Dec. 12, 2009 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
43:35
20091212_Hour_1
|
Time
Text
Welcome to the Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populous conservative radio program.
Here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host for tonight, James Edwards.
Welcome, everyone, to the Political Cesspool Radio Program.
It is Saturday evening, December 12th, a Saturday evening so cold in Memphis, the polar bears aren't even coming out.
But yet here we are once again, freezing inside the confines of AM 1380W LRM Radio to bring you yet another installment of our award-winning political talk show.
Joining me this cold, this frigid mid-December's evening.
Keith Alexander for the first hour.
And then later on in the program, we are going to hear from fellow co-hosts Winston Smith and Eddie the Bamba Dear Miller.
We have no guests this evening.
It is going to be a show.
Just us and you, of course, and our listening audience.
Keith, how are you this evening?
Doing great.
Thanks for having me on your show, James.
Well, every week, and I wouldn't consider going doing a show without you anymore.
We've had so much fun this year with you now being a part of the, you know, this, what's after a quartet?
There's five of us now.
Quintet, I guess.
Yes, been a part of this quintet we have here.
Myself, of course, you, Keith, Winston, Eddie, and Bill Rowland, who will now be rejoining us.
Of course, he's been a co-host of this show almost since its inception.
He's had work conflicts lately, but he's getting back in the groove here over the course of the next couple of weeks.
And of course, as I mentioned, you'll be hearing from Winston and Eddie later tonight.
But it's going to be an all-cesspool crew tonight.
No guests.
And we are going to open up the phone lines.
I promised you, ladies and gentlemen, a couple of weeks ago that we would do another open mic night because when we opened up the phones a few weeks back, we had such a influx of calls.
The floodgates were opened, and we had a very good show because of it.
So I promised you in December we'd do another show like that.
And tonight's that night.
So we're not going to take any calls during the first hour, but during the second and third hour, I want you to know that we want to hear from you.
And the number, as always, is 1-866-986 News as you call into the Liberty News Radio headquarters.
And of course, we are syndicated by the Liberty News Radio Network at LibertyNewsRadio.com, the greatest radio network in all the land, I would say, Keith, because we're here.
Yep, we're here, and we keep coming bloody but unbound.
I like that.
And with that being said, with the stage now being set, let's get right down into business.
A couple of exciting weeks forthcoming here, by the way, too.
Christmas approaching.
We always have a fun time with that and have a reading of the biblical accounting of the Christmas story, which I think is very special.
Unfortunately, during this first segment tonight, I'm not going to be reading anything nearly as inspiring.
I'm going to be reading from the Associated Press and a story I picked up on Wednesday of this week in preparation for tonight's show.
Keith, I'm going to read this thing in its entirety because I think people need to hear what's going on.
And then I'm going to turn it over to you for commentary.
By the time I get done reading it, my blood will be boiling so much I won't be fit to commentate.
But the United States, let me rephrase, Barack Obama is seeking to, quote-unquote, settle Indian tribal claims for royalties.
And then the President of the United States is seeking more than $3 billion for the Indians.
And the story out of Washington reads as such.
The Obama administration on Tuesday of this week proposed spending more than $3 billion to settle claims dating back more than a century that American Indian tribes were swindled out of royalties for oil, gas, grazing, and other leases.
Well, I lied to you, ladies and gentlemen.
Said I was going to read this whole thing, but that's enough as far as I'm concerned.
It gets pretty vulgar.
I wonder, though, Keith, if the United States is considering reparations for the 13 Confederate states that they stole, or if that's just something, if that was all well and good, but now transgressions that were allegedly committed back in the 1880s have to be resettled to the tune of $3 billion.
$3 billion.
That's more money, more taxpayer money going to Indians who had, who are, what, you know, almost 160 years removed from all that.
And I don't know.
There's not an Indian living that had anything to do with any of that, but somehow now they are entitled.
They are entitled to billions of dollars.
I guess the descendants of the Confederate veterans are still going to have to wait in line.
I don't know.
What do you think, Keith?
Well, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for those Confederate reparations, but of course, you know, the United States government intentionally invaded the South.
The South didn't invade the North.
The North invaded the South.
And the Northern armies, unlike Robert E. Lee's army when he went into Pennsylvania, intentionally, you know, in the Gettysburg campaign, intentionally tried to destroy, rape, pillage, and decimate the Southern economy and the goods and property of Southerners.
There were many war atrocities, rapes, killings, such as that.
And of course, that will never be redressed.
All that the South was trying to do was to be left alone.
That's all they've ever wanted.
We've never gone north to tell people in the North how they ought to live.
It's always been people from the Northeast, basically, coming to the South to tell us how to live and how to arrange our affairs.
But there'll be no reparations for that because the whole reparations movement is basically anti-white racism, pure and simple.
And it's developed by liberals, and that's the primary ideology of anti-white racism in America.
And of course, we're all waiting for the other shoe to drop.
We had Japanese reparations.
Of course, beneficiaries non-white.
Now, American Indian reparations.
Beneficiaries non-white.
And of course, we're going to get the grand idea of them all.
This is just preparing the way, plowing the ground for the big reparation of them all, which is black reparations.
Keith reparations.
Stole my thunder.
That is exactly what this is intended to do.
It is intended to set the stage and serve as a precursor for the reparations that they really want to give away.
But before we plan ahead for that demise, it says later on in the bowels of this article that the government is spending $2 billion to buy back the land from the Indians.
So parts of the Dakotas, parts of Oklahoma, the government is essentially buying those states now for the bargain basement price of $2 billion.
They're going to set up tens of millions of dollars for Indian scholarships.
This is something that has to be cleared by Congress and a federal judge.
But if and when it is done, Keith and everyone listening, this settlement would be the largest Indian claim ever approved against the United States government.
Now, this is something that Barack Obama is freely entering into.
And not only that, he is serving as the one to kickstart this whole thing.
It's not even that Indians are pressing for this.
He has decided to do this.
And, of course, his motive is to set a precedent so that he can give away money to black people in America.
And let me just say this about reparations.
Reparations is born of frustration that the left feels for its inability to raise the standard of living and raise the level of achievement of blacks in America.
For example, we've had affirmative action that is anti-white racism, pro-black racism.
Let blacks, let other minority groups have preference to get into college, have preference to get into law school, medical school, other professional schools.
Let them have preference for government contracts.
Let them have preference for government jobs.
And the problem that liberals that confounds liberals is that even with all these opportunities, so few blacks have been able to access these goodies because they just lack the least bit of initiative to do that.
So what they're doing now, basically the only way they can effectively help their lives is to give them direct cash payments because they don't want to change.
They want to be the same old folks they used to be.
They're not interested in becoming lawyers, doctors, or Indian chiefs, no pun intended.
They're interested in living their lives as they are and having more money to do it with.
And that's what reparations is going to do.
Forget all these other notions about, you know, moving up the ladder.
We're just going to start bailing out, you know, sending out the money in stacks to these people because we want an enormous wealth transfer from the white population to the black population, just as the cap and trade bill is essentially a wealth transfer from the first world to the third world.
Yeah, and of course, because that is the premise for which all reparations must follow, there will be no reparations for those who were burned out of their homes, the civilians and the women who were burned out of their homes through Sherman's march to the sea and all of that.
But, yeah, Keith, I keep taking my eye off the ball here and thinking about the Indians.
I'm thinking that, you know, at least they got the casinos.
But you're right.
All of this has nothing to do with the Indians whatsoever.
It is about, as you mentioned and put it so succinctly, the granddaddy of them all.
This is the precursor.
This, if passed, will pave the way for the reparations that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson believe they deserve so much.
We're going to talk more about this, ladies and gentlemen.
We're about to have to go to break.
I'm going to pick up with some closing thoughts on this story.
And oh, yeah, we're going to talk about Tiger Woods this hour.
I've tried to abstain from that, but the so-called mainstream media is forcing my hand, and I'll tell you why when we come back.
A lot more to come tonight in the political cesspool.
Stay tuned.
Go away.
There's more political cesspool coming your way right after these messages.
Welcome back.
To get on the political cesspool, call us on James's Dime, toll-free, at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
Since we're on the topic of Indian tribes, we were talking in the first segment about the Obama administration's plan to give $3 billion worth of reparations to the various Indian tribes who were allegedly wrong during the 19th century here in this country.
And again, it goes without saying no such reparations will be paid to the ancestors of the Confederates who were, I think, even more People, for God's sake.
I do want to say this about the Indian tribes.
I, as a child, and even now as an adult, have always been fascinated by the different tribes of Indians and the Aztecs in central Mexico, the Mayans, the Indians of North America, and other parts of the world.
I think it's just something that's very interesting to learn about.
Ancient civilization, so on and so forth, has always fascinated me.
And not just, of course, the Indian tribes, but the ancient civilizations of Europe and Greece and Rome and you name it.
I love studying antiquities.
But with that being said, let's face it, the Indians were savages.
When it comes to being advanced and enlightened, they wouldn't even be in the same realm as the Europeans.
And because of that, you know, people have this politically correct myth built into their minds that when the settlers of this continent from Europe came here, that there were these thriving pockets of different Indian tribes just everywhere throughout America.
The fact of the matter is, there were probably less than a half a million so-called Native Americans, probably even less than a quarter of a million Native Americans or Indians or whatever you want to call them living on this continent.
They were impoverished, disease-stricken, at war with one another.
There was no peaceful existence over here.
They fought with each other, and they fought with us.
From the moment we got here, they fought with us.
This nonsense, this Thanksgiving Day image we have of them coming and peacefully welcoming us with turkey and teaching us how to write our Constitution.
I mean, that's just all poppycock.
That was not the way it was.
I mean, certainly there were some peaceful tribes, tribes more peaceful than others, and there were very violent tribes.
And as I've said time and time again, you've seen Doctari, the weaker animal, always goes.
There was no way they were going to be compatible here, and credit our founding fathers with knowing that.
Well, that's been the story of the world throughout history.
There's always been conflict between groups of people, and one group or another would win.
And that's what Pat Buchanan has said that, you know, nations taking pieces of other nations has been the way it's been since the beginning of time, and it always will be that way if you allow yourself to become weak.
And see, that's remember what we said last week, Vilfredo Pareto, the Italian economist and anti-socialist of the late 19th, early 20th century, said, if you insist upon being a lamb, you will find a wolf to eat you.
Most people, including Indians and including black people in Africa, understand this intimately, and as a result, they're not about to become lambs.
The only people that are about to become lambs are white people in Europe, America, Australia, places like this, who have been sold a bill of goods by the cultural left.
And they're basically asking us to unilaterally disarm in the culture war, and we will be the lambs that are eaten unless we wake up and do like everybody else and develop a sense of racial solidarity and of survival.
Well, there is one more thing to this before we move on, and that is what happened happened, and I'm glad it happened, quite frankly.
I would rather live in cities than living on the plains and teepees and so on and so forth.
But as Dr. David Yagley said, the bad eagle himself, who is of American Indian descent, the settlers of this country had greater respect for the people that they would come to dominate than any other class of people that has ever reigned over another class, in so much as there was a great deal of respect from our people to theirs.
We've named our cities after them, our rivers.
I mean, how much it's just a very interesting interview if you go back and listen to it.
I think Bill Rowland and I conducted it with Dr. Yagley a few months back.
And that just goes to show, I think, the benevolence of our people, even in combat, even in situations as unpleasant as our relationship with the American Indians, that they would still bestow them these honors.
But nevertheless, $3 billion worth of reparations 150, 160 years later is beyond the pale.
But as you mentioned, Keith, it's not about the Indians.
It's about blacks.
And this would certainly give them a precedent that I don't think any of us need because all this stuff fosters more racial hatred.
This kind of stuff, this cult of victimology that they love to engage in, and they're getting all the candy out of the cookie jar.
I mean, it just breeds contempt.
It's going to be bad for them as it is bad for us.
Well, what's going to happen, James, is this.
The more you give, the more of an expectation you build.
Now, this is nothing but anti-white racism.
And several million dollars they're thinking about, or billion dollars they're thinking about giving to the Indians is going to be a mere hors d'oeuvre in a seven-course dinner they have planned for all minorities, primarily for the purpose of bringing the white civilization upon which our nation is founded down.
You know, the reason we have reparations, James, is because enhanced opportunities like affirmative action and the Philadelphia plan for government contracts, things like this, don't work effectively enough.
You know, you have schools like Harvard and Yale just feverishly doing everything they can to boost blacks, Hispanics, American Indians, get them into the schools, but very few of them really qualify because of the bell curve.
Only 16% of the black population has an IQ that is equal to or above the average white IQ.
So there just aren't that many of them, and most of them who get in really don't belong there.
And as a result, they're not real Harvard and Yale graduates, for example.
And they wind up devolving to that last refuge of the scoundrel and the incompetent, government employment, for the most part.
And, you know, they just don't make a dent with these enhanced opportunities.
So they are reduced to direct payments, i.e., reparations.
That's the only way they're going to be able to put jingle in their jeans and money in their pockets.
And that's what they intend to do.
And they intend to do it at the expense of the white civilization that has made America the envy of the world, that has made Europe the envy of the world, that has given us the modern life and the technological advances that we have.
For some reason, for some crazy reason, this civilization that is available basically for everybody to enjoy, you know, they have electricity in Africa and places like that now because of Europeans, because of Americans.
Yeah, but where's the credit for that?
They're intent upon bringing it down.
You'll never hear the gratitude for that, only the grievances.
And it would take a warped liberal mind to believe that it is America's responsibility to employ the rest of the universe.
And with America's money, we should make sure that no one on any corner of the planet is impoverished.
That is sick thinking.
I mean, each man is responsible for himself and his family.
And certainly we can band together as a community for certain things.
But I don't believe in this communist communal living system that we're building.
Well, you just put your finger on it.
It is a communist Marxist plan.
Trotsky wrote about this back in the 30s.
He said that the real spearhead of the revolution shouldn't be white working class or poor people.
It should be racial minorities, the non-white population of the world.
Even back then, whites were only 25% of the population, as Trotsky pointed out.
Non-whites were 75%, and all non-whites had a grievance, a chip on their shoulder about whites, because they'd either been defeated militarily or they had been taken over economically by whites, and that that chip on the shoulder attitude could very easily be transformed into what he called revolutionary zeal.
And this is a Marxist plan, people.
This is, you know, when all these people, all these were talking about things like, you know, a communist plot back then, people thought they were crazy.
The evidence is in now.
They were right.
And with that, we're going to take a break.
We'll be back with more TPC's take on Tiger Woods right after this.
The political cesspool, guys.
We'll be back right after these messages.
On the show and express your opinion in the Political Says pool,
call us toll-free at 1-866-986-6397.
I hope you heard that phone number that the Lord of the Board, Art Frith, just gave you.
1-866-986 News.
We're going to open up the phone lines during our second and third hours this evening, and we want to hear from you, our family in the listening audience.
1-866-986 News.
Take it down, and we're going to open them up in just a bit.
We want to hear from you.
And with that being said, welcome back to the show, The Political Cesspool.
James Edwards, that's me.
Keith hanging in with you from Studios in Memphis, Tennessee, AM 1380.
And we're going out to the AM and FM affiliate stations of the Liberty News Radio Network from coast to coast.
And that number again, 1-866-986 News.
When we open up the phone lines in just a little bit.
Now, that being said, I want to talk to you about Tiger Woods.
Now, you're probably wondering why I want to talk about Tiger Woods.
I purposefully steered clear of this story last week just because I don't think it's a big story.
Tiger Woods is no elected official.
He is no spiritual leader.
He's a celebrity, but I think it's a stretch to even call him an athlete.
I don't consider golf really to be a sport.
It's certainly a game of skill, but I mean, basketball is a sport.
Football is a sport.
Hockey's a sport.
Baseball is a sport.
Bowling and golf, I don't consider it to be a sport.
But nevertheless, he is a celebrity.
He is a celebrity golfer.
Now, as I said, we're going to talk about what he's done, but you're not going to hear from me some sanctimonious, self-righteous, holier-than-thou commentary that you might expect.
That's what you get from the other guys.
You hear on the political cesspool, you hear the truth, and we're not put-ons.
You know, and the thing is about those other guys who are condemning Tiger Woods, and it's certainly not anything to be proud of.
It's certainly not good things that he's done, cheating on his wife for all these years with so many different women.
But, you know, the thing about it is all of these people who are condemning him, 25% of them are doing it themselves, and another 50% wish they could.
But the bottom line is, I'm not fit to judge anyone, so I'm not going to.
What Tiger Woods has done with these other women doesn't impress me, but it doesn't bother me either.
You're in the public eye.
You have a game.
You do a concert.
You give a speech.
You have a certain charisma, and you'll go back to the hotel room every night with a couple of cocktail napkins with phone numbers on them.
You know, none of us are saints.
Or as Frankie Valley said, you sell 100 million records and see how you handle it.
But here's the thing about Tiger Woods.
Out of all of this publicity that his affairs have gotten, and it is quite possibly, I think you could argue, it is the biggest story in America this week.
Everybody's talking about it.
And yet they have all, every single one of them, every single so-called mainstream outlet that is covering the Tiger Woods debacle, have failed to mention the one thing that we feel it is incumbent upon us to mention tonight in our coverage of this story.
It is the elephant in the room that nobody can see.
Tiger Woods, this one aspect of the story is the emperor who has no clothes.
You know, Keith, I guess what I'm getting at is Tiger Woods has been certainly the beneficiary of diversity, but he certainly doesn't like to diversify his portfolio of lovers, does he?
No, in fact, yeah, let's just break this down.
Let's unpack this a little bit if we can.
Why is Tiger Woods noteworthy?
Tiger Woods is noteworthy because the Marxist, cultural Marxist elite in the media have decided that they need to teach whites the lesson that they are inferior in all things.
You know, other groups get to be superior in one thing or another, except for whites.
So consequently, whites can't even point to golf.
They were so desperately seeking, you know, the great black hope for golf because whites had dominated it for so long, and they found him in Tiger Woods.
Tiger Woods, quite frankly, was somewhat reluctant to accept the mantle.
He didn't embrace being a black man.
He said he was a Kabul Asian.
In other words, Caucasian, Asian, Dutch, a whole Negro, the whole, you know, panoply of Duke's mixture of multicultural America.
And he said that on the Oprah Winfrey show, and ever since then, his so-called community, I guess, if you want to call it that, has abandoned him.
They're certainly not rallying to him as they did to Michael Vick and everyone else.
Well, see, Nike, though, and the people that really push it, they're not going to be deterred by the facts.
They're going to continue to press him.
And the reason he is such a draw and the reason why he gets so much money in endorsements is because they want to ram it down the throat of the white population that see here the best golfer in the world is black.
They want people, that's why they're sending black kids with affirmative action to Harvard and Yale.
They want to prove to the younger generation that black kids are smarter than they are, despite obvious evidence to the contrary.
That's why you see no white running backs and why, for example, Toby Gerhard, if he gets the Heisman tonight, I will, you know, defecate and fall back in it, as we say, because, you know, there's just absolutely, you know, there hasn't been a white running back Heisman trophy winner since John Capoletti of Penn State in 1973.
That's another way in which they enforce inferiority on the emerging generation of white kids.
And Tiger Woods is part of that.
Maybe an unwitting part of it, but he's part of it.
And of course, the other part that they wanted to point to was that he was such an exemplary individual, such a kind, mild-mannered, intelligent spokesman.
He didn't have all these, You know, bad traits that bad racist white people would associate with black people, like an overactive libido or a lack of fidelity to his wife.
None of that applied to Tiger Woods.
In fact, Tiger Woods is a paragon.
So consequently, it disproves everything that you may have heard about black people.
Black people are just paragons.
Get used to it.
They're better than you.
And therefore, they deserve to rule.
And then the new idol turns out to have feet of clay.
Wouldn't you say, James?
No, you're on target with all of that.
And you're exactly right, of course, that it'll remain to be seen.
And like I said, it doesn't really interest me if this ruins his career, if this cost him his endorsements.
What gets me about this whole story isn't that he did any of that.
I mean, we knew in advance, we could have talked about Tiger Woods for the last 10 years, about him being a product of a multicultural society who was hell-bent on seeing people like him succeed.
That's not the story here.
The story is how the mainstream media is covering his philandering.
I'm going to read one for you here, Keith.
It's a story in which the article focuses on what all of Tiger Woods' lovers have in common.
All of them, well, I guess including his wife, because she's Swedish.
Now, I'm looking at the headline of this, and I'm thinking, my God, what could it be?
I'm going to have to read it though, you know, because I can't figure it out for myself just by looking at these women, what they have in common.
I'm going to check in with one of these hard-hitting sports writers in the mainstream media because, you know, they don't pull any punches.
They're not afraid to tell it like it is.
And then I found this article.
Sleaze has been the undisputed champion in the sports world for 2009.
And it reads that Sleaze has dominated the sports scene like a black tasseled whip.
The latest manifestation of it being Tiger Woods and all of the women he's cheated on that have big hair.
And that's it, Keith.
Tiger Woods likes, as I wrote on our blog, big-haired.
Well, you know, Angela Davis had big hair.
I guess they all look like Angela Davis.
Yeah, that must be it.
But, you know, look, what an imbecile.
What a pawn.
I guess if you want to write for the mainstream media, and this is why, this is just one, I think, a window into why this show, why the political cesspool is so important.
You will not find another show on white AM radio.
I mean, the blacks are talking about it, all about it.
You know, and good for them for being able to tell the truth on this.
You've got to get it.
But this is why this show is so different than all the other.
Seem to have a, you know, right to freedom of speech or blacks.
But, you know, these castratae that we have in the mainstream media won't bring it out because there's one thing that they really want.
You know, this goes against their whole thing.
It shows that at least in the minds of Tiger Woods, white women are superior.
Well, and we're going to get to that too.
But, you know, what I'm saying is, if you want to work in the mainstream media, you know, you've got to check your spine, your testicles, and your self-respect out the door as part of the deal.
You know, these women, these 12 that have stepped forward and have claimed to be his lovers, I mean, big hair.
What they have in common is that they're all white, and everybody knows it except for these imbeciles in the mainstream media.
I guess they know it too.
They just can't say it.
They're just cowards.
Well, yeah, this guy's well aware of it.
Who are we kidding?
But he also knows he's not allowed to mention it.
So he comes up with this lie about big hair that makes him look like an idiot in front of the whole world, as well as a spineless coward.
And as I said, Keith, as I said, on the black talk radio stations, they're talking about the Tiger Woods sex scandal.
The white women factor is one of the main topics of that conversation.
And for many, it's the only aspect of the conversation worth talking about.
Well, you see, though, James, the real thing.
Hey, hang on, Keith.
Hold that thought.
James, we got to take a break.
We'll be right back.
Don't go away.
The political cesspool, guys.
We'll be back right after these messages.
We'll return.
Jump in the political cesspool with James and the game.
Call us tonight at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
So lucky am I to be able to host this radio show, to be so loved and so hated all at once.
It's a position that you just don't know what it's like until you've lived it.
But welcome back to the show.
And I guess the reason why, you know, that we're either hot or cold, depending on your political persuasion, is because we, unlike everyone else in the mainstream media, do tell it like it is.
And we want you to be able to tell it like it is, too, in our second and third hours, which are rapidly approaching.
1-866-986 News.
We're going to open up those phone lines after this segment when Winston Smith and Eddie the Bombardier Miller join me.
For more political talk and commentary, we want you to be a part of the conversation.
1-866-986-News.
In the last segment, Keith and I were talking about the Tiger Woods controversy only because it is the most talked about story in America.
And until now, there has been no conservative talk radio program in the country on AMRF and radio that have mentioned the one thing that is notable about this whole thing is that out of 12 women that he has allegedly had affairs with, they're all white.
So we're going to say it.
And I was mentioning, you know, that's what we do.
Someone else is going to say it.
My God, we will.
I was mentioning in the last segment that I found an article in a prominent publication in which this sports writer said all of his lovers had big hair.
That's what they had in common.
You know, this is what I'm talking about.
So many white men like that in the media who are too cowardly to talk about Woods' fondness for white women.
It'd be better not to talk about it at all than to embarrass yourself by claiming that he's attracted to big-haired women.
I mean, what an idiot.
But this is why, Keith, the newspapers are dying and why this radio show and this network is thriving.
People will support you if you stand for something, anything.
Well, see, James, you know, you said it was the most talked about issue in the mainstream media this past week, Tiger Woods.
I would change that just a bit.
I'd say it's the most talked around.
Talk around.
Nobody will get right to the meat of the matter.
And again, the reason is racial.
And the racial reason is Tiger Woods and just about, you know, all of this lionizing in the sports area is basically done for the purpose of imposing what the cultural Marxists call cultural pessimism on whites.
In other words, I'm not, you know, there's no reason for me to play football.
Whites can't be good football players.
Whites can't be good basketball players.
And even when they set their mind to it, blacks can be better golfers than whites.
But then the reason this story causes so much consternation and so much cognitive dissonance among the mainstream media is because the lesson to be drawn from this is that Tiger Woods, a black man who's incredibly wealthy, when given a choice, invariably seeks out white women.
And that's a lesson from which you could draw an idea that white women are superior.
And because of that, they will not mention it.
It is totally taboo.
Well, Keith, I think that's, again, all you can say about it.
You can wrap up the whole thing in a couple of sentences, and that's what we try to do here.
We try to shoot straight and fast.
And Keith, that's why you're our sharpshooter.
But there are, believe it or not, more important issues happening in America today than who Tiger Woods is sleeping with.
And Keith, you'd have a few of those on deck as well for the time we've got left in this hour.
Well, one is going through our local newspaper in our Behind Enemy Lines segment, there's a headline called Funding Victory for Acorn.
If you'll remember, back in October, because of those bright bark videos showing the people at the Acorn office in Baltimore, Maryland, advising a young couple about how to run a brothel and launder money and to do this all with government loans and government grants, there was a great outcry and Acorn was defunded.
And of course, the main reason ACORN needs to be defunded is because they are a primary engine of electoral fraud.
In other words, fraud in elections.
And if they're not dismantled and not neutralized before the next set of national elections, I don't think we're ever going to get rid of these hard leftists that we have in office now.
But, of course, what the left does, and they've been doing it since Brown versus Board of Education, they run to the courts where they find a friendly liberal judge sitting somewhere in the United States on a federal bench.
And this time they went right to the heart of liberalism, New York City, and found, well, lo and behold, what a surprise, a Jewish judge named Linda Gershon.
And Linda Gershon granted a preliminary injunction against Congress enforcing this law.
Now, see, this is what they will invariably do.
And of course, the law was never going to get enforced anyway because who's responsible for enforcing those laws?
Why, the Attorney General of the United States.
And do you think Eric Holder, hard leftist Eric Holder, is going to do anything to hamper what he considers to be the salutary efforts of Acorn in committing widespread voter fraud so that leftists never are held to account.
This is what's happening.
And this is the scenario.
This is the blueprint.
This is the template that they've used ever since Brown versus Board of Education.
That's why we keep telling people that Brown versus Board of Education was a turning point in American history, and it's been downhill ever since.
Well, Keith, yeah, I tell you, it doesn't surprise me that this is going against us because our people are far too complacent.
And then to our defense, we work for a living while everyone else is able to be community organizers or whatever they call them.
Reactionary agents of change, I guess, is more appropriate.
But certainly if it comes down to Judge Gershon and Attorney General Holder, I don't like our odds of a favorable outcome when they are the two that are the determining factors on an issue of importance.
Well, and, you know, also the lawsuit was brought by the Center for Constitutional Rights, Bill Quigley, legal director.
Now, where is a conservative equivalent group?
You know, the left has captured the money.
They've captured the institutions, and they're all carrying water for the liberal Marxist revolution in America.
They're trying to bring it about.
They have so much money they don't know which pocket to put it in.
They've got so many of these organizations, and of course, we have none.
And to the extent that we have any, the cultural Marxists take them over and turn them into leftist organizations.
So, you know, this is just emblematic of the problems that we face.
Now, there's another thing that came out that I wanted to point out, and that's the House has passed a bill, the United States House of Representatives, that's supposedly going to govern and regulate the derivative industry.
In other words, the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac industry.
And of course, what was the problem with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that led to this whole financial meltdown that we're looking at?
Well, according to the left, or the leftists in Congress, it's corporate greed and reckless risk-taking unrestrained by that wonderful panacea regulation.
Well, everybody knows that the reason Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities were so toxic is that they included all of these mortgages that the federal government made banks and other lending institutions make to blacks, Hispanics, and other minority group members that had terrible credit.
When you start lending money to people that have terrible credit, you shouldn't be surprised when they go into default.
And when they go into default, the people that bought those securities, and in this case, a lot of the people that bought them were the Chinese government, who had a surplus of American dollars due to the fact that liberal globalists have deindustrialized America and 80% of the goods on Walmart shelves, for example, come from China.
They had to do something with those dollars.
They were buying Fannie Mae and Freddie Macs, and they weren't particularly happy when they found out they were the suckers left holding the bag in the snipe hunt.
So, you know, this is what has happened to America.
You know, the left causes a problem.
The left mischaracterizes the problem.
And then the left sets about to solve or cure a false problem that doesn't exist while nothing is done to correct the real problem that they created.
Keith, you know, you sound like you're just getting wound up for this hour.
Unfortunately, the time we have is winding down.
But I tell you, I sat there at full attention listening to you deliver that soliloquy.
That was a good one.
Well, look, all that we've got, all that is happening here, everything that is wrong with America today, you can lay at the feet.
You can describe it in one word, liberalism.
And because of that word.
And it's gotten its little nose in the tent of everything that we're doing and everything they involve themselves in sickens and dies.
And it just so happens, Keith, does it not, that the staff of the Political Successful have written a book about the effects of liberalism on American society.
And that is what we are offering as an incentive to anyone who donates to this radio program between now and Christmas Day.
It's a must-read book, folks.
It really brings into accord everything that we talk about this show in written form.
And Keith obviously was a driving factor in the production of this book.
We've got to take a break now.
We're going to be back.
We're going to open up those phone lines during the second and third hour.
You're going to hear a burst of national news from Liberty News Radio.
And while we're at that break and while you're listening to the news, go to our website, thepoliticalsspool.org and order the book.
We'll be back with more right after this.
Keith Alexander will be saying adieu to everyone.
But he'll be back next week, and I'll be back in just a few minutes.
So sit tight.
I'll see you in a few.
One hour down and two to go.
Stay tuned.
Hour number two of the political cesspool comes your way right after these messages.
Harvard leaped to his feet and says, something's got a hold on me.
Yeah, the day the squirrel went berserk in the first self-brightest church in that sleeping little town of Pastor Gula.
It was a fight for survival.
That book got in revival.
They were jumping, muse, and shouting.
Well Harv hit the aisles dancing and screaming.
Some thought he had religion, others thought he had a demon, and Harv thought he had a weed eater loose in his proof of the balloons.
He fell to his knees to plead and beg, and the squirrel ran out of his britches' leg unobserved to the other side of the room.