Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 31, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

01:39:20

I'm Locked Out of Twitter for Questioning Media Matters! #FreeVivaFrei & More!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	It wasn't until early February when I was in a meeting that experts at the foundation said, there's no way.
	There's been too much travel without diagnosis for us to contain this.
	And then at that point, we didn't really understand the fatality rate.
	We didn't understand that it's a fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like flu is, although a bit different than that.
	So that was a pretty scary period where the world didn't go on alert, including the United States, nearly as fast as it needed to.
	Can you see yourself working for somebody else?
	I never have.
	Can you see it?
	I'm used to having a company where the ideas that I have are something that I can easily pursue.
	I didn't know this was coming up afterwards.
	We're not going to watch any more of the man who should...
	I won't say he needs to go to jail.
	I might think it.
	He needs to stand trial.
	He might need to answer for some policy influence issues.
	He might need to answer for some conduct.
	Good afternoon, people.
	It's another hectic day.
	Am I in the good mic?
	Let me just make sure if I'm in the good mic before everyone...
	Craps on me for...
	I'm in the good camera.
	I'm in the good mic.
	Do we hear too much echo?
	I got the mat.
	I got my insulating mat handy.
	Oh, man.
	Good afternoon.
	Straight to jail.
	Right away.
	Right to jail.
	Oh, no, no.
	I was hesitant to bring up that clip where he's talking about what people were saying at the time.
	Some people.
	Some people who might be on the channel tomorrow at 3 o 'clock.
	Dr. Malone is going to be on tomorrow.
	Unless some conflict comes up 3 o 'clock tomorrow.
	Bill Gates now, two years later, people are all of a sudden starting to say what some smarter people were saying at the time.
	The disease is of the elderly.
	It affects the elderly and people with underlying comorbidities.
	Does it make sense that we should be locking down everybody?
	Mark, Mark, I won't say that I do exactly what the audience says, but when I go jogging or with my kid, I put the hair up like this, and he doesn't like it.
	He says it looks weird.
	I say he's crazy.
	No, I'll take it down.
	People were saying things back in the day that they're now starting to finally admit, and the people who said them at the time, what were they called?
	Deniers?
	Conspiracy theorists?
	Whack jobs?
	They need to be deplatformed?
	Unperson-censored?
	Have their Wikipedia pages edited?
	Locked?
	Oh yeah, but now, what are they saying now?
	There's someone, I forget who it is, talking about we should have basically a forgiveness period for everything that was said and done in COVID because the world didn't know.
	We didn't know what was going on.
	We were just knee-jerk reacting with the most We didn't know.
	Forgive us.
	Forgive us for our stupidity, our gullibility, our dishonesty, our incompetence.
	Forgive us now.
	We want to move on.
	Forgive us now a week before midterms in the States.
	Forgive us now before there's a massive shift in political tide, public opinion.
	Please forgive us, Lord.
	We did not know what we did, except...
	Except that many people did.
	You think I believe for one second that Bill Gates is only now learning things that they didn't know at the time?
	Now, the other clip I was going to put up was Bill Gates talking about the educational or intellectual deficiencies that are going to affect a generation of children, a generation of kids, that's going to most disparately impact low-income families, families in poverty, minority families.
	Bill Gates' kids are going to do just fine, though.
	Bill Gates' kids are going to do just fine.
	Why?
	Well, because, you know, his kids didn't miss school.
	His kids didn't have to have remote learning.
	I'm going to pull that clip up.
	His kids were fine.
	Viva Clips, Bill Gates.
	And you'll see where I'm going with this.
	They were called conspiracy theorists at the time.
	They were called deniers at the time.
	They were demonized.
	The people who said, is what we're doing good?
	Is it right?
	Even if there is an issue, is what we're doing going to resolve that issue?
	Or is it actually going to exacerbate certain underlying issues?
	Get a load of this one, people.
	Bill Gates, right to jail, right away.
	Listen to this.
	If all he would have had to do was, say, a 45-day lockdown, Just a 45-day lockdown of the world.
	I think we would have gotten pretty good compliance.
	Compliance.
	It says the lockdown starts extending out.
	And, you know, the lockdown hasn't dropped the cases to zero.
	You know, so the counterfactual of, okay, how much worse would it have been if we hadn't had this lockdown is unclear.
	There was a lot of uncertainty about, for example, school shutdowns.
	To this day, you know, there's still arguments about...
	How many cases that avoided?
	It's pretty clear, because young people don't get sick from the disease very often, that we probably, if we knew everything we know today, we would have shut schools down a lot less than we did during this pandemic.
	I mean, yes, it's tricky for the elder adults.
	It's tricky in a lot of ways.
	And you mean by that high school?
	Why is he talking?
	Exactly.
	Who gave the sky authority?
	Tends to work awfully well.
	The infection levels are a little higher as you get up into that age group.
	But K-12, we have a learning deficit that will take us a long time to erase that.
	And sadly, it's a deficit where the inner city is where it's almost two years.
	Suburban schools less.
	Private schools, in some cases, like my kids, almost no deficit at all.
	Right away.
	Right to jail right away.
	Let me share that link around.
	No, I should have said right to jail right away.
	That's the meme.
	Right to trial.
	My kids, not at all.
	My kids are going to be just fine.
	I'm going to share that link in the chat.
	And we are also simultaneously streaming The Emergencies Act inquiry for anybody who's interested in watching that on another rumble stream.
	So I'm sort of cannibalizing myself here to do a public service so that people can watch the Emergencies Act stream right to jail right away.
	Viva, you inspired my hubby to grow out his curly locks.
	He looks like a mix of Kramer and Lyle Lovett.
	It's a good combination, this.
	All right.
	So the latest people, before we even get into that, let me make sure that we're still good on the YouTubes.
	Let me make sure that, you know, I haven't said anything that's going to get me demonetized on YouTube.
	Not that I really give a sweet anything about that anymore, but certainly tends to have a negative impact on viewability of videos.
	You notice it.
	The videos that they demonetize, they simply do not recommend.
	They simply suppress the exposure.
	And lo and behold, it's an amazing thing.
	They almost benefit from their own self-censorship in terms of political narratives and so on.
	But we're still good.
	We're still live.
	We are never forgive, never forget.
	Now they're pretending.
	They're pretending not to know what people were saying and people knew back then.
	All right.
	We're simultaneously on Rumble.
	We're going to go to Rumble in a bit.
	Standard disclaimers, anybody who wants to support the channel, Rumble rants and superchats.
	YouTube takes 30% of superchats.
	If you don't like that, Rumble has the Rumble rant.
	Rumble takes 20% of that, so better for the creator, better to support a platform that actually supports free speech.
	Absolutely no obligation, etc.
	The best way to support the channel, share away.
	Share word of mouth.
	Especially when one of my Twitter mouths has been temporarily muzzled.
	Two weeks before the trial.
	We're going to get to this.
	Catherine Engelbert, Greg Phillips arrested for not ratting out their informant.
	Pray for them.
	The Great Reset has become the Great Awakening.
	We're going to get to that.
	We talked about it yesterday.
	We'll get to it.
	I'm going to keep it started so I know to come back to that super chat.
	Thank you very much.
	So yeah, I'm still locked out of my Twitter account and that's what we're going to talk about today and some other stories.
	But before we even do that, you may have noticed, people.
	They haven't gone after my sponsors yet.
	There's a little...
	It says this stream contains paid promotion because I've got some ballsy, courageous, good sponsors who are not just good because they sponsor me.
	They make good stuff.
	They do good stuff.
	The first one that I will be proudly promoting today, Field of Greens.
	Everybody is supposed to have five to six servings of vegetables a day.
	Most people don't do it.
	I do it.
	But it doesn't mean that I don't also...
	In the afternoon, as a healthy habit, have a glass full of field of greens, powdered greens, instead of...
	I've still been having the Red Bulls, but it doesn't matter.
	Set that aside.
	Everyone's supposed to have five to six servings of vegetables a day.
	Most people do not do it.
	One spoonful of field of greens.
	It's a powdered green.
	One spoonful is one serving.
	And I keep saying powdered greens, desiccated, dried up, pulverized vegetables.
	It's not an extract.
	It's not a supplement.
	One spoonful is one serving.
	You stir it in water.
	It gives you one dose.
	Is that what they call it?
	Not dose.
	One serving of fruits and vegetables.
	It's got antioxidants, all the powerful stuff that vegetables have that most people don't get enough of in a day because life is what it is.
	And as I found out, they don't offer fresh vegetables at a lot of fast food joints.
	It is good for you.
	It tastes good.
	It's got all of the benefits of antioxidants, super fruits, super vegetables in an easy-to-drink glass, and it actually tastes good.
	Doesn't look good.
	But it tastes good.
	Made in America.
	It's a food, not an extract.
	And I say that as well because it's USDA organic approved.
	Right there.
	You can see it somewhere there.
	Made in America.
	Good stuff.
	I use it.
	I use it.
	I ingest it.
	And it's good.
	It's a healthy substitute that will get you to drink a glass of water, get a serving of vegetables once or twice a day.
	You won't regret it.
	If you go to the website...
	And use promo code VIVA, you'll get 15% off your first order and 10% off a subscription.
	It's good stuff.
	All right, but first, before we go onto the stream exclusively on Rumble, it's Halloween, people.
	It's Halloween.
	Tonight is my favorite night of the year.
	I remember once upon a time in Canada, they canceled Halloween.
	They canceled Halloween.
	It was the year before COVID, actually.
	Oddly enough, I think it was the year before COVID, they cancelled Halloween because it was too windy.
	They had to protect the people.
	Forget parents making decisions for their kids.
	The government made the decision to cancel Halloween in Montreal.
	I actually made a video about it, but a funny story, just so we can start off on a light note.
	Funny as in, trick-or-treating cancelled in Michigan neighborhood.
	After massive cockroach infestation.
	The nanny state...
	This might be gross.
	I mean, I might be asking why there's a massive cockroach infestation so big that somewhere in Michigan they decide they need to play mommy and daddy and cancel Halloween for the neighborhood.
	Why the hell is there?
	Why are there so many cockroaches?
	But listen to this.
	Garbage clusters discovered the roaches and called police.
	I don't know how this leads to Halloween being canceled.
	A Michigan neighborhood shut down trick-or-treat festivities this year after a vacant house on the block became overrun with cockroaches, sparking fears the vermin would travel home with revelers.
	Sounds gross.
	How the heck does this happen?
	And how does the house develop an infestation without anybody knowing?
	What's in that house?
	And how does this all happen?
	I would say only in Michigan, but I don't think this is only in Michigan.
	It doesn't matter whether you're a tidy person, a hoarder.
	Roaches come in all of these houses.
	Becky Wallace, who lives near the infested home in Wyandotte, told Click on Detroit.
	The city is located 11 miles south of Detroit.
	City officials decided to cancel trick-or-treating near the 20th Street, closing sidewalks in the area due to the infest.
	So it's not really canceled, people.
	You just have to go walk a few blocks out of the area.
	Officials fear people could step on cockroach eggs and spread them throughout the area.
	It is in the best interest of the citizens to close 20th Street and the sidewalks.
	It's funny, but it's not funny.
	That's disgusting.
	Walking on the street could help kill the cockroaches, but their eggs could spread and survive.
	Anyway, those are the realities.
	A garbage man was the first to spot the infestation.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Those are the risks and perils of life in Michigan.
	Halloween is not really cancelled, however.
	It's just...
	They just have to do it somewhere else.
	Ah, so Whitmer was there.
	Oh boy, Grunt 167.
	We get jokes.
	The next story is not so funny.
	And it's actually just like, I mean...
	Your amount and message will be public.
	Hold on.
	What does that mean?
	Cade Just.
	Your amount and message will be public.
	What does that mean?
	Thank you for the super chat.
	What do we hear?
	Cheryl Gage is saying what a lot of people have been saying.
	Never got the jab.
	Now.
	I don't trust the government.
	Even a little.
	Well, you and everybody else who has half a brain, but there's more people are saying, I got it and I regret it because I genuinely feel like I was lied to and I'm one of those people.
	Genuinely feel that I was lied to.
	Not feel.
	I know that I was lied to.
	Because, you know, I know some of you don't like my excuse, but for those of you who know why I chose to get the V. It was over a year ago, August 2021.
	So, you know, I don't know.
	If anything happens to me within the next short while, it was no boosters and there will be no boosters for me.
	But one of the reasons, and you all know this, why I felt compelled, felt pressured to get it was because I was, you know, a neighborhood individual back in Montreal.
	And I used to play in the park with the kids from the daycare where my kid went to school.
	They would go out to the park and I would hear them say, David!
	And I would come up with fossils and whatever.
	And at the time, they said, even if you're not at risk, you get it to prevent transmission.
	You don't want to infect granny.
	And I didn't want to be the fringe minority with unacceptable views dude on the internet who infected a daycare of kids and, God forbid, got one of those kids killed.
	Dead.
	Died from the...
	Now we know.
	They didn't test for transmission.
	Those trials had nothing to do with transition.
	They were moving at the speed of science.
	They were moving at the speed of science.
	We know that now.
	That means I was lied to.
	I'm just happy I have a healthy ticker.
	I eat my greens in raw format and in drinkable format.
	It was not the bowling compulsion, people.
	People forget, when Quebec had the vaccine mandate, I didn't go to restaurants.
	I specifically did not go anywhere where you had to show a bloody QR code.
	And I went to the bowling alley not realizing it, and you show up to a bowling alley with four kids.
	And I know some people think I'm a coward for that, and everybody's entitled to live your life the way you want to live it.
	So that's it.
	Yeah, no, no, that's it.
	The vaccine, and now we got Bill Gates saying, well, the kids are very much not at risk.
	You got Bill Gates saying kids are very much not at risk, and then you got Dr. Eric Fagelding on Twitter, which I can no longer access, gosh darn it, saying, oh my goodness, if we don't wear masks, then the kids are going to get it, and then seven out of 30 kids are going to get long COVID.
	It's...
	Yeah.
	Oh my goodness, that's one heck of an avatar.
	That's a Halloween avatar right there.
	So anyways, that's it.
	That's it.
	Halloween.
	Now, a not-so-funny story at all, which I don't know why it comes across my...
	It's legal-based, you know?
	There's the old expression.
	We talked about it on Friday.
	Nul n 'est censé ignorer la loi.
	Ignorance of the law.
	Is no excuse.
	And this is known to hunters and fishermen.
	If you catch a fish, oh, I didn't know that it was a fish that I couldn't take home.
	Oh, I didn't know that there were size limits on striped bass.
	I thought I could just keep whatever.
	I didn't know that there were limits that I could take in a day.
	That's no excuse, and you'll get hit with a massive, hefty find.
	This story is one level more gross than that, especially for anybody who likes dogs, but...
	A Montana woman went out for hunting, killed what she thought was a wolf, killed it, skinned it, and posted pictures to social media.
	They blurred out the picture in this article because I'm not showing the pictures.
	It turns out what she killed was a husky pup.
	Now, no relation that I know of, I hope there's no relation to Barnes.
	Amber Rose, and I'm not sure.
	There's no putting this woman on blast.
	I mean, this is tremendously stupid.
	Tremendously...
	I'm sure she regrets it, and I'm sure she feels terrible for it.
	I know people hunt wolves because they're predators, they're pests, etc.
	It's legal to hunt them.
	It's not something I think I could do and feel good about, but whatever.
	So there's no putting anyone on blast.
	This woman's going to suffer the natural consequences of...
	Her own stupidity.
	She killed and skinned a husky charged with a crime.
	She posted it to Facebook.
	I'm not showing that.
	She posted it to Facebook.
	And can you imagine the gut-sinking horror that she must have felt when people started saying, you idiot, that's not a wolf?
	You moron?
	Try deleting that post.
	Try deleting that post.
	Oh my goodness.
	A, I killed a dog.
	B, I broke the law.
	And three, I did that on purpose.
	I posted it to social media, and now I realized all of this in real time.
	Oh, mamacita.
	The Montana hunter shot a Siberian husky.
	There's questions as to why there was a Siberian husky 11 miles into the woods, but whatever.
	And skinned it.
	Then has been charged with a crime.
	She mistook the six-month-old dog for a wolf during a hunting trip back in September.
	She's been charged with misdemeanor animal cruelty.
	Apparently, the unsanctioned killing of a dog.
	You can kill a wolf on a hunting trip, but you can't kill a dog.
	The laws don't always have to make total sense.
	I can understand why there's a distinction.
	But I can understand some people saying, oh, so you can shoot and kill in skin and post pictures of a wolf, but somehow domesticated dogs get more protection.
	Yeah, they do.
	That's the law.
	She's been charged.
	The 36-year-old hunter may have sealed her fate by bragging about her kill on social media.
	So this morning I sent out on a solo predator hunt for a fall black bear.
	However, I got the opportunity to take another predator, wolf pup, 2022.
	Okay.
	I mean, I don't know who can tell the difference between a husky and a wolf.
	The Husky was one of a dozen or so dogs that were abandoned in the Flathead National Forest, and that's where Barnes encountered the dog.
	She claimed that she shot the dog in self-defense, saying the dog was acting wild and aggressive.
	This was after a wave of online outrage.
	Can you imagine it?
	Like, when people do the hunting thing for, like, lawful kills, wherever, and they get massive...
	Can you imagine the backlash that she must have gotten?
	Oh, she'll appear later this month to face charges.
	Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
	Ignorance is no excuse.
	Don't be an idiot.
	And that's not to say, like, don't post to social media evidence of your crime, says the guy who used the drone to go fishing, but it was not illegal in Quebec, although I subsequently discovered it was illegal in Vermont.
	Jake Paul-esque level.
	My goodness.
	But here's another thing.
	I genuinely feel bad for her as well because I have no doubt she is mortified.
	She didn't know what she did.
	Otherwise, she certainly wouldn't have posted it to social media.
	And if you found out you killed the dog, holy crap.
	It may have been feral.
	True.
	She'll raise that defense.
	I mean, she's being charged.
	She'll have the defense.
	I mean, you come across a...
	Even if it's a domesticated dog 11 miles into the wilderness, I can imagine that making someone, you know...
	Feel somewhat threatened.
	But no, you have to feel bad for her.
	There's no doubt she wouldn't have done it had she known.
	There's no doubt she probably feels bad about it.
	She'll go into full defensive mode, try to make up excuses in her own defense, try to lie to herself to rationalize what she did.
	It's a normal human response, but it's a normal human response when someone knows that they've done something just terrible.
	I once...
	I ran over a rabbit once driving.
	My friend was having an allergic reaction.
	This is a true story.
	I might have shared it already.
	On my birthday, we had a friend who had a very bizarre allergic thing.
	Nobody knew why.
	And started getting hives, rash going up to his face.
	And we're like, we're going to the hospital and I'm driving and I'm driving fast.
	And I was driving fast.
	On a country road and I killed a rabbit.
	I felt terrible.
	And I said, after we got to the hospital and everything was fine, I said, we're going to go back and if that rabbit's there, we're going to eat it.
	I actually said this.
	But by the time we got back, it had actually been partially devoured by crows.
	I have no doubt that she feels absolutely terrible for what she did and she's going to have to forgive herself.
	But before then, she might have to get punished under the law unless she has a valid defense.
	Okay.
	Roadkill Rabbit.
	Dude, I would have done it because I would have done it.
	Good morning, chat.
	Henry, back to play.
	All right.
	We're going to...
	Okay.
	Before we move on over...
	Let me get this out of here.
	To the east side.
	Because we're moving on up.
	Moving on up.
	The second.
	My second sponsor of the day.
	Another product.
	I'm not saying it to say it.
	I use it.
	I'm new to Florida.
	I'm new to the States.
	And I'm new to the type of fraud that seems rampant, if not only in Florida, in the States, home title fraud.
	And this is a real thing.
	First of all, with Field of Greens, I spent a half an hour on the phone with the doctor of the company to ask my questions, make sure I felt comfortable.
	Not just promoting it.
	I'm ingesting it, and I do.
	With Home Title Lock, I've spent time on the phone with my insurance company, my insurance broker, to confirm whether or not this is a real risk and whether or not this is a good solution.
	I had a discussion with someone on a pier when I was fishing in Deerfield who's into construction and home development.
	He said it is as well.
	It's a real problem, and this is a real solution.
	Home Title Lock.
	People go to the county clerk.
	They can pull up your deed of sale, forge your signature, and borrow money against the property that you own.
	They don't change title necessarily.
	I'm not sure if that's another type of fraud.
	They don't say, hey, it's my house now, you know, Homer Simpson, get out.
	They go, forge your signature, go to the bank and say, hey, I'm Viva Frye, lend me $50,000.
	I'm going to borrow it against my house and I'm going to secure it.
	Here's the deed of sale.
	And it succeeds.
	And you don't even know that people have borrowed money against your house until somebody, you know, start getting letters saying you owe us $50,000, you're in default.
	We're going to, you know, if it's the state of Michigan, we're going to sell your house.
	For what it's worth and claim that it was the $50,000 deed.
	Whatever.
	That's a law joke.
	So it's a real thing.
	Home title lock basically is your 24-7 eyes.
	If anybody pulls up your deed of sale, you're going to get notified.
	There's going to be a freeze.
	They will not be able to borrow against your property.
	They will incur $250,000 in legal fees to defend if there's an issue.
	And it's a real problem and it's a real solution.
	And at least for me, it's real peace of mind.
	If you do go to HomeTitleLock.com slash Viva, you will get a $100 value title assessment to make sure that your title is clear, that you have a good title, valid title to your property.
	And then it's $19.95 a month for peace of mind and protection against a type of fraud that is rampant in Florida and in the States.
	It's the Wild West down here, people.
	And I am learning a lot from my travels, from my...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Displacement from Canada to the US.
	So hometitlelock.com forward slash Viva.
	A free title assessment.
	And it's a worthwhile product.
	$19.95 a month.
	All right.
	Now, with that said, everybody.
	And thank you, Home Title Lock.
	Thank you, Field of Greens.
	Good products and courage to...
	Have the audacity to sponsor the hinged, fringed minority holding unacceptable views.
	Although we are not a minority, our views are not acceptable, and people are indeed waking up.
	We're going to move on over to the Rumble side, and then we're going to get into some stuff.
	And I'm not doing it on Rumble because I can't do it on YouTube.
	This will go on YouTube.
	Snips and clips.
	We're going to get into Viva in Twitter jail, Elon either trolling Hillary Clinton, Or making a mistake, the latest in Paul Pelosi and Engelbrecht and Phillips, jailed for contempt.
	So, everybody, there's 2,105 people watching here.
	And how many do we have on the Rumbles?
	Nearly 4,000 on Rumble.
	Well done, everybody.
	How many are watching the Emergencies Act?
	Nearly 1,400 are watching the Emergencies Act.
	Okay, good.
	The Emergencies Act is running all day long.
	On Rumble and on Viva Clips.
	It's boring as hell.
	Chief Slowly is the guy getting it handed to him this morning.
	But we're going to go on over to Rumble right now and party hardy and talk about the utter, utter rubbish.
	I didn't know that I picked a fight with Media Matters.
	There, I said it.
	Now, with that said, everyone should mosey on over.
	We should have 2,000 more people on Rumble in three seconds.
	Three, two, one.
	I think we're alone now.
	It doesn't seem...
	Okay.
	Wearing some merch as well.
	Who?
	What?
	When?
	Why?
	Where?
	Black shirt!
	So you can see no sweat stains under my pits.
	And everybody, remind me I've got to be done by 1.45 at the latest.
	Okay.
	Let's just see what's happening here.
	Oh, that sweet number's going up.
	While everyone's trickling over, I want to show you one thing.
	I've made one improvement.
	This chair was $200, and I put it together myself.
	It's got lumbar support, and it's got a little adjust-y thing.
	What the heck?
	Oh, whatever.
	It goes up and down.
	It's a wonderful chair.
	I'm going to have some lumbar support so I can stop complaining about pain in my lower back.
	Who would have thunk that sitting, talking to a computer would be bad for the back?
	All right.
	Do I swear today?
	Am I going to swear?
	I think I'm going to swear.
	Because I've got to show you.
	Oh, hold on.
	I'm going to have to send myself something.
	Am I still locked out?
	I'm still locked out.
	Let me start by showing what's going on.
	It's 1984 all over again.
	Not all over again.
	I have been locked.
	I don't care.
	I really don't like Twitter.
	I use it as a diary.
	I use it to take notes, and I use it to share my thoughts.
	I have been locked out of my Twitter account because of a tweet that we're going to get to in a second.
	I'm going to bring it up, and I'm going to tell you that it's not even about rules.
	It's about compelling submission.
	It's about compliance.
	It's about shaming.
	It's about reprogramming.
	It's Orwell.
	In real time.
	This is the tweet for which I was blocked from Twitter.
	Now, I don't want to encourage anybody to share the tweet because I don't want anybody getting yeeted for sharing my tweets.
	The irony, I was able to share Jordan Peterson's tweets about Paige that got him banned, but it didn't get me banned because I guess, I don't know, can you report on a story without it being the violating tweet?
	I don't know.
	Tweet and retweet and share it your own risks and perils, people.
	This is the tweet that got me locked out of my own Twitter feed.
	In response to Matt Gertz, whom I did not know works with Media Matters.
	We'll get into Media Matters in a second.
	Matt Gertz enters into a 16-tweet diatribe with himself.
	Scratch my back.
	You go down his Twitter feed, and it's...
	One of 16. And then you go down the feed.
	There's no discussion.
	It's 16 thread himself, himself, himself, himself, before you hear another voice, before you see another perspective.
	And Matt Gertz's 16 thread tweet diatribe was how everybody, right-wing extremists, right-wingers, conservatives are now going to believe A whacked-out conspiracy theory because Elon Musk tweeted a link to a story on a website,
	which we're going to get to, in response to a Hillary Clinton tweet, in which Elon said there might be a tiny bit more to the story, linking an article.
	And it's not clear what he meant.
	It's not clear if he understood the nature of the publication.
	He said there might be something more to the story, Hillary.
	It might not be right-wing rhetoric that led this guy to do it.
	He's not necessarily a MAGA Republican Trump supporter.
	There might be a little more to the story.
	And the link to the article that he posted posited that this was a gay sort of hookup, some sort of personal relationship gone sour at 2.47 in the morning.
	And it had some purely anecdotal, totally unsubstantiated theorizing as to why this was the case.
	This guy goes into a 16-tweet diatribe.
	Matt Gertz from Media Matters says, right-wing conservatives are now going to believe this because of Elon Musk.
	And they've gotten so desperate.
	They've started making all sorts of crazy claims.
	And he goes through it.
	It's a mess.
	I'd rather watch a 12-minute video on YouTube than read a 16-thread tweet on whatever.
	I replied to him.
	And you know what?
	I replied to one of his tweets and said the guy was clearly a, quote, lefty.
	But don't let facts get in the way of a good narrative.
	And I retweeted with effectively the same message.
	And then I retweeted this.
	So maybe there's a rule.
	If you tweet at or in response to somebody three times within five minutes, that's a paddling.
	That's a Twitter paddling.
	I don't know.
	Maybe.
	I have no idea.
	Because I have no idea.
	Because it says, oh, tweet one of one.
	Here's the tweet.
	For violating one of our rules, oh, thank you for the specificity.
	That's wonderful.
	Let me just go see what one of the rules.
	Safety, violence, terrorism, child sexual, abuse, hateful conduct.
	You may not promote violence.
	Okay, not even in the realm of my being.
	Perpetrators of, okay, no.
	Sensitive media, no.
	Privacy, no.
	Authenticity, no, no, no.
	Oh, you're not looking at any of these.
	You don't see them.
	Those are all the things that are under rules when you click on it.
	Here's my tweet.
	A 16-thread tweet with himself explaining everything that happened before police even released body cam footage.
	I ran out of space, but you see what?
	A 16-thread tweet with himself explaining everything that happened before police released body cam footage or disclosed where they found DePop's clothing.
	And Matt Gertz accuses others of conspiracy theory disinformation.
	Massive events will generate massive discussion.
	Period.
	And people have to appreciate this because it's an important thing.
	Claiming you know definitively what happened when you clearly do not have all the information, that's as good as lying.
	I mean, you could say, this is what I believe, and that's called theorizing.
	But when you come out, like Hillary Clinton, like Matt Gaetz, it's clearly a politically motivated attempted assassination.
	We haven't seen the body cam footage from the cops.
	We haven't seen any...
	Video surveillance from the Pelosi residence.
	And if anyone's going to tell me that they don't have any, I will tell you, I've got a nice piece of...
	I've got a nice golden egg to sell you.
	This is a real gold egg.
	It's...
	Oh, it's easily a half a pound.
	This is like probably $10,000.
	No, it's like $15,000 worth of gold right here.
	If you believe that Pelosi residence has no CCTV, Google Nest...
	Video footage that you haven't seen before making an opinion.
	Oh, I broke a little piece off of it.
	Okay, well, this I'll let go for a cool $25.
	You believe that?
	I've got a pyrite egg to sell you as a golden goose egg.
	Haven't seen body cam footage.
	Haven't seen any CCTV or security footage from the residence.
	Haven't had an explanation as to how there was no security at the residence of the third in line to the presidency.
	And if you, not knowing all of that, and knowing that you don't know all of that, come out and make definitive statements, you are peddling in conspiracy theory disinformation if you are not saying, this is my feeling as of now based on the evidence as it exists now.
	But worse still, And this is what people don't seem to understand, don't seem to appreciate, or just don't seem to care about.
	When you come out and say, this is what heated political rhetoric gets us into, definitively we know that this was a right-wing MAGA Republican conspiracy, and the right-wing has to tone it down.
	That is doing exactly what you're criticizing the other side for having done that you are alleging contributed to the problem that you think exists.
	You are using inflammatory rhetoric to divide, demonize an entire group of people, which is exactly what you're saying led to this happening in the first place.
	It's people demonizing.
	It's the right-wing conservatives, the Tucker Carlson's, the Bannon's.
	It's the right-wing conservatives generating this hate, this conspiracy theories, and people are going to believe it and they're going to act on it.
	You better condemn all those Republicans.
	And you don't even know.
	Definitively, what's going on?
	Because you know that you haven't seen crucial evidence.
	Well, methinks thou might doth beeth exactly what one condemneth.
	But I put that tweet out, and that's the tweet that gets me blocked from Twitter.
	Where is it?
	This innocuous tweet.
	And I'll tell you another thing.
	I have a sneaking suspicion.
	I don't know yet why.
	I don't know what rule I broke, and I don't know how this came to be.
	I have a sneaking suspicion that this might have been a flagging, a brigading attempt of sorts.
	Because the tweet was...
	I was locked out of my account, I think it was within 30 seconds to a minute of this tweet.
	Which leads me to believe that Twitter, much like YouTube or other platforms, when they get a mass brigade, they say, holy crap.
	Something is triggering a lot of people flagging it.
	We're going to take it down and then ask questions later, like they've done with other people.
	I suspect that's what happened.
	And this will be overturned in due course.
	But I don't know yet, because just checking my email, still don't have Word for...
	I don't have Word yet.
	But I'll tell you one thing.
	We're talking about conspiracy theories, and the right wing is now going to believe conspiracy theories because Elon Musk tweeted a link to an article that has one hypothesis for what might have happened, even if it's unsubstantiated and as of yet not backed by the evidence any more than other theories.
	That generates conspiracy theories.
	I put out an innocuous tweet saying, we haven't even seen the body cam footage.
	We don't even know where his clothes were found.
	Boom!
	Censored, I'm locked out at a time when the discussion is happening.
	Do you not think, Twitter overlords, that's going to do exactly what you are purporting to respond to trying to prevent?
	A lot of people spreading conspiracy theories.
	What do we do?
	Let's lock out a relatively prominent, relatively vocal social media individual who does pride himself on weighing his words and being accurate.
	Let's lock him out and see if that doesn't generate more suspicion than...
	Just allowing that tweet to exist and having the requisite discussion around that tweet.
	So that's it.
	Now I've gotten...
	The post-millennial, Jack Posobiec, thank you very much, wrote an article on this yesterday.
	I'm going to do an interview with Alexa Lavoie this afternoon to discuss it.
	I was on Steve Bannon's War Room this morning to discuss not only the tweet and the absurd lockout.
	But the situation in general, which is equally absurd, equally outrageous, and equally doesn't pass the smell test.
	We're going to get to that.
	What was I just about to say?
	So that's it.
	So all of that aside, what was going on?
	How did this come to be?
	And what the hell did Elon Musk do?
	People, if you don't live on Twitter...
	You may have even missed the story, but you may have caught it en passant, as we say in French and in chess.
	Let me see which article I want to pull up.
	TMZ?
	Why not?
	We're on two TMZ articles today.
	Let's do this.
	Oh, I remember why I pulled up the Elon Musk, because the TMZ article actually had a screen grab of the tweet.
	Elon Musk deletes conspiracy tweet over Pelosi attack.
	Elon Musk used his new social media platform to perpetuate an unfounded conspiracy theory about the Paul Pelosi attack.
	And he did it in response to Hillary Clinton, no less.
	First of all, I'm going to take issue right now with the determination of the knowledge of Elon Musk's intent.
	TMZ, as all mainstream media rubbish, says his intention was to perpetuate an unfounded conspiracy theory.
	Not necessarily.
	Not necessarily at all.
	And I would love to hear what Elon Musk has to say.
	Why did he tweet it?
	What was his intention?
	And why did he delete it?
	Remind me to get back to this in a second because we need to get the facts out.
	The Twitter chief replied to a tweet from H.C., Hillary Clinton, since Saturday that condemned the attack on the Speaker's husband while also calling out extreme rhetoric of some Republican pundits.
	Hillary Clinton.
	The woman who, on some indivisible platform, says Republicans are literally going to steal the next election.
	Extremist Republicans is what she said, by the way.
	She's calling out extreme rhetoric from some Republicans and pundits while simultaneously using extreme rhetoric.
	Extremist Republicans are going to steal the 2024 election.
	Verbatim.
	I'll get to it afterwards just so that everybody knows I'm not making that up.
	She's now condemning extreme rhetoric.
	She is telling people that extremist Republicans, extremist conservatives, are threatening your very democracy, your existence.
	They are existential threats to everyone out there who thinks now they're going to steal the election.
	She's now coming out and saying, this extreme rhetoric by some Republicans and pundits is responsible for the incident.
	Hillary Clinton.
	The Republican Party and its mouthpieces now regularly spread hate and deranged conspiracy theories.
	Hate and deranged conspiracy theories.
	Says Hillary Clinton, the woman who literally said extremist Republicans are literally going to steal the 2020, planning to steal the 2024 election.
	It is shocking but not surprising that violence is the result.
	Oh, you mean like when a crazed gunman shoots up a...
	A Republican football game?
	Or when Rand Paul's neighbor beats him up?
	No, then it's, who knows?
	We don't know.
	When there's evidence, it's, who knows?
	When there's questionable stories, it's, we definitively know, shut your mouth, you filthy conspiracy theorists, and pet toe the line.
	As a result, citizens, as citizens, we must hold them accountable for their words and their actions that follow.
	What does that mean, Hillary?
	What does that mean?
	Sounds an awful lot.
	Like, questionably hateful and potentially violent rhetoric.
	Then Elon chimes in.
	Oh, yeah, that's actually how they...
	Elon chimed in Sunday, saying there may be more to the story than meets the eye, adding a link to a fringe site that uploaded a salacious article headlining...
	Okay, this was Elon's tweet.
	She says, Republicans' mouthpieces are spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.
	Elon writes, there's a tiny possibility there might be more to the story than meets the eye.
	And then tweets a link to smobserved.com.
	And we're going to get to the article and another one.
	Read that tweet.
	Read that tweet and now try to decipher intent.
	Because I'm not saying this to protect Elon.
	Dude's a big boy.
	I've got no interest in protecting or criticizing.
	Just an interest in understanding.
	The actual truth, what Elon meant by it, and also highlighting how the written word on Twitter can really be read very differently and lead to some serious misunderstandings, which might have led to Elon deleting the tweet.
	How about if Elon Musk agreed with Hillary and was linking this article to show one of the absurd conspiracy theories and this was sarcastic?
	How about that?
	Oh, Hillary, there's a tiny possibility there might be more to this story than meets the eye.
	If you say it in person, you can get the inflection, the intention probably a little more clear than with the written word.
	But how about if Elon just tweeted this out to poke fun at that story?
	To say, no, no, no, Hillary Clinton.
	There's no conspiracy theories out there.
	There might actually be a little more to the story.
	And here's an article from SNF.
	How about if that was his intent?
	That might explain why he deleted the tweet if people read his tweet as literal, as condoning, promoting, agreeing with, or actually citing this article.
	How about that?
	Is that...
	Is that untenable?
	Is that unfeasible?
	Is that implausible?
	Chat?
	What do you think?
	Well, first of all, I didn't see that there's a $20 rumble rant from Delamar.
	Viva, just making you aware, there are many accounts that are monitored by reporting flag bot that attack tweets, which triggers the auto-suspension.
	Lost over 15 accounts.
	It is very obvious.
	Yep.
	I'm sorry.
	I'm not on Twitter, by the way.
	Did Chris Boozy take credit for my lockout?
	Did Bot Sentinel take credit?
	And there was a $5 rumble rant from KarenHughes22.
	Viva, you missed the text messages on EA Inquiry.
	Government planning to frame the convoy January 24 as insurrectionists global working on the stories.
	I'm going to screen grab that.
	So, chat, I mean, first of all, thank you for those rumble rants.
	If I missed another one, I apologize.
	What do you think about that?
	Maybe Elon was actually being sarcastic.
	Or satirical and he's just not good at it.
	Hey, there might be a little bit more to the story.
	It might have been a gay lover hookup gone bad and he meant to poke fun at the story.
	People thought he was being serious so he deleted the tweet because people were misunderstanding it.
	Is that an implausible interpretation of what might have happened?
	I don't think it is an implausible.
	Now, equally plausible potential for what might have happened?
	Maybe Elon didn't realize quite how absurd That website is.
	Now, I say this with full acknowledgement and respect for people who may believe things that I find to be absolutely outlandish.
	People are entitled to believe things that are outlandish.
	They're entitled to believe things that are outlandish even if it might upset people.
	People are entitled to think...
	I don't want to use any...
	People are entitled to think that the moon landing was fake.
	Some people don't even find that to be outlandish even if they don't believe it.
	People are entitled to believe the moon landing was fake.
	People are entitled to believe the earth is flat.
	People are entitled to believe that Paul Pelosi, the incident, might be a lover's pet.
	That Paul Pelosi might be, you know, they're entitled to believe that.
	People are entitled to believe that Hillary Clinton might have actually died in 2016 and that it's a body double.
	That's walking around.
	I don't happen to believe it.
	I would think that this is an absolutely absurd thing to believe.
	Crazy and impossible?
	No.
	Have there been cases in real life where there are body doubles because they don't want to put someone at risk, a very prominent politician?
	Yes.
	Everybody knows that, which is why some of these theories, even if they're totally outlandish, can gain some traction because there's some element of historical truth to it.
	Political leaders, prominent political leaders, have body doubles.
	I'm fairly certain Kim Jong-un has one.
	Kim Jong-il had one.
	Fairly certain Hitler had one.
	Because assassination attempts are not something that's unheard of.
	So they do have body doubles.
	They do have people that...
	It's happened.
	Whether or not, as SM observed, wrote by Stan Green.
	Just remember that name.
	September 24, 2016.
	This is from the same publication that Elon Musk retweeted, or tweeted a link to.
	Hillary Clinton died on September 11. Actually, that was her body double in front of Chelsea's.
	Sorry, I don't think I can read this.
	Okay, there we go.
	Video of WABC News announcing Hillary Clinton's death on the air launches new wave of theories.
	So, you can go read this.
	This is an article by Stan Green.
	From September 24th, 2016, from the SM Observe, the same website, positing that Hillary Clinton passed away on September 11th, 2016, and that it's a permanent body double.
	Okay.
	Some people might find that more outlandish than others.
	And anyone who believes it, you're entitled to your beliefs.
	Beliefs don't hurt.
	Actions do.
	So that was, what was the name of that author?
	Stan Green?
	That's the same Stan Green.
	Where is the author?
	Where is the author?
	Come on, dude, where is it?
	Okay, this is the article from Santa Monica Observer.
	It's funny, why does it say Santa Monica Observer and it's SM Observed?
	Oh, here we go, by Stan Green.
	The same individual is now writing an article to the effect that this is the awful truth.
	Paul Pelosi was drunk again and in a dispute with a male prostitute early Friday morning.
	Here's the thing, by the way.
	Paul Pelosi stated that he doesn't know who the male is, but he advised that his name is David and that he is a friend.
	Yeah, right.
	This is something where, you know, I follow Scott Adams on Twitter when my account was open.
	People can be right in their predictions for the wrong reasons.
	You can be right for the wrong reasons.
	You can be wrong for the right reasons.
	And you can be wrong.
	But still right.
	So you can make a prediction that you had no reason to know was true or your justification was totally whack.
	It can still come true.
	And it doesn't mean that the story was true when you said it.
	So whether or not this pans out, Stan Green can look like the smartest man in the room if this turns out to be true.
	Still going to have to address the 2016 article about Hillary Clinton having passed away and it being a body double in front of Chelsea.
	There are people who believe this.
	And the funny thing is there are people who believe this and it has nothing to do with Elon Musk.
	It has to do with there are so many freaking holes in the story.
	There are so many unanswered elements of the Paul Pelosi story as it is currently being told that people are going to fill in the blanks.
	This is the article.
	I don't need to read it, but the bottom line is this is totally unsubstantiated, unsourced, very little, no concrete evidence.
	As San Francisco's gay, and it's not clear if this is even just like someone's fantasy, as in like writing fiction, writing what might have been, and throwing in enough plausibility that it could be believed even if there's, you know, if it's someone's imaginings.
	As San Francisco gay bars close at 2 a.m., two gay men met in a bar and went home together.
	Happens every night in the city, except one of these men was married to Speaker of Nancy Pelosi.
	It's not clear if this is intended to be fan fiction.
	I might disappear for telling the truth.
	If I do, you'll all know why.
	But here's what really happened early Friday morning.
	In my humble opinion, in my humble opinion.
	And there you have it.
	So Elon Musk, you can all Google this stuff if you want to read it.
	Elon Musk tweets that out.
	In a tweet that says there might be a tiny bit more to the story in response to Hillary.
	We don't know if he was being satirical.
	We don't know if he believed it and didn't know what an outlet this was.
	We don't know if he got threatened with a billion-dollar lawsuit from Nancy Pelosi or Paul Pelosi.
	We know nothing except for the fact that he deleted the tweet, which he shouldn't have done, in my mind.
	If it was an accident, tweet a clarification.
	And if you delete it, tweet why you're deleting it.
	Maybe it was, oh, dude.
	It was intended to be satire, but people are taking it seriously.
	But then deleting it doesn't do anything.
	Deleting it actually might only delete the exculpatory evidence.
	Go to the chat here and see what people think.
	That's the wrong chat.
	What do people think of this tweet?
	Was he duped?
	Was he just playing a joke?
	Did he not really believe it but thought it would be a funny jab at Hillary Clinton?
	A funny poke at Hillary Clinton?
	Who knows?
	Maybe Elon will come on for a sidebar and explain.
	And by the way, in that article, so that's what happened.
	Media Matters dude comes out and says, it's clear what it is.
	It's right-wing extremism.
	And if you say otherwise, you believe conspiracy theories peddled by Elon Musk and so on and so forth.
	This is the latest, by the way.
	This is the latest coming from Fox News.
	Pelosi attacks suspect.
	Paul Pelosi, a tax suspect, David DePop, had a list of other people to target.
	Police.
	What's interesting is, you know, no security footage, no body cam footage, and we're going to see if this is more substantiated than the other articles that wrote about this over the weekend.
	Sources say that he allegedly had a list of other people, politicians to target.
	I'd like to know who those sources were.
	I'd like to know what that list looked like in terms of, was it a...
	Hit list?
	Is it like a Billy Madison, Steve Buscemi dude sitting around wearing lipstick with a people-to-kill list?
	Or was it notes about politicians that he took issue?
	I don't know.
	Let's see.
	The man accused of breaking into the house of Nancy Pelosi at a California home and assaulting her husband had a list of other people to target, according to police.
	David DePop allegedly broke into Pelosi's home Friday morning and struck Paul Pelosi at least once with a hammer.
	Police now say...
	They recovered a list belonging to the POP of other potential targets.
	Oh, so by the way, wording is everything.
	They found a list belonging to the POP and they're calling it other potential targets.
	So does this guy have a scrapbook of newsworthy items?
	Does he have a social media account?
	Does he read the newspaper?
	Does he have newspaper clippings?
	Though they stopped short of calling, referring to it as a hit list, according to Steve.
	Oh, really?
	They stopped short of calling it what other people had already been calling it?
	So, they recovered belongings, a list belonging to the pop.
	They recovered a list belonging to the pop of other potential targets, as they call it.
	But it wasn't a hit list.
	What was it?
	The existence of the list, just a handwritten list, like names on a piece of paper.
	The police have yet to release any names on that list.
	Also interesting.
	I'm sure they've reported to the people.
	Police responded.
	By the way, let's just get into the facts of the story.
	They responded to a 2 a.m. call on Friday to find DePop and Pelosi struggling over a hammer.
	Who let them in the house?
	Who let them in the house?
	Questions?
	There were rumors, there were reports of a third party let them into the house.
	They were struggling over a hammer when the police got there.
	Did they stop struggling, go open the front door, let the police in, and then go back to struggling over the hammer?
	Or did a third person let them in while they're struggling over a hammer?
	And if so, who's the third person?
	Inquiring minds want to know.
	How did he break in at 2 a.m.?
	Was he in his underwear when he broke in, or did he get in his underwear after he broke in?
	Inquiring minds want to know.
	Pelosi was reportedly able to call the police by saying he needed to go to the bathroom.
	Does any of this make sense?
	There's a struggle as a result of which Paul Pelosi suffers fractures to the skull.
	I'm taking for granted they're not lying about that, but who knows anymore.
	A struggle according to which Paul Pelosi suffers a skull fracture from a hammer attack.
	Does the pop say, you need to go to the bathroom in the middle of the struggle?
	Go to the bathroom.
	Did he go to the bathroom, come back, and then struggle over that?
	It doesn't make sense.
	It's not to say that it didn't happen, and it's not to say, it's not to undermine the violence of this.
	It just doesn't make sense.
	And for the politicians to reflexively rush out and start talking about how this is right-wing Republican extremists.
	The results of rhetoric from very, very bad Republicans and pundits, that's bad.
	Oh, it would be so amazing if people were actually able to detect where the cameras are outside, because there's undoubtedly cameras outside.
	De Pop, a conspiracy theorist who frequently posted online.
	Frequently posted online.
	Let's see those social media posts.
	I didn't hear frequently.
	Has been mentally ill for a long time, according to his ex-life partner, Oxanne Taub, who apparently is in jail.
	Herself a jailed nudist activist, convicted of child abduction charges, so you might want to take whatever she says with a grain of salt at this point, claimed in an interview she had two sons with the pop.
	Wow.
	Taub went on to detail one incident in which he allegedly came home after disappeared for almost a year, thought he was Jesus.
	Okay.
	So he faces charges.
	Nancy was seen visiting her husband in hospital on Sunday, her first public appearance since the attack.
	It took Nancy Pelosi over two days to get back from Washington to rush to her husband in the hospital.
	Some people are going to ask questions about that as well.
	The thing that is probably the most haunting about when we hear the reports of this assailant, of the attacker that you are speaking of, Is that he was yelling out things that we heard during January 6th, which is, where is Nancy?
	Jean-Pierre, confirmed press secretary, liar, has said.
	Isn't this just amazing?
	Isn't it just amazing?
	When you politicize a massive event before the information is in, politicize it to demonize half of the population, what do you think is going to happen?
	You're going to make people say, The story doesn't make sense.
	You're not asking questions.
	You're censoring the people who are answering the questions, and you are coming out and making definitive and damning statements to demonize half of America.
	And look at this.
	As they do it, as they beat you, as they verbally abuse, as they call you names and demonize you, and you know, again...
	We need to end this type of rhetoric.
	As they demonize you through their unsubstantiated, at the very least, as of this time, rhetoric, they complain about how we need to tone down the rhetoric.
	It needs to stop, and it's incredibly, incredibly dangerous.
	And half of the people of America are responsible for this, and they are dangerous.
	We really need to tone it down.
	It's dangerous.
	Is that it?
	Yeah.
	It's...
	It's dangerous.
	The rhetoric, we need to tone down the rhetoric.
	But first, let me demonize half of the country and potentially wrongly blame them for something that they might not have had anything to do with.
	That might not actually be what we are saying it is in order to weaponize it, politicize it, to demonize half of the country a week before the November midterms.
	I don't know what I did on the side.
	Clear all.
	I don't want to see what I see on the side of my...
	Okay, there, it's gone now.
	Sorry, my window, I couldn't see the full screen.
	Yeah, no, no, it's...
	So what do we know about the alleged attacker, De Pop?
	He's a Canadian from British Columbia, from what I understand, a former registered member of the Green Party.
	Let me just double-check that, actually, in real time.
	I want to check that for a very darn good reason, because I don't want to make a mistake.
	De Pop...
	David Green Party.
	Hold on.
	Let me see if I...
	I want to make sure about this.
	Green Party.
	He was once a registered San Francisco Chronicle.
	Let me show my work.
	Just so nobody ever accuses me of...
	You can accuse me of being wrong, and if I'm wrong, I will correct myself.
	Who is David DePop?
	San Francisco Chronicle.
	Who is David DePop?
	One of those nudist magas?
	I am not signing in.
	Son of a beasting.
	Hold on.
	Let's archive this.
	Just around the paywall.
	This page was archived 21 hours ago.
	Who's the Pope?
	The Pope.
	Who's the Pope?
	It's not the Pope.
	It's the Pope.
	Who is he?
	From nudist activist to online hate, suspect David DePop's strange descent.
	Oh, this is the other argument, that he was a lefty.
	When he believed the lefty things, that was before he got radicalized, and every aspect of his identity that might make him a stereotypical lefty, in quotes, ignore it, because he's been radicalized.
	Ignore the fact that it seems lefties might be easy to radicalize.
	I mean, there might be that aspect to deal with if we want to swallow that narrative.
	He was a lefty.
	He was a diehard, nudist, Green Party-registered lefty, but he got radicalized.
	Maybe that says something about...
	If we want to believe that, would I not be led to conclude that maybe lefties can be radicalized?
	I don't know.
	A childhood in Canada.
	A stint on the Big Island of Hawaii.
	A move to the Bay Area.
	A stretch of pro-nudity activism.
	This is a MAGA Republican.
	Check, check, check.
	Canadian?
	Hawaiian?
	San Francisco?
	And a pro-nudity activist.
	MAGA through and through.
	Morons, anybody who said.
	Oh, but no.
	That's before the dissent.
	That's before this stereotype, not just a lefty, this stereotypical lefty heard Donald Trump, heard those Republicans and those pundits, the hateful rhetoric, and he bought into it.
	And then most recently, an apparent obsession with pumping right-wing...
	Let's just jump right ahead, people.
	He's a stereotypical lefty who has an obsession with pumping right-wing conspiracy theories into the internet, spending hours and days in front of a computer.
	Filling web pages that had no apparent audience.
	This was the strange and peripatetic...
	What the heck does that mean?
	Peripatetic people.
	Traveling from place to place, in particular, working or based in various places for a relatively short period.
	His peripatetic way of life.
	Nomadic.
	Itinerant.
	Traveling.
	Okay.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Okay.
	While precise motive for the attack just before 3 a.m.
	Friday morning was not known, DePap reportedly asked at one point, where is Nancy?
	Do you notice how...
	When is this article written, by the way?
	Because it's starting to change a little bit.
	This is two days ago.
	At first, he broke into saying, where's Nancy?
	Where's Nancy?
	Now they're reporting.
	At some point, it's reported that at one point, he said, where is Nancy?
	City dispatch recordings indicate the intruder told Paul Pelosi.
	City dispatch recordings indicate the intruder told Paul Pelosi he was a friend and planned to wait for his wife, who was in Washington, D.C. at the time.
	That's misinformation.
	The actual recording was Paul Pelosi, apparently Paul Pelosi, talking to the dispatcher saying, I don't know who this guy is, but his name's David and he's a friend.
	And that was subsequently deleted from the recordings, but there's many recordings of it on Twitter, which I can't access yet.
	Let's just see if I'm still locked out.
	So that's not...
	It's not him having told Paul Pelosi that.
	Paul Pelosi...
	I told the dispatcher that.
	I don't know who he is, but his name's David and he's a friend.
	Arrested at the scene.
	The pap was booked on suspicion of several crimes, including attempted murder, yada, yada.
	Police Chief Bill Cox says the pap was hospitalized but would not say whether to receive medical.
	Okay, fine.
	Was medical or psychiatric, or both.
	The pap's history...
	Intensified concerns that an explosion of conspiratorial right-wing rhetoric had inspired this lefty to go...
	Let's just get to the Green Party.
	Online registration with the Green Party.
	Look at the way they're trying to connect the San Francisco Chronicle, all of these...
	They don't have critical information.
	They don't have critical information, and they're trying to tie it to right-wing January 6th events.
	I mean, it's pathological.
	It's pathological, divisive, and itself exactly what they're warning and trying to tell everybody not to do.
	Tone down the rhetoric might mean don't blame your ideological political adversaries on something that might not at all be in any way related to them.
	He's a stereotypical lefty, and to make sense of it...
	It's the no true lefty, the no true Scotsman paradox.
	Well, sure, he was a lefty.
	He was a good lefty when he believed those things.
	But the second he did something wrong, right wing.
	Oh, De Pop's history intensified concern that an explosion of conspiratorial right wing rhetoric had expired the violence against Paul Pelosi, just as it had the January 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol building, when the House Speaker was also threatened.
	Some conservatives, meanwhile, sought to portray the attacks as motivated by leftists, citing the perhaps one-time registration with the Green Party.
	How about let's hold off with the ideologically motivated motivations until we know more?
	Or maybe they're just saying, by the way, maybe the conservatives are not saying it's leftists.
	Maybe the conservatives are saying, you idiots who are reflexively blaming it on the right, Hillary Clinton.
	All the media outlets that say the same thing.
	You idiots.
	Instead of reflexively blaming on the right, I could just as easily and just as disingenuously reflexively blame it on the left.
	The dude is from Berkeley, registered Green Party, hemp maker nudist, living in San Francisco.
	But yeah, he's a MAGA Republican.
	We can both play that stupid game, might be the point of some of those conservatives.
	Professor Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism in California, said De Pop's political trajectory, while striking, was not among people who gravitate to anti-authority messages.
	I'm sorry, is being anti-government a right-wing thing?
	I always thought it was also pretty much a stereotypically left-wing thing.
	You know, like, rage against the machine, fight the power.
	Stick the daisy in the barrel of a rifle of the man.
	I always thought being anti-government was pretty much just as much a part of the left, if we want to go on the spectrum, as it was a part of the right.
	Now, all of a sudden, if you're anti-government, you are only...
	If you're anti-government, you're a right-wing extremist.
	I mean, that's it.
	It seems that only the right-wing are anti-government.
	Great.
	I'm not sure that it's great to be happy about being pro-government.
	Knowing what the government has done historically.
	Yeah, Rage Against the Machine went to Rage For the Machine, says Mystic J. Nice in Rumble.
	So the dude, in as much as anybody wants to reflexively say it was right-wing, this dude's a MAGA Republican, convinced, indoctrinated by right-wing extremism, that game can go both ways, and I think that's what a lot of people are saying.
	But, you know, forgive your allies.
	Never forgive your adversaries.
	It's the no true liberal, the no true lefty paradox.
	Sure, the dude was a total stereotypical lefty.
	Whether or not being that type of a stereotypical lefty makes you more prone to brainwashing, I don't know.
	But whatever he did, because it was violent, was clearly the right got to this good lefty.
	That's the narrative.
	Politically motivated, assassination attempt from someone who managed to break in.
	We're not sure if it was in his underwear or got into his underwear.
	A friend named David apparently opened the door for the cops.
	Somebody opened the door for the cops.
	And apparently during this assault, this attempted assassination, he lets Paul Pelosi go to the bathroom.
	Yeah, but if you ask any questions about it, you get locked into your Twitter account.
	Which brings us back full circle.
	Which brings us back full circle, if I can just find where it is.
	Me's been locked out for a tweet.
	Media Matters.
	Does everybody know what Media Matters is?
	I didn't.
	I didn't know who Matt Gerth was.
	MediaMatters.org.
	Let me see this.
	Is this it?
	Oh yeah, it's got to be.
	These top advertisers can stop Musk's Twitter from supercharging online radicalization.
	Look at Media Matters.
	Hold on.
	You're not going to like it?
	I'm just going to go to Wikipedia for a second.
	Media Matters Wiki.
	Here we go.
	Media Matters for America.
	Is this it?
	Is a politically left-leaning 501c3 not-for-profit.
	Hold on.
	Let me just make sure.
	Does Gertz come up in this?
	I don't want to get the wrong one.
	Left-wing, not-for-profit, media watchdog group.
	MMFA.
	That MMFA sounds offensive.
	Sounds like a swear word.
	Is it the right one?
	Founded by David Brock as a counterweight to the conservative Media Research Center, it is known for its aggressive criticism of conservative journalists and media outlets, including its, quote, war on Fox News.
	Personnel?
	Well, hold on.
	Hold on.
	Chat, just make sure.
	Am I on?
	Is this the right media matters?
	RoyalPlague45 says, you are so bitter about Twitter, LOL, a $2 rumble around.
	I am entirely joking.
	It is the appropriate, applicable joke.
	You know, I've actually found that my life has been much more peaceful without Twitter for the, you know, the minimal hours that I've got.
	Is this the right one?
	John Podesta, the former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton.
	Provided office space for Media Matters early in its formation.
	That'll tell you about Media Matters.
	At the Center for American Progress, a Democratic think tank which Podesta established in 2002.
	Hillary Clinton advised Media Matters in its early stages out of a belief that progressives should follow conservatives informing think tanks and advocacy groups to support their political goals.
	Media Matters has hired several of the best known political professionals who have worked For Democratic politicians and progressive groups.
	Well, that looks like what it is.
	Now, what was the guy's name?
	Matt Gertz Media Matters?
	Yeah, okay, fine.
	So this is the Matt Gertz.
	This is the tweet that I was responding to.
	At M. Gertz.
	Okay, so that is the individual I replied to.
	He's a senior fellow at Media Matters, which he joined in 2007.
	His work focuses on relationships between Fox News and the Trump administration and news coverage of politics and elections and media ethics.
	Business ethics.
	I'm picturing a Billy Madison moment right now.
	Matt's writings on the Trump-Fox feedback loop has appeared in the Daily Beast, HuffPo, NBC, Think, Politico.
	And as he's discussed on CNN, oh, good for him, MSNBC.
	All right.
	So the guy's a fake news propagandist.
	Okay.
	NPR and Comedy Central.
	Your number one source of accurate news information.
	He holds a bachelor's degree in political science from Columbia.
	Matt is married to...
	Just so everybody also knows, I don't talk about my credentials all that much.
	I've got an honors degree in philosophy and a law degree with a minor in Eastern European history.
	I had another minor in there somewhere.
	Philosophy, minor Eastern European history.
	No, I don't think I have another minor in there.
	So it was an honors in philosophy.
	Honors degree.
	My thesis.
	Hold on a second.
	My thesis was entitled Deontological Consequentialism.
	Try to make sense of that.
	Because I did.
	And I can't find my thesis anymore because I had it in my Yahoo account.
	And Yahoo deleted my entire account because I did not have activity for 10 freaking years.
	Who would have thunk?
	Deontological consequentialism.
	You might know what deontology is.
	You might know what consequentialism is.
	Consequentialism is the juvenile philosophy that to maximize the good, you just need to minimize the evil.
	So if it means killing one person to prevent someone from killing ten, you've got to kill the one person because you're maximizing the good.
	Consequentialism.
	Simplified in a nutshell.
	And I posited in my thesis that the only thing that makes something good is the goodness itself.
	And that you do not maximize good by compelling people to do bad.
	And so you're actually, in killing the one to save a bad man from killing 10, you're actually just increasing the overall bad, even if you're minimizing overall death.
	So deontological consequentialism is you have to do that, which maximizes that which is already deontologically valuable in the first place.
	Okay.
	DVR Downmark says, oh my God, Viva, very liberal of you.
	The funny thing is, everything is so stupid.
	Depending on what I say, I'll get accused of being a liberal, a right-wing radical, an alt-right.
	A label is about the person issuing the label, and very rarely about the individual.
	You do something good, or you do something bad to the people who like you, they'll call you the other side.
	You do something bad to that other side, they'll call you the other side.
	It doesn't matter.
	And then you do something bad and people want to weaponize it, you will become what they want to make you.
	Thank you.
	Just reading some of the chat here.
	So Media Matters puts out Matt Gertz, and I respond, and I think I know what happened, but we'll find out.
	And that's where we're at.
	But I wanted to show this, because this is the total beauty of it.
	And the Orwellian 1984, it's not even about, it's not about ensuring the rules, it's not about ensuring A safe environment.
	It's about compelling submission.
	It's about compelling compliance.
	Look at this.
	Let me just get my Twitter back up.
	Delete.
	Delete tweet.
	I'm sorry.
	Why?
	Tweet one of one violating one of our rules.
	Look at the bottom here.
	There's that little red button.
	All you have to do, Winston.
	Just say two plus two equals five.
	Just say it, and your suffering is over.
	By clicking delete, you acknowledge that your tweet violated the Twitter rules.
	You haven't told me which rule I violated Twitter.
	Can you imagine this?
	They want you to acknowledge you violated the Twitter rules when their own notification to you doesn't tell you which rule you allegedly violated.
	All you have to do, Winston, is delete the tweet.
	Just hit delete, and it all comes to an end.
	On my locals community, I shared this with a little annotation that said, F off as a joke.
	Just delete it.
	Just acknowledge you broke the rules.
	So that we and everyone else out there can forever say you acknowledged you broke the rules.
	You're a very, very bad man.
	You can barely be trusted with your own thoughts and form of expression.
	Just say sorry.
	Just repent.
	Just acknowledge that you broke the rules, and we'll let you back in.
	Oh, don't do it.
	I'm not doing it.
	I mean, ever.
	Unless they tell me that I broke a rule, which is, you're not allowed tweeting at the same person within one minute.
	If they tell me that, I'll say, all right, I broke that rule.
	I made three tweets.
	One was in response to a tweet from Matt Gertz.
	The other one was a retweet of one of Matt Gertz's retweets.
	And the third one was that, With all different messages.
	But they don't want a clean environment.
	They don't want a compliant environment.
	They want to compel submission.
	Twitter could delete my tweets.
	Hey, Twitter, you idiots.
	Elon, I don't mean to call you an idiot.
	But hey, Elon, hey, Twitter, delete my tweet.
	You delete it for me.
	You say, Viva, it broke the rules, and we're deleting it for you.
	Why can't you do that?
	Delete it and let me go back in.
	No, they're not going to do it.
	You have to do it.
	You have to submit.
	You have to comply.
	The price of entry is sin.
	Anyways, I'm taking the words of James O 'Keefe to heart.
	I am not going to bear false witness against myself.
	They're going to justify it.
	And by the way, you want to know the ultimate kick in the teeth?
	Whoever, if it was a brigading event, if it was a mass flagging to teach a lesson, if it was...
	If it was trying to suppress my whatever, I don't care about Twitter stats.
	It's just evidence that if that was the goal, you done failed.
	Whoever did this.
	I'm going to come back to Twitter.
	I'm going to have been vindicated.
	And in the meantime, whatever message anybody thought they were trying to suppress or whatever punishment they thought they were trying to inflict, you've amplified the message.
	You've never heard of the Streisand effect, and you've actually drawn more people to my Twitter feed, so thank you.
	But that's it.
	All right, that is the latest.
	Just hit the delete button, David.
	That's all you have to do.
	Just say 2 plus 2 equals 5, and you'll be happy.
	And I'm sure Winston was happy after he said 2 plus 2 equals 5. All right, what do we got in the chat?
	Betting websites are predicting a GOP Senate majority that would ruin the FDA and CDC with the whole world watching.
	Also, my Instagram got smoked this morning as well.
	No reason or appeal.
	Poof.
	Well, now that you mention it, I care even less about Instagram than I do about...
	Oh my goodness, I just got a memory of...
	Pumpkin.
	Hold on, everybody.
	I'll tell you one thing.
	Look at this.
	Who remembers this?
	Wait, wait, wait.
	There we go.
	That was a 1,200-pound pumpkin.
	That might have been the smaller one.
	That might have been 850 or 900 pounds.
	We had one that was just under 1,000, and then we had one that was 1,200 pounds.
	Can't find any massive pumpkins here, but we are going to celebrate Halloween tonight.
	Boy, howdy.
	No cockroaches.
	Except for the lawyer.
	What do we say here?
	Bankrupt Elon.
	POS says rare field tennis.
	Yep, that's what we do.
	We don't like what someone says.
	Bankrupt them.
	We got someone who was watching the Alex Jones trial and took away the wrong lesson.
	Nature Lover Freedom says staying true to yourself is your best quality.
	At first, if they just say delete it, To come back.
	Just delete it.
	I don't care to fight over a freaking tweet.
	By deleting it, you acknowledge you broke the rules.
	I've got two middle fingers and I have the good intention of giving both of them to you.
	Twitter rules.
	Anyhow, my first tweet back might actually be the F off to that recommendation.
	You're allowed swearing on Twitter.
	Anyhow, so that's it.
	Have I missed anything about the recent drama and the Paul Paul?
	I think we've covered everything that we know as of now.
	The Paul Pelosi story does not make sense.
	I do not doubt for one minute that he was actually injured and actually assaulted by an actual individual who might actually be absolutely mentally unwell.
	I've got a lot of questions before I'm going to blame it on what is so damn politically convenient to use as an excuse.
	2020, October 2020, they arrested radicals planning to kidnap and do worse to Gretchen Whitmer.
	Right-wing, ideologically motivated violent extremism, October 2020.
	October 2022?
	Two weeks before the midterms?
	Now they're trying to pin this on that?
	Well, isn't that convenient?
	And not just that.
	Can you imagine the sin?
	The absolute sin it would be if this happens to turn out to be not at all politically motivated.
	Set aside whether or not it's a gay lover, spat, whatever.
	If it's not politically motivated, and it's just an absolute mentally ill individual in crime-ridden San Francisco who broke into the Pelosi's house undetected somehow, if it was not political, and these political people are trying to weaponize it for political purposes to exploit Paul Pelosi's random act of violence, if that's what it turns out to be, oh, he had a list, but they don't want to call it a hit list.
	They found documents, a list of other politicians.
	They don't want to call it a hit list.
	If they try to weaponize this wrongly for political opportunism, that is such a vile sin of conscience, of mind, and soul.
	Period.
	So, we'll wait for that.
	Now, let me see here.
	Engelbrecht, this is the other story that I wanted to talk about.
	We talked about it last night.
	In chaotic Texas court, Here we go.
	I have the right scoop.
	I don't want to pick a website that's accused of being too right-wing.
	Let me just see if...
	Let me see if...
	RSB Network.
	True, the vote leader's arrested.
	Look, I don't know.
	This website might be right-wing.
	RSBN.
	What does that stand for?
	Guarantee it is right-wing because I don't think many leftist links are going to be taking pride in the fact that two defendants to a lawsuit...
	Have now been jailed on contempt proceedings for not ratting out an allegedly protected source with whom they had a meeting to allegedly hack computer information and identity of the plaintiff.
	Okay, we're going to read this with the requisite degree of skepticism because I don't know the website.
	In a shocking turn of events, True the Vote founder Catherine Engelbrecht and election intelligence specialist Greg Phillips have been arrested according to multiple sources.
	The powerhouse duo who led the charge of uncovering mountains of evidence of a nationwide ballot trafficking conspiracy in Dinesh D'Souza's 2000 Mules, taken into custody by U.S. Marshals for declining to provide the identity of one of their confidential informants per the Millennial Post.
	Okay, and this is not to say that I trust the Millennial Post more than an outlet that I don't know, but I do.
	And there's the Pozo brief, Jack Posobiec.
	Breaking true-the-vote leaders arrested after refusing to reveal confidential informant.
	Post-millennial.
	Marshals took him into custody, so this is the same story.
	Federal Judge Kenneth Hoyt delivered the order holding the two in contempt of court for refusing to identify the informant, according to independent journalist Ivory Hecker.
	Ivory Hecker is the journalist who quit Fox News.
	On the air?
	I believe it was Fox.
	She's the one who quit on air.
	Everyone should go follow Ivory Hecker.
	Why, I'm just going to go reply to her tweet right now.
	It's a joke.
	Ivory Hecker says, as ordered by federal judge Kenneth Hoyt, U.S. Marshals have just taken into custody, true the votes, Catherine Engelbrecht and Greg Phillips for contempt of court due to their refusal to release the name of a confidential informant.
	And she seems to have a...
	She says, Judge Hoyt, you don't see this now, this is in response to her own tweet, orders that Engelbrecht and Phillips be held in custody for a day or more until they bring forth the information they are withholding.
	Judge says he never got a straight answer on who was in the Dallas hotel room January 2021, and he doesn't know how many people were there.
	Judge says the way Phillips and Engelbrecht talked suggests true the vote did have access to the hacked computer data, though they deny it.
	So we're now entering the realm where...
	Defendants are being jailed on civil contempt for refusing to disclose what might allegedly be a confidential source or an informant.
	All right.
	Oh, but then there's more.
	We talked about this yesterday.
	The arrest of the person in the latest civil suit filed by Koenig, a Michigan-based company that provides software to elections offices regarding poll worker management according to VoteBeat Texas.
	Kenneth alleged that True the Vote made, quote, baseless and racist accusations against CEO Eugene Yu, which forced him and his family to flee their home.
	Yu was arrested and charged by the Los Angeles District Attorney for allegedly storing government data in China, which is in breach of the company's contract.
	He was arrested on embezzlement charges.
	LA officials reportedly received their initial tip regarding Yu from Phyllis.
	Here's another story that just doesn't make sense.
	They're jailing the individual who is the one who allegedly provided the information to the authorities that subsequently led to the arrest of the individual.
	Doesn't make sense.
	At the center of the issue was the name and contact information of individuals that the pair have stated were present in the Dallas hotel room.
	Hoyt had ordered Phillips and Egbert to turn the...
	Okay, whatever.
	We already got that part.
	Here, I'm going to give you all the link because it's amazing.
	Another story that just doesn't make sense.
	They're jailing for contempt the individuals who provided the information to the FBI that led to the arrest of the CEO of the company that's suing them for defamation and computer fraud.
	Try to make sense of that.
	Celsius says Posobiec is great and I concur.
	The team at the Postmillennial is great.
	Moulton Saul says, I don't trust him, not knowing who the him is.
	If that's Posobiec or True the Vote or Kenneth U. Mystic J. Nice says, did the judge ever fly on a certain notorious airline?
	That's a joke.
	He had no good deed, goes unpunished on my farm.
	Presumably referring to the fact that these two individuals, not collaborated, worked with the FBI to get them information they needed.
	To actually arrest the individual on embezzlement charges because it violated the contract because the individual was actually storing some election data on servers in China despite the fact that he wasn't supposed to, which is exactly what True the Vote was alleging, for which they're being sued by the company whose CEO was actually just arrested on embezzlement charges.
	First of all, try to say that five times in a row.
	Second of all, try to make sense of that.
	Welsh Fluff says, bye Viva.
	Rackets is on for DB trial.
	Have a good one.
	Still really mad you left Canada.
	Welsh Fluff.
	Well, thank you very much.
	Everybody, I'm going to be over in a few minutes.
	So when you do go over to Rackets, enter the chat and drop a little good good and let them know who sent you.
	15 minutes, Viva Welsh Fluff.
	You're right.
	I got 13 minutes because I got to be out here at 1.45.
	So that's what's going on in the world.
	You can go on Twitter.
	I've never actually trended.
	I wouldn't mind trending.
	For good reasons.
	I don't want to trend because, you know, Florida man gets his genitals bitten off by an alligator.
	I don't want to be trending for that.
	Viva nad's gone.
	It was not how I'd want to be trending.
	But, you know, free viva, free viva fry.
	Free viva fry, I think, might already be out there.
	It's kind of catchy.
	And the public hearings, which are still going on, it's an absolute crap show.
	It's a gong show.
	For anybody watching it.
	I'll pop in and out of there.
	But it is Halloween.
	I've got some decorations to put up.
	Got to make sure we got enough candy.
	You guys want to know what I'm going as tonight?
	It's Florida woman now.
	Well played, Elijah.
	Y 'all want to know what I'm going as tonight?
	Bob Ross.
	And my wife.
	She also is going as Bob Ross.
	We're going.
	We're going as Bob Ross couple.
	It's going to be really, really quite fun.
	Viva Nad's gone.
	Very vestigious.
	So I think that's all that there is.
	I don't have my diary, my notes.
	No, I think we've done good today.
	We've done good today.
	Did I miss it?
	One last thank you and shout out to fieldofgreens.com.
	It'll bring you to Brickhouse Nutrition website.
	Promo code VIVA.
	For your daily dose of greens, 15% off your first order, 10% off a subscription.
	It looks like swamp water.
	Everyone says, stop saying the swamp.
	It looks like swamp water.
	It tastes good and it feels good.
	And it's good for you.
	All of the good stuff.
	Home title lock.
	You won't feel it, but it will give you a sense of security that people should have.
	And hopefully you never need to use it, but it's there to protect your home.
	So two good products that I actually use tomorrow will be another sponsored video.
	Tomorrow.
	Unless there's an issue, Dr. Malone, 3 o 'clock.
	And we're going to obviously do the better part of that exclusively on Rumble.
	I'm going to probably still post it to YouTube anyhow.
	But I want Rumble to get the exclusive on that.
	Boy, howdy.
	Because it's going to be amazing.
	Rackets says, hello, and he loves you.
	Yes!
	Dry cricket powder, yum.
	There's no crickets in here.
	Let me just take my glasses off.
	Organic greens blend.
	Organic spinach powder.
	Organic parsley powder.
	Organic.
	I'll just stop saying organic.
	Kale.
	Barley grass powder.
	Wheat grass.
	Spirulina powder.
	Green pepper.
	Banana.
	Broccoli.
	Organic prebiotic fiber.
	Organic antioxidant reds blend.
	It's good.
	And home title lock is good.
	So that is it.
	Go.
	Run.
	Enjoy the afternoon.
	Happy Halloween, everybody.
	I love Halloween.
	It's weird celebrating Halloween in Florida for the first time.
	I can also tell you, pumpkins rot a lot faster in the Florida sweltering heat.
	If you puncture a pumpkin, it's going to rot significantly faster in Florida than it does in Montreal.
	But go, have a good afternoon.
	Happy Halloween for everybody celebrating it.
	If you don't celebrate it, celebrate it.
	It's the best holiday of the season.
	I don't think I forgot anything.
	No, I forgot something.
	I got to get a video.
	To play us out.
	And I also want to leave us with some inspiration.
	Let me get the video while everyone talks.
	It's going to be a fishing video.
	Viva Fry Fishing.
	You know what?
	It's not going to be fishing.
	It's going to be a drone video.
	Let's see which one.
	Cooking a steak with a drone?
	Let's do cooking a steak with a drone.
	But what I want to leave you with, do not despair, but do not have faith just for the sake of having faith.
	God helps those who help themselves.
	Nothing's going to happen if you don't make it happen.
	But in battling monsters, do not become a monster because when you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares right back.
	And there is no point winning a battle if you lose your dignity and self-worth.
	Now, with that said, Carry yourselves, conduct yourselves in a manner that would make your parents, your children, and your pets happy, and you can do no wrong.
	And I'm going to play out with something that's going to be so damn cringy to watch.
	Ugh.
	But I'm going to do it.
	I'm going to cringe hard with the rest of you, but this was an absolute first.
	Cooking a steak with a drone.
	Sometimes the question is not, why do it?
	But simply, can it be done?
	It can be done.
	Okay, we are doing yet another internet first.
	Hold on a second.
	It's really not an ideal day because it's pouring rain, but hell or high water I'm doing this.
	We are cooking a steak with a drone on a barbecue.
	Now we're under this tree because it's pouring rain, but we're gonna do it.
	We can do it.
	Oh yeah, it's working a little bit.
	Oh, it's touching the ground a little bit.
	That's fine.
	And there we go.
	It's on.
	It's cooking.
	It's cooking.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	We're gonna wait for that side to be cooked.
	We're gonna flip it.
	You ready?
	Lift it up.
	And down.
	There we go.
	arlares
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, that wind is coming crazy.
	We've got to flip the stake.
	Okay.
	And...
	Oh, we missed it.
	We missed it.
	There we go.
	Oh, no!
	The stake is gone.
	This would be so much easier if the weather were good.
	But we are doing it today.
	Whether anyone likes it or not.
	No, no, no.
	That's touching Mike.
	up got up I got it.
	I got the other side.
	That is the other side being cooked perfectly.
	That is the other side being cooked perfectly.
	I look crazy.
	It doesn't matter.
	doing this Oh, yeah.
	Gonna let it sit there for a couple of minutes.
	Okay, and I think we're good.
	Now what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna get the drone.
	Well, I just ran the drone in because it's pouring rain.
	We've done it.
	Cooked steak off a drone.

▲