Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 28, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:47:49

Ep. 221: Google Memory-Holing the Attempted Assassination? Kamala STEALING $100 Million? & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Say her name!
	Say her name!
	And everyone beware.
	Because they're not going to stop before Election Day in November, and they're not going to stop after Election Day.
	And that should be everyone should take note of that.
	This is a movement, I'm telling you.
	They're not going to stop.
	They're not going to stop.
	And that should be, everyone should take note of that.
	They're not going to let up, and they should not.
	And we should not.
	Well, everybody, second time is indeed the charm.
	Let me make sure that my good mic is on, because we'll have to double-check now that we're going back to...
	Audio's good.
	Video's good.
	And yes, share the link around people.
	There was a bit of a glitch in Rumble Studio, so we're going to kick it up with StreamYard and not hopefully have...
	We're live across all platforms just before I even get further into this because I want to talk about that Kamala Harris thing in a few seconds.
	Let's make sure that we are good all across the various planes of the interwebs.
	We are good.
	We're on Locals.
	We are on Rumble.
	I don't care if we're on Twitter, but I know that...
	We are on Twitter anyhow.
	And that's it.
	Good. I'm sweating a little bit, but we look to be live everywhere.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Excellent. And so because we are live everywhere, now that I can confirm this and affirm this, I see Barnes is in the backdrop.
	But before I bring Barnes in, I want to bring up something here because you'll notice as we're talking about the news and the government and as you pop into the stream and it says this stream contains a paper.
	promotion. And it does this article, which I think everybody should be The FDA says it's preparing for a bird flu pandemic in one that could kill one in four Americans.
	That's if we believe the FDA.
	The fine folks at The Wellness Company, one of our sponsors for the evening, is raising the flag right now.
	They put out a bunch of great products.
	And at a time now when they're warning of what the next thing is going to be, the bird flu pandemic, it's our responsibility to be prepared for the next thing.
	Fortunately, you can get medication like Tamiflu without having to book an office appointment with your old physician.
	The Wellness Company, the sponsor, they produce a number of great products.
	They've developed the Contagion Emergency Kit, a prescription-only stockpile of life-saving medications including Tamiflu, Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Z-Pak, medications that every American should have in the medicine cabinet.
	Do you have what you need?
	The next time around, because there will be a next time around.
	And most doctors might not be prescribing what they were not allowed to prescribe the last time around.
	We can now say the words ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
	Suck on it, YouTube.
	But if you don't have these things, you want to have them in your emergency medical cabinet.
	Easily order online the one-of-a-kind prescription contagion emergency kit from the wellness company.
	Each kit provides you with a carefully selected assortment of effective medications for bird flu, COVID-19, other respiratory illnesses.
	The medications include ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, Z-Pak, Tamiflu, Budesonide, along with a nebulizer.
	Rest easy knowing that you have the emergency meds on hand along with a guidebook for safe use, backed by research from experts like Dr.
	Peter McCullough, Avoid the chaos, the weight, and the price gouging that comes with every crisis because nobody lets a good crisis go to waste.
	Avoid the hospitals.
	Order this for the cost of a single doctor's visit.
	At the end of the day, having these life-saving medications on hand will make sure that you don't have to worry about whatever is going to happen.
	Next, go to twc.health forward slash viva.
	Grab your emergency contagion kit right now.
	twc.health forward slash viva.
	That'll save you $30 on checkout plus free shipping.
	Kits are only available in the USA.
	So, Canadians, what can I tell you?
	You get what you vote for and unfortunately sometimes so does everyone else.
	Barnes is in the backdrop.
	I want to bring him right now because we have a bit of a slow start to tonight's stream.
	Everybody, I'm going to go blast the links around.
	If you are so inclined, go to Twitter and share the link of the new stream because the old link obviously will not work for obvious reasons.
	I'm going to bring in Biggity Barnes.
	As we will have our last crappy internet stream before I make the way down from the iron flag of the maple rainbow to the free state of Florida.
	And I might, I'm contemplating, Robin, you tell me if you think it's worth the two or three hour detour.
	Do I drive through Butler, Pennsylvania on the way down and try to get into the buildings or is that going to be totally off limits to journalists?
	It's probably going to be totally off limits.
	I am in...
	Discussions with someone who was actually one of the victims that day.
	We may be able to have the bandwidth to represent them going forward.
	But yeah, my guess is that they'll have it locked down.
	So maybe I'm not.
	Because it adds, it's weird.
	It's in Pennsylvania, but it makes us go like a good hour and a half west and then back down.
	So you have to go from the 87 to whatever that one is, the 91. So if I can't get a guarantee that I'll be able to get in, I'm not sure I'm going to.
	I'm driving down with a kid and two dogs, so might not want to add three hours to a 24-hour drive.
	Robert, sir, how goes the battle?
	Good, good.
	We got, you know, good, interesting load tonight.
	The First Amendment case that's going to go up to the Supreme Court, Second Amendment case, big Second Amendment win against the ATF, another one.
	The trans rights, you know, they may be winning at the Olympics, but they're not winning in court, at least the Biden's version of it.
	The jury bias, when that becomes of relevance to a potential verdict.
	Judicial recusal, there's a case up before the Supreme Court, and we had Judge Engeron deciding whether he would disqualify himself.
	No shock what his answer would be.
	Defamation law, big, big win by Gina Carano.
	Her win really is of greater consequence than just her case.
	Because it explains what Hollywood thought was their defense.
	It's all of the political discrimination they've engaged in over the last decade or so.
	The terror watch list goes up to court.
	Prisoner and probationer rights in court.
	Initiative rights.
	The ballot access, which was the top voted topic.
	It was up before the California Supreme Court, and the Democratic Party continues to try to find creative ways to keep Robert Kennedy off the ballot with more lawsuits.
	When you get a boneless wing that has a big bone in it, and yet the courts say you can't sue, Amos Miller case, and a few other fun little tidbits here and there.
	Robert, it's not on the list, but it's something that we obviously have to discuss, although we've discussed it previously.
	Trump filed an FEC complaint.
	First of all, we've got to get into all of this.
	Trump filed an FEC complaint, basically arguing that Kamala Harris is switching of the name to Biden for president to Harris for president and trying to money grab the $91 million in donations.
	He said it's the biggest heist, it's the biggest...
	Excessive campaign contribution in the history of America.
	So he's filed the FEC complaint.
	The articles are saying this could freeze up the $93 million.
	I don't know if it does.
	The process explained what would happen.
	Will they have access to that money?
	Is it going to be a question of fighting over it after the fact?
	And tell me if you think that there's any potential...
	Merit to the argument that Kamala Harris takes to Twitter on Friday and says, I'm just now filling out my forms for the candidacy for the president.
	How on earth she thinks she can then steal that $91 million?
	How does it work?
	What do you think the grounds are, the likelihood of success?
	Is that money frozen until there's an adjudication of it?
	And is Kamala really raising all the money that she claims to be raising?
	Yeah, I mean, my view is that the money raised for Biden was raised for Biden.
	It was raised in the name of the Biden for Presidency campaign.
	And I don't think that money can be simply transferred to Kamala Harris's campaign, because if it could be, then what you would have is, you could have 20 people run for office, and it's a disguised way to illegally fund one of the candidates when 19 of them drop out and give all of their money to the one candidate.
	So that's why it can't really function that way.
	And even though she was on the ticket, she wasn't yet on the ticket.
	So this was the Biden for president campaign, not Harris.
	Harris wasn't going to be on there until the Democratic National Convention confirmed her as being on the ticket for 2024.
	And so in my opinion, and just rather reaffirmed by the fact that she's not...
	She recognizes she needs her own campaign committee and that she's just now registering for it.
	So I think legally she should not have access to that nearly $100 million or so.
	Practically speaking, the way that often goes is the FEC has limited enforcement power.
	They usually decide to issue some fine after the election.
	So they can't freeze the bank accounts.
	I guess some people affiliated in Trump world may bring suit over this, as well as whether or not she's entitled to simply replace Biden on the ballot.
	But my guess is that the courts will not intervene.
	She'll get to use that money.
	Might get fined for it later, but she won't care.
	Now, there's two separate issues, as James O'Keefe has continued to expose.
	Someone else that Whitney Webb and all of her so-called genius thinks is part of the deep state is James O'Keefe.
	That gives you an idea how dumb she is.
	Her fan group wants me to debate her.
	I'm like, not a single word of your responses would inspire me to want to debate her.
	You're not supposed to pick on retards, so I'm going to try to avoid that.
	But her whole constituency is made up of these overgrown six-year-olds.
	I'm trying not to get their responses on Twitter and social media.
	I mean, you were nice enough to give her a platform.
	But the quality of her audience is really poor.
	I mean, if you're going to respond, at least respond intelligently.
	But James O'Keefe has done a great job.
	He's done this before, documenting and detailing.
	How the Democratic Party is laundering campaign donations through people who don't know that they're making donations to the Democratic Party.
	And he documented it again with Kamala Harris.
	He's been finding real people who supposedly gave her thousands of dollars.
	And they're like, I've never given her any money.
	And they're usually like blue collar people who don't have that kind of wherewithal to resource in the first place.
	So it appears that what they're doing is they're using their new app technology of ActBlue.
	To launder donations from people who don't realize they're making donations, often are not actually out of their bank accounts making those donations.
	They're laundering somebody else's donations into the Harris campaign.
	And Harris has a notorious history of this.
	Peter Schweitzer has started to talk about her long history of illegal activities in California.
	There was a case I was a part of where her attorney general's office intervened to prevent...
	A case going forward that involved a billion-dollar fraud by the Lenar Corporation against the California Pension Fund.
	That's against the people of the state of California.
	A billion dollars!
	And her attorney general's office intervened to shut it down because she has a close political relationship with the Lenar Corporation, as does Pelosi and Newsom and some other people in the state of California.
	And that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the political scandals he's involved in.
	So we'll see if anything is done about it.
	I mean, I can't imagine the Biden Justice Department is going to do anything about it.
	Maybe one of these state attorney generals will do something about this because this appears to be some form of fraud, not just a federal violation, but a state violation.
	So maybe they'll do something about it.
	I know the attorney general from Missouri is talking about getting involved in big tech.
	Once again, trying to manipulate the election by suppressing results.
	If you search Google, you won't find border czar Kamala Harris.
	You will if you search any other search engine.
	If you search for assassination attempt, the name Trump won't come up, even though it just happened a few weeks ago on Google searches.
	So once again, big tech intervening on behalf of the Olympics was exposed doing a horrendous...
	uh presentation that mocked christianity and they they abused the power of the copyright protection to hide the fact of what they did the scandal of what they did from people uh now credit to rumble rumble refused
	to recognize those bogus copyright strikes but yeah we're going to see a lot of illegality it's what kamala harris has been known for her whole life her whole career um and but we're probably not going to see consequence from it unfortunately before Election Day.
	Let me bring this up, if I can bring it up here.
	Let me see if we're going to be able to see this, because the internet is...
	Oh, the internet is equal for all.
	All right, well, it's the flipping thing.
	Kamala Harris level, the...
	Here we go.
	I won't make the screen too big.
	It's internet equity in Canada.
	So I did this, just because I...
	Assassination, and you get assassination.
	I don't even know what that is.
	Attempts, okay?
	Assassination attempts on Hitler, because that's what we're looking for these days.
	Yeah, of course.
	Then I tried to put in TR on Truman.
	I mean, in fairness, I didn't know that there was an assassination attempt on Truman, so I guess I'm going to want to learn more about that.
	Ronald Reagan, Donald Wiki.
	I mean, I don't even know what this is.
	And I actually, now that you mention it, I want to take a little credit.
	I remember back in the day when the European Union was talking about that copyright bill and they were going to go strong on copyright and enforcing copyright.
	And I was like, they're going to use that for political strong-arming by, say, I don't know, if there's a video of Macron doing something with another man, whatever, just hypothetically, and people share that video.
	Well, someone will buy the copyright to that and then take it down so that people can't actually see neither of the events.
	I have to go back and find what I said that.
	And it's amazing.
	They're doing it right now.
	Robert. I'm trying to steel man the argument.
	What could account for why it's not coming up in search results, even in the composition, both on Google and apparently on DuckDuckGo?
	What's the steel man for why that is?
	There isn't one.
	I mean, they're just manipulating the algorithms.
	It's what they've been doing.
	Robert Epstein's been talking about it for years.
	They've deliberately manipulated those to shade voters in certain ways.
	And they can have more influence typically at a lower level of election than the U.S. presidential election, but they're going to try.
	No doubt about that.
	And so credit to James O'Keefe for outing this fraudulent donation money laundering activity.
	What should happen with the donors that gave to Biden, that money should go back to those donors.
	And if they want to give to Kamala, then they can give to Kamala.
	But that's how it should work.
	I mean, we really have the...
	You know, idiocracy president.
	I mean, she's basically Camacho.
	President Camacho from idiocracy.
	It's Kamala.
	She sounds like him.
	You know, she acts like him.
	She behaves like him.
	Has the IQ of him.
	It's extraordinary witnessing.
	It dawned on me over the weekend.
	I'll be on with Richard Barris, the People's Pundit, on what are the odds tomorrow.
	Probably at 2 p.m. Eastern Time or thereabouts.
	And we'll be breaking down the impact of the J.D. Vance pick for Vice President, the impact of the assassination attempt and the fallout related to it politically, the impact of Kamala Harris replacing Joe Biden, and NBO preview of the Democratic Convention and what the media is going to do.
	But what's clear is the Democratic Party concluded.
	That their problem wasn't that the economy isn't working for working-class people in terms of housing, in terms of cost of living, in terms of transportation, in terms of quality employment, etc.
	The problem isn't the border crisis and the illegal immigrants flowing across the border and the crime and other economic issues related thereto.
	The problem is not all these wars abroad, war in the Middle East, war in Europe, under President Biden.
	The problem is not wokeism to such an extreme that they got people's genitalia hanging out on the Olympics broadcast to little kids around the world.
	No, those aren't the problems.
	The problem was their candidate was too white.
	Their candidate was too male.
	Their candidate was from the Midwest.
	Their candidate was too old.
	They're really going to run on an identity politics campaign.
	They really think identity politics solves all their problems.
	That the working class voters just didn't relate.
	They'll relate to the African, Jamaican, Indian, daughter of slave owners from grew up in Canada.
	Weird, you know, cackling Kamala laughter.
	That they'll relate to her because she checks the box in the meme video that's going around that Elon Musk retweeted.
	Vote for me because I'm a woman.
	Vote for me because I'm black.
	Vote for me because I'm biracial.
	Vote for me because I'm the daughter of immigrants.
	Vote for me because of my identity.
	They think that's what's going to fly in urban, working class, rural, suburban, Midwest America?
	That's what's going to fly with Mexican-American voters and working class voters in Nevada and Arizona?
	They're completely delusional.
	She's going to get crushed.
	It is not going to get close.
	They're not going to get anywhere near the market.
	Robert, you know, the problem is I was listening to Ben Carson on Tucker.
	Ben Carson on Tucker Carlson as I'm jogging.
	And the problem is, like, I came to this sort of revelation yesterday.
	People are idiots.
	And they're not voting for a person.
	They're not voting for policy.
	They're voting for a package.
	They're voting for a brand.
	And the media, their ability overnight, literally to pull a 1984 Kamala Harris is an idiot.
	Kamala Harris is the most liberal senator.
	Kamala Harris, they talked about her having slept her way to the top as well.
	Overnight, like, they got the new script in Orwell's 1984.
	She's now the new savior, and they're so effective at doing it, there's going to be people out there who don't know that she bailed people.
	But the problem is who their voters are.
	The reason why voters are not voting for Biden is because the economy stinks, because immigration is bad, because there's war abroad.
	Because they don't like all the insanity of the wokeism being so extreme.
	That's why.
	She doesn't cure those problems.
	She makes them worse.
	She's more of a war whore.
	She's more of a wokest.
	She's more of a pro-open borders.
	She's worse in favoring big tech and Wall Street over ordinary people in the real economy.
	In fact, Peter Thiel predicted this.
	He said, watch the Democratic Party.
	We'll nominate somebody from California.
	Because they think that's...
	They're a stellar example of what the whole country wants, and they're going to find out the whole country doesn't want California.
	So the media thinks they can just re-spin it, re-narrate it, put it out there.
	It's not going to work.
	You look at the state surveys, other surveys, even with this bombardment of favorable coverage, she's barely moved the needle.
	She should be up by five or six points right now.
	You've got two weeks of ridiculous positive coverage, and you're still behind?
	I mean, that's a disaster.
	I mean, if they need to win, then it's even worse if you dig into the numbers.
	It's even worse amongst working-class voters that are going to decide the election, whether you're talking about Hispanics who she's never played well with in Arizona and Nevada, in Texas and Florida, or you're talking about working-class black men who she's also never played well with in Georgia and North Carolina.
	Oh, she's played well with them, Robert.
	Not working-class black voters.
	She goes up that scale.
	You know, there's a sugar before that, Daddy.
	And then she really plays badly in the working class North.
	I mean, it told me that Obama didn't even realize.
	Now, he didn't want her.
	He wanted somebody else.
	And Willie Brown outmaneuvered Barack Obama.
	Not the first time, by the way.
	That guy is exceptional when it comes to political skill.
	Because if people don't know it, Willie Brown is her patron and can't wait for her to be in the White House.
	That he would consider that his ultimate achievement.
	Because nobody's going to think...
	It was like the reason why Roger Ailes loved promoting Sean Hannity.
	He was like, everybody knows that idiot couldn't make it on his own.
	They know that Hannity is there because I, Roger Ailes, made him.
	That's what makes Kamala perfect for Willie Brown.
	Everybody's going to know she would have never made it there on her own.
	But Willie Brown outmaneuvered Barack Hussein Obama, who wanted somebody else, because he's obsessed with replacing.
	He hates it that Trump keeps replacing him.
	It makes him look bad, in his view, that Trump is his natural successor.
	They're going to legally fund the campaign.
	They're going to media manipulate like mad.
	The propaganda is going to be off the charts in the month of August.
	They'll do some bogus polls.
	They're already doing it.
	They're bringing up polls where all of a sudden the electorate is now plus eight Democratic.
	They're back to doing some of their worst polling from 2016 to 2020.
	The problem is it's not going to change the minds of working class people in middle America.
	That's why I hope they buy their own BS.
	Because then we won't face another assassination attempt.
	We won't face another bad crisis between now and Election Day.
	I hope they believe their own nonsense that she's going to win on Election Day when those voters go in the voting booth because then she'll get crushed as she deserves to.
	Let me play.
	I'm not going to play the whole thing.
	Just a few seconds.
	I, Kamal Harris, and you're a Democrat candidate for president because Joe Biden finally exposed his senility of the debate.
	Thanks, Joe.
	I was selected because I am the ultimate diversity hire.
	I'm both a woman and a person of color.
	So if you criticize anything I say, you're both sexist and racist.
	I mean, it's so amazing how perfect the inflection is.
	Elon Musk tweets this, and there were some people, Robert, suggesting that Elon was breaking the law by putting up deceptive messaging.
	And I had to double-check and just say, okay, no, parity, political parity is still legal, even if you don't get the joke.
	But then I remembered Ricky Vaughn, Jesus, Douglas Mackey.
	I'm like, oh, yeah, but if someone thinks that that's...
	That Elon is trying to faithfully depict her policy.
	They'll go after Elon.
	Do you think he has created any exposure, however absurd it would have to be, by sharing that?
	No, the bigger exposure is what Seymour Hersh is reporting, which is that Barack Obama told Joe Biden that if he didn't step down, Kamala Harris had the votes to invoke the 25th Amendment to forcibly try to remove him from the presidency.
	By the way, I still think that was a bluff.
	I don't believe the Democratic Party would have embarrassed themselves so bad as to try to invoke the 25th Amendment.
	And Biden had defenses against that 25th Amendment.
	But, as Brett Weinstein and others have pointed out, this raises serious questions about whether Kamala Harris basically staged an illegal coup to steal the nomination in an undemocratic party.
	Well, it should be called the undemocratic party.
	In an undemocratic manner.
	Or as they say, an idiocracy when they're describing the UN, you know, and different things like that.
	I mean, we're witnessing a lot of time.
	But it does raise certain questions.
	I mean, if the Republicans had some courage, which they usually don't, they would seek a potential impeachment of Kamala Harris, both for her open borders complicity and for whether or not she staged an illegal coup.
	I mean, did she falsely threaten?
	I mean, if you believe...
	That Joe Biden is incompetent, incapable of discharging his presidential duties.
	Then your job is to assert the 25th Amendment.
	You can't falsely assert it and say, hey, as long as you step down, I won't assert it.
	That means you don't sincerely believe that he is, in fact, incapable of serving the job.
	And you're solely using it in an extortionate way.
	And that's what it looks like, Kamala Harris.
	And Barack Obama, we're both guilty of.
	I mean, they're both guilty of criminal activity.
	Now, Barack obviously didn't anticipate that Willie Brown would outmaneuver him in wrapping up the nomination for Kamala Harris so fast.
	He imagined and fancied that he had more control of the Democratic Party than he really did.
	But that raises much more important consequential legal questions than sharing parody videos that are very accurate parody videos on X. Now, speaking of money, Robert, and speaking of potential tax issues, second sponsor of the night, people, Tax Network USA.
	Do you owe back taxes?
	Pandemic relief is now over, along with hiring thousands of new agents and the field officers of the IRS has kicked off 2024 by sending over 5 million pay-up letters to those who have unfiled tax returns or balances owed.
	Don't waive your rights and speak with them on your own.
	They are not your friends.
	They're like the police.
	Good at a distance.
	Don't talk to them without representation.
	Tax Network USA, a trusted tax relief firm, has saved over $1 billion in back taxes for their clients, and they can help you secure the best deal possible, whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million.
	And if you owe $10 million, what the hell have you been doing?
	But whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million, they can help you, whether it's business or personal taxes.
	Even if you have the means to pay or you are on a fixed income, they can help finally resolve your tax burdens once and for all.
	Call 1-800- 1-800-245-6000.
	Now that I see it, it's 2-4-5-6000 for a private free consultation or visit TNUSA.com forward slash Viva TN Tango November USA like the country dot com forward slash Viva 1-800-246-245-6000.
	The links to both of our wonderful sponsors are in the description.
	Robert, what time is it here?
	Yeah, let's get off.
	We've done good on YouTube.
	We're going to go now, move the party over to Rumble and vivabarneslaw.locos.com.
	Did you watch it?
	I think the editor's recommendation for Rumble is the seven-minute episode.
	Well, hey, look.
	They'll fix the glitch.
	I don't know what the glitch was, but I've notified the team.
	What I was going to say was this.
	You watched Idiocracy last night, right?
	In vivabarneslaw.locos.com.
	Yeah, it was our Saturday movie night.
	It was Idiocracy.
	It was the choice of the board at VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
	I was like watching the current Democratic Party in power.
	I mean, similar kind of logic, similar kind of social and moral intelligence at the top.
	So, you know, we'll see what it all...
	Folds of it.
	But what's fascinating, we could probably cover this one on YouTube and then before we shift over to Rumble.
	I was curious what Hollywood's excuse was going to be legally for their overt, open discrimination based on political beliefs against actors, actresses, screenwriters, and others.
	And what I didn't realize is that they thought they were like big tech in the northern part of California.
	That they could say they had a First Amendment right, in the name of their expressive advocacy through their films, to require all of their employees to adopt their politics.
	They actually asserted, in Gina Carano's case, that defense.
	And had they prevailed, that would have been very damaging.
	Because it would have allowed the biggest influencer on people's minds around the world, which is still Hollywood, good, bad, or otherwise, still is, to force their actors, coerce their actors and actresses, screenwriters and employees, all the way down to janitor, that unless you imitate the party platform, unless you repeat it on a regular basis.
	Then we will use our positions of power in the name of the First Amendment to take away your First Amendment rights and require you to suppress.
	It's like the perversion of democracy.
	The party that says democracy is on the ballot is busy picking a presidential candidate who no one's ever voted for.
	She didn't file her papers.
	We might be presuming a little bit of knowledge for everyone watching or for some people watching.
	Gina Carano.
	Disney star, the DeLorean, which I've never watched.
	The Mandalorian, yeah.
	The Mandalorian, sorry, not the DeLorean.
	I was watching Back to the Future.
	So she put up that now infamous Instagram post, which was widely misrepresented.
	The post was to the effect that, you know, at first the Nazis, to get people to demonize their neighbors, to justify atrocities to their neighbors, vilified them and made neighbors fight against neighbors.
	She did not say in that post that Republicans are the modern-day Jews in a modern-day Nazi Germany.
	It was more a government getting neighbors to fight among each other as to how you got to Nazi Germany.
	Could have applied to anybody, Democrats, Republicans equally.
	She gets, you know, basically fired, canceled.
	And I don't know, did they invoke a morality clause?
	It's not the same thing as Roseanne Barr's allegedly racist joke, whatever, where she got cancelled, presumably on the basis of a morality clause.
	But they terminate Gina Carano.
	It's not just an innocuous post, or I should say an insightful post.
	I think Susan Sarandon had some overt comparisons to Nazis and whatever.
	But they fired her, and she sued.
	Now, this isn't a victory in the sense that she has achieved anything other than She will get her day in court.
	They made a motion to dismiss, and they said, we're all exercising our First Amendment rights here.
	We get to fire people who we don't agree with, even if they don't violate, allegedly, any contractual obligations.
	So she'll get her day in court, and they fail.
	That's the backdrop.
	So they argue, we get to exercise our First Amendment rights by firing employees or terminating employees with whom we disagree politically, basically.
	Yeah, I mean, it goes even further than that.
	I mean, what happened was, this was, you know, the 2019-2020, Gina Carano's already been a successful actress, but becomes one of the most popular actresses on the show Mandalorian, which was the only show that was doing any good by Disney's recreation of Star Wars, which they've mostly butchered and destroyed in the name of woke ideology.
	So, but this became, this was when you had to pronounce your pronouns.
	And they were demanding, various people were demanding at Disney that she join the pronoun police.
	That she needed to say she was she, her, hers.
	And that if she didn't, that was deeply disturbing to them.
	They were even mandating that she go to the equivalent of re-education camps to explain to her why she needed to be saying she, her, and hers.
	Why she needed to be celebrating the BLM riots taking place across the country.
	Because she didn't do that.
	But she did go along with other things.
	I mean, she was willing to sit down and talk to people and discuss it and so on and so forth.
	And then finally she's like, okay, I'll do a droid pronoun thing.
	That enraged them even further.
	And so they were looking for a pretext to fire a Terminator, especially because they got in trouble with their wokeism was killing the brand and their involvement with China was highly controversial.
	So in order to distract from that...
	They decide, hey, let's just make an example out of Gina Carano.
	And it's an example we want to set for all of Hollywood.
	That we have the right to dictate.
	You have to believe what we say you believe.
	Not just part of what content we create and put out there.
	But you have to, when you're off screen, when you're off the job, you have to be endorsing our ideas.
	You have to be celebrating wokeism.
	And we will use the power of employment.
	The power of access to your profession and occupation as the condition to string you along in that direction.
	And when they got rid of her, they not only got rid of her, they made a big public deal about it, lied about her, in such a way that her agent dropped her, her lawyer dropped her.
	She couldn't get any.
	She was going to start making millions of dollars a year.
	It's not making anything.
	And it was all because...
	Partially it was because Disney's problems and they just needed a distraction in the news cycle.
	But it was because Hollywood has chosen to make wokeism a mandatory requirement.
	It's the same thing that's happening to employees all across the country.
	Like the Red Hat lawsuit that I have.
	They're requiring everybody on the job and off the job celebrate their ideology.
	And if you don't, you're going to be set to re-education camp.
	And so the defense...
	So she brought suit because in California...
	Like some other jurisdictions.
	It is illegal for an employer to discriminate based on your political beliefs.
	They cannot use the power of employment to coerce you to doing certain things.
	This goes back to the old school liberal, classical liberal version of California.
	Is that under the UNRU Act, Robert?
	Yes, and it applies in multiple contexts.
	And they also harassed her, and you could argue there was gender discrimination because they treated her very differently than Pascal, the lead actor also in Mandalorian, who said much more crazier things politically.
	I mean, the guy's kind of wacky.
	But their excuse was that they had a First Amendment right, that because they're in the Hollywood business...
	Because they make TV shows, because they make films, they can require anybody that works with them or for them to toe the ideological line, or they can weaponize all of their economic power to crush them, and that no other laws that prohibit discrimination can possibly apply to them.
	They were saying they had a First Amendment right to be totalitarians, First Amendment right to be 1984 advocates.
	And that, I mean, it was a...
	I've always been curious how they thought they'd get away with this legally, but it was still a bit shocking that they think they have the equal power to what big tech has, where they can play editor when they want to and then play non-editor when they want to and be immune either way.
	That's Section 230.
	Hollywood doesn't have a Section 230.
	So they pretended the First Amendment embodied that.
	And the reason why Gina Carano had competent, capable counsel...
	Given that they, you know, tried to deny her any monetary access in anywhere in Hollywood.
	And the blacklisting, the real blacklisting.
	I mean, people think that the communists were blacklisted.
	Nothing like the way people like Gina Carano have been blacklisted.
	Go back and look.
	A lot of those commie writers could fake a name and get a job.
	And a lot of other commies got jobs without a problem.
	Gina Carano, they completely blacklisted.
	Because she wouldn't toe the line.
	And they wanted to make an example.
	Here's a popular actress on a TV show that made that show successful and will cancel TV shows rather than allow someone to not toe the line.
	Because these are about ideological indoctrinators.
	They're not about making people money.
	They lie to their shareholders on a regular basis.
	They should be sued into oblivion for their consumer and fraud on the markets over the last decade.
	But what they're really into, what they're really about, is ideological indoctrination.
	You can't watch that Olympics presentation and come to any other conclusion.
	That isn't about entertainment.
	That isn't about art.
	That's about indoctrination.
	Even if it were about art, I'm not watching the Olympics for that type of art.
	Maybe like spiritual art or unifying art.
	I'm not watching it for...
	I can't even think of a controversial artist type of art.
	Is he the guy that stuck the American flag up his butt?
	He's the guy that put a Jesus in his own urine.
	Yeah, and I think he actually...
	And pretended that was art.
	That's not art.
	That might be expression, but it's not art.
	Let's not defame the aesthetic of art by pretending Maplethorpe is in it.
	Now, he might be in it from a constitutional protection category, but not from an aesthetic value category.
	But the federal court came in and said...
	Went through this whole history and said, what you're claiming is that you have a First Amendment right to ignore the employment discrimination laws of California.
	What you're claiming is that your First Amendment rights trump the First Amendment rights of all your employees, of everybody who works for you.
	Because this wasn't about, and they were using lawsuits where the film itself required the discriminatory judgment.
	In other words, the film itself or the show itself required to be a woman or a man or a black person or a white person or Mexican person or whatever, or have a certain ideological inclination, etc.
	Like, that isn't what this is about.
	You're demanding everybody...
	You're claiming something extraordinary, that you have the First Amendment power to use your economic power to indoctrinate the world and use your economic power over your employees to force them to be advocates of this ideology.
	And that's precisely what California law has never allowed and has always prohibited.
	And the First Amendment has never protected.
	First Amendment has never gone that far.
	The First Amendment allows your expressive advocacy.
	It does not allow your employment discrimination and prejudice.
	And so it was a massive win for Gina Carano.
	The court completely denied every aspect of Disney's motion to dismiss, which means they're marching forward to Discovery, marching, which I'm sure is going to be very, very interesting.
	And more importantly, it means the entire legal predicate that Hollywood had been assuming gave them the green light.
	To behave like big tech towards its own screenwriters and actors and actresses and coerce them into ideological indoctrination.
	That legal template is gone.
	And everybody who's been discriminated against for political reasons, and there have been many, many, many in Hollywood.
	Remember, all these companies are based in California, California, in one way, shape, or form.
	You have a right to sue them now in California.
	You got the legal precedent to do so, thanks to Gina Carano.
	Thanks to Elon Musk, who funded her lawsuit.
	So it's a big, big win for free speech, freedom of thought, freedom of ideas in America, and a big win against the idolaters and the indoctrinators at Disney World.
	Robert, I saw something in the chat here.
	I'm going to get to this in a second.
	Your locals' timer is wrong.
	This is from the old stream.
	Hey, you know what I hate?
	The sound of mouth noises.
	Here, let me show you.
	I really...
	Really hate it.
	Are you still using dial-up in Canada, David?
	Yeah, it's very bad.
	The Engaged View says, the fact that the judge wasn't fleeing from the stage amid a hail of D batteries says a lot about the audience's understanding of the rule of law, a separation of powers.
	Viva, get Dr. Robert Epstein.
	I'm in talks with him.
	Not like there's no reluctance.
	I'm just...
	It will happen, but my goodness, I need to get back to better internet connection.
	But hold on.
	Apparently, I want to bring up the other before we head on over to...
	What is this?
	The quartering, $300.
	Jeremy, thank you very much.
	What is this about?
	Because my push to 250,000 followers on Rumble is so important, I'm going hard.
	Love you two boys.
	Let them know to follow me.
	Live every day at 1 Eastern was a great meeting.
	Was a great meeting in, that is Milwaukee, I imagine, the international code.
	I gotta pass.
	Dude. Jeremy from The Quartering.
	I think you're at a quarter of a million, man.
	That's a lot of...
	You're right there.
	Okay. Jeremy from The Quartering.
	He's got a million plus on YouTube, of course.
	But he's really trying to boost the Rumble channel.
	Does a lot of interviews.
	Has Sticks and Hammer and other people on.
	I've been on.
	I think you've been on.
	Oh, yeah.
	Does a daily show.
	Does multiple updates.
	So that's easy to remember.
	The Quartering.
	You know, I forgot.
	I was going to ask him where he came up with that name.
	Why are they quartering?
	But, yeah, cool guy.
	A lot of fun hanging out with him.
	A hard-working guy.
	He's amazing.
	Very tall.
	Very tall as well.
	I almost panicked because I just got the low battery, which meant that my plug had unplugged.
	Go follow the quartering.
	Shrewd says, listen, they will steal it.
	It's up to us how we react this time.
	Make it unstealable.
	Tommy Robinson, did you hear this, Robert?
	Was arrested under the Terrorism Act of 2000-whatever in the UK.
	50,000 people protest.
	No violence.
	Arrested yet again.
	I mean, people are going to say, like, he thought Canada was bad, and everyone's like, dude, the UK is just as bad.
	Free Tommy Robinson arrested under the terrorism laws.
	We're going to get there in this stream.
	E. Taylor says, I identify as transparent.
	My pronouns are who and where.
	Ray Price, I have a unique on the student loan forgiveness debacle that Trump would support.
	How do I get in touch with him or his campaign?
	Dude, Ray Price, tweet it.
	Tag people.
	And if it's resonating, it'll get there.
	Do you think the bogus donations to Act Blue James O'Keefe exposed, which went to the Biden campaign, would be refunded to the donors that didn't realize they donated it?
	Dude, I saw this stuff.
	It's like micro-donations in people's names who don't know.
	Okay, fine.
	Go reimburse them.
	$5, $20.
	It's like credit card surcharges.
	You get people who want to do it, and it's a big headache.
	Matt G. Hammond.
	Can we call her from here on Kumala?
	Oh, not bad.
	Dude, says Mr. Purpose.
	Viva, your rant today was fire.
	Everyone should watch it.
	Restarted my lefty hate jet engine.
	I was sweating so hard after that stream because that video was in the car and it was hot.
	But Biden got 81 million votes.
	I would appreciate you posting more often on Truth Social.
	Barnes, Truth Social would love to have you.
	Let's support free speech.
	Matt Reese, ActBlue is laundering money through donors who can't legally donate using real people who don't know what's happening.
	Absolutely. All right, we're going to have to skip these and get to these in a bit.
	The quartering name comes from his channel Origins, mostly playing claw prize games.
	Ah, interesting.
	All right, with that said, I'm going to get to some of the VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com chat tips in the other side of the stream, ending on YouTube.
	I'll post.
	I don't know how long it's going to take to upload this to the internet, so I might have to wait for a hotel tomorrow.
	It'll be on podcast and the other channel tomorrow.
	So ending on YouTube right now, come over to Rumble or vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	And do we leave it on Twitter?
	We'll leave it on Twitter.
	We'll leave it on Twitter for a little bit.
	Okay, Robert, I was waiting for the person that's behind interrupting your internet service to pop up in the windows behind and see a little Justin Trudeau.
	That would be fun.
	Let me see if I can go find someone to put on a Trudeau mask.
	Okay, so we got Gina Carano the good news.
	I forget what the segue was to Angoron, but the New York nipple judge Angoron.
	The chat there that said, you know, people should be throwing batteries at that judge.
	Don't, any violence, none whatsoever.
	Don't even throw gravel at Justin Trudeau because it allows the victimizers to pretend to be the victims.
	N. Gorong, who is, you know, I won't go, I've talked about it at length, but bottom line, he made the news recently in that Trump case where some idiot lawyer, real estate lawyer, goes on an interview the day Trump was found liable or, you know, he was ordered to pay that outstanding sum of money.
	In the fraud case that had no victim, no nothing.
	I'm not going into it because everybody knows about that case.
	So this guy gives an interview and says, yeah, I ran into Judge Engeron.
	He's giving the interview the day of the ruling.
	He says, I ran into Engeron weeks ago in court.
	Why is Engeron walking through the court?
	Who knows?
	I talked to him.
	I really wanted to make sure he got it right.
	So I talked a lot, yada yada, told him what he had to do in his ruling.
	And then today he came down with the ruling.
	He got it right.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Amazing judge.
	Trump made a motion for recusal, and as we've talked about at length, the idiocy of these motions for recusal, they're presented in front of and adjudicated by the judge whose recusal is being sought.
	Engeron issued his ruling today, and he goes through a 12-page ruling.
	They haven't met the threshold.
	I'm capable of...
	Their arguments are not persuasive.
	I'm capable of adjudicating impartially, oh, this 90-second unsolicited meeting where this guy...
	I'm not recusing myself, and I'm not granting a hearing before a separate judge to determine whether or not there should be recusal.
	Robert, I mean, the corruption has investigated itself and found no wrongdoing.
	What's your take on this?
	Well, I think it reveals the need.
	We have three examples of judicial recusal in the last several weeks.
	So we have the judge Engron in New York.
	We have what's pending currently before the Supreme Court of the United States, where you've got judges who sat on cases as government lawyers, become judges, and then they adjudicate the cases they were government lawyers in, which is supposed to be prohibited.
	In addition, the federal standard, which is really, while it's statutory, it's really constitutionally rooted, is that you're entitled to not only an impartial jurist, but the appearance.
	Of an impartial jurist.
	And that should...
	So the pending Supreme Court petition is that there's actually federal courts that are confused on this.
	They're not sure if that's what it really means.
	Because that's how desperate they are to allow corrupt judges to sit on proceedings.
	It's an embarrassment.
	The courts have proven themselves incapable of disciplining themselves.
	It's a recurrent problem that likely requires legislative reform.
	So that takes us to the third example of recusal, the Georgia Young Thug Trial.
	The good thing they do in Georgia, like they do in some states, is they require that the recusal motion be heard by a judge different than the judge whose recusal is being sought.
	In addition, they require a substitution of the judge over the pending proceeding while the recusal motion is being sought.
	So that is the minimal level of remedy that should be sought.
	And my other opinion is if we need to remove judicial immunity from damages suits in many of these cases, that would discipline judges.
	If they know there's even a risk that they be sued based on them having prejudice involved in a case they should not have been presiding over.
	So, I think Engron is one more example.
	of how we need institutional reform when it comes to both the state and federal judicial branch.
	It is very frustrating.
	I don't know if they're going to appeal that decision.
	This is the one where Engeron issued the $454 million order and then allowed him to post bond for $100 and some odd million.
	And then Leticia James actually had the balls to try to attack the bond company, the Surtee company.
	And this is Judge Engeron, who we saw in the intro of this show.
	Talking about his tools to follow the law or make the law in this case.
	All right, on to what next, Robert?
	Well, but speaking of some good cases, we've got a First Amendment case that's going to go up to the Supreme Court.
	Petition for certs already been filed, and hopefully the Supreme Court takes it.
	This stems from a 2000 case where the court butchered First Amendment law because they wanted to protect abortion.
	And what they did is all these laws were being passed saying you couldn't be near an abortion clinic, you couldn't speak near an abortion clinic, and they described it as all healthcare facilities.
	But basically, you lost your speech rights if you were within a certain proximal distance of an abortion clinic or health facility, which has never made sense.
	This was applied, by the way, to hurt people trying to protest related to COVID policy.
	So, Carbondale, Illinois has passed one of these laws based on the one that the Supreme Court approved in Hill v.
	Colorado back in 2000.
	And it's up to the Supreme Court now, and they're pointing out this law never made sense.
	That every justice has admitted at some other point that decision never made sense.
	You don't lose your First Amendment rights because you're within a certain proximal distance of a healthcare facility.
	Indeed, what they said in that decision was insane.
	They said you had a privacy right not to listen to what you didn't want to listen to.
	And it's like, what?
	You've never had a First Amendment right to shut up other people because you don't want to hear what they have to say in a public setting.
	That's directly contra the whole point of the First Amendment.
	So hopefully the Supreme Court takes that case, eviscerates that old bad doctrine, reinstates and reinvigorates the First Amendment, particularly while abortion is a hot topic in the state level of government post-Dobbs.
	People should be allowed to discuss it, but also any other health issue.
	Vaccine issues, COVID issues, ivermectin issues, whatever it may be.
	People need to have full free speech, especially around healthcare facilities.
	They did this in Canada, too, with protesting around hospitals, but only as relates to COVID issues.
	Obviously not as relates to labor issues, because then you piss off the nurses and the healthcare workers who want to be able to protest near the hospitals.
	They did it about protesting COVID issues near schools, but sure as heck not going to touch teachers who want to protest.
	But Robert, let me bring this up.
	The woman who was convicted, look at this, I love this, Reuters fact check.
	Paula Harlow convicted for blocking abortion clinic, not praying.
	And then we get to this.
	The anti-abortion campaigner, Paulette Harlow, was convicted for blocking access to an abortion clinic.
	I mean, this is the one that's making the rounds now, the news now.
	And it's like, unless I know the details of the...
	Well, you dig in, and usually what they're doing is praying.
	So, yeah, because every form of speech has been allowed to be criminalized.
	Now, at least the Supreme Court struck down years ago the attempt to prohibit people from even being within 35 feet of a hospital unless they're going into the hospital and so forth.
	They recognized that was insane.
	But this old doctrine is also insane.
	It was brought by the part of the Supreme Court that didn't really care about the First Amendment.
	And they need to reinstate and reinvigorate the First Amendment as the COVID policy protest.
	prove the necessity of.
	Thank you.
	Oh, you're on mute.
	She was convicted for two years in prison for allegedly blocking.
	Can you imagine that?
	I mean, there's people that commit serious crimes that walk.
	And somebody prays in front of an abortion clinic and they get two years.
	It's been an outrage.
	The abuse of these laws proves the necessity of this First Amendment revision and reinvigoration.
	And that's what Kamala Harris is going to run on.
	She's going to run on abortion.
	They're all excited.
	They can't wait to run on abortion.
	They're locking up grandmas.
	That's Kamala Harris.
	When she wasn't busy locking up kids over pot.
	when she wasn't busy locking up people that she knew were innocent but wanted to keep them in labor camps for the state of California.
	She's busy locking up grandmas for unauthorized visits to the Capitol or for praying outside abortion clinics.
	They think this lady is going to win middle America.
	It's an amazing thing.
	Also, I've been talking to Dexter Taylor, who's serving in the Coxsackie Correctional Facility in New York.
	They use prison workers for slave labor.
	It's an atrocious thing that most people don't fully care about because the inclination to think, well, you know, FAFO, fuck around, find out.
	And if you commit a crime, go to jail and stitch together prison clothes that a company is going to sell for profit.
	Okay, sorry.
	Well, that's the transition to our prisoner rights case.
	So we got a good case out of the Fourth Circuit because what's happened is if you're in a federal prison, as you know...
	Peter Navarro, Steve Bannon, Owen Schroer have experienced.
	You don't have the same rights and remedies that you do if you're in a state prison.
	If you're in a local jail or a state prison, the federal civil rights laws allow you to seek relief and remedy.
	I've sued a lot of prisons and jails over the years when they violate your rights.
	However, what happens when it's the federal side?
	Sadly, thanks to our conservative jurists in particular, they have eviscerated...
	The ability to sue when the government does bad.
	And this includes in this context.
	It's called the Bivens context.
	So Bivens says that if they violate your constitutional rights, sometimes you can sue in their individual capacity.
	So if they violate your Fourth Amendment rights, you can sue, depending on which Fourth Amendment rights they violated and how they did so.
	If they violate your equal protection rights, sometimes you can sue, depending again on Who did it and how they did it?
	And if they violate your Eighth Amendment rights to not be denied medical treatment while you're in state custody, then you can sue, again, depending on the circumstances.
	But what came up with the Fourth Circuit is these cops, these custodial guards, took this inmate, beat the daylights out of him, threw him in, set the isolation, which they have, they call it segregated housing, Owen Schroyer got tossed into.
	I believe Navarro might have got tossed into.
	I mean, they abuse this all the time because they're isolated from any remedy.
	And then denied him even his internal administrative remedies, which they do often, and took away his legal documents and access to legal counsel.
	So he filed suit saying, is there no remedy for this kind of violation?
	Can I just be beaten and humiliated and have all my rights taken away because I'm in federal custody?
	And fortunately, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals said no.
	If they deny you, they both violate your rights and then deny you your remedy for the violation of those rights under their internal administrative protocols, then we're going to say you have a Bivens claim cause of action.
	And that's hopeful because it's been a problem on the federal inmate side.
	What we need is legislative reform and remedy so that people can hold.
	Robert, I understand the difference that it's worse at the federal level than the state level, but I don't understand exactly why.
	Oh, because under, so there's federal law, 42 U.S.C.
	1983, and the 14th Amendment that says the states can't do certain things and that there's a right to sue whenever the states, whenever somebody violates your rights at the state level.
	You can get attorney's fees, you can get damages, etc.
	However, there's no such, and it eviscerates sovereign immunity of any of the individuals.
	They have qualified immunity, but not sovereign immunity.
	On the federal level, there's no such law.
	There's no civil rights law.
	So they're generally considered immune from suit.
	Sovereign immunity is a made-up doctrine.
	Sovereign immunity comes from the idea that the king is ordained by God and thus can do no wrong.
	You know, like the Pope, can do no wrong because he's ordained by God.
	This has no business in American society.
	Federal and state judges made it up to cover for their politician pals in positions of power.
	That's what they did.
	But while this exists, at least the 1983 laws say that if the person is a state-level actor, a local government or state government-level actor, then you have the right to sue for remedy.
	But there's no such law for when it's the federal government that screws you.
	Robert, hold on.
	Before we get further here, I want to do one thing because I see a red thing up in the chat here.
	Hairy Toad2, I love calling every COVID-19 vaccinated person who gets COVID an anti-vaxxer when they say it's COVID.
	And then we've got King of Biltong in the house who says, Good afternoon from Anton's Meat and Eat.
	Free shipping on your Biltong using code VIVA on www.biltongusa.com.
	Anton, USA.com.
	Biltong is not taxed.
	Boycott government.
	Buy more biltong.
	It's delicious beef jerky of the South African style, so wet and easier to chew and delicious compared to that nasty, dried, jaw-crushing beef jerky.
	And then, Robert, over in our Viva Barnes Law, I'll just get one here.
	Kotex Party, I recently saw a story.
	This is from M. I'm the of Oregon, Tina Kotech, and I had to chuckle remembering that a couple of decades ago, the dominant political party in Spain took out a full-page ad in El Pace, where they named another party the Kotech party because they wanted to be in the best place at the worst time.
	Then Michael Yon explained, the tampon Dadarian seems we all have been receiving something other than a tampon somewhere.
	Okay, that's funny.
	We'll get to a lot of the locals tips in a bit.
	All right, Robert, is there another white pill decision of the evening?
	Well, listen, it is food-related, but it's not a white pill.
	It's a chicken bone.
	Did you read that case?
	Yeah, but look, I'm torn in terms of...
	I don't care what it says.
	I'm not swallowing whole things.
	I don't know how big the bone was.
	These are things where I want to see the bone.
	Is it like an actual...
	Bone bone or just a small shrapnel of a bone?
	Dude gets boneless chicken wings, eats them.
	There's a bone in one.
	It gets lodged in there.
	And what happens after that?
	Yeah, so imagine you go to a restaurant and you order the boneless wings.
	And you end up with a big bone in your throat and a bunch of health problems.
	So he naturally sued.
	But according to a majority of the Ohio Supreme Court, he should have known better.
	According to them, when you buy boneless wings, you're not intending to buy boneless wings.
	In fact, it's so obvious, it's a matter of law.
	They wouldn't let the jury determine it.
	There's a matter of law in the state of Ohio, according to the Ohio Supreme Court, when you go buy boneless wings, it can never mean boneless wings.
	And no one could possibly think it means boneless wings, even though it says boneless wings.
	It's one of the more ludicrous decisions.
	It reflects the judicial bias against jury trials.
	They don't want a jury to determine the case.
	Why? Because they know what a jury would determine.
	A jury would be like, the dude went in there and he ordered boneless wings and he got a big bone in his throat.
	Somebody screwed up because the wings are supposed to be boneless.
	They actually, this is my favorite part.
	They said boneless wings just refers to a cooking style.
	Really? They said that was so axiomatic.
	Everybody in the whole world knew it.
	That no one could even challenge or question it.
	I was like, I didn't know boneless wings was a cooking style.
	I thought it meant boneless wings.
	Do you know that boneless wings doesn't mean boneless?
	Not that I'm saying I would be inclined to think that you might expect to see a bone every now and again.
	I just would assume that you're...
	I doubt the guy was swallowing it without chewing it just because he thought it was boneless.
	It's like, if you get a fish, it says boneless fish.
	He went and cut it into one little piece, one little piece, one little piece, then ate it, and he was like, you know, and he was like, what the heck?
	But now he's not even allowed to get to the jury in Ohio because boneless wings doesn't, everybody knows that doesn't mean boneless according to the great wisdom of the Ohio Supreme Court.
	All right.
	What next, Robert?
	I'm going to go pull up the list of the backdrop here, but the internet is so flipping slow.
	Yeah, we got a good Second Amendment ruling out of the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas, United States District Court.
	There's another, for those folks that follow this in the gun world, and by the way, Chris Martinson, Peak Prosperity, who you interviewed, great guy, very sharp guy.
	There's some people out there that are new to him, and so they have this, he's very idiosyncratic and he's a data guy.
	So, people sometimes get confused about him.
	And he has very unique opinions, so they may disagree with some opinion he has and assume that extends to other things.
	I know Martin Sidney's a great guy.
	He was trying to raise money very early on to help the vaccine injured and help people that were discriminated against.
	The vaccine mandate context was great at breaking down data concerning the COVID issues very early on.
	He's your classic data nerd.
	But he's a huge gun nerd.
	As well.
	That's why he's going to continue to have really good information, insight, and intel on the Trump assassination attempt.
	So I know Hunley and some other people didn't quite know who he was and had some skepticism.
	He's a great guy.
	Legit guy.
	He espouses, or he's entertaining the idea of multiple shooters.
	Yeah, and I think there's more and more evidence.
	And there's other people that are big gun people saying the same thing.
	But, speaking of who you...
	Cannot trust when it comes to guns.
	That would be the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms group that supposedly had some people stationed, oddly, at the Trump assassination attempt.
	But the ATF under Biden for quite a while, and then some of this started actually, unfortunately, under Trump's administration in the panic response to the Vegas shooting.
	We still haven't got an answer from the FBI.
	They just can't figure out what the heck happened fully.
	Well, what that did is motive.
	They'll get right around to it now that our dear sheriff is governor here in Nevada, I'm sure.
	I'm sure there was no correlation between those two things, between not solving the Vegas shooting as sheriff and getting himself elected governor for all the big casinos here in town.
	But the ATF decided they were going to redefine what the word machine gun means.
	So even though Congress, since 1934, has defined machine gun in a very specific way, The ATF decided, no, that really isn't applicable.
	We're going to define anything that can shoot more than twice in a certain way.
	We're going to describe that as a machine gun, even though that has never been statutorily or common sense what a machine gun is.
	So they tried to call Bumstock a machine gun.
	That, of course, was overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States.
	This other one, and I don't confess to know anywhere near as much about guns as many of our audience does, I just like to shoot them.
	But I don't know much about them.
	I got friends.
	I got plenty of them, including a good buddy down in Austin, Texas.
	But they got something called a forced reset trigger.
	And they were trying to call this forced reset trigger.
	They said that made the gun a machine gun.
	And they were trying to put people in prison for simply having one of these, even though they were legal up until just two years ago.
	Luckily, the...
	Federal court said, under the same legal doctrine as the Supreme Court announced in the bump stock decision case, that a machine gun is specifically statutorily defined.
	You can't go replacing the legislature like the ATF tried to do or replace us judges anymore in the post-Chevron doctrine being dead cases.
	And said, you know, it's about one trigger being able to pull an automatic.
	If it's not...
	These bump stocks don't make it a machine gun.
	A forced reset trigger doesn't make it a machine gun.
	What they're doing is illegal and enjoined all of the ATF from going forward.
	Big win for the Second Amendment.
	And I hope when you glitch for me, I don't think you glitch for everybody else, so I missed some of the stuff.
	But we covered the machine gun bump stock reversal where they said, well, the argument was that because of how the bump stock works, it bumps back and you can sort of move the gun around the trigger as opposed to the trigger through the handle.
	They said, well, it can fire too many times a second, therefore that becomes a machine gun.
	And the court said, no, the criteria was not fires per second because that would have been...
	An easier threshold to establish than what it was was one trigger actioning more than one round.
	So at least some consistency.
	Unless both those things are there, not there.
	Things that make your gun more fun don't make it a machine gun.
	That's what the courts are consistently ruling.
	Robert, we haven't actually talked about this.
	Can you believe that the Democrats in the congressional hearings last week over the assassination attempt were trying to turn it into an AR-15 gun debate?
	Of course they were.
	Of course they were.
	Though I do appreciate AOC for making clear that the AR-15 is a very commonly owned gun, because that is currently the standard for protecting it under the Second Amendment.
	Not that she would necessarily know that, but we appreciate her documenting that on the record.
	Well, I also appreciate her highlighting the fact that their security perimeter had a nice little carve-out of the area that was 140 yards away, so their security perimeter was deficient.
	Oy, all right.
	What up now?
	We've got a couple of cases left.
	We've got probably some defamation cases that are interesting.
	Juror bias cases.
	Finally an answer on what happened with the USS John McCain.
	Not the man, the ship.
	The terror watch list was one of our more interested in cases.
	And then the top vote getter at vivamarneslaw.locals.com.
	The initiative case and ballot access cases.
	Okay, Robert, give me a few minutes to do some of the tipped questions in vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Then we want to do the terrorist one because I think that might be particularly relevant at this point in time.
	Schnookums, five bucks, says the act blew shenanigans on donation laundering is not totally new.
	Why no FEC or congressional inquiry?
	That's a question I had, Robert, because O'Keefe had done a...
	I mean, I just retweeted his current one, but he did something on this years ago and nothing.
	The crickets, they don't care about it.
	Well, the Republicans in the House are weak, so that would be the only body that would want to be involved.
	All right, we've got Will Rogers, who says, The money laundering that Barnes is referring to was named Smurfing and is a massive identity theft.
	See Peter Berneger on X-Telegram.
	I'm going to bring that up in a second.
	Yes, that's correct.
	It's called Smurfing.
	Okay, good.
	I have Democrat friends concerned about Trump's affiliation with Project 2025.
	What do I tell them?
	This is from Ganthet.
	I mean, Trump is, Project 2025 is a group of conservative think tanks ideas for the Trump administration.
	Trump has not signed off on any of them as yet.
	Some of their ideas are good.
	Some of their ideas I'm less of a fan of.
	But the ideas that are good are taking apart the administrative state.
	That's what's got the media climbing the walls.
	Anybody that thinks that the Democrats putting Project 2025 and some of that, that's going to cause people to vote against Trump.
	It just shows Democrats live in their own little world.
	They read their own little publications and blogs.
	They created so many safe spaces that they no longer know what the real world thinks.
	And I think it's what we're witnessing.
	I didn't realize that I should love Project 2025 until I saw how the media was going nuts over it.
	So now I'm sure that whatever's in it I will agree with or should agree with.
	Well, it's like them making a big deal about J.D. Vance talking about All the childless cat ladies who want to run our lives.
	And they kept running this story with a picture of Kamala Harris in news stations around the world, around the country.
	And I'm like, all the ordinary person is going to see is, oh, if I get Kamala Harris as president, I'm going to be governed by childless cat ladies.
	I mean, it's like, if I were them, I would have never made that critique.
	Because you're reminding them of exactly what ordinary people don't, everybody knows.
	About the childish cat ladies.
	We all know them.
	They got like 25 cats.
	You know, they're running around everywhere.
	And it's a specific type.
	It's childish cat ladies who like to go around and lecture everybody.
	They're always spying on their neighbors.
	They're the nosy neighbor that's really annoying.
	That's Kamala Harris.
	That's what government by Kamala Harris would be.
	It is funny.
	I didn't get much flack, but I got some flack for retweeting that meme where it says, hope with Obama, hate with Trump.
	What was the other one?
	I forget the other two.
	And I'm like, the irony is that all three...
	If they stuck with the H, they would have just been ho for Kamala Harris.
	I appreciate the argument.
	Even giving advertising...
	Retweeting the message, but...
	Sticking the cat lady with Kamala is not the best branding.
	We got DTQC.
	After the DNC screwed over Bernie, they got sued for violating their own rules.
	The DNC lawyers successfully argued that they were not legally bound by their own rules since they are a private organization.
	Could this be used as antecedent or precedent?
	Robert, what do you...
	One more time?
	That the lawyers in the DNC, when they screwed over Bernie, they said they violated their own rules.
	Not exactly.
	But generally speaking, they make it very difficult to sue the DNC.
	Lying State says, what do you say to those who believe while Trump may get the votes this time out to take the big chair again?
	That's the despair element, Robert.
	I mean, how do you prevent people from despairing?
	I mean, I think they need to win outside the margin of fraud.
	And they're not even going to get anywhere close.
	So the probabilities are prevailing.
	The laws are better this time around.
	The awareness is better this time around.
	Hopefully there'll be legal advocates.
	They're ready to go.
	And I think you combine those factors, very unlikely that they're going to be able to steal it.
	And I'm skeptical of people that...
	Say, oh, they're just going to steal it.
	Because that's a person that's saying, oh, just don't do anything.
	Just quit.
	Just give up and go home.
	Those are cowards at heart.
	Disguised as cynics.
	So I find those people to be untrustworthy people when they say that.
	I'm going to read this tip because it's a $5 tip and I'm not endorsing the message someone does not like Jeremy.
	He says he's a shitlord.
	This is Ganthed who says he's on the level of destiny.
	I disagree.
	There's some drama in there, but he's not on the level of destiny.
	He was never.
	You have those weak-kneed influencers.
	You have people that are just interesting and covering the news.
	That's how I see Cordering.
	He doesn't try to be an influencer.
	He just covers the news and covers them from an angle that's not being covered by other people.
	And sometimes in the news, there's drama, and you gotta cover it.
	Oh, sure, and he covers that like everybody else.
	But he's not trying to influence like people like Destiny were.
	And that guy is just a loser.
	A lot of these people are just losers.
	I don't understand how Destiny got whatever intellectual clout anyone ever gave him.
	That's because YouTube likes that side of the opinion, is my takeaway.
	Mandelichi Barnes, please talk about getting ahead of the 2024 election fraud with latches and standing.
	What can we do?
	It goes to be proactive beforehand.
	You see the ballot access cases.
	Robert Kennedy's making a lot of good law because Democrats are suing him everywhere.
	Literally everywhere.
	Everywhere he gets on the ballot, they sue to try to get him off the ballot.
	It's unbelievable.
	But he's winning constantly.
	They haven't won in court yet.
	I think the Democrats are going to set a record for losing against Robert Kennedy and that's going to create great ballot access laws for us in the future.
	I've been asking, I text with Kyle Kemper, he's been on the channel, he's doing a lot of work for the campaign, and I would love for Kennedy to say, let's have an open convention, because at least from my predicted stock now, which I'm losing radically because Kamala's still in there, I say, what would Kennedy do if he says, I want to go to Chicago and raise hell, or at the very least, go in and lose, but make them prove that they are an undemocratic Democrat party?
	What does he have to do to say open convention and I want to throw my hat in?
	Well, I mean, he could show up and they would block him at the door.
	So he could create some drama.
	Damn it.
	So there's no chance, but I bought him at one penny.
	Unfortunately not.
	The Democratic Party has strict, rigid controls of those things.
	That will be like the security at the Democratic National Convention will be off the charts.
	It will be crazy.
	JonathanG94 has a good point here.
	He says, Cancelling Gina Carano was primarily pursued by Kathleen Kennedy to humiliate Jon Favreau and get him to quit.
	She ultimately failed.
	That was one of them.
	It turns out there are three things.
	The Disney CEO was in trouble because of the scandal of the stock collapsing and their China involvement.
	Favreau loved Gina Carano, wanted to put her in a bunch of stuff, and was going to make her a huge star because he recognized she already was a huge star.
	And Kathleen Kennedy didn't want that to happen.
	But the bigger backdrop was Disney and Hollywood believed they could weaponize all of their power, economic and cultural, to indoctrinate the world, including forcing anybody.
	If you ever want an acting job, if you ever want a screenwriting job, in your spare time, you have to be echoing the 1984 principles.
	And their fact they just lost on that legally means they're going to be in trouble because they've done that to a bunch of people.
	So those lawsuits are going to be piling up soon against these corrupt Hollywood companies.
	And there was Yael Rivka who had a humorous meme in there, which I cannot describe, but we'll get back to the tips afterwards.
	Right now, Robert, so this being put on a terrorist watch list, and I'm reading it, and before I get to the names, because I'm like, oh, this is going to be Jan Sixers who were put on a terror watch list, and we're all going to care.
	And I'm not trying to be cynical or funny.
	Then when you realize, well, it's Muslim.
	Muslim Americans.
	Did you get my...
	I thought this would be a good place to play the South Park.
	Dude, Robert, I'll play it.
	I will preface it by saying I do not endorse this message.
	I do not necessarily approve of this message.
	Hold on.
	I replied back and said, yeah, we won't.
	We may or may not start with that.
	Hold on.
	Let's bring it up here, Cartman.
	Okay, hold on.
	Hold on.
	This is basically the modern terror watch list in America.
	The South Park is just damn.
	I feel stupid for not having ever fully appreciated how genius they are.
	I do not endorse this message entirely.
	This is hilarious comedy, and if you don't find it funny, well, tough noggies.
	Here, watch it.
	All right, students, let's take our seats.
	Everyone tried to be nice because we have a new student joining us today.
	And I know you all make him feel welcome.
	Say hello to Bahir Hassan Abdul Hakim.
	Uh-oh!
	Welcome to our class, Bahir.
	Thank you.
	Dude, do not cook!
	Why don't you take a seat in Kyle's empty desk for now?
	Okay. Eric, what the hell is wrong with you?
	What's wrong?
	Has he been checked for bombs?
	Eric, that's enough.
	Not all Muslim people are terrorists.
	No, but most of them are.
	And all it takes is most of them.
	So, why is the teacher wearing a shirt that looks like it's highlighting his or her boobs?
	Because they were playing around because she was a cross-gender thing.
	I mean, they were on top of all these things before.
	They got PC Principal before everybody else.
	The crazy, you know, they've been ahead of the curve on all these things.
	But that's basically the terror watch list in America.
	And people didn't care about it back in the day.
	First of all, everyone was quite swept up.
	I presume this goes back to the Patriot Act of post 9-11.
	Everyone's swept up in it.
	Oh, it's for the greater good.
	It's for our security.
	So anybody with a certain sounding last name put them on a list.
	This was challenging how they got on the list and it was the APA challenges that there's no reason to this.
	We're just stuck on a list and it screws our...
	People care about it now.
	Now that there's a bunch of January Sixers on the list.
	And I say that not as a critique.
	I say that as...
	That's how people get their eyes open when it happens to them.
	Take it from here.
	Yeah, I don't know if I've been on the list.
	I just know I've got random specialized screening in places.
	My favorite one was in Boston.
	I think it's whenever I ticked off the wrong people in government, they would stick me on the list for like a year.
	Because I would go through like a year where specialized screening, all that jazz.
	My favorite one was in Boston.
	Where I got specialized screening, and I usually carry, I'm going to create one for 1776 Law Center.
	We're going to, I keep mispronouncing, that's supposed to be.com, not.locals, but I keep misdoing it.
	But 1776lawcenter.com, we're going to be doing these little pocket constitutions and highlight food freedom and some other ones in particular.
	But I carried a U.S. Constitution with me, a little pocket one, and the TSA guard pulled it out and said, what are you doing with this?
	You're kidding, right?
	This is like an inside joke.
	This is like a secret camera somewhere.
	I'm going to be on some punk show or something.
	I was like, I'm in Boston?
	And you're asking a lawyer?
	A constitutional lawyer?
	Why he carries a pocket constitution?
	And he's like, and then I could tell he was dead serious.
	He was like, there's something.
	Maybe this is why you're on the list, buddy.
	It was my favorite poll back in the 1970s.
	Where they quoted from parts of the Declaration of Independence without telling people it was.
	And they would ask them, does this sound like some commie propaganda to you?
	And there were some people like, yep.
	Because, you know, they lost touch with our founding.
	So what happened is, first after 9-11, and then in 2002, they passed new laws.
	They created the Department of Homeland Security.
	You know, the fatherland.
	The fatherland.
	I remember when it was first passed, a buddy of mine was like, you won't believe me.
	They've actually just passed a law.
	It's just like the Nazi law.
	It's actually called fatherland securitas.
	But Robert, I'll stop you there.
	That only makes sense.
	That only strikes the conscience of somebody who knows that you had the fatherland in the past.
	So the new generation doesn't and they don't even understand the echoes of the past.
	Sorry. That's why you gotta live and learn.
	So they created another one there.
	So they create TSA and they say use federal databases to spy on people.
	Then they create the DHS.
	And then they say, you know what?
	You should use all databases everywhere to find out who should get specialized screening and who should be put on a no-fly list.
	And now there's like six agencies.
	Now, what's interesting is people like Peter Thiel get criticized because he stepped in when this software was getting really invasive.
	So the law was so broad.
	That it was basically any databases.
	So the CIA was outspending tons of money to develop databases that could be really invasive in the guise of, oh, we're just trying to see who should be on the no-fly list.
	So what Peter Thiel does, he's been a longtime critic of a lot of this.
	He's backed Ron Paul's campaign.
	He's put his money where his mouth is many times on this issue.
	He steps in and he buys up the software companies at the CIA.
	Thought they had invested in so that he controls them instead of the CIA.
	And he shifts the software in the direction of actual security rather than being so invasive.
	And anybody that's familiar with how the watch list has worked, it's nowhere near as bad, actually, as it started.
	It started out horrendous.
	I mean, there was all kinds of people on that watch list.
	If you're a Muslim, you were guaranteed to be on the watch list, pretty much.
	But other people, too.
	So, now, that doesn't change the fact.
	I have problems with these policies.
	And it passed by Congress.
	I have problems with these agencies.
	But for some reason, people blame Peter Thiel for the policies and the agency's behavior.
	When Thiel stepped in with Palantir and created software that limited the invasive quality, not expanded it.
	And yet people like Whitney Webb, who can't understand these kind of things, if you're going to be critical of somebody, at least read what they've written.
	At least listen to what they have said.
	Watch their entire history.
	Peter Thiel's not quiet or bashful.
	I mean, Peter Thiel's been one of the biggest promoters of Bitcoin, where President Trump and Robert Kennedy were this past week, past weekend, also now championing and cheering on Bitcoin because he wants it to take away the power of the state to run your life.
	So, you know, don't turn your allies into adversaries because you're as dumb as Whitney Webb.
	But in the middle of all this, the question is, what was the legal basis of these terror watch lists?
	So they brought suit, and there's two different components of them.
	There's the extra screening, and then there's the no-fly list.
	There's a program called TRIP.
	They always got to come up with these cute little names.
	The program is called TRIP, T-R-I-P.
	It's an acronym.
	And you can ask the government whether you're on a no-fly list or whether you're subject to special screening and you're supposed to be given an administrative appeal remedy to correct any misinformation there.
	However, they won't tell you if you're on the special screening list.
	They will tell you if you're on the no-fly list.
	And sometimes they will take you.
	They sued because they said, we don't think Congress ever really clearly gave this power to these agencies.
	The problem is, yes, they did, sadly.
	Congress could have still been more clear.
	It was written by the intelligence agencies to actually make the power even more broad and vague than it should have been.
	I mean, basically, Congress gave the agencies the power to use any databases anywhere to do this.
	Now, they correctly complained that Congress has not given them power beyond flying.
	That there's no power to use this for traffic stops.
	There's no power to use this on January Sixers.
	There's no power to use this for a domestic terror watch list like the FBI is using on January Sixers and Trump supporters.
	That there's no congressional authority for that they can identify.
	The problem, of course, how do you think the court got out of that?
	No standing.
	No standing, of course.
	You haven't yet been harmed that way.
	So even though that's probably illegal, we're not going to do anything about it.
	The courts love, by the way, all these watch lists.
	Now, you can find out whether you're on a no-fly list, contrary to what a certain prominent personality claimed to be on a no-fly list, claimed he couldn't find out whether he was on it or not.
	Yes, you can.
	It's the Traveler's Redress Inquiry Program, Robert.
	TRIP. Yes.
	Aptly named.
	TRIP for short.
	Of course.
	I think that the court's decision is correct that this is what Congress intended, that it did give the agencies this authority.
	I think they should have given it to them more specifically.
	It's kind of like taxation authority.
	It should be presumed an agency doesn't have it unless it's very specifically given to them.
	But I think there are still constitutional issues with aspects of this, but that part of the case didn't reach the appellate courts.
	And I think what there needs to be is legislative reform is the bottom line.
	And then there needs to be remedial action when the agencies are using these databases in ways that they are not.
	Just on a purely logical level, the idea that this is for actual security and not for control, they implement this for terror watch lists, etc.
	While they have an open border south at the Mexican border, where they're letting in terrorists quite literally.
	It must be done with DHS to sharply restrict illegal immigration.
	Now that's one of the good tools of it, potentially, if Trump gets in there, is you can use these tools to spot identify, locate.
	Dangerous illegal immigrants and get them out of the country.
	I don't dispute that there can be positive use of database activity, database scraping, data monitoring.
	Some people say that these software shouldn't exist.
	Because it can be used for bad purposes, it shouldn't be used for any purpose.
	We should ban its existence.
	I think that's probably not practical, because China's going to do it anyway.
	So, you know, I think unilateral disarmament probably isn't the most strategic, tactically wise program.
	But I don't dispute that it can be used for good.
	It can be used for good, it can be used for bad, like almost any tool.
	And the degree to which it's used for good or bad depends on who we elect in positions of power and courts holding people accountable.
	Robert, let me bring up a few here.
	MKUltra1, David the 90s called their dial-up modem back.
	Dude, you're telling me.
	It took me an hour to upload my Twitter video.
	I'm jogging, at least, so I could listen to Ben Carson.
	Ben Carson on Tucker Carlson is an amazing listen.
	You have to listen to that.
	Ginger Ninja in the house, a member of our locals community as well.
	One, Robert Viva, you need to look into what's going on with Mike Glover, former Green Beret.
	I'm screen grabbing it because I think I had this on the list before.
	Bogus criminal charges in Utah.
	It's been months they ended up dropping the charges all because they're BS, but he lost his children to the system.
	You can be completely innocent, but when the power comes after you, absolutely.
	I'm going to look up Mike Lover.
	Thank you.
	Eastside Tony.
	Vegas shooting was a Saudi attempt to assassinate MBS gone wrong.
	Who's MBS?
	But I think I heard this theory as well.
	That's the Saudi leader.
	They needed to create a mass casualty event in order to pull out the Saudi assassination squad.
	I heard that.
	Robert Eastside Tony, what are your thoughts on the Bitcoin dollar and the United States' ability to use laws to hyperinflate the dollar into Bitcoin?
	Oh, I thought you were going to ask what Trump said on Bitcoin yesterday, which I would have been able to answer myself.
	I'm not able to answer that question.
	I thought Robert Kennedy talked about a Bitcoin Fort Knox.
	So it's very promising.
	That we're seeing financial freedom find political acceptance in multiple political arenas, not only Kennedy's campaign, but particularly President Trump's campaign.
	So that, I think, is very hopeful for those of us that, like Peter Thiel, see it as a very promising tool for individual freedom against central banks and central planners who want to use it for their own nefarious purposes.
	Robert, but as I'm listening to, I was listening to RFK a little bit, but then Trump, and I'm saying, okay, fine.
	So he's giving a good speech talking about the value of Bitcoin, and he's going to appeal to the nerdlingers, and I say that with love and respect, but that's a very small portion of the population.
	You talk about big demographics who don't understand, care about Bitcoin whatsoever.
	How do you reach the swaths of the population that the Democrat-controlled media is going to reach?
	Like, what's Trump's tactic to do that right now?
	They've got to get down and do some funny memes and stuff as well?
	Well, but really, you look at where they're at, that they're not on Democrat-controlled media that much.
	I mean, increasingly, they're on podcasts, they're on social media, they're on TikTok, and they do their own thing so that they don't get their sources from, like, my guess is your audience skews very old on all media.
	Fox, MSNBC, CNN, etc.
	So they've lost the ability to control the narrative with young voters.
	That Rumble, Musk freeing up X, that these have created independent social media platforms.
	And then just the prevalence.
	I mean, they've grown up with podcasts as normal, as a way to gain information.
	And when the left lost people like Joe Rogan, they were in big trouble.
	All right.
	What do we move on to now, Robert?
	Oh, we got the initiative.
	Speaking of, so ballot access, Robert Kennedy keeps winning those cases.
	Hopefully he will continue to against the Democratic Party's multiple efforts to keep him off the ballot.
	What's amazing is, because I'm on a lot of these, I'm on both Republican and Democratic email lists from past political activities and clients I've represented, because I've represented people across the spectrum.
	I'm on the Libertarian list, the Green Party list, the taxpayer.
	I'm on everybody's list.
	But it's amazing.
	I'll get the Democratic Party list.
	I'll get notification about how Republicans are trying to do bad things on voter and ballot access.
	And it's right at the same time that they're filing suit to keep people from being able to vote for Robert Kennedy.
	Their lack of self-awareness is striking.
	I think there's something unique to this sort of Soviet Stasi safe space world.
	That makes people unable to hear critics, that they can't see themselves even in the mirror.
	And so one of the efforts was in California, where Camila is from, they basically tried to make it, in the name of helping workers, they were going to drive independent contractors out of business.
	All Uber drivers were going to be out of business because they were forcing them to be employees.
	With workers' comp and other protections, the unions thought they could unionize everybody.
	In fact, what a lot of truckers said is we can't be truckers in California then.
	And what a lot of Uber drivers said is Uber driving won't exist in the state of California.
	So they put on the initiative, they let the voters decide.
	And the voters decided, no, we want people to stay independent contractors.
	We don't want them to be forced to be W-2 employees under the control of the state administrative matrix.
	And so then the union members came in and they sued, saying, well, that violates the workers' comp rules and that this constitutional provision tops this controversial constitutional provision.
	And so the question was, is the initiative enforceable or not?
	And thankfully, the California Supreme Court unanimously said we have to favor initiatives.
	When the people of the state put something through, we have to presume it's legally valid unless it's...
	Clear that there's something else in the Constitution that prohibits it or precludes it that is not negated by this initiative.
	And they said there isn't.
	That, in fact, there wasn't exclusive to the legislature to govern workers' comp.
	You could have the people pass their own legislation through initiative.
	And for all those that are independent contractors in California, it was very good news.
	Because otherwise, that prop would have been thrown out, and they would have been back in economic no-man's land due to the craziness of California's rules and laws.
	I was going to say something there.
	And obviously they wanted the independent contractors because it's more tax effective from the employee perspective, which pisses off the unions because they want the union dues and they want the control over the employees.
	Politics ruins everything.
	No doubt about it.
	Speaking of politics ruins everything, what happens when you're on a Navy ship and you crash into a foreign tanker in a foreign land?
	That's the case of the USS John McCain.
	Which the only reason the U.S. courts were even hearing it is because of the old Titanic law.
	That was the law that was passed way before the Titanic in 1851, which gave this immunity.
	If you owned a ship and the ship went and caused an accident, you as the owner were only on the hook for the freight and the vessel.
	You weren't on the hook for any harm you caused anybody else.
	Unless you as the owner knew about it.
	It created a system.
	Incentivizing owners to not control their own ships and to not know what's going on in their own ships.
	The Titanic infamously used it with some pals on the Supreme Court of a certain owner of the Titanic to be able to walk away from much liability for all the harm they cause, including no one could sue for wrongful death.
	They could only sue for the freight.
	And who knows, maybe...
	The owner of that ship wanted some of those people to go down with that ship because he helped found a certain federal institution called the Federal Reserve, if you still consider it federal.
	Did you do a hush-hush yet on the Titanic, or is this the one that's coming up?
	Yes, I did a hush-hush on it.
	So you can explore it a little bit more there, all the different alternative narratives.
	Was it even the Titanic that sunk?
	That was a lot of fun.
	So the USS John McCain...
	Kind of named after John McCain, and kind of like John McCain, just couldn't last.
	So it collided with an oil tanker in Singapore.
	The oil tanker is Liberian.
	Now, none of these ships are really Liberian, but that's the favorite place for all your big tankers and your big ships, your international ships, to register because of certain legal and political protections that come with it.
	Oil tanker says it's all in the fault of the USS John McCain.
	The people in the USS John McCain say, no, some fault of it is on the oil tanker.
	So the oil tanker uses that old Titanic law to try to limit their liability, and they sue in U.S. courts.
	But because the incident happened in Singapore's waters, Singapore's law is applied.
	But because Singapore is an old English common law jurisdiction, it mostly is English common law that was actually being applied.
	Rather than something specific to Singapore's laws beyond that.
	And so you end up in a U.S. court with Singapore law applying English common law.
	But of course, at the end of the day, they decide that the U.S. is 80% at fault.
	The judge finds different reasons to shift some blame to the oil tanker.
	But the problem for the oil tanker is they're like, okay, we want indemnity for our 20% responsibility because this is hundreds of millions of dollars of damages in total.
	For our 20%, we want the U.S. to pay because they owe 80%.
	And what do you think the U.S. government says?
	Oh, no, we got sovereign immunity.
	You sued in U.S. courts, pal.
	So guess what?
	There is no indemnity claim.
	You got to pay the full freight.
	So even though you only caused 20% of the damage, you got to pay all the amount.
	And so they get screwed because they made the mistake of suing in a U.S. court.
	To try to get remedy and relief.
	But it does finally explain what happened to the USS John McCain.
	There were systemic flaws in the Navy hierarchy that led to that accident.
	Trying to add this to the stage.
	Ten people died in that disaster.
	Yes. Ten sailors died in the coalition.
	Families of the five sailors attended the court-martial of the former McCain commanding office.
	And the doctrine of sovereign immunity is all this bogus nonsense about we can't second-guess military decisions.
	And all it's done is it's designed...
	To allow the U.S. military to screw up, cause the deaths of American soldiers, and then not pay a penny for doing so.
	Going to get some chat here.
	Ithaca37Cato5Bucks says, How can a middle-class, working-class person buy just one Bitcoin?
	You could buy fractions.
	They sell them in every fraction.
	I remember when it was the cost of a pizza.
	Today, Coindesk has one Bitcoin priced at $68,000.
	Can you buy a person?
	Oh, yeah.
	You could buy down to...
	You could buy...
	You could buy a penny's worth of Bitcoin.
	And then if it goes up, you'll have five pennies tomorrow.
	BroPro66 says, if George Washington would have had the attitude of they're just going to cheat me, never would have won the revolution.
	Ganthit says, I watched you and Barnes because I can be assured of what you believe you're doing, whether I agree with your ideology or opinions in what you're doing.
	Jeremy is, has, and will always be a grifter, believes in nothing and only...
	Look, I don't want to start a...
	Everyone's entitled to their opinion.
	I like the quarterback.
	You can dislike the quarterback.
	It's fine.
	But mostly he covers news, so he's not really an aggressive commentator.
	He has his opinions and his takes, but it's just not your institutional media takes.
	That's why there's a market for it.
	Ganthed, there's another one from Ganthed.
	He works really hard.
	He, like, researches everything.
	Oh, he definitely works hard.
	Ganthed says in a $20 post up there, it says, I've been watching Jeremy the Courting since before you were streaming.
	You haven't watched the Courting for any length of time.
	I think I have, though, but maybe I'm in his.
	Okay, he has a very long history.
	Yadda, yadda, yadda.
	Okay, Ganthed, thank you.
	Patty F. Weber, five bucks, says, is the tall man supposed to be Joe Biden?
	I'm comparing to Hunter the guy.
	Oh, yeah, do you think he's a fake guy?
	Do you think he's the, what do they call it, stunt double?
	No, but if they were going to do a body double, Robert, they do one who can finish a sentence.
	What's the purpose of slipping in an incompetent body double?
	Well, maybe that one was AI.
	Maybe the one walking around outside is the body double, but the one that was on the TV broadcast is AI Joe Biden.
	I would have been more inclined to think...
	And they left in some screw-ups to make it seem real.
	Because remember when they did the AI Joe Biden on the phone, people were like, that can't be Joe Biden.
	I'm looking at you, kid.
	I'm looking at you, kid.
	I would be more inclined to think that they wanted to throw Biden under the bus so they get an actor and slap on one of those rubber faces.
	I'm being half serious here, people.
	But yeah, no, I've heard people say that the height didn't make any sense.
	Are you going to talk about Elon Musk's Kamala?
	AI. Oh yeah, we did.
	I played that video.
	That's from FreeSC01.
	I unfortunately was never blessed to have any children of my own.
	I have three cats and one dog.
	I am not a crazy cat lady.
	I believe that...
	Well, I'll get to this.
	This is Denise Antu.
	You can be pets and lots of people don't have kids of their own.
	It's more of we all know of what Vance is describing.
	It's the certain deliberately childless 25 cats.
	Who wants to run your life?
	That's the three components.
	I want to finish it just because it says here, I believe in the Jesus Christ and the Constitution of these United States of America, and I mind my own business.
	She's got Lord knows how many animals.
	There's like 15 of them running out.
	There's like hamsters.
	There's like guinea pigs.
	There's like, you know, the...
	Well, I mean, you got the local disabled dog clinic there in the Viva Friday.
	Oh, God, Robert.
	I'm not losing my temper with them.
	I just want them to...
	It's the whining of the dog because she gets no pleasure on the wife except for eating.
	No, but JD gave a follow-up.
	That video is still going to be an all-time classic.
	Whenever you left, waited until you left, we gave it a good amount of time, then could figure out a way to open the door to get into the jacket that had hidden inside of it the candy.
	That was like all-time heist level.
	The dog is very smart, and I believe she's a reincarnated human.
	But J.D. Vance gave an interview, and he said, it's not the cat lady.
	What I was specifically talking about is the type of person who's infatuated with abortion, infatuated with living something of a selfish, independent life, and obviously not people who didn't have kids for whatever reason or can't procreate for medical reasons.
	Everybody understands.
	Maybe it's a complete caricature.
	But we all know that caricature and stereotype.
	The people that are a little crazy and that like to run the world.
	Like to rat on you when you're too close to people outdoors during COVID time.
	Just Thinking says Trump should demand that the debate between him and Kamala should be broadcast live on TV.
	That would be great.
	Rumble with Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson.
	Well, those would be biased moderators or at least alleged biased moderators.
	I'll be the moderator.
	There, I'll be totally objective.
	Harry Toast says, my guess is that the October surprise is Trump and RFK going on Joe Rogan, but Kamala will refuse.
	That would be interesting.
	And Eastside Tony, what are your thoughts on the Bitcoin dollar?
	We got that.
	Yeah, I got that.
	All right.
	How many do we have left, and should we do the rest in the locals-only afterparty?
	Yeah, we got, you know, the nature of defamation has come up in some cases recently, and it's just a good, you know, recourse on that.
	I'll be bringing suit for...
	Robert Kennedy soon on a defamation claim.
	And then when juror bias is actionable.
	When you can do something and how courts weasel their way out of biased jurors.
	And they do it by how they manipulate jury selection in the first place.
	Matt G. Hammond says, can we watch the movie Dave as the next Locals movie?
	It will show us how they will place a president.
	It was up there with...
	What was the other one?
	No, I think it was number two.
	Have you done Bullworth yet?
	I think you did Bullworth, right?
	I haven't, but I've never been a huge Bowers fan.
	That's okay, but you know.
	Look, I watched it 25 or 30 years ago.
	Okay, so Robert, what we're going to do, we're going to end it on Rumble and Twitter.
	We're going to go over to Locals.
	What do you have scheduled for this week?
	Remind everybody before we leave.
	So tomorrow is going to be...
	Also, Amos Miller's case we will discuss over on Locals, because I'm working on a big brief, because the man that's up for vice presidential nomination of Kamala Harris, one Governor Shapiro of Pennsylvania, who's running around attacking President Trump, believe it or not, on issues of being pro-worker and pro-freedom.
	And this is the guy who's locked up farm workers illegally in the state of Pennsylvania.
	This is a guy who's trying to shut down an Amish farmer, Amos Miller, from even being able to sell his food to anybody anywhere.
	And this guy has the nerve, the chutzpah, to go up and attack Trump on freedom and workers when he's busy violating workers' freedom every single day in the state of Pennsylvania.
	So we'll talk about that case, the defamation case and the juror bias case over on Locals.
	And I replied to that tweet.
	Like, Josh Shapiro, who is the governor of the state that basically facilitated the live execution of a president, he should watch the way he talks about that person.
	The guy who bragged about stealing the 2020 election.
	He said, Trump is not going to get it.
	We'll make sure that Trump doesn't get it.
	I'll pull up that tweet a little later.
	While he was attorney general of the state of Pennsylvania.
	On my end, everybody, I start the drive back tomorrow.
	We're going to take our time.
	I'm going to see.
	Maybe I'll hit Tim Pool up when we go through Virginia.
	And I'm thinking about Butler, but I'm not sure that that would be a big detour.
	But I'll be live in as much as I can with updates.
	Oh, it will be on tomorrow, 1 o'clock.
	I think, well, probably 2 o'clock Eastern.
	On What Are The Odds, People's Pundit Daily with Richard Barris, explaining to people why Kamala Harris will be a disaster.
	For the Democratic Party.
	From your mouth to God's ears.
	One of the greatest picks that Trump could have ever made.
	The media is already saying that Trump regrets his pick of J.D. Vance.
	They thrive on sewing discipline.
	Which tells you how good of choice J.D. Vance was.
	All right.
	We are ending on Twitter.
	Done now.
	And we're going to end on Rumble, everybody.
	Let me give everybody the link one more time and come for the after party on...
	What am I doing?
	I'm trying to get...
	This is the link.
	I'm going to go put it in the chat here.
	Link. To locals.
	And come on over, but before you leave, if you're not coming over to locals, come.
	But drop a like, make sure that you're subscribed.
	And there was one more that just came in here.
	It says, we have to remember, the Olympics has always been weird, ancient, pagan sex stuff, says Dan Vicious.
	And Joe Maskey says, by the way, as a native-born Californian who read most of the state constitution, that document is rife for collisions of one right against another.
	All right.
	We're going to...
	How do I do this here?
	I've got to go like this.
	Oh, we probably should also talk about...
	Christopher Wray being a rat.
	Let's definitely do that, but I want to make sure not to end the wrong stream.
	I'm going to end the stream manually in Rumble.
	I'm going to leave it going on locals.
	So locals, we're there in three seconds.
	Everybody else, if you're not coming, let's start off with Christopher Wray being a sneaky, weird old wascal.
	Ending on Rumble, thank you all for being here.
	Locals, here we come.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Now let me just make sure...
	I'm not an anti-pet person.
	But I am a little bit prejudiced against pets.
	All my family love pets.
	My little sister loves, loves, loves pets.
	I always see them, and I see wolves in disguise and tigers in disguise.
	They're just waiting to pounce on you.
	You're a unique person.
	You like to be around water, but not in it.
	You know, you like animals, but don't want them in your house.
	I appreciate that.
	I find it.
	I also find it weird.

▲