Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 7, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:25:17

Coutts 4: Trudeau's Political Prisoners UPDATE! And Other Stuff... Viva Frei

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Canadians, on the whole, are more complacent than Americans.
	It's not an insult.
	It's a difference in culture.
	It's a difference in history, where Americans and those who flocked to America to seek a better life and to fight for freedom and for a better life had a different mentality.
	The country that fought the British for its own independence is far different than one that relied on Britain to grant it its rights.
	That was me.
	Canadians on the whole.
	Those wise words came from this ugly punum.
	Oh!
	Good afternoon.
	Wasn't planning on going live today because I'm tired.
	I'm cranky.
	I didn't sleep well.
	I had to get up too early to take some kids to the airport.
	But we need to do an update on the Coots 4. There were some stories that I wanted to get to over the weekend.
	And I didn't get to them, so I got some stuff on the backdrop that we need to talk about.
	Now, something's bothering me here because it's not symmetrical, and we're going to live with it.
	My wife was saying that it's getting too crowded in the back, but I can't figure out what to take out.
	This is a beautiful painting of Winston sleeping on my shoe.
	Oh, hold on a second.
	I don't want to reveal anything that's not for everyone.
	Rebecca Stamen.
	Instagram?
	Well, I guess we can...
	Hold on.
	I'm going to take this off.
	Look how flipping beautiful this is.
	The shoe is from Murph's Kicks.
	He sent this to me.
	Awesome custom shoes.
	They're actually comfortable.
	I jogged them into the ground.
	That's Winston sleeping.
	And it's Rebecca over here.
	Rebecca Stamen Etsy.
	It's magnificent.
	Can't take that out of the backdrop.
	Here, everyone get that.
	Okay, let's put this back here.
	Lover of dogs and defender of truth.
	Okay.
	Then, I got my old license plate.
	We've got Silent War, five times August, latest album.
	I got it on vinyl, haven't opened it.
	I got my Rumble statue there.
	Got another one.
	There.
	So anyways, okay, fine.
	Enough show and tell.
	What else was I going to say?
	Oh, the interview that I just showed you.
	That's a segment of the most recent PragerU interview that I did.
	Towards my birthday in May, June, I forget the exact date, they just released it last week, the same day Justin Trudeau announced Splitsville from Sophie Gregoire, who we then discovered is now no longer bound by those pesky disclosure obligations under the Conflict of Interest Act.
	And we discovered that Sophie Gregoire incorporated a communications company a year ago.
	Justin Trudeau, two days before announcing Splitsville from Sophie, appears in public with a perfectly round bruise in the center of his forehead.
	Some people were suggesting it might have come from paintball, but that would have left a much bigger welt, maybe like one of those airsoft guns.
	Who the hell knows?
	None of my business, but we're going to talk about the Kutz 4 today.
	We've talked about this.
	A number of times now.
	Jason Levine, his Twitter handle is JasonLevineMP because he's an aspiring member of parliament.
	Levine, L-A-V-I-G-N-E.
	Might be the father of Averill Levine.
	Who knows?
	He was on, gave us a rundown.
	He's been at court in Lethbridge talking about this, covering this.
	All right, so that's it.
	That's the intro.
	What was I about to say?
	Standard disclaimers, you all know them.
	No legal advice, no medical advice, no election fortification advice.
	And my sweet, merciful goodness, if anybody missed last night's stream, Barnes and I, well, I say more Barnes than I, went on.
	And I say when he went on, he went off on the Trump indictment.
	I posted that as a separate highlight on Viva Frye.
	If you haven't seen that, go check it out.
	Those are the standards claims.
	You all know how it works.
	If you're new here, we start on YouTube and Rumble and vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	And then we're going to end this, I think, after the interview with Jason.
	And I'm going to head over to Rumble exclusively.
	And then we'll go over to Locals after that and have a bit of the after party.
	So Jason Levine, independent journalist.
	I still refuse to call myself a journalist.
	I'm an analyst.
	Levine is a journalist.
	And he's a good, great, independent one covering the coots for Jason, you ready?
	Bring me in.
	Five, four, three, two.
	Hold on.
	Here.
	One.
	Sir, how goes the battle?
	It goes well.
	And I got some explaining to do about the Avril thing that you just mentioned there.
	Let me bring you out.
	We're going to do wide for a second.
	I want to see what's in your background.
	Sure.
	Innocent until proven guilty.
	I have a license plate, too.
	I got innocent until proven guilty.
	The coups form in.
	Absolutely.
	They are innocent until proven guilty.
	We have upside down justice.
	You're not in the back of an F-150, are you?
	That looks like the window.
	Close.
	I'm in a fifth wheel trailer.
	So I'm where the table should be for your kitchen.
	So that's a kitchen table in a fifth wheel trailer.
	Beautiful.
	So innocent until proven guilty.
	A maxim of justice that communists and fascists seem to forget all too often.
	Arthur Pawlowski.
	Did you have Arthur on?
	He's on actually just after this.
	So once I'm done with you, I'll be speaking with Arthur.
	Son of a gun.
	He's supposed to be coming on.
	Oh, I think we did book something.
	Ooh, let me make sure I didn't double book.
	Okay, I'm going to get to him afterwards.
	Arthur is going to come on.
	I'll arm wrestle you for him if we have to.
	There's more than enough time.
	We can take all of Arthur's Wednesday.
	Absolutely.
	Okay, and then you got justice upside down because the world has gone mad.
	All right, now I'm going to bring you back to the main focus here.
	So, sir, what's the good word?
	Well, the good word is the week ended and it ended with the men still.
	Where they were at.
	They're going to be looking at that time for a little bit longer.
	The quick news is November 1st is the next scheduled court date, but there is a bail hearing for Chris Carbert in October.
	And there's a chance that the judge may make a decision on the CC1 application at any time.
	He could actually schedule something with court at any time.
	But we're not expecting it right now.
	We don't have any information on a new court date for the revealing of the CC1 application information.
	All right.
	Now, we're going to not presume the knowledge of everybody out here.
	We're going to do a brief summary.
	The coots for our four gentlemen.
	I'm going to forget.
	It's Chris.
	Chris Carver.
	Yep.
	Go for this one.
	Chris Lysak.
	Yep.
	Tony Olenek and Jerry Morin.
	Who have been in detention now.
	They've been detained in remand, not even jail, so it doesn't even have the privileges that prison has.
	Since February, give or take February 19, 2002.
	February 13, 2022, and I'll make it 540 days today.
	540 days.
	Arrested on charges of conspiracy to commit murder.
	Those are the very serious charges.
	Full disclosure, I believe it's all politically trumped up hogwash.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	They could have charged Tamara Leach with conspiracy to commit murder, and it would have been...
	Barely more plausible or more outrageous.
	So they were charged with conspiracy to commit murder against an RCMP officer.
	This is when the CBC ran that very scary picture of a bunch of firearms.
	I'm not saying weapons, but firearms.
	All but a couple of which were non-restricted long arms.
	Ballistic vessels.
	Not even ballistic.
	There were some vests in there.
	One ballistics vest, which is legal to own with a permit.
	There was one diagonal patch somewhere in there, which is going to be what ties Jeremy McKenzie into all of this kerfuffle.
	I have new information on that.
	Okay, and I'll be much quicker with the summary.
	They were arrested on charges of conspiracy to commit murder.
	From what I understand, the bulk of the evidence consists of what they disclosed to two undercover, apparently young and attractive RCMP officers at a bar.
	No recordings.
	There might be some text messages, who knows what they say, the tone in which they were written, but by and large, scant evidence at best, but you can flesh that out.
	And they've been in jail, not released on bail, despite the fact that convicted terrorists who were released and then accused of terrorism again get bail, despite the fact that accused cop killers in Ontario get bail, despite the fact that the dude who ran over four people at the protest in Winnipeg got bail, they don't get bail.
	And we're to believe that they're not political prisoners.
	In light of everything else we know the RCMP has done, texting about how funny it would be to bring a horse into the protest, all the other corruption that we know has gone down from the federal government, spying on Canadian citizens, using propaganda on Canadian citizens during COVID.
	So we know all of that, but we're to believe that these charges are very serious and very credible that can warrant unconstitutional and inhumane detention going on 500 and some odd days.
	Okay, summary.
	What's going on?
	Well, we went to court on Monday.
	So what happened there was that was the result of an application for voluntariness for Chris Carbert because he gave his interview, some people call it confessions, but we call them interviews here in Canada, to the police officer under duress, under medical duress.
	So there was a question of whether or not he reached the level of voluntariness for his actual interview.
	The judge determined he was...
	Just, just there.
	He was just there.
	So that application didn't succeed in order to remove that.
	Slow down there.
	The application was to withdraw what is being referred to as his confession by the media.
	Correct.
	So, yeah, we call it an interview here, but confession is how people refer to it.
	The media has been referring to it as a confession because they want to make it seem like it's already a foregone conclusion of guilt.
	Yeah, there's no confession there in the traditional sense where he admitted to anything.
	It's an interview where he provided information under medical duress.
	So the question was whether or not his mental state was competent during that interview, and the judge did deem it to be competent.
	The contents of it didn't provide a confession, but the contents are now admissible during the trial, if we ever get to that point.
	Are you able, again, there's publication bans on the one hand, but then there's also just general privacy on the other.
	Are you able to flesh out, was it made public, what his medical duress was?
	It's related to a condition that he had when he was younger, and he requires medication daily in order to fulfill his needs for the day, and that was being withheld from him.
	So he was being withheld from a required medication, a prescribed medication.
	Did you see the judge deliberating on this?
	Is the judge a man or a woman?
	Not that it changed anything?
	He's a male.
	He identifies as a male for now.
	Did he actually pontificate and say, well, it's pretty close, they were coercing him or whatever, or did he just say, no, flat out, this is admissible?
	He did say that portions of it was absolutely close to the line where it shouldn't have been.
	But because there was moments of clarity during it, that was what upheld his decision.
	So he was able to point to moments of clarity.
	But he certainly said the entire thing was troublesome.
	Okay.
	Try not to swear to them.
	I'm trying to turn over a new leaf.
	I swore a lot.
	That's a load of shit.
	It's close to the line.
	If you're getting close to the line, as far as I'm concerned, you've already passed the line.
	And if you observe that you're getting close to the line, it's because you know you've passed the line.
	Yeah, I would have to agree with some of the things.
	I was disappointed overall, but there were moments of what perceived to be clarity.
	If you read it verbatim, it maybe sounds like it, but if you look at it in the context, it's difficult to really say there's clarity there.
	Okay, so the motion to remove his interview or to not allow...
	Not admissible.
	Dismissed.
	So his interview.
	And do we know what it says in that?
	Is that available to the public or is that part of the publication ban?
	It was played in the court.
	And as far as I know, there's no accredited media that actually recorded it in the court.
	So we don't have a record of that outside of the court.
	Okay.
	And the general...
	It was a recorded interview or was it transcribed?
	It was recorded.
	So the family got to watch the terror that he was going through and the...
	Medical conditions he was going through.
	I wasn't there for the plane of that.
	I was in a previous day, but I did speak to the family who watched that, and it was horrific for people to watch.
	He was in medical dress.
	It's a video.
	It's like what we imagine, like a swinging, what's the word?
	Iridescent light or something.
	It's like he's in a room, and they're asking him questions, and they videotape that and then play that in court.
	It was a little bit worse than that.
	He was actually heaving over in pain.
	He was responding to a medical condition.
	It was physical for him, and it was distressful to watch.
	But during that, he was able to speak, answer questions, say stuff, answer stuff.
	For example, I don't need a lawyer.
	One thing everybody should know is all three of them, or four of them, didn't have an initial lawyer because they didn't ask for one.
	This was part of the challenge.
	I feel like playing pot brothers at law.
	Shut the F up.
	Like, how are you doing?
	Very well, officer.
	Am I being detained?
	I'd like to talk to my lawyer.
	Yes.
	Yes, the conversation after is you don't talk, even in medical duress.
	And even if you think you'll be out of medical duress in order to talk, don't talk.
	That's the situation he was sitting in.
	What did the family have to say when they spoke to you?
	They were in distress over that particular, watching that video, watching it in court.
	It was distressing for them because he was physically distressed.
	He was heaving over, groaning, making sounds while they were trying to interview him.
	When was that?
	That was initially upon detainment?
	That would have had to have been the 14th of February, 14th or 15th.
	It would have been around that time.
	Because he was sick the night before.
	That's why he was sleeping when they arrested him the morning of the 14th.
	Okay, so that motion dismissed.
	The interview will be admissible as evidence.
	You're not entirely aware of the details of that, of the video, and there might be a publication ban anyhow because there's a publication ban on a portion of this stuff.
	What else happened?
	Well, that was Monday.
	That was the afternoon.
	That was done.
	I was happy to see some press there, so there was accredited media there for that today.
	We had the next day start, which was the arguments for the application for the CC1, which is an application that was created around disclosure that was inadvertently provided to the defense, which defense feels is very damning for the Crown, and they used the term crime fraud on it.
	So around this application, there were arguments for Wednesday and Thursday around whether or not the judge should pierce client solicitor privilege and open up this envelope to take a look at the contents of it.
	Do you know what the CC1 stands for?
	Criminal Code 1 application.
	Okay.
	And I know that this can't be the subject of a publication ban because I know it and I haven't read anything under the ban.
	That was a letter which was inadvertently communicated to the defense, which basically indicated, That there were some questions as to the legitimacy, the constitutionality, the lawfulness of the course of action of investigating or prosecuting these individuals.
	And there was a re-tack of strategy afterwards.
	And the defense wants to say, well, what the heck happened?
	You pursued what you were advised was an improper line of investigation or whatever.
	Do you have any more details than that?
	Yeah, so the first thing I'll talk about is the publication ban that was put onto some of this on Thursday itself.
	So Thursday, the Crown actually was successful in putting a publication ban.
	The publication ban is going to cover the contents of this envelope, and I'm told it's four lines, just four lines that the judge needs to read, and then the decision of the judge himself will be under a publication ban.
	It's a temporary publication ban, so he didn't put in a permanent one in.
	And he didn't seal the documents.
	So when the time comes, I will be able to go look at the documents in the courthouse, but I won't be able to tell you what's in it.
	That's a temporary publication, Ben, that's put in place.
	The information that's in there, like we said, the defense believes it's crime fraud, which is a technical term for a lawyer providing illegal advice for the commission of a crime.
	The defense did say that the contents of this would affect Charter Section 8, which would be search and seizure, but the quote from the defense was, this is not just a charter issue, it's much more than that.
	So they're certainly lining up some sort of criminal code, potential violation, potentially the advice itself was criminal in nature.
	We don't know what that advice was, but that's the wording that's coming out of the defense on this particular envelope.
	And I can just hear people saying, we're going to want to prosecute potential unlawful legal advice in this circumstance while pardoning it in the United States where people are arguing that the advice that Trump got was illegal constitutional challenges.
	I can imagine.
	I have no idea what that letter could contain, but I can imagine how they were advising them to unlawfully spy because we know that the government was doing that.
	Under the pretext of COVID.
	We can know that they were...
	I can imagine they might spy on his phone.
	We don't have a warrant.
	Too bad.
	Let's ask for the cell phone data.
	I can imagine those things.
	Okay.
	Interesting.
	So that debate lasted the better part of three days?
	Or three court days?
	I gotta tell you, the Crown did his...
	Spectacular job delaying and causing adjournments.
	They were able to pull tricks out of their sleeves.
	Example, a last-minute affidavit which caused the defense to ask for an adjournment to review the affidavit, which wasted an entire afternoon on Tuesday.
	On Wednesday, the Crown changed their argument about a particular item, which again caused the defense to adjourn in order to adjust their responses to the new argument.
	In either case, it really just caused, I think, an entire day to be lost during the little window of time that we had for three days to have these arguments.
	They were successful at doing that, and it was kind of weird to watch, to be honest with you.
	But I get it.
	I get it.
	They were trying to prolong.
	What they were doing here on the arguments.
	The arguments did close on Thursday, and the judge did recognize that this will be new case law.
	There is no case law for this particular situation.
	And this is why he's taking his time, and he's going to make a decision.
	It's going to be a written decision, but did he indicate he might issue an oral decision given the time urgency, or he's going to wait for a full written decision?
	Okay, so the arguments around that was the defense wanted the decision immediately.
	Obviously.
	Yeah, motivated.
	Just so people understand this as well, the judge can say, I'm going to issue a more detailed written decision later.
	For example, on bail, look, you're out now and I'll justify it while you're out as opposed to keeping you in over the weekend while I write it, which they sometimes do to needle.
	So what did the judge say about that?
	Well, the Crown wanted to open up the envelope at the end of the trial.
	And the judge says he'll open it up at least by the beginning of the trial, which will be in May 2024.
	He did then indicate after that he can open it much sooner than that.
	There's two decisions for the judge to make.
	The first one is to pierce the veil.
	The second one is to act upon the information.
	He doesn't know that information yet, so there'll have to be another decision and potentially arguments around the contents of that envelope as well before final decisions made on the action of the contents of that envelope.
	Did you say that the trial is scheduled for May 2024?
	May 27th, 2024.
	How many days is it scheduled for?
	Through June.
	So I think six weeks.
	May 2024.
	Yes, Mark.
	That's amazing, isn't it?
	And that's taken us close to the Jordan date, which will be in August 2024, which means they would be set free because that would be 30 months straight of delayed trial.
	And not just delayed trial.
	Detention.
	Pre-trial detention in remand.
	It's one thing to have a delayed trial when you're out living your life.
	So that would be in detention, having your life stolen from you while you wait for a trial to figure out whether or not you're going to get acquitted.
	Holy cow, that's six weeks.
	Is it four days a week or is it going to be five days a week?
	Well, just from what we've had so far, it was five days a week.
	And there is an application to move it to another venue to speed it up.
	And ironically, it's the Crown who's asking for that application.
	They might be trying to cut the time for the defense to prepare or whatnot, but the Crown is trying to get it into another venue to speed up that trial.
	So there may be a chance it is sooner.
	To speed up the date, not the actual try.
	It would still be six weeks or whatever.
	Correct.
	To start it is sooner.
	Do we know what venue?
	Do they want to change it to Ottawa?
	Calgary.
	The Ottawa was a joke.
	I'm just trying to think.
	Yeah, that would be horrible because right now we're in provincial court, thankfully, because some of the people that went through federal court on charges haven't done so well.
	James Sowery was convicted by a federal jury here in Alberta for running over a pylon, but the officer was scared.
	So he got convicted of scaring the officer or violent actions against the officer.
	But he ran over a pylon, made a big bang, and he is now facing sentencing.
	James Sowery?
	Sowery.
	S-O-W-E-R-Y.
	S-O-W.
	E-R-Y.
	I don't think I heard about this story.
	Now, how many people know about these other stories that are happening in Alberta and Oliver?
	Hold on one second.
	Well, we're going to learn in real time.
	It's amazing.
	Just two weeks ago, Brendan Strzok, one of the January Sixers, puts out a story about this state...
	He had a state function.
	I forget what it was.
	It was an elected function removed from office because he participated in insurrection, according to the judge, under the radar, like happened in 2022.
	Let me share this here.
	Coutts protests are guilty of assault at check stop for driving truck at officer.
	James Sowery faced charges of assault with a weapon and dangerous driving.
	And by the way, not to say that past is prologue.
	When one understands...
	They charged Randy Hillier for assault on a police officer.
	Randy Hillier, the member of Provincial Parliament, because he moved a barricade to let protesters go up the stairs on Parliament Hill.
	That was the alleged assault.
	I can imagine what happened here.
	Dude might have just run over a flipping pylon.
	I can take you through it.
	I've interviewed James.
	I can take you through what happened here.
	He's charged with assaulting a police officer.
	This sounds like one of the stories out of a movie connected to the other.
	He was found guilty.
	They deliberated for six hours.
	He accelerated his Hydrovac truck towards constable Corey Kornicki, who had been conducting traffic stops.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	He was convicted on both charges, assault with a weapon, and dangerous driving.
	Is he in jail in the interim?
	No, but his sentencing is coming up in September.
	Tell us what happened here.
	Okay, so what actually happened was he pulled over at a check stop.
	The story says that part.
	He was waved in by the police officer to start going.
	He started going.
	He got too close on the back right-hand side of his truck to those pylons.
	He drove over a pylon.
	It's winter.
	It exploded.
	The officer dove away from the vehicle as if he was being shot at.
	The officer went and got hurt when he did that.
	There's your assault with a deadly weapon, and there's your other charge.
	That's all he did.
	What movie was it?
	It was a movie about racial injustice where the guy was in jail talking to a black inmate and the inmate says, it was sort of a comedy, I don't think it was supposed to be a true story, but it says, I'm in here because I was robbing, I was stealing a television and I dropped it when they told me to put my hands up, it landed on somebody's foot.
	Was that Shawshank Redemption?
	I think so, yeah, that was Red.
	That was how he was coming out, wasn't it?
	And he dropped it on an officer's foot.
	And he says, you want me to drop it?
	Yeah, like that.
	It's similar to that.
	And this just depends on...
	Who do you believe?
	Do you believe the defendant?
	Or do you believe the cop?
	He went and tried to run over a cop.
	During the trial, the police officer did admit he went back to work, went back to work the next day, took no time off.
	However, on the stand, he did cry about the PTSD that he received during it.
	We can take that for what it's worth.
	He did get testimony that he was traumatized, this officer.
	He did continue to work immediately after.
	It's tough not to get cynical.
	You hear the testimony of the January 6th officers, traumatized, injured, sobbing, and then lo and behold, video footage comes out of the dude who allegedly sustained catastrophic injuries to his hand or his foot.
	Totally fine.
	How much time does he face?
	Did they mention it?
	I think it's quite a significant amount.
	Yeah, it's significant because this is assault on an officer with a deadly weapon.
	It's significant.
	All right, well, thanks for the black pill detour now.
	My apologies on that, but it is happening.
	We're getting more and more stories like that.
	We got Pat King, Tamara Lynch.
	We got a lot of people who are facing obscene amounts of time.
	What's the latest on Pat?
	So Tamara Leach's trial, she's coming up with Chris Barber in...
	September 18th or so?
	September something?
	Very soon.
	She's got a wildly long trial for mischief.
	What's Pat King's situation now?
	Pat King, for everybody who doesn't know.
	Went viral two years ago now when he was on the Stu Peters show and purportedly discovered how to conquer the COVID mandates.
	And I said, nah, it's not exactly what's happening, but nothing against Pat King whatsoever.
	What happened?
	What's his update?
	Well, he's allowed to go online now and do interviews, so I'll be having him on the 17th.
	I'm sure he'd love to come speak with you.
	And he's really only allowed to fundraise for his legal fees because he's got substantial fees.
	So the court did give him relief in order to go raise funds to pay his legal bills, but he's not allowed to do anything else.
	He's got a 10 p.m. curfew, and he's working hard to continue with his defense.
	If he wants to come on.
	He is more than invited, so let him know and you'll give him my info.
	Yeah, I'll connect you two immediately after this.
	Okay.
	Who else is there?
	You've got Chris Barber, Tamar Leach, Pat King.
	Yep.
	And 125 other named people.
	So over the last week and a half, my team has been collecting information all over Canada about the forgotten people.
	Of course, we can remember Pat and the gentleman here in Coots, but there's a lot more who are forgotten.
	So we're up to 129 named people.
	And these are people that we're reaching out to or anybody touched by the criminal justice system in Canada over their work.
	Advocation or anything to do with the freedom movement, if that's happened to you, including debanking, we want to hear from you.
	So we're up to 129 people right now, viva, and climbing.
	So we'll be breaking that story a lot more over the next few weeks.
	It's amazing.
	And people fault and then get suspicious, like, why aren't people covering the Coots 4?
	Those are the biggest names.
	129, and to greater or lesser degrees of alleged criminal infractions.
	Well, we have people in jail, for example, Tamara, Jeremy McKenzie, Pat King.
	We have people who are charged.
	We have people who pleaded.
	We have people who are convicted, like James Sowery.
	And Freedom George, he pleaded in order to get back home to his family.
	So we have a large, large amount of people who have been forgotten over the last year and a half who have been touched by the criminal justice system here in Canada.
	You got updates?
	I mean, I'm in touch with Jeremy all the time anyhow, but you got updates on Jeremy?
	Jeremy's doing well, so chatted with him today.
	He's pretty frustrated with some events that happened over the last few days, but he's dealing with it in his way.
	He's upset with Ezra.
	I think some of us have seen that video or the audio that's going around.
	So I'm sure he's going to deal with that in his own way.
	But the information I want to bring to you that we found out on Friday was Diagonalon is not mentioned in any of the court documents, the disclosure, or any parts of the court proceedings except for the word Diagonalon patch.
	When identifying the patch in the photo, Jeremy McKenzie is not mentioned in any of the documents either.
	It's in the public court of opinion where this connection is being made.
	It's not in the actual Lethbridge criminal court where this connection is being made.
	And that's a challenge because the family is very, very sensitive to the fact that this diagonal keeps coming up as like the boogeyman related to their men.
	But yet, that's not the real case.
	And that's not even what the court documents are trying to allege at this stage.
	Yeah, I listened to the podcast, Ezra's podcast today.
	I mean, there was clearly, it was a video, but I caught it on Podbean or Spotify or whatever.
	Spotify or something like that, yeah.
	I've told, I'll tell Ezra publicly, privately, I think he's wildly wrong on this diagonal on Jeremy McKenzie situation.
	Rebel has done great work.
	I just think they're making, not a mistake in the threatening sense.
	I think they are objectively wrong, or at least Ezra is objectively wrong when it comes to his assessment of the Coutts four, Diagilon, Jeremy's, not involvement, but connection.
	But for the fact that it's, there's no evidence that I even know of that these four men were indoctrinated, motivated, encouraged by Diagilon.
	And there's also, other than idiot politicians and parliamentarians who think Diagilon is a meaningful threat, There's nobody else out there who even regards Diagon as anything other than a meme factory on the interwebs that might make meme tweets every now and again.
	And if they're racist, they certainly show it in bizarre ways by having a very culturally diverse crowd.
	And if they're anti-Semitic, they also show it in very bizarre ways.
	That's not to say stupid things on the internet, but...
	As far as I even understood, there was no connection other than that patch, which allowed people to draw the connection as to actual incitement, encouragement, motivation by the diagonal Kekistan meme to what happened.
	But yeah, and then the RCMP during their press conference alluded to an organization that had leadership outside of Alberta that was controlling these men and providing assistance and resources to these men.
	This was the RCMP statement.
	They didn't say Diagon, nor did the documents say Diagon, but they still haven't proven that.
	There hasn't been a single charge, a single name, or anybody else associated with this incident outside of Alberta, or even in Alberta, other than the men charged.
	So even that little narrative did not transpire.
	No, no, and it's so, it all makes sense in reverse now, when I was walking the streets, and everyone's like, Viva, why?
	And I'm reading the chat while I'm walking the streets, and everyone's like, why are you ignoring Jeremy McKenzie?
	And I didn't even understand what was going on until...
	Hindsight afterwards, when they were having the debate and they talk about Diagalon and everyone in the chat is like, Diagalon is a joke, Kekistan-esque type thing that these parliamentarians thought was a real organization that actually came up in parliamentary debates.
	And then I remember seeing more videos and now it all makes sense.
	So that was the linchpin of the legal theory.
	It was not that, as far as I understood, any of the four men said, yeah, I was part of this Diaglon and really motivated to do something bad.
	It was parliamentarians being duped by a meme and Commissioner Rouleau needing to legitimize the coups for arrest conspiracy in order to justify the invocation of the Emergencies Act.
	Correct.
	Correct.
	And it's caused a lot of anguish.
	I'm going to tell you, Viva, because I've spoken to the family if I had to hear their pain.
	It's caused a lot of anguish that there are people out there still pushing the narrative that Jeremy took them down, Jeremy put them there.
	It's causing a lot of frustration because there is a community around these people, and it's a good community.
	It's just there's some bad actors in there really pushing that narrative, and it's got to stop for you.
	But the best we can do here is just talk about the truth, and there is no evidence that there's any connection.
	I can tell you the evidence.
	I've had Jeremy McKenzie on the evidence.
	I can tell you my evidence.
	I've had Jeremy on a number of times.
	I trust him, and I think that he has been the victim of this system and not an actor or perpetrator in it.
	I've spoken to people who consider themselves to be members of Diagon.
	First of all, people send me fun stuff in the mail.
	They love the community, and they love it in the sense that it carried them through this last three years of hell, not because it's like a young Hitler or Hitler youth neo-Nazi group.
	Women men who said, Prevented me from harming myself where we had this community, we had our network, and then the government flipside takes that network because it does in fact span a country and turns it into a criminal network as opposed to a support network.
	The people I talked to have all said, hearing Jeremy rant, the community that we had, the support community, it gave me meaning and it carried me through hard times.
	I've never heard any legitimate, credible indication to the contrary, other than stupid politicians who take jokes literally when they want to demonize people to further their unlawful schemes.
	Yeah, 30 years ago, it would have been kids in the hall that they were trying to say was a big group that everybody's following and quoting and buying merch of.
	Because this is what it is.
	It's a comedy group.
	It's for adults only.
	It's 18 plus, for sure.
	But it's just a group.
	It's just a comedy group of like-minded people who are passionate.
	I'm going to bring this up because I want to address this.
	Maxim one, Jeremy is the Canadian Reyes.
	Did Reyes go to jail?
	Did Reyes get arrested?
	Held in solitary confinement?
	Get debanked?
	Get his ass hauled across from solitary in Nova Scotia to wherever in Saskatchewan?
	Jeremy McKenzie, not to get angry, it's like...
	It's a silly thing to say because Ray Epps, never charged, protected by government, praised by government, praised by the bipartisan committee, what's the word?
	Lionized as the hero that told...
	McKenzie has...
	I don't say he's had his life ruined because he's done very well in terms of not letting his life get ruined.
	Okay, so no.
	So no, it's a silly thing.
	If you say something like that, it makes you look silly.
	Okay.
	Yeah, frustration to me too is Ray was trying to get people in there.
	There's videos of him saying, go, go, go, Storm.
	There's video of Jeremy saying, don't throw a snowball.
	Be gentle.
	Be nice.
	I remember he said, keep your heads down.
	Don't give them an excuse.
	They're looking for an excuse.
	The complete opposite.
	So he's the anti-Ray.
	He's not.
	Verbatim.
	He said, keep your heads down and don't give them an excuse.
	That's one hell of a way to be a Ray Epps.
	We need to go into the Capitol is the 180 degree opposite of don't give them an excuse.
	Don't look for trouble.
	Which is exactly what he said, if not verbatim, pretty damn close because I remember those videos now in retrospect.
	And to just be very clear with everybody, Jeremy was there as a spectator.
	He wasn't there as a leader.
	He didn't have a group.
	He wasn't telling people what to do.
	He was literally there as a spectator.
	He even paid for his own parking.
	We found that out in the POEC.
	Hey, full disclosure.
	I never paid for parking when I went to Ottawa.
	If I get a ticket, I'll get a ticket.
	The tickets are $52.
	The parking is going to cost me $25 all day.
	I hedged my bets.
	That's alright.
	You might be charged now.
	Oh my goodness.
	That's the situation.
	In all the gridlock and insurrection and occupation, I found parking every day I drove down.
	The parking was two blocks down on Elgin Street.
	It was a good event.
	Do you mind if I talk a little bit about the men?
	Give you some updates on them?
	Yeah, yeah.
	So I've been speaking a lot to Chris Carbert and Chris Lysak recently.
	Just to let you know that Chris Carbert is a father of two.
	He's the one that raised his 10-month-old.
	I've been with him the entire time, so hopefully he'll be able to get his son back immediately coming out.
	He was also a small business owner that owned a landscaping company, award-winning in the Lethbridge area.
	Good gentleman.
	Chris Lysak, he's also a father of two, two beautiful daughters.
	I got to meet one of them when I was down there.
	And he's an electrician.
	He was working on his master's for his electrician at the time.
	Both of these gentlemen reminded me that...
	All the messages that were recorded, text message and stuff like that, that are in the disclosure, they're missing a whole bunch of messages.
	For example, they're planning to leave the very next day.
	Both of them were making arrangements to leave the very next day to go be with their family, both their children.
	So these were not men who were looking to take over the government at any point.
	They were planning to get out of there.
	Tony Olenek, he was a heavy equipment operator, and he is really looking forward to getting back to his mother, Betty, who misses him a lot.
	She's an elderly woman who really, really counted on her son to take care of her.
	She's doing all right right now.
	She's got a lot of good people around her, but Tessie would like to have her son back.
	And then Jerry Morin, the father of three, got a wife named Jacqueline.
	If your viewers have not...
	Watch Jacqueline's story.
	I highly recommend it because Viva, that was a hell within a hell.
	Simply being the wife of, she got charged.
	Flip me the link.
	If you could send it in private chat, I'll share it with my community everywhere afterwards, but sorry.
	You absolutely will get that.
	Yeah, yeah, because that's a hell within a hell.
	Simply by being the wife of, she was also charged.
	She's still charged.
	And because she's charged, she can't even go to his trial because she's a witness.
	So she can't even sit in the room and be part of it.
	She can't be alone with him.
	She can't go see him.
	She can call him.
	Text them because those are filtered, but she can't do anything else.
	Her story is horrific, like horrific, what they did to her and her family and the house.
	I'll pass you that link because your viewers should hear Jacqueline's story.
	It's a hell within hell that nobody's talking about.
	All right.
	The process of the punishment.
	It is.
	But the good news around that family is they're very strong.
	So what you're going to see when you watch Jacqueline is she is an amazing person.
	We'll all encourage her to run for office one day because she is definitely that type of person.
	And it was her conviction and strength that likely saved her jail time.
	As she takes you through the charges, they're the same.
	She did, according to her, she went with him.
	It was her car.
	Everything they did was the same.
	Again, no conspiracy to commit murder.
	Never happened.
	They let her off because she was very strong when it came to talking to her, trying to ping things on her and getting her to say things that she shouldn't say.
	She definitely was one of the ones that said lawyer first.
	And I do believe that's what kept her out of jail.
	She has to suffer a new jail outside of it, but her story is horrific.
	But she's got a good team around her.
	They're working very strong to support her, Jerry, and the rest of the men.
	So we're very happy with that part of it.
	But yeah, I just wanted to highlight that there is another story within this story.
	Not many people know about, and it's sad.
	It's very sad.
	And I know some of these details, and I'm ridiculously neurotic about sharing information that they may not want to share with the public, so I'm glad you're doing it.
	So if you share too much, it won't be my fault.
	I do have a video.
	She gave us a three-hour interview on this, and it's riveting the entire thing.
	So I'll share that link with you.
	Let me just show you.
	In the meantime, let's see if I can find the...
	In the meantime, everybody, don't worry.
	Don't worry.
	Trudeau's going to movies with this kid.
	Wow.
	We're team Barbie.
	It's bat shit crazy.
	I'm going to go over that a little later.
	There's rumors.
	Are you believing the rumors?
	I don't even care.
	It's irrelevant.
	I know Slopinski put out an article.
	Someone invited me to a space yesterday.
	Is Trudeau whatever.
	I don't care.
	Yeah, I don't.
	I genuinely don't care.
	I know what I think.
	It doesn't matter.
	But like I responded to somebody earlier today, what pisses me off about all this, let me rephrase, people are not outraged that he went to see a movie with his kid.
	They're outraged that in the same week that he asks for privacy, he then three days later posts the most flamboyantly pay attention to me picture with his kid whom he just asked for privacy for.
	While people are literally suffering, while people's children are literally You know, harming themselves because of the policy of this jackaninny, but he's going, we're Team Barbie?
	What the hell does that even mean is what I also want.
	What does it mean, we're Team Barbie?
	Why don't you go see We're Team Oppenheimer?
	Go see Oppenheimer.
	Watch it decently.
	It's not going to rot your brain.
	Oh my.
	He's kind of imploding a little bit, is he not?
	And also, the other thing is, maybe I'm projecting my own stress and my own anxiety.
	He doesn't look good.
	He looks awful.
	But I also think that being the worst, most hated person in Canadian history, it's got to wear on you after a certain point in time.
	And I have no doubt.
	I know what I think about the wound on his head.
	I don't think that was from playing with kids.
	But whatever.
	It's a difficult one.
	My wife has her own theories.
	It looks like a shoe.
	She has her own theories.
	Oh!
	A flipping heel!
	A stiletto!
	That's what she's saying.
	That is...
	I mean, that's one hell of a shot.
	It's so symmetrically right in the middle of his forehead.
	My initial reaction was he came from a Hindi festival.
	I'm not saying that to be funny.
	It's so symmetrically right in the middle.
	It's like it was deliberately placed there.
	If that was an accidental, someone threw a shoe.
	Good shot.
	They missed Bush when they threw a shoe, but maybe someone got him on this one.
	It can't be a paintball.
	It couldn't be like we went paintballing.
	It would have left a much bigger welt.
	It gets a good bruise here.
	Yeah, like a round.
	And then there would have been like the ripple.
	Like you get the white, then the ripple.
	Stiletto.
	Okay.
	Is it a horn that's trying to come out?
	I don't know.
	That was my initial joke.
	Between the horn on his head and the stuff in his hands.
	Oh, man.
	Okay.
	Oh, my gosh.
	But look, I really appreciate being able to break this stuff about the 129.
	Political prisoners around Canada.
	And I'm also happy, because of you, and I'm sure a lot of other people who are assisting, we are being able to get the message out a lot further now.
	So we're on Infowars, we're on some UK stuff coming up.
	Amazing.
	Have you been on, have you reached out to Steve Bannon?
	No, but there's a person who's trying to, so if you know...
	I got, I got, I got...
	I'll get you Pat King, you get me Steve Bannon, you know, you work this out.
	No, no, for sure, for sure.
	And try to generate the, not the interest in a cynical sense, someone...
	I know that I'm getting cranky when I pay attention to the troll comments where, you know, there was that article of the young teenager out in British Columbia, I think, denied.
	I'm going to go over it afterwards.
	Denied an organ because if anybody knows the family, tell them to reach out to me because I'd love to have her on so she can share her story with the world.
	And someone says, grifting, you're exploiting.
	It's like, you idiots.
	You realize that the alternative to that is that they should suffer in silence and the world should not know what's happening to them.
	But I should just stop reading the troll comments.
	I keep telling people down here, they've got to pay attention to what's happening north of the border.
	This is trickle-down communism.
	Absolutely.
	Gabriel Clark said the same thing.
	There's a woman down in the States who helped people with transition back to birth gender.
	I had her on my show to talk about that because we can't do that here in Canada.
	We can't have consultation all the way back to birth gender.
	It's against the law here.
	She said the same thing.
	She said she's seen some of the indicators up here in Canada that were further along the process and that the U.S. is maybe 10 years behind, if you're lucky, behind where we're at.
	If you're not in California, New York, Michigan, Pennsylvania, but there's some other really wacky states.
	But that's just the way it happens.
	It's the Overton window.
	Jeannie Howe is telling me to chill.
	What I lack is chill.
	What I have to go do is exercise after this and get out the...
	So 129 people of various degrees of infractions.
	The Coots Four are the headliners of this political persecution that carries on to this day.
	Tamara Leach, Chris Barber are having their trial.
	If it's not in a month, it might be in a month and a half.
	And Coots Four have their trial date, May 2024.
	And many, many more.
	So we'll break a bunch of new names.
	So James likes James Sowery and many more like that.
	You're going to hear some more stories and you'll be like, oh man, there's a pattern here.
	It just seems like anybody that said freedom is now in cuffs at some point in their journey here.
	And I'll say, again, I would say to Ezra, publicly, privately as well, the idea that so much weight is placed on the gravity of the charges, I mean, that is almost like saying, well...
	It's lending credibility to the bogus political persecution in the first place.
	Well, the lesson to be learned?
	Charge them all.
	Charge them all with serious crimes, and that way no one will ever stand up for their constitutional charter rights.
	I'd like to take this chance to actually make an offer out to Ezra.
	It's a sincere offer.
	I really mean it.
	We'll get him a copy of the disclosure.
	We can get him a digital copy of it.
	He can have it all, because I don't understand he has it right now.
	He's referring to 100 pages that he read that are under the publication ban.
	Those didn't say the diagonal connection, so we're happy to give him a copy of the disclosure and sit down and have a conversation about it.
	We're more than happy to sit with family, the lawyers, and other people to go ahead and have a conversation with Ezra directly, privately, on stream, whatever works.
	Because we think it's important because his voice is strong and it is respected.
	So I think it's kind of necessary to get this part of it correct.
	If he doesn't want to do that, I don't know what else he can offer other than we'll bring that truth forward.
	All right.
	Awesome.
	Jason, that's it for the update.
	Anytime there's more news, you'll come on and we'll keep this going so that we can get this out to as many people.
	Where can people find you?
	Well, you can find me on Rumble right now because YouTube has suspended me for some virus truth or vaccine truth.
	So you can find me on Rumble.
	Yeah.
	You can find me on Twitter.
	It's my second strike, too, so I'm in trouble.
	You can find me on Twitter, Rumble, Getter, all the other places, Jason Levine MP.
	For everybody else, that means Member of Parliament, but for Ezra, that means media person, because he doesn't like the fact that I use the MP there.
	You're an aspiring Member of Parliament.
	Aspiring, correct, yes.
	So I am a registered independent running for Yellowhead, which is west of Edmonton.
	And I'm happy to announce that, yeah, we're doing quite well out here.
	We're getting the word out there.
	But our focus right now is on the political prisoners of Canada, especially Alberta.
	It's a big problem here.
	All right, man.
	Amazing.
	I'll put your Twitter handle and your rumble in the pinned comment afterwards.
	You got it.
	And I put the Jacqueline link here in the private here.
	It's the last link.
	Great.
	I'm going to keep that.
	Jason, we'll be in touch.
	Thank you very much, Viva.
	You take care and thank you for the Tim Pool episode.
	I forgot to mention a few of the injustices.
	I forgot Sean Hartman.
	I even forgot who I forgot now.
	Oh, Gad Sad.
	I forgot to mention Gad Sad's new book.
	There's too much.
	It's flooded to the point of numbness.
	You can count on us over here, Viva.
	We'll collect a lot of this and bring it back to you weekly and give you these updates.
	Beautiful.
	All right.
	Jason, thank you very much.
	You take care of me.
	Have a great day.
	You too.
	Bye-bye.
	All right.
	And we're going to carry this on, people, because we've got some stories here.
	The link to Rumble.
	But before I do that, I think there was one super chat here.
	Jeff Pearson, worldwide liberty is dead.
	No free nation exists.
	I can't disagree with it.
	I'll tell you, it's been one of those days.
	Not sleeping well.
	And the sad, lamentable state of the world is enough to make you depressed.
	But not to turn into the monster that you're battling.
	Just, you know, depressing.
	But exercise can...
	Look at this.
	We're going to see...
	We're going to see Jason in real time as I read the rumble rants.
	There's two of them.
	Megaman Chronicle says, Thank you, Viva, for answering my rumble rant and hope I wasn't rude in asking.
	I happily look forward to listening to you and Barnes streams.
	You both are very informative to listen to.
	Mega Man, I can tell you that I wasn't offended.
	Let me see this here.
	Hold on.
	I didn't find anything rude because I don't even remember what I could have interpreted as being rude.
	So don't worry about it.
	Waha Tonin.
	Okay, let me just make sure that I'm not reading something that's going to get me in trouble.
	That cop's name is Joey Bagham Donuts and he's gun-toting Mama's Boy.
	That's from a movie.
	I know that's from a movie.
	Okay, so what we're going to do here, head on over to the Rumbles.
	We're going to go for a little bit here.
	Link to Rumble.
	I want to talk about these people who are defending Trudeau.
	Oh my god.
	Do I look tired?
	I feel that I look tired.
	I got the bags under my eyes.
	The lighting has washed out the grimace wrinkle.
	Right there.
	All right.
	Get your butts over to Rumble and we can Rumble away and have some fun here.
	How many are we?
	685.
	Come on over to Rumble.
	And then we're going to go over to locals afterwards.
	Let me see.
	VNA.
	Hold on.
	All caps does capture my attention.
	You're a lawyer, but you never tell the people the root of the problem.
	With the rights in Canada...
	Oh, this...
	I'm never getting...
	I'm not getting into this, VMA.
	I don't know anything about this.
	So, I don't know enough to say it's nonsense.
	I think I...
	I know what I think.
	I do not...
	I don't know enough about this.
	And I have legal training, as can be seen from my Université Laval diploma right above my head.
	All right.
	Come on.
	Get your butts over here.
	Rumble.
	Ending it on YouTube in five, four, three, two, one.
	Booyah.
	Let's get ready to rumble!
	And no more rumble rants.
	Let me see if there's anything in the locals chat.
	Looks like there's some good beams.
	Alright, so you all want to get blackpilled?
	Once we're on the blackpill, let's just put some of that big, shiny spotlight on the insanity out of Canada.
	Let me just make sure we've got here.
	Oh yeah, we've got some fun stuff.
	Okay, here's the story that's not fun stuff.
	And we know that it's true now.
	There was Sheila Annette Lewis, who I had on the channel.
	We raised hell over the fact that she was taken off the organ transplant list in Alberta and shined some of that shiny bright spotlight on it.
	There was a publication ban on her charter violation challenge, which did not succeed.
	Dismissed at the lowest court level.
	They said it's a purely medical decision.
	We're not getting involved.
	Court of Appeals said it's a purely medical decision.
	We're not getting involved.
	But even if the charter question did apply, it wouldn't have been a violation of her charter rights because she's making a decision not to get the jibby jab.
	And then the Supreme Court said, we sign off on your death warrant and we refuse to hear your charter violation argument.
	She then went back and sued for negligence or malpractice, and then they settled.
	Publication ban.
	Couldn't mention the organ.
	This woman needed an organ.
	She could not mention her own body organ that she needed because it might allow for the identification of the doctors whose names could not be named and the medical institution which might be named and might face the public backlash for refusing to transplant on a woman who refuses to have the jibby jab.
	That was an amazing interview.
	There was a case in Ottawa of a young man, 35 years old, who died because he was refused a kidney transplant, allegedly because he refused to submit to the jab.
	This, Sydney is in, that's in British Columbia.
	Family claims, oh no, this is the woman.
	Family claims Sydney's St. Vincent Hospital is refusing to give their young daughter a life-saving lung transplant because she won't get the COVID jabs.
	Let me just see.
	This is out of British Columbia.
	Let's see here.
	16-year-old does not want to get the COVID jab.
	She needs a lung transplant.
	Hospital policies wouldn't support transplantation of unvaccinated person.
	Hospital claims there are other factors too.
	Oh, really?
	Can we know what those other factors are in the hierarchy?
	What are the other factors?
	She's a combative recipient.
	She won't follow the other protocol because she won't follow this.
	What are those other ones?
	Let's see if the article mentions it.
	Have you got a story?
	Email david.southwell at dailymail.com.
	The family of a young cancer sufferer claims she's being denied vital lung transplant due to her decision not to receive four COVID vaccines, allegedly, according to the family.
	But the hospital claims other factors are also at play.
	May I ask that question yet again?
	What would be those other factors?
	Oh, dear, hospital.
	The parents of Dazelle Peters, who is in remission from leukemia, which was diagnosed in late 2020, alleged that Sydney's St. Vincent's Hospital is denying their 60-year-old daughter a double lung transplant because she will not take the vaccines.
	A double lung transplant.
	Her father, Josh Peters, who has had the COVID shot himself, claims surgeons told his daughter that she did not get the jabs and then caught the virus.
	She would be a, quote, major threat to everyone in the hospital who has done the right thing.
	Bear in mind, this is according to the father relaying what the hospital allegedly said to him, so take it for what it's worth.
	And remember when I said that Justin Trudeau, the woman-loving, minority-loving, fighter of all minority rights, was enacting, supporting, promoting policy that had a disparate impact on minorities?
	My eyes work, Justin.
	My brain works also, at least for the time being.
	The way he made us feel that they didn't want to give her the lung transplant, Mr. Peter said.
	The way he made us feel was that they didn't want to give her the lung transplant.
	We're getting into feelings.
	Okay.
	Mr. Peter said during the May 9 consultation, the surgeon said the hospital would give the lungs to a better candidate because DeZella's case is a complex case.
	The hospital said Dazelle's lack of COVID vaccination is a factor in her not being put on the waiting list, but there are other reasons beside that.
	Do we find out those reasons?
	Since her bone marrow transplant, Dazelle has suffered from graft-versus-host disease, a condition where her body's immune system is attacking the donor's blood cells, considering them as foreign.
	Can't see this whole thing here.
	Considering them as foreign, as well as battling a rare type of pneumonia.
	The hospital says being immunosystem compromised could further complicate a transplant procedure.
	Could this not also compromise her ability to deal with four COVID shots?
	I mean, I'm thinking like a lawyer, not a doctor.
	A hospital spokesman confirmed their policies and guidelines wouldn't support transplantation of an unvaccinated person.
	Vaccination status against various infections is a critical part of the assessment in order to ensure optimal prospects of survival post-transplant.
	Accordingly, there are national guidelines and recommendations regarding vaccination before, and yes, except that this little jibby-jab thing is not a vaccination.
	It's a therapeutic as, don't trust me, Kieran Moore?
	What was his name?
	Kieran Moore, Ontario Chief Medical Officer, once upon a time.
	Therapeutic.
	He called it a therapeutic.
	Because something which doesn't prevent contracting, carrying, or transmitting a virus can hardly, scarcely be called a vaccine.
	At best, a therapeutic.
	However, the spokesperson stressed that each case was decided individually.
	There are other complexities that need to be assessed before an informed decision can be made about the appropriateness and practicality of...
	There's a number of complexities that need to be assessed before an informed decision can be made for everything except for taking the jab.
	We have requested further follow-up from Herner Doctors, further...
	Former Deputy...
	Chief Medical Officer Nick Coatsworth explained that there was a good reason transplant patients needed the vaccine.
	Oh, really?
	Tell us.
	From a transplant physician's point of view, the biggest risk is when you hit your immune system like that, if you get COVID-19 without having the vaccine, there's a significant risk that the organ will die on you, he said earlier this year.
	Oh, really?
	I'm not calling anybody a liar.
	I would like to see the statistics on that.
	I'd like to see the studies on that.
	They didn't even study for transmissibility, let alone how a body responds.
	Oh my gosh.
	And we don't want that to happen.
	We don't want it to happen for someone who's made the sacred donation.
	Mr. Peters waits beside Dazelle's bedside as the teen battles a post-bone marrow disease that is attacking her lungs and other organs.
	I'm not looking at the picture.
	That's very upsetting.
	So that's the latest of the madness out of Canada.
	Let me see here.
	Ginger Ninja's in the house.
	I mean, this is happening everywhere also.
	It's not even a one-off.
	Ginger Ninja 1776.
	We on Locos are going to start a coup.
	Where is Pam Walker?
	We want Pam.
	We want Pam.
	No, Pam Walker is the one who...
	Hold on.
	I'm going to send Pam the link for this.
	Pam Walker is a member of our Locals community and we've recently decided that we were going to do an interview with one of our local subscribers and Pam was the winner.
	I'm going to send Pam the link right now because I don't think I saw a reply.
	I'm going to send Pam the link.
	Link to StreamYard and we can do this interview right now if we can do this.
	Any chance you can.
	Pop on for the locals exclusive.
	Everyone in chat, if Pam is there, let me see here.
	Is Pam in the house?
	Pam.
	Is Pam in the house?
	We're going to see if this works today.
	This will be so great.
	So Pam is the first winner selected randomly.
	We're going to do like a locals meet the locals community.
	Okay, we'll see if it works.
	Ginger Ninja.
	Thank you.
	Okay.
	Let's see what happens now.
	What else was there?
	There was a couple of other stories.
	Hold on.
	Are we going to do the...
	Oh, yay.
	Okay, here.
	We're going to get back to the Justin Trudeau thing because it really drives me nuts.
	This is not the one that I wanted.
	People coming to the defense of Justin Trudeau.
	On the basis that why can't someone ask for privacy in respect of one aspect of their life and then continue to publicly flaunt another aspect of their life?
	And the people who are defending Justin Trudeau are so disingenuous in the rationale for their defense of Justin Trudeau.
	Here, I'm going to bring this one up here.
	Everyone, and hiding behind, I called it, accusations of homophobia, as if to say, I find this pic outrageous and embarrassing, has nothing to do with any form of homophobia or homosexuality whatsoever.
	It has to do with an idiot shaming Canada at a national and international level.
	Charlie Senac, journalist, I guess.
	It's disgusting.
	Seeing some of the replies to this tweet.
	Can the Prime Minister of Canada not go to a movie with his kid and take part in a trend like everyone else?
	First obvious answer to that, the Prime Minister is not like everyone else.
	He's not like anyone else.
	When he announces in one week, I'm getting divorced or I'm splitting up with my wife, we'd like our privacy, and then three days later, posting a picture which, to many, Uh, was confusing in that there's a lot of people out there who didn't appreciate that this young, handsome gentleman is his kid.
	To post it.
	We're Team Barbie.
	Can he not go to a movie with his kid and take part in a child like everyone else?
	Sorry, Charlie Sinek.
	He's the Prime Minister of Canada.
	The answer to that question might actually be an unfortunate no.
	People complain when politicians are too stuck up.
	They also complain when they're gaslighting hypocrites, Charlie.
	Then they complain when they live a little.
	No!
	We complain when they are gaslighting hypocrites, as I explained to Charlie.
	I'll just read my response because I can say it.
	He's destroyed the lives of countless Canadians.
	Forget it.
	He's destroyed the lives of countless Canadians.
	Literally.
	Whether it's through people having harmed themselves, been harmed by this jab that he now acknowledges.
	I'm sure lots of Canadians have been injured by it.
	Three days before posting this, he asks the public for privacy for him and his kids.
	Three days later, he whores out his children for political profit so he can partake in it.
	No, you don't get to ask for privacy and then go publicly post selfies and complain when people are outraged.
	Don't be coy, Charlie Sinak, and pretend you don't understand why people are outraged.
	And by the way, I'm starting this.
	Charlie Sinak wants to have the old LGB flag in his profile.
	Why is that?
	That's not inclusive enough.
	It's very intolerant and non-inclusive of you not to be using the latest iteration of the 2SLGBTQIA plus flag in your bio.
	Those are the rules.
	Hey, anyone in the LGB community wants to only use the old flag and the non-new, not the new one, which is hyper-inclusive?
	You get called out.
	Oh, what?
	You think you're better than the 2SLGBTQIA plus community that you don't have to use the new 2SLGBTQIA flag?
	I'm sorry, do I sense a little bigotry among the exclusion among the LGBT community?
	Oh, no, no, no.
	I'm not using that new flag.
	I don't like that one.
	I'm using the old one, which is very, very exclusive.
	It doesn't allow for the 2S and the QIA+.
	Pretending that people are outraged that he's out for a night on town with this kid.
	No!
	People are outraged that he's burning Canada to the ground, going through...
	Substantial personal turmoil that might actually make him incapable of governing a country, although he never was capable in the first place.
	He asks for privacy, not just for him, for his kid.
	Touts out his children like little political tools so that he can get sympathy.
	Please respect our and their privacy.
	And then comes out three days later with an absolutely idiotic, shameful, embarrassing tweet.
	We are Team Barbie.
	What the hell does that even mean?
	Sorry.
	Deep breaths.
	Serenity now.
	Lord, give me the power to change the things I can't change.
	I forgot.
	I know the essence of the serenity prayer.
	I just can't do it.
	I can't do it.
	So anyways, that's it.
	That's it.
	And I think we pulled this one up already.
	Oh, no.
	All right.
	Closing the chapter.
	Because I now...
	Marissa Streit is the...
	Person at PragerU who interviewed me for the PragerU interview.
	Holy crap, Apple.
	So she put out a tweet today, and it says this, and she's right.
	She's not wrong.
	She's right.
	Just, you know, I guess it's related.
	It's a segue from the 2SLGBTQIA plus flag and the intolerance of Charlie Sinak to be flying the old flag and not the new inclusive one in a country where you cannot talk people into thinking you might get through this phase illegal.
	I have no idea who this dude is.
	And I just, I saw this and I was like, well, I got to double check it.
	I trust Marissa Streit, but I'm going to verify.
	This is how you know when someone is controlled by ESG.
	That is, what is it?
	Environmental, social, governance?
	Whatever the hell it is.
	You know, like, they're controlled.
	Political elites and giant for-profit companies control the narrative in order to control society.
	People like Noye Compound.
	Noye is Noye Compound.
	Self-explanatory.
	I don't know what Noye is.
	I thought it was music, but I'm not sure.
	Oh, singer.
	I'm an idiot.
	That's why I thought it.
	Okay.
	People like Noye Compound know and want to speak the truth, but they can't because they are controlled.
	Truth to that, Marissa.
	Singer Noye bashes parents who transition kids, forgotten their roles.
	Very proud of it.
	Noye, come here.
	We got to talk to you.
	I know you thought you're allowed to have your own opinions and use your own brain.
	But here's the thing about that.
	You're not, sir.
	We own you.
	And if you want your contracts in the future, if you want your venues in the future, if you want us to advance for whatever music production, you're going to walk that back, dummy, because you're not entitled to have your own opinion.
	Oh!
	13 hours later, I don't know what it was.
	I'd like to express my deepest apologies.
	Look at this.
	Say I love Big Brother.
	Say it, sir.
	Apologize for thinking you were able to think for yourself.
	Apologize for thinking you were an independent, respected, autonomous human being because you're not Noye, you are owned.
	After much reflection, I'd like to express my deepest apologies to anyone that I may have heard with my comments on parenting and gender identity.
	You're apologizing for having condemned what is nothing shy of genital mutilation in confused children?
	That's good.
	I've always been an advocate for love and inclusivity.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Do you have the...
	You don't have the 2SLGBTQA flag in your bio, Noye.
	How can you say that you're for inclusivity when you are excluding that presence of that flag and all its inclusivity in your bio?
	You're not.
	Bull crap.
	These apologies falling on deaf ears.
	God, listen to this.
	I've always been an advocate for love and two weeks to flatten the curve and inclusivity and LGBTQI+.
	Why not just put plus?
	If it's plus, it includes everything.
	Just plus.
	Community.
	So I understand how my comments could have been interpreted as insensitive and offensive.
	Gender identity, say the line, Bart.
	Two weeks to flatten the curve.
	We're all in this together.
	We're supporting Ukraine as long as it takes.
	Gender identity is nuanced.
	And I can honestly admit that I plan to be better.
	Hold on a second.
	And I can honestly admit that I plan to better educate myself on the topic so I can approach future conversations with more empathy.
	At the end of the day, I lead with love and support.
	I lead?
	I led with love and support.
	I lead with love.
	Oh, I lead with love.
	I would have added a comma there.
	And support everyone's freedom of expression and pursuit of happiness.
	You support everyone's freedom of expression except your own.
	No yay.
	You don't have the right to express your own thoughts.
	You don't have the right to have your own opinion.
	Someone's going to tell you what to think and you're going to apologize because you engaged in wrong things.
	Now hold on one second.
	I pulled up the article here.
	No yay's apology slammed Newsweek.
	Noye's apology slammed following controversial comments about gender.
	Noye has changed his tune about transgender children after previously saying he did not agree with parents letting their kids transition.
	Can you imagine that?
	After backtracking on his original statement, Noye is now receiving a torrent of online backlash from people slamming his apology.
	I'm not slamming it.
	I'm just saying you're a hypocrite.
	You've sold your soul to the devil.
	And you have betrayed yourself.
	You have borne false witness to yourself.
	No, yay.
	May you live forever because you have betrayed your own thought and your own conscience.
	He originally said during an interview that parents, quote, have almost forgotten what the role of a parent is.
	That's right.
	In telling a confused 14-year-old, you're not going to permanently mutilate your body because of what is a potentially 90-some odd percent of the time a passing trend.
	You'll wait until you're an adult.
	You want a tattoo?
	I can't stop you when you're 18. I sure as hell can stop you when you're 14. Because that is my role as a parent, is not to let my kids scar themselves for lives based on what is probably, almost exclusively, a passing confusion of adolescence.
	Apologize for it, no yay.
	He suggested he wouldn't let his son transition if he asked to be a little girl.
	Wow.
	Controversial right there.
	On Sunday night, the three-time Grammy Award winner apologized for its initial stance, saying he now understands how his comments could have been interpreted as insensitive and offensive.
	The So Sick singer, I don't even know what song that is, initially spoken about transgenderism on Vlad TV with host Gloria Velez.
	I just personally come from an era where a man was a man and a woman was a woman.
	That's not an era.
	That's biology.
	And there were two genders.
	And now that's just how I rock, Noye said.
	You can identify as a goldfish if you like.
	That ain't my business.
	It becomes my business when you try to make me play the game.
	Apologize, Noye.
	You thought you could have your own thoughts?
	Your handlers have some news for you.
	I'm not going to call you a goldfish.
	I feel like parents have almost forgotten what the role of a parent is.
	If your little boy comes to you and says, Daddy, I want to be a girl, and you just let him rock with that, three days later know you had posted an apology, and we read it.
	On X, formerly known as Twitter, and we read that part.
	Yeah, there you go.
	The hostage letters are getting longer.
	X user Terry Von Loon commented.
	Many people on X commented with one word replies like weak and coward.
	Well, my reply is a little longer.
	Conservative broadcaster and influencer Xavier Durusso wrote his reply in all caps.
	Do not be weak.
	Well, thousands of people commented on the retweeted Noé's apology with hardly any seemingly supporting the reversal of his stance.
	Because it's so bloody insincere and it's so bloody contrived and it's so bloody transparently hypocritical.
	I love everybody, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay.
	It's so bloody insincere.
	You betrayed yourself when you do not stand by your own beliefs.
	So, congrats, Noye.
	You did it.
	Hold on a second.
	It seems that I've been saying something wrong here.
	Noye, Noye, Noye.
	Viva tried to say Nao.
	Now say Nao.
	Nao.
	Notice the similarity?
	You're welcome, friend.
	Astro Sweat.
	What is it?
	It's Nao.
	I'm thinking of like, I thought it was like Neue, like Oyve.
	I was thinking of Oyve.
	He's actually apologizing.
	Holy crab apples.
	Bend the knee.
	You got your contracts.
	You know, when the tragic news of...
	Oh, jeez.
	What's the basketball player's name?
	King James.
	What's his name?
	LeBron James.
	When the news of his kid came out, you think you're going to have someone who's going to risk their entire livelihood?
	To potentially tell the truth if what many people suspect is the case.
	Not when you're owned.
	You are not free to tell the truth when you're owned.
	So that's it.
	All right.
	Let's share in some more stupidity.
	Some more lefty stupidity.
	Okay.
	Don't read it yet.
	Don't read it.
	They don't think things through.
	I mean...
	I've had a discussion with a neuroscientist as to what, not my wife, what's the difference between a lefty brain and a righty brain, a conservative brain and a liberal brain, a Democrat brain and a Republican brain?
	There's nothing wrong with it.
	It's like Jordan Peterson said, you know, there's two wings of a bird are necessary for flight.
	And sometimes you need emotions.
	Other times you need logic.
	And if you're only logical and you lack emotion, life is going to be sad.
	If you're only emotional and you lack logic, you're going to make dumb decisions.
	Who's Mike Hudema?
	Mike Hudema, climate campaign focusing on addressing climate crisis.
	Building green jobs.
	Let's join together and change the world.
	Let's hold hands together, people.
	Let me just see what this video says.
	There is a certain degree of beauty.
	In that, you know, these are called arteries, and they do reflect, like, blood intake, oxygen-rich blood coming, oxygen-deprived blood going the other way.
	You know, this is, like, all things have patterns, big and small.
	Okay.
	In California.
	Look at that.
	That's, like, one, two, three.
	That's, like, six lanes wide on both sides, bumper-to-bumper traffic.
	Direction, taillights on the right.
	Headlights on the left.
	Look at that.
	Look at that.
	Traffic.
	You would think that the purpose of this individual's tweet was that they're going to find a solution to traffic.
	No.
	Because, you see, the issue here is it's beautiful music.
	What am I looking at?
	Actually, that's very relaxing.
	Deep breaths down to the esophagus.
	Not the esophagus.
	What's that?
	Diaphragme.
	Down to the diaphragm.
	Okay, whatever.
	So that's a video.
	His tweet.
	Bam!
	Oh my goodness.
	Success.
	Success.
	California will prohibit the...
	California.
	They haven't been having problems with their electrical grid.
	Set that aside.
	California will prohibit the sale of new gasoline-powered cars by 2035.
	100% of new cars sold in the state will be fossil fuel emission-free.
	Who's next?
	Sounds like a threat, not a promise.
	We have the solutions.
	Implement them.
	Act on climate.
	May I see if my tweet replies in there?
	I'm going to refresh this just for one second.
	Is my tweet...
	Is it not back there?
	My reply to Mike Hudema is, what powers the electrical cars, you dummy?
	I think I said it better.
	I was like, what charges the cars, dummy?
	This is like the juvenile, childish, superficial virtue signaling thought process.
	If the car itself has no emissions, it must be an emission-free mode of transport.
	Okay.
	How stupid do you have to be to actually simplify a complex situation to that absurdity?
	A car, like, hey, look at this.
	My phone, if anybody wants any of these stickers, I think we sell them.
	My phone is emission-free because it doesn't emit exhaust.
	Oh, the lithium that went into the battery.
	Yeah, someone had to dig that up in some third-world country where they're exploiting children and slave labor to get it.
	Oh, they had to churn it up with diesel-powered generator machines, whatever.
	They had to get it onto ships.
	They had to get those phones from wherever they're made over to North America.
	Those ships look up the freight liners and the percentage of emissions, if you believe emissions are the problem.
	But this doesn't admit anything.
	Therefore, this is green energy.
	Mike, everyone else who ascribes to this idea, you're idiots.
	You're all brain-dead idiots who haven't thought this through one degree.
	But set aside all of that.
	Set aside the fact that these rare earth minerals come from slave labor in Sudan, in African countries.
	I don't know exactly which countries they come from in South America.
	Set aside the environmental ravage that it causes in someone else's backyard.
	Set aside the fact that it actually enriches China, which owns a lot of these mines in other countries.
	So when you go green, China's saying, thank you very much.
	Set aside all of that.
	People are using...
	Air conditioning to the existing population, population growth, and you want to jack up all your cars to that same grid?
	Dumb is not the word.
	I mean, I don't actually believe people can be so short-sighted and so stupid.
	I think they can only be dishonest, and they're selling it now because they have something to gain from it.
	Preposterous idiotic.
	What charges the cars?
	In Quebec, we're kind of lucky we have a lot of hydroelectricity.
	Poorly managed.
	California, not so much hydroelectricity.
	So unless you're going nuclear, which I don't think they are, that car doesn't have any emissions, but the coal-burning power plant that produces the electricity so that you can charge your freaking electric car when you hook it up to the grid, yeah, that's not emission-free.
	And you're dumb.
	We bought a Touregg.
	Not a Touregg.
	We didn't get a Touregg.
	We got a Tiguan.
	Surprisingly fuel-efficient.
	A used Tiguan.
	I drove from Florida to Montreal and back to Florida in that car.
	Surprise.
	Did someone say that I nuked the stream?
	Hold on a second.
	Hold on.
	What's going on here?
	Refresh.
	No, we're still good.
	We're still live.
	Okay.
	I'm back.
	Guess who's back?
	Back again.
	Viva's back.
	Tell a friend.
	Okay.
	What was I going to do?
	There was one last fun story that we're going to have a good laugh on.
	Because people are idiots.
	People are just idiots.
	Like I said, I don't actually believe that people are this dumb.
	I believe they have to be dishonest.
	Mike Sinkton, he comes up in my Twitter feed a lot these days because I engage with him for the wrong reasons and Twitter knows what generates engagement.
	First of all, I'm inclined to like him because he reminds me of Stifler.
	But I like Stifler.
	Mike Sinkton is an idiot.
	Senior executive at NBCUniversal, retired.
	Hollywood's ultimate insider, entertainment, pop culture, and lifestyle expert.
	So you should definitely, definitely, definitely trust him when it comes to legal analysis of Trump's third indictment, that bogus, constitutionally violative load of political partisan crap.
	Oh, let's just go back.
	I just want to see that bio again.
	Senior executive at NBCUniversal.
	Retired.
	Hollywood ultimate insider.
	Entertainment, pop culture.
	And he looks like Stifler.
	I like Stifler.
	Damn it.
	Why'd you have to do this, Mike?
	Now I look at Stifler, and I don't like him anymore.
	I'm joking.
	Guy walks in, but this is it.
	Everyone out there who didn't read the 64, what was it, 45-page indictment, don't worry.
	Mike Sinkton, Ultimate Insider, NBCUniversal, retired.
	You'll understand it right after this tweet.
	Guy walks into a bank, says to Teller, I have a gun in my pocket.
	Give me all your money.
	The line in quotes could be considered, quote, free speech.
	It's also, quote, aspirational, end quote.
	But what the guy said is a crime, even if he didn't get any money.
	MAGA Republicans get it?
	It's not possible anybody can be so stupid.
	But they're trying very hard.
	Do we need to flesh out what the problem is there?
	First of all, yes, uttering threats.
	Robbery, even if it's through deceitful means, is a crime.
	If you actually have a gun, it's an aggravating factor.
	Robbery is a crime.
	Uttering threats is a crime.
	A legal theory of presenting an alternate slate of electors for the purposes of counting those alternate electors as the electors, because the argument would go the original slate of electors were based on...
	problematic unconstitutional election is not a crime.
	It's actually a legal theory that Democrats once upon a time were contemplating when they were facing the prospect potentially of Trump getting reelected.
	So no, Mike Sinkton, I'm not a MAGA Republican.
	I'm just someone with a functional brain who has managed to retain the ability of remaining honest and intellectually honest.
	You're an idiot.
	And I want to quote Happy Gilmore again.
	Man goes in and threatens to kill someone.
	It's free speech.
	No, it's not!
	Never was.
	Anybody who made that argument is an idiot, and nobody made that argument except for you, Mike Sinkton.
	Why?
	Because you're an idiot.
	Okay.
	So that's it.
	Okay, what are we going to do now?
	So for the rest of the week, let me just see what's going on here.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	I wanted to play us out with a video.
	I wanted to play us out with a video.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	Good, good.
	We're going to do this, actually.
	Rumble has a thing where it actually cuts the stream, and I found the fun way to end the stream, which is to play a video.
	I'm going to play a video of Montreal's Shame, the Olympic Stadium.
	If you haven't seen it, it's also on Rumble on my Viva Random.
	You know what?
	Why would I watch it on the scum of the earth YouTube when I can watch it on Rumble?
	Let's go here.
	Rumble.
	My content.
	Where was it?
	Montreal Biodome.
	Here.
	I'm not going to play you the whole thing.
	I'm going to give everybody the link so you can all go watch it.
	And then I'm going to play this as we move on over to Locals.
	So here is Locals, everybody.
	Come to Locals.
	We do an after party every day.
	You can subscribe at Locals.
	Support us.
	VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
	Seven bucks a month.
	70 bucks a year.
	Discounted rate.
	You get tons of exclusive stuff if you're a supporter.
	Members who don't pay.
	Get tons of stuff as well.
	It's a wonderful community.
	So hold on.
	This is Locals.
	Locals.
	Come one, come all.
	And I'm going to share the Rumble link again.
	And then we're going to just watch a minute or two of this and you can go watch Rumble.
	Next shame.
	The Olympic Stadium.
	It was budgeted to cost $117 million.
	10 years or 20 years overdue.
	And it cost...
	Take a guess, chat.
	Before I even get there, take a guess.
	It was supposed to cost $117, give or take $120 million.
	Guess how much it ended up costing.
	I'm not going anywhere until anybody gets the right answer.
	Oh, yeah.
	Little ASMR.
	Who's going to get the right answer?
	Nobody's going to get it.
	It cost over a billion dollars at the end of it.
	A billion.
	So check this out.
	Enjoy!
	I'll see you in locals in two minutes.
	Looking to sell your house hassle-free and fast?
	I've got great news for you.
	Say goodbye to repairs, builders, and waiting months to sell.
	We're here to help you sell your house for cash just as it is.
	Avoid hefty fees and commissions from realtors and sell your house lightning fast.
	Thousands of What's the name of your company?
	them a call today.
	They'll find a cash buyer for your house.
	Can we all just judge us that?
	Stop stressing and let them handle it.
	What's the name of the-Cash for your house now.
	Home match.
	Doesn't deserve it.
	This is Montreal's Olympics.
	Massively overcharged.
	The result of corruption.
	It's a joke.
	It's a joke.
	This is it.
	Decades late to final completion.
	Cost just 10 times more than it was supposed to cost.
	Apparently they've revamped the biodome inside.
	So we've been here a while back, but we'll see what it looks like now.
	This is the biodome.
	the current use of Quebec's shame, the Olympic Stadium.
	Oh yeah, there was an incident where the roof collapsed or fell in on a rock concert, like they had a cloth tarp on it.
	We got tickets.
	They were 30 bucks for both of us, which was less than I was anticipating, and that's the non-resident pricing because I'm no longer a resident.
	I wasn't even going for the $5 discount.
	Oh, we are entering.
	What appears to be something very phallic or...
	I'm channeling a little Ron Burgundy here and go forward and put your earmuffs on.
	It's like we're walking into a whale's vagina.
	It looks like you got your tropical forest over there.
	Ending now, people.
	See you on Locals.
	Where do you go?
	Go there.
	And now I've got to go to Rumble and end the stream.
	See you all, Locals, tomorrow if you're not coming over there and enjoy the day, everyone.
	Thank you for being here.
	Share, like, snip, clip.
	Get it on social media.
	See you tomorrow, peeps.
	Peace.
	Now, locals, what's going on?
	Pam's not in the house, eh?
	Okay, let me refresh here.
	So I'm here.
	Are we all here?
	Yes, we're here.

▲