Nov. 19, 2011 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
41:35
20111119_Hour_1
|
Time
Text
Welcome to the Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populous conservative radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host for tonight, James Edwards.
All right, everybody, welcome to the Political Cesspool Radio Program.
Saturday evening, November 19th.
The last show we'll be having before Thanksgiving, if you can believe it.
Where does time go?
We're older, but better looking than we were last week.
But it's great to be here.
The Political Cesspool Radio Program coming to you live this evening from AM 1380 WLRM Radio in downtown Memphis, Tennessee, going out to you, courtesy of the AM FM affiliate stations of the Liberty News Radio Network.
And of course, we're streaming online at thepoliticalcesspool.org.
Now, you've heard, ladies and gentlemen, about men being able to walk and chew bubblegum at the same time.
I feel a little bit unprepared for tonight's show.
Normally, I like to get here about an hour early.
Now, Keith gets in here about two or three minutes early, and he was right on time tonight, as far as that goes.
Normally, I like to get into the studio about an hour early, really get into the element, prepare mentally, go over the game plan, get the karma right, light a couple of candles.
We always have candles burning for the show.
Well, I just noticed as we went on, there's no candles burning, Keith.
So what I'm going to do, what I'm going to attempt to do along the same lines of walking and chewing gum is I'm going to try to talk and light a candle at once.
So if you could, my friend, pass me that flamethrower right there.
And we're going to do this.
Or I could let Keith do the owner.
This is a candle I brought from home.
It's aromatherapy, cinnamon, and frankincense.
And that's what we're going to be.
keith we'll let keith do it again folks it's uh keith doesn't know how to use one of those big lighters This is kind of like, there he goes.
It's radio, not television, so I'm going to have to draw you a verbal pic.
But he's done it.
It's already done.
The candle is lit.
So now the show can begin.
Now I feel as though we're complete.
Has been a busy day, though.
I was putting up Christmas lights all day.
I thought, okay, I'll knock it out in an hour.
I couldn't remember how long it took me last year.
We had some new lights that we used and a new system of putting them up.
I thought, you know, maybe an hour.
I was out there from about two until about five o'clock, which is only an hour before the show started.
So I had to come down here, you know, still a little dirty.
We're just going to do what we can, though, Keith, because I tell you, every show we do, we welcome new listeners.
And these new listeners are being nourished by the kind of intellectual sustenance that we're able to feed them.
I was telling you just a moment ago about a very enriching email that I got just today, as a matter of fact.
It was a gentleman, and I can't find it now.
It was there before.
I guess I must have accidentally deleted it, but not before I read it.
If he wonders why I'm not replying to him, know that I accidentally deleted it.
But you'll know who you are when I share with the audience this email.
He said that he listened to our show for the first time last week after seven, eight years on the radio.
Last week, we welcomed a new listener for the first time.
He said, and I'm basically just paraphrasing here, that his jaw dropped to the floor, that he was so impressed with, Keith, the things that you had to say in last week's program, saying that he never thought he'd be able to turn on a mainstream establishment AM radio program and hear people talking about Nathan Bedford Forrest, Davey Crockett, and Aaron Burr as heroes.
He said he thought he was the only one, and we get this all the time.
I thought I was the only one who believed that way.
I thought I had no voice.
Well, you found a voice here, my friend.
You found a home on the radio for your beliefs in the Political Cesspool radio program.
Welcome to the audience.
Keith, last week, another new listener, I'm sure one of many, but this one took the time to write in, and we're thankful to have him, are we not?
Another listener, another convert.
You know, I just finished reading Pat Buchanan's new book, Suicide of a Superpower, and I am proud to say that I believe that we here at the Cesspool are even more paleo-conservative than Pat Buchanan now, if that's possible.
And he's one of our favorite guests.
I think he is, you know, secretly James' favorite guest of all time.
He has certainly been our mentor, our guider, our guru in every way.
But, you know, unlike Pat, I don't believe that there is anything bad about people like Orville Faulbus or George Wallace.
I think they were right on target.
I think that the civil rights movement, I think there is no part of the liberal, radical, egalitarian agenda that is good.
Every last bit of it was intended to destroy traditional America and traditional American culture.
And once you let any part of it succeed, it is like the old Arab fable about not letting the camel's nose in the tent.
If you let so much as the camel's nose in the tent, the next thing you know, the camel has moved into the tent and you've been moved out.
That's exactly what's happened with modern liberalism and the camel's nose in the tent was the civil rights movement and the Brown versus Board of Education decision.
The Brown versus Board of Education decision was basically where the left discovered how to govern America without winning elections or persuading legislatures.
They still use it every time that they run into tough sledding, James.
Keith's all business tonight.
You know, typically, when I start a three-hour program, I like to ease into it all.
I like to have a little small talk, a little friendly banner in the first segment as we begin the transition.
Keith just came in tonight, firing.
He just came in spraying tonight, ladies and gentlemen.
He had that shotgun, and he's going to town.
I'm glad Keith's here.
When he came in, he must have had, as far as Gump says, about 15 Dr. Peppers on the way in because he went into the bathroom, and I thought he'd found that whole analysis in Wonderland.
I thought Keith had gone to another dimension.
I don't know what he was doing in that bathroom, but although I see he's still got a doctor, he's got some sort of a soft drink here.
Diet Coke.
Now, I forgot you're a Diet Coke man.
But anyway, see, I like to kind of start slow.
Keith just comes in, both barrels blazing.
But we are going to talk a little bit more about Buchanan's book because I know Keith gets the cookie for the Cesspool staff, at least.
He's the first one to finish it.
Yes, Keith.
And I'll tell you, the only reason he beat me in finishing it was because he took my copy.
So I was really handicapped in the whole ordeal.
But Keith did finish all 1,600 pages of that book.
420-something, he says.
And we're going to talk a little bit more about this at the end of the first hour.
But Keith, very quickly before the break, we're going to come back with something really heavy.
And it's something that's really spawned a fiery discussion at thepolitical cesspool.org.
We're going to tell you about it.
But first, the new listener who tuned in last week for the first time loves the show.
You know, one of the things we were talking about last week were heroes, heroes that have been made popular or repopularized through song like Jim Bowie, Debbie Crockett, and others.
And I know you wanted to mention another one very quickly.
Yeah, we're definitely going to have to put Jim Bowie and Wyatt Earth, the theme songs from their TV shows up because white children in today's America are not offered any heroic role models of their own race and their own gender for the most part.
You know, if he had Jim Bowie today, I remember the old TV series had a theme song that went Jim Bowie.
Jim Bowie, he was a bold, adventuring man.
And today it would be Jim Bowie.
Jim Bowie, he is a racist, misogynist pig.
You know, that's what they think about everything.
So, see, we need to resurrect all these old heroes who are real heroes.
They're not mental cases like Sojourner Truth and Harriet Tubman and William Lloyd Garrison and a psychopath like John Brown.
These are really heroic people that helped build the country up.
Now, wasn't it a replay of last week's show, ladies and gentlemen?
He actually did sing that Jim Bowie course twice back-to-back, back-to-back weeks.
We did not play the tape.
Hey, we got to take a break, everybody.
The political cesspool, where we defend our contemporary interests while remembering our heroes.
Another thing that makes us so special.
Stay tuned.
Jump in the political says pool with James and the gang.
Call us tonight at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
As Keith Alexander can attest, every now and then, not too often, but every now and then, my wife will be here at the studio.
She pops in, pops out, may go a month without making an appearance.
Sometimes she'll come towards the end of a show.
Sometimes she'll come.
She actually was here as we kicked off things tonight in the studio.
She just came in to the broadcast booth to tell me, you know, to tell us, I guess, that she was leaving and that she was going to Walmart on the way home.
And as Keith is my witness, he saw me start breaking out in a sweat.
Starts breaking out in a sweat when she's going shopping and I'm not there to supervise it.
It reminds me of a story I heard about the tennis original bad boy, Illy Nostasi.
James, you never heard this either.
I got to tell you this.
Somebody told me this, and it's just great.
Perfect.
All married men can understand this.
He was being interviewed once and he was telling people that he had had his wallet stolen a month earlier.
And they said, well, I'm sure, you know, what happened?
Have you turned it into the company?
Have you gotten them canceled?
He said, no.
And I said, why not?
He said, because the thief is spending less money with it than my wife was.
Well, that's the thing about shopping, too.
I mean, I know I'm going to lose more money by not going there to chaperone, but at the same time, I'd rather take a beating than go shopping.
I hate them all.
I'm a man, you know, what am I going to do?
But that actually is, well, that actually is a truthful story.
I mean, she was here.
She's going to Walmart.
God help me.
But it actually did provide a great segue, too, into the next story.
Keith, a very, I'll use Bill Rowland's adjective, a very lively conversation taking place at thepolitical cesspool.org tonight.
The audience really talking about an article that I posted entitled, it was actually just a reprint.
I didn't really add much commentary to this one.
A reprint from a Marie Claire, the magazine, article entitled The New Trophy Wives, Asian Women.
And I thought it might provoke an interesting conversation.
That's why I posted it, and I encourage people to tear it to shreds or perhaps agree with parts of it in the comment sections below.
And then, well, the rest you can see for yourself at thepoliticalspool.org.
But basically, Keith, The article documents the fact that a few power brokers, and they rattled off a couple of big shots, Nicholas Cage, Rupert Murdoch, a few power brokers in Hollywood and in entertainment seem to be gravitating towards young Asian women as their wives after a string of failed marriages to white women.
So I'm going to maintain plausible deniability for the most part and let you handle the commentary on this subject.
Now I'll weigh in too.
But basically, Keith, the question being asked of the audience is, what is it that some men find attractive about Asian women?
And I'm not talking about physical beauty.
Obviously, you know, there are attractive women, but this isn't what that's about, I don't think, because there's attractive white women too.
What is it about Asian, the personalities of Asian women, at least stereotypically, that are attracting these men?
What are some of the downfalls of marrying Asian women and kind of violating God's natural order there?
Well, thanks a lot for passing the hot potato to me, James.
Where's Roger Devlin when you need him?
That's exactly who needs to be answering these questions.
And let me tell people that I. Right.
Well, I didn't have anything to do with the posting of that.
And James is kind of like Peck's bad boy.
He'll throw a skunk into the party every once in a while just to see how everybody reacts.
And that, I think, is more or less his motivation for doing this.
This is the type of much-ado-about-nothing tempest in a teapot that you can expect from the mainstream media, particularly this kind of the flapdoodle section, you know, like People Magazine and groups like that will always run something like this, trying to provoke people.
Well, that's what they're doing with this.
Now, let's get down to the subject, though.
I have no idea why certain so-called self-anointed, self-appointed big shots who are white in Hollywood, in big business and government, have taken young Asian brides.
Of course, this is part of the proper name, miscegenation sweepstakes that Hollywood and our dominant culture meisters have been trying to throw on us forever.
I remember when I was a kid watching You Only Live Twice, in which James Bond hooks up with an Asian girl, as opposed to his earlier movies like Dr. No with Ursula Andrus, and then he had this Italian beauty queen, Northern Italian beauty queen in From Russia with Love.
And then in the last Sean Connery thing, and this is maybe what set him over the edge, they had him linked up, at least for a very brief vignette, with a black woman.
Well, Pierce Brosnan did that, and I believe maybe it was the world is not enough.
Hallie Berry was his bond girl in that one, but let's not digress.
But see, this is the intention.
This is the goal of our ruling elite.
And Hollywood is run by the usual suspects, as we've said, and they dislike white people.
And they would basically, even though they lie and tell you that they celebrate diversity and they love diversity, they really don't like diversity at all, particularly in terms of race.
What they want is for everybody to meld together into a kind of beige people.
They want everybody to look like Vin Diesel, I guess, when it's all over with, or maybe a little bit darker, maybe like Denzel Washington or something like that.
They do not want diversity.
So they're always promoting interracial couplings of one sort or another.
And that's what this apparent article was about.
Where did this article come from, by the way, James?
It came from Marie Claire magazine.
But let's get down to the nuts and bolts of it.
The argument's out there that white women have been more corrupted by the tenets of radical feminism, radical egalitarian feminism, than some of these other women, particularly the Asian women.
White men, I know, like submissive, not to the extent where they don't speak their mind and they're just a doormat, but you know, we like submissive women.
I mean, I think all men do.
I mean, that's the way God ordained the sexes to be.
But now with the advent of radical feminism and the onset of that, you've got a lot of white women who now don't want to play that role.
Whereas on the flip side, you've got a lot of feminine men now.
But so is this something, Keith, that you think would be driving folks white men towards Asian women?
The fact that at least typically speaking, they seem to be more demure.
Yeah, that's part of it, I'm sure, that they like a submissive and a demure woman.
Is that really the way they are, though?
I don't know.
No, well, maybe more so than a feminist white woman or a black woman for certain.
You know, the biggest heritans of all, as I've seen, are black women.
You know, I used to wonder why black men were always trying to link up with white women.
I said they must not have any pride in their own race.
But after dealing with some in the working world, I've come to the conclusion that if I were a black man, I'd be looking for an alternative too to most of them.
But, you know, on the other hand, what, you know, feminism has been part of a master plan of the left to cut down white birth rates.
You can't, and things like Title IX, for example, where they're trying to hone the competitive instincts of women so that they can compete more successfully against men.
And men are at the bottom of it, white men are at the bottom of the totem pole in the affirmative action sweepstakes.
You know, we'll get back into this in more depth.
Time for a break, according to James, right?
It is time for a break.
We're going to revisit this after a break.
We're going to make some concluding points on it.
We're going to draw this to a conclusion and give you the real take on where we stand.
A little devil's advocacy going on here.
Stay tuned.
to it when we return political cesspool guys we'll be back right after these messages
To get on the show and express your opinion in the political cesspool, call us toll-free at 1-866-986-6397.
Oh, this is good.
All right, everybody.
Welcome back to the Political Cesspool.
Talking about a hot button topic that I reposted at our website, thepolitical cesspool.org.
It's a Marie Claire column talking about Asian women being the new trophy wives, talking about how a handful of these Hollywood tycoons have gone after younger Asian brides.
If the stereotype plays true and Asian women are more submissive to men as you think they are, more demure, can you see why some of these men would be going, I don't know.
You know, I don't think so.
I don't really give credit to that.
As I said, I believe in God's natural order, and I just don't think there's any way to justify this as far as I'm concerned.
Now, these are just my personal viewpoints.
Now, in a hypothetical situation, if there were two women left on the earth, and you say, well, look at Nicholas Cage's wife.
I mean, she's very attractive, and she is.
And you say, well, James, what would you do?
You have this beautiful Asian young bride who would play the role that a woman should play versus Heidi Byrick.
No, I mean, you know, or some radical feminist that's just, you know, rotted to the core in liberalism, a white woman, who do you choose?
All right.
In that case, I would choose the Asian woman.
But here's the point, though.
It's not that dire.
There are still very good white women out there, very beautiful white women, very modest white women, southern bells.
It's not as though everyone is infected with radical feminism.
Although, as I said before, I do think it has afflicted more white women than perhaps Asian women, radical feminism has, Keith.
But at the end of the day, my final verdict is some of them may be cute, but there's also very cute white women.
And if you are in it for the, you know, trying to find a traditional woman to marry, you know, you can still find them in our community, that's for sure.
I mean, I did it.
Yeah.
Look, I agree with everything you've said, but I will say this, that white women tend to be more ideological than women of other races.
Black women are like black men.
They're just partisans for their own race, first, last, and always.
Asian women don't seem to be that involved in politics, although, you know, there are certainly exceptions to that observation.
But I've always said that I think it was not an accident that the left picked women's suffrage as the first item on their agenda for change back in the mid-19th century.
They did it because they knew that women tend to be, and particularly white women, tend to be soft-hearted, and soft-heartedness can lead to soft-headedness in the voting booth.
You know, think about all the couples that you know, and tell me if you had the same experience I've had.
In almost every case, the woman is more liberal than the man.
That just seems to go with the territory.
And because of that, and you know, the women are now the beneficiaries of affirmative action.
I know a lot of women who, like my friend Bill Fox said, they want their husband to be Ward Cleaver, but they have no intention of being June.
They like being able to get positions and jobs of power and, you know, wealth for themselves.
But on the other hand, they always expect their husband to out-earn and out-prestige them.
And when their husband doesn't do that, which a lot of white husbands aren't going to be able to do in this new affirmative action regime in which they're at the bottom of the totem pole, you know, there's a part of the code of federal regulations that gives 44 categories, race, and gender, for preference to government contracts and government jobs.
Number one is black female.
Number 44, the person with no preference over anybody is white, non-Hispanic male.
Now, with those type of odds against them, you're finding a lot of couples now in which the woman has a more powerful and a better paying job than a man.
And women, despite what they say, don't like that.
You know, they like the option of being able to go out, for example, and be a lady lawyer for five or six years.
And then when it begins to pall, when it begins to be not quite as exciting as it used to be, and they also see if they're not going to reach the top of the totem pole in some law firm or something, they can switch to plan B, retire, marry a doctor, sit at home and eat bonbons and watch Oprah with their sisters.
I've said this many times before.
Men and women in today's world have three options.
A woman can have a full-time, serious money-making occupation, and that's perfectly endorsed by our society.
A woman can also be a homemaker and housewife and mother who does not work or earn a penny, and that's also endorsed.
Or she can get a part-time job, so she's got an excuse to be half-assed at both.
She's got some little job down at the boutique paying $7 to $10 an hour, and she says that my job is the excuse I have for not being a really top-notch homemaker.
And on the other hand, my homemaking duties are the reason I'm not earning more money.
Now, those are the three choices that women have.
Men have three choices, too.
They can work full-time, they can work full-time, or they can work full-time.
Any man that tells you he's a house husband, I predict will be divorced within two years because women, quite frankly, they want the best of both worlds.
They want that Hugh Beaumont, that Ward Cleaver guy that comes in, that gets promotions, that gets raises, just like they did in 1950.
But the landscape has changed terribly because of liberalism over the succeeding 60 years since 1950.
And as a result, men are at the bottom of the totem pole.
You look at, for example, large law firms and who they're hiring.
They're hiring women and they're hiring minority men, black men, for example, and black women.
White men are not getting hired by these groups anymore.
And there's a reason for that, too.
And there's a secret reason that the law firms, for example, don't want to acknowledge.
Abe Fortas, who was from Memphis, went to Yale Law School and was a head partner in a big, powerful lobbying law firm in Washington, D.C. called Porter and Fortas, was asked one time to describe the perfect associate.
That's a young lawyer who's not a partner, somebody that's hired on.
He said, well, the Perk associate is an editor at a top Ivy League law school.
He comes to work, gladly works 16-hour days, comes up with all the right answers, always gets his assignments done, always has winning arguments, and then, like the Cheshire Cat, magically disappears after four years, leaving only his smile behind him.
In other words, he doesn't hang around to become a partner and carve up the pie so that the then existing partners get smaller slices.
That's what they want.
And see, with women in positions like being associates in law firms, that happens naturally.
A lot of women try an occupation like being a lawyer.
And then after four, five, six, seven years, they bail out and have children.
That takes care of the ugly confrontational process of firing some guy that is loyal, that's been working there, who's going to be hanging around, who's going to have to be working until retirement age, and is expecting to make partner.
You know, there are a lot of places where they're looking for excuses to get rid of people, and a lot of women take themselves out of the game because of that.
And these cynical power mavens like that because see, they can only get credit for being liberal and being with it and being non-misogynistic by making these hires, but it also fits in very nicely with their acquisitive instincts and their greed as well, James.
I'm hearing you, Keith.
So, a final verdict with regards to the whole Marie Claire article.
Are they the new trophy wives?
Well, for some people, they are, but on the other hand, what I would suggest is that Asian women are needed by Asian men.
If you'll recall, in China, they have a one-child policy because they have sonograms over there and abortion.
A lot of women embryos or female embryos are getting aborted, and there's an overload of men compared to women in places like that.
So, they need their women.
We don't need to be raiding the hen house and taking their chicks away from them.
So, I guess the bottom line is, folks, we disagree with the Marie Claire article, but you can chime in and have your say.
Again, a very heated discussion going on at thepolitical Cesspool.org.
The new trophy wives, Asian women, according to this magazine, have your say online at our official internet headquarters.
We'll be back right after the commercial break with more on the political cesspool radio program.
Or maybe we're not even in commercial break yet.
I'm not sure.
There's a first time for everything.
A first time for everything.
Normally, we go to commercial break too late and we run into the wall and talk all over our music.
This time we did it about a minute too early.
Hey, it's live radio, folks.
It's a live radio, but the commercial break's here now.
Egg on face, egg on face.
We'll be back.
Don't go away.
The political cesspool guys will be back right after these messages.
We gotta get out of this place.
If it's the last thing we ever do, we gotta get out of this place.
Welcome back to get on the political cesspool.
Call us on James's Dime, toll-free, at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
All right, everybody.
Welcome back to the Political Cesspool Radio Program.
Still two hours of the show ahead of us after Keith Alexander leaves us at the end of this segment.
And hopefully, over the course of the remaining two hours of tonight's broadcast, we'll have a few surprises for you.
Just like I surprised myself by going to commercial break about 45 seconds too early.
But you know, it all goes to show what we always say: we're live, unrehearsed, and uncensored.
And I stress the unrehearsed part.
Never before, though.
And we just had our birthday back October 26th, the birthday of this show.
We're in our eighth year of broadcasting now.
Never have I gone to a commercial too soon.
Now, almost always will I run over the music as we head into a commercial and try to squeeze every last second of air time I can, but never have we gone too soon, Keith.
History was made the night in the Cessbool, another historic broadcast.
Just maybe not for the reason we want it.
You know, if you were here, I don't know if you ever noticed, but as we get to break, I sometimes start to stumble and stutter a bit.
It's because I'm distracted by James.
He's up here choking himself like a chicken.
He's going through all sorts of histrionics and whatnot, trying to get me to shut the thing down, which he was doing.
And this, quite frankly, this tickled the daylights out of me because, you know, he, I mean, you've never seen anybody carry on like James does as you start approaching a break.
It's like, you know, the world's going to spin out of its orbit if we talk over the music for a bit.
But let's get to something now.
We've got one segment left, and I have had the pleasure of reading from cover to cover Pat Buchanan's new book, Suicide of a Superpower.
The last chapter, number 11, is called The Last Chance.
It's kind of a summation of the rest of the book.
And I'm going to read you a bit of this, and at some point, we will probably switch off and start discussing it.
But here is part of it right here: Can we restore America?
Or has the America we grew up in already been transformed into another country?
It is the contention of this book that America has been changed in our lifetimes, that a revolution has taken place, that though we appear to the world to be the same country, we are a different nation on a course far off from the one our fathers set.
Adams, Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton disbelieved in one man, one vote democracy.
We worship it.
They believed in a creator.
That's with a capital C, in other words, God.
We have exiled him from our schools and replaced him with evolution.
They believed all men had a God-given and inalienable right to life.
With Roe versus Wade, we canceled that right for the unborn, 50 million of whom have since perished.
For 250 years after the settlers came to Jamestown, our fathers sought to build a Protestant and British country.
From the Irish immigration of the 1840s to the first Irish Catholic president in 1960, the United States sought to maintain its character and identity as a Christian and European nation.
To assert that today as an ideal would constitute a hate crime.
Then he has another segment here: the great experiment.
Our intellectual, cultural, and political elites are today engaged in one of the most audacious and ambitious experiments in history.
They are trying to transform a Western Christian republic into an egalitarian democracy made up of all the tribes, races, creeds, and cultures of planet Earth.
They have dethroned our God, purged our cradle faith from our public life, and repudiated the Judeo-Christian moral code by which previous generations sought to live.
They have declared men and women to be basically the same, that all voluntary sexual relations are morally equal, that the traditional family is but one social option, that men may marry men and women may marry women, that race is a social construct invented by bigots bent upon repressing others, that all are endowed with the intelligence and ability to succeed in the most competitive society on earth.
All religions and all lifestyles are equal, and all are to be equally respected.
These elites will fight to ensure that a mosque is built at ground zero with the same ferocity as they will fight to ensure that no nativity scene ever appears on the national mall.
If there is an inequality of rewards in society, they believe, this is the residue of reactionary America, the fruit of societal injustice, and it is the moral duty of our modern state to rectify that injustice and mandate equality.
Those who reject these truths are benighted or bigoted.
Our secular elites believe in this revolution.
The people never did.
Middle America detests it.
Thus it has had to be imposed from above by judges, bureaucrats, professors, and those who control the content of our culture.
That's why I say the Brown versus Board of Education decision on May the 17th, 1954 was such a watershed moment.
This is how the 3% figured out how to govern the 97% of us that don't go along with liberalism.
This is how they learned to govern America without winning elections or persuading legislators.
They basically pretended to find in the Constitution that our traditional way of doing things violated the Constitution, and it's all a bunch of hogwash.
And so consequently, anybody that revers Brown versus Board of Education is revering the dishonesty of liberalism, dishonestly transforming America against the will of the American people.
One part of America believes we are headed for a wonderful new age, a very small group called liberals.
The silent majority thinks the country has lost its mind.
For as Professor Williams, author of Trousered Apes, wrote, at the beginning of the great experiment, various practical attempts in the Soviet Union and China, for example, have been made to establish equality as a basis for society.
All such efforts either have failed or must fail because no stable society can be built upon a theory which runs counter to reality.
The harsh but unavoidable fact is that men are unequal in terms of hereditary abilities.
Some are born with a greater degree of intelligence, a greater capacity for sympathy, a greater ability to succeed than others.
The persistence of this myth of equality, wrote Williams, and the frustrations which its advocates experience constitute a grave psychological and political problem.
This is what they call an understatement.
The experiment is failing and will continue to fail, for it is based on a theory that runs counter to reality, an ideology whose tenets are at war with the laws of nature.
Like the Marxists who were going to create a new man in a new society, our establishment, our liberal establishment, by the way, is attempting the impossible.
To create a concept is to leave reality behind, wrote the Spanish philosopher Ortega Gasset.
Our elites have created a concept of an ideal nation, the most egalitarian, diverse, democratic, and liberated that ever existed.
And they have mobilized the vast power of government and law to force America to conform to that concept.
They will fail, and this great and good country will die of their experiment.
Some men see things as they are and say, why?
I dream of things that never were and say, why not, said the lousy Robert Kennedy, that's my, I added lousy, in a campaign for president that cost him his life.
There is a reason why things are as they are and why some dreams never come true.
Inalterable human nature and the unconquerable and eternal enemy of all utopians.
We have it in our power to begin the world over again, wrote the idealist of 1776, Thomas Paine.
He was the one atheist founding father we had, who would barely escape the guillotine in the revolution of 1789 in France that arose on the promise to begin the world over again.
In 1991, author Claes Rine called this messianic compulsion to reshape America and the world the new Jacobinism.
As it recalled, the intellectuals who worshipped Rousseau made the French Revolution and sought to force France and Europe at a legendary cost in blood to conform to their ideals.
As Rousseau famously said, sometimes people need to be forced to be free.
And forced they were and exterminated because people do not naturally embrace the foolishness that we call liberalism today.
Okay, folks, that should give you some thought.
James is going through his histrionics again.
He's jumping up and down, breaking his arms, up here choking himself like a chicken.
So we must be coming up on a break.
There you go, James.
It's coming soon.
It's coming soon.
Not quite yet.
I just wanted to say that always easy to do an hour of radio when Keith Alexander's in the studio with me.
It's kind of like an unbridled horse.
You just take the bit out of his mouth and turn him loose.
And actually, Keith, I got an email in from a loyal listener of the Cesspool down in Florida who said, the best of Keith Alexander's CD.
That was the title of the email.
And then the body of it read, idea for TPC, you can make money selling the CD, the best of Keith Alexander.
And, you know, that's what we need to do.
I haven't found a way to properly exploit you yet, Keith.
You already worked for free.
You come down here as a volunteer every week, donate an hour of your time to the cause and to the program.
But now I found a way not only to make you work for free, but I found a way where you can make money for me.
Right.
And that's the kind of relationship I'm looking for.
I'm just kidding.
No, but it is a good idea.
And see, I mean, the Keith Alexander fans, there's no, they're like the stars in the skies.
There's stars in the sky.
You just can't count them.
All right, folks, that's going to wrap it up for Keith Alexander tonight.
He'll be back with us next week.
Stuffed full of turkey, I'm sure, as we all will be next Saturday.
But a short work week coming up.
So we're all happy about that.
But the night is still young for the rest of us.
And for me, I've still got two more hours of the program to bring to you.
The Bewitching Hour Not Yet Upon us.
Stay tuned.
Hours two and three of the Cesspool coming up right after this.
Right after these messages.
Some thought he had religion.
Others thought he had a demon.
And Harv thought he had a weed eater loose in his fruit of the blues.
He fell to his knees to plead and beg, and the squirrel ran out of his britch's leg unobserved to the other side of the room.