All Episodes
Previous Next
July 21, 2024 - Viva & Barnes
02:39:18
Ep. 220: Hillary Running? Trump Assassination Attempt UPDATES! Student Loans; Hunter Biden & MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What we can see, what we believe can be unburdened by what has been.
What can be unburdened by what has been.
What can be unburdened.
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be unburdened by what has been.
Who we can be unburdened by who we have been.
What can be unburdened by what has been.
Where we can be unburdened by where we have been and unburdened by where we are right now.
What can be Unburdened.
Unburdened by what has been.
How long would we have to watch this story?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What could be unburdened by what had been?
What can be unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
Unburdened by what has been.
Believing in what can be.
What can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
Love the mask.
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What can be unburdened by what can be unburdened.
Unburdened by what has been.
See what can be unburdened by what has been.
What can be unburdened by what has been.
And knowing what can be.
Have a sense of vision about what can be unburdened by what has been.
See what can be.
What can be unburdened by what has been?
I don't know about you, but I feel dumber right now for having watched two and a half minutes of that, and I've watched that more than once today.
Everyone in the room is now dumber for having listened to that.
I award you no points, Kamala Harris, and may God have mercy on your soul.
What the hell does it even mean?
Unburdened by what?
Now I forget the expression.
Unburdened by what has been.
And I forgot where it goes after that.
Good evening, everybody.
May I be the first to say I called it?
I told you so.
I'm the smartest man that has ever lived.
I'm not.
I'm joking.
But it does feel good to make the prediction.
A long time ago.
And then it becomes more and more likely.
And then everyone jumps on the bandwagon and they say, oh, I always said it.
I said it before it was cool to say it.
My only problem is the betting aspect of it hasn't paid off because I hedged my bets a little bit too much by betting on Hillary, Michelle, and Gretchen Whitmer, all of whom are down substantially today because it would seem that in addition to gracefully backing out, he's sharp as a tack, better than ever, stronger than ever.
He's cogent.
He's mentally fit and he's out.
He got behind Kamala Harris and it wouldn't be the first.
Sorry. For those of you who are living under a rock and you haven't heard the news, Joseph R. Biden.
I don't even know if that's his middle name.
Joe Biden has withdrawn from the race today.
The only question is whether or not he knows that he did.
He has bowed out.
I'm going to go show off my Hebrew here.
We got M. Sid Loy in our rumble.
It says, "Shalom, David." I don't know what that says.
Okay, I have no idea what that says, but I'll have to look at that afterwards.
Sid Lloyd, nice to see you again.
Oh my goodness!
May you live in interesting times.
Biden is out.
Alex Jones is on Twitter yesterday with the news that Hillary's going to replace Biden.
Everybody's gotten behind Kamala Harris today.
I mean, I even heard that Willie Brown got behind...
Kamala today.
Bada bing, bada boom, I'm out of here.
Everybody seems to be getting behind Kamala, except if you've noticed Obama.
His statement was acutely devoid of any I wholeheartedly endorse Kamala.
There will be infighting.
And if anybody's been listening to me, I don't have a betting market page like Robert Barnes, but Kamala Harris at 81 cents to be the presidential nominee.
Is very high.
And if I could place another bet, I would bet against Kamala Harris right now because there will be infighting.
It will be ugly.
And I am predicting that we have not heard the last from Hillary Clinton.
I'm going to talk about it with Barnes when he gets in here because I've got some insights which I think are darn good.
But I had to go live, make sure that we're all good across the interwebs, make sure that I go to that YouTube thing because we're going to start on YouTube.
And Twitter and Rumble and vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Then we're going to end on YouTube and Twitter and go exclusive after we talk about the big stuff to Rumble and vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Then we end on Rumble and then we have our after party at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
But when we go live, I've got to go and make sure that I check off that little box that says, this stream contains a paid promotion.
Because it does, people.
And that paid promotion of the day is...
The wellness company.
Now, I don't know if you've been following the news, but there's news about the chicken flu, whatever they call it, the chicken to foxes.
From chicken to foxes, here's how bird flu is spreading across the U.S. This was an article in some news outlet.
I saw this article.
Ex-Harvard epidemiologist, got to pronounce that properly, professor tweeted this.
And the tweet below was, That is coming from Eric Fagel Ding.
The Wellness Company is on top of it.
If you don't know, it's been founded by Dr. Peter McCullough.
The Wellness Company has what they call the Contagion Emergency Kit.
It has a variety of medicines to treat respiratory illnesses, all of which you need to make sure that you avoid getting stuck in a hospital bed.
The wellness company removes the red tape of getting these prescription medicines, which you might not be able to get in the event of the next thing, which there surely will be a next thing.
Who the hell knows what the October surprise could be?
What's it going to be?
War? World War III?
Another flu?
I don't know, another political violence?
Who the hell knows?
Maybe it could be.
It could be a white pill of an October surprise.
Maybe whistleblowers from...
Secret Service come out and say, yep, they told us to stand down.
This was a staged attempt on Trump's life.
Who knows?
There will be the next thing.
And when that thing happens, you're going to want to make sure that you have a contagion kit handy.
It's an election year and we know how desperate each party is.
The parties.
So being prepared with the contagion kit is probably a good idea.
Go to, it's called the wellness company, TWC.com forward slash Viva.
TWC.health.
Forward slash Viva.
Promo code will get you 30% off.
$30 off.
$30 off when you use the code Viva.
Use my code.
Take the quick intake form after checkout.
Kit arrives in about two weeks.
It's not available anywhere but in the USA.
So in Canada, I don't know what you should do.
I don't know how it works in terms of getting it, but it's only available in the USA.
It's a prescription kit.
The Contagion Emergency Kit.
Everybody should have at least one in their house.
And that's it.
Thank you guys very much.
People, what I was going to say is this.
You'll notice that Obama did not endorse Kamala Harris.
You'll notice that the Clintons put out some sort of half-assed, we get behind Kamala, everybody out there.
But there's a lot of people on the internet who are feeling a little bit insulted right now, who are feeling a little bit lied to, exploited.
Demeaned. Degraded.
Do you understand?
Like, I made the joke, and when Barnes gets on here, we'll talk about it a little bit.
Kamala Harris has been lying to you for a very, very long time.
Kamala Harris, Karine Jean-Pierre, the inner circle of Joe Biden has been lying to you about his declining mental state.
You know, the amazing thing is the internet is what it is.
You get tips, you get leads, you get all sorts of DMs, and some are credible, some are not.
I had it on...
From a credible source.
It's always hearsay.
It's like, I heard from somebody who heard something.
And the only thing you can do to assess it is, is it someone I trust?
Is it someone who's been right before?
It has been a known fact.
And I think we all know this.
This is the thing.
It's been a known fact that Joe Biden has been suffering from dementia, Parkinson's, Lewy body, or whatever.
That he's been getting treated for it.
You know, when you have...
Specialists coming in and out of the White House, but they won't tell you who they were there visiting.
Everybody knows it.
It's not even the best-kept secret.
It's the worst-kept secret.
Kamala Harris has been involved in...
I don't know if it rises to the level of Rico.
I'm going to ask Barnes this.
They've been involved in a national campaign of deceit, lies, and concealment.
And they've treated their constituents like pawns in their game for political power.
And some of them feel stupid, and some of them have even taken to Twitter.
To say that they are pissed.
They feel angry.
One of them, I gave a hard time last week.
I called the person the dumbest of dumb efforts because they are.
They were supporting Jill Biden and Joe Biden right up until last Friday when they were being assured he's in it to win it.
He's as cogent as ever.
And then Sunday, and he's out.
And they're like, you made me look like an idiot on a global scale.
You made me look like an idiot on social media.
Maybe some of these people are bots.
But they made idiots.
Of their followers.
And some of them are getting pissed, but understand this.
Karine Jean-Pierre, Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Jill Biden, crackhead Hunter Biden, they have been lying to you for years.
Everybody knew it.
He's probably been getting treated for dementia or something for the last extensive period of time.
When they say February, he had a full physical, no need for a...
A cognitive test.
You're damn right there was no need for it because he can't get one and then have to disclose that information when you know that he would fail it, when you know that he's being treated potentially somewhere.
So this has been going on for a very, very long time, and they've been lying to you right up until after they tried to assassinate Donald Trump.
Well, that didn't work.
So now we've got to pull him out.
Change the news cycle a little bit.
Let's stop talking about that itty-bitty, boshed assassination attempt on Trump.
And let's start talking about Joe Biden now.
New invigoration for the party.
Younger, dumber, and more female.
The dumber and female part are unrelated for you people out there who are going to accuse me of misogyny.
Kamala Harris happens to be a woman, and she happens to be as dumb as a bag of rocks.
Unburdened from what has been and what will be.
So they've been lying to you, and everybody's been realizing it now.
Let's discuss something before we fall too far behind.
Dred Robert in our local screen says it was a letter.
Do we know that Joe Jill approved it before the release?
I said it.
I mean, I've been calling it.
I've been on fire lately.
Joe Biden didn't realize his exit strategy, his exit plan, the request that he drop out of the race.
It wasn't a question.
The government, as we all know now, especially the tyrannical kind, at first they ask and then they don't, which leads me to believe why it might be.
Why Obama might not be endorsing Kamala Harris.
They might have come to Obama and said, yeah, Michelle, you should really think of jumping in the race for the Kamala at what's going to be a contested convention.
Yeah, you know, Deep State, I really don't want to.
I kind of like our Martha's Vineyard property and I don't really want to jump into that.
Yeah, Michelle, it wasn't a question.
You've got a family and we're the Deep State.
Yeah, we weren't asking.
So now you got Obama coming out and saying, yeah, Joe Biden's been great.
Won't endorse Kamala because they might also see the writing on the wall.
Those buying you off in advance.
The bribery?
The $600,000 an hour for speeches?
You thought that was free?
Ooh. Well, you were wrong.
I'm going to send Barnes the link one more time here.
That wasn't free.
And you're not off the hook yet.
We might still need you.
I do also believe that this has the fingerprints of Hillary Clinton.
She's 76. If she ever wants to be the first female president of the United States, and you know that she does, this is her last chance.
In our locals community, Cookie Queen SQ donated $100.
Thank you very much, Cookie Queen.
Making me hungry.
We got, at this moment, we should focus on what we can be unburdened by what has been cackles and cankles.
Oh, can you imagine a Hillary Clinton with, or maybe it's a VP.
It's Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton as her VP.
She'll be 80. It's too late.
It's too late.
All right, let's get through some of these here.
When are they going to break the news that Joe, that he's no longer running for president, bada bing, bada boom.
We got M. Sidloy in the house who says, that is M. Sidloy right there.
Sunday Night Fun says, Mr. Repurpose.
Now, I have to make sure...
I might have to add the caveat now.
In our Locals community, we're reaching crowds levels where it might not be sustainable to guarantee the ability to read all Rumble Rants, Super Chats, and Tips without it turning into a show that consists only of reading support, which is fantastic.
Well, I'll have to consult with Barnes in real time when he gets here.
Panther AI says, the real question of the day, will the DNC settle this madness before the convention, or will we get the grade A entertainment of a contested convention in Chicago, no less?
And it is Alabama.
Oh, it's AL, not AI.
Okay, fine.
Thank you.
History doesn't repeat, but it tends to rhyme.
We're getting a 68 contested convention.
Barnes wants to go down, and he's making a joke that we've got to go down.
But I ain't going to Chicago.
On the best of weekends, let alone on a contested convention weekend of a bunch of demons.
I'm talking about the Democrat politicians.
I don't know what their delegates are like.
I'm not going to Chicago.
When I had on just yesterday, Michael Yan, and he says, you know, like the adverse journalists are the targets.
It's like when he was telling us how journalists get killed in battle, the combat journalists when they're documenting war and crimes and et cetera, et cetera.
They get targeted because the enemy doesn't want independent, trustworthy journalists exposing their criminality.
And so they actually target them.
Anybody who's a meaningfully honest and reputable guy who analyzes me, I'm not going to Chicago.
There would be no safe place for Viva to go talk to people on the street.
It would be an unreasonable, irrational crowd that would not be safe.
But bottom line.
There will be a contested convention.
We had AOC just yesterday saying, who the hell do you think?
We're not sitting here just gonna jump on the Kamala Harris bandwagon.
I mean, who do I look like?
Joe Brown?
Bada bing, bada boom, that's gonna get old, but I'm gonna keep doing it.
AOC comes out yesterday and says, we're not just gonna back Kamala Harris because you tell us to.
This is not how it works.
RFK Jr., right before this stream, was given a press conference.
I don't like the tenor of it because he's lumping together Joe Biden and the Democrats with Donald Trump and the current ticket, which I don't think is a fair thing to equate.
There is a world of difference in morality, ethics, spirituality and policy between Trump, Vance and whoever the hell is going to be on the ticket for the Democrats.
The Democrats...
Politicians, capital D. They are demons of the highest order.
I mean, just like, if we just go through some names, Josh Shapiro, Gretchen Whitmer, Joe Biden, AOC, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton.
I mean, they're awful, awful immoral scoundrels of people.
That's not to say that Republican and GOPers are honorable people.
It is to say that Trump is.
And J.D. Vance is.
Period. I don't need to say anything bad about anybody else and I don't need to, you know, Be broader than that.
The current ticket is a man who got shot in the ear.
Stood up, not knowing if he was safe to do so.
I mean, he's told the shooter's down.
He has no idea what the hell's going on.
Puts his fist up in the air.
In the first time any of us have ever seen him as a bona fide, sincere, genuine human.
Acting in the most natural, unscripted way.
Puts his fist up and says, fight, fight, fight.
And J.D. Vance, we know him.
Hillbilly Elegy.
Been on the channel.
Awesome guy.
We are dealing with those two people compared to the roster of scoundrels, crooks, liars, and demons that you have on the Democrat ticket right now.
It's an amazing thing that for everybody in America, those are the representatives of the Democrat Party.
Hakeem Jeffries, a man who is still out there inciting hatred and violence against Donald Trump as far as I'm concerned.
Who else do you have?
Oh, yeah, the eyelash lady.
What's her name?
Crockett. And you got the squad.
Then you got Bernie Sanders, Ralph Nader, Adam Sheffield.
These are the worst people on earth.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Okay, so let's see what we got here.
JD Vance called it when he predicted the VP debate.
Did I get this one up here?
JD Vance called it when he delayed the VP debate.
It was a troll that turned into reality.
It's an amazing thing.
Then we got, use the 25th.
Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the vice president, the president shall nominate a vice president.
Well, hold on a second.
How do I get this out of here?
Okay, let's do another one.
And I'm going to do something else before we get started here.
Matt Hammond, did you see the Senate whistleblower report of the failure of Secret Service released by Senator Ron Johnson from RCP reporter Susan Crabtree on X?
I have not.
Let's pull it up right now, shall we?
Bada bing, bada boom.
And it says, breaking, Ron Johnson and his staff have written an initial report from...
Let's bring this up.
Hold on.
I'm going to bring this up in incognito.
And then I want to bring something else up that came from a member of our community, which I talked about yesterday, but now I've gotten some clarifications that I think are useful to bring to...
Oh, hold on a second.
We got something here.
Using Rumble Studio.
Do I see Barnes in the house?
Ah, yes, Barnes is coming in.
And you know what?
Before Barnes comes in, let's do the second sponsor of the night, shall we?
What a time, people.
We're living on the verge of a 1776, the time we take our country back.
And I'm referring to America as our country.
I am.
Oh, Barnes, you might be on the screen.
You're on the screen, sir.
How's it going?
Well, enjoy the coffee.
Here, let me thank our fine folks at the sponsor, 1775.
You know what?
I'm going entirely off script.
We are entering a 1776 moment of the highest order in the most meaningful sense.
We have companies that are creating a parallel economy while creating impeccable products.
1775 Coffee is one of them.
First of all, I like coffee.
I drink coffee in the morning.
I've actually started going back to coffee in the afternoon to try to whittle out of that unhealthy energy drink habit.
1775 Coffee is absolutely delicious.
Grown at the high-altitude mountains of Bolivia.
Ethically sourced.
It's a company that respects free speech and respects your dollars.
It doesn't treat you like an idiot, like the Democrats treat their constituents.
They treat you like a valued customer that you are.
And they're creating a parallel economy, sponsoring Rumble.
It's a company that produces amazing coffee.
They've got dark, medium, pea berry.
I prefer dark.
Let the jokes roll.
You will not regret getting it.
Go to 1775.com.
1775coffee.com.
Promo code VIVA.
And what do you get with the promo code?
10% off your first order, so make it a big one.
It's delicious coffee.
Everybody drinks coffee.
Support a company that likes you, respects you, and create the parallel economy.
Robert, have you broken into the capital?
Look at this magic that we have going on behind us.
Can you move your head to the side for a second?
This is unscripted, people.
It's level.
Okay, that's actually kind of cosmic.
Where on earth are you?
In Pennsylvania.
I was here for the case on Thursday, have another case on Monday and Tuesday, and then head back to Vegas on Wednesday, and then probably on with the Duran to break down everything again from a geopolitical global perspective on Thursday.
Robert, okay, before we even get into it, everybody, the links to the sponsors are in the description.
This is not...
Robert, it happened.
He freaking backed out.
Whether or not he did it, he's out.
Can the times be more unprecedented than they currently are?
It is definitely a wild time to be alive, or as the Chinese proverb slash curse says, let you live in interesting times.
No doubt about that.
I mean...
We have Biden's withdrawal from the race, Soviet-style.
We have all the legal implications and ramifications of that.
We have the Trump assassination attempt and the further information and developments on that.
We've got election cases out of the Ninth Circuit.
That was the top topic voted on, other than those other topics, tonight at the vivabarneslaw.locals.com board.
False advertising cases concerning elections as well.
We have the Trump documents case being dismissed for the unauthorized appointment and the appropriations in support of Jack Smith.
We have Hunter Biden borrowing the same concept to say his cases should also be dismissed for inappropriate Justice Department.
We'll give you some background on him.
And explain to you what a useful idiot or fool is.
And we'll use as our example the one and only Whitney Webb, who does the deep states bidding as well as anybody.
She just doesn't know it.
We have the Splenda.
We got a couple of fun cases.
The Splenda class action, you know, web squatting.
People don't know that's actually an illegal thing to do.
We got a lot of interesting news about Chicago 1968 style coming up soon.
But it includes a lawsuit about how close the protesters can get to the convention section.
We've got drag queen story time and tranny birth certificates at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Do first graders have First Amendment rights?
That's up to the Federal Court of Appeals.
We've got the Ninth Circuit wanting to rewrite the Second Amendment all over again.
We've got the International Court of Justice against Israel.
We've got Huckabee suing Facebook over them promoting him promoting gummies when he has done no such thing.
And, of course, all the political news.
So it's definitely a full package tonight.
Robert, what good news is Hunter Biden expecting in the mail?
Now that Papa Joe is not going to be running for re-election, I anticipate those pardons are coming soon.
What other incentive is there for him to hold back now?
We'll see.
I mean, for those that don't remember the Soviet...
I mean, I'm disappointed I lost my bet.
I thought Uncle Joe would hang in there just a little longer.
I underestimated the Soviet-style Democratic Party.
I mean, Barack Obama really thinks that the Democratic Party is indistinguishable from the Soviet Union.
From those who don't know, in the old days, the Soviet Union would take their premier out to his Dasha in the summer, much like Biden was taken out to the summer home in Delaware.
And unbeknownst to the Premier, he would hear on the radio the announcement that he had resigned from office.
Here you have, Joe Biden doesn't make any video statement at all that he is resigning.
A statement gets placed on Twitter, on X, that purports to be a letter from Joe Biden saying he is not running for re-election.
It is the weirdest announcement of that kind I have ever seen.
And we still have to ask.
What do you think the odds are that Joe even yet knows he's not running for re-election in 2024?
Robert, I saw something earlier.
It was scrolling up in the chat, but it's moving fast.
A question is whether or not he even signed the statement or whether or not the signature was his.
The signature looks like it's a copy of his rather than his natural signature because of how it fades off in certain ways.
So handwriting experts are doubting.
That Joe even signed it.
Though given his mental state, he may not have known what he signed, even if he did sign it, that he knew what he was actually signing.
It's just very unusual that this kind of statement isn't made in person.
And again, as soon as that happened, I was like, this is so Soviet.
This is exactly how the Soviet Union used to take out their premieres.
And then soon thereafter, Barack Obama, and already, whether he knew it or not, he's endorsed Kamala Harris to be the nominee.
And Hillary and Bill Clinton came out and announced they support Kamala Harris to be the nominee, which means some deals have been cut.
And then Barack Obama came out and he said, I'm sure the convention will nominate someone interesting, you know, refusing to endorse Kamala Harris, even though the word is that Michelle Obama has been working behind the scenes with Kamala Harris.
So we've got it's it shows the degree of disconnect of the media and the Democratic Party that they think, though, that this will be a net winner for them.
I anticipate that she will pick either the governor of North Carolina or the governor of Pennsylvania, where I'm at, where we just had the attempted assassination of President Trump to be her nominee, potentially for vice president.
But it's going to be an utter disaster for the Democratic Party.
Who knows whether the convention now is a contested convention.
Will it go AWOL?
Will they try to do a summary election?
The delegates are like, don't worry, the Politburo has it under control.
And they don't seem to understand their own voters, how this is going to...
I mean, even people like AOC was like, this is a coup.
This is a disaster for the Democratic Party, a far greater disaster than Biden being on the ticket.
And Trump world can't stop celebrating with the champagne because they know this election is done.
Kamala Harris will get crushed much worse than Joe Biden would have got crushed.
The Midwest will not be competitive anymore.
Unless they come in at the last second and replace her with what I said was some surprise celebrity.
It can't be George Clooney.
It's got to be somebody like The Rock.
Other than somebody like that come bringing him in at the last minute, Democratic Party is done for.
They will lose the House.
They will lose the Senate.
They will lose the White House.
They will lose it by the biggest margin since 1996.
It's going to be just a crushing, an utter crushing, what they did today.
Robert, okay, so here are the thoughts that I've had.
One, are they running Kamala knowing that she's going to get crushed so they can then say you should have run somebody else in 2028?
Number one.
Number two, the possibility of using Kamala as a pawn.
Someone is enraged and does something stupid to Kamala and they either get the pity vote or they get to play the pity card or they get to substitute her for somebody else.
Three, she's been lying to the public for a very long time.
If it comes out that Joe Biden has in fact been diagnosed with dementia or whatever for a long time and they've been concealing that, if that drops, does Kamala not have to bow out and then, despite endorsing her, can Hillary not sweep in?
Swoop in, I should say.
I mean, here's the legal ramifications.
So she is already asserting control over all of the hundreds of millions of dollars that have been raised for Biden.
That will be contested pretty quickly with the FEC and with the courts because I don't agree that she can just usurp those funds.
The logic that she can get them, that no one else, it's undisputed, no one else could get them.
Is that the funds were raised for the Biden-Harris ticket.
The problem is they weren't.
Those funds were raised for Biden-Harris back in 2020, between July and November of 2020.
Since then, they've been raised for Biden under his old campaign committee.
And so to just transfer those right over to Kamala Harris...
It's problematic because those people were giving money to Biden.
Biden wasn't even locked into picking Harris again, right?
I mean, he could, but he always could have said no at the last minute, too.
The way Kennedy was planning on jettisoning LBJ, for example.
And so the way that's happened in some past cases as well.
So I think the first legal issue will be her attempt to usurp all those funds.
That will be contested in challenge.
Second issue.
In states like Wisconsin, you have to be on the ballot if you chose to pursue and you were the chosen candidate of the party, unless you were dead.
Joe Biden's not dead.
So there's going to be an issue about whether somebody other than Joe Biden can be placed on the ballot in Wisconsin.
There's about a dozen other states where at least there's an arguable claim they cannot substitute him in.
The reason they have these laws is to protect the election, the voters of their state.
That when their primary voters voted for someone, if that person was the person who was the presumptive nominee, they're locked in.
So there's going to be a whole new set of issues.
In those states, there'll be additional legal challenges if they try to substitute out Biden's name.
Then there's the third set of issues, which is the nomination itself.
The Democratic Party nominees are bound under law, depending on the jurisdiction, to vote for Biden, despite his withdrawal.
And so it's not clear whether they can just completely ignore the electorate of their states.
And so that's going to be the third problem.
Problem four is going to be just because Biden has endorsed Harris, those delegates, what are they bound to?
So for the ones that are not bound by state law to vote for the person that they are represented, that their people, primary voters voted for.
For those that are free, if you will, to vote for whomever they want, the nominee rules need to change because right now they're bound to vote under the Democratic Convention rules for Biden.
So theoretically, Biden has released them, but he hasn't specifically done that yet.
Assuming he releases them, then those delegates pick.
Now, the superdelegates don't vote on the first ballot.
Those are the congressmen, the senators, the big donors, the big party hacks.
But if, let's say, nobody gets 50% plus one in that first round of voting, let's say some of the delegates are bound to vote for Biden or don't want to run into legal exposure for it, so you get some for Biden, some for Harris, some for somebody else, then I guarantee you Whitmer's going to be whipping delegates for her.
Buttigieg, unless he cuts a deal with Harris, will be whipping delegates behind the scenes for him.
Newsom will likely be whipping delegates for him.
Both Newsom and Whitmer communicated to Harris that they will not be the vice presidential choice for her.
So that means that they don't want to go down with that ship, as the song sings about.
That's not going to be their anthem.
And so what if there's less than 51% for a candidate on a second, third, or fourth ballot?
All of a sudden, the superdelegates come in.
And once the superdelegates come in, the party elites and the donors pick somebody.
How does that look to the Democratic Party electorate?
How does that look to the country?
The best thing for the Democratic Party is one of two options.
Either everybody gets behind Kamala Harris so it doesn't look like the complete coup that it is and the undemocratic choice that it has become.
Or secondly, they pick someone that everybody loves, that they think that there's this massive enthusiasm for, that there's this thrill of excitement for.
And in reality, that's only someone, in my opinion, Of a celebrity status, someone like The Rock, even bigger than George Clooney.
Somebody, The Rock, if anybody knows The Rock, he's been wanting to be president for 20 years now.
Someone that the party thinks can actually beat Trump.
Somebody that they can sell the steel to.
They could say that the public would believe actually won.
This is Tucker Carlson's point.
The hardest problem for the Democratic Party stealing the 2024 election is that no one will believe it.
They need someone that the people would believe actually wanted and that it wasn't stolen.
Kamala Harris ain't fitting that bill.
Hillary Clinton ain't fitting that bill.
Gavin Newsom ain't fitting that bill.
Whitmer ain't fitting that bill.
None of the traditional people listed fit that bill.
Michelle Obama doesn't fit that bill.
They need someone extraordinary.
Obama seems to be hinting at that.
He says, I have no doubt someone Incredible is going to show up suddenly.
Well, that means Obama's been coordinating behind the scenes to make sure that person shows up.
So I would say if I were the deep state, I would have already had that candidate lined up before I pushed Uncle Joe out the door, pushed Uncle Joe from the train.
Uncle Joe, by the way, will be bitter about this for forever.
Don't underestimate this man's rage, anger, and resentment.
But it does show you one thing.
Once a Kennedy runs for president, the Democratic incumbent always resigns from running for re-election.
Because Papa Robert Kennedy got all LBJ to jump from running for re-election.
And now Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. runs, and all of a sudden Joe Biden steps out.
And I think, by the way, that's the reason why they never allowed a competitive primary when they knew Papa Joe was no longer mentally with it, is they were scared that Robert Kennedy would win the primaries.
So that they were like, okay, let's lock this down for Joe to make sure Robert Kennedy Jr.
does not get the...
Robert, now that you mention RFK and I listened to his pre-stream live conference.
And he answered the question as to whether or not he would participate in a contested convention.
And he said, I'm happy where I am.
Could he even compete in a contested election for the Democrats?
They can nominate anybody, right?
I mean, the rules of the Democratic National, if they get around the issue of the delegates that are locked in under state law to support who voted for in the primary, they can get past that issue.
If they officially release the delegates, if Biden officially releases his delegates, those delegates are free to vote for anybody.
There's no limit to that under the Democratic National Committee rules.
Now, there's still state law issues about the timing of the disclosure of the choice.
If they're trying to build drama...
They need to build a drama in a way that either ratifies Harris or ratifies this new coming, this new outsider that nobody thought about, right?
To change the...
If it's Harris, because they need as minimal complaint from within the Democratic Party as possible.
I mean, the fact Hillary came out so quickly behind Harris told me that they'd already cut a deal.
So, you know, give them credit.
But that Obama did...
Not yet on script.
Let me stop you there.
What would a deal that Hillary cuts, what would that look like?
What is Hillary's interest in all of this?
Power. That's what her interest is.
So a position in the next cabinet?
A position in the next administration?
There are people.
There's a lot of Clinton allies located throughout government and many located outside of government that would like power within government.
And, you know, maybe a little ambassadorship for Bill to help things out with the Global Foundation.
It's something significant.
I mean, Hillary already got Secretary of State, so I don't know what would be higher, but definitely for their people.
But some deal was cut because that was real quick, and the Clintons don't come out and do that sort of thing without leverage first.
And so I have no doubt.
I mean, to give you folks an idea, Biden's campaign manager was on two hours before he announced his stepping down, saying he was not stepping down.
The entire campaign team and the entire White House staff had no idea.
So, I mean, that's what a Soviet-style coup this was.
If Joe had made this decision himself, he would have talked to his own people first.
He didn't.
I mean, in fact, it wouldn't surprise me if someone signed that letter and posted it.
Just said, sorry, Joe.
And I think what you had talked about...
I mean, I think the next pressure point was they were going to leak his medical records, that, you know, there's been many stories out there from Penn and other places that there were doctors that had provided services for him over the last year of Parkinson's-related dementia, that they were going to keep escalating until Joe capitulated.
The question is, what's the backup plan?
I mean, I get why Harris thinks this has worked, and maybe she's got a deal with Buttigieg as well, and, you know, she needs to kind of deal with all these people.
There's no chance to cut a deal with Newsom.
They hate each other.
That goes way back.
Didn't cut a deal with Whitmer, I'm sure.
But he has cut a deal with the rest.
But clearly, I mean, if Michelle Obama's working with her, why is Barack Obama not endorsing her right away?
So something's AWOL there.
I suspect that Barack Obama's the more deep state aligned.
I mean, Hillary's deep state aligned, but it's a different part of the deep state.
Barack Obama is tighter.
To the big tech world, tighter to the Wall Street world, the financial sector, and the sort of elite professional managerial class.
You're Macron's of the world, right?
Hillary's more old school types that they're connected to.
So my assumption is somewhere in there that Barack Obama may have alternative plans.
I don't think it's Michelle Obama is the alternative plan.
I think the alternative plan would be, I mean, Obama, whatever you want to say about him, is in a certain way smart.
He's an arrogant prick, but he is a certain way, kind of way, smart.
He would know they need somebody completely out of left field.
They need somebody that no one has even thought about or considered.
Because all the other people, they've pulled them now for two years.
They're all underwater.
They're all less popular than Biden.
There were some people out there saying, oh, you know, Biden drops out.
The other candidate won't get any of Biden's negatives.
They're all wrong.
They get all of Biden's negatives because they're Democratic Party negatives.
They get none of Biden's positives.
I mean, they already pulled it this past week.
And when Harris or anybody else was put on the ticket, Trump jumps three to five points in every single state.
And even bigger margins in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan.
These states are no longer even competitive.
Not only that, these states have Senate races down ballot.
It is a disaster for Democrats in the Senate if this is the case.
And by the way, Schumer wants to be president.
He's been telling everybody that.
So if they want to avoid a disaster at the convention, they need to, within the next 10 days, either get everybody aligned with Harris and do some bogus, we'll do an agreed poll.
But it's not like they can suddenly schedule primaries everywhere.
That's not possible.
Or caucuses everywhere.
So they need some public pretext to rally behind Harris or rally behind whoever the surprise alternative is.
Or they're going to have a complete disaster in Chicago, which they may have anyway.
Because these delegates are all Biden delegates.
Very few of them are Harris delegates.
Very few of them are Obama delegates.
Very few of them are Hillary delegates.
They come from the old corrupt Democratic Party, the old machine that Joe Biden represented.
They know if they go into Chicago without a pick, without consensus, it's going to...
I mean, there's already...
They are coordinating...
The case came down in Northern District of Illinois this week.
They've already given huge discretion to local police to prohibit protesters from anywhere near the convention on the grounds of security risk, right?
So, I mean, they do not want Chicago 1968 all over again.
But they're going to get it unless they act fast.
Let me bring this up.
Here's the letter from our locals community, my fellow Americans.
Over the past three and a half years, we've made great progress as a nation.
Horse crap.
Today, America has the strongest economy.
I'm going to skip through a bunch of those.
Yada, yada, yada.
Okay, so he's done a bunch of good stuff.
I know none of this could have been done without you, the American people.
Together, we overcame a once-in-a-century pandemic.
Yada, yada.
We revitalized, strengthened.
It has been the greatest honor of my life to serve as your president.
And while it has been my intention to seek re-election, no crap, 14 million people voted already, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country.
I believe it is in the best interest for my party.
It's interesting.
Party over country.
Literally. I said I was going to steal that.
Who said that?
Someone smart said that.
Party over country.
Literally in the phrasing.
For me to stand down and focus solely on fulfilling my duties as president for the remainder of my term.
Oh, no reason.
They're just doing it.
I will speak to the nation later this week in more detail.
For now, let me express my deepest gratitude.
Yada, yada, yada.
I want to thank President Kamala Harris.
And let me express my heartfelt appreciation for the American people.
I believe today, as I always have, there's nothing America can't do, blah, blah, blah.
Doesn't endorse her in this statement, but this is what we should be looking at here.
Look at the signature and pay attention to that.
And let me just pull up...
It's the end of the signature that's different than his normal signature.
Yeah, I'm going to go to the...
The signature is easy to copy because it's very...
I presume he has a digital signature, but this is what one signature comes up as.
And this is another one, Joseph R. Biden Jr.
None of these look like the signature that we just saw on that statement.
I don't know what this is.
So, very interesting.
He does not endorse Kamala in that statement, but comes out in a tweet afterwards to say it.
Holy hell.
Okay, now Kamala, Robert, is currently trading at 82 cents.
Would you think that it's a good bet to bet against Kamala Harris at this point in time?
I wouldn't bet against at this point in time.
She's the most logical choice.
Like I said, if I was running the Democratic Party, I'd be recruiting someone like The Rock.
Because I need a game changer.
I need someone from totally outside the conventional names.
Someone who the party delegates would say, oh yeah, I could see him winning.
Someone who will stick to the script and obey the relevant rules.
And it would be somebody like that.
Some people said George Clooney, but he comes across as too much of a prick.
So I just don't see him being quite that...
In his day, Robert Redford, but not now.
Paul Newman in his day, but not now.
Also, those guys could be independent.
Now, of course, it would be smart for them to nominate Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. or Tulsi Gabbard, of course, but there's zero chance.
They're going to be doing that.
There's no way in the world that the deep state is going to allow a race to come down to Trump versus Kennedy.
Because then it's deep state screwed.
That's not happening.
So it's either going to be Kamala Harris or a surprise outsider.
That would be.
But I would say 80, 82, 85% chance.
That seems right, given that I think she's at minus 900 in the offshore books.
That strikes me as about accurate.
Like, George Clooney would have to have his head examined to do this, having seen what was done to Donald Trump.
Like, set aside the slander, all of the lawfare.
He wants to enjoy his wealth.
He wants to enjoy his celebrity.
So does The Rock.
They don't want literal bullets flying at them like they just saw with Trump.
I would bet against Kamala.
I think it's going to be something of a Hillary.
They're going to leak something bad on Kamala, force her resignation, or force the substitution, or it's going to be contested, in which case...
Who the hell knows what's going to happen?
It'll be wild.
The problem with the Democratic Party is any contested convention is a disaster.
Anything that pushes out Kamala Harris for anyone but an absolute exceptional replacement is a disaster.
They're kind of stuck.
This was why I said all along it didn't make sense for them to actually pull this.
To push Biden out makes them much weaker.
Much weaker electorally.
Much weaker in the court of public opinion.
Much weaker as a party.
It creates some divisions that might never be cured.
But it doesn't surprise me from the perspective that the Obama and Clinton wings of the party are completely disconnected from reality.
The media is completely disconnected from reality.
They think they handpick presidents anyway.
And so they don't understand that the party is unpopular as a party.
They don't understand that it's the party's policies that make them unpopular.
Changing chairs on the Titanic ain't stopping it from sinking.
They need a rescue is what they need.
Somebody totally out of left field would be the only kind of person who could rescue them at this moment.
To me, for them to make this choice says that they may have somebody like that, given what Obama put out.
Otherwise, this is a Dumb choice.
This is political suicide.
I get all the problems with Biden and his mental health, his mental acuity, but he was still well-liked amongst a group of voters that could keep the election close.
Hillary's more unpopular.
Harris is way more unpopular.
Newsom is way more unpopular.
Whitmer would do fine in Michigan.
She's not going to do well anywhere outside of Michigan.
They don't have a substitute.
They never did.
I mean, this was why, practically speaking, the smart polls were consistently saying replacing Biden is not really a viable option.
Well, now they've pulled that trigger.
Let's see what a disaster it breeds, because that's what I think is coming.
It's a democratic disaster.
Well, I think something is going to come out about Kamala that's going to take her out of the political running, some Hillary Clinton dirt that's going to be leaked, and then Hillary and Whitmer.
And maybe I think Michelle Obama is going to be the...
They would get crushed.
Yeah, but at least they get to say...
It would be twice as big as it would have been over Biden.
But at least then they get to say, we have a younger...
Well, not with Hillary, but with Michelle Obama.
Like, oh yeah, it'll be hope and change 2.0.
And plus she fits the...
She doesn't sell well.
She doesn't...
She's never...
There's a reason why Barack kept her off the campaign trail more often than not.
The... Goodwill around Barack never translated to her.
And it's always been a real limitation.
She hates people as a general rule.
So they could try to put her up in a debate.
She'll do worse.
And there was already a suspicion in the working class Midwest, skepticism about Barack.
It's ten times higher with her.
So does she want to get humiliated by losing to Donald Trump?
I mean, do you know how humiliating that would be for Michelle Obama to lose to him?
That would, yeah, no chance.
Hillary's already lost him, so she doesn't care if she lost him again.
She thinks that he got stolen from her the first time.
But all these people will, if the Democratic Party is so delusional, they think the core part of their problem is Biden's mental health, they got a wake-up call coming in November.
Let me read a bunch of the chats before we get into, and I'm going to get to the locals after this, but before we get into the assassination attempt and the updates here, Lee Walden, considering all what's going on, seems to me...
That law of war and devolution and COG is in a plat.
Play. Okay, I don't know what that means, but thank you.
Okay, Spoke159, what about Denier for Prez?
He was the celeb the Dems dragged out a few weeks ago.
That would be a nonsense.
Women like Kamala, especially if they walk all over him and bring some whips.
I know some rumors about, what's his face, about him that taught me a new word, but I won't say it today's show.
Jay Batts, my guess is Matthew McConaughey.
No, none of these people want to endure what they've just seen.
McConaughey wouldn't be a bad choice.
But see, think, like, let's put our Democratic Party or deep state hats on.
That's who we're looking for.
We're looking for a celebrity out of left field that's as charismatic as Trump, that has a big ego, that's willing to play ball.
They might be nervous about McConaughey because McConaughey has a tendency to do his own thing, right?
The rock, you could figure that boy you could put a leash on.
He would jump whenever you say jump.
But, you know, you need a celebrity.
You'd want a celebrity that's charismatic, that the country could rally behind, that the deep state feels comfortable with play ball.
That's the only person who can win.
There's no elected democratic official who fits that category.
Because even Tulsi Gabbard is no longer elected, and there's no way they'll do Gabbard or Kennedy because the deep state hates them.
Well, or a celebrity that they have sufficient blackmail on, that their reluctance doesn't matter anymore, or the risk of them not complying doesn't apply anymore.
I'm with Jack Posobiec on this.
I demand proof of life.
Barnes is right.
This sounds fishy and most definitively very Soviet.
Just goes to show you how far these people have gone.
Pray they lose 2024.
Be controversial regarding the third shooter conspiracy.
We're going to get to that in a second.
I did my own audio analysis.
The results surprised me.
Let me know if you want to see my work.
Crooks only fired six shots.
Randy Edward, one of Biden's younger brothers, statement noted to that effect his support of the president.
And is looking forward to spending time with Joe for whatever time he has left.
Ominous. Marty Smith then.
Robert De Niro, we not risk being too confident of a win against Harris.
I fear a repeat of 2022 red wave arrogance.
I still think it's 50-50 election.
As much as I thoroughly like your take on Harris.
Stop saying that it's won.
We have the same thing in 2020 and 2022.
And we got screwed.
Gotta vote, says E. Taylor67.
Nobody's denying that.
Mobilize the base.
Every Trump supporter should become a Trump voter now.
Brodsattva. What about the Westmore guy?
Maryland governor, deepest of the deep states.
He's been getting some media coverage, throwing shade on Vance.
Who's Westmore?
I want a little more of Westmore.
Who's Westmore, Robert?
I don't know.
Okay. Why is no one concerned about Donald John Trump talking about naming BlackRock CEO Fink as head of Treasury Chase, CEO Diamond Head of the Fed?
Teal handpicked Vance.
And Teal handpicked Vance.
This is the swamp.
It's like he learned nothing.
I'll get into the Vance stuff.
That's utter nonsense about Vance.
Porkchop Express with 55 there.
Aviva, please invite peak prosperity Chris Martinson.
He's been on twice now.
Crowdsourcing the investigation into the assassination attempt.
The audio breakdown three to four shooters also predicted the COOF lockdowns.
Some crumbs, but I think we got the rest of these.
J.D. Vance is owned by Peter Thiel.
Trump to make sure Willie Brown as an attack vector.
Instead, he can say Kamala has been waxing philosophical and call her waxing Kamala.
Do you think Bernie Sanders will try again only to have his vote screwed over by Killary?
Bernie is out, right?
There's no chance of Bernie?
Oh, no, but Bernie could still throw his hat in the ring if he doesn't like where things are going.
Can you do a vid on the Wall Street short by Wall Street Company, partly owned by Bushes, Bakers, and BlackRock, all deep-state actors in the billions of dollars?
Yeah, I think they explained the way they're short-selling DJT stock.
It wasn't actually short.
It was just a clerical error or an administrative error.
Would love to believe anyone the left...
Why would anyone believe the left when they now know they were being lied to the whole time?
Crazy. Absolutely.
They've been used and abused.
Use the 25th.
Whenever there's a vacancy in the office of the vice president, the president shall nominate a vice president who shall take, upon confirmation, the majority of both houses.
J.D. Vance called it when he delayed the...
Okay, the rest we got here, I think.
Sunday Night Fun, Mystery Purpose.
Robert, before we get into the Lost Us, this is what we'll end with before we move over to Rumble.
The updates on the assassination attempt.
Have you been following this throughout the week?
Yeah, so I did a video on Friday afternoon with Rep.
George Gammon on his Rebel Capitalist show.
And did a breakdown of what we then knew and laid out the argument against the official narrative or to express skepticism towards it.
Kind of a hush-hush, if you will.
That video's blown up.
It's gone viral.
The interest level in this is obviously very substantial.
People have their doubts and skepticism about what happened.
We now have, since then, reports from Senator Hawley, who went to the scene.
Senator Ron Johnson, who got more information, and the other information coming out from a range of sources.
Chris Martinson of Peak Prosperity did his analysis of the audio.
Some others have done.
Alex Jones had somebody on who, and Owen Troyer, had somebody on at Infowars doing audio breakdown.
And so the, you know, the short analysis, the official narrative.
Is that Thomas Crooks, a 20-year-old local in Butler, came in, snuck into the rally, climbed the roof, was in a position that was difficult to see by other snipers, fired shots at President Trump, killed one person, severely injured another, hit President Trump in the ear, because Trump just happened to turn his head at the last second, or he would have been killed at the scene.
And then that the counter-sniper team took out crooks, and that that's all there is to it.
Then the CIA leaked a story over the week last weekend that Iran was conspiring to kill President Trump.
Which, if I may add, casts even more doubt on the official narrative of the security failure, knowing that Iran was trying to take him up.
But we'll move on.
All right.
I mean, take it from there.
Yep. So the skepticism toward that is how did that come about in the first place?
That this individual, a 20-year-old individual with no apparent social media history, they haven't somehow been able to get into his phone, that apparently he had a drone over the rally scene that was not...
Nobody did anything about so that he could scout out the entire scene.
That he was seen as a suspicious figure by both other rally attendees and local police who relayed that information to Secret Service more than a half hour before he went over to the building.
That the building was completely unsecured.
He's filmed walking around the building, looking around.
Then he's able to go up the ladder because there was no security there.
Climbs on top of this building.
Local police go up and see him there, see him there with a gun.
He points a gun at them.
They immediately communicate that information to everyone, including, that is their understanding, from most recent reports, Secret Service.
And yet the secret, and this is before Trump took the stage, so that the Secret Service knew, according to the local police report, That there was a man with a gun on a roof just 100 yards away from President Trump.
And yet they did not tell him, as President Trump himself relayed this weekend, no one told him that there was any risk.
Nobody told him there was any threat.
This information was not relayed to him.
Had it been relayed to him, he would not have gone on stage, as he himself confirmed.
So he goes on stage.
Nobody does anything until the shots are fired.
Then they go on stage and pull him down.
Now, the key to understanding all of this and why I believe that there is some culpable culprit inside the Biden administration and inside the Secret Service is two levels.
One level is, despite them lying about it, now it came out in both the Washington Post and the New York Times, that the security team around Trump had been requesting for two years.
That he had an elevated threat level that was way beyond norm for a former president because he was becoming a future presidential candidate.
And they had requested enhanced security, enhanced personnel.
There's multiple personnel you have in a Secret Service proceeding.
So you have the counter-assault team.
Those are the people that are immediately responding to protect the president's life right at the scene.
You have counter-surveillance.
These are people often in plain clothes that are occupied around it.
They find out, okay, somebody's suspicious.
Boom, let's follow them.
We've got to grab them.
We grab them.
And the counter-sniper team has just three of those elements.
There's somebody who comes in days in advance who does all the planning, who says, okay, here's where our risk points are.
Here's where our vulnerabilities are.
Here's how we're going to address those vulnerabilities.
Usually they use helicopters and drones to help address those vulnerabilities.
They come up with where they're going to employ local police, how they're going to employ local police, how they're going to manage communications between every member of the security team.
They have the counter surveillance team there.
The sniper team there and the counter-assault team there, all organized in such a way as to minimize risk.
And this includes using things like big buses or other vehicles to block potential pathways and all the rest.
And so any building that's a risk, they don't put somebody on the roof because there's too many rooftops and they don't want somebody on the roof where the counter-sniper team doesn't know whether that's one of their guys or somebody else.
So they want to make the roofs clear.
Other than the roofs that are occupied by countersnipers, by securing the building.
And that's done way in advance.
And if anybody suspicious comes on, the countersurveillance team can take corrective remedial action and employ local resources as part of that.
What we now know is that almost none of that happened.
That there was not adequate personnel present.
That according to Senator Ron Johnson's report, Secret Service didn't even show up for the meeting that morning to figure out how they were going to coordinate with local police about any suspicious activity that took place.
There was not a consistent relay of communications between the Secret Service and the local police.
There were not sufficient counter-sniper teams.
The counter-sniper teams were not located in the right location to look at all risk ratios.
And most significantly, there was no action taken.
To secure that building and no action taken when they were told there was a man with a gun on a roof 100 yards away from President Trump.
That means to me either the person who planned the security for that day on behalf of the Secret Service or...
The person who implemented it.
We now know that several of the Secret Service people were substituted out with DHS people who are not skilled or experienced in protection in this way.
We now know that several members of Trump's traditional team were given off and were not there that day.
We know several of the high-quality Secret Service agents that know that area were reassigned to either Jill Biden somehow holding a...
The plan itself created multiple levels of vulnerability.
And that that had to be a deliberate choice.
Deliberate choice in the personnel.
Deliberate choice in the quantity and quality of the personnel.
And most importantly, a deliberate choice to not secure a building, to not provide consistent quick communications, to not provide immediate corrective action when notice was made of a dangerous sniper.
They didn't even have the counter sniper teams at the right locations.
Excuse me.
So I have no doubt it was an inside job.
But I do break it down a little bit further with George Gammon, and probably on Thursday we'll be breaking down all of the issues, but putting it in sort of a global context of other assassinations and assassination attempts over history and time.
With the Duran, I think it'll be on Thursday.
I don't know if that date works for them.
It's the first date that works for me.
But, you know, because America's unique in always having, for the most part, in these lone assassins.
The lone crazy person going to kill somebody, that's not a common assassination thing throughout world history.
Just somehow unique.
It always happens in America for some reason.
It's always interesting, too.
These lone assassins, they always target people that are critical of the political establishment, critical of the military-industrial complex, critical of the financial and political elites in their local world.
For some reason, it's never the case that they ever...
They never target the head of the Federal Reserve.
They never target the corrupt generals that get us involved in dumb wars.
Somehow those people never end up on the crazies list, which is its own reasons for skepticism about these kind of controlled narratives.
There's a weird dynamic.
It was originally publicly reported that this individual, the alleged sniper, alleged shooter, I had posted some things on a game, a game that was involved that originated from 2016, where it's about, can the Secret Service protect the president?
And the president's obviously a Donald Trump character.
And supposedly this kid was playing on this game and made statements about he would show how good he is on July 13th.
And then all of a sudden that story disappeared.
And now they're saying, oh, that was like a fake account.
We're getting a lot of inconsistent contradictory stories, claims of encrypted accounts, encrypted phones, encrypted communications, and then all of a sudden saying, oh, no, no, no, that wasn't the case.
Attempts to blame local police and local police saying they were deliberately excluded from all mechanisms of security and surveillance.
The only reason one local cop saw him is because he breached the protocols that the Secret Service had given him.
Why was the Secret Service interested in...
Excluding local police from protective detail when they were already understaffed.
Might it be because Butler County is a very Republican county where you don't control the DA, you don't control the local cops, you don't control them.
Now, of course, the state of Pennsylvania, where I'm currently in, Governor Shapiro might have been a willing, complicit ally in various aspects.
You might have had confidence that the state police would play ball, but local police, you couldn't have such confidence.
So all of the evidence points to, as President Trump himself hinted at, that something happened at the various high ranks within people of power.
And some people say, oh, Barnes, that means everybody has to be in on it.
Not at all.
The counter-sniper team may have known nothing.
They were just following their assignment.
The counter-assault team may have known nothing.
They were just following their assignment.
Because somebody prevented the communications in a timely manner.
Somebody was controlling that part of the process.
It's the person who put the plan in and or implemented that plan that is the person we need to be talking to and getting more intel on.
And who would that be?
What's her face?
Kim Cheadle?
So she wouldn't have been the person to do the plan right there at the scene.
So Tito may have her complicity, culpability, because she refused to assign adequate resources to President Trump, just as she refused to provide any Secret Service resources to Robert Kennedy Jr.
As I said last week, it's been clear that Joe Biden has wanted his opponents killed.
It's obvious.
But how it happened on the ground in this instance, How this kid gets involved?
What was really going on?
Those things raise additional questions.
And I think the timing of it, once President Trump was nominated, they were going to be required by law to provide him more resources, Secret Service resources.
He would have also been on the ballot, guaranteed, and he would have chosen his successor.
So I think the timing was to have this incident occur right before that.
And how did this 20-year-old kid know and got confirmation that he could just carry it?
You know, he could go walk around, you know, scoping everything out, have his drone scope everything out, then walk over the ground, say hi to everybody almost, and then climb up and get his gun ready.
How did he know that was going to happen on that day?
So, to me...
There's almost no way it can happen without a sequence of extraordinarily unlikely coincidences involving whoever was planning and implementing the agenda.
It doesn't mean anybody else on the scene necessarily was involved at all.
You might have had some people with questionable competence and capabilities, but then the question is who put them there?
That's the more important consequential question.
Whether or not we're going to ever find out that this kid was known to the FBI or groomed.
I mean, I'm still, I appreciate Martinson's analysis that there's multiple shooters or at least multiple shots.
They clearly sound like different firearms.
They come in different, you know, one, two.
Martinson's verbal method of, what's the word, making the gun sounds is very good.
He does it almost like a beatboxer.
Also believe that there were two, at the very least two if not three, different firearms shot because you can hear it with your own ears.
People are hypothesizing whether or not it's because the mic was pointed in a different direction.
But the echo is different.
The way they are shot off sounds different.
And we don't yet know if the snipers took multiple shots to take out crooks or if it was only the one last shot, in which case there's eight to, I don't know what, 11 shots that need explaining.
And who is the man in the gray suit?
It's come out that there was some guy in a gray suit who was not Secret Service, who they thought was Secret Service, who went up on the roof and instructed, hey, send this photo to this phone number of the shooter, and then walked off the roof.
And there's been no clarity on who the heck he was.
There's some discussion that it has some connection to ATF.
Say what this man with the gray suit said on the roof.
He instructed them to take a photo of the dead assailant, and he told them what phone number to send it to.
And they thought they were doing this on behalf of the Secret Service.
Turns out the man in the gray suit didn't work for the Secret Service.
It turns out, apparently, the latest report is that the phone number they sent it to was to someone in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.
And so in order to run his identity is the official narrative.
But, like, who the heck is the guy in the gray suit?
So, I mean, we got lots of weird stories and information circulating.
They have basically shut down meaningful press conferences on this.
I don't have any confidence in the state of Pennsylvania.
Now, the local county has some good, sharp people.
And, you know, we might look into it at 1776 Law Center.
Because in the state of Pennsylvania, you can petition the court to have certain people investigated or indicted.
Without regard to the district attorney's office.
And the court can order the prosecutor to prosecute and investigate.
So it gives you this sort of extraordinary potential access of making sure the criminal authorities do the proper investigation.
And I think there's good reasons to want that done here.
Because the official narrative isn't really holding up very well.
It seems that I've somehow switched off to the bad mic back on the good mic.
Robert, one of my concerns is that there's a lot of information, disinformation, that I feel that they're throwing crap out there.
I mean, it's interesting to me, this guy.
So Bill Ekman quoted somebody.
First, he quoted Martinson's report.
And then he quoted this other guy who was like, oh, no, totally, it's a lone shooter, and I can give you the simulation and show you the lone shooter.
But then you look that guy up, right?
And the guy that's saying it's definitely a lone shooter, he lists his office address as Langley, Virginia.
And then you go to his substack, and his substack appears to be blaming Russia for Nord Stream 2, the Nord Stream pipeline bombing.
And that made me think, okay, now I'm really doubting the lone shooter story.
When boys from Langley start telling me that the ones that are trying to tell me that Russia blew up its own pipeline, it's saying, don't worry, everybody, it was a lone shooter.
I'm going to be even more skeptical of what took place.
So whatever it is, there was an extraordinary security breach for which the more logical explanation is deliberate action than pure random accident.
That's what I feel confident saying at this point.
We don't know a lot of the rest of the information we won't know.
We're going to get bombarded with both disinformation and accurate information in terms of sourcing, in terms of storyline.
And they're going to do that deliberately to make it difficult for us to ever put together what happened.
They tried to keep Senator Hawley from investigating at the scene.
That's suspicious.
The Secret Service director refused to answer questions of United States senators and congressmen right at the Republican National Convention.
Word is and rumor is she's going to step down before she has to respond to a subpoena to Congress to testify on the matter.
I hope Congress uses their power.
I mean, the other aspect of this we have is that there appear to have been, and there's inconsistent information on this, but there appears to have been people shorting the Trump stock in the days and weeks leading up to this event.
And at first, we were on Tim Pool, and Tim Pool was discussing it.
That company that appeared to have a massive short on Trump stock.
And in a short, for those people who don't know, is you're betting the stock is going to take a massive decline very quickly.
Of course, had Trump been murdered, that's true stock would have plummeted because it is so tied to Trump.
And someone was betting that that was about to happen.
And the bet was placed after it was known his sentencing date had changed, or at least appeared to be.
Now, the company that was listed as placing one of those big bets...
Came out and said it was a technical error and said that they just added a bunch of zeros.
And people have noted that this company never made that mistake before.
So there's suspicions about that.
But independent of that, and that company, my understanding, was based in Austin, Texas.
That gives Texas jurisdiction to investigate what took place here.
But the other component is there were people who had done independent assessments of activity in Trump stock.
Regardless of this other company making this particular short that appeared to suggest there were major shorts going on in the days leading up to the assassination in terms of the price of Trump stock.
So these people cannot help themselves.
They love to line their own pockets.
It tends to be a way to incentivize people to participate or be complicit or keep their mouth shut.
For 9-11, there are people shorting the airline stocks that have never been satisfactorily explained, to my opinion.
They've had various explanations for this, but I've not bought them.
But that's another angle to pursue.
But I think bad faith actors tried to assassinate President Trump.
And I think Trump made the corrective remedy by accelerating his nomination to early Monday to picking someone like J.D. Vance, who contrary to that useful idiot, Whitney Webb, is a great populist choice.
Here I disagree with Robert Kennedy as well.
I think Robert Kennedy's been listening to Whitney Webb.
That's an unreliable source, to say the least.
We'll get into that.
And then doubling down on a much more populist message.
Floated some names for appointments that I'm not a fan of, and then we can discuss that a bit later.
But I think Trump interpreted it as a coordinated effort to take him out.
But, you know, the whole truth we'll probably never get, unfortunately.
All right, what we're going to do now, we are going to go over to Rumble.
Let me give everybody the link.
We're going to end this on YouTube and Twitter.
But while I do that, link is pinned in the chat.
Before we do that, there's a super chat.
In Trump's RNC speech, he specifically said that the Secret Service sniper took him out with a single shot.
There was some questions as to whether or not that is the case as well.
Hunter will be peaced, no longer be first son.
There's even questions as to whether that person is the person they're saying he is.
That I've seen as well, but again, a lot of this, I believe, is muddying the water so that somebody...
We don't know.
Yeah, I mean, that's the core problem.
We know we can't trust the people who are investigating.
Yeah, that's for sure.
We got an, I don't know what that tweet link is to, from CJ Daggs.
Everyone come on over to Rumble or come on over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
Trump played Nessun Dorma at the end of RNC, the sum of all fears when all traitors of the deep state actors were executed.
Is that Trump's message?
I don't think there was any hidden message in that particular choice.
Breaking news.
Joe Manchin registered back to Democrat to run for POTUS.
I tried to Google that.
Didn't see that.
Dark Horse celebrity guest Ellen DeGeneres.
Oh, Dark Horse celebrity.
Sorry, I thought you meant on the Dark Horse podcast.
Ellen DeGeneres.
Okay. I understand that Trump had private security team everywhere he went.
Were they there that day?
Snuggle Struggle.
That was from Christine in Texas.
Snuggle Struggle.
They all knew the threat.
They obviously leaked the intel and let it happen.
Why else would all of the establishment media cover this specific rally when they refused to cover Trump rallies before?
That I wanted to double check as to whether or not Doug Mills was at prior Trump rallies.
Whether or not CNN was live streaming other Trump rallies.
More details on locals.
I live in rural Virginia and I'm currently...
In a fight with the zoning board trying to force me to get rid of my classic cars, they claim I'm running an illegal junkyard.
Olds equals junk.
They intended it to be a Friday computer outage as an Iranian cyber attack to solidify support for a war with Ryan after Trump had been killed.
One-two punch to get to war.
Barnes, can you talk about the Title 50 USC and the security state?
Annie Jacobson goes deep into her book Surprise, Vamish, Kill.
All right.
What we're going to do now, we're going to end it.
Actually, let me...
Before we fall too far behind, I'll get a bunch of the rants, not the tips, the tips in vivobarnslaw.locals.com.
Frank Beans says, they need Biden alive for the October surprise to bolster the Democrat perceived vote.
Let's see about that.
S. Wren, it's easier than you think one person in the right position can manipulate.
The personnel, worst of the worst.
Tell protection team leader the locals have a security issue and don't trust them and use new people so you can advise and adjust their plan, leaving holes.
Easy to create confusion using positions of power.
Going up, we got Judy Hodgkin says, Josh Hawley is saying whistleblowers tell him the problem is not just the Secret Service.
The majority of the security detail were DHS, Department of Homeland Security.
I believe they answered to Alejandro Mayorkas.
Looks to me like the United States Secret Service focus is a diversion.
And question for Barnes, do you think Trump is safe now from the CCO?
Robert, what do you think about that?
Well, the ability to take, the consequence of taking him out now is more problematic for him.
And so I think it will be much, I think that was their one best shot.
And, you know, whatever you attribute to, spiritual or otherwise, he turned his head at just the right time.
Brandon Herrera did an amazing video where he showed in slow motion and made the actual shot.
I won't show it because it's an impeccable video and I don't want to show the crux of his hard work.
So Brandon Herrera, I'll send the link around.
I think it's...
That's it.
Brandon Herrera, go check it out.
It's amazing.
All right.
We are going to end on...
We're going to go to Rumble and Local, so it's going to end on YouTube and Twitter.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
The audio will be on podcast on VivaBarnesLaw for the people on Podbean and wherever else Podbeans are things.
I'll post the entire stream to Viva Clips on YouTube tomorrow.
And that's it.
We're off.
We're going to the free speech platform Rumble and VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
Update the stream.
There it is.
Robert? Not according to Whitney Webb, Viva.
Rumble is part of the deep state.
Donald Trump is a mobbed up deep stater.
J.D. Vance is a deep stater.
Peter Thiel is a deep stater.
Elon Musk.
He's a deep stater.
Steve Bannon, definitely a deep stater, according to the wisdom of Whitney Webb.
Well, here's the problem.
I'm inclined to like Whitney Webb because she's been right on some things and done good work on some things.
The question is, well, is she deep state?
I don't call her deep state, but does she get to a point in her life now where she's seeing conspiracies where they don't exist?
I mean, this is how you traumatize yourself and you see conspiracy everywhere and you trust no one to the point where nothing is what it seems, which is a fair thing to think.
But does she get consumed by her own conspiracy paranoia as Alex Jones acknowledged he did when it came to Sandy Hook?
I haven't been listening to what she's been saying, but I can understand.
Yeah. Hey, I can...
Talking with Michael Yan yesterday, and he's like, you know, Trump is into WWE.
You can't write off the fact that this might have been staged from his end to make him into the hero.
Slap a little blood packer.
I don't agree with it.
But then I think like someone who's on the left who might be thinking the way, had this been...
I don't know, Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton, they come up looking like a hero.
I said, my goodness, I'm skeptical.
So I can't write it off, but I don't believe it.
But what's she saying?
What is Whitney Webb saying, Robert?
So this is the example of a useful fool or useful idiot.
So a useful fool or idiot, if you study COINTELPRO or you study counterintelligence operations or anything like that, one of the biggest concerns of any corrupt power holder.
Establishment, deep state, military industrial complex, whoever they may be in a particular governing society at a particular given time, is they need to make sure that their allies or their adversaries don't ally with each other.
And to make sure that certain information is discredited.
And one of the best ways to do so is you need a useful fool or useful idiot.
This is someone who thinks.
They're advocating for a particular cause, but in fact are undermining their own cause.
So there's two ways you do that.
One, you get people who expose bad actions that you do to get things wrong in such a way that the person has to have gel or man amnesia to continue to trust as a source.
So you get someone, let's say, who got something right about connecting dots on a conspiracy to report a false information about a conspiracy.
And if you know it's a false information about a conspiracy, you no longer credit that source.
So all of a sudden, you in the establishment have discredited information that was true because you got the person to say information that was false.
This is what I would argue was sort of the game that was played on Alex Jones to his detriment, where people got him to repeat something that ended up being demonstrably false that they then used to discredit everything he's ever said that's been truthful, useful, predictive in his life.
And they'll never let him forget it.
Correct. And then the second thing you do, and this is always critical, go back and study COINTELPRO tactics, which is you need people that are your adversaries to not ally with each other.
And the best way to do that is to get those adversaries to attack each other.
And this is always, you know, you need to build internal dissension.
And one of the ways you do so is you convince them that so-and-so is a plant.
Or so-and-so's really a fed.
Or so-and-so's not a true believer, right?
This is one of the oldest scams in the book.
Because you know as long as you keep your adversaries from aligning with each other, you're going to be fine.
You're going to be able to divide and conquer, from which the phrase originates.
So Whitney Webb is a perfect useful fool or useful idiot.
In part because of her own inclinations and ideological predilections lead her to believe, I mean...
There's a reason she prints on socialist publications all the time, folks.
And the publications are literally titled Socialists, not just the Jacobins and others.
As she told Patrick Bette-David, she thinks anybody that's a successful capitalist is untrustworthy and is bad.
She said no one can get to the status of Trump without having cut bad deals with bad people.
Actually, plenty of people do, right?
But that's why, to her, anybody that's successful is bad.
Just automatically.
I mean, try to find the billionaire that she thinks is good.
There isn't one.
She hates Elon Musk as much as she hates Donald Trump as much as she hates everybody else.
And then that general perspective, you can see informed by she's obsessively anti-Israel.
Obsessively anti-Israel.
She comes from that old left, which I always find ironic because the old left was originally all pro-Israel.
They all loved Zionism back when they thought Zionism was going to be socialist.
You know, that's why Stalin was the first premier and the Soviet Union, the first government to recognize the government of Israel.
And then it turns out Jews aren't stupid.
They said Soviet Union versus U.S. I think we'll go with the U.S. And ever since then, the socialists have never forgiven, never forgotten, and have been anti-Israel.
And all of a sudden, Zionism is an evil curse word in socialist circles.
But of course, I'm sorry, I don't take anyone seriously that repeats and regurgitates Hamas propaganda on a regular basis at the most extreme level, which Whitney Webb does all the time.
If you read her book, One Nation Under Blackmail, she's one of those people that does guilt by association all the time.
She can't tell the difference.
She gets causation wrong all the time.
For example, she thinks Roy Cohn was taught and tutored by the mob.
Completely wrong.
Roy Cohn was an old-school anti-commie lawyer.
Who parlayed that into being one of the top civil and criminal defense lawyers in New York.
And once you're one of the top lawyers in New York, some of the people who pay you the biggest bills are mob figures.
It was his success led to him representing mob figures, not the mob created him.
But she can't get these kind of causation things.
She gets them flipped around all the time.
She thinks that because Peter, she thinks anybody has a contract where the government is evil.
Anybody that has a contract with the government, this is why she thinks Donald Trump is mobbed up.
If Donald Trump had a tiny, tiny connection to the mob, we would have known about it and all the indictments they would have brought against him.
They put him under macroscopic, microscopic review.
They couldn't find one tiny little piece of evidence against him.
You can listen to mob figures who said we didn't even bother trying to extort Trump because it wasn't worth it.
The guy would not fold or capitulate to anybody.
And they're like, we just skipped it.
Uh, these were some of the most brutal mob figures in the world.
So the, I mean, she, Patrick, that David kind of exposed her on this because David was like, okay, you're saying that, you know, the, here's all these bad figures, bad personalities, bad power brokers.
Why, if Donald Trump and the Kennedy family are all part of them, why do they hate Robert Kennedy and Donald Trump?
And she was like, uh, uh, cognitive dissonance, cognitive dissonance.
Well, but I mean, Well, I could have fielded that answer.
It's a fake hatred.
It's a fake hatred to prop up Donald Trump so that if he gets into power, they win-win.
I mean, that would be the answer.
That would have been the sophisticated answer, but she hadn't even got to that level.
If you read her book, it's so discordant.
It's so all over the place.
She just throws things together and people together in places that don't even fit.
Well, I got both volumes.
I'm planning to listen to it as I drive back down to Florida because it's freaking long.
It's a mind-numbing disaster of a book.
And what happens is, for example, when everybody's a racist, nobody's a racist.
When everybody's deep state, then nobody becomes deep state.
She discredits her own work by this broad brush that she can't distinguish.
She can't figure out cause and effect.
To give an example, Jeffrey Epstein was trying to entrap lots of people.
Jeffrey Epstein was also trying to legitimate himself by associating and affiliating with other people.
That doesn't mean every single person that was ever seen in a photo or on an Epstein plane was part of a sex scandal or trying to do something with underage kids, right?
Because you have to understand what the modus operandi of Epstein was.
In her world, it is.
Everybody that's on the plane is guilty.
Everybody that's ever seen a photo with him is guilty.
They're all part of it.
If we were in a courtroom, she would be laughed out of court by any neutral jury or jurist because that's how ridiculous her evidentiary theories are.
Anybody that understands Peter Thiel knows that he has been an independent dissident for the better part of two decades.
There's a reason why they targeted him for some of the nastiest slander work anywhere.
That's why he helped fund Hulk Hogan's work to take down their slander machine.
To pay them back for it.
Eric Weinstein has worked for him.
He's wanted to figure out.
He's been sort of on his own intellectual path.
Why is it that we have this great technological revolution?
Why is it we have these great universities and institutions, and yet our science is not going anywhere?
We haven't found a cure for cancer.
We're not really making the great leaps we should.
And why is that?
And he's come up with his own understanding of that, of the failure of the university system.
He's been one of the top critics of woke indoctrination and everything that's gone wrong with the academy.
He got to the point where he's like, don't even go to college.
Don't waste your time.
I'll fund you scholarships so you can create businesses outside of it.
He came to believe that two of the greatest threats, the freedom and liberty in the future, were the Islamist politicized Islam and the Chinese Communist Party.
The fact that he has contracts with the government does not make him part of the deep state.
The reality is the government's going to have certain software.
Would you rather Peter Thiel develop that software or Bill Gates develop that software?
Right? This sort of common sense, like, Whitney Webb doesn't have an answer.
Does she want no software to exist?
Does she want no government to exist?
I mean, what's the answer?
She can't even think through those things.
And so her credit, like, the other thing is...
J.D. Vance was created by Peter Thiel.
It's complete garbage.
So J.D. Vance had his own career trajectory.
Same with his wife, who clerked for Judge Kavanaugh and Chief Justice Roberts.
Went to Yale Law.
But watch Hillbilly Elegy, and you'll understand who he is.
Some people were trying to compare him to Barack Obama.
Barack Obama's mother came from one of the wealthiest, most politically powerful families in the country.
I mean, there's no connection at all between Barack Obama and J.D. Vance.
J.D. Vance has an old working-class populist roots who, like a lot of other working-class kids, believed that the 9-11 attack was legit and went and volunteered to serve in the U.S. Marine Corps.
Then he realized they lied to us.
And he's been on a path to try to figure out what's going wrong, what went wrong in his community, what went wrong in the war, what's going wrong in the country.
In the same way Peter Thiel has been on that same path, Vivek Ramaswamy has been on that same path.
It's like people say, well, so-and-so has interest in biotech.
Just having interest in biotech is not a problem.
I don't trust mRNA.
I don't trust certain biotech companies.
That doesn't mean all forms of biotech are evil.
This is simplified stupidity.
I don't know whether Whitney Webb comes from a Marxist background, but she gives off those vibes, where everything is reduced.
You just have this reductionist logic where everything's the class war.
Sometimes my grandpa didn't like your grandpa, and that's why we're still fighting, right?
And sometimes it ain't got nothing to do with the means of production and means of distribution and its allocated life.
You know, sometimes resources have a lot to do with it.
Sometimes they don't.
But these simplified reductionist individuals who say J.D. Vance is secretly deep state.
Well, then why does the whole deep state hate him?
Here's the proxy I use.
The great book of James.
There's a lot of good things in that good old book.
And not just the book of James, but the book James located in.
And J.D. is James.
And it says, by their deeds, ye shall know them.
If you want to know whether somebody's deep state aligned or not, you can look at just four issues in the last five years and where they stood.
Where did they stand on COVID?
The lockdowns?
The mandates?
The vaccines?
Second. Where did they stand on election 2020?
Third, where did they stand on the Ukraine war, the favorite war of the deep state that they've been wanting for the last 20 years and they finally got?
And where did they stand on Trump lawfare?
Were they one of those people like, I don't know, maybe...
Guess where J.D. Vance was?
He was on the right side on all...
For issues.
He was a critic of the lockdowns.
He was a critic of the vaccine mandates.
He was even a skeptic of the vaccines.
On election 2020, I know what he thought because he called me up and asked me about it, went and researched the sources that I gave him, and then went and publicly spoke, questioning what happened in the election.
In fact, that's why the media is still enraged at J.D. Van.
He said if he was vice president, he wouldn't have certified the election.
It takes cojones, by the way, to do that.
Third, on Ukraine, He was the first major candidate for federal office in the entire country to come out against the Ukraine war, to come out against funding it, to come out against involvement, to come out against the no-fly zone.
He did it when he was fourth in the polls and knew he was gambling his entire political career and future on it, on that one decision.
And then he's been one of the first, foremost critics of the lawfare against President Trump from day one.
So anybody who thinks J.D. Vance is deep state is too dumb to be considered a reliable source on anything.
J.D. Vance, I didn't realize they made a movie, The Hillbilly Elegy.
I actually kind of want to go watch it immediately after.
Oh, it's good.
It's a well-done movie.
Yeah, Glenn Close is in it.
It's got to be good.
He plays Memo, his grandma.
Remember, we interviewed him.
Then he explained his whole history, his trajectory, how he went from being a skeptic of Trump to a huge supporter of Trump.
He has been aligned with Peter Thiel in certain aspects of the tech world because Peter Thiel has been interested in funding independent intellectuals willing to challenge established logic and orthodoxy.
I've met with Peter Thiel.
I've seen and studied Peter Thiel.
Anybody who thinks Peter Thiel is deep state is also too stupid to take seriously.
If you think Donald Trump is deep state, you're too stupid to take seriously.
Period. There's a reason they've tried to lock him up, bankrupt him, and then murder him.
And it isn't because he's a secret supporter of the deep state.
I am thoroughly convinced about J.D. Vance.
It's amazing.
I have the book, Robert.
I used two Audible credits because it's Volume 1 and Volume 2. I'll listen to it for a bit because I already bought it.
Okay, what else was there that we're going to talk about?
We're going to get into some of the law.
Well, just one last news on the Biden administration.
His student loan latest bailout package that he only did, honestly, to try to get elected, was enjoined by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals because, again, it didn't go through the proper procedure under the Administrative Procedure Act and is in excess of authority and outside of statutory authority to even do.
But we may not see a lot of dramatic Biden policy protocols over the next three months, four months.
They may not like what they get out of Biden.
You get a Biden that no longer cares about an election?
Who knows what he does over the next four months?
Well, Robert, the way they announce it, there's no explanation given.
There's no medical condition given.
Are they going to potentially try to 25th him now that he might become a liability and not an asset?
What do they need him for?
No, because two problems.
One, that's an embarrassment to the whole party, that your president is so incompetent you have to kick him out.
And I'm sure that there was an implicit promise that if he decided not to run, they wouldn't try to 25th him and they would hold up his legacy as being great.
Second problem is then Harris has to get a VP through the Republican House.
That's a whole other disaster.
So they've got enough disasters that they're going to have to be managing.
But remember LBJ, just to get Hubert Humphrey over the top, was trying to negotiate a peace deal with Vietnam to end the Vietnam War on the eve of the November 1968 election.
And a certain Henry Kissinger helped make sure that didn't happen.
But, you know, who knows?
I think we're in for a lot more surprises, and they could go in all kinds of directions, maybe even a few good directions, depending on how things work, now that Biden is an actual free agent.
Oh, you're on mute.
The hearings tomorrow, are there classified hearings tomorrow, or are there public hearings as relates to the assassination attempt?
Well, also, if she resigns, you know, she's subject to a subpoena, but if she's no longer a federal official, how does all that work?
You know, it's unclear.
She may assert executive privilege.
The rumor is that she will resign.
My understanding is that there's going to be classified hearings, then unclassified hearings.
You know, we talked to...
To Lauren Boebert.
To Lauren Boebert.
Yeah. Very impressive in person, Lauren Boebert.
So I think we'll see how that all progresses.
I thought the convention was fun, fascinating.
I got to talk to Don Jr. to meet Tucker Carlson.
By the way, in Whitney Webb's world, Don Jr.'s deep state, Tucker Carlson's deep state, Steve Vance's deep state, everybody's deep state, just in case you didn't know.
Tucker Carlson's not, by the way.
Tucker Carlson, thrilled with J.D. Vance.
Don Jr., thrilled with J.D. Vance.
Me, thrilled with J.D. Vance.
Jeremy Carl, thrilled with J.D. Vance.
Everybody that's a populist that has freedom, liberty orientations, that is skeptical of deep state institutional power, love J.D. Vance, and for good cause.
But it was cool to meet Tucker.
I mean, Tucker's a natural.
That guy could be a politician if he ever wanted to be.
I know he hates politics, but he's so at ease around people, no matter what background they come from.
Like, you meet a lot of these people that are prominent people or in the public eye, and usually you get a range of reactions in person, right?
Maybe sometimes they're shy and nervous and they're not always at ease in those kind of social settings.
Maybe they're kind of snobbish or standoffish for whatever reason.
You get really a range.
Don Jr. has always been very accessible and sociable and friendly.
And Tucker is just a natural.
No, they're amazing.
So first of all, it was my first time meeting Tucker as well.
I'm flattered in that he thought he had met me before, so I think he might follow on the social medias.
But Tucker and Don Jr. in particular, what's troublesome about him is that he's too damn normal.
Divorces are one thing that happens.
It's almost more common than not.
He's a normal person, and he comes off as so...
So unprivileged and so down-to-earth and so natural as a human, I can understand why that pisses off the people who want him to be a prick, who want him to be a cokehead, who want him to be a total degenerate like Biden's kid.
And they're pretty inaccessible with anybody.
It doesn't matter whether it's the janitor or some high-profile politician.
Same with Dan Bongino.
They treat everybody equal.
So that was very refreshing to see.
Lauren Boebert was very nice and friendly and sociable.
We met some great local supporters who were there as delegates and alternate delegates.
I told a little backstory of what I thought was planned originally for the Trump assassination attempt on the George Gammon show.
Some of that came from people who were actually part of the Iowa delegation, part of other delegations.
I got to meet a lot of great people, you know, Raymond Jack Posobiec, the quartering, Luke...
Luke Rutkowski, you were on Tim Pool a couple times.
I was on Tim Pool once.
I got to meet Riley Gaines.
We got to meet Riley Gaines.
Amazing. Riley Gaines is awesome.
When we're doing that podcast, someone who says, I'm going to formulate an opinion and factor in other people's opinion.
It's an amazing thing to have an openness of spirit, even if you are inclined to immediately disagree with the position.
Amazing. Lauren Boebert, I'm proud to say I'm taller than her.
I was surprised.
I thought she was going to be six feet tall.
And she's 5'4".
It was fantastic.
It really was special.
We kind of missed the biggest day, but I think that that last day would have been uncomfortable with the amount of people there, and it must have been a disaster for people to get home afterwards.
I'm a little neurotic.
But Robert, speaking of what might be disastrous conventions, so Chicago, they passed an ordinance that...
Prohibited certain items that could be deemed dangerous because the counter-protesters want to counter-protest within the perimeter.
What we saw there, you know, they had their outer perimeter.
Pedestrians could get in, but they could counter-protest right up until that perimeter that required credentials.
So nobody who was not credentialed could get past the inner perimeter.
And there was no counter-protesting on site.
It looks like they're trying to ensure that something like that happens in Chicago and pass an ordinance that was challenged and the challenge was dismissed saying it's not vague and ambiguous like this moralist decision, which I don't know.
You can't bring in sharp things or that things can be used as weapons and you might not get to counter protest within the perimeter.
Robert, I mean, that won't stop him, but what do you think is going to happen?
Well, the reason why they filed suit is that they gave extraordinary discretion.
To the local Chicago police.
And for this, I recommend people go back and watch some old videos of the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, where it was the last time they handpicked the president without going through the elections.
And the reason they didn't go through the elections is the man who won those elections, Robert Francis Kennedy Sr., had been assassinated in California.
And so LBJ was there to make sure to push through Hubert Humphrey, Triple H, against the interest of the anti-war community because the Vietnam War was peak protest time.
And so the Vietnam War protesters descended upon the city of Chicago, occupying Grant Park.
And you could see in the middle of the melee people like the one and only Hunter S. Thompson.
And watching it all from their hotel room was the inimitable Norman Mailer and Patrick J. Buchanan.
And what happened was the police decided, Daley's police decided to go completely AWOL and beat the living Dickens out of all those kids there.
Now the kids were chanting stuff like pigs eat and a lot of stuff like that.
There was a class undercurrent, undertone to all of it.
But this was Mayor Daley's Chicago.
He didn't like it.
So the cops just thought, hey, it's fun to chase down these kids and teach them a little lesson about Chicago police and how the world works.
So it was a disaster in the media.
It was a disaster for the Democratic Party.
And on the convention floor, A senator, I think from Connecticut, if I recall correctly, was being critical of what was going on in Chicago.
And Mayor Daley took to the phone, took to the microphone, and used a word to describe Jewish people that is not politically correct.
Does it rhyme with, is it the infamous, it has two Ks in it?
Yes, indeed.
So it was the falling apart of the Democratic Party for all to see.
So now Chicago is now controlled by one Barack Hussein Obama, directly or indirectly.
I told people as soon as he got elected president, I said he may have learned his ideas in Indonesia, but he learned his politics in Chicago.
And I was like, you're going to see proof of that, because if I'm right...
He understands the first thing you do is you take care of your backyard.
You don't want to be a Donald Trump that's suddenly indicted in New York years later because the politics turned.
So what does he do?
There were two political threats to him in Chicago and in Illinois.
One was the dear governor.
The other one was the son of a great civil rights leader, Jesse Lewis Jackson III.
Within six months, both of them would be federally criminally indicted and removed from the political scene.
There'd be no more threats to dear Barack Hussein Obama in his backyard.
Chicago is where he has his little library.
Chicago is where he's aligned a lot of his support.
So this convention, now a contested convention, he's probably the most powerful person, probably beyond.
People shouldn't distract me with photos of Lauren Bovert.
She's very nice.
I don't know what I'm looking.
I'm peeking in the locals community.
Get married, people.
Get married young.
Keep your schmeckle in your pants and keep your marriage blinders on at all times.
Carry on, Robert.
But so this is Obama wanting to make sure 1968 doesn't happen again, especially now that they're going to steal that nomination from the elected choice.
The choice of the voters is Joe Biden.
It ain't anyone else.
And Barack's going to be probably the most instrumental and influential person in handpicking that replacement.
And he signaled that by refusing to endorse Kamala Harris right out of the gate.
Now, maybe he'll change his mind.
We'll see.
But I suspect he's trying to recruit some big name people.
He still considers it a personal insult that Donald Trump replaced him.
Obama's ego is too big for that.
I think you'll see.
And he always thought of Joe Biden as an idiot.
And he didn't like Joe Biden being his legacy replacement.
So he would love to see Trump beat.
He would love to see somebody else picked as his effective successor.
But he needs to make sure there's none of those protesters.
And the big protesters will be the anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian protesters.
We're very loud, very rambunctious, but now they may be joined by other protesters, unhappy with the Democratic Party trying to rig the nomination process.
You might have different people who are angling for positions of power to secretly put in their own protesters to create more disturbance outside the convention.
So what they did is he made sure Chicago passed a law that says, hey, the local sheriff, anything that's a security threat there, Chicago PD, you make sure that gets taken care of.
And that's going to be interpreted real broadly.
So some folks sued and said, this is obviously void for vagueness.
You're giving the local guy authority to decide anything is a security threat.
And the local judge there was like, no, no, I'm sure they wouldn't abuse their power here in Chicago.
He said it distinguishes itself from that other decision.
I think it was Morales.
It was the precedent they were setting.
Totally, totally different.
Totally different.
I didn't double check whether that judge had been appointed by Barack Obama.
But, Robert, why were there not more protests within the perimeter?
Like, you don't have to bring in weapons or stones, but why not come in?
And why were there people who did not register so they could protest within the perimeter at the RNC?
Well, the RNCOE allowed certain people to get passes.
But right outside, this was like 2016.
In 2016, I thought there'd be a bunch of protesters, and there they put in almost no controls outside the convention center itself was secure, but everything outside was totally open, unlike at the 2024 convention where everything outside was also contained.
Unlike the Democratic convention, by the way, Hillary wasn't letting any of those Bernie kooks get anywhere near her or anybody else.
I mean, it was like five miles of big, huge fences and walls.
But in 2016, there wasn't these big protests.
It told me what it was is there's no organic indigenous protest of Trump, that these protests have to be coordinated and made up.
Unless they're real well organized.
Milwaukee wasn't a town they could effectively organize enough protesters to come in or care.
But the people that are going to come and protest in Chicago do care.
And Chicago's a rife place for protests.
Maybe they'll even camp out in Grant Park again.
Not that I'm giving any of them any ideas, but, you know, 1958 was a lot of fun.
Thomas Durkin is the judge in the decision.
Yada, yada, yada.
He joined the court 2012 after an appointment from...
Barack Obama.
So there you have it.
Indeed. Shock, shock.
Total shock.
Okay, amazing.
So that's Chicago.
I'm not going, Robert.
So if you go, I'll send you well wishes and I'll pray for you.
But don't go, Robert.
You don't want to be on the front lines and mixing in with her?
Hell no.
I'm curious.
I think they're going to lock that city down is what I think is going to happen, depending on what happens in the next two weeks.
But the clock sure is a ticking.
But speaking of government corruption, there was a Chicago case, by the way, that led to the Chicago 7. They tried to lock lawyers up, multiple movies and documentaries.
Great case about free speech and effective attorney.
William Kunstler became even more famous through that case.
So there's some fun cases there.
But dealing with government corruption, the Jack Smith's documents case against President Trump was dismissed with prejudice this past week.
It's incredible how much happened last week.
We were on the road together.
We were there for four days.
It feels like it was four months.
It was Monday of last week, what I'm dubbing White Pill Monday.
Trump survives an assassination attempt.
He nominates J.D. Vance's VP, or appoints J.D. Vance's VP, and Judge Eileen Cannon out of Florida dismisses the documents case with basically, I'm lisping here, basically a scathing rebuke of Jack Smith, his appointment, and everything that he's done.
They took the blueprint from Clarence Thomas' concurring separate opinion on the immunity, said this is how kings and royalty work.
They appoint their own private investigators to go after their political rivals.
They create offices out of whole cloth, not offices that existed under law.
They bypass any government scrutiny, congressional hearings, congressional approval, and they just prosecute their political rivals like Joe Biden did, in addition to just basically facilitating their murder.
He facilitates their lawfare murder by doing what Jack Smith did.
She tosses the case, choice words for Jack Smith, elaborate, flesh it out, and tell us what impact it will have, if any, on the Judge Chutkin case, which presumably should get tossed for the exact same reason.
No doubt.
In some other cases, I mean, there was because they brought cases against other defendants in that case, in the Trump case, that should also be dismissed as well.
So first, I got to give a shout out to one of the lawyers we interviewed, former assistant U.S. attorney at the Justice Department, Jeffrey Clark, who the corrupt D.C. bar is trying to take out.
The first person to notify me.
That this special counsel appointment was completely constitutionally bogus was Jeff Clark.
And he was the one saying, we need to get this information to Trump's defense team.
And he had already thought it through.
He'd already analyzed it.
He's a brilliant lawyer.
It's an embarrassment of the D.C. bar that they're trying to disbar him for complete hogwash.
I think we met Mike Davis at the Republican National Convention, had fun chatting up with him.
He apparently was enjoying those Wisconsin beers.
And his expression communicated that appreciation.
There are good beers there in Wisconsin.
But he's dead on accurate, and he ended up being very prescient.
And thanks to his good legal work, as far as I know, that this argument even got made in the way it got made, that Edwin Meese ended up joining in, that other people were getting.
So he, again, deserves great, great credit for this critical work done on behalf of President Trump.
The issue was twofold.
The Appointments Clause to the Constitution and the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution.
The Appointments Clause says that any officer, principal or inferior, has to be nominated by the President and approved by the Senate.
Congress can choose to allow other people to nominate inferior officers, but it has to specifically do so by legislative action.
The goal was there had been so much abuse by the king, by the British king and by the British royals, in how they appointed officials, that they did not want to give carte blanche to the executive branch to appoint whomever they wanted.
The executive branch had to get the involvement at some level of Congress for those appointments.
If a principal officer, always their consent of the Senate.
Inferior officer, also the approval of the Senate, unless Congress specifically said, You can appoint this person or you can appoint this kind of official.
The issue with the Appropriations Clause is that no money can be spent by the Treasury that Congress hasn't authorized to be spent for that precise purpose.
The issue with Jack Smith is that he was a private citizen who had never been appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, not for any level of office.
The second problem was he was given a budget without any limitation.
It was just spend whatever you want.
For as long as you want.
Even though Congress had never appropriated any funds for his office, for any investigation to be done.
Credit to Marjorie Taylor Greene and others who had been raising this as a complaint.
Credit to Thomas Massey, who also had been raising this as a complaint.
And so what Judge Cannon said is, okay, if he's a principal officer, he had to be appointed by the president with consent in the Senate.
That never happened.
So that means he didn't have any powers to act.
As a U.S. attorney in that instance.
If he's an inferior officer, he also had to be appointed by the president with the consent of the Senate unless Congress created his office.
And did Congress create his office?
No, it didn't.
So, in fact, what the judge went through was their only excuse, for the most part, was an FBI statute.
It was an FBI statute and a generic statute involving commissioning special counsel.
So what it is, there's a...
When they reorganized the FBI, reorganized the Justice Department at different times throughout history.
We didn't have a Justice Department until 1970, by the way.
We might still be better off if it was gone.
That's another story for another day.
They reorganized it multiple times over the years.
And when they did, they created logistical statutes to say, okay, when you have a special counsel, here's how you commission them, here's how you pay them, here's what oath they take, etc.
He tried to take the commissioning Paying statute and say that's actually an appointment statute, which, of course, by law, it can't be under the Constitution.
Not only that, Congress, when it wants to give you somebody appointment power, it uses the exact language of the Constitution.
It mirrors it and quotes it.
That isn't here.
In fact, they use the past tense of the verb, a special counsel retained or someone that's already been hired.
Because it's a logistic statute.
She's like, a logistic statute can't confer appointment authority.
So that meant he had no appointments authority.
And then they took the FBI provision, right, that talks about how you can hire FBI agents to prosecute crimes, as saying, you know what, that means that the Attorney General doesn't have to get the approval of the Senate or the nomination of the President for appointing anybody in the entire Justice Department.
He can give all the power of the Justice Department to anyone he wants, anytime he wants, under this FBI statute.
And she's like, well, first of all, ain't that putting a truck through a...
What's the old...
What's the word?
It's like something through a mouse hole.
I mean, it's a whole tanker ship through a mouse hole, whatever the language is, that comes from the case from about 20 years ago.
She's like, Congress doesn't do that when it wants to give that degree of power to the Justice Department.
And she said it's clear that this, when you read the whole statute and the history and all the rest, it's referencing FBI agents, non-officer employees.
It's not meaning give them the power of the Attorney General of the United States to go around and do whatever they want.
And then, of course, the Appropriations Clause is an additional problem.
She says, I don't even need to get there, but if I did get there, I would say...
His appropriations clearly violates the appropriations clause because he's never been given this money by Congress ever.
They're just spending ceaseless money that didn't have authority to.
And then the only question is, what's the remedy?
Well, if you have someone who does not have the constitutional authority to be a U.S. attorney, it's like the only remedy is dismissal of the indictment, period, because the indictment was – remember we were talking about this a couple of weeks ago where other people were predicting somebody else would come in and try the case?
I was like, no, the only remedy is dismissal because he didn't have authority to go to the grand jury in the first place.
He didn't have the authority to gather the evidence in the first place.
He didn't have the authority to seek an indictment in the first place.
He didn't have the authority to give people sweetheart deals that led them to make up stories against President Trump in the first place.
Judge, to her credit, came to the exact same conclusion, said dismissal is the only remedy for the severe constitutional breach.
Great ruling.
Now Smith is appealing it up to the 11th Circuit.
Again, I think all this lawlessly because he's not a U.S. attorney.
Be like me pretending I'm U.S. attorney and just filing an appeal with somebody.
I don't think he has the authority to do so.
But putting that aside...
You're right.
As to the D.C. judge, if Jack Smith doesn't have the constitutional authority, he doesn't have the constitutional authority.
So she's going to have to go in and pretend the statute means the exact opposite of what Judge Cannon concluded, which it wouldn't surprise me for this corrupt judge in D.C. to try to do, but that will in turn get appealed.
Ultimately, if there's a split between the circuits, it's going to go to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court's going to say Justice Thomas was right because the plain language of the law reads in the exact way that Trump's defense lawyer said it did, thanks to the great argument of Jeffrey Clark.
What was the relevance of, or at least the coincidence, Clarence Thomas oversees the circuit from which this would come to him by way of appeal, right?
The 11th Circuit, yeah.
He would oversee.
But there's no consequence of that because typically what happens is those Supreme Court justices refer the whole issue to the entire court.
It just means if the 11th Circuit were to overturn the district court, I don't know how they plausibly can.
I mean, you read through her decision, there's no weakness.
I mean, you have to conclude that the Attorney General, that Congress in the statute authorizing the creation of the FBI, intended to allow all U.S. attorneys to be nominated, to be chosen by the Attorney General without approval of the President or the Senate.
No one has ever interpreted the FBI Act that way.
By the way, if you want to hush-hush on the creation of the FBI, you can go to V.O. Barnes Law.
.locals.com and figure out the corrupt history of its very origins.
But even putting that aside, ever since then, no one has interpreted this statute to mean that.
So they're going to have to go against almost a century of legal history.
And in most of the special counsels that have been chosen, she goes through, she says, almost none of them have ever cited this statute as their authority.
The only other statute is the commissioning statute.
And it's obvious that's not an appointment statute.
And again, you'd have to butcher the legal history.
The legislative history of the statute itself says, by the way, this commissioning statute is not an appointment statute.
You know, they would have to lie at so many levels to overturn her that I think the federal cases against Trump are DOA.
It's federal in Florida.
It's federal in D.C. So what is the rule?
This is persuasive but not binding coming out of Florida as relates in D.C. Yes.
And if the 11th Circuit comes down and affirms it, does it become binding in D.C.?
No. No.
All right.
So it takes the Supreme Court to adjudicate on this for it to be binding in D.C.?
Correct. Okay.
So it might be some time still.
So what do we expect to see out of D.C. then?
Presumably this is the next...
How corrupt is the D.C. judge?
The D.C. judge is smart.
She'll be like the New York judge.
Who will use the excuse to get out of all this trouble?
Remember, the goal was to convict Trump in the court of public opinion.
Get a conviction, damage him.
They already realized that hasn't worked.
That has backfired badly.
But I think this D.C. judge is such a political hack, you can't trust or rely on her to follow the law.
Then the question is, will the D.C. Court of Appeals try to make a mockery of itself one more time, show what a political partisan hack court it is, and show why the D.C. court system should be entirely abolished by Congress?
By refusing to recognize the plain language of the law as to both the appointment clause and the appropriations clause, both of which independently prove why Jack Smith never had the constitutional authority to do what he has done in this case.
Robert, I'm following Twitter at the same time.
It seems that the Democrat Party is coalescing behind Kamala Harris in real time.
Pete Buttigieg is on her supporting...
But look at this.
See, this was behind-the-scenes work.
So Buttigieg got something.
We'll see what he got.
It wouldn't surprise me if you want to take a long-shot bet, Buttigieg for vice president.
You got the first gay vice president and the first female president.
They got to push the DEI stuff.
Also, Buttigieg is a deep state favorite.
There's no market yet for VP picks, so we'll see when that market gets created.
Also, Gavin Newsom seems to have, I was going to say jumped ship, but I guess it's more accurate to say jumped on board.
But look at this, it's hilarious.
This was 22 minutes ago?
Tough, fearless, tenacious.
There's a tenacious D joke in there.
With our democracy at stake and our future on the line, no one is better to prosecute the case against Donald Trump's dark vision and guide our country in a healthier direction than America's Vice President Kamala Harris?
22 minutes ago?
Three days ago?
Sorry, that's actually three weeks ago.
I heard three words from the president tonight.
He's all in, and so am I. Joe Biden's had our back.
Now it's time to have his.
So I've tagged Defying L's.
What a difference three weeks makes.
We have his back, and now I have Kamala's back.
Well, when the Clintons were in, that meant a huge part of the Democratic political machine was the line behind Harris.
And even if Obama wanted somebody else, it meant that the ship had probably sailed.
But we'll see.
I mean, if it ends up being Harris, this will go down as one of the worst Democratic Party decisions since 1968.
There's going to be a contested election.
It's going to be awesome.
There's going to be more action coming.
Okay, what do we move on to now, Robert?
Well, we've got a range of stories.
We can do another Israel story.
The International Court of Justice?
Yeah. So what is the latest on that?
This was the ruling that declared them guilty of genocide-ish conduct, and then the question was whether or not they had, what's the word, when you acquiesce to the jurisdiction of?
Well, it's an advisory opinion, so it's not binding.
It has no legal impact.
The International Court of Justice is the UN's court.
But what's interesting is it's the duties of occupation.
Which I find fascinating.
This legal theory that there's legal duties of an occupying army.
But that's what it's all predicated upon.
That certain conventions, certain customs of international law put duties upon and that occupation can exist.
Even if you don't have physical occupation by your military, which has been, by the way, the historic definition of occupation.
They've now expanded the definition of occupation to be that if you control borders, if you control resources, you also are an occupier, even if you don't physically occupy the space.
The main legal premise of the International Court of Justice is that all occupation out from the pre-1967 borders.
If it's outside the pre-1967 borders, it's illegal.
That's what the International Court of Justice has concluded.
The International Court of Justice said that Israel even putting up a wall to protect itself was illegal.
This is the International Court of Justice where it's always gone.
It says that resources, law, and policing have to be done in a different way when you occupy territory that you don't legally have a right to.
This is also premised upon Really a post-UN legal theory of international law which rejects the theory that you can acquire territory by conflict, by any violent means.
Now the irony with that is almost all territory anywhere in the world occupied by any government Was obtained by violence.
Not just that, but it kind of makes it a no-lose situation if you want to take a chance and start a war and then claim, you know, cry foul when you lose territory in a war that you started because you can no longer...
I don't want to get too far into it.
You don't want any adverse consequences to it.
And this is, you know, both of us have been critical of how did October 7th happen?
Why wasn't that a severe?
Breach of security by Israeli high-ranking authorities.
The critical of the way Israel has approached the Gaza invasion and that that would politically backlash and not even achieve the purported objective that they wanted.
Critics have met in Yahoo.
Same time, we're not dumb enough to buy into the idea that the Palestinians should never have consequences every time they wage war and lose.
Nor am I ever going to line up with a group of people who decided to line up with the Nazis.
Like the Palestinian movement has done.
It's like Whitney Webb repeats all the Hamas propaganda.
But she says she's deeply opposed to authoritarian governments.
What would you describe Hamas as?
Maybe one of the most tyrannical authoritarian governance groups in the world, maybe?
They're a government in name only.
They're a terrorist organization that has grabbed the powers of the reins of government.
Okay, fine.
So they're a government.
What would you call Iran?
You can be critical of both Israel and Hamas.
You can think, like Thomas Massey, that it's none of our business and we should keep our money out of it.
You can think, like Donald Trump.
That there's an interest in Israel of freedom and liberty, that we should pick them over Hamas, but try to advocate for peace all along.
You can have a range of perspectives on this that I think are rooted in history and law.
The fundamental premise I disagree with the International Court of Justice is the idea that legally you cannot acquire territory by force.
It's just not realistic.
Historically, that is the most predominant method by which anybody has acquired territory.
And it becomes almost arbitrary if you say, okay, the pre-1967 borders are okay.
Well, why not just limit it to pre-1948 borders?
Why not limit it to pre-1928 borders?
I mean, how did the British come to own the mandate, right?
They're relying upon the British mandate for the legal authority of who has what land.
How did the British come to get it?
Did the Ottomans just say, here, Brits, would you please take this territory?
No. That's why it's illogical at multiple levels.
It's my problem with reparations.
I disagree with Robert Kennedy and some others.
There's no way you can get a resolution that works.
I would be okay with reparations if only the slave owners paid.
But of course, that would mean Barack Obama and Kamala Harris got to write some real big checks.
They come from ancestors of slave owners, not ancestors of slaves.
Let me highlight.
I got to highlight that because I pointed out today that, you know, they refer to Obama as the first black president, despite the fact that he's half white and was raised by his white mother.
They refer to Kamala Harris as the first black VP, even though she's half Indian, half Jamaican.
And the Jamaican father admittedly has a family tree going back to black slave owners in Jamaica.
And these are the examples that they use of the, I don't know, the progress that ethnic minorities have made under a Democrat government.
It's quite fitting.
I never knew all of that, Robert.
I mean, I knew it, but I confirmed it today in my own mind.
I know, yeah.
Everybody's going to call her Haktua Harris.
Well, that might get her some votes, Robert.
They've got to call her something else.
But yeah, so my problem with it is it's not even internally inconsistent.
I mean, internally consistent, the International Court of Justice.
Because you can't say no land, you can't recognize any borders that were created by conquest, and then turn around and say we're going to use the British borders.
Or the Ottoman's borders, right?
I mean, this is the problem with this, because fundamentally I disagree with the premise that somehow there's now a custom of international law.
It's in a few conventions.
Nobody applies them.
Nobody really means them.
And I disagree with it as a principle.
It should not be considered a custom of international law that you can never acquire property by conflict.
I mean, here they acquired this property because somebody invaded them.
So I just disagree with the premise.
That is the entire predicate.
By which they condemn Israel.
And I say this as someone who has serious problems with Netanyahu, serious problems with what happened on October 7th, in terms of I'm not yet fully convinced that high-ranking officials within Israel are not at some level culpable for what happened on October 7th, while fully blaming Hamas for what happened.
I'm just not buying that nobody in the high-ranking part of Israeli intelligence or military didn't want it to happen.
For political purposes and let it happen by taking strategic tactics and actions to do so.
And I'm critical of the method by which they are going into Gaza.
But at the same time...
That doesn't mean you have to pretend the International Court of Justice has now become intellectually independent.
It's been politically compromised for forever.
Nor does it require us to embrace legal doctrines that are just flat out ludicrous like this case is.
I remember taking some, well, I took some heat in my response to October 7th where I said, how in the name of holy hell could this have happened?
How can you have this level of cataclysmic security failings?
And I take heat for that because you're sort of ostensibly criticizing Israel.
No one gave me flack for saying how in the name of sweet holy hell could a series of security failures have resulted in Trump getting shot and nearly killed?
Nobody had a problem with it then.
Not that many people did, but I think I took a little bit of flack for that.
There's a good simplified headline for today's news.
P-pads out, knee pads in.
That's not bad.
Someone in Rumble pointed out that Biden withdrew on National Ice Cream Day.
Coincidence, I think not.
I borrowed that and tweeted it.
Robert, actually, before I forget, a number of people, so I won't read the chat when I get to them.
People are still floating the idea that Kamala Harris is not a naturalized American citizen.
She was born...
That's a good issue for us to discuss, to add to the late developing news for the legal equation.
So the question is, a lot of respected...
Scholars think this.
So Kamala Harris was born in the United States.
However, both of her parents were not citizens of the United States at the time of her birth.
This is different than Barack Obama and different than John McCain.
So John McCain was born outside the continental United States, but his parents were U.S. citizens.
Barack Obama's, the allegation was, he was born in Kenya, and his mother, because of her age, His father was not a U.S. citizen, and his mother, even though she was an American citizen, because of her age at the time under congressional statutes, he would not be considered a U.S. citizen, a natural-born U.S. citizen, because of the location of his birth and her age at the time.
This was back when they were trying to design a law to make sure young American women didn't go abroad, and they had some fancy excuse for it, but I kind of found the law dubious.
And there was always constitutional questions.
What's unique here...
Is you have someone who is indisputably born inside the United States, unlike John McCain, unlike arguably Barack Obama, but also indisputably neither parent was a U.S. citizen.
So it's the natural birth, natural born citizen clause condition of being a president of the United States.
In order to be the president of the United States constitutionally, you have to be of certain age, 35 years of age, but you must also be a natural born citizen.
What does that mean?
And this gets into the anchor baby dispute.
This gets into a range of disputes that Kamala Harris potentially triggers.
And the argument is to be a natural born citizen.
Some people say you have to be born both inside the United States and one of your parents has to be a citizen of the United States.
Others say you have to just be born to a U.S. citizen.
Others say you have to be born to a U.S. citizen if Congress at the time recognized that.
As a right of citizenship, even if you're born outside the United States, because the laws have changed over the years of it.
But that would, of course, delegate from the Constitution to Congress authority to control access to the presidency, which would raise its own constitutional questions.
And then there's some that say that just being right now, you are considered a citizen of the United States if you're born in the United States, regardless of whether either of your parents is a U.S. citizen.
The people wanting to challenge this, I can tell you that the courts have historically refused to listen to any argument.
Now, I am sure someone will file a challenge to her candidacy on the grounds that she is not an actual board citizen.
What the courts are likely to do, a court may rule on the merits, but what they did in the McCain cases, what they did in the Obama cases, is say it is not...
A constitutional question that has judicial cognizance.
Only Congress can answer.
There's no cognizable claim, as I think it was Ralph Nadler.
What Nadler said at one point.
But hold on a second.
How would this only be coming up now?
Would it not be the same requirements for the VP as for the president?
It is.
So why did this come up four years ago?
I think some people challenged it and courts threw it out.
And that's what I think would happen here.
It probably doesn't hurt Trump to have some people raising it in the background because Kamala Harris communicates a foreign vibe.
Just to remind everybody, she was not born, neither of her parents were a U.S. citizen.
She grew up in Canada.
Yep, Westbound.
Or at least went to Westbound High.
I don't know if she lived in Westbound.
Neither parent American.
She was born in America, raised in Canada.
And I would dare say this.
I'm more American than Kamala Harris.
And she might be more...
No, I won't say she's more Canadian than me.
Okay, good.
Robert, before we...
It's any easier in Canada than you.
Under its current politics.
Let me bring up...
Well, actually, I won't bring up...
I want to read a bunch of the tips in our community.
Barnes, Viva, the comment thread is infested with Karen eruption against visual images of free speech.
Karen eruption resulting in a troll counterattack.
Sadly, it appears you, one or both of you, Yeah, if you get offended by an image, I don't know, don't look at it.
On the locals board, you know, be reasonable.
You can share a photo here or there, but sometimes people get a little too excited and they start sharing like 20 photos of people in bikinis and whatnot.
The board is mostly meant for conversation.
It's okay to share some, share some cool memes.
We always get some great memes.
It's cool to share a photo now and then, but don't hog the conversation.
Okay, and obviously no illegal photos and no graphic stuff that people don't want to see.
Encryptus, we are launching...
Oh, hold on.
This is what I want to bring.
Robert, I'm going to bring up the Encryptus song.
The AI...
Yeah, that was very cool.
It's amazing.
You can feel it live today.
Hold on.
I made a few changes.
Here, let's play this and then I'm going to read because Encryptus wanted me to specify what he's doing now and talk about what he's doing.
We'll play the whole thing.
But listen.
Together we can rise, never gonna fall.
In the face of the storm, we find in the calm.
Thank you, God, above.
Holding tight to us palms.
It was a rally night, crowd gathering tight in Bullah Amazing. This is the best part.
And right now.
I'll stop it there.
And now I'm going to go back to Encryptus' message in our local screen and then maybe read, if I may read the text that he was sending me, because he wants me to explain what he does.
We're launching the PolyCompass Analyst, a powerful AI tool designed to provide unbiased, comprehensive insights into political candidates.
Our mission is to help voters make informed decisions based on facts and records, not rhetoric or party lines.
We aim to raise $75,000 in the next two months.
To cover infrastructure and a high-performance database.
The quicker we reach our goal, the sooner...
Hold on, I just clicked on the link.
The sooner we can deploy this tool and make it available to everyone.
And I'm going to...
It's on Give, Send, Go, so that's fantastic.
And I'm going to open it up here and share the link to everybody on Rumble, where we have the biggest audience and locals.
He's from Chattanooga.
He's been working on this for quite a while, and the goal is...
The most common question I've got is, is there a resource I can find out from my city council member, my county commissioner, my state representative, my congressman, somebody running for judge, that I can get accurate, quick information about who and what they believe so I can see what it is I believe.
Whether I support them or not.
That information is not very accessible.
The AI that's out there is contaminated and politically prejudiced.
He's been spending a lot of his own money and a lot of his own time.
To take it to that next level needs some public support to make it happen.
If you support this, if you want this to be available, if you want this...
Uh, a technology made accessible to a broader range of the populace so that they can make informed judgments about their electoral choices, uh, then definitely support this project at Gibson Go.
Okay. So I sent the link out.
That's it.
And it's fantastic.
Now let me get back to, and I also just texted encrypt this, um, scroll up here.
Did I send a message?
If I did, I have another one, have another one.
This is from Tony the hat.
PR nerd, Robert, can you please tell JD to announce the Trump admin will protect independent contractors?
I'm in a Facebook group of small biz owners.
Julie Su's attack on 1099 workers, Proact, has flipped hundreds of thousands of damn voters.
It's especially bad for minority and elderly self-employed and sandwiched generation women caregivers.
It's an easy layup issue, even better than keeping men out of women's sports.
One-third of the workforce, 63 million, are 1099, and it's not just gig workers.
We've got Tupac Amaru.
The security failure last Saturday was so great and of such magnitude, has the burden shifted to the government to show that it was not a simple mistake?
That's the way it should be, Tupac.
They should have to prove their innocence, not vice versa.
Uncivil. Barnes, can you make an attempt to steelman the confluence of errors theory?
I think we've done it, but my problem with these explanations for the assassinations on Trump is if Secret Service...
Which has been largely well-respected up until DEI began in 2021.
It's capable of such confluence of errors.
Why not Bill or Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden?
Granted, George Bush had a grenade thrown at him in 2005 in Georgia.
Why now only the threat to the deep state, Donald Trump?
JB Rancher, thoughts?
Biden drops out via Soviet-style tweet and endorses Harris.
Tomorrow, USS Director Chilas testifying deep state leaks it was Biden-Harris campaigns who sanctioned the assassination attempt on Trump.
Enlist complicity from Attorney General Garland and DHS Secretary Mayorkas.
Taints Harris enough to oust her as nominee.
Opens up the deep state to insert their candidates.
Dem machine can look like the hero for getting the party back on track.
Solves candidate issues and assassination investigations together.
JB Rancher, Robert.
That's kind of genius.
We'll see.
Okay, go for it.
No, it's going to be some more, but we'll get to more afterwards.
Okay, what do we got next?
We got a big election case out of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
This concerns Arizona's law.
And there was two issues, one good ruling, one not as good ruling.
So in Arizona, if you use a federal voter registration form, you don't have to produce any ID to register to vote.
But if you use a state registration form, you do have to give voter registration.
You do have to give ID to vote, to register.
And what was happening is in Maricopa County, that hopelessly corrupt county, the heart of Arizona, where Phoenix is, 60% of the votes are, was if you came in and filled out the state form and didn't have ID, they said, we'll just call that a federal form and allow you to do it anyway, because most of the registration forms are coming in on the state form.
Ninth Circuit said, no, you can't do that.
That if it's a state form, they have to produce their ID, and if they don't produce their ID, you can't register them to vote.
So a very good win on election integrity out of the Ninth Circuit.
I mean, it could have been better.
I think they should have said the same thing about the federal law, but yeah, that is what it is.
Of note, in Pennsylvania, they're running false advertising, which, according to the Mackey case, isn't that all a crime now?
They're telling Republican Trump voters that Trump doesn't want them to use any mail-in voting.
Even though they know that, in fact, Trump has an organized effort to do mail-in voting because anybody who can't vote in person or won't be able to vote in person or fears they might not wants to maximize Trump turnout with the mail-in voting as long as mail-in voting is still legal when he would like to get rid of it.
But as long as it's still there, you might as well use it to your own benefit and not just unilaterally disarm.
But it's interesting.
There'll be no action taken over that false advertising.
By people connected to the Bob Casey campaign and others, according to public reports.
Hunter, by the way, is also claiming that his special counsel wasn't properly appointed.
Now, the difference is his special counsel was a U.S. attorney.
So it's going to be much harder for him to make that argument through.
They used the same statute, Judge, so if it was good for Trump, can't it be good for me?
Well, the only difference being that his special attorney actually went through the congressional nomination, but the vetting process, so it was done properly.
It's not all special counsels that are unlawful, just the ones that were unlawfully appointed unilaterally without going through congressional hearings.
And my prediction will be watch for Joe Biden to pardon Hunter Biden before the election.
Didn't he say that he wouldn't pardon or commute, Roberts?
But now he's no longer running.
So Joe is not going to care what anybody thinks anymore.
He's going to do whatever he wants to do to preserve his legacy and protect his family.
And he's not going to trust Kamala to take care of that business.
So he's going to take care of that business sooner rather than later.
It's amazing.
You did bring up some interesting semantics.
Maybe he said, as president or as candidate, I will not pardon him.
I've got to go back and read how he said it, actually.
Okay, hold on.
Before you went there, I had some other thoughts.
It was a question that I wanted to ask you on these cases.
Okay, forget it.
It doesn't matter.
What are we moving on to?
So, yeah, we got the Splendid Class Action.
We got web squatting.
We got drag queen story time.
We got tranny birth certificates.
We got...
First Amendment for first graders.
We got Second Amendment reconsideration.
And we got gummies by Huckabee.
Or maybe not.
Well, let's do the ones that I'm familiar with.
The Splenda proposed putative class action of people alleging...
That Splenda was making false statements that their product can actually help you counter diet or fight diabetes, prevent diabetes, reduce diabetes.
It's the number one reason people use sucralose products is because usually they have diabetes or they're worried about getting diabetes.
And it turns out there's a lot of studies that sucralose worsens diabetes, increases the chance you get it and worsens it if you already have it.
And not only that.
It can also cause cancer, amongst other things.
So this is some consequential false advertising, and a big class action was allowed to go forward on these grounds.
So it's something to really watch.
A lot of these sugar substitutes, unlike stevia, unlike monk fruit, unlike some other ones that are natural, stevia is from Brazil, purely natural, these chemically created ones by big food.
Big agriculture.
Credit to Trump, by the way.
This is probably part of the J.D. Vance effect.
But he's out tweeting about make America or truthing about make agriculture great again.
So we're starting to get some progress on that side of the aisle.
I'm here in Pennsylvania where they're again trying to shut down Amos Miller.
Effort number 17. We have to file briefs by the end of next week.
But sucralose is a chemical creation by big companies that I don't trust.
And good to see this class action progress and move forward.
Well, I mean, they try to dismiss it on a motion to dismiss and say that it has no chance of success.
They're basically saying, look, the FDA says it's better.
The FDA says it's okay, judge.
And thankfully, the judge is like, that's not enough in this case.
Well, also, the judge said that's not even what the FDA is saying.
The FDA didn't make any claims about it reducing diabetes.
The other thing is my wife explained this to me.
It's not the sugar itself that's the problem.
It's the triggering of the senses that make you think that you're eating sugar that triggers other...
Physiological responses and you end up eating...
Well, other than the fact that sucralose, I believe, is pure crap and causes cancer, it tricks your body in a way that is still fundamentally unhealthy.
Just eat less sweets or things that are chemically altered to taste sweet.
Okay. Then...
Go to AmosMillerOrganicFarm.com and still get his food while you still can before the government tries to shut him down again like they currently are.
What was the other one?
So Stevia.
We got web squatting, got drag queen story time, got trainee birth certificates, First Amendment speech for first graders, Second Amendment, Ninth Circuit reconsideration, and Huckabee and gummies.
Okay, let's do the web one and then we'll do the other ones quickly on locals.
But the web one, web squatting, this is something I've been talking about for a little while.
I had the idea, buy good domain names and sell them off later, is different than squatting an existing web name for the purposes of some form of blackmail.
This case was a little complicated because it sounded like there was a prior existing relationship, an employment relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant.
So it wasn't just someone saying, I'm going to buy X now.
Or 30 years ago.
And then if Elon Musk says, I want X because I've got a business called X, we'll say, tough noogies, I bought that, buy it for me.
That wouldn't be necessarily the web squatting that would be unlawful.
But this person was basically buying up domain names to confuse with an existing business, one that he was formerly employed at.
What was the stage of the case?
I think they were trying to get it dismissed as well and basically survived the motion to dismiss.
Yeah, semi-judgment stage about whether it could go to trial.
And what most people don't know is that trademark laws...
Apply to website domain names, number one.
Number two, the Lanham Act was amended to specifically prohibit cyber squatting.
Cyber squatting happens all the time.
This is somebody who goes out and gets a domain name and then makes you pay a bunch of money to get it, even if it's your own name or your own business.
Under the Lanham Act, that's illegal, and you can force them to give up that domain name to you or sue them, and they have to pay costs and damages.
So it's something that most people don't know.
They think they have to go pay somebody for their own name.
And it's similar to the Mike Huckabee case against Gummies, which is Facebook was allowing advertisers to run, lying to Huckabee's audience.
And my guess is that with Facebook, you can actually target certain groups by names.
So my guess is that Facebook authorized them.
To advertise directly to people who follow, watch, or listen to Mike Huckabee.
And it would say things like, Miracle Health Issue, Miracle Health Solution for Huckabee.
Huckabee leaving this network for this network.
Find out why.
And it would take you to gummies.
And there were a bunch of people that were buying marijuana pot gummies, CBD gummies, thinking this was endorsed by Mike Huckabee when he's endorsed no such thing.
So he has sued Facebook because Arkansas law recognizes a right of publicity.
So does the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and other courts.
This is the right in your own name, your own image, your own likeness, etc.
And what's interesting is I was like, okay, how are they going to get around Section 230?
And how do they blame Facebook for this?
It's something that I forgot because of the nature of his claim.
He's like, this is really an intellectual property claim.
And as such...
It's not covered by Section 230 immunity.
So Facebook might have to start paying a bunch of money for all the bogus advertising it's allowed to be run on its platform, misusing other people's name, image, and likeness.
This could be an expansive area of potential liability for Facebook.
Well, but that's interesting.
I'll try to steal menace even though I don't want to defend the devil.
How are they supposed to vet or prevent this from happening?
If they become aware of it, they have an obligation to take it down?
That's an interesting question.
I mean, usually that's the protocol, right?
And usually some degree of due diligence is required by the platform before they allow just anybody to advertise.
But exactly when they're liable and when they're not is yet to be determined.
Well, that's interesting, actually.
They'll have to either have better vetting process or securities in place for whom they allow to advertise.
I do remember when I wanted to advertise.
There was a bit of a vending yet to get approved to advertise on Facebook, and I only did it for politics, people.
Okay, now, Robert, let me, before we end it on local...
I'm going to turn the lights on real quick.
Yeah, don't worry, you look good.
It's very romantic.
Before we go over to...
Oh, let's see here.
This is perfect.
Share screen.
And touche, viva, sis, Karen Tom.
Now, I forget what that was touche in respect of, but I like the whale, which means that person's a member.
Jancox04. Kamala picking Hillary for VP would be a mistake if she wants to last a full term.
That's funny.
Oh my God, is that funny?
Yeah, that would be suicide.
Is Gavin running?
Gavin seems to definitely not be running because he's just endorsed Kamala and his stock is tanked on predicted.
Can't trust the government, but you can trust in Barnes to look dapper as fuck.
That is a stoner with a boner.
That's a good name.
Tuxedo Blackfoot.
Blame is not a push to...
To 100%.
Hamas may have been 100% responsible.
There may still be Israeli operators 50%.
My point is that if you know you're living next to a terrorist organization who you call them what they are in the wake of the attack and you leave your front door open, I'm sorry.
There are people who are trying to kill Donald Trump every day, all day long.
You don't get to say, oh, we had a lapse in security.
How could that have happened?
What was me?
Bad man shot at Trump.
No. When you screw up at your one job, Cataclysmically incompetently so, there is blame on you, and we need to know how that happened.
Was it a Lee Hop, a Me Hop?
Or are you, in fact, incapable of doing what you're supposed to do?
Protect your citizens.
Okay, Harris got her start with Diddy.
Okay, I might have to see that.
There might be more blackmail material than we can possibly...
I can't see if Barnes is in here.
Hold on a second.
Did he come back?
Oh, he's in it.
Barnes, what's up?
Okay, sorry.
I was on the...
So let me just go through these as fast as we can, because we're going to go over to...
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com afterwards.
Democrats literally installed a Caucasian Indian woman whose family owned slaves to screech about Trump and Republicans being racist.
This is peak stupidity, C.J. Daggs.
We ride at dawn to free Nova Scotia from tyranny of the crown.
C.J. Daggs.
Harris Buttigieg's ticket.
Electo. I gotta pee.
That's gonna make me pee.
Nevada Legion.
Has SCOTUS ever dismissed a case with prejudice?
And can that even occur as so many lawsuits are unconstitutional?
Robert? I mean, they just either accept or deny petition for cert.
And when they do take a case, they usually remand it with directions consistent with the opinion, which might include dismissing it with prejudice, but they themselves don't do that.
That's done at the lower court level.
CJ Daggs, Trump 2025 invade Canada, bring freedom to the citizens of Nova Scotia.
All good guy.
I'm predicting that Jack Smith's appeal to the circuit will be denied on standing as he does not hold the office.
Can they deny him on standing on appeal where he had standing on the initial stage?
Hypothetically, yes.
Hypothetically, yes.
That's wild.
Canada is where people get government-sponsored sex changes and gravy fries, but I, for one, will fight to free Nova Scotia from the tyranny.
That is the crown, free Nova Scotia.
CJ Daggs, I'm just going to go to some other ones here.
We need antitrust laws for billionaires.
Denise J. Smith.
I, what does that say, land free or iron free?
Joe Biden dropped out on, oh, that's the presidential ice cream day, long live Eva Barnes, just thinking, says Dems are a mess, Chicago will burn, and then there's a link to a Rumble video.
If Harris were to already be president via any need to, oh, if Harris were to already be president via any need to fill the role of Biden, it would remove the emotions of voting in hope and perceived purpose to elect the first woman and break the glass.
Oh, that's a good point.
That's a good point.
Yep. King of Biltong in the house says, I know you guys have lots of rants to read.
This is my second one for 50 bucks.
Thank you very much.
King of Biltong.
Everyone go support him.
Good evening from Anton's Meat and Eat.
Free shipping on your Biltong using code VIVA on www.biltongusa.com and antonusa.com.
We got that.
Okay, is it true that Tucker spoke unscripted?
Yeah, he does.
He does it all the time.
It's amazing.
Brilliant guy.
I used to watch Whitney Webb.
She seemed to have good info.
I quit because she started to accuse absolutely everyone of everything.
Started to get kind of nutty.
I think she's a nice lady and everything.
That's why I say she's a useful fool.
By the way, you can look it up.
There's a dictionary definition of useful fool.
It's something the powers that be always look for.
And unfortunately, that's what she's become.
It's like litigation trauma, but in conspiracy world.
When you go through litigation, you begin to think everybody's out to get you, and it destroys relationships.
Same thing with conspiracy phenomenon.
Can we please get RFK as special counsel to investigate the assassination?
I think he'd be great at that.
We've got Webb regularly told folks to challenge her book sources.
Diane West went through them and questioned.
Webb didn't even seem to know many of her own sources.
Her response was an immediate ad hominem.
Barnes, tell me more about Whitney Webb.
I think we did that already.
Teal owns Vance.
Get into it, Barnes.
Okay, well, I don't think we have a problem with Teal.
Okay, breaking.
Okay, then we're all the way down to the bottom here.
So if I missed anybody, miscoosies, me apologies.
We are going to go now to locals, and it's going to be supporters only.
Yeah, we got drag queen story time cases.
We got trainee birth certificate cases.
We got First Amendment for first grader cases.
A federal judge says there is no First Amendment if you're a first grader.
Too little.
Poor Ethan's out of luck.
We got the Second Amendment at the Ninth Circuit being challenged.
And a little update from here behind the enemy lines in the state of Pennsylvania.
And just while I have a breath in here, the return of Stacey Abrams of former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms.
That is from Lolly Newby.
That's $10.
We got another one.
Norm1320, $10.
With Biden at $0.01 for the nomination on predicted, would it be worthwhile to buy in the hope that he'll be back in the play after he finds out that he's bowed out?
Oh, it's possible.
Yeah, maybe he comes out tomorrow and says, I didn't put out that letter.
I'm thinking maybe I'll do that.
No, I won't do that.
Elliot Five Buck says, on Smith's appointment, Chalkin would be bound by the D.C. Circuit precedent.
That reads one line from the Supreme Court and Nixon is essential.
Okay, fine.
Cannon took the view that the Senate was dictum.
If the 11th Circuit panel wants to skip Smith in business, it only has to say it with a dictum.
This is very technical, but thank you very much, Elliot.
And then we got one more before we end this here.
Five bucks here.
We got Blue CW Soldier 3. Still don't have to read my username.
No one has treated the Secret Service as a legitimate agency since the Columbia cocaine incident.
I'm not even sure what that is, Robert.
Oh, one more.
Oh, and then we got Jeet N. I live in rural Virginia.
I'm currently in a fight with the zoning board, and we got a picture of the letter.
Thank you very much for that.
Okay, now I think I said we already read that one in Rumble.
And now we're going to end this on Rumble.
Entire stream will be posted on Twitter as well, unless we go over three hours, in which case it won't allow me to.
And we're going to do locals.
It's going to be local supporters because that's the way Rumble Studio is set up.
If you're not a supporter, consider supporting.
And if not, you can get it tomorrow on everywhere else.
Okay, we are hitting it, people.
It's going down.
▲
Export Selection