Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 16, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

01:38:39

WW3 Barely Averted? Trudeau Humiliated! More Fake News & MORE! Viva Live

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	If SPF knocked on your door again and said, look, I failed in my last venture.
	One second, please.
	I have a new...
	If SPF knocked on your door again and said, look, I failed in my last venture, I have a new crypto venture, I need money, would you back him?
	That's a great question no one's asked me yet.
	Great question.
	I think we can all admit, you can love him or hate him given what's happened, but he was one of the most brilliant traders in the crypto universe.
	He also built one of the most robust...
	We used FTX actively.
	It was a very robust platform that allowed us to get information on a compliant basis.
	So I really like what he built.
	Would you back him?
	The answer would be yes.
	I'm going to tell you this.
	Sorry, I think if the audio is low on that, it's because of the audio.
	I've got to give a full disclaimer.
	I haven't seen the context in which the broader discussion was occurring.
	It's entirely conceivable this is so out of context that the words I heard coming out of Kevin O 'Leary's mouth are otherwise explainable.
	It's possible it's a deepfake.
	I'm not quite certain who this individual is.
	Someone sent me this very recently.
	Mr. Lee.
	Junior looks legit.
	The audio and the video looks a little too high quality to be deepfake.
	Knocked on your door again and said, look, I failed in my last venture.
	I have a new crypto venture.
	I need money.
	Would you back him?
	Great question.
	That's a great question no one's asked me yet.
	By the way, this is buttering up the individual.
	Great question.
	You're so smart.
	I would have never thought to ask that question under such circumstances, possibly because nobody in their right mind would think it is a great question to ask in the broader context of what we've just witnessed over the last week and a half.
	I think we can all admit, you can love him or hate him, given what's happened, but...
	I think there's only one, maybe two sets of people who love him.
	The Democrat Party, from whom?
	Who were gifted...
	Tens of millions of dollars, if not hundreds of millions of dollars.
	Some political groups, some researchers who were gifted tens of millions of dollars of FTX foundation monies to conduct research, to fund COVID research.
	There's a few people who are very happy and love him a lot.
	They got a blank check, their money cashed, and they're well on their way.
	I think a great many other people probably hate him, and rightfully so.
	He was one of the most brilliant traders in the crypto universe.
	He also built one of the most robust platforms.
	We used FTX actively.
	It was a very robust platform that allowed us to get information on a compliant basis.
	So I really like what he built.
	Would you back him?
	The answer would be yes.
	I'll need to know if there's more context to that.
	I would love to have Kevin O 'Leary on.
	I doubt he would.
	It's a funny thing.
	He'd never come.
	He would never agree to it.
	I wouldn't be mean.
	I would not be mean, disrespectful, or berate anybody, call them names.
	I would just ask him very, very uncomfortable questions that I'm certain he would not like to be asked.
	Such as, would you back him when he's paying me?
	I'm not backing him.
	He's backing me.
	That's how it works.
	Would I vouch for him?
	If he pays me enough.
	If he backs me enough, I will vouch for him, like I did the last time.
	Would you back him?
	O 'Leary, from what we know, invested in the company, but was being paid to be a spokesperson and an ambassador.
	So who is backing who here?
	He built a very interesting tool.
	He was a great trader.
	Did he say trader or traitor?
	He was a great trader, right?
	Because he managed to find a way to fabricate money out of thin air.
	He came up with a Ponzi scheme that worked well enough in the interim for whatever the reason.
	I am now, by the way, I did a live stream earlier today, Locals Exclusive, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	I still believe that this is a Democrat money laundering machine scheme.
	I believe that thoroughly.
	The amount of dollars that went from FTX through Sam Bankman Freed to the Democrat Party, it's in the tens of millions and probably hundreds of millions.
	The amount that went to...
	Political entities, and I am now unfortunately including research in political entities.
	FTX Foundation funding COVID research, funding COVID studies, funding certain studies that had highly political results.
	Hundreds of millions of dollars.
	And it all goes belly up the day after the elections.
	Bankman-Free, FTX, I think they put $10 million into Biden in 2020.
	They put...
	Bankman put in $39 million to the Democrat Party.
	If it wasn't the full $39 million, at least 90% of it.
	Two of his, what do they call them?
	It was a word that had to do with maritime law.
	Two of the deputies or whatever, the people at his FTX, $30 million.
	That's $70 million right off the bat.
	His mother and some others at Stanford or MIT, I forget where, threw Mind the Gap.
	$140 million raised to get out and vote this year.
	I don't think we're going to focus on cameras off.
	I don't think we're going out on too much of a venture to say it was a clear scam.
	One that a lot of people were in on.
	I want to know how much Kevin O 'Leary was paid as an ambassadorship.
	Net.
	How much did he get?
	How much did he invest?
	What was his net loss or net gain?
	Would I back him again?
	Oh, no, but he was a great, savvy investor.
	He realized that if you say you have assets and then arbitrarily affix a value to them and then sell those assets to another arm's-length company that's actually not an arm's-length company to establish a fabricated, inflated value, you can basically say I'm worth a trillion dollars.
	Look, I sold a token to another company for $100 million, and I got another 10 of them.
	Oh, that other company I'm related to?
	Yeah, he's a great savvy trader in that he figured out a scheme that, like all children, eventually find out.
	You're not that smart, and how did you ever think that this was going to work?
	My running theory now, by the way, just to finish that thought, He's a patsy.
	I've watched enough interviews with him.
	I've seen enough of his general demeanor.
	I'm not sure that he's all there mentally.
	And I say that with full respect to all people on the spectrum of what it is to be a human.
	He's clearly not all there.
	I think he's a patsy or a fall guy for what was on its face, seemingly.
	A vehicle through which to dupe retail investors into party with their hard-earned cash.
	Pension funders in Canada investing in this.
	The retail folk.
	I'm not blurry.
	Am I blurry?
	Okay, put this off.
	I'm not blurry because I can read my...
	There, I'm in focus.
	He's a fall guy.
	For a broader scheme and the full extent of that broader scheme, I don't know, but that's my prediction.
	That's my take right now.
	Okay.
	Sure, he's a victim, right?
	I don't think he's a victim.
	I think he was a useful tool for this.
	I mean, he's going to get the punishment, but a lot of other people are going to have made off like freaking bandits.
	Hundreds of millions of dollars to political and...
	Politicize philanthropic entities.
	Maybe this guy was actually lacking enough intellectually to think that he was actually going to become the next philanthropic billionaire.
	And the rug has been pulled out but hard.
	But Kevin O 'Leary, paid ambassador to FDX, paid spokesperson, he'll back him again.
	Because he liked the fact that he built a functional exchange.
	I mean, I'm no genius, but I could probably find people to do that.
	But this also highlights a very serious problem of a very material conflict of interest.
	O 'Leary is sort of upfront about it, you know, in his interviews.
	He's like, I'm ethically bound to tell you that I'm a paid spokesperson for this company, but I'm invested in it.
	And SPS parents are fancy Stanford, MIT professors, tax attorneys.
	If anybody can set this up regulatorily-wise to ensure that it's legit.
	It's his parents.
	Settings.
	HD.
	I'm in HD.
	The internet people came today.
	I'm looking at Rob A. It says, Viva, it's your internet connection.
	You are only loading in less than HD.
	Why would that be?
	Blurry on Rumble.
	Already double-checked that I'm 1080p.
	Hold on.
	and it will just do something.
	Thank you.
	People, I'm in HD.
	Here, I go standard.
	Look what happens here.
	That's standard, 480.
	Let's go low def.
	That makes absolutely no difference.
	Back to high def.
	People, am I sharper now?
	Is it...
	He's not all there with respect to Biden and Fetterman.
	Treasure Troller.
	I've never seen it.
	I don't think I've seen that avatar before.
	All right.
	It's good enough.
	How clear do you...
	Madoff, like Burnoff, like Bernie Madoff.
	Cameron, that's a good one.
	I'm not being swatted.
	The entire world economy is floating around.
	Okay, hold on.
	It's good enough.
	How clear do you need Viva to look?
	What are you in love with Viva?
	They should be.
	This really highlights one of the problems of being in a radical conflict of interest.
	And it segues into the next story.
	Clear now?
	Good.
	I think I know what the bloody problem is or was.
	Kevin, you can't...
	The people who are getting paid will never suffer as much as the people who are not getting paid.
	It's bottom line.
	Common sense.
	You can't ask people who have a vested interest.
	You can't ask people who are being paid by the organization to rate the organization.
	They can't.
	In as much as...
	They can't.
	And you're asking O 'Leary, who has been paid by this guy and might see dollar signs in the future again.
	Would you do it again?
	Well, he didn't lose his pension.
	But this is another problem.
	Here.
	Josh Zeps.
	This is going to blow your minds.
	Josh Zeps is a reporter.
	I think it's NBC or ABC.
	Let me just make sure I get it right.
	ABC broadcaster.
	This man, I discovered him.
	I think it was through...
	Was he on Joe Rogan?
	I saw him at one point.
	I was like, ugh.
	I'm interested.
	I don't know which angle this individual is coming from.
	ABC reporter.
	You'll see where I'm going with the conflict of interest here.
	You can have a healthy libertarian skepticism towards mandating a safe, effective vaccine.
	But believing the vaccine was unsafe and ineffective was not healthy skepticism.
	It was superstitious bullshit.
	Remember this sentence.
	Superstitious bullshit.
	Bullshit.
	And remember the time-tested and true principle of life, confession through projection.
	The wild success of the vaccines at reducing the national mortality proves it.
	You'll notice here it's ambiguous.
	National mortality at large or national mortality from COVID?
	Some might say reducing the national mortality from COVID.
	Is the natural evolution of the spread of a virus.
	It wreaks havoc among the most vulnerable at the beginning.
	The virus itself mutates to become less lethal.
	And those that were the most vulnerable and susceptible to death have already suffered the most severe consequences.
	So that mortality, national mortality, if it's from COVID, will naturally change directions.
	But this guy is saying it was...
	Superstitious bullshit to say it was unsafe and ineffective.
	Josh Sepps, remember this.
	And I posted a number of responses, one of which was, hey, yeah, I heard those myocarditis trials were a smashing success.
	Oh, wait, that's right.
	They haven't done them yet.
	Do you know what is...
	You can let them in.
	Do you know what is true superstitious bullshit?
	A so-called journalist claiming a vaccine is safe and effective before the manufacturers even conduct trials to determine if it causes myocarditis.
	But where's the conflict here?
	Oh, hey.
	You want to say hi to everybody?
	Get up here.
	Where's the conflict?
	We'll show you where the conflict is.
	It's not with Winston.
	Oh, God, he's eating my face.
	Say hello.
	And say goodbye.
	Where's the conflict?
	Let's see how far down the response is.
	Everybody remembers that wonderful three minutes brought to you by Pfizer?
	ABC News Nightline.
	Let's let it play a few more times.
	Brought to you by Pfizer.
	ABC News Nightline.
	Brought to you by Pfizer.
	ABC News Nightline.
	That's the same company for which Seps works.
	Sponsoring them.
	Imagine, let's just hypothetically say, and we're going to segue into my sponsorship.
	Imagine you work for a company that makes hundreds of thousands of dollars through one of its sponsors, We're called upon to report on that sponsor.
	It's been a wild success, this experiment.
	It's been a wild success.
	I'm a journalist.
	I have a blue checkmark.
	I'm objective.
	I do my research.
	I am commenting on our sponsor.
	If I were to come out and say, How did they tell us it was safe and effective before conducting the very trials on myocarditis that they're conducting?
	Now, how did they tell us it was safe and effective to one of our sponsors?
	What do you think that sponsor might say?
	They might say, what the F are you doing?
	You're undermining our product and we pay for airtime on your station?
	We pay your salary and you're coming out now and making people reluctant or skeptical about the very product that we sell, that we sponsor you for?
	Oh, yeah.
	Josh Zeps, who works for a company that is sponsored by the pharmaceutical company on which and about which he's tweeting, is telling you it's been a smashing success, wildly successful, and expects anybody to believe him.
	And the depths of the lies.
	I typically try not to intentionalize or impute intentions.
	The depths here, it doesn't end.
	I mean, people say I have to stop trying to engage because I'm engaging with the insincere.
	I'll assume that he's sincere for the sake of it or I'll assume that he's insincere.
	I am engaging, hopefully, just for the faintest of hopes of reaching other people.
	Listen to this.
	He said, you can have a healthy skepticism.
	We all went through that bullshit.
	Excess mortality throughout 2021 skyrocketed during the rollout of the vaccines.
	Correlation does not equal causation.
	If you mean mortality specifically from COVID, that can be argued.
	Here, listen to this.
	What does the disingenuous brought to you by Pfizer have to say about it?
	Yes, and it was due to dementia, diabetes, and other conditions that had been time shifted from 2020 due to lockdowns, and which even anti-vaxxers concede vaccines don't cause.
	First of all, I take offense to the term anti-vaxxers as a pejorative, as a derogatory term.
	Who knows what movies that's from?
	Who knows what movies that's from?
	I'm going to let someone try to guess it.
	You use the word.
	In a derogatory manner.
	I didn't.
	He's using anti-vaxxers in a derogatory manner.
	Judgmental, discrediting manner.
	There are some people who might disagree with that.
	There has been discussion as to whether or not the jibby jab penetrates the blood-brain barrier.
	There have been some discussions.
	About doctors seeing an increase of certain types of illnesses that some people think might be caused by a weakened immune system, and they hypothesize as to what that might be.
	Three-year mortality is down massively in Australia compared to the rest of the world.
	I can't comment on that.
	What I can comment on is another lie.
	Leading cause of death in Alberta is now unknown.
	By the way, unknown.
	Unknown.
	We've covered this, but...
	Ill-defined and unknown causes of death is now the leading cause of death in Alberta.
	In New Brunswick, they're having trouble accounting for massive excess deaths for a quarter in 2021.
	Above and beyond dementia.
	Dementia, this is like the first time from what I understood that dementia is not the leading cause of death.
	It's above COVID deaths.
	So this guy, in trying to...
	You know the old song, when you tell one lie, it leads to another.
	Oh, all-cause mortality is down.
	No, it's not.
	No, it's not.
	And the all-cause mortality of a certain age bracket is certainly not down according to insurance statistics.
	Here we go.
	This is it.
	In working age people.
	At the very least, Kevin O 'Leary had the transparency to disclose his conflict of interest.
	At the very least, Kevin O 'Leary disclosed it.
	Josh Zeps, journalist at ABC, bought to you by Pfizer.
	Sorry, I meant brought to you by Pfizer.
	Bought to you by Pfizer.
	Okay, I see.
	Josh works for the Australian Broadcast Company, not American Broadcast, wrong ABC.
	Oh, damn it.
	I'm going to have to go revise that.
	Let me double check that.
	Damn it, not American ABC, wrong ABC.
	All right, well, I'll have to go see if they're sponsored by Pfizer anyhow.
	Damn it, I checked that.
	Okay, I'll have to correct.
	I will have to correct myself if that is in fact the case.
	But now, speaking of sponsors, by the way, and by the way, hey, I wouldn't take a sponsor if I didn't like the sponsor.
	And I would not expect anyone to expect me to be critical of a sponsor because I would not be critical of a sponsor that I would have as a sponsor.
	But you may have noticed that, oh shoot, I know I did it.
	I know I did it.
	My sponsor, people.
	Brickhouse Nutrition, it is Field of Greens.
	Hold on.
	When you put in Field of Greens, Field of Greens, people, it's the healthy alternative.
	It's actually just healthy.
	Desiccated vegetables, powdered greens, not a supplement, not an extract.
	So you would have great difficulty ODing on it.
	It's an actual food.
	Desiccated, pulverized, dehydrated vegetables, power fruits and vegetables.
	It gets all the antioxidants, the nutrients that you want from vegetables.
	Most people don't fully appreciate.
	You're supposed to eat five to six servings of vegetables a day.
	I think most people do appreciate.
	Most people do not eat five to six servings of vegetables a day.
	I do, but I nonetheless enjoy, as an alternative to some bad habits, a glass of the powdered greens, field of greens.
	You get the antioxidants.
	You get the nutrients.
	You get a serving per spoonful.
	If you do it twice a day, that'll be two servings of vegetables and the nutrients that go there with.
	Dried.
	It is not a supplement.
	It is not an extract.
	It's a food.
	It is USDA organic certified.
	Made in America.
	I spent a half an hour on the phone with the doctor.
	I did a live Q&A with the doctor on the channel.
	Great product.
	It actually tastes good despite what it looks like.
	I always say it looks like...
	Swamp water.
	But swamp water is the most robust nutrient-filled waters, which is where all life comes from.
	It actually tastes good.
	And my goodness, it's healthy and far better than sucking down one of those toxic energy drinks, Cokes, Diet Cokes, whatever.
	Fieldofgreens.com, promo code VIVA.
	You'll get 15% off your first order and 10% off your subscription should you choose to subscribe.
	It's good.
	It's good, and it's a good, healthy habit to get into.
	I always say that humans are creatures of habit, and getting into good, healthy habits is the best thing to do.
	Now, the person who has made me...
	I have to go double-check this now.
	And then correct and apologize.
	Or not apologize, just correct.
	So that's it.
	Ultra Maga Swamp Juice.
	It tastes good.
	It doesn't look good, but it actually...
	Look, I'll tell you one thing.
	I've made smoothies and we've stuck vegetables into smoothies like spinach.
	It doesn't go down the same way.
	Dried seaweed.
	Dried seaweed is the best.
	I'll stop after this because it's actually just good.
	Field of Greens has kale, spinach, cherries, berries, all the good stuff.
	It's great.
	Okay.
	Eat real food.
	Yes.
	Raw.
	Fruits and vegetables are the best first thing to do.
	The next best thing is try to do that.
	And if you can't, get into healthy habits.
	Fieldofgreens.com.
	Brings you to Brickhouse Nutrition and it's good stuff.
	Okay.
	Let me see if Barnes is going to come.
	So we don't have a guest for the sidebar tonight.
	I'm going to see if Barnes is coming.
	Are you coming?
	Question mark smiley face.
	Even if he doesn't come, I've got a lot.
	We've got a lot more than you.
	But now that's driving me crazy about the ABC.
	America Broadcast Company.
	Australia Broadcast Company.
	Let me go.
	I will see if they're sponsored.
	And then I will correct my mistake.
	If it's in fact a bona fide mistake.
	Viva, there might be a desiccated bug in it.
	Who cares?
	I won't eat bugs because people force me to.
	I will eat bugs of my own volition as I have done in the past.
	Good sponsor, yes.
	Do we bring it over to Rumble?
	That's what I forgot to do.
	Of all the things I forgot to do, it's to put the link in the pinned comment.
	Here it is.
	Link to Rumble.
	Everyone, we're going to bring it over to Rumble now because we're going to talk about Mr. Poopypants.
	Oh my goodness.
	I only talked about that during the local stream earlier today.
	I want to make it trend.
	Poopypants Trudeau.
	It can be done.
	It can be done.
	We're going to go from Trudeau crapping his pants because he got scolded by President Xi publicly, humiliated to the point where he waddles off into the background, to Twitter wanting to get the world into a world war based on the fog of war information that people react upon and simply do not learn from their mistakes.
	All right, let's do it.
	So let's move on over to the Rumble side.
	Oh, yeah.
	Did I miss anything here?
	Let me see here.
	Dan has my James Topp interview raw unedited.
	That's my...
	Dan is my brother, Chet Chisholm.
	Okay, I'm going to ask him.
	Thank you.
	And then we got...
	He's not all there with respect to...
	You know what?
	Treasure Troll, now that you say it...
	Are we not noticing a pattern, actually?
	Aussie ABC is the authoritarian left in Australia, very similar to CBC.
	All right, is it state?
	Well, I'm going to have to just double-check this.
	If anybody knows, and this is not to say, not to weasel out of a correction, the fundamental point is journalists being sponsored by the pharmaceutical companies upon which they're reporting.
	If he's independent?
	In that regard, I will correct that aspect of accusation and revert back to the bottom line, lies, lies, and lies.
	You can't say something is safe and effective until you've done the studies to prove that it's safe and effective.
	Effectiveness, the definition has evolved.
	Evolved.
	I will say shifted in terms of goalposts.
	The safeness, they made a public...
	Positive affirmation.
	And they're now doing the tests to double-check that positive affirmation.
	We'll see.
	Government subsidized.
	Okay.
	That's even better.
	That's even better.
	Okay, it does matter.
	All right.
	Let's do it.
	And make sure I vote for Trump.
	I'm not sure that I'll be able to vote for Trump in 2024.
	I probably still will not be able to vote, Big Pete.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Brad Raymond.
	Let's get to it.
	Move on over to Rumble, people.
	I'm going to wind it up here in three, two, now.
	I think we're alone now.
	Let me just go make sure that everybody's trickling in to the Rumble universe.
	Okay.
	Looking good.
	Looking good.
	Yeah, I figured out what the problem is with the internet now.
	My goodness.
	I'm an idiot.
	I'll have to find a longer-lasting solution than just unplugging something.
	All right.
	Yeah.
	They changed the definition of vaccine.
	They changed the definition of 100% effective at preventing whatever they said it was going to prevent.
	Oh, we didn't say it was going to prevent transmission.
	We said it was going to prevent hospitalization.
	Safe and effective.
	Now let's just change the definition of safe.
	It's safer than skydiving without a parachute.
	Agreed.
	Okay, people.
	Let's see this here.
	I'm just going to make sure that we got in the chat.
	I've been here.
	SSB33, did you call IT?
	I called IT.
	They replaced the modem.
	I do not have an Ethernet, whatever it's called, like fiber optics from the modem to the computer, but I've got fiber optics into the house.
	Anyways, I think I know what the problem is.
	It doesn't matter.
	Hi, YouTubers from Game Owl.
	Okay.
	Guys, let's start with the stuff that will make us laugh and then we'll get into the stuff that might end the world.
	Look at this.
	That's not the right one.
	What's going on here?
	It says the tweet's unavailable.
	No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	So watch this.
	Oh, oh no.
	I think I know what's going on.
	I hope Global News didn't.
	Okay.
	Everything we're discussed has been leaked to the paper, that's not appropriate.
	And that's not how the conversation was going to happen.
	If I have a passion, we can continue to come and continue.
	If there is a sincerity from your part, we will continue to work constructively together, but there will be things we will disagree on, Some can be changed.
	The economic conditions.
	Let's create the conditions first.
	Watch it now.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Okay, so there's a lot to unpack here.
	There's a lot to unpack in this.
	Let's start again.
	Let's start again.
	This is President Xi talking to Justin Trudeau.
	Now, the one thing is to look at President Xi or Xi's demeanor.
	It looks like absolute and utter disdain.
	He can't even stand to look at Justin Trudeau in the face.
	It almost looks like Justin Trudeau has bad breath, which is why she's turning his head to the side.
	The explanation to that might be he's focusing on the translator and not really paying attention to Justin.
	That's up for people to decide.
	Look at this.
	Can you imagine being told by another foreign leader that what you did is not appropriate Like, scolded like a child.
	Scolded like a little child.
	It's not appropriate.
	And look at Xi's face right now.
	Absolute lack of respect.
	Like, you're an idiot.
	What the hell are you doing?
	Who are you treating me like?
	A trucker?
	And then listen to the vapid...
	Virtue-singling, verbal diarrhea platitude that Trudeau says.
	In Canada, we believe...
	Tell me what we believe about in Canada, Trudy.
	Canada.
	I think.
	I'm happy.
	If there is a...
	Also, I think it's possible.
	In Canada, we believe in free and open and frank dialogue.
	From a prime minister who didn't take 30 seconds to come down and talk with protesters, picketing on his front lawn for three and a half weeks.
	And by the way, what would free and open and frank dialogue have to do with leaking the contents of a conversation among leaders to your government-subsidized propaganda arm of the government, the media?
	What would it have to do with that?
	And look at she's face right now.
	You think he's convinced?
	Look at that.
	Now, it's true.
	He might be looking at his interpreter for the interpretation, or for the translation.
	Watch, watch.
	There'll be things we disagree on, like leaking our private conversations, and apparently, according to Xi, inaccurately so to the media.
	Yeah, we might disagree on that, Trudy.
	Look at those hands right there.
	You idiot.
	Listen to what I'm saying and shut up.
	Let's create the conditions first.
	Now, Justin Trudeau waddling off.
	I've made the joke.
	It looks like he's actually crapped his pants.
	I think he's wobbling to avoid bumping into a woman.
	Right here.
	Right here.
	He's like, oh, I don't want to knock her.
	Okay.
	And now, now I'm going to recoil to my bedroom and sob into my pillow.
	I want to go and see what people think about this.
	Xi is trying not to slap him.
	Some people were astutely observing that this might have been a power play by Xi.
	He knew the cameras were there.
	Come in, publicly humiliate Justin Trudeau.
	Berate him knowing it's on camera.
	You're going to get your sound bite of...
	Dictator Xi, going back to communist China, saying, this is how you grab...
	Oh, God.
	I have a joke.
	I can't make it.
	It's not my joke.
	This is how you put someone in their place.
	Xi goes back, has got the video that he needs to establish his dominance in China by having berated and humiliated the leader of a foreign country.
	It's a fair observation.
	But there's even something that's more interesting that I almost forgot to point out.
	And look at this.
	Let's bring it back up.
	Nope.
	Still there.
	I want to bring it back up.
	Okay.
	Now I just need to go get...
	Where is it?
	Here.
	Do you notice, by the way...
	Do you notice just in the backdrop over she's shoulder?
	Right there.
	Right there.
	A man wearing a mask.
	Okay.
	And notices interpreter.
	And by the way, just also notice, what you leak to the paper, it's not appropriate.
	Trudeau doesn't even bother denying it.
	Sorry.
	Sorry, sir.
	I won't do it again, sir.
	But mask in the back.
	Translator wearing a mask.
	The masks.
	There you go.
	Look in the back.
	Nobody else is wearing a mask.
	None of the people in the back.
	None of the dignitaries.
	The mask, you know, at the beginning, and I'll tell you this, I learn slowly sometimes, and sometimes I don't learn at all.
	From the beginning, a lot of people were saying the mask is a symbol of compliance submission.
	Now that I see these politicians going to classrooms and it's the children wearing masks and not the politicians, G20 Summit.
	It's the servers.
	It's the underlings.
	It's the...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	I won't say slaves.
	Someone said it here.
	Cheap shot.
	Masks are for slaves.
	The underlings.
	The servants.
	You wear the masks while us dignitaries go maskless.
	Science.
	Science.
	Who was recording this?
	I don't know that we know that right now.
	The video had global news as the watermark, but that doesn't mean very much.
	I don't know who was recording it.
	All that I know is it's humiliating.
	It's degrading.
	It's exactly what poopy pants Trudeau deserves.
	And it illustrates everything that is wrong with Trudeau, but also just that subtle thing.
	Translators wearing a mask, the guy over his shoulder is wearing a mask, but the dignitaries, they don't wear masks.
	But speaking, by the way, of someone just...
	Trying to get us into World War III.
	We'll get to the news, actually, just the latest updates and try to make sense of what the hell happened yesterday.
	I'll be happy for once.
	I was somewhat ahead of the curve on this.
	By the way, I told this story during the locals live earlier today.
	I've been spreading myself somewhat thin now that my wife has been out of town for a week.
	She comes back tomorrow.
	And so between the parenting stuff and the actual live streaming and the actual just making sure I'm up to speed with everything, I've double-booked myself multiple times now, inadvertently.
	And yesterday, I did an interview on RT, Russia Television, talking about the latest from the convoy in Canada, from the commission in Canada.
	Which part do I do first?
	Totally forgot about it, and I was out of the house and had to find as quiet a spot as I could in public to do this.
	We were in a park, and luckily I found a restroom facility, but not in the restroom.
	It was a big one.
	It sort of looked like one of those campground-type ones.
	And holy cow, the lighting might have been just good enough.
	It looked like I was in a...
	Facilities at a campground.
	And it was...
	Done is better than perfect, but my goodness, it would serve me good to have a memory.
	But I did an interview.
	It actually went very smoothly.
	Technically, substantively, it was quite on point.
	People like to badmouth, berate anybody who goes on RT.
	It's Russia television.
	It's Russia state-funded propaganda.
	First of all, I'm not going to be intimidated or browbeated into avoiding certain outlets.
	For reasons that others find relevant.
	And I've seen RT be more critical of Putin than I've seen CNN be critical of Biden.
	And if the idea is state-funded and therefore fundamentally discredited, well, that's one philosophy about it.
	But you can go on any state-funded apparatus and get a point out Ironically enough, other state-funded media apparatus I would not invite you on to discuss because they're state-funded apparatuses of the government.
	CBC, for example.
	Oh, I'd go on CBC, state-funded CBC, Trudeau government propaganda CBC.
	I'd go on and tell them exactly what's going on in the commission, let their viewers know what's actually going on in the commission, what actually went on at the protest, the legalities of it, the humiliating...
	Evidence that's being disclosed during this commission.
	I would go on CBC for an hour-long, unedited live and talk about it.
	They won't invite me on because they are such state-funded propaganda tools of the government that they wouldn't even invite me on in the first place.
	But RT, I'm supposed to not let the world know what's going on in Canada and be silenced on two fronts.
	I went on RT.
	Talked about everything that has been going on during the commission that's been revealed.
	No real news has been revealed to those who were paying attention at the time.
	But the commission has revealed incompetence, infighting, juvenile bickering, egos, clashes of egos.
	But most importantly, it has revealed that when the Emergencies Act was invoked...
	The Ambassador Bridge blockade was already over, having been resolved through court order, i.e.
	existing remedies under the law.
	When the Emergencies Act was invoked, five days earlier, Justin Trudeau admitted to Ford in conversations among them that have been now transcribed and submitted as evidence.
	Trudeau said, at the provincial level, you have everything you need to deal with this crisis.
	We now pretty much know definitively that the EA was invoked.
	As a provocative act by the government to try to provoke the very violent response that they wanted so badly from the protesters, CSIS, Canadian Security Intelligence Service, something along those lines, had an internal memo where they acknowledged that by invoking the Emergencies Act, they were going to further exacerbate anti-government sentiment.
	They might trigger a violent response.
	They knew it.
	Oh, hold on, Barnes.
	I'm live now whenever you can get in, period.
	They knew it was going to happen.
	And they did it anyhow.
	And they did it.
	Ostensibly, seemingly deliberately to provoke the very violent reaction that they weren't yet getting.
	Oh, so I went on.
	RT, to share with the world, anybody who's listening, what this commission has been revealing.
	And it's been damning like it's nobody's business damning.
	But most of us already knew, maybe not the full extent to which it was unjustified, abusive, provocative.
	Now we do.
	Now, hold on one second.
	I saw Tales22 says, fast forward five years, Viva moves from St. Petersburg, Florida to St. Petersburg, Russia.
	No!
	No!
	Because I don't trust the Russian government any more than I trust other guys.
	I'm not moving to Russia.
	There's that.
	So in as much as I'd go on RT, I went on RT.
	I've been on them a few times now.
	I make comments about, you know, like, governments are fundamentally corrupt.
	I don't trust the Putin government any more than I trust the Biden government or the Trudeau government.
	I mean, the whole sick irony.
	The West laments the authoritarian Putin government for locking up Brittany Griner for nine years or seven, yeah, nine years.
	While they lock up people for seven years after having detained them in pretrial detention for two years.
	After trials, which are arguably less sham trials than Brittany Griner's trial in Russia.
	Arguably less show trials than Otto Warmbier in North Korea.
	So, yeah, I'm not traveling to Russia anytime soon.
	But if I do travel to Russia, I'm sure as hell not bringing in drugs.
	I'm sure as hell making sure I know the law and abiding by the law.
	The only problem is that, you know, we live in a realm now where you don't even have to have committed the crime in order to be accused of, pursued for, and convicted of having committed a crime.
	Putin loves me, Viva?
	I doubt Putin loves me.
	Putin would not love me any more than Trudeau would love me.
	Authoritarians, or people who want to retain power, would never love truth-tellers in the first place, because truth-tellers tell the truth, and the truth might not be always what they want to hear.
	I wouldn't even believe that Pierre Poilievre would love me, because if Poilievre...
	That's the conservative leader.
	If Poiliev messes around and doesn't follow through on promises or whatever, I'll call him out on it.
	I'm not partisan in that sense, but it does matter.
	So, I was on RT, talked about what was the latest in the commission, and by the way, it's more of the same.
	We'll see if Trudeau gets back to Canada in time to testify.
	He's supposed to testify.
	Next week, it's supposed to be the parliamentarians testifying.
	We'll see.
	Was there anything more with this?
	Oh, yes, that's right.
	World War III.
	So, we all saw the news yesterday, and this is going to be one of those times where I'm like, I'm not, it's not a healthy dose of libertarian skepticism.
	Right now, I'm just skeptical, but not to the point where I'm searching for conspiracy theories.
	Right now, it's at the point, and I'll credit this to my experience with Robert Barnes.
	I don't believe the first variations of the story.
	Appeal to the first variations of the story.
	It's going to be for reasons of skepticism or reasons of fleshing out the hypocrisy.
	Yesterday, the biggest news of the day was...
	Well, actually, the first biggest news of the day was Zelensky puts forward a 10-point peace plan at the G20 summit.
	It's the first time Zelensky, in the context of this conflict, has put forward any peace plan.
	Some people believe, in their minds rightly so, that Zelensky did not initiate this conflict, so therefore he has no obligation, no moral, legal, political obligation to put forward a peace plan.
	He's the victim of aggression.
	He has no reason to put forward a peace plan.
	Other people, who I dare say might understand the conflict a little better, might say this conflict didn't start in 2022.
	This conflict has been brewing at the very least since 2014 and probably historically a lot earlier.
	Some people would say that Zelensky ran on a platform of and was elected on the basis of negotiating something of a peace for the disputed territories to the east.
	For whatever the reason, apparently reneged on that political promise.
	And as such, you know, whether or not the act of aggression in 2022 came from Russia.
	Some argue that the act of aggression came from Zelensky and not negotiating a peace there in pursuing NATO membership and in pursuing NATO interests, in pursuing chemical research facilities, according to Newland, that are not biowarfare plants, but research facilities that don't exist but do exist, that might not be funded by the states, that are funded by the states.
	Some might consider that an act of provocation.
	This is not to say both sides are equally bad or equally good.
	Some people have a...
	A more in-depth understanding of the conflict.
	But the big story of the day was the week after the FTX collapse, I'm not connecting the dots, but those two dots you cannot ignore.
	Two massively cataclysmic events that occur within a week.
	FTX goes belly up or files for Chapter 11, loses 18, 17 billion dollars of net worth after having funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to Democrat entities.
	And apparently, potentially, I don't yet understand this nuance of it to Ukraine.
	Back to the Democrats.
	Ukraine comes into the picture at some point in the order of hundreds of millions of dollars.
	I don't understand the nuanced details yet, but when Barnes gets here, maybe we're going to flesh that out a little more.
	FTX goes belly up the day after the midterms.
	Everyone's made off with their money like bandits, literally.
	Hundreds of millions also hacked out of the accounts.
	Less than a week later, for the first time since this conflict arose in 2022, Zelensky comes together, puts together a 10-point peace plan.
	Hold on, I had the window.
	That was, at the start of the day, that was the big news.
	Then at the end of the day, the big news was...
	Russia bombed Poland, NATO member, killing two civilians in Poland, which would be a violation of international law and an act of aggression that could likely trigger not a nuclear war necessarily, a world war.
	And this is not like hyperbolic, we're on the verge of World War III anymore.
	This is now hitherto, not hitherto, up until now, the conflict was between Ukraine, Not a member of NATO and Russia.
	And everybody was saying, you know, they're trying to draw NATO members into this so they can make it into a world war where NATO members have a legal obligation to intervene.
	Some people are saying that, you know, it's a proxy war because the West is financing a war against Russia through Ukraine.
	Poland is assisting in a war through Ukraine, not directly.
	So it's not...
	It's not a world war.
	It's just a proxy world war.
	The day starts off with Zelensky for the first time ever submitting a 10-point peace plan and then ends up with, allegedly, early rumors were Russia bomb, although they were crafty in the way everyone described it, a Russian missile landing in Poland, killing two, which could easily and quickly provoke a world war.
	And if it were for the buffoons on Twitter, All clamoring for world war, in a part of the world where they don't live, fought with soldiers who are not their brothers, sisters, or children, or parents, clamoring for world war.
	Unacceptable.
	Violation of...
	Oh, Section 5, Article 5 of the UN Treaty.
	Clamoring for it.
	And I'm sitting there thinking, like in the situation with Assad allegedly using chemical weapons, at a time when, you know...
	He could do whatever damage he wanted with conventional weapons and not trigger international involvement.
	What would be the purpose?
	Zelensky lays out a peace plan.
	And that evening, Russia bombs Poland?
	I mean, I couldn't put anything together.
	It made no sense.
	And it turns out that it made no sense because it's not exactly what happened.
	But for cooler heads prevailing, I guess, it wasn't.
	Russians act by all accounts.
	Joe Biden himself had to begrudgingly acknowledge it wasn't Russian.
	It was likely Ukraine itself.
	And there's more to this.
	It was likely Ukraine itself.
	And then when this news comes out, after people had already taken the position, this is Russia, we've got it.
	This is now our cue to go into World War III.
	Well, they have to back it up.
	Backtrack it a little bit.
	And it's an amazing thing.
	You see the mental gymnastics in real time.
	You see the motivated reasoning in real time.
	When an ally does it, it's an accident.
	When an enemy does it, it's deliberate.
	When an enemy does it, it's deliberate malice.
	And this is Disclosed TV.
	They've made some...
	Bad statements before, like inaccurate statements, but everyone acknowledges it now.
	And we're going to see something in a second.
	Poland's president says it's very likely missile blast was from the Ukrainian air defense, calling it an unfortunate accident.
	It's a thing to have a memory.
	It's an unfortunate accident.
	And they know that because it's them by proxy who did this.
	It's their ally.
	They know that their allies are true benevolent, would never accidentally kill or target innocent civilians.
	I mean, when Obama drone bombed the wedding in Yemen, it was an accident.
	Whereas if anyone else did it, it would have been a war crime.
	And it was arguably, but not arguably, a war crime when Obama did it.
	But people have already come to the conclusions.
	They say, oh, Russia did it.
	It's a war crime.
	Oh, shit.
	Russia didn't do it?
	It's an unfortunate accident.
	But I have a memory.
	I have a memory.
	And it's a blessing and a curse.
	This is how Trudeau framed it today.
	This is from today.
	1.09pm.
	Following yesterday's explosion in eastern Poland.
	I called President Andrzej Duda earlier today.
	I offered my condolences to the Polish people and reiterated Canada's support for a full investigation.
	We agreed to keep supporting Ukrainians, even when they accidentally killed Polish civilians?
	But that's the second part.
	We agreed.
	It's a foregone conclusion.
	We're obviously going to continue supporting our allies, even when they accidentally kill civilians.
	An explosion?
	I mean, can you imagine the intellectual dishonesty?
	You can call it an accidental strike.
	You can call it an accidental bombing.
	But an explosion?
	Like, it just happened.
	Something just exploded.
	And the thing is, I remember right away, it was not the first time Trudeau had done such a political mental gymnastics maneuver.
	To avoid putting responsibility where it belongs for political reasons.
	Back in the...
	This was in the early days of the pandemic.
	That's the same one.
	Hold on.
	Oh, no, this is another point that I was trying to make.
	Sorry.
	This is when Putin...
	I won't put it in a quote.
	When Putin kills civilians, everybody knows it's deliberate targeting.
	It's not war.
	And it's not like when the Allies firebomb Dresden.
	To deliberately start firestorms to kill as many civilians as possible.
	It's not like that.
	When Putin, in an act of war, kills civilians, it's a war crime.
	I joined other G7 leaders today to address Russia's missile strikes on Ukraine.
	We condemn these acts in the strongest possible terms.
	Indiscriminate attacks on innocent civilian populations constitute a war crime.
	And we will hold Putin responsible.
	And we will hold Putin and those responsible to account.
	War crime.
	Just, where's the difference?
	Other than the fact that you start off on the premise that you will forgive any act of violence.
	Remember when there were these terrible videos circulating of people doing terrible things in war and, you know, torturing prisoners, shooting prisoners, and then the internet justification is, well, I would do the same thing to someone who invaded my country.
	Whereas, on the other side, war crime on the one hand, Tolerated and, dare say, even encouraged on the other.
	Putin kills innocent civilians in the context of war.
	It's a war crime.
	Ukrainians, by all accounts, you could substitute the words.
	It's an explosion.
	It just happened.
	It just happened.
	And again, it's not to...
	It is not at all to condone one while condemning the other.
	I'll condemn both.
	This is war.
	And it's a war that people have been going out of their way to promote and to continue.
	And to say there is no reason.
	Nobody should negotiate.
	You're dealing with Hitler.
	When Russian soldiers are kneecapped, you get what you deserve.
	Russian, when Russia, you know, a missile goes off target, kills civilians.
	War crimes.
	When Ukraine missiles go off target and kill NATO member civilians in a foreign country that's not engaged in the conflict, it's an explosion.
	It's an accident.
	Listen to this, though.
	And to still try to blame it.
	To still try to blame it on Russia.
	Listen to this.
	Let me be clear.
	This is not Ukraine's fault.
	Russia bears ultimate responsibility as it continues its illegal war against Ukraine.
	Let me be clear.
	This is...
	Now, again, always potentially other...
	Let me be clear.
	Anything goes.
	Following that rationale, it incentivizes, or at least it incentivizes through not disincentivizing.
	Accidents happen, it's Russia's fault.
	Accidents happen for Russia, Russia's fault.
	War crime when it happens to Russia, when it happens via the hands of the Ukraine military, war crime for Russia.
	And that incentivizes Some very, very bad thoughts and some potential very bad actions.
	There was one more, though.
	There was one more about Trudeau.
	When calling it an explosion, and I recall back when it was in the early days of the pandemic, and Iran had just shot down A civilian plane that was carrying a lot of...
	Jeez, Luis, I know that I found the old tweet from Justin Trudeau.
	Here we go.
	What was the date?
	No, this was right before.
	Was this right before?
	This was right before...
	My goodness.
	How the timeline of life has gotten totally fudged.
	There was the Iranian...
	It was a regional conflict.
	It was pre-COVID.
	Iranians shot down a civilian airliner.
	And it was known at the time.
	But there was political pressure as to why Trudeau couldn't call it that.
	Canada and Ukraine are grieving together.
	Earlier today, I spoke with President Zelensky about the tragic...
	Plane crash in Iran and the need for a thorough investigation.
	Plane crash.
	They knew at the time he made this statement that it was shot down.
	And I have remembered this.
	I said, it wasn't a plane crash.
	By all accounts, the passenger plane, there's a typo even back then.
	The passenger plane was shot out of the sky by missiles.
	There is another more accurate word for that kind of incident.
	We have...
	Spineless leaders who are morally and ethically corrupt and will tolerate through passive descriptions and through allowing it to happen.
	They'll allow it to happen.
	They'll condemn it in the weakest possible terms and then adopt an entirely different moral political standard when it's politically expedient.
	Hold on a second.
	Let me see.
	It's the curse of remembering these things.
	I remember it, and it's shameful and disgusting.
	Okay, hold on a second.
	We've got rumba rants here.
	Fleet Lord Avatar.
	Contact Carrie Lake via SM or website.
	Sue in court.
	100,000 sample ballot signature verification.
	If percent greater than a percentage, ask judge for new elections.
	That's Fleet Lord Avatar.
	Contact Joe Kent.
	Via SM or website.
	Sue in court.
	So...
	Oh, God.
	Maybe we'll have to have Harmeet Dillon back on.
	Or Ron Coleman.
	I can have either or or both to get them back on.
	Yeah, where's Barnes?
	Hold on a second.
	You coming?
	The crowd is getting antsy, smiley face.
	They'll be here in a second.
	Barnes is coming.
	It's my fault, actually, because I thought...
	I started at 6 o 'clock and typically the sidebars start at 7. Yeah, Barnes is coming, people.
	Chill out.
	It was totally my fault because I actually took for granted that he knew that I was starting at 6. But the sidebars typically start at 7. Mea culpa.
	So that's the latest on...
	You know what?
	Until Barnes gets here, let's...
	Let's look at another highlight of the day.
	This will distract us a bit for the time being from the imminence.
	And if people had their way, you know, if people had their way and they acted on their reflexes without doing what they should have learned to do through time and time again of having made mistakes from early reports, take a step back, take a breath and wait for the information before jumping to the most cataclysmic of responses.
	People don't learn.
	And maybe that's the lesson of life.
	Those who study history are bound to repeat it.
	Those who don't know history are bound to repeat it.
	And those who do are bound to watch others repeat it.
	Listen to this before we can get into truly understanding the disgusting game of politics.
	Now more than ever, we're short of workers.
	We have a population that is not reproducing it on its own with the same level that it used to.
	The only way we're going to have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the dreamers and all of them.
	Because our ultimate goal is to help the dreamers, but get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here.
	now more than ever.
	We're short of workers.
	We have a population that is not reproducing it on its own with the same level that it used to.
	We have a population.
	The only way we're going to have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the dreamers, and all of them, because our ultimate goal is to help the dreamers, but get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here.
	Thank you.
	Does everyone appreciate exactly what we just heard?
	We're not reproducing as we once did.
	We have a population problem.
	I'm not sure about not having workers problem.
	I don't think that's an issue.
	The population is not growing as it should.
	While they promote and want to facilitate abortion in as much as possible, how does one reconcile those two problems and solution?
	On the one hand, there's a problem.
	The solution to that problem is...
	Abortion on demand without apology.
	On the other side, our population's not growing fast enough, so what should we do?
	Let's reward illegal immigration, grant citizenship, what do we want to call it?
	Amnesty, to a large portion of, they call them undocumented, illegal aliens, the legal term, so that we can...
	Also, you know, just potentially exploit them for cheap labor because what else can they do?
	I mean, they're here.
	It's better than being turned back and sent back to the country.
	Let's use them for cheap labor on the pretext, however, that the population is not growing because the policies that we're implementing are causing the population not to grow.
	It's an amazing thing.
	You get the vote of those who support abortion.
	And you'll get the vote of anybody you give citizenship to through Amnesty.
	Guaranteed.
	It's the surefirest way to stay in power.
	Not indefinitely, because it won't work indefinitely.
	And there are some people out there who have certain theories about replacement theory.
	And I'm not espousing it.
	I'm not getting into it.
	One can easily understand how viewing the world...
	Not through this lens, but according to this policy, let's promote abortion among citizens, lament the fact that we don't have population growth, to encourage the idea of promoting, ratifying, giving amnesty to illegal immigrants who are here.
	The replacement theory has an ethnic-religious aspect to it, but this might just be a way of saying a different form of replacement theory, a political replacement theory.
	Replace the current population with one that will continue to vote us into power and keep us in power.
	It's enough to make the optimist cynical.
	And the way he says it, hold on, the way he points to his belly.
	Now more than ever, we're short of workers.
	We have a population that is not reproducing it on its own with the same level that it used to.
	The only way we're going to have a...
	Gee, I wonder why, Chuck.
	I wonder why.
	It's a mystery.
	It's a mystery.
	You know what?
	Hold on one second.
	I know Barnes is coming.
	Okay, hold on.
	I'm texting him.
	If we all start chanting Barnes, Barnes, Barnes, he'll get here.
	I got questions for Barnes.
	Okay, hold on.
	Let's just see.
	I'll go to the chat and just...
	Uh-oh.
	They found me, Marty.
	Another interesting theory is, I think it was Jen Psaki who said that they didn't have the vaccine requirements for immigrants, for migrants, for undocumented migrants.
	Oh, man.
	Okay, let me see if I texted him.
	It's not his fault.
	It is still my fault.
	While Barnes comes, hopefully, this is going to be like not Jablinski Gaming again.
	I'm sweating, people.
	Let me go up here.
	I had more on the diary.
	FTX was a money laundering scheme.
	I got questions about that.
	Okay, hold up.
	Hold up.
	Here we go.
	Okay, so we had the explosion in Ukraine.
	This is funny, by the way, people.
	Lord Buckley.
	Okay.
	I wanted to talk about the Trump announcement as well.
	That was one of the subjects.
	Barnes is coming.
	I hope he's coming.
	Come.
	The crowd is chanting your name!
	I did not watch Trump's speech last night.
	It's not the earth-shattering news that I was not expecting.
	But everybody has an opinion on it now, and some people think he shouldn't do it.
	Other people think he should do it.
	Some people are framing DeSantis now, having talked about...
	Media coming after him as though he was talking about Trump.
	Either way, just a funny exchange on the interwebs.
	The prevailing theory right now as to why it was a red trickle and not a red tsunami, why Democrats outperformed or why Republicans underperformed, there's a lot of theories.
	I am not as in the weeds in Arizona, Nevada, as other people are.
	There are anomalies that occurred on election day in Arizona that could have, in theory, impacted the outcome.
	Problems with machines that we knew about, documented 20% of the voting stations having problems.
	But the running consensus of the mainstream media now is that the red trickle that was supposed to have been a red tsunami is because people...
	It was a rebuke of Donald Trump.
	That's the theory.
	Nobody wants election deniers.
	Carrie Lake...
	You know, a strong Trump supporter, an election denier, as they're being called now, as if people are not allowed, demanding the utmost of scrutiny and transparency for elections.
	Will Hurd, voters dumped Trump in 2020, and they overwhelmingly dumped him again last week.
	There's two statements, at least one statement a lot of people might disagree with.
	We don't need any more evidence that he's a sunken ship, and entertaining his candidacy should be an easy pass for the GOP.
	America needs us, us to do better.
	Us children.
	Mark Robert, Lord Bucky, Lord Buckley, who you may know from Eric Conley's America's Untold Stories, he says, hey, it's the CIA guy telling us how to vote, everybody.
	Thanks, CIA guy.
	I was like, Buckley's not often wrong.
	So I just have to go see this.
	William Hurd, former member of Congress, former undercover CIA, native of San Antonio, grad.
	It is literally like America needs us to do better.
	He's one of us.
	From a former CIA who we now probably know did not like Trump very much.
	Framing the past, framing the present, and trying to shape people's actions for the future.
	And it was funny.
	Now hold on, I'm going to go back to the...
	Rumble rants.
	Rumble chat for a second.
	They can never let Republicans win again has been said.
	That is Natalie Clendon.
	Let's see what we got here.
	Carrie Lake won.
	Seriously, ABC.
	ABC.
	DeSantis is one of them.
	I've said it all along.
	Good cop, bad cop still works from Bixa.
	Robert, where are you from meme 2021?
	I hope Robert's coming.
	Let me just...
	I know he's getting my text messages.
	I am now the annoying girlfriend.
	Robert.
	So, it's phenomenal.
	Lord Buckley has gotten good on the Twitterverse.
	Hold on.
	Where's my Twitter thing here?
	Is that it?
	No.
	Close this down.
	We need Barnes to get it because I had my own questions I wanted to ask about.
	Trump and Russia and the Ukraine, but we might have to wait for that.
	Okay, so hold on one second.
	Let me just make sure.
	Let me go back to my diary of thoughts.
	Timeline of a world gone mad.
	Blaming Russia for the Ukraine.
	Okay, let's see what we got here.
	There's another good parody account that people have to look at.
	Jagmeet Singh's hypocrisy.
	Parody.
	That's how you do it, people.
	It's in the title so that nobody can get confused.
	I saw this and I thought the picture had to be...
	This is Jagmeet Singh, the leader of the NDP, the new Democratic Party.
	The new Democrat Party.
	I recently received my fifth booster to save the kids.
	So I suspected this was not true.
	But then I thought maybe that the image itself had to have been doctored as well.
	I have been told that the image is current and the image is unaltered.
	Jagmeet Singh is getting, I don't know, whatever shot he's on.
	It doesn't matter.
	And he's wearing a shirt called Jabba Palooza.
	And all that I want to know is whether or not they have...
	ready at this Jabba Palooza.
	Thank you.
	Now, the only problem is I have to also be out of here at 7.30 because I got to go back to the parenting thing.
	I'm going to have to correct myself on the ABC, I think.
	But you know what?
	This reminds me of one of the points.
	We're not going to play the whole video.
	This is, talked about this during the locals live stream today.
	It's one thing to make a mistake, and a mistake that costs people their lives.
	It's another thing to, and I suspect I take for granted that Ukrainian military probably knew what happened before most other people did.
	To try to turn the mistake, to exploit one's own mistake, to blame it on one's enemy, To try and provoke the rest of the world to intervene in global conflict is to make a sin out of a mistake.
	Some people might remember a while back, during one of the intifadas in Israel, there was a family that was murdered in the occupied territories.
	The picture circulated.
	It was the most horrific thing ever.
	I think the Israeli military was taking flack for releasing the images because They don't typically release those types of images or didn't at the time.
	People were saying it's not proper to share these images.
	But they did to show the absolute horror of the incident.
	A few years later, the very same images were being circulated.
	And this time they were being circulated to depict, allegedly, what the Israeli military had done to innocent Palestinians.
	And I remember thinking at the time, there can be no greater offense to human dignity than to...
	Invoke your own acts and claim that you're the victim of those acts caused by your adversary.
	I have to presume authorities knew that it wasn't a Russian missile that did this.
	And I presume that the Ukrainians probably knew.
	And then Zelensky to come out and exploit of it as the incident to provoke a world war, to get people to jump into his defense.
	All's fair in love and war, but not always in love and war.
	Fraser McBurney says, we will count the ballots after the polls close, after we stuff the number three box six days later.
	It's...
	Well, I'm not sure that I'm getting anybody for tonight, but I will apologize if Barnes...
	And it's not his fault, it's my fault, so I don't want anyone getting mad at Robert.
	Oh, so that's what's going on in the world.
	And we'll see if Robert can get in here before I have to actually wind up and get back to the parenting.
	Gosh, thank goodness I have my diary.
	We had talked about the driving force behind Fetterman.
	I said, like, after the Fetterman-Oz debate, where Fetterman still went on to beat Oz in Pennsylvania by a healthy margin.
	And after the debate, we were saying, The man needs to heal.
	The man needs to be protected, not exploited for political purposes.
	And a number of people were saying, this is not Fetterman's doing, this is something else.
	I've seen a bunch of the videos.
	I didn't know who this person was when Fetterman was not taking questions.
	Now I know who this person is.
	I see this picture.
	I literally thought this was satire.
	First day.
	John Fetterman.
	And I swear to you, I thought this was satire.
	Look at this.
	Giselle Barreto Fetterman.
	I presume that's Fetterman's spouse.
	This picture, which is supposed to be commemorating, celebrating Fetterman's first day in the office, is clearly featuring someone other than John Fetterman.
	Clearly.
	In fact, John Fetterman...
	Looks like a second thought afterthought to this picture.
	And it immediately became clear exactly what the heck was going on.
	The best part is, though, you go to Giselle Barreto Fetterman.
	Second lady of Pennsylvania.
	Slop.
	That's probably the worst acronym I can imagine.
	There's so many jokes about, like, SLP.
	Just go with SLP.
	The of typically does not make its way into the acronym in any event.
	Just an SLP.
	Slop.
	I mean, and I'm just thinking, like, what other states are out there where this would be even worse?
	And I can think of a few states where this would be even worse.
	But this seems to actually clarify what the heck is going on with Fetterman.
	Yeah, so this was one of the jokes, fixed it, because there was literally another picture that I stumbled across of her with Fetterman, you know, we're out there, and Fetterman's head is actually cut off.
	Okay, it's quite funny.
	So it might make a little more sense as to what's happening.
	I don't know what the exact laws are, like if Fetterman backs out or bows out or whatever, does...
	Does she become the de facto replacement?
	Or is this just making her way into the political venue?
	But it's quite clear now, at least in my mind, what was ultimately going on here.
	In terms of Fetterman, a man who suffered a stroke and made a severe stroke, had to have a blood clot pulled out of his neck, according to Dr. Sanjay Gupta, being pressured to stay in the political race.
	Let's see this.
	We might end with Alex Stein 99. A little bit of it.
	I'm going to take it out next.
	I don't want to play it.
	If Robert...
	I don't want to get him in trouble.
	He might not be making it, people.
	Let's see what's going on in the chat.
	Why would his wife be the replacement?
	I don't know what the mechanism is.
	Whether it would be a political or just...
	Starting that career.
	She looks, okay, no, no, no, no.
	Okay, let's see what we got here.
	Viva, that is Fetterman's first day in office as Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania.
	Fat slice.
	I don't know what's going on in that picture.
	Anyway, I don't know.
	Thank you.
	Did I see Schwab's speech at G20?
	No, I didn't.
	Should we go try to find that right now?
	Hold on.
	How long is it?
	Let's do this right now.
	Hold on.
	If I hear Kiki walk in the background...
	Okay, let's see this.
	I don't know if this is...
	Okay, I don't know who's...
	Let's just get...
	Klaus Schwab, full speech.
	Do we play the whole thing?
	Do we play the whole thing?
	Do we want to...
	Hold on.
	By way of yes or no in the chat, do we watch this entire thing right now?
	Okay, let's...
	Y or N, Y, let's watch it.
	N, let's not watch it.
	So far, I only see two no's, three no's.
	There's a 30-second clip going around.
	Okay, well, let's see if we can get that.
	I don't want to watch a 12-minute clip either.
	Um, da-da-da-da-da.
	All right, I think this is going to be the good one.
	Here we go.
	And then we'll end it.
	Sorry, people.
	I think Barnes is not going to come, and I have to get back to the parenting side of life.
	Here, let's see this here.
	Of course.
	If you look at all the challenges, we can speak about the multi-crisis.
	Economic, political, social, and ecological.
	An institutional crisis.
	But actually, what we have to confront is a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of our world.
	And this will take some time.
	And the world will look differently after we have gone through this transition process.
	The driving forces for this political transformation, of course, is the transition into a multipolar world, which has a tendency to make our world much more fragmented.
	I can't make the volume any louder.
	Events like this one, the G20.
	And so on are the very important connectors to avoid a too great segmentation.
	Okay.
	That was not as good as I thought it was going to be, but that might not be the good clip.
	Hold on.
	Let's just try this.
	Oh, that's the GoPro.
	They're getting their ads money worth here.
	Okay, let's hear this.
	Before I play this video, can anyone say New World Order?
	Think about what he's saying.
	I think this is going to be the same clip.
	Of course, if you look at all the challenges, we can speak about the multi- It's the same clip.
	Yeah, okay.
	I've got just one obvious question.
	Why the hell is Klaus Schwab speaking at the G20 Summit?
	Why is he speaking at the G20 Summit?
	Let me just do one thing here.
	Let's do this in real time.
	Stop screen and present.
	Let me share this here.
	Google.
	G20 Summit.
	Okay.
	This is what the G20 Summit is according to the G20.org.
	Is this my internet or is this I don't know if this is my internet or the website.
	They might be getting a lot of traffic right now because people might all of a sudden...
	Forget this.
	Bali G20 Summit.
	Okay, let's just go to...
	No, that's going to be the same problem if it was slow there.
	Okay, here we go.
	Let's just...
	No, that's not working.
	G20, here we go.
	The G20, or Group of 20, is an intergovernmental forum comprising 19 countries and the European Union.
	Why is an unelected official...
	Sorry, let me rephrase.
	Why is an unelected individual?
	Why is Klaus Schwab speaking at the G20?
	It's a very interesting...
	I mean, it's not interesting.
	It's actually terrifying.
	Is he a guest?
	Or is he an organizer?
	Is he an honored speaker?
	Or is he...
	Something else.
	What the hell is an unelected individual speaking at the G20 that is intended to be among countries, among intergovernmental forum?
	Why is he speaking there?
	The history.
	Let's just see what this is.
	It's the latest series of post-World War II initiatives aimed at international coordination of economic policy.
	Which include institutes such as Bretton Woods Twins, the IMF, the World Bank, and the World Trade Organization.
	How does Klaus Schwab get in there?
	Like, what is the WEF at its core?
	I mean, we know what they're doing.
	What is the WEF?
	International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation.
	Yep.
	It makes total sense.
	And anyone talking about the New World Order is a conspiracy theorist.
	Hold on.
	B20.
	Hold on.
	Let me go back to what that was.
	What is the WFD?
	We're going to go back to G20.
	What are people saying about G20 versus B20?
	No.
	The G20...
	Oh, is that the B20?
	Okay.
	Arnoche.
	Arnoche.
	Hold on.
	Okay, I'm going to the chat.
	What the heck is going on?
	G20 used to be secret.
	What is the B20?
	Okay, so hold on now.
	I see now Indonesia 2022.
	What is the B20?
	I think there's an answer to this question.
	Let's see if the chat gets it before me.
	We're doing a lot of impromptu research here.
	G20.
	Now, we're going to go back.
	Let's share at the stream B20 Indonesia.
	Okay, so I think, let's just, we're learning in real time together here, people.
	B20 Indonesia.
	13th and 13th.
	Okay, hold on.
	Okay, so the B20, since the B20 Summit was established in 2020, this gathering has served to channel the voice and aspirations of the global business community to G20 leaders.
	The B20 Indonesia is organized by the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce at the behest of the government of Indonesia in the hopes of bringing together global business and thought leaders to address pressing economic issues from a business perspective.
	It is our hope that this year's B20 Summit will find consensus and common ground.
	Okay.
	Interesting.
	Okay.
	The G20?
	B20 summit to the G20 presidency of Indonesia.
	Well, this is confusing.
	Oh.
	Oh.
	Thank you.
	And my internet is not...
	Oh, my goodness.
	This is not satisfactory.
	B20 summit.
	Add to calendar.
	No, thank you.
	The 17th G20.
	Okay, there's an interplay between the B20 and the G20.
	I'll find out what it is and talk about it later.
	Still funny, though.
	What the heck is this guy talking about anything for?
	There's a lot of check.
	Go feed your kids nature.
	Okay, I do hear them in the background.
	Everybody, I'm sorry Robert didn't come tonight.
	And it's my fault because I started at 6 and I thought Barnes could read my mind.
	Thank you.
	What do we have tomorrow?
	Tomorrow's Thursday.
	I've got something good tomorrow, which will be coming out next week.
	But all in all, B20 business, B20 business part of G20.
	Okay, it's six of what?
	It's a potato, potato, tomato, tomato.
	What the heck is going on?
	Everybody, thank you very much for coming.
	Sorry that it was my mistake.
	I screwed it up in terms of the timing.
	I wouldn't have been able to go from 7 to 8.30 because I got to go put one kid to bed.
	I got up at 4.20 this morning, by the way, for part of the parenting side of things.
	4.20 in the morning.
	You know, we have a light outside and the frogs, those little sticky frogs stick to it.
	It was too early for the frogs.
	So it's been a long day.
	My wife comes back tomorrow, and it'll be good.
	Parenting is a two-person job.
	It's a tag team job.
	But with that said, everybody, be a family.
	Let's close this stream out with golf ball stacking.
	You will all remember back in the early days of the coronavirus.
	Oh, yes.
	This is going to blow your mind.
	Back in the early days of the pandemic, when it was two weeks to flatten the curve, and Scott Adams said, when everyone thought, how could we have thought it was going to be two weeks?
	Scott Adams had a great philosophy.
	Develop a COVID muscle.
	You have two weeks where you're locked in your house voluntarily.
	It turned into two years and turned into a bunch of crap.
	Develop a muscle.
	The muscle that I decided to develop.
	Golf ball stacking.
	Oh, I feel like such an idiot in retrospect.
	I did my very best to try to make the best of it early on, and I learned early enough on that shit didn't make sense.
	But at the very least, I developed this muscle, which I will not soon forget, and I might try to go for a new world record.
	No, I will never get a world record, but I might go for a record.
	Everybody, enjoy this because it will blow your mind.
	Absolutely.
	No glue.
	No cheating.
	No nothing.
	Just obsessive-compulsive disorder fixating on something until you get it done, even if it's something as dumb as this.
	Thank you all for being here.
	See you tomorrow.
	Be well.
	Sleep well.
	Get out there, talk to people, exercise, and deep breaths in as much as it's hard to do, but enjoy this to close us out.
	That's me, by the way.
	Focus.
	Good night.
	Guys!
	Guys!
	I did it!
	Marion!
	Marion!
	Come down!
	Don't even come near!
	I am retired.
	I am retired.
	I am retired.
	It's a basketball.
	It's five golf balls.
	I thought you were going for six.
	Well, why would I stop right now?
	But I swear to you I'm done.
	I'm not doing it anymore now.
	I'm not doing it anymore.
	There's no chance in the bowels of Satan's Inferno that I can get another ball.
	It's utterly impossible.
	That top ball is quite...
	Oh my god!
	Everybody, how long have I been doing this for?
	Two days.
	That feels like forever.
	Don't do two days.
	Oh my gosh.
	It's not- it's physically not possible to do six.

▲