All Episodes
Previous Next
June 30, 2025 - Tim Pool Daily Show
01:04:03
Democrat Zohran Mamdani Calls For TAXING WHITE PEOPLE, Media Says HES NOT Communist
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Democratic socialist, aka socialist, aka communist candidate, Zorin Mamdani.
So we get a lot of flack over this past weekend because deep down, actually not even deep, just literally on the front page of his campaign website, he says, tax white people.
Yup.
And so the New York Post issued this front page physical paper where it shows him saying tax the whites.
That's amazing.
Now, this guy's an overt communist, and it's funny because that word is thrown around quite a bit, especially historically.
You're a communist.
But he is.
Now, of course, they try to draw a distinction and say he's a socialist, but the end result of socialism is always communism, and the goal of socialism is always communism.
The only way socialism can exist is when you install a rigid, top-down political system that controls the economy.
So, yeah, he's a communist, but here's the funny thing.
Politifact says he's not a communist because he's only advocating for some communist things.
Basically, they're like, look, communism is when there's a centrally planned economy, like the government controls the flow of goods.
He's only calling for government-run entities that would compete.
And it's like, okay, are you seriously arguing that?
Because I'll go full Godwin's law on you.
Okay, let's do it.
That's like arguing Hitler wasn't a fascist, Nazi, violent genocidal murderer because he didn't actually adopt those policies until after he got power.
Now, what I mean is, as if the argument would be that Hitler wasn't evil because he didn't actually start killing the Jews until after he got the power of the government.
The point is, you want to see the warning signs of evil people and stop them.
That's the lesson we learn.
I know Godwin's love.
I don't need to.
We can go any other direction other than just screaming Hitler 400,000 times per minute.
But let's say Stalin.
He's not really a communist because he's only advocating for workers' rights.
My dude, come on.
But here's where we are.
Now, my friends, we're going to break all this down and talk about why they're lying, but ultimately, it may be good news.
Most of the country hates socialists, so they're probably going to end up losing quite a bit.
So it's not the apocalypse, but maybe the Democrats are imploding and the Republicans will become the super majority party in this country for better or for worse.
Now, before we get started, my friends, I want to give a shout out to Stephen Crowder and the Mug Club.
You guys rock.
Thank you for joining me for the noon hour in the Rumble morning lineup.
Now, of course, bringing you into that afternoon.
Thanks for watching.
Don't forget to smash the like button and share the show with everyone you know.
And of course, we've got a great sponsor, my friends.
It is AmericanFinancing.net slash Tim.
What if you could delay your next two mortgage payments?
That's right.
Imagine putting those two payments in your pocket and finally getting a little bit of breathing room.
It's possible when you call American Financing today.
If you're feeling stretched by everyday expenses, groceries, gas bills piling up, you're not alone.
Most Americans are putting these expenses on credit cards.
There doesn't seem to be a way out.
American Financing can show you how to use your home's equity to pay off that debt.
You need to call American Financing Today before you get to a point where you can't make those payments.
Their salary-based mortgage consultants are helping homeowners just like you restructure their loans and consolidate debt, all without upfront fees.
And their customers are saving an average of $800 Per month.
That's like a $10,000 raise.
It's fast.
It's simple.
It could save your budget this summer.
Call now before it's too late.
That's 866-890-7811.
That's 866-890-7811.
Or visit AmericanFinancing.net/slash Tim.
Shout out.
Thanks for sponsoring the show.
And of course, don't forget to follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast.
I'm your morning host, Tim Poole, here to talk about the goings-on in the world.
And I'll be the first to tell you guys, Slow News Week.
Hey, look, we're about to enter MAGA month, okay?
And everybody's excited, as am I. The amount of burgers that will be grilled and hot dogs with grilled onions to be had, it is going to be obscene.
The amount of amazing grilling we will do in celebration of this great nation.
4th of July, of course, is coming up this Friday.
Everybody's gearing up for this holiday weekend to celebrate America.
And of course, whenever this stuff happens, the news cycle slows down a bit.
But we do have stories for you.
Let's start here.
The New York Post dropped an editorial from their board.
Zoran Mamdani's tax whites more is pure racism.
But let me tell you, my friends, it's to be expected when y'all become a minority.
The funny thing is, these what identitarians had been screaming about this for some time, actually arguing that they agreed largely with what Black Lives Matter had been saying about racial identitarianism.
The sad reality is that people are racist.
And this is funny.
This is like critical race theory light.
Like this is a tenet of that.
I shouldn't say it's light because you don't have to agree with their weird communist garbage just because you can recognize that people are racist.
Now, what does that really mean?
Take a look at this from Zoran Mamdani, an avowed and overt racist man.
He writes on his website, 25% of all NYC homeowners spend more than half of their income on housing, a burden felt most acutely in our city's immigrant communities and black and Latino neighborhoods.
Prior to becoming an assembly member, Zoran worked directly with these New Yorkers to keep them in their homes.
Now, okay, all right.
I mean, he's highlighting a couple racial groups and ethnic groups.
What's wrong with that?
What he actually writes, he writes, shift the tax burden from the overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods.
Indeed.
He says the mayor can fix this by pushing class assessment percentages down for everyone and adjusting rates up, effectively lowering tax payments for homeowners in the neighborhoods like Jamaica and Brownsville, while raising the amount paid in the most expensive Brooklyn Brownstones.
That's right.
Whiter neighborhoods.
He's saying it.
Now, I'll tell you this.
These people are evil and they are racists.
So what does it mean to be racist in this context?
Okay, now this is an argument that I've gone to into with a lot of people on the right because the view semantically, colloquially, when people on the right say racist, they're talking about a guy who looks at another guy who's a different race and he says, I plum just don't like you based on race.
Okay, that is how the right largely views it.
It's not an incorrect assessment of the term.
However, the left goes nuts with it and they say racism is like structures.
Okay, whatever.
I'm just using racism to define prejudice.
And you will find that every racial group has a bias in favor of their group.
That's it.
Except for white people.
White liberals have out-group preference.
And so to varying degrees, there is a preference for, maybe I shouldn't say racist then.
Maybe that's a little too strong.
Maybe I should say groups identify based on race largely, and they will have a preference for those groups.
So what happens?
Zoran Mamdani is free to tell white people he's going to tax you because only 29% of New York is white.
And it's largely white liberal without group preference, meaning this is the popular position in New York.
Now here's what the editorial board writes.
Before we get into the historical data, I'm going to show you the breakdown of the racial demographics of New York City.
The devil's in the details, and so is the racism.
Zorin Mamdani shows New York where his priorities really are in his position papers, where he promises to fix the city's property tax system.
His solution, punish Whitey.
He'd shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and wider neighborhoods.
How will he do this?
Well, once elected, he would push assessment percentages down for everyone, which, like most of what Mom Dani proposes, is highly unlikely.
But never mind that.
Next, King Momdani would adjust rates up based on racial, the racial makeup of a neighborhood.
The plan would effectively lower tax payments for homeowners in neighborhoods like Jamaica and Brownsville while raising, we read that already.
So what percentage of paleness classifies as a neighborhood as white?
A plurality, 50%.
Guess that means Williamsburg, which is 57% white, will have to pay, but not Astoria, where Mandani lives because it's 48%.
Maybe he'll go door to door and route those nefarious Caucasians, make them pay their white tax.
Mandani could have proposed property taxes that fix and focus exclusively on valuation, but that's not what his campaign is really about.
It's about identity politics and a hierarchy of oppression.
Did the rich white liberals who helped him win the Democratic primary know he would turn to them so quickly?
Sorry, Zo Ran, we need a mayor for all New Yorkers.
Well, I tell you this.
If you are a white property owner in New York, good luck.
You probably want to sell as fast as you can because this dude's coming for you.
And you know what I love about this?
The best part is like Williamsburg, the rents are going to get jacked up like crazy if he actually does this.
Okay, here's what's going to happen.
These people are really dumb, okay?
Communists and socialists are developmentally disabled and they are stupid.
I mean, I tweeted this earlier, but aside from the obvious logical fallacies, okay, that we have a history of the failures of socialism, but they're just too stupid to get it.
Therein lies the big problem of a modern republic.
Now, we can all make fun of communists and socialists and say their systems don't work, but to be fair, we're only like a Couple degrees better.
Now, while our modern Constitutional Republic is pretty fantastic, still opens the door for communists.
And if communists can walk in the door, they can turn you into a communist.
So, I mean, your country, right?
So, admittedly, I get it.
All systems are bad.
Ours is just the least worst bad, as the saying goes.
So, we are facing that, but these people are as dumb as a box of rucks.
I don't need to go through for the 80th time exactly why all of this is dumb.
His policies don't make sense.
But let's just address why all the white people's rent is going to go up a lot.
And they're going to have to leave.
They're going to leave.
And it's going to drive the white population way down.
And it is explicitly based on race.
It is racist policy.
The funny thing is, they're going to claim race is prejudice plus power.
Okay, well, in New York, white people make up about 30% of the population.
So what power have they when they're a minority?
Now, I guess technically they're a plurality, but not a majority.
Okay.
So what happens is government gets in, and it's their own fault, really, and it says raise the tax on the white neighborhoods.
Here's how it works.
Okay, I rented in Brooklyn.
I lived there for a while.
Buildings are run by companies.
These companies have jobs.
The job is maintaining the buildings and making it market competitive.
You can by all means go live with a slumlord because it's cheaper and you can be noisy, but maybe you want standards.
So you find an apartment you think is nice and there's a company behind it.
I had an apartment in Brooklyn.
There was an office building and they owned like 10 buildings where they had something.
They probably had, I don't know, 10 buildings.
And this one had six units.
So between 60 and 100 units being rented out.
And they had property managers that would go.
If you had a problem, you'd call them.
They have to service it.
So they are making a profit.
They do make money and they are wealthy, but it's a large business.
They have a lot of employees and they are maintaining the system.
Now, what happens when you go to that company and say, we're going to increase your hard costs every year by 2%?
They're going to say, okay, we're going to have to increase rent by at least 2%.
This idea that they're going to go, well, gee, gosh, darn it, I'll just reduce my profit margin.
That's not going to happen.
There's investors, there's loans, there's requirements.
The business, this is what's mind-blowing to me about communists, okay?
I was hanging out at this brewery the other day, and it's like a $5 to $10 million business.
And I was just thinking about how crazy it is.
I'm like, how does someone start a business like this?
It's nuts, right?
Like a car dealership.
It's finance.
It's all finance, okay?
So here's what happens.
These people, them being so stupid.
The owners of these buildings don't just own them outright for the most part.
Some do, right?
But many of them are.
A company gets a loan and they say, it's funny because I need to explain this to you guys, but for the communists that may be watching, construction company sees a plot of land.
They do an assessment and they say, we are going to see development in this area by X percent.
If we are to build two units, each with six units or two buildings, each with six units, we'll have 12 units.
That's going to sell pretty quickly.
It's going to cost us $400,000 to build.
The land is going to be $400,000.
We can sell this for $1.2 million.
That means all of the people have their costs covered.
And the additional costs go to the administration, the construction company, it's going to go interest fees.
So the construction company goes to a bank and says, we need $800,000 to build this thing.
We think we can sell it in X amount of time for $1.2 million because of the growth in the area.
The bank says, okay, we'll give you this loan with X percent interest.
They got to pay that interest back.
The profit that they make, certainly these people are wealthy, of course, but the profit they make is somebody at a high level managing a bunch of businesses, and it pays the salaries and it pays like the profit isn't just going to the construction workers, right?
There's a firm that invests and buys the land, hires a construction company.
They got to pay their accountants, and then the property owners get a very, very small percentage of profit.
But when you have 100 of these going at once, that's where your wealth comes in.
Now, company that manages property says, we're going to buy this because we are seeing, we agree with your growth assessment.
So we are going to pay X amount of dollars to buy the property.
And then they do.
And they say, we have to rent out each unit at X amount of dollars.
They go to the bank.
They say to the bank, we're going to buy this for $1.2 million.
We're going to pay you.
It's going to be, you know, 3% interest, 4% interest.
So we've got to sell it at this rate here.
The taxes here, the hard cost, they calculate it all.
When the property taxes go up, long story short, when the property taxes go up, the bank is going to say, your risk has increased, and that can cause problems.
The business running these properties is just going to say, we are going to have to do an increase in rent.
They're going to go, you can't because the mayor, the government, they're also blocking you from increasing rent.
And they're going to say, nobody wants to do this job anymore.
That's how you implode a housing market.
Property values collapse and you get bad neighborhoods, crime, poverty.
But this man is as dumb as a box of rocks.
So what could you expect?
Now he's largely targeting white people.
We get it, but let's talk about the ethnic makeup of the neighborhood.
I asked ChatGPT to break it down for us.
It's kind of hard to see because it's a silly format.
But we can see everything started to change from the 60s to the 80s.
I mean, it's been changing.
In the 1920s, it was about 80 to 90% white, 5 to 10 black.
And then you had tiny populations of, you know, non-whites.
I'm sorry, in 1940, it was 92% white in Manhattan, 80% white in Brooklyn.
The city, 75 to 80% white in the 60s, 60% white in the 80s, 35 to 44% white in the 2000s, 33.3 white in 2010, and it's 30.9 as of right now, largely due to a massive growth of Hispanic Latino migrants and their children who have moved in and begun settling in New York.
Now, let me just start by saying I literally don't care about the race of people.
That's not me, right?
I'm more of the, you know, you get it.
And most of you probably agree.
If you're a good person, you believe in the American dream, like The color of your skin is not what matters.
However, the problem is most of these people are going to have race preference, racial biases, and racist tendencies.
This is a fact.
So, what happens?
Zoran Mamdani has no problem publicly stating in his campaign that he will tax white people explicitly because they are a minority voting block.
Now, of course, you can say, no, no, no, no, Tim.
30% is the single largest.
So they're not the minority.
They're still the majority.
They're not the majority.
They are the plurality.
Okay.
This means that they don't make up more than 50%, but they are the single largest, the plurality, but not the majority.
The majority, you could argue, would be non-white.
However, there's still difference there, right?
Like, you know, an Asian guy from Vietnam is not the same as a black guy from New York, but they're not white.
So when you get white people as a plurality but a minority, it is easy for you to campaign on, hey, guys, don't like white people.
Let's go after them.
Now, here's the issue.
The only reason he's able to do this is because whites have an outgroup preference, white liberals.
And New York is largely white liberal.
Meaning, I'd estimate that with 80% of the white people there being liberal, we're looking at 25%ish of the white population believing things where they hate white people.
So when dude looks at this data, he says, this is easy.
I've got a race I can scapegoat, white people.
We can tax them.
And even white people agree.
Now, the business owners are going to freak out and probably leave and the city's going to start to crumble and break down.
But, well, that's what happens.
But this is what happens when anybody becomes a minority.
That's funny.
Because the left talks about the problem of people being minorities.
And the only arguments that the problem minorities face, I should say, and the only argument they're actually making to anybody who pays attention is you better fear being the minority, which just exacerbates the issue of racism.
Now you've got a growing political sect of white identitarians, which we've seen over the past 20 years, and the left can only call them white supremacists.
Now, let me tell you, when you've got a dude who looks at the left's argument and says, they're right, minorities are mistreated.
And then he says, we need to, you know, or should I say they want white racial affinity groups or whatever they call them, that's a product of leftist critical race theory.
The classical liberals, and I mean that in the true sense, not American liberal Democrat.
I mean like the actual founding fathers, Enlightenment values, weren't even as non-racist.
They were a bit.
And with the Civil War, times started to change.
I think largely what we have is in the conservative faction with conservatarians, libertarians, conservatives, conservatarians being like kind of more libertarian, but conservative, nobody cares about your race.
The only problem, most of the people who are non-white and coming to this country, you've got a lot of immigrants, the Asians and the Latinos, who are not raised in Enlightenment values and classical liberalism.
So they don't know or care.
They're just going to vote for people they think are like them, as evidenced by Chicago.
I talk about it quite a bit, but when I broke down the voter maps by neighborhood and the racial breakup by neighborhood, every neighborhood voted for the black guy.
Every black neighborhood voted black guy.
Every Latino neighborhood voted Latino guy.
Every white neighborhood, except for Loyola, voted for the white guy.
The Loyola leftist area voted for Brandon Johnson, the socialist black guy, who was not the first choice of the black neighborhood.
But the black neighborhood's top three candidates weren't even the frontrunners.
Now, I'm going to stress this again for you guys.
In Chicago, in the black neighborhoods, the top three candidates were not the frontrunners.
So there were frontrunners that you could see in the mayoral race who had the highest polling percentages.
But when you looked at the black neighborhoods, it was just three black candidates.
I think Lori Lightfoot was doing really, really well, Brandon Johnson and one other guy.
And then you look at this, and that's what I was confused by.
I was like, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Candidates for mayor?
How is this guy polling at 27%?
But not a single top candidate for the black neighborhoods had this guy in it because the white neighborhoods overwhelmingly supported him.
That's the reality of what's happening with race and ethnicity in this country.
Now, by all means, you can argue white supremacy is bad.
You can say whatever you want.
I certainly think white supremacy is bad.
But I also recognize that any other racial supremacy and stuff is also just as bad.
And what I mean by white supremacy is not what the left claims it is, like showing up to work on time.
I'm saying outright, like denying rights and voting access and work to people because of their race and things like this.
With that in mind, welcome to your reality.
White people without group preference and as a minority, if we're comparing this based on the leftist view of non-white and white, POC and non-POC and white being default, whites are the minority.
Then your politicians are going to levy policies against white people.
And the judges in that place are going to say, but white people have privilege and power.
Imagine going to court in New York and suing over this and trying to win.
They're going to be like, yeah, no, you're a white person.
You have all the privilege and all the power.
And you're like, we're a minority and they're taxing us based on race.
And they'll go, nah, nah, it's allowed.
You know, so I think maybe this is the lesson Michael Malice has been preaching for some time about being an anarchist.
I mean, I've said this in the past, that I view myself as a philosophical anarchist in that I've always recognized that it is but those with power that rule, right?
You can claim to want everything, but if your worldview and your faction doesn't exert power to defend and assert it, you cease to exist.
That's a reality.
Now, I view myself as functionally moderate, somewhat liberal, in that there's a way I would like a system to be run, but that requires the power to run it.
What we have now is just the harsh reality of the left will indoctrinate, will get power, and they will exert that power against people they don't like.
And they don't like you.
And they don't like white people especially, but they don't like you as an Americans.
And when they get power, they will wield that against you.
And that's what we're going as a nation.
Now, there's a lot to break down in this guy being a communist beyond all of that stuff.
With PolitiFact saying that he's not a communist.
Oh, boy.
Excuse me.
What do we have here?
This is, oh, yeah.
Let me play this clip for you.
And so we can break down exactly why a communist.
What the purpose is about this entire project is not simply to raise class consciousness, but to win socialism.
And obviously raising class consciousness is a critical part of that.
But making sure that we have candidates that both understand that and are willing to put that forward at every which moment that they have, at every which opportunity that they are given.
We have to continue to elect more socialists.
And we have to ensure that we are unapologetic about our socialism.
This is not controversial.
The goal of socialism is communism.
That's Len's worldview.
And this guy's overt.
I don't think we should have billionaires.
What does that mean?
What does that mean?
Zorin Mamdani, blah, blah, blah, we've heard it.
He said in an interview that I don't think that we should have billionaires because frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality.
You know the problem with inequality?
Inequality will destabilize systems.
It's a fact.
Basically, we're talking about monarchy, tyranny, fascism, etc.
The more power consolidated, the more people get angry about it because there needs to be a redress of grievances to release steam.
And with the billionaires, you get a form of that.
So I don't agree with their crackpot ideas, but I can recognize the instability that arises from dramatic inequality.
The problem is the solutions they propose are developmentally disabled.
We'll put it that way.
Taxing the rich, taking more money.
It's just not possible.
Unless you want to create a global tax, people will then just start hoarding their wealth in some other way.
They call them loopholes.
It doesn't matter.
There is no way by which a person of merit and power will be deprived of it unless you kill them.
And then that's what you see with communists.
That's what they do.
So let me put it this way.
The saying goes that if you take anybody who is a millionaire or billionaire, plop them on an island with a, or like a brand new country, and you erase everybody's wealth.
Or actually, what do they say?
No.
If you erased the wealth of literally every single person on earth, just to zero, no money, money's all gone.
Property, everything's gone.
The millionaires and the billionaires would quickly rise back up to where they were rapidly.
For instance, some people who are millionaires aren't even all that good.
It's just they got a personality that attracts and people want to give them money.
There's tons of women that go online and just do naughty things and are given obscene amounts of money.
That's just what they are and who they're.
I've said this about Alex Jones too, and they tried taking his money away.
I'm like, dude, Alex Jones is his net worth, is his value.
It is he.
If he lost everything, people would want to watch him.
He's entertaining.
They like him.
They like the news that he presents.
They like the job that he does.
What just happened?
This computer is like trying to reformat itself in real time.
It's going to do it again.
Just watch it.
Look, there it goes.
Yo, that's wild.
I have no idea why the screen just did that.
That's freaking me out.
Maybe it's a ghost.
Anyway, I digress.
The point is, if you take everything away from Alex Jones and then have some 15-year-old kid film him on a cell phone, the video is going to get a ton of views and people are going to want to watch him.
These policies do not work.
Now, I'll be joined in a moment by Michael Flynn.
Lieutenant, I believe, I don't want to get his rank wrong.
So, of course, the famed Michael Flynn.
He'll be joining us to talk actually a bit about this.
So smash that like button, share the show with everyone you know.
That'll be coming up at 4 p.m. at rumble.com slash Tim Pool or over at youtube.com slash Timcast.
Don't miss it.
Follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast.
Thanks for hanging out.
And we'll see you all then.
As for everybody else, we'll continue.
Starting with this story, we've got this from the post-millennial.
PolitiFact says Mamdani's city-run grocery stores are not communist.
Indeed, the fact-checking outlet responded directly to a truth social post by Trump saying he's not a communist false.
I love this.
I mean, the dude's literally a communist.
As the saying goes, the goal of socialism is communism.
And the dude's an avowed and overt socialist, but sure.
They say that wanting free buses, daycare, rent control, city-owned grocery stores, none of that makes him a communist.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Okay.
What they're basically saying is that you are not a communist or a fascist or a Nazi until after you're elected.
By this logic, no one's a white supremacist.
Literally, somebody who's advocating for certain policies isn't actually a white supremacist because, well, they're not proposing a full system where white people control and rule everything.
They're just literally saying white people should have certain access.
Uh-huh.
I remember when the Klan started talking about white rights.
I'm not kidding.
There was this big story like eight years ago where it was like Klan members were saying they're a white rights advocacy group.
It's like, nah, dude, we get it.
You think white people are better?
That's fine.
You're like, I don't agree with your opinion.
You're allowed to have your opinion, but you don't need to lie about it.
But that's what they're doing.
It's all PR.
No, this guy is a communist.
He wants to bring communism to New York and he's going to start with city-run grocery stores.
I'll tell you, it's real simple.
When you have city-run grocery stores that don't pay rent, don't pay taxes, and are selling goods at cost, other grocery stores can't compete.
Eventually, you win The market competition and start taking over.
And it's going to be a market issue.
People are going to say, My grocery store can't afford to stay open anymore, so it's shut down, so I have to go to the city one.
Slowly, over time, the city replaces it, and that's how you get communism.
In order to get a centrally planned government, you don't just overnight say, We're going to by force shut you down.
It's always the revolution.
Now, I don't think it's all bad this guy's winning.
Take a look at this from Rex Mussin.
71% of voters reject socialism.
The Democrats are currently in the gutter.
Now, young people tend to like socialism, so it's entirely possible this poll is reflecting an older demographic combined with a younger demographic.
But my point is simply this.
If they're really going this route in the Democratic Party, embracing socialist candidates in New York, it's going to burn them down in the midterms.
The rift will be dramatic.
We've already got a socialist in Chicago and in Los Angeles.
I'm sorry, and in New York, but Congress may not flip Democrat in the next midterms because the socialists are putting a bad taste in the mouths of all of these people.
Now, we're going to be joined by the one and only Michael Flynn.
Let me grab the interview and get it all set up for you.
And he's going to talk to us about this and other things.
We got it booting up right now.
General Flynn, can you hear me?
Hold on.
I can.
I sure can, Tim.
How are you doing?
Good, good.
I can hear you.
Thanks for joining.
Absolutely.
This is a great day.
Great day in America.
Thanks for being American.
It is.
We're a week away from the nation's birthday, so I'm excited for that.
But in terms of this communist guy winning in New York, I don't know that it's a good time.
What do you think?
Oh, my God.
So I've been pinging some friends of mine that I think could be in contention for New York City mayor.
And I don't think it's Curtis Sliwa.
I don't think it's Curtis Sliwa at all.
And I think, you know, his name has popped up.
He actually ran before, got beat by Adams.
I don't think Adams can win as an independent.
I think Adams, if Adams was smart, he'd go to the New York GOP, maybe even call up the president and say, look, I'll jump to the Republican Party if they'll have him.
No, I'm serious.
I mean, we cannot have this guy.
And since the last few days, people have sent me old videos of this guy saying other things.
I mean, some of the things that this Hamdan guy has said, they're just so outrageous.
He believes, you know, and the soft word, Tim, is socialism.
It's not socialism.
This is pure blown Marxism.
And this is part of the Marxist takeover of the country that frankly started with Barack Obama.
And I think people, when we really, the historians that really deeply examine his background, and I'm not talking about whether he was born in the States or not, but just the kinds of belief systems that he had and what he did to parts of our government and then created a sub sort of a shadow government, if you will, when Trump won, which was a total, you know, it was in 2016 when Trump won.
Nobody believed it.
And so they, between the time that Trump won and the time that he left, there was a shadow government put in place.
And we now know it's roughly about 2,000, 3,000 people that were put into different parts of the government, many in the Department of Justice, certainly the Intel community.
And then Trump goes through his first, you know, his 45th administration, right, as 45.
He does fine.
He did a great job.
He got beat up a lot.
Russia Gate was the big to-do.
Nobody's even paying any attention to that anymore.
Fast forward 2020, you get, I believe, a completely rigged election.
We get Uncle, I call him Uncle Joe.
Everybody knew then that he was having stages of dementia, even back then.
And we now know from recent testimony in front of Congress with the woman who testified that, well, she was just told to auto-pen these documents, right?
So there's more to that.
But so then you have another four years of this element.
And this element is a Marxist socialist communist component of what used to be the Democrat Party.
And your audience, I'm a former Democrat, right?
I always said that when I supported Trump back in 2015 and 2016, I was a registered Democrat.
I always said I never gave a shit about politics.
I never even voted for President of the United States when I was in the military, Tim, because that was my commander in chief.
I didn't want to say, well, I didn't vote for that guy.
I didn't vote for that loser because of the decisions that I'm having to execute now.
So I made a very conscious decision early on, but I was a Democrat.
I was a, you know, we call him a Kennedy Democrat.
So then, so, you know, then you jump to the 2020 to 2024 period of time, right?
And what they were able to do because they learned.
So when I say they, this is this Marxist movement inside of this country, which has clear ties to the globalist element, you know, within the whole globalist community of the World Economic Forum.
We don't need to go down that rat hole right now unless we want to.
But yeah, there's a lot to unpack.
But these are people, right?
These are people with ideas and ideologies and intentions, and they're well-funded, and they see the world in a completely different way, right?
They see the world as sort of a one-world government, right?
World Health Organization, trade, bank, all these different UN.
So you had four years.
And in that four years, without the acknowledgement or really the intention of Joe Biden, because he just wasn't switched on, what they did was they created it and they infiltrated inside of the government even in a much, much broader, stronger way.
So now Trump comes in.
And I'm totally on Team Trump and Team America here, but the challenge for Trump, because I do want to talk about Iran and I want to mention a couple other things.
I know some things that you were interested in, and I am.
I think their audience is as well.
But There is only a crust.
It's kind of like you got a big snowbank, right?
And then there's a crust of ice at the top.
Well, Trump has not been able to break through that crust of ice yet, because down below that crust of ice, that crust right now, you got people like Pam Bondi, Cash Patel, Tulsi, you know, all the name brand people that are standing on that crust.
And some of them are trying to step on it and beat that crust, beat a hole in that thing to crush the ice and get down into the depths of where that snow is hiding out, right?
And all these people are hiding inside of it because there are many.
Trump has got to hire like 3,000, 4,000 people.
Now, I know he's saying, well, we're not going to hire as many.
Well, you got to make sure that you understand the processes that the government runs on.
So if you're going to make Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, National Security Advisor, head of USAID, head of all these other things, those are processes or there are processes in our government, Tim, that still have been running for a long time.
It doesn't mean that they're right.
It just means that the bureaucracy runs on those.
And unless you control them, it's like getting a hold of a freaking pit bull who's attacking your buddy's dog.
I mean, you got to yank that.
You got to put the choke chain on that sucker and you got to pull it back.
I don't think that there's been enough choke on the bureaucracy that has been put in place, not just under Obama or Biden, but over the last 16 years.
It does seem, I think a lot of people agree.
You know, to kind of just kind of make the point on the Zoran Mamdani thing, he's not yet mayor, but it's just a lot of people are seeing this trend as continuing of socialists are getting more traction, overt communists.
I would say there's no reason not to just, that's the end goal for all of what they're doing.
And then at the federal level, this is where we hope the counter comes into play.
A lot of people feel like not enough has been done.
I see these tweets all the time.
It is still a little early.
I mean, it's been four or I mean, three to four months for some of these appointees.
I've heard rumors that we'll start seeing some arrests of some individuals, maybe midsummer.
But I think a lot of people are really worried that we're not going to see it.
And like you're saying, Trump isn't able to break through that crust actually to the deep state, and it may just be surface level.
Yeah.
So Hamdani is an indicator.
Okay.
Let's talk about him specifically, and then I will address why this is so difficult for Trump.
Hamdani is an indicator because this is not, he's not the first socialist to take over a city.
He will be the first socialist to take over New York City, which is kind of a bellwether for the direction that the United States of America is observed by the rest of the world.
I mean, it is an international city.
And if we have a social, I mean, this guy wants to eliminate the New York City Police Department and turn it all into a bunch of social work.
He said that.
He wants to tax white people.
Yeah.
So Hamdani is an indicator of what has already occurred across our nation in many other mid-sized and large cities and certainly even in some governor's mansions in certain states like Tim Waltz, the gal from Michigan.
I mean, these are people who are, they're clearly on the socialist spectrum.
So that said, so those are indicators.
That means that our country is shifting in a way that I don't think we truly realize it.
And it's really shifting pretty quickly too.
And I saw a stat yesterday, which I found fascinating.
It was out of Byron York, for those that followed Byron York.
During the bicentennial, which was whatever, 1975, 76 timeframe, one in 21 Americans were foreign born, one in 21 at the bicentennial.
Here we are 50 years later, right, 2025, right?
And it's now one in six, one in six.
So what they do is these are people that come from other countries and they don't necessarily, you know, they want to come to America.
They say, well, I love America, but they don't assimilate well.
So Trump is dealing with a cultural shift in our country.
And that, and where a lot of them go to is they typically go to, now we're talking the last 25, we're talking a generation, Tim, right?
A lot of these people, they end up working inside of government, local, state, and federal.
And when they get inside of the government apparatus, and then when you have leaders who are intentionally behind them, because I can tell you the Chinese, the Chinese are intentionally behind the infiltration of the idea of socialism and communism into the fabric of the United States of America.
That's their plan.
Hell, they wrote that plan back in the early 1950s.
It became declassified in, I think, 1996.
Then they wrote a book about irregular warfare and how they're going to fight this without firing a shot.
So these are the big shifts that are occurring.
And that's that that I saw yesterday blew me away.
You know, one in 21, now it's one in six.
That means that there is a cultural shift and the immersion of people in this country who kind of looked at it and said, guys that look like me, guys look like you, and said, well, geez, you know, no way could we ever become a communist country.
No way would people do that.
Yeah, it could happen overnight.
And so when you look inside of the government and you look at the policies that are implemented by administrations, and frankly, we've had more, you know, quote unquote Democrat administrations than we've had Republican administrations and the Republican administrations like Bush for eight years.
What did we do for those eight years?
We fought the war in Afghanistan, maybe rightly so for a little while, should have gotten out of it way back then.
And then we went into Iraq on a lie.
We went into Iraq on a lie.
The biggest, to me still as a former military guy, the biggest strategic mistake this century to date was the decision to attack and remove Saddam Hussein.
Huge, huge mistake.
Now, Is that water under the bridge?
It is not because it is affecting everything going on in our country today.
So, going forward from those decisions that were in your lifetime, in my lifetime, and the lifetime of many in your audience, you know, we are still experiencing that.
So, we're still engaged in the Middle East.
We still have a bureaucracy that has turned into a, you know, they desire socialism more than they, I mean, let's just face the numbers.
Let's look at the numbers.
The number of people in the federal government of Washington, D.C. is like 96% of that federal government voted for, I forget her name, Kamala.
They voted for Kamala, right?
96% of the federal government voted for Kamala.
That's a stat that we know.
So that means that you've got people that would have preferred Kamala Harris over Donald Trump.
Why?
I mean, and you go, you say to yourself, and now we look at like Tim Waltz.
You know, Tim Waltz the other day, he's in front of the, he's testifying the other day.
And what does he do half the time?
He says, he does the Comey trick.
I don't recall.
Right.
Such bullshit.
So let me ask you something.
One of the things that Trump is doing to try and rectify this, I think, is the mass deportations.
You know, you're mentioning the high intent, like the high percentage of foreign born.
And this means people who are not raised on American values and the American tradition, understanding the history or not being attached to it.
Doesn't mean it's impossible.
It just means they're less likely to be.
And so Trump says, well, okay, if you're an illegal immigrant, you got to go.
And this is the second biggest issue in the election.
Help deliver the win for him.
Big, Beautiful Bill largely is funding all of this stuff.
And so with that, you have this guy, Zoran Mamdani, in New York saying he will protect illegal immigrants on their property, on city property, from deportation.
Now, my argument is we are facing an existential crisis as the country is being split politically on the verge of imploding.
And Donald Trump won a popular vote on the platform of let's deport illegal immigrants.
My argument is at a certain point, these sanctuary jurisdictions, these Democrats that are obstructing ICE law enforcement need to be charged with seditious conspiracy, which I believe it absolutely qualifies for, that they are conspiring to obstruct federal law enforcement, to delay law enforcement, and to use force to do so.
More importantly, the conspiracy itself gives Democrats extra congressional seats and electoral college votes in these states where they're counting illegal immigrants towards the census.
So my argument, maybe extreme, I don't know.
If someone like Zoran Mandani was publicly stating, vote for me and I will protect illegal immigrants from deportation, the DOJ needs to go in and say, if you do that, we will charge you.
Yeah, let's cut to the chase.
If a city mayor, I don't care what mayor it is, I don't care if it's New York or Seattle or Portland, Portland's going through hell right now.
Any mayor that does that, those buildings, the president of the United States has the executive authority and frankly under national emergencies, has the authority to do damn near anything he wants.
Now, we want to make sure that the president doesn't get out of control and remains benevolent.
But if he wants to federalize buildings for the protection of our Constitution, right?
I mean, one of the things that people forget, the President of the United States is the only person that says in his oath of office, he uses the word preserve, preserve, not protect and defend.
He uses the word preserve.
Only one, Tim.
And for your audience, that means that the President of the United States, by the mandate of the people of this country, giving him, you know, we give the judgment of us, you know, in a majority to the president of the United States to make these decisions.
If you've got a guy like Hamdani that says, all you illegals, come on into the mayor's office and, you know, we'll feed you.
You know what?
Trump has the authority to go in there and seize that building and those individuals.
If, you know, now the left will lose their mind and they'll start suing them.
But Trump has the responsibility to preserve.
Now, the other thing is that this business of deportation, because the big, beautiful bill, I'm not, you know, I mean, there's parts of it that I would argue against, honestly, but he needs a budget.
I mean, guys like Tom Homan, his budget to be able to do the things he needs to do is in that big, beautiful bill.
So nobody, the government can't move forward.
The establishment, the uniparty in Washington, D.C., loves it.
These judges that have been blocking and tackling anything that Trump says, they love this.
This is what they're doing on purpose to intentionally delay.
So they can basically say, you know, your first year at buddy is gone.
We did our job.
You know, now we're going to start worrying about the 2028 election, not even the 2026 election.
I mean, Christ, I've already saw an article the other day at a Wall Street Journal about who the next candidates are for president of the United States.
One last data point, I think, for your audience.
If we started in February, okay, let's just say we have 20 million illegals in this country that came in under the Biden administration.
If we started in February, that means that we have to deport about 460,000 a month, a month, to get to the end of four years where we've gotten the majority of them out.
I mean, I'm not a math major, but all you got to do is take the 20 million, divide it by 48 months or some number of months where you think you're going to be able to do it.
That's a lot of people.
We're not doing that right now.
We're not doing that.
That's why I love this.
I love this alligator Alcatraz that they're building down in Florida.
Build it as big as you want.
There is this challenge right now in that over the past several decades, through policies of the Uniparty establishment, we have a younger generation that doesn't want to or doesn't know how to work.
And so I've encountered this.
There are businesses by me that have shut down.
There's a restaurant, a Thai food restaurant that recently went out of business by me because they couldn't find anybody to do the job.
They were trying to hire kitchen staff and they couldn't find Anybody.
So, the argument we're getting now, and while this is a real phenomenon, there are people arguing to Trump: don't deport the farm workers, even though they're illegal because we don't have the labor force.
How do you solve for this 30-year mass migration of 20 million plus illegal immigrants into the country?
And I also want to stress this too.
We'll put a pin there.
When we say 20 million illegal immigrants, what people don't understand is there's 10 million or more that were illegal in the past and were either granted amnesty or some kind of pet citizenship that now have legal status, but still are a component of the U.S. did not train its younger generations to work hard for the responsibilities of inheriting this country.
And now the concern is with these mass deportations, which of course I agree with, we're going to end up with labor shortages and economic risks.
Yeah.
So a couple of things, because I was at a restaurant, kind of what you're talking about, up in New Jersey last month.
And like everybody that was serving us was speaking some type of actually European language, right?
And I said, so what's, you know, my buddy who owns the restaurant, we're sitting there talking.
I said, so what's the deal?
Like, you got a lot of people that look like they're from, you know, if they're speaking as though they're from like Eastern Europe.
He goes, yeah, he goes, I can't find anybody to take these jobs.
And, you know, this is waiting on tables, busing the tables, cooking in the kitchen.
And so he's got a, he got a really good system down on the H-1B visas, right?
So there is something there.
And I think that probably the smartest person, certainly in the administration, is Stephen Miller on this kind of issue.
Oh, yeah.
But so that system for particularly for small businesses that need some type of labor to work in their businesses, whether it's farming or whether it's restaurant work, that system has got to be fixed and it's got to be figured out.
And instead of taking, you know, you got somebody on an H-1B visa for, you know, I don't know, a year, six months, whatever the time is, I'm not an expert on that issue, but that to me seems to be a valid requirement.
And it was created for that purpose.
And I'm fine with that.
What I'm not fine with is the fighting back from these mayors, particularly mayors and some governors that are fighting back, getting rid of some of these criminals, known criminals, judges who are allowing criminals to go through their courts and then let them go out on probation or something.
I mean, when we've got people that are getting, you know, they're having their asses kicked at abortion clinics because they're out there praying and they end up going to jail because they got involved in an assault or something.
I mean, I just, our system is so turned upside down.
So there's got to be something to where we fix that.
That's a system that's been going on since I was a kid.
I mean, we've had a visa work program for a long time in this country and it's worked.
And it's worked.
I mean, I'm from up in New England.
I'm not from like Arizona or New Mexico where you get the farm workers, migration workers coming across every year.
I'm from up in New England area where we always had guys in the fishing industry, right?
You got guys in the fishing industry.
They'd come in, they'd get their visas updated, they go back home for a little bit, then they'd come back and they'd work the lines again for another six months.
I mean, so it's been going on a while.
We've got to fix that.
But you have people back to the problem, you know, and what Trump needs to do, I think.
The problem is you have people inside of our government, never mind those that are on the outside pressuring, but you have people inside of our government that are slowing everything down.
They are delaying every single action.
When Trump sits there and he does this, you know, signs an executive order and he does this, right?
Everybody sees him do this.
I love it.
Every time he signs an executive order and some, you know, some guy on his team says this executive order is to keep people out of the country.
You know, the problem is, is you got to then have somebody checking that that executive order is being executed, right?
In the military, we use this phrase, what gets checked is what gets done, right?
So the commander, you know, I've been a commander at different times.
If I, you know, I don't, I don't like tell people, hey, I'm coming down to the loading dock today, or I'm going to come into the motor pool, or I'm going to go out to the training range, because if I do, everybody's out there making sure that they're shining up the dog and they're shining up the pony, right?
No, you have to have somebody who just shows up and checks whether or not that executive order is being implemented at the lowest level.
Because if it's not being implemented at the lowest level, I guarantee those in between what we used to call the bars and the stars, right?
The captains and the generals, between the bars and the stars, somebody is either usurping your authority, meaning they're undermining your authority, or they're basically not, they don't, they're saying to you, I don't give a shit what you say because you're only going to be around for a little while.
So do we need to see mass firings, ASAP?
Because I'm down.
I just, I love the Doge stuff.
I want to see more.
Yeah.
I wish Doge, yeah, so yes, that's what I would like to see.
I would like to see a lot more inside of different departments, particularly in the Department of Justice, Department of Defense.
I mean, the Intel community is so rife right now.
And actually, Tim or I'm sorry, Tulsi and Pete Hagseth and Pam Bondi, they have the mandate from the American people to do it.
And you think the president's going to go and say, oh, no, no, I don't want you to fire anybody.
No, if Pete Hagseth turns around and says, I'm going to relieve all the chiefs of the services, you know, I'm going to tell them, thank you for your service, put your paperwork in, next Friday, you're done, right?
People are going to go, thank God, finally, because those individuals were responsible for DEI policies for the last four years and many others in there.
So that's just the Department of Defense.
Never mind the Intel community, the Department of State, all of these organizations, you know, the Veterans Affairs side.
I mean, I'm a vet.
I haven't really seen any real radical change in our veterans policies or issues.
I just haven't seen it.
So it's not Trump as much because Trump is like, you know, he's the director.
He's the orchestrator, right?
And so he's like saying, okay, this is what I want.
Now it's up to those individuals, many of them who have never served in government or have never served in a place where they led large organizations.
Because when you lead a large organization, it's a lot different than tooling around four or five staffers when you're a member of Congress or, you know, frankly, on Fox News, right?
I mean, even an attorney general at the state level is much different than an attorney general at the federal level.
In fact, on that note, the attorney general for the United States of America doesn't have to be a lawyer, has to be a leader.
And so I guess what I'm saying is that the American people want accountability.
Accountability is not just somebody being indicted by the Department of Justice.
Accountability is telling, you know, you, Tim Poo, your podcast sucks.
You're done.
We're going to move somebody else in.
I mean, nobody, of course, I'm facetious right now, but you know what I'm talking about.
The American people, the majority, the majority that gave this president a mandate for the idea of crushing the deep state once and for all.
Because if he doesn't, if he doesn't, and I know that there's some things in play, but it's like there's a momentum, right?
There is a momentum that occurs.
And that momentum, you know, I can feel it.
And it kind of sometimes I feel like this past week, Trump had some victories, right?
But now you see the, you know, the, you know, the Ayatollah's fatwa, right?
The fatwa.
I know we're not going to get a chance to talk too much about it.
But, you know, don't believe these people when they say, oh, yeah, we're ready to have a peace deal.
Don't believe them.
Don't believe them.
Even when somebody in the government says, hey, we're squaring that away.
We're following the president's orders.
That's total bullshit.
You better go down.
You better have somebody who's loyal to you, knows what they're looking at, and they go down into the bowels of the institutions, plural, and they see whether that stuff is being executed.
If it is not, then you have, then the president can say you have the authority to get rid of them or go to the secretary to say, move out, or you come back and you tell me, and I'll make one phone call to secretary of whatever and say, you're not doing your job.
You got, I'll give you a week.
I mean, we are at that point because socialism and communism is here.
It is here.
We've seen some great stuff on social media, actually, from people pointing out that some of these bad actors are getting jobs, are getting appointments, they're getting promotions.
And then we've actually seen Trump rescind or these people end up getting terminated.
So I know he's listening.
I think the challenge is just that there is a gigantic mountain of corruption and only so much time.
But General Flynn, I do appreciate you joining me.
Do you want to give any final thoughts and then let people know where they can find you?
Yeah, I mean, you know, so I'll shamelessly promote my book, Pardon of Innocence, that just came out this week.
And it's actually number one on Amazon right now because of the great work by people.
Yeah, here's what I want people to understand.
Trump is paying attention to us.
He's paying attention to the, I call them digital soldiers, right?
Trump is paying attention to social media.
He's paying attention to our voices.
And so when people complain about something or bitch about some appointment or something, he's watching that.
And so what we've got to do is we've got to leverage this alternative information warfare that we are involved in.
I call it fifth generation warfare.
We are involved in that.
And Trump is paying attention.
So when we all do come together in that world, we can actually win these battles.
And believe me, President Trump is paying attention and he knows that he's got so much time to do the things that he needs to do.
So, you know, we need to stand behind him, but we need to, you know, we need to demand, we need to demand execution of those executive orders that he has put out by those leaders that are that are sort of his, you know, his first-line supervisors, his first-line commanders, right?
Well, where can, I do appreciate you coming in and sharing your insights.
Where can GeneralFlynn.com?
People can go to generalflynn.com or follow me on X at Jen Flynn, G-E-N-Flynn.
Right on.
Well, again, thanks for joining.
We got to get you back in the studio because we have a lot more to talk about, obviously, but not enough time.
But General Flynn, it's been an honor.
Thanks for hanging out, and we'll see you next time.
God bless.
See you.
Take care.
That was the man himself.
General Flynn joining to talk about what I completely agree with.
Fire them all.
There are a lot of people in the federal government right now that are still deep state.
But I think it's important to point out, it's still a little early.
It's not going to have all time in the world.
So it's starting to get not early.
But I agree largely with the sentiment that we need to see more action.
So I trust Cash and Dan.
I think they're doing a pretty good job.
We don't know everything, but I look forward to seeing more.
Some of my friends, we're going to gear up to raid our good friend Russell Brand.
So y'all can join his show.
He's going live.
This, of course, is the Rumble Morning Lineup.
You guys, here's the next raid.
Smash the like button.
Share the show.
That's the most important thing.
Rumble is building something tremendous with this live morning lineup that we've got.
It's an honor and a privilege to be a part of it.
We have some of the biggest live streams in the country because you guys share, join the raids, and watch.
It's like as if Rumble is itself a new network competing with all the other rivals.
So thank you so much for hanging out.
Smash that like button on the way out.
Share the show.
And we'll see you all tonight at 8 p.m.
Timcast IRL.
Same place.
Don't miss it.
▲
Export Selection