Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 22, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

01:48:49

Emergencies Act Drama; Pelosi Story Goes Silent? Kari Lake, Elon Musk & MORE! Taco Tuesday

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We've got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero.
	And that's going to be based on the number of people, the services each person's using on average, the energy on average for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy.
	So let's look at each one of these and see how we can get this down to zero.
	Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
	Back from high school algebra.
	But let's take a look.
	First, we've got population.
	Now, the world today has 6.8 billion people.
	That's headed up to about 9 billion.
	Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
	I'll admit it.
	All right.
	Good afternoon, people.
	I was just watching Died Suddenly at the recommendation of a lot of people.
	That clip, Bill Gates saying, with the help of healthcare, vaccines, reproductive care, we can get that number down.
	Population.
	And a lot of people had run with that as the...
	Saying the quiet part out loud.
	Bill Gates admitting that they're going to use vaccination to reduce global population.
	It certainly sounds like that's what he said.
	And this clip was featured in the movie, Died Suddenly, on the Stu Peters Network.
	Well worth the watch, and we're going to get into it in a few seconds.
	Holy crap apples.
	I mean, hypochondriacs out there will know.
	You can watch someone getting cut with a knife, and you can feel in your own body getting cut with a knife.
	You can watch someone talking about nausea, vomiting, strokes, heart attacks, and you'll feel like you're getting nauseous, like you're about to throw up, or like you're going to have a stroke or a heart attack.
	I am a wicked hypochondriac.
	It's called With Insight.
	OCD With Insight.
	That clip about Bill Gates saying they can reduce the population by at least 15% through vaccination.
	One can trust their ears and just say, he said it, now what did he mean by it?
	The fact checkers, did I pull up the fact check?
	I don't need to pull up the fact check on this.
	The fact checkers fact checked that statement and said what he was referring to, the broader context, is that through vaccination, through healthcare, Through reproductive care, you can cause parents to not fear losing children, so they'll stop having multiple children as insurance if they know that the one, two, or three children that they have are going to survive childhood.
	So the fact-check, fact-checking, missing context, the context which fact-checkers allege was missing, is that Bill Gates...
	Was saying when parents can be assured that their children are going to survive childbirth, survive...
	What's the opposite of adulthood?
	Childhood.
	If they can survive through childhood, they'll stop having five, six kids as the insurance just in case one, two, three die because of poor healthcare, whatever.
	And so longer life through childhood, more guaranteed survival.
	Parents will have fewer children and therefore through vaccination, through healthcare, through reproductive care, you can actually...
	Counterintuitively enough, reduce the population by ensuring that the children that parents give birth to survive childhood so parents don't have to have multiple children just in case.
	That's if you believe the fact check.
	That's the steel manning of the fact check.
	But it certainly sounds like Bill Gates said what he said he said.
	Talking about population being a problem, overpopulation, the earth, I didn't check the year of that clip.
	I wish I had done that.
	6.8 billion whenever he said that.
	Marched past 8 billion people on Earth.
	Oh.
	Yep.
	Beth Noyes cannot vet this, cannot confirm this, cannot fact check this.
	This is not...
	Hold on a second.
	I want to save something here.
	Cannot verify this, but Beth Noyes says, Viva, we're seeing so many injuries from the jab at the hospital now.
	Look, let's...
	Let's block our ears and cover our eyes and say, you're seeing injuries.
	We don't know if it's from the jab.
	It could be from three years of stress.
	It could be from three years of being locked down, three years of immobile lifestyle, isolation.
	Isolation causes injury, as a matter of fact.
	You can look it up.
	Or it might not be from the jab.
	It might be from the Rona.
	The Rona, as they say, causes clots.
	So correlation does not equal causation, as they say.
	To which I'll respond, all right, if the uptick in cancer, if the uptick in sudden deaths, if the uptick in heart attacks is not the result of the jibby jab, but rather the indirect or some might say the direct and foreseeable result of government policy, thanks.
	It's one government policy that's killing people and not the other.
	But with that said, people, I just watched Died Suddenly.
	At the request of a lot of people.
	Shouldn't have watched it.
	My day was going relatively decently.
	I went for a jog this morning, still being a hypochondriac.
	Let me just see how many miles I did because I took a new route.
	Went with my kid on a bike.
	It was hot.
	Hey, now.
	6,848 steps.
	That's typically going to be around...
	Six and a half kilometers?
	That wouldn't be enough.
	Seven kilometers?
	We'll see.
	Got to wait to the end of the day.
	So I went for a jog.
	I have chest pains, but it's generally just anxiety, nervousness, not taking deep enough breaths, or muscular stuff in my pectoral muscle.
	But I went for a jog.
	Came back.
	Watched the Stu Peters Network documentary Died Suddenly.
	People want to know what I think.
	I'm going to tell you what I think of the movie right after this.
	You may have noticed this video said contains a paid promotion.
	Let me see if we've been demonetized yet.
	We're not demonetized.
	Contains a paid promotion.
	First of all, I got to correct something I said yesterday.
	Today's sponsor is not Field of Greens.
	It's EnviroCleanse air filtration system.
	But yesterday I did Field of Greens.
	Talked about how great it is.
	Oh, it's right here on my desk.
	Yes.
	The fieldofgreens.com promo code HEALTH.
	Gets you 30% off everything for Black Friday week.
	Thanksgiving week.
	So not 15%.
	30% off everything all week.
	Fieldofgreens.com.
	Promo code HEALTH.
	That's the desiccated powdered green food.
	That's not today's sponsor, but I wanted to correct that from yesterday.
	Today's sponsor.
	Something that I also use.
	And, you know, I like to think I'm making some good decisions in my life that are going to help me live longer.
	I don't have any expectations in life, except that I want to live forever.
	I'm joking.
	I don't want to live forever.
	I just want to know that I'm going to live to 102 years old, pass away peacefully in my sleep, possibly...
	Oh, I have a dirty joke that I won't make.
	I want to know that I'm going to live a long, healthy life.
	Nobody can know that.
	Such is the mystery of life.
	And if we knew that we had 60...
	59 good years left.
	It might make us lazy in the present time.
	But I like to think I'm making good decisions.
	And one good decision that I know that I've made is having procured EnviroClean's home air purification system.
	It's that unit that you see right over here.
	And it's a quiet air filtration system that has a HEPA filter that filters out particulate matter and has a patented purification filter.
	With minerals and stuff in it that actually neutralizes bacteria, odors.
	They call them VOCs, like volatile organic compounds or something like that.
	It neutralizes odors.
	It neutralizes bacteria.
	It's quiet.
	It's patented technology.
	It's used by the Department of Defense.
	I have gotten no further details than that, but it's used by the Department of Defense.
	It's in over 300,000 classrooms in America.
	I always say that I'd like to get it into classrooms in Canada so that they could rely on...
	Quality air without having to open the windows for air circulation in winter because that's the lamentable state of schools in Canada.
	It's expensive in that it's $699.
	There's 0% financing.
	But if anybody knows that they need these things, you know what they cost and you may as well get a good one that is good enough for the Department of Defense, good enough for 300,000 classrooms across the states.
	There's a reason why the U.S. Navy chose to equip their ships with EnviroCleanse.
	Over other air purifiers to help stop COVID flu colds from spreading aboard their ships and subs.
	Patented air filtration cartridge.
	HEPA filters.
	It's good stuff.
	0% financing.
	Go to ekpure.com.
	Promo code Viva.
	You get 10% off the unit.
	And a free air quality monitor.
	Links in the description.
	Breathe easy.
	Breathe comfortably.
	And know that you're breathing good air.
	No joke.
	We have dogs.
	We have a kid with asthma.
	We have a kid with...
	Dog allergies, and we're not getting rid of the dog, despite what people actually have the audacity to suggest that we do.
	Maybe get rid of the dog.
	Maybe no.
	So we got a good air filtration system.
	Okay.
	Where am I here?
	Am I?
	We are live here.
	And we're live on Rumble.
	Oh, that's the Rumble rant.
	That's why I can't bring it up.
	Poroska.
	$5 Rumble Rant says, Viva, I know so many people that have gotten cancer, as well as my 35-year-old vax-injured son.
	No one in the medical profession even cares, deniers.
	Proska, I know...
	I don't like talking about anecdotes because they're worth what they're worth.
	I know more people who have passed in contemporaneous conjunction with the Jibby Jab.
	Then the Rona.
	Young, young, young people.
	Fleet Lord Apertise says, oh my God, $2 rumble, right?
	Just realized it's Soylent Green.
	You've got to tell them Soylent Green is people.
	We got to stop them some.
	It's not Soylent Green.
	It's powdered greens.
	One serving of vegetable per scoop.
	Vegetable fruits and, that was yesterday's sponsor, but fieldofgreens.com, they have a Black Friday special all week long, 30% off, promo code HEALTH.
	EK Pure, Enviro Cleanse.
	EKpeer.com, promo code VIVA.
	Okay.
	Thank you for those Rumble Rants.
	Now, actually, standard disclaimers, no medical advice, no election fortification advice, no legal advice.
	Anyone who so chooses to support the channel through Rumble Rants or Super Chats, YouTube takes 30% of all Super Chats.
	If you want to support the channel without supporting a platform you might not want to support, go to Rumble.
	Better way to do it.
	The best way to do it, right over here, people.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com for amazing community, tons of free content.
	And that's the best bang for your buck.
	70 bucks for a whole year and tons of exclusive content.
	And if you don't want to support there, just be a member of the community.
	We're over 100,000 strong and it's beautiful.
	Beautiful.
	And if you want merch, VivaBri.com.
	Okay.
	Died suddenly.
	Full disclosure.
	I am always honest and I'm blunt.
	I've known Stu Peters' content for a while, and there's no judgment whatsoever.
	There's just critical assessment.
	My critical assessment sometimes, it's the nature of a beast.
	He is quite dramatic.
	He's quite theatrical.
	And the one incident that I had as a matter of fact and substance was back, holy crap, it's a year and a half ago, when Pat King went on the Stu Peters show.
	And claimed to have, you know, found the solution to COVID.
	He was going to end the COVID lockdown measures once and for all, globally.
	And laid out a plan.
	This is all you have to do.
	He had gotten a ticket for some COVID protocol violation.
	He thought, he purported to have beat the ticket when he actually didn't.
	He subpoenaed.
	It was either Dina Henshaw or Bonnie, one of the provincial medical officers.
	He went on the Stu Peters show, and the both of them sort of went a little heavy.
	On the idea that they beat COVID, that this is what you have to do to end the lockdowns everywhere and it's going to happen.
	It didn't happen.
	As a matter of fact, they were both wrong.
	And I noted it at the time and said, look, Pat King didn't beat his ticket.
	I didn't know that he actually had to pay his ticket.
	I just knew at the time he didn't beat it.
	He just issued a subpoena that actually was quashed.
	And I took a little bit of flack for saying, no, what Pat King thinks he did, he didn't actually do.
	I took some flack from people saying, Viva, you're spoiling the inspiration.
	People need inspiration right now.
	They don't need a wet blanket.
	And I said, nobody needs inspiration if it's factually incorrect and misleading inspiration.
	He was on Pat's show, and let me see here.
	Pat claimed to take down Alberta Health Services single-handedly when he actually got laughed out of court.
	I don't need to say it that judgmentally.
	Yes, Pat made a mistake.
	It either got misunderstood, was misexpressed.
	I don't need to attribute intentions.
	It doesn't matter.
	So that was my last experience with the Stu Peters show.
	I've watched it.
	He's got some very interesting guests and communicates some very interesting information.
	That being said, I always have that in the back of my mind.
	I watch everything skeptically.
	I watch everything skeptically.
	Stu Peters, CNN, MSNBC, fellow law tubers.
	I watch everything skeptically, especially when I probably am more inclined to believe it, and especially when I want to believe it.
	I'm very self-reflective when it comes to this.
	I grill myself harder than most people grill me.
	I know what I believe.
	In my heart of hearts.
	I know what I believe based on my experience, the evidence that I've seen, the interviews that I've conducted.
	You all can probably surmise what I believe.
	We know what I believe.
	I know what I want to believe as well.
	And watching the Die Suddenly documentary, I know that I've seen a lot of people dying suddenly.
	I know that I've been reading a lot about people dying suddenly.
	I know that I've been seeing Justin Bieber getting Bell's palsy.
	But lawyer from the convoy.
	Vax to the max, collapsing in real time for the world to see, and from what I understand, still has not returned to being a lawyer at the convoy.
	Lots of people dying suddenly.
	The author of Julie and Julia, dying of a heart attack after a bout with COVID, after being jabbed, boosted so many times.
	I know what I've seen.
	I know what I believe.
	And the documentary, Die Suddenly, is confirming what I already believe and what I...
	What I truly feel is reality right now.
	And so I have to approach it with even more skepticism than something that I don't believe.
	Bell's palsy is caused by all sorts of things.
	Mine came from shingles.
	Yes, and shingles is caused by all sorts of things.
	I'm not saying, Rock, I have a family member who got Guillain-Barré syndrome.
	Not from the Jibby Jab.
	This was before.
	You can get GBS, you can get Bell's palsy, you can get shingles from any viral infection.
	You can get it from any vaccine.
	Legit, I mean, vaccines that actually work, you can get it from a tetanus shot.
	The issue is not that you can get it from any vaccine, it's that we're being told that you can't get it from this particular shot.
	I'm no longer calling it a vaccine.
	So, lots of things cause lots of things.
	Lots of things cause heart attacks.
	Stress.
	Isolation.
	Lack of good exercise.
	Lack of good diet.
	I'm not flagged.
	I'm going to star this comic because we're going to get back to it.
	Because I know what I believe a lot of things that I've seen empirically that I've done.
	I've had discussions with doctors, with healthcare professionals who don't want to come forward.
	And they say the things I've seen would blow your mind.
	But I can't talk about it because I will literally lose my license.
	I'm not an asshole to say you're a coward.
	Ruin your life and come forward.
	And nor am I the one who's going to secretly record these conversations to put on blast someone who doesn't want to go public.
	That's not my thing.
	That's not my shtick.
	Someone else can do that.
	I know what I know.
	I know what I know that I sometimes allude to but don't state this fact because it's anecdotal and I don't have the sources who want to come forward.
	I know what I have seen confirmed in mainstream media.
	Neonatal deaths skyrocketing in Scotland.
	They don't know what's causing it, but somehow they know what's not causing it.
	Deaths of unknown causes now leading the deaths in Alberta above dementia and above COVID.
	They don't know what's causing it, but they can say what's not causing it somehow.
	Excess deaths in New Brunswick.
	Oh, hold on, actually.
	I want to bring this one up.
	The excess deaths in New Brunswick.
	You will recall we talked about this multiple times.
	I'm going to see if I can find the original article.
	Excess deaths, New Brunswick.
	Because what's an amazing thing is they come out with the bad news.
	Oh, look at this.
	Unbelievable.
	Bullshit, people.
	I'm sorry.
	I'm not sorry about swearing.
	I'm sorry because I don't have the window up.
	I'm cranky again today.
	Listen to this.
	We went over this article before.
	Excess deaths in New Brunswick during pandemic need study, experts say.
	National health and population academics are pointing to high excess mortality numbers as an important riddle for provinces to solve in their understanding of the human cost of the COVID-19 pandemic.
	But New Brunswick, with some of the most puzzling numbers in Canada, is resisting the idea it has underreported deaths.
	New Brunswick had reported...
	Abnormal number of excess deaths for a quarter.
	I forget the month.
	Because what ended up happening...
	Let me just see here.
	What ended up happening, as you can imagine, what date is this?
	They report news that's not good news.
	That doesn't make things look proper.
	And then what happens afterwards?
	Oh, here, look at this.
	Look at this.
	Major revisions required in pandemic death counts.
	They report bad news.
	And then a few weeks after the initial story, CBC has to come in.
	White night for the government.
	Major revisions required in pandemic death counts.
	A problem unique to New Brunswick.
	Oh, they don't actually have an excess death problem.
	They have a problem as to how they counted deaths.
	Statistics Canada says low-quality data from New Brunswick likely to trigger downward revision of excess deaths numbers.
	Oh, that's convenient.
	They come out with the bad news, then they have to come out with an explanation or revise the original bad news.
	Expect something similar for what's going on in Alberta.
	Oh, it's not unknown causes.
	We misspoke.
	It was actually...
	They were unreported COVID deaths.
	And now look at that.
	COVID's going to go from number three...
	After dementia and unknown causes, back to number one.
	Because those unknown causes, oh, it was our mistake.
	They were actually COVID deaths.
	New Brunswick suffered the highest fatality rates in Canada in late 2021 and early 2022.
	You know what they were doing at that same period of time?
	Take a guess.
	According to ongoing estimates from Statistics Canada, but the agency acknowledges it has been struggling with the accuracy of its New Brunswick pandemic death counts and is uncertain how reliable the province's shockingly high numbers really are at the moment.
	This is an issue unique to New Brunswick.
	Let me just go and see in real time, people.
	Alberta, unknown death.
	Well, here, someone else is coming to...
	We've already seen this.
	No evidence rise in deaths due to unknown causes in Canada is linked to the COVID-19 vaccines.
	Can you imagine when people say there's evil in the world, the banality of evil?
	We don't know what's causing it.
	But we've ruled out the most likely, the most obvious culprit.
	We don't know.
	It's still unknown.
	But we know that it's not linked to the Jibby Jab.
	How do we know that?
	Don't ask me.
	I'm not a doctor.
	See, and I could see just general frustration leading to heart conditions.
	Because this is enough to make you have an aneurysm.
	I was watching someone else's video.
	Sorry, they called those who work at MSM.
	Urinalists.
	Oh, I get it.
	We're all going to get back to the...
	We're going to get back to...
	So that's...
	I know what I believe already.
	And so when I see something that reaffirms what I believe, it's not a question of being less scrutinizing.
	It's a question of being more scrutinizing.
	Okay.
	Sorry.
	I wanted to get to this.
	As a disabled veteran, I attend many events, so all will count against me.
	So as a disabled veteran, I attend many events.
	Are they still?
	Okay, they're on lunch.
	I got my other computer.
	I'm just watching the...
	Okay, so Die Suddenly.
	I'll give credit.
	It's extremely well done.
	Good music, good editing, compelling, good what they call bokeh, you know, like the blurred lights in the background, good depth of field.
	It's professionally done documentary.
	So that's it.
	How did you get three comments in 10 seconds?
	Don't I have slow-moed on?
	It's well done, period.
	From the analytic level, spoiler alert for anybody who hasn't seen it yet, but go watch it.
	You already know the spoiler alert.
	They've got morticians, or the people who work at embalmers, not morticians, embalmers, talking about how they are Noticing very unique, very peculiar, literal horror movie stuff.
	Clots, fibrous sort of, they describe it as the texture of calamari, hard, rubbery, stringy clots, which they're not blood clots, but they are fibrous, squid-like, calamari-like substances in the veins.
	That do clot the arteries, so they call it clots, but it's not a blood clot.
	And they're noticing these things, and according to the embalmers, according to the morticians, if that's the word, they've never seen them in their...
	Some of them have 40-plus years of experience.
	They've never seen them until now.
	They're seeing them now.
	And they're seeing as they drain the blood from the deceased, they say it looks like dirty blood, like there's sand in it.
	But there's a number of graphic images where they're pulling the blood clots out of the veins.
	One is a real autopsy image.
	And it's like...
	It would be like a pimple-popping video fetish if it weren't so devastating and disastrous what it is.
	They're pulling these long clots.
	They're long, like six, eight inches.
	I think one of them, they said, was three feet long.
	Pulling them out of veins, out of arteries.
	Of deceased individuals who...
	I don't know how you survive with something like that in your body, but I guess at some point you survive until you don't.
	And that's it.
	That seems to be the phenomenon.
	People were calling the jibby jab the clot shot for a long time, and according to the people in the documentary, they're noticing these types of clots.
	The premise of the film is that they're attributing...
	These clots, whatever they are, to the jibby jab.
	Whereas a lot of people are going to say, well, you know, it could be the result of the Rona itself.
	In the movie, they say, you know, like one of the main, the leading embalmer or the leading mortician guy says that, you know, he's been doing these on people who allegedly have not gotten the Rona.
	Everyone's argument is going to be, well, everyone's gotten the Rona.
	Whether or not you know you did, you probably got it anyhow.
	And so, hey.
	How do you determine if these clots are from a man-made virus that was genetically modified in a lab in Wuhan, China, versus the genetically modified jibby jab that they've concocted in record time with no meaningful testing, apparently?
	They haven't yet done the trials on myocarditis.
	How do you know it's not caused by that?
	So you're always going to have this issue in terms of demonstrating.
	First, the issue, is there, in fact, a clot problem?
	There would seem to be.
	Because Johnson& Johnson, Moderna, identified the problem, recommended that, you know, in Johnson& Johnson's case, that women, middle-aged women, don't take Johnson& Johnson because it increases the likelihood of clots.
	What are the clots?
	Well, I can presume that the clots that Johnson& Johnson had an issue with probably look something like these demonic, alien-form clots.
	If this were a horror movie, it would not be written any differently.
	It would be, we found a solution.
	Here's the solution.
	And once this is in your body, it starts to like...
	Like the thing out of...
	The thing.
	The thing out of the thing.
	It looks like squids, octopus being pulled from human veins.
	Once it's in your body, it starts...
	It's like...
	It's literally the stuff of horror movies.
	You can get an antibody test to see if you've had COVID, but only for a certain period of time after COVID.
	It doesn't last forever.
	That's why they insist everyone take the jibby jab so there's no control group.
	That's one of the ways they allegedly tainted some of the trials, by jabbing the placebo group.
	So that's it.
	The movie has five or six main characters who document what they've been witnessing, and that is abnormal clots, excess death rates among middle-aged men, working-aged men.
	And the question is...
	Is the phenomenon here?
	I don't think many people can disagree that the phenomenon is here.
	The one thing you can rely on for accurate stats?
	Underwriters.
	Insurance companies will make money or lose money depending on how accurately they assess risk and pay out risk.
	And if they're saying, holy jibby jabs, we're paying out a shit ton more than we've ever paid out before because there's an excess rate of death among Those who are the least likely to need insurance on the underwriting scale of risk, well, they're going to know.
	And when they say certain things, you can know that that's much more reliable than government stats because one answers to the almighty buck and the other one answers to nobody.
	And so here, Beth, noise.
	Yeah, 100 massive clot, but also screws up your T-cell immunity.
	And then there's discussion about whether or not we're seeing spikes in certain types of very aggressive cancers.
	And I don't think anybody can deny that.
	I don't think that element is up for denial.
	Now the question is going to be, oh, is it a spike in cancers because people had not gotten diagnosed because they were too scared to go to the hospital for the last three years, and therefore cancers that might have been diagnosable three years ago are now in advanced aggressive stages?
	Maybe.
	Other people are going to say, Is the jibby jab triggering some form of immunological response or decreasing some form of immunological defense that's resulting in this?
	Or, hey, maybe this.
	Maybe it's a perfect storm of both.
	Yeah, God love ye, Vivian.
	Holy jibby jabs.
	I would put that on a shirt, but I'm not putting that on a shirt.
	Oh, I like your avatar, actually.
	So that's it.
	The documentary is great.
	I'll tell you, I watch it with...
	A great degree of skepticism because I need to put in check that which I believe and /or want to believe.
	There's a whole montage of people collapsing in the movie, and it's horrifying.
	I mean, it's horrifying.
	Do I share one of my...
	Do I share this thought?
	I have to.
	I just said it.
	So one of the more traumatic videos, back when the internet was in its infancy, the only thing the internet was good for...
	It was shock videos and naked women.
	That's what the internet was.
	The internet is for porn from Avenue Q. But it used to be, you know, you had these websites, Augresh.
	You had websites, LiveLeak.
	Before LiveLeak was a mainstream media outlet website, it was what the internet was known for in terms of like, you want to see the worst stuff on earth?
	That's where you go to see it.
	The internet...
	Came about when I was like...
	I want to say 13, give or take.
	From early days, kids are kids.
	Kids are stupid.
	Humans have an obsession with mortality.
	The internet was where you could go...
	You see that video of the kid getting hit by a train.
	One of the videos that I remember having seen in my younger years was an individual who got run over by a train.
	The individual was...
	Was dead.
	I mean, I don't know how there was even movement, but the body was on one side of the track and the other half was on the other side of the track.
	But the individual was still like, in some sense, still had nerve endings and looked to be like punching at the sky.
	And that image traumatized me as a child or as whenever that, however old I was, traumatized me.
	This montage of people collapsing triggered that memory in my head because a lot of them, for whatever the reason, I don't know what happens when You have a stroke, or you have a heart attack, or you collapse, but they all started reaching their hands for the sky.
	Many of them were spinning in circles, and then collapse.
	A number of them collapsed and fell into oncoming trains or metros, which is...
	The movie's quite graphic, that montage.
	But watching that montage, you need to make sure that what you're seeing is what you're being told you're looking at.
	So, on the one hand, we know that certain things are happening, but are we relying on...
	Videos that are either taken out of context or actually predate the incident.
	So that type of skepticism.
	If you want to be skeptical about the movie, you have a half dozen recurring characters.
	So you have to say, oh my god, in a world of 8 billion people, with however many hundreds of millions of professionals, why are there not more people?
	Why are there not more...
	What are they called?
	Embalmers coming out.
	Why is it the same half dozen that we've seen?
	And so you have to, you know, you can ask yourself the question, do they have a reason for doing this that's less than pristine?
	Why are there not more people coming out if this is such a prevalent problem?
	If all embalmers, I keep losing the word.
	If all embalmers are seeing this, why are there not more coming out talking?
	Why are there not more doctors coming out talking about it?
	So there's that level of skepticism.
	I'm more inclined to think that there are very few people who want to come out and have the spotlight shined on them.
	Like, I need to get the names of the people in the movie because I want to have them on for interviews.
	And then you look, you know, you watch some of the video footage of them pulling these clots from these corpses.
	And it's shocking.
	It's graphic.
	It's upsetting.
	But then the question is, is it like, are there, there's 8 billion people on Earth.
	Some of them are going to have conditions.
	Some of them are going to just be fundamentally unhealthy.
	So are we looking at these videos, getting, what is the word, ephemerally shocked, repulsed, and then making rules out of what are the absolute exceptions?
	I ask myself these questions.
	I ask myself these questions.
	But above and beyond the one-offs or the single examples.
	We're seeing the stats in real time.
	It's becoming undeniable.
	What's just shocking to me is they still keep pushing it.
	And people are not only doing it again, again, again, and again.
	They're doing it to their kids again and again.
	We know that it interferes with menstrual cycles.
	We just know it now because they finally admitted what people knew for the last two years.
	That does things.
	When something impacts your menstrual cycle, it follows to reason, unless you're an idiot, that it can impact something else, pregnancies.
	And they keep pushing it.
	They keep pushing it, even though they have now come out and basically said, we don't know if it causes myocarditis.
	We're going to do those trials now.
	But in the meantime, keep taking it.
	What are we talking about?
	Dude, if you just got here, Liberty Dude, we are talking about died suddenly.
	And I think we're done.
	Did I miss all of these super chats?
	Yeah, I saw that clip.
	I mean, good for her.
	It's a clip from a new movie where she's chewing out the woke student.
	As a disabled veteran, I attend many events, so all will count against me.
	I'll tell you one thing.
	As a veteran...
	The tide is turning, and there will be respect and dignity, even from those who didn't appreciate that they should have had it in the first place.
	But thank you, Dragon Slayer, for your service.
	Diva Frye, do they think they're...
	So for the greater...
	This is the other ultimate question.
	Is it deliberate?
	Is it negligent?
	Is it a master plan of evil whatever?
	The one thing I don't understand, Jared, the rationale is that...
	The global population is reaching numbers where it's going to be cataclysmic and there'll be a dramatic die-off if we don't reduce the population now, humanely.
	That's six of one way, half a dozen the other.
	The elites, whether there's 10 billion, 20 billion people, the elites will have their wagyu, their foie gras, and their caviar.
	They'll have it.
	So whether or not it's like a massive conspiracy to reduce the global population, I don't know.
	I do get a little skeptical or my spidey senses start tingling when people start saying that because you're talking about determining intent of mega mind level villainy that you'll never be able to prove.
	And so it sounds a little eccentric.
	It sounds a little extreme and it doesn't contribute anything to the discussion other than allow people to discredit you based on saying these hyperbolic things.
	It's a master plan to reduce the population.
	I say that, though, but I had the same reflex when people were talking about the 2030 Agenda, WEF, the Great Reset, until I realized it's in there verbatim, word for word, in their own platform, on their own policy.
	So, yeah, I don't know.
	Oh, Miller's in the news here.
	I'm going to be on it, Levine.
	Don't worry about it.
	We're talking about Miller when I move over to...
	We're going to go over to Rumble in a second.
	This is all planned by ultra-wealthy global elites, Philip Smith.
	And...
	Uncle got another booster a few weeks ago, ended up in hospital.
	D-dimer test was 1704, should be under 500.
	They found a clot in both legs.
	I know people, and they're too embarrassed.
	Friends who had chest pains after their shots.
	43-year-old guy, keeled over, died a couple weeks after his shot.
	My family friend died the day after getting the jab, heart attack in a bathtub.
	And it's only when people go to the funeral that they're like, oh yeah, you know, she was all fine.
	That happened, yes.
	And then people didn't even know that that happened.
	And then that's it.
	Done.
	Buried and we're done for.
	That's it.
	Move on.
	All right, everybody.
	The link is there.
	I'm going to go share it here.
	We are at 3,300 on Rumble.
	1,700 on YouTube.
	If everyone would be so kind and obliged to go over to Rumble, where we shall continue this and talk about...
	What the hell happened at the Emergencies Act inquiry?
	It's drama, and I know what happened.
	I've gotten confirmation, and I know what happened.
	Everyone, mosey on over to Rumble, and we should be at 5,000 in no time on the Rumbles.
	So we're going to end it here.
	I'll shout out my sponsors one more time.
	Today wasn't the sponsor.
	Field of Greens.
	Go to the website.
	Promo code HEALTH.
	30% off all week for Black Friday.
	EKpeer.com.
	Air filtration systems.
	Patented.
	It will kill jibby-jabby germs.
	And it will make your air cleaner and smell good.
	I can affirm and confirm it neutralizes the smell of dog urine and dog feces because we have a lot of that in our house.
	All right.
	Ending it on Raw.
	Ending it on YouTube.
	Moving over to Rumble.
	Three, two, one.
	Boom.
	Boom.
	Okay.
	I have to pee, but I'm going to hold it in.
	Yeah, I can hold it in for another hour.
	Maybe.
	If I can't, I'll go.
	Okay, so I got some stuff in the backdrop.
	Let me just see what we have.
	We got a little update.
	I'm only updating the Paul Pelosi, David DePop story.
	Just to remind everybody that we still haven't seen the body cam footage, surveillance footage.
	That right-wing Republican extremist stuff has gone out the window for anybody who's paying attention.
	But there's some humor in the...
	The story's preposterous.
	He's a Canadian.
	An illegal immigrant.
	Canadian.
	And apparently he talks to squirrels.
	That's the latest.
	So that's why I'm going to read an article from Fox News.
	We're going to go over the Emergencies Act inquiry because there was a number of things that happened this morning.
	Liar, liar, pants on fire.
	Mark Mendicino, who's the Minister of Security or something, he testified.
	He's a liar.
	That's ginger.
	Raw energy kombucha.
	It's a little powerful.
	There was some drama there.
	Elon Musk.
	I'm not picking fights with Elon.
	The funny thing is I get accused of picking fights with Elon, and then I get accused of kissing Elon's ass on Twitter.
	We're having an ongoing discussion, although I don't think he's...
	Can you imagine being Elon and literally having to answer...
	All the wish list letters from...
	Elon is Santa Claus and everyone else are children sending letters to Santa Claus asking for gifts for Christmas.
	He's got to answer everybody's wish list on Twitter.
	You can't make everybody happy.
	If you make everybody happy, it's not possible.
	If you piss everybody off, you're doing something wrong.
	And some people you will never be able to make happy.
	So, sorry, I'm not getting called as a little thing there.
	So with that said, We're not done on the issue of the Alex Jones not coming back to Twitter.
	And he put on some tweets yesterday, which I think are worth talking about.
	And what else do we have here?
	What is that?
	Well, here, let's just bring this one up because I don't remember what it is.
	Oh, yes.
	Let's talk about...
	Let's just...
	As a segue into everything.
	Elizabeth Warren is a hypocrite.
	The government, they don't even keep track of their lies to make consistent their idiotic positions.
	Elizabeth Warren.
	I was looking for the tweets yesterday.
	Someone had tweeted out.
	Oh, Zuby.
	Zuby astutely pointed out that the treatment of Alex Jones is unfair in that, A, he's gone through the court system already to be judged for his wrongs.
	It was a kangaroo court that he happened to go through, but he went through the judicial process, a highly compromised kangaroo court, a sham of a judicial process, but he went through one.
	He's apologized repeatedly.
	He's corrected repeatedly.
	And yet, other people, other politicians who have defamed people have never apologized, have never corrected.
	And so I go look for the tweets from Deborah Holland, Rep Deborah Holland of Hawaii?
	I forget where.
	And Elizabeth Warren's tweets about the Covington Catholic kids.
	Where they called them white supremacists, racists.
	This is what intolerance looks like.
	Fake news, defamatory, although they weaseled out of the lawsuit on the basis of sovereign immunity.
	They not only have never corrected and apologized, they left those tweets up.
	I will suspect, as does Robert Barnes, because they're the most popular tweets they've ever had.
	You know, putting out that vitriolic disinformation that gets your base going.
	On one end and the other, oh man, yeah.
	You get that endorphin, right?
	I'm not taking down my most popular tweet, even though it's a bald-faced lie that defames a 16-year-old kid.
	Their tweets are still up there.
	So while I'm looking for these tweets, and I'll pull them up in a second, I find this gem from Elizabeth Warren.
	And like, it's like, we're living in a bizarro clown world.
	That is, the criminals are running the prison.
	Elizabeth Warren.
	I won't even tell you the date yet.
	Here we go again.
	We can't keep letting this happen, and I have a bill to stop it.
	In response to Johnson& Johnson, a lawsuit where they were ordered.
	To pay how much?
	J&J puts talc liabilities into bankruptcy.
	This is October 14, 2021.
	This is Johnson& Johnson.
	You may remember this trustworthy company from other such things as the jab that goes in your body for which they have immunity from any wrongdoing.
	Johnson& Johnson on Thursday put into bankruptcy tens of thousands of legal claims alleging its baby powder and other talc-based products caused cancer.
	Offloading the potential liabilities into a newly created subsidiary.
	Let me just see here.
	It's got a market cap of 400 billion.
	Let's see here.
	High stakes litigation.
	Reuters first reported in July that J&J was exploring offloading its talc liabilities and placing them to bankruptcy.
	Thursday's moves shifted high-stakes litigation over the safety of J&J's talc from courtrooms across the United States to one legal proceeding before a federal bankruptcy judge who could potentially force a settlement among the blue chip company and plaintiffs.
	Let me see here.
	Where was the punitive damages?
	Hey, here we go.
	In June, because I covered this.
	I remember where I was when I covered this story.
	In June, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear J&J's appeal of a Missouri court ruling that resulted in $2 billion in damages awarded to women, alleging the company's talc caused their ovarian cancer.
	And the allegations were that Johnson& Johnson knew about it and concealed it.
	Okay, there are issues about whether or not that trial itself was compromised, political, whatever.
	But the bottom line is that Johnson& Johnson was found guilty of having knowingly concealed the fact that its products caused cancer, was ordered to pay $2 billion, and here we've got Elizabeth Warren, hypocrite and liar, lamenting the fact that these big, untrustworthy corporations are abusing of the law to shield their assets from damages that they caused in violation of the law, and lo and behold, everybody, shut up and take the jab from this company.
	They've been immunized.
	They won't have this problem again in the future.
	They won't have the problem of having to shield their assets because they've been given immunity by the government that is lamenting the fact that this criminal organization is abusing of bankruptcy laws to shield its assets from paying out damages from its criminal behavior or civilly liable behavior.
	Although I'm pretty sure they were ordered to pay the largest criminal penalty as well.
	I have to find that.
	I mean...
	Are we...
	I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!
	From Cameron Vesey, Convoy Organizer's lawyer, speaks to the media after removal from Emergencies Act inquiry.
	TSE experience.
	A $1 rant.
	Look, you all want to see this.
	Okay.
	Guessing this was covered.
	Just Watch Died Suddenly.
	Must Watch TV.
	Nike7, a $2 rumble rant.
	Thank you very much.
	MedicWiz, a $2 rumble rant, says, what about the dropping birth rates?
	Hey!
	COVID.
	COVID infection.
	It's...
	It's a known fact that infection and inflammation during pregnancy causes problems.
	That's why they're saying the jibby jab causes inflammation, which causes problems.
	So do viral infections.
	So there's always going to be this very convenient blurring of the lines.
	The only problem is, I don't know, check what the birth rate decline was during the bad flu season of 2018 when pregnant women, I presume, were getting viral infections.
	I suspect a viral infection is different than what we're currently witnessing now, but I'm not a doctor.
	KGB 2021, $2 run around, says, I'm incredibly grateful that you watched it.
	Conversation and dialogue is healthy for our country.
	Thank you for taking the time to watch.
	KGB 2021, thank you very much.
	So that's Elizabeth Warren being a pathological hypocrite, as per usual.
	And before I let her off the hook, let me just let me just go get their tweets.
	Let me just go get their tweets about the salmon that they still haven't taken down, because, God, gosh darn.
	Hey, it's their most popular tweet.
	Okay, look, I remember it was in response to Zuby.
	It was yesterday.
	I was fishing.
	I didn't catch any fish, and so I gave up fishing.
	Oh, look at that fish, by the way!
	Tabarnush!
	Can you believe that?
	Are we looking at the same thing here?
	Are we looking at the same thing?
	We are.
	That's a big-ass goldfish.
	That goldfish actually reminds me of Peter Griffin from Family Guy.
	Okay.
	Okay, so it was there.
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	The defamatory tweets.
	Just never let them forget.
	The tweets as of yesterday were still up.
	Elizabeth Warren.
	Before the dust has even settled, we need to call it out.
	Fox News is...
	No, that's not the right one.
	Oh, no, that wasn't.
	That gives a megaphone to racists and conspiracists.
	That's not the right one.
	Ah, cripe, that wasn't the right tweet.
	Whatever, I'll get Deborah Hollins.
	Here, Deborah Hollins.
	This veteran, the one who actually stole in valor, apparently never served, Nathan Phillips.
	This veteran put his life on the line for our country.
	The student's display of blatant hate, disrespect, and intolerance is a signal of how common decency has decayed under this administration.
	Heartbreaking.
	Lie, lie, lie.
	From the liar who laments the absence of...
	What did you say?
	Common decency.
	Who doesn't have the common decency to delete her damn tweet and apologize for being wrong.
	Lecture us on common decency, Deborah Holland, because you're the master of having none of it.
	Just disgusting.
	Okay.
	Deborah Holland and Elizabeth Warren hate-filled hypocrites.
	Period.
	They don't even have the common decency to apologize for having defamed a 16-year-old kid.
	That's the defining element of that administration.
	Heartbreaking.
	It's not heartbreaking.
	It's stomach-turning, nauseating, and disgusting.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Let's get to today's convoy, people.
	Who?
	Hold on.
	All right.
	Good.
	We're at almost 5,500 people.
	I don't often ask for the subs.
	Hit the plus button.
	That little, like, thumbs-up thingy thing.
	Not a big deal, anyhow, one way or the other.
	But welcome to the party, people.
	Knowledge party.
	That could be good for a shirt.
	Okay, so let's start one by one here.
	Marco Mendocino is a liar, and he, for one split second, said the quiet part out loud.
	Okay, so Marco Mendocino, Minister of Security, I think.
	He's the one who got up during the debate and told Raquel Doncho.
	That the EA, the Emergencies Act, needed to be invoked because of threats of rape.
	The truckers who had driven across the country to protest the COVID mandates, they were just running around Ottawa threatening to rape women.
	That happened.
	It happened so much.
	According to Marco Mendicino, they had to invoke the Emergencies Act.
	Well, here he's discussing...
	Respecting the separation of powers between the RCMP and the federal.
	And he says something in between this.
	His full answer was a solid three minutes and 43 seconds of diarrhea of the mouth.
	I cut it down to the essential, but listen to what he inadvertently spills out halfway through.
	It was the fact that the scale of this was national.
	It was the fact that...
	What sparked this movement in the opinion of the government was an expressly stated political objective that at times was expressed in violent terms that led to the entrenchment of a significant number of individuals to ignore the direction of law enforcement at the risk and at the peril of Canadians.
	It was the challenges that we had in government around having the appropriate intelligence tools to understand how those initially stated objectives could pull in people from many different walks of life with different backgrounds.
	And all of that was, I think...
	Part of the reason why people were really trying to apply public safety to the economy, to our international relations, significantly and persistently caused significant interruption to public safety, to the economy, to our international relations.
	And all of that was, I think, part of the reason why people were really trying to probe and understand that despite the fact that you had a criminal code, You couldn't use it, despite the fact...
	Bullcrap!
	The only charges laid on anyone, any of the people arrested, were under the criminal code.
	Bullcrap!
	...that you had provincial statutes around the Highway Traffic Act.
	They couldn't be effectively used, despite the fact that we had tow trucks.
	We had many tow trucks that they could not be deployed to clear...
	The blockades.
	And all of that was leading to an escalation of the risk and the threat of serious violence as time went on.
	As time went on.
	And it went on for three and a half weeks.
	And there was no violence until the police came under Justin Trudeau's Executive Emergencies Act.
	And that is why I think that the commissioner both signaled her concern, but also appreciated my interest.
	Look at that.
	She's like, yeah, tell me about it.
	It must have been so hard for you guys.
	I mean, you did nothing and you were all out of ideas.
	...intervention, that we still had to be respectful of that principle of operational independence.
	Operational independence between RCMP and the federal.
	It caused significant problems to our international relations.
	Now, they might have been talking about the Ambassador Bridge, the flow of goods from America to Canada.
	But no, because we're in Ottawa now, the Ambassador Bridge blockade had already been resolved.
	Shocking with existing laws through the existing court system through an injunction that ended that blockade.
	What he said here?
	This was embarrassing.
	On an international scene, this protest had taken on international importance.
	It had inspired protests across the world.
	It was an embarrassment on Herr Trudeau.
	It made him look weak.
	It made him look like he couldn't even control his lowly peasants.
	Farmers are doing this to you, Justin Trudeau?
	I can picture Xi behind closed doors.
	President Xi, Justin Trudeau, your people are doing this to you?
	They didn't go home when you said go home?
	They didn't cower in fear when you said that they were a fringe minority holding unacceptable views?
	Language which you directly borrowed from communist China?
	No.
	It was an embarrassment, an international embarrassment for which people needed to get punished.
	That's examination-in-chief of Marco Mendicino.
	It's softball questions.
	It's, hey, Marco, tell us how hard it was.
	Tell us that you had no other choice.
	That should be the commission's lawyer, I think.
	That should be the commission's lawyer.
	But the drama, this is when the drama happened.
	Save the drama for your mama.
	Let's see this here.
	Is this it?
	I can't see too good in my back screen here.
	What in the...
	Why can't I see?
	I know it's...
	Okay, hold on.
	I'll have to go to my...
	Give me one second.
	I'm going to have to go to Twitter here.
	There was some drama, and it's legalese drama.
	So I'm going to pull it up because...
	Some people might not appreciate exactly what happened, and it did require a little bit of context to fill in.
	Okay, so here we go.
	Brendan Miller, convoy attorney.
	Strong like bull.
	This guy takes no guff.
	It'll be up for discussion as to whether or not he went a little too far.
	I didn't post the first half of the video.
	Okay.
	So what's happening is Marco Mendicino is testifying for the government.
	This is the week where government officials and Trudeau are supposed to testify.
	Mendicino was testifying on the basis of documents that had been communicated from the government, which were highly redacted.
	Apparently, the convoy attorneys, Brendan Miller, had made two They're called motions or requests.
	I don't know what the term is.
	Written motions to unredact the documents for the purposes of cross-examination.
	As of now, we're not yet back after the lunch break.
	Those two written motions have yet to be adjudicated on by Commissioner Rouleau.
	I am not faulting Rouleau for any of this, anything.
	I think Rouleau has done a stunning stellar job here.
	But apparently, the convoy had filed two written motions.
	To unredact documents that had been communicated by the government, which were heavily redacted, and basically upon which Mendocino was currently testifying directly or indirectly.
	Those two motions had yet to get heard or adjudicated upon.
	Rouleau said he's going to come with his ruling after lunch.
	I don't know where Miller's going to be after that.
	If anybody knows if Miller's going to be allowed back in the courtroom, let me know.
	So Miller makes a verbal motion during the testimony in chief.
	Of Mendocino, a verbal motion to call a new witness, an individual who's in the courtroom, not the courtroom, sorry, who's in the commission room currently, who says, I can contradict what Mendocino is saying here, and you're not yet able to because of the redacted nature of the documents.
	Call me as a witness so that we can rebut what Mendocino is saying.
	And then this happens.
	What happened?
	Order allowed.
	The commission has reconvened.
	So, yeah, that's right.
	Miller made the verbal request.
	The judge says, I'm going to break for 15 minutes.
	Come back.
	This is what happens.
	Sir.
	This is Brendan Miller.
	Commission counsel has not completed her presentation.
	I like Miller.
	And there's no but to that.
	Talking over a judge rarely will end well.
	I have a feeling Miller knows exactly what he's doing right now, and it's not because he lost his cool.
	It's not because he...
	It's calculated.
	Righteous indignation.
	That's my suspicion, because Miller is smart, talented, experienced, and while I might have done something similar, but as a mistake, I don't think Miller...
	Was beyond himself, and I think he did on purpose.
	But talk over a judge or a commissioner.
	It's not going to end well.
	The commission has reconvened.
	Sir?
	The commission council has not completed her...
	I understand, sir, and your council has advised you that...
	No, I know you've directed...
	I'm sorry, I'm speaking.
	Yes, sir.
	The application, if you want to do it, you've been advised it to be done in writing.
	He says, don't make...
	They're calling it an application.
	I call it a motion force of habit from provincial terminology.
	Application, motion, request, whatever.
	He's saying, you want to do it?
	Do it in writing.
	To which Miller's going to say, I've done it in writing twice.
	You have two pending written applications that you have yet to adjudicate on, and you're telling me to go back and do a third.
	Not in the middle of the presentation.
	Sir, we filed two motions in writing at your direction that you've refused to rule on with respect to the redaction of documents from the Government of Canada.
	You're speaking.
	I'm speaking.
	I will take a break while you're asked to leave.
	I will return in five minutes if security could deal with the council.
	There's a guy on the left there who's got a mask on.
	Oh, the security's got a mask or whoever that is.
	Mask.
	Mask up in the front.
	Mask up in the front.
	One, two.
	I see one.
	Holy crap, Apples.
	Hold on.
	I'm going to play count.
	Like, where's Waldo?
	I see one, two, three, four, five.
	I mean, I'm not judging.
	It's just an indication.
	It's become a cultural thing.
	Cultural, political thing.
	And he was asked to leave.
	Now, I don't know what happened after that because I started preparing for this stream.
	That's what happened.
	Security.
	Get Miller out because I'm scared.
	I think it's all fun.
	Let me just go to the chat, actually, and see if any...
	Okay.
	Two super rumble rants.
	Andres Bertens says, Viva, there was violence.
	One kid kicked another kid in the jumping castle.
	Get your facts correct.
	Nike7 says, Not covered or vetted.
	Well, the ambassador bridge was likely a government operation.
	That's a $5 and $2 rumble rant respectively.
	In the chat, has Brendan been allowed back in?
	Let me see if I can get real-time information.
	Will Brendan be allowed back in this afternoon?
	So people are saying biased judge.
	I'm not going to play devil's advocate for the sake of it, nor am I going to look like I'm trying to be objective by defending the side that I disagree with.
	Nobody can accuse this judge of not working hard.
	So the judge here is sitting from 9.30...
	They were testifying 7 o 'clock last Friday.
	12 hours a day.
	The judge has been doing this day in and day out for six weeks.
	I can understand that the judge has not had time to rule on two written motions.
	Apparently, the ruling will be ready after lunch, and then they're going to know how to proceed.
	I can understand that the judge is just up to his ears, has to eat, has to sleep.
	The judge is smart, has to exercise as well.
	So, in as much as I could, did Miller just publicly expose a politically biased judge, Rocky Bernard?
	I'm going to say no.
	And some people might think I'm controlled opposition.
	My rationale, my thought, the judge is working 10 hours.
	The judge is working more, the commissioner, is working more in this hearing for six weeks than, in my experiences, judges work On a regular basis.
	You know, judges in court, court starts at 9 o 'clock or 8.30, whatever.
	They take a 15-minute break at 11, which lasts 25 minutes.
	They break for lunch, and they shut down at 4.30 on the nose because at the courthouse, at least in the unionized Quebec courthouse, Montreal, at 4.30, gates come down automatically.
	And if they have to stay till 5.30, they've got unionized workers who don't like doing it.
	It causes a whole big headache.
	This judge, Commissioner Nugulo, is working harder than I've ever seen a judge work.
	If by doing nothing else than sitting there for 10 hours a day listening to this and paying attention.
	So the fact that he's got two pending motions that he hasn't adjudicated on, given everything else that's going on, I can understand that.
	Can I understand him calling security?
	That looked like it might have been for show.
	Maybe he wants to rein in decorum in the courtroom.
	So, you know, and Crometa says, if you talk over the judge, you'll get the boot.
	There's a time to drop law bombs, political bombs.
	There's a time to fight in a way that you know is going to end up with you in contempt or you being hauled out.
	And I think that's what Brendan was going for.
	I don't think this was just, he got taken over by the moment and he's going to apologize for it.
	Although I guarantee you the minute he comes back into that court, he is going to apologize to the judge and say just that.
	But I think he was making a point.
	He made his point.
	The consequences will be no more dire than that.
	And he'll be back in sooner than later with any luck.
	And that's it.
	Angry Viking veteran says, don't judges have staff?
	They do.
	But everybody has been working day in and day out for six weeks on this.
	But bottom line also, everybody's playing games.
	Government files, what, 90% redacted documents?
	What the heck?
	What the heck could require redaction in this?
	Let's finish this up here.
	So I'm inclined not to see both sides.
	You talk over a judge, for right or for wrong, you're going to get in trouble.
	And the judge has been working very hard, and so I can't fault the judge for not having replied to these motions.
	I also can't fault Brendan for vigorously defending their position.
	But also, bottom line, the judge is not wrong.
	Make your motion.
	Even make your verbal request after they've examined the witness.
	Because he's still...
	It's not even that examination in chief of Mendocino was over.
	That was still going on.
	Yeah, Wilson is stepping in pronto.
	He says, yeah, I saw Wilson was testifying afterwards.
	I've got to my left here, I've got another computer where it's running.
	So I can see when they take back after lunch.
	Maybe we'll bring it in.
	So that was the latest drama.
	Let me see something here.
	I'm going to pull up a video that we're going to watch while I go pee.
	So let me see.
	Something that's going to be relevant for our stream, because the more I say stream, the more I remember that I absolutely have to pee.
	How long is this?
	55 seconds will not be enough time to...
	Oh, yeah.
	I'm not bringing up that Michael Rappaport...
	Hold on.
	Give me 30 seconds.
	I'm going to find a video so that I can play while I go.
	A minute 30?
	Here, guys.
	Let's watch this one.
	Paul Champ, How Not to Lawyer.
	I'll be back in under a minute.
	I'll be back in under a minute.
	I'll be back in under a minute.
	Thank you.
	You will not be able to argue your way into the answer you want.
	Ah.
	So let me make sure I understand this.
	Thank you.
	That's my testimony, you dumb bum.
	You should have understood that five minutes ago.
	Okay, that's Paul.
	I'm an idiot.
	I didn't put up this.
	Oh, for goodness sake.
	Did I put up the stream?
	Did I not put this up?
	There was no video.
	I'm an idiot.
	For goodness sake, what a buffoon.
	Who is this guy?
	Me.
	But Mr. Vino, let's just be clear.
	There's someone making a threat against a public official because they're trying to influence that public official.
	Let's do that again.
	That inherently falls under 2C, does it not?
	Now, it may be that you don't view the threat as credible, but if it was a credible threat, it would inherently fall under 2C, would it not?
	I think that if you...
	I'm not answering your question, sir.
	It's not the answer I want.
	Inside the service and working with partners to better understand how the IMV phenomenon was interacting with the CSIS Act.
	And Ms. Khan walked us through earlier a description of how we go through the process of understanding this, which will be the sphere of CSIS responsibility, which will be the sphere of the law enforcement responsibility.
	I just want to understand something.
	If I threaten a cop, it's not automatic emergency act?
	It's dynamic, and this is why people talk to each other on an ongoing basis.
	Hold up, hold up.
	Normally, I'd like to give witnesses full-time to answer, but I only have a limited time.
	I'm just trying to get an answer because I believe I've asked it a few times.
	Yeah, and you should be taking the hints, champ.
	If someone is threatening a public official because they want to influence that public official to take some policy choice, does that not inherently fall under 2C, yes or no?
	Each case is look on a case-by-case basis, and it would not be a default proposition.
	I want an answer that you're not giving me.
	So if someone's threatening to kill a mayor or a premier because they want them to drop a public health measure, that does not necessarily fall under two Cs.
	Is that your testimony, sir?
	Yes, it is.
	You got it.
	How dare you not give me the answer that I wanted?
	That would have been a wrong answer anyhow.
	Okay.
	They're back on.
	I see it on my computer there.
	The Emergencies Act is back.
	The Emergencies Act inquiry is back on, but you can catch up afterwards.
	We'll go for a few more minutes here.
	That's the drama of the day.
	The bottom line?
	Marco Mendocino is a liar.
	Proven liar, by the way.
	Lied about the fact that the RCMP asked them to invoke the Emergencies Act when it turns out, in reality, not only did they not ask them, they didn't want it, apparently.
	Anyway, so he gets up and he got some softball lobball questions from the commission attorney.
	A lot of people making jokes that, you know, the commission's attorney will be running for the liberals in the next election or she'll be granted some beautiful title.
	Lobball.
	The cross-examination is going to be fun and I might bring it up.
	Either go live on the main channel or go onto the second channel and live commentate that.
	Although I've got a...
	Do something at 4 o 'clock.
	So that's the latest from the Emergencies Commission, the Emergencies Act Inquiry Commission.
	I'm going to see if I can get Brandon on for an interview or Keith sooner than later to talk about it to see what the fallout is because I'm curious to know what the fallout is.
	It's not every day that a judge or a commissioner says, I think could have just asked Miller to leave without having to mention security.
	Did they let him back in?
	Who knows?
	Find out next time.
	Holy crap.
	So a lot of rumble rants just came in.
	MedicWiz says watching a pro liar like him should let everyone learn how to identify a liar.
	Maybe we're going to do that for a few seconds because it's true.
	He's a polished liar.
	And I don't even think Mendocino is all that smart.
	He's just a skilled liar.
	And I think some people are saying, well, it's not a lie if he believes it.
	It's conceivable he believes all of the rubbish that he's spewing out, which is why he can do it with such sincerity.
	Oh, I thought the RCMP asked us.
	But yeah, watch it.
	And you can see there's like, there are facial movements and there's just like gesticulation of a deceiver.
	Pamela R. Walker.
	David, I've never heard anyone beside myself talk to and about themselves like we do.
	Idiot, buffoon, etc.
	We both should stop doing that.
	I have read in books that we should use forgiving and flattering terminology when referring to ourselves in our own mind's eye.
	I find it's a lot easier just to berate myself all the time.
	Why did I say that?
	What an idiot I am.
	It's a lot easier.
	And that way, when other people say it, it's like water off a duck's back.
	Switz guy, $1 rum around, says HHS is saying masks should be mandated again.
	It's happening again.
	Switz guy, I know.
	There you go.
	Now I got it.
	Now I got it.
	It's not in my chest.
	It's in my pectoral muscle.
	Magical underscore Trevor, $5 rumble rant, says, if you can't make fun of yourself, someone else will do it for you.
	Hear ye, hear ye.
	Agree.
	St. Claus would be giving some many Christmas gifts since Christmas.
	Real Truth 22. Uh, Blairs?
	Okay, hold on.
	Okay, so that's the convoy.
	Oh, when Trudeau, when Trudeau testifies.
	Oh, hold on a second, by the way.
	Let me show you something.
	And you're going to tell me if you like this.
	What day is it today?
	What day is it today?
	Let's choose it.
	We've got a new concept.
	Courtesy of DSLR Dave.
	Let me see if I can do this.
	Save as...
	We're going to call it anti-authority rhetoric.
	We're going to put this on the shirt, people.
	Hold on.
	You're all getting an exclusive sneak peek now.
	You're getting an exclusive sneak peek at what will be...
	What did I just do?
	No, that's not it.
	Hold on.
	I can't find my window now.
	Oh, cripe.
	Okay, here we go.
	I thought I just kicked myself off the stream.
	Okay, hold on.
	Yes.
	Guys, what do you think?
	I like.
	This is going on a shirt, on a bumper sticker, on a mug.
	This is coming out today.
	So that's what we're working with.
	You've all seen it.
	Exclusive.
	Copyright has been created.
	Booyah.
	Okay, so that's the latest on the EACON fight.
	When Trudeau comes, man, I am going to be on that deposition like flies on poo-poo, like white on rice, like whatever other cliches go.
	Moving on.
	Moving on.
	This.
	Okay, so I've never seen Mark Elias before.
	I've heard the name.
	I've heard the name Mark Elias.
	I know how Robert has spoken of Mark Elias.
	I know what people think of Mark Elias as a legal mind.
	This is Jack Posobiec tweeting, look at this chud.
	I don't know what chud means.
	And I did not look it up in the Urban Dictionary.
	And I hope it's...
	Nothing too bad.
	Listen to Mark Elias telling everybody who's thinking Carrie Lake might have gotten hosed in Nevada.
	Listen to Mark Elias making the most compelling argument for why they should all shut the heck up.
	And I don't know if Mark Elias understands what he's just done here.
	Listen to this.
	I mean, if you look up the term chutzpah in the dictionary...
	You find the idea that Carrie Lake is saying that there is voter suppression.
	They're complaining that...
	I really wish people would not do that.
	Mark Elias using the word chutzpah to make a political point is worse than Kanye West saying shalom to make a political point.
	It's worse than...
	Was it Chuck Schumer?
	No, it was Raskin.
	Referring to Epps, Ray Epps, as a poor schmuck.
	I hate identity politics, and this is a facet of identity politics.
	Pulling out identity words of the community when making a political point is to make identity politics an element of the discussion.
	I hate it.
	I loathe it, and I wish people would stop doing it, but the people who do it are never going to stop doing it.
	Mark Elias.
	If you look up chutzpah, first of all, no, Mark Elias.
	Say it properly, but don't say it.
	Raskin, don't refer to Ray Epps as some poor schmuck.
	We're not sitting around like Friday night dinner.
	This is politics, and this is where you don't need to infiltrate your ethnic identity into the discussion.
	It's irrelevant.
	And it will rub people the wrong way.
	I mean, if you look up the term chutzpah in the dictionary...
	You're going to find Mark Elias using the...
	If you look up chutzpah in the dictionary, you're going to see a picture of Mark Elias telling you about not using...
	telling you what chutzpah is.
	That's what chutzpah is.
	Find the idea that Carrie Lake is saying that there is voter suppression.
	Hold on, hold on.
	You're going to find...
	Was there an edit there?
	There is voter suppression.
	Yeah, there was a little bit of editing there.
	Why?
	It takes chutzpah.
	It takes audacity.
	Dishonest audacity for Carrie Lake to say there's voter suppression.
	Why?
	Plaining that there were long lines.
	Well, you know why there were long lines?
	There were long lines because the Carrie Lakes and the Republicans have been making it harder to vote.
	If you look at her complaint about voter suppression takes gall because they're complaining about long lines?
	Well, there were long lines and it's their fault.
	So there was voter suppression, but it's their fault.
	Oh, but wait.
	There's more in Arizona.
	They're complaining that voters were disenfranchised due to voter registration laws.
	You know why?
	Because they were.
	Perry Lake and the Republicans have made it harder to register in Arizona.
	They're claiming that ballots were thrown out due to mismatched signatures.
	You know why?
	Because when we sued Arizona to make signature matching more accurate and make it easier for people to cure their ballots, they opposed us.
	And by the way, on the long lines point, while they're crying crocodile tears about people waiting in line for an hour to Maricopa County, where are they talking about the students who waited for six hours in the cold in Michigan?
	And you raised that as an argument for problematic elections.
	You raised that as an issue for...
	Oh, so by the way, hold on.
	Let's just hear this.
	There were long lines because the Carrie Lake...
	There were long lines.
	There were long lines.
	Disenfranchised due to voter registration laws.
	You know why?
	They were disenfranchised due to voter registration laws.
	What was the third one?
	Oh!
	Due to...
	Ballots were thrown out due to mismatched signatures.
	Mismatched signatures.
	You know why?
	They were!
	Thank you, Mark.
	You truly are a phenomenal lawyer.
	You just made Carrie Lake's case for her.
	And I tweeted out that as much so that they should know.
	You know why you were disenfranchised?
	It's your fault.
	You know why there were long lines and you had trouble voting?
	It's your fault.
	You know why ballots were thrown out?
	Hey, thanks for confirming it happened.
	See you in court.
	With any luck.
	I just saw a rumble rant.
	KGB 2021.
	Read Carrie Twitter response.
	Okay, hold on.
	Let me see if I can find that fast enough.
	You know why?
	I just saw Bill Clinton's face for some reason on the video.
	Okay, I'll see that one afterwards.
	So that's Mark Elias making a very compelling case for the chicanery afoot in the Arizona...
	Yeah, did I say Nevada before?
	Arizona, sorry.
	In the Arizona voting.
	And apparently, I'm going to see if I can get Harmeet Dillon to come on to talk about the latest of what's going on.
	Oh, by the way, let me just make sure it's confirmed.
	I believe it is.
	Carl Benjamin, Sargon of Akkad.
	We're going to be going live next week at some point.
	Time to be determined.
	Whitney Webb has been confirmed.
	November 30th, 9 o 'clock Eastern.
	Whitney Webb.
	What a time we are going to have.
	It's going to be amazing.
	When is November 30th?
	So that's a week from tomorrow, 9 o 'clock in the morning.
	And Carl Benjamin, Sargon of Akkad, at some point next week, to be determined.
	There's a time zone change and family life on both ends that makes things.
	But it's confirmed with Sargon.
	Carl, just don't know the time.
	It's confirmed with Whitney Webb.
	Nine o 'clock in the morning, 9.30.
	Mark your agendas.
	And more importantly, everyone, mark my agenda.
	I've been absolutely bad.
	I haven't marked.
	Don't worry about that.
	Okay, but speaking of Sargon of Akkad, for those who don't know, like, it happened slowly and then all at once, for good and for bad.
	The slow trickleback of banned accounts, you know, started with Trump poll, Trump came back, and then just like that, Raketa Law, Sargon of Akkad, Jordan Peterson, Project Veritas, all coming back to Twitter, and thus far.
	Nothing has happened.
	Thus far, I still feel safe.
	But this is the interesting discussion.
	The discussion comes down to Alex Jones.
	And Alex Jones, you know, whatever you think about him, is not making, is not seeking political capital.
	Out of Elon not yet bringing him back, he's being actually quite courteous about it and understanding.
	And I think, look, Alex Jones knows that he is toxic.
	He knows that he's a liability.
	And in as much as I can, I know that when I write to people privately and say, hey, you're on that end of the spectrum politically, you don't need to worry about my side.
	You need to worry about your side if you say yes, so be sensitive to that.
	I've come to grips with that.
	I don't think it's a reflection of me.
	I think it's a reflection on them and the rest of the world.
	But some people said, yeah, sure, I'll come on and say, look, just be forewarned.
	Don't read the chat.
	But also, your side might come after you.
	If the purpose of you coming on to my channel is to discourse and not to try to humiliate me, you'll take some flack and then sometimes I don't get callbacks.
	I still keep giving the fair warning, even though it cost me some interesting interviews.
	I think Alex Jones appreciates that.
	But the debate right now, currently, is, is it fair or consistent, or why is Jones seemingly not yet bringing back...
	I was going to say Alec Baldwin, but Alex Jones.
	And this is the latest of it.
	I'm going to get past my tweet here.
	Okay, Elon Musk.
	So this is the discussion.
	Did Sam Harris unblock me or can I only see it in incognito?
	Sam Harris blocked me.
	Makes it very difficult to follow these tweets.
	I have to go cut the thing, go into another browser to see what the original tweet was.
	Sam Harris says, is it time to let Alex Jones back on Twitter, Elon Musk?
	If not, why not?
	To which Elon Musk replies, suffer little children and forbid them not to come unto me.
	For of such is the kingdom of heaven.
	I understand what that is.
	I just don't know if it's actually from the Bible or a poem.
	Kim.com, who's also been reinstated on Twitter, says Alex fucked up with Sandy Hook.
	He admitted that and apologized.
	He also got a lot of conspiracy theories right.
	If serial liars like Biden and Trump are allowed on Twitter, then Alex Jones should be allowed to.
	Please reconsider in the interest of real free speech.
	To which Elon Musk replies this.
	I don't know this story, and I didn't know this story.
	I have to go look into it afterwards.
	It was new to me, and I have not looked into the details.
	My firstborn child died in my arms.
	I felt his last heartbeat.
	I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics, or fame.
	Okay.
	I don't know if I'll be able to see.
	I'll get one of my other responses, but I had one.
	This is a principle which, you know, it's a principle of law.
	It's tough for some people to appreciate.
	Pity cannot guide the courts.
	And you don't ask the victims to dole out the punishment.
	And you don't base policy on personal trauma.
	Man, there's a lot of...
	You know what?
	I'll get my other reply.
	But then I had to pull this up because it's like...
	Not everybody lives on the internet.
	Back during Sandy Hook, this is 2013-01-15.
	This is Pierce Morgan.
	This is his tweet.
	I'm being accused of, quote, standing on the graves of dead Sandy Hook children.
	If that's what it takes to get action, so be it.
	So you have here, and remember what the statement was, I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics, or fame.
	And what you have is Piers Morgan doing just that.
	I'm sure he believes it's for his legitimate political game or legitimate politics.
	You have him doing just that.
	And so the question is, is there a consistent application or is Elon Musk, as the ultimate arbiter to some extent of Twitter, it's a private company, he can do what he wants, basing policy...
	Off his own personal trauma, his own personal experience.
	I don't need to bring up the tweet response.
	And I have a philosophy, a theory.
	I doubt it's mine.
	That experience makes you stronger, but not always.
	Sometimes experience will actually make you...
	Experience makes you smarter, but not always.
	Because sometimes experience doesn't actually make you smarter.
	I won't say it makes you less smart, but it traumatizes you.
	And so experience can condition you going forward despite all evidence, despite everything.
	In other words, sometimes experience actually makes you less smart and not smarter.
	Perfect example, you get bitten by a dog once.
	That experience has not taught you that all dogs are bad and dangerous, but it's taught you to probably fear all dogs irrespective of reality.
	Trauma.
	Traumatic experiences are the definition of not making you smarter through experience, but rather wrongly conditioning future behavior based on past trauma.
	And I said that nobody should have to experience that type of loss, period, full stop.
	But it is not because you have had that experience of trauma that policy should be crafted broadly and as a generalized rule.
	Based on your personal trauma and sensitivities to specific issues.
	That's not how policy works.
	You don't make rules of the exception.
	And you don't allow your personal experiences to dictate policy for others across the board.
	And it's difficult to have these types of discussions on Twitter given character restrictions and how things can be taken out of context.
	I mean, the idea...
	The analogous idea is to say, you know, my grandfather escaped Poland.
	My grandfather escaped the Holocaust while the 24 other members of his family stayed in Poland and never got out.
	Okay.
	And if I'm Twitter, I say, well, therefore, I'm not going to tolerate any Holocaust denial on Twitter.
	You do that, you're banned for life.
	Well, I didn't have family in the Armenian genocide.
	And if I don't apply that rule, if I say only Holocaust denial and not...
	Armenian genocide denial.
	Well, then someone's going to say, that's your experience, and now just because you pull the purse strings or the control strings, you're going to make a rule based on your experience that favors something that's sensitive to you, but not to other people, or to create an exception that will allow your specific issue to deviate from the rule for the norm.
	It's not how things should be done, despite the importance of that event for that individual.
	So, we'll see.
	You can't craft policy on saying, well, when it comes to that, I take specific issues, so that will be the exception to promoting free speech on the platform.
	Setting aside the fact that, from what I understand, Alex Jones did not get banned from the platform for that issue in any event.
	I think it was for allegedly harassing a journalist.
	I'm not entirely certain, but I don't think he got banned for that issue in the first place.
	And so that's the latest discussion with Twitter and who comes back and who doesn't.
	I have a feeling it's going to be a culmination.
	I don't want to say that.
	I don't think Elon's going to use the Alex Jones as a marketing ploy and build up to the big news for business purposes.
	I think he's...
	What I personally think is it might be, you know...
	The personal historical trauma is certainly a factor in his thought process, but I have a sneaking suspicion there are much more powerful forces at play here that are saying, you put Alex Jones back on the platform and either A, we're going to come after your platform for the balance of the $2.75 trillion that we're seeking from Alex Jones or the $1 billion that we've already gotten, or, and or...
	We're going to come after Tesla with criminal investigations.
	We're going to come after Twitter for FTC violations.
	This is why when you have too much, you're not easily corruptible, but you could be easily intimidated.
	And Alex Jones just might not be worth the headache.
	And bottom line, Alex Jones doesn't really need Twitter.
	But it is a question of principle.
	And it's also a question of...
	It would be a question showing that despite one's personal trauma, one is not going to allow that to compromise their judgment on a going-forward basis.
	To some extent, everybody's had trauma more or less greater or far less great degrees.
	I might have my own issues where I say, yeah, this is how I'm going to conduct my own behavior, but it's not how I'm going to dictate other people's behavior.
	So we'll see.
	It's interesting, but it's fun.
	One thing that's just super cool is the CEO of Twitter is active on the platform, engaging, bringing back voices, and Twitter is starting to look and feel like what it once was.
	It's starting to look and feel like what the internet once was.
	Not the Wild West, as some people call it, with people hurling racial slurs left, right, and center.
	Nobody likes that.
	Nobody likes that.
	There's a reason why certain other platforms where that was prevalent didn't grow and ultimately went down.
	Nobody likes that.
	And the reality also, if there's people on the platform you don't like, if Kanye West bothers Peter Fox, block.
	And if words bother you, check yourself.
	Look inward, as we say.
	All right, that's the Elon story.
	I think there was one other story.
	Oh yes, here we go.
	Nancy Pelosi, Paul Pelosi!
	Look, there's no minimizing the incident.
	It's an act of violence against someone who happens to be a politician.
	I'm of the opinion that that doesn't make it more serious than acts of violence against regular people.
	Violence is violence, and violence should not be tolerated.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	And there's no but to that.
	Why haven't they released the body cam footage?
	Why haven't they released the surveillance footage, the video surveillance footage?
	And how has this story just disappeared from the public political discourse?
	It went from being MAGA-Republican-motivated conspiracy theorist, politically inspired assassin, to crickets.
	And then as the news came out, forget the conspiracy theories or the rumors and whatever.
	That's it.
	The story's over.
	That's it.
	They've gotten everything.
	The guy pleaded not guilty after having allegedly given a Miranda's confession.
	Amazing, beautiful.
	End of story.
	The right-wing MAGA Trump Republican, an illegal immigrant from Canada named David, which already I don't like, who allegedly...
	Talks to squirrels, people.
	I love squirrels.
	Now, that's it.
	You look up David and squirrel now, and I don't know, you're going to get two sets of search results.
	Let's just hear what the latest is, shall we?
	This is from Fox News, so take it for what it's worth.
	They're not really reporting on the story.
	The liberal media's portrayal of Paul Pelosi, suspect.
	David Popper, as a MAGA supporter, may have succeeded nearly one month after the incident, some critics say.
	Buck Sexton, co-host of the Clay Travis Buck Sexton show, and former CIA officer added his voice to the critics, slamming the mainstream media's coverage, or lack thereof.
	Just recall, was it NBC who pulled another story because it might have been too true?
	And apparently the guy who reported it, last I checked, hadn't been back on the air.
	An illegal immigrant from Canada had been charged with the attack.
	On Jesse Walters' primetime, Sexton responded to several recent clips of mainstream media trying to tie De Pop to MAGA-right Republicans, despite his reputation as somewhat aloof with ties to nudism and Berkeley counterpoint.
	We know all this stuff.
	One CNN report said De Pop was a proliferator of videos featuring MyPillowGuy, Mike Lindell, a fervent...
	What does that even mean?
	That just might mean where the ads are being run.
	And I've seen MyPillowGuy ads on a lot of places, I think.
	But where was the part where he was registered to the Green Party?
	Sexton said DePop was less of a right-winger and more simply a frequent patron of the Crazy Town Buffet, pointing to a rare New York Times report citing recollections from DePop's girlfriend they attended an anti-war nudist protest, among other developments.
	De Pop was also, despite his status as a non-citizen, reportedly a registered member of the Green Party in California.
	I thought he was a registered member of the Green Party in Canada.
	Oh yeah, those MAGA lovers are always very Green Party-esque.
	This guy has pulled together these different conspiracy theories and argued.
	Literally, according to the New York Times, De Pop told people he was Jesus, lived under a tree, and thought he was living in a game simulation.
	Well, anyways, that's it.
	But when you have a total lunatic who might as well be speaking in pink elephants under the tree that he's living under, they're telling us it's the fault of the GOP.
	Hand over your guns and freedoms because the guy's a maniac.
	I don't think so.
	The firestorm toward the media in the Paul Pelosi story has intensified after NBC essentially scrubbed a report corresponding with correspondent Miguel Almaguer that other critics suggested ran counter to the mainstream media narrative.
	They have a way of doing that, don't they?
	CBS pulls their story about Ukraine.
	NBC pulls their story about...
	Because it didn't meet journalistic standards after they were told it did not meet journalistic standards.
	Yeah, okay, let's see what we got in the chat here on the rumbles.
	Pelosi cam video leaked, waiting for it to surface, allegedly shows him answering the door in unharmed condition.
	Lowhawk...
	I'm just making sure I'm not getting...
	Tricked on the name again.
	Lohawk says, Pelosi police cam video leaked waiting for it to surface.
	Allegedly shows him answering door in unharmed condition.
	If that leaks, not a question of invading people's privacy.
	Do you understand?
	You can't analogize it to Jussie Smollett because I believe the incident occurred.
	I don't believe Paul Pelosi was not attacked and injured.
	Weaponizing something that was unrelated.
	Ironically, exploiting something that did happen to blame it on your enemy.
	Ironically, where did we just see that happen?
	Oh, I don't know.
	In the Ukraine.
	In Ukraine.
	Just Zelensky exploiting their own mistake of accidentally killing two NATO civilians in Poland, trying to blame it on their enemies to drag the world into World War III.
	That's analogous.
	To arguably taking an incident that had nothing to do with politics, pretending it did, so that you could drag the country into some form of political civil war.
	So yeah, I'd like to see that video when it comes out.
	Not because I want to see what kind of underwear they were wearing.
	If Paul Pelosi answered the door unharmed and then went back to his assailant and didn't immediately flee to the protective cover of the cops, and the cops...
	Let Paul Pelosi meander back to a 42-year-old man in his apartment at 2.30 in the morning.
	That, to me, would be more of an indication that this was a call to, hey, cops, come get this guy out of my house because he won't leave and make it disappear.
	And not, this is a crisis call.
	I need you to immediately intervene.
	That's my theory.
	Hashtag my opinion.
	Hashtag no defamation.
	Forge and Anvil.
	$1 Rumble and says, on my new podcast, Forge and Anvil, I had a nice chat with my left-leaning friend, Zach, about Elon Musk and free speech last night.
	I'm still trying to convince him he's no longer on the left.
	Send help.
	You know what the easiest way to convince someone they're no longer on the left is?
	Get their allies on the left to turn against them.
	Then they'll realize.
	Dershowitz still thinks he's on the left.
	Jonathan Turley still thinks he's on the left.
	When your political allies view you as the enemy, that's when you realize, I haven't left the party.
	The party left me.
	Or I should say the party kicked me out with stiletto heels in the back.
	Oh, yeah.
	Okay.
	Oh, then, well, Acomers says, wait a minute, before you go blaming Ukraine for that missile, you have to also then blame them for bombing Kiev, the same as you're asking for the body cam image for Nassi Pelosi.
	Not sure I understand that.
	All I know is that for that particular incident, that people don't seem to learn from history, there is very little doubt that Zelensky knew immediately, if not shortly thereafter, that it was not a Russian bomb, but sought to exploit the political fog of war.
	uh for political benefit and potentially to you know just escalate to world war three um Yeah, Bill Maher's going right too.
	Yeah, Bill Maher's.
	Anyhow, so that's it.
	People, I've got to go do a couple of errands.
	Okay, so Mendocino is still testifying.
	Hold on.
	Let's do this for a few seconds.
	I just got a video that was Mark Rober.
	Okay.
	Hold on.
	We're going to go to Viva Clips.
	Let's just see what's going on with Mendicino.
	Mendicino is testifying right now.
	Here we go.
	Emergencies Act.
	I'll give everyone a look.
	You can go watch this afterwards.
	Okay.
	I'm dancing because I hear dance music that you don't yet see.
	Here we go.
	Present.
	Here we go.
	Power to enforce the criminal code, for instance, and the commissioner says yes.
	This is like Viva Inception.
	This is what's currently going on.
	It's just part of what they're allowed to do, and the commissioner says yes.
	And then if you could scroll down, Mr. Registrar.
	I'm going to go back to watching this.
	I'm going to take this out.
	But we're going to end today's video not with law or politics.
	With something good.
	What should it be today?
	It's going to be drone.
	No, it's not.
	Viva Fry Ostrich.
	It's going to be another ostrich video, people.
	No, it's not going to be that.
	Fishing or drone?
	Fishing or drone?
	We did the drone tooth pull.
	Fishing?
	I think we've watched all of the good fishing shows.
	Ah, okay, fine.
	We'll do another fishing video, guys.
	Everybody, thank you all for being here, as always.
	Tomorrow, stay tuned.
	I mean, we're going to do something tomorrow.
	I don't know if we have a sidebar or I'll just do an evening stream.
	Kids are off school for the week for Thanksgiving.
	My parents are in town, so we're going to be hanging out.
	But we'll do something.
	Next week, Whitney Webb, Sargon of Akkad.
	It's going to be glorious.
	Nothing but good things.
	And tomorrow I'll be on Megyn Kelly, pre-recorded, talking about Alec Baldwin.
	People, there's a shift in the zeitgeist if I'm not being unduly optimistic.
	Let's finish up with this week of the Emergencies Act inquiry.
	When Justin Trudeau testifies, I will be there and I will not be quiet.
	So if you want quiet analysis, you're going to want to watch it on someone else's channel, but we'll be there.
	I'm going to try to get Keith Wilson on, Brendan Miller, talk about what happened here.
	For the time being, stay the course, hold the line.
	Am I still allowed saying that?
	Hold the line of respectful discourse, of tolerance, of truth-seeking, and of conducting yourself better than...
	Your ideological adversaries.
	Do not become the monster when battling the monster because when you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares right back.
	And as I always say, conduct yourself in a manner that would make your parents and children and pets proud.
	And you can do no wrong.
	Everybody, thank you all for the support.
	VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com if you want to support.
	Be a member.
	Unpaying member.
	No problem.
	Tons of content there.
	There's a lot of exclusive stuff for supporting members.
	Merch, VivaFry.com, and my sponsor today, EK Pure Air Filtration.
	EKPure.com, promo code Viva, and Field of Greens from yesterday.
	30% all week off for Black Friday.
	But now, we will watch a beautiful pike.
	I miss kayak fishing.
	And I got a kayak here, and I haven't used it yet.
	But with that said, enjoy the fishing video.
	I will see you all on Twitter, in Locals, on YouTube.
	Rumble tomorrow.
	Peace out, peeps.
	I thought I hooked a rock.
	There's a big fish on this.
	Oh my goodness.
	I thought I was snagged.
	What is it?
	Oh my gosh!
	sad music
	This is the biggest fish.
	This is the biggest fish.
	This is hands down the biggest fish I've ever Oh my gosh!
	Holy cows!
	Oh my gosh!
	This hook is coming out.
	Oh my gosh!
	Stay there, please.
	Stay there, please.
	Oh my gosh!
	Please.
	Please.
	This is the biggest fish!
	Oh my gosh, please, please, please, please stay.
	Please stay, please stay.
	Please stay.
	Look at this!
	This is the...
	Who sees this?
	Who sees this?
	Oh my gosh!
	I don't know how big this is.
	I don't know how much this weighs.
	Oh, my gloves are stuck in things.
	Oh, my.
	When I hooked that, I thought I hit a rock.
	I thought I was snagged in the water.
	I take this as a sign from above.
	I must keep doing YouTube.
	That was simply a monster.
	We can go in for the day now.

▲