Jan. 8, 2011 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
41:35
20110108_Hour_1
|
Time
Text
Welcome to the Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populous conservative radio program.
Here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host for tonight, James Edwards.
Welcome, everyone, to the Political Cesspool Radio Program, our award-winning broadcast coming to you tonight from Memphis, Tennessee, AM 1380, WLRM Studios.
It is Saturday night, January the 8th, 2011.
And of course, we are broadcasting across the country to the AMF and affiliate stations of the Liberty News Radio Network and simulcasting online to a worldwide audience at thepoliticalcesspool.org and libertynewsradio.com.
We have a little bit different lineup for you this evening.
Keith Alexander, my co-host who sits in with me for the first hour of each show, is taking the week off.
We had a staff meeting earlier this week and he asked for a little furlough and far be it from me to deny a good soldier some much needed rest.
Keith will be back with us next week filling in for him this first hour.
We have no slouches.
Bill Rowland, of course, co-hosting with me since this show's very inception, is pulling Keith's slack for him this evening.
And we also have the first of two featured guests this evening coming in right at the top of the show.
Good friend of mine, author, attorney, and speaker Sam Dixon.
Sam actually has his hands in so many pies that it's hard to really describe him.
He does so much.
Sam, I'm going to make political cesspool history right here, do something I haven't done with any of our guests, and ask you, how would you describe yourself?
A moderate.
Well, we have Sam Dixon, the moderate, and Bill Rowland, the co-host, tonight at the top of the program to discuss a breaking and developing news story.
Sam Dixon has a great angle on this, but before we get to Sam's commentary, I want Bill to put the pieces into place.
Bill, a lot of stuff floating around on the internet, lots of things coming together.
We've heard conflicting news reports.
What is the story and what have you gathered so far?
James, the breaking news right now is the story of Representative Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona was shot in the head earlier today.
From the latest news that I've gotten, five people are dead, including Judge John Roll, a Bush One appointee, and a number of other people.
Clearly a chaotic situation in Arizona, in Tucson, Arizona.
Apparently, Representative Giffords was holding some sort of public event, a public forum at a grocery store, and a man approached and apparently opened fire with a semi-automatic handgun.
Representative Giffords was hit in the head.
Judge John Roll was killed.
And as yet, there is no clear motive for the killing.
The 22-year-old suspect has been taken into custody.
He apparently was tackled by a member of the audience there to listen to Representative Gifford.
And so he has been taken into custody.
The question for me, James, is what is the significance of the shooting?
What does this mean?
Why would a loan gunman approach a member of the Congress of the United States and put a bullet through her head and then kill a number of other people?
I do have some background information on Representative Gifford and on Judge John Roll.
Some interesting coincidences or some interesting overlap there.
Representative Giffords, first of all, was a Democrat.
She was opposed in the 2010 election, midterm elections, by a Tea Party candidate.
She did prevail in the election, but by a very small margin.
And she apparently won because in her campaign, she did campaign for border control for increased surveillance of the border, including a National Guard surveillance.
However, Representative Giffords is also a supporter of the B1A visa program.
In fact, she wanted to increase the visa program to 180,000 participants a year, over 65,000, which had been the cap previously, to allow, in other words, more foreign workers into this country to take American jobs.
Now, I cannot say that this was the motive or the reason that the shooter attacked Representative Giffords.
However, this is just one fact that's come out about this particular representative.
Judge John Roll had been involved in a lawsuit.
He was a judge in, I think, the 9th District Court who ruled that a lawsuit could go forward involving illegal immigrants who were suing an Arizona rancher in a $32 million lawsuit against this rancher, I guess, for trying to prevent these illegal aliens from entering the country.
This rancher was being sued, and this judge allowed this lawsuit to go forward.
So there is some connection with illegal immigration or the loss of jobs in this country to foreign workers and these two victims of the shooting, James.
Well, Bill, you know, like I said, I appreciate you putting together the who, what, where, when, and why facts for this as we try to prepare for ourselves a foundation for further commentary.
Got to get to Sam Dixon in just a moment.
As I said, there was a lot of conflicting tidbits coming out.
Has the woman died?
I've seen stories on MSNBC that contrast with stories on Fox News and CNN about the state of her being.
The latest information I have, James, is that she is alive and that, in fact, she had responded to surgeons who were testing or questioning her to, I guess, ascertain her mental capacity.
So apparently she is alive.
Judge John Roll is the federal judge is certainly dead.
The latest number I have is five other victims of this shooting.
Now, certainly while this is a terrible crime, we must ask ourselves, what was the man thinking who fired the shots?
Do we have any indication of motive, Bill?
No clear indication.
James, as we spoke earlier, you and I discussed the shooter and his possible or his perceived motives.
And as you said, he apparently had read MeimComp and Daskopital by Karl Marx.
So there is no clear indication of his ideological viewpoint.
But almost certainly, and from what I've gained from the research I've done subsequent to this shooting, is that clearly the media is spinning this as I don't want to be the first to use this term, but it's a key party assassination.
Apparently, Representative Gifford had come under extreme criticism for some of her stances on particularly the H-1A VizA program.
And according to some reports, she'd had her office vandalized and so forth.
Just a quick buy on her.
She is the first Jewish woman to hold office at the federal level in Arizona.
So, you know, she does have some very liberal views.
Hey, Bill, Bill, hold it right there, my friend.
We've got to take a break.
And when we come back, I want to go straight to Sam Dixon for some commentary on this, approaching it from a different angle.
Sam has an excellent take on this.
It's really going to be a highlight of this hour's commentary.
Stay tuned, everybody.
We're putting this together on the fly.
be right back.
Welcome back to get on the political cesspool.
Call us on James's Dime, toll-free, at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
All right, everybody.
Welcome back to an unorthodox edition of the Political Cesspool Radio Program.
I want to just get this out here straight away.
Don't forget our guest tonight are Don Wassel, going to be talking about sports.
But first of all, in this first hour, Sam Dixon, our featured guest, who is with us now.
If you've not yet joined us in our Political Cesspool Virtual Fan Party and online chat, we encourage you to do so if you're listening online.
And of course, not while you're driving around listening to us in the car on one of the AM FM affiliate stations.
But if you're listening to us online, go to cfcc.org and join us in the online chat.
A lot of people there with some very interesting takes on this story, which we're covering right now.
It's a developing news story, a breaking news story.
Bill Rowland did an excellent job of fact gathering and disseminating those facts there for you during that first segment.
What I've been able to glean, Bill mentioned it in passing, it seems as though this congresswoman who was shot, as he mentioned, was the first Jewish woman elected to Congress in Arizona, where the conflicting bits are coming in.
It said she was a pro-border control Democrat.
It also said she was pro-gun, although she received D-ratings from the NRA and other gun lobbies.
Of course, to be in Arizona, you'd almost have to be pro-gun, and you'd almost have to be for controlling the borders because it is such a popular issue there.
But nevertheless, family members of Congresswoman Gifford says that the whole Tea Party was her enemy.
Sam, you can almost hear the media and the leftist attack organizations foaming at the mouths as they tried to spend this shooting in a way that will discredit the race realist movement.
Sam, you had an excellent take on this via email.
I'd like to ask you to share it with us now.
Well, before going there, let me say that.
Obviously, all of us are very sympathetic to Congressman Gifford and her family and to all of those who've been killed or injured in this incident.
Bill was talking about what positions these people had taken and that sort of thing.
There's no evidence yet at all as to what this gunman's motive was, and certainly a nine-year-old child was killed.
So in all likelihood, this person is probably simply someone who is mentally unstable.
What you can see on the internet about him, including a rather funny, peculiar video he put out and his list of favorite books, the guy was simply a crackpot.
His books include things as goofy as Ayn Rand's, one of Ayn Rand's novels, the Communist Manifesto, Mein Kamp, George Orwell's Animal Farm.
Not that Animal Farm or Ayn Rand's novels are goofy, but it's a salad.
It's every kind of ingredient imaginable in this 40 or 50 books that this guy said were his favorite books.
And in all likelihood, he's simply a disturbed person.
But this will not stop the media from, in all such cases, they have an almost ritualistic response to try to demonize groups which are not support groups of the regime, groups which oppose the establishment and the government regime that represents the establishment.
Jovangoin goes back to a forgotten factoid, us old people, some of us old people may remember, that when President Kennedy was assassinated, before anything was known about who had shot Kennedy or why, the chief judge of the nation, the liberal saint and icon, Earl Warren, who the supposed champion of the rights of the accused,
publicly announced that the John Birch Society had killed President Kennedy, that the Birchers have killed Kennedy.
And of course, it turned out, no, the Birchers had not killed Kennedy.
The evidence appears to be that a communist had killed Kennedy.
But this is a shocking thing, what Warren did.
And of course, liberals have exerted themselves very carefully to edit this out of history and to keep it away from the public mind, that the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court would accuse, try, and convict people before the identity of the assassin was even known.
And that's an extreme example of what liberals do on this.
In the case of Eric Rudolph, when Eric Rudolph was indicted for the bombing of a homosexual nightclub and an abortion clinic, the Southern Poverty Law Center issued a very solemn intelligence report, which was respectfully reported in the Atlanta Journal Constitution in Atlanta, where I live, reporting that Rudolph was linked to white supremacist and Holocaust deniers.
And when you read it, the links that the intelligence report had uncovered were that he came from an area of North Carolina which was known for extensive Ku Klux Klan activities in the 1920s, about two and a half generations before Eric Rudolph was born, and that he was born in a town which was only 20 miles from where a known Holocaust denier had lived until his death when Eric Rudolph was 11 years old.
And of course, all these were indisputable facts that the SPLC had uncovered.
Who can dispute these facts?
And sarcastically, who could ask for more probative information than the fact that someone came from a region where three generations earlier there had been some kind of activity and lived till he was 11 years old, 20 miles from where somebody else lived.
At the time of this breathless report by the SPLC, I lived three miles from the King Center in Atlanta.
So I was about seven times more closely linked to Coretta King was linked to the alleged Holocaust denier.
But, you know, as silly as this is to thoughtful people, the establishment can dress all this stuff up and can actually influence people's thinking.
They can stampede people.
It's what I call intellectual terrorism because it's not designed to help bring about any kind of constructive civil debate, which all of us as moderates want.
And we really are moderates.
We are people that are within the mainstream of our racial and cultural and religious and national heritage.
Whereas people like the SPLC and most liberal groups are marginal.
They're extremists and they don't fit within that mainstream.
But it's a remarkable tactic.
It takes all kinds of forms.
Only when applied to us, though.
It is perfectly acceptable for a talk host show, talk show host, for instance, to challenge some representative of our way of thinking, like Jared Taylor, by saying, well, Mr. Taylor, your ideas led to Auschwitz.
Now, if anyone ever, if James Edwards, by some miracle, ever had Hillary Clinton on political cesspool and turned to Hillary Clinton and said, well, Ms. Clinton, you believe in equality.
And that kind of thinking led to Robespierre and Joe Stalin and Paul Pott and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.
I guess that takes care of your arguments.
Well, the whole world, the media would erupt and deserve ridicule of James Edwards.
But they can get away with this kind of silly stuff.
They can get away with it.
And the thinking here that is behind this method of intellectual terrorism is that the apparent reasoning is if we can find somebody who did bad things in the name of the idea that you believe is true, then we have refuted your idea.
The beauty of this approach is that you can refute every single idea that has ever existed.
You can find instances in which Roman Catholics tried in 1602 tried to blow up the parliament on November 5th in Britain.
And so I guess that takes care of Roman Catholics.
We don't have to worry about considering anything they have to say.
Hey, Sam, I hate to interrupt you when you're on a roll.
We've got to take a quick commercial break.
When we come back, I'm going to let you and Bill hammer the rest of this thing out.
Excellent commentary, the likes of which you will only find on this radio program, ladies and gentlemen.
Sam Dixon, our featured guest.
Stay tuned.
More of Sam to come in the next segment.
To get on the show and express your opinion in the political cesspool, call us toll-free at 1-866-986-6397.
All right, welcome back to our live show tonight.
It's Saturday evening, January the 8th.
We are really moving at a feverish pace tonight.
Everything that you're hearing on the program tonight, as always, is unrehearsed and unscripted and uncensored.
It goes without saying.
But the infusion of this topic, the shooting in Arizona, which obviously happened very, very recently, it was something that we had not planned to discuss tonight.
And we are doing our best to cover this developing story with the facts that are out there.
I want to thank Bill Rowland, who was not scheduled to be on the program tonight at all, for rising to the occasion and doing a little fact gathering and presenting those facts to us at the very top of this show.
Sam Dixon has now taken over with me for the remainder of this hour, and Sam was making some very astute and observant points about this breaking news there in the last segment before we ran into that commercial break.
Sam, before I pose my next series of questions to you, I'd like for you to continue on that train of thought you were on before the break.
Well, I think I think it's almost a conclusion, but the point is that this kind of reasoning of your ideas led to Auschwitz, this can be used to refute any kind of social movement, any kind of idea, religion, philosophy.
I mentioned it can be used to just say, well, we don't have to consider what the Catholic Church has to say.
It can be used to refute Buddhists, even Buddhists resorted to persecution in Japan against the Jesuits.
So I guess that could be, they crucify Jesuits and Christians.
I guess that would just mean that we don't have to worry about what Buddha had to say.
You know, you could equality, well, as I said, Robespierre and the reign of terror and Stalin with the Kulaks and Paul Pot with the killing fields in Cambodia.
We don't need to think about equality.
It's just the silliest kind of reasoning imaginable.
But if you control the media, as the enemies of the American people do and the enemies I race do, you can get away with it because nobody can call your hand on it except in small, semi-underground things like the political cesspool.
We are sort of like the Russian dissidents were under the dying communist regime, where they had what they call the Samiz Dot press, and people would surreptitiously copy things on copy machines and leave them in public places and hand them to each other and that kind of thing.
We really like that the soy dissident Samiz Dot movement were competing with Pravda when we try to compete with the New York Times and these other establishment media outlets.
Well, as long as I have a poker in hand that will allow me to continue to stoke the burning embers, Sam, I guess I can go with that.
But this story, as I said, it's horrible.
And I want to get back to something you said at the very opening of your commentary in the previous segment.
Obviously, it goes without saying that we disavow all violence.
It's not something that's typical of people within our movement.
It's something that we certainly don't embrace and have never encouraged.
There's so little violence in America.
This guy, undoubtedly, somebody with a disordered mind.
You meet so many people in just day-to-day life whose minds are impaired by mental illness, by trauma to the brain, by alcohol, by drugs.
It's just a wonder to me that there is so little violence.
And fortunately, that those who perpetrate this kind of crime usually choose methods in which they're unable to kill very many people.
It's a tragedy that five or six of them have died in Arizona.
But without talking about it in public, there are obviously ways that somebody who has a disordered, homicidal mind could find that would kill huge numbers of people.
But fortunately, with our race, somehow Providence seems to have hardwired the human mind where when someone becomes this kind of deviant in his thinking, it somehow scrambles his brain where he's not able to come up with really horrific doomsday scenarios which could be thought of if one thought them through logically.
Sam, you used an excellent adjective to describe his apparent ideology or so-called ideology.
You said it was a salad.
If you looked at some of the news that's coming out from, I don't know if it was his Facebook page or his YouTube page, but he just seemed to have a cornucopia there of conflicting ideas that he claimed as his own.
So it still harkens back to the question I asked Bill earlier, and there is no real answer yet forthcoming, as we said.
Rest assured that the media and the leftist attack organizations are working on that motive as we provide commentary this evening.
But there has been no real motive come forth yet as to the killer's beliefs.
And it would appear that the victim herself, or one of the victims, the main victim, I guess, the Congressman, or the most high-profile victim, the Congresswoman, apparently a Jewish Democrat who, according to the press, and you have to take this with a grain of salt, was pro-border control and pro-gun, although I'm also reading information here that she voted for the DREAM Act, Obamacare, etc.
Well, wait a minute, wait a minute, James.
I guess if she was pro-border and in favor of Second Amendment gun rights, then maybe the media will say that this is what comes from allowing groups like the Anti-Handgun Group and La Rossa to spread their poison publicly and to cause borderline minds to pervert this kind of crime.
Well, I'm not going to talk down.
I'm sure that they're a victim of their own propaganda right now.
She was pro-border and pro-gun as she ran for election in Arizona, but now that she could serve as a martyr, they're going to have to scrub that.
But Sam, what are the headlines going to read tomorrow?
Do you think it'll be another Eric Rudolph?
You provided some excellent background information on how they portrayed that story.
Do we have another Eric Rudolph in the press here?
I don't know.
I suspect that will be the case.
You know, that will be the case.
And the fact that Mein Kampf is included in his list of favorite books will be highlighted.
The Communist Manifesto will be played down.
Maybe Mark Potok of the SPLC will go on All Things Considered Monday with his adoring fan, Michelle Norris.
And maybe as she squeals and sighs and ecstasy over his every word, maybe he'll find ways to link Luffner to white racists and Holocaust deniers and Latin mass Catholics and the daughters of the American Revolution and anyone else that the liberal establishment doesn't like.
Well, you know, I laugh because I just love your wit, but this is certainly not a laughing matter, whether the victim be a Jewish Democrat or Anglo-Saxon tragedy, conservative Republican.
We don't wish this on anyone, not even our most ardent enemies.
I mean, this is something that is just certainly out of bounds and off the reservation.
But, Sam, I tell you, we couldn't have found a guest on shorter notice than in all such cases, this kind of violence.
In every case I can think of in history, this kind of violence has served the cause that it was directed against.
I mean, I think that Luffner is just a crackpot from what we're seeing about him.
But when you go back through history, taking the example of the extreme, embittered, marginalized lunatic fringe in Britain in 1602 in the gunpowder plot, which Americans don't know about because we have lost our history.
You know, the Catholics had suffered persecution after the Reformation.
And so a handful of them, 11 or 12 lunatics, got together and decided they were going to blow up Parliament and kill the King and kill all the members of the House of Lords.
And they got caught.
This did not, fortunately, before they could kill all these people, these people were not representative of any kind of typical Roman Catholic in Britain.
And their goofiness in trying to carry out this horrific crime set back toleration for the Catholic Church by 200 years.
It would be the 1830s and Queen Victoria over 230 years later before Catholics would be granted toleration because of the national horror at this terrible crime that was proposed by these fanatics claiming to be speaking for the Catholic Church.
And, you know, the assassination of Abraham Lincoln was a catastrophe for people in the South.
Not because Lincoln was any kind of gentle, lovable, wonderful figure like he's made out to be, but because it allowed him to be the myth of Lincoln to be created and for him to be raised to a Christ-like status.
There are occasionally things where it does pan out.
Certainly, John Brown was a horrific terrorist who murdered children with his own hands.
But the liberals were the left in 1859 when he tried to foment a race war in the South, were able to turn this horrific murderer into something of a saint.
I think Emerson said that he had raised the gallows to the status of the cross.
Half the Republican elected officials in the country endorsed him.
Sam, one more break, my friend.
If you can hold with us when I ask you to pause one more time, going to take a message from our sponsor.
We're going to come back to wrap up this line of thought with our featured guest for this hour, Sam Dixon, right after this.
Jump in the political cesspool with James and the gang.
Halt tonight at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
Welcome back to our live show tonight, ladies and gentlemen, the Political Cesspool broadcasting from AM 1380, our flagship station, WLRM Radio here in Memphis, also broadcasting to the AM FM affiliate stations of the Liberty News Radio Network across the country and online as well to a worldwide audience at thepoliticalcesspool.org.
Very frantic night in the studio.
Papers flying everywhere.
It's completely off the cuff and ad-libbed this evening, as it always is, but tonight more so because we're covering a story that obviously was not on our radar until just a few hours ago.
This is something that is breaking news, and we're doing our best to give you our take on it before the media can poison your mind with theirs.
And when it comes time to provide commentary on just such a subject, you can do no better than have Sam Dixon as your guest.
And he has been our guest for the entirety of this first hour.
We're having for a few more fleeting minutes right now.
Sam, wanted to let you, for the last time this evening, pick up where you left off right before that last commercial break.
Well, I think we've pretty much said it.
We've said it, and that's pretty much it.
And we'll see how the media plays this.
But always remember that the media has an agenda.
And that agenda is to apologize for and cover up for all of the regime support groups and to demonize anyone that opposes the regime.
And we must not let them tell us who we are.
At the beginning of the program, I said I was a moderate.
I think that in some strange way, people come to resemble the attacks may or think of themselves in the way they're attacked by their enemies, as if it's done over a long time period of time.
And you see this.
You see Southerners who behave as laughable oaths at Southern meetings and, you know, dressed up in overalls and their parodies of the Beverly Hills parody.
And they somehow think that this is what the South is all about.
And we must not let them tell us who we are.
And we are moderate people.
We are sensible people who think within the normal, rational ways that Western European people have historically thought.
And we represent people of goodwill.
And we are not at all what the SBLC says we are, and they are not at all what they pretend to be.
Great parting words of wisdom from Sam Dixon tonight.
Sam, I want to thank you again for coming on in short order.
We had you booked for tonight for a couple of weeks, but of course we were originally planning on covering something entirely different.
This story came up and no one could have done a better job.
And thanks for coming on and providing us with some depth and analysis on the story we're sure to hear much more about over the weeks and probably months to come.
I can see the made-for-TV movie already.
Well, thank you, James.
You do a great job.
There's hardly anyone in the world that reaches more people than you do.
And it's the product of long hours of uninteresting, boring work.
And I think I speak for everybody listening when we say thank you.
Well, Sam, you're very welcome, and high praise indeed coming from you.
You have a great night, my friend, and keep them straight in Atlanta.
Good night.
Happy New Year.
Happy New Year.
Sam Dixon, everybody, covering the terrible murders there in Arizona today.
By the way, as I catch my breath now, what a first hour it's been.
I mean, you hate to start the show covering something so sinister, but to have Sam Dixon on, my goodness.
With Keith Alexander out tonight, taking a little vacation and a little downtime, he'll be back in short order.
You could not have done any better than to have Sam Dixon, his analysis tonight.
Absolutely superb.
You will not find another radio program in the world covering the story that will feature a better guest than the one we had tonight, Sam Dixon.
And I know I share with everyone as we give Sam Dixon a round of applause this evening.
I got a picture.
Thanks to Kyle Rogers.
Keep in mind, we are here in the CFCC Political Cesspool Virtual Fan Party and online chat here at cfcc.org.
If you're listening to us tonight, join us.
Comment with us and be a part of our show this evening.
Kyle Rogers, the CFCC intrepid webmaster, posted a link in this very chat room and had a picture of the suspect, Jared Lee Lofner, as he is now being referred to by the media.
I was talking to Sam during the commercial break in between the last two segments, and we couldn't put our finger on it.
But after you become an assassin or an alleged assassin, you always get referred to by your full name, your first, middle, and last name.
So now we have Jared Lee Lofner here, the suspect.
And he just appears to be a very geeky young white man.
I'm assuming he's white.
His picture certainly looks white.
Curly hair down past his shoulders and so on and so forth.
So anyway, we'll just see.
We don't have a lot of information above and beyond that, which we've already presented to you tonight.
But we'll just see how the media spins this and what they focus on as they come together and lay this out for us.
And you can rest assured that our best interests will not be in their hearts.
It's going to be very interesting to see what the media's take is on this story going forward.
And that is the reason why we felt it was so imperative for us to provide you with our take on it first.
And that's what we've done tonight.
Thanks again to Bill Rowland, who provided us with the facts of this story at the very top of this hour, and then Sam Dixon, who broke it down over the course of the last three segments.
Again, getting back to our reminders, we normally do these announcement type bits at the top of the show, but we had to get right down to business this evening.
But I want to remind you, as I just did, to become part of our nationally syndicated radio program tonight, as you interact with me and my co-hosts and guests, as we bring you our unique commentary and special interviews, you just heard from Sam Dixon.
Coming up at the top of the next hour, we have an equally impressive guest, Don Wassel.
Don Wassel, another jack of all trades.
He is the head of the American Nationalist Union.
He is the publisher of the great newspaper, The Nationalist Times.
He is also the proprietor of Cast Football.
He's going to be coming on for the entire second hour, and he will be taking your calls.
We're going to be talking with him about sports-related issues tonight as we shift gears.
The college bowl games are in full swing, coming up to a zenith here on Monday with the BCS title game between Auburn and Oregon.
We're going to be talking to Sam about college football, the NFL, pro football.
Its playoffs start tomorrow.
We're going to be talking with Don Wassel about the NFL playoffs as well as the NBA, whose regular season is in full swing right now as well.
So coming up the next hour, taking your calls will be Don Wassel of castfootball.us.
We're going to be talking about sports, college football, pro-football, and pro-basketball.
It is going to be a very, very fun second hour forthcoming tonight in the Political Assess Poll with Don Wassel.
But don't forget, we have got an incredible month planned for you.
Last week was great.
David Duke, our first guest of the year.
If you missed last week's show, we encourage you to check it out in the broadcast archives at thepoliticalspool.org, where you can revisit any of our previously aired programs dating back all the way to 2005, I believe, just shortly after we went on the air in 2004.
We started broadcasting our shows on the internet and archiving them.
If you missed last week's show with David Duke, we encourage you to check it out.
Tonight's show, of course, Sam Dixon.
If you missed any of that, go back, check it.
Don Wassell coming up in the second hour, and then we've got a couple of surprises for you as well in the third hour.
But all of January is just jam-packed with some of the greatest guests that could ever be featured on talk radio.
Next week, we have Paul Craig Roberts.
He's the former Assistant Secretary of the United States Treasury and also a world-renowned columnist.
He's penciled to reappear on our show, as is Bill Johnson, the chairman of the American Third Position, and Pastor John Weaver on Saturday, January 22nd, looking ahead, but not too far ahead.
Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review will be on, as will Gordon Baum, the CEO of the Council of Conservative Citizens and Reverend Ted Pike of the National Prayer Network.
That's on Saturday, January 22nd.
And then it keeps on keeping on the 29th, February 5th.
Our show is packed all the way through February 5th already with many more interviews forthcoming as this year progresses.
We are just getting started in 2011 here in the Political Cesspool Radio program, and we are off to a blazing hot start, if I do say so myself, with great guests coming to keep you warm all of January, exclusively on the Political Cesspool Radio program.
If you have not donated to this program recently, we ask you to consider doing so tonight.
We bring you insight and commentary that is unique and I think very much needed, and we are a listener-supported entity.
So if you want to help us out as we get our feet wet in 2011, you can do that as well by visiting thepoliticalcesspool.org.
Click on the donation link.
And if you've not yet bought my book, I encourage you to do that as well.
All of that can be done at the website.
Don't forget to check out our blog, too.
It features some great articles, many of which are covered right here on TPC itself.
So now that we've got all those announcements out of the way, I'm going to let everyone catch their breath.
Go to the kitchen, get a drink.
Join me at the top of the second hour, coming right back at you after these words from our sponsors.
And Harve leaped to his feet and said, Something's got a hold on me.
Yeah!
The day the squirrel went berserk for him, the first South Baptist church in that sleeping little town of Pastor Goo Barbara It was a fight for survival for that broke out in revival.
They were jumping views and shouting, Hallelujah!
Well, Harve hit the aisles dancing and screaming.
Some thought he had religion, others thought he had a demon.
And Harve thought he had a weed eater loose and just proved the blues.
He fell to his knees to plead and beg, and the squirrel ran out of his pretty leg unobserved to the other side of the room.