June 11, 2016 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
50:43
20160611_Hour_1
|
Time
Text
You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network, and this is the Political Cesspool.
The Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populist conservative radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host, James Edwards.
Okay, friends and family.
Well, let me tell you again, this Saturday evening, June the 11th, as you listen to the Political Cesspool Radio Program broadcasting live tonight, each and every Saturday.
We're always here in Memphis, Tennessee.
We stay lit for you folks.
The mercury is climbing outside.
It was about 101 degrees outside Memphis today.
And the only place it's hotter is in this studio and in the political climate that is the American presidential race right now.
And we are once again finding ourselves at the center of it.
Here in the political cesspool, the media keeps on knocking.
Keeps on keeping on.
They absolutely do.
Now, the main course tonight is going to be our discussion of Donald Trump and the La Raza Judge.
In fact, that was Pat Buchanan's title of a commentary that covered that particular issue, the Donald and the La Raza Judge.
Dr. Kevin McDonald will be with us on in the second hour to help us break this down.
We're going to try to set the table before Kevin arrives with us in about 60 minutes time.
Pretty much going to stay on that topic for the first two hours with very little deviation.
But before we do start, I should let you know, and we do like to be open and honest here in the political cesspool, that we received a few more media inquiries this week.
When you get contacted by someone at the Daily Beast, that's one thing.
That's a left-wing echo chamber.
That's an online rag.
I'm a reporter with the Daily Beast.
I was interested in seeing what you thought of Mr. Trump's remarks about Judge Curiel.
Let me know when you get a chance.
Thanks so much.
That came in to me a couple of days ago.
And of course, I responded, this time politely, not as belligerently as I did with the Wall Street Journal reporter a few days ago.
But I just succinctly said I have no interest in talking to you about that matter or any other matter.
And that was my entire response.
But that was from the Daily Beast.
How about the New York Times?
The publication.
How would you describe it, Keith?
The New York Times, I guess it's the newspaper of record for the world, right?
Or at least one of them.
Well, it's the flagship of liberalism in journalism in the United States of America.
Of course, owned by the good son of Israel, Pinch Salzberger, and his family for generations.
Never has heard a conservative word or a true conservative word coming out of that newspaper there.
House conservative David Brooks is a little bit left of Vladimir Lenin.
So, you know, definitely.
You see,
ladies and gentlemen, when you start talking about the New York Times, you see what happens.
You get disconnected.
You can disconnect.
Look how powerful the media is.
I'm telling you.
Well, nevertheless, I will read to you very quickly and then we'll continue on in earnest here.
The New York Times sent an email to me, and we were talking about this being the program or the, yeah, we're the program of record for the American right, but the New York Times, of course, the newspaper of record for the United States and certainly one of the premier newspapers around the world.
Now, that doesn't mean that they're honest at all or that they're not entirely leftist and biased, but nevertheless, they have a good standing in the media or a good reputation amongst their peers, which is, of course, circles we don't want to be involved with.
But here's the email from the New York Times, and I tell you that they know not only that we are someone they want to talk to, but they even know our stand when it comes to the media.
Listen to this: Dear James, the email reads: I'm working on a story about how Trump has changed the public discussion in the United States about race and ethnicity, particularly around the political issues of immigration, Muslim refugees, and some other issues.
Do you have some time tomorrow to discuss?
It would be pretty open-ended.
And of course, I'd want to begin with a discussion of your own views and what ideas you subscribe to and affiliate with, so that I could characterize you accurately down the road.
I understand that this has been a point of contention, but I do pride myself on always seeking to represent people fairly.
So that comes from a New York Times reporter.
So what do you think I did, ladies and gentlemen?
Do you think I took him up on the offer, having been burned?
I don't know, about a thousand times in the past.
No, I said the exact same thing.
I have no interest in speaking with you on this or any other matter.
But it just goes to show that now the most prominent and powerful news entities in the world are coming to the political festival for content and comment.
Now, we have been covered extensively by the press since our inception, but there's no doubt about it that the waves of publicity would come and go intermittently this year without question.
It is coming every week.
So we are right at the eye of the hurricane on this one, folks.
And when you have the New York Times, the Washington Post, the New York Daily News, the biggest newspapers and magazines, we were in Time magazine last month.
Every week, they come and get their news the same place you get your news, and that is here on the Liberty News Radio Network, the Political Sessible with James Edwards, Keith Alexander, Eddie Robin Miller will be back in tonight, a little later on in the third hour.
He's been on a brief hiatus, and we're going to catch you up with Dr. Pappy as we call him.
So that's all forthcoming tonight.
But ladies and gentlemen, know that when you tune into this radio program to hear our thoughts and opinions, so too does the national and international media.
And I say that to say this, ladies and gentlemen, that's not Keith and I patting each other's backs here on the radio here in this opening segment.
That is totally because of the prayerful and financial support that we draw from each and every one of you.
So we are your proxy.
We are your voice on the radio.
When the press asks to speak to us, they ask to speak to you.
We speak for you.
Not everyone can, of course, be on the radio.
We are so happy to serve as a voice for paleo-conservatives, for European Americans, for Southerners, and for Christians.
And I think if you put those four things, paleo-conservatives, Christian people, our people, European Americans, and certainly we favor the South, even though we do have an international and global audience.
But if you put it into a blender, what comes out is the content on this show.
And we're so very happy with the way we've grown, with what our reputation is.
Folks, again, it's all because of you.
We are here because of you.
We are here to serve you.
And we're going to serve you with a better connection.
We come back after the commercial break.
We had a brief power search here at the radio station.
It is always something, isn't it?
It is always something, but it keeps it entertaining and it keeps us on our feet.
We don't want to fall asleep here doing this.
And so we're excited that something always goes wrong to keep us going.
Not always, but when it happens, it certainly seems as though it happens a little more frequently than usual.
But nevertheless, when we come back, we're going to start breaking down Donald Trump and the judge.
And we'll cover it in our own word.
Kevin McDonald will have them in the second hour.
And then we'll get to Eddie later on tonight.
It's going to be a full show, as it always is.
Thanks so much, folks.
just get started.
As the United States boldly stepped forward in the glorious light provided by its new constitution in 1787, the nations of the earth were in awe of the newfound strength and hope of this free land.
Today, the nation stands at a crossroads.
A divergence from the original intent put forth in the United States Constitution has brought grave threats to our beloved nation.
A miracle is needed if the United States is to survive.
That miracle is again the pure application of the United States Constitution.
I'm Scott Bradley.
In my To Preserve the Nation book and lecture series, I bring forth truths that will help raise up a new generation of statesmen like those noble Americans who founded this land.
Vigorous application of these principles will invigorate and restore the nation, and we may become again the freest, most prosperous, most respected, and happiest nation on earth.
Visit topreservethenation.com to begin that restoration.
Do you want to fix America's police and take the country back in the process?
If you answered yes, then CSPOA needs you.
CSPOA.org, the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, is an organization comprised of citizens, sheriffs, police, and other government officials.
We are taking America back, sheriff by sheriff, county by county, and state by state.
And we need you.
Over 300 sheriffs constitutionally trained.
We teach public servants the Constitution and need your help.
Become a part of the solution today at cspoa.org.
Are you a business owner who offers high-quality products, services, or solutions?
Do you love America and want your business to support a freedom-loving cause that will help defend the Constitution?
Well, if the above describes your company, then I want to connect you with my loyal and like-minded listeners.
Contact me at restoretherepublicshow.com and I will personally consult with you to build a sponsorship package that will grow your business.
Support a message of freedom and become a sponsor of the Restore the Republic show today.
Together, we will restore the republic.
If you're at all like me, you have a tough time remembering appointments and events.
But ladies and gentlemen, I have the answer.
It's a premier service on the internet called MemoToMe.
It's free.
You ought to try it.
Now, I never miss the honeydew items for my wife or the important business meetings.
They have strict privacy protection.
That means they will release your email address to no one ever.
You will not get spammed because of Memo to Me.
Unmatched dependability.
Ladies and gentlemen, these folks have been around since 1998 and they are absolutely up online all the time to send you your reminders and appointments.
They have rock-solid reliability.
They have five redundant internet connections, diesel-powered generators backing up the system.
I'm telling you, MemoToMe is the premier reminder service on the internet.
It's free.
You ought to give it a try.
And oh, by the way, if you're not available at your computer to get your email reminders, they can even send a reminder to your cell phone or pager.
I use MemoToMe.com daily and highly recommend it to you.
M-E-M-O-T-O-M-E.com.
It's time to jump back into the political cesspool to be part of the show and have your voice heard around the world.
Call us at 1-86-698-66397.
All right, back to full strength or so, we hope.
James Edwards, Keith Alexander here in studio.
We're going to talk about the Donald and the La Raza judge, as Pat Buchanan put it in about 60 seconds after we take this call from Ethan in New York.
Ethan, take it away.
Hello, Mr. Edwards.
My name is Ethan Stroggins.
I really appreciate you.
Take my phone call.
I love you guys very much.
I want to comment.
Well, we love you too.
I'm Mr. Trump.
Mr. Trump never questioned his heritage.
He only questioned that he would probably question his heritage because he wanted to build a wall.
And that's very understandable.
And then it got blown up on the media.
I think Mr. Trump was completely correct.
All he wanted to do is build a wall, and rightfully so.
And since he is a Mexican, he's probably going to be anti-him.
Number two, Mr. Trump never has an intercom.
He only has about 30 seconds to speak off the heart of what he has to say.
And sometimes he's right, sometimes he's wrong.
But you have to understand, he's not Hillary Clinton.
He's not Barack Obama.
And number three, he's going against the most Zionist Jew media, the most racist people on the planet earth.
So Mr. Trump is always correct, and even when he's wrong.
And I'd like to say that very quickly.
I love you guys.
Well, I appreciate it.
Good luck with all you have to do.
Thank you so much, Ethan, for calling.
We appreciate your opinions.
I think there's no doubt that one of the things you're trying to say is that he's not a trained politician, so he doesn't have the politically correct answer, nor would he want to have a politically correct answer.
In fact, his disdain of the media.
Right.
His disdain of the media and his utter disregard for political correctness is what's propelled him to the within a breath of the presidency.
Keith?
Well, the thing I was trying to point out before we had those technical difficulties in the first segment is that the media, the establishment media, and of course, like you said, racist people on the planet earth.
Well, thank you, Ethan.
Yeah, but really, you know, the New York Times is the flagship of the liberal media.
They not only hate Donald Trump, they hate the Republican Party.
And why the Republican establishment would grovel before them, knowing that there's nothing they can do that will ever cause the media to call off the dogs on them is beyond me.
They apparently are beyond learning from experience, James.
I want to go to Buchanan's opinion on this.
I'll cut off here.
Since Ross Perreau, he's the best we ever had.
God bless Donald Trump and God bless all of you.
I love you guys.
Take care.
All right.
Thank you.
And this is what Buchanan says about it.
Before the lynching of Donald Trump continues to proceed, what exactly was it that he said about that Hispanic judge?
Stated succinctly, Donald Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who is presiding over a class action suit against Trump University, is sticking it to him.
And the judge's bias is likely rooted in the fact that he is of Mexican descent.
Can there be any defense of a statement so horrific, Buchanan asks in jest.
Just this.
First, Trump has a perfect right to be angry about the judge's rulings and to question his motive.
Second, there are grounds for believing Trump is right.
On May 27th, Buchanan writes, Curiel, at the request of the Washington Post, made public plaintiff accusations against Trump University that the whole thing was a scam.
The Post, which Bob Woodward tells us has 20 reporters digging for dirt on Trump's past, is having a field day.
And he is Curiel, an appointee of President Obama.
He has for years been associated with the La Raza Lawyers Association of San Diego, which supports pro-illegal immigrant organizations.
But Trump's real hanging offense was that he brought up the judge's ancestry, the son of Mexican immigrants.
He was an anchor baby himself, implying that he was something of a judicial version of Univision's Jorge Ramos.
Apparently, it is now not only politically incorrect, but in Newt Gingrich's term, inexcusable to bring up the religious, racial, or ethnic background of a judge or suggest this might be that or to suggest that his influence, his actions may be influenced by these things on the bench.
But these things matter, Buchanan writes.
The bottom line is, Keith, we all know judges have become unelected legislators and political advocates, and there's no doubt that these things, heritage, culture, race, go into someone's thoughts and opinions, and yes, their legal opinions and legal rulings.
In fact, when Donald Trump had suggested a slate of candidates that he might consider for the Supreme Court, the media just two weeks ago, maybe it was three weeks ago now, jumped all over him because these people were white.
So that was the media just two weeks before this media manufactured non-story about Curielle.
The media said, well, these people have to be looked at hardly, looked at harshly because they are white.
But then when Donald Trump questions someone's qualifications because they are of Hispanic descent and an outspoken liberal activist judge, of course, that's beyond the pale.
What's the difference in the two situations, Keith?
Well, the difference is that we have an incredible, breathtaking double standard in American life.
White judges and white juries have been questioned regarding their lack of impartiality by the liberal media, and particularly the New York Times.
There are over 40 articles in the past year alone on this, as pointed out by Ann Coulter in her article of June the 8th.
Stunning new development.
Media calls Trump racist.
See, this is exactly what is driving the debate.
The fact that it's enshrined in American jurisprudence now.
There's a case called Batson versus United States in which it's invoked all the time.
It was invoked last week to overturn a conviction about 20 years ago of a black murderer because apparently there weren't enough non-whites on a jury to satisfy the Supreme Court standard in Batson.
So in other words, white people come with a presumption of partiality in racial matters.
Why then would it be impossible for a Hispanic or a black judge or a black jury like the OJ jury, for example, to be partial or biased as well?
That's just one of the explanations for the incredible pillorying that Trump has taken in this Trump University case, which is much ado about nothing, trumped up, no pun intended,
by the leftist media and the leftist Establishment that you know, Trump's universe, you know, basically how many universities here's what it is in a nutshell: you have people that say that they had to overpay to get an education that promised them a higher-paying job and it didn't happen.
You know what, James?
That sounds like every college and university in the United States today, not just Trump University, but Trump University is being persecuted in court by the left because they want to have something to beat him and bludgeon him with in this election.
And of course, this is why we've said that Trump, if elected, needs to just establish his own media, an alternative media, a conservative media, to just stop this, you know,
consistent drumbeat of leftism that we get from the media, an anti-conservative, anti-populist, anti-nationalist trope that is, you know, dominates the national news, not only in the print media, but in the broadcast media.
We need to have some true diversity.
Let's celebrate some diversity in the media.
And the idea, you know, Trump should never apologize for his comments because if whites are presumed to be biased, is it you're saying that it's impossible for some non-white to be biased?
It's ridiculous.
It's absurd, but it's the official position of the United States media.
We're going to take a break right there, ladies and gentlemen.
We come back much more on this topic.
It will continue this hour and well into the second hour when Dr. Kevin McDonald joins us live tonight.
It's going to be a busy, brutal show.
Stay tuned if you can handle it.
You're listening to Liberty News Radio.
News this hour from LibertyNewsDaily.com.
I'm William Grigg.
Anders Kumpas, former Director of Field Operations for the UN Human Rights Office, has resigned to protest the complete impunity of officials responsible for the rape of children by peacekeeping troops in Africa.
In an interview with the humanitarian news agency IRIN, Kumpas condemned the lack of accountability, quote, for those who have been found to have, in various degrees, abused their authority, together with the unwillingness of the hierarchy to express any regrets for the way they have acted toward me.
Two years ago, Compass leaked a confidential UN report documenting sexual abuse of children by peacekeeping troops in the Central African Republic to prosecutors in France to protest the world body's refusal to act.
A British program to train Saudi police in high-tech enforcement and surveillance methods spurred concerns by human rights activists that the instruction might help facilitate torture.
Since 2009, according to documents obtained through a freedom of information request by the advocacy group Reprieve, the England and Wales College of Policing has maintained what it calls a trusted professional partnership with the Saudi Interior Ministry.
This has included instructing Saudi police in digital forensics, cybersecurity, voice recognition, and cell phone surveillance methods.
Reprieve activist Mayafoa points out that Saudi security and intelligence operatives have used these techniques to identify protesters who often face execution through beheading.
For the news the networks refuse to use, turn to libertynewsdaily.com.
For libertynewsdaily.com, I'm William Gregg.
The Occidental Quarterly fills a unique niche in bringing together scholarly articles on a wide range of topics that are mired in political correctness elsewhere.
It is edited by Professor Kevin McDonald, who's no stranger to listeners of the political cesspool.
There are quite a few reasons for the precarious state of our civilization and our people, but one of the main ones is that we have lost the intellectual and moral high ground to a cultural elite that is hostile to our people and our culture.
Those of us who are politically aware must understand that the elites dominating culture and the political process in the West are intellectually and morally bankrupt.
TOQ is the key.
Digital download subscriptions are only $30 a year.
Subscriptions by first-class mail are only $60 a year.
Go to toqonline.com and click on subscribe now.
In addition to receiving fascinating and informative articles, you will also be supporting the work of scholars who are part of a community defending our people and our culture with the highest level of integrity and intellectual sophistication.
That's TOQonline.com.
Subscribe now. Welcome back.
To get on the show, call us on James's Dime at 1-866-986-6397.
When Obama named Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, a woman of Puerto Rican descent who went through college on affirmative action scholarships, did Obama think this would not influence her decision when it came down whether or not to abolish affirmative action?
I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life, Sotomayor said in a speech at Berkeley Law School and in other forums.
Translation, ethnicity matters, and her Latina background helped her guide her decisions.
So, Keith, again, imagine a white judge saying that I would hope a white man could come to more fair and equitable decisions than a minority.
That's exactly what she's saying.
And there wasn't even a hint of controversy in the media.
And as far as Trump goes with this La Raza judge, and we were talking in the break, they're trying to say that this lawyers guild, the La Raza, which means the race lawyers association of San Diego, is different from the hardcore thug La Raza group that we see out there, members of them at least, going out and bonking people's heads in the streets that go to Donald Trump rallies.
But the fact of the matter is, all of us are products of our faith, family, race, and ethnic group.
And the suggestion in these attacks on Trump that judges and justices always rise above such considerations and decide cases solely on the merits is naive nonsense.
People seek changes of venue all the time in court cases.
And the most depressing thing about this episode, as Buchanan concludes in his piece, is to see the Republicans, Paul the Cuck Ryan, being exhibit A, rushing to stomp on Trump to show just how well they've mastered their liberal catechisms.
Well, what it is, James, this is in a microcosm, in a capsule, the playing out of something that has been noted on this show for time immemorial.
Shelby Steele, the so-called black conservative, said it and showed that he was no conservative when he said it.
Said that you cannot allow white people to have the same types of racial identity organizations and racial identity lobbying efforts racial and ethnic groups have, because if they did, then they would be at an unfair advantage.
In other words, we are at an unfair disadvantage, and that's why, for example, it's impermissible for a white man to complain about the racial bias of any non-white judge or jury,
but it is perfectly permissible for any non-white to complain about the racial bias of any non-white judge.
jury.
In fact, the New York Times has gone so far as to say even when there is no evidence of racial bias on an all-white jury or a majority white jury, and the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed with this in the Batson case,
the mere appearance of possible bias is so bad that we're going to have to take steps to require the inclusion of blacks on juries and to have a critical...
mass of non-white judges via affirmative action.
See, this is what it's come to in America.
You know, racist is the most toxic term in the language now and all white people are racist.
With the new description, with the uh, with the advent of concepts like white privilege and institutional or structural racism basically, racist is nothing more in today's America than a synonym for a white person, James?
Well, it absolutely is.
But the good news is things are changing.
Things are changing now.
I don't like to lift full passages from Buchanan's columns, but really no one puts it better.
The only person that puts it almost as well is Ann Coulter, and if you want to read a real uh, see the way I break them down and Coulter is wittier.
Pat Buchanan's articles are wiser.
Now, that's not to sell either of them short.
There's plenty of wisdom in Ann Coulter's columns and there's plenty of wit in Pat Buchanan's columns.
But basically, Ann Coulter can really just zing you.
I mean, she comes in with the zingers that are stunning.
You know jaw-dropping.
And Pat Buchanan's encyclopedic knowledge of everything is so great that when he talks, any reasonable person is going to stand up and listen because he's so good so at what he does and this is the diversity of our cause is that different people respond to different temperaments and different styles.
We have a style different than some of the other pro-white leaders, but we're there at the tip of the spear just the same.
But I will tell you this about Buchanan, who of course, gave me my start in politics and without the experience I had with Pat, would have never made it to the radio, and we talk about that a lot on the anniversary, anniversary shows and so on and so forth.
But his columns, the last six to eight columns he's done have been so hard-hitting and so prescient that I think he's outdone himself.
He's outdone his entire life's work in the last couple of months.
He went two columns ago, the Donald and the La Raza judge.
We read a couple of excerpts from that and infused those, interspersed those in our commentary here on the radio.
He has his most recent why Trump Must Not Apologize.
Never retreat, never explain.
Get it done and let them howl, Buchanan writes.
In rejecting demands that he apologize for his remarks about the La Raza judge, Buchanan again refers to him as the La Raza judge presiding over the class action suit against Trump.
Curiel Antonio Curiel.
The Donald is instinctively correct.
Assume, as we must, that Donald Trump believes what he said.
Why then should he apologize for speaking the truth as he sees it?
To do so would be to submit to extortion, to recant, to confess a sin he does not believe he committed.
It would be to capitulate to pressure, to tell a lie, to stop the beating, to grovel before the Inquisition of Political Correctness.
Trump is cheered today because he defies the commands of political correctness, and to the astonishment of enemies and admirers alike, he gets away with it.
Trump's rebellion is not only against the Republican elite, but against the establishment's claim to define what is right and what is wrong, true and false, acceptable and unacceptable in this republic.
Contrast Trump with Paul Ryan, who has buckled pathetically.
The speaker says Trump's remark about Judge Gonzalo Curiel being hostile to him, probably because the judge is a Mexican-American, is, quote, the textbook definition of a racist comment.
The most depressing aspect of this episode is to witness the Republican Party in full panic trashing Trump to mollify the media who detest them.
These Republicans seem to believe that if or when Trump goes down, this whole unfortunate affair will be over and they can go back to business as usual.
Sorry, Buchanan writes, but there is no going back.
And he goes on to write about the nationalist resistance that is taking over Europe and America.
Well, that's exactly right.
You know, you cannot.
They basically need to adopt our motto here at the political cesspool.
No surrender, no retreat, no apology.
That's what that quotation from the former professor at Balliol College in Oxford University in England says in not quite as succinct a fashion as we say.
Listen to what Ann Coulter said on the same topic.
Stunning new development.
Media calls Trump racist.
This is her thing.
Now, the thing about Ann Coulter is that she used to be all the time on the Sean Hannity show and on Fox News generally.
I see that now she seems to have been replaced without much fanfare by Laura Ingram.
That's a shame because it shows you that Ann Coulter is really digging close to where the bodies are buried because I consider Fox News to be part of the mainstream media itself and basically not nearly conservative enough to be the standard bearer for conservatism in the American media.
Here's what she said.
Annoyed by federal Judge Gonzalo Curiel's persistent rulings against him in the Trump University case brought by a law firm that has paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for speeches by Bill and Hillary Clinton, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said that maybe it's time the judge maybe it's because the judge is a second generation Mexican immigrant.
The entire media and most of the GOP have spent 10 months telling us that Mexicans in the United States are going to hate Trump for saying he'd build a wall.
Now they're outraged that Trump thinks that one Mexican hates him for saying he'll build the wall.
Curiel has distributed scholarships to illegal aliens.
He belongs to an organization that sends lawyers to the border to assure that no illegal alien human rights, quote unquote, are violated.
The name of the organization, the San Diego La Razo Lawyers Association.
La Raza means the race.
And let me make these comments.
Their motto is, for those within the race, everything.
For those outside the race, nothing.
They are an extremist, racist group.
You know, there's no white group that compares to them, quite frankly.
And that, you know, this is just to be disregarded.
You listen to Bill O'Reilly, who is another phony conservative at Fox News, and he says, oh, they're not related.
They're obviously related.
Saying they're not related would be like saying the NAACP Legal Defense Fund isn't related to the NAACP.
Excellent point.
Excellent point.
Well, folks, again, our conversation on this is just getting started.
And as we continue to discuss this, the discussion will evolve into things that shoot off from this topic, Donald Trump versus the La Raza Judge.
Stay tuned.
Hi, it's Joyce Riley with the Power Hour.
There's something really fun and exciting about discovering products that make life more pleasant and enjoyable.
Well, Miracle 2 soaps definitely fit that description.
The shelves at the supermarket are packed with soaps and cleansers that are full of chemicals that slowly destroy our health and the environment.
Miracle 2 products are all natural, like the green soap that can replace your bath, laundry, household soaps, and cleaning products.
And please try Miracle 2's Skin Lotion.
It's quickly absorbed and not greasy like all those other mass-produced lotions.
Miracle 2 Moisturizer is full of fabulous oils and emollients that leave the skin healthy and baby soft.
I guarantee after you discover how amazing Miracle 2 products are, you'll recommend them to everyone you know.
Just call 8778-179829.
That's 8778-179829.
Or visit thepowermall.com.
You'll learn why so many people say it's not just soap, it's a miracle.
We fought, we learned, we struggled, we won.
Despite Obama's best efforts, the newspaper of the human resistance survives.
We have lived only to face a new nightmare, the war against the machines.
Read about our struggle in The Sovereign, newspaper of the resistance.
The Sovereign is a 24-page monthly tabloid newspaper about the war between man and machines.
We've tried reason.
We've tried legislation.
We've tried every peaceful means imaginable.
And all it's gotten us is shut out.
So now we fight the machines.
Order online today at thesovenews.com or find the sovereign at select newsstands.
Remember to read The Sovereign, newspaper of the resistance.
The human resistance's battle against the machines will be everlasting.
This is Mercy.
It was never our destiny to stop the age of Obama.
It was merely to survive it.
Together, together.
With autumn in the air, it's time to think about getting ready for winter.
And it's time to save at herbalhealer.com.
You'll find amazing seasonal savings to prepare you for the fight against cold and flu season.
Like oregosillin to promote lung health.
30 capsules regularly, $34.95, now only $25.
HHA Olive Leaf, a natural antiviral, normally $16.95.
Now 60 capsules are just $12.
HHA Elderberry Power, a great flu and virus fighter.
Regularly $16.95, 60 capsules, now $10.
Saving all our homeopathic detoxes, choose from lungs, kidney, liver, brain, libido, or whole body.
Normally $26.95, now just $20.
Visit herbalhealer.com and click on the fall winter specials button to save on all our natural cold and flu fighting products.
Also, explore our Herbal Healer Academy correspondence courses that teach you how to handle your health naturally.
Herbalhealer.com.
Healing the world with nature, one person at a time, since 1988.
Welcome back.
To get on the show, call us on James's Dime at 1-866-986-6397.
All right, everybody, welcome back.
Continuing on, Winston Smith has written a slightly more nuanced column on this issue than the commentary that Keith delivered was.
Not that Keith was wrong.
Winston just takes a slightly different track, although both gentlemen, of course, end up at the same destination.
Winston on Friday wrote exclusively for thepoliticalcestable.org, The Trials of Trump.
I will read a couple of paragraphs from that piece.
Beginning with his famous declaration that he will build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, the left has been trying to hang that scarlet letter R around Trump's neck.
They finally found a chain they think is long enough in his musings over the partiality of mestizo judge Curiel presiding over the kangaroo trial involving Trump University.
Did I say this was nuanced?
Maybe that's not the word.
The judge is a member of something called the La Raza Lawyers Association.
That was just nuanced.
This is what Winston says about that, though.
It's not a bad group.
They encourage mestizos to go into law school and pursue careers in the legal profession, or at least that's their stated purpose.
But there's that phrase, La Raza, or the race, as in the mestizo race.
They prefer to have more mestizos in the justice system because they want mestizo defendants to have a better chance of getting a mestizo judge and attorney.
Nothing wrong with that.
I say, if I'm ever hauled into court, I prefer a judge who is of my own race.
So writes Winston.
Racial bias in the justice system is a common concern.
Blacks perpetually complain that white judges and juries cannot render justice to a black defendant.
It's almost SOP for blacks to argue that a white judge was too hard on one of their own.
But a white defendant like Trump, thinking a mestizo judge might, on some level, take issue with his hardline stance on keeping mestizos from illegally entering the United States is not just racist, it's a whole new level of racist.
So we have a judge who is a member of a Mestizo advocacy group presiding over the trial of a white man who has made some common sense statements and proposals concerning Mestizos legally entering illegally entering, I should say the United States.
And the white man wonders if the Mestizo judge might have a political agenda.
I'd say that the Donald has a legitimate concern.
After all, we have that sterling example of Mestizo racism in the highest court in the land, and again Winston quotes Supreme Court justice Sonia Sotomayor.
I would hope that a wise Latino woman with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than a white man.
Well, why wouldn't a wise white Anglo-Saxon Protestant woman like Ann Coulter?
for example, be a better choice.
I guarantee you, Ann Coulter has better legal qualifications to be a federal judge than Gonzalo Currielle.
I guarantee she was the editor-in-chief of the University of Michigan Law Review, which is a top law school in the United States.
She has experience as a practicing lawyer more than Sonia Sotomayor and also particularly more than Elena Kagan.
In fact, I can think of no better person than Ann Coulter to be the replacement for Danton and Scalia on the U.S. Supreme Court.
You've got a, you're hard up to get Coulter on the court, but I don't think that's going to happen.
It's not going to happen, but the fact that that's beyond the pale and everybody would chuckle about it shows you what a, shows you what a terrible double standard we have.
Ann Coulter would be an excellent candidate for not only the Supreme Court, but any federal court if we lived in a fair nation in which fair and unbiased, impartial standards were applied to selecting judicial candidates.
The fact that she's not is a perfect example of the affirmative action that we have labored under under the past 40 years.
You know, I was pointing out at one of our shows recently that affirmative action started in 1969, which was the year that I graduated from high school.
I am now 65 years old, so my entire scholastic, you know, higher education and professional career have been served under the baleful shadow of affirmative action.
And, you know, maybe under Trump, by having the courage to speak out about bias from non-white judges, and then we can extend it to juries, and then the judicial selection process, maybe we can finally break the iron grip of affirmative action once and for all if he's elected president.
Boy, what a constant, what a, you know, what a wish list.
That would be at the top of my wish list to have affirmative action destroyed.
And, you know, this is starting the conversation.
That's why Trump should never, as both Ann Coulter and Pat Buchanan have said, apologize.
This is the conversation about race that we want, not what Eric Holder wanted when he said he wanted a monologue about race.
Let's have a conversation about race, and this is a good place to start.
No, he said he wanted a conversation.
Nationalist.
We've got hiccups all over the place.
I'm telling Keith, if we're going to have fantasy candidates in the Supreme Court, we might just go for the full money and do Bill Johnson or even Keith Alexander Esquire himself, because I don't see, I don't see Ms. Coulter getting on there.
But I would say this, the nationalist resistance to the invasion across our southern border and the will to preserve the unique character of America are surging.
And they have their counterparts all over Europe.
People sense that the faith and future of the West are in the balance.
Buchanan writes this.
While Trump defies political correctness here in Europe, one can scarcely keep track of the anti-EU and anti-immigrant nationalist and separatist parties spouting up from the Atlantic to the Urals.
Call it identity politics, call it tribalism, call it ethno-nationalism.
It and Islamicism are the two most powerful forces on earth.
A decade ago, if one spoke other than derisively of parties like the National Front in France, the blacklisters would come around.
Now the establishments in the West are on the defensive when they're not openly on the run.
But suddenly, to the shock of an establishment reconciled to its state, populist resistance, call it Trumpism, if you will, seems to be everywhere and it seems to be rising everywhere.
So this is the good news.
As the cucked Republican establishment and the media are seemingly, at least for the moment, in a bad state of affairs, our issues, nationalism, populism, paleoconservatism are ascendant and it is happening all over the Western world.
I don't know what took it this long before that trajectory started to skyrocket, but nevertheless, this is where we are right now.
And I would like to add this.
The media, you know, they're coming to us saying how racist we are, the media is, the New York Times, they all want a piece of our flesh.
They want to try to get us saying something like, we think race matters.
Oh my God, race matters.
You know, these guys are so evil.
Well, every minority group would tell you that it matters.
Sonia Sotomayor said it mattered.
I didn't see her getting flogged on the pages of the New York Times.
But how about this?
Now, the Huffington Post isn't legitimate press.
It's just an online rag.
I wouldn't say the New York Times is legitimate either.
I don't care what their standing is amongst their beers.
They're just liars, very much like the rest of them.
But you had a headline on the Huffington Post this week entitled, Sorry, Liberals, a Violent Response to Trump is as logical as any.
So now we have never advocated for the mistreatment of anybody based upon their racial or ethnic heritage here on the political festival.
We have said that all people, including white people, ought to have organizations and spokespeople who stand up for their unique group interests.
We say that we don't begrudge the minorities for having that, but we won't be told we're evil for wanting the same for ourselves.
But one thing we have certainly never done is say that we need to advocate violence against a group of people.
Where here you have a Jewish columnist, he is Jewish, so we will mention that.
He mentions that.
In fact, that's his defense.
He says, as a Jewish person, I'm paraphrasing what he wrote on Twitter.
As a Jewish person, I don't apologize for violence.
I've seen what fascism does.
So basically, he's equating Trump to Hitler, as they all do.
Any conservative is a Nazi.
We know how that goes.
And he says, a violent response to Trump is logical, is as logical as any.
So this is the Huffington Post has good street cred amongst the media.
And so he is openly calling for violence against Donald Trump and his supporters.
And no one in the national press that I've seen, no one to this point has said, you know what, that's a bridge too far.
That's racist.
That's not right.
No, no, he's totally accepted.
Now, somebody email me.
Call in if I'm wrong.
Has this guy been reprimanded?
I believe his name is Jesse Ben.
Has he been reprimanded for advocating violence, flat out advocating for it in the headline and in the body of his piece?
Has he been reprimanded for calling for open violence against white Trump supporters?
I don't think so.
And this is where we're at with the media.
Quit calling us names for wanting for ourselves and for our families what everybody else is not only entitled to have, but encouraged to have.
We don't play that game anymore.
And I'm telling you, it's going to be a bad road if you keep going down it because you're making a lot of people mad.
And when our people get mad, we get results.
And I don't know why it's taken.
A righteous anger is nothing to fear.
A righteous anger is something everyone should have.
And our people need to become angry and to go out and get engaged in the political process to get out and advocate for their people in the court of public opinion and quit being shamed by these radioactive shut-up words.