Dan Bongino and Kash Patel allege the FBI's "Arctic Frost" investigation, initiated by Timothy Teboldt without independent review, violated the no-self-approval rule by wiretapping senators like Ron Johnson and Lindsey Graham to suppress conservative voices. They claim Jack Smith surveilled 18 senators before the 2024 election while Letitia James faces mortgage fraud charges, arguing these actions surpass Watergate in severity. Ultimately, the discussion frames these events as a coordinated political weaponization of national security agencies under the Biden administration to protect the campaign and target opposition figures. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, Qwen/Qwen3-ForcedAligner-0.6B, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Ugly Revelations Exceed Watergate00:03:04
Dan Bontino, Kash Patel, they warned us things were about to get ugly.
And indeed they are.
Unbelievable what is being discovered at this moment.
I can't wait to bring all of this to you here on the Trish Regan Show today.
A very big day indeed as we learn more and more and more about what was really going on.
The violations, frankly, of individual rights that the Biden FBI and DOJ were willing to push forward.
I mean, it's absolutely unbelievable.
This is bigger than Watergate.
No one's talking about it for some reason.
No, no, no.
Only to say that somehow we don't have it right, that it wasn't really wiretapping of U.S. senators.
No, no, no.
It was just gathering of all kinds of metadata, big metadata.
Welcome to the program.
Make sure you subscribe.
We are all over that story as we see more and more FBI agents being purged, being fired, moved off the job because of concerns that they didn't do things the right way.
And I'm not just talking about Timothy Teboldt, whom you're going to learn a lot more about in today's show, but many others as well.
Meanwhile, Letitia James, whoa, she's struggling right now.
Oh my goodness, she just did her first appearance, her very first appearance in a big rally crowd since the indictment.
And whoo, you can tell she's really, really worried.
She didn't misquote scripture this time, but close to it, she's really coming unhinged.
I can't wait to show you this one.
Plus, more problems for her as it is uncovered that there are documents suggesting this alleged mortgage fraud may be even worse than anticipated, along with allegations she was somehow harboring a criminal.
Ernie's, it's getting ugly, and the shutdown continues.
Here we are, and we're still in it, and it's getting ugly.
You got nearly 5,000 federal workers that are being laid off from agencies like HUD, from agencies like the IRS.
I know you don't feel too bad, and the agency, the EPA.
Okay, they're all getting tossed, and Mike Johnson isn't having it.
Like, these guys don't want to negotiate seriously to his point.
Look what they're asking for in their legislation, their counterproposal on the CR to keep the lights open.
This is what they want to do they want to spend $24.6 million.
Of your hard earned dollars as a taxpayer for climate resilience in Honduras.
They want to spend $13.4 million for civic engagement in Zimbabwe.
They want to send $3.9 million for LGBTQI democracy grants in the Western Balkans.
What is the I plus?
They're sending $2.9 million.
Is that a new?
Do we just add another alphabet letter?
I mean, I don't know what you guys are going to do.
You're going to have to reinvent the alphabet because you're going to run out of letters at some point.
There's only, what, 26 letters in the alphabet?
And now we get an I?
In there with the Q.
It's news to me.
Woo!
Okay, Donald Trump's reacting to his magazine cover.
Apparently he's not too happy with it.
We'll discuss.
And Charlie Kirk, within the hour, is going to be, of course, after his death, unfortunately, awarded the Medal of Freedom.
It's actually his birthday today.
Happy birthday, Charlie.
He would have been 32 years old.
Happy Birthday Charlie Kirk00:10:31
Just a remarkable, remarkable guy.
I miss him every day.
Welcome, welcome to the Trish Regan Show.
We begin on news out of the FBI.
FBI.
I'm telling you guys, I'm not kidding.
Dan Bongino wasn't kidding.
Kash Patel wasn't kidding.
They warned us more stuff would be coming.
And here we are looking at numerous agents having been fired, but also more and more stuff coming out every day.
It's unlike anything I don't think we've ever seen in our generation.
You can go back to sort of the Cointel times of the Hoover. FBI, and you can go back to what the FBI did in terms of tracking and tracing and spying upon Martin Luther King Jr.
But I don't think we've ever quite in our lifetimes, or at least in my lifetime, seen anything like what the Biden administration, which by the way was a continuation of the Obama administration, did to Donald Trump and anyone associated with Donald Trump, including, by the way, Charlie Kirk, who's being honored today, posthumously, obviously, but Including to organizations that stood for conservative values.
I want to go to Chuck Grassley, who's been speaking on this and he's demanding a wider and wider investigation.
He's come up with a lot of fascinating, fascinating documents courtesy of whistleblowers.
It's both Grassley here and Senator Ron Johnson, who was spied upon.
His communications were intercepted by the FBI under one Joe Biden.
Let's listen in.
Solicitation of these telephone records, which I think emphasizes the political weaponization that was behind all this effort.
And we're still getting more information, but we've released some records today, and I'll let Senator Johnson take over from here, and then each one of you colleagues can join in when you want to, whatever you want to say.
First of all, I want to thank Senator Grassley.
It is because of his relentless advocacy for whistleblowers that a lot of this information is surfacing right now.
We wouldn't know about the list of 100 Republican entities that were targeted by Jack Smith's Arctic Frost investigation.
I don't think we know about this as well.
So we need whistleblowers.
I think Dan Bongino and folks at the FBI, they don't know where all the records are hidden.
They still don't.
They're not necessarily getting 100% cooperation.
But this is outrageous what has happened.
I just want to give you a timeline of this.
I think you've already got the the FBI sheet that shows the number of members of Congress that were targeted Representative Kelly, Senators Graham, Haggerty, Hawley, Sullivan, Tubberville, myself, Senator Lummis, and Blackburn.
This memo was dated September of 2023.
To put it all into context, the Marlock.
I mean, think about that.
Like a year before the election, they were going after all that.
And that's actually a really important sort of timeline to consider.
And he's going to get into the timeline, which is just bonkers.
Watch.
Raid occurred in August of 2022.
Jack Smith announced the indictments against President Trump in August of 2023.
So, this is almost two months later.
They're casting this net, this fishing expedition against Expedition against members of the Senate and the House?
Again, I've been investigating this with Senator Grassley.
This doesn't surprise me, but it should shock every American.
Yeah.
Shocks me.
The Biden administration has done, and by the way, this is the first time I was targeted by the FBI.
Under the Obama administration, the same thing happened to both Senator Grassley and I as part of the Foreign Influence Task Force.
We were giving a A briefing to try and convince us that the Hunter Biden laptop was no big deal.
Basically, trying to throw us off the track.
Oh, yeah.
So, this is major corruption that's being revealed inside the Obama and Biden Department of Justice and the FBI.
And I'll turn it over to, I guess, Senator Haggerty, who's one of the individuals.
Again, none of us were subject or targets of this investigation.
There's no predicate, there's no reason for this other than a fishing expedition, which, again, should outrage and shock every American.
It does.
It outrages.
It shocks me.
And it's why I keep saying, we're like, I'm a dog with a bone on this one.
I'm not going to let it go.
And you're going to know every little nook and cranny of this story.
Together, we are going to solve this because this can't actually happen ever either on both sides.
Okay.
You just can't do this stuff.
Here's the memo that came from the FBI.
So they've got eight senators and one House representative that we know of.
I mean, plus the nearly 100 organizations, including Charlie Kirk's Turning Point, that they were also investigating. under the pretense of, oh, well, they're going to steal the election.
They're going to take it out from under.
That's why we got to make sure that we go after those guys after J6.
I mean, of course, you're relying on Nancy Pelosi's daughter's footage from J6.
The CNN played in a loop and ABC played in a loop.
I mean, she was the documentary filmmaker who conveniently got invited in that day.
And they took that ball and they ran with it as fast and hard as they could.
So we know that they were collecting metadata.
We can't say wiretapping because they're going to come after.
That's what they've made this story.
They're like, oh, there's no story there because it was not wiretapping.
How dare Josh Hawley say it was wiretapping?
It was the interception of private communications.
And wait until you see what we've got.
But just to keep you up to speed, in case you're just joining the Trish Regan show, we got a guy, Jack Smith, who was the special prosecutor and who was trying to go after Donald Trump for everything and anything specifically trying to basically compromise our entire quote democracy.
They don't want to say republic.
They say democracy.
Okay.
I always get a bunch of comments from you guys saying it's a republic.
It's a republic.
It's a republic.
I know it's a republic, but you know, this is their line.
Okay.
So Jack Smith thinks that Donald Trump and his cronies are going to take down democracy.
So therefore, he is entitled to go after them with everything he's got.
Oh, except you can't actually, because there is actually a whole like law about this, a whole bunch of laws.
And so now you've got 18 senators, including Graham, including Grassley, including Johnson, including Blackburn.
They all, including Cynthia Loomis, they are all out for blood.
And they're like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
This has never happened in our entire political career.
You got Cynthia Loomis saying, I want to know like what my own rights are as an individual, separate from the fact that I am a sitting U.S. Senator.
And so they are furious and they are mad.
18 of them coming forward and demanding a massive investigation.
They want criminal prosecutions into those that initiated this.
Here is the quote that Lindsey Graham gave to Fox the other night when Jack Smith was looking at phone records.
and that of other senators.
I think he broke the law and I think it needs to be held accountable.
And I think those who brought this about need to pay and pay big.
And you know who that's going to mean?
I think it's going to mean Team Biden.
Yes, Team Biden.
By the way, we knew this was going to get ugly, did we not?
Because my friend Dan said so not too long ago.
In fact, I want to take you back to what he said about eight, 10 weeks ago on Fox on my former colleague Sean Hannity's show.
And Bongino then tweeted this out with the words, bookmark this.
Well, we bookmarked it And we're sitting back and watching it all unfold.
Let me ask you about are you going to be looking into, when Cash and Pam, any potential collusion between the DOJ, Letitia James, the novel legal theory of Alvin Bragg or Nathan Wade or Fonnie Willis and the DOJ?
Is that something?
Has anything come up?
Is there any way to determine whether or not evidence was destroyed in any of these cases?
Well, there's always a way to determine that.
I don't want to comment on that specific case right now for a reason.
I don't want to get ahead of the Department of Justice on that.
But I want to say this.
You know, the FBI obviously has the public corruption portfolio.
And yes, if you are a corrupt politician out there, if you are engaged in behavior, you know what you're doing, we're going to find you.
I promise.
No one is going to get off the days of selecting and putting your partisan bias on and taking care of your friends.
Those days are over.
You know what, Sean?
I don't have any friends.
I don't want any friends.
Well, maybe outside of you and a couple of.
I don't care.
I didn't come here for the money.
I didn't come here to make.
I know.
I don't want to.
You didn't come there for the money.
I can tell you.
I didn't come here to make friends.
I don't give a damn about friends.
I don't have any friends.
I don't want any friends.
I got my wife.
I got you and I got a small crew of people.
So I don't need any friends.
If you're a friend in D.C., get a dog.
We're coming for you.
That'll help.
Yeah, go.
The reason why this is so important though.
What he was saying there, aside from the friends thing, hey, Dan, I consider you a friend.
I hope you consider me a friend too.
But anyway, aside from that, What he was basically saying is, we're coming for you.
And it doesn't matter how many friends you have, they're protecting you.
So that was sort of a direct shot, for example, at Comey.
Remember, Comey had his son in law working in the Eastern Virginia office, right?
And what happened?
They got rid of the U.S. attorney, Eric Sieber, who is there.
They replaced Eric with none other than Lindsey Halligan.
And Lindsey Halligan, per my sources, is actually cleaning house there as we speak.
She fired one prosecutor just within the last 36 hours.
who was believed to not be on board with the Comey indictment.
So anyone not on board with the indictment of Letitia James or James Comey or perhaps the Bolton one that's coming down the pike?
By the way, Biden's team started that one or perhaps the Brennan one.
We're going to get to that that's coming.
I mean, there's a lot coming.
Okay.
There's a lot coming.
And then we got to get back to just exactly how did they think that this was okay?
I want to show you this.
Lindsey Halligan Cleans House00:07:51
So there's a guy named Timothy T. Bolt and he was at the FBI.
He was actually in the Washington office and he had been like charged with like looking into dicey cases before.
He was actually the guy who was looking into the Hunter Biden laptop.
Yeah.
He was the guy that was looking into the Hunter Biden laptop while the 51X spooks were telling us, no, the FBI isn't looking into this laptop.
Well, he was.
And I guess he, you know, he was a party man, right?
Like he was.
Per what I've read and what I've heard, he was kind of going along for the ride.
And so he didn't step up to the plate and say, hey, guys, you know, your memo in Politico is wrong.
They knew it was wrong.
Well, the metadata on the document that was Arctic Frost, that document actually shows, because you can see who saves it when they save it, that it was created by one Timothy T. Bolt.
And it had been saved by one Timothy T. Bolt.
Now, The reason this is important, you guys, is because you're sitting there going, wait a second, what is this Arctic Frost investigation and why were they out there getting the data, intercepting the communications of eight sitting U.S. senators as well as a congressional representative, as well as how many other people we don't know, right?
Why were they doing that?
They were doing this in the name of Arctic Frost.
They said they had the authorization because they had opened this case.
It had been opened in August of 22.
I believe it was August of 22.
And it had been opened by one Timothy.
T-bolt, so he was the FBI agent in charge of this whole thing.
He opens it up right, he opens it up, and because he's opened it up, he's saying okay, I get the right to do this, that and the other.
Except that he didn't.
Except that he didn't at all.
Forgive me, it was november of 2022, so in november of 2022 now we're talking like a ways, after J6, it like dawns on them that Donald Trump is running again.
So we better get into high gear, right?
And as soon as Donald Trump says he's running again, they start getting into high gear.
And that's when they initiate Arctic Frost courtesy of this one agent who's no longer there, who has since resigned from the FBI.
So this is something that Grassley brought up, the fact that it had been saved repeatedly.
Here we go.
According to his testimony on February 3rd, 2025, he said the author of this document for Arctic Frost was Timothy Tebalt.
And it also said it was last modified by Timothy Tebalt.
And he said the document attached to the email lists the author and modifier as you guessed it, Tebalt.
So the document itself is titled Arctic Frost.
It adds President Trump as the criminal subject in the investigation.
And the problem is you can't do that.
You can't do that because there's this little thing called no self approval rule.
You know, you got to like actually go to a judge and get a warrant if you're going to.
Be gathering the metadata on somebody's phone, meaning you're getting their call logs, you know who they're talking to, where they are, when they're talking to them and how long they're talking to them.
For so there's section 3523.
This is the Fbi's domestic investigations and operations guide, and it is the no self-approval rule which states an official who approves an investigation action, especially opening or closing of a case, may not approve their own work.
Instead, independent review is required.
So who did the independent review?
Apparently, there was no independent review.
Apparently, this guy, Tim Diebold, comes along and says, I'm going to do this.
I'm going to do that.
And I'm going to do this.
And apparently, it all just comes into place.
So this is a huge problem.
And this is why they're saying this is such a total violation of anything we've ever seen.
I mean, again, you got to go back to it's known as the Cone Tell sort of era, right?
When you had the big FBI going after everyday American citizens.
Here's the guy I'm talking about.
So he's no longer there.
But he is and has been facing a lot of scrutiny from Republicans.
Certainly going back to his role in suppressing, right, the FBI's Hunter Biden investigation, we wouldn't know a lot more about that if it hadn't been for Tony Bobolinski, who was the partner, right, of Hunter Biden at the time.
We wouldn't know a lot about that if it wasn't for the whistleblowers that came out and told us everything.
But this guy, he was the one in charge of that investigation, and we didn't know all the things that we should have.
And then he's the guy that basically put forward Arctic Frost named Donald Trump as somebody who was the criminal subject of that.
And then he's the one that allowed for allegedly the spying on all of these different groups and all of these different senators, all in the name of preserving the democracy, right like that.
I mean hey, if you can, if you can use that.
And they just kept going back to, well, we have to, we have to, we have to because of J6.
If we don't do this, then there's the threat that he's going to take us down.
So this is bad.
This is like really, really, really bad.
If they're out there spying without warrants, like, I mean, I don't even know what to tell you.
I think that guy's going to go to jail.
I think Christopher Wray, if he was involved in this, could find himself in jail.
And I want to know how high up the food chain does it go?
I mean, is this involving the likes of, I don't know, Tony Blinken or, you know, Brannon?
I don't know.
I don't know who's involved.
I think that's what we got to get to the bottom of.
We know T-Bolt signed off on this.
We know that the people that were involved in the spying, they have since been fired.
Cash and Dan made that very clear the other day.
But Dan Bongino had to go in and brief all of these senators and say, hey, guess what?
They've been spying on you for the last couple of years.
I mean, it's totally wild.
And Lindsey Graham, who was one of the ones affected, is livid.
He's furious and he's demanding, demanding answers and a criminal investigation.
That crosses a line between the Justice Department being independent from the executive branch.
I think our Justice Department and the hands of Biden crossed every line there is to cross.
I think within three days of announcing he was going to run for president in 2024, he did that in 2023.
But what about Trump?
He had done a lot of indictments.
What about.
Now, I think the grand jury is going to take care of this, but you didn't care any about this.
You didn't care that Leticia James made up.
Charges that no one's ever faced.
But Senator Biden never faced charges no one ever faced.
He had 90.
Biden regretted that they didn't do it before the election.
Jack Smith surveilled my phone records and eight other senators.
Jack Smith introduced his brief against Trump October the 24th before the 2024 election, violating every protocol just to politicize the election.
So this may bother you that people are being held accountable.
It doesn't bother me one damn bit.
Hmm.
Doesn't bother me one damn bit either.
Doesn't bother you?
No, I want them held accountable every single step of the way.
And I'm sick of what about Trump?
What about Trump?
What about Trump?
Oh, this is somehow payback because Trump is going to I mean, what the heck went on?
Are we supposed to roll over and play dead and say, oh, we don't care?
Oh, it doesn't matter that, you know, people had their phone records tapped.
It doesn't matter that nearly 100 organizations, including my late friend Charlie Kirk, who was gunned down, because of this radicalism on the left?
I'm sorry.
No, it all matters.
And we're going to get to the bottom of it.
So Jack Smith, be damned.
It's all coming out.
Jackie boy, you're going to be in trouble too, okay?
Accountability for Everyone00:09:04
You cannot be out there doing this.
Again, collecting the phone records on eight sitting U.S. senators that we know about.
I mean, how much more?
Because, you know, remember when Dan went on Fox and Friends, Bongino, and he said, hey, there was this room.
They told us about this room where there were all these documents.
They're still finding it.
They're relying on whistleblowers to come forward and tell them everything.
Which is, by the way, how the COINTEL program was also disclosed.
You had none other than brave whistleblowers coming forward and admitting all of this stuff.
Because you see, you can't do this.
You've got the Wiretap Act.
You've got the Computer Fraud Act.
You've got state privacy and eavesdropping laws.
You can't do this in the name of democracy.
You're going to have to actually get something like a court order or subpoena, a Patriot Act letter or a FISA warrant.
And they didn't have any of this stuff.
But, you know, they don't care.
They have a whole different way of playing.
It's a whole new ballgame.
Right with them, they just figure they can do whatever they want, and oh, maybe Donald Trump is stupid and he won't catch on to it.
But he's smarter than he looks, okay?
Listen, Comey, he started it all with Russia, Russia, Russia.
I mean, well, if you really want to go back in time, Hillary Clinton started it all because Hillary Clinton was the one who bought and paid for the opposition research courtesy of her law firm, Perkins Koi, that decided to hire Fusion GPS.
You know, they figure, you know, you can just whittle it down.
You get layer after layer after layer, make it more and more opaque so nobody really knows where it's coming from.
Fusion GPS goes out and hires Christopher Steele.
You know the drill, right?
The ex-British spy who was hanging out in the UK.
He calls some of his ex-spy friends in Russia and they were probably like, you know, let's cook up something good.
And so they did.
Cooked up something really good.
And then they used that, you see, to then get a FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.
They also did these quote unquote bumps.
We've talked about this.
George Papadopoulos, remember him?
He's been on the show.
George kept getting quote unquote bumped, which enabled them to then tap and wiretap, like actually wiretap the conversations of George Papadopoulos, who was working on two campaigns.
He actually had worked on the Ben Carson campaign, and they were tapping him then, which leads.
George to believe that they just wanted more intel into the whole Republican circuit at the time.
And then when he went to work for Donald Trump, they tapped him there again.
And, you know, the whole time, you know, Comey had one objective and one objective only.
And that was to get basically a special investigator, a special prosecutor to look into these quote unquote allegations about Russia, Russia, Russia, even though they knew that they were fake.
I mean, that's, that's the killer here.
Like they knew that they were fake.
They had that meeting.
Tulsi told us all about it.
Right.
With Obama and Obama said, okay, here's the deal.
We're going to try and figure out how the Russians interfered in this election and we're going to pin it on the Russians.
And Donald Trump is not going to be a legitimate president, to quote Jimmy Carter, right?
This is how it all went down.
And so Comey, the whole time, he knew what he was doing, for goodness sakes.
I mean, here, this is a great example of it.
Comey talking out of both sides of his mouth.
Now indicted, by the way.
Wow.
There's this little thing called tape.
Rector Comey, have you ever.
Been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?
Never.
Have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?
No.
I needed to get that out into the public square, and so I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter.
Didn't do it myself for a variety of reasons, but I asked him to because I thought.
That might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.
And there we have it.
Yeah, there we have it.
So take a look at this, you guys.
This is from some of the records, okay?
Newly released records that show us just exactly what Comey's interaction was with the media.
He wanted, basically, this information to get out there.
So what did he do?
He allowed for the hiring.
Not just, you know, it wasn't just his friend.
He wasn't just calling up his friend from Columbia University, but rather, His friend was on the payroll.
Okay?
This guy, Professor Richmond at Columbia University, a law professor, a close friend of Comey.
They met while they were working in the Southern District of New York together.
And the New York Times article contains several quotes attributed to one professor, Daniel Richmond, which defended Comey's decisions to make a unilateral public statement about the mid year exam investigation, et cetera.
But basically, fast forward here.
Let's go to the part in yellow here, if we could.
And what you see is that Comey hired him because he wanted basically.
A media liaison.
Okay, the investigation revealed Comey also hired Richmond so Comey could discuss sensitive matters, including classified information, with someone outside of the Fbi's regular leadership.
Comey also used Richmond as a liaison to the media, so he hired a flack to try to get his version of the story out in the media.
You understand how messed up this is, considering that his version of the story was that Donald Trump was some kind of you know pervert who was over there in Russia doing all.
I mean, it's a wild story right, he?
I read that thing before it was out in the media because it had circulated among some journalists.
I saw it and I was like well, this is a bunch of trash.
Like you can tell that this is opposition research.
How is it our own FBI director, James Comey, can't tell that it's opposition research?
Oh, because he knows it's opposition research.
He knew it the entire time and he did not care, just like.
Just like they knew that that was Hunter Biden's laptop being investigated by Timothy T Bolt, but they didn't care because they're a whole bunch of scumbags that just wanted to keep on winning and winning, and winning and winning, and they were clinging to power however they could, illegally perhaps, and this is what they're going to be going down for.
I mean consider consider, You know, Brennan, for example, consider Anthony Blinken, who was our former Secretary of State.
Oh boy, he must be loving this Israel deal, right?
You know, oh my gosh, they tried and yet they couldn't get to first base.
And then Donald Trump comes in and what do you know?
Anyway, Brennan right now, I think he's getting nervous because you see, if you go back and again, these documents have come out.
I want you to see this email.
This is from John Brennan.
And it says, okay, Michael, add my name to the list.
Mike Morrell, the deputy director of the CIA at the time.
Good initiative.
Thanks for asking me to sign on.
The question from Mike Morrell, Deputy Director of the CIA.
I mean, the CIA is doing this because they want to help the Biden campaign.
He writes, John, can I add your name to this list?
We'll be adding Leon, that's Leon Panetta, Sue Gordon, Jay Johnson, George, Lisa Monaco, Mike Rogers today, and working on adding Dan Coates, Mike Rogers, and Tom Bossert, and lots of other IC career folk trying to give the campaign.
particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue.
Okay, that's like really, really, really messy stuff.
So this exists.
We now know this was all politically motivated.
Okay, so they made up this idea that somehow it was misinformation to talk about Hunter Biden's laptop, that that was just brought to you courtesy of Rudy Giuliani and the Russians.
But in fact, what did they know?
They knew that it was actually under investigation.
That guy Timothy Tebold, I was just telling you about he was doing the investigation, although they had kid gloves during the entire time.
It was under investigation, and yet they chose to lie about it so directly, so flagrantly to the American people.
And then if you dared to talk about it, you were the one who was in trouble.
You were the one who was going to lose your Twitter account.
You were the one who was spreading misinformation and disinformation because, you know, they said it was the way it was.
And yet Brennan, John Brennan, he thinks he's not in trouble.
Are you kidding me?
Former head of the CIA, I think he's freaking out in real time as we speak.
Here he is a couple days ago trying to say, I'm innocent.
I didn't do anything wrong on MSNBC.
He doth protest too much, I think.
I don't see any case against me.
I have looked back on all of my actions and decisions.
And with John Durham, the special counsel, and others that have looked at what we did, it was certainly consistent with our legal authorities and with the law.
So I don't know what they're referring to there.
Individuals who used to work in the government, even if their security clearances were revoked, they could be subpoenaed.
They could be called to provide testimony in support of whatever allegations they have.