All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 5, 2023 - Viva & Barnes
01:32:32
Ryan Carson Suspect ARRESTED! Letitias James CORRUPT? Yale False Accusation AND MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We have here in the chamber today Ukrainian-Canadians, Ukrainian-Canadian world veteran from the Second World War who fought the Ukrainian independence against the Russians and continues to support the troops today,
even at his age of 98. I might just have to start every show with this to remind everyone for an eternity.
Everyone in that room is stupid, and some of them are liars.
His name is Yaroslav Hunkka.
And I was going to say he's in the gallery, but I think you beat me to that.
But I'm very proud to say that he is from North Bay and from my writing of Nipissing-Taniskaming.
APPLAUSE He's a Ukrainian hero, a Canadian hero, and we thank him for all his service.
Thank you.
I want to replay this again because as I...
Oh, there's Christian Freeland standing up first to do it.
I'm looking for Greg Ferguson here.
Can't find him.
Greg Ferguson, the new house speaker who replaced this guy.
I want to just...
Actually, let it play one more time.
Because I think I just noticed something.
Let this soft mineral melt.
Bloody hell, I don't know what that is, and I don't want to see it.
Oh, another ad.
A lot of people think that in order to conceal carry...
I want to just play it for one second, because I think I just noticed something.
Remember Anthony Rota's excuse, or at least Justin Trudeau's excuse, was that...
He was an invitee by Anthony Rotta, and it's his fault and his fault alone being this guy who had to resign and got replaced by Greg Fergus, ethics breaching, liberal political trash, just like all the other liberals out there.
Look at his face when he announces the guest.
He looks surprised.
We have here in the chamber today Ukrainian Canadians, Ukrainian Canadian world veteran from the Second World War.
I'm telling you, he's reading something that he didn't write and it comes out as a surprise to him.
He's not reading something that he wrote because he's struggling to read it.
Oh, surprising to me.
Anyhow, it's all bullshit.
We all knew that Rota was merely the fall guy.
He was not the guy that was responsible for it.
There can be no shame where there is no pride, and there is no pride in Canadian Parliament anymore, so there can be no shame, but shame on all of those dirty, rotten scoundrels.
Okay, short notice stream again.
I like to say short and sweet are the notices, much like Viva Frye.
We're going to talk about...
Look, I had the ordinary stuff on the schedule.
There's been an arrest of the suspect in the...
I forget the guy's name who got stabbed to death in Brooklyn.
Carlson?
I forget his name and I don't mean to be disrespectful.
I just can't remember names.
There's been an update in that.
And there's some other equally interesting details in that story as relates to a GoFundMe that has been set up.
So we're going to talk about that afterwards.
Or at least that was one of the three subjects that I planned to talk about today.
The second of the three subjects.
I'm scouring the internet for Leticia James quotes from the past.
We're going to talk a little update.
The daily updates in Trump's New York trial in front of Judge Angeron, the man who has every tool under his belt to allow him to come to whatever judgment he wants based on his own emotions and biases.
Ryan Carson, thank you very much, Holly Karp.
We're going to talk about the updates in that trial, and I'm just pulling up clips of Leticia James from years past.
Where she has been hell-bent on finding the crime of the man that she has been shown, that being Donald Trump.
Third subject is actually an excuse to talk about the guest I'm going to have Saturday.
I'm going to have Saifullah Khan, who is the Yale student, and I hope I'm pronouncing his name right.
I asked him just to make sure how I pronounce it, pronunciate it, as Barnes would say.
I'm going to have him on Saturday.
This is the Yale student who was wrongly, falsely accused of...
The most egregious type of sexual assault was… What ended up happening in that story?
was ultimately that Yale conducted a joke insult of a kangaroo court hearing into it he was ultimately acquitted and then he sued the accuser and Yale for defamation and I think it got tossed and then it got reinstated or he's been allowed to proceed on his defamation lawsuit on the basis that Yale's investigation was nothing more than a as much of a setup and a frame job as Leticia
We're going to cover that story just briefly to do the update on it.
Because he's going to be on Saturday at 5 o 'clock to talk about his ordeal and what's going on.
But then, as I'm thinking about this, I was, you know, drawn back to a video that I saw yesterday that I retweeted.
And I'm like, holy crap, I know the guy that shot that video.
I met him during the Ottawa protest.
I'm going to reach out to him and see if he can come on and talk about the video because there's a video of police.
I made a joke.
Well, I made a joke.
Police being police.
You know, Justin Trudeau's Gestapo.
And I made a joke that these police are kneeling on a guy, tasing him in the back when there's no resisting arrest, pointing the taser at the crowd, like a bunch of idiots, like a bunch of maniacs.
And I said, are they going to give these two gentlemen a standing ovation in Parliament?
Because that seems to be what they do for SS soldiers.
Bada bing, bada boom.
So, before I get going, let me just make sure that we are, in fact...
Currently live and successfully so everywhere.
We're on Rumble.
Good.
We're on Rumble.
Let me just put on pause again.
Thank God Viva's on.
Alex Jones...
Okay, I'm not reading the editor.
Yes, thank...
Well, don't thank God that I'm on, but yes, it's good to be on.
I was going to be on earlier, but I was trying to clear my mind.
Didn't really work.
All right.
So we're live on Rumble.
We're live on Locals.
And for everybody who doesn't know how this works, start on YouTube and Rumble.
End on YouTube early.
We're going to end on YouTube after we interview Chris Dace from Dace Media, who's going to explain what the hell's going on in Canada after we watch this video.
Going to go to Rumble, do the other stories.
End on Rumble.
Go over to Locals and have a little Locals After Party.
That is it.
Okay, now, I'm going to bring in Chris.
You ready, Chris?
All right.
If you don't know him, you're going to know him now.
Chris, sir, how goes the battle?
It goes, man.
It's always interesting here in Ottawa.
We run into each other a couple of times here, so you might know a little bit about it.
Well, no, no, for sure.
When I saw the video, I could recognize your voice.
We ran into each other repeatedly throughout the Ottawa protest.
You were one of the men on the ground, one of the people on the ground doing the live streaming.
I know nothing about you.
Can I ask you a few questions before we get started?
Yeah, yeah, go nuts.
So who are you?
And tell it to the world.
Yeah, okay.
So I'm Chris Dacey.
I'm from Ottawa.
I was born and raised here before all this or before COVID.
I was a carpenter for most of my life.
I was living downtown Ottawa for, man, about a year.
Before the convoy came in.
Long backstory there, but I kind of got stuck downtown and didn't know what was going to come next.
And then this happened and I've been kind of on the ground and started filming and filling a vacuum when everyone kind of left after the convoy and I haven't stopped.
I'm going to bring up the video, but not to watch it just yet.
I just want to put it on pause and then take it out of the backdrop.
You are what Elon Musk refers to as a street journalist.
You started doing that during the convoy, just hitting the streets and recording in real time?
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, I've always been interested in photography, and I've always kind of taken pictures and recorded what's around me, but never for really anything in particular.
And during the convoy, I went out and kind of did that with purpose.
And I ran into you.
That helped give me a little boost, probably.
And I kind of ended up in a new position where I ended up with a following that would have been hard to grow, maybe otherwise, and just been running with it, really.
Now, before I forget, and I'll ask you before we leave, just to make sure that I get it out there.
On Twitter, you are at Chris Dacey.
Yeah, Chris, Dacey Media.
So you can find me that way pretty much anyway.
D-A-C-E-Y Media.
All right, we don't need to go into childhood this time.
We'll do it the next time.
So you've been doing the street documentation, street journalism since the, Jesus, the, come on, the Ottawa protest, the Ottawa convoy.
What's been going on lately?
You were at the protest in Ottawa, education on indoctrination at the beginning of the summer?
Yeah, that was a big one a few weeks ago.
It was probably about 10,000 people that ended up marching through Ottawa, so that was a big one.
There's been ongoing protests pretty much daily to some degree ever since the convoy on Parliament Hill.
Sometimes it's a few people, sometimes it's more, but there's always stuff going around here.
And when Parliament's in session, I've managed to get pretty close to some politicians, and, you know, you can ask some questions, and, you know, I'm still getting my feet under me, but there's a lot of stuff to do here.
I wish I had actually had time to pull up some of your other good, some good questions that you've asked members of Parliament.
If you can pull some up, flip them to me in the private chat, we'll look at them.
But this is the one I say went viral.
Went viral is such a, like, almost a degrading way of describing.
No, okay.
So I was here for all this.
I didn't actually shoot this one.
This was a woman's live.
I know her quite well.
So this was kind of one of the better angles I got right away.
There was so much going on this day.
So this was a third or fourth incident of the day with Ottawa police.
So there'd been one by the House of Commons.
No, but back it up even earlier.
This day, what the heck?
What's going on?
What day of the week is this?
And what's the protest?
Yeah, so this is, I don't know if you would have heard, but there's been a lot of talk about another convoy.
So this thing is the East and East West convoy.
There's been all kinds of talk about it all over Canada.
There wasn't a lot of information.
In fact, Toronto got shut down a couple of times.
They closed down the area around Queen's Park just because of rumours and whatnot.
So basically this convoy, it's being called a non-voy now, is a group of people from all over the country, like Freedom George Billings, Ron Clark, a few different people.
And they've gathered outside of town, and their plan is to come in, or was to come in, you know, there was a small number that went yesterday, and legally and lawfully protest, right, come in on foot, and protest by the House of Commons and by Parliament, and just so people that that's not something you need to be scared about, and that that should be, you know, it shouldn't be a problem to go, you know, walk down Wellington Street in the nation's capital and protest your government if you want to do that.
A convoy-related protest?
Or is it about education?
Is it about transgenderism?
Or is it about basically everything that's going wrong in Canada right now?
Yeah, I would say probably the latter.
It's people that all these different groups and different individuals all kind of know each other.
And it all stemmed from that one common shared experience, which was the Freedom Convoy.
But, you know, these things have evolved into a lot more.
And a lot of people have been looking and they're trying to figure out avenues to fight.
education over indoctrination, it seems to be one that, that really gets some traction and it's bringing in all different kinds of people.
Um, that isn't their only specific goal, but they kind of go under the hashtag save the children.
So, I mean, that's, that's, yeah, go ahead.
Sorry, no, I'm just going to bring it up again.
So that this, this is an unorganized or at least, um, I don't want to say like un, unregistered.
Yeah, so to use the words recently, I think it was Hamilton police.
Anyways, an Ontario police force.
We put out a tweet about unsanctioned gatherings.
Like, is that a thing now that we need to sanction all our gatherings?
Well, I'm pretty sure a protest is necessarily an unsanctioned gathering.
I'm pretty sure.
Unless the Charter of Rights only meant, you know, obtain a permit to protest, in which case it's not a right, it's a privilege.
But, okay.
Well, as my good friend Patriot Smoothie likes to say, you know, no matter what a protest is, a protest is a protest is a protest.
And you don't need a permit to protest.
If you want to go on Parliament Hill and use loudspeakers and things, then you need to deal with them.
But if you're just in the street and want to protest and hold a sign and do whatever, I mean, that should be well within your legal right.
All right.
So what day of the week did this occur on?
This was yesterday.
All right.
And this was, I say, a disorganized non-voy.
Do you know how many you were on the streets as this happened?
Yes, yeah.
So I was there the whole day for all these areas.
What did the protest look like?
How many people were there?
Where was it?
Were the streets closed off?
If you can describe it.
No.
I mean, it was a, I would call it a relatively small group.
I'd say at most 100 would be pushing it at the very largest.
It started out as kind of like 20 or 30 people.
Okay.
And just flags, some signs, various signs.
And at first it was at the House of Commons.
Then it moved over to Parliament.
That's right in front of Parliament.
Okay.
So that is to say House of Commons.
Parliament is right in the middle of Wellington.
House of Commons...
It's just to the west so that they sit now in the west block, which if you're facing Parliament, it would be directly to your left.
Okay, fine.
And so the doors come out and there's a staircase that, I mean, the MPs, except for Trudeau, basically, go up and down these stairs, right?
So if you want to be patient and wait for some people to come by or you want to protest somebody, that's a very good place to do it.
Okay, and so there's maybe 100 people on...
It's on Wellington.
Okay, but it's on Wellington and on the sidewalks, I presume.
Yes, yes.
The street was open the whole time.
No problem.
Okay, so now I'm gonna play this through here.
Do you know who this guy is?
Yeah, so this is a gentleman by the name of Billy Dalton.
I may have identified him as a senior, and all I'm hearing now he's 54. I'll try to confirm that.
The point is, he's not a young man.
I wasn't trying to misrepresent the case there.
No, from what I understand, has a history of heart condition or heart disease or heart attacks.
Yeah, so I got that directly from his partner.
Okay, and so I guess What happened leading up to the image that we're seeing right now, but we're going to watch the video.
Yeah, okay.
So there's a few things.
The only thing, really, that I can talk to as many witnesses here as I can.
I didn't even see anything, really, myself that led to this.
It turns out somebody has basically a DeWalt electric wimper snipper type thing, but it has a horn on the end instead.
So it's kind of a loud horn.
He may have honked this horn once, and then he walked into that intersection.
And the police came from behind him and basically took him.
And that's the kind of way the video starts.
I'm sorry.
I was describing the image as though the screen was already up and I forgot.
I didn't have it up.
So at worst, honked a horn on a bullhorn and gets tackled down.
Is there a resisting leading up to this?
Do they say stop?
No.
No.
There was no command.
They went straight in from behind and went kind of hands-on.
I don't think anyone heard any commands.
Did you capture any of it yourself on your own camera?
No, no.
So I'm going to play this now.
And in proximity to this, I thought I heard your voice.
Were you watching this?
Yeah, but I'd be farther quite a ways away.
When this first started.
So yeah, that's how I came and got all this video and stuff in the aftermath.
Okay, so I'm going to press play and maybe turn the volume down if it gets too loud.
Hold on.
He really is saying, back the fuck up.
Like, that's what the cop is saying, pointing his taser at the...
This is the...
What's that?
Oh, we're looking down at the cenotaph now, or no?
Yeah, kind of.
Yeah, Parliament is literally just off the left of the screen.
And I don't know if you can see, but so the prongs of this weapon he's waving around pointing at everyone frantically are still stuck in this man's back.
It's not a contact taser.
Okay, so look, do you see the little finger that I have here?
Yeah, yeah.
So these are the cables running down where they've got the pins in his back.
I guess that makes it less lethal to point it at the crowd if the taser prongs.
The other question I would have, I don't know a lot about these things, but how many times can they be discharged?
Like, if he just got wild with it, would he be zapping him again while pointing at the crowd?
I don't know.
This is nuts.
I'll keep playing this.
I mean, let's play this as four minutes, but we'll see if we get through the whole thing.
No!
Fuck it!
I need to go!
Get back up!
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
Get back up!
You're a killer, Terry!
Stand behind me.
This is Canada, by the way.
I hope he does, because I'll sue the balls off of him.
I will sue the balls off of him.
This is forceful, man.
Man, can you control him?
He's just being brutal.
He has no balls.
Don't worry.
Yeah, you're lucky it didn't chase me, bud.
If you wait one second here.
Yep.
So as they take him away in cuffs, yeah, right before that, it's kind of relevant.
So watch them as they're walking him slip.
He also may have slipped during this whole thing in the initial occurrence.
But watch these two.
He slips again, and the officer and him go barreling down.
And from that interaction, there's a guy in behind that the agitated officer turns to and he ends up getting arrested as well.
So a second person gets arrested.
So lucky you didn't save me.
Yeah, big fan on campus.
Well that's karma, that's karma.
He didn't do anything, man.
He didn't do anything, man.
Are they accusing him of having put oil on the ground or something?
Yeah, or having something to do with it.
The guy that fell, I guess, was just so upset and had somebody to blame.
But it looks there, if you can see those shadows, it looks like something with water came through there.
And anybody who's ever been on a wet crosswalk would know it's pretty slippery.
I mean, that guy certainly didn't do it.
Well, here, I'll turn the volume down and we'll just play this as we go through.
So who's the guy that's going to get arrested?
This guy right now?
Yes, this guy here, yeah.
So here comes another taser, by the way.
That's a taser that's not a firearm?
Yeah.
And the police here, are they RCMP or are they OPP?
OPS, Ottawa Police Service.
Don't hit him, sir.
Just back up.
You back up, sir.
Okay, let's save yourself.
Back up.
He's not allowed to touch you, but I don't want you to get hurt, babe, okay?
I know.
I know.
Is this just going on day in and day out in Ottawa now?
No.
No.
So that's kind of...
There's kind of tails off here, but...
And then there's...
Yeah, there's a bunch more interactions there, but it's kind of just nonsense interactions.
Not that they're okay, but...
So normally, like for instance, these are all, I don't know about legal experts, but generally what happens here is that a bylaw-related offense, they initiate contact with some type of bylaw issue.
And then it always escalates into this.
So in this case, it was a horn, which would be a violation of a noise bylaw.
And there was no contact.
It wasn't a bylaw officer.
Officers went in and grabbed him.
And then it ends up escalating into these criminal charges.
I mean, he's facing two criminal charges now.
And on top of these criminal charges...
The people that get caught this way are also banned for 500 meters around the area, which is essentially revoking their ability to protest.
And so I guess back to your point, sorry, about if it's regular.
It happens sometimes, but very rarely.
So normally every single day of the week, the guy down there got fined yesterday for a thousand bucks, but he's down there every single day with a megaphone and speaker.
And he doesn't get tackled, he doesn't get bylaw tickets.
There's groups of people that go around with megaphones.
There was people with megaphones heckling Tamara Lipsch and Chris Barber recently after trials.
Well, that actually was one of my other questions.
Were there any counter-protesters?
Anyone from the other side?
There was two of them kind of present at a few times during this, but they weren't being a problem.
The problem came from police.
OPS, Ottawa Police Services, not...
Ontario Provincial Police and not the RCMP.
This is the update that you retweeted, which is update.
Billy Dalton is back home after being tased.
They tased him more than once.
He's had two previous heart attacks.
His wife vocally informed the police of his medical condition.
He was not resisting arrest, nor did he initiate the confrontation.
So that's it.
Have you heard any other word from him?
Yeah, yeah.
So that's a good friend of mine, Patriot Smoothie.
Follow him too if you guys don't.
Yeah, so I got that info yesterday.
I've spoken to his partner today.
I haven't talked to him directly yet today.
He's in rough shape.
He's having a lot of trouble moving around.
He's pretty sore.
But, I mean, he's okay, relatively speaking.
He was released last night, not too long later.
Released from jail or from the hospital?
Yeah, from jail as far as I know.
Okay.
I haven't talked to him yet, so maybe that's just speculation.
Yeah.
It's unbelievable.
I mean, it's like now it's the status quo, the standard operating procedure for dealing with protesters in Wellington, in the capital.
Dealing with the wrong kind of protesters, right?
Because if people who follow me will have seen, there's groups of protesters who are allowed to come down the entire street.
They can have noisemakers of any variety, you know, blasting speakers.
They can have electronic whistles.
And they will come in escorted by police.
We've seen the unions propped up by Jagmeet, rah-rah, you know, and march around the hill.
And I have video of them blockading a bridge into Quebec.
So it really is very dependent on who you are.
You did ask a parliamentarian, I'll call it a provocative question.
I forget who it was and I forget what the question was, but I know that I saw it and heard it.
I've asked a few.
I'm scrolling through your timeline to see one of the classics that I can show.
But there's the big news.
Oh, by the way, what kind of dog?
You have a dog also, right?
No, I lost her a little while back, actually.
She got hit by a car.
In Ottawa?
I did.
No, I took a trip to the East Coast, and yeah.
Okay, that's traumatic.
I'm sorry.
She was an Australian shepherd.
Yeah, a lot of people would miss her that know me.
Yeah, we all miss her, but she was a wonderful dog.
We had a good run.
Sorry about that.
Yeah, that's actually very kind of you to know and ask about it.
No, because there's a few things.
Look, I remember, like I said, bikes, kids, and dogs.
She was a member of the one kid.
Okay, so this is good.
Are there other protests over the weekend scheduled?
How does it work for you?
It's not so much that it's a big protest schedule, but yeah, there's going to be a presence in different areas from various people, right?
So it's not like there's not a big group with, you know, like this master plan or anything.
It's just people that want to protest and they're going to come in groups.
It's not cars or anything.
I don't think people are just going to stand by and give up their right to protest because of what happened yesterday.
I do think that we need to be very careful about how we do things.
I've always thought that.
But in some of those interactions that we watched, there's just a lot of yelling and screaming.
Some of these things, they don't help.
Have you, from your end, had any problems, either from what you did during the Ottawa Convoy, donations, or any run-ins with the police?
Yeah, I mean, I've had some close instances with the police.
We're live, by the way, Chris.
After the convoy, I called out, at the time, acting chief on a live, and I went back to my place, and a couple of minutes later, I got a gang on my door.
By the cops?
Yeah, two OPS officers for a wellness check.
So, I mean, that was actually one of the most...
I was there through the police movement, and that honestly shook me more than almost probably everything that I saw.
It's better a wellness check than a swatting.
I think in America, there's a wellness check.
Yeah, for sure.
There was a good officer that came, and luckily we had a talk, and he kind of did care, but it was a pretty disconcerting thing.
Since then, there's been a few times where I've been pushed around by the police.
Getting up against a cruiser and tossed around a little bit, but nothing terrible.
I was traumatized pretty bad, and my whole life I had a healthy respect for law enforcement, I would say.
And that was destroyed in Ottawa, and it took a long time to just get over the shock and trauma initially, and I've been trying really hard to re-humanize police and develop relationships, and I think some of us were getting there in some ways.
And incidents like yesterday really destroy that.
I remember being so wet behind the ears and naive that I said when Artur Pawlowski referred to them as Gestapo and Nazis, like, oh, that rhetoric might have been over the top.
I mean, there's no other way you wouldn't describe them as Nazis.
You see the way these guys, they're like a neon and elderly guy pointing their tails like a bunch of frantic idiots, like they're under a January 6th attack in their own minds.
It's crazy.
And maybe they are.
Maybe they are.
There's a lot of rhetoric out there.
And there's been a lot of talk about people that may be coming to Ottawa and insinuations that they're dangerous and they have terrible motives and all this stuff.
And there's been an increased police presence, an obvious police presence, all around Ottawa.
So a huge amount of resources going to visually, I don't know, deter people from lawful process?
I don't know.
I hate to say it's unbelievable because anything's believable at this point, but it's not anything I thought would ever be possible in Canada.
And this is directly in front of Parliament.
Like, directly in front.
Chris, I mean, I'm watching it from Florida, and I'm listening to what people who are paying attention to it here are saying of Canada.
It's like nobody regards Canada as a free, beautiful country anymore.
Everybody down here says, holy shit, that's coming down south.
And we need to keep an eye out in terms of what's going on up there.
Trudeau's a joke.
It's a police state.
Censorship left, right, and center.
And now it's gone through legislation.
There's nobody down here that looks at Canada with admiration anymore.
Maybe it's my milieu.
In the world could be the case.
So you're going to keep on keeping on.
You're on Twitter.
Have you started?
You're able to make a living doing this?
Is this sustainable yet or no?
Not really, no.
I mean, it's starting to be somewhat, you know, like brought in a few.
I didn't try to bring in donations or monetize for a very long time.
It was only recently when I really decided to start focusing on this, you know, more professionally and completely.
I've always been all in, but so I'm still figuring out that process.
There's a few things, but because of the content and what I do...
It's a really, really difficult thing to at least monetize the socials anyways.
Every time I get off restriction, I'm suddenly banned again.
It's a difficult thing to navigate.
Plus, I got into this completely unprepared.
Untrained, right?
So it's a steep learning curve.
I don't have all the logistics in behind me yet that I need.
Who was it that said, someone in the chat's going to get it, life is about jumping off cliffs and growing wings on your way down.
So you're growing your wings, Chris.
I mean, it's amazing.
The world needs this.
And I say the rumbles of the world, the locals of the world have allowed people to make a living doing it.
So people can't do it for nothing and they can't give away their time all the time.
But Twitter's also helping out a little bit as well.
Do you have any big events planned for the future?
Is there a known protest somewhere that you're going to head out to?
So there's going to be, from what the scuttlebutt is, October 21st, I believe, it's a Saturday, is going to be another march for children.
In Ottawa?
Yeah, in Ottawa.
I don't know about the rest of the country, but for sure in Ottawa, some of the same.
Mainly it started from a group of Muslim people that we connected with.
So they're kind of spearheading this one, I think.
But I was heavily involved in planning and trying to facilitate different things in the first one.
So it's going to be interesting to see if we can repeat that on a weekend maybe and get more families out and have another fantastic event.
All right, amazing.
So Chris, we'll be in touch and maybe you can be the American, what do they call them?
Not protege, it has an E at the end of it.
Someone who's on the street.
Oh, the word for someone who's on the street.
Yeah, I know.
I can't remember it anymore.
It's not a protege.
It's not a communique.
It's the reporter who's on the ground.
I'll do it.
Whatever it is.
Now I'm looking to see if anyone in the chat is going to get it.
Anyways, I'm going to put your links up there.
Chris, thank you very much for giving some context to that.
It's outrageous.
It's outrageous.
We're looking at a militarized police in real time, literally assaulting and abusing citizens who are...
By all accounts, I mean, I don't know what degree of violence would be required in order, in my mind, to justify that response, but sure as hell wasn't that.
Chris, thank you very much.
We'll keep in touch.
Yeah, thanks for having me.
All right.
Pleasure.
Have a good one.
Bye.
Everyone else out there?
Now, Corn Pop, I can see you.
Let me see here.
The link to Rumble.
I like Chris.
I remember running into him during the protest, and we were always hanging out in the same spots.
Correspondent?
That might have been the word, actually.
What the hell am I thinking with the...
Come on, Viva, get your stuff together.
Yeah, get...
Get out of the U.S. before it's too late.
At some point, if the U.S., I mean, this is the internal discussion I've been having.
Get out of Canada before it's too late.
Get out of the U.S. If the U.S. falls, I mean, that is the last bastion of freedom on Earth.
Then you're just picking, like, okay, well...
Am I going to be better off in Poland or Russia in terms of avoiding communism or the Western form of communism?
A dude should start a Patreon.
Patreon's the wrong way to go, Evil Fandango.
I'm going to tell Chris he should start a Locals because that is the Patreon without the politics.
And it's exponentially better functionally than Patreon.
Patreon is the go F me to video hosts and platforms, whatever the hell they call it.
All right, so now what we're going to do...
We're going to go on over to Rumble.
So let me just do the get your bits to Rumble.
And the link is there.
We're going to end this on YouTube and we're going to get into the other stories of the day.
And I'm going to finish my Celsius hashtag.
Still not.
Would I accept?
I mean, even if I had the option, would I accept a sponsor from Celsius?
I use it.
Thus far, it's been working to burn fat.
All right, we're going to end on YouTube, everybody.
Come on over to Rumble, and then we're going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Hold on!
See, I've got to get better.
I've got to get better at actually plugging my own stuff here.
If you want to support, and you don't want to give a super chat, you don't want to support YouTube, and, I don't know, you don't want to give Rumble rant, or you don't want to sign up for the $7 a month, $70 a year on vivabarneslaw.locals.com, go get some awesome merch.
But...
Maybe you don't want to have your own Wanted for President mugshot shot glass.
I don't have the mug here.
And you want something apolitical, neutral, you can go get the We Are Here shirt.
Above average.
I love this one.
You're above average.
Although I don't know why it only tapers off at 150.
I like to think my IQ is much higher.
And then we got all the other merch.
Bumper stickers.
Fun stuff.
Here, let's just see what we got here.
Bumper sticker.
You got taxation isn't theft, it's armed robbery.
That was my expression.
I think I created that.
We'll be wild.
Politics ruins everything.
The classic.
All right, now we're going to end it, now that I've shamelessly self-promoted my own merch, our own merch, ending on YouTube, going over to Rumble.
See you there and...
now?
Okay.
What do we start with?
I want to start with Leticia James.
Yeah, I have to.
Some of these things.
I've just been going through scouring the internet and pulling up...
Now, you know what?
Let's just cleanse our palates before we get into Leticia James and let's vomit with this classic blast from the past two days ago.
L 'honorable.
Très honorable.
Ah!
Lizard tongue.
Mon premier erreur.
My first mistake.
Oh, excuse me.
I'm sorry.
I almost wretched in the collective faces of the internet.
Leticia James' trial, her persecution of Trump.
What do they call it?
I think they're called bills of attainder.
When you pass a piece of law specifically directed to target one individual, it's illegal.
When you campaign on a platform to prosecute one individual, My understanding is it's similarly illegal or unlawful for different reasons.
Leticia James, for those of you who don't know, campaigned off the policy of prosecuting Trump and Trump entities for whatever the reason.
I mean, the thing is, literally for whatever the reason, because if you had asked her her reason five years ago, this would have been it.
Leticia Tish James.
Oh, she's so cute and quirky.
Imagine I run for office and I'm like, "Vote for David Viva Freiheit." I would be discredited, and rightly so.
Nobody cares what your...
I mean, I don't know if it's a nickname.
Nobody cares what your nicknames.
Okay, five years ago.
This might have been 2018.
Five years ago.
This is what she said.
President Trump was almost on the verge of bankruptcy.
Oh, yeah.
And then all of a sudden, he was flush with money.
Russians.
We all know that domestic banks were not offering him and extending any credit to him.
Oh, that's interesting.
I thought the basis of your current lawsuit is that they were extending credit to him, but based on an overvaluation of his properties.
That the banks, they don't even bother to go check the value of the assets before they lend hundreds of millions of dollars.
Oh no, here the banks weren't lending him.
So it must have been Russian fraud five years ago.
Oh wait, what's that?
The banks were lending him?
It's fraud because he overvalued his assets and defrauded the banks who lent against those assets.
Presumably after having valued those assets themselves.
Yeah, I'll play it one more time without opening my big mouth, I promise.
Here.
Got to do it again.
How are you almost on the verge?
You are either on the verge or you're bankrupt.
He wasn't quite on the verge.
He was almost, possibly, nearly on the verge.
He wasn't quite on the verge.
He was right before on the verge.
Almost on the verge.
Okay, now I'm going to shut my big mouth and I'm going to let it play.
promise.
President Trump was almost on the verge of bankruptcy.
And then all of a sudden he was flush with money.
And we all know that domestic banks were not offering him extending any credit to him.
And so the question is, where did he get all that money from?
Russia!
It has to be Russia!
The amount of interviews that I'm scouring through now, just, I want to find the most damning stuff I can find.
It's magnificent.
Where did he get all that money from?
It had to be Russia!
Can't be anything!
Oh, we all know that the domestic banks weren't lending to him.
Oh, but they did, Leticia.
And now your argument is that they lent to him because he...
Tricked the poor big banks into lending him money by just, you know, he said my property's worth a billion dollars.
And the bank's like, okay, Donald Trump, I mean, we know you've had bankrupt entities before.
We're just going to take your word for it.
We're just a stupid little bank, wet behind the ears, babe in the woods bank.
Here's a billion dollars.
Oh, how dare you overvalue your assets and trick us, the innocent little banks, into lending you big, bad Donald Trump money?
Just wonder if it was the same banks that were actually managing Jeffrey Epstein's money.
The innocent little banks, they got exploited by big bad Donald Trump.
Anyhow, they're into day three now of the trial.
After the judge, on summary motion, determined that, you know, Trump, as a matter of fact, fraudulently, what's the word, enhanced, increased, exaggerated the prices of his assets.
We'll get to that in a second.
But, you know, Fannie Willis treating Trump like every other defendant.
Is giving her daily updates of the trial?
Hold on.
We'll watch it again in a second.
Watch again, but I don't really want to.
Oh, I heard the potching of the mouth.
Okay, I shouldn't make fun of that because I probably do it myself.
New York Attorney General James.
They should just say N-Y-A-G, Tish.
We love Tish.
Everybody loves Tish.
When was this from?
October 4th.
It's from yesterday.
My eye is itchy.
Oh, God, my eye is itchy.
That's really itchy.
Hold on a second.
I'm going to scratch that.
Okay.
9.54 p.m.
954.
I think that's actually the area code for Florida.
How interesting.
All right.
Today was the third day of our trial against...
Donald Trump and the Trump Organization, regardless of how many dangerous, racist comments the former president makes.
At least she's referring to him as the former president.
In other interviews, she says 45, and the man occupying the White House.
I guess now, if she says that now, she might get indicted for election denial.
Oh, and his racist comments were what he said that he's being screwed because he's not getting a jury trial.
We explained that reason yesterday.
No, no, racist.
That's an amazing thing, eh?
You can't criticize Leticia James because she's black, and if you criticize her because she's black...
Oh, let me rephrase this.
If you criticize her and she's black, it has to be because she's black.
So if you criticize Leticia James, you're racist.
Hey, it's an amazing thing.
Remember when Justin Trudeau, talking about Greg Fergus?
Le très honorable.
He says, uh...
Greg Ferguson, you're the first black Speaker of the House.
Oh, now any criticism of the Speaker of the House for being an ethics-breaching, corrupt, you know, butthead like the rest of the liberals.
Oh, that's racist.
Can't criticize.
You can't say he's unfit for office because he's got an ethics breach.
That's racist.
Oh, my goodness.
Anyhow, so regardless of how many dangerous racist comments the former president makes.
Capital P, Leticia, next time.
I am not going to back down from my duty.
Duty.
To enforce the law.
Oh yeah, and you got just the judge to do it.
Let's see what you have to say.
Today was the third day of our trial against Donald Trump, the Trump Organization, and other defendants.
We continued to present our case.
It feels like she's trying to look like she's looking around a room of crowded people.
She's in an empty room, presumably, acting.
Acting.
Look solemn.
Look like it hurts you to exact justice that you campaigned on, you corrupt attorney general.
Sell your assets.
Get the hell out of New York.
Hearing more from our first witness and also from our second witness, a certified public accountant from the firm Whitley Penn.
Whitley-Penn compiled financial statements for Mr. Trump, the Trump Organization, and the other defendants.
Meanwhile, the defendants continued to challenge our case, falsely claiming the underlying law is unconstitutional.
I'm sorry.
Let me pause you there.
Let me pause you there.
Falsely claiming the underlying law is unconstitutional?
That's not so much a statement of fact as it is a statement of opinion.
One can challenge the constitutionality of the law.
I don't know if they...
If there's a determination already from the highest court of the state confirming the constitutionality of this ambiguous law that apparently can create fraud out of thin air that can affect anybody and everybody willy-nilly, depending on the political predilections of a corrupt attorney general.
You don't falsely claim that a law is unconstitutional.
That's clearly a matter of legal opinion.
But anyhow, let's...
Details.
...constitutional and other baseless claims, including that this is a wig hunt.
That is...
I'm just going to let it play.
Okay.
Executive Law Section 6312 is the primary law used by my office in affirmative litigation.
It is a special law giving the Attorney General exclusive power to investigate repeated and persistent...
No matter how much money you think you have.
Oh, now they're dangerous comments.
Now they're dangerous.
They went from being racist, now they're dangerous and racist.
Oh, but if she says that they're dangerous and racist, does that mean that Trump is intimidating the Attorney General?
Oh.
You do see how all of this works, right?
This is the Attorney General now coming out with her daily presser in her political persecution of a man she campaigned on persecuting.
Planting those seeds.
Dangerous and racist comments.
Well, wait, hold one second.
Wasn't Trump ordered not to intimidate witnesses or people involved in the lawsuit?
Oh, I don't know if it was here or if it was in D.C. or Georgia.
Dangerous.
Hey, we better get Judge Angeron on this.
Hey, Judge, the AG in your case just said that Trump made dangerous and racist comments.
Go get him.
Gag him.
They're dangerous now.
Show me where they were dangerous, Leticia James.
It sounds like the only person lying and making bullshit statements right now is you.
But we all knew that.
The laws of this great state and nation apply equally to everyone.
No one is above the law.
Even Donald Trump.
No one's above the law.
And it is my duty and my responsibility to ensure that the law is enforced and upheld.
If you understand that she's in an empty room.
And that she's pretending to look around like it's a crowded room.
This becomes exponentially more psychotic.
And I refuse to back down or to be bullied.
Do you know what it's called?
Darvo.
Darvo.
I just want to remember what that is.
Darvo.
Oh, not defense.
I'm such an idiot.
Deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender.
Jeez, can someone help me remember that?
She will not be bullied.
While she uses the full force of a corrupt prosecutorial system, a clearly corrupt judicial system, to prosecute and persecute a man she campaigned on persecuting.
She won't be bullied.
Can you believe this bullshit?
Oh my gosh.
It's pathological.
Deny attack and reverse victim and offender.
Gotta remember that.
Now, what I also wanted to just do in real time was Whitley Penn.
Tax audit.
Let me just...
Let's just see what happens here.
I don't know anything about this.
I just wanted to see if...
Top aid...
Okay, so forget it.
I was just wondering if there's any immediate connection that I can discover in real time between Whitley Penn, the accountant firm that the prosecutor is using to persecute Donald Trump.
Anyway, so that's it.
This pathological...
Patently corrupt Attorney General, who for, in 2018, literally, literally campaigned on persecuting Trump, is now claiming that he's the bully.
DARVO, deny, attack, reverse victim and offender.
But in case any of you had any doubts, I put together just a little highlight of an interview, not an interview, but it was a campaign video that she did, this is Leticia James, last year on It's a thing called Now This.
I don't know if anybody knows about it, but I know that I've been featured on Now This a number of times, but absolutely not for political legal analysis, for fun stuff like saving carp out of the river type thing.
But I just put this together because it's mind-blowing.
It's mind-blowing.
It's like Russian propaganda.
It's like Goebbels-level propaganda of a political official.
Putting this video together.
This is her again.
This is five years ago, 2018.
Leticia James.
Listen to what she has to say about then-President Trump as part of her election campaign to get elected as Attorney General.
I won't even spoil it with my own commentary and assessment.
Listen to this pathological rubbish.
America is an uncharted territory.
We are angrier and more deeply divided than we've ever been at any point in our history since the Civil War.
And at the eye of the storm is Donald Trump, ripping families apart, threatening women's most basic rights.
I'm running for attorney general because I will never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president.
Illegitimate president!
That's an indictable offense.
Illegitimate president?
Are you questioning elections?
Are you trying to overthrow democracy?
There you go.
Indict Leticia James.
Let's let it keep going.
Look at the scowl on her face.
Oh, gosh.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
That's not nice.
You shouldn't make fun of people's faces.
Don't make fun of people's faces.
Oh, I can't zoom in.
Illegitimate president.
Hold on.
It's an amazing thing.
You can actually, I believe, as far as body language reading goes, genuine scorn in the eyebrows.
Like, she hates this man.
Look at that face.
That's the face of genuine scorn.
It's in the eyebrows.
It's like...
Okay, let's let it play.
...president when our fundamental rights are at stake.
From the Muslim ban to efforts to deport immigrants.
To denying transgender students the ability to choose whatever bathroom they want.
Oh, whatever bathroom they want.
If they want the girls' bathroom one day, they get that bathroom.
They want the boys' bathroom, they get the boys' bathroom.
Whatever they want.
All of this is lies, by the way.
The Muslim ban lie.
Deporting immigrants?
I'm pretty sure they all meant only the illegal ones.
And whatever bathroom they want.
I hate this president.
Rolling back regulations to protect our planet.
Colluding with foreign powers.
That's a lie.
That's a lie.
Putting profits over people.
I don't even know what that means.
Dividing us in ways we haven't seen in generations.
I believe that this president is incompetent.
Incompetent.
I believe that this president is ill-equipped to serve.
So I'm going to go take him out at a state level with a politicized state prosecution for what I could not possibly do at the federal level.
Oh, impeachment?
Screw it.
I'll just go after him at the state level.
Elect me, New Yorkers who loathe Donald Trump.
In the highest office of this land.
And I believe that he is an embarrassment to all that we stand for.
Okay.
He should be charged with obstructing justice.
For what?
I believe that the president of these United States can be indicted for criminal offenses.
Oh, that's good.
We would join with law enforcement and other attorneys general across this nation in removing this president from office.
In addition to that, the office of...
Oh, money laundering.
Oh, that didn't pan out, did it?
That's a threat.
when Trump or anyone else threatens our rights.
So I hope that you will join me and vote on Thursday, September 13th, in quiet dignity and defiance.
Can you imagine if Donald Trump came out and said the days of Leticia James are coming to an end?
Can you imagine what would happen if Trump said that?
The days of Judge Angeron are coming to an end.
He'd go to jail.
But Leticia James can say it.
The days of Donald Trump are coming to an end.
Link to tweet.
She can say that.
Because when she says it, she means it peacefully, legally, lawfully.
Imagine the outrage and the judicial backlash if Trump were to suggest that anyone's days were coming to an end.
Holy Crabapple.
So that is the latest, I think.
But I also, there was one last clip because, you know, Joe Rogan was talking about it with...
Who was Rogan talking about it with on Rogan earlier today?
I was listening to it.
Oh, the guys from Trigonometry.
I always forget their names, but this is...
And we'll get into the...
Common misunderstanding where the talking point now is the judge didn't say the properties were worth $18 million.
The judge didn't say the Mar-a-Lago property was worth $18 million.
That's a lie.
That's misleading.
Let's look at this.
You know the Mar-a-Lago controversy of the pricing or the...
The inflated value of the house.
The judge on summary judgment...
Didn't, apparently, by the talking points, didn't say that Mar-a-Lago was worth 18 million.
He just said, it's assessed, it's appraised at 18 to 27 million, and Trump valued it at over a billion.
Clear fraud.
The judge ruled that it was worth 18 million.
It's 20 acres in, like, the most expensive real estate in that area.
Like, a house down the street from it, much smaller.
Just sold for $50 million.
Wow.
Even if Forbes said it's worth somewhere between – I think – see what Forbes said.
I think they said it was worth between $300 million and $700 million.
And they were saying that it's worth $18 million.
It's like they don't even try to pretend.
Why does no one trust the mainstream?
If the guy says it's worth a billion dollars, right?
And then you come along and say, no, no, no, it's worth like $800 million.
Forbes says it's worth as much as $700 million.
We'll call it $700 million.
Now you've got a reasonable argument.
But you have a reasonable argument for an overvaluation, not fraud.
You have a reasonable argument for a disagreement.
I say it's worth X, and you say it's worth 2X.
Well, when the judge says he overinflated it by 2,300%, that's because he's assuming it's the baseline valuation, $18 to $27 million.
So don't you liars out there come out and say the judge didn't say what the judge said, but don't take my word for it.
I'll show you in a second.
But if you say $18 million, you've got to know that's a palace.
The place is a palace.
It's 20 acres.
Get the fuck out of here.
This is great.
You can't do that.
That's like too obvious.
You don't give a fuck about the truth.
They don't.
You don't give a fuck about the truth.
True that.
And by itself, there will be people out there.
He didn't say it was worth $18 million.
He just said it was appraised at $18 million.
To which I say...
What am I on here?
To which I say...
You are either the liars or the ill-informed ignoramuses.
This is from the judge's decision.
At whatever page it's at, 26 to 35, the judge says, From 2011 to 2021, the Palm Beach County Assessor appraised the market value of Mar-a-Lago at between $18 million and $27.6 million.
Notwithstanding the SFC's value, Values do not reflect these land use restrictions.
Donald Trump's SFCs, I forget what that stands for, value Mar-a-Lago at, let's just say, $426 million and $612 million, an over-evaluation of at least 2,300%.
That's from the judge's decision, you idiots out there, who say the judge didn't say it was worth $18 million, he just said it was appraised at $18 million.
No!
Because the judge just found in his own ruling that Trump overvalued it.
By at least 2,300% compared to the assessor's appraisal.
And what does he go to conclude from that?
It drives me nuts.
Like, nobody can be this stupid.
they can only be dishonest.
He goes on to conclude, this argument is wholly without merit.
At the time in which the defendant submitted the SFCs, the restrictions of the property were in effect and any valuations represented to third parties must have incorporated these restrictions.
Failure to do so is fraud.
Assets values that disregard applicable legal restrictions are by definition materially false and misleading.
Accordingly, the Office of Attorney General has demonstrated liability He goes on to conclude Oh, yeah, but the judge did say it.
And the only reason the judge is backtracking like a coward now is because it's getting put on blast by people who understand this to break it down and let the...
Citizens out there understand the degree to which this is an absolute affront to everything that is just.
The judge didn't say it.
He was only saying that the appraiser value.
Yeah.
And then he went on to say that Trump overvalued it by 2,300% because he didn't factor in the land restrictions and therefore it's fraud.
In the judgment.
Go read it.
Although you wouldn't even understand it if you did go read it to some of the people out there saying these things.
And as if there's not a difference, by the way, between the county appraisal and a bank's valuation for the purposes of using a property or an asset as collateral to a loan.
As if this judge is not this stupid.
He's not.
It's not that the judge doesn't understand the difference.
The judge is a corrupt political hack.
As confirmed by all of the statements he said eight years ago, I want to come to a conclusion and I've got the tools to allow me to come to that conclusion.
So this trial is bullshit.
It's a political persecution.
There was one, I haven't clipped it together yet, a previous interview of Leticia James where she's saying to a podcaster that she's being interviewed by, oh, this is a civil case, so I can't put anyone in jail for this.
Oh, but we're also pursuing criminal fraud against Trump.
We're also pursuing other criminal cases against Trump in New York as well.
So we'll get him there.
Don't worry about it.
She didn't say that verbatim.
That was the...
She can't put him in jail.
She can only issue fines, cancel business certificates, liquidate assets, sell your stuff and get the hell out of New York State.
But the judge said it.
And anybody who says otherwise is either dumb, a liar, or a little bit from column A and a little bit from column B. Now, moving on, I did not notice that we have some, that we have some super, some humble rants that I shall read because I have not yet read them.
I love seeing the clock in the background.
Yes, 1350.
Okay, it says Thursday.
I thought it said Saturday.
Embedded reporter, Sammy.
Thank you.
That's the better term.
I'm not your buddy guy.
We're in the endgame of global tyranny taking over.
There are multiple Western elections coming up.
Intel will flex their power for a global outcome.
This is our last chance at stopping true evil.
I'm not your buddy guy, says this fraud at trial is the perfect...
Perfect to a T example of communist show trial.
You show me the man, I'll show you the crime.
And not just that.
We're going to avoid the uncertainty of a jury trial.
Remember, because it's a provision of law.
We discussed this yesterday.
It's not a jury trial because they didn't check a box.
It's not a jury trial because it's under some specific provision of law, 6312, that there is precedent to say doesn't go to a jury trial.
What do they say that gets a penalty in equity?
I forget the exact reason.
I'll flesh it out with Barnes on Sunday.
So there's no jury trial.
This judge issues a summary judgment or a judgment on summary motion.
As a pure uncontested matter of fact, the property's worth between $18 and $27 million, an overvaluation of at least 2,300%.
Done.
And now what the hell they're going on?
It's a kangaroo court.
Actually, I wouldn't mind having a kangaroo court.
A kangaroo court communist show trial.
Even worse than Otto Warmbier, because at least nobody took the court system in North Korea seriously.
Let's see, I saw a highlighted comment, and I saw the word agree, so I want to see what that says.
Oh, where did it just go?
It said, yep, I 100% agree.
Oh, son of a bee sting.
Where did it go?
Oh, yep.
100% agree.
We are in the very last leg of TakeOver.
That's America First PHL.
And then the last one was Astro Sweat.
Was fun seeing you in the Whiskey Podcast?
Capitalists.
Urinals.
Yeah, we had a lot of discussion about dirty urinals last night.
But I guess it's fitting for the times in which we are living.
Okay.
So that's it.
That's the latest in the show trial.
I wanted to do one thing while we're here.
Let me go back and check monetization on YouTube.
Refresh.
And add the commercials.
Add ad breaks.
At 9 minutes, 18 minutes, and 27 minutes on the YouTubes.
Okay.
That's for the first half hour of the show.
And now that we're on Rumble, yeah, they got to get mid-roll ads on Rumble.
So that's the latest from the show trial out of New York State.
And I'll say it over and over again.
When anybody says I follow the law and I follow the facts, they're not.
They're lying.
Period.
Because when you do that, you don't need to tell people you're doing that.
The only time you need to tell people you're doing that is when they're questioning whether or not you're doing that because you're not doing that and you need to reassure them that you're doing that because you're not doing that.
Say that five times fast.
Okay.
Next.
Dacey Media.
I'm just going to close a couple of the windows back here.
We're going to get into the...
Carson stabbing.
I hate these stories because they're awful stories.
That's right.
They're awful stories because there will be not a question of people trying to go with the schadenfreude.
There will be people who are going to say...
I saw an interesting expression.
You deserve what you tolerate.
I don't know who said it, actually.
Let me just see if I can't find quickly who said that.
Google, you deserve what you tolerate.
Who said it?
Let's see.
Brainy quotes.
Who said it?
Who said it?
I don't think we're going to get anyone who's going to know who said you deserve what you tolerate.
Yeah, we got Mark Graben seems to have the...
Iteration.
You get what you expect and you deserve what you tolerate.
Mark, grab it.
I don't know who that person is.
So there will be people who will say, in a non-gloating, non-gleeful sense, you deserve what you tolerate.
If you sleep with dogs, you'll get fleas.
If you take too many chances, eventually someday it'll catch up with you.
When the Australian guy, Steve Irwin, when Steve Irwin died, I mean, other than being, it's a tremendous tragedy, it's a tremendous accident, and people are like, you know, getting stabbed to death in your heart by a stingray is like running with a pencil and, you know, falling on a pencil and it skewering you in the heart.
It's exponentially rare odds, at least for that.
The problem is, you know, go skydiving enough, and eventually an accident which is exponentially rare, well, the likelihood of it happening increases the more you engage in the activity in which that exponentially rare negative outcome occurs.
It happens for good also.
It's exponentially rare to win the lottery.
Maybe that's a bad analogy.
But you wrestle with enough alligators, wrestle with enough crocodiles, gorillas, stingrays, sharks.
It might be one in a million that you get stung by a stingray and die.
It's a one in a million you get attacked by a shark.
It's a one in a million that you get attacked by a gator.
And now you do all three, you're up to three in a million.
So this guy, we know the story, you know, a BLM activist, social rights activist, call the social worker and not the cops.
Activist gets stabbed to death in front of his girlfriend at three 50 in the morning on the streets of Brooklyn while they're waiting for a bus.
I'm not playing the video.
I've seen it.
I mean, in as much as the video exists, there's the section, the most graphic section, which seems to be edited out from all the videos.
It's horrifying.
It's tragic.
You know, there is...
I mean, I don't know if everybody else has this fear.
I have no greater fear than the fear of death.
And I do think I speak for most people when I say that most people's greatest fear is a violent death.
It's what nobody wants to die.
Nobody wants to...
But if you're going to die, like, you know, 102, quietly and you're better.
103, like my grandmother, can't get much better than that.
I have...
There's funny jokes about good ways to die, you know, like being suffocated by...
Never mind.
It's an old joke.
But a violent death, I think, is probably most people's greatest fear, right after public speaking, which I clearly don't have.
So these stories are horrible.
And the added level of irony, to some extent, earlier on in the week, you had the journalist, activist journalist, Josh Kruger, getting shot.
I don't know if we know the details yet.
I don't know if they've arrested anybody.
An activist journalist.
Same type of activist, seemingly falling victim to that which they were activists against.
You know, call social workers, don't stigmatize crime, criminal justice reform unless it's Donald Trump.
You know, what do they call it?
Revolving door bail unless it's one of Trump's attorneys.
Lock him up.
And then they have these violent, horrific deaths, which some people...
We'll get a form of schadenfreude.
I think it's a form of a sin and bad juju to put in the universe.
Other people are going to say it's a tragedy through and through.
That said, there is a lesson to be learned from it.
In the video, and I'll only describe it, they're sitting at a bus stop at 3.50 in the morning and a dude passes them on the street.
They get up and start walking in that direction.
The guy seemingly kicks in the window of a car.
Having some sort of mental health crisis.
And then the guy says, you know, calm down, calm down.
And then the incident occurs.
And it's almost like in their own minds, they see this as an opportunity for their activism.
Like here's a man at four in the morning on the streets of Brooklyn, clearly having a mental health crisis, whether he's schizophrenic on drugs, whatever.
Let's try to talk him down.
Let's try to call in a social worker and not the police.
Tragedy!
Would it have happened if they just sat there and said nothing and let the person walk by?
Who knows?
I know that the girlfriend's reaction to the incident is peculiar to the point where there are people floating, you know, not floating theories, but asking questions, hypothesizing, was this a hit?
Her reaction wasn't normal.
Her after response, apparently she didn't want to identify the murderer.
One can only imagine why, and I'll get into it in a bit.
Some people are saying her reaction doesn't make any sense.
She's like, after her boyfriend has been brutally stabbed and is dying on the streets, she tells a pedestrian to go keep an eye on the guy who just brutally stabbed her boyfriend to death.
I cannot judge anybody under those circumstances.
Lord knows what anybody's normal response is to a situation that is absolutely out of the ordinary.
Horrifically so.
So that's the breakdown-ish update where people start to have The schadenfreude, let me just bring up this article here, is that after these things happen and people go into social media where some people have been much more vocal on certain issues, what's the word I'm looking for?
Insensitively so?
Politically so?
And then they say, my goodness, you spent three years demonizing the police and now this happens.
What do you think happens?
You can't call social workers for mental health crises?
The same people who say, remember when Penny, Daniel Penny, deals with the guy on the metro in New York who happens also to be black.
The race only became an issue because people made it an issue.
When he was addressing someone having a mental health crisis on a metro, going around threatening People on the metro.
And they subdue the man with the headlock and the guy dies and now Penny's facing second-degree manslaughter.
So, you know, the moral of the story is, well, it's like when there's mental health crises, you're going to end up either as the Daniel Pennies of the world or the Carsons of the world.
You subdue someone who's having a mental health crisis.
They need love and affection and social workers not subduing that ends up killing them.
You go to jail.
Oh, you try to give them what you think is the social work, the help that they need, you get stabbed to death.
You can't start to address crime if you ignore the crime.
Period.
Yes, social workers would be good for people who have drug addiction, mental health crises.
There's a number of other issues that could be dealt with in tandem.
You can't deal with crime by defunding the police.
You can't deal with crime, people having mental health crises, by talking them down.
Anybody who's had any experience with someone suffering from schizophrenia, any sort of mental disorder, they don't know that they're having it, by and large.
You're going to try to talk someone down?
Dude, calm down.
I forget what he said, chill out or calm down.
No.
And then, when you've been insensitive and politically active, and then tragedy befalls, people go, look, the internet is forever.
This is from sportskida.com.
I've seen this outlet a few times.
The girlfriend of the victim was caught wearing an all-cops-or-bastards shirt.
Was caught, you know, BLM.
BLM, cops are bad, protests in 2020.
From the article, the stabbing death of Brooklyn activist Ryan Carson in front of his girlfriend Claudia Morales has sparked a flurry of activity on social media with people unearthing.
Unearthing old posts from 2000 is not unearthing old posts.
That's called reading a timeline.
Wearing a shirt that said, all cops are bastards t-shirt in 2020 during the BLM movement.
Carson, who was fatally stabbed in an unprovoked attack early Monday.
He and his girlfriend were coming back from a wedding.
He was a poet and activist.
The incident caught on surveillance video showed the moment the 32-year-old was stabbed in front of his girlfriend.
I'm not playing it.
As the news of his death made national headlines, a volley of social media posts pay tribute to the environment activist who served as campaign manager at the New York Public Interest Research Group, a nonpartisan political organization focusing on waste.
Several others also supported Morales who witnessed the attack.
They started a GoFundMe.
We're going to get to that in a second.
Let me just open that window up in the back.
No, no, no, that's not.
I don't want to do that right now.
Okay.
However, shortly after the internet came after Morales because of an old picture, they came after for a little more than that, but nobody should be doing that, period.
Although there is a difference between highlighting the flaws in the policy that people support because of the real-life consequences that ensue versus going after.
It's not schadenfreude if you highlight the horrific consequences from idiotic policy.
And if you support idiotic policy and it brings about the horrific consequences, you're not being gone after for people pointing out that this is unfortunately the increased odds that occur when you swim with crocodiles and when you try to tackle stingrays.
Okay.
All cops are bastard.
It's a critique of the role the police play in society.
The term ACAB is also known to generate antipathy towards cops.
Okay.
And then Andy Ngo pulled up some tweets.
I'll give everybody this article.
Okay.
All cops are bad.
BLM.
You know, it's...
Amiri King, I don't know who that person is.
The man who was stabbed to death in Brooklyn bus stop in front of his girlfriend, Ryan Carson, was a radical left-wing activist and self-described member of Antifa.
His girlfriend is pictured here with all cops are bastards shirts, a social media post condemning police, praising yada yada.
How do I get past here?
Did I just see Salty?
No, I thought I saw Salty Cracker for a second.
However, some point out that Morales' association with all cops are bastards did not justify them.
Nobody in their right mind is suggesting it justified it.
What they're suggesting is all cops are bastards, stigmatizing and demonizing the police such that they don't go to high crime areas or they are few people applying for these positions because of the exposure that it creates for them accepting these positions.
You go to jail like Chauvin.
You go to jail like Chauvin.
You get prosecuted like Daniel Penny or they're not there and you try to administer...
Social welfare to a man having a mental health crisis on the street and then you end up as a Carson.
They've identified the subject.
They're stabbing an 18-year-old kid.
I mean a kid.
An 18-year-old man.
They've identified him.
This article doesn't name him and that's this article.
I didn't have the article up the entire time.
Well, that's great.
Well, that was the article.
I'll give you the link because I didn't show you the article here.
Link to article.
Sorry, I thought I had it up.
That's the link to the article.
So they've identified the suspected killer.
Let me pull that article up.
I don't think I have it here.
Hold on.
I sent it to myself by email earlier today.
18-year-old.
Is this it?
No?
Give me two seconds here.
I've lost it.
Spokita Daily Mail.
Here we go.
The Daily Mail identified him.
Here.
This is the latest of the day.
This came out today.
Brooklyn suspect who stabbed activist Ryan Carson to death is an emotionally disturbed school worker, 18, who was reported to police for breaking all of his girlfriend's belongings two months ago.
Ryan Carson, 32, stabbed.
We all know this.
We know the facts.
He's described as an emotionally disturbed 18-year-old who works in a school.
Police have revealed the teenager's full name has not yet been released.
They released his full name, but it doesn't matter.
We don't need to do that.
So this is it.
Emotionally disturbed.
And apparently, the friends of Ryan Carson are saying that he would have had sympathy and Sadness for the sorry state of society that produced his own murderer.
Well, that may or may not be true, but it certainly gives you an insight into how they would view it if it were anybody else.
But I made an analogy.
It's exactly like how they had to suppress the stories of the negative impacts of the jab because they start with the premise.
That they want to arrive at as their conclusion.
The jab is safe and effective.
And so we have to suppress stories of people getting injured by the jab because that would cause deterrence in people to take the jab that we've already concluded is safe and effective.
No evidence to the contrary could ever convince you that your policy is problematic because you're predicating the argument on the conclusion as opposed to arriving at that conclusion which you would not arrive at.
If you had to actually factor in the evidence.
It's safe and effective.
And so we need to suppress the evidence showing that people are getting injured by it because that would cause deterrence for people who would take it because it's safe and effective.
Call a social worker, not the cops.
Defund the police.
Well, I'm starting on the premise of defund the police.
And so we have to say that the victims of violence that results when you defund the police would have tolerated that.
They would have been forgiving on that because...
I want to defund the police because all cops are bastards?
And the same friends who are allegedly saying, you know, he would have had forgiveness.
Bullshit.
I mean, I couldn't believe it.
I read a number of these articles the other day.
Bullshit.
Oh yeah, he would have had forgiveness on his murderer.
First of all, you can have sympathy for someone who's having a mental health crisis.
You can have empathy.
You can want to help.
That doesn't mean defunding the police.
That sure as hell does not mean demonizing all cops as bastards.
But they started a GoFundMe, and this is another thing that I had to fact check, where a number of people were saying that the GoFundMe was actually not geared towards the victim of this crime, but rather towards his friends.
Towards their purported trauma.
There we go.
This is it.
We're looking at the same thing.
Let me just make sure.
We're not looking at the same thing.
Oh, we are.
I see it here.
This is the GoFundMe for Ryan Thorson Carson.
Hi, everyone.
We created a collective of Ryan's close friends.
We are a collective of Ryan's close friends reeling from a brutal loss.
We are asking for your help on behalf of his partner in easing the burden and stress of this horrifying situation so that we can have space and time to grieve.
We can have space and time to grieve.
And remember Ryan, immediate needs are to offset the costs of working class people taking time off work to properly mourn.
If you Google Ryan Carson, you'll hear and see about the tragedy that struck on early Monday morning.
But if you look past the breaking news, you'll see news of his legislative victories, you'll probably find his social media accounts filled with thoughts and memories, and you'll find collections of his artistic works to date.
We hope you find his thoughts on mutual aid, his works on advocacy and understanding his radical principles of community care, justice, and dismantling an individualized, profit-centered way of life.
Are worth carrying forward in our own communities.
It is this time of remembrance and healing that will allow for reflection.
We thank you in advance for any material you support can provide.
So the reports on the interwebs, why will that not show me?
The reports on the interwebs that this GoFundMe is in fact not for the victim's family, immediate family funeral needs, seem to be accurate.
But it's an obscene perversion of ideology.
The cops are bad and they have to be defunded even as crime goes up and the very activists who promote this ideology fall victim to the consequences of it.
But you can't second-guess the ideology because the ideology is good.
We've started off on that premise.
And so these are just the victims of reform, I guess.
That's the latest on that.
They've arrested the guy.
Mentally disturbed.
I don't think the girlfriend was in on it, as some people are hypothesizing.
No one has any idea how one reacts under these circumstances.
It's not even clear.
They cut the middle part of the video out.
It's not even clear that the girlfriend knew that he was stabbed and not punched necessarily, although I suspect it became clear relatively quickly.
But even in all of this random act of horrific violence, it's almost as though the girlfriend's initial response was, keep an eye on the aggressor because he's the victim in all of this.
Keep an eye on him.
Make sure he's okay.
And I have my boyfriend bleeding to death on the street.
My boyfriend, who's the victim of this aggressor, look after the aggressor.
Make sure he's okay with his mental health crisis.
And, you know, if we have time.
I'll take care of my boyfriend who's bleeding to death on the street.
Okay, Jules1533 says, I'd like to suggest a guest.
She Van Fleet.
I believe she would be a good interview for you to consider.
I don't know who that is.
Not because of any other reason that I don't know of everybody, but I screen grabbed it and I'll have a look at it.
Now let me just see what else is going on in the rumble chat.
I'm definitely not at the bottom of that yet.
Chat's moving a little too quickly for me to keep up with.
Those who believe in socialist communist ideologies, like the stabbed kid and his friends, should be institutionalized.
I mean, if you've ever known anybody who's had a psychotic break, or schizophrenic, or manic bipolar, you know there's the expression, it's sort of comedic.
What do the dead, the mentally ill, and the stupid have in common?
They don't know it.
It's not because they're aware of their mental illness.
I mean, that's part and parcel of the problem of mental illness.
It's part of the problem of certain drugs is when you don't even know that you're on the drugs anymore.
And the idea that, call a social worker.
Anybody could have a knife.
Anybody can have a gun.
And you've created a world where there is no alternative in the minds of these people.
And I say the people driven by the ideology.
Subdue them.
And you run the risks of Chauvin and Perry.
Penny, sorry.
Perry is the guy out of Texas.
Subdue them and disaster happens?
Chauvin and Penny.
Don't subdue them and you're the victim of the disaster?
Well, those are your two options.
Because we want to defund the police.
Because social workers are not armed police officers.
Okay, I think we've made the point here.
The world is crazy.
Zed Origin.
And then Faithless says they are denying these people the mental help they need in order to be kind to them.
There is something to be said about, you know, these types of mental illnesses, these types of, what do they call them?
Mental health crises.
Well, when you want to legalize drugs and promote safe injection sites, And it's not to say that I'm necessarily for illegalizing all drugs, but when you want to promote the legalization of drugs and promotion of healthy, what do they call, safe injection sites, all this other stuff, decriminalized drugs, you are in fact exacerbating the very problem that you purport to want to be eliminating.
You're going to find a lot more public mental health crises the more drugs you legalize, the more safe injection sites you create.
But I mean, it's common sense.
And we'll see what's happening.
New York is going to shit.
Philadelphia, going to shit.
Los Angeles, going to shit.
I'll pick some cities in red states.
Baton Rouge, going to shit.
People like to say, well, the red states have the worst crime.
If we're doing that argument, the red states might have the worst crime in the big blue cities.
But at some point, you can set the political blame aside and just go to the ideology.
Secure the goddamn border.
Stop with the influx of drugs.
Decriminalizing drugs, hard drugs, the type of drugs that induce mental health crises, is not going to solve the problem.
Criminalizing addiction might not solve it either.
But there's a gray zone.
There's a play there.
An interplay, I should say.
All right.
There's a discussion in the chat that I won't get into.
They've been promoting mental health for years instead of holding people responsible for years.
Well, the other problem is at some point you also have to hold...
I have an operating theory that most murders don't occur if you're of sound mind.
It could be...
Crimes of rage, which would not be...
I mean, that might be a legal defense in terms of sentencing, but not in terms of culpability.
It could be outright automatism.
It could be criminally not responsible.
But most people don't kill people unless they have some underlying mental disorder, but that's not necessarily the legal defense to legal culpability.
But my goodness, when we live in a society that actually promotes, encourages, and...
Valorizes mental illness?
Not that it should be stigmatized, but that it should be treated and not encouraged and not valorized.
Whether or not TikTok as an algorithm has anything to do with exacerbating this problem, I happen to think that TikTok as an algorithm is being used as a weapon against the West as much as the drugs that China is shipping in through south of the border.
It's a war being waged against the West.
It's a war that's claiming the lies of fighting aged males.
More than others?
It's claiming the lives of the younger generation, but that's my own connection of the dots, and that's all I have to say about that.
All right, now we're going to end on the story.
We're just going to do it briefly and cover the article so that I can do a little bit of my homework.
I've got many articles to read and many interviews to watch before I do the interview with the former Yale student who was acquitted of sexual assault in 2018 who now gets to sue.
Both the accuser and his university that made his life an absolute living hell to, you know, promote victimhood, valorize victimhood, and demonize.
And I suspect there were some cultural...
You want to talk about who's the racist in this?
I suspect the institutionalized racism of Yale and possibly the accuser might have played a role in this gentleman who I believe is Afghani.
I believe it might have played something of a small role in the preconceived notions and the propensity to believe the woman in the absence of, you know, at the very least disputed stories, but at least in the absence of evidence.
Okay.
Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in June that Saifullah Khan...
Who allegedly raped a female peer at Yale in 2018 may proceed with a defamation suit against the accuser.
I think he's suing her for $110 million.
Nate Brody did a great breakdown of this the other day.
Content warning.
The article describes sexual violence.
Let me just see how long this article is.
We're not going to read the whole thing.
Let's just see here.
I'm not going to read the whole thing because I'm going to talk about this later.
In criminal court, Khan was found not guilty on all charges of sexual assault by a six-person jury in March 2017.
Despite his acquittal, over 77,000 people signed a petition asking the university not to readmit Khan.
Can you imagine this?
Guilty until proven innocent, and then sometimes guilty even when proven innocent.
He was acquitted.
They lifted a suspension.
And he could re-enroll.
In the fall of 2018, Khan returned to the university, living off campus and taking classes, including constitutional law, #irony.
And the criminal mind, #irony.
But on October 5, 2018, the news reported that John Andrews, one of Khan's chief supporters during his trial and later romantic partner, alleged that during their seven-month relationship Khan had sexually assaulted him and physically attacked him on two other occasions.
Khan denied sexually assaulting Andrews.
"These accusations are painful and illegitimate," Mr. Khan's Okay.
Andrews having no connection to Yale, Chun suspended Khan again for Khan's physical and emotional safety and well-being, two days after the news published regarding Khan's alleged behavior towards Andrews.
Kahn v.
Yale.
December 19th.
Kahn sued Yale, alleging that the university had harmed his reputation and violated its contract by not giving Kahn his degree.
Kahn also contends that his right to a fair trial was violated during the UWC proceedings as he was unable to cross-examine Doe or receive meaningful assistance from legal counsel in his hearing.
Specifically, the suit alleges that while Kahn's lawyer was present, they could not speak, pose questions, or tender objections.
Wow.
Kind of sounds like the Alex Jones trial.
Kind of sounds like the trial we're seeing with Trump.
Hold the show trial for the sake of it so you can say, well, due process, even if that due process is total rubbish.
The Connecticut Supreme Court decisively rejected the notion that Yale's administrative process was a reliable fact-finding form.
Norm Pattis, one of Khan's lawyers, wrote to the news.
We seek to hold Yale and Mr. Khan's...
As yet, pseudonymous accuser accountable for all they destroyed.
Yale recruited Saif and promised him the world.
It then discarded him as though he was a piece of garbage.
A jury will be outraged.
Listed among the defendants, the university, administrators involved, including Chun, a bunch of other people.
Also included among the defendant is Doe, who would typically be exempt from being held liable for statements made during a quasi-judicial hearing, which is how UWC proceedings are classified.
So this is crazy.
So he's going to get to Sue now.
Do I want to go down all the way here?
Oh, this is a long article.
Ah, forget it.
I'll give it all to you.
You guys can read it.
I'm going to read it later, anyhow, in more thorough detail.
But he's going to be the guest Saturday, 5 o 'clock.
Because I think, you know, there are certain injustices that need to be righted in as much as they can be righted, which means have the rectification be put on as much blast as the false accusations in the first place.
By the way, Sunday we will be talking about the baseball player.
I forget his name.
We will be talking about the baseball player who also was falsely accused.
I remember seeing the evidence in real time at the time that suggested maybe his accuser was making up stories.
But, you know, you've got to believe all women, even...
Even when there's hard evidence and good reason to suggest that they're lying.
Link to article right here.
So I gave everyone the link there, and I'll give the link in vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Now, I think that covers everything that we wanted to talk about today.
I hope you've all had an interesting time.
The Kevin MacArthur's ousting, that's all from yesterday.
Okay.
I think we've done everything.
We've covered the interesting big news stories of the day.
Now we're going to go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for anyone who wants to come and partake in the après-feite.
That's not actually how you say it in French.
The after-party.
Here, come here.
I'm going to give everybody the link.
Boom shakalaka.
Thank you all for being here.
It's always great to hang out and try to make sense of a world gone batshit crazy.
Tomorrow, I've got a podcast at 10.30.
I'm going to go to the TimCast event.
So I don't know if I'm going to have time to stream a stream during the day, but maybe I'll do a Viva live from the event.
TimCast or Tim Pool, Patrick Bet-David, Alex Stein is going to be doing some stand-up.
Luke Rudkowski is going to be there.
I think I got all of it.
So I'll be doing that.
Let me just see here.
Now I'm going to go to the chat for one second.
I see a thank you, Viva, from America First PHL.
Yeah, that's after skiing.
Another awesome show.
Thank you, says Hoppity Hooper.
Well, thank you very much.
Okay, look, I like seeing good show because I've lost all ability to criticize.
Well, I've lost all ability to assess myself.
Favorably.
So I only look at myself and criticize myself.
Harsher than any troll on Twitter.
These stupid trolls on Twitter think they insult me by saying stupid things.
Dude, I'm harder on myself than any troll out there.
Thanks, people.
Okay, awesome.
So if you are so inclined, that's not Locals.
Is it Locals?
That might have been Locals.
Get your butts over to Locals.
We're going to have an after party.
Is this it?
Gail Daily?
No, what is my problem here?
I'm copying and pasting.
Oh, I've got to refresh locals is the problem.
I had put the article header in there.
Let me give you all the link.
Not that link to locals.
Link to locals.
And then I'm going to go play with the kids and maybe try to find a place to go fishing.
Oh, dude, you're one of the best, says America First.
And Irish Marine says, no, you're cool, bro.
Good.
Thank you.
Unless you weren't talking to me.
I'll choose to believe you were talking to me.
VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
I've got some news.
I've run a poll.
I've ran.
I've run a poll.
We have run a poll in Locals.
And I will be reading the results and confirming that I will be abiding by the results.
So come on over to VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
I'm typing too fast.
It won't let me chat again.
All right.
Ending on Rumble.
Get your butts over to Locals if you're so inclined.
Otherwise, I'll see you tomorrow.
Thank you all for being here.
Enjoy the day, and peace out, peeps.
Booyah.
All right, now we're on Locals.
Bill, I haven't checked the results in a little while, but I don't think the results are going to change much.
Let me refresh here.
▲
Export Selection