Live with Julie Kelly - Jan. 6 & Trump Indictments! François Amalega - Canadian Tyranny! Viva Frei
|
Time
Text
Afternoon, East Coast.
Good morning, West Coast.
Good evening, Europe.
I started three and a half minutes early.
So people are going to say, what the hell's going on?
I got the notification.
I'm starting early because Julie has a hardout at one o 'clock, which means we're going to have 30 minutes with Julie Kelly to go over well more than 30 minutes of absolute mind-blowing injustice of an insanity.
Mind-blowing injustice of insanity.
And I want to make the most of that 30 minutes.
So we're going to start off earlier than anticipated.
Let people trickle in because they're going to get the notification in panic.
And I'm going to do the sponsor right off the bat.
It's actually going to work out perfectly for everybody.
Before bringing in Julie at 1230.
So what do we have now?
It's 1227 and change.
Julie Kelly, we're going to talk January 6 convictions.
They are excessive beyond any measure of political bias.
Julie Kelly is going to be out at 1 o 'clock.
François Amelaga is going to come on at about 1.15, give or take.
We're going to go to Rumble for that.
Follow up on François Amelaga, see what's going on in the batshit crazy asylum of Quebec and Canada.
Not that the rest of the world is much better.
And that's what we're going to do.
But I know you saw as you came in.
It said this thing contains a paid promo.
Yes, people.
I haven't sold out because I actually use this stuff in as much as any man is going to admit using skin products.
But we need to get past that bias because taking care of your skin...
It's a good thing.
If I look younger, if I don't look 44 years old, despite the weight of the world of breaking my back and shoulders and giving me wrinkles and gray hair, maybe it has to do with the retinol.
Maybe it has to do with if you can't cry, laugh, and that's how we deal with this.
But I think I should probably stick to the script this time.
Do you think your face enjoyed the summer as much as you did?
Ladies and gentlemen, here's Ella from Rockford, Illinois.
I can't stick to script.
I'm going to read a testimonial from Ella from Rockford, Illinois.
I have not vetted Ella from Rockford, Illinois, but I trust Genucel as a company.
I have both age and acne spots, and this stuff is actually fading both of them.
The serum is worth every penny.
She's raving about the spot corrector from Genucel.
Talked about it a little while ago.
The retinal thing that firms up your skin.
You can use it if you go outside and put suntan lotion on.
I'm gonna have to...
Skip a little over the script here, but they have a package which you're looking at right now.
I did my due diligence into the company.
I talked with the doctor.
I think it was, I want to say Dr. Mike, but I might have forgotten his name.
I wanted to get familiar with the company, make sure it is a legit company, that the product is good, and I use it as well.
An American story, for those who don't know.
An Egyptian pharmacist comes to America, starts his own pharmacy, has his own proprietary brand.
Blend of product.
Skin cream gives it to his customers at his pharmacy.
They say, we want more, we want more, and thus a business is born.
Made in America, out of New Jersey, I think.
50-some odd employees.
Sponsors of the New Jersey Devil.
They have great skincare products.
Dr. Drew, his wife, use it and love it.
I'm not much into skincare, but my wife says I should be because we moved to Florida, at least temporarily.
Lots of sun.
You gotta keep your skin looking young, tight, firm, etc., etc.
I don't care about that.
I care about what's in the head, but there's nothing wrong with making sure that you take care of your skin.
So go to GeniusCell.com, promo code VIVA.
You'll get 70% off the most popular package, which has got the retinol stuff and spot remover.
And it's this package that you're looking at right here.
Great company, great product, great testimonials, and thus ends.
I see Julie in the back and we're 12:30 on the nose.
Oh boy!
People, I saw some people saying, I don't want to get my blood pressure up.
We're going to have high blood pressure today together and get the latest, the details from Julie, who's covering January 6th like nobody else, gets the transcripts of the court hearings, covering the Trump indictments.
She's amazing.
Julie underscore Kelly.
There might be a two in there, but the link to Julie Kelly on Twitter is there.
Julie, are you ready to come in?
Yes.
Okay.
Hold on.
Now I got to go add to stage.
Julie, how goes the battle?
It's ongoing, and I'm afraid it might be a losing battle, but we're not giving up yet.
It all depends on when you start and stop the measurements.
Right now, it's losing beyond anybody's wildest dreams.
It's injustices that, like I said on Twitter this morning, they make people sympathetic, or it will make people sympathetic, to the Proud Boys, to the Oath Keepers, even if they might have otherwise had a negative impression of them.
If you could, just tell us what the latest is.
I feel like I just want to let you talk for 30 minutes.
Tell us what the latest is on January 6th.
The Proud Boys that were just convicted sentenced to 17 and 13 years respectively.
The environment, the judge, the hearings.
Tell us what's going on.
I mean, it's hard to really put into words exactly what has happened in this trial.
In this case, for more than two and a half years, I've covered it pretty extensively.
It was handled by Judge Timothy J. Kelly, a Trump-appointed judge who claimed to be a conservative but has acted as nothing more than a rubber stamp for this Department of Justice's abusive, vengeful, and destructive prosecution of Trump supporters.
And, of course, that was the case with the Proud Boys.
Judge Tim Kelly not only denied release of these men, held them behind bars for nearly two years before their trial started.
Judge Tim Kelly also refused to move this trial out of Washington, D.C. Even though, Viva, it happened at the very same time that the January 6th committee was conducting televised national hearings, specifically mentioning these very defendants.
As jury selection was going on in Washington, D.C. in late December of 2022, the January 6th committee released its report mentioning the Proud Boys over 100 times and claiming that they were working in tandem with Donald Trump.
To attack the Capitol on January 6th and overthrow the government.
There was so much conflict of interest.
As you know, D.C. is almost 100% Democrat.
They're really the only city paying attention, you know, blow by blow what's happening with the January 6th investigation in the committee.
But yet he refused to defend the rights of these defendants, which is his job.
He's a former federal prosecutor in the very same D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office now handling every January 6th case.
He worked on cases.
He's buddies with one of the top prosecutors on this case.
His wife works for D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser.
He is so compromised, and it was evident throughout this trial.
So not only did he let the government get away with whatever they wanted, now he has imposed a total of 82 years in prison.
For five Proud Boys, of course, the highest sentence being 22 years for Enrique Tarrio, who is not even in Washington, D.C. on January 6th.
This is a travesty of justice, but just an escalation of what's been happening in this January 6th prosecution since early 2021.
Okay, so we'll back this up just to flesh out a few things.
Enrique Tarrio at one point was called an FBI informant or was working with the FBI.
He has been, along with the other Proud Boy co-defendants, in pretrial detention up until now for the last, give or take, two years.
Enrique Itario actually was arrested a year after the other defendants, but...
To your point, Joseph Biggs, who was sentenced to 17 years in prison.
Ethan Nordean, who was sentenced to 18 years in prison.
And this is based on seditious conspiracy.
They didn't assault police officers.
They didn't damage government property or destroy anything.
They didn't bring weapons to the Capitol.
Ethan Nordean actually is on video walking through an open door with at least five Capitol Police officers standing right there.
Nonetheless, Judge Tim Kelly has denied their release repeatedly, held them in pre- Okay.
Conviction on seditious conspiracy.
I'm going to bring this question up because I think I understand the point of it.
And the point is, who built the gallows for Pence?
I would venture to say, who cares?
And even if you found the person, you don't put anyone in jail for 22 years for what is arguably First Amendment rights, even if it might cross a bit of a line.
But Julie, so these guys, they are convicted on seditious conspiracy by a jury of their peers.
For those who don't know, DC 95 plus percent pro-Democrat, pro-Clinton?
And the people seated on this jury, there was actually a deep dive into this on Lawfare Blog of all places, at least eight of them told the prosecution and the judge that they had been involved in left-wing demonstrations over the past few years, including, you know, March for Women, Gun Control.
Demonstrations, not a single one was tied to the political right.
Nonetheless, they were seated on this jury, came back with quick convictions of seditious conspiracy.
Now, let's talk really quick about seditious conspiracy.
It is a joke to try to prove.
This is a Civil War era statute.
Note, American, before January 6th, this prosecution has been convicted.
We now have close to, I think, 15 convictions or plea deals.
Here's how low the bar is.
To use by force.
Not only that, the jury instructions said that the agreement to a conspiracy doesn't even have to be verbal.
It can be a wink and a nod.
It can happen at the moment that the whatever sedition...
It's so vague, intentionally vague, so dubious, that of course the jury would come back with a conviction because it basically meant Ethan Nordean and Joe Biggs could have looked at each other, shaken offense, and all of a sudden that seditious conspiracy and an act of terrorism, that's exactly what has happened in this case.
So this is the sort of travesty that's been, as I said, been happening.
But I think some people now are waking up to the extreme measures that this DOJ and federal judges will take to punish people who supported Donald Trump and protested Joe Biden's election that day.
I'm going to bring it back up just one more time.
We'll read it in real time.
I've read it prior here.
I mean, it sounds like everyone who was involved in Kavanaugh hearings were guilty of the same thing.
They shall be each fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 20 years or both.
We're going to get to the over 20-year sentences.
I think I remembered five, maybe a few people had ever been charged with seditious conspiracy, but these are the first convictions in the history of America.
For Americans, this is a statute that was reserved for foreign terrorists.
For example, the blind Sheikh and several of his co-conspirators, co-terrorists, were convicted of seditious conspiracy for trying to blow up the World Trade Center, and in the process, killing five Americans and injuring dozens more.
This is the sort of statute that is supposed to be applied to those people, not for people who organized, planned to go to the nation.
You know, who breached a few exterior barriers, who shook a metal fence.
That's not what this is intended for.
So this is very dangerous precedent that is being set.
And Republicans are totally out to lunch on this because we now have a whole new long list of federal crimes of terrorism, including seditious conspiracy, obstruction of an official proceeding, and yes, shaking a temporary metal fence, even if you weren't in the city.
Because that's how Enrique Tarrio got his terror enhancement from Judge Kelly.
We're going to get to the terror enhancements and Enrique Tarrio.
The convictions on the seditious conspiracy, okay, how did they get to these wild sentences?
I mean, it has to do with the terrorist enhancements to the charges?
Right.
So that's part of it.
So there are convictions for seditious conspiracy, obstruction of an official proceeding, also a felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison.
Then there were added enhancements.
Well, you obstructed justice.
Well, you obstructed Congress.
But the big one was the domestic terror, not domestic, the terror enhancement.
And Judge Kelly said, well, because you were involved in the destruction of government property, the shaking of a metal fence, That he said, my hands are tied.
This is what the statute says, so I have to add this enhancement.
Well, what the defense counsel was arguing last week, I was in the courtroom, is look, this usually means blowing up government buildings, right?
It means trying to blow up, you know, say the federal building in Oklahoma City.
Doesn't mean shaking a metal fence where there's also dozens of other people you don't even know who are doing the same thing.
So when the Defense Council said, look, not only is this reserved for destruction of government property, meaning buildings or facilities or military installations or using weapons of mass destruction or plotting a mass casualty event,
the lead prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason McCullough, argued The point that, well, yes, you know, loss of life is bad, but this also rises to the same standard as an event like 9-11, which, of course, we've seen judges and prosecutors compare January 6 to.
So I don't think people really grasp the gravity of what's happening in these courtrooms and what these people are saying.
What our own government is arguing and turning otherwise peaceful protesters, people who have worked with law enforcement, by the way.
Enrique Tarrio was an FBI informant 10 years ago.
Joseph Biggs was meeting with the FBI to tell them their plans to fight Antifa and BLM.
They were working with law enforcement up to that point.
Including an official with the Metropolitan Police Department.
So who tries to overthrow the government, brings no weapons, and is talking with the FBI and local police about it?
So they were definitely, you know, roped into this operation.
And now they'll spend, you know, a lot more time in prison.
How many days did you spend in the courthouse listening to this in person?
So last week I was there for two days.
The first sentencing hearing was canceled by Judge Kelly.
He called in sick, believe it or not.
So I missed one day that I planned to be out there.
But I was there for at least one of the sentences.
But I have been out there the past several months following and covering the four-month trial, keeping up with all the court motions.
And keep in mind, too, recall, numerous FBI informants were embedded in this group months before January 6th.
And you had an FBI informant who told the court and the government that there was no pre- I mean, these guys stopped at a food truck before they got to the Capitol.
They had a party planned at 3 o 'clock in the afternoon with the ban.
Were they going to go to the food truck and then overthrow the government with no weapons and then go have a party afterwards in Washington, D.C.?
This is the sort of insane case that this DOJ brought, that the D.C. jury bought hook, line, and sinker and that Judge Kelly now considers acts of terrorism.
I mean, there are two absurdities either way on this.
You know, the FBI was involved in the seditious conspiracy, infiltrated.
That's how they got the conviction, both for the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, I believe.
If the FBI were involved and knew of this plan for seditious, this plot for seditious conspiracy on January 6th, and simultaneously claims we had no idea this was going to happen, we were understaffed, that's how they took over the building, those are two mutually incompatible thoughts that cannot be held at the same time.
The idea that Enrique Tarrio was not even there and then nonetheless found guilty of seditious conspiracy, which means whatever it means.
He was sentenced to 17 years, not 22?
No, he was sentenced to 22. Enrique Tarrio was sentenced to 22. Ethan Nordean was sentenced to 18 years.
Joseph Biggs was sentenced to 17 years.
Zachary Real, another defendant, sentenced to 12 years.
And Dominic Pizzola, who was the only defendant not convicted of seditious conspiracy in this trial, nonetheless has been in prison for three months already and sentenced to 10 years in prison.
He was the one seen using a riot shield to smash the window.
You know, certainly nothing we would approve of.
But nothing that should keep him in pretrial detention for almost three years and then a 10-year prison sentence in addition to that.
When I do the Sunday nights with Barnes and he says, you know, they're creating rules which they don't know how they're going to come back and bite them in the butt.
That presumes honesty and integrity in terms of being victims to the system.
I think they're not fearing that because they don't enforce the rules the same way.
So the guy using a shield to break a window.
Okay, naughty, naughty.
I don't know how much that should be worth.
But then you got the Molotov cocktail lawyers out of New York.
Molotov cocktail a police car during a protest.
And they got, well, at least one of them got a year and a day.
They got disbarred.
I'm not sure if the disbarment was...
It's not applying the law equally.
And even if it were to apply this to them, I would still object because this is outlandish.
I mean, when the judge sentences this, does he look guilty?
Does he look like he feels bad?
Or does he look proud about what he's doing?
Look, Judge Tim Kelly just put himself in the history books.
He is, you know, he's now a famous figure.
When history books are written on January 6th, Judge Tim Kelly, who is nothing more than a line prosecutor at the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office and then a staffer for Senate Judiciary Committee, I suspect that that's how he got his judgeship.
Now he's going to be the most famous judge tied to January 6th.
They're going to talk about how he condemned these men.
I mean, he actually mocked Enrique Tarrio yesterday and scolded him.
For comparing one of the Proud Boys to George Washington, saying that you defamed George Washington by comparing...
Well, who are you to say what Enrique Tarrio can post in a private group chat, or even if he announced it to the world?
This was a First Amendment case.
This is what the defense attorneys made all along.
But again, as we continue this march towards...
Criminalizing free speech, criminalizing political activity, criminalizing now, objecting to a rigged election.
This is just one more, I think, giant leap in our march towards, you know, really Marxist, banana republic-style territory.
Have you been speaking with counsel for the defendants?
Yes, and actually tonight I will host a Twitter Spaces at 645 Eastern Time with Stephen Metcalf, who is one of the Proud Boys defense attorneys.
He represented Dominic Pizzola.
So he will take questions and he will explain how this terror enhancement sentences work.
And I think he'll have lots to say about how this case unfolded.
I mean, I know it's appeals without question, but have they explained the process?
What the likelihood of overturning?
Because you're going to have a number of legal issues to overturn.
One is the conviction of its own, and then it's going to be the sentencing and the terrorist enhancements.
Has defense talked about the appeal at all, or other than alluding to, it will happen?
It will happen.
And you cannot appeal until your client is sentenced.
So I believe that those appeals will be coming in short order.
So they will appeal a number of things, including errors during the entire process made by Judge Kelly, things that he allowed, things that he didn't allow.
Get this.
Here's one example.
This killed me the most.
A federal prosecutor told defense attorneys they had to pre-clear questions under cross-examination of government witnesses related to the use of FBI informants.
This is totally inimical to the adversarial climate of a federal trial.
Judge Tim Kelly gave, not just a rubber stamp, was an extra prosecutor on the government's team.
Who says pre-clear your cross-examination questions with your adversaries?
But this is just one example of his egregious mishandling of this case.
Not only that, the jury instructions, the bogusness of the seditious conspiracy, the obstruction of an official proceeding, which is headed towards the Supreme Court anyway, and of course, the ridiculous, absurd use of the terror enhancement at sentencing.
The pre-clearing of the questions, that can go two ways.
Which way did it go?
Did it say, just give us the questions beforehand so we can make sure none of them cross the line, or if any of them do cross the line, you don't even get to ask them.
We'll tell you whether you can use these questions at trial.
We'll tell you whether you can question this witness about FBI informants in front of the jury.
So that's exactly what happened.
And every time they got towards exposing more of the FBI, not just the use of informants, but also corruption by the FBI, withholding documents and information, Judge Kelly would step in and referee And, you know, choose the government side.
Unbelievable.
So Judge Kelly was presiding over the case for all of those Proud Boy defendants.
The sentence comes from the judge, not from the jury, obviously.
And some of the wildest sentences we've ever seen, not for this type of crime, for this type of conduct, which is essentially, as I think you're not wrong to point out, it's First Amendment stuff.
It's like texting over the violence, maybe not, but...
Even still, you compare it to the BLM Summer of Love, you compare it to January 2017, you compare it to the Kavanaugh hearings, there's no comparing.
One is an overt political injustice.
How doom-pilled are you?
I know it's tough to remain even mildly optimistic, but what is your thinking going forward?
Where do you see this going?
I mean, I do feel like these defense attorneys are going to file very strong appeals.
It just depends on where it goes from there.
We had what's called a splintered ruling out of the D.C. appellate court for the obstruction of an official proceeding.
So a count and the use of that count.
Against more than 300 now, January 6th defendants trying to turn this post-Enron statute that has to do with tampering with witness and evidence into a crime for political protest.
So I think a lot of this eventually is, I'm not so confident about the D.C. Circuit, although there was a very favorable ruling.
They smacked down the use of what's called a dual sentence for people accused of the most petty offense, parading.
These judges were imposing both prison time and probation.
D.C. Circuit came back and said, no, you're not allowed to do that.
They knew they weren't allowed to do it, by the way, but they thought they were going to get away with it.
But it will be years before this is all sorted out at the Supreme Court level.
In the meantime, the lives of these men, their families, completely destroyed, bankrupted.
Families have been broken up.
Marriages have been broken up.
Businesses have been lost.
I mean, there is a real human toll here that goes...
Beyond a prison sentence.
And I don't give a sweet bugger all about YouTube.
Four of the defendants or four of the accused committed suicide?
At least four January 6th defendants have committed suicide, including last week, the death...
Suicide, I'm told by a source very close to the case.
Suicide of a 22-year-old young man who was 19 at the time, went to the Capitol with his uncle, was inside the building for less than 10 minutes, didn't assault anyone, didn't bring a weapon.
The only thing that he brought into the Capitol was a Trump flag.
And of course, that is why he was going to be charged his life ruin.
And instead of facing the consequences that so many January 6th defendants have, he, like people like Matthew Perna, Mark Angst, Others took his life instead of being tormented and tortured by this Department of Justice.
Okay.
And so that's January 6th.
You're following the Trump stuff as well, the Trump indictments in Georgia and D.C., or just are you focusing on the D.C.?
I'm mostly focusing on the January 6th indictment and the classified documents case in Southern Florida.
I was following a little bit of the Georgia case, but there's only one person.
And so, yes, I'm mostly still focused on January 6th.
You're deep diving into this like nobody else because you're ordering the transcripts of the hearings to capture what the judge says in court that you can't record.
Tell us a little bit about the Trump D.C. January 6th indictment.
Well, so there's four counts currently pending against Donald Trump.
He has, unfortunately, Judge Tanya Chutkin, an Obama appointee who is handling this case, already creating a lot of problems.
I have a whole deep dive into her handling of January 6th cases.
She's well known and has bragged about, you know, incarcerating, overcharging, oversentencing January 6th defendants.
She has hinted in previous hearings that Donald Trump should be charged.
She went along with one defendant who tried to blame Donald Trump for his conduct, said, yes, but I'm not in charge of charging decisions.
So hinting that, yes, he Donald Trump should have been indicted for January.
And by the way, she did compare January 6th to 9-11 and the Boston Marathon bombing.
So Trump is in real legal jeopardy simply because this case is being handled in Washington, D.C. But Jack Smith still has his D.C. grand jury working on January 6 matters.
I think it's supposed to expire next week.
I'm sure he will get that extended.
So I don't think he's done with Donald Trump.
And this is why the Proud Boys convictions, headlines, sentences tie to Donald Trump.
The Department of Justice, these prosecutors, made Donald Trump a key figure in this prosecution, said that the actual date, the start of the conspiracy, began on December 19, 2020, when Trump tweeted out, come to D.C. on January 6, we'll be wild.
The government used that.
As the starting date and basically the launching pad for this alleged seditious conspiracy.
The judge brought up Donald Trump numerous times last week in his pre-sentencing hearing.
The DOJ brought up Donald Trump during their closing arguments back in April.
So, I fully expect Jack Smith to use these convictions, these sentences, especially the terror enhancement, to eventually bring additional charges against Donald Trump.
And, of course, we still have six unindicted co-conspirators, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Johnny Eastman, you know, the villains list of Trump world, that are still waiting for Jack Smith to lower the hammer on them as well.
It's an interesting thing you say about the conspiracy, the seditious conspiracy starting in December, and now that you mention it, during the trial of the Proud Boys, it sounded like through Hooker by Crook, they got the defendants to say, "Yeah, I was just abiding by what I thought Trump wanted." It's sort of like what I said was the "I love Big Brother" type admissions.
Did they, in fact, I mean, was that the extent of or an element of their defense, like we were just doing what we thought Trump?
It was Trump who motivated us to do this.
And did you get the feeling that this was done out of coercion to be able to make the argument stronger against Donald Trump later on?
There were two defense attorneys, I believe, in closing arguments who did bring up Donald Trump, you know, basically that he was the source or he was the instigator for this seditious conspiracy.
So I'm sure Jack Smith has that fully armed.
Now, keep in mind also, though, last week, Dominic Pizzola, the window smasher, when he left court after being sentenced to 10 years in prison, yelled Trump won as he left the courtroom.
So he certainly was not buying into the blame Trump line.
Sure.
I mean, this has been a defense of quite a few January 6th defendants trying to blame Trump.
Now, the judges have tossed that out of court, by the way, including Judge Chutkin.
So I'm not sure how that will resolve itself if and when Jack Smith brings these additional possibly seditious conspiracy counts.
But yes, they have tried to, attempted to blame Donald Trump for what happened.
Most shocking things that you can recall offhand?
I mean, you have to have at least a few that come to mind right away.
I mean, listening to Judge Kelly in that courtroom, he gave a three-hour oral ruling last week, and I was sitting in the courtroom, and I just couldn't believe what I was hearing, how he thought he was basically repeating the government's case, citing things that we know were not even produced by the Proud Boys, including a document that he called Roadmap to January 6th that was produced by a former Intel asset and sent to a girlfriend of Enrique Tarrio, and he never even opened it.
He didn't produce it.
He didn't author it.
He didn't even read it.
So just sitting there listening to him, just give the blow, the...
Government's blow-by-blow account of what happened and the Proud Boys' involvement.
Not a single ounce of skepticism from this judge.
And as one defense attorney said to me after this three-hour oral ruling, he said, what you just saw there was the end of a once great country.
Because he recognized as anyone else who is sitting there listening or has followed this case or has followed this prosecution, you know, what this all means for our short-term and long-term future.
That's very dark and doom-pilled.
There's no silver lining to that.
Have you seen the defendants or spoken to the defendants at all?
I mean, I saw the defendants.
I haven't spoken to them.
I do keep in touch with some of the defense attorneys.
You know, it was heartbreaking to see them in court.
They're broken men.
They're in orange jumpsuits.
They're being treated as terrorists by the government and by the media.
And by, you know, at least half the country.
So it was really distressing to see them and especially to see their family members who were there.
I mean, I saw one father, you know, sobbing, saying he doesn't want to die with his son in jail.
So these are very difficult things to see.
They are just human collateral.
DOJ, Biden regimes were on terror against the American right.
And keep in mind, too, three of these men are veterans.
Joe Biggs is a Purple Heart veteran.
I mean, they serve their country.
Joe Biggs especially, honorably.
They've lost their military benefits.
They are now outcasts in their community, even by their family.
So it's really tough to see that side of it as well.
What do you have next on the...
So you have the Twitter spaces tonight at 6.45.
I know you've got another hit at one o 'clock, so we'll wind this up.
Yeah, we've got like five more today.
That's okay.
I'm glad we made this work, though.
No, I'm glad.
I mean, people need to hear this.
It upsets me that people don't realize just how atrocious this is.
I'll share an anecdote when we end this about one of these convictions that I had last night.
Where can people find you?
Thanks so much.
So my sub stack is declassified with Julie Kelly.
As you know, I'm on Twitter.
It's on posting breaking news and court motions, transcripts, Julie underscore Kelly, too.
And then Truth Social at Julie underscore Kelly.
And thank you so much for you've been covering my work since the very beginning, you and Robert.
So I'm very grateful.
Well, I don't have the I'm not going to Washington.
I'm like, I can't.
Even imagine going into the courthouse and doing this day in and day out, the way you're doing it.
It's amazing.
So I've got to pick and choose where I can get the overview from, from people who are doing the deeper dives, and you're doing amazing stuff.
Julie, let's do this.
Whenever you want to come back on, open-ended invitation.
I will certainly let you know.
Thanks again for having me on.
Great to see you.
Thank you very much.
The same.
See you soon.
Oh, it makes me want to cry, actually.
I cry out of frustration, sometimes cry out of sadness.
Cry during commercials.
That is...
It's atrocious.
And I'll share an anecdote.
And it doesn't matter who it was with.
It doesn't matter where it happened.
I was talking with someone and noticed that they were from Michigan.
And then I said, oh, you're from Michigan.
You're following the trial that's going on now for the Gretchen Whitmer Part 3 of the kidnapping trial.
And the person is not as...
Deeply involved and deeply engrossed by all of this as I am and said, no.
Part three of the trial is coming on and then the person's like, yeah, well, they're all guilty.
I said, look, it would be very hard for anybody to watch that trial and see the evidence that's being presented in chief prosecution and not come to the conclusion that they're guilty.
I mean, it's like the evidence is bad.
The only question is, the but for the involvement of these many agents, these many informants, would they have ever gotten to this point in time?
Oh, it was actually...
The damningest piece of evidence that they're showing in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot is the drive-by of Whitmer's cottage, and from what I've been told on good intelligence, it was the FBI informants who brought them there.
So you get a bunch of vulnerable individuals, you know, downtrodden, living in literally basements of vacuum shops, eating and washing their hands and brushing their teeth in the restaurant bathroom next door.
And you get the FBI, to some extent, arguably, manufacturing these criminals out of thin air.
And there was the terrorist one that we covered two weeks ago with Robert Barnes where the judge said the entrapment in this case was like a made-for-em movie, how the FBI creates the criminals as opposed to foils the plots.
And so after talking about Whitmer, it goes into the recent convictions.
And this person was of good faith and just wildly ill-informed but unaware of the degree to which He or she was ill-informed.
Says, oh yeah, they got what they deserved.
Finally got some of those insurrectionists convicted.
And I'm like, I don't even expect the rules to be applied evenly to both sides.
I think no one's above the law, but some people are under the law.
I don't think even the left has to worry about these laws being weaponized against them because, like some people say, it's the seizure of power without any aspiration of ever relinquishing it.
But the insurrectionists, even if that's what you consider them to be, who did nothing more and a lot less than the BLM Summer of Love.
Oh, but that wasn't politically motivated.
That was socially driven in response to whatever.
What they did during Kavanaugh hearings.
Disrupting the Kavanaugh hearings.
What they did in...
Where was it?
Those two people who got removed from office for the gun protest on the floor of the House, Wisconsin?
I don't think it was Wisconsin.
There is no world that is a free, democratic, democratic republic, whatever the distinction you guys want to make, that can justify these sentences.
Period.
Full stop.
And I'm noticing an evolution in real time.
Once upon a time, I said, pardon all of the nonviolent January 6 offenders because you don't tolerate violence regardless.
Well, I am now have seen how even those who deserve maybe some punishment.
Just and proportionate punishment have been abused by a politicized system where now even those people who might have otherwise been rightly sentenced to a proportionate sentence have been absolutely abused and violated by a politicized, weaponized system.
They need to be pardoned as well.
And Vivek, from what I understand, is saying it.
And he might be the only GOP running for the primaries other than Trump.
Well, Trump hasn't really said it yet.
They're going to just...
It feels like the end of a system.
Oh, it was Georgia, Tom says.
Constitutional Republic.
Yes, for the sake of discussion, I understand the distinction, and as Barnes and I have discussed, for the sake of the discussion, as the terms are being used, democracy is interchangeable with Constitutional Republic, although there are different modalities of how they work.
Okay, now let me see here.
We're going to go over to Rumble.
Let me just tell François Amelaga that we are good to go.
We are good to go when you're ready to join.
Okay, what we're going to do right now, people, because I didn't want to interfere.
The 30 minutes was short and it goes fast.
I didn't want to interfere with Julie Kelly giving us the latest.
Come on over to Rumble.
The link is there.
We'll cover some other stuff.
I've been posting some highlights of the ADL madness because it seems a lot of people don't quite know how insane the ADL has been.
We'll talk about some other stuff.
So what we're going to do right now.
Ending on YouTube, come over to Rumble where the party shall continue.
And then after that, we're going to go over to Locals and have the Locals after party.
So what I'm going to do now, I'm going to end on YouTube, come over to Locals, Rumble or Locals.
You know, I actually remind myself.
Here's the link to Locals where we've got a nice crowd.
Come over to Locals or Rumble.
But we're ending on YouTube in 5, 4, 3, 2...
Now let's see if that discussion of self-harm, of what ends up happening, you imagine it's...
And they don't care.
It's like the system probably revels in this.
It's a real-life version, in real time, of 1984.
Crush them.
Make them say Big Brother as you destroy them.
Their teeth...
I mean, if anybody...
I don't recall seeing the movie 1984.
I don't think I want to.
As they're torturing Winston at the end of the story.
And, you know, like, his teeth are falling out.
He's emaciated.
He looks in the mirror.
He doesn't even recognize who he is.
I mean, it's a poetic novel, pun intended.
It's a novel way of describing reality.
It's what they've been doing to these people.
These January Sixers have been sitting there.
You don't treat animals.
The way they're treating these people, even if these people were guilty of the most heinous of crimes.
Years of pretrial detention, denied medical treatments that they needed, abused, isolated, tortured.
It's torture.
They are shadows of their former selves.
And make them say I love Big Brother as though they can somehow garner some favor or some forgiveness from the regime, which it doesn't give them at all.
And, you know, the ones that are weak, that can't put up with this, that can't tolerate, that don't want to bankrupt their families over legal defense funds, that don't want to shame their families, that don't want to be subjected to years of torture, take their own lives?
From the regime's perspective, it's not collateral damage, it's collateral victory.
Hey, that'll learn you.
Hey, we will send you to jail.
Or you will take your own life facing the prospect of the brunt of a wildly politicized, totally unjust regime.
Oh, and at the same time, we're going to lecture Putin on what an authoritarian autocrat he is sentencing people to 25 years just for journalism.
You know the protesters?
The Molotov cocktail.
Let me bring this up because it's worth reminding.
Molotov cocktail lawyers.
Sentence.
They actually had their sentence reduced.
Look at this.
Let's bring this up here.
Bask in the madness.
Here we go.
During George Floyd protests, two lawyers' futures went up in flames.
Oh, their futures went up in flames.
How about if they go to jail for 22 years?
That's having your future go up in flames.
Colin Ferd Mattis, who was sentenced Thursday, and Uruj Rahman burnt a police car.
They lost their licenses to prison.
That would be bad.
Although Molotov cocktail-throwing people, perhaps...
I'm not even sure I would go that far.
Clinton Mattis'trajectory from working-class upbringing in East New York to the Ivy League in corporate law abruptly ended.
It ended.
He didn't end it.
It ended.
When a Molotov cocktail ignited the center console.
You see how they...
Passive descriptions.
It's not active.
He didn't end it.
He didn't throw it.
It ended.
And a Molotov cocktail ignited the scent of an empty police car.
Don't worry, guys.
There was no cop in it.
I don't think they knew that.
They burnt a police car with a Molotov cocktail that they threw.
No shaking a fucking fence.
On Thursday afternoon, Judge Brian M. Kogan of the U.S. District Court in Brooklyn sentenced Mr. Mattis, one of two young lawyers who burnt the vehicle during the destruction of government property.
To 12 months and a day in prison and a year of post-release supervision.
No one's above the law.
A year and a day for burning a cop car.
I forget what she was, what Uruj was sentenced to.
I don't really care at this point in time.
So that's it.
And then the insanity coming out of...
Robert said on Sunday night, this entire last three years of COVID was a Milgram experiment or the Stanford experiment in reigning in full tyranny, full government control, full subjugation of what was hitherto at least perceived as being a free and democratic society.
And it's happened, and the amazing thing is they've gotten the victims of it to actually defend the regime themselves.
Oh, lordy, lordy.
Okay, let me see what's going on in Rumble over here.
Hoppity Hooper said, they added the one day, enables the guy to get out earlier.
Imagine that.
Jacob Castro says, that's not justice.
What about the horses that were burnt?
Anything on that?
That's new to me.
I'll have to look that up.
That's from B1 Gerald B1.
Oh yeah, they were also, and Hefty Joe says they were also, I think they were also passing Molotovs out to other protesters too.
I believe you're right about that.
Oh.
Now, in Canada, for that matter, just we'll shift it over.
In Canada, speaking of full tyranny.
Full abuse of the process.
You know, in the States, the way some people have rationalized this absolute egregious injustice of the January 6th defendants, the way they've rationalized it, is at least on paper, at least on video, there was some violence there.
Whether or not it was characterized, defined by violence, is arguable.
I've interviewed Brendan Strzok.
I interviewed Adam Johnson, the lectern guy.
The lectern guy's looking at this and saying, "Holy shit, I mean, for God's sake, yeah, I'm damn well gonna plead to something and spend 70 some odd days in jail." They would have gotten me on terrorism charges.
Using a lectern as a battling ram.
22 years.
Father...
The reason why they've gotten away with this with respect to the January Sixers is there were some pockets of violence that they sure as hell weaponized.
I won't go back to raging against Bill Maher.
He's very fast, except when it comes to his thought process.
Maher in French and Hebrew means fast, but Bill Maher.
Well, I won't rage against Bill Maher like I did yesterday.
The reason why they saw pockets of violence, and those pockets of violence were weaponized by the January 6th committee, who spent two years making the most highly edited video montages you can possibly imagine.
Propaganda videos that would make Joseph Goebbels green with envy.
And so you have people who think that January 6th was violent.
How many people, they say, died as a result?
It claimed the lives of...
What did they say?
Seven people?
Roseanne Boyland, who apparently either died of a medical emergency or was trampled by police.
Oh, gee.
Now I'm forgetting the name.
I'm forgetting the name.
Who was shot?
Oh my gosh, that's terrible.
Hold on, I'm just having to...
Ashley Babbitt.
Ashley Babbitt, shot point blank by a Capitol Police officer.
Two victims, arguably, and not so arguably, of police abuse, counted as the examples of the violence of the crowd.
Imagine that.
They kill you, and then they use it against you.
Ashley Babbitt, Roseanne Boyland, Brian Sicknick, who died of a stroke, but they said he was murdered by a mob of protesters.
Is that still online?
He dreamed of being a Capitol police officer.
Oh yeah, look at that.
It's still there.
It's still there.
Fake news.
He dreamed of being a police officer, then was killed by a pro-Trump mob.
You want to see the update that the New York Times?
Because, you know, that headline is flat-out wrong.
It's not just flat-out wrong.
It's a lie because they know that it's wrong.
Whether or not it was a lie at the time, it was.
It's a lie now.
They know it's not true, but they run that headline.
It's still there.
Not corrected.
Not died of a stroke wrongly attributed by the fake news New York Times to murder.
The death of Brian Sicknick, a military veteran and experienced Capitol Police officer, amplified the tragedy of Wednesday's riots and undermined President Trump's pro-law enforcement.
Oh yeah, the tragic murder.
It wasn't a murder because he was not charged or convicted.
The tragic killing, I guess we can call it a homicide in law because it is, of Ashley Babbitt.
The death of Roseanne Boylan.
Many people believe that she was stomped, beaten by the police and the crowd.
Those are examples of Trump's anti-police stance.
It's not an example of the tyranny.
But by the way, so the headline is, it's still up there.
Update.
Update.
Look at that.
I don't know when it was updated.
Published January 8, 2021.
Updated March 24, 2021.
New information has emerged regarding the death of the Capitol Police Officer, Brian Sicknick, that questions the initial cause of his death provided by officials close to the Capitol.
We had an anonymous source.
Who...
Bullshit.
They knew at the time, by the way.
They knew at the time that he was not killed.
And they ran with it.
Fire extinguisher.
And they ran with it.
And they never retracted it.
They never corrected it.
And there are still dipshit Democrat politicians in open government reiterating that lie two years later.
I forget the guy's name, but I think I called him out thoroughly for it.
So...
The reason why they get away with this with the January Sixers is because they have been brainwashed, propagandized into believing that there was violence.
You think there needs to be violence for this to happen?
Look what's going on in Canada now.
We're going to give this guy full, full shout-out credit because, you know, like Julie Kelly is on the ground covering this in detail that nobody else is, you can't be everywhere at once.
Tamara Leach's and Chris Barber's trial started yesterday in Canada.
Bear in mind, Tamara Leach was in jail for nearly two months, aggregate time, for non-violent mischief charges and then allegedly breaching her bail conditions.
Thrown back in jail like an animal.
Their trial started yesterday.
And there's someone on the ground, I think he's with Rebel, or at least he's with Rebel now.
Here.
You might want to go follow this guy to get the latest.
Let's just see.
They're on trial for mischief charges.
Nonviolent mischief.
Incitement of mischief.
That is, mischief itself is arguably, like, not a bogus charge.
You know, it's mischief.
You're making a ruckus.
Mayhem.
Except in Canada, you can go to jail for 10 years for mischief.
Incitement of mischief.
What's that?
That is telling someone else, encouraging someone else to make mischief.
And I don't know if it's the case, I have a feeling that the incitement of mischief, and from what I understand was when Tamara Leach was being arrested, and she said, hold the line, that was the incitement of mischief, I think.
There might have been others, you know, she was saying, well, we're going to protest.
Because protest used to be a constitutional right, a charter right, now it's criminalized, and in the States, it's terrorism.
Appreciate what that means, even if you don't like Enrique Terrio, or you don't think that you don't like, or you think you don't like Enrique Terrio.
So their trial starts now.
And the way to follow it is...
His name is Krajcik?
Let me see here.
Krajcik.
And so he's doing a play-by-play and he's going to come on to give us the latest.
So check out Robert Krajcik.
I don't want to do that.
Thank you for the request.
R-K-R-A-Y-C-H-I-K.
At R-K-Rajcik on Twitter.
Now I see our guest, our second guest in the backdrop, François Amelaga.
I'm not blaming him at all.
I'm going to say it as a joke before he gets here.
I had my interview with Francois Amalaga, the marathon two and a half hour interview where he talked about being arrested, jailed in Quebec for violating the COVID rules.
YouTube took it down.
Medical misinformation, they said.
I said, you're a bunch of fucking liars.
I'm sorry.
You're a bunch of fucking liars.
Where?
Just give me the timestamp.
That's all.
I just want the timestamp.
Appeal, rejected.
I nagged them on Twitter.
They said, sorry, there's nothing more we can do.
I said, no, there's nothing more you want to do.
Just tell me the timestamp where Francois Amalaga gave medical misinformation.
Oh, and what was that medical misinformation?
That the masks don't work?
Oh, I'm sorry, I think that was just confirmed the other day.
You censorship bastards is what they are.
Okay, I see Francois laughing, so we're going to start this off with a laugh.
Francois, you ready?
François Emelaga, if you didn't see the interview, go check it out.
It's still on Rumble because Rumble is the free speech platform.
François, sir, how goes the battle?
I'm fine, and I'm happy that you received me and your platform.
I'm really, really honored and happy.
All right, man.
Well, it's going to be great.
Okay, just satisfy my neuroses a little bit.
Tilt your camera down about three inches.
Perfect.
There you go.
Now we can still see the Charter of Rights behind you in as much as the government thinks that that is not even worth the paper it's written on.
But that's the Canadian Charter of Rights behind you.
Look at this.
I love this guy.
It's beautiful.
It was beautiful, Francois, when I thought it meant something.
Okay.
All right, dude.
So tell us, for those who don't know, 30,000-foot overview.
Who are you?
And then we're going to get into...
I am Francois Malega.
I am a Canadian coming from Cameroon.
I've been in Quebec, in Canada for 11 years.
I'm a math teacher.
I was teaching in Collège Jean de Brébeux.
I was a permanent teacher there and I had problems because of COVID because I was not agreeing with what the government said.
I've been teaching there for five years.
I resigned.
I have been in many protests and I was challenging the curfew, refusing to wear masks.
I've gone to prison several times because of all those protests.
I have a COVID fine, more than $98,000 of COVID fine.
My only regret is that I'm not...
It's a joke.
I mean, it's funny because it's so preposterous.
You got $100,000 in fines.
How many individual fines did you get?
Because they were like $1,500, $1,800 each.
How did you get to that number?
I mean, my first three fines, I had them in December 2020.
Well, because I refused to wear masks in a protest.
On the 19th, we had a protest, a small one, and I had a fine for not wearing masks.
On the 20th, there was a very, very big protest.
Maybe we could be 20,000 people in Montreal.
I had another fine.
On the 20th, we had another small protest.
Those were my three fines.
Then, on the 9th of January, I had my first fine for...
So that is how the fines were going one after the other.
And we were organizing many protests against the curfew and many other things.
So that is why...
So today I have more than 50 fines, let's say around that.
And it is a total of $98,000.
So for me, it was clear that I cannot wear masks during a protest.
I cannot...
I am not wearing masks anywhere, anywhere.
I would not respect the curfew.
And even one time, I went to the...
I was supposed to go to the court because I went into a shop without a mask.
Then the police was not there at that time.
They called the police.
But when the police came, I've already finished the shop.
So when I saw...
I went into my car and I was ready to go.
I saw the police and I came to the police.
I told them that the man you are looking for is me.
And the police told me that, okay, we've heard what you have done.
Don't do it again.
You understand?
I said that, no, I have the right to shop without a mask.
And they told me that, okay, go out from your car, give us your driving license.
I gave them the driving license and they were going to their car to make me a fine, a COVID fine of 1,500.
While they were going into their car, I entered into the shop again without a mask.
So they came, they arrested me, they put me down on the ground, and they gave me the fine, but they added something.
They said that I have done, in French we say, Entrave à la police.
Police obstruction.
Okay, so that happened in March 2021.
In September 2021, I was going to the court for that case, for police obstruction.
But to enter into the court, you have to wear the mask.
So I entered to the court without a mask and the security guard told me to go out.
And I always do peaceful protests and peaceful civil disobedience.
I argued a bit with them, but they insisted, so I went out.
So now out, one of the security guards went to the judge and he came back and he told me that the judge is asking me to wait outside.
And when he will call me, I will wear a mask and go to the court.
Inside the court, I can remove the mask.
I told him that the mask will not touch my face.
He came later, some minutes later, and told me that there is an arrest mandate against me.
It's like children.
It's like children.
They can't believe, A, if you're not even sick, they can't believe it does anything.
And even if they thought you might have been innocent, it's like childish in the irrational fear, but I don't even think it's childish irrational fear.
It's childish enforcement of rules because they can.
And to make a murder trial out of it, I mean, it's laughable, but it's the reality that you went through.
In that occasion, I did seven days in prison just because of refusing to wear masks.
And for me, it was clear.
And it is clear that if we say no, we refuse to obey, everything will just stop.
And it is important.
Well, now what's going on?
So people don't know what's going on in Quebec right now, but Quebec is talking about bringing back the masks.
Are they talking about bringing back?
What measures are they talking about bringing back now?
Because the caseload is going up.
In the end of August, the Minister of Health said that people that are positive against COVID have to isolate themselves.
For now, they have not yet made it a law, but they are recommending that if you are positive, you are COVID positive, just isolate yourself.
Not only that, they have started recommending people to start wearing masks again.
So that is where we are now.
They are just now mounting Starting the...
En français, c 'est quoi?
Il recommence avec le discours anxiogène, le discours de peur.
Yeah, so they're starting with the...
Well, the fear porn.
We'll call it fear porn.
Exactly.
So that is where...
And when you go to the metro, you can see some people already starting wearing the mask.
Do they not know what was just established by a very thorough study that they didn't work?
Do people not know that?
Or is it superstition?
It's like people need God, and if they don't have God, they're going to find religion.
If it's not in a kippah or not in a shawl, it's going to be in a flipping mask.
But what you are saying is deep.
And what you are living is more than religion.
Because I go to church.
In the church, you can discuss with a pastor.
You can have a different argument.
And there are even many churches that can have different point of view on some subject.
Even in the mosque, if you go to the mosque, you can ask a question to the imam.
And if you do not agree, and even in Islam, there are some different points in different aspects.
But what we are living is more than a religion.
Because everybody has to think the same thing.
If not, they find you.
And they are really, really aggressive.
Last time I posted in my social media what happened in 2020 on that young girl, that young woman of 21 years in Australia that was aggressed by a policeman, almost killing her because she had not worn a mask.
We are really in the face of people.
It is more than a religious state.
And the problem is that people do not read.
When you're surprised that the people...
They don't read.
They say that we who are protesting against the sanitary measure, generally in Quebec, they say that those people are not educated.
Which is wrong.
And what you see is that even the people who are even reading the books, we are listening to the news.
But other people, they don't read.
They don't listen to what the government is saying.
And there is nothing to compare.
They are not comparing everything.
I had an argument with some young people in the university.
It's like some month ago.
I asked them, what was the need of the vaccine passport?
Because I told them that when somebody is vaccinated and another one is not vaccinated, the vaccinated person is protected.
So it is the unvaccinated person who is in danger.
So what is the need of the vaccine passport?
They were just completely...
Because they realized that having some space where only vaccinated people are there does not make sense because they are already protected by the vaccine.
So why are they afraid of the vaccinated people who are supposed to be vulnerable?
And you realize that the QR code has completely destroyed the QE.
So the IQ, the QR has destroyed the IQ.
I'm stealing that, Francois.
Okay.
I mean, I was, yes, yes.
The QR code has completely destroyed the IQ of the population.
They have become robots, just obeying, not thinking.
and we are not going to obey.
Now, Francois, I sent the link.
I put it back in the chat.
Everyone should go watch the original interview because it was magnificent.
Like after two and a half hours with someone, you get to know them.
When it's live, unedited, unscripted, and I love it.
Nothing was off limits.
So go watch the original, everybody.
The link is there.
But Francois, if you haven't gotten into enough trouble, what are you up to these days?
There's two big protests from what you've explained that you're participating in or organized?
Yes, but just to say for the trouble, I think the 13th of May, I'm supposed to be arrested.
Because out of the $98,000 I own, I've already been condemned to $69,000.
I've already been condemned to that amount.
And I've received a letter on the 17th of April of this year.
And I got the letter on the 3 of May.
And in the letter, they were saying that I've been condemned for $69,000.
I have to pay the money.
Or if not, I have to call to have an arrangement.
or I have to do 817 hours of public what?
What is it called?
Something like that.
Travel communication.
And they told me that I have 10 days to react.
After 10 days, if I don't react...
They will not have any other choice than to arrest me.
You're going back to...
I mean, I don't want to jinx it.
You're going to go back to jail because they've got a judgment.
And, you know, when people say, back in the day, they said, well, it's just a fine.
We don't jail people for civil penalties.
You don't know how the process works.
At some point in time, that becomes...
Because it's not paying the remedy now.
It's not respecting a court order.
Not respecting a judgment.
But what happened, I was really happy to receive that letter.
Because on the 3 of May, I opened my box.
I got the letter.
And you went to the police station.
Once I saw the letter, no.
I took the picture.
I posted it in all my social media.
And I said that I am not paying it.
I'm waiting you to come and arrest me.
So normally on the 13th of May, the deadline was there.
So it is three months.
I'm waiting that they should come and arrest me.
I will not pay it.
Never, never.
It is not even passing on my idea that I should pay it.
So I'm waiting it because it will be very important that they should come and arrest me and people know that COVID is not finished.
I was waiting that they should arrest me in June so that people should know that this is somebody...
They are not arrested me because I have killed somebody.
They are not arrested me because I've stolen the money.
They are not arresting me because I've been engaged in a sexual something.
No, no, no.
They just arrest me because I was out at 8 p.m. working with people and shouting freedom.
I refused to wear masks.
In a protest, I refuse to wear masks in a shop.
So I am still free and I'm surprised.
For the protest, yes, we are having...
I'm looking only because Rumble on my computer seems to have...
It won't change anything.
I think we might still be live, but they might be under a DDoS attack.
It says HTTP error.
It says Rumble page is not working.
Let me just go to the homepage.
All right, whatever.
One way or another, I'm recording this, so...
It's going to be up afterwards.
Okay, so...
Oh, I love it, though.
You stick up the sign and say, come and arrest me.
I'm not paying it.
It's not that they don't know who you are.
Like, the authorities know who you are.
At least you didn't walk up to the police station and say, here I am.
Arrest me, biatches.
I have received three...
In French, they call it ucier.
Oh, bailiffs.
Yes.
Three of them have come to my house.
They have come.
Many times I was coming to the house, I was receiving a document.
Maybe if I can quickly show you the document.
Don't show your address.
So for those who don't know, a nouricier de justice is a bailiff.
It's like a process server in the States.
So they come to properly serve documents that they need to know were delivered in hand to the person who needs to receive them.
Yes.
They send me a document like this, three of them.
What does it say?
Is your address on it?
Make sure the address is on it.
No.
Okay, so show me what that says on the top.
Urgent.
Manda is a warrant, people.
Francois Emelaga.
Oh my god.
There's a warrant out for your arrest.
Another one.
Well, it's good to see you laugh.
You're still smiling about it.
Yes, and yeah, my address is somewhere, but this one, he came and he gave me the paper and he told me.
They came physically now.
He entered into my house and...
Unbelievable.
He saw that there is nothing to take.
And he told me that I have to call.
I have to book for an arrangement.
I told him that I'm not calling anybody.
I'm not booking any arrangement.
And I asked him, are you not ashamed of doing what you are doing?
I told him that, come and arrest me.
I'm not calling anybody.
I'm not looking for any arrangement.
Because I told him that the...
Director of Public Health.
I have a video of him saying that he does not have any proof that the mask protects.
I have a video of him in a press conference and he says that maybe they will never have proof of that.
So, I mean, it's not possible at a single minute.
I mean, it is not even an idea that is passing in my mind that I should pay One cent of that.
So that one is just...
And I think that very soon they want to put back the measure.
I will do quickly to go and reach the $100,000.
That is the first thing I will try.
Because if they put the mask...
I have a car, but if they put the mask on the Metro, I will quickly go to the Metro filming myself because I want them to complete it.
If I have a...
Two fines of $100, $500.
I love it.
You're doing the math.
This is like the Jeopardy equation.
How much do I have to bet to get the right answer so that I win?
Oh, it's fantastic.
I mean, you're incorrigible, as the government would say, and that makes you public enemy number one.
All right, so you're organizing or participating in two protests that are coming up in Quebec?
What's up with that?
Yes.
In July, we organized a protest on the 8th of...
July, around the Museum of Civilization.
Okay.
But that one concerns the gender insanity that is going around now.
Yeah.
And in the museum they have exposed, you can see it, it is a video of Rebel News, where they have organized things where an old man is making himself naked in front of children.
And the exposition is a bad exposition of very ugly things concerning sex, sex, sex, and all those things.
But the protests didn't have place on the 8th of July because there were some problems.
So we planned another one on the 9th of September.
So everything is concerning all these...
Gender indoctrination?
Gender indoctrination and...
Because they are doing bad things to children, telling them that you are not a girl when she's a girl, or you are not maybe a boy when you are really a boy, confusing the spirit of the children and giving them a poverty blocker, doing some vaginoplasty, phalloplasty, things like that.
I mean, many people are going through bad and complicated things.
And the confusion is serious.
There is a letter in Quebec that has been posted by a father.
And the letter is a teacher.
The name of the teacher is Martine.
She's a woman, but she is non-binary.
So in the letter, the director of the school was saying that they wrote the letter to the parents of the class of that teacher.
And in the letter, they were saying that it is something that was supposed to take place in September.
And in the letter, they were saying to the parents that, because in French, when you are a woman, they say Madame, M-M-E.
When you are a man, they say Mr. M-R.
And in the letter, they were telling to the parents that since that teacher is non-binary, they will call her M-X.
The ironic thing about that, people are going to have to speak French from France to get mech, or mech en français is a guy.
So if you have mechs, it sounds like plural of guys, you know, like in France.
Exactly.
And the father took the letter and put it in all the social media and we share it.
But it is a serious problem because when you send your child in a school, The teacher is supposed to teach the child gender in French.
I mean, because in French we have a lot of gender.
Even in English, she, he, and her, his.
There is a lot of gender.
I mean, you have to teach it to children.
But now the person who is supposed to affirm gender when you are writing French or English...
It's starting by confusing the children.
Because that is really complicated.
And the problem is that a part of the danger that comes like the given poverty blocker, because when they succeed to confuse the child, they start giving him poverty blocker and it can go to the vaginoplasty, phalloplasty, which is sexual.
Or in French we say mutilation, sexual mutilation.
But aside of that, you are creating human beings that are confused.
Because being a guy or being a boy is the first thing that is creating the spirit of everybody.
If you speak with six years, five years old children, when you come in front of them, I mean...
They know that you are a guy.
They know that you are a woman.
By the voice, by the physical appearance, by the beard.
But if now I present myself in front of children and I tell them that I am a white woman and they have to accept it, if not, they are bad children, that one is creating a serious damage in the brain of those people.
Those people will not be able to stand against the corruption and the totalitarian measures that are coming.
I mean, I know that I don't need to convince the people that are listening to you, but now the reason of one of the protests of the 9th of September is around the Museum of Civilization in Quebec City.
It is this Saturday at 1pm, and we encourage...
All the people that are around to come, to invite the people, it is very important.
I encourage all the people of all community, even if you don't believe in God, come is important, because they want to confuse.
If you're a Muslim, come.
If you're a Catholic, a Protestant, come.
The problem is that they just want to destroy completely our humanity.
you don't have to convince me.
I believe it's child genital mutilation.
And for a culture that condemns it in African countries, countries as practices where they call it FGM for a reason and it's outlawed for a reason.
Here, it's compassionate.
They've given it a new name.
It's gender affirming care.
genital mutilation or child genital mutilation.
It's an amazing thing.
You control language, you can control thought itself.
Exactly.
The last time we spoke, you had had an incident with Antifa coming after you.
And from what I understood, it was Antifa coming after you, not because of your COVID stuff, but because of the positions that you were taking publicly against trans ideology.
Exactly.
Has that gotten worse?
Has that blown over or has there been any Up till now, I made the police complain.
There is nothing new that has come out from that.
And yes, I've been addressed by Antifa.
Two times.
Two times.
Yes.
And they attacked me physically.
They destroyed my glasses.
They stole my phone.
They stole...
Yes.
And on my car, the tires...
The first time, they burst one tire.
The second time, they burst all the four tires.
And yes.
But, I mean, that one will not stop us.
We are going to fight.
To the end and we are going to win.
That one is really impossible.
Because we cannot accept a society where they are telling us that the reality we see is different from, is not the reality.
That we have to accept what they tell us.
It is the same thing that happened with COVID.
They started by destroying science.
That is why there were no debate.
Because if you open the debate and if you allow people to say contradictory things, people will open their eyes.
It is exactly what is happening now.
They start by destroying the science on gender.
And they start by building up a false science and there is nothing.
Because the parents are not the one deciding on the sex of the child.
Neither the child himself is not the one deciding on his gender.
The gender which is equal to sex is decided from the womb.
It is decided from the womb.
From the 18th week of conception, already they can know that it is a boy or it is a girl.
Let me tell you a funny story that happened in many African parts of the world.
You know that in many African country villages, there is polygamy.
And what happens generally is that's when somebody gets married to a woman.
And they have one child, a girl.
Two child, a girl.
The third one is a girl.
The fourth one is a girl.
The fifth one is a girl.
What happened generally is that the mother of the guy tell him that the wife you have got is only giving you girl.
We want a boy now.
We want a boy.
So let's get another woman so that maybe that woman will give you a boy.
That was what was happening in African tradition because they were thinking that it is...
Since the child is coming from the womb of the woman...
They were thinking that it is the woman who is giving just girl, girl, girl.
But now with science, we know that it is the man who determines the sex of the child.
And it is because of the chromosome.
So now people want to destroy it and tell us that it is at the birth that we assign the sex of the child.
And what they tell us at the same time is that no, we are confusing.
There is a difference between sex and So, now the question is this: if there is a difference between sex and gender, why are you making sexual mutilation when there is a gender dysphoria?
Because if the two things are different, there is no need of...
Do you understand what I mean?
I don't know.
I would say it maybe in French.
Si le genre et le sexe sont différents, pourquoi est-ce qu'on fait des opérations de sexe quand il y a une dysphorie de genre?
If the gender and sex are different, then why would you do...
If the gender and the sex are...
Different.
Because that is what they tell us.
Many people are telling me that I'm confusing myself.
Sex is something.
Gender is another thing.
But if it is two things, different things.
And if it happens that a child has a gender dysphoria...
Why are you touching the sex of the child?
Since it is different.
Oh, I see.
Well, see, this is a very logical way of putting it.
You're touching the genitals.
If gender is a social construct, and if gender and sex are different, you don't need to modify the sex tools in order to identify with the gender.
You're talking logic, and logic doesn't work anymore these days.
And I have another thing to say.
When I see LGBTQ, when I see the letter, L is a woman who sleeps with women.
J is a guy who speaks with guys.
B is the person who sleeps with the two sexes.
So it means that there are only two, gender.
Because, I mean, in those letters, it is gender.
So they recognize that there are only two genders according to the first three letters.
So now they want to create another one.
And the problem is that they want to create human beings that are confused.
Actually, in a school, a child is completely aggressed by three things.
First of all, they're asking him, are you really sure that you're a boy or a girl?
The second thing...
They are telling him that our world is completely destroyed by climate.
And the world is complete.
Third of all, there is COVID.
We have to.
And let me tell you, in Quebec, it was yesterday that they closed the school.
Some school closed in Quebec because the weather was 28 degrees.
They said that 28 degrees is too much.
They closed the school.
So those are the type of people they are creating now.
Confused by climate, confused by gender, confused by COVID, and saying that the climate has problems because of you.
It is because of the human being that there is a climate problem.
It is because of the human being that COVID is going around.
It is because all those things.
So, I mean, on the 9th of September, this Saturday, I invite as many people as possible to come and join us in the protests.
Capital, it's Capital National, as we say, the national capital of Quebec City, which is about two and a half hours east of Montreal on the 20 or the 40, depending on how you get there.
Francois, I will share out the link to the protest.
So September 9th, and was there a second one that you said was...
There was a second one on the 12th of September.
Okay.
So after this Saturday on Tuesday, that one will be in the morning at 9 a.m. because there is a...
What we call la rentrée parlementaire.
Yeah, that's the return to parliament or the reopening of parliament.
Yes, that will be in Quebec City.
So there will be a protest that we organize there because there is a lot of things happening now.
We know that they want to start again with COVID.
We have to tell them that we...
So generally, when there is a rentrée parlementaire, they are walking around that place.
So we don't...
It will be peaceful, but we will engage some conversation with them.
And we have some many signs that we have already prepared to say that we do not agree.
And there are many people that will come.
And yes, they have increased their salary in Quebec 30%.
Yes.
So the least salary was like $100,000.
Now the least deputy is $130,000.
And they are awesome that are having more than $200,000, $300,000.
While in the population, many people do not have $1 increase since many years.
To get a house in Quebec now is something...
I mean, that one is from their global agenda to make the population very poor, to be able to easily sell the population to the globalists, and that is what is coming.
So we want to tell them that we are not agreeing, we are not submitting.
So that was the main thing I wanted to say.
On the 9th of September at 1 p.m., Musée de la civilisation in Quebec.
Both protests, if anyone's in the Quebec City region, are in Quebec City.
Yes.
And if people are in Montreal, they can still travel to Quebec.
If people are around, just let's go.
If you have time on those two days and if you can bring people, let's be many and let's...
Yes.
Well, Francois, thank you for coming back on.
Thank you.
I say I wish you the best, but we know where this is going.
The government cannot let you continue to defy their authority.
And so we'll see what happens.
But everybody should be paying attention to Canada because it trickles down.
Canada is quickly moving back towards masks, all the other shit that they suspended back in the day.
And it looks like it's coming back faster than anybody thought possible.
So, Francois.
I'll tweet it out, but everybody, François Amalaga on Twitter, what is it, your handle exactly?
I mean, I put it in the description, but where can people find you?
On Twitter, it's François Amalaga on Twitter, and on Facebook also, and on Telegram, and on Instagram.
Okay, so Francois Amelaga.
I spelt it right over there.
A-M-A-L-E-G-A.
Francois, thank you.
Keep fighting the good fight, man.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Go for it.
Have a good day.
Thank you.
You know, the funny thing is, everybody needs religion, and this is beyond religion.
Yeah, and what I was thinking, I want to say it.
It's beyond religion.
It's called a cult.
Unquestioning.
You follow the rules.
They tell you who to see.
They tell you who to listen to.
They tell you what you can say.
They tell you what you can think.
It's a cult.
It's an abusive relationship.
And it's what we have been involved with as relates to the government for the last three years.
I like that guy, but man, he's done it.
He has pissed off the government and they will not soon let him forget.
All right, everybody.
We're going to end this in a few minutes, bring it on over to Locals for the Locals After Party, but I think I brought up a few tweets that I want to...
Oh, no, that's not the right place.
This is the link to Locals.
Link to Locals.
Now, I've got other guests in the pipeline as well.
Let me just see what I had in the backdrop here before we head on over to Locals.
Oh.
This.
Okay, hold on.
Now I hear something and I don't...
Here it is.
Okay, I don't want to hear Karine Jean-Pierre, but I did want to pull up.
Oh!
You want to hear the amazing takes on the internet now?
People on the internet are just amazing.
The FBI just posted this on Facebook, on Twitter.
Here, I'll give everybody the link and we can see what...
Does the general population think that this conviction...
Is justice or a crime in and of itself?
Proud Boys leader sentenced to 22 years in prison on seditious conspiracy and other charges related to January 6th US Capitol breach.
Henry Enrique Tarrio sentence is the longest sentence to date related to the breach.
You'd think...
I mean, I guess it's purely objective.
It's factually correct.
What does...
Oh, I can't see the comments in this.
What does the general population think?
Do they think that?
Link to FBI tweets.
Justice or a crime of its own?
I know what I think.
Okay, fine.
So let's just hear.
There's a couple of good takes here.
What do we got here?
I'm going to bring this up just before we leave.
This was the meme that I wanted to bring up the other day.
The government in 2021 take the shot.
Or we will fire you, starve you, take your children, put you in camps, and leave you to die without medical treatment.
Some of that's an exaggeration.
Others is not, unfortunately.
And in 2023, you got good Smeagol.
Nobody forced you to take the shot.
That's a good tweet.
This is stuff that I've had on the backdrop since yesterday's livestream.
Let me see what's going on here.
22 years is ridiculous.
Perhaps for the murder of Ashley Babbitt.
That comes from hyphen.
And I don't know if that's never fear hyphens here.
I think it might be.
22 years.
That's right.
It's justice.
All right.
No, I don't want to log into Twitter.
This is what I wanted to talk about.
This was one of the other anecdotes.
And it segues perfectly with what we just discussed with Francois et Malaga.
I have since been blocked by this person.
This is a tweet, and I feel bad because there's got to be something very wrong with someone to live in such an incessant state of fear.
And that's not to say that I don't live in constant fear of, what do they call them?
Catastrophizing or fear of impending doom.
I know it's irrational, and I have to...
Operate on the basis that there are some fears, as my wife has told me, that are rational.
Some you can control, some you should control.
Some fears are irrational and you should understand the difference and not let the irrational fears guide or ruin your life.
Worry about the things you can control and try to understand that there is no use, there's no utility in fearing the things that you can't control or fearing things that you recognize are irrational fears.
Let me take this tweet out, because this was the response.
Eric Fagelding, who's a propagandist, and from what I understand, also a hypocrite, in that, you know, the...
Here we go, this is it.
A hypocrite in how he has dealt with COVID in terms of personal family decisions, which I don't need to get into.
But he's a fearmonger of the highest order.
And I know some people are going to say, Viva, you're a rage farmer.
Piss off.
Bugs off with that nonsense.
This is what Eric Fagelding is tweeting.
This was yesterday.
One in four nursing homes reporting COVID outbreaks in New Jersey.
COVID rapid tests sold out in many stores.
Hospitalizations rising.
First lady also infected.
School outbreaks nationwide.
No more excuses.
Mask up.
And I guess he's got a typo in his hashtag.
Mask UO.
Ventilate.
COVID is not over.
And I'm reading this tweet, and I was like, at what point are we going to acknowledge as a society COVID is now, if it ever wasn't this, now it certainly is a seasonal flu.
It's a cold.
It's whatever it is.
It's not a flu.
It's a seasonal illness that is part of society, and you're going to get it.
You cannot avoid getting it.
All of the means that they tried to implement to prevent you from getting it was about as useful as trying to staple an egg to a wall.
A raw egg, not a hard-boiled egg.
You can do it with a hard-boiled egg if you have a, you know, one of those plaster screws.
All right, forget the joke.
Fear porn.
It's what Eric Fagelding does on Twitter.
And it works on his crowd.
And someone in his crowd posts out a tweet.
I won't be able to get it now because she blocked me.
Where was it?
She said, my kid's going off to college.
What am I going to do?
Implying that the kid is a 20-year-old kid going to college.
He's living in dorms.
I'm so nervous for him.
And I was like, is this a real tweet or is this parody?
And then I ultimately went back and scrolled down her replies and she says, COVID is a big deal.
It gets in your organs and it can damage the organs of a 20-year-old.
I'm like, I want to be an asshole, but if that's the fear, do you know what alcohol does to a kid?
Do you know what...
Driving for a kid.
I mean, I know people sit around fearing that their kids are gonna get in car accidents and that's sort of like a rational fear, but there's like next level irrational fear porn.
And I said, I think this is, is this a serious question or is it intended to be parody?
Snark or sass intended?
Oops.
I think that was supposed to say no snark or sass intended.
Oops.
Assuming your son is a college age, 18 to 22, do you know what his risk is in statistical terms?
Like if you understand that the risk is Infinitesimal.
Why would you terrorize yourself to fear an infinitesimal risk?
Do you know the consequences for yourself living under this level of psychological distress, assuming you're in fact being serious?
Turn off the news.
Stop watching CNN.
Stop reading Eric Feigelding tweets.
And then she blocked me.
And then I realized you cannot help people who don't want to help themselves.
You cannot help people who relish in the misery.
Because like I was saying with Francois, let me back this chair up.
People need, if it's not religion, they need some sort of religious type guidance.
They need something they can rely on.
They need something they can have faith in.
Take solace in.
For the fears, the unknowns of life.
Some people take that solace in the...
Terror that they impose on themselves.
They take that solace in the suffering they impose on themselves.
Some people don't want to stop suffering because that's from what they derive their meaning in life and their guidance.
It's like that line from Vegas, baby, Vegas.
Oh my goodness, what's the movie?
Vegas Swingers.
It's like the line from Swingers where, you know, when you break up with your girlfriend, he says, you know, it hurts.
And it feels terrible.
And you're sobbing.
And then eventually the pain gets lighter and lighter and lighter.
And eventually the pain goes away altogether.
And eventually one day you say, I miss the pain.
These people don't want to live without the pain.
They don't want to live without the terror because it gives them meaning.
It gives them something to focus their energies on.
Wash my hands.
Wear my mask.
Fear my kid.
Incessant.
It gives them someone to direct their anger.
The people's not washing their hands.
That guy's not wearing a mask.
That one didn't get vaccinated.
So I can direct my anger towards them.
It gives them purpose and meaning in life, and they don't want help.
And it is impossible to help someone who doesn't want to help themselves.
Honor 234 says, or they're mentally ill.
But not all mental illness manifests itself like that.
So there's that.
But it's depressing.
And then you got the people thinking, yeah, what was the other one?
It was another great one that I just wanted.
We'll end on a bad one, and then we're going to end on a good one.
Hold on.
Not this one.
Proud Boys, I already got that up.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
No, here.
Forget it.
Karine Jean-Pierre.
Here.
I don't know what this clip is.
It's from RNC Research.
I have to verify with RNC Research their tweets, but I think this one's good.
We know that these vaccines work, right?
We know when people stay up to date with their vaccine, that works.
And we know that these vaccines work, right?
We know when people stay up to date with their vaccine, that works.
And we know that these vaccines work.
Go to hell.
Sorry, that was rude.
Okay, I'm saving the Mehdi Hassan discussion for Locals Exclusive.
Everybody, let's do that.
Come on over to Locals.
There's chat going on there.
I'm going to end with one good thing here.
We know it works.
It works.
It works for jack shit, Karine Jean-Pierre.
Oh, no.
It prevents transmission.
Oh, it doesn't prevent transmission, but it reduces symptoms.
What did they say?
Even if it reduces transmissibility.
It's an amazing thing.
It prevents transmission, which was a lie because they hadn't tested for it, so it was a lie.
A lie can take on two types.
Saying something you know is false or asserting something that you have no reason to believe is true.
When they said it prevented transmission, it was a lie because they hadn't even tested it to prevent transmission because they were moving at the speed of science.
Fact became known.
It has to be, well, if it doesn't prevent transmission, what the hell am I taking it for?
You told me to take it to save granny.
Oh no, because it reduces the severity of your symptoms.
Well, don't worry about that.
I don't care.
I'm a healthy fit.
44-year-old.
It makes it less transmissible, you see?
If you get the vaccine, you'll still get it, you see.
But when you get it, you will be less likely to...
Oh, I'm sorry.
Can you explain to me what that poppycock is based on?
No, you can't, because you're liars.
It still works.
It works.
Wild Arms 420 says, I wish you didn't force your audience into locals, brother.
I don't have the time.
I'm a single father.
Everyone can afford to watch you here.
Well...
No one's forcing anybody anywhere, but we have a Locals community, and I like to provide some stuff which is exclusive for the Locals community.
It's open to everybody, so all you have to do is take this link right here and come on over to Locals, because we have a community there, and I like to spread the love, but also show my thanks to the community in Locals.
So that's it.
We're going to end on something good, because while we are all watching, I want to give...
The shout-outs where the shout-outs are deserved.
Easy Meats on Glades.
Hashtag not an ad.
Glades is a big street in Florida.
They have the best meat on the face of the planet.
Tomahawks, all this great stuff.
And they're also heavily into Brazilian jiu-jitsu.
And that's how I actually found out about the place.
The owner, my goodness, he's chiseled from a model of what God said a human could look like.
Like six foot three pipes for arms.
I don't know if he's watching.
Good-looking, handsome like you can't imagine.
Nice, friendly, the softest, most sympathetic eyes you can imagine.
It shakes your hand.
It feels like a glove of a superhero.
So they're awesome, easy meets, but that's not what this is about.
Beck to Wood on Instagram.
B-E-C-K to Wood makes the most amazing cutting boards you've ever seen.
Now, these are obviously things like, you know, they're...
First of all, not everybody can get a cutting board, and it's not a question of that.
Everybody also is trying to really make a living in hard times.
And so when people make beautiful stuff that celebrates values that we share, they should be blasted at the highest levels on all social media.
Beck to Wood, amazing, beautiful custom cutting boards, just nice cutting boards.
And they got the nice rivet so that when you slice up your steak afterwards, you know, the juice doesn't go all over the floor.
And they're beautiful.
So, back to wood.
That was it.
All right, now that's what we're going to do.
We're going to come on over to Locals and we're going to pate-hate like it's 19-dickety-two.
I'm just reading to see if I've missed anything here.
Sefer Dean Squibb.
No!
Sefer Dean Squibb.
I'm not reading the comment, but I am able to objectively analyze and assess...
Perfection.
Physical perfection in a human form.
All right.
Let's end this on Rumble.
Come over to the locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com Oh, well, I almost nearly forgot.
Hold on.
Can't end the stream without plugging my own merch.
VivaFry.com for anybody who wants the best merch, the best mug of all time.
You got the Wanted for President Trump mugshot mug.
Coffee mug, the mug shot, shot glass, the Wanted for President shirt.
Shipping is not the easiest thing on earth, so if you're going to do this, wait until you need to get more than one thing so you don't pay multiple shipping because it's...
Whatever.
But that's it.
Okay, now we're officially done.
VivaFry.com for your Wanted for President.
And there's other stuff there.
There's other stuff if you don't want to publicly declare any political stuff.
You got our Above Average.
I love this shirt.
What's going on here?
We are here.
The joke in the vivabarneslaw.locals.com locals community.
Everyone's above average.
You are there.
Okay, we are here.
And then we got all this other good stuff.
View all merch.
Okay, that's it.
Go for it.
We are now ending on Rumble.
Come on over to Locals.
We got the exclusives up there.
So live stream.
And thank you all for being here.
Stay tuned.
It's Wednesday.
Thursday, I'm going to try to get an amazing guest for tomorrow.
Otherwise, the news will not leave us bored.
That's it.
There's other stuff.
I'm forgetting something, but come on over to Locals.
See you there.
Ending livestream on Rumble in 5, 4, 3. Snip, clip, and share away.