Facebook now admits it was a...
	Remember, by the way, it's not happening.
	It's a conspiracy theory.
	And then it turns into, oh, it's happening, but it's a good thing.
	Or, okay, it's happening, but it was a mistake.
	A mistake?
	My ass.
	They were censoring the iconic Trump fist in the air, fight, fight, fight, blood dripping from his head after, as has now been confirmed, a bullet struck his ear.
	Confirmed 100%.
	It's going to be one of the highlights we look at.
	Facebook admits mistake in censoring iconic Trump assassination attempt photo.
	This was an error.
	I'm going to go ahead and say no.
	I'm going to go ahead and say at this point in time, it was deliberate and you need to prove that it was an error, not assert that it was an error.
	Google was previously accused of censoring search results for the assassination.
	Okay, that's part of it.
	Let's read this.
	Facebook wrongly called the popular image of Donald Trump pumping his fist in the air after an assassination attempt an altered photo.
	A spokesperson admitted Monday.
	Users across X shared reports that their Facebook accounts were labeling the image as, quote, altered, explaining, quote, independent fact checkers reviewed a similar photo and said it was altered in a way that could mislead people.
	Can you believe this?
	Meta Public Affairs Director Danny Lever.
	Oh, that's funny.
	It's unbelievable.
	Yeah, he's kind of pulling the levers there, isn't he?
	Later explained on X it was done in error as the systems were meant to detect a separate version of bull earmuffs bullshit of the highest order.
	This was an error.
	The fact check was in it.
	First of all, this is why we talked about this with John Stossel, the journalist, Candace Owens.
	And their fact-checkers are not just partners with Facebook.
	They're literally partners with Facebook because they make money off of their own fact-checking of Facebook posts.
	This was a part of the basis of Candace Owens' lawsuit.
	I don't know if you guys remember this.
	That they would fact-check Candace Owens' wildly popular post and then say, oh no, fact-check false and redirect you to their own fact-checking source.
	Appreciate what that means, by the way.
	Candace Owens will put a post up there.
	It'll get millions of views.
	And what they will do, these parasites of the highest order, is they'll say, ah, our independent fact-check partners determine this is fact.
	Go read the article that we determined to be the accurate one, and it redirects to their own websites, the own fact-checkers' websites.
	So they siphon off the traffic from Candace Owens' Facebook post to their own, thus generating ad revenue and whatever else to their own stuff.
	So they are actual parasites.
	But this is why they should not have fact checkers that partner up with them.
	Because once they partner up with them, they're actually making money off their own fact checking and siphoning and parasitically siphoning traffic from popular and the most popular accounts on Facebook and whatever.
	But everybody hope that was clear enough.
	This was an error.
	The fact check was initially applied to a doctored photo showing the Secret Service agents smiling.
	And in some cases, our systems incorrectly applied that fact check to the real photo.
	This has been fixed.
	We apologize for the mistake.
	When was this?
	Let me see.
	What date was that tweet?
	Holy merciful hell.
	That was July 29th.
	That was yesterday.
	So for the last two and a half weeks, they've been censoring people's ability to share that iconic photo to show that Trump took a bullet for America.
	And after he took a bullet for America, he didn't hide under his secret service.
	He didn't cuss them out to say, get me the hell out of here.
	He didn't.
	Yell at them and say, protect me better!
	They didn't scuttle him off the stage after a bullet clipped his ear, killed Corey Camperatore, and grievously wounded two others.
	He got up there and he said, wait, wait, wait.
	And it still makes me tear up when I watch it.
	Put his fist in the air and said, fight, fight, fight.
	And it's the most human that you will ever see Donald Trump.
	It's the most revealing video that you will ever see of Donald Trump.
	A moment that reveals character.
	That's the character in Donald Trump.
	So two and a half weeks later, they're now admitting it was a mistake.
	What a bunch of filthy scoundrels.
	Don't need to read it.
	Lever confirmed that the mistake was...
	The altered image Lever referenced.
	I don't give a crap.
	None of the agents in the original picture are smiling.
	It's so nice that they're doing all of the dirty work for us to fact check instead of letting us just do it on our own.
	Because we were told, you know, doing your own research is a right-wing thing to do.
	Don't do your own research.
	That's how you get duped.
	Until it comes time for them to...
	The very same people said, don't do your own research.
	Google Project 2025.
	Google Project 2025.
	You might find out that it might make a whole hell of a lot of sense.
	Backlash against meta and Facebook comes as big tech concern, yada, yada.
	More election interference.
	Okay, so let's see what happens here.
	On Monday, Google users were surprised to find the website's autocomplete feature omitting references to the assassination attempt.
	Instead, it recommended other search results, such as the failed assassination of Ronald Reagan.
	It did not offer any additional results.
	A Google spokesperson later told Fox News that there was no, quote, manual action taken on these predictions.
	Okay. So there's algorithmic action.
	Big freaking deal.
	Quote, our systems have protections against auto-complete protections associated with political violence, which were working as intended prior to this horrific image.
	Unbelievable. So they censored the image because it was wrongly labeled as doctored, and now they censored the search results from the assassination because they wrongly associated it with political violence.
	This is not even a with.
	This is conspiracy.
	In real time, actual conspiracy.
	First, it's not happening.
	Okay, it's happening, but it's a mistake.
	Company spokesperson added that the autocomplete feature is, quote, just a tool to help people save time.
	Yeah, and how does it do that?
	By recommending, suggesting the search that the most amount of people are currently searching for.
	What does Gary Vaynerchuk have to do with this?
	Why does he have to be, uh...
	He was up in the thinking.
	Okay, so Gary Vaynerchuk.
	Vaynerchuk Media Reacts to Meta's Political Ad Rules on the Clayman Countdown.
	Okay, fine.
	So that was that.
	I'm not sure.
	Outrageous. So they were censoring the image.
	They are censoring the search results, or still are.
	Let me see, actually, if they still are.
	Let's do this in real time here.
	Share screen.
	New tab.
	Assassination. Oh, there you go.
	Look at this.
	Assassination. Now it's coming up.
	Attempt. Well, it's still pretty...
	On presidents.
	On Truman.
	On U.S. presidents.
	On Reagan.
	On Hitler.
	On Castro.
	No, no.
	That's definitely not what we're looking at.
	Assassination Trump.
	Well, at least we got that here.
	And then we got search results.
	So that's what's going on here.
	It's everything they did during 2020.
	And understand that, by the way.
	Intelligence came out and lied about the Hunter Biden laptop.
	Social media operating under the lever of, I think it was James Baker at the time, the former FBI general counsel.
	Intelligence lying about the Hunter Biden laptop, social media censoring it.
	It had a determinate impact on the outcome of the election.
	2024, four years later, intelligence lying about the Trump assassination.
	Intelligence lying about what happened, what didn't happen, and social media, big tech, censoring search results to put their fingers on the lever.
	Okay. Let's get into the hearing.
	But before we do that, let's just go to a couple of these.
	Safe travels.
	David would say, That means something about the path.
	Oh, maybe tzlicha means safe.
	I can read it.
	Can't necessarily make out what it says.
	Okay, hold on.
	We got Cliff Norman in the house who says, largest surrender of the American army to Stonewall Jackson in history and would stand until World War II.
	Union forces had capitulated.
	More than 12,000 troops surrendered.
	It was the largest surrender of the Union forces during the war and the largest in U.S. history until the surrender of MacArthur's army in the Philippines.
	And you know where it happened, people?
	Right where I am right now.
	Amazing. History is amazing, but it only makes sense if you've lived long enough.
	Okay, let me go into...
	We're live on here.
	Okay, good, good, good.
	All right.
	We're good.
	Sorry, one more thing before we even go here.
	As we travel on the road, people, and it's very difficult to get fruits and veggies.
	How do you get your fruits and veggies?
	He's fully immersed in a game of Fortnite.
	It's very tough.
	We could only get pizza last night, by the way.
	We could only get pizza, and I called a pizza place, and I'm not faulting, there might have been some language barriers, but I'm not faulting anybody for anything.
	I said, have you got any vegetables?
	Can I get a salad?
	And they said, we have a vegetarian pizza.
	I was like, you don't have any salads?
	No. I was like, alright, so can I get a half veggie lover pizza and a half pepperoni?
	And now that I know, what comes on the veggie lover pizza?
	Red peppers, green peppers, onions, what else was there?
	Mushrooms. I was like, okay, cool.
	Instead of putting those on a pizza, can you just put those in a cup?
	Just put those in a cup and send them with me.
	I'll pay for a salad.
	Just put those veggies without the onions.
	So help me, goodness, don't put any onions in there.
	Can you just put them in a cup?
	What we had there was a failure to communicate.
	So I had to eat pizza and it made me sick.
	It's very difficult to get your fruits and veggies when you're on the road.
	And most people do not appreciate that you're supposed to have between five and seven servings of raw fruits and vegetables a day.
	And most people don't do that.
	A small regret is slouching in the dentist's chair thinking I should have brushed my teeth better.
	A big health regret is not listening to a doctor and thinking I should have paid more attention to my nutrition when I was younger.
	Better health today and when it matters most is why I ingest Field of Greens, especially when I cannot get my raw fruits and veggies.
	It's unlike any other fruit or vegetable green product.
	Field of Greens isn't watered down extracts.
	It isn't a supplement.
	It is an organic superfood.
	It is desiccated fruits and vegetables, not an extract, not a supplement, pulverized.
	You mix it together in water.
	It's delicious.
	It's whole fruits and vegetables.
	Each fruit and vegetable was selected by doctors to support vital body functions like heart, liver, kidneys, metabolism, and immune systems.
	And only Field of Greens is backed by a better health promise.
	At your next checkup, your doctor will notice your improved health or your money back.
	Don't look back and say, I should have paid attention to nutrition when I was younger.
	Field of Greens is a key to better health today when it matters most.
	Exercise, eat healthy, get your fruits and vegetables, and take Field of Greens.
	Substitute out a bad habit for a healthy habit.
	Let's get you started with 15% off and free shipping.
	Visit fieldofgreens.com.
	It brings you to Brickhouse Nutrition.
	Fieldofgreens.com.
	Promo code VIVA.
	Promo code forward slash Viva and it'll get you 15% off and free shipping.
	Fieldofgreens.com.
	Bada bing, bada boom, booyah.
	Oh, people.
	Finboy Slick in the house.
	What does he say?
	Google doesn't want to recommend the word attempt.
	There is no other way to view what happened to Trump.
	By the way, I didn't share this.
	It's amazing.
	We're going to get the exclusive now.
	I was watching the live stream on CNN.
	And CNN, even on their own stream, ran a poll.
	And the question was, what more can Secret Service reveal in this hearing?
	And the options were security sabotage, security failure, dereliction of duty, and too complicated.
	Now, I obviously voted for sabotage.
	As did nearly 50%.
	I don't know if you can see that.
	47% of CNN's own viewers think that...
	I mean, the question's a little bit odd.
	It says, what more can Secret Service reveal in this hearing?
	Bottom line, 50% nearly of CNN's own crowd, and that's 50% on a four-choice option, believe security sabotage would be revealed or could be revealed or might be revealed.
	Bottom line, that is possible.
	And there is no other way, no other way to think about it.
	Okay, I'm going to play one clip right now, which is the timeline.
	It's a bit of a long clip, but we're going to watch it because it's critical.
	And I'm going to pause it each step of the way, and we're going to listen to this.
	This is Acting Secret Service.
	Okay, I thought Acting Secret Service Director.
	You know where the word testify comes from?
	Holding your testes and taking it out, something along those lines.
	Okay, this is the timeline.
	And I have to stop using the expression, certain expressions about blowing one's psyche.
	I'm going to just have to filter that expression out of my vocabulary.
	It's going to enrage you.
	There is no way to listen to this timeline, as it's known today, nearly three weeks out, and think this was anything other than a deliberate sabotage to have Trump be, as Benny Johnson is called, Benny Thompson, Benny Johnson, in the kill box.
	For this guy to do what he wants.
	And I still do not believe that this kid, Crooks, was unknown to FBI or intelligence.
	I know they say he wasn't in their holdings.
	I still don't know what that means.
	My humble belief, and I know that it's not yet borne out by any tangible evidence, Crooks was not unknown to the FBI or intelligence in the days and weeks leading up to this.
	That's my prediction.
	Next, I want to provide a brief highlighted overview of the timeline established to date through witness interviews and other information.
	Again, this is our understanding at present and is subject to change and further refinement as more facts are collected.
	On July 3rd, the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania was announced.
	On July 6th, the shooter registered to attend the rally and performed a search for, quote, how far was Oswald from Kennedy?
	On July 7th, the shooter traveled from his home to the Butler Farm Show grounds and remained there for approximately 20 minutes.
	Okay, so just stopping here, this is now known.
	This is the timeline as it's known now, but some of the stuff wasn't known prior to.
	So the fact that he looked up how far was Oswald is known now, but nobody knew it at the time.
	I don't want to also live in a world where people are going to say that search result should have led to, I don't know, police.
	Tracking the VPN, getting information, and raiding the kid's house.
	So yeah, we also want to make sure not to have a knee-jerk reaction to say, oh, supervise the internet a little more.
	If someone looks up something scary, pay him a little visit.
	That's not the world we should be living in.
	Okay, let's let this go.
	We assess the show's advanced planning and reconnaissance on his part.
	On July 12th, the shooter traveled from his home to the Clareton Sportsman Club, where he practiced shooting.
	July 12th is the day before.
	This kid obviously had more training than just the day before, but the day before, after having searched that, he's going out and practicing.
	On the morning of July 13th, at approximately 10 a.m., the shooter returned to the farm show grounds and remained there for about 70 minutes before returning home again.
	At approximately 1.30 p.m., while at the residence, the shooter's father gave him a rifle for the purpose, he believed, of going back to the sportsman club.
	About 25 minutes later, the shooter purchased ammunition while en route to the Butler Farm Show grounds.
	Now, there were some rumors earlier on that the father called the police and reported a gun missing.
	So I'm not sure what's true.
	What rumor was ultimately confirmed to be just rumor?
	Right now, it sounds like the kid just took the gun to go shooting, according to the father.
	But I believe that I had heard prior that the father reported the gun missing and that his kid was having something of a mental health crisis.
	Also, how long until the parents get sued?
	How long until people denying this violent event get sued in order to pay a billion dollars in damages?
	The subject then arrived at the scene and was moving around the farm showgrounds close to the American Glass Research AGR building from which he ultimately committed the attack.
	Close to the AGR building, which was not included in the security printer.
	So they had a nice carve-out for that building.
	No one was on it.
	No one was on the roof.
	This guy ultimately testifies, I don't know why no one was on the roof.
	We're still trying to find that out.
	And two and a half weeks out, doesn't have that answer.
	Shortly thereafter, at approximately 3.51 p.m., the shooter flew a drone approximately 200 yards from the farm show grounds for about 11 minutes.
	The drone and controller were later found in the subject's car.
	Analysis has not revealed any photos or video taken by the drone, but we can confirm that he was live streaming at the time and would have been able to view it on his controller.
	200 yards is nothing, and the range of drones is substantial, like 5 kilometers, but by law you're not allowed flying a drone further than unassisted eyesight, and I know this because I took my drone license class and passed with flying colors.
	I wanted to highlight something else here.
	It's not yet known if it was known that he was flying the drone prior to the event.
	Oh, that's what it was.
	I don't know how it works for creating zones, security zones, that a drone will read not to be able to fly in, but they do this, DJI in particular, if there's a reported air zone or sometimes, I think, natural disasters.
	I don't know how it works, but they can program no-fly zones where the drone won't go into that zone, period, or there will be certain restrictions, like it won't go above a certain height that is not allowed to go above.
	Those Lime scooters have the same thing, where I think they can get updated, and I don't know if Secret Service has the ability to cordon off digitally, electronically, a zone in which drones ought not be flown, given the fact there's going to be an event.
	Don't know that, and that was not revealed today either.
	Press play.
	The first reported sighting the shooter by local law enforcement was at approximately 4.26 p.m.
	The shooting was at 6.11 or 6.12.
	Today I heard 6.12, and that's also a poignant verse in the Bible, but just understand that.
	We're like an hour and 40 minutes before the shooting.
	At approximately 5.10 p.m., the shooter was again identified by local law enforcement.
	Why? At about 5.32pm, local SWAT observed the shooter next to the AGR building, using his phone, browsing news sites, and with a rangefinder.
	So suspicious, virtually an hour before the shooting.
	They take a picture of him.
	45 minutes before the shooting, they see him again, acting suspicious, carrying a rangefinder.
	One of the questions that we're going to get to, I think it was Holly.
	What more do you need?
	Oh, well, we lost him.
	Oh, okay, so you lost him.
	You took Trump out on stage, knowing that this kid with a rangefinder was unaccounted for.
	At approximately 5.38 p.m., the photo of the shooter taken earlier was sent to local SWAT operators in a text message group.
	Picture sent to SWAT operators, the local SWAT, not the Secret Service, counter snipers.
	Subsequently, approximately 25 minutes prior to the shooting, the U.S. Secret Service command post was notified of a suspicious person.
	It really pisses me off, like, having this discussion with people.
	What more would you need to see in order to understand that this was a me-hop or a with, that they wanted this to happen?
	What more would you need to see?
	Would you need to see text messages laying this out?
	That's not how it works.
	Now, let's just bring this back.
	Now, Secret Service notes.
	...
	and with a range finder.
	At approximately 5.38 p.m., the photo of the shooter taken earlier was sent to local SWAT operators in a text message group.
	Subsequently, approximately 25 minutes prior to the shooting, the U.S. Secret Service command post was notified.
	25 minutes before Trump took the stage, they were notified of a secret service, notified of a suspicious person with a rangefinder, but presumably the backpack and the bike was also sent to them.
	Officers lost sight of the subject from approximately 6.02 p.m. to 6.08 p.m., but continued to communicate with each other in an attempt to locate him.
	It's like, oh, they lost sight of him, but they're still being responsible.
	They're trying to locate him.
	Why did they let Trump out?
	Secret Service knew.
	Suspicious kid in the crowd, range finder.
	Oh, we lost him.
	Hey, why'd they let him out?
	Recently discovered video from a local business shows the shooter pulling himself up onto the AGR building rooftop at approximately 6.06 p.m.
	Oh, was that when people were notifying the police that somebody's crawling on a roof?
	At approximately 6.08 p.m., the subject was observed on the roof by local law enforcement.
	Sorry, what time was that at?
	At approximately 6.08 p.m., the subject was observed on the roof by local law enforcement.
	Three minutes on the roof.
	Did they see that he had a gun at that point?
	Because presumably he did.
	At approximately 6.11 p.m., a local police officer who was lifted to the roof by another officer saw the shooter and radioed that he was armed with, quote, a long gun.
	Within approximately the next 30 seconds, the shots were fired.
	The evidence recovery team found eight shell casings at the scene next to the shooter's body.
	We believe the subject, the shooter, fired eight rounds.
	While the investigation...
	Notice they're still, they say, we found eight casings.
	We believe that he fired eight rounds.
	They're still being equivocal about that.
	I'm not suggesting two shooters and they planted the five shots.
	I'm not suggesting that.
	I know some people believe that.
	But they're being quite equivocal with the fact that there were eight.
	Shell's found, but we believe that he fired all these.
	...
	has not determined motive.
	The investigative team continues to review information from legal returns, including online and social media accounts.
	Something just very recently on the cover that I want to share is a social media account, which is believed to be associated with the shooter in about the 2019-2020 timeframe.
	2019, 2020.
	They just discovered a four-year-old social media account.
	Why don't they just disclose this so that the fine folks on 4chan can actually discover the information?
	Can you imagine the guys and the gals or the people on 4chan are better at intelligence than the FBI and the Secret Service and the CIA?
	Just open it up to the public.
	Crowdsource the truth here.
	Crowdsource the information.
	Crowdsourced the aggregate knowledge of the internet.
	They found a four-year-old social media account, wait for it, anti-Semitism and racism.
	...
	100 comments posted from this account.
	Some of these comments, if ultimately attributable to the shooter, appear to reflect anti-Semitic and anti-immigration themes to espouse political violence and are described as extreme in nature.
	So, it's a guy who's an anti-Semite and an anti-immigrant.
	Who's then going to attempt to assassinate the president that is called and accused of being an anti-Semite and an anti-immigrant.
	That makes total sense.
	Oh, no, but now they're going to get to frame this as a far-right extremist who tried to assassinate Donald Trump and not a batshit crazy lefty who had been groomed by the FBI.
	That's my theory.
	It's wild.
	Oh, we just discovered hundreds of comments from four years.
	So when the kid was...
	16? You found racist and anti-immigrant comments from a 16-year-old in video games?
	While the investigative team is still working to verify this account to determine if it did in fact belong to the shooter, we believe it important to share and note it today, particularly given the general absence of other information to date from social media and other sources of information that reflect on the shooter's potential motive and mindset.
	So we found nothing recent.
	We found four-year-old comments, anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant in Asia, which is why he went to assassinate the president that people accused of being anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant.
	He went on a four-year hiatus after that.
	I believe it.
	In as much as I believe the FBI, Secret Service and Intelligence was involved in this, why the hell would I believe something so implausibly stupid?
	These are the facts that the investigation has revealed to date.
	While the shooter is dead, our work is very much ongoing and urgent.
	Thank you, and I look forward to answering any and all questions.
	I thought he was going to do something even super like, while the shooter is dead, our work is very much alive.
	Investigation has revealed to date, while the shooter is from social media and other sources of information that reflect on the shooter's potential motive and mindset.
	Here, right here.
	These are the facts, in part, that the investigation has revealed.
	These are the facts, in part.
	What facts are you not telling us then?
	Like, I thought that was, and I think that's a Freudian slip because he almost, like, tried to swallow his tongue right after.
	These are the facts, in part.
	These are the facts, in part, that the investigation has revealed to date while the shooter is dead.
	So I think that was something of a Freudian slip there, people.
	And I believe that.
	Let me just link to the tweet here.
	So I'm going to give you all the links to the tweet.
	That's in Rumble.
	Let me see what's going on in YouTube.
	Link here.
	And I'll put it in VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com And here, link to the tweet.
	So that's the timeline so everybody can appreciate that, digest that, and come out and tell me, yeah, yeah.
	Alright, so...
	I mean, it should make you mad.
	It should enrage you.
	And it should make you understand that they put Trump up on stage to be murdered in front of all of America, like JFK was murdered graphically, brutally in front of America, and it demoralized the nation for...
	Some people say that America never recovered from the assassination of JFK.
	This was intended to be JFK in HD.
	And the media's...
	Trying to run off with other stories.
	The Brat campaign is doing so well.
	Let's just ignore the fact that Secret Service just allowed this to happen.
	An attempted assassination on the president.
	Do not let up on this.
	And do not ever be demoralized into apathy at what they try to do.
	Viva, you are just a weird, crazy cat lady.
	I don't know if I'm doing this right.
	Just copy what I see on X. Oh, yeah, you know, the weird.
	J.D. Vance is weird.
	A man who's married with kids, served the military, he's weird.
	But the people who go by Zzer pronouns, who record, I don't care that it was gay sex, record sex in the Senate, the people who flash their fake tranny titties on the White House lawn, they're calling J.D. Vance weird.
	Holy hell, the iron law of woke projection.
	What do we got here?
	Leftists can be anti-Semites too.
	They're the worst.
	Leftists are the most bigoted people.
	When you have white dudes for Kamala, I don't know what's parody anymore.
	When you have white dudes for Kamala because black women can't do it on their own, I'm like, do you not understand that that's the most racist white savior complex on earth?
	That's the definition of racism.
	Black women can't do it on their own.
	They need white men to help them.
	It's crazy.
	I think that was a tongue-in-cheek.
	Finboy Slick says, I have a pretty cool meme based on the movie Snatch that I wanted to share with you all on Sunday because it's one of Barnes' favorite movie.
	I have to watch Snatch again.
	Today, I think, as we're doing the podcast, I'm going to have my kid watch The Patriot.
	I think it's a little violent, but we watched Gladiator unscathed, so I think we can watch that.
	So that's the timeline.
	And come to whatever conclusions you want to come to.
	About the timeline.
	The other thing, this is not in any chronological order of the hearing.
	You do recall the other day when Christopher Ratface Ray, I don't know, Rat Ray.
	Rat Ray.
	Christopher Rat Ray gets out there and says, it could have been a shrapnel from the teleprompter that caught Trump's ear.
	And that is all that the rabid, violent denial, conspiracy theory, tinfoil hat wearing lunatics on the left needed to hear in order to run with the...
	Oh my god, even the FBI Director Christopher Wray confirmed that it could have been a piece of the shrapnel and they're not sure.
	Well, shut all of your filthy mouths, you bunch of scoundrel hypocrites.
	This was a question unequivocal, quite clear from today, and the answer also unequivocal, but the answer, oh, it just missed one follow-up question, which I'll add after we play this.
	Mr. Abate, am I saying your name right?
	Yes, Senator, thank you.
	You are the Deputy...
	Director of the FBI, is that correct?
	Yes, Senator.
	Is there any doubt in your mind or in the collective mind of the FBI that President Trump was shot in the ear by a bullet fired by the assassin Crooks?
	Senator, there is absolutely no doubt.
	In the FBI's mind, whether former President Trump was hit with a bullet and mooted in the ear.
	There never has been.
	Let me just pause it.
	No doubt there never has been that Trump was struck by anything other than a bullet in his ear.
	In other words, there is no doubt and never has been that it was a bullet that struck Trump in the ear.
	No doubt, never has been.
	The very beginning, and that has never been raised.
	You're sure?
	Yes. It wasn't a space laser.
	But was it a Jewish space laser?
	That's what I want to know.
	I know what he's doing here, but this, I thought this was stupid, but I'll let it go.
	It wasn't a murder hornet.
	Murder hornet is not a bad suggestion either.
	Have you ever seen a murder hornet, people?
	They're massive.
	And they're murderous.
	They're big-ass murder hornets from Japan, okay?
	Absolutely not.
	It wasn't Sasquatch.
	No, Senator.
	It was a bullet.
	It was a bullet, Senator.
	Fired by crooks.
	Yes, sir.
	That hit President Trump in the ear and almost killed him.
	100%, Senator.
	And I would have followed it up with, then why the hell did Christopher Wray suggest it was a piece of the teleprompter, you dirty, rotten scoundrels?
	Answer that question.
	It was a bullet, 100%, that hit Trump.
	Then why, in the name of sweet holy hell, did Christopher Wray get up there and spread narrative-changing disinformation?
	Oh! Does it sound like what they did in 2020?
	The Hunter Biden laptop bears all the earmarks of Russian information campaign.
	Why the hell would Christopher Wray get out there and say that, if not, to alter the news cycle and plant a seed in people's heads that some people won't even know was planted there?
	I mean, it's that alone is confirmation that Christopher Wray, if he wasn't in on the me-hop, he's in on the cover-up.
	These people are investigating themselves, and while they're doing it, they're lying like the dirty, rotten finks that they are.
	And when I say Noman S. Oman, that guy's name is Abate.
	It's A-B-B-A-T-E.
	Actually, there's an Abate on the Howard Stern thing.
	So his name is A-B-B-A-T-E.
	They pronounce it Abate.
	Do you know what abate means?
	Of something perceived as hostile, threatening, or negative, become less intense or widespread.
	Is it wild, people?
	I don't believe in this matrix, not matrix, simulation theory.
	But my goodness, the humor that the man up there right now trying to placate, downplay, undermine the gravity.
	The egregious let it happen or made it happen on purpose of this entire failed Trump assassination attempt.
	His name is pronounced Abate, which literally means to reduce, become less intense or widespread of something negative.
	It's hilarious, except it's not funny.
	Okay. Okay.
	Okay. Okay.
	So we can go.
	That's funny.
	If anyone didn't know that, but that's what Abate.
	You got Abate who's trying to downplay this.
	You got Lever.
	Lever. Is it Meta?
	I forget which one it was.
	Facebook. Who's pulling the levers?
	You got Anthony Weiner sending dick pics.
	You got who else?
	There's so many names.
	Ray. Do you know what?
	I guarantee you W-R-A-Y means something.
	I used to play a lot of Scrabble when I was a kid.
	Ray, definition.
	Shut the front door.
	Christopher Ray.
	They say it's obsolete now, your dictionary.
	Christopher Wray.
	Okay, maybe to reveal.
	That might be like an urban dictionary.
	Hold on.
	Wray. Oxford English Dictionary.
	Let's see what it means.
	Wray. What does Wray mean?
	This is one of the meanings.
	This word is obsolete.
	It's only recorded in the early 1600s.
	Well, what does it mean?
	Ray is perhaps a variant of a...
	Well, what did it mean in the 1600s?
	Ah, whatever.
	We'll find that.
	Oh, no.
	Now I'm kind of...
	Merriam-Webster.
	Ah, whatever.
	I'm sure there's a funny one there.
	Ray. Ray is a very intelligent, sweet, nice Joker guy.
	Okay, I forgot.
	So there's some funny things going on with the names.
	But okay, all right.
	So now we've got the timeline.
	We've got a disputed fact that Christopher Ratface Ray planted that seed of disinformation for which he should be fired.
	Straight up.
	There was never any doubt.
	Why would there be?
	In our community, Ray, transitive verb to reveal, to disclose.
	What's the source on that?
	you.
	That's very funny.
	Anyhow. Dude, get those feet out of there.
	Now that I see them, they're bothering me.
	So we got the timeline.
	We've got a crucial fact that has now been confirmed.
	Christopher Roy should be fired for having lied to the people.
	Get out of here.
	And let's get...
	Do I want to go to...
	Oh, my goodness.
	There's just so many good ones here.
	I'll get to the joke afterwards.
	All right, let's go to...
	Who's this woman?
	She's a Democrat.
	So you know that she's...
	Oh, it's Klobuchar.
	Yeah, okay, fine here.
	Let's see what Klobuchar has to say.
	These people, they invoke their own insanity and try to...
	Guilt by association to other people by lumping them together with their own insanity.
	It was insanity, stupidity, that people were purporting that Trump was not hitting the ear with a bullet.
	And it was, oddly enough, the lefty Democrats who accused the righty tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists, people, of being tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists.
	Listen to this.
	For the people in my state that keep asking me, I just don't get how he got on the roof.
	I know we've gone through great details and a lot of examination.
	It's so...
	It's implausibly insane that even the people on the left think that it has to be a conspiracy because it's so egregious.
	We're looking at the same thing.
	They just want to decipher, they want to derive another conspiracy from it, which is that it didn't happen or that Trump set it up.
	It's so egregious that nobody can buy how this kid got on the roof.
	They just can't buy the timeline.
	So they have to come up with their own conspiracy and their own conspiracy.
	Trump did it to himself.
	He had a little razor blade in his hand, you know, because he's into all sorts of theatrics.
	So he cut his own ear and he killed one of his own supporters to really sell it.
	Or the guy wasn't killed, in which case whoever says that should be sued for a billion dollars.
	That's their conspiracy theory.
	Listen to this.
	For the people in my state that keep asking me, I just don't get how he got on the roof.
	I know we've gone through great details and a lot of examination.
	Could you just give a minute on...
	What went wrong and how you think it can be fixed?
	I think it's just going to help you dispel the conspiracy theories.
	There are some people that think it didn't really happen, which of course is completely ridiculous.
	It did.
	There are some people that think all kinds of conspiracies went on within the government, which is also false.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	I'm sorry.
	Why is that false?
	Oh, I'm sorry, because that's as false as saying it didn't happen.
	People within the government colluded or colluded actively or passively.
	I'm sorry, Klobuchar, why is that false?
	Not only do I ask you why is that false, I'm listening to the testimony and I'm saying they are all but confirming that that's what happened.
	That's also false.
	So we can just dispel the government, the intelligence participating in this because, you know, I got my own nutcase lefties on the left who think it never happened.
	So let's just pull them all together and throw them out.
	Okay, but let's hear it.
	Listen to this.
	How did this happen?
	But could you just tell them what went wrong so they understand?
	What went wrong is that Crooks missed his shots.
	Thank you, Senator.
	I thought long and hard about this.
	I think this was a failure of imagination.
	Oh, we must become unburdened by what has been in the pursuit of what can be.
	You know, that's actually even better than what she said.
	I still don't understand what Kamala Harris is saying.
	A failure of imagination?
	Who could have ever thought that a sniper who wants to kill a president would pick the most perfect line of shot from an elevated position at 120 yards?
	Yeah, what we had was a failure of imagination.
	Holy crap.
	Senator, I thought long and hard about this.
	I think this was a failure of imagination.
	A failure to imagine that we actually do live.
	In a very dangerous world, where people do actually want to do harm to our protectees.
	I think it was a failure to challenge our own assumptions.
	The assumptions that we know our partners are going to do everything they can.
	And they do this every day.
	They do this every day.
	There's so much that's wrong with this.
	I want to put my fist through my computer screen.
	We have a failure to imagination.
	Where people do actually want to do harm to the nation.
	A failure to imagine that we actually do live in a very dangerous world.
	People do actually want to do harm to our protectees.
	A failure of imagining, that is literally your job.
	Literally. To protect your protectees because we live in a world where people want to do them harm.
	The failure of imagination.
	On behalf of the people whose job it is not just to understand that that's reality, but then to think like the people who would do the ill.
	A failure of imagination?
	No. What you have is a failure to think.
	It's not even a failure to think, because I don't believe it was a failure to think.
	You knew damn well there were people who want to kill Trump.
	Iranians had just reissued a threat to Trump.
	There are people all the time who want to take people out, and if they're going to do it, elevated positions.
	With a clear line of sight within short range is you didn't have a failure of imagination.
	You had a failure of execution on the one hand and a failure of thought on the other.
	But it gets worse.
	I think it was a failure to challenge our own assumptions.
	The assumptions that we know our partners are going to do everything they can.
	And they do this every day.
	They do this every day.
	They do this every day is not an explanation for how they didn't do it.
	101 on that day.
	It's actually evidence that they let it happen, that they deliberately did not do what they do every day, 101 on that particular day.
	But we didn't challenge our own assumptions of, we assume that someone's going to cover that.
	We assume that there's going to be uniform presence.
	We didn't challenge that internally during that advance.
	So in other words, you didn't do your job.
	Not, oh, we, not, how could this have happened?
	We did everything right.
	This is, how could this have happened?
	We did everything wrong.
	Oh, we just assumed someone would be on that building.
	So in other words, you didn't do your job.
	How can we prevent this from happening again?
	It's not like this was something unforeseeable.
	Someone actually deviously, you know, sat on that building for four days, painted himself white with stripes to fit in, and at the last minute of waiting four days straight, took the shot.
	This wasn't something that happened because of unforeseeables.
	This was something that happened because of absolute, egregious, incompetent oversight or deliberate oversight.
	We just assumed there would be someone on the building.
	Oh, then why did the snipers on the other building see it?
	Oh. Look at his face.
	He's so sympathetic.
	Moving forward, I've directed that when we're talking to people and we're making requests, we are very specific about what we want.
	I'm sorry.
	Have you not been specific about what you want in your job in the past?
	This sounds like it's the first time they've ever done this.
	Oh, we just figured it out.
	We're going to make sure we give good instructions, clear instructions, and that they are following the good and clear instructions.
	We're going to do that going forward.
	It'll never happen again, people.
	You say this will never happen again, that would be in the context of something where it was unforeseeable how the person did it.
	Not where it was unexplainable how you allowed it to happen.
	Going forward, we figured it out, people.
	Give me a raise.
	We're going to give good instructions.
	We're going to make sure that they're following the good instructions, and we're going to follow up on those good instructions.
	Yes! Take that, Iran.
	Don't you even think about trying anything like this.
	Providing explicit instructions on exactly what our expectation is, and what we need them to do, and what we want them to do.
	What the hell have you been doing leading up to now?
	This is their big revelation.
	We've got to give them good, clear instructions and tell them what we need them to do and make sure they do it.
	This guy comes up in front of Congress.
	This is a jackass.
	But he's not a jackass.
	He's a culpable participant either in the Made It Happen on Purpose or the cover-up.
	I'm just a neurotic kid of a neurotic mother.
	I would go there and I would be great intelligence.
	I would be great security.
	I would say, not just the ruse.
	When was the perimeter last checked for people who might be hanging out in crawl spaces for four days?
	I'm just obsessively neurotic.
	The roof would have not just been like, oh, that would have been number one.
	This guy's like, oh, we just figured out how to do our jobs.
	It'll never happen again.
	Fired. And people need to go to jail.
	I'm going to let this play.
	Sorry. That's the only way that we're going to be able to move forward beyond this.
	And let me just tell you that our state and local law enforcement partners are the best.
	They're the best.
	This belief that somehow they are less than federal law enforcement or they're less than the Secret Service.
	They're out there patrolling communities every day.
	They're the ones out there going into hazardous conditions every day.
	They know their communities.
	They have the ability to enforce state and local laws.
	Our advance agents do not.
	Right. We need them, and we need them to be partners with us, and I think we need to be very clear to them, and that may have contributed to this situation.
	It may.
	It may have.
	What an effing joke.
	Here, let me give you that link.
	Link here.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	You can share that around.
	This is all evidence for later.
	This is all documenting in real time.
	Because you never know when this is going to be.
	Memory hold from the interwebs.
	Link. Oh my goodness.
	Yeah, we need to make sure.
	By the way...
	Okay, what was the next one here?
	Okay, this one's a long one.
	And this one's going to be the last one.
	Oh my goodness.
	Hold on.
	Before I go there, let me just make sure that I got all the latest tips.
	Sorry to nag, but play the meme, Viva.
	It's on topic.
	Hold on.
	Don't be...
	So hold on.
	Let me get this here.
	We've got something in our...
	Oh, this is on...
	Okay, hold on.
	Let's see what this meme is.
	Let's see the meme.
	Okay, so...
	Okay, this looks cool.
	Snitch. Okay, let me bring this up because this looks like someone put some time and effort into this.
	A politician?
	Well, to be technical, he's precedent, but...
	Who is president?
	I've been dealing with those politician darks.
	Give me a name.
	Donald. Donald Trump.
	Yeah. As in Trump the bullet dodger.
	Why do they call him the bullet dodger?
	Of course he dodged his bullets, Feebo.
	He won't fall.
	you.
	Okay, it's amazing.
	But I have to go back and watch Snatch now.
	I haven't seen Snatch in a very, very long time.
	Finboy, it's a work of art.
	It's a work of science and art.
	Let me scroll down to the bottom here.
	Pennsylvania, where Biden and Trump were tied Biden's home state.
	Jill and Cackles in Pennsylvania the same weekend as Trump.
	Oh, no, I can actually bring this up here.
	It's certainly a way to explain how resources were spread thin.
	Oh, you need to check out the work being done by John Cullen, says KS Kingford.
	I certainly will.
	All right, let me bring up the last one here.
	This is a bit of a long clip, and we want to go through it because it's just a thing of beauty.
	This is Holly, Rep Holly.
	The moment of the day, last seven minutes.
	So from this vantage point, as the law enforcement who are in those windows, as they look left, they should be able to see the shooter clearly there on the AGR second floor roof.
	My question is, Why is there not a Secret Service counter-sniper on that roof?
	Listen to the answer.
	Why wasn't there a sniper on the roof?
	Our methodology is to look at things that can see in on our protectees so that they can provide that coverage.
	Why is there not a Secret Service counter-sniper there with clear line of sight?
	That roof has a clear line of sight to the former president.
	Why didn't you put a Secret Service counter-sniper there?
	Simple question.
	The Secret Service's counter-sniper role is to neutralize those threats that are looking in on us from where the protectee is.
	Do you understand that he asked him a question and he's answering something that does not answer the question?
	Why wasn't there one there?
	The role is to neutralize.
	Now, what he gets to is that the snipers, the other two snipers behind President Trump, should have been surveilling and would have neutralized the threat if they had seen it.
	Then the question becomes, why didn't they see it?
	But why wasn't there someone on the roof?
	There with clear line of sight.
	That roof has a clear line of sight to the former president.
	Why didn't you put a Secret Service counter-sniper there?
	The Secret Service's counter-sniper role is to neutralize those threats that are looking in on us.
	Thanks. Why wasn't there one there?
	From where the protectee is.
	Not necessarily in this position.
	You think maybe you might want to revise that protocol in light of what happened here?
	They were protecting the principal.
	The principal got shot.
	I understand that, sir.
	So do you think you might want to revise the protocol?
	Let me ask you this.
	Who was the lead site agent who made the decision to leave the AGR building completely outside of the security perimeter?
	Who was that?
	Senator, I cannot give you that name.
	This person is operational.
	They're still doing investigations.
	They're still doing protective visits.
	The person who decided to exclude the AGR building from the security perimeter is still working.
	Relieved of duty.
	Senator, they have not been relieved of duty.
	I know their name, by the way.
	Why have they not been relieved of duty?
	They are still cooperating, not only being interviewed by the FBI.
	They're still cooperating.
	So we're keeping them employed to ensure that they continue to cooperate?
	Oh, they're cooperating so they get to still do their job?
	That they are grievously, and I would say criminally negligent at?
	I'm sorry, what more do you need to hear?
	In order to understand or be convinced that this was a plan, a setup, a staged coup.
	The person who deliberately chose to exclude the AGR building from the security perimeter is still working and still doing investigations and still cooperating so I guess they get to keep their job, at which they grievously failed.
	One person's dead, two people grievously injured, and Trump, but for the grace of God, clipped his ear.
	It's just...
	But also by our Office of Professional Responsibility.
	And we will let the facts of the mission assurance and any further investigations play out.
	Isn't the fact that a former president was shot, that a good American is dead, that other Americans were critically wounded, isn't that enough mission failure for you to say that the person who decided that that building should not be the security perimeter probably ought to be stepped down?
	Senator, I think you're using the word decided, and I think we need to allow the investigation play out to include...
	Okay, so who did make the decision?
	You see what he says right here, by the way, this guy.
	Abate. Abate.
	You say decided.
	The person might not have decided to exclude it.
	They just might not have seen it.
	It might have been an omission.
	They didn't decide actively not to include it.
	They just forgot to.
	So we don't want to fire the person if they just forgot to.
	They might not have actually visited the premises before they established the perimeter.
	The problem is this.
	The exclusion of the AGR building had to have been an active decision.
	It could not have been something where someone said, I didn't go to the premises and I didn't know there was a building there.
	Because it was literally carved out of what would otherwise be just a big circle perimeter.
	Well, you're saying decided.
	They might not have decided to do it, so we don't want to fire someone if we don't know they actually made a decision that could have resulted in Trump being killed.
	The question I would have asked if I was Holly was, if Trump had been killed, would this person be fired?
	If it wasn't the lead side agent who made the decision, not to put that in security permit.
	Senator, you're zeroing in on one particular agent.
	I want to find out exactly what was the entire decision process.
	What the hell?
	You're focusing, damn right, I'm focusing on one agent.
	Who made the criminal?
	Who made the fatal decision?
	Because it was fatal.
	Not for Trump, but for Corey Comparatore.
	Who made that fatal decision?
	Oh, I just want to get a brawl bigger.
	No! Who made that decision?
	Just tell me, and why are they still working?
	I think, yeah, I want to be neutral and make sure that we get to the bottom of it and interview everybody in order to determine if there was more than one person who perhaps exercised bad judgment.
	Well, sure.
	My question is, why don't you relieve everybody of duty who made bad judgment?
	So yeah, you're right.
	I am zeroing in on somebody.
	I'm trying to find somebody who's accountable here.
	So you're telling me that the person who made the decision not to include this in the perimeter has not been relieved of duty.
	What about the person who's in charge of the interoperability of radio frequencies between local law enforcement and Secret Service?
	Has that person been relieved of duty?
	No, Senator, because interoperability is a challenge, is a greater challenge than just...
	On that day, we had a counterpart system.
	It failed.
	As the person who decided, who made the decision to send Donald Trump onto stage knowing that you had a security situation, has that person been relieved of duty?
	No, sir, they haven't.
	As the person who decided not to pull the former president off of stage when you knew that, in your words, the locals were working a serious security situation, has that person been relieved of duty?
	No, sir.
	Again, I refer you back to my original answer that we are...
	Did you notice his face right here?
	Has the person who decided, who made the decision to send Donald Trump on the stage knowing that you had a security situation, has that person been relieved of duty?
	No, sir, they haven't.
	Has the person who decided not to pull the former president off of...
	That's a Peter Stroke psycho face right there.
	Look at that.
	That's a Peter Stroke psycho face.
	Clip it, snip it, and share it.
	The person who took Trump on stage knowing that there was a lost security threat with a rangefinder near or on a roof.
	That person hasn't been fired either.
	Has that person been criminally charged?
	Because they deserve to be.
	Former president, off of stage, when you knew that, in your words, the locals were working a serious security situation, has that person been relieved of duty?
	No, sir.
	Again, I refer you back to my original answer that we are...
	What more do you need to investigate to know that there were critical enough failures that some individuals ought to be held accountable?
	I mean, what more do you need to know?
	What I need to know is exactly what happened, and I need my investigators to do their job, and I cannot put my thumb on the scale.
	What do you mean put your thumb on the scale?
	You're asking me, Senator, to completely make a rush to judgment about somebody failing.
	Rush to judgment.
	There are some explanations that defy reason.
	There's no rush to judgment.
	Why wasn't that building included in the perimeter?
	I didn't think it was necessary.
	Fired. Why wasn't that building included in the perimeter?
	I didn't see it.
	Fired. Why wasn't that building included in the perimeter?
	I wanted Trump to get shot.
	Fired and criminally charged.
	I'm sorry.
	Why did you do that?
	There are some omissions that will have no proper explanation that would not result in getting fired, at least.
	And this is one of them.
	I acknowledge this was a failure.
	Is it not prima facie that somebody has failed?
	The former president was shot.
	Sir, this could have been our Texas school book to Oh, he's lost sleep.
	Oh, my God.
	Do you understand what's going on here?
	DARVO. Deny, attack, reverse victim and offender.
	Narcissism. This guy's the victim.
	This guy has lost sleep over 17 days.
	And he's getting aggressive with Hawley for asking him why the person who didn't include the building wasn't fired.
	Why the person who brought Trump on stage knowing there was a threat.
	Oh, he's getting mad at Hawley and he's the victim in all of this.
	Pathological. I'll tell you, Senator, that I will not rush to judgment, that people will be held accountable, and I will do so with integrity.
	By the way, people will be held accountable does not mean they get to work until they're held accountable.
	The person who failed at their job should be removed from their job and then held accountable if it's deemed to be worse.
	And not rush to judgment and put people unfairly persecuted.
	Unfairly persecuted.
	Unfairly, sir.
	We have to be able to have a proper Proper investigation into this, Senator.
	You said earlier that you've got to make sure that your protocols are followed, and unless there's a protocol violation, people wouldn't be disciplined.
	I would just say to you, I don't really care that much about your protocols.
	I think if your protocols don't provide for the fact that when a former president is shot, when an American is killed, when other rally-goers, innocent people who just showed up on the day, when they are shot at and critically wounded, if that isn't a protocol violation, prima facie, you should revise your protocols.
	Senator, I think this is where you and I agree.
	This was a failure, and we will get to the bottom of it.
	Well, I hope you're going to do something about it.
	Let me ask you something else.
	The RealClearPolitics reports this morning that you were directly involved in denying additional security resources and personnel, including counter snipers, not just to this event, but over the last two years that President Trump's team repeatedly asked for these additional resources, and you personally were involved in denying them.
	Is that true?
	Senator, as I stated earlier, that is not true.
	So you never denied any resources to former President Trump?
	I never denied.
	No, not me.
	Not me.
	And you weren't involved.
	Not me.
	I'm going to let this play.
	I saw some commenting.
	Viva, stop interrupting.
	Did you ever deny Trump's additional request?
	No, no, no.
	Not me.
	It's amazing.
	He has my investigators, but when there's a decision that involves him, all of a sudden the me is excluded from it.
	Listen to this.
	I'm going to let it play.
	President Trump's team repeatedly asked for these additional resources, and you personally were involved in denying them.
	Is that true?
	Senator, as I stated earlier, that is not true.
	So you never denied any resources to former President Trump's team?
	No, not me.
	And you weren't involved?
	Not personally.
	You were never involved in the decision-making?
	No, sir, I was not.
	Let me ask you just one or two other things here quickly.
	Liar. Well, whistleblowers tell me that, in fact, law enforcement were stationed to be on that roof.
	And that law enforcement abandoned their post because it was too hot.
	Is that accurate?
	Senator, I have heard that as well.
	Again, they posted up inside.
	And I think moving forward, as I said earlier, we're going to ensure that state and local counter snipers are on roofs.
	But do you know if someone was supposed to be?
	Going forward.
	It's not like, oh, we never thought, we never knew that that's where snipers were shooting.
	We did.
	Going forward, we're going to make sure that there's snipers on roofs.
	Jail. Jail for having said that.
	Going forward, we're going to make sure to do what we always knew had to be done.
	Jail. Be on the roof.
	Do you know if someone was in fact, that's what the whistleblowers tells me, that may or may not be accurate.
	Do you know that to be the fact?
	Was somebody posted to the roof, local law enforcement or whomever?
	I do not know that to be a fact.
	Well, can I ask you why you don't know that?
	Again, Senator.
	We are looking at this and they should have been on that roof.
	And the fact that they were in the building is something that I'm still trying to understand.
	I just want to express my frustration, Director, that 17 days or whatever it's been, that whistleblowers are telling us more than you are and you don't know.
	You haven't ascertained if there was supposed to be law enforcement on the roof.
	That seems like a pretty basic fact.
	I'm also told that local law enforcement suppliers offered the Secret Service drones.
	And you declined them.
	So, Senator, one, I've been very transparent and forthcoming.
	Bullshit! Your agency has not been transparent and forthcoming, so please, let's not go there.
	I have been forthcoming, sir.
	No, you haven't.
	That remains to be seen.
	You've been on the job a few days.
	So far, you've fired nobody.
	Now, the drones.
	Thank you, sir.
	Were you offered drones?
	No, listen, listen to the answer.
	I wasn't offered to fly a drone on that day.
	And why did you deny it?
	Again. I think the ability of local law enforcement to provide an asset, we probably should have taken them up on it if it was offered.
	Can you appreciate what he just said at the end there?
	It was offered.
	Why didn't you do it?
	One, I've been very transparent.
	You fired nobody.
	Now, the drones.
	Were you offered drones?
	So there was an offer to fly a drone on that day.
	And why did you deny it?
	There was an offer to fly a drone on that day.
	So yes, local law enforcement said, we got a drone.
	Do you want to fly it?
	Why didn't you do it?
	Again, I think the ability of local law enforcement to provide an asset, we probably should have taken them up on it if it was offered.
	But you just said it was offered.
	We probably should have taken them up if it was offered.
	You just said it was offered.
	So why didn't you take it up?
	Because we kind of wanted Trump to get shot, but we can't say it.
	Jail. Because there's nothing here that can leave any room for doubt as to the fact that this was a make it happen on purpose, let it happen on purpose, or wanted it to happen.
	So, that's it.
	Very angry.
	I am very angry.
	And the media just wants to forget about it.
	The internet wants to, Google wants to suppress it.
	And that's it.
	They've moved on to other more important stories, and we haven't even gotten to the bottom of what will be a historical future-altering event.
	It'll be future-altering for the good and not for the catastrophe that it would have had that bullet landed where everybody, these intelligence bastards, wanted it to land.
	We'd be in World War III right now.
	Doesn't mean they're not going to try.
	And given the fact that it doesn't seem like anybody's learned anything...
	And from what I'm understanding, I'm listening to Benny Johnson as I'm hiking.
	He's talking about Charlie Kirk.
	Charlie Kirk is saying security seems to be rubbish.
	And Trump is defiant, going to continue doing outdoor events.
	And these mother effers are not going to stop.
	They will not stop until they successfully demoralize the nation into submission and into compliance.
	So that's it.
	What I think I want to do now is take a shower, because I'm stinky and salty from our hike, and go over to Tim Pool's place and do a podcast tonight, and it's going to be amazing.
	Do you think...
	Is the Patriot too violent for my kiddies?
	Ten years old?
	Eight. Okay, whatever.
	We've watched Gladiator.
	We've watched Starship Troopers.
	We've watched The Matrix.
	I think it's fine.
	And I think historically we need to re-watch The Patriot.
	Everybody, what do we say?
	We're going to go.
	We're going to do it.
	I'm going to go to the chat.
	I'm going to go to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Make sure I got everything here.
	View all the tips.
	Viva, you were just a weird, crazy cat lady.
	I got that one.
	That was from Corey540.
	The dog has found the pizza box in the bathroom.
	I'm going to let her chew on that for a while.
	Google. Okay, so I got all of the tip questions in Viva Barnes Law.
	So everybody, if you want to support the channel, the easiest thing to do is make sure that you're subscribed, make sure you have notifications turned on, and share my stuff around with people who you think would like it, and especially with people who you think wouldn't like it because they need to watch it.
	If you want to support, there's merch at vivafry.com.
	If you want to join our wonderful community, either as a non-paying member, you can go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	And if you choose to support $10 a month, $100 a year if you get a year at a time, or you can do the coins things and just give tips or whatever, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	MerchantMarine says, love you, Viva Fry.
	You and the fam, go have some fun.
	We're going to have fun tonight.
	Boopsie says, thank you.
	Executive action, the parallax view.
	Those are two good movies.
	Safe travel.
	So after this, we're going to see where we go tomorrow.
	I don't think we're going to do the torturous 15-hour and 15-minute drive straight to Florida.
	I think we're going to divide it up over another day and maybe go see the coast of, is it South Carolina or North Carolina or Georgia?
	Movie choice.
	A river runs through it.
	No, but I want to see The Patriot because I want my kids to understand the difference between the culture and history of Canada.
	Versus the culture and history of America.
	I think he gets it.
	I think he's been getting it through osmosis.
	When we go to...
	Oh, live now.
	Give her a watch.
	Kirsch. Okay, I'm going to put this up on the side.
	Let me see who said what now in the chat there.
	Oh, I'm going to go to the chat.
	So, everybody, thank you all for being here.
	I don't know if I'll get to go live tomorrow.
	It's going to be a tough week.
	We're going to do a lot of driving.
	But I can do certainly a short video and I'll be able to...
	Keep up and catch up with the news as I drive tomorrow.
	And what else?
	That's it.
	Thank you all for being here.
	VivaFry.com for merchandise.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com in our Locals community.
	The Viva Fry on Twitter and Viva Fry on Rumble.
	Everybody, go forth, prosper, and enjoy the rest of the day.
	We're going to be doing it.
	Get out.
	Go. I will see you all tomorrow.
	Kids have been very good at the back.
	Everybody, peace out, locals.

▲