June 13, 2009 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
43:13
20090613_Hour_2
|
Time
Text
Welcome to the Political Cesspool, known worldwide as the South's foremost populous radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the political cesspool is your host, James Edwards.
Like it or not, you're back with the political cesspool.
You're out there.
We know you're out there, and we're glad you're joining us tonight.
My name is Bill Rowland.
I'm the co-pilot sitting in tonight for James Edwards, and my co-host is one of my favorite co-hosts, Winston Smith.
And we're back on the air.
And call us tonight because we're having open mic night.
We're waiting for you to call.
We're sitting here in our prom dresses just waiting for your call at 1-866-986-6397.
That's 1-866-986-6397.
Winston, as always, it's great to have Keith on, and always he brings us important information from behind enemy lines.
So, you know, what is he talking about?
He's talking about the same thing we hear all the time, and that's reverse discrimination.
That is, people qualified for scholarships, sometimes kids, white kids, who have worked all their school careers to make really good grades, to really excel academically, being denied scholarships and losing those scholarships to inner city kids who, you know, may have dawdled away most of high school doing, you know, little of nothing.
And yet these are the future leaders of the United States.
These are the students who are supposed to become the leadership cadre of America.
And we can see that that's the truth because all we have to do is look at Barack Obama and all the boosts he got during his lifetime.
You're absolutely right, Bill.
But Keith's main point in filling us in on that information is that unless, well, liberals now see the Supreme Court as the ultimate source of power in the United States.
Presidents come and go, but the Supreme Court stays.
And if you're going to wield any power at all over American culture and American society, you're going to have to do it from the Supreme Court.
In fact, Sonia Sotomayor said that the court is where policy is made.
She was completely erroneous in that, but that's how liberals, that's how leftists, that's how Marxists view the court.
And the fact is, unless you are from one of these elite schools, you are not going to be considered for the court.
And so that's why it's important to get European American kids into these elite schools because our people are being shut out of the Supreme Court.
And we need to be there.
We're being shut out of the very institutions we created.
And that is by design.
And unfortunately, the people who call themselves conservatives never call themselves pro-white or never say that, you know, we're going to maintain the demographic and we're going to maintain the founding stock of this country within our institutions.
It is the very old white men who are turning this country over to the non-white third world demographic.
And the fact is, and I've said this on the show before, we have a third world government.
We are already entering the third world.
And the proof of it is Barack Hussein Obama.
You don't have a third world president unless you have a third world government.
And so we're just simply being prepared right now through these appointments and really through the elections of the mass of liberal Democrats to become an impoverished and underprivileged third world nation.
The only option we'll have is to create perpetual wars to feed people into a military-industrial complex.
And that's what's happening right now.
We're keeping wars going all over the globe so that we can generate materials for war and so that we can perpetually keep war going for the sake of the economy.
So, you know, that's what we're faced with.
You know, only third world countries maintain a consistent 10 to 20 percent unemployment.
You know, only third world countries see a loss of property in terms of net worth and what property is worth and the values of things.
Only third world countries become deindustrialized.
And that's where that's the point we have reached in this country.
And of course, the same, you know, self-righteous, sanctimonious old white men who have held positions of power in this country are not replacing themselves with young, competent versions of the founding stock.
They're replacing themselves with incompetent, you know, incompetent replacements who share none of their values, who share none of their outlook, who inevitably will sink into corruption and sink into empowerment schemes and seek only to keep their positions.
We see that here in Memphis.
We know that's true because we have a third world government here as well.
Well, folks, if you want to sound off on that, you can do so.
You call us at 866-986-6397.
Again, that's 866-986-6397.
We have a caller, Rob, from New Orleans.
You're in the political sales pool with Bill Roland and Winston Smith.
Hey, guys, I just want to thank you so much for your program.
I have never been so disaffected with the American political process since the election of Jimmy Carter.
Just, I was disheartened when that happened, and even more so now.
As a Catholic, I get money to the Catholic Church, and every once in a while, contributions come around for the Campaign for Human Development.
I found out that that money over the past 10 years, $9 million, went to Acorn to elect Barack Obama, who is a pro-abortion president, which is in direct contradiction to Roman Catholic teaching.
People, be very careful about what you give with charitable contributions and to whom you give them, because they can be subverted.
Like this money is obviously being subverted at the Memphis Prep School.
There's an online outfit called the Center for Equal Opportunity in Falls Church, Virginia.
It's a law firm.
They're a nonprofit.
They will take information about this case at that prep academy, and they will send letters and file necessary actions against them.
Rob, I'm sure you'll find this entertaining, being a good Catholic.
A couple of weeks ago here in Shelby County, there was a meeting of the Shelby County Commissioners, and the meeting was over an ordinance which became a resolution to ban discrimination on any non-merit bases in Shelby County hiring.
Now, what this started out as was an ordinance that would specifically ban discrimination against queers, against transvestites, against any sexual deviancy you can come up with.
Shelby County and their hiring would no longer be able to discriminate on the basis of that.
Now, at this meeting that I attended, I was amazed that a Catholic priest from Immaculate Conception here in Memphica got up to defend hiring sodomites.
This is a Catholic Church.
Roman Catholic churches is run through, Winston, with evil people running it.
It's a good institution, but some of the people running it are pure de-devils.
Well, what I thought was odd about it was that here was a Catholic priest admonishing or encouraging the Shelby County commissioners to start hiring queers, the same Catholic Church that is still paying out billions upon billions of dollars to settle lawsuits that came about because of queer priests molesting little boys.
I'm not trying to embarrass you as Catholic, but here was this guy who had not learned his lesson.
Pure D evil.
Pure evil.
Still within the bosom of the church.
Well, thanks a lot for calling, Rob.
I appreciate it.
Thank you for your program very much.
Well, we're glad to be of service to you, and we're glad you're listening.
Call back again.
And once again, my friends, if you want to sound off on the political cesspool, you can do so at 866-986-6397.
Again, that's 866-986-6397.
A phone number which, to my ear, has far too many sixes in it.
But that's just me.
Bill, any comment on Rob's call?
Well, of course, you know, Rob is just expressing the frustration and really is quite right, of course, to express that frustration in our government.
And, of course, I don't know of anyone who has seeped in the third world more than some resident of New Orleans.
I mean, that city is completely, it's more than beneath sea level in terms of being low down.
I'll tell you that.
It's a thoroughly corrupt city and thoroughly incompetent leadership, as represented by Ray Nagan.
So, of course, anyone who lives in this type of environment knows that the deterioration from a high standard of government to a low standard of government only takes one or two generations.
And once the city positions are filled with blacks or other unqualified applicants, then there's an immediate favoritism scheme is put into place.
Immediately, there's favoritism, and immediately it's hiring friends and relatives for positions for which they're not qualified.
And there's corruption, and there are sexual scandals, and it goes on and on and on.
And it becomes rampant.
Now, of course, any government, regardless of color, creed, or national origin, is susceptible to these things.
But when you have a third world population running a city or running a government of any kind.
Hey, Bill.
Bill, hang on to that thought.
We have to go to our break.
Folks, stay tuned for more of the political cesspool.
You can call in at 866-986-6397.
Stay with us, folks.
right back.
Go away.
There's more political cesspool coming your way right after these messages.
To get on the political cesspool...
Call us on James's Dime, toll-free, at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
No, no, it's not James Edwards.
James is away, which means Bill and Winston get to play.
Welcome back to this broadcast of the Political Cesspool, the South's foremost populist radio program.
Heard from our flagship station, WLRM Radio in Millington, Tennessee.
Folks, we are so glad to be with you tonight, and we hope you're enjoying the show.
This is your chance, folks, to call in 866-986-6397.
Again, it's 866-986-6397.
When James comes back, who knows, you may never have a chance to call in again like you're having tonight.
Bill and I want to talk with you, so give us a call, and we'll be glad to deal with whatever it is you want to talk about.
I'm looking at the Political Cesspool blog right now, and there are many, many articles here.
Folks, you can read all the haps in the news by going to www.thepoliticalcesspool.org.
Again, that's www.thepoliticalcesspool.org.
It is an informative and tastefully designed website designed with you in mind, designed with giving you ease of navigation to the stories that are making headlines today and for the most succinct commentary on the news.
Here's one that is titled, Obama Compares Gay Marriage to Incest and Child Rape.
Well, that's odd.
Obama compares gay marriage to incest and child rape.
The commentary is, lawyers from Obama's Justice Department are in court defending the Defense of Marriage Act as constitutional.
And they compare same-sex marriage to incest and marriage to children.
The linked article is, Homos are outraged.
Let's go to that story.
As soon as it comes up.
Let's see.
The Obama admin defends DOMA in a brief comparing marriage to rape.
Let's see.
Well, I keep clicking on the link, and it's not coming up the way it should.
Okay.
Obama administration moves to uphold DOMA before Supreme Court.
DOMA means Defense of Marriage Act.
The Obama administration is trying to uphold it.
John Arevosis has finally gotten a copy of the Justice Department's brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss the legal challenge to the so-called Defense of Marriage Act.
The case was brought by Arthur Smelt and Christopher Hammer, who were married in California last year.
Averroes goes out on a few limbs in his post, claiming that the Obama administration compares same-sex marriage to incest and pedophilia, and others are blindly running with it.
The problem with that is that the brief does no such thing.
It does mention that the different states do regulate the qualifications for marriages differently with regard to kinship and age of consent.
I think we have a caller on the line.
Stacey from Oklahoma City, you're on the political cesspool with Bill Rowland and Winston Smith.
How are you this evening?
I'm doing well.
Hi, guys.
How are you doing?
I'm very well.
And you?
I already asked you that.
Yeah, I'm doing great.
I just had a question, or I kind of wanted to hear your thoughts on the 10th Amendment movements that are going across the nation, and if you thought that that was like a proper step towards maybe secession and secession as a way of restoration of traditional America.
It might be a little bit intellectual, but I just was wondering what you guys are thinking about the 10th Amendment movement.
Well, I can tell you that I think it is, this is Bill.
I think it's a step in the right direction as long as at some point this sort of legislation grows some fangs.
Right now, these are just simple declarations or simple expressions of a viewpoint and carry no weight.
And in order for a 10th Amendment legislation or 10th Amendment bill of any kind to succeed, would mean that the state is going to say, give an ultimatum to the government, that if you do this, then we will react a certain way.
The closest thing to real that sort of legislation has, I think, taken place in Montana with regards to actions by the state government there to protect Montana gun owners and the production of guns and ammunition in Montana being not susceptible to any restrictions by the federal government.
So it's that kind of thing.
But I'll tell you, one of the problems with these Tenth Amendment resolutions is that they are not uniform in their expressions of outrage or defiance of the federal government.
They all tend to vary to such a degree that there's not a real coherent message being sent to Washington.
I would prefer that these governments make stronger statements and that these state governments sound more the same in their view of how they will treat intrusions by the federal government into state affairs.
Yeah, I agree, and there seems to be a lot of confusion across the nation with them, but I just see a sign of optimism on a local level.
Even if it's just sentiment right now, and maybe not systematic kind of direction to it, I just think the sentiment is encouraging.
It sounds to me like what we need is sort of a shadow United States.
We need to have the states who want a stronger 10th Amendment statement.
They need to band together as separate states united together in a cause.
We need to have these United States kind of rallied against the United States to make sure that they are still able to exercise their legal and constitutional rights to not be something other than simple administrative provinces of the federal government.
And that's what the state governments have become.
They've become administrative outposts of the federal government.
And the federal government honestly believes that it has the right to usurp state laws.
And folks, that is something that we have allowed to creep in.
We shouldn't have.
But, you know, you get people like Barack Obama, and you get these arrogant senators up there who think that since they are now part of the federal government, that they have somehow been granted omnipotence, that what the states want is of no import, that the federal government can claim sole domain, eminent domain, if you will, over all the goings-on in the states.
And the Constitution was written expressly to forbid that.
The federal Constitution, the United States Constitution, is a limiting document.
It limits the federal government.
The Constitution was never meant to give the federal government absolute and sole authority over the state governments.
Bill?
On a practical level, however, a state that actually did propose or intend to secede would face the prospect of economic independence as well, and without the benefits, so-called, of being attached to a larger union and a central government.
So there are only a handful of states that would qualify, I think, for immediate secession, successful secession, secession both economically and culturally and politically.
One such state being Alaska.
Obviously, Alaska's got the oil to sustain itself, and in fact, it would be probably a major economy in the world if it were an independent country.
Possibly Hawaii, another one, economically very strong state in a good location as far as independence because it's a tremendous distance from the continental United States.
There are other few states that could survive as independent entities.
But more than likely, a secession movement on a mass scale could only succeed if two or three states combined in their effort to secede, not as to form a central government, but to form sort of a confederacy, if you will, in order to maintain themselves economically.
This is the big problem with secession, is that the states have become so dependent on the federal government for welfare dollars, for all kinds of services, that if the federal government was to pull the plug, many of these states would dry up very, very quickly, especially those states that have large government-dependent populations like Mississippi or Alabama,
some of the other southern states that have large black populations that are also either intelligent or on welfare.
So we're about to go into our next break.
Stacey, thank you for the call.
And like you, I share your optimism that it's being talked about.
Maybe we can talk about it some more on your side of the break.
Stay with us, folks.
You're listening to the political cesspool.
Don't go away.
The political cesspool, guys.
We'll be back right after these messages on the show and express your opinion in the political says pool.
Call us toll free at 1-866-986-6397.
Hello, everybody.
Hello, my friends.
We've reached the bottom of the second hour for tonight's broadcast of the political cesspool.
The political cesspool tonight is being hosted by Bill Rowland and yours truly, Winston Smith.
And we have on the line one of our favorites, political cesspool, one of our favorites from the political cesspool, all-star stable of talent, Pete Stanton.
Scoop, you just caught me just as one of our cats jumped up on my lap here.
How are you?
How have you been, Pete?
Good.
Can you hear me?
I can.
We also have a caller online, Jim from Buffalo.
But Pete, why don't you give us what's been going on with you lately?
And we'll let Jim from Buffalo come on in just a minute.
Okay, great.
Well, I want to talk to Jim because I used to live in the Empire State.
First, a couple of things.
You remember the dollar coin that the men try to push on us?
Which one?
The one with Seca, Julia?
Oh, yeah, I remember that one very well.
In fact, I wrote into the Washington Times about it.
The Washington Times has set up some kind of mock competition.
And one guy wrote in and said that it didn't matter who they put on the dollar coin.
Americans did not want a dollar coin.
He said you could put a Hooter's girl on a dollar coin and people still wouldn't want it.
And so I wrote in and said, you know, I'd be willing to try that one, but then we'd have to have somebody judge whose image would appear on that dollar coin.
And frankly, the possibility of Bill Clinton desperately angling for the position of Treasury Secretary was just too nauseating.
We should skip it.
Right, right.
Well, it's back, and the men's pushing a new dollar coin.
This time it's the Statue of Liberty.
So when I was up in D.C. a couple weeks ago riding the trains, they had billboards all over the train stations.
And to me, call me a conspiracy not.
Me.
This is telling me that we're marching one more step towards globalism because the Treasury Department and the U.S. Men's pushing this dollar coin and lots of foreign currencies, such as the peso, Canadian dollar, British pound and the Euro, all come in coin form.
So you know, stand by, stand by and start getting your Ameros.
So that's, that's one thing I would mind.
So they're gonna, they're gonna give us a dollar coin, whether we want it or not.
Right, and the last time with the SACA, Julia.
I mean, people are trading in the dollar coins for bills.
I'm just surprised they they didn't decide to put Michelle Obama's picture on a dollar coin.
Oh, speaking of the Obamas in my hand now, as I said before, I was riding the rails of the Washington Area metro system and to ride the trains you needed something called the fare card.
Well, I put some money into a machine, popped out a fare card and the metro system in DC is has a picture of Barack Obama on it and it reads, celebrating the inauguration of Barack Obama, 44th President of the United States.
So I'm at Melissa James, and I want to make this the official fare card for the Washington Metropolitan AREA Transit Authority.
As far as DC is concerned, it's all Obama all the time.
Right right right, right.
And Jim from Buffalo, what do you think about that?
Say good, Jim from Buffalo, what do you think about that?
What do I think about which?
Which thing?
About well, the dollar coin.
And about Obama being on the fare cards?
I like neither.
Hey Jim, Jim from a question, are you listening over the internet or are you listening over the radio?
Well, I'm listening to my station over the internet, but I'm at work this evening.
So well, we're glad to have you on the show.
And why are you calling?
We want to.
I wanted to comment about the, the shooting the other day, and and because, of course, we have been hearing about it non-stop.
But I wanted to point out that the moment that that I heard about that on Wednesday, I said, here we go.
This is going to open up the door for the usual suspects to come on out and start talking about, about hate crimes and all that again.
And sure enough, yesterday on this program, in the noon hour, on this rate, on a radio station around here, the host brought on none other than Mark Potok from the, from the Southern Poverty LAW Center, and her intro said, you know, Mark Potok monitors hate as his.
That's his job from the SPLC and generates hate.
Yes, I'm sorry, I said Mark Potok generates hate.
Well, of course they're not going to tell you that.
I just wanted to point out a couple things that he said, because it's unbelievable the outright misinformation and lies that this man perpetrated on a national radio show yesterday.
First of all, he said, yes, there is clear-cut evidence that hate crimes are on the rise in this country, although he gave no numbers, nor did he really tell us the truth, which is the ones that are any of the crimes that are committed that fall under that category are less than 1% of all crimes committed in this country.
And even that's a joke.
He was asked right off the bat if this had anything to do with Obama being in office.
And he said, well, I don't have any hard evidence about that, but it's clear that that's what this all comes down to.
Okay?
I mean, again, I don't know, but I guess that's what it is.
He guesses.
Then he went on to say, he blamed people specifically.
He said, for example, Lou Dobbs was one of the so-called conservative talk show hosts who are responsible for the rise.
He said his rhetoric about illegal immigrants coming into this country and telling people that, you know, the ones that come over here want to take back the Southwest are responsible for this 40% rise in crimes against Hispanics.
So she said, hmm, well, well, how about giving us an example?
And he only could cite one thing, and that was some Hispanic guy was killed in New York by a roving gang of teens, which, of course, you know, is mainstream media doublespeak for minorities.
Yeah.
Okay, because obviously if they were white, he would have said it.
But anyway, just one lie after another.
And of course, Dobbs never has, not that I know of, nor could I find that he said specifically that the people themselves, he referred to the group La Raza, which Potok conveniently left out of his nonsense.
I mean, this guy was allowed to speak, guys, for five minutes, and it was just one over-the-top lie after another.
Unbelievable.
Every time he opens his mouth, nobody ever challenges him on the numbers.
As long as they say that name, the SPLC before his name is taken as gospel truth, and we know, just from our experience, being political says pool co-hosts, that they are the biggest bunch of liars you can imagine.
They have never had a good, they never had good publicity from true investigative journalism.
Every investigative journalist who's ever looked into them has come away with a report saying that they're a bunch of charlatans, that they are the epicenter of hate in this country.
Now, what I expect to happen from this Holocaust museum shooting is that we will soon see the Stephen Tyrone Johns hate crime legislation.
That was the name of the guard who was killed during that episode.
And they're going to try to use that man's death to further their own Marxist agenda.
Right.
And of course, I agree with you.
I believe exactly the same thing is going to happen.
This is going to ramp up the rhetoric concerning passing hate crimes bills.
This is going to have Congress sweep this whole nonsense under the rug with the last one, you know, because of course it's still stalled because of the sexual orientation thing they can't get around.
This will be perfect fodder to say we have to do something about it because it's out of control, folks.
Look at what just happened on Wednesday.
And it's going to get ramped up.
And people in this country are going to sit back and just go, eh, okay.
And that's the part that bothers me the most, okay?
That's the part that really gets me, is that a lot of people just simply don't either don't care or are just apparently too preoccupied to concern themselves with little trivial matters like this.
Scoop Stanton, we got about 45 seconds left before we go to a break.
What are your thoughts on it?
Well, I mean, Jim just took the length of myself.
I want to ask Jim, since he's just a caller and just an average guy, average intelligent guy since he listens to Cesspool.
Of all the news stories about the shooting at the museum, have you heard the gentleman's name mentioned at all other than the shooter, but the poor victim that got shot by that nut job?
No, hardly ever did I hear the victim's name.
Exactly, me neither.
And I thought I was just not paying attention, but you know, nonetheless.
All right, gentlemen, we're about to go.
We're about to go into our next break.
Could both of you hold on when we come back?
Sure, sure.
All right, folks.
Stay tuned for more of the political cesspool with Winston Smith and Bill Rowland and Pete Stanton and Jim from Buffalo.
Stay with us, folks.
Don't go away.
The Political Cesspool, guys.
We'll be back right after these messages.
We'll return.
We'll return.
Jump in the political cesspool with James and the gang.
Call us tonight at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
You are listening to the Political Cesspool, whether you like it or not.
My name is Bill Rowland, and my co-host tonight is Winston Smith.
And James Edwards has decided to play hookie tonight, so we decided to come in and cover for him and turn the knobs and push the buttons and ring the bells.
And we are on the air right now with our old buddy from Washington.
He's with us.
Go ahead, Pete.
Are you there?
Yes, I am.
And you were saying before the break that there's a coin about to be circulated with the Statue of Liberty as the theme, and that really the transit system in Washington D.C. is now all about Barack Obama.
Well, the fare cards are about Barack Obama, but the U.S. in the metro system in D.C. had an advertising blitz all over the transit system to advertise a stupid coin that nobody's going to want.
Well, now let me ask you something.
You mentioned before the break that this coin you feel is a step towards global currency.
And, you know, from my point of view, we ought to have coins instead of paper money anyway, because it's not as easy to, it's a lot easier to print as much paper money as you need and assign a value to it than to stamp coins and assign arbitrary values.
But, you know, it's an interesting point you bring up because a few years back, the head of the monetary policy for the Council of Foreign Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, a guy named Ben Steele, had suggested that a global currency should be developed around precious metals and commodities.
And so you might be right.
We may be well on the way to a global currency through the use of coins.
Yep.
And because as soon as I saw the coin, I go, oh, my God, we're heading towards a global currency because, again, when I was living over in Europe, the Euro denomination is a coin.
What do you think, Winston?
Is this it?
World government, the big I?
I think so.
I think so.
I do need to say something right quick.
We do have a caller on the line.
I would like to ask the caller to hang up and call us back during the next hour.
We want to reserve this half hour for Scoop Stanton's report.
So caller, if you could, please hang up and call us back at the top of the next hour.
That's all I got.
But Jim still on the line?
What's that?
Is Jim still on the line?
No, he's not.
Oh, he was a great caller.
Yeah, he's a regular.
I hated to say goodbye to him, but it gets a little difficult sometimes with four different people on the show at the same time.
So I hope he'll call back maybe in the next hour.
So I like talking to him as well.
Well, Pete, you better take a deep breath because you've got the next 30 minutes here.
Okay.
Speaking of the Holocaust Museum murder, I did a Google search and notice there are Holocaust museums all over the country.
And I was thinking, you know, is this a museum about a horrible incident?
Or is this like a Hooters franchise and they're popping up everywhere?
There's even a Holocaust Museum in Richmond, Virginia.
And it's like they're putting these things in places that had nothing to do with the Holocaust.
But then if you ask your typical Zionist ADL rabid Zionist type, they're going to tell you that everybody was involved in the Holocaust.
Either you were a perpetrator or you were a victim.
And of course, if you weren't a Jew, then you were a perpetrator.
You might not have even been born at the time.
But you are still somehow intimately involved in the Holocaust, whether you know it or not, whether you like it or not.
Right.
And here's a question.
Okay, we've got all these Holocaust museums for the Jews that got killed in World War II.
Where are the Holocaust museums and all the remembrances and memorials for all the Russians and the Chinese peasants that were killed in their own Holocaust?
And most people in Russia and China were much, there were more of them than the Jews killed in Germany.
The idea is that Zionists like the ADL, they want to limit the use of the word Holocaust to refer only to what they say happened to Jews during World War II.
And I'll say right now, nobody at the political cesspool denies that there were atrocities committed during World War II against a lot of people.
But what we virulently fight against is some of the outright lies that have festered into fact surrounding those incidences.
And they have done so with no grander thought in mind than just to generate money and to heap guilt upon people who were not even involved.
But there were other Holocaust that took place.
And there was the Arminian Holocaust, which was perpetrated by a group of Jews known as the Young Turks.
In fact, the ADL fired one of their regional directors for having the temerity to suggest that the ADL might want to acknowledge Zionist participation in the murder of millions of Arminians.
They did it.
And yet just this one regional director for the ADL, he said, you know, we might want to just admit that we did something wrong here.
They fired him.
They blackballed his name.
He'll never work in a Zionist organization ever again.
But the fact is, Jews have been at the epicenter of just about every evil that was perpetrated in the 20th century.
Be it the Bolshevik Revolution, which was a Zionist, a Zionist campaign, be it psychoanalysis, be it feminism, be it the long march through the institutions that the Frankfurt School perpetrated.
Those were all Zionist perpetrated.
Bill?
This shooter at the Holocaust Museum, I think, really presents some difficulties for the Holocaust industry and for the people who want to push for hate crimes.
Because we have to remember that this is not a you know, this is not a neo-Nazi straight out of prison with a swastika tattooed on his forehead.
This is an 88-year-old man who, by the very definition given us by Tom Brokow, is a member of the greatest generation.
This was a man who was fighting in World War II against the forces of fascism and totalitarianism, and in fact who was given, you know, was awarded medals for his courage and heroism and his abilities.
So he presents some very difficult problems for assessing him as a villain.
There is no doubt an element of tragedy in this man's life in terms of how it's ended up.
So I think that the more they look at von Braun or Von Braun, I think it's von Braun, and his writings, the more difficult he is going to become a villain.
Certainly what he did was a crime and it was wrong, and it is certainly going to generate a great deal of publicity for the ADL and for these Holocaust museums and no doubt generate a great deal of contributions.
But upon examination, this man is really an enigma in terms of the reasons that he did things, how he got involved in a movement that would push him towards committing a violent crime.
And I mean, I'm not going to reduce this.
There are some, no doubt, people who would say that he should be treated in the same way as any other martyr for a cause or assassin who would go after a tyrannical institution.
And that's not the case.
He committed a crime.
He committed a murder.
Let's not gloss over that with fancy language.
The point is that because he doesn't fit the profile of the neo-Nazi extremist, he's going to be a difficult monster to sew together.
And the problem that he is still alive is significant because he's going to, at some point, open his eyes and open his mouth.
And, you know, the press and the media are going to have to deal with that problem.
And if he lives long enough to go to court, that's going to present another difficult evaluation of a man who, let's say at the end of World War II, came out being considered a hero and a man who served his country.
So it's just a difficult ⁇ he's a very difficult study, I think.
Bill and Pete, I kind of got the impression that he was already being painted as a neo-Nazi and as an anti-Semite.
And I'm starting to see the phrase white nationalist to describe him more and more.
Pete, have you seen that?
No, they always call neo-Nazi, you know, white supremacist and every other name that's out there, you know, cutting paste from the intelligence report from the SPLC.
But one thing, if you notice, remember a couple months ago, the guy who shot and killed the four Oakland police officers in one day?
If you go back, The media almost buried that story.
And then, when a bunch of idiots had a parade for the guy that shot and killed four cops, the media had some sympathizers for the guy.
Meanwhile, this guy in DC shoots a man and kills him.
And they're making him at the second coming of Hitler.
I mean, it's such a double standard.
A crime is a crime is a crime.
I mean, the guy that was killed in the district.
We have to go to a break.
Hang on for the next segment.
Listen to the political cesspool.
Stay with us.
Believe it or not, there's a third hour of tonight's installment of the political cesspool coming your way right after these messages.
The cold rising sun and it's been the ruin of many a poor war.