The Media are Shameless, Remorseless, Rampant Hypocrites! Viva Frei Live
|
Time
Text
For those who are listening on podcast, you are staring at Justin Trudeau and Christia Freeland in a very unfortunate frozen image, but this is how their video started.
I did not do it like this to embarrass them.
Now I'm going to back out and we're going to play this and listen to it together for the first time.
Hey everyone, I'm here in my office today with the...
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Chrystia Freeland, because by the time you watch this, it'll be Budget Day.
We're going to be presenting our federal budget with our plan for how to grow the economy and support Canadians.
I can't tell you everything that's in it.
I can't tell you everything that's in it.
But I can tell you that there are three priorities in the budget.
Exactly, Monsieur le Prime Minister.
That's the extent of Christian Freeland's French, from what I understand.
I'm joking, sorry.
And not to make fun of anybody for not being able to speak French, not everyone in Canada is perfectly bilingual.
More power to them.
Oh, but let's hear what they have to say.
The question is this, Monsieur Trudeau, mon dire chef.
Will the budget balance itself?
On our three big priorities.
First, making life more affordable.
So we're going to shut you down and put you out of business, but cut your Disney Plus and you can save $12 a month for those who were even subscribed to that satanic Disney channel in the first place.
Ooh, I think we might have it on our...
No, I'm fairly certain we cancelled that a long time ago.
So you can pay the bills at the end of the month.
Second...
Look at these eyes.
She's so confident in what she's seeing.
It comes so naturally to her because they believe in it.
They put it together that where the hell is she looking?
Oh, I can tell you where she's looking.
Read the lines, Mrs. Freeland.
Read the line.
Building a clean economy so we have even more great middle class jobs.
Building a green economy so that we have even more good middle class.
And, obviously, we're going to have a responsible fiscal approach to all of this.
This is as natural as saccharine.
We don't want to throw oil on the fire of inflation.
Can you believe it?
This is 90 seconds, or I should say 93 seconds, of stupidity.
We're going to make life more affordable while acknowledging massive inflation.
We're going to make life more affordable by creating green jobs, which means shutting down other jobs, because Canada contributes less than a percent to all global emissions, even if you take for granted the argument that emissions are what's causing global warming.
Keep going, keep going.
Look to your boss.
What does he have to say?
It's going to be a serious budget for a serious moment.
We're going to do a lot of things to help you with life costs or costs of life, costs of living, to make life more affordable, to deliver concrete results in our health care system.
Because you've only had eight years to do it, you incompetent nincompoop.
Et aussi pour créer une économie croissante et verte avec des beaux emplois pour la classe moyenne.
To create a wonderful economy, a flourishing economy, and a green economy that will benefit the middle class.
Look at Chris, she's so proud.
We're going to head out on the road to share with Canadians everything we're going to be doing for the year and years ahead as we focus on them.
So stay tuned right here to find out more about the budget today and in the weeks to come.
That's 93 seconds of my life that I'm never going to get back and 93 brain cells that I'm sure I just lost through seething rage.
Croissant.
Michael Scriven says, did he say croissant?
Yes, because croissant means to grow and expand because that's what croissants do in the oven.
By the way, get down here, camera.
Follow me, camera.
Wrong way.
Oh, the camera.
Technology brings new problems down here.
There we go, this way.
Okay.
Nice.
Audio's good, everybody.
Let's bring this mic.
There we go.
I bought this for my wife when I came back from Vegas, meet up with Robert Barnes, Eric Hundley, Mark Grobert from America's Untold Stories.
It was a selfish purchase because I knew that I was going to end up using it myself.
I knew it.
She doesn't like this cup.
I know that she has her favorite cup in the pantry that holds the cups, the cupboard, the cupboard.
I knew that this was going to be good.
Now, I saw a chat that I want to bring up.
Where was it?
Oh, yes, it was here.
Let me just make sure I can...
Ah, they live to help and also help to die with a maid.
By the way, that's going to be how they're going to make sure that the healthcare system can pay for itself.
Just burn out the useless wood.
You know, like gather it and set it on fire and it'll be better for the rest of the forest.
Let's save some of the costs on the people who...
They're a burden on the system in any case.
So allowing them to decide to end their lives, it will actually save us money.
So let's maybe go ahead and encourage them to do that.
Maybe one of them can donate their spine for a nice little purse that someone can make and sell on Instagram.
Okay.
Good afternoon, everyone on the East Coast.
Good morning on the West Coast.
And good evening in Europe and...
Top of the morning to you if you're in New Zealand, Australia.
Let me just make sure that we're simultaneously live on all the platforms on which we should be live.
We are live on Rumble.
We are live on YouTube.
And we are live on Locals, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Standard disclaimers.
No medical advice, no legal advice, no election fornication advice.
My Clips channel is under attack.
There's quite clearly no question about that.
What was I going to say?
Superchats, people.
If you see these little things called Superchats, thank you for supporting the channel.
Bear in mind that YouTube takes 30% of those Superchats.
If you want to be efficient about it for both supporting free speech and for the creator, go to Rumble.
Viva Frye, they have Rumble rants.
They take 20%, so better for the creator, better for the platform to support free speech.
If you want to support us, go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
$7 a month, $70 a year, or more for those who actually choose to pay more than the monthly Minimum.
Tons of great content.
A wonderful community.
We are all above average in that community.
When we go to Rumble, we're going to talk about the horrendous act of evil violence that we witnessed yesterday.
Some of us witnessed.
Some videos are popping up online.
We'll talk about that on Rumble.
I hate these things.
I hate these stories.
As should everybody with half a soul and half a conscience.
Because...
For those who are able to close their eyes and have what is referred to as hot empathy and actually be able to visualize and actually feel such horror, it makes it difficult to go on with our days.
It makes it difficult to go on just like life goes on.
I mean, that's it.
The news reports on things and then...
A couple weeks later, they've moved on, but the horror and the tragedy will be forever for those affected.
And then the systematic, standard responses, the cycle plays itself over and over again.
An act of outrageous violence, inhumane evil violence occurs.
Everybody seems to be the first ones to want to chime in.
With their political spin, with their hot take, some people don't think twice before offering their hot take.
To the infinite perpetuity of the interwebs, the lies begin, the exaggerations begin, the rumors begin, and it happens, and then the media circus moves on, and everybody else's life goes on except for those who have been permanently, irreparably affected by the act of violence.
And it's very...
It's hard to get around and it's hard to talk about.
And then there's the other part about talking about it, because the media knows this.
And I'm very delicate in the way I talk about these things.
The media knows that the incessant coverage, and I dare say even the glamorizing in the imagery and the images used, they know it inspires copycats.
They know it.
There's ample studies about it.
I can't even pretend that this is my knowledge.
This has been known since we were kids, since I was kids.
Every time there's a massive act like this and they go and they delve in, they give the perpetrators of this violence the attention that they were starved for in their daily life most of the time, that they sought this violence in order to get the attention that they were lacking in their daily lives.
The media gives it to them, posthumously, for those who do this as an act of a final act.
Everybody knows that it proves to be inspirational, and yet nonetheless, the media comes out every time and does the same thing over and over again.
We'll talk about that there on Rumble, because there's some stuff to go through.
For me, the shocking thing, above and beyond the absolute act of depravity and evil, are the reactions and the responses.
We're going to get to the Pac-Man tweet, but did someone say that Pac-Man was on...
Patrick David.
I saw someone earlier on.
There's a couple of tweets.
I mean, let's not get ahead of ourselves.
We're going to talk about that on Rumble because it's...
Who doesn't take a moment just to step back and say, regardless of what I mean by this tweet, how can it be misinterpreted?
So we'll get there.
We'll get there on Rumble when we move over.
But for now, we're going to start...
Okay, which way is this stupid thing going on?
Okay, there we go.
We don't want to see the megalodon tooth in the background.
This camera wants to see the megalodon tooth in the background.
Let's see what's going on.
When you see, like right over there, you're going to see in a second a beautiful megalodon tooth that I bought at, of all places, FAO Shorts when it was still open before it closed down.
I think it opened up again.
Yeah, Pac-Man destroyed Patrick...
When?
Today, John Miemi?
Was it today that it happened?
Anyhow, cops knew about it.
Okay, I'll start this.
We'll get to it later.
For the time being, tweets.
People don't think about them or they do think about them and know exactly how they're going to be misinterpreted.
Now, for those of you who follow me on Twitter, you know that I've been having something of a back and forth with Canadian...
She's still a journalist.
I know that she got fired from Global News.
Sorry, I don't know that she got fired.
I know that she no longer works for Global News.
There's rumorings that she got fired from Global News.
I don't care.
I don't want to mock or revel in someone having lost their job, even if it's for a cause.
Going after people's employment or reveling in their loss of employment, it's not something that I choose to do, revel in, or use as a point of mockery or derision.
Rachel Gilmore, I've been having some back and forth, and it's going to lead into something that's going to lead into today.
But on Sunday, I'm going to show you the video.
I'm going to show you the tweet.
I'm sorry.
I'm going to show you the tweet first.
And speaking of whether or not we think tweets are deliberately or accidentally misleading, we're going to go to this one.
This is where the journey starts.
Sorry, I almost forgot about my introduction.
I'm a little reluctant to do the video or, you know, to talk about these tweets because I don't want anybody going and harassing Rachel Gilmore.
And, like, full stop, you know this.
Everybody knows this.
I'm almost reluctant to because Rachel Gilmore does go to Twitter and make quite a big deal of when she thinks she's being wrongly attacked or, you know, makes a big deal of nasty comments that she gets, which are nasty comments, even if they get...
Absolutely no traction, even if they're just like the random ramblings that necessarily go along with posting something to hundreds of millions of people.
She likes to make good use of those, to demonize the critics of her.
And so I always say, do it just to prove a point.
Be nice with Rachel, even when you are expressing your discontent with her.
Now, I'll call her, as you're going to see in one of these tweets, I'm going to accuse her of promoting a very bad...
Message ideology.
But avoid the obvious stuff.
First of all, never threats, never violence, full stop, no buts.
And as much as some people don't like that, tough noogies, that's me and you take it because that's my philosophy.
And to do anything else is to be, you know, your own thing, but something that you know that I don't approve of and I don't find respectful in the public discourse, even if I do use hot language sometimes.
So even this, despite I'm reluctant to talk about it because I don't want her saying, look, right-wing podcaster sent his hordes of angry subs over to bother me and harass me.
Don't do that.
Does that mean that I'm going to be then, to some degree, indirectly silenced from addressing the madness because I know that that's going to be the response one way or the other?
No.
So I happen to get Rachel Gilmore's tweets.
She hasn't blocked me yet.
Okay, that's fine.
I haven't blocked her.
I don't block anybody.
Joe Biden was in Canada meeting with Justin Trudeau.
There was a tweet that came out.
It started with Tonda McCharles, who I think has actually blocked me on Twitter, but it doesn't matter.
The White House pool reporter who was in the motorcade.
There were dozens of protesters in front of Parliament and dozens onlookers more further down the street.
Your pooler saw one protester holding a Nazi salute with his left arm.
Okay, that was one tweet.
Then the retweet, or the retweet comes from Rachel Gim, which says, a pool reporter says there was a Nazi salute from one of the convoy protesters as the motorcade drove past.
The question is this, Chad.
And I'll ask it, and I'm not going to put it up as a poll question, it's not that important.
When you read this tweet, what is your impression of what is being described here?
Is your impression that what is being described is that there is a far-right, neo-Nazi, anti-Semitic supporter among the protesters?
Or is your impression that there is a protester who is mocking Joe Biden and or Joe, what's his name, Justin Trudeau as being fascist tyrants by invoking that image and that saying, hail Justin or hail Brandon, to mock them and call them fascist tyrants?
One, four, you think that what is being described here is that there is a bona fide neo-Nazi anti-Semitic element of the protest.
One is that.
And two, It is intended to be mockery to deride Joe Biden and or Justin Trudeau as being fascist dictators.
One, legit.
Two, satire.
Let's hear what the chat says.
I got one, two already.
That's interesting.
I got three twos.
Four twos.
Five twos.
All right.
Well, I say to this...
The camera's moving again.
I say to this, and this is where it started.
Do I go back here?
That this tweet is deliberately misleading.
And I say, I will not believe that there was someone doing a Nazi salute in the crowd.
Oh, do I not have all of it?
I gotta go get it.
Hold on, hold on, hold on.
Here we go.
I just go to look for it.
And this was the image, by the way, the first image, allegedly, of the man doing a Nazi salute.
Okay, that was later on down in Rachel Gilmore's thread.
Later on down still was a video, which apparently seems to be from the point of view of the person doing the salute, and this is the video.
Oh, here we go.
Yeah, this has got to be the one then.
Okay, I got to get my salute going.
Let's go, Brendan!
Let's go, Brendan!
Hail, Brendan!
Oh, here we go.
Yeah, this has got to be the one then.
So that's it.
Now, the question is, in the reporting of that tweet, with evidence that comes later on in the tweet, what would be a reasonable person's understanding?
She may be correct, though.
Rickety comes in with the, this is the argument.
Technically correct, but misleading is still dishonesty through omission, in my humble view.
As much as I had the funny joke, hold on, I'll have to pull it up here, because now I was...
I was just describing exactly what happened.
There was someone there holding up a Yahtzee salute.
And now, in retrospect, because life can only be lived forwards but understood backwards, you recall in the early days of the protest when they were saying there was a swastika.
In the crowd of the protesters, and everyone was like, oh my god, it's a bunch of racist anti-Semites.
That's what the media went with.
Now I'm going to be inclined to believe, okay, maybe there was one jackass with a swastika flag among the protesters who was trying to make the same message that this guy was making here, which, not one that I make, but one that has been done before to mock fascist tyrants.
White European cisgender male dresses like Hitler and does Nazi salute.
Rachel, I was just reporting what happened.
Gilmore.
Last one.
This was just a fun repartee.
Just reporting what happened.
Now I'm not so convinced that if there was a Nazi support, although it was one of the explanations from the beginning of the Ottawa protest, it was there to attempt to paint the Trudeau regime as a fascist dictatorship of a regime.
That was one of the explanations given, but that certainly wasn't the way the media described it.
Anyhow, so...
So that was the weekend back and forth.
But listen to this.
This is a TikTok video that Rachel Gilmore put out yesterday.
And people are going to...
I guess we'll play the original just so nobody excuses me of being...
Taking things out of context.
Could social media entirely be banned for anyone under 18 who doesn't get their parents' permission to use it?
The state of Utah is about to find out.
It's all thanks to this guy, Utah Governor Spencer Cox.
He signed two bills into law on Thursday that restrict social media access for youth from 10:30pm until 6:30am.
And that also require age verification to use the applications and parental permission to do so.
These are standard rules regardless in any event.
I haven't looked into this law to determine whether or not this is an entirely accurate representation of the bill that has been proposed.
These are the rules already for YouTube.
I think it's 13 years old.
There are already age restrictions to social media that people don't use that YouTube abuses of the fact that they're not being used so they can actually track minors and then, you know...
Run targeted ads directed at the miners by unlawfully gathering data on the miners and then paying massive fines, which represent, you know, a day's worth of profit.
But let's keep going here.
On top of that, it gives parents lots of power to access all of your private conversations on social media.
Typically, these are rights and not just rights, obligations that parents typically have regardless.
There have been lots of very valid criticisms of the impact social media has on the mental health of young people.
Such as?
Self-harm ideations in young women?
Contagion-like promotion of certain ideologies among young, impressionable youths leading to self-harm, suicidal ideations, and in fact suicide?
Such as?
But let's gloss over that, and let's get into the crux of this.
But detractors of this law say that it could violate the First Amendment rights of these young people.
First Amendment rights of young people, children.
Now, I am a very, very staunch supporter of First Amendment rights.
Children have things called parents.
And children acquire certain rights as of a certain age and do not have the right to this.
And it could hurt access to safe spaces for young people who might be able to have conversations online that they can't have with their parents.
Safe spaces online.
For children to have conversations that they can't have with their parents.
We'll come back to that in a second.
Pretty much certain that this law is going to be challenged in the courts.
But if it survives those challenges, it's possible that other governments could follow suit.
And some are already considering doing so.
Do you think this is the right step?
But detractors of this law say that it could violate the First Amendment rights of these young people.
And it could hurt access to safe spaces for young people who might be able to have conversations online that they can't have with their parents.
Safe spaces for minors to have conversations online with strangers that their parents don't know about is exactly what gave rise to certain security features that were, you know, the underpinnings of Section 230 immunity.
The chat rooms, anonymous chat rooms, where they have conversations with minors that their parents don't know about, there's a word for that.
There's a word for that, and it's not a good word.
By the way, these are the arguments being raised.
I'm not personally attributing this to Rachel Gilmore, though, you know, by the sounds of the reporting, I don't know if this is reporting, commentary, or indoctrination.
That's the word I'm thinking about, honor.
And I make the joke.
I tweet to her.
I say, do you have any idea?
Do you hear yourself?
Safe spaces online where children can have conversations with strangers, anonymous strangers, unbeknownst to their parents.
Do you know how dangerous that is for children?
And people are rightly pointing out she doesn't have children.
And I'm aware of that.
And we live in a world now that is so upside down and so backwards that some people, I don't know, I'm not saying Rachel in particular, some people think they are virtuous.
And thinking they are looking out for children by not protecting them or by protecting their ability, their right, to expose themselves to danger.
Nobody should be getting in between the parents and their kids unless there's overt, objective abuse.
And I tell this to people, and I tell this to my kids, to other kids, adults should know better.
Than to talk to kids without their parents being present.
Adults should know better than stopping to ask a kid for directions.
I mean, I said, like, any adult that doesn't know better than stopping and asking a kid for directions already has a problem.
And those that do know better and that do it anyhow have an even bigger problem.
But we're living in an...
And it's going to segue into when we go to Rumble.
We're living in an absolute upside-down backwards world where I do not believe that they don't know.
I do not believe that they do not know that it's dangerous for kids.
I believe that they wholeheartedly know that it's dangerous, that it's destructive, that it will be exploited by the most nefarious actors, the most nefarious predators out there, and they don't care because, A, they get those wonderful virtue points from it,
and it's how they build their own They want the ability to corrupt and brainwash young people they don't care at all about First Amendment rights.
They care about First Amendment rights for children until that 16-year-old kid in Canada says there's only two genders and then gets slapped with a fine.
They care about First Amendment rights until someone has the audacity of not respecting, of identifying someone biologically and not based on preferred pronouns.
It's an absolute upside-down world, and it's one that I am now noticing is becoming increasingly focused on breaking up the family unit.
I mean, this is it.
Like, this is full Black Pill Viva now.
I've been alive.
And conscious of my ignorance for long enough that I remember people saying, these entities, and I'm not saying left-wing, these nefarious actors, want to destroy the nuclear family.
I remember from my childhood.
They want to destroy the nuclear family.
They want to do it because it's easier to control the people.
I've now lived long enough to have swallowed this black pill.
I've been listening to Michael Malice's white pill all week.
I haven't gotten to the white pill part yet.
What I've gotten to is listening to Mutatis Mutandis.
It's not the same in extent, but it's certainly directionally the same.
Stalin's great terror, communism at large, fascism as well.
It's not letting Hitler off the hook.
Breaking up the family unit, making a god of the government, destroying the basic pillars of what made society functional and healthy.
And I'm seeing it happen in real time now, and I remember people saying this to me six, seven, eight years ago, maybe ten years ago.
I remember seeing these elements of this when I was a kid, and now I can finally put two and two together.
Big Pharma keeps changing the color, David.
All right, with all that said, people, let's go over to Rumble anyhow, and we're going to get into the wonderful hot takes.
And like I say, even...
Maple syrup.
I tell you what, we're living through this black pill together.
I think the white pill is a great awakening.
The white pill is everybody recognizing this now, identifying it.
The attack on family.
Look, call me controversial.
I know that people have problems with Pete Buttigieg and his family, you know, gay couples adopting.
I know people have problems with that.
I don't.
Call me controversial and I'll agree to disagree with anybody who's, you know, I understand the argument.
Biological parents, man and a woman, I understand it.
Two loving parents is all I need in life, even if they're not biological parents.
So that's it.
Let us go over to Rumble now.
Okay, ending on YouTube, going over to Rumble, and we will continue there.
Three, two, one, booyah.
No fun hope.
It was a comment that says, I have problems with Pete adopting.
I know some people do.
I do not share that view.
When Pete Buttigieg put out that picture of him and his husband holding the baby, and then I think it was Kyle Becker who tweeted it and had his comment on it.
And I just said, the picture was the two of them in a hospital bed.
And my initial reflex was nothing against gay couples adopting babies.
My issue with the image was it kind of looked like...
There was an attempt to replace the actual birthing, the woman who gave birth to the baby, by staging a photo op on the delivery bed as though.
And then people had, you know, I posted a tweet, a response, and I said, why are they in a hospital bed?
And people rightly pointed out, look, they might have been in the hospital, the woman might have just given birth, and that's the only place they have to take the picture.
Very reasonable explanation.
I do appreciate some people thinking.
That there's an attempt to erase the nuclear family, and that's one of the tools to do it.
At some point, you know, there's going to be some gray zone in between where we will have to agree to disagree, but there's going to be the black and white end of the spectrum where we're going to have to say we have to call things the way they are.
David Langsher.
Okay, hold on.
Sorry, I was just reading one more comment there.
Okay, now let me go over here to rumble and make sure that we're good.
Do they still have nefarious words on Rumble?
I don't know.
All right, so...
The news of yesterday.
We heard the news.
It's another school shooting.
Everybody's going to immediately go out and try to politicize it.
I felt bad at one point because I do follow David Hogg and I hadn't heard about the news yet and David Hogg puts out a tweet talking about, showed a graph of countries by school shootings.
I had not known the school shooting had occurred yet and thought it was just an abstract discussion where David Hogg put out a tweet and it showed a graph of school shootings by country and it had the U.S. vastly at number one and then it had Mexico.
A few other countries, but I only remember Mexico because I happen to know homicide rate by intentional homicide rate and firearm homicide rates based on gun restrictions.
And so I went and looked up then a couple of numbers, one of which was total deaths by firearm, which is another one of the classically misleading statistics.
Not that suicide should not count as something that needs to be addressed because it does.
One of the classically misleading firearm statistics is they go by total deaths.
And I think it's like 47,000 is the number.
Let me see if I can pull it up actually quickly.
They go by total deaths.
Firearm related.
Let me just see here.
And the wildly misleading statistic about it is that something like almost two-thirds?
It's definitely over 50%.
Are suicides.
So, I got the numbers.
Here, I'll bring this up here.
So, when people want to raise one argument, and it's sort of a strawman argument in support of abolishing the Second Amendment or stricter gun laws, they'll say right here.
Here we go.
45,000 people died from gun-related injuries in the U.S. in 2020.
That's the statistic.
Gun deaths are 45,000 a year.
54%.
Are suicides.
Okay.
So now you have to bring that number down because otherwise it's a dishonest framing of gun violence.
It's not to say that suicide should not be addressed because it has to be.
Why so many people are committing suicide is something that needs to be tackled.
It needs to be addressed.
And it's also something that can be attributed to some very, very bad government policy.
When I went to look up homicide rate by countries, I don't think the U.S. was a firearm homicide rate or violent crime.
I don't even think the U.S. was top 10, which goes to show you Mexico was up there.
Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world and has some of the most, the highest gun-related violence in the world.
So that to say, there's something more to be said about gun violence than strict gun laws because Mexico has some of the strictest and has some of the highest, as does Venezuela.
And so I replied to David Hogg, and then I didn't realize that an incident had occurred, and I didn't want it looking like my immediate reflex was to try to politicize an abhorrent tragedy.
It doesn't stop other people from doing it.
It's outrageous.
And so there were some early rumorings as this went down.
Early rumorings, you know, when the incident happens...
Depending on the motivation, they either will or will not immediately release the name, identity, race of the individual.
Sometimes they will, sometimes they won't.
And yesterday's was one of those incidents where they don't immediately release the name and race of the shooter.
And then some rumorings started circulating that the shooter was a biological female.
Who identified as male as per LinkedIn profile.
I saw the screen grabs.
Once bitten, twice shy.
Wait for the information to be confirmed before even formulating an opinion.
And then Fox News reported the police at the scene confirming that the murderer, biological female, identified as transgender.
And then you quickly see this just...
When there are no principles underlying opinions, when there are no principles underlying politics, when there are no principles underlying values and basic morals, it goes with the tide.
It changes from one day to the next.
It changes with a shift in the wind.
Once upon a time, it was a mortal crime in the media to misgender someone, to deadname somebody.
But then apparently no longer.
Yesterday, the media running around referring to the shooter as a she, by her name.
Now, very self-reflective as always.
This is a lose-lose for the media.
If the media decides it's necessary to use the preferred pronouns of a mass murderer, I will mock and deride that media for...
Having improper values, to put it mildly.
I'll call them evil when they act evil.
So had the media come out and said, we've got to show respect to the murderer and not misgender her, I would have had a massive problem with that.
The fact that they didn't and everyone's just walking around calling the shooter her as if the last three years of this has been optional, capricious, I have a problem with that.
And then when, I think it was USA Today that comes out and then makes an issue of it.
People are mischievous.
Well, then I have an issue with it as well.
So it turns out that the individual identifies as trans.
And now the media, the people who are coming out who wanted to say this was a white male shooter, this is an act of racism, hate crime, whatever.
Who knows?
When the shooter is a white male, racially motivated or hate crime is presumed.
Far-right extremism is presumed.
When it turns out that the shooter's not white, that narrative gets put on the back burner.
When it turns out the shooter is a woman, well, my goodness, do certain narratives have to get put on the back burner?
And then, you know, laser-focused, there's only one problem here, there's only one contributing factor to this violence, and that's the Second Amendment argument.
That's the news, as far as I, of the story.
But what ends up happening?
You know, everyone wants the hot take.
Everyone wants to be the first one to tweet out something.
And I say this in full awareness of confession through projection.
There are times where sometimes I do have a joke, not in respect of a tragedy.
I do have a joke where I want to be the first one to get an insight out.
I want to be the first one to get an original thought out.
But the rush to get the first hot take leads people to do...
Just terrible things.
First of all, here, just pulling up the media, all of a sudden doesn't care about it.
And I don't want to show pictures and I don't want to mention names.
The media all of a sudden just doesn't care about it.
And they've got to bury that because now the fact that it happens, the fact that this is the perpetrator of the act of violence might cause people to start asking some other questions, which we're going to get to also in a bit.
But the hot takes.
Here, let's just go with the first one by David Pakman.
I don't know if David Pakman...
Things happen quickly, and I don't know if David Pakman came out and issued a proper, unequivocal apology for this.
Let me just go here.
I'm going to go to Clifton Duncan.
Everybody should also be following and watching Clifton Duncan.
He does podcasts, thoughtful ones.
Someone I like to listen to and like to follow on Twitter, quite obviously.
Hold on.
Clifton Duncan.
Self-reflective, self-aware as well.
Still considers himself a lefty.
I had an interview with him and I was on his channel.
People come on and say they're still lefties.
Jimmy Dore.
I think they think of it in the classical term.
There are no lefties or righties now.
There are blue pills, there are red pills, and there are those who are, you know, dancing, flirting with the black pills.
Clifton Duncan.
I'm ashamed to admit that there was a time in my life when I would have been amused by this vile, churlish...
You can go ahead and read it while I feel like Scott Adams now while I have a sip of my coffee.
Now, this is the problem, people.
So I don't know if Pacman issued a full-throated mea culpa and if that would even change anything.
Pac-Man has been very vocal, proactive about accusing others of anti-Semitism.
Accusing others of religious and racial intolerance.
I just pulled up a couple of tweets that I'm able to find very easily because the internet is forever.
During his CPAC speech, Viktor Orban said he has a zero tolerance quality for anti-Semitism, then brought up how terrible George Soros is for the planet.
As if criticizing George Soros is an act of anti-Semitism.
But Pac-Man...
Who happens to be Jewish as well, and I say that because I am as well, but I don't talk about my religion very often, because by and large it's useless and not relevant for my political positions.
If you want to understand my history, why my last name is Freiheit, which means freedom in German, yeah, being Jewish is somewhat relevant to that.
I never invoke my religion in order to add...
Undue and unwarranted support for my arguments, nor do I invoke my religion to offer baseless critique of or undermine other people's positions.
Why is it relevant here?
Because David Pakman criticizes others for antisemitism, invokes or appeals to what he perceives to be antisemitism, equates criticizing Soros with antisemitism, which I will criticize George Soros rightly, justifiably, because I think he deserves critique.
I guess I might be one of them self-hating Jews.
Here we go.
David Pakman says a great way to fight anti-Semitism is to actually fight it.
Don't write off Holocaust revisionism, anti-Jewish conspiracies, and stereotyping as unimportant because Jews are doing fine now.
Don't vote for candidates at a level of government that espouse or embolden anti-Semitism.
So Pakman's got a legitimate concern, in his view, about anti-Semitism in the real world.
My massive problem with such an absolutely vile tweet, Is that it's coming from someone who condemns anti-Semitism and it politicizes the death of children while mocking the Christian victims of the act of violence.
What sentiment might that elicit in the minds of anybody who's prone to painting broad brushstrokes, coming to broad conclusions based on individual acts of people who belong to identifiable groups?
What might that promote in terms of negative...
Sentiments.
It's not complicated.
It's not rocket science.
Growing up, here's a little personal anecdote.
Not that I've always been a bad Jew, but I do enjoy bacon now.
Growing up, here's a distinct memory that I have.
I wasn't a kid at all because I was at a casino with my father.
So I had to have been at least 18. I remember it.
We were at Turning Stone Casino in New York State.
And we're at a table playing poker.
And there was a Hasidic Jew behind us, you know, dressed up in the black jacket, black hat, paste, and all the stuff.
Clearly intoxicated, inebriated, and clearly behaving improperly.
Like, not over the...
Just...
Not behaving in a way.
Behaving in a way that would cause people to say, oh, okay, now I'm gonna...
I'm going to draw a rule from this incident, even if there is no broader rule to be drawn from this individual incident.
And I remember the guy's like, he's talking loud, he's being rude, all this stuff.
And my dad turns to me and says to me, although he was not talking to me, says, remember, David, you represent 5,000 years of history.
And I knew exactly what he was doing.
And apparently so did the religious guy who was acting highly improperly because he said, what did you just say to me?
And my dad's like, oh, nothing.
I'm talking to my son.
I understood it.
And for right or for wrong, for good or for bad, humans want to paint rules and come to these broad rules as quickly as they can based on the minimal amount of information required to draw a generally applicable rule.
And so when they see identifiable people belonging to certain groups behaving improperly, the human brain tendency is going to be to draw a broader rule about that.
When David Pakman comes out, someone who has been vocal about condemning anti-Semitism, comes out and then mocks...
Or politicizes the murder of young children while blaming or mocking the Christian victims because they're Christian.
My goodness, David, you have to appreciate what you're going to be doing with that.
And it pisses me off because...
I'm not taking this position because I think I'll be spared.
If ever real Nazis come back to the world, I don't expect to be spared because there's video of me eating bacon.
I'll get swept up there as well.
This is not about that type of self-preservation.
What this is about is not creating what will be a generally applied bad impression because of people with big bullhorns, nice blue check marks, big spheres of influence acting in a way that will bring shame on everyone who might be directly or indirectly associated with them.
That was one bad take.
They don't stop there, by the way.
That is my critique of David Pakman.
Maybe he's come out with a full-throated, wholehearted, sincere apology.
Maybe he's learnt the error of his ways, but I've been following him on Twitter for a while.
This was the most egregious thing I've ever seen, but it certainly was not the first bad, mock-worthy take from David Pakman.
Okay, before we get to the second one.
All right, I'm going to mute some spam here.
People, if you do see spam in Rumble, you can report it.
If I see it, Trump neck vag was definite spam.
If I see it, I'll put him on timeout for this stream.
I don't like blocking people because they might have...
No, he's not.
Anyway, so that's it.
That's my issue with David Pakman.
It gives David's a bad name.
It's just terrible.
And then, by the way, what ends up happening?
Pakman apparently started receiving threats and harassment online.
Don't do that either.
You're not making any point by turning the victimizer into the purported victim.
People, I don't know what people consider to be threats or harassment.
Some people consider, you know, being called a grifter or being, you know, bothered online harassment.
But the bona fide genuine stuff, don't do it.
Because you know what happens then?
Just like with Justin Trudeau, the dude who threw gravel at his head?
Great.
Now the greatest victimizer in Canadian history gets to pretend to be the victim.
David Pakman should apologize for this.
He should be made to feel very bad about it.
And he should be compelled to change as a human and reflect.
But if he now feels of himself as the victim because people are harassing him or threatening him online, well, guess what?
He learns nothing.
He then gets to say, I'm the victim.
These boorish people that I just criticized, you know, insulted.
With my tweet, I was right.
I was right to have done it.
Because look how they're treating me now.
So, please.
And thank you.
Now, second.
Speechless.
Just speechless.
Let me see here.
Where is it?
Is it this one?
Yeah, this one.
And now, again, like I tell you, I'm so once bitten, twice shy, third time traumatized.
Going back to that doctor who had a fake tweet put out about her, which may have been true in spirit, but a fabricated tweet.
And I went to try to find the original.
Couldn't find the original because I was blocked.
And then I said, oh, I guess it's real.
Couldn't find this original because apparently it's been deleted.
You never know.
You don't know anymore.
But look at this.
I mean, I asked him.
It's not a rhetorical ask.
This is like, if this is not true, please quell the internet rumors.
But I think it is.
Because you go and you try to do a reverse image search and you see people screen grabbed it or people captured it.
Of course, when the tweet's deleted, unless it's been archived, you can't really find the actual original tweet.
You want to talk about dog whistles?
You want to talk about dog whistles?
NBC, I don't know the name.
Nashville is home.
The shooting occurred in Nashville.
Nashville is home to the Daily Wire, a hub of anti-trans activity by Matt Walsh.
Can you imagine?
This is malicious.
And I deleted it because I was getting harassed.
That is, when people talk about, when the blue pill side of the aisle talks about dog whistles, they see dog whistles everywhere, it's because they think in dog whistles.
I mean, can you imagine that?
If that tweet is not authentic, may that individual come out and confirm it.
Thank you.
Okay.
And then there's more bad takes, but whatever.
The bottom line here is that the narrative is going to change so that certain questions don't get asked, so that the focus can again be on one solution and one solution only to the problem, which itself is not an actual solution.
You know, the David Hoggs of the world and all the left politicians who want to come in and say, It's the guns, it's the guns, it's the guns.
Look, there are multiple contributing factors.
It wasn't the guns with the Waukesha killer, it was a vehicle.
It wasn't the guns in Vancouver, it was a knife.
Okay, so the guns, the tool of the act, or when it's an actual weapon, when it's used as a weapon and not as a tool, when the weapon is always a component, whether the weapon is a firearm, a car, or a knife.
Or anything else.
Or, you know, homemade explosives.
The weapon is one component.
And then there are other contributing factors that also have to be addressed if you're actually looking for a solution.
Now, in an ideal universe, we would all say, yeah, if there were no guns on Earth, nobody would have a gun to commit a crime with.
If there were no knives on Earth, you know, maybe they'd find sticks.
Sticks are harder to kill people, so they'll find rocks like they've been using since the biblical age.
Okay.
In America, there is a Second Amendment.
So it's not a realistic thing to say, get rid of all guns.
It's not realistic also because there's 350 million guns in America.
It's also not realistic because the problem now is that those who might have been amenable to say, okay, well, let's talk about high-capacity magazines, let's talk about...
Rapid firing, firearms, etc.
The people in the middle ground, and now I consider myself to be one of these people, who might have said there is room for some rational discussion as to what can be done for certain limitations, maybe, have now come to see that one side, you know, some of them say it and some of them don't.
They want all of them.
And they want the U.S. to look like Canada, where, you know, they're on the verge of criminalizing if they haven't already done it.
12-gauge shotguns for hunting.
They want, what they see in Canada, a country where self-defense itself is criminalized.
And so once the problem is, even if you're open to certain practical solutions, even assuming that the laws aren't already there and the issue is one of enforcement and not one of non-existence of laws, even the people who might have been open-minded to reasonable discussion have now seen how far off the rails and how intellectually dishonest One end of the debate has proven themselves to be and have admitted themselves to be.
And so then how do you compromise when you know that your compromise is just going to be used as the new starting point for further demands of compromise?
How do you do it?
Well, it makes for a political impasse, so to speak.
When you understand and when some just stated overtly, we want Canada to look like Australia, to look like...
England, where you don't have gun crime, you have knife crime, and you have acid crime.
We want to talk like Canada, which has a lot of gun crime nonetheless, despite guns being more illegal than hard drugs, literally.
So there's a political impasse.
And then the question is, how do you have political discourse when one side has proven that they are there?
They're coming after your kids, and they're coming after your guns.
It's now just been openly stated.
You've got journalists now saying the problem with the law is it doesn't let your kids roam around the internet in chat groups online, unbeknownst to their parents.
Oh yeah, and we also don't want you to have the right to defend yourself.
Okay, so...
Oh yeah, I'm sorry.
So the question...
The question in this situation is...
One side is going to say, now that we know that this was committed by a transgender individual with a manifesto, and I suspect we're going to learn stuff that this was, whether or not this was a targeted attack on the school because the shooter went to this school, I'm strongly suspecting there's going to be something more akin to a hate crime here than to avenging a teacher who might have done something wrong to this student when she was a student at this school.
In any other switching of the variables, this would have been called a hate crime already, an act of domestic terrorism already.
But now one of the questions is going to be asked, and there's people talking about it.
Let me see here.
Let me just get the tweet.
Oh, hold on.
I didn't get that tweet.
There are people now talking about mental issues.
I mean, some people have been talking about one thing that seems to be consistent from one school shooter to the next, and that is Mental medication, SSRIs, uptake inhibitors.
That seems to be one common theme, other than guns in gun violence, which is baked indefinitionally.
One thing that seems to be, I think it's without exception, unless I'm mistaken.
That's not being discussed.
And why?
Because the discussion about whether or not pharmaceutical head drugs are playing a highly contributive factor.
Now that it's a transgender issue, transgender shooter, one of the questions that's coming up is the chemical cocktail that some of these individuals are taking.
In addition to all of the other mental issues that go along with...
What is diagnosed in the DSM-5 as gender dysphoria, in addition to all of that, the pharmacological cocktails that these people are taking now as gender-affirming care or as treatment.
I don't know who Tim Wise is.
Let me just see who Tim Wise is.
Anti-racism educator.
Dispatches from the race war.
Okay, I don't know who he is, and I have no judge.
This is one of the discussions now.
So folks are blaming testosterone supplements for causing the Covenant School shooting.
First, you don't know if the person was on T, testosterone.
Second, next time a cis man commits violence, by all means, I want to hear you blame the much greater testosterone load.
Tell us how men are inherently murderous.
To me, it's...
I thought this was somewhat parody or satirical because, first of all, people have been talking about this for decades.
That was the Hulk, the female version of the Hulk.
She has to literally walk around the world because she fears that men want to murder her.
Two things to that, and people rightly pointed out the gender-based ignorance of that comment in that highly woke...
Piece of garbage of a Hulk.
It's true that men commit the vast majority of violent crime.
It's a statistical fact that has been known for a long time.
It's also true that men have statistically contributed to war and fought wars because they're stronger and they're bigger and they have...
No, it's a statistical fact.
What made the woke rubbish of that female Hulk thing so offensive is that men tend to be the victims.
The vast majority of the victims of violent crime.
It's true that when it comes to certain types of violent crime, which necessarily implies difference in sexes, there will be the perpetrator sex and the victim sex.
But when it comes to violent crime, the vast majority is committed by men, and the vast majority of the victims of violent crime are men.
See how that's...
So I tweeted it.
It's a statistical fact.
Let me just see who the comments...
Okay, I did not know that.
Sorry.
In case you didn't know, Tim's a race-baiting hack.
In a DEI lecture at my corporate engineering job, he called me racist for opposing lockdowns.
He is not a serious person.
I did not know that, and I don't care.
Sometimes I'm talking to the world, and sometimes I'm talking to the actual person to whom I'm responding.
And just a couple of, you know, why are most murderers, rapes, and violent crimes committed by men?
And here's some FBI statistics.
I mean, I guess when they were still keeping these statistics, this is 2012, but like...
The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by men, period.
The vast majority of victims are men as well.
And one of the theories is that it has something to do with testosterone.
This was also from the government website.
I think it was from FBI or whatever.
But the relationship was most striking.
This is when they're testing saliva for testosterone in criminals who have been convicted of violent crimes and not found...
Now, this is a limited study, but there is correlation.
There's a lot of studies out there that correlates whether or not it's causation, correlation.
Testosterone to violent crimes.
The relationship was most striking at the extremes of the testosterone distribution, where 9 out of the 11 inmates with the lowest testosterone concentrations had committed nonviolent crimes, and 10 out of 11 inmates with the highest testosterone concentrations had committed violent crimes.
And then there was another psychology.
Testosterone and cortisol levels, that's stress hormone, are linked to criminal behavior, according to new research.
But now, can't talk about that question.
The pharmacological cocktails that not just trans people, but American youth are on.
And it's like, hey, it's an opioid crisis.
This overprescribing of mind drugs to children is as bad as what was once the opioid diagnosis.
They knew they were diagnosing, prescribing addictive medications that were killing people.
They knew it.
And they continued to do it anyhow because it was just too damn lucrative.
You think they don't know that they're overprescribing head drugs for kids now?
And they know that it's causing problems and they just don't care because they're making too much money from doing it?
But can't ask that question right now.
And...
Oh, hold on one second.
Let me see this here.
Present share screen.
Rumble Rants!
Because I see two now.
Hold on.
How long ago was this?
At 2.42...
This is 242 from Kenzie67.
Viva, please ban Trump neck vag.
He is trolling shit talk across the channels.
I've put them out for this one, for this channel, but sometimes when they're actual bots and you block them for one stream, they never come back.
Uncle Nanny says, next time, buy your wife a rod and reel, Homer.
Dude, I got six fishing rods in the garage.
When I went with my kid trolling at...
Captain Jack's, oh no, it was called Bar Jack's Drift Fishing.
Like an absolute idiot that I am, I forgot to bring my fishing rod.
We used their rods, but I didn't like their rods.
I'm going to bring my fishing rod the next time.
So that's what's going on there.
Don't ask questions about these drugs that they're prescribing to kids.
You all know that I have OCD of sorts.
I have such, I'll call it an irrational fear, and other people will call it a rational fear, of any drug that alters the mind.
Of any of these pharmacological antidepressants, Ritalin, ADHD drugs, I have such an irrational fear of all of those mind-altering types of pharmaceutical drugs.
I used to suffer from migraines.
I still do occasionally.
What do I have now?
It's called ocular migraines.
I thought I was dying from a stroke when I had one, but I'll tell you about that in a second.
I have such a fear of these things that I had a doctor once prescribe a...
Low dose of Valium or some type of antidepressant for the migraines, and I never took it.
Kenzie 67 says it is irrational.
And I've known people who get on these drugs, these antidepressants, and they can't get off of them.
Apparently, they feel like nerves shooting down their arms when they try to get off of them.
They can't get off of them.
And then they get you stuck on these things, which change the way your brain thinks.
Look, in full self-awareness, I don't take any of these brain drugs, but I do enjoy a nice, relaxing martini, even if I've listened to Andrew Huberman and I know that it might not be giving exactly the relaxation that you think it's giving.
I understand that.
Yeah, so that's it.
That's where we're at with that crap.
It's...
It's...
Yeah.
Okay, let's see what we have in the comments section here.
Molten Salt says, I like booze sometimes.
XSSFDIT says, Viva Fry, I has one just this morning.
They can be scary.
Alright, now what else do we have on the menu for today?
Oh, I'm going to play this one, people.
So that's it for the horrible news.
The video of the cops...
Coming in and, I mean, embodying, exemplifying the definition of hero.
These cops come in, rushing, running into danger.
I said this morning, like, I've always had this thought experiment, like, is evil more evil than good is good?
Like, is hot more hot than cold is cold?
If you have, like, apply equal temperatures to an iron rod, will the rod be...
Hotter more than half, colder more than half, or will it be exactly equally hot and cold?
Evil is, in my view, and it's a sad realization, evil is more evil than good is good.
One act of evil causes exponentially more evil than one act of good causes.
That being said, these cops who ran in and charged danger in the face and ended way more prematurely than had been done elsewhere.
This act of incomprehensible evil.
The heroism cannot be under understated and they will be hailed as heroes as they deserve to be.
But there's not a part of me that expects these cops to view themselves as heroes.
Hold on a second.
I have no doubt that they are going to live their lives saying if I could have just gotten there five minutes earlier, we could have saved one, two or three more people.
They might deep down know that they're absolute heroes, but they're going to live, notwithstanding that, with the regret and the wish that they could have gotten there one minute earlier, two minutes earlier, five minutes earlier.
They would have been the same heroes, and if they could have saved just one more person.
But in as much as anybody believes in God, and I believe in a cosmic God, God bless those cops.
You cannot prevent evil people from doing evil.
But these people put themselves out in literal harm's way and prevented even more tragedy from befalling the people who are going to have to deal with this for the rest of their lives.
Okay.
Now that's officially the end of it, unless I've forgotten something that I had to put on here.
This is what I wanted to put up.
Y 'all remember Chris Sky?
On a lighter note, Chris Skye, aka, or I should say Chris Sacaccia, which I now know is Italian for pocket.
This man has been demonized by the media, not wrongly so.
He's said some stupid things in the past, things which he might not yet have the courage to just wholeheartedly and full-throatedly.
I had him on the channel recently.
Chris Sky, you may know him from such pandemics as the COVID pandemic, was one of the most vocal, outspoken critics of the measures.
Had some wildly successful predictions as to what was going to go down and what went down.
And it was wildly accurate.
Had him on the channel.
He's Canadian.
He's running for the mayor of Toronto.
He was facing many criminal charges.
That's part of the reason why he was being demonized by Canadian media.
He threatened to kill cops.
He threatened to strangle his business partner.
He said he was going to kill Doug Ford and all members of parliament.
Those were the charges.
He faced some firearm charges.
I'm not sure if those are included here.
He was on the channel talking about it.
Vigorously defending himself, said, I'm going to trial, and he said it was March, I think it was March whenever, 27th.
I'm going to trial, and I'm going to get acquitted because these charges are trumped up bullshit.
Well, they got acquitted.
They got acquitted.
He got acquitted.
The charges were dropped, or the charges were, he was found not guilty.
Apparently, on all charges.
Hello, everybody.
Today is March 28, 2023.
And after an almost two-year struggle...
So I love this music.
It's like...
But also, I'm not a tattoo person.
I do not have a tattoo.
I will never get a neck tattoo.
But I kind of...
As far as tattoos go, I like Conor McGregor's neck tattoo and I kind of like Chris's neck tattoo.
Would never do it.
If I ever get a tattoo, it will be a place where I can easily hide it.
I finally had my day in court.
Chris, someone should have told you to change the music.
You could have found better music.
And the music could be a little lower.
If you have to ask if the music is too loud, the music is too loud.
But it doesn't matter.
This is about the substance, not the cheesy porn music that we're listening to.
Not guilty on all charges.
Not only proving that I'm not a criminal, not only proving that this is all a government-targeted thing, me personally, but proving once again that everything I tell you that's going to happen, happens.
Chris Guy, not guilty on all charges, baby.
Okay, that's funny.
Hello, everybody.
Let's close that down.
So Chris Skye was found not guilty in all the charges.
But the headlines, I mean, the headlines last forever.
As will be the case with Randy Hillier, Ontario Member of Provincial Parliament.
As will be the case with Jeremy McKenzie.
He'll have been debanked.
We don't want people, we don't want your kind at this bank.
So Chris Skye, that's, I guess, the white pill news of the day.
Some people who sit there and fight.
And don't bear false witness to themselves sometimes get acquitted.
Other times, they won't.
I'm not so optimistic for Jeremy McKenzie, given the political climate there and the charges he's facing.
But at least even when you vigorously defend yourself and the court says you're still guilty, well, you've fought and you've still maintained your innocence instead of bearing false witness against yourself.
I gotta see what the chat's saying here to this.
He's a hero, says Maple Syrup.
Look, I...
It's a very tightrope to walk when you say, I like Chris Skye despite the fact that he put out a Facebook post eight years ago or ten years ago that I think is stupid or that I think is badly worded.
It's like you can never again compliment somebody for something that they've actually done that has been a good thing.
A successful thing.
If you can find one element of their past that you can demonize, even rightly so.
Unless you know you're Justin Trudeau.
In which case, nothing you've ever done in your past can be held against you.
It can only be used to judge and lecture other people.
Justin Trudeau gets caught in blackface.
Time for him to lecture us on racism.
Justin Trudeau has to apologize for groping a reporter.
Time to him to lecture us on misogyny.
Justin Trudeau gets found guilty of ethics breaches not once but twice.
Time for him to lecture us about ethics.
But I like Chris Sky.
I've had a lengthy discussion with him.
He's quite an opposite personality to me.
He definitely does not have some of the...
I would say constraints.
He's a different person than me.
And that's probably for the better.
If the world were filled with me, holy crab apples, it would be a damned annoying universe.
So Chris Sky, good news.
Fully acquitted.
He's running for Toronto mayor.
I forget what his campaign is, if anybody knows it.
Pop it in there and I'll get it afterwards.
And that's it.
Let me see here.
Okay.
Okay.
What else do we have as remaining stories before we go on over to Locals and have our discussion there?
There is some news, by the way.
Speaking of Canadian...
I love this.
I haven't read the full article yet.
We'll just do it together because it's going to be fun.
This is CTV News.
How many COVID vaccine doses should you have by now?
this headline presupposes two facts with which many people might fundamentally disagree right off the bat.
How many COVID-19 vaccine doses presupposes that that Stuff that they stuck in your arm is a vaccine.
Now, before anybody calls me an anti-vaxxer, which they're going to anyhow, despite the fact that I had two of these fucking shots, I've had my tetanus shots because I believe that the tetanus vaccine is an actual vaccine that will prevent me from potentially getting tetanus when I was metal detecting, thought I struck gold, and was digging vigorously in the soil and sliced the tip of my finger open with a little pull tab, which was what...
The piece of metal was that I found.
And I got the tetanus shot, not because, this is a little known fact, everybody thinks like rusty nails and rusty metal give you a tetanus.
No, it's a bacteria in the soil.
So you're actually more likely to get tetanus, no medical advice, from dirt than from a rusty knife or a rusty nail that cuts you.
Got my tetanus shot.
Got my kids vaccinated, even though I know some people are now saying, don't get your kids vaccinated.
And even now that I see what the CDC has said about the COVID jab.
It's causing me to question things that I had never prior to questioned.
This headline presupposes that the thing is a vaccine, and it also presupposes that you should have had at least one of those things by now, at least one and probably more.
So it's nice when the question presupposes two facts with which I suspect a great many people might vigorously deny or object to.
Earlier this month, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, Nazi, oh, that's terrible.
Nasi.
Nasi.
Or Naki.
No, it's Nasi.
It's a C. It's not a K. The Nasi.
Oh my gosh, is that irony.
Said people facing a high risk of serious illness should get another COVID booster in the spring.
With the latest messaging aimed at specific groups and COVID-19 cases seemingly stable across the country, they'll never admit it's over.
It will never be over for them.
And they are never relinquishing some of these powers that they...
No, I'm not wondering that.
Thank you.
Nasi says all Canadians five or older should be immunized against COVID-19 With a full primary series.
Now, I'm going to look up a word called immunized to see what it means.
Look up immunized.
To make a person or animal resistant to a particular infectious disease or pathogen, typically by vaccination.
You can't see the definition because I've highlighted it on my screen.
To make a person resistant to a disease.
The jab we now know does not do that.
It might make your symptoms reduce, but it doesn't make you resistant.
So they are using words improperly here.
They're using words improperly.
The number of doses considered to make a full series depends on the vaccine.
For people of most ages receiving either Pfizer or BioNTech, a full series consists of two doses.
About eight weeks apart.
For children between six months and four years old who are receiving the three-microgram pediatric formulation, a full series of three doses, eight weeks apart.
I cannot understand anybody who would do that.
I cannot understand.
I don't tell people what to do.
I don't tell people who to vote for, even when I'm running for office.
I cannot understand someone who would do that.
Six months and older who are receiving the Moderna spike facts.
The full series, two doses, eight weeks apart.
NACI's guideline for children aged six months may be immunized.
It's unblued.
Eighteen years and older who are receiving the Moderna spike facts.
I don't care.
I don't care.
It's sick.
It's depraved.
And that's government-subsidized media telling you to vaccinate your six-month-old to five years with a novel technology.
Of a jab that doesn't immunize because everybody's still getting it.
And the majority of deaths now are in vaccinated people.
Of course, because everyone's vaccinated.
Go immunize yourself with something that doesn't immunize you.
The vast majority of the people who are currently dying from the illness are vaccinated.
And go test it out on your six-month-old to five-year-old.
It's speechless.
Speechless.
That's the news coming out of Canada.
Okay.
The news internationally, people.
People.
Ah, yeah.
Looky, looky here.
I have to do this.
I have to do this.
Extreme MAGA Republicans.
Extreme MAGA House...
Extreme MAGA Republicans.
This is from POTUS.
If extreme MAGA House Republicans...
Can you imagine calling your members in office extremists?
I mean, that's basically what he's doing.
Proposals become reality.
Services at 125 air traffic control towers would be shut down and passengers at some large airports would face wait times of two hours or more.
To which I had to say, this is going to segue into the next story.
The guy who blew up a natural gas pipeline to an ally, arguably the greatest act of infrastructure terrorism in recent memory, is referring to others as extremists.
Accuse others of what you are doing.
So as to create confusion.
Joseph Goebbels.
And for those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, Seymour Hersh, award-winning journalist, had a wildly explosive expose that everybody already knew that the U.S. was behind the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline connecting Russia gas lines to Germany.
Blew up a pipeline carrying gas to a NATO ally.
After having publicly stated on multiple occasions that they were going to do it, that despite the fact that it was situated in Germany, they would find a way to do it, that boasted about how they were able to do it, and then denied having done it after the fact.
And you would think that they would be eager to have an independent inquiry into who did it.
The prevailing theory from the people who said they were going to do it, Who said they were going to end the pipeline one way or another if Russia invaded Ukraine.
Who said they were going to do it regardless of the fact that it was on German-European soil.
The same people who said that on multiple occasions ultimately came to the conclusion that it was something like...
Pro-Ukrainian group with a dinghy.
The way that I put my GoPro on a fishing rod, they put explosives on a rope and they lowered it to the depths of the pipes and blew them up.
It was some pro-Ukrainian pirates, sailors.
It's amazing.
They don't want any international body looking into this.
Now, I will steelman America's position here.
I'll steelman those who do not want independent inquiry.
But it's telling that the motion proposed by Russia to look into who blew up the pipeline didn't get the votes to pass.
Al Jazeera, because everybody has to read news from different sources, UN Security Council turns down requests for Nord Stream inquiry.
Questions remain over explosions in September that damaged gas pipelines connecting Russia and Germany.
Russia failed to get the UN Security Council to ask for an independent inquiry.
into explosions in September that ruptured the Nord Stream gas pipelines connecting Russia and Germany, spewing massive amounts of methane gas into the Baltic Sea.
Only, looks like bricks, Russia, China, Brazil voted in favor of the Russian-drafted text on Monday, while the remaining 12 council members abstained.
A resolution needs at least nine votes in favor, and no vetoes by those with veto power.
Russia, China, France, United States, United Kingdom to pass.
Russia proposed the draft resolution last month, just days before the first anniversary of its invasion of Ukraine.
The Kremlin said on Tuesday it would keep demanding an international investigation to the blast.
Kremlin's spokesperson said everyone should be interested in an impartial investigation in order to find the culprits.
Russia has complained it has not been kept informed about ongoing national investigations.
Masao has misgained.
Without providing evidence, Western nations were behind the explosion.
So has Seymour Hersh, by the way.
Without evidence, Seymour Hersh had insider evidence.
What evidence is going to...
We need the blueprints, the actual plans or an actual video of people giving selfies as they lower the explosives onto the pipeline and have their buoys that allow them to detonate the explosions through sonar pulses that have to be sufficiently different from animal pulses that might have accidentally detonated.
Do you have to have like a selfie with that in order to have the evidence out of zero?
Without an objective and transparent investigation, the truth will not be uncovered as to what And I don't think we care about the rest, anyhow.
Very telling that certain powers do not want an independent investigation.
Now, to fully steelman this, because one has to, and this goes back to the UN in general, Yeah, I could be weary of a proposal drafted by the country that we're trying to blame this on.
And the UN in general.
I mean, when you have China on security councils and human rights councils and they draft resolutions that the US vetoes for the benefit of Israel, I can understand that this institution itself is fundamentally partisan and fundamentally political.
And so no one's going to be agreeing to resolutions drafted by their...
Political enemies, even if they're all sitting around a table together.
So I can understand it, but it is interesting.
There has not been an independent international investigation into this, notwithstanding certain public statements, public admissions, and certain publications, one Seymour Hersh confirming how it was done in great detail.
Nothing to see here, people.
Seth Radin Squibb, I haven't seen you in a while, says the UN is a collection of rich people that don't need to earn a living sucking the teat of the taxpayers of the world.
No question.
The UN meets in wonderful places while telling everyone to lock down for COVID and to shut down for global climate crisis stuff.
Divine purebloods.
US did underwater explosion tests that caused roughly 4.0 on the Richter scale off Florida.
Interesting.
I don't know about that.
I'm not affirming any of these comments.
I'm just reading some.
Let me see here.
No fun, no hope, says Norway and America being pinned without the involvement of other EU players are to save some from their own citizenship.
As far as war measure go, it was absolutely the correct move to bust the pipe.
Nature Lover Freedom says no investigation.
Equals Biden did it.
He said he was going to do it.
I mean, it's so crazy.
It's so crazy.
Just from a logical...
I'm going to commit the crime.
I have the intention to commit the crime.
I'm publicly stating that I will commit the crime.
I'm publicly stating I will commit the crime notwithstanding logistics and politics.
The crime occurs.
I didn't do it.
You've got to be a conspiracy theorist.
A tinfoil hat to think I would have done it.
What the hell would I have done that for?
Enjoy1788 says, Hirsch is still just conjecture, Frye.
You have to admit that there is no actual proof yet.
No, it's not conjecture.
If he's spoken to people who said that they were involved with it, if he's got insider sources, it's not conjecture.
It might be testimonial evidence.
But the guy that they locked away for taking an accidental photo of a submarine, I mean, you think anybody's...
I don't know what concrete evidence you would need.
Like even if you get blueprints, well, those are just blueprints.
That doesn't mean they did it.
Okay, well, those are just email exchanges.
They didn't mean they did it.
Seymour Hersh has his people inside who are telling him this.
It's not his own imaginings.
So it's not conjecture.
It might be hearsay in a technical sense, but it's testimonial from people on the inside that he knows, that trust him and that he trusts.
That's journalism.
I am always skeptical of unnamed sources because I'm skeptical that the journalists are going to lie about them like they did with Trump.
Unnamed sources, shithole country that never happened.
Unnamed sources, he removed the bust of Martin Luther King from the White House that never happened.
But with Seymour Hersh, dude's got a bit of a better proven historical track record than CNN or Fox News.
And not to be mean, I'm not trying to rail on you.
I understand that argument, but that's why I disagree with it.
Chemical spill in Pennsylvania.
Train, derail in North Dakota.
That is Dolonic.
I mean, look, you're going to find the media covering these incidents now because they're good for clicks and they're good for news.
If it bleeds, it leads.
It's time-tested and true.
Okay.
Okay.
Hold on.
Did I not start with this?
Okay, so hold on one second.
Let me bring this one up because this...
Don't get the punchline yet.
Okay.
This is from Ian Miles Chong.
Well, I'll tell you who Humza Yousaf is in a second, but listen to this.
Most senior positions in Scotland are filled almost exclusively by those who are white.
Take my portfolio alone.
The Lord President, white.
White.
The Lord Justice Clark, white.
Every high court judge.
White.
Every High Court judge is White in Scotland.
You know where the punchline is going with this paper, but let's just listen to it anyhow.
And everyone in Scotland has a Scottish accent.
My God.
Lord Advocate, White.
The Solicitor General, White.
The Chief Constable, White.
Every Deputy Chief Constable, White.
Every Assistant Chief Constable, White.
The Head of the Law Society, White.
The Head of the Faculty of Advocates, White.
Every Prison Governor, White.
And not just Justice.
The chief medical officer, white.
The chief nursing officer, white.
The chief veterinary officer, white.
The chief social work advisor, white.
Almost every trade union in this country headed by people who are white.
Almost every trade union in this country headed by people who are white.
In the Scottish government, every director general is white.
Every chair of every public body is white.
Okay, who's Hamza Yousaf?
I gotta tell you, I'm not...
Totally familiar with...
Oh, I've got to bring that back.
I'm not totally familiar with Scottish politics, but I knew...
Hamza Yousaf...
Is this him?
This is him, yeah.
Born in 1985.
Holy cow, I'm six years older than him?
Okay.
He's a Scottish politician serving as leader of the Scottish National Party and the first minister designated to Scotland since March 2023.
Yousaf served as...
He's a politician.
Now, I don't know who the Scottish National Party is.
Scottish National Party is...
Yeah, I think we're looking at the same thing.
I don't know if it's the majority party.
So I don't know how this works.
Membership is down 72,000.
I don't know what the Scottish National Party is.
So I don't know if he's in charge or what he's in charge of in Scotland.
But one thing we're learning about Scotland is everybody or virtually everybody in a position of power is white.
Almost all heads of the union white.
Do you know where this is going, people?
Let me tell you a little bit of something about the demographics of Scotland.
It's 96% white!
Sweet, merciful goodness!
It's almost like the entire country is white.
So it would make statistical sense if virtually every position in that country is held by people who are white.
Unbelievable!
Go on, tell me about the religion.
What's the Jewish population in Scotland?
I don't think there's done many of them.
This is the pervasive, insidious, mind-numbing, victimhood-searching aspect of identity politics.
You go into a country that's 96% white and then imply that there is institutional racism because 96...
Maybe even 97%, maybe 98% of positions of anything are held by white people?
Good God, is that ridiculous.
It's a bloody outrage.
Everybody in Scotland is Scottish.
It's not like Scotland, as a country of origin, was the melting pot that America is.
Go to Nigeria and tell me how many white people are in the government there.
How many positions are held by people who are black?
Go to Ethiopia.
No, Ethiopia is a little bit more multicultural.
That would be a bad example.
It's preposterous.
And this is the logic that politicians are using in today's day and age.
Not just equal opportunity.
Not even...
Equity of opportunity.
Not even equity of results now.
Now it has to be statistically overcompensated.
You know, it's crazy.
But we all know that.
I just wanted to bring that up anyway because it was just...
It also gave me an opportunity to show my Scottish accent.
I can do a good German accent and I can also do a good Scottish accent.
Oh, I've been meaning to re-watch Trainspotting, which Once Upon a Time was one of my favorite films.
Life has ruined my favorite childhood movies.
Funny enough, I went to see Trainspotting seven times in the theater.
Alone.
I used to go watch movies alone as a rule.
I actually did not like going to watch movies with people as a kid because I didn't want to have to worry about what other people were doing.
I didn't want to have to worry about someone else's enjoyment of a movie.
I didn't want to have to worry about them talking to me.
I wanted to enjoy the movie.
And I went to see Trainspotting seven times.
And one of those seven times, I ended up sitting next to a psychiatrist.
And I told him that I went to see movies.
He didn't think it was such a good idea that I was seeing movies alone.
And he didn't think it was such a good idea that I saw Trainspotting seven times because his theory, and it's not a bad one, Is that people can end up making excuses for their own weaknesses by reveling in or taking consolation in the worst problems that other people suffer from?
I'm allowed to do the bad things that I'm doing because at least it's not as bad as what that person is doing there.
Another thing I remember from childhood.
But!
Before we head over to locals, people.
Irony of the day.
Another one.
When I say that it's not liberal versus...
Conservative, Democrat versus Republican.
It's blue pill versus white pill.
White.
It's people who think the government is going to be trustworthy now, even though they've never been trustworthy in their entire existence.
The defining feature?
Lack of self-awareness and lack of introspection.
As exemplified right here.
Let's listen to this.
So I don't know what the heck the context was, and it doesn't matter because the context of the video is not the beautiful thing.
Mike Gibbs.
Media relations for public health of Ontario.
Okay.
Political staffer.
This is a Canadian man.
Hashtag LGBTQ2.
Hashtag mental health.
Hashtag the resistance.
Hashtag BLM.
Hashtag astronomy.
What the hell do these hashtags even mean?
Doesn't matter.
He comes out and says, of course the Conservatives sent out a man to talk about gender equity.
Does everybody know where I'm going with this immediately?
Everybody knows exactly where anybody with...
The slightest critical thinking mind is going to go with this, where the hypocrisy is.
Mike Gibbs is criticizing the Conservative Party about the fact that they sent out a man to talk about gender equity, not understanding that he's taken it upon himself as a man to complain about the Conservatives sending out a man to talk about gender equity.
I think I put it more eloquently in my tweet.
Yes, of course I did.
Of course, a man thinks he is righteously coming to the defense of helpless women because he thinks they are unable to express their own thoughts and or objections to a man talking about gender equity.
Do you see the irony, hypocrisy?
Probably not.
Of course they sent out a man to talk about gender equity and these women.
Who I need me, their white knight, to come out and defend them for themselves, to express their outrage at the conservatives sending out a man to talk about gender equity.
No irony there.
No lack of self-insight.
No lack of self-introspection.
No lack of self-reflection.
That is par for the course for the blue pills.
All right.
Now, I think we've done it all, people.
Almost every trade union, blaming testosterone.
Shameless, remorseless hypocrites.
Okay.
People, we have done it all.
I should...
Okay, I'm going to give the link to Locals for those who are inclined to come over to Locals for l 'après-partie.
L 'après-fight!
Comment bien en français?
Did I miss any rumble rants?
No, I didn't.
Let me just get a few more...
A few more cheats here.
Can I be an albino Nigerian?
Actually, do love the...
Well, there are albinos of all races, yes.
Just wasted 30 minutes on YouTube, says Testo Tudo.
Testudo 133.
Sefer Dean Squibb says, My mom raised all by herself, by the way.
I do not believe women are helpless and stupid.
Nature Love or Freedom says, I never go there, and I presume that's to YouTube.
Jesse Jennings, do you think you're second-class citizen males?
Check your...
Sorry.
All right.
Let me see if there's a video that I can play that'll make people happy so that we can end on something of a happier note.
Hold on.
I know what I'm going to do.
I know what I'm going to do.
Hold on.
I'm going to go to Rumble.
I'm going to go to Viva Random, which is my channel on Rumble.
And I'm going to pull up a video.
At least play a little clip that'll make people smile.
Okay.
Some of you might have already seen it, but I'm going to play this video to play us out as we head over to Locals.com.
If you want to support, no pressure.
Like, share, subscribe.
Hit the thumbs up before you leave.
And enjoy a tarpon inhaling.
Inhaling my hands.
We are at Robbie's Marina in Isla Morata.
I'm going to hand feed a tarpon in slow motion and you're going to see something amazing now.
Nature is beautiful.
Not my GoPro, my iPhone.
Got a fish.
Ready for this?
Okay.
Y 'all ready for this?
Hold this here.
VivaBarnesLog.local.com.
See you there in 30 seconds.
There we go.
Nature is amazing.
Look at that thing.
I know you've already seen this.
I can watch this all day, every day.
Oh, my hand.
Oh.
Yeah.
Are you okay?
Yes.
I just hope that was worth it.
That you don't go to the hospital.
No.
And just so everybody can know also before I go, it's healed up.
There.
It's healed up nicely.
I'm fine.
Alright, people.
Let's do it.
We're going to end on Rumble.
Go over to Locals and I'll get the Locals tips and answer some Locals exclusive questions.
Enjoy the day, people.
Sidebar tomorrow night.
Probably a live stream.
Thursday is Libs of TikTok.
Friday, I might not be able to do a stream Friday.