Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 8, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:46:30

Hypocrites & Cowards! Eric Adam, Liberty Safes, & the Fall of Canada! It's Frei-Day!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Minister, did you ask your colleagues on the Chinese Communist Party Climate Committee whether or not they would quit interfering in Canadian democracy, or did you leave that alone?
	I have spoken with human rights issues when I was in China just last week.
	Canadian democracy, though.
	Minister, did you ask...
	Okay, so just so we understand, first of all, I think Minister Gilbo...
	Honorable bullshit.
	Minister Gabo has a speech impediment, so people should be careful not to make fun of what might be a medical condition beyond his control.
	But how he spews the bullshit is different and to be distinguished from the bullshit that he spews.
	This is Minister of Environment and Climate Crisis.
	Stephen Gilbo.
	He used to be the Minister of Heritage, for those of you who have been paying attention to Canadian politics.
	He was the one, when they were championing Bill, whatever the Online Streaming Act is, that they were going to go after online streaming platforms who act like publishers and impose on them the provisions of the Canada Broadcasting Act because the Canadian government...
	Wants to control the internet the same way it controls radio and television under the Broadcast Act and the CRTC, the Canadian Radio Telecommunications Company, whatever it's called.
	This is the same scumbag of a liar who said, we don't have any interest in governing social media accounts of individuals.
	This is just if you're acting like a broadcaster, we're going to come after you.
	And then when pressed on that said, well, if you had an exclusion in the law that excluded individual social media accounts, why did you secretly in the dead of night eliminate that exclusion?
	He had no answer for it.
	And lo and behold, the law ultimately ends up passing.
	And lo and behold, it will apply to individual social media accounts if they're sufficiently big.
	This guy.
	Shuffled out of Minister of Heritage and into Minister of...
	Whatever I just said it was.
	Minister of Environment.
	We're going to get there in a second.
	Kian Bextie.
	I think Kian Bexley's with the counter signal.
	I don't think he's with Rebel News anymore.
	Asks him a very good question.
	Let's hear the question.
	And I don't think Gilbo knew who was asking him the question because he actually answered the first part of it with a non-answer.
	But let's just hear that again.
	Ask your colleagues on the Chinese Communist Party Climate Committee whether or not they would quit interfering in Canadian democracy or did you leave that alone?
	I have spoken with human rights issues when I was in China.
	Did you talk about Chinese interference in Canadian politics?
	I spoke with human rights.
	Thank you for answering the question nobody asked Lisa Simpson.
	Canadian democracy, though.
	Look at this arrogant, pompous prick.
	Oh, no, I'm sorry.
	That wasn't the question I asked you.
	And what does he do?
	Let's just look at his face.
	I look away from you.
	Prochaine question.
	Prochaine question.
	Like, it's contempt.
	It's scorn.
	This is a public servant.
	And I've always been reluctant to refer to elected officials as public servants because it has a connotation that is not inappropriate for the term.
	This is an elected official who serves the people.
	The people are this criminal's boss.
	And I can call him criminal because I believe he was actually convicted or arrested of something we're going to get to in a second, 20 years ago.
	I'm saying it tongue-in-cheek.
	This is an elected official.
	The people are this man's boss.
	And this guy thinks he is the boss of the people.
	That's a free press whether he likes it or not.
	He doesn't have the luxury.
	Or at least I should say he ought not or should not have the luxury of saying, I ignore your question because it highlights corruption of the Liberal Party of Canada.
	Prochaine question.
	I disregard you.
	Filth.
	Pleb.
	Go away.
	I go now.
	Answer.
	Government-funded media.
	Stephen Gilboa.
	You're going to notice a theme running through today's stream.
	Hypocrites, scoundrels, and liars.
	I was in the chat before coming here.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com and tongue-in-cheek saying, yes, it's getting a little hard to smile.
	You know, like I have some neighbors who text me every Friday and they say, have a great weekend.
	And I say, Yeah, man, it's another week, another step lower in what seems to be the endless depth of political judicial depravity.
	So I say jokingly in our VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com community.
	Yeah, it's getting hard to stay optimistic even for someone who considers themselves to be the eternal optimist.
	You get out of here.
	I'm surprised they didn't have him forcibly removed.
	You're going to notice the theme.
	Scoundrels, hypocrites, and liars throughout today's stream.
	I figured we'd just start with that.
	Now, my son wanted you to see right here, this beautiful work of art.
	That...
	uh he asked that i hang up in the backdrop and asked that i bring everyone's attention to so i guess that also could be the white pill it won't stay there forever although i kind of like it looks kind of like a good framing how's everyone doing here's what we're gonna do we're gonna take a deep breath we are angry we are discouraged we are politically um what's the word i'm looking for i should have said politically discouraged we are politically um getting um Despaired.
	You take a deep breath.
	I'm not going to pull the Scott Adams drink out of the mug.
	Deep breath.
	Smile.
	It will change chemistry.
	Now, before we get going, let me just make sure that we are simultaneously streaming on Rumble.
	The channel is Viva Fry on Rumble.
	VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com Are we good?
	Here.
	And what happens, for those of you who are new to the channel, but I don't think anybody is, we end on YouTube after a bit, go over to Rumble exclusively with locals, and then end and go over to locals for an after party.
	We will take...
	I'll do...
	I'm going to do an AMA, like just straight up.
	No tips or just AMA.
	I'll pick a question, answer it.
	Honestly.
	Just don't ask embarrassing questions, but I'll still answer those anyhow.
	Okay.
	So that's it.
	That was Stephen Guilbeault.
	I do not answer questions on Chinese Communist Party infiltration into the Canadian government.
	Prochaine question, next question.
	Some of you may or may not have heard that Canada has been going through climate crisis wildfires.
	It's an amazing thing that there have been wildfires, unprecedented wildfires, which can only be explained by climate crisis.
	It can only be solved.
	By CO2 reductions and crippling the Canadian economy, crippling the Canadian way of life, crippling an otherwise free and democratic society, though I don't know if it ever was that, through climate crisis measures.
	The latest ban coming out of Canada, it's amazing.
	WD-40, not as a standalone object, but...
	Products that have aerosol levels of VOC's volatile organic compounds above 10%, I think, banned as of January 1st.
	So aerosol WD-40 will be banned as of January 1st.
	Clyde DoSomething, great Canadian channel, covered it.
	I'm going to pull up a bit of his explanation.
	But we're going to get there after we get to this climate crisis forest fires raging across Canada.
	And if you dare say...
	This looks a little suspicious.
	You're a conspiracy theorist.
	If you dare say odd timing, odd responses, odd stuff going on, you're a conspiracy theorist.
	If you do not say anything other than we must destroy the Canadian way of life to preserve the environment, even though it does nothing on a global scale, because Canada, even if you buy into the COT emissions bullshit, emits 1.5% of global emissions.
	Surprise, surprise, when you shut down certain energy production in Canada, you outsource the pollution to China, which represents 27 or 28% of global emissions, more than, I don't know, what is it, the next three combined?
	So when you cripple Canadian way of life, you outsource the pollution, and not only do you not solve the problem, you exacerbate the problem, but lo and behold, that is the modus operandi of government.
	So there's been a series of wildfires in Canada, and some of us have hypothesized That they might have been arson.
	Some of them.
	No longer shall we need to hypothesize.
	I will steal men the response to this.
	This is the latest coming out of Canada.
	I believe it's close to the latest.
	What's the date on this article?
	It was...
	What kind of news outlet doesn't put the date and time of the bloody article?
	I say, where the hell is the date and time of this article?
	It was today.
	Published yesterday.
	Great.
	How about a date and time?
	Okay.
	Quebec man.
	Quebec man.
	37 charged with arson in connection with wildfires in provinces north.
	Hmm.
	I seem to recall a lot of fires.
	I seem to recall people saying some of these might be arson.
	Now, I'm going to steel manned people because we don't yet have definitive evidence that the bad forest fires were caused by arson.
	But let's just read this article.
	Quebec Provincial Police have arrested a man for arson in connection with numerous forest fires that burned earlier this summer in the province's north.
	Police say a 37-year-old man was scheduled to appear by video conference today in a court in Roberval, Quebec.
	Roberval, I think, is near like Val d 'Or, if I'm not mistaken.
	Facing arson charges.
	The man is from Chebougamou.
	By the way, this is going to be a fun cultural lesson for those.
	of you out there who might not know you know there's that Timbuktu you know like when someone says oh you're from Timbuktu there's actually a place on earth called Timbuktu uh it's in it's in the desert I want to say I'm going to double check that in a second in Quebec we have a we have a Quebec equivalent Chebougamou like yeah that's in the middle of nowhere Chebougamou is a place in Quebec the man from Chebougamou was arrested by members of the provincial police's major crimes unit Told Radio Canada that the suspect allegedly started
	a series of small fires that were quickly extinguished by firefighters.
	So the steel man here, people, is, yeah, there's always arsons, but these aren't what caused the fires.
	And even if it were, it's like that ever-moving goalpost.
	These weren't the fires that started the fires.
	These were quickly extinguished.
	But even if they did start the fires, they were exacerbated by climate change.
	Absolutely nothing to do with forest management.
	Absolutely nothing to do with a response or lack thereof.
	So, nothing to see here.
	Move on.
	Quebec had an unprecedented forest fire season this year, with almost 15,000 square kilometers burned.
	Shabougamou's 7,500 residents were temporarily forced from their homes because of blazes and poor air conditions.
	Now, things acutely missing from this article.
	The dude's name, and I'm not looking for any, like, in the States, or at least, you know, in certain areas of social media, people look for the name for, like, racial identity stuff.
	I want to just, you know, I would like to go through the person's social media history if we can.
	Why would they not release the name?
	I'd like to go through the person's social media history to see what, if any, social media posts Timbuktu.
	City in Mali.
	I'd like to know what, if any, social media postings this individual might have posted.
	But they don't give us that information.
	I'm sure maybe at some point in time they will.
	Oh, they're going to say the man was arrested.
	His fires were not the ones that started the big fires.
	And even if they were, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay.
	There have been multiple incidents now of individuals being arrested for arson as relates to the vicinity of these fires.
	And one thing is for certain, if something has happened once, it's happened more than once.
	Very few things only happen once.
	And the only thing that might only happen once is, you know, immaculate conception.
	That's the only thing that might only happen once because the first person to have thought of that as an excuse...
	What movie was it from where they said, you know, that excuse can only be used once.
	If something has happened, it has happened before.
	If they catch one guy for arson, there are many others.
	Don't need to quantify it.
	There are more than one other not caught for arson.
	And it begs the question.
	They don't give the guy's name.
	Coming all back to Stephen Gilboa.
	Do you guys know that Gilboa was arrested once upon a time?
	And I'm not saying this to...
	I'm not saying this to say once a criminal, always a criminal.
	I just want to get the picture of...
	Of Guilbeau in his orange jumpsuit after having gotten arrested.
	Stephen Guilbeau, 20 years ago, was arrested for climate activism.
	And there's a little something that we've talked about once upon a time on the channel called the political permission slip.
	Here, I'll just read this.
	This is Guilbeau, and then we're going to get the picture of him in his jumpsuit.
	Look at this guy.
	I mean, this is the face that only a mother can trust.
	And even then, I doubt the mother trusts the kid.
	Trust but verify.
	Early life and education, the son of a butcher.
	He is of French-Canadian descent, although his maternal grandmother, Edna O 'Farrell, who is high-erish Canadian.
	When he was five years old in Latuc, Guilbeault refused to get down from a tree that he had climbed in an effort to block a land developer from clearing wood.
	The tree was felled a few days later, but the event is cited by Guilbeault as the genesis of his environmental criminality.
	Oh, I'm sorry, I meant environmental activism.
	All right, let's go here.
	Gilbo, where is his early career in arrest?
	Here we go.
	In 1997, just going to highlight this.
	This is Wikipedia, yes, take it with a grain of salt.
	In this case, take it with a grain of pardoning the criminal.
	It's an amazing thing.
	One man's political activism is another man's criminality, depending on the political orientation and how the Wikipedia partisan hack website that it is wants to frame it.
	In 1997, Gilbo joined Greenpeace Canada.
	He was put in charge of its climate change division, and he managed the climate and energy campaign before being the organization's Quebec bureau chief in 2000.
	In 2005, he coordinated the climate campaign for Greenpeace International.
	On four occasions, Gilboa made headlines for Greenpeace, such as when he scaled the CN Tower in 2001, accompanied by British activist Chris Holden.
	At the time, it was the time...
	There's a tallest...
	Who gives a crap?
	After ascending the height of 340 meters, they furled a banner that read, Canada and Bush Climate Killers.
	Gilbert and Holden were arrested and charged with mischief.
	Did they go to jail for 10 years?
	What did that trial look like?
	What did his mischief charge...
	By the way, actual mischief?
	Climbing the CN Tower.
	Not actual mischief?
	Organizing a protest.
	Oh, my goodness.
	Did he get held in jail for five months like Pat King for mischief?
	Did he get held in jail for like 60 days like Tamara Leach?
	I don't think so.
	He's got the good mischief.
	Oh, the good, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, what happened here?
	The stunt cost the CN Tower Corporation an estimated $50,000, and Gibbo was sentenced to one year's probation, and the court ordered him to pay a portion of the costs.
	Aw, isn't that a shame?
	That's what he gets.
	So hold on one second.
	I want to go Stephen Gilbo-Arrest.
	Let's just get the picture so we can see.
	Here you go.
	Look at that guy.
	Look at that.
	Yeah, he's a hero, though.
	He's a hero, and Tamara Lich is the enemy of the people because politics ruins everything, including people's ever-loving minds.
	The question is this.
	He was arrested for climate activism, and I'll just call it climate criminality, because that's what it is.
	You might think it's justified criminality.
	It's criminality.
	It's not protesting on the sidewalk.
	It's mischievous criminality.
	Do you think that people who look up to Stephen Gilboa might look up to his mischievous criminal activist past and say, that's a good thing?
	The ends justify the means?
	If I start a fire here, but the end result is enacting our climate crisis policy, the ends justify the means?
	I'm a hero?
	Who the hell knows?
	I would dare say yes.
	It's called the political permission slip.
	When people think they are politically justified, they have the affirmation that whatever they do is righteous, even if it's criminal.
	They'll do it.
	They'll burn down buildings.
	They'll Molotov cocktail police cards if they think it's politically justified.
	And?
	If that political permission slip is out there, they don't even get a slap on the wrist for their criminality.
	Is it possible that some liberal climate activists, people who have been brainwashed by Greta Thunberg, are sitting out there saying, Jesus, it's a climate crisis.
	Even if we have to make the fires, we will make the fires so that we can get the change.
	We will create victims so that we can enact policy to protect the victims, even if the victims are the ones of our own doing.
	Is it possible?
	Do you think he's a little biased?
	Democracy, you know, necessarily politically biased.
	He's going to, you know, get elected by the people who agree with his politics.
	And I don't hold criminality against people for the rest of their lives.
	And there's, you know, let's just say victimless in that there's monetary compensation or monetary damages for the CN Tower.
	You know, scaling a building, flying a flag.
	I wouldn't make such a big deal of it if they didn't make such a big deal of it when you honked a horn and flew a flag and protested on a street.
	But is it conceivable that some climate activists in Canada might be either reading a permission slip that they think they have or might be so despaired they're saying, we're going to die anyhow.
	I may as well make the climate change policy come sooner than later.
	It's definitely possible.
	Okay, we're going to do a couple more Canadian stuff before we head over to the rumbles.
	But before we do that, hold on one second.
	Did I do the disclaimers?
	Whatever.
	You know the disclaimers.
	These things, Rumble Rants, Super Chats, it's a great way to support the channel if you so choose.
	The best way.
	Hold on a second.
	The best way is vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Seven bucks a month, $70 a year if you get like a year thing up front.
	Tons of exclusive content for supporters only, but there's a massive community of members.
	You don't even have to become a supporter.
	The best way, I've ordered mine.
	They haven't yet come.
	Oh yeah.
	I want my mugshot.
	I want my mugshot shot glass and I want my mugshot coffee mug.
	The shirt's coming as well.
	VivaFry.com for the best merch ever.
	But bear in mind, YouTube takes 30% of Super Chats.
	Rumble takes 0% of Rumble Rants for the rest of the year.
	They typically take 20%, so that's it.
	Flush the turd.
	I don't often show this flag.
	Yeah, there we go.
	Foxtrot Juliet Tango.
	Someone sent this to me.
	Not the type of flag that I would hang on the wall, but I keep all fan mail and I keep all fan gifts.
	There was another one hanging around the desk here somewhere.
	Can't find it.
	I'll find it later.
	Okay.
	We're not done with Canada yet.
	That's Foxtrot Juliet Tango, which also means F Justin Trudeau.
	Can your merch deliver to Alberta?
	I am thinking about the shot glass.
	I'm not your buddy guy, definitely.
	The merch company is a Canadian-based company, getpressed.ca, and they do great stuff.
	Shipping is not ideal.
	Shipping is a problem, so save what you need to order and get more than one thing at a time.
	Okay, we're not done with Canada.
	Buy a long shot, people.
	They can block me, but I have my moles.
	All right.
	This is crazy.
	For those of you who don't know, this is not just idle gossip.
	There's a good reason for this.
	The ADL has been screaming anti-Semitism.
	The ADL has been screaming that they're being attacked.
	They're being attacked with anti-Semitic backlash because they were promoting an advertiser pause.
	On Twitter because the ADL determined, concluded, unilaterally declared that there was anti-Semitic content on Twitter that was not being removed fast enough to their liking.
	So they went out and tweeted that advertisers should pause advertising on Twitter.
	Because.
	Now, for those of you who haven't heard it, listen to this.
	Listen to this.
	They say they're not doing it.
	While admitting that they do it.
	So this is what happened with the ADL, the fight with Twitter.
	I talked about it earlier this week, but I'll play this again in case people haven't seen it.
	How out there are you, publicly and behind the scenes, talking to advertisers and telling them, do not advertise on this platform?
	Are you doing that?
	We are not.
	Okay.
	How active are you?
	Are you doing that?
	Listen to the answer.
	Are you doing that?
	We are not out there publicly or privately talking to advertisers.
	They will make the decisions that they want to.
	Frankly, it's true, we did call...
	Oh, we're not out there publicly or privately telling advertisers not to advertise.
	Oh, it's true.
	We did publicly announce and demand a pause.
	Since that initial statement, what we are doing...
	Just an initial statement.
	Since that initial statement, we haven't done anything then.
	First of all, I don't believe you.
	Second of all, I don't believe you.
	...is engaging with the management of the company, trying to help them make it better.
	And by the way, it doesn't sound like Elon believes them either.
	And I probably presume, or I should say I presume, that Elon probably has the receipts of emails.
	People saying the ADL has been getting in touch with me.
	Or...
	ADL emails to potential advertisers.
	Do you know there's anti-Semitic stuff on Twitter?
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Yeah, the record year was 2019.
	But right after Elon bought the company, we started complaining about anti-Semitism even more.
	And although we're not publicly and privately asking advertisers to stop advertising, we did put out a warning asking them to pause.
	Here's the warning.
	Today we are joining dozens of other groups to ask advertisers to pause Twitter spending because we are profoundly concerned about anti-Semitism and hate on the platform.
	Here's why we're asking advertisers to stop hate for profit.
	That sounds a lot like what ADL does, although they're a not-for-profit, although with a CEO that makes $1.2 million a year, and stop toxic Twitter.
	And then they complain about hashtag ban the ADL.
	It's amazing!
	Oh, and by the way, when he says we're not out there publicly or privately above and beyond the first thing, well, if they're not out there doing it, but as they're saying here, a dozen other groups are doing it on our behalf.
	You know what that's called?
	Greenblatt, that's called doing indirectly what you claim to not be doing directly, a.k.a.
	doing what you're saying that you're not doing.
	Oh, we're not doing it.
	We've got a dozen other groups that are doing it after we've announced this pause in November.
	Oh my goodness.
	Statement, what we are doing is engaging with the management of the company, trying to help them make it better.
	How?
	We're engaging, but our other dozens of other people are out there harassing advertisers, telling them to pull it.
	And oddly enough, you know which one's pulled it?
	Crap.
	Do I want to say Volvo?
	I don't want to besmirch an innocent company.
	But Pfizer pulled their ads.
	That's interesting.
	I sure as hell see a lot of Pfizer as on Fox News.
	I wonder what that's about.
	So that's the ADL complaining about antisemitism as a critique, as to explain the backlash that they're facing for trying to effectively bankrupt a company through a targeted harassment campaign.
	It can't be anything less than that.
	Okay.
	It seems that some groups might reflexively Invoke the anti-Semitism to explain the backlash instead of actually focusing on what they're doing to elicit the backlash.
	One of those people is a Canadian named Millie Kaplan something, Mirth.
	I did not know who this person was until they blocked me, and I don't even know why I discovered it.
	She's a, I'd say, a council person in Ottawa, an elected...
	I don't know whom, but also a doctor.
	And this is Dr. Nilly Kaplan Mirth, MD's website.
	Welcome to my family practice and to the Common Ground Collaborative Care.
	Please note, masks are required for all appointments.
	For those of you who don't follow her on Twitter or for those of you who haven't been blocked by Nilly Kaplan on Twitter, nothing less than what Lewis Carroll described as the...
	Nosy, tyrannical, busybody.
	Is it Lewis Carroll or C.S. Lewis?
	It's C.S. Lewis.
	I always get mixed up.
	Nothing less than what C.S. Lewis described as the most horrendous form of tyrant.
	The tyrant who feels morally justified in their tyranny.
	They never sleep.
	They eat.
	And even when they eat, they think of creative ways to tyrannize you.
	And then when you complain about it, Millie Kaplan cries anti-Semitism.
	She blocked me a long time ago.
	I don't know that I ever directly interacted with her, but I had to...
	Someone sent me a tweet this morning, and I just had to...
	I had to maybe try to drop a little truth bomb.
	Where's the tweet that I put out here?
	Has it occurred to you?
	Don't read this yet.
	Let's just go right to the...
	There we go.
	Okay.
	Someone sends me this tweet of Nilly Kaplan taking to Twitter.
	In the chat, whoever knows what her elected official is, is city council person.
	Just let everybody know.
	I don't know what it is offhand.
	Nellie Kaplan tweeted this out.
	Imagine turning to a room of colleagues to say their silence as...
	Okay, hold on.
	Imagine turning to a room of colleagues, maybe she meant to say, to see their silence as I receive anti-Semitic death threats isn't okay.
	Oh!
	Imagine turning to a room of colleagues to say their silence as I receive antisemitic death threats isn't okay.
	The only person to respond says they are uncomfortable with the risk I bring them, dismissing that I'm the target as a Jew.
	So can I please stay off social media?
	Now, I have been blocked by Nili a long time ago, and I don't know why.
	I actually don't know why because I don't think I ever called her any names.
	I can understand why some people have blocked me.
	I call people names every now and again.
	I justify it with fact and evidence.
	And I definitely highlight when they block me.
	So it's tough for me to pull up some of Nilly's gems, but I was able to.
	There was a video of Nilly Kaplan going around unhinged, deranged.
	It is appropriate.
	This is quoting from her interview in the tweet that you're looking at.
	Let me just make sure we're looking at the same tweet.
	And we are.
	It is inappropriate to say that masks are some form of hardship.
	They are not.
	They are not cruelty.
	Oh, okay.
	That's factually incorrect now.
	Let's just skip the cruelty part.
	They are a form of hardship.
	They actually cause problems that some people know of.
	Dentists talking about cavities, mask mouth, maskne, other potentially toxic masks coming out of Quebec.
	There are confirmed problems that you risk running into from extended, prolonged mask wearing.
	So, Nilly, you're a PhD or whatever the hell you are, you're an MD, you're also wrong.
	Let's not let being wrong get in the way of a good narrative.
	It's not a hardship.
	They're not.
	Children learning developmental speech patterns, it's not a hardship to have your speech development delayed a year or two.
	That's not a hardship for you, Nilly.
	Maybe.
	Okay, what else there?
	Tonight, that's the interview.
	This clip really exemplifies how Nilly KM is such an angry, ignorant voice.
	That's just one clip.
	That was an interview.
	Then you got this one here, just showing you.
	She's got the 3M95 mask.
	Wear your mask.
	That's a profile picture.
	That's one I could pull up here.
	This one's amazing.
	So Volvo cars have complained that I told Saint Laurent Volvo, is that in Montreal?
	They should be wearing masks.
	I just got a call from Ottawa police wanting to speak to me because I took a photo of staff without masks.
	And are they kidding?
	The crime isn't that I took a photo.
	The fine is lack of masks.
	I think she means crime here.
	This is a woman, a human, with such a lack of introspection, she can't understand why people hate her.
	And I just have to drop the bomb of all truth bombs.
	Has it occurred to you, Nilly, that the reason why so many people sincerely loathe you has nothing to do with you being Jewish and only to you being an insufferable, mentally unhinged, ill-informed, tyrannical busybody?
	And the more you hysterically cry anti-Semitism, the more it legitimizes people's disdain for you.
	Like, has this thought ever occurred to you?
	I sit around and I know that there are people on Twitter who don't, they say they don't like me, but I think that they like me.
	I think they find some engagement and I think that they still like me.
	But with every tweet that I put out or don't put out and I say, okay, how would someone who wants to turn that tweet back on me, turn it back on me?
	I say, is there a reason why someone might hate me?
	I can understand why people might dislike me.
	I ask myself that question.
	Every minute of the day.
	And sometimes I judge myself harder than people out there judge.
	These people, they lack introspection.
	And I'm not saying these people, Jewish women.
	I'm saying these mentally unhinged, deranged, and I'll dare say psychopaths.
	I'm sure that if she doesn't suffer from a mental disorder, she suffers from a personality disorder.
	They lack introspection.
	And they run around.
	Crying antisemitism?
	Nili.
	The only way I knew you were Jewish is because you said it.
	Now that I think, though, Nili Kaplan, maybe it's an Israeli name, the Nili.
	Never would have known in a million years.
	And here's a spoiler alert.
	Nobody hates you because you're Jewish.
	They hate you because you are loathsome.
	Okay.
	My brother's in the backdrop.
	We're going to do...
	Oh, no, we might have to do this.
	We're going to do this over on Rumble, but so that my brother doesn't...
	Dan.
	Oh, there I am.
	Give me a warning next time.
	I have my finger in my nose.
	Dan, before we go over, we're going to go over to Rumble exclusively now to talk about the Pfizer stuff.
	It's not your findings, but you're definitely following it closer than I am, and I've been piggybacking.
	I think you've packaged it in a way that people can now see it like that.
	Yeah, well, dude, you're getting good on Twitter, and you're getting good at delivering the message without using expletives, which is where I might have been two years ago.
	I'm looking at you.
	We're going to get you softer there.
	You dumb bum.
	I'm working on you, Dan.
	Two years from now, you're going to be a madman.
	So, by the way, everybody out there, if you don't know, this is actually my brother.
	Second of five, or the fourth of five kids.
	I'm the fifth of five.
	I'm just daring myself when you talk.
	I've got to work on them.
	You've got to work on them.
	Look at the camera.
	When you look at the camera.
	I'm not looking at you.
	When I look at you, this is what it looks like.
	It looks terrible.
	Before we go over to Rumble here, what's your Twitter handle?
	Who are you?
	I put on my...
	Look at there.
	You look at the bottom of the screen.
	It says, on X, lion advocacy.
	That's X. I swear to you, I thought that was a wiener with an X. Okay, I'm joking.
	Now you have to change it.
	That does look like a dog.
	I can't unsee that now.
	That says something about me, though.
	Okay.
	So, yeah, you're a practicing lawyer out of Ontario.
	I'm actually blushing.
	Look at that.
	Practicing lawyer in Ontario, but also an advocate in the wee hours.
	I do like to advocate about best practices for what I kind of encountered in my role as lawyer in this madness.
	Okay, so I'm linking to Rumble here, everyone.
	Come on over to Rumble because we're going to get into the Pfizer document drop that was hard fought through legal proceedings out of South Africa and the implication that it probably likely has.
	On the West, because, you know, what's happened once has happened elsewhere, guaranteed.
	Dan, so it doesn't change anything here.
	Everyone, come on over to Rumble, or go, actually, hold on a second before I do that.
	Come on over to Locals, where we will have an AMA at the end of the show.
	VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
	Ending on YouTube, and I'll post the highlights later.
	Three, two, one, 457 people.
	456.
	Everyone, come on over.
	Bye-bye.
	All right, Dan.
	Okay, so what's the deal?
	I'm going to pull up the tweet while you explain what's going on.
	What are you following?
	You've been following what's going on in South Africa.
	What has been going on?
	Well, so that document that was just dropped was not a surprise to many people, at least the people in the know.
	They were like, this is not news.
	They obtained unredacted copies of the Pfizer document in other countries.
	So I guess it wasn't that shocker.
	What was surprising was that the country as big, as powerful as South Africa, relatively speaking, It had all the same restrictions on in that contract, meaning, well, first of all, that they redacted it the way they did, that they were ordered to unredact it, that that's what the process had to go through.
	And then it all had all the same issues about the whole, you know, getting them to sign off on efficacy and safety and all that stuff, or waive their, you know, waive any, you know, release Pfizer for any possible claims.
	Just crazy stuff.
	Well, here, I'll bring it up.
	Health Canada's in big trouble.
	Check out the disclaimer Pfizer got South Africa to sign.
	We had seen this in drafts.
	We had seen this elsewhere.
	I forget what Eastern European country it was.
	Oh, Slovenia.
	Slovenia.
	Same as Canada's, undoubtedly.
	And we're going to bring this up.
	I talked about it yesterday.
	In the locals exclusive portion, not for any, you know, circumventing rules, just because I forgot to mention it during the mainstream.
	This is the purchaser acknowledgement.
	Purchaser being the government, vendor being Pfizer, and the vaccine capital V vaccine being defined as whatever, you know, whatever this thing can be called.
	Purchaser acknowledged that the capital V vaccine is in defined term and materials related to the capital V vaccine and their components and constituents materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of the vaccine to purchaser under this agreement.
	So, Dan, explain the obvious.
	That means they're going to continue to study its effects after the government gets it and compels people to take it.
	And I guess we kind of all knew that, or some of us knew that, or some of us didn't care, or the extent of the experimentation was kind of unclear.
	I'm not really sure, but...
	All those people that said we were an experiment, and you keep quoting Obama on this one, but yeah, you know, it was experimental.
	And I think a lot of doctors will say that it was an experimental vaccine.
	It was on the NIH's website.
	They called it the experimental mRNA vaccine, or the experimental mRNA vaccine.
	Which is, like, I got no issues if millions of people wanted to join the experiment.
	Where the issues come up, and I'm still dealing with now in my solicitor's work, is, okay, if people don't want to take it, then that's fine.
	Even, even, you can fire them.
	You can even fire them.
	But not for cause.
	Not because they didn't join the experiment.
	Just fire them for some other reason.
	Give them notice.
	Give them their year or two years, whatever.
	Okay?
	But don't fire them for cause.
	Don't fire them for misconduct.
	And that's what the federal government is doing with all their EI claims.
	Full disclosure, I'm involved in an EI dispute with misconduct.
	It is not misconduct to not want to join the experiment.
	Anyhow, sorry.
	Well, no, no.
	I'm going to come back to that.
	And so explain for people who might not know.
	Fired for cause for misconduct means you're not eligible for EI employment insurance benefits.
	Right.
	So people pay into this little program, not so little, called the Employment Insurance Program, okay?
	They pay for years.
	Stop for a second.
	It used to be called Unemployment Insurance, but they found that that was too...
	It was called UI, not EI for the longest time, but Unemployment Insurance is a judgmental term.
	So let's call it Employment Insurance.
	It's a federal safety valve for people who lose their jobs for, you know...
	For people who lose their jobs for whatever it is, downsizing, even for some wrongful termination, as long as it's not that wrongful.
	People lose their jobs for whatever reason.
	You can apply for the program that you paid in.
	And so the question was, people that choose not to get the jab, okay, well, they get fired for misconduct.
	But no, it's not really misconduct.
	But then they apply for EI, and there again, the government says, yeah, it's misconduct.
	It's so shocking that it should be enraging everybody.
	You pay into this.
	They've been taking off your salary, EI contributions for however long you've been working as an employee.
	And then when you want them at this point in time, they say, no, you were fired for misconduct the same way the Sheila Annette Lewis's of the world paid into a health care system that they were then cut out from because they refused to submit to this experimental project as it was going on.
	Flabbergasting.
	What are the benefits do they lose, Dan?
	Well, everything.
	People have lost it all.
	And honestly, these stories, like I can't even, like, it's crazy.
	So besides losing, so normally if you fire someone, you give them a bit of time to find a new job.
	So whatever it is, depending on the, you know, the job that it is, it could be three, six months senior people, you know, or people that have, you know, difficulty finding another job.
	It can be longer.
	So they'll, anywhere from three months to like, you know, it could be two years.
	But when COVID came around, okay, all the sinners that decided not to get vaccinated and put everybody else at risk, those sinners get no notice, and that's misconduct.
	And once you get into that realm of misconduct, harder to find another job, don't get EI.
	You don't get minimum survivable income.
	So what are you supposed to do?
	You have to right away sell assets or you have to have enough saved up.
	Nobody anticipated this before the pandemic that you'd be treated like this for not getting vaccinated.
	And so this is why the Health Canada...
	Keep saying it's safe and effective.
	Of course it's misconduct with such a safe and effective vaccine.
	And then you get this contract.
	And again, so we don't know if this clause...
	We know.
	We know, but we don't know.
	Because it was enacted.
	Let's get to the second part of it because now, you know, it will continue to be studied after provision of the vaccine to the purchaser under this agreement.
	Great.
	We're going to continue studying it because you're part of the study now.
	Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known.
	And we'll get into the next one afterwards.
	Safe and effective, not...
	Not currently known.
	They were telling pregnant women this was safe to inject into their bodies.
	They were telling kids, at virtually no risk of the Rona itself, safe and effective, while secretly behind closed doors, assuming the Canadian contract has this provision, which it undoubtedly does.
	While acknowledging behind closed doors, we don't know shit long term.
	Well, okay, Kate, and then, but then Beast is so like...
	You look at the BC, immunized BC, this provincial agency.
	I don't know what they say.
	So they're saying, no, mRNA has been around for like 10, 20 years.
	We know it's safe.
	Like, don't worry about it.
	You're good.
	And like, do people believe that?
	Like, people believe that.
	And now we're seeing, we saw very quickly.
	By the way, we saw very quickly there were adverse reactions.
	People were like, ah, it's okay.
	One in 100,000 for whatever, that's fine.
	And then they're like, ooh, actually, one in 50,000.
	Ah, still safe.
	You know, one in 20,000.
	The numbers keep changing, but no matter what, it's safe.
	And I was like...
	At what point do you have to start qualifying what's safe and effective people now?
	It's even worse than that.
	The people saying mRNA has been around for decades are willfully blind, ignorant, or liars.
	I want to get a little into the weeds here and the mRNA.
	When you and your colleagues were trying to decide which route to go down, the traditional vaccine route or the mRNA route, you write that it was "most counterintuitive" to go...
	I will make fun of Albert Bula now.
	It was most counterintuitive because we had never used it and we didn't know squat about how it was going to affect people.
	But listen to this.
	The mRNA route.
	And yet you went that route.
	Very surprising.
	It was counterintuitive because Pfizer was mastering, or let's say we had very good experience and expertise with multiple technologies that would give a vaccine.
	Antenoviruses, but some of the other vaccines.
	We were very good in doing that.
	Protein vaccines, we were very good in doing that, plus many other technologies.
	But mRNA, no.
	mRNA was the technology that we had less experience, only two years.
	Two years.
	And actually, mRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day.
	Not vaccine, not any other medicine.
	So it was very counterintuitive and I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go and I questioned it and I asked them to justify how can you say something like that.
	But they came and they were very very convinced that this is the right way to go.
	They felt that the two years of work on mRNA since 2018 together with BioNTech to develop a flu vaccine Made them believe that the technology is mature and we are at the cusp of delivering a product.
	Made them believe the technology was mature.
	Two years old, never delivered a product.
	And people out there repeat a lie that even the, I'll call them the criminals, themselves are not making.
	It's absolutely mind-blowing.
	But it's BC especially.
	I mean, Ontario is pretty bad too, but BC is more provincially centered, meaning BC still has crazy mandates that are being top-down delivered by the government there.
	So that's what's really weird in BC is that they have this immunized BC that says it's totally safe, it has long-term studies of mRNA, and yet they're the ones that are really, of all the Canadian provinces, are forcing it the most on their workers there, and that's crazy.
	There's just no words for it, really.
	Yes, I don't know.
	Safe and effective.
	If you don't do it, you're fired for cause.
	Although Justin Trudeau comes out a couple of months ago and says, nobody forced you to do it.
	And we told you it was safe and effective while we did it.
	But hold on, because there was one more aspect to that that I wanted to get to, Dan.
	It was the last part.
	Further to the extent applicable, purchaser acknowledges that the product shall not be serialized.
	I had to ask my go-to.
	Yeah.
	So do you know what that means?
	I had to ask my go-to folks.
	The beauty of Twitter is like, you get some...
	Who are your go-to folks?
	I got our Viva.
	Oh, I got my...
	No, there's a lot of Xpharma.
	You look in the bios, Xpharma, and they seem to post credible stuff.
	You could find them if you really hunt them out.
	And you just, you know, you accept views that you don't agree with sometimes, and you accept other views that align with your hunches.
	Serialized, from what I understood, was meaning it's to prevent fraudulent batches being distributed under the name of Pfizer, right?
	So that you can track and trace.
	I think it also allows them to do some safety tracking, better safety tracking.
	But you can also do that through lot batches, I think, which are separate from the serial.
	So there's two ways to track safety.
	The main thing, what I understood from these experts was that it's to make sure there's no fraud, which is interesting.
	I think you covered this on one of your shows because there were cases where people were getting either air shots or getting something that wasn't the vaccine.
	And you go down the rabbit hole of conspiracy theories.
	Those are rumors, Dan.
	Those are rumors.
	No, this one was pretty...
	No, no, there have been people who were talking, they called them ghost shots.
	Ghost shots?
	Yeah, I've heard that as well.
	But look, the fake certificates, the fake vaccine certificates are now accepted and there have been charges for those.
	So if you're giving fake passports, you know, it's not hard to reckon that people were, if you really want to set up the fraud a bit better, then...
	Lack of serialization is a good way to exploit that.
	Not to say that that was inserted for this reason.
	That would be way too down the rabbit hole.
	I think it's probably just inserted for cost, like just for saving and just administratively way too complicated to serialize and track every single batch.
	You're rushing.
	It's a war zone, right?
	So you've got to rush these things out ASAP.
	So that's the other way to look at it, right?
	Like necessity is the mother of invention, right?
	Or the parent of invention, I should say.
	Yeah, or it's the, never mind, it's the source of corruption.
	Right.
	Dan, you're working on the Vaccine Injury Support Program.
	Am I allowed to ask you about any of those?
	Yeah, I don't like to talk too much about them because they're ongoing.
	The gist was, and I posted this just yesterday, the appeals process, okay?
	The Vaccine Injury Support Program, the way I'm seeing it now, it's kind of like a holding area, and it's allowing the government to delay awareness.
	And delay paying because there's actually a funding shortfall for these vaccine injuries.
	And I posted that on Twitter.
	But, and yeah, full disclosure, I am helping a few people in the program.
	I'm not making, you know, significant sums from this, but it's...
	No, first of all, you don't have to apologize for expecting remuneration for the work that you're doing.
	Oh, he's grifting.
	He's grifting off.
	He works with personal injury lawyers.
	No, the bigger point that people should focus on here is that there is something called the Vaccine Injury Support Program in Canada.
	It's...
	To compensate people for vaccine injuries, have you seen cases?
	Have you seen compensation?
	Have you seen denials?
	And how's it overall going in Canada?
	Yeah, it's good.
	So the government budgeted, what was it, $2.7 million a year or $2 million a year to pay for injuries.
	I think they're way higher than that.
	But what they're doing is, because it's managed privately by a private company, RGCT, I think it's called, because it's...
	Managed privately, the incentive, the motivation to manage this program is profit.
	So they're going to do what they can to make it on budget, to be good friends with the government, to delay paying where possible, making sure that all these claims are legit, not fraud.
	And so you can do that.
	You can drag this on for one, two, three years, more, and then deny people, and then make the appeals process complicated.
	Or just not be transparent about it.
	So I'm trying to get more transparency on what the appeals process is in writing, not how people make it up on the spot.
	So a lot of people are being told, we're going to close your file for inactivity.
	I'm like, no, no, no.
	There's no closing of files for inactivity.
	It's slow to get all your papers in.
	Don't just shut down files.
	So that program, that for me is the real canary in the mind because there you see.
	The injuries, they're all the same.
	They all look the same.
	Or not all, but they're all part of a pattern.
	The autoimmune response.
	Just the immune system going wonky and how that plays out in people's bodies is different, but it's a real tragedy.
	And it's fine, again, for people that want to take that risk.
	It's the people that didn't that were painted into this corner and are now dealing with the fallout.
	Man alive.
	It's beyond a tragedy.
	It's a crime against humanity.
	And like I tweeted, I mean, I was very slow going to get on the Nuremberg Two Trials bandwagon.
	I am thoroughly there now.
	What they've done, they were lying in real time while they were covering their asses behind closed doors.
	That is crimes against humanity level corruption criminality.
	I won't ask you to agree or disagree, Ben.
	You still have a professional order to answer to.
	No, but there are lawyers that bring those wonky, wild, you know, put your career on the line type of claims.
	And I think there was one, actually, out in Alberta who's bringing stuff to The Hague or something.
	See where it's going.
	At the end of the day, things were so compartmentalized.
	I don't even know who's really...
	Besides major ministers that actually issued weird orders in council or like...
	Everyone was kind of siloed.
	So at the end of the day, I don't know who...
	Put it on the, you know, one particular person here and there.
	I could put on a few dozen.
	Give me a few dozen.
	We'll have a trial that could be justified for six weeks, unlike the mischief trial for Tamara Leach.
	All right, man, Dan, I won't keep you.
	Okay, good stuff, man.
	Thank you.
	Lion advocacy, and yeah, you might want to change that ex-dong, because that looks like a wiener pointing at the...
	What is that thing called?
	The ASCII?
	Yeah, I've ruined it, Dan.
	I would have put a bird, but the bird died.
	I love it.
	Your face is actually red now.
	Right?
	I know.
	It's crazy.
	All right, man.
	Go.
	I'll call you later.
	Yeah, chop.
	Have a good one.
	All right, people.
	That's my brother.
	That's my brother.
	Lion advocacy out of Ontario.
	Now, out of Ontario, we've got some good stuff.
	I'm just going to go to the chat for one second.
	But before I go to the chat and before I go to the rants, do me a favor.
	Hit the plus button and drop a comment in the comment section because I'm looking at the Rumble landing page and I don't see us anywhere.
	I'm scrolling down.
	I see that Russell Brand had Sam Harris on and they respectfully disagree.
	I'll be watching that after I'm done being live.
	Hit the thumbs up button and drop a comment because apparently that puts us up on the front page or whatever.
	Okay.
	What was I going to say?
	What do we have still left in the backdrop?
	We're going to get to Liberty Safes.
	It's an all-out political war.
	No limits, no holds barred, and people don't yet seem to understand that.
	But before we get there, I wanted to share the screen so that we could go through some of the rumble rants over on the rumbles.
	Corn on macabre says, Viva, every time you clap, I get flashbacks of the movie The Menu.
	You gotta watch it.
	If you haven't seen it, it's fantastic.
	I've never heard of the movie The Menu, but when you talk about flashbacks, and you're going back to last year, my flashbacks go back to like 2001, 1996, watching Trainspotting.
	Fuck God, 2022.
	We're still in 2022.
	I've screen grabbed it.
	I'm going to go watch that movie.
	Hutchie says, apparently Zexy Lee, the one suing the convo, yep, and works with the Liberal Party, has dual citizenship, but I'm sure that has nothing to do with the foreign interference allegations in our elections.
	She's a federal worker.
	I mean, she's an interested party already, but whatever.
	In theory, you know, people should be allowed to petition the courts.
	Although also, in theory, $600 million class-action lawsuits for a protest limited to Parliament Hill should get tossed with costs.
	And we've got M. Sidloy says, Two frites in the House.
	Shabbat shalom to you both.
	Thank you very much, Sidloy.
	Sidloy.
	Oh, my goodness.
	Yeah, that's my bro.
	That's my bro.
	That's one of them.
	I've pulled him into the...
	He thinks he's going to get me away from swearing.
	Dude's going to be cussing like a sailor in two years when he realizes just how far the corruption goes down.
	Oh, all right.
	Now, stop sharing the screen.
	I'm going to bring up the next story of the day.
	Let me see.
	What do we want to do here?
	We've got...
	I wanted to start with a video of Brandon Strzok.
	I'm going to end with it before we go over to locals because it'll actually make people feel good because it's funny.
	Oh, no.
	We have one more Canadian story.
	We have one more Canadian story.
	It's going to make you puke.
	I talked about it in Locals exclusively yesterday.
	But I have to put it on blast.
	The blast of all blasts.
	So that everybody out there should know just how far we are falling as a society and our institutions are falling.
	People say out there, our institutions need protection.
	When the institutions protect themselves, that is corruption.
	That is tyranny, communism, whatever you want to call it.
	When the institutions are protecting themselves, you've got a problem.
	Institutions typically are protected by or upheld by the trust that the people have in them.
	And when people no longer have trust in the institutions and the institutions need to protect themselves, that's a symptom of the problem, not the solution to it.
	Okay.
	With that said, as a precursor to what I'm going to talk about now.
	Did I talk about this yesterday?
	Am I going totally crazy?
	Chat, did I talk about Juno Beach Center on Rumble yesterday?
	Let me see.
	I'm going to just go to the chat.
	I think I didn't.
	I'm fairly certain that I didn't.
	But, chat, let me know.
	I'm going to refresh here because I don't see the comments.
	Did I talk about...
	The Juno Beach yesterday.
	I got Kenzie Says No.
	Good.
	Let's talk about this.
	Okay.
	Now I have to go to the screen.
	This is going to make you puke.
	It's going to make you puke in your mouth.
	I covered the Tamara Leach trial yesterday.
	We had Robert Krejcik from Rebel News who's attending the trial every day of the week.
	Juno Beach Center.
	Before we get into what they said, let's get into...
	Who they are.
	Can I close this without seeing it?
	Oh, son of a bee sting.
	Hold on one second.
	They make it hard.
	They make it hard because you have to go to...
	You have to be logged in in order to be able to navigate when you're in Juneau Beach Center.
	Right here.
	Here.
	Let me grab this.
	Because you need to see who they are before you can understand the pure outrage of what they've done.
	Stop screen.
	Let's go here.
	Juno Beach Centre.
	This is it.
	Okay.
	Juno Beach Centre.
	Discover Canada's Second World War Museum in Normandy, France, en français.
	It's Canada's Normandy...
	Sorry, it's Canada's World War II museum.
	Set up...
	To commemorate, to celebrate the heroism of the Canadian men and women and the men and women of the world who fought, bled and died to preserve freedom as we knew it.
	They bled and they died on the beaches of Normandy to preserve freedom for the rest of us.
	That's the Juno Center.
	Juno Center comes out with a tweet yesterday or a statement.
	A statement that nobody asked for, that they didn't have to put out, but that they did.
	And you tell me what you think about this statement.
	Juno Beach Center, the museum commemorating the brave men and women who died in World War II to preserve the freedom of the West, of the allied nations.
	Juno Beach Center.
	A brief statement from Juno Beach Center regarding recent posts on X, formerly Twitter, mentioning...
	Our institution.
	Someone mentioned our institution?
	We have to dissociate ourselves from them, from that rubbish.
	Who was it?
	Oh, good question.
	It has come to our attention that an individual has used her past relationship with the Juneau Beach Center to spread political messaging on this platform, contrary to the values established by our founding veterans.
	I want to be able to fold the middle toe on my feet to give you four middle fingers.
	Not the institution, the Twitter account.
	Whoever thought this was right.
	We have blocked and removed the account from our followers.
	The Juno Beach Center does not support Tamara Leach or the Freedom Convoy.
	This would be the Babylon Bee level satire if it weren't written.
	And I swear to you, by the way, I read this and I'm like, no.
	This has to be satire.
	I can't.
	It's not satire.
	The Juno Beach Center, with a museum on the beach of Normandy, France, says, we do not support Tamara Leach, who was out there protesting for our constitutional rights that those men and women died for, bled for, sacrificed their bodies in order to uphold and protect.
	We do not support Tamara Leach or the, quote, freedom conflict.
	Can you imagine?
	The audacity it takes to make that tweet.
	The lack of insight it takes to make that tweet.
	And I, you know, it's an amazing thing.
	If there were to be corruption there, let's just say it doesn't make sense that an institution founded to commemorate the men and women who fought, bled, sacrificed their bodies and lives for to defend our freedom during World War II.
	It doesn't make sense that they would make a tweet like that.
	If there were to be corruption in there, insidious, wink-wink, nudge-nudge corruption, what would it look like?
	Money corrupts?
	And it probably might have to do with money.
	So I just have to go look here.
	Let me see how many...
	Okay, good enough.
	Hey, Juno Beach Center, did Justin Trudeau's government threaten to withdraw your funding unless you disavowed Tamara Leach?
	How does it feel to have gone from representing people who died fighting tyranny to being a willing executioner for the tyrant?
	I went...
	Where did I get this from?
	I think I got this from their own documents.
	Yeah, I did here.
	Juno Beach Center Association, strategic plan 2021 to 2025.
	Look at this.
	Funding.
	Hey, remember when Minister of Heritage Pablo Rodriguez comes out and says, hey, Meta, Google, you're not going to pay the link tax, mofos?
	We're gonna cut our advertising to you.
	Oh, what's that?
	Our government advertising to Meta and Google represents like one-tenth of one percent and it doesn't matter, so they're gonna tell us to piss off and not give links to news outlets and cut us off in Canada?
	Well, that didn't go as planned, although it certainly did.
	Oh, there are some outlets for whom $500,000 will make or break a budget.
	Not for Google, not for Meta, but it's certainly a little easier with smaller institutions that rely on government funding.
	The Juno Beach Center is funded through revenue from its ticket and boutique sales in addition to vigorous fundraising activities executed by the JBCA, the Juno Beach Center Association.
	Additional funding is provided through an annual grant of $500,000 from Veterans Affairs Canada, VAC.
	In 2020, Veterans Affairs Canada approved special COVID relief funding of $500,000 over two years.
	Oh, isn't that convenient?
	Isn't that interesting?
	$500,000 a year from Veterans Affairs Canada.
	And for those of you who don't know, Veterans Affairs Canada.
	What is Veterans Affairs Canada?
	Oh, look at that.
	Would you look at that?
	What does it say?
	Where does it say what it is?
	Come on, tell me about.
	Where's the aboot?
	That's on the side.
	Veterans Affairs Canada is the department within the government of Canada with responsibility for pensions, benefits, and services for war veterans, retired and still serving members of the Canadian Armed Forces and Royal Canadian Mounted Police, their families, as well as some civilians.
	That's what Veterans Affairs Canada is.
	It's a part of Trudeau's government.
	Oh, look at that!
	Veterans of...
	The Juneau Beach Centre, reliant on $500,000 a year from the government, comes out and disavows not just Tamara Leach, the Freedom Convoy itself, the veterans who were there, shoveling the snow, salting the sidewalks, getting the shit kicked out of them by Trudeau's government.
	The Juneau Beach Centre disavows the Freedom Convoy.
	Oh my goodness.
	I no longer need to believe in hell because the hell is that which is created by...
	I won't say demons.
	Hell is that which is created by the unscrupulous on earth.
	Atrocious.
	Hope you're proud.
	So that's the end of Canada.
	Sorry, that's the end of the Canadian content for the day.
	But maybe even it's a Freudian slip.
	Okay.
	I said hypocrisy, scoundrelism, and overall disgusting politicians were going to be the theme of the day if it's not going to be the theme of my channel.
	Oh my goodness.
	Here.
	Don't read the comment until I play the video.
	I'm sure you've all seen this.
	Maybe you haven't.
	This is Eric Adams.
	This is new.
	This is the same Eric Adams, by the way.
	Who was shipping migrants to the Canadian-New York border.
	Buying them bus tickets and shipping illegal immigrants to the border of Canada so they could cross from New York into...
	I think it's Quebec.
	I'm pretty sure it's Quebec.
	It is Quebec.
	I'm sorry.
	Michigan borders with Ontario.
	Eric Adams, mayor of New York City.
	Sanctuary City.
	Mayor of Sanctuary City, New York City.
	How it started?
	How it's going.
	And 10,000 migrants.
	Still sticking with the term migrants, not illegal immigrants, but illegal immigrants is offensive.
	Alien, which is used, as far as I understand, under certain laws, offensive.
	Unemployment insurance.
	Offensive.
	Let's call the insurance that you pay in the event that you're unemployed or get fired or have to quit.
	Let's call that unemployment insurance.
	Employment insurance.
	Let's call illegal aliens.
	Let's call illegal immigrants breaking the law to cross the border into a foreign country.
	Let's call them migrants.
	If you watched yesterday, let's call them unvetted non-taxpayers.
	Let's not use words in their ordinary, plain and accurate terms and then complain about what happens when thought itself is skewed.
	Let's start again and just play it uninterrupted.
	110,000 migrants.
	Spoiler alert, I'm not going to be able to play this without interfering.
	We have to feed, clothe, house, educate the children, wash their laundry sheets.
	Wash their laundry sheets?
	I seem to recall Tucker Carlson being called a white supremacist racist for saying that, go look at the streets, the streets are dirtier where this is happening.
	I remember him being called a racist white supremacist, demonized ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
	I don't even know if those are the right words.
	Demonized.
	You got Eric Adams saying, we gotta wash their laundry?
	I'm sorry, that just sounds like a polite way of saying they're making a mess and we literally have to clean up their mess.
	Wash their laundry.
	And the undignity of it.
	We have to wash these migrants' laundry?
	Give them everything they need.
	Healthcare.
	And this team here, we stated, let's do everything possible before we have to push it out into neighborhoods and communities.
	Push it out into neighborhoods and communities.
	We're a sanctuary city and now you're sanctuary neighborhoods.
	Like it or not?
	Month after month, I stood up and I said, this is going to come to a neighborhood near you.
	Well, that sounds like you're saying this problem, it's a problem and it's going to spread.
	This is very white nationalist of you, Eric Adams.
	Very racist.
	We're here.
	We're here.
	We're getting no support on this national crisis.
	And we're receiving no support.
	And let me tell you something, New Yorkers.
	Tell it to us.
	Never in my life have I had a problem that I did not see an end into.
	I don't see an end into this.
	Oh, geez, Louise.
	It's almost like some people were saying this for years.
	Build the wall.
	Oh, my goodness.
	That's racist.
	Now we don't have...
	Now Eric Adams, Nostradamus, doesn't see an end to this problem.
	Geez, Luis, maybe if you had spent a little time listening seven years ago.
	Oh, now I don't see an end to this problem.
	How did this happen?
	Stick the spoke in the front wheel of the bike meme inserted now.
	I don't see an ending to this.
	This issue will destroy New York City.
	Oh.
	Destroy New York City.
	That's not very nice to say.
	We're getting 10,000 migrants a month.
	One time we were just getting Venezuela.
	Now we get Ecuador.
	Now we get Russian speaking coming through Mexico.
	Whoa, whoa, whoa.
	You're getting Russian speaking.
	Shut the borders down.
	Jeez, you know, the only way I think Democrats would shut the border, if Republican voters were crossing the border.
	Then they shut the border down.
	You know, so they give them the Cuban treatment.
	Now we're getting Western Africa.
	Now we're getting people from all over the globe have made their minds up that they're going to come through the southern part of the border and come into New York City.
	No shit, Sherlock.
	It's almost like everything that some person was saying for the last seven years has come to fruition.
	Oh, and now you want extra credit for coming to the party seven years late?
	The person that you've called racist for coming down those steps and saying they're not sending their best?
	Kind of sounds like you're saying the exact same thing, racist, white nationalist, white supremacist Eric Adams.
	You're saying the exact same bloody thing.
	But there's no mean tweets, so maybe you get a pass.
	And everyone is saying it's New York City's problem.
	Every community in this city is going to be impacted.
	We have a $12 billion deficit that we're going to have to cut every service in this city.
	That sounds like a threat.
	Unbelievable.
	It's going to be impacted.
	Look at them nodding in the back, by the way.
	Look at them nodding in the back.
	It's going to be impacted.
	Oh, yeah.
	All of us.
	We failed at our jobs and...
	Now we have a bigger problem that we're going to have to manage, so trust us to manage the bigger problem that results from our own stupidity and incompetence to begin with?
	Holy crabapples!
	Is government the only place where you can fail upwards to this degree?
	And so I say to you, as I turn it over to you, this is some of the most educated, some of the most knowledgeable, probably more of my commissioners and deputy commissioners and chiefs live in this community.
	So as you ask me a question about migrants, tell me what role you played.
	How many of you organized to stop what they're doing to us?
	To stop what they're doing to us.
	Jeez, it almost sounds like he's talking like an invasion.
	We're part of the movement to say, we're seeing what this mayor is trying to do, and they're destroying New York City.
	It's going to come to your neighborhoods.
	All of us are going to be impacted by this.
	I said it last year when we had 15,000.
	Oh, say it now.
	I'm telling you now, with 110,000, the city we knew we're about to lose.
	The city we knew is about to lose.
	We're about to lose.
	I forget exactly.
	Can you believe it?
	And...
	He's 1,000% right.
	He's just seven years late.
	He's just a raging, godforsaken hypocrite for having demonized the person who was saying this seven years ago.
	And not even in more eloquent terms than Eric Adams.
	The city that we knew is going to be over.
	Well, my goodness, that's actually a little worse than Trump saying they're not sending their best.
	I said it when there were 15,000.
	Now I'm saying it when there's 100.
	I'm sorry.
	Were you not a self-declared sanctuary city?
	Did you not think this through?
	Do you think that your virtue is a currency to pay for your virtue?
	Oh, that's good, actually.
	I'm going to write that down.
	I got something in my eye.
	And now, by the way, he says that.
	And people, instead of getting angry at the problem, get angry at the people who are saying, holy crap, he's finally admitting the problem.
	None other than...
	Mehdi Hassan, the propagandist for the destruction itself.
	MSNBC.
	Enemy of the people.
	Enemy of the people in the most literal, truest, and clearest of the senses had this amazingly insightful tweet.
	I have seen the Eric Adams clip claiming migrants will destroy New York City.
	It is awful.
	There is a reason why Republicans and far-right folks are gleefully sharing it.
	The problem is not that Eric Adams is right.
	The problem is not that there's a massive problem that maybe Mehdi Hassan, I don't know how much he gets paid in a year.
	I'm going to check that in a second.
	Maybe it doesn't affect him.
	I saw a tweet the other day.
	It said something to the effect of, it seems like a lot of people are less interested in solving the problems than just interested in making sure that they have enough money to ensure that the problems don't affect them.
	Mehdi Hassan, we're all in this together, my ass.
	You're not in this.
	And you don't care about the suffering of the people who are going to suffer at the hands of these policies.
	And so you come out and you don't get enraged at the problem.
	You don't get enraged at the policy.
	You don't even get enraged at Eric Adams for saying it.
	Your rage is that Republicans are sharing it gleefully.
	They're the ones at fault here.
	New York Dems could have had Maya Wiley as mayor, but they went for the ridiculous Adams.
	A Trump knockoff.
	Oh, they didn't go for Adams because he was a Trump knockoff when they elected him.
	But notice the deflection.
	The problem is not the problem.
	The problem is not the reality that Eric Adams, the mayor, is observing and lamenting.
	The problem is that he's a Trump knockoff.
	He's saying mean things.
	And the problem is that Republicans are so awful.
	Such scornful people that they're sharing the...
	Roosters, chickens coming home to roost of the policy that they were warning about for the last seven years.
	Let me just see something here.
	Mehdi Hassan Salary?
	I don't know if we're going to see this.
	I don't see how much.
	Yeah, this cannot be...
	These things are wildly inaccurate.
	Goodbye.
	I'll look it up afterwards.
	Yeah, no, so that's it.
	That's...
	That's the Mehdi Hasan.
	The problem is not the problem.
	The problem is people reacting to the problem.
	And it's very nice.
	It's going to affect everybody in New York City as if crime is not already the problem, as if the subways are not already a disaster, as if the city is not already overwhelmed.
	The so-called sanctuary city now feeling what it means to be a sanctuary city, who for the last however many years have been telling Texas...
	It's your problem.
	Deal with it.
	We don't shut away people who are looking for a better life, even if they're coming here illegally and even if, you know, the consequences are what we're seeing in New York.
	Hypocrites, scoundrels, and liars.
	Thy name are politicians.
	Okay.
	Oh, you know, let's just bring up another one just to talk about it.
	This was Tulsi Gabbard on Joe Rogan.
	Haven't gotten through the whole thing yet.
	Listen to BJ Penn, Tulsi Gabbard on Rogan earlier this week.
	Listen to this.
	Talking about the Lahaina fires.
	Talking about corruption, incompetence, and criminality of the highest order.
	Criminal negligence is criminality.
	And that's criminal negligence if one wants to believe it was negligence and not by design.
	Listen to this.
	And then says he wants to take the land for the state.
	That's his first word.
	Now this is one of the reasons why we want to talk about this.
	How is that possible?
	That these people could lose their home and then lose their land.
	How is that possible?
	It is the number one concern of people there in Lahaina, is that a few days after this happened, I haven't spoken to the governor, but he said in a press conference, he said, we're talking to the attorney general, he said, I'm talking to my attorney general to explore options for the state to take over.
	That land and use it to build workforce housing or build a memorial for the people who lost their lives.
	Or if it's just toxic, declare it like a toxic site that has to be cleaned up by the government and expropriated by the government.
	Can you imagine?
	Tulsi says it's unconscionable.
	It's criminal.
	But the fears that the people in Lahaina have.
	Some of whom, like Archie Kalapa, famous surfer, community leader, Native Hawaiian leader, his family has lived in Lahaina for nine generations.
	Now being told, well, the state, the governor is looking at taking that land, taking ownership of that land.
	Nope.
	It is unconscionable.
	By the way, let the behavior panel...
	Let the behavior panel analyze this.
	There's seething rage in Tulsi Gabbard as she said that.
	Look at this.
	It is unconscionable.
	I want to impress the behavior panel.
	Look at her eyebrows.
	It is unconscionable.
	And there's, oh, you know, for those who've been displaced, we'll see about doing a landslap and we'll send you to the Big Island to live in Puna.
	Jesus.
	Taking away the sovereignty of people's rights to have a say over their home, in many cases, their generational lands, is such an abuse of power.
	And I'm glad that there are leaders in the community who are leaning into this fight to make sure that they are fighting this fight before anybody tries to do that, rather than looking in the rearview mirror and saying, gosh, I wish we had done something.
	A governor going on television after a massive tragedy where you have, we don't even know the number of people.
	They haven't buried the bodies because they haven't recovered the bodies.
	They haven't given a number count on the bodies.
	They haven't updated that number.
	But they're talking about grabbing your land.
	You have this massive area that's been burned to the ground.
	And then he starts talking about taking it over for the state.
	That's an insane position to take.
	And if you dare ask any questions about it, then they label you a conspiracy theorist.
	A far-right extremist conspiracy theorist.
	Holy crap, it almost sounds like you're trying to exploit the consequences of your own criminal negligence.
	Post-tragedy.
	When people are suffering at their most, they can't even believe it happened.
	And then all of a sudden he's saying, We're going to take it for the state and make a memorial?
	How about give the fucking people their homes back?
	I like Joe Rogan.
	You imagine, the fires, arguably, but not so arguably, started by, call it criminal negligence or incompetence or, you know, of Hawaii Electric.
	We don't yet know if the power lines were shut down and if the original fires had started from these decrepit power lines.
	Collapsing, even though they all knew that they were antiquated.
	Susceptible being blown over in high winds.
	Arguably criminal negligence.
	Whether or not the forest fire started as a result of that.
	Some people think it did.
	So set aside, you have massive corporate negligence at best.
	Criminal negligence at worst.
	Outright criminality, I guess, is the ultimate worst.
	The disaster exacerbated by government incompetence.
	Not sounding the alarms.
	Not allowing water to flow so they could put out The fires.
	Arguable criminal negligence at the hands of the government.
	And then after all that, they say, thank you for your death.
	Thank you for your destruction.
	We're going to take that land now.
	I'm sorry we burnt your house down and killed your children through our gross negligence, criminal negligence, however else you want to call it.
	Now we're going to have to go ahead and take your property.
	It's atrocious.
	It's atrocious.
	And the more you learn about what happened in Lehena and the more you know of history, the more that it makes sense in the most sinister possible manner.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Maybe there's a silver lining.
	Let's do a little bit of a silver lining.
	I made the joke, you know, like 10 years ago or in 2008.
	In 2008, they were doing Dave After the Dentist remixes.
	In 2007, they did Leave Britney Alone remix.
	Leave Britney Alone!
	They would do like dubstep remixes.
	In 2008, there was Dave After the Dentist and they did an amazing year.
	It was just, it was the trending thing.
	Remixes of Dave After the Dentist.
	2010 was the Double Rainbow guy.
	2012, the coming, hide your wife, hide your kids.
	Antoine Dodson interview that they, you know.
	The thing, the rage, the trend was remixing those interviews.
	We're now in 2023 where the trend, the social movement, if you think it's gotten there, is now remixing Oliver Anthony's The Rich Men North of Richmond song.
	This is the second or third one I've seen in the last week.
	And they're amazing.
	Trump Latinos' Rich Men North of...
	I want to play this because...
	When there are people out there disagreeing as to whether or not, you know, what percentage of more of minority votes are going to go to Trump this time around if he, you know, survives the other corruption, which we're going to get to in a second.
	And people say, yeah, those are widely, you know, Trump's going to do no better now than he did in 2020.
	And in 2020, he only did, what did he do, like 50% better than he did in 2016.
	There seems to be something of a grassroots social...
	Trending movement going as evidenced by the remixes of these songs.
	listen to this one.
	Oh, it is.
	Listen in the day.
	I love my country because I'm blessed with my freedom.
	Ukraine got rich.
	But Hawaii really needs us.
	Got a devil in the White House.
	I'm gonna pause it there actually just for one second.
	You know that when they accidentally forgot or you know I don't know how they accidentally forgot sent too much or realized they had five or six billion more dollars to send to Ukraine they've sent a hundred and on the Rogan show they said it was up to 135 billion last I checked it was 113 billion after the Lahaina fires they're asking for however many more billion they could rebuild every single destroyed home for five billion dollars on Hawaii but No, that would be taking care of your own citizens first.
	That would almost be like what Eric Adams is complaining about out of New York.
	No, they've got to send over $100 billion to fund death and destruction in a proxy war overseas.
	We'll get to the end so you can see it.
	We'll be right back.
	I'll share the link so that you can all go.
	I don't want to play the entire thing because you got to go watch it.
	It's on Twitter, but I think that's only a portion of it.
	It's not even the whole song.
	Here, let me give you the link.
	No, there seems to be something of like social media, but who knows?
	Maybe I spend too much time in Twitter so that I think that it's more impactful in the real world than it actually is.
	I don't think I'm wrong.
	However...
	Oh, lordy, lordy.
	Let's see here.
	I haven't been here in a while.
	Okay, I'm going to go to the chat for a second and just see what's going on in the chat.
	People talk a lot and do very little.
	Most don't even know who their congressman is.
	That's from C130Herc66.
	Dogdigger says, thanks, David.
	Oprah asking me to send money.
	I live on an army disability budget.
	That is Michael77 or Michael77.
	It's outrageous.
	IrishMarine57 says, what we need is a landslide victory across the country for Trump.
	We need to move past these weirdos.
	We need to move these weirdos out of power and take our government back peacefully and patriotically.
	And I...
	Agree with that, Irish Marine 57. And I've got to tell you, I'm getting real frustrated trying to have discussions with people on Twitter as to why they need to understand that if they succeed with Trump, it doesn't end with Trump.
	And I tweeted at Ian Miles Chong because now they've just announced they're going to, what did they say, a grand jury in Georgia has recommended an indictment against...
	Here we go, right here.
	Grand jury, a Georgia panel urged criminal charges against Lindsey Graham and other Trump allies.
	This is from date and time today, this morning.
	Former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and former Senators, sorry, David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler were also among those who were recommended for indictments.
	Can you understand what the fuck is going on?
	Sorry, my wife said yesterday she heard me swearing through the door.
	Can you understand what's going on?
	It doesn't start and it doesn't end.
	Let me rephrase.
	It starts with Trump and it ends with any and every political adversary who is a genuine political threat to the powers.
	I mean, I'm having discussions privately with people.
	They don't understand it.
	Well, Trump, you know, Trump, it's too much.
	There's too much baggage with Trump.
	Just put someone else at it.
	Who?
	Like Lindsey Graham?
	Oh, well, now go indict Lindsey Graham.
	He can't run for president.
	Go indict Abbott.
	He won't be able to run for president.
	Go indict DeSantis.
	He won't run for president.
	I actually had a discussion with someone on Twitter who said, oh, I'm sure with that Martha's Vineyard, I'm sure DeSantis is a lawyer.
	He had to have covered his butt properly.
	He's smart.
	And I'm like, I don't want to call everybody an idiot, but you naive, young, wet-behind-the-ears individual.
	You don't have to even have committed a crime in order to be indicted and convicted in a politically biased, weaponized, prosecutorial justice system.
	There is no covering your ass hard enough.
	The only reason they're not going to come after you is if they don't want to come after you.
	Flew those migrants over to Martha's Vineyard.
	He made sure that he could never be indicted by a DC grand jury on charges of human trafficking, fraudulent misrepresentations, kidnapping.
	I'm sure he made sure that that couldn't possibly happen.
	Trump just didn't commit his crimes properly enough.
	You don't understand.
	You'll never understand at this point.
	Let's see what the charges are against Lindsey Graham.
	A special grand jury convened by Georgia prosecutors recommended criminal indictments of Senator Lindsey Graham and a slew of other allies of Donald Trump who have not been charged by Fulton District United Foundation.
	According to reports, the grand jury, which led a year-long investigation of efforts to subvert the 2020 election in Georgia, helped Willis compile a massive trove of evidence that she used to secure a sprawling indictment last month against Trump and 18 other.
	Co-conspirators, alleged co-conspirators.
	We went through that indictment.
	A steaming pile of judicial dog shit is what I call it.
	But the special grand jury report, which was filed in December, but had been largely kept confidential until Friday, shows that a majority of the panel urged her to indict a much wider array of figures linked to the effort.
	Oh, so either Fannie didn't do it because it would have been a step too far.
	Good for Fannie is going to be the spin.
	It shows you what a load of shit the grand jury is in that case in the first place.
	Lindsey Graham, David Perdue, Kelly Loeffler, I don't know who they are quite as much, Boris Epstein.
	I think he had some stuff seized about him recently.
	I forget.
	The special grand jury, a quirk of Georgia law, had no power to issue indictments but was required to make recommendations to Willis, who then pursued charges through a traditional grand jury.
	Trump and other 18 defendants who were indicted were all on the list identified by the special grand jury.
	The newly released report indicates that there was some dissent among the 23 special grand jurors and three alternates assigned to hear the case.
	The panel Divided its probe into seven categories of alleged crimes.
	Let's see here.
	Skip over this crap.
	Okay, seven jurors dissented from the recommendation to indict Graham, and six opposed indicting Loeffler.
	A large majority of the jurors favored bringing fraud charges against most of the GOP activists who posed as false electors, alternate electors, not false electors.
	But never let facts get in the way of a good narrative.
	But the panel split evenly on whether many of those same would-be electors should be accused of joining a racketeer This is like absolute political mayhem.
	It's absolute political mayhem and people don't understand.
	This is not weaponizing.
	This is not bastardizing.
	We're well beyond that.
	This is the destruction of institutions from within.
	In each of those votes, one juror recommended against a Trump indictment and a few of those votes also drew one and three abstentions.
	It's unclear if Willis will seek indictments against some of the figures who have not yet been charged.
	She has called for a trial of Trump in the end.
	Okay, fine.
	The special jury recommended charges against Graham, Perdue and Loeffler among dozens of others.
	It's almost like it's no longer a jury of your peers.
	It's an execution of politically motivated citizens.
	I mean, it's like it's nothing more than judicial execution.
	Oh, in their role in a national effort to overturn the 2020 election.
	You cannot petition the government.
	You cannot avail yourselves to constitutional remedies.
	You have to sit there, shut your face, and say, yes, the elections were clean and kosher, even though we all admit...
	They censored the Hunter Biden story.
	And if that were the only thing that they did and it wasn't, that would have been enough to falsify the results, the will of the people as relates to that election.
	It's unclear precisely what facts the panel based its recommendations on.
	That presupposes there were any.
	And the document doesn't elaborate on the rationale behind any findings.
	Here's the rationale behind the findings.
	It's a kangaroo court.
	This is judicial assassination of a political candidate.
	And people don't understand it.
	They somehow think they won't come for me.
	Oh, DeSantis is smart.
	He didn't do anything illegally.
	He covered his ass.
	Sure, they won't come for me.
	They will come for DeSantis.
	They will come for Abbott.
	They will come for Vivek.
	I made the joke.
	Erwin Schroyer.
	Or, what's his name?
	Owen Schroyer, not Erwin.
	Owen Schroyer.
	They're now asking for him to go to jail because he made a speech.
	Because he was chanting 1776 on January 6th.
	Hey, once 1776 becomes indictable speech, they'll come after Vivek.
	Indictment for encouraging insurrection.
	This is our 1776 moment.
	Inciting insurrection.
	Indict Vivek.
	You no longer have Vivek.
	DeSantis, indict him.
	No longer.
	Hey, you know who you're left with?
	Chris Christie.
	They sure as hell will not indict Chris Christie.
	Why?
	Because he's doing their bidding for them.
	He's playing their ball.
	They will never indict Chris Christie.
	Anybody who doesn't play ball, they will indict.
	And if they don't indict someone, at some point in time, you can pretty much safely assume that's because they're playing ball.
	So that's the latest there.
	Yeah, they wanted the grand jury, the special grand jury.
	They were prepared to indict Lindsey Graham.
	Just indict all of them!
	Indict all of them, take them all out of power.
	And the spin is going to be, Fannie Willis is so ethical and she's so not corrupt that she stood up to that grand jury, that special grand jury, and she said, no, the evidence is not there for Lindsey Graham.
	It's only there for Trump, Jenna Ellis, Jeff Clark, Rudy Giuliani, and 16 other lawyers, or a number of other lawyers.
	Oh my goodness.
	It's an amazing thing.
	It's almost how...
	Like, it's almost 4D level chess as to how they're going to legitimize the illegitimacy by not having gone with the absolute absurd extremism.
	You know, oh, now they're talking about indicting Hunter Biden, which is just pressing the criminal charges based on what he was already charged with.
	Oh, they're going to indict.
	Word is they're going to indict.
	Hunter Biden.
	And that just shows you that there's no political preference in the system.
	So would they indict Hunter Biden for tax fraud, for felonious lying on a firearm application and felonious disposal of a firearm?
	Well, that's just even-handed justice because they're going after him and Trump at the same time.
	So it's totally legit.
	It's like they legitimized their insanity by not having gone along with the absurd insanity on steroids.
	It's a very interesting tactic.
	People might want to pay attention to it.
	Sigh
	Yeah.
	Great piece on PJ.
	Why are the Proud Boys getting longer sentences than murderers?
	They're really bad because they're really bad.
	Because seditious conspiracy convictions, if the jury could even explain what the hell that is, that's more serious than taking someone's life.
	I'm not going to read the whole thing.
	I'll just share it because it's a good article.
	Who wrote it?
	PJ Media.
	Rick Moran.
	Let's see here.
	On Tuesday, a federal judge sentenced Proud Boys Enrique Tarrio to 22 years in jail.
	Wasn't there.
	He wasn't there, but the idiots online, the boot-licking blue check marks.
	Well, Charles Manson wasn't there either for his crimes.
	Yeah, except murder for hire is a little bit different than seditious conspiracy for hire.
	Murder for hire.
	Oh, by the way, Charles Manson, I'm pretty sure he was at the crime scene for at least another separate set of murders.
	But he certainly allegedly returned to the crime scene the next day with the murderers.
	And he certainly told them, inspired them, instructed them to commit murder.
	There's a wild difference between the brutal murder of six people at the direction of and in concert with an out-of-his-mind madman.
	Murder for hire is a lot different than someone telling people to commit seditious conspiracy or plotting to commit seditious conspiracy.
	They're just a little different in nature and tenor, but don't let that get in the way of a good narrative.
	22 years.
	He was nowhere near Washington that day.
	He was in Baltimore after being arrested on separate charges.
	However, Tarrio tweeted out support for the riot and claimed credit after the fact.
	You know who else did that?
	Ray Epps.
	You know what he got?
	Not even charged.
	I organized it.
	He tweeted that out to his kid after the event.
	He was there.
	He encouraged it.
	He promoted it the day before.
	He was there on site the day of.
	Entering restricted areas the day of.
	Tweeted out to his nephew or kid, I forget which.
	After the protest, I orchestrated it.
	You know what he's facing?
	Nothing as of now.
	The common sentence for first-degree murder is 20 years.
	Why did Tarrio get 22 years?
	When he wasn't even at the physical location of the riot, other Proud Boys and Oath Keepers also received long sentences.
	classes.
	What are they calling it?
	The trial penalty.
	Go read the article.
	We don't need to go into this any longer.
	I talked about it with Julie Kelly and posted a number of the highlights.
	You know what it is?
	It's...
	Letting everybody know, fuck around in 2024 and you'll go to jail for 20 years.
	That's what it is.
	Oh no, but they'll never do that to me.
	They'll never do that if I just have a peaceful protest like we had in Canada.
	Oh, I'm sorry, what's that?
	Tamara Leach is standing trial now for mischief charges?
	Incitement of mischief and faces 10 years in jail?
	No, they'll never come after me.
	At first they came for the union workers and I said nothing.
	Then they came for the whomever.
	Then they came for the Jews and I said nothing because I wasn't Jewish.
	And then they came for me and there was no one left to say a damn thing.
	History doesn't repeat.
	It tends to rhyme.
	If you learn nothing from history, you are bound to repeat it.
	It is truly evil, says Sefer Dean Squibb.
	It's beyond evil.
	They are stealing people's lives.
	Oh no, but at least they're not killing them.
	They are, first of all, at least for the defendants, committed suicide.
	They are killing them directly and internally.
	They are stealing their lives.
	That's just a slow, it's a slow murder.
	And it's atrocious.
	And Vivek is the only one calling it out.
	And as much as I respect DeSantis, I don't think I've heard him say anything about pardoning the January Sixers.
	Chris Christie, my goodness, he's frothing at the mouth.
	He loves this.
	Every sentence that comes down that steals a man's life, every indictment that comes down against Trump, that brings Chris Christie, the deep state bootlicker, one step closer in his mind to the presidency.
	Now, that was a loud noise that happened upstairs.
	Let me just hear if I hear crying right after.
	Nope, I hear walking.
	We're fine.
	Oh, so that's it.
	Do we do the Liberty Safe before we go over to Rumble?
	Thevivabarneslaw.locals.com Yeah, we'll do this here because actually it's the type of work that deserves to be shared.
	This is from Jordan Schachtel's Substack.
	So this is an amazing story.
	Everyone's been talking about it.
	We're going to talk about it in greater detail Sunday.
	Tim Poole did a piece on this.
	This, apparently, Black Rifle Coffee-type safe company, which sold itself as being, you know, freedom-oriented.
	Well, apparently they were not, never were, were owned by some EID, whatever the hell that is, DEI, D-I-E, ESG company, and apparently just, you know, forked over backdoor entry to safes to the FBI, which allowed for the seizure of some assets of a January 6th defendant.
	Covered it in his sub stack.
	Why did I come here?
	I came here to share the link with everybody.
	That's what I came here for.
	Sorry.
	Here.
	We'll just go through it real quick, and then I'm going to save a couple of stories for our vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Yeah, that's what we are.
	vivabarneslaw.locals.com afterparty, where I will take questions.
	I will do it.
	We'll do an AMA, and it won't be based on tipped questions.
	I will get to the tipped questions, but it will be an open AMA.
	So long as no one asks truly private and embarrassing questions.
	There's the link to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	So come on over.
	Liberty Safe, owned by a woke private equity firm, assists feds in tyrannical overreach and mistakenly exposes ideological Potemkin Village.
	I need to look up what Potemkin Village means.
	I'm going to have to express my ignorance.
	What's up, sir?
	I got a wallet.
	You got a wallet?
	Okay, do you mind sharing?
	Do you want to share it with the world?
	Hold on, hold on.
	Okay.
	Kid got a wallet.
	I don't know why he got a wallet.
	He's got no money.
	Let's see here.
	Oh, I got $20.
	Oh, he got $20 too.
	Kid got a wallet.
	That's a cool wallet.
	And I'm going to have to take that from you.
	Thank you.
	Daddy!
	I'm joking.
	Take it and get out of here.
	That's a cool wallet.
	Okay, get out, get out.
	I'm not done yet.
	When are you done?
	20 minutes.
	Get out.
	Go.
	Don't make me tell him to get in here and get you.
	Go.
	Get out.
	Alright, let's bring back that story here.
	Okay.
	Kid got a wallet with a $100 bill on it.
	So the whole story details how Liberty Safe sold itself, you know, like a black rifle coffee type company, to liberty-minded...
	I will say conservative, freedom-loving Americans.
	And it turns out it's the exact opposite.
	Continue reading.
	FBI raided the home last week of Nathan Hughes, a resident of Fayetteville, Arkansas, after charging him with nonviolent allegations related to his presence at the January 6, 2001 Capitol riot.
	No, 2020, 2021.
	I found a typo.
	So I can always find other people's typos.
	I can never find my own.
	Hughes is charged with misdemeanor offenses of entering and remaining in restricted building or grounds, disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds, and impeding passage through the Capitol grounds or buildings, the FBI press release said last week.
	You know who was not charged for that?
	Ray Epps.
	I might have to put that on a shirt.
	All right.
	So Hughes has a fundraiser.
	You can go check it out.
	And then lo and behold, it turns out that this company was bought and owned by...
	Okay, so the company they were bought by Monomy celebrated their addition to the top of the ESG index, adding that the company is proud signatories to the UN's principle for responsible investment.
	What the fuck is this?
	I waited for the kid to be gone before swearing.
	So yeah, it turns out that the company that threw an American citizen under the bus and some of its users of its product was bought out by an ESG DEI.
	Compliant company cooperated with the FBI and provided backdoor entry to information that they probably should never have done.
	So there, that's the link to the sub stack.
	Everybody can go check it out.
	We will undoubtedly talk about it more on Sunday night.
	Now, let me go to the chat here for a few seconds.
	Left to be discussed at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	In the backdrop.
	Hold on.
	We've got the WD-40.
	Madness out of Canada.
	Clyde Do Something.
	Coverage of it.
	Scum of the Earth.
	Jagmeet Singh remix.
	We're going to end with the Brendan Strzok video so that everyone can at least have a bit of a white pill because when we talk about a grassroots movement that I think we're seeing, something of a social media trend that we're seeing now, which is why they're coming after the internet.
	They're coming after free speech.
	They're coming after everything.
	They are trying to criminalize freedom.
	Is the new banner on my Twitter feed.
	Before we go over to Locals to take care of all of that, I'm gonna give everyone the link one more time and see if there's any chat here.
	Link to Locals, come on over.
	Hail Clyde Do Something.
	You know what?
	I'm gonna do that while we have the crowd here because Clyde Do Something also deserves full exposure, full recognition.
	Clyde Do Something has a great video.
	I'm gonna give everyone the tweet to this so you can go find it, support him.
	All aerosols that contain more than 10% volatile organic compounds, VOCs, will be banned in Canada on January 1, 2024.
	Companies will either have to change their formulas or sell them in non-aerosol form.
	I go into it in my video here.
	Let's play a little bit of that.
	That's the link to the tweet, and I'm going to bring up the video so we can watch just a few minutes.
	Twitter refused to connect.
	You know what, this little bastard.
	It's because it's not in...
	Ah, damn it.
	You know, we'll watch the video over in the locals.
	It's because it's not in...
	Twitter doesn't let you, I guess, link when it's in incognito.
	So come on over to there.
	Viva, my niece is attending McGill University.
	Is she safe there, says Irish Marine 57. You're asking a neurotic man with OCD who fears everything, yet on campus, a thousand percent.
	Montreal is still very safe.
	Like I like to say, you know, back when I lived there, there really was no place that you would even be fearful for being at night.
	I don't say the same.
	The same is not true anymore.
	I would personally never attend St. Catherine Street between McGill College and, say, Guy Street.
	St. Catherine is a disgusting cesspool.
	It's disgusting.
	I mean, it used to be disgusting back when I was a kid, like strip clubs and whatever.
	I don't know how safe it is at night anymore.
	Anywhere where there's alcohol and, you know, big crowds.
	Yeah.
	St. Laurent Street, the main, I still think, I mean, I think it's good, but you want to stay out of the north.
	You want to stay out of the east.
	And also, you want to stay out of...
	Stay out of the streets at night.
	Nothing good happens after midnight, and I think I have to update that to nothing good happens after 10 o 'clock.
	But, macho, all things considered is still very safe, and by and large, you can avoid trouble by not doing stupid things.
	McGill is woke as fuck, says Irish.
	TommyGun66.
	You know what's even more woke than McGill?
	Concordia University, where Gadsad teaches.
	Concordia was woke in the year 2000 when I was in university.
	It's on steroids.
	Now, McGill, I think, still has some holdouts.
	Oh, and now Faithless says intellectually safe.
	Maybe not so much.
	What did, um...
	McGill did something that I thought was funny recently.
	Oh, it doesn't matter.
	Okay, so we got, let me see here.
	I work at McGill.
	It's probably funded WEF.
	All the woke stuff is there.
	Oh, yeah.
	Klaus is deep inside Justin, says GDM FSOB.
	Okay, you know what?
	We're going to go to Locals because I think my kid's going to start bothering me here.
	So come on over to Locals and we're going to end with nothing.
	We're doing Brendan Strach and we're going to watch a bit of the Clyde Do Something video on Locals.
	Viva, go stock up on WWD-40 in the USA and have it available for your fellow Canadians if need be.
	More than one way to skin a cat.
	Yeah, I'll do...
	What were they doing at the beginning of the COVID?
	They were...
	People were buying either the tests...
	They were buying something that was needed in order to resell it, and then I think they got screwed with, like, massive quantities of it that they couldn't.
	I do thank everybody for being here.
	Before we go, I will actually say one thing.
	The child has found me.
	Hold on a second.
	Everybody, if you have disposable cash that you don't mind, if you need a shirt and you don't mind...
	You know, they're not the cheapest things on Earth.
	You can get cheap mugs and you can get cheap shot glasses.
	So this is only for those who want to support the channel, who want to own a piece of history.
	Go to VivaFry.com and get your Wanted for President merch.
	It's beautiful.
	Now we're going to end on Rumble.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Sunday night, we've got a great show coming.
	Tuesday night, 9 o 'clock.
	Dave Smith, the comedian, the libertarian, the philosopher.
	9 o 'clock at night.
	Dave Smith.
	How can I almost have forgotten to have announced this?
	Confirmed.
	Dave Smith.
	Do you know how excited I am for this podcast?
	Dave Smith is coming on 9 o 'clock Eastern Time, Tuesday night.
	It's going to be da bomb.
	And now that I think about it, he's not in Florida.
	It's not going to be in person.
	It's going to be digital, but I just thought for a second, maybe we try to do it in person.
	And yeah, Dave Smith confirmed.
	9 o 'clock, Tuesday night.
	Sunday night.
	The stream.
	Saturday, I might try to do a Viva Family video to get away from the decline of the American empire.
	And that's it.
	That is all that we have on the menu.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Head on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com now, and we're going to end the stream here.
	Thank you all.
	Enjoy the weekend.
	Stay sane.
	Stay safe.
	That's patronizing.
	And also, it's not like everybody's running out into danger, although I think I might go try to go skydiving.
	I'm joking.
	Check in on friends and family.
	Talk to people in the real world.
	And don't lose faith.
	But don't rely on blind faith as action.
	Blind faith is not action.
	The Lord loves the working man because the working man makes their own solutions.
	And God helps those who help themselves.
	So be well.
	See you all Sunday if you're not coming over to Locals.
	And peace out, people.
	End stream now.
	Locals!
	Let me see what's going on behind here.
	There's a kid right there.
	Do you want to explain the motif behind your drawing there?

▲