Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 3, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:36:31

Trudeau Corruption; Biden Corruption; Judicial Corruption - IT'S CORRUPTION ALL THE WAY DOWN!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Trudeau has survived scandals that would have put Servative in jail.
	He takes all expenses paid to the Aga Count's private island and doesn't disclose.
	Second ethics violation was when he appoints the first Indigenous Minister of Justice and Attorney General, Jody Wilson-Raybould.
	Appoints her, fires her, when she doesn't adhere to his corrupt demands to not criminally prosecute this international construction conglomerate called SNC-Lavalin because he's chummy-chummy with them.
	Third ethics complaint was his mother was getting paid by a charity.
	His government then attributed a sole source government contract to.
	Child's Play stuff.
	Other scandals.
	And then the blackface scandal where the media was sitting on pictures of Justin Trudeau having worn blackface more times than he could count.
	Back in 2000, he allegedly groped a reporter and apologized to the reporter behind the group.
	He owns the media.
	Trudeau has survived scandals that would have put a conservative in jail.
	In jail.
	And I'm not being hyperbolic.
	Jail.
	For those of you who don't know, pull up the link to the video because I did a PragerU interview.
	I did the PragerU interview.
	It was in May, I think.
	May of this year, and they just released it yesterday.
	When other news dropped.
	Just coincidental timing.
	The Cosmos could not have timed it better because it was not coordinated.
	Let me see.
	PragerU, Marissa Street, Viva Friday.
	If you haven't seen it, give it a watch.
	It's a good one.
	Did I miss any?
	I missed the intro.
	Can you name all of Trudeau's Aga Khan Ethics Violation?
	Confirmed.
	SNC-Lavalin Ethics Violation?
	Confirmed.
	The WE Charity scandal, they sort of cut the details there.
	That is the one mother and his wife and his brother payroll or gift recipients for speaking fees for the WE Charity.
	And then miraculously, as coincidence as what happened, the WE Charity was granted a sole-sourced, no-bid contract to manage...
	I think it was a billion dollars in student loans for which the WE charity was going to get paid like $20 million.
	You had Gropergate back in 2000.
	You had Blackfacegate four times than he can count.
	You have the China donation, CCP money being donated to the Trudeau Foundation.
	You have alleged CCP involvement in...
	Elections.
	You have the Emergencies Act scandal where it became known in that six-week commission that Trudeau was just dying for an opportunity to invoke the Emergencies Act.
	Turned down a negotiated settlement that would have seen a peaceful resolution to the insurrection, occupation of all.
	Have I missed any?
	Chat, have I missed any?
	It is corruption all the way down.
	And we're going to talk about it today.
	Because the news, the breaking news...
	First of all, I'm back in my studio.
	How good is it to have this beautiful...
	Oh yeah, I missed you, Mike.
	Out of focus, Viva.
	It's not out of focus.
	It might be a slow internet connection.
	We're having massive storms here.
	I know that I'm not out of focus because I can see...
	I don't think it's out of focus.
	I think it's bad internet.
	I'm noticing one bar on my stream yard.
	And...
	If everybody's saying it's blurry.
	Hold on.
	Gosh darn it.
	There was a massive, massive storm that came through.
	Mike is not...
	Video has issues.
	Hmm.
	This is very frustrating.
	So let me refresh.
	And if I get booted from the stream, I haven't really...
	I started anyhow.
	That's what I wanted to say to start.
	It's fine.
	It's blurry.
	I'm refreshing.
	I'm refreshing.
	I'll be back in five seconds.
	Reload.
	Thank you.
	Yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	Okay, good.
	Now the internet.
	Two bars.
	I don't know what the deal is.
	It looks like it's with StreamYard.
	My internet connection has the three bars of the radar, but on StreamYard, it looks like it's better.
	Okay.
	It's better.
	All right, so now, we're going to talk about it.
	Yesterday, the news of the day, Justin Trudeau announces he's separating from his wife.
	You have to read the various headlines.
	Some say the Gazette, Montreal Gazette, I think it was Montreal Gazette, reported Stofi Trudeau separating from her husband.
	Others say Justin Trudeau separating from his...
	The way the media describe this, depending on their ideological alignment, is wild.
	But we're going to get to that because it looks like there's even more action to that story than was initially thought.
	I had my theory, which I'm going to have to read because the thing that we talked about yesterday, it got community noted on the original post.
	They specified what might have been said.
	In the background, we're going to go over that because we talked about it yesterday.
	And we aim to get things always right here.
	I said, you know, it sounded like he might have said something about...
	Sounded like he might have said something crass about male regulatory fluid when I listened to it.
	But nonetheless, the reaction from Jagmeet was bizarre.
	Seems that there might be another layer of corruption, even to the separation of Justin Trudeau and his wife, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau, in that we're going to have to talk about it.
	She might be exempt from conflict of interest provisions of law by virtue of her now being separated from Justin Trudeau.
	As timing might happen, it might or might not be about a year after he created a new company.
	We'll get there in a second.
	Hunter Biden, Devin Archer, corruption all the way down.
	Donald Trump, plead guilty, corruption all the way down.
	I'm loving Jonathan Turley these days.
	I love the fact that he's now regular on Fox News, although I don't like Fox News.
	My stream has messed up.
	A lot of people mess up.
	This is very frustrating.
	Let me see what I can do about this.
	Hold on, let me just see what it looks like.
	How bad could it possibly be?
	Getting an ad.
	It's gonna play after the ad.
	Let me see this.
	How bad could it possibly be?
	It's pretty bad.
	It looks like it's being shot with a potato.
	Let me see this.
	Why would it be so bad?
	Okay, let me just see if I can't.
	The audio is good.
	That much I got.
	But let me see if I can't do something.
	This really sucked.
	I don't know if it's the storm.
	I don't think it's the internet at my place because it looks like it's fine.
	And yeah, so we're going to talk about that convenient thing that might allow, that might dispense.
	No, I'm going to remove it.
	Ah.
	Ah.
	Thank you.
	Close this down.
	Join.
	Is this going to be any better?
	I've opened a new window, so now I see it going to two bars, and in a second it's going to go to one bar.
	We're back to one bar.
	Okay, great.
	Thank you.
	Okay, can you hear me?
	You don't need to see me.
	All right.
	Flipping pixelation.
	Okay, by the way, speaking of corruption all the way down, tomorrow...
	We have a special guest, and it involves Hunter Biden corruption.
	Garrett Ziegler, Marco Polo, is coming on tomorrow for an interview at 2 o 'clock, and it's going to be glorious.
	But now what I've got to do here, I've got to bring this window back up here.
	How do I bring the window back into the bar, the green bar here?
	It was very frustrating.
	Here.
	I didn't figure out how to get the window back up.
	Oh my goodness.
	Hold on, people.
	Hold on.
	At least are we live on Rumble?
	I forgot to double check if we're live on Rumble.
	I'm going to enter the studio one more time.
	Bringing me in.
	Going to close this one down.
	Once I find it.
	Stream here.
	Close it.
	Pop myself back in.
	Okay, we're done.
	You laugh, and I'm going to sit here getting frustrated about the words.
	Messed up as well, but at least we're live.
	No, I think I just...
	A massive storm.
	I'm going to blame it on the storm.
	I'm going to blame it on the rain.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Okay.
	We're going to do Trudeau, Biden, and play some videos.
	Devin Archer.
	Remember the timeline here, people.
	Joe Biden discussed his son's business deals with his son.
	Joe Biden was never in business with his son once it became clear that he discussed business dealings with his son.
	It's quite been in the business with his son, but the business never really materialized any fruits.
	It was just influence peddling.
	Let's do it.
	What do we bring up first?
	So what we're going to do is we're going to go live.
	We're going to end on YouTube.
	Go over to Rumble in a few minutes exclusively.
	Then we're going to go over to locals and have a stream party.
	Milli Vanilli in the house.
	We've got someone who's as old as I am.
	Rumble is the same sucky video.
	No, no, no, no.
	We're going to have to live with it.
	The only alternative is for me to reboot my computer.
	Get all of my...
	Links back up.
	You know what I'll do?
	I'll keep myself in small on the side.
	We're going to start with Justin Trudeau and the latest convenience story of the day.
	Sophie Trudeau, listen to this.
	So they've announced their separation.
	They've apparently entered into a separation agreement.
	I forget exactly how it was in Canada.
	I think you need to be separated for 12 before you can get a divorce.
	There's a convenient side of this agreement that they might have had.
	Now, some people have been reading this.
	I'm thinking it was the separation agreements that Justin Trudeau and she entered into that absolved her of ethics laws.
	That's not my reading.
	My understanding is that now that she's no longer someone who's married to or cohabitating with a member of parliament, she is exempt from conflict laws or they don't apply to her.
	But we'll read this article from the Western Standard, who's going to come up twice in today's stream.
	Look how beautiful Sophie Trudeau is.
	Oh, Lord, we were married long enough, and now we're going to get divorced, and I presume I'll get half of whatever he's got, which I presume is much more now than it was back in the day.
	This is the news.
	Due to a separation agreement with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Sophie Gregoire is exempt from Conflict of Interest Act disclosures.
	Last year, Sophie registered a new federal corporation to offer...
	What do they call it with?
	Influence peddling.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	No, no, we're not talking about Hunter Biden and Joe Biden.
	We're talking about she incorporated a new company.
	This woman now is not that that's not.
	It's just very, very interesting timing.
	Last year, registered a new federal corporation to offer communications services.
	I mean, whatever has to mean.
	Quote, Sophie and the prime minister have signed a legal separation agreement.
	That means it's a separation by consent.
	I still think they have to spend their time apart, not cohabitating before they can actually get divorced.
	The rationale, as far as I recall, to that law was that you don't want splitting up, getting to realize, well, we're not really done with each other.
	We want to get back together.
	Now you have to go do the paperwork again.
	So they want to make sure that people are sure that the marriage is over before they form the papers and make it.
	The Prime Minister's office said Wednesday in a statement, they have worked to ensure all legal and ethical steps with regards to their decision to separate have been taken.
	I believe it's the Conflicts of Interest Act.
	I think that's the one that Justin Trudeau was in violation of.
	I think it was that act.
	Under the act, disclosure is mandatory for, quote, a person who is cohabitating with a public office in a conjugal relationship.
	However, no disclosure is required, quote, For, quote, a person for whom a public office holder is separated if all support obligations and family property have been dealt with, end quote, by a divorce decree or separation agreement.
	A separation agreement or an order is required, said Melanie Rushworth, spokesperson for the Office of the Ethics Commissioner.
	According to BlackRock's reporter...
	I should probably pay for a subscription to Blacks.
	They are worth it and they do deserve it.
	According to BlackRock's reporter, the PMO did not provide the date when the separation agreement between Justin and Sophie was signed.
	However, on April 6, 2022, Sophie Trudeau registered a federal corporation at OstLegal, a Toronto law office.
	I'm fairly certain I went to law school with Thomas.
	Good guy.
	A Toronto law office.
	Under Your Light Communications Incorporated.
	Under Your Light Communications Incorporated.
	Oh, that's the name of the company.
	Under Your Light Communications Incorporated.
	Services, end quote.
	And Sophie is the sole director.
	Previously, Sophie had been a paid speaker.
	Speaker spotlight of Toronto.
	Which is the talent of the Trudeau family.
	In 2020, the talent agency informed the Commons that it had destroyed accounts to document talent fees paid to Sophie before 2013.
	It should be noted that Sophie and Justin Trudeau got married in 2005.
	Wow.
	Oh, here we go.
	With the We Charity scandal, it didn't result in an ethics violation because whatever Sophie received from the We Charity...
	Apparently, neither she nor Trudeau's mother nor his brother were family members, apparently, under the law.
	Close enough family members, which were required for a violation of conflicts of interest.
	Before We Charity received a federal grant of $43.5 million in 2020, according to records, it was discovered that We Charity provided Sophie with talent fees, gifts, and expense.
	Paid trips in London and New York, amounting to $25,681.
	The grant was withdrawn after discovering that the Wee charity paid $471,000 in fees to the Trudeau family, which included the Prime Minister and brother.
	July 30, 2020.
	How this was not an ethics violation?
	Mario, what's his name?
	Was it Mario Dumont?
	I forget the ethics commissioner's name.
	How this did not amount to Justin Trudeau's third ethics violation?
	It's a sign that the core and corruption all the way down.
	In July 30, 2020, testimony at the Commons Finance Committee, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said, quote, he knew that my brother and mother had worked with We Charity, but was unaware of the...
	Sounds very familiar, eh?
	I never discussed my mother and brother and wife getting paid by the We Charity that got a full-source government no-bid contract from my government.
	We never talked about it.
	It's amazing.
	Everyone's through and through all over.
	They play the same move over and over again, mutatis mutandis.
	I did not know how much work either of them had done with We Charity or how much they had been paid.
	Bull.
	She.
	Ut.
	Justin Trudeau.
	During earlier testimony at the Finance Committee, Craig Kielbro, founders of We Charity, denied that they ordered any favors in exchange for hosting Soviet.
	They didn't want any favors.
	They just knew that they would get them.
	This is a knowledge beverage.
	We didn't ask for any favors.
	We didn't want any favors.
	We didn't expect any favors.
	We just know how things work.
	Give a little $25,000 to his wife, a little half a million to his mother and brother.
	Good things happen.
	Oh, Sal Trudeau is more than someone's wife, said Kielberger.
	Oh, she is more than someone's wife.
	She's a person.
	She's also his wife.
	And you gift her gifts, and then you get gifts from Justin Trudeau's government.
	That's called corruption.
	We live, we engage with individuals on the merit that they bring selves as individuals.
	Oh, really?
	Then why do you have conflict of interest acts?
	Laws.
	For disclosure purposes, MPs are required by the ethics commissioner to update information about their marriages in their files regularly.
	Then Attorney General David Lamedi.
	The one who replaced Wilson-Raybould when Justin Trudeau, in a second ethics violation, fired Jody Wilson-Raybould because she wouldn't do his bidding for SNC-Lavalin, the International Construction Chamber.
	Lamedi replaced her.
	It went from, it's 2020, we have to have half a cabinet as women.
	I hired my first indigenous woman, mature justice attorney.
	It went from her to David Lamedi because he'll do Justin Trudeau's bidding.
	Oh, nothing better than his lawyer writing self-serving crap.
	Geneviève Sommier, Lamedy's wife, is a law professor at McGill University.
	In 2020, Lamedy took her name off a list called...
	Off a list called the Public Registry of Designated Travelers for MP spouses.
	Corruption all the way down, people.
	I'm going to go give everybody the link to that article.
	Link to article.
	The timing works out great.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Is the audio bad now too?
	Who just said now the audio?
	Come on, don't mess with me here.
	Hold on one second.
	Let me see here.
	I'm going to refresh this and see if it's any better.
	play Thank you.
	Okay, and the audio is fine.
	Sorry.
	So that's the latest out of Canada.
	It's all a wonderful party.
	It's a wonderful club, and we ain't in it.
	Very funny, however, I did...
	The law firm...
	The lawyer's a good guy, as far as I remember.
	He was president of the Law Student Association before I was.
	Dude's like six foot six, and I'm like five, five and a half, and when he handed down...
	The presidency of the...
	When he handed down the...
	Whatever it was they bestowed to the next president of the Law Student Association, he literally had to bend over a foot to give it to me.
	All right.
	But that's one part of the story.
	Good things happen when you're in the club.
	And I'm sure they're going to be worth millions and millions of dollars.
	They're going to get...
	Hundreds of thousands of dollars in speaking fees and Kielberger from We Charity.
	How dare you suggest that we would give Justin Trudeau's wife payment, travel expenses, gifts to procure favors from the federal government?
	How dare you suggest it?
	I mean, sure, they did give us favors afterwards.
	But we measure each person on their own merits.
	And if you don't think so, you must be a misogynist who doesn't think Sophie Gregoire Trudeau earned the gifts that we gave her.
	And if you don't think we earned the gifts that the federal government gave us, well, then you're just as bad with us as you are with them.
	Okay.
	Now, bring this back up yesterday.
	Remember when I played this video yesterday and I was reading the tweet.
	This is from Rowan Thee Stallion.
	Who said, driver, call out the Prime Minister inaudible.
	Sting, you're homophobic.
	Driver, you're a POS.
	Listen here.
	It's about here.
	The guy who posted this tweet said, so call out the Prime Minister inaudible.
	And I said, it sort of sounds like he says something like, suck up all of the Prime Ministers.
	And I thought it might have been fluids.
	The community notes come out and says, on versions with better audio, the heckler appears to have said, suck all of the Prime Minister's rooster and not call a Prime Minister.
	And then you get a link to the YouTube video, which we're going to look at for the sake of science.
	This might...
	Put a little dent in one of my more outlandish theories, which will be wild if it ever materializes.
	Let's hear this.
	Take a pause if anything goes on.
	If it's not on stage 3. Prime Minister's ****.
	Listen, if you're homophobic, you know, keep it to yourself.
	Your homophobia is very inappropriate.
	You're driving away.
	You're driving away and causing an accident.
	****.
	You can have a conversation if you like.
	Yeah, we can talk about that.
	Take a pause at this, then he goes on at this.
	No, I'll say it's real.
	You're a piece of sh**.
	You're a piece of sh**.
	All right, that's the state of Canadian policy.
	All right, people.
	Oh, I see two bars.
	I see two bars now on my...
	It's back down to one part.
	So close.
	All right, what we're going to do, we're going to end it on YouTube.
	We're going to go over to Rumble.
	Let me see.
	Let me just get my notes and tell you what's coming up here.
	Why would I stream from wireless internet to begin with when I have a choice?
	I have a choice?
	Before we go over to Rumble, what we have in the backdrop.
	Alrighty, alright.
	We got an email that is so self-servingly exonerating you'd have to be stupid to think it was incriminating.
	We've got Bill.
	If you had any doubts about Bill Barth, sincerity or lack thereof, no more doubt shall be lingering after this.
	Nancy Pelosi.
	Nancy Pelosi.
	And then we got another Canadian lawsuit in Canada.
	One of the lawsuits challenging the charter, challenging the ArriveCan app, basis of, you know...
	A shameless, egregious, incontrovertible violation of charter rights.
	The lawsuit was dismissed at the time for mootness because behind the lawsuit got to court, the government had not rescinded, not revoked, but suspended the policy.
	Court said, moot.
	Because you've stopped, the government has stopped beating you, don't you see?
	So you can't, government.
	To get them to stop beating you.
	So come back when the government starts beating you again.
	Because until such time, your claims for damage from having been beaten by the government moot.
	Not a joke, by the way.
	I'm not even exaggerating.
	And then we've got some other fun stuff.
	So let's go over to the rumbles.
	I'm going to give the link here.
	And then we'll go over and do this.
	And everybody, 2 o 'clock tomorrow.
	It's going to be good.
	All right.
	Ending on YouTube.
	Sorry about the internet connection, people.
	Ending on YouTube in 3, 2, 1, now.
	All right.
	How are we doing on Rumble?
	Let me see.
	It doesn't look that bad.
	It just looks like someone slapped Vaseline on the screen of the camera, and that's it.
	Let me just go in the chat here and just see that everything's okay.
	Eat a big one.
	YouTube says sad with raging.
	Uphill Gardner says bitches in the house.
	Now I'm over here says Alpica.
	Okay, good.
	F-Y-T, which I believe says something YouTube.
	No way, jerk says dog meat.
	Did not say I do not say.
	I'm not reading that.
	Okay.
	Everybody.
	And let's just see.
	I forgot to check if we're good on Locals.
	barneslaw.locals.com.
	We're good.
	While we're on the Canadian stuff, we'll stick with the theme here.
	Justice Center for Constitutional Freedom.
	Oh, and we got one other terrible story.
	Justice Center for Constitutional Freedom.
	I've had the president on the channel, John Carpe, a number of times.
	JCCF does great work.
	I support them vocally.
	I support them through donations.
	And I support them by encouraging everybody to support them.
	Listen to this.
	I mean, it's as absurd as we will enact unconstitutional, inhumane legislation.
	We're going to dig you through the court system, which moves at about the speed of a snail with a needle through it.
	And then by the time it gets to court, if the government decides to, you know, unilaterally, arbitrarily, capriciously, as capriciously as they invoked it, revoke it.
	Well, tough shit.
	You're out of luck.
	Look at that.
	Oh, you spent all that time and money.
	Challenging the institutional nature of a government fiat.
	Tough crap, come back another day.
	Who wrote this one?
	I don't see who wrote it.
	This is JCCF, anyhow.
	The Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms is disappointed with the federal court's decision in the matter of Yates-Al versus Canada.
	And I forget if this is the one that also included Peckford, Brian Peckford, the last lit signatory to the...
	Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
	There are so many of these things, but they were challenging the constitutionality of the Arrive Can app.
	A constitutional challenge to the mandatory use of the Arrive Can app.
	So this was not the same one.
	This is another one.
	So they're challenging the constitutionality of the Arrive Can app, which made you enter a bunch of information which precluded you from flying, I presume, unless you were vaccinated, taking a bus.
	They challenged a constitution.
	It was released on July 19th, 2023, where the court found no errors in the motion judge's decision that the application was moot.
	The decision will be reviewed thoroughly, and an update will be provided in the court's next potential steps.
	What are you going to do?
	Take it to the Supreme Court of Canada?
	We've talked about this endlessly with the Trump legal challenges.
	Not ripe?
	Latches?
	Moot.
	Not ripe?
	Come back later.
	Come back later?
	Oh, too late.
	Or come back later.
	Too late latches.
	You've already lived long enough with the actions, the impugned actions.
	Therefore, you can no longer challenge them.
	December 20th, 2021, the government required Canadians who were unvaccinated or who were vaccinated but did not use ArriveCan to undergo testing and mandatory quarantine upon returning to Canada.
	Bear in mind, there was the story of a woman whisked off to a mandatory quarantine center.
	They called them Quarantine hotels.
	Because they converted hotels into government detention facilities.
	They whisked off a woman.
	I forget her name, but it'll come back.
	She wasn't allowed to get a lawyer.
	She wasn't allowed to tell her family where she was going.
	Another woman was sexually assaulted at all these places.
	People were whisked off to quarantine hotels, which is nothing more than makeshift government detention facilities.
	Oh, but they're not camped.
	It doesn't rhyme.
	I'm sorry, let me rephrase.
	It doesn't repeat, but it certainly rhymes.
	So they challenge the application in the constitutional challenge are Canadians who refuse to disclose their vaccination status via the Arrive Can app, assert privacy and constitutional rights.
	Many of the applicants have received fines of up to $8,500 and are still facing prosecution on those fines.
	August 24, 2022, they filed it.
	That's okay.
	They filed the application.
	That challenged the constitutionality of the arrive can.
	Soon after, the government brought a motion to strike the applicant's case on the basis that it is moot.
	Since on September 30, 2022, the federal government dropped the arrive can requirement.
	Recall, people, they didn't revoke it.
	They didn't rescind it.
	I believe, I might be mistaken, but I don't think I am.
	They suspended it.
	Meaning, it can come back at any time.
	And there are exceptions even to the argument of mootness.
	Alright, is technically speaking the question of law no longer applicable because the legislation has been suspended?
	Revoked might have been more of a legitimate basis for the mootness argument, but one of the exceptions to the mootness is if it's susceptible of repeating.
	Because this stupid game of cat and mouse...
	Something of a judicial shell game is susceptible of repeating over and over again, especially when a bullcrap precedent like this has been said, oh, what's that?
	We get to violate your rights.
	Oh, what's that?
	We're going to wait for people to sue us?
	Okay, sue us.
	Oh, what's that?
	You've sued us now.
	We're going to drag you through the judicial process a little bit.
	Then we're going to suspend legislation or retract the legislation and say, tough noogies, you no longer have a claim because the legislation is no longer in effect.
	And we will repeat.
	Repeat, repeat.
	That is exactly what the court here has just ratified.
	It's an amazing thing.
	Justin Trudeau invokes the Emergencies Act.
	He gets a pass from Commissioner Rouleau.
	Go ahead.
	You recall, by the way, when they had these quarantine facilities, there were initial charges to this.
	And a federal court judge said at the time, nothing unconstitutional but being hauled off to...
	Yeah, there was a bit of a constitutional violation where some people weren't allowed to call their attorneys before getting hauled their butts off.
	But, you know, it's an emergency.
	Now what they've done?
	Hey, we get to create, enact unconstitutional legislation that violates the most core rights of a free and democratic society.
	And we just get to drop them before a hearing on the merits and you no longer get to avail yourself of your rights.
	March 16, 2023, the associate judge of the federal government dismissed the constitutional challenge, holding that there were no live issues for the court.
	to consider bull crap there may be no live issues but there are certainly issues that are susceptible of repeating and they will be repeated further the court decided not to exercise discretion to hear cases the federal court of appeal heard the appeal on june 13 2023 in which the request was made to review and Bullcrap.
	Lawyers for the applicants argued that a decision from the federal court would swiftly resolve the constitutional arguments that otherwise clog the courts where prosecution of Canadians who did not use the Arrive Can app are proceeding across the country.
	Too bad.
	So sad.
	You've wasted all that time and money.
	What do you get for it?
	Nothing.
	You get played by your...
	Politicians.
	You get played by the judges.
	And we are all victims of an absolutely captured, corrupt regime.
	And there's no other way to say it.
	Oh, what's that?
	It couldn't get any worse in Canada?
	Got worse for somebody.
	Western Standard.
	You won't be able to share these links in Canada anymore very soon.
	I'm sure that's going to be very frustrating to Justin Trudeau.
	You won't be able to share these articles, and you're just going to have to know that outlets like the Western Standard exist, because otherwise, you're going to have to rely on CBC.
	Garnet Harper, hold on.
	We're going to come back to this.
	Let's see.
	Maybe I'm wrong.
	CBC reported on this?
	Garnet Harper, Ontario.
	I don't know.
	I want you to know my location.
	Ontario News.
	Nope.
	What are the chances?
	So you're just going to have to know that outlets like the Western Standard exist.
	Because otherwise, if you go to the CBC, you're probably not going to see this story.
	And people have been asking me to cover this.
	I hadn't heard about this story.
	And also reluctance until I know the details.
	Unfortunately, this is the reality of the world in which we live.
	It's impossible to stay up to date with the tragedies.
	And then it's also impossible to definitively know you're not playing for half a story.
	So we'll read this story and cover the story now.
	Subbury, Ontario resident Garnet Harper died from kidney disease after he could not receive a transplant because unvaccinated.
	Quote, I said, I'm not going to be participating in this program as long as people like my husband are not eligible to receive organs from the Trillium York, end quote, said Harper's wife, Megan, in an interview with the Independent Journalism.
	And I said, are you aware that unvaccinated people are knowledgeable to receive transplants in Ontario?
	And that's a large part of why my husband is lying in this bed right now.
	Megan said the nurse who inquired if the Trillium network could take his organs if he died was surprised.
	While she was emotional and distraught, she tried to offer education to the nurse about what is going on in Canada.
	She said hospitals, quote, need to change because we can't continue this way.
	By the end of the call, the nurse agreed with her.
	The nurse said she did not know about the unvaccinated organ transplant patients being denied treatments.
	She pledged to pass on her comments to her superiors.
	Megan confessed in the fact that they call you while you're sitting with a dying loved one and they ask if they can have his organs while meanwhile he wasn't good enough to receive organs from them.
	I can't describe the feeling.
	It makes me sick to my stomach.
	An obituary from Garnet's family said he was fighting kidney disease when he passed away at 35 years old on May 22nd.
	Quote, Pre-deceased parents.
	He leaves behind Megan and his children, Ava, Eliana, Yara, Nia, and Judah.
	The Supreme Court of Canada said on June 8th it would not be hearing Alberta...
	We talked about this when Sheila...
	Not Sheila, Sheila Lewis.
	She resolved her case.
	And people were like, this guy, Garnet Harper, passed away after being denied a kidney transplant because he was unvaccinated.
	That's it.
	Here, if you can share this one around and share it while you can in Canada, people.
	There you go.
	Well, that's Canada.
	You think it couldn't get any worse and it proves you wrong every day.
	Now, that being said, do we move on to the States, everybody?
	Where it's not much better in the States, but at the very least, it is somewhat better.
	Depending on the states.
	The federal system in the states is still respected.
	The provincial...
	State independence in America is still respected.
	Whereas in Canada, the provincial independence, autonomy, not so much.
	Not so much.
	All right.
	Devin Archer, people.
	Holy crabapples.
	We have to read the news from the enemy.
	Because you know that whatever the mainstream media, the legacy...
	Fake news is saying whatever they're saying, you basically know the opposite is true, or you can at least reasonably wait that the opposite is going to be true.
	This is from the Washington Compost, and you read this, you have to read it.
	You have to sit there and torture.
	You have to understand what they're saying if you want to be in a position to understand it so that you can be in a position to retort in as much as humanly possible.
	August 3rd.
	2023.
	Washington Compost.
	Who's here?
	Philip Bump.
	Oh, I'm going to have to go follow him on Twitter if I don't already.
	Devin Archer.
	This is the headline.
	Devin Archer said the opposite of what Republicans claim.
	Oh, let's hear the straw man of what Philip Bump is going to say Republicans said Devin Archer said.
	And then let's see how Devin Archer actually said the opposite.
	Devin Archer came up and said, Joe Biden is clean.
	He never lied.
	There's no corruption.
	There was no quid pro quo.
	There was no corrupt business dealings by slapping Hunter Biden on the board of a corrupt Ukrainian energy company as if that doesn't offer some sort of protection from invitations.
	He totally didn't insist that the prosecutor looking into Burisma be fired.
	None of that.
	If the Republicans are telling you that, Devin Archer is telling you the opposite.
	Let's hear what Philip Bump has to say.
	Soon after, Hunter Biden's former business partner, Devin Archer, finished testifying before investigating working for the House Oversight Committee, two top House Republicans joined Sean Hannity's Fox News in primetime.
	Archer's testimony was enormously damaging to President Biden, they suggested.
	The House Oversight Committee, James Comer, insisting that Archer's testimony made the bribery allegation he'd first introduced two months ago more credible.
	That allegation centered on the Ukrainian energy company, Burisma, where Hunter Biden and Archer once sat on its board.
	Don't ask how Hunter Biden got on the board of Burisma.
	Don't ask why Hunter Biden got on the board of Burisma.
	Don't think for one second that having the son of the vice president on a corrupt Ukrainian energy company's board might offer that company some protection, potentially, or might lend some undue, unwarranted Legitimacy to that company.
	Don't think that.
	That would be crazy.
	Hunter Biden is value-added because of his big brain.
	He's the smartest son Biden ever had.
	Archer, quote, said that Hunter Biden was under immense pressure while they both served on the Burisma board to call Washington, D.C. immediately and try to get Shokin fired.
	Comer told Hanley.
	That's the Ukrainian prosecutor.
	And not many days later, Joe Biden traveled to Ukraine, a trip in which he called for Shokin's ouster.
	And then later bragged about having done it.
	I hope I'm not making a mistake on the person.
	I don't think I am.
	Post-Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan reiterated the same clip a short while later after a board meeting in Dubai in December 2015.
	Hunter Biden and Burisma executives quote, make a phone call to D.C. I don't know who they call, but they call D.C. and five days later, December 9, 2015, Joe Biden is in Ukraine and he gives a speech starting the pressure on the prosecutor in Ukraine.
	All of this tied together in the narrative that Comer and Jordan have been presenting.
	Burisma was being propped.
	Burisma was being probed by prosecutor Victor Shokin, so they needed Hunter Biden to loop in his father, and his father obliged.
	The bribery claim asserts that Mayoka Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, with whom Hunter Biden and Archer met, paid millions to Biden and his father protect the company from Shokin.
	Sounds like a fair assessment.
	On Thursday, the Oversight Committee released a transcript of Archer's testimony.
	Testimony for which Comer wasn't present.
	What Archer said not only doesn't comport with the presentations made by Comer and Jordan on television, his testimony undermines the idea that Burisma wanted to choke and fired.
	That is, Lushevsky paid any bribe, and crucially, that Joe Biden was involved in any of them.
	Don't trust your lying ears.
	An archer explained that his work for Brisbane was centered on finding external financing for a young company to spend.
	Hunter Biden also helped set up connections in Washington, helping, quote, set up with legal firm Boies Schiller, with Blue Star Group, with the DHS lobbyists, with the whole government affairs and lobbying team in D.C. Sounds like we're saying the same thing here, but just differently.
	He said that Biden's last name helped.
	And that Hunter Biden sought to give the impression he was leveraging Joe Biden in his role.
	Oh.
	But he also testified that Hunter Biden knew this was deceptive.
	Oh.
	Archer testified that Hunter Biden knew this was deceptive.
	Archer confirmed an email in which Hunter Biden discussed how to frame an announced trip by then-Vice President to Ukraine.
	The announcement of my guy, his father, by the way.
	My guy.
	Upcoming travels should be characterized as part of our advice and thinking.
	But what he will say and do out of our hands.
	Oh.
	The email, right?
	In other words, it could be a really good thing, or it could end up creating too great an expectation.
	This distills Archer's broader point.
	Hunter Biden wants to give the impression he could bend Joe Biden's will, but in private conversations, he said he couldn't?
	It's not exactly what he said right there, sir.
	He was getting paid a lot of money, Archer told investigators, and I think, you know, he wanted to show value.
	Doesn't this sound exactly like what was going on with the charity and Sophie Trudeau and Margaret Trudeau, Justin Trudeau's mother, and Justin Trudeau's brother?
	We pay you.
	You have connections to people in high places, the big guy, and you bring us value through that name and, you know, other stuff.
	It is true, Archer said in December 2015, Zelenshevsky and Burisma were under a lot of pressure, but Shokin was not a cause of that pressure, he testified.
	Shokin was an asset.
	There was capital tied up in London, 23 million pounds.
	There was, you know, a U.S. visa denied and then a Mexico visa denied, he testified.
	Shokin wasn't specifically on my radar as being an individual that was targeting him, but yes, there was constant pressure.
	The sort of pressure that those non-vice presidential connections Hunter Biden had helped set up or try to relieve.
	Oh, my goodness.
	Dan Goldman pointed out in questioning Archer, Shokin had himself helped relieve some of that pressure on Boris, those assets in London.
	They were frozen in part because Shokin refused to assist in British investigations into Zloseski, Goldman noted.
	This goes to the idea that Shokin, who was prosecutor general in 2015, was good for Britain.
	Uh-huh, replied Archer.
	I don't know how we take that.
	Uh-huh.
	When Biden traveled to Ukraine in 2015, a trip that was announced publicly before the phone call that...
	Jordan and Cole had triggered it.
	He joined other international leaders in condemning Shokin's performance.
	This was not, as Jordan claimed on Fox News, the starting of pressure of Shokin.
	Archer testified that he was told by Burisma's team in Washington that this pressure was bad for Burisma.
	How long does this go on for?
	Holy crap.
	Where were we?
	Archer agreed that the fact that Shokin did not pursue corruption investigations against Burisma's owner, effectively shielding the owner from prosecution, as Goldman articulated, meant that Shokin's ouster put Burisma and Zlosevsky at more risk, not less.
	Bull crap.
	More broadly, Archer's undercut Republican claims about Hunter Biden's interaction with the president.
	Oh, really?
	It's not Republicans' claims.
	It was Joe Biden's claims.
	I've never discussed my business dealings with my son.
	I've never discussed my son's business dealings with him.
	Is now a bona fide...
	Bald-faced lie.
	I was never in business with my son.
	What the original statement was also seems to be a lie.
	He had first indicated that Hunter Biden called his father after that meeting in Dubai in December 2015, but later said that he only knew that Hunter had called D.C. So he was asked, did Hunter Biden ever ask his father to take official actions on behalf of his business partners?
	He did not.
	He did not ask him.
	To my knowledge, I never saw him do anything for any particular business.
	Because that's not how it works.
	Archer was asked later to confirm that he's not aware of any policy discussions between Hunter Biden and his father, or of any occasion on which he asked the then vice president to do anything improperly, Yeah, I would, Archer said.
	As seemed to have been told about the bribe noted, this sort of boasting was common.
	Very similar to DC operators, Archer added, not needing to identify Hunter Biden as an operator.
	What's more, he's under penalty of perjury, mind you.
	He was never aware of any such bribe offered to Hunter or anyone else.
	How are we doing bribe here?
	There was never a good reason to believe the bribe allegation was legitimate, and Comer's repeated claims about it have done enormous damage to his credibility.
	Archer, to have Devin Archer dismissed Certainly isn't complete exoneration, but it's more evidence against the idea that it occurred.
	What else?
	The first words out of Comey's mouth.
	Every day this bribery scandal becomes more credible.
	That's the pattern here.
	Comer and Jordan and others hype up Joe Biden's involvement in Hunter by York only to see those claims collapse as more information is made public.
	Oh my goodness.
	This is spin of the highest order.
	Devin Archer's testimony as a central breakthrough in implicating Joe Biden instead.
	This is a guy they want to put in jail for fraud.
	Remember, one day he deserves to be in jail for fraud.
	The next day, after they think they can spin what he said, it's got to be credible.
	It's under penalty of perjury.
	That Joe Biden was not involved in Hunter Biden's business.
	First of all, that's a matter of interpretation, but that was never the original lie.
	The original lie was Joe Biden never discussed business with his son, and that is a bonafide-faced lie.
	10% for the big guy, people.
	Oh, but hold on.
	Don't take my word for it, because there's an email, which is probably the most amazing email you've ever seen, or hasn't seen.
	It's been reported, so you've probably seen it by this point in time.
	Let me see it.
	Here we go.
	Oh, Daily Mail exclusive.
	Hunter Biden told Devin Archer to buy a burner phone three days before meeting with MVP Joe at the White House, and weeks later, the business partners announced their board sets up seats at corrupt Ukrainian gas firm Burisma.
	Daily Mail obtained an email from Hunter Biden to business partner Devin Archer, telling him to buy a cell phone from a 7-Eleven or CVS and I'll do the same.
	Request came at the end of an email that also hinted at Hunter's touting of his influence over his VP father, who he described as my guy.
	Okay, so we can go read the whole thing.
	What's a bear doing?
	Oh, that's a guy in a bear suit.
	Who cares?
	Okay, let's just go to the email.
	It's a little long.
	I'm going to be able to see the internet actually not even going to allow me.
	Holy crab apples.
	This is how slow the internet is going.
	Okay, here we go.
	I don't know.
	Without taking a chance, I'm not going to get it.
	We got Hunter Biden to Devon Archer.
	Don't listen to this.
	Don't listen to your lying eyes.
	Listen to Phillips bump.
	We're going to read through this whole thing.
	It's a little long, but it's fun.
	We'll see how much it makes more sense in retrospect.
	And I can read fast.
	I have to go to Houston with Beau tomorrow for a department checkup.
	Some thoughts after doing research.
	By the way, bear in mind the punchline of this.
	Go get a burner phone so that we can have talks offline that nobody can track.
	And then perhaps read into the intent behind this is to write a self-serving, artificially I'm a good little boy.
	I want to follow the law.
	I don't want to break any law.
	Now go buy a burner phone so we can talk about breaking the law.
	That's just my humble assessment.
	I have to go to the good boy.
	Some thoughts after this research and some thoughts about organization going forward.
	Poroshenko appears likely that determining our team's relationship with him is he is credible with the West and by all accounts a true reformer.
	Some sort of decentralization will occur in the East.
	If it doesn't, the Russians continue to escalate their destabilizing campaign, which could lead to full-scale takeover of the eastern region in Donetsk.
	The strategic value is to create a land bridge to Crimea.
	This is interesting just on its face in that this is Hunter Biden's insight.
	This is not Russia conquering Ukraine with global domination.
	This even seems to be Hunter Biden internally saying there might be a conflict in the east that's going to be strategic and limited to the eastern province of Donetsk, not Putin is Hitler with global domination and wants to take over all of Ukraine.
	Interesting side note, but we can move on.
	Three, that won't directly affect my holdings, but it will limit future duration and utilization of offshore opportunities in particular.
	Four, it will also result in further destabilization of UK nationally and whatever government you are, and the US will respond with even stronger sanctions.
	Those sanctions will threaten the tenuous support of the EU, which does not have the political will to incur energy price increase.
	That didn't play out properly, did it now?
	Five, which will result in further price increases, okay, of gas, on, I think, Russian gas to the UK.
	The IMF loan guarantees will allow the UKs to weather the economic impact, but the required reforms to UK public subsidy and the new president.
	There will be enormous pressure on Burisma to lower prices for the national good.
	Even if the company hit in profits, it would seem imprudent to raise prices in...
	I guess, concert with Russia price gouging.
	Burisma has an opportunity here to play the hero if it ignores the artificial market value of their product and plays to the national interest.
	Interesting.
	Kazakhstan could also play a pivotal role in providing gas at rates lower than what the Russians are asking, but I doubt they would want to poke the bear.
	The pipelines across the UK are the key to all of this.
	But if the UK shuts down pipelines...
	They also shut down 60% of their energy supply and put a strangle on EU supplies from Russia, which the EU will never accept because they are pussies.
	Now I'm thinking about the Nord Stream pipeline and all of this.
	There is no immediate supplier solution to replace Russia.
	Even if Burisma increased output from their reserves by 100% It would, one, take at least two years, and two, UK would still be about 35% short on their best-wise.
	Our guy needs to set himself up as the anti-Victor Pinchuk.
	Cole and steal all our pro-Russian Yanukovych.
	Our guy.
	His dad.
	The best way to weather the storm, by the way, now on elections, is to throw all in with the chocolate king.
	Hell?
	I don't even know what that means.
	Even if he loses to Tabashenko, unlikely per the polls of today, Poroshenko is a safe ally to help protect from the vault of the moment.
	Additionally, you, me, and Alex should reconnect with the boxer and help gain support of Biden.
	And if the moment by elections he needs to weather, if he's seen his unfairly profiting from Russia induced price spike, things could turn against him fast.
	The Burisma website or press releases should talk about how...
	As the largest independent is committed to supplying UK industry with as much power at a fair price as possible.
	The crisis with the emphasis on utilizing the best technologies in the world-class team to ensure increased production and domestic delivery post-haste.
	We can actually be of value here.
	Developing a relationship, bringing the US expertise to the company, supply strategic, yada, yada, yada.
	BSF can actually have a direct impact.
	Okay, we're going to skip on this.
	19. We need to have long-term agreement and across-the-board participation.
	This is a huge step for us that can easily become very complicated.
	And if we are not protected financially, regardless of the outcome, we could find ourselves frozen out of a lot of current and future opportunities.
	To that end, they need to know in no uncertain terms that we will not and cannot intervene directly with domestic policymakers.
	And that we need to abide by FAR and any other U.S. laws in the strictest sense across the board.
	I'm not saying this smells like a lawyer after it, but it smells like it might have had the influence of a lawyer.
	Let me just, before we get into getting burner phones and talking off-grid, let me just make sure we need to be a barred.
	Totally respect the FAR laws because we've seen how people have weaponized those FAR laws for...
	Arguably political persecutions.
	Prosecutions, I should say.
	We need to be good.
	We absolutely want to follow the law.
	The contract should begin now.
	Start paying me now.
	Not after the visit of my guy because we don't know what he's going to say.
	Start paying me now.
	And if shit doesn't go down the way I think it should or that we all excel, I want my money now.
	Show me the money.
	That should include a retainer in the range of $25,000 per month with additional fees where appropriate for more in-depth work to go BSF for our protection.
	Complete separate from our respective deals re-board participation.
	Give me the money now.
	You give me the money now when my dad goes down, when our guy goes down, he knows that you've done your end.
	I can't predict what he's going to do, but I think I know what he's going to do.
	Oh, by the way, afterward, you know.
	Give me my money.
	Compliant with Farah.
	By the way, go buy a phone from 7-Eleven or CVS tomorrow and I will do the same.
	This could be the break we've been waiting for.
	If they're smart enough to understand our long-term value.
	Oh, they're smart enough to understand your long-term value.
	If they're looking to just use this until the storm passes, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay.
	Finally, we need to have a plan how to develop an entity, LLP, that allows us to draw on funds generated here to free us from existing under-producing commitments and build our own investment expansion strategy.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, we should also, just last paragraph, find highly credible and discreet firm to perform our due diligence and deep information for us on the ongoing basis.
	I think that's it.
	Yeah, so we want to make sure that we're totally by the law.
	Go get a burner phone.
	And we can continue discussing that which I don't necessarily want to discuss with you on the non-burner phones.
	Totally, totally kosher.
	Totally above board.
	Totally not suspicious.
	And totally show that Joe Biden was not in business with his son.
	Except for the 10% for the big guy.
	Except for the...
	Discussing business with his son.
	My dad's going to go down after he knows that I got the money.
	I didn't say after he knows that I got the money.
	Give me my money now.
	Sign the retainers now.
	Give me my 25k a month now.
	I'll let my dad know.
	And our guy goes down and to you, if you're good to me.
	Um, um, Thank you.
	What else is there?
	a plea day.
	That's one aspect of the corruption.
	The other aspect of the corruption, the plea deal.
	I don't think we need to go into this in too much detail.
	Gouveia did a masterful breakdown, and he makes the insufferably boring interesting and entertaining.
	You gotta...
	Barnes, Robert Barnes, for those of you who are new to the channel, you know, our weekly Sunday night law streams and Barnes briefs, Bourbon with Barnes on VivaBarnesLaw.com.
	He's a opinion that whether or not this plea deal falls through, it looks like Hunter might actually have immunity from prosecution for everything and anything directly or indirectly related in the app.
	Appendix to diversion agreement, which is everything and anything.
	When people knew or found out that Hunter was getting a diversion agreement or a pretrial diversion or a plea deal off of his tax evasion, big-time tax evasion of the most serious type of tax evasion, hiding money, making it difficult for the IRS to find them.
	That's being hidden.
	We found out he was getting a diversion agreement on his felony gun acquisition, felony gun possession.
	People thought, even on its face on that, that it was unheard of, because it is, in fact, unheard of.
	It looks like he might have prosecuted immunity for everything and anything.
	The deal may have been blown up by the judge, but it's arguable as to whether or not he actually, nonetheless, got rid of the immunity the government granted him.
	No one's above the law.
	Wait until you hear Nancy Pelosi say it.
	From Forbes, August 3rd, Hunter Biden plea agreement documents made public.
	I read about tax news, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay.
	Oh, sorry, who was it?
	Kelly Phillips, ERB.
	ERB or ERB?
	In June 2023, Hunter Biden, the son of the President Joe Biden, was charged with tax and gun charges as part of a plea deal.
	This week, new information about the related plea deal, including documentation, was made available.
	Biden had initially agreed to plead guilty to two charges of failure to pay other people who have gone to jail for decades.
	That section covers a wide variety of offenses, including failure to pay estimated tax, failure to return, failure to keep records, and failure to supply information.
	My goodness!
	You want to pick people who've gone to jail for years for similar allegations?
	As part of the agreement, the gun charge was to be treated as a diversion case.
	The felony gun charge to be treated as a diversion case.
	So you get your back massaged for what people would have gotten hanged for in terms of tax evasion, and then you get your felony gun charge from the party of more gun laws.
	More gun laws for thee, but not for me.
	This means he would not...
	This means he would not be technically pleading guilty to gun charges.
	Criminal possessions of a gun can be considered a felony.
	We'll enter a program for nonviolent offenders with substance abuse problems.
	As noted in prior coverage, Biden was required to appear in court to answer the charges officially, and the judge must approve the plea deal.
	I don't look like that's going to happen.
	That happened on July 26, when Biden appeared in front of the logistic judge, Norieka, who expressed concerns over some of the details of the agreement.
	It's unbelievable what they tried to say on the judge.
	And I can tell you, judges with a conscience or judges with a bit of dignity don't like being played the fool by a prosecution that is basically acting as the defense person that they should be prosecuting.
	The prosecution and the defense are coming to an agreement that is solely and wholly in the best interest of the defendant.
	You have the prosecutor basically acting As amicus, co-counsel to the defendant that they should be prosecuting.
	Noreika was specifically interested in how the plea agreement, which involved charges related to failure to pay taxes and the gun possession charge, were tied together.
	How were they charged?
	Good question.
	As a result, she has requested additional information about the deal.
	She got it.
	In the meantime, there's been a lot of speculation about what was revealed during the investigation.
	NBC News requested that the related documents be made public.
	Noreika agreed.
	Noreika agreed.
	You can read the documents here.
	The documents include a memorandum of plea.
	Exhibit P1, which is a statement of facts agreed by Biden and his lawyers, as well as the prosecutors.
	The documents don't reveal anything particularly new.
	They largely focus on Biden's behavior, his drug use, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, the facts.
	We can review the documents.
	They're boring, but I'll give everybody the link afterwards.
	Hold on one second.
	Where were they?
	Where was it?
	You can read the facts.
	Here.
	Where was it?
	I saw there was a hyperlink where it says you can read them here.
	Here we go.
	Okay, I'll get that.
	I'll open that afterwards.
	Okay.
	2017.
	Despite his addiction, Biden successfully entered into business and legal clients earning millions of dollars.
	Specifically, according to these court documents, Biden earned just under $1 million from a company he formed with the CEO of a Chinese business conglomerate.
	Can you believe the numbers here?
	$6,666,666 from his domestic business interests.
	Is that a joke?
	Is it a joke?
	How did they get that number?
	He earned a million from his Chinese business conglomerate, $666,666 from his domestic business interests, $644,000 from a Chinese investment company, $500,000 in fees from a Ukrainian energy company, $70,000 We're looking for a Romanian business and $48,000 from a law firm.
	My goodness, is this the most talented individual on earth?
	I'm trying to be gracious with my assessment.
	That is, if I'm just doing some quick math, we're about up to $3 million.
	That's 2017.
	He received $2.6 million in similar income in 2018.
	He did not have an accountant during...
	Oh, why would he have an accountant for all that money?
	Maybe because he never planned on accountings.
	Biden...
	Oh, hold on a second.
	He did have an accountant...
	What's my problem?
	He did have an accountant during those years who pushed from his accountant.
	Biden did not pay or file on time.
	He did not pay until 2021 when a third party helped him pay approximately $1 million for each year.
	Where'd the money go?
	Already spent it on hookers.
	I'm not saying that to be funny.
	Even though it has been suggested that Biden escaped penalties and interest with the plea deal, which would have been highly unusual, the agreement indicates that did not happen.
	According to statements of fact, penalties and interest were applied for 2017-2018.
	Who are they paid for by?
	Until a third party helped them pay...
	That's interesting.
	Questions have also been raised about other tax years.
	Those...
	We're also addressed in the documents which noted that Biden's accountant discovered in 2020 that his 2016 return had yet to be filed.
	Amazing.
	What happens to a layperson if you forget to file?
	The amount due was initially half a million, of which $450,000 was timely paid.
	The balance due was just under $50,000 yet.
	Biden timely filed in 2019.
	Good.
	His tax liability of $200,000 was paid.
	Okay.
	What is even more common is that you have to pay.
	In the US, we have a pay-as-you-go system.
	That means taxes are typically withheld from wages.
	That's the amount of your paycheck that your employer holds directly to the IRS.
	Or in the case of certain other income, payment may be subject to a flat withholding rate.
	If you will owe more than $1,000 due to business or other taxable income not withholding, you normally make automated tax payments.
	Those mechanisms help keep most tax bills manageable.
	When you don't pay as you go, When it comes to paying as you go, Biden made two big but not uncommon mistakes.
	Oh, why would he not know to not make these mistakes?
	One, as noted, he did not timely make estimated tax payments.
	More importantly, as indicated in the court documents, he withdrew, quote, substantial funds outside of payroll, typically legal but often problematic.
	Oh, problematic.
	The payroll system that was set up had, quote, been created in part...
	To ensure that Biden's holdings to pay any outstanding tax liability.
	That's the equivalent of an everyday business owner taking money out of their account rather than via paycheck.
	The business owner might be entitled to this money, but it is still subject to tax.
	As noted in prior coverage, failure to pay does not typically result in jail time.
	Concealment does, though, as I understand.
	It's considered a misdemeanor and usually means fines of up to $25,000, though prison time...
	Up to a year could act on if the situation warrants.
	A misdemeanor failure to pay?
	Yeah, okay.
	Do we get to the concerns?
	In addition to the consolidating charges, Nareka also seems to be concerned about whether the agreement protects Biden from further prosecution.
	As part of the diversion agreement, the government confirmed it would not prosecute Biden, quote, for any federal crimes encompassed by the attached statements of fact.
	The deal will not apply to any future conduct.
	That should mean that Biden wouldn't be prosecuted for the gun charge or the tax-related conduct as laid out in the state of the facts.
	However, there seems to be some disagreement with parties and Nareka about what that means.
	Biden's team thinks it should cover everything and anything.
	And when the judge pressed the bat and said, whoa, whoa, whoa, you're not giving this guy a...
	Total immunity for everything and anything.
	The prosecution says, no, no, no.
	Only related to the tax on the gun charges.
	Then Biden's team says, no, no, no.
	It's for everything.
	And if it's not, then we're walking away.
	The civil treatment of the tax-related charges is more straightforward.
	The agreement includes a provision that parties further understand that if the internal IRS determine that there are taxes due and owing for the taxes due, they are not subject to the terms of this agreement.
	That should mean that the IRS may assess a difference.
	What's next?
	At the hearing, Noreka asked Biden, without me saying I'll agree to the plea agreement, Biden responded, not guilty.
	Biden is expected to reverse his guilty plea if he reaches a new agreement or the additional information satisfies Noreka's concerns.
	A new hearing is expected in about six weeks.
	My question is going to be, who, if anyone, is going to get to Noreka?
	I wonder.
	Call me cynical.
	Call me jaded.
	Hey, Nareka, what the hell are you asking so many questions for?
	This stuff is delicious, by the way.
	12 calories.
	Hashtag not an ad.
	12 calories.
	And it's delicious.
	It's corruption all the way down.
	But by the way, sweetheart deal that nobody on earth has ever gotten before and will never get again unless, you know...
	No one's above the law.
	No one is above the law.
	Listen to this.
	It comes to the indictment of Trump.
	Lock him up for the rest of his life for things that we've done.
	No one is above the law.
	Wait until you hear the shameless I mean, I don't know what other word there is for this.
	Listen to this.
	With great pride in the work of the January 6th committee, the leadership of Benny Thompson, Chairman Benny Thompson of Mississippi, vice chair of the committee, Ms. Cheney of Wyoming.
	They were great leaders of the committee, but every member made a contribution with patriotism and excellence.
	To your point, they were.
	Weren't there to perform.
	They were there to be patriotic, to seek and find the truth.
	To be patriotic?
	Because they knew the evidence.
	They knew the law.
	And they knew that charges should be brought because no one is above the law.
	Not a president of the United States, not anyone.
	So people say, oh, well, this will cause a fuss if we, you know, if you take him to court.
	Well, he is not above the law.
	So it's a fuss.
	They say it.
	No one is above the law, but some people are certainly beneath it.
	And some people are above the law.
	Understand this.
	One indictment after the other, each more far-fetched than the last.
	Hunter Biden gets a plea diversion for his not filing and not paying tax on millions of dollars.
	Trump gets indicted.
	At the New York State level for what is effectively nothing more than an accounting matter, a book entry matter.
	37 charge indictment.
	It's got to be bad.
	Oh my, but no one's above the law because Nancy Pelosi said it.
	And speaking of the indictment of Trump, the hat trick of indictments, but don't worry, there's going to be a fourth one coming shortly because once you've walked around and diluted to the point of meaning nothing, justice itself, keep getting...
	Rappaport's having a wet dream on Twitter.
	These people are reveling in the fact that they've made a mockery.
	They've desecrated the judicial system, the Constitution, the democracy, the Democratic Republic, however you want to call it, of America.
	They're reveling in it.
	Look at what we can do to this guy.
	It's a bloody joke.
	We know it's a joke, but it's our joke.
	What did Bill Barr have?
	I have to say about this.
	I can't believe that at any point in time I actually liked Bill Barr, but I think it's only because he reminds me of John Goodman out of The Big Lebowski.
	And I think because he made me think of...
	Was it Stan?
	Listen to this.
	It's even stronger now?
	Oh yeah, it's definitely stronger.
	the allegation of another kind of cover-up and obstruction attempt after getting a subpoena for surveillance tapes than entering into a conspiracy to delete surveillance tapes.
	This is Bill Barr, former Attorney General, not allegedly entering into a conspiracy.
	The accusations, the indictments, the conviction.
	By the way...
	My memory was that Trump wanted to release the surveillance footage.
	He wanted to make it public.
	Is it conceivable that at the end of the day, what they're alleging now as a conspiracy to destroy the evidence was actually Trump's plan to potentially make public video surveillance that he wanted to make public?
	Let's just let the bar keep big.
	And it's also quite typical in this sense.
	These two individuals, Noda and Carlos, are dragged into this thing.
	Their lives turned upside down by Trump to pursue the caper of his.
	I put myself on mute.
	I want to stop it there.
	Talk about dog whistles.
	Understand what Bill Barr is saying right now.
	What he's saying is that Noda...
	Who's the guy?
	Noda and...
	Not in Carlos.
	They're dragged into this.
	They are.
	Who's dragging them into this?
	Their lives turned upside down.
	Their lives are turned upside down.
	Who's turning their lives upside down with a bullcrap indictment against the two of them to drag them into this and to turn their lives upside down only because they dealt with Trump?
	Who's doing it?
	It sure as hell isn't doing it.
	And it sure as hell is not that did it.
	What this is right here?
	This is the mob saying, get involved with...
	That guy.
	We will get involved with that guy.
	We will come for you.
	We will break your windows.
	We will slash your tires.
	We might even break your kneecaps.
	Don't let that guy ruin your life.
	Don't let that guy ruin your life.
	That bar is saying right here.
	This is not an assessment of Trump.
	This is a warning to everyone.
	The deep state, the administrative state, the prosecutorial machine that has been weaponized for partisan purposes will ruin your life.
	Like they've been doing with every single one of its allies from the get-go.
	Carter Page, Steve Bannon, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, anyone who comes into Trump, they will ruin.
	And then they'll say, it's Trump doing it, but they know damn well what they're saying and what people are hearing when they say it.
	It's not Trump ruining these people's lives.
	It's this weaponized, politicized, prosecutorial system that has made a mockery of justice by...
	By destroying and turning up lives, upending the lives of these individuals, anybody who had anything to do with Donald Trump.
	God damn.
	I mean, it's infuriating.
	By Trump to pursue, you know, this caper of his.
	And he leaves in his wake, ruined lives like this.
	The people who went up to Capitol Hill, these individuals.
	The people who went up to Capitol Hill.
	The people who were egged.
	On into going to Capitol Hill through informed, through agitators, through Ray Epps-type people.
	The people who were egged on to do it, provoked into doing it, or, right, framed, for lack of a better word, you know, waved in by the Capitol Police and then sentenced to jail.
	Oh, no, no, it was Trump that did that.
	It wasn't FBI, CIA.
	It wasn't a weaponized judicial system out of D.C. It was Trump.
	Our right now is just we will ruin this of anyone who comes into Trump's orbit.
	Oh, but it's Trump that did it.
	Many of the people who served him in government that got into things and he just leaves all this carnage in his wake.
	Oh, he cares about that?
	No, he doesn't care about that.
	Loyalty is a one beat for him.
	Who's he talking about right now?
	And in many ways, you know, I think these two people down in Mar-a-Lago represent.
	Many Republicans who feel that they have to man the ramparts and defend this guy no matter what he does and go along with him.
	And I think they have to be careful or they're going to end up as part of the carnage in his way.
	That's what your message is to those people who do feel that's of loyalty to him?
	Do we understand what this is an overt threat?
	Anybody who feels the need to help Trump, we're going to come and win your life as well.
	I think we all.
	I have primary loyalty to the Constitution in the country, not to any particular individual.
	And, you know, at some point trying to defend the indefensible.
	Oh, it's indefensible.
	He always says he had a right to declassify the documents or take them with him.
	I mean, if he really thought that, why would he ask to delete security surveillance footage?
	Well, yeah, but not the whole thing.
	If he really thought he had the right to have the documents...
	Why would he have told the reporter, I could have done this when I was president, but I can't do it now?
	Guaranteed.
	I haven't seen the full end of the scene.
	Umpteen ways for him to assert that when he was asked by the government and during that one-and-a-half-year period.
	He never did.
	He never asserted it in a lawful way.
	What did he do?
	Oh, he never asserted it in a lawful way.
	That's an interesting distinction.
	Are you a judge, jury, and executioner, Bill?
	He obstructed the subpoena.
	And both subpoenas.
	You've said before that at its core, this is an obstruction case because you say, you know, if he gave the documents back, he would have never been indicted.
	But what do you say to Republicans?
	And this includes 2024 GOP candidates who say it's unfair for him to be prosecuted for that.
	They say it's a process crime.
	It's awkward.
	I mean, this is a grand jury subpoena asking for the documents.
	And he makes his lawyer, puts his lawyer in a position of making a full statement that a full search was made when he knew it wasn't, and in fact prevented the lawyer from making it.
	I mean, that's the essence of obstruction, an obstruction jury.
	It doesn't get more serious than that.
	What would you say?
	He just brought on two new attorneys, Todd Blanchett in April, John Laro just now.
	They're going to ruin your lives too, that's what I would say.
	Given what has happened with other attorneys that he's had, what would you?
	What's your advice to his attorneys?
	Don't do it.
	Don't do it.
	Get a lot of insurance.
	Because we're coming after you, too.
	They'll be spending a lot of time themselves at some point, you know, for grand juries or answering questions or as witnesses and investigators.
	Can you believe what this man is saying right now?
	Get a lot of insurance.
	We're coming for you, too.
	Solicitor client privilege.
	Be damned.
	Attorney General, my ass.
	He's spending a lot of money on legal fees, too.
	His political action committee spent more than $40 million on legal fees already this year.
	What do you make of his supporters, his political supporters, giving him money to his campaign, and he then uses that for his legal fees and his co-defendant's legal fees?
	Yeah, I find that...
	That might be a crime.
	We might have to look into that.
	Sort of nauseating.
	I mean, this guy claims to be a multibillionaire.
	And, you know, he goes out and raises money from hardworking class, hardworking people, small donors, and tells them this is to defend America.
	What an absolute snake.
	He didn't provide significant support during the 22 elections.
	And a lot of this money seems to be going to his legal fees.
	I would say get insurance because we're coming for you lawyers.
	Nobody should represent him.
	He shouldn't be allowed to have lawyers because we're going to come after them too.
	He shouldn't really...
	He should have to bankrupt himself in order to defend against this witch hunt of a persecution.
	Understand exactly what Bill Barr, former Attorney General, is saying right here because there's nothing shy of that.
	Holy sweet, merciful goodness.
	Is that worse than I could possibly have thought?
	What would you say to his lawyers?
	We're coming for you.
	Didn't you hear what I said about Trump leaving everyone's life in disarray?
	Get insurance because we're coming for you.
	I never thought I would see the world come to this level of actual political depravity.
	You read about it in the history books.
	You look at other countries and you say, my goodness, I'm glad I live in Canada.
	I'm glad I live in America.
	And you can see What's it been?
	26...
	Barely 10 years!
	In both countries, they've gone from...
	Maybe they were never free and democratic in the first place, and I was just living a pipe dream.
	They've gone from free to tyrannical regimes in Canada.
	They've gone free, if it ever was, although now I'm thinking maybe it hasn't been this way for 50 years, to the former Attorney General basically saying...
	If we want to destroy your lives, we will.
	We're going to leave you without a lawyer.
	We're going to violate constant rights.
	We're going to violate the most fundamental rights of the judicial system if we don't like you.
	And then we're going to blame it on the victim for having destroyed the lives of the people that we've destroyed the lives of.
	Ah, paramba.
	All right.
	We're going to end on a mildly good note before we go over to rumble.
	Before we go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, everybody.
	Sorry about the video today.
	It's very frustrating.
	I'm going to reboot everything after this stream.
	Although maybe, is it better now?
	No, it's still on one bar.
	This is some funny, funny stuff.
	January 6th.
	What do we say?
	We'll end on the funny, which is representative Eric Swalwell's memory of what happened on January 6th.
	But first, so this is Benny Johnson.
	Leaked?
	Remember?
	I think this is...
	Yeah, this is it.
	Okay.
	Tucker Carlson said that he had interviewed the dude there, the Capitol Police Chief, when he was at Fox, got fired, and they never aired the interview.
	This is new to me.
	I haven't seen this.
	So we're going to walk together in real time.
	Let me just maximize and make sure that we're good here.
	All right, let's see what's going on here.
	We're very restrained and rational and not giving an overstatement.
	But the facts that you're describing are shocking.
	The reason why I've had a lot of people ask me, you know, get this book.
	Hold on.
	That glitching was not me.
	That was the actual clip.
	I try to do what I can.
	To get the truth out?
	Yes.
	I was allowed to do my job as the chief.
	I got a significant experience.
	If I was allowed to do my job as the chief, we wouldn't be here.
	This didn't happen.
	You're lambasted in public, and it all appears to be a cover-up.
	Like I said, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information intelligence...
	I'm not a conspiracy theorist because that's somehow still pejorative.
	I am a conspiracy theorist.
	Because the conspiracy theories are turning out to be more than the mainstream media bullshit calling out the conspiracy theorists.
	Yep.
	Conspiracy theorists.
	It originated in a lab in Wuhan, China.
	The jab does not actually prevent...
	The masks don't actually work.
	The jab causes myocarditis in insanely high numbers in a demographic of people who risk.
	Yeah.
	Call me.
	It has become a badge of honor, and I will wear it like one.
	This is amazing.
	It's all watered down.
	I'm not getting intelligence.
	I'm denying support of the National Guard in advance.
	I'm denying support of the National Guard while we're under attack for 71 minutes.
	You're in a fight?
	Yeah.
	A fight for a couple of minutes wears you out.
	One minute.
	I was going to say, 60 seconds, three minutes.
	Let me tell you, it wears you out.
	My officers were fighting for 80 minutes before the...
	So you described this as a failure to get the intelligence of the people who needed it, but it sounds like they were hiding the intelligence.
	It almost sounds like a prediction tweet of 22 that this was a big fat setup so that they could weaponize it to do exactly what they've done with it.
	I mean, imagine.
	The second impeachment was based on this nonsense.
	You had police officers sobbing about the injuries that they got, and then, you know, apparently the video that they didn't want to release shows that the officers may have been as injured as they purported to have been.
	You have Capitol Police understaffed because of COVID.
	You have FBI and intelligence.
	Having infiltrated the Proud Boys, allegedly, the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, on the plot of seditious conspiracy, and yet claimed to have been caught totally off guard on January 6th.
	You got Ray Epps, still hasn't been charged, despite having said, oh, I'm going to get charged.
	Ray Epps, egging on the crowd.
	Only die guy not to get charged.
	This was set up.
	So they played exactly how they played it.
	And that's what I'm getting at, is...
	Could there possibly be people that actually did something happen and kind of wanted to?
	It's not a far stretch.
	I don't know what the other explanation is.
	You know, it's sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out.
	Kierkegaard, life can only be understood backwards but must be lived forwards.
	Play it backwards now.
	Play it backwards from this to January 6th.
	And with everything that we now know.
	You play this in reverse and you say, it all makes sense, right?
	What was their end goal?
	You look at what's happening.
	That was their end goal.
	That was their end goal.
	Well, I mean, there's no question that what happened on January 6th has really helped the Democrats.
	It's to politicize the U.S. military and the intelligence agencies and the FBI.
	And they're all, I think, bad for America and violations of the Constitution, but they're all good for the Democratic Party.
	That's a fact.
	That's what happened.
	Absolutely.
	And I write about that because as a cop of 30 years, I'm a rule of law type of guy.
	Yeah.
	You know, there's a reason that Lady Justice is depicted with a blindfold.
	The fairness of our legal system goes out the window, and that is exactly what has happened.
	They've stripped that blindfold away from Lady Justice.
	And it's not perceived as being fair anymore.
	They've ripped off the blindfold and they've added laser sights.
	And those laser sights are pointed at specific people and specific parties.
	Oh my goodness.
	You know the other conspiracy theory?
	Sicknick, a young healthy male, dies suddenly from a stroke.
	And I mean, I didn't even...
	I didn't have the thought in my head at the time until they mentioned that the Capitol Police were understaffed because of code.
	And when did they roll out the GBJ and what were the now well-documented risks of adverse reactions among a demographic of young health men?
	No.
	And then the harder they tried to push that story as him having been murdered by Trump supporters, there is no shame.
	There's no bottom to the barrel of the depravity of exploiting victims for their own political game and love for their own political game.
	Has anyone ever...
	Any remote suggestion thought that could have been related to what we now know is an all-too-common adverse reaction to the jibby jab?
	All right, we're going to end it with a bit of a laugh because it's going to be Eric Fartwell.
	I said I'd never make fun of him for the fart, but I think he deserves it now.
	I think this guy outright deserves it.
	Listen to this.
	Oh, how's it going to get posted?
	Oh, it's almost like they wanted it to happen.
	It's almost like...
	They want to make themselves heroes and vilify their ideological adversaries, their political rivals, and all of their supporters, and turn them into terrorists.
	It's almost like that's what they wanted from the beginning.
	Oh, what's that, Rip Swallow?
	August 2nd, going to make that very clear to the rest of us?
	On January 6th, I gaveled.
	Look at this.
	Jackass is wearing a off-face mask, and I can see his nostril indent.
	Science people.
	I can see the nook of his nostril.
	You know that that mask is doing wonders to block COVID.
	Rep Eric Swalwell, a man who allegedly had a questionable relationship with a Chinese spy.
	A man who, did he also allegedly potentially falsify a screen grab that he posted?
	I think he did.
	We might have to look into that.
	This is what he has to say about January 6th.
	His retrospective.
	His memory.
	On January 6th, I gaveled the house in.
	Let me start that in.
	On January 6th, I gaveled the house in to start the day.
	After a few hours later...
	Oh, I gotta start this again.
	On January 6th, I gaveled the house in to start the day.
	A few hours later, when Trump's terrorists...
	Is he talking about Ray Epps?
	Did he just call Ray Epps a terrorist?
	Ray Epps should sue Swalwell for defamation.
	Trump's terrorists attacked the...
	A few hours later when Trump's terrorists attacked the chamber, I texted my wife that I loved her and to kiss our children goodbye for me.
	What a scumbag piece of rubbish.
	This guy is pretending to be one of the people on United 93 or on one of the planes of 9-11.
	I texted my wife that I loved her and to kiss our children goodbye for me.
	What the hell are you on?
	Well, tell me what drug you're on.
	That that is the reality that you purport to have.
	Oh, by the way, scumbag McGee, can we see the text?
	They're coming for me, honey.
	I'm in the most secure building in the country.
	Oh my goodness, these rubes with their American.
	There's one guy with a spear and an animal head on him.
	Kiss the children goodbye for me.
	Tell them I love them.
	It's time for justice to be served.
	Oh, it is Rep Swalwell.
	Oh, my God.
	I mean, I'm sorry to use the Lord's name in vain.
	Swalwell.
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Fake text message?
	Oh, yeah, it is.
	Look at Scumbag McGee.
	Oh, no, this is not the right one.
	That's not the right one.
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Falsifies?
	Maybe it wasn't him.
	Eh, whatever.
	Oh, dear lord.
	They've come to protest.
	Tell the children I love them.
	Kiss them goodnight.
	Read them our favorite bedtime story.
	I may never see you again.
	As security ushers us into the bunkers.
	We will be so...
	Oh!
	Oh!
	Lord, have mercy.
	Okay.
	Let's go to locals after this.
	Come.
	I'm going to give everybody the...
	Oh, what do I want to...
	I want it to play us out with a video, but maybe I won't be able to.
	Oh, yes, I can.
	Hold on one second.
	I will play us out with something that will make everyone laugh.
	I was going to start with one of two videos.
	Oh, I'm not going to end with Michael Rappaport.
	Hold on.
	I'm going to end with another highlight from my interview with PragerU.
	Yeah, here we go.
	Let's play at this one here.
	Everyone, come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	We're going to have an after-party discussion, a little Q&A, and then I'm going to eat with the family who has already eaten dinner because...
	Actually, they went shopping.
	I don't know where they are.
	All right, hold on.
	We're going to go here, here, here.
	And here.
	Let's end it with this.
	Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and listen to Viva Lament about the absolute state of Canada.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Tomorrow, 2 o 'clock, Marco Polo.
	It's going to be amazing.
	And that's it.
	See you then.
	That's the law that they were selling Canadians as, oh, let's promote Canadian content because...
	Netflix is over and there's too much American content and so let's make it great for Canada.
	But really it's not.
	It's more let's control the media.
	What it is is let's get the administrative body to sink its hooks into people we don't like, ideological adversaries, entities that are competing with us.
	Then they came in competing with us being the government.
	And then they came in with it's Bill C-18 which is like determining what's authoritative news on the internet.
	In terms of regulating news sources on the internet, which is obviously intended to reestablish the dominance that Stadia had when it had a monopoly on radio and television.
	Like CBC, Radio Canada, when there was no internet and they were on television and radio, you had no other choice.
	That's where you went for news.
	Now that you've got the internet, you go to Rebel News.
	You go to True North.
	You go to Post Millennial.
	You maybe even go to Viva Frye.
	CBC and the state, our allies, the ones we bought out or bought up, they're losing their dominance and they're actually just losing their market share.
	How do we reestablish this?
	We've got to get control over the Wild West of information, being the internet, and this is how to do it.
	It's pure censorship, but it's always sold as being for your own protection, disinformation.
	We can't have foreign interference in Canadian politics, even though Trudeau has no problem taking literally a million dollars.
	Follows from the Communist Party for his father's Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.
	Very analogous to the Clinton Foundation in terms of the pay-to-play type influence.
	People just don't know and they don't care.
	They don't care.
	I've forgotten the stream on Rumble.
	All right, everybody.
	Enjoy the night.
	I will see you all on Locals for those of you who are coming.
	And for everyone else, see you tomorrow.
	Two o 'clock.
	It's going to be amazing.
	Peace out, peeps.
	Alrighty, locals.
	Let's see here.
	How's the video here?
	Remove this.
	How is the video on locals?
	It's very frustrating when these things happen.
	It's like...

▲