Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 18, 2025 - Tim Pool Daily Show

01:01:25

Trump DEMANDS Impeachment Of Judge Who BLOCKED TdA Deportation, Judge Claims EQUAL POWERS To Trump

Participants

Main voices

tim pool

01:00:50

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Things are certainly heating up, my friends, as it pertains to the deportation of criminal terrorists in this country.
		Donald Trump deported his administration, Trente Aragua criminals, to El Salvador to be held in their prisons.
		It's cheaper than holding them here.
		And the concern is that the concern is if these individuals are deported to Venezuela or anywhere else, they will simply come right back.
		Now, the scandal erupted when a judge ordered the president to turn around military flights over international waters in midair and bring these people back to this country.
		A hearing was held yesterday where, I kid you not, a lower court judge argued his powers are equitable to the president.
		And I have the quotes.
		Trump has responded, demanding the impeachment of this crooked judge, saying he wasn't elected.
		It is remarkable to see where we are at, my friends, where Democrats who just 10 years ago, Fox News ran this clip of Hillary Clinton saying criminal illegal immigrants would be deported, no questions asked.
		Now, what changed?
		Now, all of a sudden, these liberals are coming out and they're saying that we must have due process for noncitizens who commit crimes and are part of terrorist organizations.
		OK, well, they get due process.
		Due process, meaning the appropriate procedure by which their rights are upheld.
		So what are we doing?
		Listen, if a gang member broke into my house and was known to have committed crimes, and then I said, we all here recognize you, sir, who broke into my house, have committed these crimes, I'm going to give you a ride home.
		That's violating their rights.
		It's wild to me that these people, the worst thing most of them are getting.
		I mean, the ones that are going to the El Salvador in prisons, they're going to prison.
		That's going to be up for El Salvador to figure out.
		We're deporting illegal immigrants.
		As for the other deportations, and I got a bunch of stories for you the left is freaking out about.
		The idea that the worst thing in the world is we give people a ride home is shocking to me.
		But I want to make sure you understand that.
		All we're doing is saying, if you came here illegally, we get it.
		Step in the car, in the plane, and give you a ride home.
		Now, my friends, welcome to the Rumble lineup.
		It is the noon show.
		I am your host, Tim Poole, for the TimCast Morning News Show.
		I want to give a shout-out to Steven Crowder and the Mug Club for the raid on the show.
		The news came out yesterday.
		Ladies and gentlemen, I think 10 of the top 15 live news shows in the world were Rumble.
		That's pretty crazy.
		We are changing the shape of the game.
		And in terms of live streaming in general, we here, the TimCast morning show, we were in, what number were we?
		I think we were like number four or something like this.
		Is that where we were?
		We were huge.
		Steven Crowder, I think, was number two behind Kysonette.
		You can't beat those young gun streamers, though.
		Kids want to watch their shows.
		But Steven Crowder, I think, was number two in the world.
		And so far...
		This morning, the Rumble light-up has dominated each time slot at number one in the world.
		I'm pretty sure in the world.
		I could be wrong.
		Maybe it's nation.
		So we'll be humble and say, in the country.
		So that is fantastic.
		We are changing the way the game is played, and we are going to create a sphere of influence, of meritocracy, responsibility.
		So stay tuned.
		We're going to be live with you guys for the hour, going over this story.
		And I'm not just here to talk to you about Trump's demand this man be impeached.
		I'm here to talk to you about the current state of the left.
		And, you know, with the Democratic Party polling at a favorability, according to NBC News, of 27 percent, I don't think I'm the only one in this country who feels this way.
		We've got another swatting.
		We had, I think we're up to like 16 or 17 swattings, arson attacks.
		We've got arrests related to the violence and terror of the Tesla dealerships.
		I want to compare and contrast as Donald Trump seeks to bring about justice and accountability to this country and say, you know, these are criminal gang members that Biden let in.
		They are they are rapists.
		They are murderers.
		They are bad people.
		They are not citizens.
		Their due process is being upheld.
		If you are not a citizen, you get arrested.
	We check your immigration status and then send you on your way.
	But no, they want, as they have always wanted on the left.
	The liberals to treat non-citizens equally to citizens.
	Now, don't get me wrong.
	There are certain there are certain due process rights that we extend equally to citizens and non-citizens.
	But if you are here illegally, you get deported.
	We don't go and face a criminal trial where we present evidence to a jury to determine whether or not you're here illegally.
	We simply say, are you a citizen?
	No.
	OK, right this way, sir.
	We're giving you a ride home.
	And this is where we're currently at.
	So, my friends.
	Smash that like button.
	Share the show with everyone you know.
	That's the important thing.
	As we are now dominating the news cycle with the top live shows in the world back to back to back, next week, no more YouTube.
	This morning's show will be Rumble exclusive.
	But I will stress, Timcast IRL is remaining largely the same.
	We're not trying to just, we're trying to build something.
	With stability and the morning lineup will be a Rumble exclusive lineup with the top shows in the world.
	And I gotta tell you, the Tim Pool morning show yesterday for a single stream had more viewers than Tim Kest IRL.
	Isn't that something?
	And that's thanks to you guys who are a part of this Rumble lineup, who are watching as we do these raids, as everybody watches the morning show.
	We had one guy super chat us last night saying he was a trucker.
	And he loves turning on Evita at 9 in the morning and just letting the show play as he drives because he gets all these live shows just like that.
	That's really awesome, you guys.
	You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.
	Don't forget, my friends, Cast Brew Coffee.
	It's the best coffee, everybody agrees.
	We got Appalachian Nights, Rise with Roberto, Stand Your Grounds.
	And for those that prefer decaf, don't forget, we got Sleepy Joe and Unwoke.
	As always, join Rumble Premium.
	If you go to rumble.com slash timcast IRL, check out The Green Room, episode 101 with Eleazar Perez.
	To be honest, we were largely just goofing off, and I was ranting about video games that I find to be too woke.
	This is a premium behind-the-scenes show where you as Rumble Premium members get to watch us hang out in our green room at our studio.
	And not so family-friendly.
	Certainly it is uncensored because I imagine everyone in the world would ban us for half the things we talk about.
	But let's jump into the news and see what's going on with this impeachment.
	As I already said, my friends, you can help the show out by sharing it with all your friends and hitting that Like button.
	Newsweek reports.
	Trump demands impeachment of crooked judge.
	President Donald Trump attacked the judge who blocked his deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members as crooked and an agitator demanding his impeachment for thwarting the democratic will.
	U.S. District Judge James E. Bosberg temporarily blocked the Trump administration from using an 18th century wartime law, the Alien Enemies Act, to accelerate the deportation of Venezuelan gang members.
	I would like to assess how they write these stories, Newsweek.
	Now, they're not the worst, but notice every outlet does this.
unidentified		They've criticized Trump over an 18th century law.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		They're trying to play this game.
		18th century law implies it's archaic and not needed.
		Heavens me, why are we even discussing it?
		Well, our Constitution is 18th century law, not in the literal legal context of what law is, but it's the law of the land, the Constitution, and it is also 18th century.
		Why does it matter?
		You can literally just say the Alien Enemies Act, which exists for a purpose, for the president to execute his authority to get rid of enemies in this country.
		Why frame it that way?
		They're trying to diminish it and make it look like Trump is doing something wrong when he's exercising his authority under the executive branch, as he has always been allowed to do.
		The act allows non-citizens to be deported without the opportunity to go before an immigration or federal court judge.
		Trump Saturday proclaimed that proclamation called Trendy Aragua Gang an Invading Force.
		I'd like to throw it to Hillary Clinton, who also said, I believe it was 2014, deport criminal aliens, no questions asked.
		Yes, that is the authority of the president.
		Next question, I guess.
		Oh, but here they go.
		The liberals are coming out saying we believe in the Constitution.
		Uh-huh.
		And this law from the same period gives Trump these powers.
		Well, here's a statement from Donald Trump on Truth Social.
		This radical left lunatic of a judge, a troublemaker and agitator, who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected president.
		He didn't win the popular vote by a lot.
		He didn't win all seven swing states.
		He didn't win 2,750 to 525 counties.
		He didn't win anything.
		I won for many reasons.
		It's an overwhelming mandate, but fighting illegal immigration may have been the number one reason for this historic victory.
		Well, it may have been it was number two in most polls still.
		I am just doing what the voters wanted me to do.
		This judge, like many of the crooked judges I am forced to appear before, should be impeached.
		We don't want vicious, violent, and demented criminals, many of them deranged murderers, in our country.
		Make America great again.
		I was shocked completely, and I mean this sincerely, when the reports came out that this judge claimed he had equal powers to the president.
		Equal.
		The president is elected by the body politic as a whole.
		The entirety of this nation cast their ballot for a single president, and Trump won the popular vote.
		Congressmen are by district, senators are by state, governors are by state.
		There is one man that is elected by literally everyone.
		It is Donald Trump.
		That beats any poll.
		How dare you claim to have powers equitable to the president himself?
		Now we can mention the branches are co-equal.
		That's fine.
		But a lower court judge?
		Imagine the Secretary of State claiming he can overrule the Supreme Court's decisions on things.
		Now you can argue the executive can dispute and debate with the Supreme Court given certain orders, or the legislative branch can challenge that and there are checks and balances.
		That's how it works normally.
		Legislative body will pass a law.
		Trump will reject it.
		Then there will be a veto.
		And that's a normal check and balance.
		They can't get past a veto.
		You don't even need the Supreme Court.
		A law will get passed.
		Trump will sign it.
		The people can then sue.
		And it goes to the Supreme Court.
		How about that?
		I'm going to read more of this where they say why it matters.
		But first, let me show you some of these posts from the actual hearing.
		Take a look at this yesterday from Julie Kelly.
		Boasberg is the judge here.
		Quote.
		Actually, let me go back one.
		We're going to get some context.
		The judge ordered the plane be turned around in midair.
	This is a military flight, mind you.
	Julie Kelly says, Boesburg and the DOJ are now arguing over court's jurisdiction over international waters and airspace.
	Boesburg keeps interrupting DOJ and insisting he has ultimate authority.
	Isn't it a better course to return planes to the U.S. and figure out a better course instead of we will do whatever we want?
	He says Trump admin only relief is to appeal his order, not ignore it.
	There is no evidence that this is the case.
	That is the case.
	I'm just asking how my equitable powers don't attach to that plane after it left the United States.
	DOJ citing presidential military and foreign diplomatic authority.
	That's how insane this is.
	Boesberg, quote, You're saying the president has extra powers over a plane once it leaves the United States?
	How is this real?
	Boesberg says, quote, I think my equitable powers are pretty clear that they don't end at the water's edge or airspace edge.
	These are interesting questions to have on a set of facts, which is what I was hoping to get to today.
	Julie Kelly goes on to say the ACLU lawyer babbling about equities.
	Babbling about equities.
	What are we doing?
	Why is it jumping on me?
	Let's try that again.
	Okay, it's literally not letting me load this.
	So we'll try that and see if that loads.
	ACLU suggesting a flight related to proclamation took off Friday, March 14th.
	Boesburg again demands that DOJ tell him how many people are covered by proclamation.
	DOJ resists, and Boesburg says he wants to know why he cannot receive that information.
	Quote, This is incredible.
	What we have here is a lower court judge arguing that Trump's international Negotiations with El Salvador.
	The deportation.
	The removal of enemy combatants.
	These are criminal gangs.
	Many of them are labeled as terrorist organizations.
	They're cartel members.
	And Trump is saying they have waged war on our border.
	We are removing them.
	And a judge says, no, bring them back.
	Because my powers are equal to yours.
	They're not.
	Not even close.
	And it's remarkable that this judge thinks he can order the president to return a military flight.
	Can we address that?
	Imagine if they got away with something like this.
	Imagine if they do.
	What they are doing, as they have always been doing, is trying to gut and rip to shreds the foundations of this country.
	My friends, I got no problem saying the executive branch has expanded its powers way too much over the past several decades.
	The president can direct the military.
	That's what he does.
	And a judge can't tell him no.
	Now look, there are some things where courts can, but this certainly ain't the way.
	If we have questions, right?
	The challenge is when a president engages in unilateral actions against an enemy, the remedy would be impeachment.
	But there's a mandate.
	The Republicans want to cross the board.
	This judge has gone rogue, essentially.
	The Republicans have the House, the Senate, and the presidency.
	They agree with the actions Trump is taking.
	He's not going to be impeached.
	He's not going to be convicted.
	The American people largely support these actions.
	So this one singular judge arguing that simply by virtue of appointment from a previous administration, he has equal powers to the president, is truly something to behold.
	In a post from Margo Cleveland breaking down this hearing that took place, DOJ points out oral order is not the injunction.
	And transcripts said saying I would memorialize gave DOJ good faith basis to wait for written order.
	So basically, the other day, Trump's got planes in the air and a judge says, I hereby order you to turn those planes around.
	The Trump administration just kept the planes going.
	And they said, until we get a written record in the court record, there's no order enforceable.
	The judge argued that simply by virtue of saying it, they must abide.
	They don't.
	That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
	I gave this analogy yesterday, but I want you to imagine a scenario.
	I want you to imagine this.
	Okay, let's say you were in an airport.
	How many of you were military?
	All right, let's try this one.
	You're in the military.
	You're a flight crew for a flight deporting enemy combatants.
	Maybe it's a little hyperbolic.
	Let's just say non-citizens.
	We don't even know what their crimes are.
	But these are people who are not citizens of the United States.
	You are ordered.
	Board them on this plane.
	This plane takes off at 1,700.
	You say, yes, sir.
	You start doing the work.
	You load the plane.
	All of a sudden, someone runs out.
	Hey, stop the flight.
	Stop the flight.
	Why?
	Because a judge said so.
	Which judge?
	Well, a judge told the DOJ lawyer, Janet, And she told the clerk, Bill, Bill relayed the information to me by text.
	You've got to stop the flight.
	You know what they're going to say?
	Unless I'm ordered directly to do so, I ain't doing it.
	Now imagine there's a commanding officer sitting in his room.
	The guy goes, oh, I got it.
	So he runs in.
	Sir, you've got to stop that flight.
	Why is that?
	A judge ordered it.
	Really?
	Is there a written order instructing me to stop the flight?
	No, he just said it.
	Who said it?
	I think his name was, what was his name?
	I don't know his name.
	They just said a judge said it.
	Let me check my text.
	Boesburg.
	Boesburg?
	Okay.
	So who sent you the text?
	Jim.
	Who's Jim?
	Jim Smith.
	He's a lawyer.
	Okay, so a lawyer texted you saying a judge said a thing?
	Bro, I am not going to shut down a flight that's ready to go because someone texted you or called you and said a thing happened.
	It is insane that a judge thinks he can verbally decree in a courtroom to a judge, turn the plane around, and that's going to stop the machine of the executive branch and everybody who is lined up to send these flights out.
	It's ludicrous.
	Now, hold on.
	Hold on.
	Let's say the judge is, he's got his written order in the court record.
	Now it's very easy.
	The guy runs to the commanding officer.
	Stop the flight.
	Why?
	Here you go.
	A court order.
	Oh.
	Got a court order delivered in the court record.
	Docket number of this.
	Let me make a phone call.
	Is this legit?
	It's in the court record.
	It's a real order.
	The judge is ordering you to stop.
	Okay.
	I'm going to ask my commanding officer.
	It's not even that simple.
	But the idea that by virtue of hearsay, I hereby decree to you, lawyer in this room, make sure the president knows I said to return that flight around.
	Look, guys, let me tell you something.
	If I am ever walking down the street and someone yells, hey, I don't turn around.
	Hey is not my name.
	I don't listen to that.
	Okay?
	The idea that a judge could decree to a lawyer and the lawyer is going to convey that to who else?
	First of all, the lawyer is not going to call the flight crew.
	The lawyer is going to call the DOJ office, which is going to go to Pam.
	It probably won't even go to Pam Bondi.
	How many hours would it take before someone finally gets word to the president or to anyone in the executive branch who's going to shut these flights down?
	Imagine if this lawyer says, I'm going to go directly to the airport and say the judge said stop.
	They're going to be like, I don't answer to you.
	I don't take orders from you.
	I'm not shutting this flight down.
	It is psychotic that the judge is demanding his oral words in a lower court would have any kind of mandate over the executive branch military operations.
	There's more.
	The judge quoting says, you're saying, quote, I'm telling you immediately turn planes around.
	The judge, you're telling me that very clear point is not an order.
	All right.
	What is it?
	DOJ, I'm telling you the government's position and it wasn't in written order, but so written order controls.
	The judge says you knew that morning there would be a hearing at five.
	So when I said directly turn that plane around because my written order was pithier, that can't be disregarded.
	That can be disregarded.
	It isn't a matter of disregarded.
	It's a matter of minute order controls.
	So you're saying we are outside of airspace, so no jurisdiction.
	DOJ, no.
	Removal happens when they left the U.S. So that means they were already removed, which is what the court order.
	The judge says equitable power has extraterritorial reach.
	You can't violate.
	You can't violate it.
	Long story short, this judge believes That he has equal powers to the president.
	Now, I ask you, my friends, who's that guy?
unidentified		Who that?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		You've never seen that face before in your life.
		Do you think that this guy could give commands to the military?
		And they would like, OK, let's just try this.
		If Donald Trump, I mean this sincerely and honestly, I want you guys to comment because I'm not I've not served in the military.
		If Donald Trump showed up.
		With Secret Service and all.
		And he went to someone in the military and ordered them to prepare to set up a flight.
		Go tell your commanding officer, whoever you need to, we're getting this flight ready.
		Would you do it?
		And I mean that sincerely because I genuinely don't know.
		I'd have to imagine you'd be like...
		Yes, sir, Mr. President, let me start organizing this.
		Even if you were an enlisted private, just showed up for your first day out of basic training, I'd imagine when the president says, go do this thing.
		Yes, sir.
		And I don't think anyone's going to have a problem with that.
		You'd make a phone call.
		The president's here.
		He's asking me to do this thing.
		Can we figure this out?
		Someone above me has got to take care of this.
		I could be wrong.
		I'm pretty sure if the president showed up and said, this is what's happening now.
		Get it done.
		Pretty sure you don't got to worry about too much because the president's ordering you, and he's ordering you to prepare a flight.
		I mean, obviously, if he ordered you to do something crazy, you'd be like, I don't know about that, Mr. President.
		Like, I don't think I can do that.
		Some people might just do it.
		Okay, anyway, here's my point.
		Now, some may argue they will or won't or whatever.
		I think most people are going to say yes.
		We got some chats here.
		Cameron Hansen says, the commander-in-chief, yes, I would.
		Commander-in-chief, president supersedes all.
		POTUS is the commander, the commanding officer of the Uniformed Services.
		He has final say in military matters.
		I kind of felt that way.
		The president's not going to show up by himself, right?
		His plane lands, Air Force One, they get out.
		He's got people with him.
		He's got all sorts of whatever around him.
		And if he gives an order to whoever's there, they're going to say, yes, sir, let me take care of this for you.
		Now, imagine this judge shows up.
		He arrives by car and he's got a security detail and he goes wearing his judge robes and says, turn that plane around.
		They're going to be like, who are you?
		I am Judge Boasberg of the Federal District Court out of Washington, D.C. And I say, turn that plane around.
		They're going to be like, I don't take orders from you, sir.
		Please step back.
		You're agitated.
		It ain't going to happen.
		And that's the point.
		The point is what we as a society.
		Recognize and can agree upon.
		And the idea that this guy has the gall to say my powers are equal to the president, all it takes.
		Let's do an experiment, Judge.
		You walk up to anybody loading that plane and you order them to stop getting that flight prepared and to turn it around.
		And you tell me what they say.
		You want to talk about equitable powers?
		Let's talk about what you think you have versus what you actually have.
		Everybody in the world knows who Donald Trump is, except perhaps maybe the North Sentinelese.
		I'm kidding, not literally everybody.
		There's other uncontacted tribes out there other than North Sentinel Island.
		My point is, you can go to the slums of India and people are going to recognize Donald Trump.
		For real.
		Maybe not literally everybody, but you get the point.
	If Donald Trump shows up and says, this is what we're going to be doing, it's going to happen.
	It's going to happen.
	If Judge Boasberg shows up, even with a written court order, It ain't gonna happen.
	That's power.
	Okay?
	You can show up with marshals, police, whatever you want.
	And if you go up to any one of these guys, get in the plane ready, they're gonna say, until I get word from my commanding officer, this means nothing to me.
	Your court order means nothing to me.
	I'll put in a phone call for you, but this is some random guy with a piece of paper as far as I'm concerned.
	This is what power, how it actually works.
	The idea...
	That a judge in a lower court is going to turn around a military flight is ludicrous.
	But here we are, my friends.
	We got Mike Davis chiming in.
	Mike Davis says the president of the United States correctly designated Trende Aragua, a vicious Venezuelan gang, as a foreign terrorist organization, as he has the authority to do so.
	Any objections?
	No.
unidentified		Why?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Well, they took over apartment buildings and there's a video of it.
		These are people who have raped, killed, pillaged and murdered.
		And everybody seemed to agree.
		Yeah.
		Foreign Venezuelan prison gangs waging, you know, conflict on our border and killing people.
		Terrorist organization.
		The president correctly put these terrorists on planes to get them a heck out of the country.
		Yet D.C. Obama judge James Bosberg thinks he has the power to order the president to turn around the planes in midair and bring these terrorists into America.
		It's the most dangerous constitutional crisis imaginable.
		They do not say this lightly.
		The president has a constitutional duty as the chief executive officer and commander-in-chief to ignore Judge Bosberg's lawless and dangerous order.
		The Supreme Court must use the emergency docket to immediately stay Judge Bosberg's order.
		Next week, the House must impeach Judge Bosberg and defund his court.
		I agree.
		100% completely agree.
		Mike Davis, of course, former chief counsel for nomination, Senate Judiciary Committee, Article 3 project.
		I'll tell you why.
		We're facing a constitutional crisis.
		A crisis because there is a judge who lacks the authority asserting the authority.
		This is outside the purview of the court.
		This is not something they should be engaged in, and there must be limitations placed on these lower court judges.
		I believe it is fair to say the judge, with a hearing from the ACLU, can argue a couple of things.
		Lack of jurisdiction and reject Thank you and have a nice day.
		You can then appeal to a higher court where they can also say lack of jurisdiction.
		Here's how it should go.
		I'm a judge.
		The ACLU comes to me and says the president is exercising his authority under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport individuals who are not citizens and accused of crimes.
		We challenge this and believes he should not be able to deport these individuals.
		My response would be.
		Are your clients citizens?
		No, they are not.
		But they do deserve due process.
		OK, the president is well within his authority.
		We have no jurisdiction here.
		The court hereby dismisses the claims and we refuse to hear it.
		Appeal to a higher court.
		Have a nice day.
		That's what should happen.
		That's it.
		Imagine a different scenario pertaining to executive authority.
		Donald Trump responds to a direct strike on our men and women in uniform in Iraq.
		And he says.
		I'm ordering our men to retaliate against those who are currently bombing our military bases.
		And a judge in D.C. goes, no.
		Tell him to stop firing.
		You'd be like, what?
		No one's going to listen to that.
		That's the game that's being played right now.
		Now, of course, there's a bit more nuance in that this is domestic deportation.
		But I will stress this.
		First, the argument of the plane having already left the United States and being over international waters plays 100%.
		A judge ain't turning around a plane beyond the over international waters.
		Trump negotiated terms with a foreign country.
		If a lower court judge can undermine agreements between two nations that the president has set forth, you have no country.
		And I love this because I am opposed to the U.S. funding of Ukraine.
		I know Trump is restoring this stuff.
		I'm not a fan of it, but I trust the president to get the job done to the best of his abilities, and I'm hoping it's better than it is.
		I don't like the bombings in Yemen.
		We'll see how these things play out.
		It is remarkable to think that as we have argued against the war in Ukraine, and the left has argued, so what, no one can trust our country?
		We said in the Budapest memorandum that if Ukraine was attacked, we would come to their defense.
		And my response is, you can't promise the children of one generation to the next.
		Sorry.
		And more importantly, when circumstances change, 30-year-old promises mean very little.
	The response I get is, so people should just recognize that America is untrustworthy and you can't do deals with them?
	I say, yeah, probably.
	Look at what the Democrats are arguing right now.
	That Donald Trump contacts the president of El Salvador and says, let us come to terms on an arrangement for international and national security.
	That is violent criminal gangs passing through South and Central America from Venezuela to the United States that pose a threat to this country.
	We are removing.
	We want them held.
	We want to transport them to you for you to deal with.
	If we return them to Venezuela, they will come right back.
	They come to terms.
	In midair, as El Salvador is preparing to receive criminal illegal aliens, terrorists designated by the United States, a lower court judge says.
	Turn them around.
	The president's orders are meaningless.
	What is Venezuela going to say?
	Or what is El Salvador going to say?
	What will any foreign country say if Trump were to do this?
	They'd say, you mean to tell me that if we enter into good faith negotiations, we are going to take in these criminals in exchange for revenue from the United States?
	You can break that deal because the president does not have the authority to negotiate?
	That's an absurdity.
	An absolute absurdity.
	I argued this the other day.
	In regards to the classified documents, the Democrats once again made the same argument.
	The president has no authority over classification, which, of course, is insane.
	He has plenary declassification powers, meaning there is nothing above or beyond him.
	He is the absolute as it pertains to declassification.
	I want you to imagine a scenario.
	They tried putting Trump in jail for this.
	Imagine a scenario where Donald Trump is negotiating with Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine, as he's doing literally right now.
	And Putin says, I know that you've got special forces in Mariupol and in Kiev.
	If we are going to gauge the CIFAR, I want you to withdraw these forces.
	And then Trump goes, I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of any forces.
	Thus, it can't be part of any negotiations because that would be a confirmation or denial of Putin's going to go, huh?
	Are you going to pull your troops out of Ukraine so we can have a ceasefire or not?
	Trump goes, let me ask Congress if I'm allowed to share with you confidential information.
	Then maybe we can negotiate peace and put an end to this war.
	Would that not be the stupidest thing you've ever seen?
	Yet no, the president's going to go to Putin and say, OK, we'll pull our troops out.
	That's it.
	Think about how the nuclear disarmament negotiations went.
	Vladimir Putin says, our instruments have detected nuclear launch sites in these Eastern European countries.
	If you want us to remove our nukes from Cuba, you remove your nukes from Turkey.
	And then Trump goes, what nukes?
	Sorry, I don't have the authority to reveal any classified information in war negotiations to a rival nation for which we're about to annihilate each other.
	Let me go ask Congress for permission.
	That's fake.
	There's no one he asks.
	The president goes to him and says, We're going to remove, we're going to pull, he's the commander-in-chief, we're going to pull our forces back here, you pull your forces back there, don't play games.
	It is an absurdity that we live in this reality where they're trying to make those arguments.
	Now we have Sean Davis.
	Bozberg is now ordering Trump to give him operational military intelligence on the size and status of Venezuelan TDA forces currently within the United States.
	As if Bozberg himself is the commander-in-chief and Trump is some staff officer detailed to him.
	Boesberg can get wrecked.
	Can you believe this?
	Amazing.
	And then here's the media chiming in, my friends.
	Ed Wellen, so ugly how so many folks are skipping over any serious analysis of the legal issues and instead calling for Judge Boesberg to be investigated, impeached or jailed.
	I mean, at bare minimum, a higher court should say you are out of line.
	You are out of line.
	You have no authority.
	This is out of your jurisdiction.
	What got?
	What are you thinking?
	Sean Davis says, National Review now white knighting for the Russiagate FISA judge who has appointed himself commander-in-chief for the purpose of protecting Venezuelan terrorists.
	Wayland's Zillow floor plan truthing was somehow less ridiculous than this.
	Here's what I'd say.
	I do believe the Trump administration should publish a roster with a short bio of everyone being deported.
	There's no reason not to do it.
	I'll tell you why.
	We're Americans.
	We want to make sure that no innocent American is swept up in this, right?
	Okay, it's simple.
	I don't believe that Donald Trump is getting anybody who's innocent and an American citizen swept up and deported.
	It's probably not happening.
	All you got to do, Trump, is if these really are trendy Aragua terrorists, you should put out information pertaining to the individuals deported.
	You know why?
	Effectively, an APB.
	These are the criminals.
	Here's what they were accused of.
	Here's why they're being deported.
	Here's the list.
	They will not come back.
	And the information will be publicly available in the event they somehow do come back.
	We want them deported again.
	Some may argue national security concerns we can't reveal.
	I don't see any reason why we can't say, here's the list of all the Trendy Aragua members we have deported.
	And then people can see, oh yeah, that's, maybe there's a guy in there and someone goes, hey, wait a minute.
	That's not Trendy Aragua.
	That's an American citizen.
	I really doubt it.
	But I want to see transparency.
	I do believe it's fair to say that due process is served.
	If you are not a citizen of this country and you are apprehended by ICE, the idea that you would get a hearing is ridiculous.
	If you're an American citizen and you have your documents to prove it, I do have a concern about authoritarian governments deporting Americans, but that seems strange.
	In what circumstance does that happen?
	If you're a citizen, you're a citizen.
	I'm a citizen.
	They say, let's look up your information.
	They look up your information.
	They say, OK.
	And there are questions about American citizens.
	I suppose I'll say this.
	I don't see American citizens getting deported.
	If the Trump administration does accidentally do that in any regard, then there will be hell to pay and they should pay restitution for the mistake.
	But I'm not talking about rare circumstance.
	I'm talking about intentional, deliberate actions where they decide to deport a person, and then either because of ignorance, mistake, or otherwise, there should be hell to pay if people get caught up in this.
	I think there's got to be some degree of a filtration to make sure that Trump is deporting who he says he is.
	I think that's simple.
	We do have some stories for you.
	I want to show you how the left is responding to all of this.
	USA Today.
	He voted for Trump.
	Now his wife sits in an ICE detention center.
	Okay, who wants to make the guess as to why his wife is in a detention center?
	Anybody?
	Anybody going once, going twice?
	Could it be?
	She's an illegal immigrant.
unidentified		Yep.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		He voted for Trump.
		He was married to an illegal immigrant.
		She got detained.
		Next question.
		Listen.
		If you're here in the United States illegally and your husband votes to have illegal immigrants deported, what makes you think that you are special?
		They run this story trying to play this game as if, oh no, this poor man voted for Trump and Trump betrayed him.
		No, he didn't.
		Trump did exactly what he said he was going to do.
		They bury the lead.
		Bradley Bartel and Camilla Munoz had a familiar small-town love story before they collided with immigration politics.
		They had met their mutual friends, had a first date at a local steakhouse, married after two years, and were saving to buy a house and have kids.
		Munoz was already caring for Bartel's now 12-year-old son as her own.
		But last month, on her way home to Wisconsin after honeymooning in Puerto Rico, an immigration agent pulled Munoz aside at the airport.
		Are you an American citizen?
		She answered no.
		She wasn't.
		She's from Peru.
		But she and her husband had taken legal steps so that one day she might get U.S. citizens.
		Now, hold on there a minute.
		Sounds to me like this is a person who was here legally.
		They took the legal steps because she's marrying an American and she lives here and they're buying a house and she's helping raise his son.
		What's going on, Trump?
		What have you done?
		What have you done?
		Wait a minute.
		Let me scroll down quite a bit where it actually says.
		Millions, including Bartell, had voted for President Donald Trump, promised to crack down illegal immigration, but eight weeks in, the nasty partition effort has rapidly expanded to include immigrants whose application for legal status in the country is under review.
		Even those married or engaged U.S. citizens are being detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
		Uh-huh.
		Because they're here illegally engaged.
		In addition to Munoz, USA Today has confirmed through attorneys, family members, and documents that ICE has detained for weeks.
		A woman in her 50s who has lived in the country more than 30 years and is married to a U.S. citizen.
		So, someone who's here illegally?
		I have questions about that.
		Valid proof of legal residency.
		I think it's fair to criticize CBP and ICE.
		If there are stories like this, though I don't trust the corporate press, I say, let's be magnanimous.
		Let us be better than the rest.
		And I'd like answers to that one.
		And I am critical of them if that is the case.
		However, based on how these stories go, you know there's going to be something to the story where you're like, oh, she committed a crime.
		Because I got another story for you.
		Just wait.
		Wait till I pull up the next story.
		A European woman in her 30s engaged to a U.S. citizen who overstayed her visa when she was 21. So in other words, here illegally?
		A woman engaged to a U.S. legal permanent resident with whom she has lived for nine years.
		Uh-huh.
		So once again, a person here illegally?
		I mean, what is this?
		They're going to say none of the women.
		has a criminal record, according to USA Today.
		All were in an ongoing legal immigration process and felt comfortable enough boarding a domestic flight.
		Immigration agents swept each of them up as airport checkpoints at mid-February in Puerto Rico in the Virgin Islands.
		Neither ICE nor its parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, responded to multiple requests for comment.
		Nora Ahmed, legal director for the ACLU of Louisiana, said immigrants in legal limbo of any kind should take precautions if they plan travel.
		The unfortunate answer is they have to be worried.
		If you are not a citizen of the U.S. and you're going to go through an immigration process, your first thought needs to be, how can this process be weapon against me?
		David Rose, an immigration attorney representing Munoz, agreed.
		Anyone who isn't a legal permanent resident or U.S. citizen is at risk, period.
		Bartell and Munoz wore their wedding rings for the flight home, securing the knowledge the U.S. government knew they'd applied for her green card.
		She had overstayed her original visa.
		But they reasoned she had been vetted from the start, worked on a W-2, and paid her taxes.
		Before agents led her away, Munoz pulled off her wedding ring, afraid it might get confiscated, shoved it in her backpack, and handed it to Bartel.
	He shook as he watched her disappear and thought, what the F did I do?
	Your fiancé wasn't here legally?
	I don't get it.
	You see how they bury the story halfway down?
	She had applied legally to stay and she was married.
	And then you find out she overstayed her visa.
	I don't get why these people think the law will not apply to them.
	I have no sympathy.
	They knew she was here illegally and now he's shook.
	Bro, I have friends who got engaged to European, European women.
	Who had visa on entry.
	We're not talking about, you know, in Mexico, it's not as easy to get a visa depending on where you're trying to go.
	And if you're from El Salvador, it's harder to get a U.S. visa.
	Even tourist visas can be tough.
	I'm talking about, I got friends who've met people from European countries with visa on entry.
	And when they got engaged, they went to immigration and immigration says, just make sure you don't overstay your visa.
	Simply getting engaged doesn't do enough.
	You get extensions.
	They'll allow you to stay a little bit longer.
	There's a lot of leeway when you announce to immigration you are preparing engagement.
	But they warn you, if you overstay your visa, you can't come back for up to 10 years.
	So go home, get your paperwork done, then come back legally.
	Who are these people?
	But there's more, my friends.
	This story I think is important too.
	Deported family of U.S. citizen girl recovering from brain surgery alleges civil rights abuses and new complaint.
	This is always going to be the case.
	These stories were going to erupt, and we warned about this last year.
	Again, I will scrutinize any administration, any law enforcement.
	If there are abuses, though I don't trust these people, I say, again, let's be magnanimous.
	Let's go above and beyond to make sure that we are doing this by the book and take the teeth out of any argument they may have.
	Here's the story.
	A family was deported in Mexico.
	They're requesting an investigation into abuses they say they face in U.S. attention.
	I really doubt they face any abuses, but I'm willing to entertain an investigation.
	I think they're likely lying.
	It's a sad story.
	Their daughter, their children were born here.
	They were not.
	They came here illegally, had kids, stayed here illegally.
	A 10-year-old girl is recovering from brain surgery.
	They're in an area of Mexico where they say they fear for their safety.
	Well...
	That's why they came here illegally, I suppose.
	But a lot of people outside of the comforts and confines of the wealthy nation of the United States probably fear for their safety.
	If I was in the middle of the woods, I'd fear for my safety too.
	I feel bad for this 10-year-old girl.
	And I believe we could be, to say it again, magnanimous.
	We could make sure this 10-year-old girl gets her medical treatment she needs.
	Come on.
	She's a U.S. citizen.
	However, the challenge here once again is...
	For a long time, the U.S. has tolerated illegal immigration and chain migration.
	These people came here illegally and had kids.
	They are going to be deported because we tried the amnesty route.
	The argument was, let's say right now, no more illegal immigration and we grant amnesty.
	That's what the Democrats argued.
	That's what they argue with deferred action, right?
	With these DACA kids.
	They say, how about this?
	If they were brought here as a kid, they can stay.
	Deferred action will get them processed.
	They can be citizens.
	They don't know any other country.
	And the agreement was supposed to be, but no more illegal immigration.
	What happened?
	Joe Biden flooded the borders.
	He said, surged the border.
	He opened it up and he brought everybody in.
	Well, now you want to play hardball.
	Hardball is the only response.
	Non-citizens get deported.
	You have two choices.
	The U.S. government can keep your children.
	I'm not a fan of that.
	Or you can keep your children, which is more humane, but you've got to go home.
	That's it.
	When your kids are old enough, they're citizens for now, though I think Trump is going to challenge birthright citizenship of many of these individuals.
	But I say of this little girl, they're of course targeting this story because it's going to make liberals say, oh no, she had brain cancer, quick burn the Constitution.
	I'm sorry, I'm not going to play that game.
	I am a man.
	I am not to be swayed by you bringing a crying child before my eyes.
	I will do what I can to help others.
	I empathize.
	I sympathize.
	But the blame rests with the parents who are evil.
	The parents, who I understand came here because America is great, but decided they would engage in acts of evil to benefit their children and themselves.
	And for this, they now suffer, and the blame is not on us.
	You cannot put your children in harm's way and then blame us for trying to secure our country.
	It just doesn't work that way.
	I think the story is important because this is one of the biggest that the liberals are pushing, claiming Donald Trump has deported U.S. citizens.
	Technically.
	Technically, he deported their parents and gave them the option to keep their kids.
	Don't bring your kids here if you want to break the law.
	And that's what they did.
	And now, this story.
	This one's going to make you laugh.
	Politico reports deported Brown University professor had sympathetic photos of Hezbollah leaders on her phone, DOJ says.
	The government's explanation of Rasha Alaway's deportation came before a judge postponed a hearing on whether it defied a judge's order that she not be deported without advance notice to the court.
	For those that are not familiar, this is round two of the Mahmoud Khalil story.
	Mahmoud Khalil was an organizer at the Colombia protests against Israel and pro-Palestine.
	I'm not going to play this game where I argue that simply he was aligned with Hamas.
	I don't play that game.
	And I don't need to.
	The argument from the DOJ is that he was engaged in actions aligned with Hamas, a terrorist organization.
	I don't like that.
	I don't.
	Aligned with?
	You're allowed to be critical of Israel.
	Don't play those games with me.
	That being said.
	A non-citizen here on a temporary green card.
	They say he was a green card holder.
	Yeah, he had a two-year temporary stay.
	Okay?
	He was supposed to be going to school.
	He graduated.
	I don't know what he was doing.
	And he organized protests that broke the law.
	He was an organizer of.
	They took over buildings.
	You've got this story.
	Take a look at this from the Post Millennial.
	I learned this when I was a kid.
	If you rob a bank, you're going to jail.
	If you help someone rob a bank, you're going to jail with him.
	If you organize the robbing of a bank, Or I'll put it this way.
	You organize a flash mob.
	Let's say this.
	You get a bunch of buddies.
	Hey, we're all going to go to a bank and then we're going to dance.
	And then you show up and your friends start robbing the bank.
	You are going to jail.
	That's it.
	You're not getting any.
	Maybe you can rat somebody out or whatever.
	But you're going to be charged as a part of this group that did this.
	Mahmoud Khalil got his visa revoked because the Secretary of State has the authority to do so.
	Under the Immigration Nationalization Act, I believe it is.
	Some have argued that because it was a temporary green card, it's a different legal apparatus.
	Okay, go to court for it.
	My point is, I don't like the idea of non-citizens coming here on temporary stays and then organizing protests where they take over buildings, break the law, and violence breaks out.
	I don't know why we would tolerate that.
	So this guy is now facing deportation and he's being held in a nice center.
	I say, okay, they're doing it again.
	Politico reports.
	Federal authorities say they deported a Lebanese doctor holding an American visa last week after finding sympathetic photos and videos of prominent Hezbollah figures in a deleted items folder on her cell phone.
	Rasha Alawaya, a physician specializing in kidney transplants and professors at Brown University and a professor at Brown University, told CBP agents that while visiting Lebanon last month, she attended the funeral of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and followed his teachings from a religious perspective, but not a political one.
	according to an official report of her interrogation by an immigration officer.
	CBP questioned Dr. Aloua and determined that her true intentions in the United States could not be determined.
	The claims in court filing submitted Monday by DOJ lawyers are the first public examination of why Aloua 34 was deported.
	I'm going to say it again.
	The Secretary of State has unilateral authority.
	To revoke visas.
	It is in the law.
	We went over this on Timcast IRL.
	Literally says there is no judicial review required.
	Now, there is an exemption.
	Libby pointed this out.
	She was right.
	I was wrong.
	That should it be the only reason they are deporting them, then there is to be a hearing.
	But I believe if they're claiming national security, then the revocation of visa, then the deportation, they can make an argument they don't have to.
	But once again.
	What's going on right now, largely, is Democrats and Republicans are arguing over things that have not been adjudicated.
	For instance, the Autopen question.
	I didn't realize this.
	This is my bad.
	The narrative that I saw from most of the commentators I follow is that Autopen was a reference to DocuSign using apps to plant your signature.
	I missed this.
	This is my bad.
	So I apologize.
	Correction.
	No, it's literally a machine.
	You slide a pen and screw it in and the machine signs for Joe Biden.
	Well, I don't think that should be legal, but it's never been adjudicated.
	The Supreme Court has not issued a ruling on whether or not presidents can do this, which to me is an absurdity.
	But that's the point.
	These are questions that typically aren't being challenged or asked.
	And so the answer right now is I'm not going to give you this.
	I guarantee Trump has the authority.
	So be it.
	I'm not going to give you this.
	Well, certainly not the liberal perspective of this is unconstitutional.
	The reality is so long as the law is written as is, Trump has the authority to do these things and the courts have not adjudicated them.
	For now, immigration law says Secretary of State can revoke any visa at his discretion for any reason.
	And there need not be judicial review.
	There's like one exception related to if you are deporting someone.
	And for that reason, you revoke their visa, they get a review.
	But I believe that if there is a cited reason which results in the revocation of visa, you can then deport them after the fact without judicial review.
	I'll put it this way.
	Nobody actually has a determination from the higher courts.
	Until then, nothing illegal is happening.
	We are talking to Elad the other day.
	We'll light this one up again because he debated.
	Loopholes in taxes.
	So let me just say it like this.
	There is no such thing as a loophole.
	When the left says that the billionaires are exploiting loopholes to avoid paying taxes, that's not correct.
	What they're actually saying is billionaires are engaged in a legal practice.
	Period.
	That's it.
	They use the phrase loophole to try and make it seem like they're doing something untoward intentionally.
	Most of the time, these individuals just say, what am I legally allowed to do and what am I legally not allowed to do?
	And so long as you're allowed to do it, it's not a loophole.
	I reject that because it creates, it puts the onus on the individual to know that they are acting outside the confines of what the government wants them to do, and they must abide by the spirit of what the government intends.
	No, the onus on the government to explicitly codify in law what is or is not allowed.
	And as of right now, Trump is well within his powers to do all of these things.
	Now, I do have some fears.
	Trump ain't perfect.
	He's not.
	But my friends, I have to warn you.
	We are looking at a wartime presidency in Joe Biden and in Donald Trump.
	Joe Biden, mock him all you want, but his administration sought to imprison their political rival.
	There's a strength in that.
	That is terrifying.
	Maybe Joe Biden wasn't literally doing it, but his administration did.
	In Donald Trump, there is a strength in the action that he's taking as well.
	And it's basically that I will exercise the powers that I must to do what I must to win.
	That's wartime presidency.
	So when I look at stories like this, I say, buckle up, mother.
	It's on.
	We've got a wave.
	Look at this.
	This is a guy, Jack Tron, infiltrating a Tesla protest, paid for by 501C4 charities.
	Here we have Nick Sorter.
	A man was arrested for keying Teslas.
	Oh, I'm starting off light, baby.
	This guy, Levi Campbell, I drove past a local Kansas City Tesla dealership, vehicles on fire, barely caught a girl in a black dress running away.
	Here's a suspect who keyed another Tesla car.
	Juanita Broderick got swatted.
	This guy, Dustin Grage, swatted.
	Joe Paggs, swatted.
	Here we go.
	Uh-oh.
	This one got taken down.
	That tweet's gone.
	Bearded vet swatted.
	Did we get another one taken down?
	Okay, Matt Van Swole swatted.
	And here's a video of a suspect trying to light up a car.
	I don't know what this one's related to.
	This video was wild.
	The guy ended up blowing up an incendiary device, which hurt him.
	And then, of course, we have Chuck Schumer's security concerns.
	I don't want Chuck Schumer to get hurt.
	I hope he's all right.
	Scrapping a book tour.
	I'm just saying.
	The left is engaged in extreme violence.
	Donald Trump is deporting people.
	It ain't stopping here, my friends.
	Things are escalating.
	I don't know where it goes, but it's not even summer yet.
	It's not even spring yet.
	In all of my years covering conflict and crisis, winter conflict is rare because people don't like going out in the cold or the rain.
	And they are now.
	To be fair, it is starting to get warmer in certain places.
	But this is crazy.
	We're going to grab some of your Rumble rants, my friends.
	Let's do it!
	Before we sign off, make sure you smash that like button.
	Here's the game I like to play.
	Yesterday, with the pardons being argued to be voided, I said, every like is one year Fauci will do in prison.
	Every time you hit the like button, you were voting for how many years you should be in prison, and we got 17,500 likes.
	I'm kidding.
	I was like, I will inform the president that's how many years he must get.
	Nobody actually thought it was serious, but it was fun anyway.
	What's this?
	We got Chris Rumble.
	Tim Pool is the number one streamer in the USA for the noon hour.
	The Rumble lineup is crushing!
	Evita, number one.
	Vince, number one.
	Crowder, number one.
	And Pool, number one.
	You guys watching right now, the Rumble lineup, you guys are heroes.
	You are gentlemen and scholars.
	So, tremendous respect to all of you who have been tuning in to watch the Rumble lineup.
	We are doing something transformative.
	And the Rumble lineup now...
	Owns the number one spot.
	Check this out.
	It's not just that I'm number one right now.
	Crowder was more than double the viewership, by the way.
	Shout out to Steven Crowder.
	Thank you for the raid and for having me a part of this lineup as well as Chris.
	But Evita, Vince, next up, in the next five minutes, we're going to grab some more of your Rumble Rants and Super Chats.
	The quartering, Jeremy Hambly, you don't want to miss it.
	We're going to have you guys join his show and keep it going.
	And we want Jeremy to be number one for the 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. slots because we're making a statement here.
	Rumble is the premier video podcasting platform.
	Spotify is trying to get in the game.
	YouTube suspended and shut down.
	Steven Crowder and some of the biggest podcasts, they banned Dan Bongino.
	In their arrogance, they said, we don't want nothing here.
	And now we're looking at what they call the podcast presidency.
	The number one, some of the biggest shows in the world were kicked off YouTube.
	So let's take a look at the premier spaces for video podcasting.
	Spotify.
	They're okay.
	I got no beef.
	The viewership ain't all that there.
	Their podcast viewership is relatively low compared to these other platforms.
	Apple doesn't even do video, so it's just audio.
	Maybe they'll get in the game at some point.
	YouTube's the big player.
	Don't get me wrong.
	But they will shut you down in a heartbeat.
	And right now, they can't hold a candle to the Rumble lineup.
	Meaning, if you want to be in a space for podcast success, it's Rumble.
	Rumble is where the number one shows are.
	Rumble is where you have an opportunity to start something new without fear of censorship.
	And growth opportunities are massive.
	We are now looking at, on the second day, I'll tell you why.
	It's simple.
	Free speech matters.
	People want to express themselves without fear.
	You get shut down into the platforms.
	More importantly, as I already explained, Rumble said outright, if you are a video podcaster, we will make sure you flourish here.
	We will give you the tools you need and the space you need to have a successful show.
	YouTube doesn't.
	They make it impossible to get monetized.
	They're too big.
	They don't care about you.
	Spotify ain't bad, but they're really small.
	So with all due respect to Spotify, I got no beef.
	They've been nice to us.
	Rumble's just a better place.
	We launched Timcast IRL on Rumble.
	And almost instantly we doubled our viewership on Timcast IRL.
	Doubled.
	I kid you not.
	Some episodes, 300,000, 400,000 views.
	Yesterday we had 30, I think we had, what, 33,000 on Rumble and 40,000 on YouTube.
	Rumble now rivaling those numbers on YouTube.
	So we're hitting massive numbers, and it's all thanks to you guys who have decided Rumble is number one.
	And that's really it.
	What makes Rumble the best place to be?
	You guys who are watching.
	I do got to make sure we grab some of your questions in chats, though.
	So here we go.
	Tim Brackis is breaking.
	SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts just said President Trump's call to impeach a federal judge is inappropriate.
	Very interesting.
	Roberts rejected the impeachment also.
	Very impressive.
	Very impressive.
	Let's see what you got for the old Rumble rants, my friends.
	Forced name change says 18th century law.
	What about murder?
	That's been illegal since before Abraham.
	Is that void because it's old too?
	Right.
	Something20 says murder is even older law.
	So by their logic, I say we do away with that law and all related laws.
	They play this game, an 18th century law.
	Yeah, there's a lot of laws that we, like, you guys hit the nail on the head.
	Murder.
	No, don't do it.
	Whiplash says due process rights are only guaranteed to U.S. citizens, not illegal aliens.
	In most contexts, there is a bit of due process that is afforded.
	That is, they have a right to argue if they are or are not illegal immigrants.
	So that is their due process.
	Due process basically means you are due a process by which the law will be adjudicated fairly for you.
	They'll stop you.
	Do you have an ID?
	No.
	Are you a citizen?
	No.
	Okay, you're being deported.
	That's it.
	That's due process.
	We ain't locking you up.
	We ain't hurting you.
	We're not doing anything.
	We're just literally going to give you a ride home.
	I have no idea why they are so, they're acting like that's the apocalypse.
	All right, we're going to grab, I think we got time for just one more here.
	McCarthy was correct.
	The commies infiltrated the highest levels of our institutions.
	These judges must be removed if they cannot be neutral arbiters of the law.
	Well, my friends, I believe Jeremy Hambly over at The Quartering is live, and so that means it's time for all of you guys to jump to the next hour of this amazing Rumble lineup.
	So let me raid all of the viewers.
	Here we go.
	I want to say I'm confirming the raid.
	Thank you guys so much for hanging out for this massive show.
	We had, I think, around...
	80,000 combined concurrence with the peak at around 63,000 on Rumble.
	Yo, you guys rock.
	I really do appreciate it.
	For those, before you, as the sequence finalizes, follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.
	Subscribe to this channel.
	We're back tomorrow at noon.
	And shout out to Jeremy at The Quartering.
	Take it away, buddy.
	Guys, if you're still watching, before you go, Get Jeremy to number one.
	Let's have every live show in the Rumble lineup prove it.
	This is the place to be, and we are number one.
	Thank you all so much for hanging out.

▲