All Episodes
Previous
Plain Text
March 26, 2026 - Tim Pool Daily Show
01:00:46
Trump Says Iran “BEGGING” Him To Make Deal, Iran Denies EVERYTHING

Grab your Stinger now before this deal disappears and visit https://mcgtac.com/TimStingShow more Host: Tate Brown @realTateBrown (everywhere) Show less

|

Time Text
What is going on, Patriots?
This is Tate Brown here, holding it down, taking you from the morning to the afternoon on the Rumble daily lineup.
It is a beautiful Thursday just outside of our nation's capital here.
It's another sunny day.
It's like spring's finally here.
It took a little while.
That little rat, that Puxwatani fell, a little weasel.
I just want to wring his neck because he's just always screwing up spring for me, it feels like.
But just that's a joke.
I respect Phil very much.
He's a good, you know, whatever he is.
He's a rodent of some sort.
He's a badger.
Groundhog, groundhog.
He's a great groundhog.
We love him.
Fantastic.
Shout out to Puxwatani.
Phil.
With that, we have a big show for you guys today on this beautiful Thursday.
As you saw from the title of the show, obviously we're going to be talking Iran again.
What else is there to talk about?
I mean, this is really the story because it's just the crux of everything.
I mean, it really is.
It's hilarious that it's actually not really that interesting for people outside of politics because it really has such a massive magnitude.
I mean, this could either go into World War III, which I do think is unlikely, very unlikely, but it has the risk of that.
You'd think people would be paying more attention, but not really.
We have a few other stories we'll get to.
We got, well, there's an interesting story out of Maryland.
You might have saw it already this morning.
A woman hired a broofing company, like a group of guys, to do her roof.
And about midway through the roof job, called ICE and got all of them deported.
You know, people have been joking around about doing that, but someone finally actually did it.
There's video of it, and it's really, I think, a beautiful thing.
I think she's a total patriot.
So we'll cover that.
We've got a few other stories we're going to get to if we have time.
I think we're going to do a mailbag today.
So I'll be chopping it up with you guys at the end of the latter half of the show.
I want to get to the Church of England.
Obviously, the State Church of England.
As you probably know by now, have appointed a woman to be their archbishop, which, you know, is uncommon primarily because it's unbiblical.
So, you know, it's interesting that they're trying to, as their church is completely dying off, just pretty much speedrun the race to the bottom.
It's very interesting stuff.
So we'll get into that.
And we have a few other stories we'll get to if we have time.
But before we get into all of today's stories, I want to play a quick word from today's sponsor, and then I'll join you guys after the break.
I'll be right back.
We're going to give a shout out to today's sponsor.
It is Stinger Combat Optic.
Have you ever wondered what it feels like to shoot with the same precision tech used by U.S. Special Forces?
Well, the good news is, after years of research and development, MCG Tactical just dropped something incredible, the Stinger Combat Site.
This is your average red dot.
Using holographic technology once reserved for elite military and law enforcement, the Stinger delivers crystal clear precision.
So accurate, you could hit a dime at 300 yards without even trying.
Wow, I need this thing.
This is the exact same level of technology used by the pros, but here's the twist.
Most sites like this go for $600 or more, and people happily pay it.
But right now, through an exclusive deal with MCG Tactical, you can get this mill-spec site for under $200, and it gets better.
For my listeners, you're getting 67% off, and they're covering shipping.
Just scan the QR code on your screen or go to mcgtac.com slash Tim Sting to get yours today.
The only catch, supply is tight.
And these are already flying off the shelves.
So if you want a site built for the best, now's your shot.
Grab yours before they have to shut down orders.
Grab your stinger now before it disappears.
McGtack.com/slash Tim Sting.
Well, thank you very much for sponsoring the show.
And with that, we're going to get into our first story for today.
This one's more of the same in a lot of ways, but we do have an update.
Obviously, you guys probably saw President Trump is saying, not just is Iran ready to make a deal, but now they are begging to make a deal.
So, this is the word, the latest word from the president.
Let me get in a frame here.
What's going on?
This is what he had to say on Truth Social today.
The Iranian negotiators are very different.
Sorry, the Iranian negotiators are very different and quote, strange.
They are quote, begging us to make a deal, which they should be doing since they have been militarily obliterated with zero chance of a comeback, and yet they publicly state that they were only quote looking at our proposal.
Wrong.
They better get serious soon before it's too late.
Because once that happens, there is no turning back and it won't be pretty.
President Donald J. Trump.
So, yeah, I mean, I think he's just kind of indicating because, again, we had this yesterday.
I guess I'll go ahead and lead in with this.
This is from Al Jazeera.
They were basically reporting on behalf of FARS, the state media out of Iran.
They were basically just, you know, giving us what the quotes were from their response.
So, this was in response to Trump yesterday and Monday as well, saying, you know, we're talking to someone in Iran and the war will be wrapped up soon.
This was from Ibrahim Zulfikari.
He's the spokesperson for the unified command of Iran's armed forces.
He said on Wednesday in comments to FARS and their, you know, their central state media, quote, has the level of your inner struggle reached the stage of you negotiating with yourself.
Okay.
Don't call your failures an agreement.
And basically, just completely rebuffing, just completely rebuffing that there is any sort of deal being struck here.
The statement is in the latest official Iranian denial that Tehran is engaged in diplomacy with Washington, even as Trump insists talks are ongoing and reports circulate of the U.S. sending a peace proposal.
Speaking to reporters at the White House yesterday, U.S. president said Washington is speaking to the right people in Iran, which he claimed wants to make a deal so badly.
They're talking to us and it's making sense.
And then, you know, Al Jazeera tightens it up here.
Trump's position marks a stark shift from days earlier, which he threatened to strike Iran's power plants if Tehran did not fully reopen the street of Hormuz, where it has threatened vessels from enemy nations.
Hours before the ultimatum expired on Monday, the U.S. markets reopened for the trading week.
Trump said he would delay any planned attack for five days, citing diplomatic progress.
Iranian officials denied this.
Zulfikari said that there would be no return to previous oil prices or the prior regional or order until our will is done.
Which indicates like you know, he probably will attempt to strike the Gulf states again if we were if we you know conduct any further massive operations in Iran.
Trump is really trying to wrangle the market here.
This is why you saw I was talking about on the show yesterday why he you know Trump really declares a very insane ultimatum this weekend or this previous weekend.
So, you know, Ken, everyone's looking at the clock.
He's saying we're going to strike it.
But this is just felt like it was going to be a massive escalation.
We have already seen that thousands of troops are headed towards Iran.
And then Monday, like pretty much right after, right as the market's opening, Trump comes in and says, no, there's a deal on the table.
You know, we're going to delay the strikes by five days, et cetera, et cetera.
Now, again, we're heading.
So he said that if we have five days of delay the strikes now, today's Thursday, so we're heading into Friday.
So now the question again is, are we going to strike him?
Like, what's going on here?
What's the plan here?
That's where Trump comes in.
This is Trump today, again, saying not only is there no need to strike Iran anymore, but they're actually begging us for a deal.
Trump's basically trying to keep as much leverage as he can right now in order to potentially extract some sort of concessions.
But the problem is, you know, we're not dealing with...
We're not dealing with necessarily a party.
We're not dealing with a opponent whose interests are completely economic or completely even geopolitical.
This is a country who has a religious fanaticism.
This is one thing that the pro-Israel, you know, like we got to blow Iran off the Mark Levin types.
One thing they do get right is that Iran is driven by fanaticism.
There's really no question about that.
I don't even think like a lot of people that are super anti-Iran war can even really deny that.
That's why they are still persisting.
And that's why for Iran, a victory for them is just surviving this.
A victory for them is just getting out of this in one piece.
Meanwhile, for us, our victory condition going in was basically what was outlined from the start, at least that was sort of, if you read between the lines, what was outlined, which was the protests were happening.
This is why we decided to strike now, because we were under the impression that, you know, if we were able to basically create a vacuum, a power vacuum, that the protesters would just sort of rise up and then take control of the government.
This is kind of what we expected to happen.
And then kind of the opposite happened is there was kind of a rallying around the flag that occurred in Iran.
So then we had to kind of change course here.
Okay, let's see if we can just completely decimate their nuclear, you know, nuclear program and, you know, decimate them to the point where maybe we can just get a deal.
We can get a deal out of this.
And that's kind of what the plan is now.
It's difficult.
This is why people were getting upset at me.
They were saying I was not trusting the plan so much anymore when I went on IRL two days ago.
And I was saying we've already kind of fallen short of what our initial victory condition was.
So it's really difficult to call this operation a success unless there's just a massive drastic turnaround.
Again, if we're to believe President Trump here, if we're to believe that this is accurate, that Iran is begging for a deal, then I think perhaps this could be a successful operation, all things considered.
Again, if we do see a complete dismantling of their nuclear program, they turn over uranium to us.
You know, we basically sort of fold them into the global system once again, kind of take them away from China's camp, moderate their regime.
That's all kind of a success.
For the Israelis success, because they're, you know, the other part of this equation, for them, success is regime change.
That's why they're amplifying a lot of stuff around the monarchy.
Like, oh, Pahlavi is, you know, ascendant and there's this massive upswell of support for him and Iran, which is true to a degree, but he's not going to be put in.
I mean, Trump's already said it.
It's not going to happen.
And I'm getting all these people hopping on my head for like laughing at the idea that Iran's going to have a monarchy again, at least because of Trump.
It's not going to happen.
I mean, Trump's already said it.
It's not going to happen.
Like, just drop it.
It's not me.
I don't really care.
It's not me cheering against the monarchy.
I have no personal problem with the guy.
It's just not going to happen.
I'm tired of hearing about it.
It is what it is.
To Trump's point, you know, they need someone inside the country, right?
You need someone that people that will still be vehemently loyal to the regime can at least stomach.
And that's going to be the key because he's going to have to, you know, whoever this new leader is still going to have to wield a massive power structure within Iran.
And like I said, they're driven by fanaticism.
So with that, let's get into some of Trump's sound bites today regarding this whole situation.
This was at the top of his little press huddle today.
We're just going to go ahead and go clip by clip here because there's some really, it's still going.
So if I get any other new juicy clips, I'll throw it in the stack here.
But this was starting off about 30 minutes before showtime or about an hour before showtime.
Trump started this press gaggle.
Take a look at these clips right here.
This is the first one.
Trump on Iran, they are begging us to make a deal, not me.
They are begging to make a deal.
Again, I think both parties here are probably sort of hiding the ball a little bit because, again, they're trying to have max leverage in these negotiations.
I don't think they're begging for a deal.
I think they're probably reviewing.
That was another report that a lot of Iranian officials came out said reviewing the terms of the deal, this 12-part deal that Trump proposed.
But I do think Iran probably is keen on wrapping this up.
That's true.
I don't think they're begging for a deal.
But that's like, that's to sort of debunk what they're telling the public, the Iranians are telling the public, because I do think they're keen on getting out of this.
I mean, I really don't see an indication that they have certain goals in this war.
Like they were in the driver's seat whatsoever.
It's like, no, you got bombed, and then you reacted.
That's not, you don't need, you're not dictating terms here, especially because you don't even have a Navy anymore.
So I don't even know what you're supposed to do.
With that, let's get into some of these clips.
I'll stop yapping here.
Take a look at this first one.
And just so we set the record straight, because I've been watching the Wall Street Journal's fake news and all these stories that get printed like, oh, I want to make a deal.
They are begging to make a deal, not me.
They're begging to make a deal.
And anybody that saw what was happening over there would understand why they want to make a deal.
But they say, oh, we're not talking to anybody would know that.
Only a total fool.
And they're not fools.
They're very smart, actually, in a certain way.
And they're great negotiators.
I say they're lousy fighters, but they're great negotiators.
And they are begging to work out a deal.
I don't know if we'll be able to do that.
I don't know if we're willing to do that.
They should have done that four weeks ago.
They should have done it two years ago.
Or they should have done it when we first came into office because two years ago, they had free reign under Biden, Sleepy Joe, worst president in the history of our country.
What he allowed to happen to our country at the borders.
And even with a thing like this.
So true.
Again, it's true, Sleepy Joe, everything you said, that's correct.
Again, I think the Wall Street Journal's report, and not to countersignal the president here, I hate doing that, but I do think the Wall Street Journal's reporting is probably a little bit more accurate in which the Trump administration is trying to figure out maybe what they can sort of include in these negotiations to sort of sweeten the deal for the Iranians to wrap this up because I think it's in the Americans' interest to just end this now.
Because to my initial point, we kind of have fallen short of what this operation was all about.
Therefore, let's just wrap this up, like our wounds, and take whatever victory condition, you know, victories we have.
Because look, Scott Greer was talking about this on his show.
It was like yesterday or the day before.
The American people really actually don't hold presidents responsible for these sort of foreign policy, like where if they fall short in these foreign policy instances.
I mean, even Afghanistan, you know, with Biden's withdrawal of Afghanistan, most people had already forgotten about it.
I mean, like, a lot of veterans obviously was at the top of their mind and people that are like in family, veteran families, et cetera, et cetera.
And then beyond that, the only people that really cared were Beltway types because we should have.
I mean, it was a very horrific, embarrassing scandal.
Putin certainly didn't forget about it.
But Biden, for the most part, kind of moved past Afghanistan in a large way because the American public have amnesia.
The American public only have like three month long memories, but that's probably even being too gracious.
I mean, genuinely, like the Boeller thing, the Mueller tweet was a headline for like a day, and then people have already forgotten about it.
I mean, people do not have long memories.
The American voter does not.
So even if Iran, you know, if he bail now, or at least, you know, bail, you know, soften the land and get a parachute out.
I really don't think it hamstrings Trump that much.
I really don't.
You know, people are saying, well, this is going to be a blot on his record.
You know, this is going to, some people are just out of control.
They're like, this is every, all the good work he's done is completely undone by this.
You know, he's going to go down the history books for this.
I really don't think so.
I really don't think so.
I mean, if that was true, you would, that would be conditioned on, you know, conditional on two things.
A, that this is a massive failure, which I don't think so.
I mean, you know, compared to it's, it's, Afghanistan is still a massive, you know, a monumentous failure.
Way worse than what's going on right now.
I mean, Afghanistan, as a result of how big of a failure it was, Putin realized he could just invade Ukraine.
It was a miscalculation.
He had no think he expected the U.S. to back Ukraine as hard as we ended up doing.
But that's just the reality of the situation.
Where Iran, it's like, okay, we fell short of our initial goal.
So you could say the original operation has been somewhat of a failure.
But it's fine.
Like we can kind of just leave and nothing will really happen.
There's no like long-term blot on Trump's record, really.
I mean, people will go back and say, yeah, that was a bad, bad moment.
That was ugly.
But I promise you, like, the American people have amnesia.
There's a chance that if this wraps up in the next week or two, people won't even be talking about this rolling into the midterms.
And if the sanctions are lifted on Iran, then oil prices will go down below what they were before the war.
In theory, I mean, it's going to take the while.
Qatar, you know, Qatar's LNG facilities were hit pretty hard.
So, you know, there's some modeling that shows that actually energy prices might not drop back down.
But I'm sure the Trump administration calculated this.
I mean, you know, people are pointing out that Venezuela could have potentially just been a way to bolster the global oil supply before an operation in Iran.
There's something to be said about that.
That could be the case.
It could very well be the case.
Regardless, it probably is time to wrap up, get out of this in one piece.
I don't see the Trump administration even wanting to escalate.
I mean, the fact that they're kind of trying to gaslight the Iranians into cutting a deal here kind of indicates that the Trump administration really just feels like this was a mistake.
Let's get out.
You're seeing it from Trump's True Social posting.
He's kind of all over the place.
If you look at what Trump's primary goal has been over the last two weeks, it's been to keep the market stable.
He's not even, I don't think he's really as preoccupied with this anymore.
I think for the most part, he's keeping the market stable.
I think most of the operation is Hag Seth, Mark Rubio, and then negotiations is really just Witkoff's baby right now.
Trump's primarily focused on making sure the economy doesn't burn up, which is valid because that will sink us indefinitely.
So we'll get into some more of these clips here.
This one is Steve Witkoff reads a prepared written statement to Trump on Iran peace deal.
Quote, Iran is looking for an off-ramp following your powerful threat on Saturday, obviously responding to the ultimatum Trump issued on Saturday.
Take a look at this clip here.
I can report to you today that we have, along with your foreign policy team, presented a 15-point action list that forms the framework for a peace deal.
This has been circulated through the Pakistani government acting as the mediator.
And this has resulted in strong and positive messaging and talks, as you just indicated to the press.
But these are sensitive diplomatic discussions, and you have directed us to maintain confidentiality on the specific terms and not negotiate through the news media as others do.
I can say this.
We will see where things lead and if we can convince Iran that this is the inflection point with no good alternatives for them other than more death and destruction.
We have strong signs that this is a possibility and if a deal happens, it will be great for the country of Iran, for the entire region and the world at large.
Your policy of peace through strength is the most effective tool for a diplomatic resolution here, just as this policy was an effective tool in each and every one of all of the other conflicts you settled in your first year.
Iran is looking for an off-ramp following your powerful threat on Saturday.
Your indications that you are willing to listen to peace proposals have been well received.
You have instructed us that your preference is always peace and that we should make that our priority.
We have delivered that message, sir, along with the 15 points for peace.
Finally, we have told Iran one last thing.
Don't miscalculate again.
Thank you very much.
We get that here.
I mean, Wickoff, again, is kind of echoing, intellectualizing what Trump's been saying, which is like, look, actually, it's Iran that's desperate for a deal here.
It's Iran that is looking for an off-ramp, which, again, is probably true.
I think it would be surprising if both the U.S. and Iran are both looking for an off-ramp right now.
That's why it seems like a deal is imminent.
It's just the U.S. is going to have to make concessions.
That's just the reality if they want to get this across the finish line.
I would expect, I was saying this on IRL, and from everything I've researched, I would expect, I mean, there's no chance we're going to leave the Persian Gulf.
That's the demand from Iran is that we leave the Persian Gulf.
That's not going to happen.
Never in a million years is that going to happen.
For one, we've still got to unblock the straight, which apparently the British are leading a group of allied nations to go clear the strait, which we'll see how that goes.
We'll see if the British still have that fight in them.
I'm not going to count them out yet.
We'll just see what happens there.
But yeah, I don't see that happening.
I think what seems likely is potentially a full withdrawal from Iraq.
I mean, that's been in the discuss.
It's been in the cards for the U.S. for some time now.
That's been discussed.
I could very well see that being what we end up sort of pulling the lever on to get a deal across the finish line.
With that, we have another clip here from Trump.
This one was just funny, him responding to a journal.
Some journal is just asking like a retarded question and Trump just like totally owns her.
Take a look at this club.
President, are you going to go in for the uranium?
Like, how do you secure Iran?
Let's assume I was or I wasn't.
Why would I ever answer a question?
Can you accomplish that?
What kind of question?
Am I going to go in for the...
Oh, yeah, I'm going in.
We're going in tomorrow at 3 o'clock.
How could you possibly ask a question and expect an answer?
I don't know.
Freaking silly for me.
President?
Just asking a dumb question.
She's wasting the big Don's time like that.
I mean, if we were a serious country, she would have been hauled out of the White House for that.
And they would have taken all of her credentials away, probably tried to denaturalize her and probably send her to Guantanamo.
I'm just saying, like, I don't think that should happen.
I think that would be evil and wicked.
I'm just saying, in a serious country, wasting the big Don's time like that, there'd be consequences.
Okay, there'd be consequences.
For one, you wouldn't be just, you know, mouthing off in the White House like that anymore.
Seriously, lady?
Just silly void.
Just utterly ridiculous.
Here's another clip here.
This is this one dropped while I was when I was about to go online.
What am I trying to say?
Go live.
And then I have another clip after this.
And I think that's enough.
I think that'll be it.
And then we'll move to something else.
But take a look at this.
Trump says, Steve Witkoff, Steve asks Steve Witcoff for permission to disclose that Iran gifted the U.S. 10, quote, big boats of oil as tribute to show that they're serious about making a peace deal.
These boats are Pakistani flagged, according to Trump.
Take a look at this clip.
This is like massive, quite frankly.
If this is legit, then that really does indicate that both parties are interested in making a deal, and we're going to be wrapping this up quite soon.
Take a look at this clip.
We have very substantial talks going on with respect to Iran with the right people.
You know, I told you about a present, right?
Steve, can I reveal the present?
You can do anything you want to say.
They said to show you the fact that we're real and solid and we're there, we're going to let you have eight boats of oil.
Eight boats, eight big boats of oil.
This was two days ago.
And they'll sail up tomorrow.
That was three days ago.
And I didn't think much about it.
And then I watched the news and they said a very good anchor, actually.
Happy to be Fox.
But I watched it and they said something's unusual happening.
There are eight boats that are going right up the middle of the Hormo Strait.
Eight big tankers are going loaded up with oil right through.
And I said, well, I guess they were right and they were real.
And I think they were Pakistani flagged.
And I said, well, I guess we deal with the right people.
And actually, they then apologized for something they said and they said, we're going to send two more boats.
And it ended up being 10 boats.
I hope I haven't screwed up your negotiations.
I thought it was appropriate to say because I did taunt you the other day by saying they're going to give us a present.
Heck of a present.
I mean, again, that's a massive thing, if that's true.
Granted, you know, not to downplay.
I think that very well could be the case.
There is some truth to the fact that the current structure of Iran, the Iranian leadership broadly, is that they're completely decentralized.
They've always been decentralized, but in this instance, now they're severed.
They're not operating as one unit anymore.
They kind of, they kind of, the way that they sort their, you know, the way they organize everything over there is kind of like fiefdoms in a lot of ways.
And so that's there's potential that Trump is talking to, this is what he's been saying.
I'm talking to the right people.
I'm talking to the right people.
He is talking to someone in Iran.
And whoever this is, whoever this sort of party is, so to speak, is able to sort of call shots like that.
I mean, there's potential that whoever's, you know, these guys that are going to FARS are a completely different set who are just not on the same page whatsoever with the group that Trump's talking to.
There's a power struggle going on in Iran.
They realize this could be their chance to consolidate power, especially if they're the ones that can go back to the Iranian people and say, not only did we strike a deal, but we struck a deal that extracted some concessions out of the United States.
That's going to play well.
That's going to play in Peoria or whatever the equivalent of Peoria is in Iran.
Take a look at this clip right here.
This one's really wacky and wild from Disclose, obviously, is where I've been getting all these clips.
Thank you very much to Disclose.
We're doing some great work here.
Trump on Iran.
The reason that they want to make a deal is they have been just beat to shite.
That's what he had to say.
Take a look at this clip.
This is hilarious.
This dropped while I was live, by the way.
I just had to pull it up.
That we weren't negotiating with them.
And now they admit that we were negotiating with them.
So they want to make a deal.
The reason they want to make a deal is they have been just beat to shit.
They said yesterday.
Yeah, so I mean, to Trump's point, you know, they came out in this Al Jazeera article and they said, oh, well, you know, we're not even negotiating.
You know, we're not even negotiating with President Trump.
You know, I don't even know what you're talking about.
But then they come out today and some senior Iranian officials come out today and they say, we're reviewing the deal.
You know, we're taking a look at the deal.
So to Trump's point in that clip, you know, yesterday they were saying that we're not talking that.
We don't know what he's talking about.
And today they're like, we're negotiating.
We're looking at the deal that he sent over.
Guys, I really do think this is going to get wrapped up.
I really do think this is going to get wrapped up quite soon.
I don't think the escalation that a lot of people are anticipating is really going to happen.
I think Trump is just here's the problem.
Here's the problem with all of this right now.
Is the question is, what is Israel going to do?
Because Israel could legitimately blow up this entire negotiations right now, figuratively and literally, whenever they would like to.
That's the question.
I mean, how far does Israel want to go?
Because Israel, I mean, for the most part, they're getting hit, you know, in Tel Aviv.
And, you know, Jerusalem, I saw some missiles landed and elsewhere in the country.
They are getting hit, but I think they want to finish, you know, quote unquote, finish the job here.
I don't think they actually want the United States to leave the theater right now.
There's a chance, that's what people need to keep an eye out for, is it's not just between us and Iran.
Israel could potentially blow this up and drag us, you know, to further escalation.
I wouldn't be surprised.
You know, that's what a lot of people speculated.
It's a lot of people speculated with Rubio's initial statement saying, oh, well, you know, they were going to strike us, so, you know, we had to strike them.
That's kind of the question here.
Okay, well, what's Israel?
Is Israel going to be satisfied with the deal?
I mean, that's the question.
If they're even included on these negotiations, which I don't think they are, I don't see much reporting that they're privy to every single negotiation that occurs with Iran.
Something tells me they probably are privy to it based on either espionage or potential people in the White House talking with them.
But they're not supposed to be.
At least that's not the indication.
I haven't seen anything in the press indicating that.
There's a situation.
I hate to get conspiratorial, but there's a situation in which we do have a deal signed or inked, a deal that both parties are somewhat satisfied with.
And Israel ratches up the pressure.
Israel, as we saw, they bombed gas fields without our permission.
And Trump told them off.
Granted, they face no repercussions for it beyond just a scathing truth social post.
What happens if they decide that, you know, because look, look, let's look at it this way.
Benjamin Etanyahu has already come out and said previously, previous to the war, that the United States needs to sort of wean itself, or sorry, Iran, or sorry.
Israel needs to wean itself off of the United States, which makes a lot of sense.
You know, they should be self-sufficient as a country.
If that is true, then in their heads, they're thinking, we actually don't even want to, A, can we rely on the America as a long-term ally?
And B, do we even want to?
Do we even want to rely on America as a long-term ally?
They could see this situation as if we can get Iran out of the way with the United States' help, then we don't even need the United States anymore.
All of our regional foes are decimated.
I mean, who's left?
Who's left in the region that holds a candle?
It's Israel.
The Saudis are chill.
So it's really just Iran.
Like the last thing that is an impediment to sort of becoming a regional power.
And so, well, they're already a regional power, but like becoming the sole, you know, regional power.
So, there's an instance here.
The calculation from Israel is like, we can't let the Americans withdraw, you know, until this is done, until Iran is completely decimated.
Therefore, if a deal is going to get done, which is why I don't even know, you know, Trump, I guess, as part of negotiation tactics, is you know, you kind of have to worry about, I'm sorry, you kind of have to worry about that.
I mean, they've already gone out of line and conducted operations without a permission.
What's to stop them from blowing this deal up?
You know, that's the question.
Now, if that happens, if they do decide to blow this, you know, blow the negotiations up, you know, again, figuratively and literally, that could be kind of, that could be something that really strains the relationship, right?
I mean, Trump has been vehemently pro-Israel, which is hilarious when people come out and they're like, oh, he's a Zionist.
Trump's a Zionist.
It's like, yeah, he's been open about that since like the 1980s.
Like, are you seriously surprised by that?
I mean, he literally was going around in his first presidential runs, like, I'm going to be the greatest friend Israel's ever had.
So it's like, I don't know why people feel like they're so like betrayed by that.
It's like, you were just, I guess you were just ignoring that to your own demise, I suppose.
That's on you, quite frankly.
If you didn't know that, that's on you.
It is what it is.
He's a baby boomer.
They're all like, that's just kind of like how they operate.
That being said, that could be something that really strains the relationship between Trump and the Israelis is if they decide to conduct some sort of operation that stalls these negotiations.
That's why I don't think it's going to happen.
Because I know Benjamin Netanyahu's come out and he said, look, you know, we want to wean off the United States.
And Israel has, I think, is becoming increasingly convinced that they cannot rely on the United States as a long-term ally.
I mean, we've seen somebody reporting.
I mean, Tim's talked about it, how like what he told Benjamin Netyahu, what was supposed to be Chatham House rules until other people started mouthing off, is that, look, you guys can't rely on us.
You guys can't rely on the United States.
Even within the conservative movement, I mean, like, let's look at like, let's look at what was the primary sort of support for Israel?
Where was that coming from in the United States?
Well, it was coming from both parties.
It's kind of unified.
Everyone kind of agreed.
That was like a baby boomer kind of consensus because it was fresh after World War II.
It was on everyone's minds.
It was an exciting political project.
Can we establish a liberal democracy in the Middle East, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Then, as you kind of descended down the generations, the primary support for Israel was coming from like Christian Zionists for the most part.
Primarily, again, because of a reading, a theological interpretation, dispensationalism.
Again, I don't want to get into like a debate over this.
It's neither here nor there.
But the reality is nobody under like 40 in the evangelical church really believes in dispensationalism like outright anymore.
Maybe in like non-denomed churches, but those people aren't really that politically involved anyway.
But like within the Southern Baptist Convention, I mean, you're looking at all these reform churches, churches that adhere to covenant theology.
None of them really view Israel as like this, you know, the same Israel of the Old Testament.
It's not really a thing.
They just kind of view Israel as like another country whose people do have some significance, you know, and like, you know, biblically, but like this is not the same Israel from the Old Testament.
That's like the persuasion of most Christians nowadays in the United States.
So yeah, all this to say, this is why Israel cannot really depend on the United States long term.
I mean, you're seeing with young people, even outside of what I broke down, the reason I'm harping on, like getting specifics with dispensationalism and covenant theology is because Israel's primary support came from the Republican Party over the last 10 years.
And in addition to that, within the Republican Party, the sort of faction that's been clamoring the most for continued support for Israel is sort of that Christian Zionist contingent.
So all this to say, I mean, once that weans, you know, once that wavers, that sort of religious support for the state of Israel, even the Republican Party, I don't think the Republican Party is going to outright turn against Israel.
I don't think the Democrat Party's really done that.
I mean, I know a lot of people like, you know, a lot of like really vehemently pro-Israel people will say that, but that's even not really the case.
I mean, hello.
I had this clip in the stack.
I mean, Gavin Newsom coming out and saying, I'll just play you this clip.
I mean, this just indicates that like it's like if you're pro-Israel, like you really don't have that much to worry about right now.
Take a look at this clip.
Do you consider yourself a Zionist?
Do I consider myself a Zionist?
I believe I revere the state of Israel.
I'm proud to support the state of Israel.
I deeply, deeply oppose Bibi Netanyahu's leadership, his opposition to the two-state solution, and deeply oppose how he is indulging the far right as it relates to what's going on in the West Bank.
You regret using the word apartheid to describe it.
I used it.
I do in this context that I said it and I referenced why I used it, a Tom Friedman article in that same sentence where Tom used it in the context of the direction that Bibi is going.
Not the current concern, correct?
And that is a legitimate concern I have that I share with Tom that that direction, if that vision and that direction of the far right that Bibi is indulging, that if they see the full annexation of the West Bank,
then that's not something that's a word you may hear others use.
So it's really funny because like in the Republican Party, and this is where I might get in trouble, but it's just true.
I mean, it's just true.
And the Republican Party, the explanation for why so many of the politicians really have like Israel at the top of their list of like issues of importance is because the base, by and large, still really cares about Israel.
And again, people are going to be upset about that, but it's true.
Again, you have to remember the base isn't like you and your friends.
The base is like 65 and up.
The base of the Republican Party is literally like retirees.
That's why Social Security and like Medicaid and Medicare, that's why these are like such monumental issues.
This is why whenever you go to a town hall and you go and you like listen to a congressman give a stump speech, he's going to spend like half of it talking about social security.
Because that's, again, elderly people vote at a very high rate because they have nothing better to do.
They vote at a very high rate.
The Republican Party is already older on average, and the country is getting older.
So again, like the most, the majority of the Republican Party is these like Christian Zionist boomers.
And that's fine.
Like I'm not, this isn't me like attacking them because you're, for whatever reason, I mean, for what it's worth, you're not really going to change their mind anyway.
But that explains why a lot of like politicians, Republican politicians, because they're of that ilk.
That's why they're so vehemently in support of Israel.
You know, people will like post AIPAC graphs.
You know, they'll post like the donation, you know, how much they've donated to Republican politicians.
And they'll be like, see, this is like, you know, APAC buying off these Republican politicians.
I don't think those politicians, I think they took the APAC money because they support Israel, not the other way around.
I don't think they were ambivalent or against Israel, then got bought off, and now they're pro-Israel.
It's the other way around.
They took the money because they're so pro-Israel.
I mean, like, really, you think Lindsey Graham is like this, you know, just fairly ambivalent on the state of Israel until APAC paid him?
Is that what you really think?
No, that's like the majority of these Republican dinosaurs or establishment, really just broadly, the Republican Party broadly, are just pro-Israel inherently.
For, again, if they're like evangelical or because they're a boomer and that's just like was like the thing for them.
There's not really any way around that.
It's actually more egregious on the Democrat side, and this is where I might get in trouble, is the Democrat Party does not have a natural pro-Israel dispensation within the base at all, especially because the Democrat Party is increasingly becoming diverse.
It's increasingly becoming less white.
And support for Israel is primarily like a white thing for a variety of reasons.
It's primarily white people in the United States that like care, not just like care about Israel, but like support Israel.
And the majority of the vehement anti-Israel rhetoric in the country, the majority of like the pro-Palestine stuff comes from non-whites.
The reason for that is because they view Israel as like a colonial state.
So this isn't like when you hear like a lot of like non-white like leftists in the United States going on and on about Palestine and how Israel is an oppressor, it really doesn't have anything to do with the fact that Israel is Jewish, like a Jewish state.
It has more to do with the fact that they perceive Israel as like a white settler state, like an apartheid state, hurting innocent brown people in the Middle East.
That's why that's happening.
If you're someone that's watching the show and you have this, you're anti-Israel and you're on the right, just understand that the reason that you have a critique of Israel is completely different from why a leftist does.
And the leftist is not going to go to bat for you on anything.
Because again, they're looking at the same issue you are and they're agreeing with you as far as what the summation is.
But the reasons for that, their motive for why they have this position on the conflict is completely different from yours.
And you can't really ally with it.
It's not how that works.
You're not going to be able to ally with them because they're just going to, again, because they're just not approaching it from the same perspective as you whatsoever.
All this to say, I outlined why support for Israel is kind of natural in the Republican Party.
I don't even know if you really, maybe as time goes on, you're going to see more money coming in to try and keep people in line.
The Democrat Party does not have a natural disposition to support Israel, the state of Israel.
Again, especially Jewish, you know, Jews in the United States have swung Democrat heavily, but now they're kind of swinging into the Republican Party in recent years.
And in addition to that, they're becoming a smaller proportion of the population and an increasingly smaller proportion of the Democrat Party.
So you can't really explain.
And like I said, white voters are becoming a smaller proportion of their Democrat Party.
And in addition to that, a larger and larger chunk as time goes on of white Democrats are now anti-Israel for the same reasons that like non-white leftists are as they view Israel as like an apartheid state.
It's not like a based, you know, right-wing, whatever.
It's like, no, they just, again, they view Israel as like the same way that they viewed apartheid South Africa or Rhodesia or something like that.
So all this to say, the Democrat Party doesn't have a natural support, a natural base to support Israel.
So the only explanation for why Gavin Newsom, who is sort of stumping, you know, he's trying to position himself for 2028, the only reason he would feel the need to come out and declare himself as a proud Zionist that reveres Israel is because that is where the donor money is.
Again, that's going to piss people off.
That's going to infuriate them.
But again, how else do you explain that?
You think Gavin Newsom, the career opportunist who will literally change his politics to whatever is in vogue, whatever could maximize his chances of winning political office?
Do you think he finally had one organic position, which is that he should support the state of Israel?
Is that really what you think?
Do you really think Gavin Newsom, again, who every single position he has is fake because he's a fake person?
Every single position that he has is not real.
You know, but then suddenly he has like an organic, independent thought in Israel.
He's really sat down and thought about it.
He's like, maybe I should support the state of Israel.
You know, maybe they are like our greatest ally.
No.
It's like that's again, he needs money.
He needs, if he's going to run a political campaign, he needs donations.
There's a lot of, again, there's a lot of Jewish groups in the United States.
And this is like, again, people are going to say this is anti-Semitic or whatever.
There's zero ill will.
This just makes sense.
This is how you would operate if you were in this situation.
If any minority group was in this situation.
Again, the Democrat Party, as time goes on, is becoming increasingly hostile to the state of Israel.
So Gavin Newsom being a frontrunner, it would be in your best interest if you were like a pro-Israel group in the United States to, again, sort of lobby on behalf of your interest.
That's how lobbying works.
You lobby money, you know, you provide money, you do favors for Gavin Newsom to get him closer to his goal of being the nominee in 2028.
And he returns the favor by pledging support for your cause.
Israel's not the only lobbying group in the country.
They're one of the largest, but they're not the only one.
There's a lot of lobbying organizations.
Now, the reason why Gavin Newsom is different than a Republican is because for a Republican, you don't really need to.
If you say, I support Israel, no one in the base really reacts.
They're just kind of like, yeah, you're a Republican.
That's what I expect.
When Gavin Newsom does it, a lot of the base is confused.
A lot of the Democrat base, at this point, the base of the Democrat Party is no longer these working class, you know, rust belt, disaffected voters.
The base of the Democrat Party is literally radicalized leftists that are sympathetic with Antifa and celebrated Charlie Kirk's death, like white people or like non-whites.
That's like the base of the Democrat Party now.
Those two groups, if you pulled Israel among those two groups, you're going to see not much support.
You're not going to see much support.
If you pull the base of the Republican Party support for Israel, it's still going to be very high, despite what people online say.
It's still going to be very high.
Again, if you're upset about it, there's nothing you can really do about that.
That's just the reality of the situation.
So Gavin Newsom supporting Israel this vehemently is far more shocking, right?
And this, I guess, it's, you know, for lack of a better word.
So with that, I'm going to get to one more story and then we'll throw it to the chat.
See what you guys are saying.
This is just awesome.
I don't have too much commentary to add on this.
This is just really like a funny thing.
I had headphones on.
I had the cans on the whole time.
This is a really funny story.
This is from long time history.
I think this is a libtard.
Homeowner waits until construction job is nearly done and then calls ICE on six of her own workers.
A woman even provides the ladder used by agents to detain men who she owes $10,000 for a three-day job.
Not anymore.
Quote, she called the damn law on us and now we're totally screwed.
Men yell in Spanish.
They surround us.
They surround us.
Agents even left behind the workers' van with doors wide open.
It's not their van anymore, filled with thousands of dollars worth of tools.
The arrest was broadcast for about 30 minutes by a co-worker identified as this guy.
Quote, seeing it is not the same as experiencing it.
I've seen many videos and sadly today I had to experience it.
At the end of the video, he gets the woman who called ICE on camera.
It is the same woman tidying up the house still with hatred in her heart.
This incident occurred in Cambridge, Maryland.
Hatred in her heart.
I think she has hatred.
Yeah, it's like a lot of people.
It's literally like minions.
Spanish is a beautiful language.
And oftentimes they kind of look like they're wearing overalls and tiny stumpy.
They're falling over each other, pranking each other, laughing.
Ice has got him on the side.
You can see here, like, first of all, first of all, the implication from this post and what everyone is saying is, oh, well, she, you know, she waited for him to finish the job and then called ICE, like,
you know, to not have to pay the bill, which, even if she did that, that would be base, and I would still support her.
No questions asked.
Because, quite frankly, I don't think there's anything wrong with deceiving thieves.
You know, there's nothing wrong with that.
These guys are robbing our country.
They shouldn't be here.
They're robbing our country, robbing our inheritance.
So, again, tricking them, you know, bamboozling them.
Nothing wrong with that.
Not a sin, not nothing.
No reason to pearl clutch.
But that's not even what happened.
So I don't even have to, you know, go on on that.
Look at her roof.
All they've done is taken the tiling off.
That's all that happened here.
They've taken the shingles off.
So they were halfway through the job.
This isn't even a complete job yet.
They're halfway through the job.
And then she called ICE.
Presumably, because what likely happened is she hired this roofing company under the impression that people that were allowed to be in the country were going to be working on the roof.
And then halfway through, she realized, you know, for whatever reason, she picked up on it somehow, but they weren't.
Perhaps someone had told her, she received a tip, or perhaps she suspected it and just needed confirmation.
And then calls ICE.
So what exactly has she even done wrong here?
I mean, what has she even done wrong?
This is hilarious as a patriot.
And quite frankly, if more people were doing this, you know, we would be in a better country.
But even from a moderate perspective, what did she do wrong here?
I mean, that's what you're supposed to do.
If you see someone breaking the law, you contact the authorities.
Because all these workers are doing is ensuring that roofers who are doing the right thing, roofers that, again, if they're immigrants, they have their paperwork sorted or roofers that are American, you know, da-da-da-da-da.
All these illegal roofers are doing is driving their wages down, making sure they're getting paid less for their work, making sure that their families have less, making sure that these men have to work longer and be away from their families for longer.
That's all they're doing.
So again, let's just say hypothetically, I mean, that's not even what's happening.
Like I said, I mean, this isn't even like what the headline is, which is she waited for him to do the job and then called the police so she had to pay him.
Not even what happened.
But let's just say hypothetically, that is what happened.
Let's just say hypothetically, again, they did finish the job and they hand her the tab and it's 10 grand and she says, Ice, Ice, get over here and arrest him.
What's wrong with that?
Really, I don't think there's anything wrong with that.
Again, that's what, you know, faking out a thief?
Is that wrong?
I mean, seriously, is that wrong now?
Is Kevin from Home Alone like this sinister, wicked man boy, for pranking thieves?
Or maybe should the wet bandits not have been in this house in the first place?
Because I'm seeing, like, again, these Christian leaders are just calling out recently.
Christian leaders coming out and saying, this is wicked, you know?
You're not paying a debt you're owed.
This is stealing.
They're in our house.
They're here illegally.
Is Kevin from, are you going to write, you know, should we ban our children from watching home alone because Kevin is robbing, you know, he's harming these poor innocent man, men?
Or is it their fault for breaking and entering?
Is it their fault for being in Kevin's home illegally?
The McAllister household has rules.
The McAllister household has locks and the windows are shut and everything's locked up.
And the wet bandits break in illegally and they start stealing.
And all Kevin does is just respond by pranking them.
And then he calls the police.
That's the same thing that just happened here.
That's the same thing that just happened in this clip.
Some thieves broke into this country illegally and they're stealing and plundering.
You know, they're stealing from other roofers.
They're stealing their wages.
They're stealing their time and stealing from these roofers, other roofers' families.
This woman, the Kevin McAllister in this instance, just simply deceives them, tricks them, pranks them.
That's above board.
You're in our house.
You're kind of at our whims.
Again, you have human rights, I suppose, that we can't violate.
I say, I suppose we can't kill you or anything.
That's wrong.
But again, deceiving, like, you know, you're actively in, you're actively stealing from us.
You're in the active process of thievery.
So, no, I'm not going to pearl clutch over this.
It's ridiculous.
And you're soft, quite frankly, if you're doing that right now.
So, with that, let's see what chat's up to.
Let's see what chat is up to.
Let me take a look here.
And we'll get this going.
Bada bing, bada boom.
How do I pop this out?
No, that's not how.
That is not how.
Pop out.
Yo, pop out, chat.
Bang.
Am I doing it right?
Let's see what everyone's up to.
Yo, yo, chat.
Yo, chat.
What's going on?
Let's see what chat's up to.
We'll do interview.
Like I'm interviewing you guys.
Like I'm interviewing chat.
What's a okay, let's see here.
It's a time question.
When she realized they were illegals, when did she call ICE and how long did it take for ICE to get there?
Was it all incidental and even, or did she do this on purpose?
Even if she did this on purpose, again, that's on the guys.
That's on the ICE agent, that's on the illegals for not having their paperwork sorted.
I imagine part of it was probably incidental, you know, because it takes ICE some time to respond.
Like, it's not like the police were as soon as they hear there was an illegal, they immediately run over there and stop it.
She probably told ICE at the, if I had to speculate, we haven't seen any statements from her, at least I haven't seen any statements from her.
She probably tipped them off near the beginning of their roofing job, and then it probably takes Ice like a day or two to respond.
So that would be my guess.
Let's see here.
Yeah, if she did it on purpose, it's even better.
I mean, like, again, it's one of those things, like if everyone did this, if everyone sort of held illegals to these standards, roofers that are here legally and other tradesmen that are legally, again, or Americans, their wages would go up.
So it's just a W.
Let's see here.
Roofing company.
This is from Seth Morgan0305.
Roofing companies don't charge less when they have low-paid illegals.
They just pocket more profit.
They should be on jail too.
Yeah, I mean, and Phil Lebonte makes this point all the time: is like these companies need to be prosecuted probably even harder than like the individual legals because the companies are the ones that are facilitating this all in the first place because they're the ones giving these guys jobs.
To your point, yeah, that drives the wages down for other roofers, but for the people that are getting their roof resurfaced, same cost.
If anything, it's cost more now.
So, I mean, yeah, to Seth's point, not only is it undercutting roofers, so now roofers are being paid less, but it doesn't even make it cheaper for us.
Like, resurfacing the roof still costs a frick ton of money.
And then these companies are just pocketing, you know, pocketing the difference.
So it's just really evil, evil stuff.
Bungo Didle puss, I think, is how you say his name.
Sorry, there's like a light right by the name.
Hit the like button like a Muslim hits his third child wife.
So true.
Daloozi, Trump stopped mass deportations.
When did he actually do any mass deportations?
He has been having it done methodically, and many have self-deforted.
You people are just effing stupid.
Oh, he's pro.
No, okay.
Yeah, good.
No, it's true.
That's exactly what's going on.
I mean, look at this.
The New York Times, this is from the New York Times.
Net immigration has fell in every metro area in 2025.
Look at El Paso down 95%.
I mean, like, we're fine.
We're fine.
Like, okay, it's not like dramatic.
You know, we're not deporting 30 million people a year.
But, like, to Oren McIntyre's point, no matter what your frustration with foreign policy, our border and immigration wins are simply too important.
Trump has been the best president on this in my lifetime.
It isn't even close.
I mean, like, you got to be, you got to be realistic here.
I mean, this is unbelievable.
This is unbelievable.
This, again, advocating for something like this would have gotten you like thrown out of a like out of CPAC like five years ago.
And now it's the political, it's official policy of the United States of America.
So, again, that chatter, I think, was agreeing with me.
So, W W chatter.
What else do we got here?
Let's see here.
This is from, I can't even read his name.
Bretling.
Brettling.
If you want to have some fun, walk around car dealerships, big ones, and listen for Mexicans near the shop, then call ice.
So that's a good idea.
I might try and throw this on.
This is a hot take.
This is a really hot take here from Zoom Pyro.
He says, I liked Trump's first term better.
That's an interesting thing.
I don't think I've heard a single person say that before.
I don't think I've ever seen anyone say that before.
He says, I voted for Trump three times, so please tell me I have a slight right to say this.
I mean, look, that's your opinion.
I'm just curious why, because from my perspective, the first term was a disaster.
The first term was like, it sucked.
Like, nothing really got done.
That's my perspective.
But that's an interesting take.
I respect it, I suppose.
Seth Morgan, our guy, John Doyle, did a show yesterday laying out all the white pills that haven't been in the headlines.
Three miles of border wall per W per day.
That's a W.
Yes, absolutely.
Seth Morgan.
John Doyle, go check out his channel and watch his video he did because you really like again.
People's like dopamine receptors are fried.
They're expecting like, you know, like literally Caesar, right?
It's kind of difficult to pull off with the way that our government is structured.
These things take time.
But John Dole did a great job like laying out, again, all these W's that for conservative media, even like the videos of the media isn't reporting it.
The conservative media is not incentivized to publish these sorts of things.
Right now, us working conservative media, we're incentivized to generate as much hysteria as possible and make you feel like Trump's like betrayed you.
Trump's backstabbed you, you know, because that feels good.
That gives you a sense of like moral, you know, high, high ground.
The reality is, again, Trump, yeah, I mean, you know, foreign policy, I think people are pretty upset, rightfully so.
But best president of our lifetimes by far.
Massive, massive win after win after win.
And yeah, I mean, John Dole articulates this at a much higher level than I possibly could.
So go watch his video.
Take a look.
Really fantastic stuff.
So with that, we're going to wind down this show.
We're out of time.
Sorry, we're out of time.
What are you going to do?
With that, you can follow me on X and Instagram at RealTate Brown.
Come give me a follow.
Come hang out.
It's always good to hear from you boys and like the three girls that watch this show.
And I think I'm fairly accurate in saying that.
I've seen the analytics.
YouTube's a little different story, but Rumble is like the fellas.
Rumble is for the fellas only.
I'm going to send you guys over to Devori Darkens, the great Devore Darkens, and go hang out with him.
And he's going to have a great show for you guys.
With that, exit Instagram, RealTate Brown.
Come follow me on X and we'll hang out.
And we'll be back tonight for Timcast IRL at 8 p.m.
Thank you very much for watching.
▲
Export Selection