All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 25, 2025 - Tate Speech - Andrew Tate
01:27:06
Andrew Tate Private Conversations
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
It's funny because someone asked me and they said, what's it actually like to be globally famous?
And I tried to explain that.
Truthfully, there's no light without dark and every positive has a disadvantage and there's always good and bad to everything.
But I feel like you are always at the same level of contentment.
It's kind of like as a man, you're at a certain level of contentment with who you are.
Some people are super depressed and some people are super happy.
But I'm no more or less content than I was when I was a struggling fighter who couldn't pay the bills.
But you're happy with who you are and you're doing your best and you have a certain mindset, a certain happiness level.
And then you may transgress through the world of finance and global stardom, etc.
But you get there and then you have all the disadvantages that come with that.
And then you have the advantages also.
I'm not complaining.
You know, more money, more problems, but at least you're rich.
But then you're at the same level of contentment.
I don't think you're any more or less content anywhere along the journey.
I don't feel any different than 2019, if that makes sense.
It's really interesting when I try and analyze my successes and how well I've done across the last few years.
And I feel like it's pretty similar to air resistance.
As a car is trying to go faster and faster, the wall of air it's competing against gets stronger and stronger.
And I do believe where you get to in your life is down to how aerodynamic you are as an individual.
How much stress can you adopt?
Because there was a huge, there was many points along this journey I could have slowed down and stopped and not got where I was because there was pressure pushing against me.
But me and my big mouth kept pushing against it back because my engine was powerful enough.
And then you end up in a crazy situation, which I'm currently in, which is the democratic government telling the Romanians to try and shut me up.
So it's really interesting how it all works out.
But I guess it would be foolish of me to say I didn't want to be here.
Like when I was in jail, I said to Tristan, I kept saying that they're going to put us in jail, and I kept saying we have to try and not go to jail, but I kept talking.
Don't you feel like...
I wouldn't call it self-sabotage, but it's kind of just like, you know, you know where things end and you still do them.
Isn't it the same with an addict?
A drug addict who knows where it ends and he keeps doing drugs, or you keep fucking that crazy girl, or you know where it ends.
It's kind of weird how the human mind works.
You know what?
I'll stay right here.
I'm 100% dangerous.
They're going to use this against me in court, but fuck them.
I think every man is supposed to be.
I mean, I can be dangerous.
I control myself, but I have the capability to be dangerous completely.
I think all men should be.
That's the reason liberals hate me so much, because they're scared of me.
They see me as a big threat and danger.
But if you look at the best men on earth, they all have the capability to be dangerous.
It's a tenet to masculinity.
But yeah, I mean, maybe if I was unhinged, I guess I could be dangerous.
But then I think anybody can be dangerous when they're unhinged.
I think that trying to be intense and making sure that I'm very intent with what I do and making sure that I... In fact, I'm going to change that answer.
I feel like perhaps, if I were to analyze this from the outside, I feel like one of the primary objectives perhaps of The Matrix is to make men hide the fact that they're dangerous.
Aren't men going through the world now trying to prove how dangerous they aren't?
Like, think about it.
I was sitting with my girl the other day and we were watching TV, watching Netflix.
And then we turned Netflix off because it annoyed me.
We watched something else.
And I said, why are all these dudes faggots?
And she goes, they're not all gay.
I'm like, no, no.
I'm not talking about the gay ones.
I'm talking about the straight ones.
They're gay.
There's nothing masculine about them.
It's like they're trying so hard to prove they're not a threat all the time.
And I don't believe that that's accidental.
I believe that's very intentional.
I think a lot of men have been psyoped into trying to prove how passive they are so they don't come across as a threat.
I understand why, if you work in corporate or whatever, whatever.
But that's not a concern of mine.
If you look at me and think, oh, he might be dangerous, I don't give a shit.
That doesn't cross my mind.
And I think a lot of men never used to care, but now there seems to be a concerted and deliberate effort for men to prove that they're not a threat to anybody.
Well, I'm attracted by it because there are people who get to reject the conformity and they get to reject the rules.
I really don't think there's much difference inside of the mentality of...
I mean, there's certainly difference in capability.
If you look at a street criminal and a Wall Street banker, there's difference in capability.
But is there really difference in intent?
Is there really difference in, you know, the mentality?
You sit here and you argue that someone who steals a loaf of bread is a thief and someone who works at Wall Street isn't a thief.
You're just talking about differences in capability.
I don't think you're talking about differences in mentality.
The people who own the world today are perfectly prepared to rob everybody.
And they're going to steal as much as they can.
And they're going to do it.
And they're going to sleep just fine.
And it's not going to cross their mind.
It's not going to bother them.
So we sit there and say, a drug dealer is terrible.
Arms dealers are terrible people.
You're like, okay, yeah.
I mean, that's an easy one to paint to the general consensus of the population of the normies.
Arms dealings bad.
But if you look at most of the things that are happening at the highest level, I mean, arms dealing isn't even bad at the highest level, but all the things that are happening at the highest level are just as bad, if not worse.
So I think that...
Once you understand that you don't want to live a normal life and you don't want to conform, then you're going to try and find the people who aren't living a normal life.
And unfortunately, in Luton, there's not many high-level Wall Street bankers.
So you just end up seeing the people doing everything else.
And then this becomes a question of morality.
And you have to sit there and go, yeah, are these people genuinely any worse than the people who are running the world today?
I don't know if they are.
I don't think they are.
I mean, the people who run the world today, think of some of the decisions they make.
I mean, I don't want to get you in a jail cell, but fuck it.
You may as well go because I went.
So I'm going to put it on your podcast.
You talk about the Secretary of Defense of America sitting there deciding millions of young men need to die.
I mean, are these good people?
Are they moral people?
Like, are they better than the person who's selling crack to kids?
Are they better than the person who's stealing bread?
Are they better than the people in Luton who are robbing houses?
Sending 200,000 people to get blown to smithereens by Russian artillery for their own banking interests so their stock goes up?
I mean, this is just the world.
Anybody who's not conforming seems to operate to a degree with this level of psychopathy.
All of them do.
And if you don't have that psychopathy, fine.
Then you fall somewhere within the herd, but that herd is just getting exploited permanently.
Now you're in the perma-exploitation herd.
So then you have to sit there and go, okay, well, do you want to be a little bit dangerous, a little bit psychopathic, a little bit sociopathic, or do you want to be exploited?
I don't know.
I mean, that's another question for people to answer, but I guess I made my choice.
Oh, completely.
And no, you're completely right.
And it's actually interesting because in the movie The Matrix, when he's sitting in the second one with the architect, and Neo doesn't believe what the architect's saying.
This is an architect, so...
There you go.
And the architect's saying, the only reason we allow you to do what you do is so that you can find the other people whose minds which are trouble, and you can free them, and you can go be a problem, but most people stay with inside the system.
Which is also, I guess, perhaps to a degree, I consider myself Morpheus more than Neo, but I guess that's me.
I'm looking for the other people whose minds want to be freed, but I don't want the entire matrix to crumble.
I like the fact that a lot of people do believe in the bullshit because it would be stupid of me to think, everybody should think like I think.
Well, now we have chaos.
There's no order left when everybody thinks like I think.
I can look at the system and realize it's all bullshit, but you do need most people to believe in the system.
And you're right.
There's different systems in different places on the planet, but there's a system everywhere.
And then, you're right, we've become very cynical about the West, and I used to shit on the West all the time, but you have to be kind of careful when you do it, because what's the alternative?
You know?
Like, I was talking to someone the other day, and they were saying, you know, the West is all corrupt, we talk about democracy, and we don't believe in democracy, we talk about justice, we don't believe in justice.
Look what we did to Assange, and I'm like, completely true.
But if Assange was in China...
And he was anti-Chinese, he'd be dead.
If he was in Russia and he was anti-Russian, he'd be dead.
If he was anti-Saudi in Saudi Arabia, he'd be dead.
Okay, he did some Belmarsh, but he's alive.
Are we the best of a bad bunch now?
I don't know.
I mean, as bad as the West is, are we still the best of a bad bunch?
If you look at the rest of the world, in many ways we are.
I mean, Trump's just one so we can pray for a revival.
But the whole idea of democracy and justice and all these things we've based ourselves on, I think the reason people are so angry and cynical now is because It's a lie.
And this is the unique thing about it, because China never based itself on freedom.
It's never based itself on freedom.
So if you're living in China and the government's oppressing you, you're not like, this is unfair.
You're kind of like, well, that's the game I'm living.
The West, we have this disconnect from people who can think for themselves to people who can't.
The people who can think for themselves are very, very angry at the West and very, very angry at Western leaders because they're like, you lied to me.
You told me this was democracy.
It's not.
You told me this was freedom.
It isn't.
You told me judges were fair, they're not.
You told me the Department of Education was educating my children, they're not.
You told me doctors kept me alive, they don't.
So it's this lying that I think has upset us more because if you're actually smart enough to analyze it from the outside and go, okay, forget the lie, but actually look at the system as bad as it is in the West, is it better anywhere else?
I mean, the way I've pissed off Western governments and what they put me through here in Romania, yeah, inconvenient, fine.
But if I would have pissed off Russia and I was, if I pissed off Putin the way I pissed off the West, I'd be dead.
That's the bottom line.
So it's like, it's kind of hard to measure.
It's like, it's all a big, bad bunch.
I think a lot of people are just very upset they've been lied to in the West.
And you're right.
The reason, well, you're right that everyone has to believe a lie.
The biggest problem we have in the West is that the lie we've told is so untenable.
They're like...
Yeah, that's right.
And you know what's really interesting?
Because if we talk about it from the sheep's herd perspective, it's interesting because...
This also ties into race, because we talk about race a lot, and I'm mixed race, and I talk to both sides of it, and people talk about how racial identities unify people, and I agree with it, and I understand, because in the West, we're constantly now searching for something to unify us, because we don't have it.
And if you look at most other countries, what they are actually unified by as a flock of sheep is fear of the wolves.
So you can have all these different colored sheep with different religions from different places.
From Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Muslims, Christians, you name it.
Eskimos on one side, white Christians on the other side.
But they're all Russian.
And they're all unified behind the Russian flag because the wolves are outside.
So their sheep herd is unified by fear of the wolf.
They're not saying to their sheep they're free.
They're not saying to their sheep they even have any degree of liberty.
In fact, it's pretty much the opposite.
They say, we have a big fence.
And we're going to have a big wall, and we may call you up to fight the wolves, but we have to, or we're all dead.
We're unified by that.
Whereas in the West, because we're the dominant power, we don't really have an enemy that we truly believe in anymore.
We used to a bit after 9-11 and the Patriot Act and this crap, and they're all coming to kill us.
People are a bit too awake for that now, to try and convince the average person that a farmer in Yemen is going to get on a fucking rowboat and come take your house in Tennessee.
It's going to be difficult to do, right?
So we're not unified by this common enemy.
And then you have to ask yourself, Is there anything else that can truly even unify people?
Because we're now unified by the idea that we're free.
So all the sheep are looking at the fence going, well, if we're free, why is there a fence?
Why are there so many laws?
Why am I told what to do?
Why do I have to pay so many taxes?
If I'm so free, how come this fence is actually the biggest fence of all the other sheep herds?
Because we have the biggest fences with the most laws.
It's like, so what is this freedom garbage?
And this is where you go into the degeneracy argument.
I've said this before, but I'm going to say it again.
I truly believe one of the reasons they promote degeneracy is so they can convince you that the freedom is real.
Because freedom is a big lie.
So they have to take the one sheep who's, you know, a little bit special and say, well, you know, he can have a rainbow fleece on.
He's allowed to do that.
And the other sheep herds, you can't do that because we're free.
So they allow you to do all the degenerate things you can't do anywhere else to try and convince you you're free.
But you can't do anything actually important.
And you can't resist your enslavement.
And you can't resist power.
And in many ways, you're less free than in other places.
And this is where the race argument comes in.
Because I've discussed this with a lot of people.
And they say, yeah, so we need to be unified by race.
And I sit there and I say, I agree with you.
I understand how that's tempting, especially in the modern Western world.
And I understand that having your ethnicity replaced and erased is extremely upsetting.
But then even if you look back, has that ever worked?
Like when it was all white people in America, there was the northern versus the southern, or you're from that state, or you're from that town, or you're, you know, if you had, if you got, if Ireland was all white again today, there'd be an argument between Dublin and Belfast.
They start arguing again.
So we always find a line to divide ourselves on unless we are unified by a common enemy.
And this is actually why a lot of the countries in the world do what they do.
This is why North Korea on the news every single day threatens America.
It's not because they're going to go to war with America.
They don't really want to go to war with America.
They want sovereignty, but they don't want to get annihilated.
But they know the best way to keep their population unified is to talk about the size of a wolf.
And we don't have a wolf anymore in the West.
So the only thing that unifies us is this imaginary guise of freedom.
And the second thing that unifies us is that we supposedly, we can get rich.
Supposedly.
Be nice to each other.
You can do whatever you want, but you can't.
But you can get rich.
And that's where society is starting to get into because I think the reason a lot of people are actually discontented, as you just talked about, the reason a lot of people are upset is they've realized they've been lied to about a lot of things.
And the final, most insulting lie is that I don't even get to be rich at the end of this.
You know, you move to America and you're like, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I want to get rich.
American dream.
What's the American dream?
Be nice to everyone, irregardless of their skin color or religion.
Get rich.
Once people are starting to wake up now and realize and go, wait, I'm never going to be rich.
And everyone at the top is rich.
The shepherds are rich off me, and I never get to be rich.
That's where the discontentment's coming in.
I think that's where a lot of the actual anger is coming.
And Russia doesn't promise its people they get to be rich.
China doesn't promise.
China doesn't say on the news every day, you get to be a rich person.
In fact, I'd actually argue it's the opposite.
They say, you get to go work at a factory.
Be thankful.
We're the only people who are saying, you can be rich, you can do whatever you want.
And then you're not rich, and you can't do whatever you want, so you're pissed.
And that's how I think we got here.
Well, you know, it's kind of interesting because I've never heard this before, but it's super true because they go hand in hand, right?
As they try to make you docile, that is directly negatively correlated to your competence and individuality and capabilities, which makes you more angry because you're a loser, which means you need to be more docile.
So they kind of go hand in hand.
So the better the manager gets at making you docile, the more docile you need to become because the more angry you are.
I tweeted something this morning on my way to court for human trafficking.
And I tweeted, Western government in a nutshell is the fact that Germany sold its Bitcoin last month at 53,000.
They've lost 1.8 billion at the current price, let alone where it's going to be in 10 years from now.
And the amazing thing about this is, Western government in a nutshell is, no protests, nobody cares, no review.
No one's responsible.
No accountability.
No one's even the government's even going to talk about it.
No one's going to be held up on TV and be made accountable for what they've done.
No explanation why they've done it.
They just did it.
And everyone just goes, oh, well, the government's so dumb.
Oh, well, let me just keep paying my taxes.
You talk about docile.
People are so docile now.
That they brag about how stupid their leaders are.
I sit there with people and they're like, oh, you know, the MPs in England are idiots.
I'm like, yeah, they are, but they're your boss.
You're right, they're idiots.
I agree, they're idiots.
But you're even more stupid because they're running you, you know?
It's truly crazy.
So you're right.
Incentives is a really interesting way to look at it.
I've never thought of it that way before.
But the more docile they make you, the more you need them because you're incompetent.
And then by exchange, the more angry you get due to your own incompetence, so the more docile you have to become.
So what's their end goal?
I heard somebody else very smart say one day that the end goal of every government is always communism because new laws are passed every single day.
And this is what Elon Musk is trying to do right now.
He's trying to put in some kind of limit for laws.
If you pass a law, there needs to be a time limit until it's reviewed because you make a law and you forget about it.
New laws are passed every day and laws are never taken away.
So every single day you are less free than you were before.
We won't talk about the sheep herd and talk about freedom.
We have these signs everywhere of freedom, but every day our wall actually gets smaller because there's a new law every day.
Nobody even knows what they are.
Oh, well, let's talk about human trafficking.
When people said human trafficking to me before, before this garbage I went through, I was like, human trafficking?
Yeah, that sounds bad.
I mean, okay, you beat someone up and you put them in chains and then you drag them somewhere and...
Yeah, less like entrapment and false imprisonment.
I get what human trafficking is.
Until you end up being charged with human trafficking and you're like, what the fuck?
Bro, I'll give you an example.
There's another person right now currently in Romania who I've spoken to in court.
They're going through a human trafficking case.
It's a woman who had these women from Thailand and Bali working for her, doing massage.
And she had a massage parlor.
And one of those girls...
Ended up sleeping with one of the customers.
And Deca are saying she met him at the massage parlor.
And the owner of the massage parlor, who is charged with human trafficking, is like, okay.
I'm like, okay, so you're bringing girls from Thailand and they're having sex with people and you've human trafficked them for sexual slavery.
She's saying, no, I flew in masseuses to give massages.
And one of those masseuses slept with a customer outside of business hours, outside of the business premises.
How am I even supposed to know this is happening?
Decault don't give a shit.
They write up human trafficking, sexual exploitation, trafficking across.
So what is human trafficking?
Well, she transported them.
She moved them from Thailand on a plane.
That's the transport.
For what?
For profit.
Because they give massages.
Yeah, because they're masseuses.
Like, they just tick all these boxes, and before you know it, there's indictments being thrown around.
It's like, what the fuck is this?
Well, the thing is, because there's so many laws, you don't have time to understand any of them until you're already caught up in it.
It's only when they've already hit you with the bullet.
You can't avoid bullets.
You have to get shot first to find out what caliber it is before you can call the medic.
So this poor woman who I spoke to in court who's on the verge of suicide is like, they're saying I transport these women here for sex instead of, I did the transport and financial exploitation because they worked, you know, eight hours a day and blah, blah, blah.
She just tried to open a fucking massage parlor.
But what's this prosecutor's incentive?
You want to talk about incentives?
What does a prosecutor do?
The same prosecutor who's coming after me.
Why?
Who gives a shit?
Type it up, write it out, send it to the judge.
The judge decides.
I don't give a shit if I'm right or wrong.
What's my incentive?
I need to just get cases.
That's my job.
I want a promotion.
So I'm not the only person in Romania or the world charged with bullshit human trafficking.
I didn't realize that human trafficking wasn't what I thought it was.
It's actually a bullshit, vague term that they just attack anyone with when they decide to.
It's interesting when you talk about the inflationary language and how languages are different and narrative control.
They do that the most with wars.
You know, when we attack someone, it's a tactical strike.
Tactical.
Tactical precision.
I mean, that's blowing up a school, by the way.
I mean, and if you were to see a video of this tactical strike, you would see, and that's why, for the first time ever, people are actually outraged about Gaza-Israel, because we can see it.
It's been going on forever, but now we can see it.
These tactical strikes are children without arms being dragged out of rubble, you know?
But when the bad guy attacks, it's brutality.
Hamas's brutal murder, Hamas's barbaric actions when they went on October 7th.
But we replied with tactical strikes.
It's all bullshit.
It's bullshit narrative control.
And it's actually very interesting because of all the things they could have charged me with, that's another reason they choose the things they do.
Once you look at somebody's reputation, you talk about someone sticking their head above the herd.
Now you have all these very vague laws, right?
And they can apply nearly anything to anyone.
So once a sheep sticks his head above the herd, you have to sit and say, okay, well, if we martyr this man, the other sheep will back him up.
So we have to make this person disliked by the herd.
We can't just put him back in the herd.
Otherwise the herd will be like, whoa, you stuck your head up and you came back, you're alive.
How was it?
Should I try?
You know?
Wow, you have a Bugatti, a sheep Bugatti.
Let me try that.
No, they have to get rid of that idea.
So they're like, he stuck his head up.
He needs to go back with a bad reputation.
They can't, I mean...
They're going to charge me with tax fraud and all this crap.
Nobody cares because nobody wants to give their fleece to the fucking owners in the first place.
So if you say, oh, you didn't give the owner all your fleece, everyone's going to be like, good, fuck them.
What do they do with it anyway?
So they have to get something heinous.
And unfortunately now, especially against men, but all these varied versions of sexual crimes are now so vague that they can attack anybody with any of it at any time.
And now you're stuck trying to defend yourself, and there's still people inside the herd who are like, oh my god, did you hear about him?
It really is amazing to me, but I mean, these people still believe in the vaccine, so what the fuck can you do?
What's right and wrong anymore?
Everything is subjective now.
Nothing is right or wrong at the point where it's hard to have a hard line on almost anything.
That is the bottom line of masculinity in general, is having a hard line on things.
That's why they fear Trump, because he says, I'm deporting you.
And they're like, oh, but what if?
And they come up with their what ifs.
Their exceptions that disprove the rules.
Their subjectalities.
That's all the female mindset.
And that's what they want everyone to think like.
They want you all to think it's subjectiveness.
So when they say, I'm going to deport this person because they're here illegally.
Somebody who is masculine goes, okay, they're there illegally.
They broke the law.
Deport them.
Fine.
But the subjective mindset would go, but how long has he been here?
But did he commit a crime?
But did he go to work?
Oh, has he got a family?
Does he help his neighbor?
Did he cut his grass?
Maybe not him.
And then it all goes down the rabbit hole, right?
Of the rabbit hole of endless subjectivity, the rabbit hole of endless inaction, endless whatever.
The reason they fear Trump is because he's the kind of person who just goes, no, that's the line.
And that's what they don't like.
You're right.
They want everything now in this big cloud of constant and endless possible confusion.
Yeah, it's two mindsets.
There's people who believe morality comes from parameters, and people who believe morality is having no parameters at all.
I think you nailed it.
We just said it there, that the system, the matrix, whatever you want to call them, they try very hard to conflate docile and passive and inept with moral.
Oh, he lets anyone around him do whatever they want, so he's a good person.
When the truth is, if you actually look at history, it's been the absolute opposite.
The good people, the heroes, the men did not allow people to do whatever they wanted.
And that morality has convinced the Western world now into committing the largest act of suicide that we're going to ever see in probably modern history.
I mean, the level of cuckdom that the average Western Government is operating under is fucking ridiculous.
They're giving up the safety of their native females and they're giving up their lands to people who don't respect their culture because they're good.
Oh, but I'm nice.
I'm moral.
And it's crazy how we've completed that.
When true morality would be standing on the beachhead with a spear saying, you don't come here.
But this is it, right?
So this is it.
They've even inversed it completely because masculine morality has always been in the defense of things.
That's what we've been for.
The good men went to war to defend.
But now because everything's turned on its head and there's no war worth fighting and all the people who are in charge of everything are trying to make us as docile as possible and everything's so inverted, now morality is allowing the people who are advocating for illegal immigrants to come and rape the native women and bring drugs and commit murders believe they are moral.
They believe they are good people.
For allowing these undocumented people to turn up and destroy society.
They believe they're moral for that.
And that's what's truly scary.
The scariest thing between these two opposing tribes, the people who think for themselves and believe in parameters and are resisting the matrix and the people who believe in the matrix.
When you talk to the people who believe in the matrix, you try and explain to them why the world voted for Trump.
Like America voted for Trump to fix things.
And the reason they don't get it is because they don't think anything is broken.
Yeah, that's it.
That's what's scary.
What's scary is they won't even say, yeah, it's broken, but he's not the answer.
They're going to sit and say, what's broken?
Illegal immigrants, so?
You're like, because a country needs a border to be a country.
Well, that explains why hot girls are conservative and why ugly girls are liberal.
Because hot girls are conservative because they're like, I'm hot and I like me and I like the way I act and I like the way I think and I like the way I look and I want my kids to look like me.
And then you have the ugly trolls who hate themselves.
They won't admit they hate themselves, but they do by proxy.
So they're committing suicide by proxy.
It's their internal hate that they're trying to project outwards.
It's kind of interesting.
I'd love to sit with a liberal.
I don't debate liberals anymore.
I mean, destiny couldn't afford my fee.
And even if he tried to, I'm not going to sit and debate with these people because one of the things I'm going to try and do with all my money is avoid all these scum.
Life's punished him.
But I'd love to have a conversation with him and say, what would be the line?
That would make you not be liberal anymore.
Like, if the government said you all had to chop off your little finger, is that the line for you?
But they came up with a reason.
Because of immigrants.
Gays.
Whatever.
Chop it off.
We'll give you anesthetic.
You don't really need it.
Study after study about how you never really use it.
The mainstream media talks about how unimportant it is.
Everyone's holding a cup without one.
People start talking on The View and on MSNBC about how much better life is without one.
You know, ever since I chopped mine off, my hand feels so light and so mobile.
And before you know it, is that the line?
Or does it have to go up a digit?
What about your middle finger?
Like, where does the point come where you finally realize you're being exploited?
Or do you hate yourself so much, so viscerally, that you're happy to just go to the end?
You're happy to just get shot in the head.
Because it's self-hatred.
Everything they purport and push for humanity is just destruction.
Because they hate themselves.
And they want society to pay a price, by extension, because God managed to make them trolls.
And it's self-hatred.
It's a death cult.
And I'm wondering, is there any line to wake these people up?
I don't know if there even is.
So then you sit and say, well, why am I debating?
This goes into my point about why I won't debate with them.
Debate with who about what?
You're just born to fucking lose.
People like you have always been born to lose.
And when people like you met me, in every period of human history, on every geographical location on the planet, you were destroyed.
Every single time.
Now you have the internet and I'm supposed to sit here with you and talk about it.
When anywhere else you were gone.
You were history.
Fuck these people.
But yeah, it's interesting the huge ideological divide.
And it's very interesting because morality, we just talked about.
I believe morality is being prepared to kill others.
To protect who you...
That's what morality is.
And it's kind of crazy that liberals try and pretend it's something else, that morality is acceptance of all things.
Because that's hypocritical in and of itself.
When you call the police, you expect them to kill the bad guy.
You know, I don't believe in violence.
I'm moral.
Cops!
So what do you expect them to do?
You want them to shoot whoever's causing you the problem, right?
So I agree with your morality.
The morality is violence to defend what I believe in.
If you're going to sit there and you accept everything and you think that makes you a good person, well, you're advocating destruction of your civilization.
We can go down the gender path about why females are more likely to think this way because they're incapable of violence.
So females are less likely to have a differing opinion because they can't defend that opinion.
There's a whole bunch of pretty basic psychology that explains these things.
But it is interesting because that is the plague of the Western world currently.
The plague of the Western world currently is this decision on what is morality.
And if morality is going to be this version of it that they're trying to purport by the MSM, then the only end result is destruction.
If morality is accepting everything, then the end result is destruction.
Accepting anyone coming from anywhere who wants to do anything they want and think however they want and talk whatever language they want and exploit the system any way they want, you're going to lose.
You can't do that.
You need to have a strong...
It's kind of interesting.
If I had to have a country and I had to accept immigrants from all around the world, I would actually say, okay, if we're going to do this for whatever reason, then they need to come in and adhere to our moral code.
We need to have stronger morals, not less.
We don't need to be accepting of everything.
They need to turn up and they need to believe these 25 points.
They need to repeat them every day and they need to say them every day and their existence within our state is contingent.
On believing in these things.
Then it doesn't matter what color they are.
It doesn't matter what religion they are.
Because these things at least unite the people.
We've done the absolute opposite.
We said, you can come with your own morals.
And we're moral because we let everyone else have their own morals.
Freedom!
No, it's true.
You know what?
Liberals are at battle with their own instincts.
No, no.
I've never heard this before.
Women don't want kids if they're liberal.
Men don't want to resist oppression if they're liberal.
Men don't want to defend their society and defend their land and defend their women if they're liberal.
They're at war with their own instincts.
And I guess the reason why they do something like to castrate themselves is to try and make those instincts go away.
Otherwise, you're left with the eternal feeling of cowardice, right?
Does it come down to a degree of bravery?
I'm not sure.
But if you feel instinct to defend something but you're afraid to defend it and you don't act to defend it, you either have guilt or you have to then go and suffer the consequences of defending it.
So there's two sides.
But you're right.
Liberals are at war with their own instincts, which has to evolve into some degree of mental illness and self-hatred.
I mean, I don't know the statistics on this because I don't read statistics because I don't believe in them.
I think they're all made up.
But I would argue if somebody out there could do a real study that liberals were far higher on the mental health.
I mean, the people who are taking antidepressants or people who are taking anti-anxiety meds, I'd argue the majority of them are liberals.
Or let liberals at least take them at a much higher percentage.
Which is kind of interesting.
If we were to accept, and I think liberals themselves might even accept this, if we were to accept that liberals take mind-altering drugs more often than conservatives for anxiety, depression, whatever it is, some kind of mental health ailment, why were you trying to push the world with your worldview?
When all of you are on the verge of suicide.
Like, isn't that disqualifying?
Isn't that disqualifying in itself?
Your worldview, the majority of people who think like you, can't even live within their own mind.
And you're trying to make society do it.
Like, how does this end?
You know, it's interesting what you said, because even a broken...
Clock is right twice a day, right?
So, like, I agree with the liberals on Gaza, Palestine, Israel.
I agree with the liberals.
All the liberals with the Palestine flags, I agree with.
But then they have a Ukraine flag in their bio.
And I don't agree with that.
Like, they always choose the oppressed team.
So sometimes they get it right, and a lot of times they get it wrong.
They always choose the oppressed team.
But it's interesting because I rationally look at both situations and come to what I believe to be a rational conclusion.
People can disagree with me.
It's fine.
But I don't believe I'm ideologically aligned.
I literally just look and go, well, that's not right.
And that is right.
And that makes sense.
But they automatically choose the underdog no matter what.
That's it.
And so for them, it is like a biological response to things.
It is very interesting.
You can say certain things.
It's actually kind of annoying, because especially when you talk on the internet, you have to be careful how you phrase things, because especially when you end up, everything's translated and put in a court of law.
But it's interesting.
I've always been the person who looked at a tree, a big, beautiful tree.
And my girlfriend would be like, wow, look how beautiful that tree is.
And I'd sit there and go, that tree killed every tree around it.
That tree annihilated every sapling anywhere near it.
Its roots go so deep.
An army tank.
Can crash into that tree and the tree will stay standing.
That tree is annihilated.
How many other trees has that tree murdered?
And the women see, wow, a pretty tree.
And I see that tree's a gangster, but he's dangerous.
That tree's killed people.
My mentality's always been that.
Now, when you say this, there's going to be some artists on the internet who's going to think, oh, Tate said go out there and kill all my enemies.
I'm not saying that.
But, please.
But, yeah, to a degree to win.
I guess you have to accept, to win, there must be a loser.
If you're going to be a winner, there are a loser.
And often, in many cases in life, for one man to win, a hundred must lose.
This is how it goes.
So maybe this whole mentality of, we don't want anyone to lose, we are moral, we accept everything, we're not better than.
Maybe you do have to have, not maybe, perhaps, you do have to have a degree of arrogance.
You do have to believe you're worthy of winning.
Which means you have to believe you're better than the people you beat.
You have to believe it.
Otherwise, you wouldn't beat them.
And I guess the easy way to believe that is to believe that your culture is better or your religion is better.
But they throw all that away.
They don't want to believe they're better than anyone in any way.
They want this false idea of this equality, this fake, everyone-can-just-get-along equality garbage, which anyone with a brain understands isn't true and will never work.
Ever.
The question is, do they really even believe it'll work or do they just hate themselves so much?
I literally think it's like almost angst.
But is a lot of that just cowardice and escaping suffering?
Yes, I think so.
Is that what it is?
I mean, is it just being born with a mindset where you hate suffering so much and you always team with the underdog and everything's unfair and nobody should have to suffer?
I mean, if you have the mentality that you're born to suffer...
I think you'll be pretty good at things.
If you're born with the mentality that nobody should suffer, you're always going to be shit at things.
I understand that I was born to suffer.
And truthfully, I mean, I'm very, very blessed with my life.
A lot of people have said to me, you know, you're under stress and they're putting you in jail in Romania and you're going through all this court.
Like, how do you deal with it?
How do you smile?
This is nothing compared to the suffering I could.
I mean, is it hard?
Not really.
I mean, I don't know.
I was built to suffer.
I wake up every day and go, what's on the menu?
Let's go!
I'm so used to it.
I'm kind of excited by it.
The only period in my life where I could say where everything was genuinely perfect was about a month before I was arrested.
And I've never been so anxious.
I felt so anxious.
I was in Dubai.
All those videos from Dubai with the Bugatti and the big mansion and all the girls and everything.
And me and Tristan were sitting around the pool.
And I remember I've said this on every podcast.
I'm going to say it again for the people at home in case their life's going good.
If your life's going good, panic.
I'm telling you, if your life's going well, worry.
Because I was sitting there by the pool with the Bugatti and the McLaren and like 20 girls I'd never even met who were beautiful.
And we're sitting by there and we got the big pool.
Then we're in this huge mansion.
Tristan goes, six years ago we were in Luton.
We made it.
And I was like, nah, we're fucked.
Something's coming.
He said, what do you mean?
I was like, I'm 36. I could not have completed life this level.
I could not be the most famous man on the planet.
Hundreds of millions of dollars.
Endless women want my children.
Bugatti on the drive.
Like, nah.
There's no way!
I can get away with this for the next 50 years.
Something's coming.
Mom's like, there you go.
That's just how it goes.
So I feel comfortable with the suffering because I feel like I have a direction and an objective.
When I have endless suffering, I'm like, okay, well, I know what I need to do now.
I mean, what's more frustrating?
A video game where you can't beat the final boss?
Or, you know, when you play those games and you get lost and you can't find the next part and you're just going around in circles.
I've been in this room.
I'm just going around and going around in circles.
Those are the games that piss me off more than the game where I'm trying to beat the guy I can't beat.
I'm happy fighting an enemy I might not be able to beat.
I'm much more anxious when I'm lost.
So, I think when you accept that suffering is part of life, you get good at suffering and then you get good at things.
If you're going to go through the world trying to make the world suffer-less and yourself...
Not have suffering.
Well, then you're going to suffer more than anything.
I guess that's why they end up popping pills.
How successful you are in life is directly correlated to your stress tolerance.
In fact, it's more correlated to your stress tolerance than anything else.
Forget IQ. Forget most nearly anything.
If you're the guy who can deal with more stress than anyone else, you're going to end up in the position where you're dealing with more stress than anyone else.
And those positions, one way or another, pay you.
Because no one else will do it.
I think there's stats on that, by the way.
Well, no.
I'm telling you because...
Because that's the only way you can even separate yourself from the labor market in general, right?
I can put myself in a position to do what others won't do.
Even me, why am I globally famous?
I've said water's wet.
I don't believe I've said anything truly remarkable, but everyone already knows it.
But I'm the one who's dumb enough to say it and go to jail for it.
So that's why.
So you have to put yourself in a position where decoderating your home with guns, kicking your dog, threatening to shoot your dog in the head.
Yeah.
Threatening to shoot your dog in the head, you know, dragging your females around by their hair.
And you've got to put yourself in a very stressful place.
And that's the same with everything.
It's the same with every fighting champion.
They take the shot.
I want the belt now on two days notice.
I'll take it.
That's how I won my first world title, two days notice.
So why do they become champion?
Because they were the guy ready to fight for a championship without a training camp.
They're that guy.
So a lot of it is down to stress tolerance, but it is really interesting how these things apply to the individual and how these things apply to the macro.
And, you know, I try and have conversations with...
Here we go.
Let me say something controversial.
I try and have conversations with women, which is always a mistake, because they don't understand anything outside of themselves.
They only think about themselves.
They're very selfish.
And whenever I discuss any subject with men, we discuss it on the macro and we discuss it on the personally applicable, right?
We can even look at a legal system.
Romania is the safest country in Europe.
You know why?
Because they'll lock you up on nothing.
They don't care.
This whole individual rights, individual liberties, innocent until proven guilty, that's Western garbage.
That's why London stabbed city.
Because of that.
The reason there's no stabbings here is because if they even suspect that you maybe might have once, you go to jail.
And it's your problem to get out.
It's not their problem.
It's your issue.
They don't care.
And lots of societies are like this.
Japan's the same.
Everyone talks about Japan and talks about how safe it is.
Since I got out of jail, I did a lot of research on different legal systems around the world because I'm going through the Romanian legal system.
I thought, you know what?
This system is garbage.
What other systems are there?
Everyone goes, oh, Japan's so safe.
Japan's so safe.
Do you know why?
Because they have a 98% conviction rate.
That's why.
Because if you stand in front of a judge, you're toast and there's nothing you can say to get out of it.
If England did that, it would be safe too.
But we don't.
Individual rights, individual liberties.
We've put the individual's feelings over the sanctity of the entire society.
The bee over the beehive.
I'm not saying that's right or wrong.
I mean, I'm currently in a situation where, as a bee, I wish things were different.
But as a beehive, Romanians are like, oh yeah, well, you know, you're rich.
Romanians say this to me.
You're very rich.
You talk a lot.
You drive a fast car.
It's good that the poor people here see that being rich comes with problems or it might make riots.
You know, you're rich and you go to jail sometimes.
They're just like, it's for the beehive.
It's for the beehive.
Get over it.
This is kind of how they think.
And I sit and say, I'm innocent.
They go, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Innocent, guilty.
That has nothing to do with it.
It's good for the beehive.
Yeah, it's good for the beehive.
So get over it.
China's the same.
It's good for the beehive.
So fuck the bee.
We're the other way around, right?
So these things all apply.
And it's very interesting when you discuss all these subjects because you can discuss something about the legal system and what's the right way to do it, how it applies to society, and how it applies to the individual.
I was talking about this with some girl.
We were watching a TV show and a stalker killed his ex-girlfriend.
And she was like, why didn't they stop him?
That's terrible.
She kept calling the police.
Why didn't they stop him?
That's terrible.
I'm saying, explain to me.
Come on, I'm going to try and treat you like an adult, which is a mistake.
Woman.
Explain to me how they could have stopped this happening.
The police.
But she called them.
She called the police.
Yes, she called the police and said that her ex won't leave her alone.
Do they now have to life imprison her ex?
Is that your solution?
What's the solution here?
He called her over and over and over again.
Kept calling her.
He made a threat.
The police went around and saw him and said, stop threatening her.
Don't contact her again.
He contacted her again.
They put him in jail for a month.
He then got out and killed her.
What could they have done different?
Are you saying that any man who texts his ex should go to jail for life?
Apply this to the macro.
Forget about you being a woman seeing the woman dead on the TV. Apply this to a society and explain to me your plan.
I ain't fucking got one.
And by extension, as it dissolves, it dissolves to culture with it.
And culture is far more effective at policing than even a government can be.
We talked about, I just talked about the Romanian legal system, the different legal systems around the world.
But I would also argue that one of the main reasons Japan and Romania are safe is that if a Romanian is going to steal, he'll steal outside of Romania because he doesn't want his family to be known as thieves in Romania.
And I've heard them say that.
If I steal, I go to England.
Because then no one's going to call my mother the mother of a thief.
So the culture polices them here.
And the culture polices people in Japan.
The culture.
But you're right.
If you remove all these other things and give everything to the state, well then the culture dissolves along with it.
And it's actually culture that will police far more effectively than a police force ever could.
I mean, you can spend endless money on police forces.
Like America has.
I mean, their police forces have more money than armies.
It doesn't stop the crime.
At all.
It's only going to, you know, because the culture's a mess.
The culture is everyone out for themselves and take drugs and rap music and garbage.
Well, the culture is shit.
Police ain't ever going to fix it.
They never will.
That's what's so transformative about a Trump win.
And that's what liberals actually fear and won't admit.
They don't fear any policy he's going to pass.
They say they do.
They say they pretend to give a shit about some policy and tariffs.
Now liberals are upset about tariffs.
Since when has a liberal cried about tariff ever?
You're literally the party of taxes.
You're trying to give your money away and now you're complaining about tariffs.
They don't care about his policy.
They care about the fact that he's going to change the culture masculine.
That men have won.
Not gendered men.
Actual men.
Not the gay faggots.
The real men have won, which means the culture will become more masculine, which means parameters will appear.
People will start saying, no, you're not teaching my kid that.
That's what they're afraid of.
They're afraid of the culture changing.
So they try to disintegrate culture and give everything to the daddy state because they like this idea of absolute fairness and clarity in all things to remove suffering.
Let's make it all fair.
What's so insane about that is that the state isn't fair with anything.
That's what's so crazy about it, right?
I completely understand why people do not like the idea of...
The brothers of a woman going around and beating up the husband who hurts her.
I get why people might say, yeah, but what if they go too far?
What if they kill him?
Who's going to decide what's fair?
What if he only slaps her and they break his face?
Whatever.
We need to give it up to a court to be fair.
Well, maybe the court's better with certain things, but courts aren't fair.
Courts are not fair.
Unless you've been to court yourself, you have no idea how unfair courts are because courts have judges and judges are people.
You know, I've gone to court here with a piece of paper.
That says I'm a bad person.
And the judge said, jail.
And then I've appealed it and walked in there to the next judge with the same piece of paper two days later.
And she's read it and goes, there's not enough evidence here to even hold this man on house arrest.
Free.
Same law.
Same piece of paper.
Same country.
Two judges.
This is a philosopher.
Friedrich Nietzsche is talking about the problem of morality.
Because we're talking about the liberals and conservatives.
They literally see the world.
Interesting, because then you have to analyze, because I don't want to be the kind of person who complains without coming up with a solution, right?
It's easy to complain that space travel is expensive, and then they say, okay, fix it.
And you're like, well, I don't know.
So it's like, what's the solution?
So how do you fix, how do you even build a fair judicial system?
I don't know.
It's kind of interesting.
Right now, completely off the top of my head, based on what you just said, which made me think of something, which is quite interesting.
I think it would be very good to have, let's say you had a panel of judges from all different socioeconomic backgrounds.
Now, they'd all be biased, but at least you'd have a spectrum of bias.
Because the problem is, when you have a judge who's been, like you said, to a university, which is liberal, and his friends are other liberal judges, and they were probably wealthy, raised in a liberal area, and their parents were liberal.
I mean, do you even have a real G who wants to go be a judge?
I mean, it's a lot of book reading.
I mean, it's a lot of studying.
Like, we want to do other things.
The mentality that makes you want to sit and read for 10 years is already counter to a lot of masculine imperatives.
I don't know.
If you were to get a judge, and the judge knows the law, whatever, whatever, and you were to put him next to a builder, and just hear the case.
See what the builder has to say about it.
You know what a builder would say about my case?
This is bullshit.
This is the biggest bullshit.
What?
This girl lied?
What?
This is stupid.
A judge will sit there and go, oh, well, you know, maybe.
It's really interesting.
You're right.
So liberalism is almost now coded into, as you just said, the power structures.
Liberalism is coded into the power structures.
And if you try and become powerful and you're not liberal, well, they'll crush you anyway because you're outnumbered.
That's how it works.
I don't think you'd even get far.
You often wonder why.
I mean, Trump's pulled off a miracle.
You look at England.
I don't know about Ireland so much, but I'm sure it's pretty similar.
England will never have a Trump.
They'll just never...
I want them to, and I hope I'm wrong.
But it's just like, when anyone is even 5% of Trump, the way they're piled on, and the difference between Trump and everyone else is Trump didn't bend.
That's the difference.
Everyone else who's kind of tried to be of Trump a bit, bent.
Like, I was a huge fan of Nigel Farage.
I like Nigel Farage.
I'm not insulting Nigel Farage.
I supported him for UKIP. I supported him.
The second they say, Edutate supported you, instead of saying, Lots of people support me, and I'm not responsible for the actions or the lifestyles of every single person who supports me.
I'm here to do my job, and I'm glad that lots of prominent figures across the spectrum support me.
That's a professional answer, which I just come up with off the top of my fucking head, so I'm more qualified than him.
What does he say?
Oh, well, Andrew Tate says really bad things I know, and I don't want to talk about it.
He shits himself.
It's like, stop shitting your pants against these people.
That's what they want.
They thrive on your fear like demons.
That's why they hate me so much.
Because I sit down with the BBC and they're like, oh, so we think you're a rapist.
I'm like, fuck you.
Fuck you.
You're a misogynist.
Sometimes it blows their mind.
That's why they hate Trump.
You can't say that.
Says it again.
He's a master of what you say?
Repeats himself.
That's the only way to beat these people.
It's amazing how this herd mentality has put so much fear.
So much fear, especially inside of the Western Mail, that we're all afraid.
Even the freedom, even the truth speakers, the freedom fighters, especially on Twitter, who say the things that you're not supposed to say, great.
Stage one is to say it.
I agree.
I'm not against you.
The fact you're all anons, all, just devalues it.
They can't kick you all out of your jobs.
They can't ban you all.
You might get a movement if you put your fucking face to it.
You know?
I know it's scary.
This is exactly it.
It's scary.
It's dangerous.
But that's why I'm in the situation I'm in, because I put my face to it.
The thing that's so interesting about morality is that you can rationalize it so easily.
Like, it's immoral to steal.
But he was starving.
Okay, well, he was starving.
So he stole.
But then how do you medically, like, at what point is starving?
Like, is he going to die tomorrow?
Is he going to die next month?
Is he just hungry?
Did he eat yesterday?
Is he a little bit peckish?
Like, how do you now justify it?
And we all do it.
I did it myself.
I did it myself.
When I ran my webcam studio, I had my webcam business, and I had all these girls working for me, and everyone was happy, and everyone was making millions and millions of dollars.
Everything was fine.
The girls were making money.
I was making money.
Everything was fine.
And then I'd sit there and go to Tristan and say, ah, you know, we should move into another business.
Let's move away from all this stuff.
Tristan goes, let me make a whole bunch of money.
I'm like, yeah, but let's move away from it.
And anyway, we went on holiday to Thailand for a week.
And then we came back after a week in Thailand.
None of the girls had worked.
We'd been in Thailand having a great time.
And on the website, we saw all their customers, all their customers were just giving other girls money, just spending money.
And I was like, Tristan, if we don't run our webcam business, these guys are going to spend their money anyway.
It's like, let's say you have an alcohol store.
There's two alcohol stores in a row, side by side.
An alcoholic walks into your store to buy alcohol.
If you don't sell it to him, He'll just buy it the next place.
Are you going to go bankrupt?
Is that moral?
So that you can't feed your family?
So then you rationalize it and go, well, he's going to buy it anyway.
These guys are going to spend money on girls anyway.
You can't stop them.
If you tried, you couldn't stop them sending their money away.
So why can't I take it?
Maybe it's bad to have a webcam business, but the girls are happy.
I'm happy.
They have Lambos.
I have Lambos.
The guy's going to give his money away anyway.
Why not us take it?
So then morality all becomes...
And then, once again, this is what's so interesting, what we said earlier.
On the micro, yes.
The girl who worked for me was rich.
I was rich.
The man was happy because he was going to give his money away anyway, and he got stuck to the girl he liked.
All happy.
But how does that apply to society?
How does that apply on the macro?
The decision, sometimes what's good for the bee, isn't good for the bee hive.
And this is basically the argument you can have with anything.
The reason a factory wants loads of cheap migrant workers is so the owner of that factory can have a yacht.
That's why.
Is that good for the society?
And these things conflict.
And they'll have enormous rationalizations for that.
And they'll have enormous rationalizations, and they'll rationalize morality.
So the people who are looking at the town saying, you're bringing in millions of illegals to this town, you're destroying the town.
That's immoral.
He'll say, I'm saving millions of disadvantaged people from a poor country and giving them honest work.
I'm the good guy.
No, I'm the good guy.
And all battles in life, that's the reason they're so complicated, is because the Western world and the empire of lies actually tries very hard, when it wants to, to add clarity and make this clear dividing line between the black and the white, the good and the bad.
Putin is bad.
Everything he's ever done is bad.
Everything about him is bad.
Hitler is bad.
Everything he's ever done is bad.
You say, well, yeah, Hitler may have done some bad things, but he did build the Autobombs.
He built roads.
What?
Do you love Hitler?
There's no subjectivity when they want it clear-cut.
They want it bad.
But the truth is, with nearly all things, it's varying shades of gray.
It's not black and white.
And this is where the most fierce battles come from, is when both sides are kind of right.
And then we, as people, choose our team, right?
So we'll choose the town.
Perhaps.
And say, we agree with the town.
The liberals will agree with the factory owner who's helping the migrants.
And then everyone believes they are right.
And people don't fight when they believe they're wrong.
They all believe they're right.
The Nazis thought they were right.
The Allies thought they were right.
That's why it was so fierce.
That's the human condition.
How do you fix that?
I don't know how you fix that.
And there's not many places on Earth where that can happen.
Not many places on Earth.
Because an election is a replication or a replacement for a war.
That's the whole point of it, right?
Who's the leader now?
Let's find out.
And to avoid all the bloodshed, you have an election.
And it is kind of amazing.
But the whole Western society, you talk about Western values, and I say how they're based on freedom, it's actually kind of amazing that Western society at large is based on that.
It's based on this idea that people are prepared to take an L. And that's what gives law and order.
I've always found that amazing.
I live in a house with many different cultures, many different races, and we're racist to each other all day long, and it's funny.
Because it's funny.
And half my family's white, half my family's black, so we have these different worldviews.
And whenever I'm talking about my black side of the family or my black mindset towards certain things, and I've always said, I find it amazing, because I'm an mixed-race person, right?
So I can tap into both sides.
I can change teams, right?
So it's truly amazing.
But I'm like, one of the things I find amazing about white people in general, or Western society in general...
Is that people can take L's like that.
Like, I'll have a disagreement with my neighbor in Minnesota.
We'll sue each other.
We'll go to a judge who wasn't there.
You weren't even there, sir.
And we're going to tell you.
We're both going to tell our story.
And the judge who's never been there and never even seen it will go, that happened 10 years ago and I wasn't there.
I think him.
And the other guy will go, okay.
The end!
Now, isn't that remarkable?
Like, if two neighbors have a disagreement in Zimbabwe, it's Michelle's.
It's like, alright, let's fix it then.
It's kind of amazing.
And the whole Western world is built on this principle.
And it's kind of incredible.
And you're right.
That's the one thing the Western world for a long time did well.
We're going to see how it goes into the future.
But that's what it did good.
No, 100%.
Because it's gone too far.
It's gone way too far.
There's no light without dark, and there's a limit to all things, right?
So one of the things I said on Twitter that super pissed white people off was when I said that white people are going to go extinct, and they got fucking mad.
They got super mad.
And it's like, and they came up with all the cope about mass deportations, and supposedly they're going to kick me out.
Yeah, good luck.
Blah, blah.
All these dreams.
And it's just like, it's kind of interesting because...
The same thought process that allows you to sit there and listen to a judge and build these complicated rockets and work together and consider other people's feelings and have these huge organizations and these other teams and the fact that you're not just selfish in and of yourself is great.
But that's also the exact same thing that's going to castrate and constrain you.
Like, if white people truly care about white people, which they do, and your societies are all collapsing, which they are, you need to have children.
Now, if you say to a white person to have kids, they're going to come up with reasons why they haven't yet, or they will, or they're going to say, oh, my wife doesn't want any more.
Is your wife's feelings more important than your civilization?
Find someone else.
Now, that's the black in me.
The black in me is like, then get another chick.
And they're like, you can't do that, you can't do that.
It's immoral.
So your moral is just to walk off a cliff and get replaced by the black people?
Because the black people don't give a shit.
So it's really interesting when you look at it that way.
Once again, beehive bee.
But it's really interesting because you're going to allow people into your country who will have kids with anyone, irregardless, be less interested in their offspring, financially at least.
And also, now you've built this mentality where the average white woman wants Birkin bags and an Instagram lifestyle.
If you say to a white chick, do you want a kid?
She goes, yeah, once we have a second house and three cars and a nanny.
Well, not everyone can provide that.
It's actually one of the strengths of Islam, and I don't want to talk about religion on this podcast, but one of the strengths of Islam is that you can work in a chicken and chip shop, and you have a wife who will have your children and obey you.
Bottom line.
And that's why they're out reproducing the white population so crazily.
So it's very interesting how there's light and dark and all things.
So the same thing that does amazing here, now the white man, I say to the white guys in his house, I make fun of them.
I'm like, bro, you need to have ten kids.
He goes, oh yeah, my woman.
She takes too long, bro.
You need five chicks.
They can't get their head around it.
Like, I can't do that.
Why?
Why?
It's not even illegal!
It's not even illegal!
Save the race!
But they can't do it.
But we all know that fatherless children are problems.
We all know that.
And we all know that society's stable with man, woman, child, boom.
I get all that.
I'm not disagreeing with any of that.
I'm saying you're going extinct.
So we can talk about society, but you're not going to be around to see it.
So it's like, at what point do you reduce the quality for quantity or become less moral to win?
At what point do you do what it takes to just survive?
I don't know.
I mean, I'll tell you that if there was a nuclear war coming and a warhead was about to drop on the city you're in and you needed a train fare to get out and the only way you can get train fare is to mug an old lady.
Are you immoral or are you moral?
Like the nuke is coming.
Like, you're running out of time!
So it's really interesting when you actually analyze these things, you apply them to Bee, Beehive, and how it all plays out in the end.
But it's mass consensus.
But it's very interesting because here's where you talk about the different sets of morals.
Because the people who come into the Western world believe they're as moral as you are.
They just have different morals than you do.
But their moral is now, their morality has now allowed them to be more competitive in this said space.
Now, it's not going to be that way forever because they're going to degrade the society they're enjoying now.
But for the short term, They're going to gain more and more power purely by population dynamics.
That rocket thing you just said, super interesting, because it's completely coincidentally.
We had this exact conversation in this house two weeks ago.
I said, white people built NASA. White people had glasses and Texas accents, and they built rockets.
And I was making fun of the black guy saying, you ain't ever built anything.
And his reply was, we let you build society because we just come to take it.
It's ours now.
And I'm like...
What do you have to say, white guy?
I'm in the middle.
Here we go.
What's good for the beehive?
What's good for the bee?
So if you say to a woman, the only way to save society is for you to stop going to university and wasting your most futile years reading an old textbook and instead start having kids, she's going to say, I don't want to do that.
That's bad for me.
The bee.
So yeah, but think of the hive.
So now you come down to the arguments of, and then once again, it's the age-old argument you can apply with nearly anything.
Bee versus beehive.
Same thing with men going to war, going to the army.
Like, I don't want to go get blown up, but your country needs you.
So it's like, as we move towards individualism, perhaps, I don't know, you know Roman history better than I do, but as we move towards individualism, the most crazy thing and toxic thing about this is, it's not just female individualism, because the main way society has always fixed this is didn't give women the choice.
That's the truth.
Most places in the world just said, you're a woman, you get pregnant.
Get over it.
Now we've given them the choice, but at the same time, we've given them the choice and convinced them to not get pregnant.
To poison them.
And whether that's purposeful, we've come along and I would argue that there's a lot of incentives by Hollywood and by The Matrix to try and convince women to not have kids.
Or it's just accidental by the envy of endless social media.
Women now don't want to have children and they have the choice.
And I'm not saying they shouldn't have it.
I'm saying that's the situation we're in.
How can you fix it?
It's difficult.
It's all like pathology all the way down.
I mean, we always go back to...
Idea that the 1950s was this utopia, and I'm sure it wasn't.
But, you know, the average man had an average job.
He could afford an average house and an average car in a factory, even if it was on skilled labor, and he had his wife and blah, blah, blah.
We talk about the 1950s, but the basic deal that promoted birth rates and provided children, the basic deal back then was that you had a woman who took care of you and obeyed you, and you went to work.
And the reason why no one's really having kids, especially in the Western civilized world now, is the deal's completely broken because women don't want to listen to you and they don't want to obey you.
They may even still say they want marriage.
Women say they want marriage all the time.
It's not that women don't want marriage.
Maybe it's just me being a billionaire, but trust me, it's all they want.
But I'm not stupid enough to fall for it.
Maybe I'm a bachelor.
I mean, I'll have a kid with them.
My morals...
Now, I can sit here and justify it to you for the next 10 hours.
Well, I will not marry her because financial protection for me, physical protection for her.
She has enemies.
I have enemies, sorry, and she'll become a target.
For law enforcement and everyone else, X, Y, Z, I'll still give her a kid, I'll still pay for the kid, I'll still see the kid, I'll still raise the kid, but they'll live there.
I can come here and sit here and justify it, but morally, I'm sure a lot of people will sit there and say it's wrong, but I'll sit and say, oh, but I'm going to die with 20 sons, so I win.
So all the morals are always all mixed up, but the basic premise was, you're a man, you go to work, you get a woman who obeys you and does as she's told, and you get to get married.
The deal was a man will give his freedom for a woman who obeys.
Now no one gets married because women don't want to obey men.
So why would you marry one?
I don't know.
What's the point?
During the Roman days, I'm not sure what they were up to.
But then you have to look at, once again, controversial subject, the different ideas of race and bachelorism.
Because a black bachelor has 20 kids.
And a white bachelor has none.
It's the same with everything.
The people in the middle get fucked on every single point.
Poor people didn't get the vaccine.
Rich people didn't get the vaccine.
People in the middle got the vaccine.
It's the same.
Poor people don't pay taxes.
Rich people don't pay taxes.
People in the middle pay the taxes.
You know, it's so interesting and so amazing how it's the people in the middle who get fucked.
I guess the reason for that, the logical reason, would be because if you're going to make a law, you want to make a law that applies to the most people, the largest percentage of the population, I'm guessing.
If you're going to make a law...
Obviously, the law...
I mean, laws can't be individualistic.
Laws have to be...
We talk about the little girl getting dragged out from the house because she's an illegal immigrant.
The point of it is, that's the law.
And you can't individually apply it.
Because that's like me saying to the police, I'm allowed to speed.
I'm a better driver.
And it's true.
I am.
And I am allowed to speed.
I decided.
But according to the law, I'm not.
Because the limit is 30, so everyone has to obey the law.
That's the law.
So I guess we're going to make a law you want to apply to as many people as possible, I guess.
But the people at the top and the people at the bottom get away with a lot of things that the people in the middle get wrecked with.
And you're right.
I mean, it's easy for me to say have endless kids because I can afford endless kids.
I can afford 100 families.
And it's easy for the people at the bottom because they don't give a shit.
It's the people in the middle who have, like, tried to do the right thing.
It's weird.
You know, sometimes you do the right thing and you get screwed over.
Sometimes you do the right thing and you get fucked.
I can't remember the exact...
And this is what's scary now because being a law-abiding citizen...
It's going to end in your destruction.
You're going to be broke.
You're going to be sad.
You're going to have no kids.
You're going to be full of vaccine.
And you're going to want to kill yourself.
It's amazing that you can't just wake up like you could in the 1950s and say, I'm going to be a law-abiding citizen that follows the law and I won't have problems with the law.
No.
Because if you want to get out, if you want to escape the matrix, I said to Tristan, we're in jail.
We're sitting in the jail cell.
I was like, bro, there is no way.
Forget webcam.
Fuck webcam off.
There is no way.
People like you and I from the Luton Council estate could get this rich without catching a case.
There is no way!
It doesn't matter what we did.
I could have sold the cure for cancer.
I would have got a case for something.
You just can't get out without catching a case somewhere along the way.
So you can't just say I'm a law-abiding citizen.
I don't have to fear the law and I'm just going to do as I'm told and I'll be fine.
Because the laws are so restrictive that the reality you're going to live is going to be so dire that you may as well break the fucking law.
There's no point in even trying to live this existence.
And it's amazing how these laws stranglehold.
I found this out the other day, and I'm not even sure it's true.
I haven't fact-checked it.
But if it's true, I am amazed.
That laws stranglehold.
We just talked about how new laws come in every day.
And they slowly, incrementally take your freedom away.
That's what they do.
They do it little by little so you accept it.
Ah, it's only 1%.
Ah, it's only 1%.
It's like inflation.
Of course.
50 years later, you're fucked, right?
I remember congestion charge coming into London.
And I remember how big of a deal it was.
When the congestion charge came in, you had to pay £10 a day to go into central London.
And they said it was about traffic and fixing the environment.
And at the time, it was £10.
And there was a big hee-haw, but eventually it went through.
And then eventually it went up to like £30 or £40 a day.
Who can even afford that on a normal wage?
I don't know.
So that went up.
And they said, because it's for the environment, if you have an electric car or a hybrid, you don't have to pay it.
I don't know if this is true, so if this is not true, please forgive me.
But I have heard that you now have to pay it for electric cars.
That they've made it...
Can you check this?
That they've changed the law, so now even electric cars have to pay the congestion charge, which is supposed to be protecting the environment.
So they made the congestion charge, then they slowly put it up, then they remove the exceptions, and slowly by slowly you get fucked.
Imagine you were the guy who sold his car he loved and bought a bullshit Prius.
Just to avoid congestion charge to get screwed anyway.
And this is how the governments work.
And there's no riots from the people.
Nobody complains.
No one in the government is held accountable.
Because there's no responsibility and accountability, there's some minister for transport that nobody really knows his name.
You never see his face anywhere.
But truthfully, no one's going to be like, who did this?
Whose idea was this scam?
Who thought in the next decade we'll slowly get the Prius users and fuck them last?
Who did it?
Nobody.
Who's in charge of the German Bitcoin selling?
Nobody.
Who did it?
Who knows?
Oh well, we're all broke.
And it's the people in the middle who are getting monumentally and endlessly fucked.
Because the people at the bottom or the top have a different mentality.
And perhaps this ties in full circle to what you said at the very beginning about the mentalities to escape.
The people in the middle of the top sit and say, I'd rather be a fugitive than live like that.
It's like Goodfellas.
Or is it Goodfellas or Scarface?
One of those movies where he says, I saw people.
You were suckers.
I couldn't live like you.
I had to do something else.
I couldn't be the common man.
I saw you all as Marx.
You're all suckers.
I had to do something else.
Five years, play this.
I'm telling you, it's the beginning of the end.
Because we'll talk about registering in a minute.
But in fact, let's talk about it now.
You're in the middle.
You want to be a law-abiding citizen.
England just said you have to tell them how many chickens you have.
They've just passed a law where all the farmers have to say something to do with bird flu.
Just tell them all the chickens you have.
But we all know what's going to come in the next 10 years.
It's a limit on how many chickens you have.
So that's why you have to tell them how many chickens you have.
The people who obey this law are going to get fucked.
The people who end up making a whole bunch of money or going broke because they go to jail, either rich or poor, are the people who don't obey the law.
The lawbreakers.
Because if you're law-abiding, you can't escape anymore.
So, the people with the mentality of, I'd rather catch a case than obey, are the people who either end up homeless or on a yacht.
It's really interesting.
If you were to say to me right now, I was in jail four months, in Romanian jail, which is the worst jail you can possibly do.
Since I've got out, I spoke to my friends in England who have all been to jail, and they're like, bro, don't worry about English jail.
You're gonna fuck it.
I described my jail, and I heard his jail, and I was like, bro.
Now I want to go to English jail.
They're trying, so hopefully I can go experience it because it sounds great compared to what I went through.
So I've done jail maximum, so I've experienced it.
But my point is, I said to Tristan, would you rather live like us with our finance and our global notoriety and our access to the most beautiful females on the planet and private jets and yachts and the best cars and we can go anywhere and private security and sleeping safely at night with guys with guns outside of our house and endless children?
And go to jail for six months a year for your life, but have six months of freedom.
Or would you rather live a normal life?
And Tristan looked me dead in the eye and he goes, those people are more in jail than will ever be.
And I'm like, I would rather go to jail every year for the rest of my life and be me than go back into that bracket.
Because that bracket is just fucking dire.
Goes back to what you said about making them docile.
Making them docile, making them sick.
So they can't organize themselves.
So they're not a formidable force against the power structures.
And this is what we aren't.
The West has fallen to the point now where all of the people in charge aren't even competent on any level.
They're not nationalistic, but they're also not competent.
Isn't the baseline for a leader a competent nationalist?
Wouldn't you call those two maybe the basic?
I'd like someone who believes in the country and can do things.
Please.
But anyone?
We don't have a single one in Western Europe.
The rule...
I hate to interrupt you.
I hate to interrupt you, but this is so important, I think.
The rules are so scary to rule followers.
And it's kind of interesting when you talk about mentalities, because my mentality has always been...
And I'm sure, once again, this is going to go against me.
I'm still going to say it.
I don't care.
My mentality has always been break the rules.
Not in a bad way.
Just in a, hmm, there must be a way around this rule.
I can give you a million examples.
I remember.
Getting caught by a speed camera.
I was 21 years old, and I had a GSXR 600, and I was driving too fast, and I got caught by a speed camera.
And I had to go to court.
I had a three-point fine.
And I went to court, and I think I said it wasn't me on the bike or something.
I lied.
I lied.
And I ended up walking away with six points.
And I remember saying to the judge, I remember saying it, why did I try and do the right thing and even come to court?
I tried to do the right thing and come to court, and I got more of a punishment.
This is bullshit.
Anyway, from there, I then thought, I'm going to buy my next motorcycle in France.
So I have a French plate.
So I can speed through speed cameras.
That's just how my mind works.
When I look at this Oulet shit, if I lived in London, I'd go, cool, I'll go buy a car in France.
Well, the wheel's on the wrong side.
Who gives a shit?
I think outside of the rules.
This is how my mind works.
Give me another number plate then.
Send the tickets to France.
Good luck.
That's how my mind works.
Most people's minds don't work that way.
Oh, the rules.
Well, maybe the French police will arrest me.
Yeah, they're going to send Interpol over a fucking, ooh, that's fine, dickhead.
They're such pussies that that's why they end up stuck in the middle permanently.
Now, that is the matrix, but we need that.
If everyone thought like me, it would be chaos.
I know this.
So it's actually super important and super interesting how scary the rules are to the rule followers.
And this is what's amazing, that Elon Musk has the same mentality as a bank robber.
If the mentality is the same, if the capability may be different, obviously there's going to be tweaks to the mentality, but you need to be, as a man, smart enough to pick your battles.
Like, I'm going to court on time.
You've got to know when to break the rules, when to follow the rules.
Not everyone has that balance right.
Because Elon knows, okay, we're going to build the Rockets.
I have to follow the rules for now, but if I take over the government, you know, like...
But his mentality is rule breaker.
If you're too far with it, which is what I said earlier, you have to be careful what you say on podcasts, but if you're too far with it, then you just become a straight criminal.
You just rob people.
Give me that now.
If you're too far with it.
So it's really finding that balance that's interesting.
And talking about Elon, I really think that this Elon Trump thing, you know, divine, to say something is divine, I think is overly used.
But the way Trump moved his head from that bullet, bro.
And then, Elon pairs up with him.
And most people don't understand that Elon is literally the only person on the planet that could have bought Twitter.
Not because he's the richest.
There's a lot of people with money.
And a lot of conglomerates with money.
Because the government needs him.
He's the only one they can't kill.
They need him for EV, which China's taking over.
And if Musk dies, China runs EV for the rest of human history.
They need him for space.
NASA needs him.
They need him for communications.
They need Starlink.
They need him alive.
If any other billionaire tried to do what Musk did, he would have been law-fared or assassinated into the end.
They tried to law-fare him a bit, but they can't go to that point of making up some girl from the history and locking him in a room like they do with everyone else.
They can't assange him or try and do what they did with Trump.
Ah, some girl did it, bankrupt him, Gene Carroll, some psycho bitch.
So Elon is in a really unique position because the government needs him.
So he's managed to pull this off.
And now he's in government to reform everything, which is really, truthfully, unlike any other political change in history, this is a real rebirth.
I also like to think a lot of these neocons and a lot of the Matrix and a lot of the boomers, etc., are dying.
So it's good.
They're dying.
They're old, these people.
They're 70, 80, 60. You know, they've been around a long time.
They're Russiaphobes.
They're just stealing from the stock market.
They all own Lockheed Martin, blah, blah, blah.
They are dying.
And we have this new generation of people coming in.
So it's going to be very interesting how society changes.
Paired with AI. AI scares the shit out of me.
And one of the reasons AI scares me is because it's going to remove my competitive edge.
Because I believe my competitive edge is how well I think and how fast I think and how fast I talk.
And I'm going to lose all that when everyone knows Neuralink and it's going to piss me off.
Because I want my competitive edge.
So I'm going to lose it.
So that shit scares me.
But I guess to the average man, maybe that shit's appealing.
I don't know.
So society is going to change in a very interesting direction.
And how we're going to come up with morality and apply laws and all these things in the future is going to be super, super interesting.
I think we're living, and I'm sure lots of people felt this way, where I'm sure in nearly every generation they felt like the world was ending and that they were living in a very interesting time.
But I like to feel like we are living in a very interesting time.
Oh, it's a blast.
It is super interesting.
And tying back to what we said about suffering.
You have to be prepared to go along for the ride.
I think the best mentality to have with this world we're living in and how fast things are changing and how many hypocritical standards are set and how many things don't really make sense and how much insanity there is is just to be prepared to surf the wave and enjoy it for the surfing.
Don't try and stop the waves.
Just enjoy it for what it is.
Liberals may be trying to stop the waves in one direction and conservatives are trying to stop it in the other direction.
I'm not an accelerationist and I'm not an anarchist.
But I am very good at riding the wave.
I am very much like, white people, you're about to go extinct.
Black people, you can't build rockets.
I'm just like, it is what it is.
I'm on the surfboard.
And I'm kind of enjoying it for what it is.
Because it is truly incredible and crazy.
And how it all ends up, I don't know.
I just hope we live long enough to see some kind of final result from it.
Because it's going to be very, very interesting.
And when you talk about Beehive Bee, you can also apply it to all these ideas, because we talk about AI and all these different things.
They also apply so differently to different hemispheres, different countries, different places.
It's kind of interesting.
You watch those sci-fi movies, and you have these utopian cities, and then outside of it are the barbarians who can't...
Or not allowed in the utopian city.
And it's kind of like that now with the Western Hemisphere and the East.
But imagine when AI comes in.
Imagine once every single person in America has a neural link installed at birth.
And it's all AI systems controlling everything and there's no crime.
And then you have the African continent has 17 times the population and no one has a neural link.
And just imagine how fucked the world will be.
And how can these people even compete globally?
How can they even compete economically?
How can they even generate money?
How can they even generate goods or services or anything?
It's going to be super interesting how these things apply.
I mean, I guess there are some lines already semi-drawn, but once you add AI into it, everything accelerates to infinity.
Bro, I fired 20 of my staff and I replaced them with AI. And the thing that's worrying about it is I've warned them all a thousand times.
The thing that's worrying about being a human that every single one of you at home should understand is that you're annoying because you're a human.
It's part of being human.
So even if your boss, and I'll talk from the authoritarian perspective, because in this scenario I was, even though I had the best intentions, I said, look, guys, I can replace all of you with AI today, but I won't, because I like you.
All I'm asking is that you try.
And then a month later, he's late.
And then a couple weeks later, he's late.
A couple weeks later, he doesn't reply.
Over time, when I have this option, which is free, and you cost money, and you're a human, You're going to get replaced.
It doesn't matter how much your boss likes you.
It doesn't matter how much he loves you.
Because even if you never make a mistake, he now can't compete against the more ruthless people who will simply fire all their staff.
So it's very interesting also, you talk about the Western world.
You're right.
And also what's interesting, we talked about the boomers dying and the power.
Power is getting into the hands of people who are younger and younger because, I mean, look at crypto.
They're like 16-year-olds.
Betting on meme coins.
It's insane that when I was 16, I didn't have, if I had a five pound note, I was rich.
When you were a kid back in our day, and we're not even that old, you couldn't possibly be rich at 17. You couldn't have made your own money at 17. There was no social media.
There was no crypto.
You could not have had a YouTube channel.
You couldn't be a streamer.
You couldn't run a company.
No one took you seriously.
There was no possible way.
Now we have children.
Children becoming millionaires.
Even me, when I need to do some of our most advanced AI stuff, I go inside of a room we have inside the real world.
We have another room with the advanced AI stuff.
A lot of these people are like 18, 16. I'm like, I'm talking to kids!
The children are doing this stuff.
It's really incredible.
With like a child army, I'm like Kony with his child army building these robots.
It really is going to be a very, very interesting future.
And I guess the best thing you can do is just be aware of it.
You don't have to believe in evolution.
Some people do, some people don't.
But Darwin said the most adaptable survives.
So you have to be aware of these things and at least paying attention to them and perspicacious because a lot of people don't even think about these things.
It's amazing.
A lot of people don't even think about these things.
It's not good for them because it's not good for them.
And this is actually one of the things where we can talk about morality because, okay, morally I'm making a bunch of children rich.
If you join the real world at any age, you can be old or young.
But we do teach people how to make money online.
And we're the only school, it's actually kind of amazing to me, as fast as the world moves, we are the only school that updates twice a day.
There's no other educational place you can go and pay money where they update their curriculum twice a day.
If you go to a university, you're learning things 20 years old.
Like, we're the only school that updates twice a day.
If you log in tomorrow, it's different than it was today.
So we update twice a day, and we're teaching all these people to make money.
And I am teaching all these people of all ages to make money.
We have older guys, and we have younger guys.
And some of these young guys make money, and then they message me, and they're like, oh, so what should I do now?
And I'm kind of like, yeah, you're 19. You have 3 million.
Liquid.
You're 19. They're like, what do you do?
I don't know.
What do you do?
It destroys you.
It destroys you because I'm like, well, I can tell you what not to do.
Don't fall in love with that girl who wants handbags because you're going to lose all your money.
Don't go popping bottles in clubs and trying to show off how rich you are.
I can give you a list of all the things you shouldn't do that you would have learned from experience of life if you'd lived, but you haven't lived.
You just made money as a kid and now you're all rich.
It is really crazy.
It's a scary, crazy world because money amplifies.
That's what money does.
And I can talk from personal experience.
Money does not change who you are.
It amplifies who you are.
It makes the bad people bad.
It makes the good people good.
It makes the smart people smart.
It makes the idiots idiots.
And it makes the children children.
And that's the problem.
You don't understand why they do it.
I was super anti-steroids.
And someone convinced me for steroids.
And I still don't take steroids.
But someone convinced me for it so easily.
It was kind of scary.
I'm super anti-steroids.
And the reason I'm anti-steroids is because I'm annoyed because I have a very good physique.
And if steroids didn't exist, I'd be even more exceptional.
So it really pisses me off.
But I'm lucky because I had my blood test done and my free test, I think it's set on, I don't know the Romanian systems, is between 1 and 19 of level of test.
And mine's at 22. So I'm above the maximum level completely naturally.
Maybe it's just down to the stress I'm under.
Maybe it's jail.
Who knows what it is?
But my body produces loads of it, so I'm fine.
So I've never taken any steroids.
I'll pass any test you give me.
Blah, blah, blah.
And then I said to this guy, I don't need steroids.
I just train really hard.
I've never needed steroids.
He goes, Andrew, you're big.
He goes, of course you don't need steroids.
Look at you.
If you were like me before I took steroids, you'd take steroids.
And I was like, yeah.
I was like, you don't think you could have ever trained your way out of it?
He goes, I did for five years.
I trained my ass off.
I ate everything right.
I couldn't get my test level up.
I couldn't.
He showed me a picture of him before he was on steroids.
I was like, I get it.
He convinced me.
I was like, yeah.
Yeah, I was like, well, some people just need it.
I was like, fine.
Okay.
I don't need it.
So I'm elitist.
I'm like, fuck steroids.
Well, duh.
No one in my position takes it.
You know?
So it is interesting.
It's right.
It's going to be really interesting when the Chinese make their version of the bionic man.
Yes.
And we make our version of the bionic man.
And we have the collectivism against the individualism.
Because...
As an individualist, and I am because I'm a rule breaker, so I'm an individualist because I'm not even collective enough to stay inside of the middle class.
I'm not even supposed to stay where I'm supposed to in a free society, so I'm absolutely individualistic.
But when I look at collectivism, I find it intimidating.
Like, when I see all the Chinese people doing the drums in tandem, I get scared.
I'm like, they all know kung fu?
That scares me!
I'm not scared of an individualist.
You can put some big, scary MMA fight in front of me.
Because I believe, I don't care.
I'm a man, I got a chance.
One swing.
One shot.
I'm a man with a chance.
But when I see collectivism, it intimidates me.
It's going to be really interesting how the AI, how we try and pair AI with individualism, if we try that at all.
Or we try and alter our society completely so that we do move into a collectivist mindset so we can compete against the East.
Because they're going to stay collectivist.
Perhaps this is also a very interesting thing, a last thing to tie in.
Perhaps as we lose our manufacturing base and we lose our societies to crime and fentanyl and we lose ourselves in the West, perhaps one of the reasons they are trying to make everybody so docile is that they've looked at their competitors, which is the East, and their collectivism and said, individualism was fantastic for us to be entrepreneurs and individualism was fantastic for us to do all these amazing things once.
But now we don't really need entrepreneurs because the AI is going to be the entrepreneur.
And the machines are going to do all the thinking.
So now what we need are drones.
So perhaps collectivism is going to beat individualism because individualism has no merit against the AI machine anyway.
So what do you need all the problems of individualism?
Of get rich or die trying.
Fuck the rules.
I'll get a French number plate.
You don't need any of that.
We're all just a problem now.
People like me at least do things and get rich and build rockets, whatever.
Once the AI does the thinking, why do you need individualism at all?
You don't.
Then you want collectivism.
So perhaps we're in an interesting situation where are they going to try and move Western society towards collectivism, which it seems they're trying to do?
Are they going to try and pair AI with individualism?
And how is that all going to work in the Western Hemisphere when it goes to war head-to-head in the big cyborg war of 2098 against the Chinese collectivist army?
It's going to be interesting.
We're going to see.
But the final thing is that it's kind of interesting to me, and I have no stats or data on this at all, but I feel like when I look, it feels like Elon himself, as an individual, is the only person who is competing against China's eventually hegemony over the planet.
And I talk about EV vehicles about this because he has Tesla.
Once you take Tesla away, every single EV is made in China.
All of them.
All of them.
Like 98% of the world's EVs are made in China.
Have you ever seen those videos of Chinese cars?
And how we don't buy them over here because they're huge tariffs and they're sanctioned.
But if you've seen for like 20...
It's the day of tariffs.
That's right.
For $25,000, a Chinese car is like a million times better than a $300,000 car in the West and it does everything perfect and it can drive underwater and like all this crazy...
Look up Chinese cars.
No way.
You will not believe how advanced their shit is.
But we don't...
The West doesn't let them come here because VW, BMW, Mercedes will be out of business like that.
So we don't let them in.
But they're out-competing us.
And it's like, when it comes to space, when it comes to EVs, when it comes to so many important things, AI, only Elon.
It's like Elon versus China.
And the scary thing is, we don't even really know what the Chinese have because they hide it all.
But you can see in their vehicles, and I'll tell you a very quick story.
I probably shouldn't say this, but I'm going to say it.
I have a Rimac Navarro, which is the fastest car in the world.
It's an electric car made by Rimac, and they're a great company, and I know them well.
They now own Bugatti, and I know the owners, and Rimac are an amazing company, and I'm super excited to drive my Navarro.
It's a $4 million car.
There is a car out of China.
I think it's called a BVY9000-something.
It is faster than the Rimac Navarro, and it costs $300,000.
My Navarro is $4.2 million.
Bro, I'm telling you.
So it's like Elon himself versus China.
And here's where you talk about, I guess it's the perfect place to end, the death cult of the West.
Because in any serious country, in any serious society, you'd sit and say, we have one man who is the richest man in the world who is competing directly with our number one competitor on the planet.
Let's put him in government.
Sensible, no?
But liberals...
Can't stand him.
And they don't want him in government.
They want him in jail so that we can just implode and die.
So the liberals, like, that's how unserious America is.
We don't need Elon.
▲
Export Selection