Dec. 4, 2025 - Tim Pool Daily Show
59:47
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| What is going on, guys? | ||
| Happy Thursday. | ||
| Oh my goodness, it is Thursday. | ||
| We've made it. | ||
| This is the final day of the Tate Cast week one. | ||
| If you've been here, if you've been a loyal Tate Cast viewer thus far, you've probably seen the mounting for the guests has not gone these smoothest the last two days, but we just had the team in here all morning getting things a little tuned up. | ||
| And hopefully by next week, we'll have a new backdrop. | ||
| Been getting a lot of hate on the backdrop. | ||
| You know, I was kind of rocking with the Patrick Bateman vibe, but then I realized I'm wearing just like a, you know, a waffle knit sweater. | ||
| Kind of kills the, you know, wage, wage cage aesthetic. | ||
| And I've said this before, the wage cage really is where I truly feel at home. | ||
| That being said, we have some fantastic stories for you today. | ||
| I am your host, Tate Brown, here, holding it down for you guys for Tim Pool. | ||
| We have some great stories. | ||
| The FBI has finally made an arrest in the Pipe Bomber case. | ||
| I don't know if you saw. | ||
| A few weeks ago, the Blaze thought they had him. | ||
| Was not the right person, but the FBI has made an arrest. | ||
| It was a 30-year-old male out of Virginia. | ||
| The rumor right now is that there's Antifa ties, which shouldn't surprise really anybody. | ||
| But not too much information is out yet. | ||
| So that's why the lead story is the Somalis. | ||
| Trump has been dunking on the Somalis left and right. | ||
| This has been going on for a few days now. | ||
| And yesterday he doubled down after Jacob Frey, the mayor of Minneapolis, said Somalis are like the greatest things in sliced bread. | ||
| They don't even have bread in Somalia, so I don't even know what he's talking about. | ||
| We have a few more stories that we'll get to. | ||
| Obviously, if you've been paying attention to the Timcast news, Tim's personal channel on YouTube today and also on Rumble, you would have seen the news that the New York Times is suing the Pentagon. | ||
| They're really upset over the personnel change in the media environment, and they're not too happy about it. | ||
| And they're launching a lawsuit. | ||
| And of course, Tim Poole and his organization, Timcast, were named in that lawsuit. | ||
| I myself am a member of the Pentagon Press Corps. | ||
| So who knows? | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Maybe I'll get involved. | ||
| Maybe I'll mix it up a little bit. | ||
| Time to piggyback. | ||
| I mean, Tim, you know, you should go watch his segment on it. | ||
| To piggyback, yeah, I would reiterate everything he said. | ||
| Specifically, that, you know, they made it a point that, like, oh, Timcast News is not an investigative journalist, you know, outlet. | ||
| And he said himself he's not going to maintain a large presence at the Pentagon. | ||
| And they said that like it was blowing up something that were, you know, like high. | ||
| It looks like, no, we've been pretty vocal since day one. | ||
| Our intentions is like, yeah, it'd be nice to pop in and ask questions here or there, but we're not going to maintain a large presence at the Pentagon. | ||
| And we're not investigative journalists where we provide commentary and reporting. | ||
| So, you know, I don't know what these people are. | ||
| They're just vindictive, really. | ||
| They're just vindictive. | ||
| They threw their toys out of the pram. | ||
| And now they're trying to maybe pull a toy back in every once in a while. | ||
| Sorry, that ship sailed. | ||
| The new press corps is here to stay. | ||
| So with that, before we get into everything else, we have a few more stories. | ||
| We'll see if we can get to them. | ||
| I keep overpromising. | ||
| I keep overpromising the amount of stories I'll get to. | ||
| Like, we're already three minutes in, and I've just been yapping. | ||
| So let's get to our sponsors. | ||
| Our first sponsor, Cast Brew Coffee. | ||
| Oh, I am sipping on a right now St. John's Grat. | ||
| Is that too, like, is that too Reddit to have a mug with your alma mater on it? | ||
| My, my bad, if that is. | ||
| I'm terribly sorry. | ||
| I would rather be called, I would rather be accused of murder and put on trial. | ||
| And my entire everyone I know in my life to disown me than to be publicly accused of being a Redditor. | ||
| And I mean that, unironically. | ||
| That being said, I am sipping on a secret proprietary Casprew blend. | ||
| I've heard some rumors. | ||
| I'm actually not in the loop on which Caspar flavors are going up where. | ||
| But I've heard some rumblings that there's a new flavor coming. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know. | |
| Maybe I'll get in trouble. | ||
| Maybe the Shepherd Hook will come out of frame and yank me off. | ||
| But I heard there's a new blend coming soon. | ||
| So who knows what's going on? | ||
| But Casprew coffee, some really some fantastic stuff. | ||
| We got, oh, what am I doing here? | ||
| We got Josie's blend, Appalachian Knights. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| You guys hear me talk about this all the time. | ||
| Maybe we'll get different sponsors in here soon. | ||
| Who knows what's going on? | ||
| We got Ian's Graphene Dream. | ||
| I mean, it's like legal drugs. | ||
| I mean, that's all good it is. | ||
| It's like you might as well. | ||
| It's like doing a bump of cocaine, except it's coffee. | ||
| That's disavow. | ||
| I don't know why I said that. | ||
| We also have Mary's Ghost Blend. | ||
| It's really scary stuff, really spooky. | ||
| If you can't let go of Halloween, if you're a Halloween cell, grab you some Mary's Ghost Blend. | ||
| We also got Boonies Store. | ||
| Oh my gosh, look at all these boards. | ||
| Holy mess. | ||
| We got the Primal Collection. | ||
| If you're feeling primal, just slonk a few eggs, get a little raw milk down the hatch, a little methane, and then get you a primal collection and just rip your shirt off and storm around your house banging your chest. | ||
| That's what I would recommend doing. | ||
| If you're not into that, you could get the uncancelable board, maybe the B-Gay. | ||
| Don't be gay board, make a decision there. | ||
| It is a choice now. | ||
| It's official. | ||
| It's a choice. | ||
| You can decide Milo can expand on this further when he's on the show tomorrow. | ||
| In addition, maybe we'll ask George Santos which board he would prefer to buy. | ||
| That being said, let's get into the news. | ||
| The first big story. | ||
| Oh my gosh, this is a monster. | ||
| This is continuing to develop. | ||
| So right now it's very early. | ||
| If you're here for pontificating, I can't do that because I don't want to get sued. | ||
| CBS News, FBI arrests suspect in 2021 DC pipe bomb case. | ||
| Sources say. | ||
| Now, if you are a loyal Tim Cast viewer, you have seen us cover this ad nauseum, I would say, as we should, because this is a very scandalous case. | ||
| The TLDR, and then the CBS News will get into this, is there were two pipe bombs placed outside of the DNC and RNC headquarters on the eve of the Capitol riot on January 6th, 2021. | ||
| And look, there's a lot of inference you can make from that. | ||
| You have to ask yourself, why would someone do that? | ||
| Because, you know, let's turn back to the clock a little bit. | ||
| January 6th, 2021. | ||
| I was in college. | ||
| I vividly remember the rally, the rally at the Capitol. | ||
| This was being proposed. | ||
| This was a big thing. | ||
| It was going to be a big thing. | ||
| I even considered making the trek down from New York to DC for it, just to support, because I love President Trump. | ||
| And there were some suspicious things going on in that election, to say the least. | ||
| And yes, there was a gentleman. | ||
| Well, if you remember on the show with Oron McIntyre a few weeks ago, Tim actually made the call that it might have been a woman because of the way he bent over or she bent over. | ||
| Well, we'll have to see. | ||
| We'll have to see what's going on. | ||
| All we know right now is from four law enforcement sources that have told CBS News that the suspect is a 30-year-old, Brian Cole of Woodbridge, Virginia. | ||
| It's not far from here. | ||
| He is expected to be charged in federal court in D.C. on Thursday. | ||
| There is a press conference that is coming up, and we will probably find out some more information about who this is. | ||
| Because, again, the autistic anons on Twitter are diving in. | ||
| They've got like three different Brian Cohes right now, but the guy that looks like he fits the bill, you know, all I can say is there's some interesting ties, potentially Antifa ties. | ||
| That is what is suspected right now. | ||
| Again, I don't want to pontificate too much. | ||
| I don't want to put any pictures up. | ||
| That could get us in quite a bit of trouble if it's the wrong person. | ||
| We already saw the Blaze. | ||
| We love the Blaze. | ||
| The Blaze are doing great work. | ||
| They thought they had the gal. | ||
| It turns out it wasn't her. | ||
| She was crossed, to say the least. | ||
| We'll read a little more from CBS News. | ||
| We'll see what they have to say. | ||
| The arrest marks a major step forward in a case that has vexed the FBI for nearly five years. | ||
| The pipe bombs were placed outside DNC and RNC headquarters on the evening of January 5th. | ||
| Federal investigators have said the device made out of 1x8 inch pipes, kitchen timers, and homemade black powder did not detonate, but the FBI has called them viable and warned they could have killed or injured people. | ||
| Now, if you remember this, if you look at this ingredient list right here, if this was the Obama era, that would have been a clock. | ||
| You know, I don't know. | ||
| You know, put it in a pencil box. | ||
| You got a clock and you can get invited to the White House. | ||
| Well, Trump's America. | ||
| No, that's a bomb. | ||
| That's a bomb. | ||
| You're trying to bomb the RNC and the DNC. | ||
| You have to ask, what was he cooking? | ||
| That is the question of the hour. | ||
| What was he cooking? | ||
| What was he trying to do? | ||
| Well, if it's true that he is Antifa, I think the inference is obvious. | ||
| He wanted to create chaos. | ||
| I mean, if Antifa can be epitomized by one thing, the number one thing that drives Antifa is chaos. | ||
| They want to create chaos because there's this thing that occurs in radical people with radical political opinions is they are convinced that if the system as it stands burns to the ground, that their ideology will be the one that rises from the ashes. | ||
| You can ask anyone that's a rat, rat and a radical political ideology. | ||
| They are convinced that when the system burns down, it will be them. | ||
| It'll be their ideology, their cohorts that rise like a phoenix from the ashes and impose their will on the government. | ||
| That seems to be the case. | ||
| It seems to be what happened here is he knew, and we're going to say he for now, it could be a transgender person, but who knows? | ||
| I'm saying it's a he for now. | ||
| When he put those bombs there, he wanted to create a situation. | ||
| He wanted to create a, I mean, can you imagine? | ||
| Could you imagine the day before January 6th, two bombs going off and killing a ton of people in the RNC and DNC? | ||
| It would have been calamity. | ||
| Now the question is, and a lot of you guys are probably asking, did he know that a riot was going to occur on January 6th? | ||
| I mean, look, you've seen the videos by now. | ||
| It's been five years, almost five years. | ||
| There were some weird things going on January 6th. | ||
| There were some barriers being moved. | ||
| There were some people with flags that looked like they had just been unpackaged. | ||
| They had crease marks on them. | ||
| You had some people shouting some really federal things in the crowd. | ||
| There was a lot of interesting characters in the crowd that did not seem to be, yeah. | ||
| They seem to be privy. | ||
| They seem to have a motivation to cause a riot. | ||
| That's all we can really say for now. | ||
| So you have to wonder. | ||
| We know there were some Antifa elements that were active in the January 6th. | ||
| We'll call it the riot insurrection is what the libcards call it. | ||
| But, you know, it was a riot. | ||
| That's fair to say. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it was very obvious that there was some sort of Antifa presence there. | ||
| If this guy was Antifa, you have to wonder if there was coordination. | ||
| If they were going to set the bombs off at the same time as this sort of storming of the Capitol occurred, my goodness, could you imagine the timeline we would be in? | ||
| I mean, you know, Biden cracked down pretty hard there. | ||
| I mean, obviously the J sixers, there's a lot of them are thrown in prison really without any age, kind of just skimmed over the entire legal system. | ||
| Obviously, Trump has now pardoned a lot of these individuals, these J6ers, which has been fantastic and not talked about enough. | ||
| That is a massive dub for the Trump administration. | ||
| Clearly, this guy, again, let's just, you know, let's assume for the sake of argument that he is indeed Antifa or Antifa aligned. | ||
| He might have been privy to maybe other people in the Antifa network that also wanted to instigate a riot, instigate a situation on January 6th where capital's getting raided. | ||
| Boom, bombs start going off throughout DC. | ||
| Could you imagine the situation? | ||
| Can you imagine what this country would have been plunged into? | ||
| My goodness. | ||
| So, this guy, this guy obviously needs to have the entire book thrown at him. | ||
| This guy was trying to destroy the United States of America. | ||
| You know, if we want to talk about Trump, you know, the accusation against Trump is always, oh, he's undermining democracy. | ||
| Kind of based. | ||
| I mean, read a little Aristotle. | ||
| Democracy is very cringe. | ||
| If we want to talk about who is undermining democracy, I think Mr. Brian Cole actually would be the prime person to fit that billing. | ||
| I mean, he was trying to destroy the United States of America. | ||
| He was trying to rip us apart at the seams with a, well, I mean, you could call it a false flag, I suppose. | ||
| Again, we'll see. | ||
| We'll see what his motive is. | ||
| I mean, who knows? | ||
| Maybe this press conference happens. | ||
| It's something entirely different going on. | ||
| I know a lot of people have speculated potentially some foreign, you know, this could have been a foreign intel agency running an operation. | ||
| A lot of countries have been named, you know, Russia, maybe the Chinese, maybe the Israelis. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Who knows what's going on? | ||
| But very, very wild, wild stuff. | ||
| So with that, we'll see. | ||
| It's at 1 p.m. | ||
| I just got word. | ||
| The J6 bomber press conference has been announced at 1 p.m. | ||
| So it'll be right after we wrap. | ||
| Kellen, producer Kellen, has linked us. | ||
| The FBI is raiding the suspect's home in Virginia. | ||
| We have a live aerial view. | ||
| Let me pull that up real quick, actually. | ||
| Let me take a look. | ||
| Let's see what's going on here. | ||
| Give me a second. | ||
| We're reporting live. | ||
| You know, I take it back. | ||
| Maybe we are investigative journals. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| We don't need a Granger ad. | ||
| But yeah, can you imagine? | ||
| I mean, just imagine the timeline we would have been in if this went down. | ||
| So, okay, let's take a look here. | ||
| Can you guys see? | ||
| We don't need chat up. | ||
| Come on, bunch of Yahoos. | ||
| Yeah, it looks like this is the gentleman's home, and the FBI is conducting some sort of operation here. | ||
| This is a very nice home. | ||
| Look at this. | ||
| It's kind of like a federal style. | ||
| It's quite nice. | ||
| This guy must have been doing all right for himself. | ||
| Woodbridge is a pretty expensive area. | ||
| I don't know how much action is going on here. | ||
| We're getting a really keynote shot. | ||
| Okay, yeah, there's some agents outside. | ||
| Oh, yeah, look at this. | ||
| Look at the spread here. | ||
| Can you imagine being his neighbor? | ||
| Can you imagine being his neighbors? | ||
| He's like, oh, Brian? | ||
| That's what Brian was up to? | ||
| He spends a lot of time in his garage, and he's a little weird. | ||
| He's really into Reddit. | ||
| There's no question about that. | ||
| But I didn't know he's capable of this. | ||
| Yeah, it looks like the FBI is here. | ||
| Well, you know, I'll put it off to the side. | ||
| I'll keep an eye on it. | ||
| We'll see what's going on. | ||
| Maybe there'll be some interesting happenings occurring. | ||
| So let me do this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Boom. | |
| And then slack here. | ||
| We're doing a little Bill O'Reilly effort. | ||
| We'll do it live. | ||
| You know what I mean? | ||
| We love that. | ||
| Anyway, so a lot of chaos, a lot of insanity happening. | ||
| Again, we'll stay tuned. | ||
| We'll stay tuned for 1 p.m. | ||
| With that, let's get into the next story. | ||
| We'll keep moving here. | ||
| It's already 12.15. | ||
| I'm already behind. | ||
| Oh, my gosh. | ||
| Can you believe this? | ||
| I'm on CPT right now. | ||
| I'll show you my ancestry DNA results and you'll see why that is the case. | ||
| With that, let's take a look. | ||
| Somalia. | ||
| Oh, Somalia is in the news. | ||
| Trump is cooking. | ||
| Trump is cooking. | ||
| He doesn't like Somalis. | ||
| He does not like Somalians. | ||
| He goes really hard on Somalians, and I love it because Somalians infamously have an IQ of around 68. | ||
| Me and Connor Tomlinson, we have our weekend show Across the Pond. | ||
| It's our weekend series that goes on the culture war. | ||
| We call it Across the Ponds Culture War. | ||
| Sorry, the Culture Wars Across the Pond. | ||
| It's a great show. | ||
| He's made this point. | ||
| Me and him, we were doing some preparation for the show. | ||
| And yeah, we were trying to pull some data on Somalia. | ||
| We were trying to figure out what their inbreeding rate was. | ||
| The country is so nasty and so backwater that they can't even properly collect data. | ||
| And this isn't just an African thing. | ||
| Like, Kenya actually has data. | ||
| You know, South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Zambia. | ||
| I've been to all these places. | ||
| They have data. | ||
| The government's there function to some degree. | ||
| Enough where people can come in and conduct and collect information. | ||
| Somalia can't even do that. | ||
| They can't even chuck together data to, you know, study. | ||
| So we don't know what's going on there. | ||
| Let's take a look at Trump's quote. | ||
| This was on December 2nd. | ||
| So this would have been two days ago. | ||
| This was, he was asked about Somali immigrants. | ||
| And here's what he had to say. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Maybe this is not what he had to say. | ||
| Audio is not feeding. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Let me see if I can do this on the fly. | ||
| Give me a second. | ||
| One second, everyone. | ||
| See if I can pull this off. | ||
| If daddy can pull this off, we'll take a look here. | ||
| Audio output capture. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And device. | ||
| Let's do this. | ||
| Does that work? | ||
| Let's try it. | ||
| If not, I'm going to read you guys quotes. | ||
| You can't hear this, can you? | ||
| No, you can't hear this. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Well, what are you going to do? | ||
| Bill O'Reilly, we do it live. | ||
| We'll read the quote. | ||
| This is really depressing. | ||
| This is really depressing. | ||
| You're just going to have to. | ||
| Maybe you can do a Trump invitation. | ||
| I'll do a Trump invitation for you guys. | ||
| We'll see how this goes. | ||
| Trump on Somali immigrants. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When they come from hell and they complain and do nothing but bitch. | |
| Again, this is me quoting. | ||
| I don't cuss. | ||
| I'm not a cursor. | ||
| I'm a Southern Baptist. | ||
| We don't cuss, but I'm just doing this for you guys. | ||
| We don't want them in our country. | ||
| Let them go back to where they came from and fix it. | ||
| So true, President Trump. | ||
| Jacob Frey stepped up to the mic the next day to boldly defend Somalians. | ||
| Here was a quote from the very gay mayor of Jacob, very gay mayor of Minneapolis, Jacob Frey. | ||
| Somali people have been a benefit to our city. | ||
| Elon Omar, she's where's my quote from Elon? | ||
| Apparently they are called Somalis. | ||
| This was her FYI she put up back last January. | ||
| Somali people are called Somalis, not Somalians. | ||
| If you're going to talk about us, at least try to get our ethnicity right. | ||
| I don't care, lady. | ||
| I don't care. | ||
| We don't like you. | ||
| Look, these people are coming in here. | ||
| Lance videos. | ||
| Clearly nobody likes you. | ||
| Go back to Somalia. | ||
| We don't like Somalians. | ||
| Full stop. | ||
| They're troublemakers. | ||
| Again, I can't get the audio to feed, which makes me nervous for the interview, but we'll see what happens. | ||
| That being said, Fox News, this was today. | ||
| No, this was yesterday. | ||
| This was yesterday afternoon. | ||
| The reporter, a reporter, I don't know which reporter specifically, my apologies. | ||
| We couldn't figure it out. | ||
| Asked President Trump, the mayor of Minneapolis, Jacob Frey, has been saying that he's actually proud to have the largest Somali community in the country. | ||
| And his police chief and Trump said, well then, he's a fool. | ||
| I wouldn't be proud to have the largest Somalian. | ||
| Look at their nation. | ||
| Look how bad their nation is. | ||
| It's not even a nation. | ||
| It's just a people walking around killing each other. | ||
| Look, these Somalians have taken billions of dollars out of the country. | ||
| They have destroyed Minnesota. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They want to kiss our country good night. | |
| So true. | ||
| That is exactly what is going on. | ||
| You probably saw the article from a few days ago. | ||
| These Somalians in Minneapolis are taking welfare from the state. | ||
| And it turns out a lot of that money was ending up with al-Shabaab. | ||
| It was ending up with al-Shabaab. | ||
| For those who don't know Ball, al-Shabaab is a terrorist organization in Somalia. | ||
| Not good people. | ||
| And they're being bankrolled in part by your dollars. | ||
| Especially if you're a Minnesotan, your dollars directly was getting finding its way over to Somalia because it turns out, and this point needs to be made, and it's made at nauseum, is everybody is a blood and soil nationalist. | ||
| Everybody. | ||
| But everybody is a blood and soil nationalist for somewhere. | ||
| For whatever reason, white Americans, and I will say that explicitly, white Americans, Americans of European extraction, are the only people in the United States that are not allowed to be blood and soil nationalists for anywhere. | ||
| Certainly not for the United States. | ||
| And that's kind of how white people operate. | ||
| White people don't really operate that way. | ||
| White people in America are still subscribed to this MLK, wholesome, post-Civil Rights Act mindset of like, oh, we should, you know, we should seek this post-racial utopia. | ||
| Like, we're better than this. | ||
| We won't stoop down to ethnic narcissism and ethnic nepotism. | ||
| But we're the only people that aren't allowed to do that. | ||
| We're the only people that are not allowed to sort of advocate for our group, especially if you're a heritage American. | ||
| I mean, some of these later arrivals, you know, they do advocate like Italians, Irish, Polish, etc. | ||
| They do advocate for their group from time to time. | ||
| But if you are a Anglo-Protestant heritage American, right, your family, you can trace it back to before the Constitution was even framed. | ||
| You're supposed to just ignore all that history. | ||
| And you were told that, hey, even if your family descends, if your family trotted off the Mayflower, you're just as American as Elon Omar, who showed up yesterday. | ||
| That's what's being told. | ||
| And that's what white people accept in the United States at large. | ||
| Most white people actually do sort of conceptualize themselves in that way. | ||
| All that to say, Somalians do not view America as this post-racial wholesome melting pot. | ||
| No, they look out for other Somalians within the United States or back home. | ||
| Hence the money being shipped back to al-Shabaab. | ||
| And this is the case with every immigrant group that has arrived post-Harp Seller Act. | ||
| Obviously, 1965, the Harp Seller Act radically changed the way that we conducted our immigration policy. | ||
| Prior to that, we had a few different stopgaps to ensure that we didn't have people coming from places like Somalia. | ||
| We had the, you know, we had the national formulas. | ||
| So, you know, we would sort of evaluate groups of people based off of how likely they are to assimilate into the United States. | ||
| Obviously, like you go back to the 19th century, that was the first big batch of new immigrants coming from Germany, primarily. | ||
| And they, you know, it took a little while, but they assimilated fairly well. | ||
| But even up until the world wars, they still spoke German in a lot of places. | ||
| Like the whole country of Texas, there's a lot of German speakers. | ||
| The Dakotas, Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois. | ||
| You had a lot of German people that came from Germany in the 19th century. | ||
| And they were still speaking German. | ||
| You know, they were Lutherans. | ||
| That was the church that a lot of people in Germany were a part of. | ||
| They came, they brought that to the United States. | ||
| So even with the Germans in the 19th century, it still took until the World Wars for them to fully assimilate, a lot of them to fully assimilate. | ||
| The Italians, the Irish, we had some problems when they came. | ||
| Like, you know, again, it worked out in the end, obviously. | ||
| But look, when they came, it caused some problems. | ||
| Tammany Hall, obviously, the Democratic machine in New York City was an Irish institution. | ||
| The Irish sort of drove a lot of the, you know, New Deal politics and these sorts of things. | ||
| And they were the backbone of the Democrat Party going into the 20th century. | ||
| The Italians caused a lot of problems, obviously, the mob, etc. | ||
| I'm not downplaying, you know, they have a stake in this country, obviously, but I'm making this point to illustrate that even European immigrants had a tough time assimilating, and the core population of the United States had a tough time assimilating them. | ||
| So if we have a tough time assimilating Irish people initially, I mean, again, now they're indistinguishable from any other American. | ||
| But if we had a tough time assimilating Irish people, how on earth do you think Somalis are going to assimilate? | ||
| Well, the answer is they aren't. | ||
| They aren't assimilating. | ||
| They're taking money. | ||
| And that's what President Trump is trying to illustrate here. | ||
| He is saying, look at their nation. | ||
| Look how bad their nation is. | ||
| It's not even a nation. | ||
| It's just a people walking around killing each other. | ||
| It is. | ||
| Somalia, for all intents and purposes, is just a giant PvP server. | ||
| It's not a country. | ||
| It's a PvP server. | ||
| It's a total free-for-all. | ||
| It's a total disaster. | ||
| Hopefully I'll never end up there. | ||
| You know, if I end up in Somalia, something's gone wrong. | ||
| And I like danger tourism, but I don't like that much danger. | ||
| Somalia is a horrible, horrible country. | ||
| You even have Somalians getting hyped up on Twitter. | ||
| They're saying, oh, whites are jealous because they can't compete with Somali excellence. | ||
| What exactly is Somali excellence? | ||
| Like killing people and launching an RPG off of a building. | ||
| That's Somali excellence, I suppose. | ||
| Marrying your cousin. | ||
| If we're talking about excellent, they're excellent at marrying their cousins. | ||
| I guess I'll give them that. | ||
| That's something to be said about that. | ||
| Look at the demographic statistics of Minnesota. | ||
| Here's what the Somalis are up to. | ||
| Here's what Somali excellence looks like. | ||
| The overwhelming majority of them are in poverty compared to 10% of Minnesotan. | ||
| That's the average, which is factoring in Somalis. | ||
| Again, 10% of Minnesotans are on food stamps. | ||
| And about 45% of Minnesota Somalis are on food stamps. | ||
| Less than 10% of Minnesotans are unemployed. | ||
| 40% of Somalis are unemployed. | ||
| And about 10% of Minnesotans do not have a high school education. | ||
| 40% of Somalis do not have a high school education. | ||
| Again, these are not grind set people who have it all figured out. | ||
| They don't need a high school education. | ||
| That is not what's going on here. | ||
| These are people that are too retarded to go to high school. | ||
| That's what's going on. | ||
| This isn't people that, you know, have things figured out. | ||
| Complete disaster, not adding anything. | ||
| They're detracting. | ||
| Upstate Federalist, great poster. | ||
| He put a piece of commentary up on this headline that KSTP, it's a local, it's the local ABC broadcaster in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. | ||
| They put out COPE yesterday. | ||
| They said, actually, Somali Minnesotans generate at least $500 million of income annually and pay about $67 million in state and local taxes. | ||
| Wrong cap. | ||
| That is a lie. | ||
| That is COPE. | ||
| Upstate Federalist lays it out here. | ||
| Remove all the welfare they're taking. | ||
| Let's just not, let's leave it not even, let's just pretend like they're not taking any welfare. | ||
| Still, there are 4,000 Somali children in Minnesota public schools. | ||
| Minnesota spends $18,600 per student. | ||
| The cost to educate Somali children is $74 million a year. | ||
| The whole of Somali paid annual taxes, as you can see here, $67 million, does not cover the cost of their own children in public school. | ||
| That blows up the entire narrative. | ||
| And that's not even counting the welfare. | ||
| That's not even factoring in this data about poverty and food stamps and whatever. | ||
| They're already a net negative on the books. | ||
| They're already in the red. | ||
| And that's before you even factor in the welfare. | ||
| 68 IQ, by the way. | ||
| They're not going to figure this out anytime soon. | ||
| IQ is hereditary. | ||
| We had Elon Omer. | ||
| I already talked about that. | ||
| Matt Walsh obviously came in. | ||
| I've been quoting Matt Walsh. | ||
| I've been glazing a lot lately. | ||
| He's a great example of how the Irish have not only assimilated, but they're now punching above their weight in a lot of ways. | ||
| Matt Walsh is terrific. | ||
| There's a lot of great Irish Catholic gentlemen. | ||
| He put some commentary up on that post. | ||
| The average IQ in Somalia is 68, which is below the line for mental retardation. | ||
| These are a retarded people. | ||
| That's maybe why Tim Waltz likes them so much. | ||
| He can relate. | ||
| Tim Waltz is spiritually Somali when you really think about it. | ||
| Seven out of ten Somalians live in poverty. | ||
| Their per capita GDP is a grand $1,000. | ||
| The United States is $90,000. | ||
| I'm not doing too hot. | ||
| I need to catch up to the average. | ||
| Somalians do not have a functional waste management system. | ||
| The tallest fully constructed building in the country is 10 stories. | ||
| So where is this Somali excellence exactly? | ||
| Yeah, the Italians ruled Somalia for years with like 10 guys. | ||
| The Italians, like, they're focused on like Libya. | ||
| They just sent like 10 boys over to Somalia and subjugated the entire country. | ||
| It's a total disaster zone over there. | ||
| And look, this is what they're up to. | ||
| They look out for their own. | ||
| Everybody is a blood and nationalist, blood and soil nationalist for somewhere. | ||
| This was the bear with me. | ||
| Hopefully nothing starts floating in the trailer. | ||
| The Al Hassan Islamic Center. | ||
| I feel like I just need to go to church after saying that. | ||
| They put out a note after, bear with me. | ||
| I'm going to try and read this name here. | ||
| Looks like a Wi-Fi password. | ||
| Kwalinle Ibrahim. | ||
| He abducted a 12-year-old in Minnesota and raped her. | ||
| It's a very tragic situation. | ||
| The Islamic Center in St. Paul, which is the Al-Hassan Islamic Center, wrote a letter of community support saying that he is, quote, not assimilated into non-Somali culture. | ||
| Again, they put out this piece here, basically just advocating for this gentleman, looking out for him, saying he is not assimilated into non-Somali culture. | ||
| In other words, he is still distinctly of Somali culture, and Somali culture consists of killing and raping 12-year-olds. | ||
| That is Somalia in a nutshell. | ||
| It is a disaster. | ||
| It is a disaster zone. | ||
| So, with that, I am going to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Before we get started, we got a great sponsor. | |
| It is Beam Dream. | ||
| One second, everyone. | ||
| Let me tweak this read for you guys. | ||
| Bear with me for one moment. | ||
| Do I have the ad read ready to go? | ||
| Let me see here. | ||
| Chef IQ, my apologies. | ||
| Bear with me. | ||
| With that, we're going to conduct a quick ad read. | ||
| I'm going to try this myself because the Tim Pool ad read is not functioning before we get into our interview with Brianna Morelo, who is going to give us her thoughts on the New York Times lawsuit, the ridiculous New York Times lawsuit. | ||
| Let me pull that up. | ||
| Lawsuit, Pentagon. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Look, we're doing it live. | ||
| Boom. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| One second, everyone. | ||
| One second, one second. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Chef IQ Sense is the wireless cooking thermometer that takes all the guesswork out of holiday meals. | ||
| Your roast, turkey, or prime rib comes out perfect every time, turning I think it's done into, I know it's perfect. | ||
| It tells you when to flip, when to take off the heat, and how long to let it rest. | ||
| Basically, it's like having a personal chef right in your kitchen. | ||
| With Chef IQ, you can sip your cocoa and actually spend time with your family instead of hovering over the oven. | ||
| Here's the best part: it's the gift everyone will love. | ||
| Perfect for seasoned cooks, kitchen rookies like me, and everyone in between. | ||
| This season, give yourself and your loved ones the gift of perfectly cooked meals with Chef IQ. | ||
| And with our Tim Cast promo code, Tim, that's T-I-M, you can save 30% and get all of your shopping done. | ||
| Go to chefiq.com, promo code Tim, T-I-M, chefiq.com. | ||
| Head on over there. | ||
| It is a fantastic, fantastic product. | ||
| We love ChefIQ. | ||
| Head on over, get you a meet the thermometer and save the holiday season. | ||
| We don't want any burnt turkeys or hams. | ||
| That's a total disaster. | ||
| We're not, it's not going to fly. | ||
| Head on over, get you some. | ||
| With that, we're going to get into our interview with Brianna. | ||
| First, I want to set the table here. | ||
| You probably saw all the hubbub. | ||
| The New York Times is suing the Pentagon over media restrictions. | ||
| This is from NPR. | ||
| The New York Times sued Defense Secretary Pete Heckseth on Thursday over the Pentagon's new policy that requires media outlets to pledge not to gather information unless defense officials formally authorize its release. | ||
| The policy unveiled in September includes a ban on credentialed journalists. | ||
| And the Times is now suing. | ||
| They named all of our friends in there: Tim, Libby. | ||
| They came after Libby Emmons. | ||
| I mean, they went after everyone. | ||
| So we're going to bring in Brianna Morella. | ||
| We're going to see what she thinks about this. | ||
| This is a ridiculous, a bunch of scumbags, quite frankly, is who these people are. | ||
| And I'm sure that Brianna will have some thoughts. | ||
| Let's get this interview going. | ||
| Bear with me one moment. | ||
| Let's see here. | ||
| Let me get my headset on and let's go. | ||
| Brianna, hey, how are you? | ||
| Can you hear me? | ||
| Yes, I can. | ||
| How are you? | ||
| I am doing all right. | ||
| How about you? | ||
| Good. | ||
| Staying busy. | ||
| Staying very busy. | ||
| Well, I am sure you have some strong thoughts here on the New York Times, obviously. | ||
| Not too happy about being ejected. | ||
| It looks like they have a bit of buyer's remorse. | ||
| Maybe they just should have signed the agreement. | ||
| It seemed like very sensible policy from the Pentagon. | ||
| Obviously, they're saying, hey, you can't just like roam around the halls and leak classified information. | ||
| They threw a fit over it. | ||
| And now they're suing. | ||
| What's going on here? | ||
| I mean, you're there. | ||
| You're there firsthand. | ||
| What's your thoughts? | ||
| What is other people in the Pentagon saying? | ||
| What's going through the New York Times' head right now? | ||
| Yeah, well, it's interesting, right? | ||
| Because they did that whole photo op where it's a bunch of so-called journalists kind of carrying their things and leaving the area. | ||
| First off, they didn't even clean up. | ||
| It was disgusting when we got in there. | ||
| Dirty wine glasses and face masks everywhere. | ||
| I suppose that's kind of what you would expect. | ||
| But the best part about it, though, had to be the fact that they did that photo op, right? | ||
| It was a group of journalists, but for some reason, only the New York Times is filing this lawsuit. | ||
| Now, normally, because they did this big exit, you'd expect all of these outlets to jump on board and be the plaintiffs in this, but it's only one. | ||
| It's only one, which tells me that all of their attorneys probably told them it's probably not a strong enough case. | ||
| So that's why they didn't go public with that. | ||
| But the New York Times being the first one to step on and say, we're going to try to take on the Pentagon in this matter. | ||
| So they're claiming it's First Amendment right violation. | ||
| I knew this was what they were going to do. | ||
| It was very predictable. | ||
| It would have been a First Amendment right violation for the rest of us, independent journalists, who were never given the opportunity to cover any federal agency at all, given the Pentagon either. | ||
| So that was First Amendment. | ||
| This isn't First Amendment. | ||
| And we'll kind of walk you all through this as well. | ||
| But the filing itself details how they deem this as a First Amendment violation. | ||
| They also go after the Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson. | ||
| They also go after Sean Parnell, who's listed as a defendant and all of this. | ||
| And they're pulling all of these like key quotes out of statements they made publicly. | ||
| But the reality of it is, is they voluntarily left. | ||
| And it wasn't like a contract agreement where like if you didn't agree to this, you would be, you would lose your credentials. | ||
| It was, here are the rules. | ||
| Let us know if you read these. | ||
| And then you sign here. | ||
| And that's exactly what it was. | ||
| We all saw it. | ||
| I know Tim Cass saw it. | ||
| I saw it. | ||
| We read through it. | ||
| I had my legal friends read through it. | ||
| We didn't see anything in it that was outrageous. | ||
| And they're trying to make it seem like, oh, the Pentagon has to control our messaging. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| Your messaging has been controlled for at least, playing it nice, eight years. | ||
| Eight years, I can give you. | ||
| It's been controlled. | ||
| So it's all hot garbage that they're trying to spew this nonsense. | ||
| And then on top of it all, they start calling out these journalists. | ||
| Now, they're trying to make it seem like they're mega journalists. | ||
| They call it Tim Poole, call it James O'Keefe. | ||
| They call it Laura Loomer. | ||
| They call out Libby as well. | ||
| She's also listed in this. | ||
| And they're trying their very best to go after people. | ||
| Oh, and Matt Gates too. | ||
| I forgot to mention Matt Gates. | ||
| They try to go after all these people and explain why that they deem that they're not really journalists, but we are. | ||
| Only problem with that is I think we've all broken more stories, factually correct stories, than the New York Times at all. | ||
| Like if you want to combine the last 10 years, I mean, they're all garbage. | ||
| So reading through the lawsuit, I don't think it's going to go very far. | ||
| It doesn't matter what kind of liberal judge you get in front of, it doesn't make any sense to us, mainly because they have expanded access to the media. | ||
| Right now, you guys have access. | ||
| I have access, something we weren't given before. | ||
| The government doesn't get to decide who is a journalist and who isn't. | ||
| That's not their job. | ||
| It's not their authority to do so. | ||
| It doesn't matter. | ||
| The First Amendment doesn't say that the government gets to decide who it applies to. | ||
| So definitely the New York Times doesn't get to decide that. | ||
| But the best part in all of this, the New York Times reached out to me back in October when I announced that I was actually going to the Pentagon to start covering it. | ||
| And I'm an independent journalist. | ||
| I work for myself, but I also host a show on InfoWars. | ||
| So I announced that I'm going there. | ||
| I'm not a full-time employee at Infowars. | ||
| I am literally my own boss. | ||
| And so they went nuts. | ||
| They thought Infowars was getting credentialed. | ||
| And yeah, of course, I'm covering it. | ||
| I work there too. | ||
| Not as an employee, but I've contracted, of course. | ||
| And so it's pretty funny that they didn't use my own comment. | ||
| Let me read you what I told them. | ||
| So the email that this journalist, journalist, sent over from the New York Times asked a bunch of questions as if I have to go and turn to them for the authority of whether or not I should be credentialed, as if they were the ones who have to give their blessing. | ||
| But they sent me a bunch of questions and initially wanted me to jump on a call, but I don't trust the New York Times. | ||
| I also hope The Guardian too, I don't have time to jump on a call with you. | ||
| Send me your questions. | ||
| And so the New York Times said that The Guardian didn't. | ||
| And then I just outline that I've been critical of the Pentagon on several occasions and several reports. | ||
| And I was very grateful that they had also granted me access anyway. | ||
| And then I also added that rather than just giving it away to MAGA-aligned voices. | ||
| So they know that there's people in there that weren't MAGA-aligned voices. | ||
| Obviously, Matt Gates being critical too of like the administration's take on Israel and what they're doing with Israel. | ||
| So none of it makes sense of what they're outlining in their court documents and trying to angle it as we're just going to be propagandists. | ||
| That's what they've been doing for far too long. | ||
| So they're just really upset. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, I noticed specifically, like, well, obviously it's close to home. | ||
| When they were talking about Tim, they were almost framing it like it was a gotcha. | ||
| Like, oh, he said that they weren't even going to have a heavy presence and that they're not investigative journalists. | ||
| And it's like, yeah, we've been forthright about that. | ||
| We're not going to have a heavy presence there. | ||
| It's nice to have the opportunity to be able to ask some questions from time to time. | ||
| It read with that and the way they spoke about Libby, the way they spoke about a lot of our friends, obviously, it just came off as vindictive. | ||
| And you have to wonder what their legal team is thinking. | ||
| I mean, it really just feels like they just wanted to write an opinion piece and they put it in a legal document. | ||
| Yeah, well, that's exactly what it was. | ||
| And they're trying to sit here and pretend like there's something here of substance. | ||
| I mean, they're trying to throw a jab. | ||
| This is like an ex-girlfriend who won't leave you alone after a tough breakup. | ||
| And then they're going after all the new girls you're starting to date. | ||
| That's exactly what's going on here. | ||
| They're not happy about it. | ||
| They even, oh, I forgot. | ||
| They even call it Raheem Kassam also in this. | ||
| He actually wasn't even there. | ||
| Maybe he had another representative that I didn't know of, but I didn't see him present at any of this over the week. | ||
| So there's that. | ||
| Hold on, one second. | ||
| She's eating the wire. | ||
| Oh, yeah, there you go. | ||
| We almost lost a signal because of this little one. | ||
| But Gia, say hi. | ||
| If you're going to be rude, you might as well say hi. | ||
| But the best part is that they act like, they act like these bitter, bitter individuals who are going through a tough, tough breakup. | ||
| And they're so upset. | ||
| They're so angry about this. | ||
| But the reality of it is, is, you know what? | ||
| They sat here for so long and never spoke up on our own behalf. | ||
| You know, they weren't upset that Tim never got access to the press room. | ||
| When I would reach out for comment, they never responded to me, these comms employees. | ||
| So they just want to be the actual people behind all of this who are the ones controlling the messaging. | ||
| Now that they don't have control over the messaging, they're really upset. | ||
| And keep in mind, too, you know. | ||
| We saw the Washington Post put out a false story about the narco-terrorists. | ||
| And it was so bad that even the Times had the fact check them, but they never do that. | ||
| That's unheard of. | ||
| Probably to try to get back into the Pentagon. | ||
| And as I was walking around the Pentagon in the areas we're allowed to be walking around, I did notice, though, there was a bunch of Pentagon employees who did tell me that, you know, secretively, members of the media realized that they kind of effed up and they're actually reaching out trying to get back into the Pentagon. | ||
| Yeah, well, that's what we had heard. | ||
| I mean, there was reports. | ||
| I had heard from a few people saying that when the news came out that HegSeth would be doing a gaggle, a lot of these mainstream outlets reached out like, hey, like, could we just come hang out for a little bit maybe to ask Pete a few questions? | ||
| And it's like, hey, we have rules. | ||
| Again, very sensible rules. | ||
| And also, for the record, I checked all of the defense ministries from around the world. | ||
| They all have pretty much the exact same rules. | ||
| So all we're really doing is just freshening our rules up for like the 21st century. | ||
| That's all that's really going on here. | ||
| And yeah, these people just, they think that they have, I think it really epitomizes the issue with the mainstream media is they operate without impunity and they feel an entitlement. | ||
| That's what it is primarily is they feel an entitlement. | ||
| And everyone in the audience that you'll know this is if you've ever met a journalism major, yeah, they carry a bit of a chip on their shoulder. | ||
| They're very entitled people, not all the time, but generalizing a little bit here. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| No, you're right. | ||
| Cause you know why? | ||
| That email that I got from the New York Times report. | ||
| Let me pull it up so I can get you his name. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For sure. | |
| He thought he was very entitled. | ||
| Eric was his first name. | ||
| Eric Wemble is his name. | ||
| And he's someone who obviously is very entitled because he thought that he could ask me questions about how many times am I going to be at the Pentagon reporting? | ||
| Obviously, he's trying to angle it as there's a rule at the Pentagon that you have to be, I believe there, three times a month. | ||
| I think that's the rule. | ||
| But what this New York Times reporters don't seem to understand, because it wasn't just Eric, there were other people who also reached out to me from the New York Times too on this or trying to attack me on social. | ||
| They were trying to say, oh, you got to be there full time. | ||
| And the reality of it is who makes those rules? | ||
| Oh, the communications team at the Pentagon. | ||
| So they could quickly change that if they wanted to. | ||
| And the fact that they're so like trying their best. | ||
| I mean, this Eric guy in the email itself, he said, how often do you expect to be working within the building? | ||
| Why the hell is it your personal information? | ||
| Like, why do you think, like, why do you think that I have to answer to you? | ||
| I'm an independent, which means I don't want a boss. | ||
| So definitely the New York Times shadowing over me to ask me questions and try to clarify or try to rationalize or justify why I'm getting access somewhere. | ||
| It's absolute garbage. | ||
| But they're claiming that this is a First Amendment issue for them. | ||
| If this was truly a First Amendment issue, they'd be excited to have other journalists in the room with them, but they're not. | ||
| That's not what this is all about. | ||
| They just want to control the narrative. | ||
| They just lost all the power to do so. | ||
| And they know that if they were in that room with us right now, we would all be going after them. | ||
| I mean, if they would have been in the room with me, Laura Loomer, James O'Keefe, oh my gosh, James O'Keefe, especially, they would have totally lost. | ||
| And Jack Bostobic was there too. | ||
| I mean, they would have totally lost out big time in that one. | ||
| So maybe that's the reason why they didn't want to sign the agreement too. | ||
| I mean, they are trying their best to figure out how to get back in, but they just don't want to be around us, I think. | ||
| And maybe they were afraid of being swooned by James and brought on a date and then letting a lot of information slip. | ||
| Who knows what could have happened? | ||
| Exactly when he puts on a mustache. | ||
| It's true. | ||
| The O'Keefe Riz is different. | ||
| It's next level. | ||
| Yeah, it's really hitting. | ||
| It's really hitting the big issue with the mainstream media is they are still operating in the 20th century. | ||
| This is the way they conduct it. | ||
| This is the way they conduct themselves. | ||
| They have had this monopoly on information, the information that belongs to the American people that they are obviously supposed to gather. | ||
| They conduct themselves like dinosaurs. | ||
| And this is what was so interesting to me: all the write-ups after the first day of the Pentagon Press pool. | ||
| I was there. | ||
| It was a great time. | ||
| It was really cool to see everybody. | ||
| They were like, oh, when they're kicking out all these mainstream dinosaur outlets, they're cutting off millions of Americans from information coming from the Pentagon. | ||
| And I'm like, yeah, maybe it's millions when you combine all of the outlets' viewerships together. | ||
| But honestly, at this point, everyone I saw in that room, the access that, you know, the viewership that they have outpaces mainstream media by far. | ||
| So it's like, now, if anything, information from the Pentagon has much further reach, you know, the reporting coming out of the Pentagon versus like, I mean, what, CNN? | ||
| Like, who's even watching? | ||
| I mean, when's the last time you really saw a lot of useful information coming out of the Pentagon? | ||
| These journalists are just, I think it's just like a boys' club. | ||
| And that's what it sounded like considering how defensive they were over their desks. | ||
| It really just seemed like it was a frat, by all intents and purposes, rather than actual reporting going on. | ||
| Yeah, well, they drank apparently. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And they know how to party with their face masks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know what they're using those for, but you know, it definitely was. | |
| It definitely was. | ||
| That's why I got so protective and so upset when the rest of us were stepping in. | ||
| It's so ridiculous. | ||
| It really is so ridiculous. | ||
| They don't have an audience. | ||
| And here's also how you know this: when you go to these journalists, these so-called journalists, you go to their pages, their social media pages, you find that they don't have a following. | ||
| So the people trying to jab up, and I know it sounds superficial, but the people trying to jab up and try to go after us. | ||
| A lot of them, me specifically, I think one had 15,000 followers, another had 20,000 followers on Twitter. | ||
| Now, I'm north of like 350,000. | ||
| So if I were to respond to you, it would do you a favor rather than. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So I didn't respond. | ||
| I just started blocking them all just so that they know that I just don't care for them. | ||
| I don't like them. | ||
| I think that they're evil people. | ||
| And so I block a lot of them. | ||
| But they don't have an audience. | ||
| I mean, they just have the big name, the New York Times, the LA Times. | ||
| I mean, they have these big names behind them, but there's nothing of substance there. | ||
| And if you truly were a journalist that was doing incredible work, your audience would follow you. | ||
| You know, my audience has followed me through everything. | ||
| I've broken stories and I see my numbers go up. | ||
| And so if they were breaking stories, they see their numbers go up too. | ||
| But they're not breaking stories. | ||
| They're not doing anything for the American people. | ||
| And that's the reason why nobody cares. | ||
| And if you look at the numbers of like the New York Times, their Twitter account, I mean, what they're in the millions. | ||
| Let me pull that one up too. | ||
| They're in the millions with followers. | ||
| And yet you look at their interactions and they've got nothing there, literally nothing there. | ||
| So it's like, I think it's all inflated numbers. | ||
| Also, when they cut off USA, that was a big dagger to the rest of them who are getting funded by USAID. | ||
| So they're really going through tough times. | ||
| And that's why it's such a mind warp for them because journalist to get into the psyche of a journalist, a journal, as we say, they're fundamentally at their core. | ||
| They're ladder climbers, these corporate journalists. | ||
| They're ladder climbers at their very essence. | ||
| And so it's really a mind warp for them to be put in the position where now a lot of these people occupying the new press corps, obviously, are much bigger than they are. | ||
| And these are people that, like you said, if you were to interact with them, it would be actually like doing a favor for them. | ||
| So it's clashing with their ladder climbing psyche where they're actually, you know, they're supposed to appeal to those that are larger than them that can help them out. | ||
| But now it's a mind warp where it's like, hey, now, you know, the reckoning is here. | ||
| Like mainstream media is dying off. | ||
| Independent journalists, that's where people are going to get their news from because, quite frankly, it's more accurate, more poignant. | ||
| It's quicker. | ||
| And it's completely, you know, it's completely subverting. | ||
| And it's, and I think really what's happening is it's causing an identity crisis for a lot of these people. | ||
| Is there, like you're saying, you know, they have the New York Times attached to them, the LA Times attached to them. | ||
| And suddenly that doesn't mean as much anymore. | ||
| Like a lot of people kind of roll their eyes. | ||
| I mean, I know quite a people, including myself, where if you see Washington Reporter or Washington Post, you immediately kind of tune out to what they're going to say to a large degree. | ||
| So, yeah, fundamentally, it's insecurity driving a lot of this. | ||
| And, you know, to go back to the document that we saw, the lawsuit, it's just, again, it comes off as an insecure X. That's really what's going on here. | ||
| Yeah, if you look at the New York Times, I just could pull up their page. | ||
| They have 52 million people following them on Twitter, but can't even scrape up more than 50 likes on a post. | ||
| Max 100. | ||
| Today, they broke waves, though, with 2,400 likes on their announcement of the lawsuit, which was a bombshell. | ||
| But I think everyone else who's talking about it is probably going to do more. | ||
| Yeah, they don't pull in an audience. | ||
| So their numbers are falsely afflated. | ||
| That's what I think in my opinion at this point. | ||
| 52 million is an insane number to claim that you have following you as a trusted news source. | ||
| And so I truly think at this point that this is all happening for a reason. | ||
| I mean, they don't like the fact that they don't have, they're not bringing in the money. | ||
| They're not bringing in the views. | ||
| They're not bringing in the subscription. | ||
| So that's why you're going to see the constant attacks for sure. | ||
| Well, yeah, that was the last asset for the mainstream media. | ||
| It's the last thing that gave them any sort of value in the market was the access to these things. | ||
| And again, they're just, all they're doing is mooching off of the work that people before them did. | ||
| Because there's no denying, I mean, you go back to the 20th century, especially like, you know, the mid-20th century and prior, when a lot of these, a lot of this infrastructure is being built out, when a lot of the relationships were being built with government officials, they were actually, you know, performing journalism at a fairly high level. | ||
| They were reporting and it was good and it was useful for the American people to a large degree. | ||
| What these people are doing now is they're standing on the shoulders of giants and spitting down on people that have replaced them, that have, you know, that have sort of superseded the role of the information gatherers and disseminators. | ||
| And so now what's happening is, okay, now that the new press corps is in, that eliminates the last, you know, valuable asset that they had, which was access, because the Pentagon has correctly realized, they said, why are we even like, why are we even dealing with these entitled brats when we could just bring in, you know, the people that are actually relevant now, the people that are actually disseminating information that's actually reaching an audience. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And I assume that they're going to start going after people individually one by one, trying to discredit their work and take it out on them. | ||
| But again, if they truly were believers in the First Amendment, that would be a different argument. | ||
| They wouldn't be going out there and trying to do all of this. | ||
| But the reality of it is they're losing power and it's happening rapidly. | ||
| I mean, they've been caught lying to so many different people. | ||
| Obviously, their audience for so much, but on so many different subject matters. | ||
| I mean, the fact that the Washington Post, for another great example, sat back and published information about Pete Hedseth and tried going after him and stuff. | ||
| And we obviously now know it's false. | ||
| I mean, I figured when I read it too, it was false, but it just goes to show no one trusts these people anymore. | ||
| I mean, it's like, how many times are we going to sit there and go out there and put out bad information? | ||
| But here's the difference, right? | ||
| If I were to put out bad information, I don't have a big name behind me. | ||
| It would just be Breanna Morello was wrong. | ||
| It's not going to be like that for them. | ||
| It's going to be the New York Times was wrong. | ||
| The New York Post was wrong. | ||
| The Fox News was wrong. | ||
| MSNBC. | ||
| So you don't remember the actual names of the people behind the stories. | ||
| You just remember the actual companies itself. | ||
| So for a lot of these journalists, doing all of the dirt behind the scenes and like doing the digging really isn't relevant to them, getting that story out as quickly as they can to get a headline out there. | ||
| And for the low IQ American who doesn't do any digging besides a headline and that's it, doesn't do any follow-up or any type of research or thinking for themselves, it works in that case, but doesn't work for the rest of the country. | ||
| And the rest of the country has had enough. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| Well, I mean, that Washington Post, I mean, who knows who was behind that? | ||
| No one's discussing that. | ||
| They're discussing the Washington Post. | ||
| Like you said, I mean, if an independent journalist, you know, has something like that, information that was so wrong, like the Washington Post, they get ran out of town. | ||
| Like they would have a very difficult time rebuilding their reputation. | ||
| With these journals, it's almost like SeaWorld when like an orca like kills one of their trainers and they just like move him to another SeaWorld. | ||
| That's what these journals are like. | ||
| They just completely crap the bed somewhere. | ||
| And the next thing you know, they got a gig over at, you know, the New York Times or wherever. | ||
| There's just zero accountability. | ||
| And they shouldn't be surprised because, I mean, think about when Heg Seth was first, you know, was first appointed to this position. | ||
| Rather than analyzing anything of any relevance to the American people, they were like harping on about his tattoo, which was innocuous and like it was a Christian tattoo. | ||
| That's like was the scandal. | ||
| And yeah, the fact that he was on television. | ||
| So like right away, you knew what was going on. | ||
| It was going to be not fact-finding, not tough, challenging media journals like they think they are. | ||
| They think they're in a movie. | ||
| No, it was going to be like vindictive. | ||
| It was going to be caddy. | ||
| And I don't really blame the Pentagon at all for, you know, getting a little fed up with this because ultimately these people were just out for themselves. | ||
| They were trying to build a name. | ||
| And again, it's not like the Pentagon actually did anything that would target them. | ||
| That's not what was happening. | ||
| Again, they just implemented rules that are very sensible. | ||
| Again, that are internationally, you know, standard. | ||
| And they threw their toys out of the pram. | ||
| And like we were saying earlier, they're trying to sneak back in in ways that sort of collect it. | ||
| Another point was if they really were, you know, trying to make this brave stand for the First Amendment, what if they just went in there, they signed the document and then they get tossed out? | ||
| Like then they could have this champion moment where they could be like the martyr. | ||
| But I think subliminally they knew they actually probably weren't going to get tossed out because what was happening is it wasn't with the with what we signed, it's not actually placing any restrictions on the journalists. | ||
| It was placing some restrictions on these officials basically saying like, hey, you can't just start mouthing off to a journal. | ||
| Like you need to sort of be approved to some degree with the information that you can't just like let a bunch of class classified information fly. | ||
| So again, it's not even really putting any restrictions on the journalist. | ||
| Journalists can still report whatever they really uncover. | ||
| It's protecting really the integrity of our national defense by saying like, hey, you can't just start spouting off everything, you know, spilling your guts to a random reporter. | ||
| It's just not conducive for what we're trying to do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, remember when you're walking around the Pentagon, they had you put on this big pass that said media and it was red so people knew who they were talking to. | ||
| So you can't just walk up to strangers at the Pentagon and be misleading and pretend that's what they want you to wear those constantly. | ||
| That's normal, by the way, too, like requiring you to wear that constantly. | ||
| That was what happened when I worked in sports. | ||
| You couldn't walk around a baseball field without that on. | ||
| So they tried to make it seem like that was like something unethical that was being asked of them. | ||
| It's common. | ||
| It's very, very common. | ||
| But also, you know, you brought up the beginning part of Pete Hadsef being nominated. | ||
| When Heg Seth was being nominated, there was also, I don't remember what outlet it was, but they went after him and said that there was Fox employees, anonymous Fox employees, who said that he was a heavy drinker at Fox. | ||
| I worked at Fox. | ||
| I worked there. | ||
| I didn't work directly like in face to face with him. | ||
| I worked in the same studio, obviously New York, but in the control room. | ||
| So it was obviously Obviously, walking distance, I constantly would be asked to do Fox and Friends, and I did Fox and Friends for them. | ||
| And so my point to it is, I would have his microphone in my ear during commercial breaks, before they went on air, all of those times. | ||
| He never acted inappropriately. | ||
| He never was like a drunk or came off as a drunk. | ||
| And even like Joey Jones cannot smell the smell of alcohol. | ||
| He just can't tolerate it. | ||
| And you're like, if you're a friend of his, you know that. | ||
| And so when that anonymous letter came out, they all published it and went with it. | ||
| Like it was factually correct. | ||
| I instead then followed up and put out my own letter and sent to all of the U.S. senators saying that as someone who was going to put their name on it, as someone who worked at Fox, I could tell you, I've never heard of him doing anything inappropriate during my interactions while working in the control room and having his microphone on constantly. | ||
| I never heard anything. | ||
| He never appeared to be drunk or have consumed alcohol the night before. | ||
| And I pretty much give him a detailed alibi. | ||
| But I mean, it's so crazy because they went with everyone else's claims that were anonymous. | ||
| But mine, when I put my own name on it, they didn't correct themselves at all or even issue a type of like, just like an editorial note, say, hey, one person did put their name on this. | ||
| And it's someone who is contradicting everything that you're being told by anonymous sources. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, it's again, everyone you speak to that knows Hegseth has nothing but great things to say. | ||
| And that's rare because actually a lot of people will have some sort of axe to grind. | ||
| So it's actually remarkable that he really has such a great reputation. | ||
| Yeah, that was another thing, like when he, I think, shared a video from Doug Wilson, the pastor, and the media like flipped out. | ||
| And you watch the video, you listen to what Doug Wilson says. | ||
| And this is like very just contemporary Christian views on everything. | ||
| And again, that just says like, hey, Hegseth is actually very normal guy. | ||
| And when you see that, that's a proxy attack against the American people at large. | ||
| So just really bizarre reporting. | ||
| Again, just vindictive, caddy, gay, I would say. | ||
| But I wanted to ask you, we have a little more time. | ||
| We're running out of time here. | ||
| I just want to ask you one final question. | ||
| Where do you see this lawsuit going? | ||
| Obviously, you said the legs not really there. | ||
| Where do you see this lawsuit going? | ||
| What do you think it's going to mean for the new press court? | ||
| If anything, what are the implications? | ||
| That sort of thing. | ||
| And in closing. | ||
| Well, they're not going to be able to kick us out. | ||
| I think that's true. | ||
| I also got a comment. | ||
| I'm going to pull it up right now from Sean Parnell, who is the chief Pentagon spokesman and also senior advisor to Pete Hegseth. | ||
| We are aware of the New York Times lawsuit and look forward to addressing these arguments in court. | ||
| So I don't think they're going to back down from this anytime soon. | ||
| I, in fact, would assume knowing Sean, knowing the team behind there, they're going to fight it, probably ask for it to be dismissed and tossed out because they've expanded the coverage, the media access that's currently getting coverage of the Pentagon. | ||
| They haven't taken away from that. | ||
| They voluntarily left, walked out, and they don't really have a leg to fight. | ||
| And the fact also, too, to bring it back to this, the fact that no other media outlet was also named in this lawsuit as a plaintiff tells you everything you need to know. | ||
| Everyone else probably told him there's nothing here. | ||
| We're going to lose. | ||
| Because otherwise, they all walked out together. | ||
| They all would have signed on to this lawsuit together. | ||
| That's a really good point. | ||
| I mean, I mean, you've seen how these journals have been operating on Twitter. | ||
| You would have thought that they would be chopping at the bit to jump on something like this. | ||
| And they've all gone silent all of a sudden. | ||
| The chest beating has subsided. | ||
| So, Brianna, thank you so much. | ||
| Where can people find you to get more? | ||
| Yeah, so I'm the host of the American Journal on InfoWars every single morning, 9 a.m. to noon. | ||
| And you can find me there or you can find me on X as well at Breanna Morello. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's at B-R-E-A-N-N-A-M-O-R-E-L-L-O. | |
| I'm also on Rumble. | ||
| And I did make a YouTube page, but I'm not loved on YouTube. | ||
| Many such cases. | ||
| Well, thank you. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| We'll catch you. | ||
| I'll see you at the Pentagon. | ||
| I'll see you around at the Pentagon. | ||
| Yeah, we'll be there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Thank you so much. | ||
| Have a good one. | ||
| Bye. | ||
| You too. | ||
| All righty, guys. | ||
| Well, that was the great Breanna Morello. | ||
| That was a good time. | ||
| She's obviously super on top of all of this. | ||
| I agree with her analysis. | ||
| I really don't think this has legs. | ||
| That's a really good point that, you know, not many people are actually willing to stick their name on this because it's probably not going anywhere. | ||
| Tim, Tim put a segment up this morning discussing the implications of this lawsuit, and he really did a deep dive on it. | ||
| I'd recommend go checking that out. | ||
| I think it was quite concise. | ||
| With that, we will wind down here. | ||
| I'm going to send you guys to the great Devori Darkens. | ||
| He's going to be up next here on our Rumble morning lineup. | ||
| Thank you very much for watching, guys. | ||
| We actually got the interview up and we got the interview up and you could hear. | ||
| I mean, it's a miracle. | ||
| It's a Christmas miracle. | ||
| We are approaching Christmas. | ||
| So, yeah, we're getting going. | ||
| Next week, I'll have a backdrop for you guys again. | ||
| You don't have to deal with the wage cage aesthetic anymore. | ||
| Love that. | ||
| Well, guys, you can follow me on X and Instagram at RealTate Brown. | ||
| Go give me a follow there. | ||
| I'll probably have some Pentagon content for you guys over these next few, well, years because I mean, we're not going anywhere. | ||
| The Pentagon Press Corps is here to stay. | ||
| Follow me there. | ||
| We'll be back tonight for Timcast IRL at 8 p.m. | ||
| It is going to be a good one. | ||
| I'm going to get that raid going. | ||
| We're going to send you all over to the great Devori Darkens, like I said. |
Export Selection