All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
March 10, 2025 - Uncensored - Piers Morgan
01:03:31
20250310_fifty-days-of-trump-antichrist-newsom-trudeau-out-
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Economic Pain and Tariffs 00:09:55
No one's talking about bringing down Medicaid and taking out these programs.
They're talking about getting the waste and flood out, which it is obvious.
There are 150-year-olds that are getting benefits, 300-year-olds getting benefits.
That's not true.
Let's try it like that.
I want you to keep more of your money.
Do you want me to keep more of my money?
No, because you're a millionaire, Dave Ruben.
How much appearances money do you want?
It's not just Gavin Newsome.
It's a lot of the left-wingers who I would call woke, because I have no problem with you being a Democrat if you're true to your values.
But this woke disease, now that Trump ended it, they want to get on the winning path.
I mean, I think the guy's basically the Antichrist.
He's the devil incarnate.
Give me another example in the history of war where the attacked country needs to pay for electricity for the country that declared war on them.
Release the hostages, Peter.
That's the censor.
Release the hostages, and then I'll come on this show and tell you Israel should leave them alone.
50 days is not a very long time in the grand scheme of life.
It's roughly how long it takes to grow a lettuce.
With that in mind, it's quite staggering to consider that President Trump is today marking only his 50th day back in the Oval Office.
In seven frenzied weeks, Elon Musk and Doge have taken a sledgehammer to government waste.
We said RIP to USAID and DEI.
Tough talks began on an end to the Ukraine war.
Tough tariffs began.
A trade war with China, Mexico, and Canada.
The Gulf of Mexico became the Gulf of America.
The Prime Minister of Canada became a state governor and then became unemployed.
Russia came in from the cold.
Zelensky was given the cold shoulder.
The leaders of Britain, France, Jordan, and India all came bearing gifts.
The leaders of the resistance all came bearing silly auction paddles and pink t-shirts.
And as the Democrats enter a Great Depression, the president's refusing to be drawn on whether America faces a recession.
Are you expecting a recession this year?
I hate to predict things like that.
There is a period of transition because what we're doing is very big.
We're bringing wealth back to America.
That's a big thing.
And there are always periods of it takes a little time.
Well, President Trump's point is that you can't make an omnipotent without breaking some eggs.
Democrats, meanwhile, are furious about the price of eggs and the fact they have no obvious leader to go out and say it.
One self-appointed candidate is California's Governor Gavin Newsom.
By the way, not one person ever in my office has ever used the word Latinx.
So can we finally put that to bed?
But where did that even?
No more Latinx, everybody.
Well, just didn't even know where it came from.
I'm like, what are people talking about?
Was it the pronouns?
By the way, once, once.
You'd think California invented the frame of the program.
I mean, literally, I had one meeting where people started going around the table pronouns.
One.
There's been a hell of a lot of days between 2020 and today and one meeting.
So it's not like this is, I'm like, what the hell is, why is this the biggest issue?
Wow.
I wonder why.
Look, I've got a house in California.
Trust me.
Everyone's been personally pronounced for years, fueled by their governor, who was all for it, until now he suddenly isn't.
Suddenly, everybody, it seems, wants to say, it was all nothing to do with me, this woke crap.
Perhaps the biggest thing that's changed in the past 50 years, though, is actually nothing, 50 days, is nothing to do with executive orders or diplomatic chess games.
It's the total collapse of the insanity that got Trump re-elected in the first place.
Well, to bait all this, I'm joined by the host of the Rubin Report, Dave Rubin, the former Bernie 2020 National Press Secretary and host of Bad Faith Podcast, Brannon Joy Gray, commentator Emily Austin, and the host of the social contract with Joe Walsh, former candidate for president.
Joe Walsh, welcome to all of you, an appropriately stellar panel for this momentous day in history.
Dave Rubin, it's only been 50 days.
Can we all agree it feels like 50 years?
Yeah, well, 50 years of success.
I mean, you just laid out 10 bullet points that are pretty freaking fantastic.
I don't need to repeat all of them, but I don't even know that you mentioned the border or the deportations.
There is so much goodness happening in America.
And by the way, that clip that you just showed of Trump, where he's even admitting there's going to be a little pain point here.
You may remember during the election that Elon admitted that as well, that as we go in and hack away at the deep state at these ridiculous budgets and criminal negligence, that I would say that has abused we, the people, the taxpayer who are funding all this, as we do this, there's going to be some pain points.
So I'm not sitting here telling you that everything is absolutely great.
Egg prices are a little high.
It's true, although you might want to look into the Biden administration that killed about 100 million chickens right before they left office.
But the point is that we are leaning into being a great country again.
We are leaning into being the world's leader again.
We are allowing the American people to do more with their money and not have this endless deep state, administrative state, blob, whatever you want to call it, swamp, just run their lives.
And I think most people know it.
And that's why the left has just been left with nothing.
So Gavin is pretending he had nothing to do with pronouns.
Gavin himself has tweeted out Latinx.
Your people can check it right now.
Fact 100%.
Yeah, I mean, Dave, before we go to the others, the thing that would slightly concern me if I was a pro-Trumper American would be there's a new poll out today.
It shows Trump's approval rating is quite significantly down now on Inauguration Day, notably amongst young men who turned out in massive numbers to vote for him, notably because of concerns about the economy.
Plus, the stock market is, I wouldn't say tanking, but it's certainly taken a big hammering in the last week or so.
He's got to be careful, Trump.
It's all very well saying that there's going to be some pain, but if people are already starting to fret about the economy and that gathers momentum, that could become quite problematic for the guy who said the good times are coming.
Well, it could.
Of course it could.
If the economy does not do well, if it trips up, if the tariff thing backfires, of course, right?
I would answer that as honestly as I would answer any other question.
But I would say that largely what he has done is put us in this transitional period.
So I personally do not know anyone that supported Donald Trump that has peeled away their support at this point.
I actually do know a few people, and there are plenty of people.
You can see them online.
People like Stephen A. Smith, who did not vote for Donald Trump, who've basically said, I don't know that he says he's a supporter, but basically kind of not been hysterical, even someone like Bill Maher.
So I don't know anyone that's going in the other way.
That poll may be right, but I would also say that might have a little something to do with the fact that the left has so imploded that some of the energy that drove Trump may be dissipating.
Because as the left's lunacy disappears, the need for the destructor Donald Trump is different.
This is where he needs to be statesman Donald Trump.
I think he's doing it.
All right.
Joe Walsh, are you as jubilant about the first 50 days of Trump Part 2?
No, I agree with Dave's assessment of the Democrats.
They're as helpless, hopeless, and feckless as ever.
Look, Trump is Trump.
He's doing what he said he was going to do.
We're seven weeks in, and there's a battle in the free world between NATO, our alliance, our allies, Europe on one side, and Putin on the other side.
And the president of the United States has clearly put America on the side of Putin.
I find that troubling.
We talk, and last thing I'll say, Pierce, we talk about the economy.
By all indicators, Trump was given the strongest economic recovery since COVID.
You got to break a few eggs to make an omelet.
I don't know what kind of omelette he's making.
We talk about the tariff thing.
Today's Monday.
Are tariffs on?
Are they off?
I think the chaos economically of the first seven weeks, Trump and not knowing what he's doing with this tarot, his tariffs, I think have pissed off and confused everybody and has begun to damage the economy he was given.
Okay.
I mean, we had a president who had dementia before him.
So that's a problem.
And then to say that we're aligned with Russia right now is not true.
We're trying to end an endless war, a war that has no ending, that nobody seems to be able to say how many tanks does Ukraine need?
How many ships do they need?
How much money do they need?
How many planes do they need?
What do they need to win this war?
Nobody can tell you that because they can't win this war.
That's just reality.
Putin's got nukes.
So trying to negotiate a settlement and get to peace, I think is a good thing.
But the idea that we've aligned ourselves with the USA.
I've not heard Donald Trump align himself with Russia against NATO or the West or even Ukraine.
I've heard him get pretty rough with President Zelensky, which many people didn't like, but it may be because he feels resistance from Zelensky to actually get around a table with Putin, which might well be the case.
He may not really want to, but he's probably going to have to.
Emily, let me bring Emily in here.
I mean, Emily, I just want to mention.
Yeah, go on.
Yeah, go ahead.
Welcome back, first of all.
Welcome back, Emily.
Thank you.
And then please, the stage is yours.
Piers Morgan Uncensored is now proudly independent.
If you like the show, we ask for only one thing.
Subscribe on YouTube and follow PiersMorgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.
Now, let's get straight to the point.
Support for today's show comes from a business focused on a critical issue.
Billionaire Influence on Elections 00:15:16
Prosperity.
U.S. national debt is at crisis levels.
Inflation has made life more expensive for everybody.
And the stock market is precarious.
It's enough to make anyone's financial future feel grim.
So what is the solution?
Well, a simple one is to opt out of the chaos and invest in something solid and reliable, physical, gold, and silver.
And there's only one name you need to remember, American Heart for Gold.
This company has earned the trust of thousands of customers with an A-plus rating from the Better Business Bureau and glowing reviews you can see for yourself.
They offer an incredible range of gold and silver bars and coins that can be delivered directly to your door, or they'll help you set them up in a tax advantage gold IRA.
First-class customer service makes the whole process simple, secure, and straightforward.
American Heart for Gold is committed to getting the truth out there and giving you peace of mind in uncertain times.
And if that wasn't enough, you'll get up to $15,000 worth of free silver when you make your first purchase and mention my name, Piers.
So make the smart move.
Call 866-692-2474 or text Piers.
That's P-I-E-R-S to 655-32.
That's 866-692-2474.
Or text Piers to 65532.
All the details are in the description.
Now on with the show.
Thank you.
It's a pleasure to always be back.
And Joe, I just want to go off of what you said about the economy because the truth is we're not coming off of the best economy since COVID or whatever you wanted to call it.
But in fact, we're still facing the consequences of what Joe Biden did from his first in office as president.
And now I don't want to repeat the repetitive rhetoric of, you know, it's Biden's fault, it's Biden's fault, because Trump is in the process of fixing it.
But the truth is, because of his actions, and the prime example is cutting off the pipeline in Canada, the oil pipeline, and skyrocketing oil prices, which then inevitably leads to every single price skyrocketing in the United States.
We're still coming off of that.
We're still coming off of consumers' lack of confidence.
Under Joe Biden, there were two, what could possibly lead to world wars that broke out under America's weak leadership that now consumers are spending very conservatively because we don't know what the trajectory looks like.
Now, under Trump, we're gaining our confidence back, but we are coming off of the worst economy because of Joe Biden.
Now, Trump doesn't have this magical wand that within the first 50 days of office, he can fix it, but he's implementing the right policies on getting us on the path to fix it.
And yes, there comes growing pains.
Of course, it's not going to fix itself overnight, but we are coming off of the worst economy.
Well, I think, look, I would say, well, I would say on that, it wasn't the worst economy.
Look, America's economy has actually outperformed pretty much everybody else's since the pandemic ended.
So it's all a question of degree.
I mean, compared to the UK's economy, America's been on fire the last few years.
However, Trump has been persistent in saying it could have been doing a lot better.
And now it's incumbent on him to actually prove that.
Let me bring in Brianna, who's been waiting patiently here.
I thought that Dave Rubin made a good point that the thing we didn't mention in the first 50 days, there's so much we could have mentioned, was what's happened at the border, you know, where it's demonstrable, massive, immediate success there.
The number of people coming over the border illegally has been dramatically cut.
I mean, do you, as an American, welcome that?
As an independent left populist, I think this conversation is exactly why we need a workers' party in this country.
You opened, Pierce, by mentioning that Trump seems to be admitting that there's going to be, quote, growing pains.
It's not just an admission.
Republicans have been telegraphing this and pointing specifically to Malay and Argentina as an example of the economic policy they want to pursue.
This is not an accident, nor is it a consequence of inheriting Biden's economy, which I have no interest whatsoever to defend.
But it is worth noting that Donald Trump is implementing an agenda that is purposefully throwing the country, if not into recession, then toward it.
Because we have to ask ourselves the question of who he represents and who he is working for.
But what about inauguration?
There were three, there were three billion.
There was a lot that was said.
I'm sorry, Pierce, if I could just respond to a couple of things that we had to do.
Well, yeah, I did ask you a straight question.
I mean, you can come to the other stuff, but on that specific point about the southern border.
I mean, to me, to me, look, as somebody who is described as an exceptional alien on my immigration status to the United States, that's actually what you guys call me on my paperwork, who's gone through the laborious process of applying legally for a visa to enter the country and so on.
You know, I've been horrified by the scale of illegal immigration under the Biden administration.
It was completely out of control.
Up to as many as 10 million people are believed to have come in illegally.
And Trump, quite clearly, probably the most significant achievement, I would say, inarguable achievement in the first 50 days has been that he's stemmed this tidal wave of people coming over the border.
And I'd simply ask you, as an American, do you welcome that?
Are you pleased?
Yeah, what I welcome as an American is upholding the law, our immigration system, and a path to citizenship.
The significant backlog of undocumented people in the country is not a consequence of border crossings, which, yes, of course, do spike and valley and did have a spike under the Biden administration, which is now more and a value.
So you're pleased.
In part because of Trump's policies.
Of course, that is the case.
But we also need to look forward to whether or not the Trump administration is going to handle the millions of Americans who are waiting for a path towards citizenship.
And that incentivizes those long waits, incentivizes people taking illegal means.
But this is the fundamental question that I know it's very awkward for people to ask themselves because many of the very affluent people on this panel are implicated by it.
Who policy agenda is Trump pursuing when at inauguration he is backed by three billionaires?
Elon Musk, Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg.
Why is it that we are talking about the people?
Well, they are three of the most successful.
They are three of the most successful people.
We're talking about the in the history of planet Earth.
I mean, do you have a sort of ideological problem with unbelievably successful people and job creators in America?
The left is helping the president.
I would love to answer that question.
I have an ideological problem with the idea that a billionaire, the richest man on earth, someone who is recently, only recently an American citizen, spending almost $300 million to buy an election and advance his agenda, standing in front of the cabinet, as though he is the president of the United States of America and pushing policies like a tax cut that would raise taxes on the lower 50% of Americans while making a tax cut for the top 1%.
When you have the very top 1%, fraction of 1% standing on the room and advancing these policies, I think it's worth it for the American people to ask why the egg price conversation is talked about as though it's a footnote, while we're not talking about soaring housing costs, why nobody can afford the cost of education, why nobody can afford healthy food for their family, while nobody can afford car repairs, and why somebody like an independent senator Bernie Sanders was going around the country talking about those things, turning out huge crowds in red districts that Donald Trump won.
Okay, Dave Rubin, your response.
It's so funny.
You say Trump wants to advance his family.
Let Emily dissociate it.
I'll come to you, Dave.
Emily?
No, it's so funny how Brianna, you just said that Elon Musk bought his way into the election to advance his agenda.
Meanwhile, his agenda is to eliminate waste and fraud from the government, and he's been doing a superb job in doing so.
And so far, the loudest opposition of what Elon is doing are quite literally the most guilty in indulging in this waste and fraud and waste of taxpayers' dollars.
So it's ironic that you said that.
Okay, I want to play, Dave, a clip from SNL at the weekend, mocking Elon.
Then get your response.
Let's take a look.
So you two need to start acting like mature adults, okay?
So let's begin with Marco.
Polo.
No, Elon.
I'm trying to talk to Marco.
Polo.
What is that?
What's this?
Elon, you got to listen to me, okay?
Marco is a very important part of the team.
And we all need to...
Phase one of my plan is complete.
Ingratiate yourself to the president and take over the media.
But was taking this job a bad idea?
A lot of people seem to really hate me.
Tesla stock is crashing and my personal net worth just dropped by $100 billion.
It was quite a funny sketch, I have to say, Dave.
But is there a point there that Elon Musk might be getting some buyers' remorse about getting his way into the real seat of power in America, but actually now copying a lot of flat?
Do you think he might be beginning to regret it?
I don't think so.
I'll give him credit.
The Austin Powers callback was kind of good.
But look, the rest of it, yes, is he a little autistic and like this is the day of autists now?
Yeah, he is.
Okay, part of it.
That's also part of his success, actually.
As for buyers' remorse, I don't think so at all.
I mean, I just watched, we played it on my show this morning.
I mean, just over the last couple of days, you know, he walks into the meeting with the entire cabinet saying that this is his words, he said, literally the greatest cabinet in American history.
You know, this idea that successful people being part of the government is somehow bad, that people who build things, who send rockets to Mars and who build incredible things like, I don't know, the Amazon marketplace that allows you to get things at your house three hours later, that these people are all inherently evil.
Someone like David Sachs, who's worth hundreds of millions of dollars, who's now heading up AI and crypto, these people are doing these jobs for either no money or virtually no money in their worlds because they care about America.
Bobby Kennedy has said repeatedly that he has never seen a time in his life where more good, qualified people who do not need the headache of this.
You think Elon wants the headache of having the Soros-funded protesters at his Tesla places like I saw this weekend in Miami?
He doesn't want that, but I don't think he has any buyer's remorse.
I think he is a deeply proud American who understands how great this country is, and it was heading off the cliff.
So yeah, are there going to be pain points not only for the country, but for him personally?
Has it attacked his reputation?
Is he going to not get invited to some of the elite parties?
Yeah, but is he going to probably save the country in the meantime?
I think so.
Joe Walsh, we've seen some...
Well, hang on.
Hang on, Brian.
I'm just going to go to Joe.
We've seen some tensions being reported.
New York Times, I think, reported about Marco Rubio.
Excuse me.
Some tension there with Elon Musk and a big argument between them and the cabinet and so on.
Look, you're going to get arguments between smart people in powerful positions.
I don't think there's any doubt about that.
I've followed politics long enough.
But you've also got all of them in the cabinet are there because Donald Trump got elected and they are therefore effectively elected officials in that sense.
Elon is the outlier.
He's the one that's just there as a kind of unofficial advisor to the president, but apparently with almost unlimited powers.
Is that sustainable or are you going to see a lot more tension creeping in between the official cabinet members and Elon?
Well, I don't know, Pierce, how sustainable is.
I worry that it's not constitutional.
And look, you're right.
The cabinet members and Trump are going to reflect more, much more so than Elon, where the voters are.
And a lot of what Elon and Doge have been doing, and nobody on this panel knows what Elon and Doge have been doing.
Pierce, you don't.
I don't.
That's a problem.
I see.
Well, hang on.
Hang on.
We have it every day.
Hang on.
We have seen.
We've seen a lot of stuff they're doing, actually.
They've been actually remarkably transparent.
We've seen, for example, on USAID, we saw some alarming, ridiculous wastes of money.
So we are seeing what they're doing.
Pierce, we don't know.
We have no accurate accounting of what's been cut.
Emily, I think, talked about waste and fraud.
There's been no Doge reporting on waste and fraud that's been cut.
There's a reason why, and there are over 100 lawsuits have been filed.
Maybe I'm biased.
I say this as a former member of Congress.
Our founders made Congress the most powerful branch for a reason, because they feared a king.
When I was a congressman, I would yell every time Obama picked up his pen and his phone and enacted an executive order.
We're a million miles beyond that now.
And a lot of this stuff is just fundamentally not constitutional.
That should still matter.
But what about Ken?
But what about figuring out what he's saying?
Just to put it in context.
Hang on, hang on.
Joe, Joe.
Joe, I wanted to just Marco Rubio tweeted today about the USAID purge being complete.
After a six-week review, we are officially canceling 83% of the programs at USAID.
The 5,200 contracts that are now canceled spent tens of billions of dollars in ways that did not serve and in some ways even harmed, he said, the core national interests of the United States.
In consultation with Congress, we intend for the remaining 18% of programs we are keeping, approximately 1,000, to now be administered more effectively under the State Department.
Now, there'll be a lot of Americans who say, good, good.
If you've uncovered a load of tens of billions of dollars being squandered on stupid programs and you're going to cull them and the American taxpayer is a beneficiary, what's the bad news?
Two quick things, Pierce.
Again, USAID, most Americans have no freaking clue what it is.
USAID is an independent agency.
There's a reason why every cut that's been made, supposedly to USAID, has been taken to court because Trump and Musk do not have the authority to just get rid of that agency.
They don't.
It's a separate agency made separate by an act of Congress.
Same thing with the Department of Education.
I'm not a fan of the federal Department of Education, but Trump and Musk can't get rid of it, Pierce.
Only Congress can.
The Constitution still got it.
Pierce, can I interject?
Yeah, you can, Emily.
Yeah.
So I want to also point out, of course, Congress has the highest power.
And when they allowed for USAID to spend our tax paying dollars to go to allocated groups, I'm sure what they didn't expect was millions, if not hundreds of millions of dollars going to transgender choirs and DEI in Ireland and a lot of the waste that Elon Musk is now cutting out.
So given that we have the clear proof that our money that Congress passed is going to things that we didn't approve of it going to, yes, by all means, you have the authority to undo it.
Social Security Waste Concerns 00:15:25
And here's another thing I want to bring up.
When I went to the Oval Office and Secretary Rubio was speaking to the group of influencers who came, he was speaking about Doge and Elon Musk.
Why?
Because we wanted to know exactly what their agenda is.
We wanted the transparency and they gave it to us.
He pointed out something that blew my mind where he said he and Elon spoke that morning and Secretary Rubio asks Elon, why did you target USAID first and what's next?
In which he said Social Security is next.
He targeted USAID because when Elon said, I want to eliminate waste and fraud, they were the loudest opposition.
And Elon thought to himself, well, why would you be opposed to saving taxpayer dollars?
That's when he did his deep dive into USAID to see our money is going to garbage.
And now you're questioning, well, what is Elon doing?
He's going to go group by group, piece by piece, and start tackling all the waste and fraud.
So the fact that you haven't seen the full scope of it yet is only because we're just getting started with this.
Right.
And Brianna, Brianna, I would say that what is clear is that the American people on this issue, on Doge, and the waste that's being exposed, they are in a big majority right behind the administration.
So there are other polls that show them not as confident about other things.
But on Doge, that seems to be a very popular thing.
I'm really glad my co-panelists pointed out that Social Security is next.
And polls show that Republican voters also are overwhelmingly opposed to cuts to Social Security.
The majority of Americans rely on Social Security to keep their elderly parents and relatives and loved ones from living on the street.
And not to mention Medicaid, Medicare, these are some of the most popular policies in America that even Trump understands it's bad politics to put them on the chopping block.
And that's why he ran away from those policies in the Barto Laromo Fox News interview just this week.
But the reality is that that's exactly what he's going for.
And the numbers that have been articulated by the Trump administration and Elon Musk for what he anticipates in terms of budget cuts cannot happen without significant cuts to programs exactly like Social Security.
And this is why the 300-year-old parents are billionaires.
I'm sorry, if I could just finish this point without interruption.
This is why the earlier point about millionaires and billionaires who are running this government and why it is that we should be concerned about it is so germane.
There was a 2014 Princeton study that showed that there is no relationship between what Americans want, what voters articulate in polls, and what actually gets passed in Congress, whether it's a Democratic Congress or Republican Congress.
And the reason is because oligarchs, billionaires have captured our government through lobbyists.
There was a question asked on Fox News recently: why is Northern Virginia the most affluent place in America?
And the implication was that it was because of government spending and government programs, when the reality is because that's where the lobbyists live.
And that's where all of our government money is going.
The instinct to want to look at where our tax dollars are being misdirected is the right one.
But should we be skeptical of the fact that the literal richest person in the world and the number two and the number three and the number four are standing there telling you that the problem is the programs that are keeping your elderly loved ones sustained and not the military spending?
The Pentagon budget is three times the budget of the Department of Education.
Our military spending is more than the next 10 military spending of the next 10 countries beneath us combined.
Elon Musk is a defense contractor himself.
And that is why you're not going to see him talking about cuts to people like him who personally have hundreds and thousands, sorry, hundreds of millions of dollars worth of wealth that they've gotten through government contracts.
No, they want to throw your grandmother out of the hospital and your family members onto the street.
Okay, Stay if they want to show you, they want to throw your family into the street.
It's so boring and it's so thin.
Yes, Elon's doing all of this to make more money.
He was like, yes, I really need another yacht.
I don't even know that he has a yacht.
He doesn't, you're the guy who wants to be a lot of people.
His wealth doubled since the election.
That's number one.
Number two, let's try it this way.
I would say, Brianna, in some sense, you're kind of directionally right in some of this stuff.
But let's try it this way.
First, as Emily pointed out, no one's talking about bringing down Medicaid and taking out these programs.
They're talking about getting the waste and fraud out, which it is obvious.
There are 150-year-olds that are getting benefits, 300-year-olds getting benefits.
That's not true.
We have to rely on the state.
We're trying to like that to manufacture consent to cut a popular policy.
That's a catastrophe.
But no one's saying cut the policy.
It's children that are running out of the policy.
But let's try it a different way.
David, I would be for lowering taxes on everybody.
I would be for lowering taxes on absolutely everybody so the government has less money to waste and spend on nonsensical things.
I want you to keep more of your money.
Do you want me to keep more of my money?
No, because you're a millionaire, Dave Rubin.
I don't think you should keep more of your money.
And that's exactly what Donald Trump is doing.
So you want to take my money?
Wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
What right do you have to take my money?
And do what you want.
I hate to break it to the parents.
Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays.
Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about.
The juicy details in the world's politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between.
It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show.
Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast.
Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Wait a minute.
I hate to bring this up.
And they should pay less taxes too.
I want everyone to pay less taxes.
They've been working on that.
You think that jealousy is virtue.
This is why the leftists have been a lot more careful.
They've been working as hard as they've been working.
I think it's really fascinating that if someone sticks up for working people in this country, they're called a communist.
I want working people.
I'm sure that's what I'm saying.
You want David.
You want Dave Rubin to give up more of his budget.
And how there was a chicken in every pot, and how Americans were so much happier in the 1950s.
Well, in the 1950s, the top marginal tax rate was 90% on the top richest voters.
That is how you end up getting a country in a social safety net where we have parks and swimming pools and schools and museums and safety and libraries and the kind of country that we remembered were one-on-one family income.
You could support the money.
How much of my money do you need?
How much appearance is money?
I know he's not probably an American, but he's probably got more money than me.
How much appearance's money do you want?
The question shouldn't be whether or not Joe's probably doing okay.
You can probably get some of his cash.
I'm telling you, David, I'm telling you, Dave, that there are poor and miserated people in this country who signed up to vote for Donald Trump because they believe that he is right, and I believe he is right, about trade policies like NAFTA being unfavorable to the American worker.
He is right about that sort of thing.
And frankly, Bernie Sanders running on those policies back in 2016 and 2020 is why a lot of people, independent voters, were attracted to him.
And he was the number one candidate with independent voters.
And Democrats killing his campaign is exactly why they have the Trump phenomenon right now.
But those kind of political parties.
But how much more money do you need to get to America?
To get to your utopia.
How much if we took all of Iran's money and all of Bezos's money?
And all appearances money.
How much?
What do we need?
Canning the economy, intentionally cratering the economy, driving 50, like what happened in Argentina where 50% of the population was driven into poverty, saying that that's going to be the tough times that people are going to have to endure when that endurance had squarely put on the shoulders of poor and working class people in the country is a lot of people.
Wait, are you arguing that the economy of Argentina?
After five years of disaster?
Booming for whom?
Throwing 50% of your population into poverty and having authoritarian crackdowns on speech and protest to prevent people from articulating their democratic right to rise up.
That's exactly what's happening here in America as well.
And people should be very afraid.
Pierce, I'll make one political point.
There's a reason why my former Republican colleagues in the House are being told not to do in-person town halls because Dave and Emily maybe love what's going on, but I think there is a lot of confusion out there.
And a lot of regular folk, even regular Republicans, when they see headlines like 80 to 100,000 veterans losing their jobs, this is the kind of stuff that's going to hit Trump hard politically if he can't explain what it means.
Yeah, I think that's a perfectly reasonable point.
I want to change topic, if I may, to Gavin Newsom.
And let me start with you, Emily, on this, if I can.
Gavin Newsom is now seeming to be on the sort of road to Damascus here, one of the all-time great conversions from Chief Wokey of California into a guy that I never heard any personal pronouns.
What?
Latinx?
No, once, I think.
Et cetera, et cetera.
He even now is outraged about trans athletes in women's sport, which I don't remember him being before.
I thought before he thought it was a great idea.
So are we seeing now a movement by the progressive left in America on the Democrat side very sharply turning back to the center because they realize after that election shellacking that they took that actually the progressive agenda is unelectable now in America?
Of course.
And regarding Newsom specifically, I think it's clear he's trying to make his run for presidency in 28.
And he realized that now that the woke wave is kind of dying down and coming to its end, that campaign policy won't work for him anymore.
But what's really good about living in a digital era is that everything someone says can be fact-checked by their own history and their records.
So everything that he said with Charlie Kirk during his podcast has already been debunked by his own words.
So he said he's not against transgender.
He is against transgenders and sports.
But previously we've seen that he's protected men in women's sports.
He backtracked himself on basically half of his policies that in his own Twitter comments now we're holding against him.
But the truth of the matter is that it's not just Gavin Newsom.
It's a lot of the left-wingers who I would call woke, because I have no problem with you being a Democrat if you're true to your values.
But this woke disease, now that Trump ended it, they want to get on the winning path.
So if they see that it's not winning, they're totally going to flip-flop all of their policies, lose their credibility, lose their trustworthy reputation just to reinsure that they're going to win.
Now, I don't think Newsom stands a chance, especially if he'll run against Vance, but I just find it ironic that suddenly he's doing this complete 180.
So in conclusion, when it comes to him, they say you can judge a parent by the way they raise their kids.
So let's just equivocate that to governor.
If you can judge a governor on the way that their state is running, Newsom gets a zero.
DeSantis, for example, I'm a big fan of him, will get an A in my book.
So I would really urge people, don't listen to Newsom's words.
In fact, don't listen to anyone's words.
Follow what they do, follow their actions, and follow what they put.
Well, I think that's always a good idea.
That's what I would urge you.
Yeah, even if it, especially with Donald Trump, for example, I would always say focus on what he actually does rather than what he says all day.
Joe, Joe Walsh, I mean, I want to play a clip.
This is of Democrats pretending to be video game characters in a loading screen with the title at the top of the video, Pick Your Fighter.
Which one would you pick of this lot?
I mean, Joe, I didn't think anything could get more pathetic than what I saw in Congress when Trump made his speech the other night in terms of the Democrats' reaction.
That video, I mean, the idea you would back any of that lot to fight for you to open a crisp packet is beyond parody.
I mean, it's a ludicrous, almost like a parody, actually.
You watch it and you assume it's a spoof.
It's not.
It's real.
They think this is exuding an air of powerful women who are going to run the world.
No, they're not.
Yeah, you know, Pierce, I completely agree.
I wrote a piece just before the election.
And you know, I don't like Trump and I think he attacks the Constitution every day, blah, blah, blah.
But I wrote a piece and I said, the worst thing about the Democrats, if Kamala Harris would win, is the Democrats will not address their fundamental problem.
They've been able to run cycle after cycle on Trump is bad, Trump is bad, Trump is bad, and they've been able to win.
That day is done.
Gone.
So now that day is gone.
So now Democrats have to actually stand for something.
And I think I agree with most people on the panel.
They've got to move away from their far left and meet most Americans where they are in the middle.
I don't see that happening, though.
No, I don't.
I mean, Brianna, I mean, that video was just utterly cringe-making.
I don't know who is directing the Democrats.
But if you look at, again, the response to Trump's speech with the ridiculous series of things they were doing, the fact that Democrats, so-called caring, compassionate liberals, could sit on their seats when a young 13-year-old boy who'd survived brain cancer after 12 surgeries lives his dream of becoming a Secret Service agent for the day.
The idea that a Democrat would make a political protest by staying on their seat for that moment and not applauding, I thought was utterly shameful, but really indicative that they will literally do anything that is anti-Trump, even if it means treating a 13-year-old boy with such incredible disrespect.
Yeah, I think what's interesting here is that we're not seeing a robust response, a substantive response, I think, to Joe Walsh's point to what's going on right now and the broad discontent among Democrats, obviously, about Donald Trump's policies, because you're right.
Democrats don't stand for anything and they haven't for a really long time.
Now, the leftist critique, and again, earlier the words like far left were used to refer to Gavin Newsom.
I want to be clear that he's a mainstream multi-millionaire corporate Democrat right in the middle of the party.
And that's the part of the Democratic Party, the core establishment Democratic Party that has over-relied on identity politics, weaponizing identity politics in various ways, because they don't have anything material, substantive, economic to offer the people of the country.
They do exactly what the corporate right does, which is to go back and forth about cultural issues, hoping nobody notices that 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, hoping nobody notices that while life expectancies are great for the top 1%, you live seven years less long than the top 1% if you're in the bottom 50% of this country.
And so as long as they're doing TikTok dances or holding up paddles or we're talking about wokeness or the mere 10 trans athletes that are in the NCAA, you can convince a lot of people to go to the polls and pull a lever for one side or the other.
Critique of Identity Politics 00:08:47
And 10, 20, 30 years from now, they wake up and say, what happened to my mortgage?
What happened to my life?
What happened to my ability to raise a family and have kids?
And that's exactly the conversation they want us to be having.
Instead of focusing on why it is that our government run by corporatists and billionaires, regardless if it's a Democratic government or Republican government, seem to only consistently serve one segment of the population, and it's the very, very rich.
Okay, Dave Rubin, this.
Can I add to that, please?
I'll let Dave.
I'll come back to you, Emily.
Let Dave just respond to it because you've been waiting a while.
I mean, Dave, this position the Democrats find themselves in is it's almost embarrassing actually to watch them.
They don't seem to have any idea where they need to go.
I mean, Newsom, to his credit, seems to have identified that the progressive stuff is just over, that people do not want to hear it.
They don't want to see it.
They're done with all of it.
And he's trying to move.
And I don't think he's going to work for him because he's too attached to it.
But when you see the behavior of the Democrats right now, they're like a bunch of kids.
No, well, look, quickly on Newsom, because I have not ever held back with this guy.
And I very publicly fled California because of Gavin Newsom after I campaigned against him.
I mean, I think the guy's basically the Antichrist.
He's the devil incarnate.
And you don't have to trust me on that.
A million people have fled California, over a million people post-COVID or during or post-COVID.
And many of them have ended up where I am in the free state of Florida, or they ended up in Tennessee, or they ended up in Texas.
And that is not a coincidence that those are all red Republican states.
But look, the Democrats don't know what to do because they went all in on something that was completely fraudulent from day one.
Let me address the pronoun thing for a second.
Because if you had ever believed that, say, the Latin X or the he, she, they, them, Zs, or if you had ever believed that any of that was legit or important, well, right now, now as evil white supremacist, Donald Trump is in the White House, you would be doubling down on it because your fight would be more important than ever.
But what happened the second, what happened the second Donald Trump took office?
AOC magically got her pronouns out of her bio.
Pete got his pronouns out of his bio.
Gavin's pretending he never said Latin X. They're all abandoning the positions because the positions were based on ideology having nothing to do with reality.
I assure you, I am here in Miami.
I spend all of my days around Cubans and Venezuelans.
If I walked down the street or if I went to Calle Ocho and said, hello, my Latinx friends, I would get a mojito thrown in my face.
So nobody believed this.
They're abandoning their positions faster than they ushered them in because they're all BS, period.
Yeah, but I mean, Brianna, you can answer it.
I would say I lost it with them completely when Sam Smith, the singer, having pretended to be straight, then he comes out as a gay man, then he comes out as I can't remember, as non-binary gender fluid or something.
And then we had to call him a singular human being who we'd already had to rename several times.
We then had to call him they them.
And I thought of him when that ad came out that Trump did that was so successful, which was the Carmel is for they them, Donald Trump is for you.
I thought that was remarkably powerful in its simplicity.
You cannot look at one person and call them a plural.
It is bullshit.
Brianna, over to you.
Pierce, I don't think I follow pop music as closely as you do.
But to Dave Rubin's point, I think it's worth noting that the questionnaire that was made into an ad that was very effective against Kamala Harris about gender reassignment surgery for trans prisoners.
It's the same man we're talking about.
It was a consequence of, but yeah, it was a consequence of the Democratic Party, the same corporate Dems I'm talking about.
Not leftists like Bernie Sanders, not the so-called far left, which is an economic populist movement, but these identitarian centrists in the Democratic Party trying to take Bernie out in 2020 by trying to get to his left.
They couldn't get to his left on economic policy.
They refused to back a policy that 49% of Republicans and 88% of Democrats support like Medicare for all, because they're private insurance donors, they're healthcare insurance donors, their big pharma donors wouldn't let them back it.
But they could try to get to his left on social issues.
And they circulated that questionnaire, hoping that Bernie, as he did, wouldn't say tick yes to some of the more fringe cultural aspects of it.
And ironically, ended up coming back to bite Kamala Harris in the butt.
But the core lesson here is this is what moderate centrist establishment people do to distract the public from the fact that they are not delivering on the populist economic policies that people on both sides of the aisle in a bipartisan way actually want.
And there is a way that us, it's worth it for historical reasons to like understand that and talk about it here in this context.
But the core takeaway should be: okay, we agree that Gavin Newsom is an empty suit that he'll change whichever way the wind is going.
That these people had no principles when it came to the pronoun stuff.
And I agree with that wholeheartedly.
That is a critique from the left.
But what do you do with that?
Do you just keep people polarized and fighting with each other?
Or do you say, now we realize that we're actually united on these core issues and we're going to make a demand, whether it's Donald Trump or God forbid if Gavin Newsom becomes president or whomever it is to actually have our needs met in this country.
Nobody on this panel responded to the horrifying trait that you live longer in this country if you are rich than if you were in the bottom 50%, not even poor.
Well, yeah, but hang on.
Okay, but Brianna, maybe the reason for that is that is not an unusual statistic around the world.
I mean, where you have rich people.
It is America's health outcome.
Pierce.
Hey, Mike Baker here, host of the President's Daily Brief podcast.
If you want straight talk on national security, foreign policy, and the biggest global stories going on of the day, this is the show for you.
We publish twice a day, Monday through Friday, once in the morning, again in the afternoon, and on the weekend.
We go longer with the PBB Situation Report with excellent guests, including national security insiders and foreign policy experts.
Check us out on Spotify and Apple or wherever you get your podcast.
Also on our YouTube channel at President's Daily Brief.
But my point is that in the UK, you get healthcare.
I can guarantee you the wealthiest people in the UK live longer than the poor people.
That's not the statistic.
But that's not the statistic I'm saying.
I specifically said not just the poor people are not living as long.
It's the rich people who are living seven years longer.
And we have to ask ourselves why in America we pay more for our health care than in any other similarly situated.
Well, I agree with that.
Listen, you know, I'm in the outcome.
Listen, I'm in the UK where if you fall over and break a leg, you get free health care, right?
If I do that in Malibu, I have a bank standing over me demanding 20,000 people.
You could go bankrupt.
Yeah.
Emily, you wanted to get involved in this?
You know, I keep seeing a reoccurring theme from Brianna that it seems like she wants to wage this war on capitalism.
That's what it seems like to me.
But I want to point out something.
And if you could remove your evil fight for poor working-class people, Emily.
I do want to find out.
I understand.
You want Dave Rubin to pay more because he's richer.
I got it.
Understood.
It's fine.
That's not my point.
My point is people who work.
You keep criticizing Donald Trump to afford it.
I understand you, of course, to be able to afford it.
I understand you, Chris.
And I see that you are mocking and derisive of that reality.
And I think the audience hears that loud and clear.
No.
No, I think that we're hardworking people and that we're all self-made, and we deserve to enjoy the fruits of our hard work.
So do me a favor, let me finish my point.
You are very critical of Donald Trump for seeming to want to take advice from one of the most successful people in the world.
So let me tell you something.
As the owner of a skincare company, when I was starting my company, the first thing I did, and I'm lucky enough to have the resources, was go to the billionaires who sold their companies from billions and try to replicate a model of how they've achieved so much of their success.
Now, if Donald Trump can have three, let's say Bezos, Zuckerberg, and Musk, self-made, successful billionaires who revolutionized the modern-day world that we live in, and he has the privilege to get to learn from them, how ignorant and egotistical would he be to not so graciously accept their advice?
You know, you keep criticizing them because they're rich, but they are self-made men.
Trump would be insane to not want to include them in our administration and be insane to not advise, receive their advice on how to make our country wealthy again.
All right, Joe, you want to jump in?
If George Soros was standing behind and in his cabinet meetings and directing his policy, you would rightly understand that it was in a public secretary.
Soros was pulling the strings.
Soros was pulling the strings in secret.
Last time I checked, none of you were called Joe apart from the guy on the right.
I don't mean any of you because the audience just one really quick point.
Israel Gaza Power Cuts 00:11:12
Brianna is right in this.
We are living in a populist moment.
I think Trump is an evil demagogue populist, but Trump's always recognized the moment.
The Democrats have never recognized this moment.
I campaigned for three months for Kamala Harris every day in a battleground state.
And a lot of regular people who only pay attention to Pollock's politics every now and then, they all told me the same thing.
They know Trump's a bad guy, but they said the Democrats are snobs who look down on me.
The Democrats got to figure out a way to connect to regular people again.
That's their biggest problem.
Okay, Dave, I want to just, before we finish, just mention the fact that you came after me big time on X this week in a furious onslaught.
And Brianna, to my astonishment, leapt to my face.
I believe I said the words respectfully.
Brianna leapt to my defense actually on X.
So let's play this out on my show where I have more control over your outburst.
No, to be serious, it was an interesting point, really, because the point that I was making is this about Israel cutting off the power into Gaza.
I actually did not know the full answer to the questions I was raising, is the honest truth, which is, well, how much power in Gaza comes from Israel?
Turns out more than 50% does.
It also turns out that pretty much from the start of the war, so October 2023, the power has been cut by 90%.
And my question when they cut the rest off this week was: if you think about how this ends all this, and hopefully sooner rather later, and you get to a stage where you can move forward and you try and rebuild things and everything else.
The point I was making was, Dave, and I'm interested what you say to this.
Do the Palestinians not just have to have the basic same fundamental rights to things like their own power, their own water, their own food supplies, all these kind of things, without Israel having the ability, ironically, the power, if you like, to just yank it whenever they feel like it.
And I know the history because I've studied it.
I know that this was the deal that was done and they claim it back from the Palestinian Authority from taxation on the Palestinians and so on.
I know all that.
But it just seems to me until the Palestinians can honestly say to themselves, we have the same human rights as our Israeli neighbors, you're never actually going to get rid of the problem.
Well, as I said to you on Twitter, I think my exact quote was, Piers, respectfully, I think you're confused about the issue, but what you just said there was actually closer to the truth because you're right.
It's the Palestinians who have to look at the Palestinians and figure out what they want.
Remember, Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005.
There is not one Jew in Gaza until October, basically 9th of 2023, after October 7th.
They wanted not only nothing to do with Gaza, they wanted to leave them to self-rule.
They said, we'll take our, they had eight, I think, 8,000 citizens there.
They said, we'll take everyone out.
Hitler would have loved the place, totally Juden, Ryan, right?
And they said, do what you want.
There was no blockade.
By the way, no one ever talks, and I did tweet this to you, no one ever talks about how Egypt has a border with Gaza.
Gaza was part of Egypt before 1967.
Egypt's wall, maybe your guys can pull it up when you post this, the wall that Egypt built with Gaza is massive and has trenches and barbed wire and cement and everything else.
Israel, I've been there to the kibbutzes that were largely destroyed.
They had a freaking, they had a simple chain link fence like you might have around a dog park.
But yes, I completely agree.
In 2005 and for the last 15 plus years, almost 20 years, they have had a chance using the same exact set of border there that is the same beach as Tel Aviv to build the most prosperous, wonderful society where all of their oil-rich Arab brothers could have put in tons of money and they could have spit in the eye of the Jews and said, look what we have built in Gaza.
Instead, they took everything, not only just the money, they took literally the pipes that were bringing them water to turn it into rockets.
Okay, but Dave, I would say this to you.
Okay, but let me say this, though.
I would say this.
I hear you, right?
And I've read a lot of this in the last 24 hours to just inform myself really about the reality of all this.
But look at the situation in Gaza where you have 50% of the population is under 18.
So 50% are kids.
We know that many, many thousands, let's not get into the exact number because everyone always goes, it's not that, it's this.
But we know many, many thousands of children have died.
Innocent children.
We've got nothing to do with this.
And they've died.
Turning off the power into Gaza, given the state of Gaza right now.
Release the hostages, Peterson.
That's the answer.
Release the hostages.
I agree.
If your wife got killed and your daughter was kidnapped, release the hostages.
Then I'll come on this show and tell you Israel should leave them alone.
I agree.
Every hostage should be released.
And Hamas are a despicable terror organization.
I'm not talking about them.
I'm talking about the innocent children, more of whom will now die inevitably because power's been completely cut off in Gaza, which led me just to ask, I don't think Israel should have that power to do that.
Israel doesn't have to do that.
Yes, you're 100% correct.
Israel shouldn't have to do it.
Where are the Egyptians?
Where are the Qataris?
Where is the government?
Hang on, don't talk to once.
Emily, then Brianna.
Then Joe.
You keep going to the root of the problem.
You said, why does Israel have the power, which you said is not 100% of the power over their electricity, but let's say over 50% in controlling their electricity?
The question is: well, why do they have that power?
Israel, by the way, including the United States and many Arab countries, have sent billions of dollars to Gaza, as Rubin said, to build infrastructure, hospital, schools.
And instead, they build terror tunnels and they build rocket launchers and nurseries.
And Hamas is a lot of people who are in the world.
Israel bombs under Al-Shifa.
Israel has reportedly bombed the power plant because I just said that.
How long did the individual issue safe?
Terrorist HQs are built, not infrastructure.
Even their hospitals are not.
So now Israel can't.
Even their hospitals are homogeneous.
Critical infrastructure.
So do me a favor with Gaza's infrastructure.
I'm live.
They don't have the critical infrastructure.
Brianna, you are hysterical.
You repeatedly call critical infrastructure in Gaza.
That's your point.
Terrorist activities.
Bomb it, kill people, and then after the fact due to these investigations, demonstrate that there was absolutely no infrastructure.
There were terrorists or Hamas.
Go to Al-Shifa hospital.
Gaza al-Shifa Hospital.
When the IDS terrorists, baby nurses.
It's hard to do.
Hang on, hang on.
Hang on to the creator.
Ladies, I can't hear either of you because you're both talking at the same time.
So I was simply saying...
Well, Joe, I'll come to you, Joe, but my point remains that on a humanitarian level, given the scale of child death in this war in Gaza, it seems to me inhumane.
And yes, I accept Hamas are inhumane.
I accept the keeping of any hostages is inhumane.
But it can also be...
Hang on, hang on, don't all start again.
But it can also be inhumane to turn off all the power and to stop the fuel going in now, which will only lead.
Which will only lead to more children dying.
That's my point.
Joe.
Pierce, how do they prevent the power being ruled?
Pierce, hold on.
I mean, the Palestinian, you raised this.
I remember you two being called Joe.
Pierce, Brianna.
I'm so sorry, Pierce, but yeah, you raised this talking about my tweet.
Am I able to talk about what my tweet actually said?
Yes, I'll give you the last word, Brianna.
Let me just take 20 seconds.
On October 7th, the governing entity of Gaza went to war against Israel.
Give me another example in the history of war where the attacked country needs to pay for electricity for the country that declared war on them.
There's no obligation that Israel should have to pay and supply the electricity to the country that went to war against them.
Yeah, have some answers.
Can I give the Russia aid while you're at it?
Wait, Pierce, please, can I please address that exact point?
Joe, I'll just quickly get an important point in this direction.
So for one, the mythology that Israel pays for the power is wrong.
I think it's about $11 million that Gazans pay to Israel for that power that is taken out of tax collections from the people of Gaza.
Two, Israel has repeatedly bombed the power infrastructure long before October 7th over the last decades to prevent Gaza from being able to be independent in its power, exactly so it can use collective punishment, which isn't just immoral, as you put it, Pierce, but is in fact a war crime.
And three, the idea that there was a withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 and therefore it was independent and could thrive and grow and do what it wanted to do, but it chose not to become the next Dubai or whatever it is that Trump said is a misnomer.
Were Jews in the Warsaw ghetto free just because Nazis withdraw and stood around on the edges?
It is an occupied territory.
It has been called an outdoor prison.
And that is the reality of the state of Gaza.
There are not premium borders and surveillance population on the planet.
And that is why there wasn't a problem.
Okay, everyone, look, the bottom line is, in the Oslo Accords, Israel said they would supply, and they weren't paying for this privilege.
They got the money back.
They would supply water, power, and fuel, right?
And they said they would do that.
So they've made a conscious decision to stop that because, and the argument, obviously, is because we're at war, a mass want to kill us.
I get that, but there's still a humanitarian aspect to this, as there is in any war, and it seems to me to be an inhumane.
I would say that's the problem.
And it's also a breach of the hostage exchange law.
Let Dave respond to that.
I would say a good question, rather than relitigating all of that, would be that Sinai, which Israel used to control, by the way, and gave up for peace with Egypt, Sinai is about 10 times larger than Israel, not just Gaza, about Israel itself.
I've been to Sinai.
Almost nobody lives there.
Egypt has a border.
How about the border and let all the Gazans in?
Why not?
Okay, if everyone's just moving from their ancestral homes, let's let the Zionists move there then.
The problem is if we really cared about the hostages, you wouldn't have flagrantly disregarding the ceasefire agreements and imperiling the lives of hostages, which is causing so many hostage families to protest Netanyahu.
Because his goals and his administration's goals have been clear, which is to get rid of Gaza, to take over Gaza, to ethnically cleanse Gaza, to drive them out of the territory, just like Dave Rubin is describing doing right now.
James Bond Casting Debate 00:02:53
And as a consequence, they don't care about the hostages.
They're concerned about the government.
So why are we going to do that?
And that is not only a lot of people.
We're going to have to time out afraid.
We're going to have to wrap it up.
I want to end with something that I think will bring joy to all the panel.
I think we can all be united in this moment of sadness, which is that probably the wokest world leader in the history of planet Earth bid farewell this week, Justin Trudeau.
And you'll be unsurprised to hear that he did so with tears.
Let's take a look.
Okay, that was Ella Grace Trudeau, a very put-together 16-year-old.
I would not have been able to give that kind of speech at that age.
And here's Justin Trudeau on what is undoubtedly an emotional moment for him.
An emotional moment for all of us to see the end of the blubbering wokey.
And what a hypocrite he was with all his blackface stuff that all used to come out at the moment.
He was lecturing us all about racism and so on.
So farewell to Justin.
No flowers need be sent.
And also, I just want to say, since you're all there as a bunch of Americans staring down the camera at me, and we had a horrifying moment last week where we discovered the James Bond franchise was now going to be moving to the control of Americans at Amazon.
The first thought was, are you going to put one of your lot in charge of playing James Bond?
Which would have been a national travesty.
And I'm delighted to report.
You don't want Bezos in control of 007.
Well, actually, to his credit, they put out a statement saying James Bond will continue to be male, which is a huge relief to all of us.
And secondly, he will be British or from the Commonwealth.
In other words, he will not and never will be.
Let's define American.
So you still have a chance, Peter.
Just as Captain America will never be English, right?
James Bond remains resolutely male, British.
And I hope we don't have to see him crying anymore like he did in the last couple of movies.
And I also hope we allow him to go back to wantonly seducing women because that is what the character used to do.
And that is what he should be allowed to do without people like Justin Trudeau getting on their high horse and saying, will you please make James Bond completely impotent and then make him cry over time?
So on that bombshell, I will leave you all.
Thank you all very much.
Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent.
The only boss around here is me.
You enjoy our show?
We ask for only one simple thing.
Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow PiersMorgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.
And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate and entertain.
And we'll do it all for free.
independent on censor media has never been more critical and we couldn't do it Without you.
Export Selection