Trish Regan details New York Attorney General Letitia James's impending criminal indictment in Eastern Virginia for alleged mortgage fraud under 18 USC 1014 and 1001, carrying a potential 30-year sentence for falsely claiming residency to secure taxpayer-backed loans. The host contrasts this with Donald Trump's private disputes while criticizing "deep state" bureaucrats obstructing the administration's goal of deporting 3,000 daily immigrants and blocking Supreme Court rulings on special parole programs. Ultimately, the segment frames these legal and political battles as evidence of systemic corruption and a cover-up regarding President Biden's cognitive decline. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, Qwen/Qwen3-ForcedAligner-0.6B, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Mortgage Fraud Charges00:15:33
And we're live.
It's going to be a big week, ladies and gentlemen.
A lot going on.
We've learned from DHS that that attacker in Colorado was actually here in the country illegally.
We're going to talk a lot about that as the Trump administration tries to crack down on this and get as many as 3,000 illegals out of the country every single day.
Meanwhile, I've told you before, I'm telling you again, Letitia James is absolutely finished.
And you know what?
She should be.
The indictment could be happening as soon as this week, certainly.
Coming very, very soon.
We're going to talk all about that.
Meanwhile, oh my goodness, oh my goodness.
We got a lot to get into with this whole Biden AUTO PEN scandal and i'm telling you, Msnbc is cook internal rumblings now in media circles about whether or not they decide to get rid of Msnbc altogether and move forward with this Versant spinoff.
That's what Spinco is going to be called.
They had to, you know, use a good French name to kind of make the place seem a little spiffier.
They also got rid of Joy Read in the process.
But do they get rid of all this Msnbc altogether?
That's one of the big questions.
We are live.
Welcome, everyone, to the program.
It is wonderful to have you here.
I am Trish Regan.
This is the Trish Regan Show, and we're really happy because we just got named in YouTube's Top 100 Podcasts.
We're up over 800 and what, 28,000 subs and climbing right now.
That's all thanks to you guys.
Again, we're live.
I see all the comments, every single one of them.
So bring them on, all right?
Bring them on.
Leticia James, we keep talking about this, and we're going to keep talking about this because this woman is going to be out as Attorney General of the state of New York, and she's going to be out for a variety of reasons, as she should.
But most pressing on her docket at this moment in time this week is that that indictment is imminent for one Letitia James.
The Eastern Virginia court is coming forward.
They've subpoenaed everyone, the grand jury.
And that indictment, as I said, is expected any day now.
So she's going to be heading off to court to try and defend herself and prevent herself from going to the Slammer for, what, 30 years?
That's the penalty.
basically for being in violation of 18 USC 1014, false statements to obtain a federally insured loan, or 18 USC 1001, false statements to the government.
So the subpoenas have gone out.
The subpoenas are issued.
She's got to fight this thing.
She's fighting it by just saying it's political.
Well, I don't know, Letitia.
I mean, you are a lawyer, right?
So on the power of attorney, why would you be saying that Virginia was your permanent residence?
And we could say, okay, you know, one time, little mistake.
Not that she should have had that mistake, but it's multiple times.
And so now you've got New York State.
Looking into this, launching an investigation into what she was doing with her brownstone that she claimed was four units instead of five units because it got her, once again, a special deal.
As she said, these are her words, okay?
These are her words, not mine.
This is what makes this whole thing so darn poetic, everyone.
When powerful people cheat to get better loans, it comes at the expense of honest and hardworking people.
Everyday Americans cannot lie to a bank to get a mortgage to buy a home.
And if they did, our government would throw the book at them.
There simply cannot be different rules for different people.
You're right.
You're right, Tish.
Now Donald Trump is finally facing accountability for his lying, cheating, and staggering fraud.
Because no matter how big, rich, and powerful you think you are, no one is above the law.
So these are really coming back to haunt her in a rather big way, don't you think?
As the indictment looms, as she's going to get her tushy hauled into federal court, facing the possibility of 30 years.
Meanwhile, what do you have?
Voters getting pretty furious that she's trying to use taxpayer funds, $10 million of a slush fund that Kathy Hochul, the governor of New York and other Democrats in New York have set aside for Letitia.
The GOP in New York is like, no, no, we're not having this.
Meanwhile, you got the FHA director coming out, outlining the whole thing.
Let's take another look at William Pulte, who put forward the letter to the DOJ in the first place and says, we've got a case.
We know mortgage fraud when we see it.
And I love how he refers to Tishy Baby as the subject.
Listen.
He recommended that the DOJ investigate New York Attorney General Letitia James over alleged mortgage fraud.
The AG, Letitia James, has responded.
We don't have the video, but here's the quote This investigation into me is nothing more than retribution.
It's baseless.
It has to do with the fact that, on a power of attorney, I mistakenly indicated that I was a state of Virginia resident.
And prior to that, I indicated to the mortgage broker that, in fact, in bold cap letters, that I am not a resident of Virginia and never will be.
They just took the power of attorney and they're using that as a basis for enforcement of their investigation.
Bill, do you know why she said she was a resident of Virginia on the power of attorney, if in fact she wasn't?
Well, I know that we are mortgage experts and we only refer things that we think are mortgage fraud and we stand 100% behind the letter.
I'll let the letter speak for itself.
I do know and I have seen some reports from that subject's criminal defense lawyer saying certain things.
I'll leave it to the DOJ to correct various things.
But again, when we see mortgage fraud, we are going to report it.
When we see mortgage fraud, we are going to prosecute it within the confines of our duties.
And we are not going to be intimidated by a subject's criminal defense lawyer.
We are not going to be intimidated by a politician or just because you have an Esquire behind your name.
We are not going to be intimidated by people.
If we see mortgage fraud, we're going to do something about it.
And I think that you're going to see us be taking this on in a big way.
Mortgage fraud is a big problem.
These companies are safe and sound, but where we see it, we are going to do something about it.
And that subject's case is no different.
Well, what are the ramifications of this now that you've referred this for criminality to the DOJ?
Well, I would refer that to the DOJ.
Again, as I say, we spend our days, we are mortgage experts.
We are not politicians.
I view this as an economic job, obviously.
The president can fire me at any time, so I guess in that way.
But look, I look at this as an independent agency.
We found the mortgage fraud, whether it be that particular subject or other subjects, and we work actively with the DOJ and different law enforcement.
Yes, they do.
They work actively with the DOJ, the FBI, who has announced as well its investigation.
The DOJ who's announced its investigation?
Of course, the grand jury there in eastern Virginia.
But let me share with you a little bit from that letter.
He writes, Pultey writes about 604 Sterling Street, North Virginia.
On august 17th 2023 I mean this is like during the height of the whole thing, with Trump right where she's accusing him of mortgage fraud Miss James granted miss Chamise Thompson Hairston power of attorney to make a Virginia property her principal Residence and on August 30th and 31st, through her attorney, Ms. James, purchased this property in Norfolk, Virginia,
Norfolk, Virginia, forgive me, in a Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac form 3047.
And in mortgage documents, she reaffirmed this would be her primary residence, despite being a public officer in the state of New York at that same time and presumably, right, primarily residing in. the state of New York.
So let's go back to Tishy baby saying, okay, nobody is above the law, nobody at all.
When powerful people cheat to get better loans, it comes at the expense of honest and hardworking people.
You see, Tish, in this case, you were trying to use taxpayer funds to get that better mortgage because you see, when you have a primary residence, you get totally different mortgage rate than when it's a secondary residence.
Why?
Oh, because the banks say, gee, there's a really good shot. that somebody might be more likely to default on a loan for a secondary vacation home than they would in a primary home.
So therefore, you do get a better financial picture.
So this is what she is allegedly trying to take advantage of, despite, despite at the very same time going after Donald Trump, trying to say he's trying to get a better mortgage rate because, you know, he's inflating the value of his home.
That's between him and his bank, by the way.
This was a private transaction.
This is not a federal transaction where you're hitting up Freddie and Fannie and thus us U.S. taxpayers, okay?
Tissue baby, that's the difference.
That's why you never should have brought your case to court in the first place, something that the judges cited over and over and again.
I mean, as soon as the appellate lawyer who's arguing the case came before the judge, what did they say?
There's no victim.
This is a commercial dispute.
What are you doing here in our darn court?
Not to mention, why the heck do you have a half a billion with a B dollar fine leveled against the now president of the United States?
May it please the court, Judith Bale for the New York Attorney General's Office.
All of the defendants repeatedly violated.
Ms. Bale, can you identify any previous case?
In which the Attorney General sued under Executive Law 6312 to upset a private business transaction that was between equally sophisticated partners, where the supposed victim had the ability and legal obligation to discover the allegedly misrepresented matters by conducting its own due diligence, where the supposed wrongdoer advised the supposed victim through written disclaimers to conduct its own due diligence and to draw its own conclusions.
Where the alleged misrepresentation almost entirely concerned inherently subjective valuations of properties and businesses.
Yes.
And where the victim never complained about any fraud in the transactional losses from it.
Because I've gone through the cases which you've cited, and all of them always involved the consumer protection aspect, it involved protection of the market.
And I want to add to his question and little to no impact on the public marketplace.
Boom.
Okay.
And that's why the case never should have been brought.
But remember her, too male, too pale, too stale.
All the, I'm going to get Trump.
I'm going to get Trump.
I'm going to get Trump.
I mean, she campaigned on it.
She raised money off of it.
This was the whole thing.
Even though she says that wasn't the case.
Hey, there's this little thing called videotape, Ms. Leticia James, and we got it.
I'm not going to bore you guys with it because we've played it a lot of times on this show, but you know exactly what I'm talking about.
She campaigned on it.
So one, she should be out just because of that.
Two, this case has got to be thrown out.
The appellate court.
Case that is with the 500 million dollar fine, my gosh.
And three, she's facing court herself with the indictment coming because of her own alleged fraud and abuse.
I mean, the judge said it here again this is a private transaction.
What are you doing, bugging us with this?
It was using.
I'm sorry, but what's being described sounds an awful lot like a potential commercial dispute between private actors.
Well, to go back to the first question about whether there's other examples of this, there are other examples of this.
In the first American case, the Attorney General brought a 6312 case where the transaction at issue was between a very big bank, Wells Fargo, and a professional appraisal firm.
But it wasn't the concern there that the public would ultimately be negatively impacted and affected by what those corporate actors were doing.
And that concern is here as well, because when you have hidden risks getting injected into the market, it hurts the market and honest participants in the market.
And the legislature also decided, contrary to what defendants think, that making sure that business in New York stays honest is the way to attract and keep business to that point.
The executive order.
I'm sorry.
Again, commercial transaction, no victim.
So you can try and spin this however you want.
Let's go back to the fact that there's no victim.
Let's go back to the fact that Deutsche Bank is free to make whatever kind of deals it would like to make.
And Deutsche Bank is on the hook for making sure the square footage is what Donald Trump says it is.
Deutsche Bank is on the hook for making sure that the valuation he places on the property, which is a heck of a lot more, obviously, than Letitia's $18 million.
I'm telling you guys, we've got to like put a fund together, right?
And say, hey, Letitia, we'll buy it for that amount of money.
Unbelievable.
So she's deciding suddenly the attorney general of New York what something is worth.
I don't think so.
No, Deutsche Bank is going to make that decision and decide whether or not they're going to take on the risk.
The reason why the case with Letitia James is so entirely different is in that situation, you have public funds.
that are being used, public money.
These mortgages are being secured by the likes of Fannie and Freddie, not by Deutsche Bank.
So therefore, you're actually commingling, right?
Public funds, our taxpayer dollars, thereby putting us all at risk when you do something like this.
Fill out an application saying that it's your principal residence.
Again, going back to Pulte's allegations against her, this is, in their estimation, absolute positive mortgage fraud.
On top of that, right, you've got the fact that she's got that Brownstone in New York.
They're looking into this one in New York where she's saying it's four units instead of five units, because then she gets extra favorable terms and special uh, federal money, housing money for that.
I mean, this is a woman who believes in living off the system.
Let's be honest.
What is she?
She is someone who's going to live off of taxpayers.
That's why she wants taxpayers to foot the bill for her massive legal expedition here.
She's going to court and she expects you to pay for it.
Well, You, if you live in the state of New York, I'm telling you, she's running out of cash.
She's got this Abby Lowell who represented Hunter Biden, and he costs a pretty penny.
So what is she going to do?
She's going to use that $10 million slush fund they have for her in New York that the Democrats put aside.
Only thing is the media has caught on to this, right?
The New York Post has reported on this.
I have reported on this.
And I don't think taxpayers are going to love this.
Even the liberal New York Magazine is saying that this is kind of questionable.
James has, again, they write, displayed dubious ethical instincts in her response to the pending inquiry.
She is inexplicable.
I mean, I think you can sue her just for that, can you not?
I mean, you can't be using taxpayer dollars to cover your personal legal challenges.
It's not New York's fault or the taxpayer's fault that you decided to lie on your documents and now you're cut.
I mean, you know what they say about throwing stones at glass houses?
Tishy baby, you know, I'm looking at one of your comments.
You guys are saying she wanted to take over Trump Tower.
You better believe it.
I've played the sound bite before, but I'm going to play it again because it's so good.
Again, poetry at work.
This is operatic in its nature, given what's going down right now.
She may lose that house in Virginia.
She may lose that brownstone in New York, and she will lose her position as attorney general of the state of New York, possibly, as she should her law license.
Taxpayer Dollars Debate00:04:53
And I expect, There may be some prison time.
Here she is bragging about how she's going to get Trump.
Four days after a judge ordered Donald Trump to pay $355 million for a decade of fraud.
New York Attorney General Letitia James says she's prepared to do everything she can to make sure the former president pays his fine, including, she told us, seizing the buildings that bear his name.
If he does not have funds to pay off the judgment, then we will seek, you know, judgment enforcement mechanisms in court, and we will ask the judge to seize his assets.
Okay, I think they're gonna be seasoned nerds.
your assets.
I mean, poetry.
You know, like I like seeing justice.
I just got to say, and I think it's fascinating that of all the things they could have gotten her on, they're getting her on mortgage fraud, alleged.
Right?
Like, I mean, you got to admit, it's rather remarkable.
Whoever did the digging and found this, and I think Roger Stone had a hand in it, brilliant.
Okay, just brilliant.
Because she's looking at 30 years in the slammer.
I didn't laugh.
It's terrible what she did.
It's absolutely terrible.
It was mind boggling.
And so you know what?
She deserves whatever Tishy Baby is going to get.
I'm telling you.
Oh, we got news out of the Intel department today.
Deep state going bye-bye, bye-bye.
New Intel ops being purged as we speak.
I told you Trump was going to clean house.
Indeed, we saw that he fired about 100 NSC staffers right before Memorial Day.
It was like Friday, late on Friday.
And they said you get 30 minutes to clean out your desks.
There's 100 of these people from the National Security Council.
Well, this is accelerating now.
Because it's not just the NSC.
You've got, I believe this is foreign, this is one of the Foreign Affairs Journal writing on this, is the NSC dead.
But you've also now got something called, I had never really heard of this, the CISA group, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
Well, the heads, three of the top six people in that division, they're saying bye-bye.
They're leaving, they're winding down their positions this month.
This is all courtesy of Donald Trump, who's trying to make some massive changes.
So they had six people there.
They're now down to, Three, this comes on the heels of him getting rid of the head of the NSA.
Remember that?
And I suspect that a big part of the motivation here is you had too many people that were within the system that were sort of career government bureaucrats that were not in line with his thinking.
The other reality of what's going on, and I'll just point out what CISA is, it's had a long time task of defending U.S. government systems, elections, and critical infrastructure from foreign hackers.
It also has been a target of Trump.
who went after Chris Krebs, remember back in 2020 over the election.
So there's been some bad blood there.
And I think fundamentally, he just doesn't like these people, right?
He does not like these people because he sees them at being at odds with him.
The other thing I'll just tell you about him, and I know this from him, it's been my personal experience with him, you know, he'll call you up and say, like, you know, he wants a perspective or intel on something or maybe wants to talk to somebody.
I remember once talking with him about something that was going on in Latin America, and he doesn't speak Spanish.
And I do.
And I was like, Well, you're going to have to involve your team.
Like you're going to have to bring them in.
He's like, I'm like, but you don't speak Spanish.
So, you know, but it struck me as sort of kind of cool and amazing that you have a president who wants a direct line of communication, right?
Like he wants to talk to all the people that are on the ground actually living, breathing a situation as opposed to all the people within the NSA, within the cybersecurity team, within the State Department and within the NSC.
And so he, I think, bottom line, trusts his own instincts and the sort of word of what he's hearing.
He wants to hear a lot of different opinions, by the way.
Don't get me wrong.
He's all about hearing many different sides, but he wants to make the decision himself.
And so when NSC comes in and they've got the briefing, right, and they're like, here's the deal.
Here's how you have to think about North Korea.
Here's how you have to think about Russia.
Here's how you have to think about China.
Here's how you have to think about Venezuela.
He's like, let me think about how I want to think about these places, okay?
And then we'll talk.
But instead, there's a deep state system within our government that has policies, right?
And those policies stay and they rarely shift.
And he's coming and saying, no, no, I'm the CEO here.
I want to make the decisions.
I want to shift policies and I'm going to do it.
And so he has all these people and the system that's in the way.
And you think about the system, James Comey, that not only was in the way, but then could do some serious damage to him.
And I think he's like, I'm not taking it this time.
I'm just not going to do it.
Visa Overstay Details00:04:53
This is what's going down.
There's a total purge of these deep state people.
And it's happening at a good time because I think that a lot of things are shifting and changing.
And I don't know that every president in the future is going to have, shall we say, Donald Trump's capabilities or instincts, et cetera.
So there may be a point in time when you say, okay, we need more intelligence ops in the background because, you know, the president's kind of just like a little puppet.
I mean, it shouldn't be that way.
But let's face it, what do you think Joe Biden was, right?
And then you had Joe Biden's NSC team.
Going on bragging and bragging.
Jake Sullivan, so proud of the fact that they had cleaned up the Middle East.
And then what happened days later?
October 7th, sadly.
And what we said is we want to depressurize, de escalate, and ultimately integrate the Middle East region.
The war in Yemen is in its 19 month of truce.
For now, the Iranian attacks against U.S. forces have stopped.
Our presence in Iraq is stable.
I emphasize for now because all of that can change.
And the Middle East region is quieter today than it has been in two decades.
Whoops.
Tragically, we know what happened right after that.
So, you know, you can't be naive about these things.
I don't think Donald Trump is naive.
I think he's very much a realist.
And he looks around at this team with all their research and all their briefings.
And he's like, hang on.
Let me get to the bottom of this.
And so consequently, yeah, you're seeing a lot of shift, a big shift that's going down as we speak with all of these career bureaucrats kind of being told, see ya.
And so they're upset about it.
And the more this happens, the more upset they're going to be.
Right.
I mean, that's just.
the reality of all that's happening.
There's other things happening right now too.
I mean, you think about Susan Rice and her frustration, her frustration for Trump not reading his briefings every single day.
She said this, I'm trying to see if I can find you this, guys, because it was rather interesting to hear Susan Rice's big attack on the president.
And I'm like, here's what you guys don't get.
Here's what you don't get.
People like the fact.
That he's not depending on deep state for all of his information and all his briefings.
We'll find it later, but anyway, Susan Rice has come out and said that oh, you know, he shouldn't do that, he shouldn't do that.
Well, guess what he's going to do that?
And, given what we're learning about who has come into the country, including what just went down in Colorado tragically, like we're learning, there's a lot of people that are not necessarily on team USA okay, that are here and they're here and going to do us harm, and this is why you have people like Stephen Miller, so furious that we need to get some of these individuals out.
3,000 a day the Trump administration is shooting for right now with that number expected to grow and to grow.
Because, hey, I mean, you got to protect yourself first.
We get news from DHS today that the Colorado attacker is a terrorist that was illegally in the United States of America.
Illegally in the United States of America.
We go to CNN.
All right, breaking this morning, new details on what the FBI is calling a targeted terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado.
At least eight people injured in the attack on a peaceful march.
In support of the Israeli hostages held in Gaza.
Smoke rising from the scene where the FBI says a man used a makeshift flamethrower and threw an incendiary device into the crowd.
Witnesses describe bystanders using water to douse the burn victims.
Seen on video carrying two bottles, police say he shouted, Free Palestine.
Right?
I mean, you get why this administration is saying we need to actually figure out and vet who is here.
You understand why this administration is saying to all these fancy, fancy universities like Harvard, hey, we need some intel.
We need a list of all the people that are here and whether they've engaged in any of these free Palestine things and whether or not they're trying to stir up you know what.
Here is information that the DHS has.
CNN so reluctantly reports on this particular individual causing such tragedy in Colorado.
Let's listen.
He, according to the Department of Homeland Security, uh, this is from the, uh, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Trisha McLaughlin.
Uh, he entered the country in August 2022 on a B2 visa that expired in February 2023.
He filed for asylum in September of 2022.
2022.
Sources are telling CNN's John Miller that he had previously applied for asylum in 2005.
We know that the White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, had previously tweeted that he had overstayed a visa and was in the country illegally.
Illegal Entry Confirmed00:11:22
Excuse me?
So he overstayed a visa and is in the country illegally.
Why are we allowing this?
Okay, like why it is so unbelievably bad, and the you know, the deep state apparatus.
And this is why Donald Trump is so passionate about fighting the NSC bureaucrats that actually were all for the open border thing.
What's going on?
Like, how are they, how is anyone okay with somebody who is a threat to our country being here illegally?
I'd like to know, you know, you want to tell me, CNN, Stephen Miller, shutting them down.
Do you think a judge should just rubber stamp what your White House does?
If not.
What checks and balances do you think should be in place for this White House?
It's not the job of a district court judge to perform an individual green light or red light on every single policy that the president takes as the head of the executive branch.
Just think about the premise baked into your question, respectfully, Pam.
You're saying that when the American people elect a president of the United States of America, well, it's the implication, who is the sole head of the executive branch.
Well, let me finish.
I will answer the question happily.
But look, when you have these kinds of lazy assumptions built into questions, it makes it hard to have a constructive dialogue.
That was a lazy assumption.
I said, you all had a win.
You said, no, you said, is it my expectation?
I'm speaking in the same language.
You said, is it my expectation?
It's not just you, it's the whole media.
In other words, when you hear a sentence like.
It is a completely different question.
You say, Juggs, I'm not going to answer the White House.
And I will gladly answer it.
When you say, do we think district court judges should rubber stamp each action?
There is a premise that is built into that that is absurd.
The president is the sole head of the executive branch.
He's the only officer in the entire government that's elected by the entire American people.
Democracy cannot function.
In fact, democracy does not exist at all.
If each action the president takes, foreign policy, diplomatic, military, national security, has to be individually approved by 700 district court judges, that's democracy.
So, if there's 15 communist crazy judges on the court, that each of them as a team working together can block and freeze each and every executive action?
Yeah, I don't know how that really actually works, right?
Because then the president is losing all federal power.
You can't have this disjointed system.
And he's totally right on that.
I want to go to Peace of My Mind's comment who's asking Has anybody explained this yet?
Why the open borders?
Why allow expired visas to stay?
I think the problem is, Peace of My Mind.
It's not that they're necessarily allowing, it's that they've kind of just infiltrated the system and they're hiding.
And then you got to go out and find them.
And so it's a big undertaking.
And this is exactly what the administration is trying to do.
And then they're getting fought at every turn with all of these sanctuary cities and all these sanctuary counties and all these sanctuary states.
And that's why they've come out and labeled 30, 30 cities in the United States of America as sanctuary.
And they're stripping them of federal funds.
Because it's like, you know, the reckless kid that's unfortunately ruining his or her own life, right?
Do you keep feeding them money and say, go for it, go for it.
No, you cut them off.
And that's what Donald Trump is doing to these 30 sanctuary cities and states.
He's cutting them off.
You're out of money, you're not gonna get anything because you're not complying with federal law.
And I don't care what anybody says, federal law trumps pun intended state law every single day.
On this one, you go to the supremacy clause, you go to the commerce clause, you go to the naturalization clause.
It is very clear.
It's all over the Constitution Of the United States.
So don't tell me for two seconds that somebody can say no no, you can be here, we're sanctuary, we're this, we're that?
No, not happening.
And this is another thing.
You know I hate to keep going back to Miller, but gosh darn, he's good right, he?
He just eviscerated this CNN reporter the other day on all of these things.
It came up again as we learned that oh, a migrant had been sent um into.
Well, a migrant is being targeted allegedly by the feds because the Mark, the migrant, allegedly sent a letter threatening Donald Trump's life.
I mean again, this comes as we're learning that somebody who's here illegally did something really bad in Colorado.
So can you blame the administration from saying or for saying we want to actually make changes here?
Here's Miller.
Basically, you know, you had me at illegal.
If you're going to come here and you're going to disturb the nation or you're just going to come here illegally, that puts you in a pretty bad bracket.
And you shouldn't expect, frankly, the same kind of treatment as anyone else.
If you're here illegally, you're here illegally, period.
Do you think a judge should just rubber stamp what your White House does?
If not, what checks and balances do you think should be in place for this White House?
It is not the job of a district court judge to perform an individual green light or red light on every single policy that the president takes as the head of the executive branch.
Just think about the premise baked into your question, respectfully, Pam.
You're saying that when the American people elect a president of the United States of America, well, it's the implication, who is the sole head of the executive branch.
Well, let me finish.
I will answer the question happily.
But look, when you have these kinds of lazy assumptions built into questions, it makes it hard to have a constructive dialogue.
What is a lazy assumption that you said you all had to win?
Meaning, you said, no, you said, is it my expectation?
I'm speaking in the same language.
You said, is it my expectation?
It's not just you, it's the whole media.
In other words, when you hear a sentence like.
It is a completely different question.
You say, Doug's going to be the president of the White House.
No, And I will gladly answer it.
When you say, do we think district court judges should rubber stamp each action?
There is a premise that is built into that that is absurd.
The president is the soul.
And we heard that.
So, again, I just think he's doing a really good job laying it out and explaining it.
Jeff Monhey, thank you for the generosity.
Let's go again back to Miller.
The part I wanted to show you was where he's sort of like, you know, you had me at illegal.
And in light of what's going on in Colorado, I think that this is relevant.
Undocumented migrant sent a letter threatening to kill the president, promising to self deport after the assassination.
CNN reporting shows that investigators believe the migrant was set up, it was a victim of a setup.
What is the administration going to do now?
And this is an undocumented immigrant.
I do want to note that.
But this was someone who came forward, was a victim of a crime, and now law enforcement believes he was set up.
Go ahead.
Well, I want to clarify what you mean.
So we're talking about the same thing.
Are you saying this immigrant was here illegally?
Yes, but I am, and that's why I said that.
I clarified that.
You said undocumented, and I wasn't clear what that means.
I'm assuming they have a fake ID.
I'm assuming they have a fake social security number.
That's neither here nor there.
That's gain away from the question, Steve.
I want this to be and call me naive a good faith discussion about what's happening right now.
When we use language that's designed to obscure the truth, that's not good faith.
It does go anywhere.
It does go anywhere.
They're not an undocumented.
Okay, that's fine.
That's another discussion for another date.
I don't know the details of the assassination threat.
All I can say, based on what you're telling me, is there's an illegal alien in our country who's making menacing threats.
Regardless of the facts or circumstances, we don't want him here.
We're going to get to the bottom of it, and I would gladly come back on whatever information they're showing us.
They were set up.
Just to be clear, but quickly, where is the White House on the media's question?
The guy was treated unfairly.
Yes.
I'm sure the guy was treated very unfairly.
Yeah.
Because he's saying, I'm sure he was treated unfairly, right?
You're always going to say that.
Again, it brings us back to center, right?
So as Donald Trump purges people within the deep state, a lot of people within the deep state, and tries to rewrite the rules here on these open borders and is faced with these 700 district court judges who may think one way or another, he's running up against certain challenges.
One good bit of news we got last week on Thursday, the Supreme Court did say, The 535,000 estimated non-citizens who had come here under Biden's special parole program from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, they are now blocked.
They have to leave the country.
So now, of course, they're going to have to go out and find all 532,000 of them because they just disseminated into this country.
Part of the reason for this, guys, and I hate to say it, I hate to say it, but this is just the reality of the Democrats nowadays, is that they were looking at what's called gerrymandering, right?
Redistricting, where they wanted to make sure they had a certain influx of people coming into states that they were trying to reposition.
as blue states.
Oh, they want Texas.
Oh, they want Florida.
Oh, I mean, they got California.
We'll see.
maybe that'll eventually shift because I think people in California are like, oh, whoa, we didn't sign up for this.
High taxes, high crime, lots of problems.
I mean, it's a mess in California.
So great example, right?
Great case study of what you don't want to become.
My point being that Biden was for whatever reason, and it may not have been Biden, right?
I mean, I think that's what we're learning, may not have been Biden at all, but they were trying very hard to bring in a lot of people.
Here into this country that would need to live off the system and then could therefore help them redistrict because oh, we have this many more people in this particular area in Florida so boom oh, we're going to get another congressperson there.
That's how we're going to win.
You call that winning.
These people don't play fair.
I mean, they don't play fair.
So I think it's a huge win.
The Supreme Court said, you know what?
You can end that parole program.
A huge huge huge, huge deal.
And i'm telling you more is coming because, as 3 000 people are being sent home every day, lots more is going to happen.
Meanwhile, you look at what went just down in Colorado and you got to ask yourself, what's the deal with all the visas, the student visas that were given out left and right?
Harvard coming under the microscope for that losing federal funding.
They're suing, of course.
And then, of course, the administration is like, all those students you have here, we want information on them.
And by the way, they deserve to have the information on them.
DHS deserves that, especially in light of what we've learned in Colorado.
The president's authority to prevent foreign nationals from entering the country.
Is one of his greatest and highest authorities.
He's operating at the apex of executive power when he does so.
Congress, likewise, has codified and cemented that authority by giving the Department of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State plenary authority to reject the entry of foreign nationals into this country, which is what makes that Harvard ruling from this crazy judge so obscene.
Harvard defied multiple DHS subpoenas for information about his foreign students and about law breaking and national security threats on campus.
Harvard has engaged.
In decades of invidious, unlawful, and illegal race based discrimination against American citizens.
So, Harvard is engaged in illegal and criminal conduct.
And a judge is siding with Harvard's right to pat his pockets with foreign cash over the rights of American citizens and the American Constitution.
The Democrat Party's philosophy right now is for foreigners, everything, for Americans, nothing.
President Trump is fighting for American workers, for the blue collar workers, and for the middle class of this country.
Harvard Discrimination Lawsuit00:09:45
Boom.
About time, right?
Okay, so lots of changes coming.
And I think a lot of people just don't like this.
They're really threatened by it.
It's really scary, by the way.
A little moment to brag.
We've been named the top 100 in the YouTube podcast list.
I hope we stay on the top 100.
That's why I'm looking in the chat.
Don's like, and subscribe and share and comment and all that good stuff because it's a big deal.
The algorithm likes it.
When you guys like it, the algorithm likes it.
And then they put us in the top 100.
And then, you know, what do you know?
We get we get more viewers.
So it's this circle of giving all around.
Thank you for all you guys do.
Biden, serious, serious, obvious mental decline.
He spoke out about this recently.
And so did one Bill Clinton.
Okay, Bill Clinton.
It's like a CYA move.
You got Bill Clinton worried about his hide.
You got Jen Psaki, the former press person.
Remember Little Peppermint Patty over there that was in the gig before KJP?
She at least had the good sense to get out.
She's coming out.
Oh, I didn't see anything.
Nobody saw anything.
Come on, people.
I mean, we all saw it.
Biden, however, says, you know what?
He would do it again and again and again because he could beat them all.
Just like that.
He is a mess.
I've showed you that bite before.
It's really kind of unforgivable, all that went down.
But like I said, he'd do it again because he could beat them all.
And there's also been a lot of discussion recently about your mental and physical capabilities while you were in office.
You can see that.
I'm mentally incompetent and I can't walk and I can beat the hell out of both of them.
Do you want to reply to any of those reports and also to the fact that there are some Democrats who are now questioning whether you should have run for reelection in the first place?
Why didn't they run against me then?
Because I'd have beaten them.
Do you have any regrets?
No, I don't.
No.
He says he's in tip top shape.
Yeah, right.
That's what we saw over and over again.
That's what we saw with the invisible chair, tip top shape.
There was a chair.
In fairness, there was a chair, but he really wanted to sit in it a little too fast there.
Remember that one?
And, you know, Jill's like, no.
Not yet, honey.
Not yet.
Not yet.
Anyway, Bill Clinton has decided to weigh in on this, ladies and gentlemen.
And let me go to what he's saying because this is just unbelievable.
John, thank you for the generosity.
We've got a few of these super chats in the crowd here today.
Thank you to all of you.
I'm going to get to your comments.
There's this book that came out that talks about Joe Biden and the people around him seeing that he had cognitive and physical decline.
Did you ever have a moment? With him, where you thought maybe he was unfit to run for president?
No.
I thought he was a good president.
The only concern I thought he had to deal with was could anybody do that job until they were 86?
And we'd had several long talks.
I had never seen him and walked away thinking he can't do this anymore.
He was always on top of his brief.
You never saw any cognitive decline.
So I didn't know anything about any of this, and I haven't read the book.
I saw President Biden not very long ago and I thought he was in good shape.
But the book didn't register with me because I never saw him that way.
To because he's not president anymore, and I think he did a good job.
I think we are facing challenges today without precedent in our history.
And some people are trying to use this as a way to blame him for the fact that Trump was reelected.
Yeah, well, I think he's a big part of the reason why Trump was reelected.
I mean, he.
Again, poetry at work, ladies and gentlemen, and poetry that Letitia James is getting hit with the exact charge she tried to go after Donald Trump for in a very strange way, right?
You know how I feel about that case.
And then simultaneously, you know, it comes out that Joe Biden is being covered up for by all of these Dems.
And now suddenly people are realizing, gosh, you know, maybe that wasn't the brightest thing to do.
Maybe that was all about holding on to our own darn power because actually the best way to hold on to power is to not have a puppet president.
but to put up a candidate that the American people believe in and want to get behind.
But you wouldn't do it.
You couldn't do it.
John Luna, thank you.
Thank you so much.
I'm glad that you're enjoying the stream.
And AJ as well, thank you for the generosity, guys.
Much appreciated.
Make sure you guys subscribe, share, like, all that good stuff right here on the Trish Regan channel.
But I got to tell you, there was a whole lot of cover-up going on.
And they don't know what to say about it all now because it was totally obvious.
Anyone had two eyes and a brain.
I mean, all you had to do was listen to them.
All you had to do was look at him and you knew.
Right.
So now Bill Clinton's like, ah, you know, I didn't see that.
I didn't see that.
Gosh, he sounds just like Little Peppermint Patty, Jen Saki, trying to profess her innocence as only she can.
I left in May of 2022, just for the facts here.
And I have seen Biden once since then when I took my daughter to the holiday party this last December after he had lost.
And so I hadn't seen him in person during that period of time.
I never saw that person, not a single time.
And I was in the Oval Office every day that was on that debate stage.
I'm not a doctor.
Aging happens quite quickly.
Were things that people saw during that period of time that were similar to that or would have been in a category of that?
I don't know, possibly, right?
And all these books are going to tell us.
Do you think that they were actively covering it up?
Were they sort of in denial or was that just a bad debate?
Like, what is your read on that?
Well, this is what I mean about cover up is a very loaded term, I think.
Well, it means you knew that it was really bad and you're pretending otherwise versus you're deluding yourself, which I think is what people do a lot.
Well, I understand, but I still think it's like cover up is often like a crime, right?
We're talking, people use that term.
They say it's worse than the crime.
People use that term as they relate to Watergate or the covering up of not sharing public information about a war.
Yeah, and I'm not accusing anybody of a crime.
I understand, but other people have used that term, and I think it's a bit of a dangerous term.
By the way, including, including guys, the author, including the author of the book, I'm not a fan of Jake Tapper.
I think he's phony, phony, phony, phony.
He saw exactly what we saw.
There's no excuse for anybody trying to say that, you know, this guy was in tip-top shape and it was a bunch of cheap fakes that were daring to show the invisible chair moment.
There was a chair.
Okay.
But like we all saw the same thing.
We all saw how incoherent he was, how slow he was, how he couldn't.
I better not start your questions.
I'll get in trouble.
How he couldn't take questions because he'd get in trouble.
Who's he going to be in trouble with?
They said, do you have a message for voters?
Thanks, come on.
We all saw that together.
And yet they want to cover it up.
Clinton's covering up.
Socky's covering up.
Chick-Jabber.
Oh, my gosh.
I couldn't believe it.
And now he comes out trying to make a buck on the whole thing.
Well, I'll tell you this.
This is going down as the biggest scandal in modern political history because Joe Biden may not have known anything that he was doing.
He didn't know that he was opening up the border so he could have 300, 532,000 people come here and be non citizens.
Somebody else that was targeting Florida redistricting, targeting Texas redistricting, they were busy doing this, which means the auto pen is going to be in big trouble.
And we've got an investigation.
That I haven't said before because it came from a Secret Service whistleblower.
This past year.
I talked to so many of them after the attempted assassinations of President Trump.
But this Secret Service whistleblower actually was assigned to Biden, and he told me that Biden used to get lost in his closet in the mornings in the White House.
I mean, the guy literally stumbling around in the White House residence couldn't find his way out of his own closet.
The President of the United States.
I mean, this is outrageous.
We were lied to.
And Sean, you know as well as I do, the press has a huge role in this.
I mean, the press actually is really.
Important in America.
They're supposed to report the truth.
It's what you do every night.
It's not what you do every night.
But they couldn't.
They couldn't, for whatever reason, seem to get out of their own way.
They weren't reporting the truth because there was this groupthink and perhaps even an administration that wouldn't allow them.
I mean, I've never seen state media like we saw state media in action for Joe Biden.
And his biggest regret was that he didn't do more of it.
He told Susan Page at USA Today in his exit interview when she said, Do you have any regrets?
He said, Yeah, I wish I could have controlled the misinformation more.
And I'm like, Whoa.
Really?
I mean, you don't think you did enough during the campaign?
You and Antony Blinken coming up with the big idea to put 51X spooks out there signing their names to a bunch of bogus nonsense?
You wonder why Donald Trump wants to get rid of the entire NSC, why he wants to get rid of CISA, why he wants to get rid of all of these deep state apparatuses?