'You Want The World To Think It Was ISRAEL?' Piers Morgan vs Bassem Youssef on Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk’s murder has shone an unflattering spotlight on the abject state of discourse and division, especially online, where extreme takes increasingly lead to real world consequences. Many of the protesters at London’s massive anti-immigration march this weekend brought their fury about Charlie Kirk onto the streets. And at the heart of it all is a bitter blame game in which neither side is in the mood for compromise. Comedian and activist Bassem Youssef returns to Piers Morgan Uncensored to give his take.Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent and supported by: Ground News: Ground News: Go to https://groundnews.com/PIERS for 40% off the Vantage subscription and find the truth mainstream media doesn't want you to see. Oxford Natural: To watch their full stories, scan the QR code on your screen or visit https://oxfordnatural.com/piers/ to get 70% off your first order when you use code PIERS. Preorder Woke is Dead by Piers Morgan: https://www.waterstones.com/book/woke... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Freedom To Disagree00:15:01
Isabel Brown.
The wait is almost over.
She's joining Daily Wire Plus with the Isabel Brown Show.
Cannot wait for you guys to see how hard we've been working.
I could not be more excited for this new adventure.
You can expect larger-than-life guests, see for questions to the nerds.
Meeting the President of the United States and the Vice President, and now meeting our new American Pope.
This is crazy.
Let's jump in.
Join me every weekday for the Isabel Brown Show on Daily Wire Plus or wherever you get your podcasts.
If I got shot today, I am sure there are millions of people around the globe who would travel in my death.
So Charlie Kirk himself tweeted the right to speak freely is the birthright of all Americans.
It's very interesting that in the last three days after Charlie Kirk was killed, they even proposed a bill to revoke citizenships for people critical of Israel.
Who committed the hit job on Charlie Kirk?
I don't know, but I find it very interesting that Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Accounts, went around the TV shows making sure that we didn't kill.
I mean, it's like, this is like a very weird position.
But I've also been, as you know, increasingly critical of the Israeli government.
I'm sorry, you're not fooling me, Pierce.
You are actually the real Iron Doom of Israel.
You want the right to suggest that Charlie Kirk was the subject of a hit job by Israel.
You want the world to think that.
Well, let's talk about Toby Robertson.
So Israel openly causing civil unrest in London.
You call me an ill-informed, irresponsible journalist.
Because I'm not a journalist.
I'm a comedian.
Remember, I'm a clown.
Charlie Kirk's murder has shone an unflattering spotlight on the abject state of discourse and division, especially online, where extreme takes increasingly lead to real-world consequences.
Many of the protesters at London's massive anti-immigration march this weekend, already fired up by some dubious content, brought their fury about Charlie Kirk onto the streets.
And at the heart of it all is a bitter blame game which neither side is in the mood for compromise.
Comedian and activist Basim Youssef is a familiar face to uncensored viewers.
His recent contribution to these debates implies he's in no mood for taking the temperature down.
He's about to embark on a new talk called The Belly of the Beast and he joins me now.
Basim, great to see you again.
Hello.
What is your view of the Charlie Kirk assassination?
Oh, assassination is bad.
I mean, it's a very open question, Yanny.
So if you're talking about the assassination, of course it's bad.
But can you get more specific what you want me to say?
Yeah, I mean, I guess the more specific one would be, I've been appalled.
I didn't agree with everything Charlie Kirk stood for or said, but I respected the fact that he always went in to college campuses in particular and invited everyone who disagreed with him to come and debate with him.
He was always happy to hear other people giving their views and would challenge them and they would challenge him.
And I was appalled that the woke left, as I see it, as opposed to the old liberal left, of which I used to be a happy member, that the woke left seemed to be gleeful about his murder and have raced to social media to celebrate it.
We've seen rap stars do it.
We've seen TikTokers do it.
Influencers do it all over the world, competing with each other to see who could be the most gleeful.
We've seen teachers, doctors, you know, university administrators and so on.
I'm at a complete loss to understand how any human being with any sense of humanity would want to be seen celebrating the murder of a 31-year-old man with his wife and two kids watching at the time for his opinions.
I mean, it's terrible, of course.
I mean, to celebrate anybody's death, whether it's a 31-year-old father or babies and children in Gaza every day, where we have seen the woke left and the right are celebrating the death of children every single day and nothing happened to them.
I mean, first of all, when you say the woke left, who are these people?
Are they like, who are the leaders?
A bunch of pop stars and influencers and people with TikTok.
And I mean, does that represent that?
Well, I think it's more.
Well, I would say it's more than that.
I'd say there's a lot of people who I think have been part of what I call the woke ideology in the last few years, which has morphed from a very laudable thing originally in the 60s and 70s.
It started in American black music and it was about promoting a raised awareness of social and racial injustice.
I wrote a book about it.
By that criteria, I'm happily woke.
But what it's morphed into in recent years, driven, I think, by very tribal social media, is it's become a form of fascism where people on the woke left are quite happy to want to shame and vilify and cancel and destroy people for having a different view to them.
Whether that view is about historical figures or about books or about movies or about fashion or about hairstyles or what you can wear on Halloween or whatever it may be, it became a puritanical purge, which I felt has bordered on fascism.
And at the heart of it was the constant description of Donald Trump as the new Hitler, his supporters as the new Nazis.
They're all a bunch of fascists.
And eventually you have a young deranged mind who apparently, according to investigators, is of a woke ideology, radicalized, who initialed on the bullets that this was an anti-fascism assassination because he probably believed that Charlie Kirk was a fascist and a Nazi and everything else, because that's what his people had told him.
And I feel that's an incredibly dangerous cocktail that has been allowed to happen.
And when I saw the celebrations going on, I realized it wasn't just about the shooter, that there were a lot of people in America, in the UK, around the world, who actually agree and were prepared to celebrate it.
Well, let's break this down.
Now, when you say the left, it's very general.
If you have thousands of people with TikTok accounts that celebrate people's death, it happens on the right and on the left.
There are people who have like mocked the death of the Minnesota lawmaker and her husband and her dog that were shot in front of their four years old.
And again, I just like want to preface it, like I'm not condoning what happened to Charlie Kirk.
What happened is terrible.
It should not be accepted.
And mind myself, I will never celebrate something like that.
But like, I'm a little bit confused because someone like Randy Fine, who's a congressman from Florida, who posted about going after people's jobs if they mock Charlie's death online, which is terrible, of course, like if you mock anybody's death.
But the fact that you go after someone, it's very confusing because for those of you who don't know who Randy Fine is, he is the fat bitch who continues to suck Israel dick every day on daily basis.
And that guy, yeah, he is in Gaza.
Like he said, everyone in Gaza should die.
Kill them all.
Let the blood fall in Gaza.
They are animals.
And now he pretends to have a soul.
This kind of manufactured selective rage could confuse you.
If you're going to have rage, please.
If you're going to be angry, please.
But just like be consistent.
And we have people losing their jobs, their careers, getting canceled for being dismissive about Charlie.
Again, terrible to do.
But I don't get it because I thought canceling something is what the APPC left would do.
I don't condone making insensitive remarks about a guy who was just murdered.
We can discuss his ideas.
We can praise or trash his ideas because his ideas will live on forever.
But if some people are insensitive or rude, well, he was a public figure.
For many people, he was a controversial figure.
If today Biden or Kamala Harris or Hillary Clinton died or got shot, I'm sure there's a lot of people that will celebrate their death.
If I got shot today, I am sure there are millions of people around the globe who would travel in my death and he will then make like content that would call it insensitive.
I'm sure that if you died, Piers Mogherd, people would be celebrating.
So I don't understand.
Yes, we can talk about it being insensitive, terrible, can talk about it with a moral issue, but I don't understand the double standards of the West.
Well, I think I think on that, Basa, I really want to.
Let me ask you this part.
Because for years, we as Muslims and Arabs, we were lectured from the West about freedom of expression, freedom to offend.
It's very important.
Freedom to offend.
freedom to offend.
But for years, people made fun of Muslims, Arabs, our religion, our culture, our babies and children being killed in Gaza every single day.
And no one lost a single minute of sleep over it, which is very confusing to me because the lines between what is legal, what is allowed, what is accepted, what is punishable, what is prone upon, these are lines seem hazy.
So please, yes, go rage, like be angry about it, but like be consistent so people can believe you.
You know, I think you make a very good point.
I've seen some of the hounding of certain people out of jobs in the last few days is clearly hypocritical because unless you're actually condoning the murder and endorsing and supporting an act of criminal murder, if you're just criticizing Charlie Kirk for positions that he held, I think that's perfectly okay, right?
I may not like it if you're a friend of Charlie's or one of his family members, but he would be the first to say that's fine.
Where I think the line is for me with cancel culture, if you like, is that there's a guy, for example, who's the president-elect of the Oxford Union Debating Society.
I think you've done it, Basil, haven't you?
It's not just how the news is told, but what's left out, which concerns me.
And when a friend in the business recommended I try ground news, I gave it a go.
Quite honestly, I was impressed.
It does something brilliant, which most news platforms are afraid to do.
It's an app and a website that lines up coverage of the same story from across the spectrum, left, right, international, and lays it all out side by side.
That kind of transparency is increasingly rare and is vital.
Ground news helps you to dig in and find the facts by showing you who owns each outlet, what their bias is, and which stories are being buried.
It has an especially revealing blind spot feed, which services stories being reported almost exclusively by only one side of the political divide.
I want to hear every side before making up my mind.
Ground news makes that possible and easy.
It's independent, funded by subscribers and not corporate interests, just like my show.
And it's a tool that puts the power back in your hands.
Go to groundnews.com slash peers to claim your 40% discount, the unlimited access vantage plan and see what everyone else is missing.
That's groundnews.com slash peers.
Right.
So we've both done that.
It's probably the most famous debating society in the world.
The whole point of it is that they bring people into that chamber to debate, to have different opinions and debate, as you and I do regularly.
And the president-elect, after Charlie Kirk was murdered, having debated opposite Charlie Kirk in that chamber in May himself, actually gleefully celebrated the murder, said LOL and said, let's fucking go with a big exclamation mark, right?
That to me, it's not cancel culture to say that guy should not be the president of the Oxford Union Debating Society.
Clearly, he should not be the president of a debating society if he celebrates somebody being murdered for their opinions.
Would you agree with that?
I agree with that.
But let's say if we agree on that, let's agree on everything else.
So everybody who holds a position who mocks the death of Palestinian children being killed every day in front of cameras, they should lose their job too.
You understand why it is difficult for me to be on the same page with you?
Because this is like cherry-picking.
Well, you haven't asked me if I agree with you.
No.
I don't disagree.
I think if you're a doctor.
Explain if you're a Harvard professor or you're a doctor or you're a teacher and you glorify or celebrate the murder, or depending which side you're on, whether you see it as murder or you know collateral damage as you go after Hamas, whatever you want to call it.
But if you are seen celebrating that, you have to mention Hamas there, right?
No, no, I'm just showing you.
You had to just like shade.
No, no, you know my view of this.
No, no, Bastin.
No, I'm simply saying.
You just have to mention how I remember.
There are many pro-PA.
Let me clarify.
The reason I clarified, there are many people who believe what the IDF has been doing with civilians is murder and genocide.
There are others on the pro-Israeli side who believe that they are targeting a terror group in Hamas and that innocent people will get killed in the process.
Therefore, it's not murder.
So I'm clarifying the two sides of that debate.
You have a strong view, other people I've had on have an equally strong view the other way.
But my point being, if you're in a position of-there's no two sides of genocide, there's no two sides of the Holocaust.
Seriously, so let's start two-siding it because it's becoming exhaustive.
Okay, let's not get into that part of the debate.
The part I want to agree with you about is this: I think if you're an administrator of a university or a hospital or a school, if you're in charge of teaching people or you know, medical practice and you are seen celebrating the deaths of innocent people publicly on social media, you should not keep your job, right?
Because clearly you are unfit for that job.
And it should be down to the people who run these organizations to say, sorry, no, you don't get to teach kids if you glorify murder.
Well, there are people who are teaching kids on the left who actually who glorified, like, hey, happy five anniversary for George Floyd is a five years sober because he's dead for five years.
I mean, the thing is, my thing is, if we're going to live in a utopian, polite society, let's make it general.
The idea of just like cherry-picking things.
I don't disagree.
I don't disagree.
Yeah.
So, so, so, so, and the thing is, here's the thing: this is the internet, Piers.
The internet will always promote the most hateful, the most controversial reactions.
This is how social media, like, I mean, there's like a whole kind of scoring system.
A like would be one point, an angry face would be five points.
This is what the inter the internet, this is what boils up to the surface.
It's always like that.
If people say, Oh, Charlie was a good man, I hope he like he is in heaven, that will not get a lot of traction.
But people with more controversial, this is they're just a function of the internet, you know.
But if you're gonna talk the internet, people go on Twitter and they just write whatever on their mind.
But if you're gonna, if you're gonna punish people with whatever in their mind, so we need, I think, to expand this spectrum.
And let me read something that Charlie Kirk himself tweeted talking about free speech.
Because in April, he said, Tomorrow the House will vote on H.R. 867, a bill that will criminalize private boycotting of Israel, fines up to $1 million, and prison up to 20 years.
The Moral Equivalency Trap00:04:01
Bills like this only create more anti-Semitism and play into growing narratives that Israel is running the U.S. government.
In America, you are allowed to hold differing views.
You are allowed to disagree and protest.
You're allowed to farm too many people who hate America to move here from abroad.
But the right to speak freely is the birthright of all Americans.
This bill should not pass.
Any Republicans that vote for this bill will expose themselves.
We will be watching very closely.
And then it's very interesting that in the last three days after Charlie Kirk was killed, in the past three days, the Congress approved $650 million for Israel for missile defense.
They presented an amendment that bans Pentagon from boycotting Israel.
And they even proposed a bill to allow Mark Rubio to revoke citizenships for people critical of Israel.
This is what we need to talk about.
This is what we need to talk about.
There are like people that there are people there who celebrate if the Pop.
The pope would kill people like.
There are people like oh, it's been going on for years, even when the pope like was if, if he died, people celebrate his death.
Yeah, you know, this is like.
This is words.
Yeah, it could be terrible, offensive words, but when you turn words into destroying people careers, revoking people citizenship because they talk about a foreign country, this is the real problem.
This is the real problem with freedom of speech.
That's not about like people like celebrating or angry about someone who died.
All right, our roads and infrastructures, our education system, our healthcare they're failing.
They're failing while settlers in the West Bank, they occupied Palestine.
They get free housing, get free health care, free education.
Same in England.
I mean, i'm sure i'm sorry, but like you as a very um famous and a very able and a very competent investigative reporters, I think you should actually talk about why half of you, more than half of your cabinet in the British government, is financed by Israel.
Why the Royal ARMY, the Royal AIR Force, are giving logistical uh help to Israeli planes bombing Gaza.
I'm sure that there's not a single British person who would agree on that.
Isn't that more important than this kind of manufactured rage?
I mean, why don't you talk about like, aren't you worried?
No no, but like seriously seriously, i'm very, very curious.
Yeah, but why don't you talk about this?
But Basam, as you know, I talk about the war all the time and, as you know, you never talk about financing your British.
You never did all right.
There are always lots you never did okay, but there are lots you never did okay.
But i've also been, as you know, increasingly critical of the Israeli government.
You can't accuse me no, you're biased.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry you're not fooling me, Pierce.
I'm sorry because, like I came on your show many times, I discussed october 7th.
Many people came to you and asked you and people said, oh people Paris Morgan, have like changed the mind.
I'm sorry, it doesn't fool me for a second.
It's not about changing my wine.
I'm i'm.
I'm sorry.
You and the western media have been complicit in diverting and deflecting the truth and the facts.
You are actually the real Uh Iron Doom of Israel.
You pretend to ask tough questions for the Israeli to maintain your credibility but, like you, over the past two years you had laundering, Zionist talking points.
You never investigated the Hanimal Directive.
You never questioned why it took them six hours to respond.
You never used the Hasbel.
How many times have I had you on the show?
Uh no, it's.
How many times?
Don't throw.
How many times have you been matter?
No no no, it's not about you say I never question these things.
I've platformed you multiple times and you have talked about this every time.
Right, so you.
So you have been doing that on my show.
Literally you have been doing that on my show.
Effective and you effectively sabotage these interviews.
I brought up in your interviews many times is a White Stand, who's a British reporter who talked in length about the rape hoax, about the Animal Directive, and he was raided by British police.
They took his laptop and I asked you twice on your show to bring him on your show to talk to you about how the Israeli propaganda lies are all lies, but you never did.
If you actually were, were actually honest about this, you would do this.
Not about platforming.
I mean, you're platforming people.
Journalists And Conspiracy Claims00:15:56
It's.
It's good for good for views, it's good for reach but like, i'm sorry, It's about like, how many times did Ben Shapiro come on your show and he talked about moral equivalency?
There is no moral equivalency, there is more moral equivalency.
Well, if he thinks there is, he said there's no moral equivalency between Hamas and Israel.
He said that.
But the thing is, if, yeah, but if any journalist who have dread a little bit, who would say, well, now Chomsky said that moral equivalency is a propaganda term that was used in order to prevent us from looking to our action.
So we turn people into bad guys and good guys.
The bad guys, even if he's occupied, he deserves to be killed.
The good guys, even if they nuke them, it's okay because it's the good guys.
You see, this is how you do the conversation.
It's not about platforming.
You think, Ben, listen, Basson, you think Ben Shapiro is very partisan to the Israeli position?
I wouldn't disagree.
I don't think he would disagree.
But many people think you are very partisan the other way, and that your hatred of all things Israel leads you to say things.
Well, hang on.
Leads you to say things.
This is literally to say things like this.
This is what you said about the Charlie Kirk murder in relation.
Many people think you were implying something about Israel.
Here, let's take a listen.
Charlie Kirk is an obvious hit job.
What happened there?
But will we get the answer?
No.
They will stick it to whatever and then use it.
I don't know.
Maybe they would stick it to Iran, like Netanyahu and his people, you know, the Israeli area and the others were pushing for Iran being the culprit behind Trump's assassination.
They can do that to Charlie Kirk and start the war, or stick it to the left and start a civil war.
There is anger, and there were people who would use this anger.
So, Basson, just to be clear, who committed the hit job on Charlie Kirk today's show is brought to you by Oxford Natural, makers of the Optimum Day and Optimum Night, all natural supplements.
Thousands of Brits and Americans are already taking them with incredible results.
Optimum Day is designed to boost your energy and support weight loss throughout the day.
Optimum Night helps you relax and get deep, refreshing sleep.
And don't just take their word for it.
Here are just a few of their success stories: England football legend, Michael Owen, lost 40 pounds.
Robbie, the face of AFTV, dropped over £100.
Linda, a top laurel firm executive, lost £50.
And Danita, an immigration lawyer, shed £60.
To watch their full stories and find out more, scan the QR code on your screen or visit oxfordnatural.com slash peers.
And here's the best part: use the code peers, P-I-E-R-S, and get 70% off your first order.
You're 70% off with the promo code PIES.
I don't know, but I find it very interesting that Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Akanzi, went around the TV shows making sure that we didn't kill.
I mean, it's like, this is like a very weird position.
So, why are you suggesting Israel did?
Have you ever no?
I'm not suggesting that.
But you are suggesting that, aren't you?
Because maybe the FBI is lying to us.
The FBI has been lying to us.
Right.
I mean, I'll give you an example.
But why don't you be honest in a way you always want everybody else to be honest?
Why don't you be honest and admit that when you say Charlie Kirk's murder was clearly a hit job and then you start talking immediately about Netanyahu denying it was him?
That you believe or you what you want people to think.
I have doubts.
You want people to think it may be an Israel hit job.
I have doubts.
I have doubts.
Because like, I mean, look at the fact that job we know who it was.
I'm not sure.
I don't know.
Well, another Patty, 22 years old, jerking off in his mom's basement.
I mean, another like Trump.
I mean, here's the thing.
The FBI actually has been lying to us.
They have been covering for, like, they told us about the Epstein file, which is Israel is clearly involved.
And then they said there's no Epstein file.
Israel has been like holding 98% of the Congress hostage, either with money or blackmail.
And you cannot dispute that.
And I actually, if you want to dispute that, here's like a little case for you.
And that last month, a guy by the name of Tom Alexandrovich, he was the head of cybersecurity in Netanyahu's government, right?
And this guy, he's not a random guy, he's like part of the Netanyahu government.
And he was caught in Nevada in a FBI stink child sex operation, trying to lure a 15-year-old minor.
That guy was protected by the DA, who's Israeli, by the way, in Nevada.
And he went on the plane and he missed his trial.
Now, you come to me and you tell me all of these things.
Like when people are raving about Israeli Mossad and how they're infiltrating, and then suddenly we have to believe that they're innocent.
I mean, not a single mainstream outlet talk about Tom Alexandrovich.
So now you have pedophiles coming into our country.
Actually, I've read that story.
I've read that story on multiple mainstream media outlets.
No, not a single one.
Go to Chat GBT right now.
I'm very familiar with that story.
No, no, no.
Yeah, you have seen them on Young Turks.
You have seen them on Breaking Points.
You have seen them on those independent media outlets.
You have seen them on The Guardian.
Yeah, The Guardian.
I'm talking about American mainstream, right?
American and also American mainstream.
Not a single comedian in late night show even discuss this.
So the question is: when you have this cover-up by the FBI, when the FBI lets a pedophile from Israel flies back to Israel, why also Israel is known to be holding the biggest number of pedophiles escaping from justice, having refuge there?
All of these things.
Like, I mean, doesn't like make you like, what the hell?
This is like a whole cover-up.
Well, it does, but then, but then it does, Basim.
But then when I see you say Charlie Kirk's murder was Tilly a hit job and you imply it's Israel, I think you've lost your mind.
Maybe I did.
Like I lost my mind when I told you about the Hannibal Directive and then I no, I think there's merit to the Hannibal Directive story.
Oh, but now it's there is merit.
Yeah, there's no problem because I remember.
Because I remember you making fun of me and you're telling me you show me just a bunch of pictures.
Yeah, unlike you, Bassim, are you changing your mind?
My views of things evolve when I see new information.
It's called being a journalist.
Really?
Why don't you do your job as a journalist and actually talk about it?
What you mean is why don't I smear what you would like me to do as a journalist is only focus on anti-Israel stuff.
And that's fine.
That's what you want to do.
No, no, no, no.
I'm saying that you're not asking the right questions because you maybe you're a better journalist than I am.
No, I'm not a media better.
Like I am just like a like a normal guy looking in the internet.
But let me ask you a question.
You always talk about hostages, hostages, hostages.
And then Israel goes to Qatar and bomb that negotiating team about hostages.
Yeah.
While you, for two years, you were always like, what about the hostages?
What about the hostages?
At this point, and here's my like.
Why don't you ask me what I think of that?
Given I've literally interviewed today Israel's UN ambassador, Danny Danon, about the attack in Doha.
About time.
Why don't you ask me what I think first?
No, Bassim, I'm sorry.
Before you make presumptions about what I think about it, why don't you ask me what I think about it?
It's not about presumptions.
You have actually laundered a lot of Zionist talking points.
And you never ask the tough question.
You ask the tough question now when it is fashionable.
So why do I get so many Zionists telling me the complete opposite?
Yeah, yeah, well, they do that to everybody.
It's like they do that.
Like, I mean, they even talk, they even called Black Biden and what is your point about the strike in Doha?
You don't think I'm against that?
No, no, I'm not talking about them against that.
I'm talking about you always talk, put like that hostages front and center.
Yeah.
Right.
And we have told you many times, Piers, for two years, it's never about the hostages.
It's never about the hostage.
But you would put people, what about the hostage?
And we told you, Netanyahu doesn't care about the hostages.
We told you from different sources from the Israeli government.
It's not about the hostage.
But they should be released, right, Basin?
They should be released.
Yeah, they should release, but it doesn't matter if you have 50 hotish or 20 hostage.
You don't decimate a whole country, a whole people.
But I agree.
It is not an excuse.
I agree.
Here's the thing.
My question is.
Basim, I agree with you.
Why should even, why should you even take Israel for any word that it's said, right?
They lied about not targeting civilians.
They talked about like not targeting doctors, women, children, building.
They lied about the intention not to displace people in Gaza and they're doing it.
They lied about being like everybody's.
I don't think you've watched my show for a while, have you, Basin?
Because otherwise you would know that everybody's because that people are going to be able to do it.
You would know that one of the Bassin, if I may respond, you would know if you'd watched my show for the last few months that one of my biggest criticisms is Israel's refusal to allow international media into Gaza to independently verify what's been going on.
Because my strong suspicion is that when they finally get in there, they will find a lot of evidence of war crimes.
I've said that very loudly and clearly.
I'm sorry, Piers.
I'm sorry, Piers.
The Israeli soldiers, they film on TikTok their war crimes and they put it on the word.
Do you?
And it's like, I'm sorry.
I did it.
Anybody who knows anything about an army, any army in the world, knows that the army is all about discipline.
Those people who are not going around with their mobile phone, shooting this and putting out unless the army is letting them.
Because I don't think the British army or the French army or the Egyptian army or the American army will allow their soldiers shooting this and putting there unless there is some sort of unwritten rules like, yeah, show them, show them what we can do.
This is not just like a bunch of people.
But I've called that stuff out, as we know.
Or maybe you don't know.
Yeah, I said it's totally wrong.
But some of these Basin, it's never enough for you.
You see, it doesn't matter how critical journalists are about Israel.
It will never be enough for you because you want the right to suggest that Charlie Kirk was the subject of a hit job by Israel.
You want the world to think that.
That's why you said what you said.
And that's why when I asked you, you went Yahoo says it wasn't him.
By the way, I'm not even the only one.
People are actually, here's the thing.
If you continue lying to your people, right?
I'll tell you what.
Call me a conspiracy theorist, right?
Call me someone who is illogical.
Call me whatever you want.
If your government continues to lie to you consistently, this is where conspiracy theories thrive.
If you're not transparent.
Why do you want to be one of them?
If you want to cover...
No, no, no.
I'm not saying I'm one of them.
Why float a man conspiracy theory about Israel?
Because it's the internet and I'm a comedian.
But it's not that funny, though, is it?
Actually, a lot of people thought it was very funny.
You have millions, I'm sure we did, but millions of people follow you and you want them to think that Israel was behind the murder of Charles.
So they went to the community.
You call me an ill-informed, irresponsible journalist.
Yeah, because I'm not a journalist.
I'm a comedian.
Remember, I'm a clown.
I'm a clown.
I'm a clown.
I don't think you're a clown.
That's what I do.
Oh, I'm a clown.
Actually, I'm a comedian.
Comedians are actually overpriced.
But I think you're somebody who is so blindly hateful of all things Israel that you'll even promote a conspiracy theory, which is obviously nonsense.
They have something to do with Charlie Kirk's murder.
I'm not blindly hateful of Israel.
I'm actually eyes, wide-eyed, open hatred of Israel.
Sure.
But unfortunately, what it's done is driven you to promote conspiracy theories about their potential involvement in Charlie Kirk's murder.
I just released a video today and I told them, you need to give us better lies.
I didn't even mention that Israel.
I said, like, this is a hit job.
It was a hit job.
Whether it was like a you inferred it was Israel.
And when I asked you about it, you went on a little rant about Netanyahu.
Everyone can see it for what it is.
No, okay.
So call me a conspiracy theorist.
No, I think you're doing it quite deliberately because you hate Israel so much.
You want to associate every bad thing that's going on in the world.
Well, I prefer to be a bit more nuanced about it.
Let me ask you about it.
Let me ask you before we finish about the Elon Musk intervention in the UK protests at the weekend, the Unite the Kingdom rally organized by Tommy Robinson.
What was your view of that?
Actually, there was a scene that I found it very interesting.
I felt like the Maui, the Maori, which is the indigenous people of New Zealand, they were doing like a traditional dance, like a haka dance, and they were like tearing off the Palestinian flag, which I found it very oxymoral, like indigenous people tearing off Palestine.
Well, let's talk about Toby Robinson.
Well, this guy has been in Israel many times and he has like a lot of IDF shirts and musad shirts all over.
Should we actually call that a conspiracy theory that he's not like actually like someone who's been pushing a certain agenda or that also he's obviously been pushing a certain agenda?
He's very pro-Israel, obviously.
Yeah, okay.
So that's not a conspiracy theory then.
No, it's a fact.
So Israel openly causing civil unrest in London, in the in London.
Israel has been openly causing all of these problems.
Israel has been openly.
No, no, no, but he's but he is being put by Israel.
Like Israel doesn't have like I mean, he was doing this stuff long before Israel came along the the 525 Congress people out of the 535, which is 98 of Congress, they're all paid by Israel, they're not Israelis and they're causing more damage to American public more than anything.
So the thing is um, let me tell you something that, like it might actually make you see where, like where, I come from.
If you are a citizen of a country and it is the superpower of the world, it is a one of, by the way, I like living in the United Cities.
The United States is a great country and the people here are great.
I have never had a a single bad day here because the people here are lovely and it's a great country, a great potential, wonderful people.
But when you see that all of your politicians, all of your uh representatives, are openly uh financed by a rogue country that is indicted in the ICC and ICG uh, and and just last year we sent them 30 billion dollars and we sent them billions and billions of dollars and we see all of our infrastructure is falling, you will also hate that country.
You know it's not that even if Gaza like like, is resolved today, I don't see it resolving in a good way right, even that, that still stands.
Israel is a leash on our system, on our country, on your country.
Can we get back to the rally on our country?
Can we get back to the rally in London?
That was the question I asked you, and whether you think it was right for Elon Musk to get involved in the way that he did and to say, you have to fight violence on the left, you have to fight back.
What did you think of that?
I mean that's is that in.
Isn't that inciting violence?
The guy, the guy, the richest guy in the world, who has the biggest platform in the world, who, by the way, just suspended the Twitter account of the flotilla going there to Israel, which is making him very biased.
But like, I don't understand.
The guy, it is crazy now that we've seen people in tech using their power to incite violence.
It is crazy and it is unacceptable.
And I think you, as a British citizen yourself, should be worried.
You should be worried because for the past two months, non-stop, daily, Dylan Musk has been tweeting about Muslim gangs raping women.
And he's even like getting cases from 1991 where statistics say that actually 85% of rape and criminal crimes are actually done by white people.
So I don't understand.
Is that helpful?
Is that healthy to England?
Condemning Government Cover-Ups00:02:21
Well, what was not healthy was a massive cover-up going on with the almost exclusively British Pakistani gangs who were grooming and raping many young girls, including underage girls, for many years.
And it was deliberately covered up to avoid creating any racial tension.
And then subsequent governments single-handedly failed to deal with this and made it worse.
So yeah, that was a real scandal.
And Robinson was very vocal about it.
And it played into his hands as an example of the establishment working to cover up the sexual abuse of young girls.
Yes, the cover-up of sex and abuse of young girls and men should not go away like Tom Alexandrovich, who actually escaped.
That's our other cover-up.
Presumably you would condemn those British...
You would condemn, I presume, those British Pakistani men for what they did to those girls, right?
And I would condemn the governments who covered up for them.
And I would actually ask them to be brought to trial.
Yeah, I agree.
The same way that everybody in the FGA should be brought to trial for covering up MST and files and Tom Alexandrovich.
Okay.
I don't disagree.
Good.
Let's end on a note of agreement.
Good to have you back on our sensor, Bass.
Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome.
We'll be given some breaking news.
Woke is dead.
The war on common sense is officially over.
Cancelled celebrities are emerging from Twitter jail.
Virtue signaling has been outlawed under punishment of mass ridicule.
And we are finally free to call a spade a spade.
So what was the cause of death?
How did the silenced majority finally win?
And what exactly is going to take its place?
Woke is dead is my definitive story on the rise and fall of woke, as well as the common sense heroes and PC villains who have dominated news and culture across 10 years of madness.
It's also my personal roadmap back to a less divided world.
A world where we can agree to disagree, where debate triumphs over censorship and where common sense is king.
You will be shocked by how much you agree with me.
Woke Is Dead00:00:24
Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent.
The only boss around here is me.
You enjoy our show.
We ask for only one simple thing.
Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.
And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate, and entertain.
And we'll do it all for free.
independent on censor media has never been more critical and we couldn't do it Without you.