Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 15, 2024 - Tim Pool Daily Show

01:58:13

Harris Campaign First Policy Is LITERAL COMMUNISM, Far Left ATTACKS Democrat Event | TimcastNews

Participants

Main voices

tim pool

01:47:02

Appearances

karine jean-pierre

01:19

Clips

peter doocy

00:24

theo von

00:30

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		It's the moment you've all been waiting for.
		Kamala Harris has begun to release her campaign policy positions, and I guess, I mean, it's kind of surprising.
		You'd think she'd try to avoid this stuff, but I also guess kind of surprising to very few.
		Her first policy position is Literal communism!
		She's backing price-gouging bans, okay, which literally means price controls.
		Price-gouging is a relatively nonsense term.
		There are certain contexts where you can argue there's actual price-gouging, but generally it means private businesses can't set their own prices.
		I'll talk to you all about price-gouging, and I think it should be totally allowed.
		You can charge whatever you want for whatever you want.
		Now, if a group of businesses get together and conspire to fix prices, what's price fixing?
		Price fixing is different.
		That's anti-competitive.
		But Kamala Harris, along with Joe Biden, are making the arguments, Biden first made the argument, that the reason prices are too high right now is not because of, I don't know, hundreds of billions of dollars being spent on Ukraine.
		Mass spending and government mismanagement open borders and a flood of low-skill workers displacing other low-skill workers.
		No, no, no.
		They're saying the real argument is it's those dang corporations.
		They've decided just to charge you more money for no reason.
		They're allowed to.
		Thank you and have a nice day.
		If McDonald's wants to charge 50 bucks for a cheeseburger, they're allowed to do it.
		And the argument is, yeah, but all the other restaurants are charging the same thing.
		Nobody can afford this.
		Well, I guess that's their prerogative.
		They're allowed to charge what they want.
		You can't come to me and tell me, I have to do labor for you at a certain rate.
		Because ultimately what price controls come down to, anti-price gouging, is someone coming to you, imagine they said this, I want you, Dear viewer, to go work the register at McDonald's, and I know it's called McDonald's, I'm joking.
		And imagine you were like, I don't want to work at McDonald's.
		Well, no, you have to do it.
		You need the job, right?
		Well, I do need the money.
		Great.
		What is it worth for your skill set, your college degree, your 10 years of experience of mechanical engineering to work at McDonald's?
		You're gonna be like, I'm way overqualified.
		I don't want to do this job.
		You got to pay me 20 bucks an hour.
		Wrong.
		You're only allowed to get paid $12 an hour because now you're price gouging.
		There's no difference.
		If a business says, for us to do the work, it has to be worth it, we're going to charge what we want, to shut that down, nonsense.
		But we'll talk all about this.
		I can't say I'm surprised.
		I want to give a shout out to our friends, the Krasensteins, for giving one of the greatest tweets I've ever seen, where he's like, so what, when the, I'm not kidding, he said, when the left controls prices and gives money to certain people, that's communism, and I'm just like, I can't believe the guy tweeted that!
		So we're gonna have a lot of fun.
		I'm in a good mood this morning.
		And then we got the Kamala Harris Democrat event being attacked by far-leftist pro-Palestine protesters.
		We've got a new poll showing people want Joe Biden to step down and resign the presidency.
		We knew this was coming.
		A new poll coming out showing around 60% of people saying Joe Biden should resign the presidency.
		Kamala Harris then becomes president.
		And Ted Cruz predicted this.
		And then...
		Thanks to a popular request from everyone's favorite Raymond G. Stanley Jr.
		I got a cultural segment for you.
		It's this viral video of a woman who's pulling her pants down in an AT&T store and showing off her underwear or making strange noises.
		And everyone's like, why would someone film themselves going into an AT&T store and pulling their pants down and squeaking and making weird noises?
		I think this is TikTok melting the brains of people intentionally as a cyber weapon.
		Because this woman, who's got half a million followers on TikTok doing deranged nonsense, doesn't have any followers on Instagram or YouTube.
		I mean, she does, but like very little.
		And I think it shows actual American meritocratic platforms slightly.
		I mean, there's censorship.
		It's very different.
		And TikTok, in my opinion, what they're doing is they're encouraging, through promoting algorithmically psychotic behaviors, they're encouraging the dissolution of American society and social structures.
		So it's cultural.
		It'll be fun.
	But we'll start with the hard news.
	Before we get started, my friends, head over to castbrew.com and buy Cast Brew Coffee because it's good.
	Look it, Alex Stein loves it so much.
	Look at his face, he's screaming!
	He's screaming with joy because he loves Cast Brew Coffee.
	Actually, in the commercial, he's screaming because he has no energy, so he made Alex Stein's primetime grind two times caffeine.
	If coffee's hard on your stomach, we got low-acidity coffee, Ian's Graphene Dream, and everyone's favorite Appalachian Nights by Cast Brew.
	To support the show and the work we do, full disclosure, all the revenue from Cast Brew is going into Cast Brew.
	I think we've got like one employee right now.
	The resources are being used to establish our physical locations, and it's a new investment.
	So you're supporting our cultural endeavors when you buy from castbrew.com.
	If you want to support the work that we're doing here on this show, head over to timcast.com, click join us, To become a member and support our work directly.
	As a member, you get access to our Discord server, our members-only call-in show, Monday through Thursday at 10pm.
	And but for $10 per month, you can help us fight fake news!
	And if you like the work that we do, whether you agree or disagree, then we need your support because we are a member-supported show.
	This only exists because you guys are members.
	So smash that like button right now.
	Subscribe to this channel if you didn't already.
	Share the show with all your friends.
	And follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.
	Let's jump to the first story.
	We got this from the New York Times.
	Harris will back federal ban on price gouging, campaign says.
	The vice president is leaning into an effort to partly blame big companies for inflation.
	His progressives have pushed her to embrace that argument.
	I'm going to pause right away and break down for you why she's lying.
	The first thing I will say is telling private entities they have to charge a certain amount of money is literal communism.
	It's... Okay, so, all right, let's play first.
	Capitalism, which I believe was coined by Marx in the first place, but market trade is when private entities decide for themselves what their labor or product is worth.
	Communism, or socialist economics, is when you do not.
	The government, the collective, sets the controls.
	So, basically, capitalism is used to refer to private trade between parties, and socialism is used to refer to public control of trade.
	When the government continually encroaches, it's not just a light switch on communism, off communism.
	There are degrees of it.
	This is literal communist policy telling corporations, you cannot charge what you think your product is worth or what you can get for it.
	I reject that.
	It's communism.
	And I'll tell you why it's not.
	They're trying to create this narrative that private companies are overcharging intentionally to make money.
	No.
	I got this tweet from Andrew Gruhl.
	Subway calls emergency meeting with franchisees as sales plummet.
	And Gruhl points out, People like Subway because it's lower cost goods.
	It's easy to operate a Subway because everything's basically ready to go.
	It's cold cuts.
	It's put in a toaster maybe.
	You don't gotta cook stuff.
	One person can make each sandwich.
	So for a lot of people, it's a low price.
	The build-outs were cheap.
	The lack of hood, smaller size.
	An economy is to scale.
	Buying prepped ingredients, easy.
	But now that price of billets have gone up so much, regulations have driven operating costs higher and food costs are through the roof.
	They can no longer sell the food at a low cost.
	Their initial selling proposition has fallen apart.
	It's happening to many value brands.
	It's the result of by dynamics.
	So let's talk about Crackpot Kamala's economy.
	Now, Also, there's this amazing exchange between Peter Doocy and Kareem Jean-Pierre.
	Kamala Harris is desperately trying to get away from the Bidenomics brand, and she's trying to distance herself from what Joe Biden is doing as president.
	And so Peter Doocy is like, he says, Kamala Harris is trying to get away from this brand, like she's trying to stay away from Bidenomics.
	And Kareem Jean-Pierre goes, um, excuse me, it's the Biden-Harris administration.
	And it's just like, Whatever you say, KGP.
	KJP.
	Sure.
	This is Kamala Harris' fault.
	You cannot go to Subway and tell them, you're charging too much for your sandwiches, bring the price down.
	Because Subway's gonna go, we're barely breaking even, we're shutting stores down!
	And they're gonna say, your sandwiches cost too much, bring the price down.
	If we don't sell where we're at, we can't maintain these stores.
	Then what?
	This is why price controls don't work!
	But don't worry, Trump's getting no special treatment from me, we'll talk about that in a second.
	The New York Times reports, Vice President Kamala Harris will call for a federal ban on corporate price gouging on groceries in a speech laying out her economic agenda on Friday.
	Campaign officials said late Wednesday in an effort to blame big companies for persistently high costs of American consumer staples.
	The plan includes large overlaps with efforts that the Biden administration has pursued for several years to target corporate consolidation and price gouging.
	Corporate consolidation?
	You start to have a real argument.
	They say including attempts to stoke more competition in the meat industry, fair, and the Federal Trade Commission's lawsuit this year that seeks to block the merger of two large grocery retailers, Kroger and Albertsons.
	First question, do Kroger and Albertsons overlap in territory?
	Otherwise, I don't know that it matters.
	It also follows through on what people familiar with Ms.
	Harris' forthcoming economic agenda said this week, would be a centerpiece of her plans, an aggressive rhetorical attempt to shift the blame for high inflation onto corporate America.
	Polls show the argument resonates strongly with voters, including independent voters who could decide the November election.
	Welcome to the end, my friends, because people, they ain't smart enough to understand.
	When you spend $200 billion on foreign war, your prices go up.
	Okay, so, I'll try to break this down simply.
	I'm not an economist, but there is something simple.
	When you mass print and mass produce money, and how do they do it?
	Well, money is created upon the issuance of debt in the United States.
	So when someone takes out a loan, they go, there's your money.
	Literally, when you spend money on a credit card, you're just creating money.
	That's it.
	Now, it's supposed to be paid back with interest, and the interest rates are to control inflation.
	However, when you spend hundreds of billions on foreign war in a very short period of time, the economy gets flooded with cash.
	Simple version?
	Inflation happens.
	The savings of individuals go down.
	Real simple version?
	A guy who's got a million dollars, you're not going to be able to convince him to go and work at McDonald's working the cash register.
	But then what happens if the million dollars can only buy you one cheeseburger?
	Well, all of a sudden that million dollars ain't so good, and dude's going to have to go work the cash register.
	But guess what?
	If he wants to buy a couple cheeseburgers, you're going to have to pay him two million dollars an hour.
	Inflation.
	Anyway, simple version.
	Progressive groups have urged President Biden and now Ms.
	Harris to fully embrace the argument.
	In a release announcing the policy, Harris campaign officials did not detail how a price-gouging ban would be enforced or what current corporate behaviors would be outlawed if it were enacted.
unidentified		Ms.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Harris would work in the first 100 days to place a federal ban setting clear rules on the road to make clear that big corporations can't unfairly exploit consumers to run up excessive corporate profits on food and groceries.
		Why not?
		Why not?
		Tell me why I, as a private entity, aren't allowed to sell my products for what I want to sell them for.
		I'll tell you where this goes, my friends.
		Some people think they're worth more.
		Some people would rather live in a van down by the river.
		So let's say you got a guy who lives in a van down by the river, but he is the best ever at, um, I don't know, uh, crochet.
		And so you say to him, I'll pay you 10 bucks an hour to crochet, or I don't know, is that knitting?
		Whatever.
		And he goes, nah, not interested.
		10 bucks an hour, don't cut it for me.
		You say 20 bucks?
unidentified		Nah.
		30?
		Nah.
		40?
		Nah.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		$100 an hour.
		Alright, fine, I guess.
		The motivations of every individual are different.
		You cannot go to a private group and say, you must work for this amount.
		Because what ends up happening is a lot of people are going to be like, I'm worth more than that and I'm not interested in working for that little.
		And what happens?
		You go to a big corporation and say, you cannot sell your products for more than a certain amount.
		They'll discontinue whatever the product may be, or they'll say, okay, then it's not worth it to produce.
		We're talking about economies of volume.
		So a big corporation might be like, we'd have to sell 10 times as many cheeseburgers to make it worth it to make the cheeseburgers.
		Just pull them off the menu.
		Stop making them.
		It does not work.
		It results in shortages.
		This is Economics 101.
		More importantly, there's the philosophical.
		Even if it did work, you can't force me to sell a good or my labor at your set price.
		That is, I just say, immoral.
		The government mandating what you're allowed to earn?
		No, I choose what I want.
		If I want to go live in the woods and build a tent, I guess so long as I have the right to tent to camp where I am, it's fine for me.
		But the idea that I would have to work for you and I can't make more than a certain amount?
		This is the most pro-corporate plan I have ever heard.
		The officials also said Ms.
		Harris would authorize the Federal Trade Commission to impose harsh penalties on corporations that fix prices.
		Now hold on there a minute, I agree with that.
		Price fixing is different.
		If there's five companies that manufacture computers or something, and they all get together in a secret meeting and say, hey, don't sell your computer for less than a thousand bucks, and then no one can buy a cheap computer.
		That should be not allowed.
		The government should go in and say, hey, hey, hey, Competition!
		If you can't compete in the market, you shouldn't be having secret meetings to fix prices.
		That I agree with.
		They all said that Ms.
		Harris would unveil plans on Friday related to housing costs and prescription drug prices.
		Many states ban price gouging, but the federal government does not.
		And I'm not a fan of any of it.
		Let's talk about the literal term, price gouging, as it pertains to most common usage.
		Let's say that there's a hurricane and it blasts through Florida.
		Just wipes out a bunch of residential areas.
		You enter what's called a disaster economy.
		Disaster economies are rough.
		Everything's super expensive.
		So there was a circumstance.
		I think this was the the algal bloom some 10 years ago in Ohio.
		The Great Lake had a massive algae bloom, an algal bloom they call it, and it toxified the drinking water.
		Within 40 miles of these cities, there was no water to drink.
		You couldn't drink from the lake.
		The systems couldn't handle it.
		The algae bloom was toxic.
		So people were bringing in bottles of water.
		And some people were charging like 10 bucks for a bottle of water.
		And they said, hey, you get out of here with that price gouging.
		Those bottles of water, they should cost a dollar.
		And you sell them for 10.
		You're exploiting poor people who can't... Let me explain something.
		It's not price gouging.
		It's called market economics, and it's a good thing.
		And I'll tell you why.
		Homie is sittin' there in his suburban town some 40 miles just outside of a big Ohio city and he's like, hey pa, you hear that there ain't no water anywhere near these, I don't know how they speak in Ohio, they don't sound like that, but you get my point.
		He says, there's no water in Ohio.
		And the dad says, let's get a bunch of water and bring it in and sell it.
		We could sell it for probably 10 bucks.
		And the government says, hey, hey you, hey, don't you do that.
		And the guy goes, I can't?
	You cannot bring in the water and sell it for 10 bucks a bottle.
	And the guy goes, okay, I won't.
	Then guess what?
	There's no water!
	I'd rather have $10 water than be dying of dehydration.
	I do not respect this argument that the government should control prices in an emergency.
	If the government can't accommodate, and I'm not even a fan of that, look, we're going to sit back and rely on government to come and deal with all our emergencies.
	If private interests say, I can go out, buy a bunch of water, drive it in, and provide water at the price that matters, that makes sense to me, so be it.
	And if someone's like, I'm dying, I need water, the guy's gonna be like, well, aren't you glad I took time out of my day to bring the water to you, and you need it.
	So pay what you're willing to pay.
	Otherwise, people are gonna have to leave, but I think that's fine.
	And a lot of people are very emotional.
	They're like, but that poor man, he'll die without water.
	He sure will.
	It's called the disaster economy.
	Food becomes expensive.
	Security becomes expensive.
	Everything does.
	It gets to the real world.
	But I bring you now to everyone's favorite liberal, Ed Krasinstein.
	I, my friends, you are going to laugh your asses off.
	I just, I read this tweet from Ed and I just bust out laughing.
	Holy crap.
	He said this.
	MAGA now thinks that cracking down on price gouging is considered Marxist.
	Uh-huh.
	Doesn't Trump keep trying to take credit for setting a limit on the price of insulin?
	Yes.
	Didn't Trump give subsidies to farmers after his trade war greatly harmed them?
	Uh-huh.
	And then he goes, I guess Marxism is only Marxism when the left uses government power to control prices or give money to certain people, right?
unidentified		Yes!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		When the left uses government to control prices and give money to certain people, literal communism!
		Literal!
		The idea is, it is not just... Okay, so to be fair, it's socialism, because communism is more of a form of governance that uses a socialist economic system.
		But it's Marxist.
		It's Marxist in its essence of oppressed versus oppressor and controlling prices because poor people are being oppressed by rich people, blah blah blah.
		So Steve Cortez says Kamala Harris goes a full-on Marxist, wants price controls on food instead of fixing the underlying problem of exorbitant borrowing and spending.
		Ready for break lines.
		So I said, um, ha ha ha ha ha, I guess Marxism is only Marxism when the left uses government power to control prices or give money to certain people, right?
		Ha ha, OMG, effing yes, Ed!
		Literal effing yes!
		I love this.
		Ed then says, do you agree it's Marxism when Trump does it too?
		Do you think putting tariffs on goods, giving subsidies to farmers, trying to put price controls on drugs, and mailing checks to Americans making sure your name is on them is Marxism too?
		Is that Marxism too?
unidentified		Yes!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Dude, Trump doesn't get any special privileges for trying to do similar things.
		That being said, there is a difference.
		First, we are in a mixed economy, which means we are not a free market capitalist society nor a socialist machine.
		We're slightly more socialist than capitalist.
		That's true.
		Actually, it fluctuates.
		So we're a mixed economy.
		Sometimes we have heavy government subsidy.
		The Federal Reserve is a very, very central, like, controlling inflation rates and all of that stuff.
		It is not free market economics.
		It leans more towards Marxism, socialism, etc.
		Let's talk about what Donald Trump did.
		Putting tariffs on goods for foreign countries?
		No, that's not socialism.
		Okay, that's literally not.
		What I'm saying with the yes is, if Trump were to put taxes on American goods for export, and then use that money to give to other Americans, like to farmers, putting price controls on drugs, and mailing checks out to certain people, yes, no question, same thing, I am not a fan of these things.
		In emergencies, I don't know what to tell you.
		Because we are a mixed economy.
		That being said, what Donald Trump did with insulin prices, I think that's what he's trying to refer to, is he opened up importing insulin from Canada to increase competition.
		I'm fine with that.
		That's deregulation.
		There's a difference.
		Donald Trump giving subsidies to farmers.
		We're a mixed economy.
		I'm not a fan of paying farmers not to farm, but that's what they do because they want to control the economy.
		It's a mixed economy.
		It's not core central planning, but there is an element of central planning.
		So what they do is they have concerns that if farmers mass produce, there's a couple things.
		If farmers mass-produce, they could, you know, rip out the land, or you get dust... We had the Dust Bowl in the early 1900s, where the farmers weren't crop rotating, then the topsoil was destroyed, and then dust swept across the country.
unidentified		No good.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Trying to avoid things like that, crop rotation becomes essential.
		So the U.S.
		government, because we also have a ton of food, does things called, they pay farmers to fallow their fields.
		I interviewed several farmers about this.
		Some of them have no choice.
		The government forces them to do it.
		They come in and say, you cannot grow crops in this field, leave it untouched, but don't worry, we're going to pay the difference.
		I am not a fan of these things to an extent.
		I'm not going to pretend to know exactly everything.
		And I do think sometimes you do need some kind of intervention if a crisis looms like the Dust Bowl.
		But the challenge is, I think the challenge for free market economics is that they don't accommodate for like a Dust Bowl happening.
		People will just strip mine.
		You'll get the goose that laid the golden egg, and they'll rip it apart to get the eggs out, and there's nothing in there.
		So some mixed economy is not that bad.
		But I tell you this, my friends.
		I tell you this.
		Overt price controls at a federal level are not good.
		State-level price controls, I'm also not a fan of, and I would say are bad, and are socialist policies.
		Trump doesn't get special treatment for this.
		Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Ask Economics, and this is from Reddit from two years ago.
		They ask.
		Why are price controls not seen as a legitimate way of dealing with current inflation issues?
		In most parts of the world, central banks are responding to inflation issues by increasing interest rates.
		To me, this seems to hit the middle and lower classes the hardest.
		By increasing their biggest expenses, mortgages, people can just buy less when products become expensive.
		But you can't really reduce loan payments without severe consequences.
		Why don't central banks consider price controls, especially on less elastic goods like food, as a strategy for dealing with inflation?
		What am I missing?
		Also, are there any economists that do advocate for alternative solutions to increasing interest rates?
		The top comment is, changing interest rates ultimately changes supply and demand.
		To be precise, the goal is a downward shift of the demand curve.
		Price controls don't change supply and demand.
		They only increase the quantity demanded and decrease the quantity supplied.
		Movements along the demand curve, not the curve itself, causing shortages.
		This person says, ever since intro I've always wondered how well this holds true in reality.
		If someone bought a house for $100k and charges $500 a month in rent, but the value is up to $500k
		and they get a new tenant and charge $2k a month, the cost to the owner does not increase,
		just the profit. I understand that in a perfect economy, a rent ceiling would cause a shortage,
		but the economy has already been manipulated. So the challenge, so ultimately,
		Economics 101 is, you're going to end up with shortages.
		But I can make it really simple, as I mentioned already.
		If Subway can't afford their overhead as prices go up, and so instead of controlling interest rates and trying to hit the underlying cause, which is actually the massive spending in the war in Ukraine and other things like this, you go to Subway and say, stop selling $7 sandwiches.
		They're gonna be like, dude, our tomatoes cost a bunch.
		Our tuna costs this much.
		Our bread costs this much.
		Our electricity costs this.
		Our labor costs this.
		We can't just reduce and product like food.
		So I'll put it this way.
		When looking at hiring labor right now, or I'll give you, I'll start with this.
		I go to the grocery store.
		I was trying to buy strawberries and whipped cream because it's actually very good and it's low carb, by the way.
		And the whipped cream was six bucks a can.
		Those little cans, I shake them up and whip cream, six bucks.
		It was like $5.59 plus tax, six bucks a can.
		And I was like, holy crap.
		Yo, that's so expensive.
		Now, if you went to that whipped cream company and said, don't sell your whipped cream for six bucks, what's the problem?
		The dude who works the whipped cream company that you gotta pay says, bro, when I go to McDonald's, the cheeseburger's $10.
		I need to make this amount of money.
		If you force a reduction of the price on the product under the assumption the corporation is just ripping people off, then you're not going to be able to, you can't just reason an economy by targeting goods this way.
		You would have to price control literally everything at the exact same time, and that still would not work.
		Because what happens when you do flat price controls for everything, but then the market gets flush with cash, people don't want to work.
		So if you said, okay, every food product has cost a dollar.
	And then everyone's like, I make ten bucks an hour.
	I can cut my hours back.
	Now, products stop getting made.
	You can't do this, okay?
	It's just simple economics.
	It's Economy 101.
	Well, Newsweek's ringing the alarm bells, and this is why Kamala Harris is panicking.
	The U.S.
	economy alarm bells as two signs of recession emerge.
	I talked about this the other day, but the big issue at hand is it's not so much Well, I'll put it this way.
	Kamala can try to play off that she's nothing to do with this, but the economy getting bad does... You can't campaign away from it, okay?
	A regular guy is gonna go to the grocery store and he's gonna be like, you know, the prices are too dang high.
	And you can run every commercial in the world.
	You can say everything you want.
	It's not gonna matter.
	Because people will just say, I'm voting for the other guy.
	What you're doing is bad, I'm voting for the other guy.
	They don't even think about it.
	And those margins are huge.
	Now I give you this, ladies and gentlemen.
	Kamala Harris tries to distance herself from Biden in yet another policy flip-flop.
	Everything about her campaign is fake.
	She's trying to distance herself from Bidenomics.
	The Vice President Kamala Harris is furious at trying to distance herself from Biden's record, while also disavowing the far-left policies she heartily embraced a few years ago.
	The campaign, as a result, run entirely on style over substance, since Harris took the Democratic mantle from Biden last month, as Democratic campaign operatives warn that she risks voters catching on, and realizing she is selling only cynical political opportunism.
	It's a marketing strategy that is TV-esque, one senior Democratic aide said.
	With such a short timeline now, policy matters less than personality.
	Do I have this?
	Let me see if I can find that Corinne Jean.
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	This is fantastic.
	I've got this video for you guys.
	Oh, Peter Doocy.
	Here we go.
	Let me play this clip for you.
	I saw this earlier on TV.
peter doocy ▲ ● ▼		When did you guys learn that Vice President Harris wants to distance herself from Bidenomics?
karine jean-pierre ▲ ● ▼		Why do you think that?
peter doocy ▲ ● ▼		Axios is now reporting that she is hoping to distance herself from President Biden's unpopularity on the economy.
peter doocy ▲ ● ▼		Can you blame her?
karine jean-pierre ▲ ● ▼		Do you know this is the Biden-Harris administration?
		Are you aware that this is the Biden-Harris administration?
		And she is indeed the vice president.
unidentified		Oh, Corinne Jean-Pierre is so dumb!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Dude, Ducey gave you a layup!
		Kamala Harris wants to distance herself from Biden's policy.
		And Karine Jean-Pierre is like, it's the Biden-Harris administration.
unidentified		Kamala's probably going, stop, stop, stop!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		You know, the economy is bad.
		Harris is trying to play this game, which is like, vote for me and I'll fix it.
		Karine Jean-Pierre should say, well, the vice president certainly is right now in the administration, but Joe is the one leading the charge in his economics, and Kamala may have a different view.
		Instead she just keeps going.
peter doocy ▲ ● ▼		Policies on the economy were working or if they were popular, would he still be the candidate?
karine jean-pierre ▲ ● ▼		You literally just had this, the chair of the CEA here who laid out a pretty, pretty
		robust, uh, point by point about the economy and what's had to happen under the Biden Harris
		administration.
		And I thought it was pretty convincing.
		Look, as far as anything that, uh, the vice president wants to do, or as she's talking
		about her policy that's campaign related you would have to speak to her.
		One thing that I know for sure, that I know for sure, is that this president, this vice president, are fighting very hard.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Oh, dude.
		Okay.
		Here's what I think.
		I think Karine Jean-Pierre, well, there's one of two options.
		She is as dumb as a box of rocks.
		Actually, I take it back, it insults rocks.
		Or, she's salty about Joe Biden being ousted, and so she's like, ain't no way Kamala's getting away from this one.
		That's her economy, too.
		The economy is bad.
		They're warning of a recession.
		Kamala's got crackpot price control policies as her attempt to solve things.
		And the warning is, it's going to cost you the election.
		And Karine Jean-Pierre is like, okay.
		I love it.
karine jean-pierre ▲ ● ▼		To make sure that the middle class is stronger.
karine jean-pierre ▲ ● ▼		They wanted to make sure that we're working to cut taxes for the middle class, for working people.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		No, they're not.
		They raise taxes.
		Kamala Harris signed the tie-breaking vote to increase taxes.
		They got 87,000 new IRS agents.
		I'd like to explain this to you.
		These people are despicable.
		They bring in 87,000 agents and they say it's to go after the rich people.
		You can't get that much money from the rich people.
		I'll explain how this works.
		First of all, there ain't that many.
		And even if you were to tax every single individual in the 1% at 100% of their income, I think you fund the government for, like, not even a day.
		It's like 40 minutes or something like that.
		It's probably a couple days.
		I don't know.
		Maybe more.
		But if you took every dollar they had, you're not getting anything done.
		And that would actually just destroy the economy.
		When they want to raise money for the government and control inflation, they have to go after the little guy.
		Also, understand this.
		If a rich person gets a letter from the IRS and it says, you owe us a million bucks, they're going to go to their lawyer and say, okay, look, I'll give you a $50,000 retainer.
		Save me a million dollars.
		The lawyer will then fight the IRS.
		The IRS will go, oh, it's costing us too much money to go after this guy.
		And the rich guy's going to say, million dollars or fifty grand?
		The greater the bill that the IRS is trying to claim from a wealthy person, the more valuable, the more worth it is for him to just hire a legal firm to defend him and to fight.
		So it's cost-benefit analysis.
		Now hold on there a minute.
		Let's say you got 100,000 working-class Joes and Janes, and you say to each of them, you owe $300.
		Not a single one of these individuals is going to be able to go to a law firm and say, save me $300.
		The law firm's going to say, our fixed cost for representing you is going to be X thousands of dollars.
		For the rich person, they're like, eh, I'll throw in $50,000 on top if you save me a million bucks.
		For the poor person, they're like, I'm not going to spend $5,000 to save $300.
		The 87,000 IRS agents and the enforcement has largely hit the working class.
		They are lying.
		They are ripping money away from poor people who can't fight back.
		And a lot of this stuff, I would assume, is fake.
		You get a letter from the IRS that says, did you know you owe us $320?
		And you're going, there's no way I owe that money.
		There's no way.
		That's BS, but I can't do anything about it.
		And then they just take the money from you.
		That's their administration.
		Welcome to the modern Bidenomics.
		Here we go.
peter doocy ▲ ● ▼		But would you admit, at least, that if Bidenomics was more popular, President Biden would still be?
karine jean-pierre ▲ ● ▼		I'm not going to get into polling.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I'll pause right there.
		Doocy says, would you admit that if Bidenomics was popular, Biden would still be the candidate?
		No.
		I don't think whether Biden was doing well or doing poorly, whatever his policies were, matter that much.
		The issue is, people on the left, Democrats, vote emotionally.
		So watching a feeble, disheveled Joe Biden struggle to speak was all they needed to hear.
karine jean-pierre ▲ ● ▼		What I will tell you is BINOMICS has been something that both the President and the Vice President has worked on.
		You guys have called it BINOMICS.
		We talk about how the President is trying to put forward an economic policy, building the economy from the bottom up, middle out, that does not leave behind the middle class, and make sure it has equity at the center of it.
		MAGINOMICS, which is very different, which is something that neither of them believe in, wants to do the opposite of what we're trying to do on behalf of the American people.
		That's the difference.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Donald Trump famously... Actually, let me see if I can find this.
		From Matthew Iglesias.
		Progressives messaging on taxes.
		Let's see.
		Here we go.
		Let's go back in time.
		And I'll tell you about magnomics versus bytonomics, if this article loads.
		So here we have, from Free Beacon, Vox writer—he's no longer there, this is five years ago—praises progressives for misleading Americans on tax cuts.
		So let's see if we have the quote.
		He said, progressive groups did a really good job of convincing people that Trump raised their taxes.
		Yeah.
		There you go.
		They say, Vox Rotem Matthew Iglesias praised progressive groups for
		misleading Americans about their taxes on Monday.
		In a tweet, Iglesias praised the messaging success over President Donald Trump's Tax
		Cuts and Jobs Act.
		The president signed the bill into law December 2017.
		At the time, then-Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said the bill would save families making $73,000 per year more than $2,000.
		At the time, Democratic Party messaging insisted the bill was a catastrophe for the middle class.
		Andrew Cuomo said the middle class got the crumbs from the table.
		Chuck Schumer claimed it was socks it to the middle class.
		Nancy Pelosi says 86 million middle-class families will see a tax increase.
		According to the Tax Policy Center, the average middle-class family is keeping almost $1,000, which would have previously gone into government coffers.
		Oh, it looks like he deleted it.
		Monday, Iglesias admitted the bill had in fact been a success.
		Despite Democratic insistence to the contrary, the facts say a clear majority got a tax cut.
		Did he actually?
		Did he delete the tweet?
		Let me see if I can pull up.
		It's an old one, but he probably got rid of it.
		Yup, it's gone.
		In fact, is Matt even on X anymore?
		Oh, he blocked me, that's why.
		Oh, okay, so maybe it is available, but he has me blocked.
		Bye, Matt.
		This is what Democrats do.
		This is what they're saying.
		Okay?
		You can believe Kareem Jean-Pierre if you'd like to, but these people, this is why I say they're evil, okay?
		Look, I don't know what to tell you, man.
		You know, You got these people going after Joe Rogan, and it's the stupidest thing ever.
		Republicans for Harris, Twitter account, posted a clip of Rogan saying what Kamala did at the rally was professional.
		She nailed it.
		It was a setup, blah, blah, blah.
		They're trying to once again reignite MAGA to attack Joe Rogan because Joe is a middle-of-the-road guy.
		And Trump supporters are stupid enough to buy into it.
		I'm sorry, not all of his supporters.
		I'm saying some of his supporters.
		Some of his supporters are super diehards, and because of their obsession with all of this stuff, they harm themselves.
		They get mad at anybody who insults Trump.
		No, Trump needs to be criticized so that Trump can win over moderates.
		But I'll end this out by saying, my friends, what we need from Donald Trump is 2016 energy.
		People are saying that the frame rate is sus.
		I can't control what YouTube does, man.
		Like, we got fiber optic gigabit over here.
		It is what it is.
		But I'll tell you this, we need 2016 energy, and we ain't getting it.
		So I'll go through some of these.
		We've got this great video from Western Lensman.
		It's a great attack ad on Tim Walz lying about his record, his political career.
		This is actually a really great ad.
unidentified		Tim Walz wants to be a heartbeat away from commander-in-chief, but Tim Walz has lied about his military record for years.
		He's used the rank that he never achieved in order to advance his political career.
		Walse lied repeatedly about his rank.
		Retired command sergeant major.
		Retired command sergeant major.
		Command sergeant major.
		Retired command sergeant major.
		Walse lied about being in combat.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Uh, what Westerlund's been needed to include because this was lost on me is what his actual
		rank was.
		I didn't realize, I thought he was a sergeant major, and that he was given the position of command sergeant major.
		I literally thought the story was, he was promoted, and then he was given command, but the command didn't stick because he didn't finish his training, so, he had, he was, he went back to a non-command position, when in reality, he was actually a master sergeant.
		And, they, they, uh, what do people call it?
		Uh, uh, was it frocking?
		He never finished, so he's actually lying about an entire rank upgrade.
		That I didn't realize.
		I think a lot of conservatives, a lot of vets, they don't understand this.
		I was actually talking to my brother and my dad, because they're both vets, and they were saying E8, E9, he said whatever, and I'm like, people don't know what that means.
		They don't know what you're saying.
		And I don't think, it took me a couple tries to be like, no, no, no, you need to say what his rank was.
		My brother actually pointed out really well, when we saw that Tim Waltz put the command sergeant major on his challenge coin, my brother was like, why would he even do that?
		People who aren't in the military don't even know what that symbol is.
		Military people are going to easily see that's not his rank.
		He was lying.
		He was lying to people.
		But people need to point out, you need to point out what his rank actually was and what it means that he lied about it.
unidentified		I can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war that I carried in war.
		Everybody knew they were going to train and go to Iraq.
		The warning order basically stated it.
		Too much later after he knew it, that's when he knew.
		Walls disparaged Minnesota National Guard soldiers.
		The mayor said, I request the National Guard.
		We're going to have massively trained troops.
		No, you're going to have 19-year-old Joe Cooks.
		That same Minnesota National Guard that he disparaged, unlike Walls, served heroically in Iraq and Afghanistan.
		Tim Walls is not fit to be anywhere near the office of Commander-in-Chief.
		Tim Walls is guilty of stolen valor.
		He abandoned us.
		I mean, what the hell kind of leader does that?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		That's a crazy good ad.
		The Stolen Valor stuff is ripping the Democrats apart, and Tim Walz has had to answer for it twice, and it's not working.
		So, that's energy right there.
		Now, the line to be careful of is Guilty of Stolen Valor, but I don't think this crosses into any defamation or territory.
		Stolen Valor, in a legal sense, is when you claim to have a medal you didn't have, as of 2013.
		So to say he's guilty, as if to imply it was a crime, however, colloquially, Stolen Valor means that you lied about, you're misleading about your rank, or whether you served in combat.
		Tim Waltz certainly lied about his rank.
		Here's the video I was pointing out where Joe Rogan says Kamala Harris crushed it.
		The goal of Republicans against Trump right here, it's not Republicans against Trump, they want Cat Turd and Dilley and these other guys who attacked Joe Rogan to keep doing it because it is a catastrophic move for Donald Trump.
		Donald Trump needs to enter this as the outsider again.
		In 2016 he was the outsider, he was mocking the machine, and what he offered you was a rebuke of the establishment elites who are ripping you off.
		Hillary Clinton represented the machine and people did not like her.
		Joe Rogan is saying that Kamala Harris crushed it when he's talking about whether she pulled off a campaign stunt or something like that.
		Okay, and?
		But they're hoping that Trump's diehards are going to come out and attack Rogan and sour themselves with moderates.
		Stop doing it.
		And what else do we have here?
		We have this.
unidentified		Well, you can't tell by the way I use my walk, I'm a woman's man, no time to talk.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Okay, that's enough of that.
		I'm not going to play the full song because I don't want them to give me a copyright claim or whatever, but even though it's, you know... So anyway, here's an AI of Elon Musk and Donald Trump dancing in the street.
		I gotta admit, the dance moves from the actual people who did the moves, really good, but...
		Boy, do I find this as cringe as cringe could be.
		I don't care.
		It's cringe.
		Oh, dude.
		When I saw this, I was like, oh, what are you doing?
		Oh, man.
		Someone posted it.
		And when I see this online, I laugh.
		Real Donald Trump posted it.
unidentified		it. Okay, here you go. Oh man.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		This is Madonna in 2016.
		Hillary gonna snatch that presidency, so watch out.
		Girls gone wild.
		And it's... Look, I understand that AI has dramatically improved in the last eight years, so it didn't have the capability to make the video that Trump is posting.
		But this is not the 2016 energy we're hoping for.
		A lot of people have started to say that Donald Trump is bringing the Hillary Clinton energy of 2016.
		He's acting like... He's acting like He's acting more like part of the machine with, and these cringe memes, instead of being the guy challenging the machine.
		Instead of being Prometheus stealing fire from Mount Olympus, he's acting like one of the guys at Mount Olympus was angry with one of the other guys on Mount Olympus for not guarding the fire properly.
		Now look, I think Trump is the best bet.
		I can criticize him for price controls, whatever, I can call it, oh yeah, the meme I posted, yes, it literally is, okay?
		You wanna do all these things, that's what you're gonna get.
		Donald Trump is still the better option foreign policy-wise.
		It's going to be better spending, even though Trump was not that good on spending.
		It's a marginally good presidency.
		I sit here and I wonder to myself sometimes, why am I telling people to vote for Donald Trump?
		And I see a lot of people, Joe Rogan doesn't want to say it.
		He doesn't want to say it.
		I believe that a reasonable conversation, maybe Joe doesn't want to say it for business reasons, his reasons are his own, but I don't see how you have a conversation with anyone who is reasonable and rational and you go through all the details and they conclude anything other than you got to vote for Donald Trump.
		That's it.
		The progressives have lied about taxes.
		They're lying about the economy.
		Kamala Harris has no policy positions.
		She wants price controls as they mass spend in Ukraine.
		This is the end of the Roman Empire.
		This is a mass spending crisis, a credit crisis, and then trying to implement centralized command economy structures to save yourself from crumbling.
		It is not the way to do it.
		Maybe it's intentional.
		Well, I'll wrap up that segment.
		Right here.
		And we'll jump to the next one in just a bit.
		So smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends.
		You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.
		The next segment is we got to talk about Kamala getting protested by the far left.
		And it's gonna have a big impact on the election.
		If the Democrats cannot get the progressive vote over their stance on Israel, the youth vote is going massively far left and anti-Israel and Democrats are in trouble.
		The deep state's not gonna be able to maintain this.
		That's why I think Trump's got a strong chance to win, because the deep state's going to want him to win.
		So we'll talk about that.
		And let's jump to a Super Chats from you guys.
		And is that it?
		Are people in the chat mad that Donald Trump is posting cringe memes?
		Dude, I don't care.
		When you look at the memes from... Let's compare.
		Donald Trump saying, because you'd be in jail.
		Hilarious and strong.
		Let's talk about Donald Trump.
		And what else do we have?
		Megyn Kelly saying, you called women fat pigs.
		Only Rosie O'Donnell!
		Edgy, assertive, a little crude.
		Posting him doing the Bee Gees' Elon Musk, it's the same thing that Hillary Clinton did.
		You know, when Donald Trump said, Bill Barr is fat, lethargic, and incompetent, and that because he endorsed me I'll remove lethargic, that's what I'm talking about, baby!
		So I'm saying, if you don't criticize the man when he does something wrong, he's just going to keep doing bad things and he's going to spiral out.
		So I'm going to tell him the lethargic thing is the greatest roast I have ever seen in my life.
		It is a hall of fame roast.
		Give him a trophy for that one.
		That was awesome.
		It was so good.
		And then when he posts the Elon Musk, Donald Trump dancing, don't, don't, don't do that one.
		Don't do that one.
		Don't do that one.
		All right.
		Let's see what, uh, let's see what we get over in the, uh, super chats.
unidentified		All right.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Talking about guys this morning, Tim, I've heard the Trump campaign is replacing their campaign manager.
		Have you heard anything?
		I have not.
		I have not heard that.
		TheAndyMan says, Tim, Kamala's pictures have been available for some time now.
		See the Kama Sutra for more details.
		Ah, ba-dum-tsh.
		Daniel says apparently the Secret Service on Harris' detail is accused of breaking into a beauty salon in PA during a Kamala rally.
		Hear this?
		Yes!
		It's actually a big story I haven't covered.
		During a campaign event for Kamala Harris, they broke into a salon to let Kamala supporters use the bathroom.
		Yo, that's nuts.
		That's crazy.
		Apparently they, like, apologized for it.
		But still, that's like a Third Amendment violation.
		Yo, that's wild.
		Yo, that's absolutely wild.
		Questionable Condent says, are there any plans for making the new coffee blends cake cups?
		Also, for Seamus's blend, you should do an ultra light roast and call it Seamus's pot of gold.
		Yeah, maybe.
		We got to get to it.
		We got to get to it.
		I think it ultimately comes down to the company needs.
		You know, we really want to get to the point where we're expanding the physical locations.
		And everything's prioritized right now in the physical location in Martinsburg.
		Once it's up and running, it should be a lot easier to get everything else going.
		But you know, brutal.
		All right.
		Wayne the Outlaw, Wayne Moore, Wayne Moore, the outlaw, says, Hey Tim, have you seen the news that every American social security number address has been stolen in a hack?
		I did.
		I don't know much more details about it.
unidentified		All right.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Bogey.
		It starts with price control.
		Then when goods are no longer in stores, the government moves to seized farms.
		Exactly.
		That's how communism happens.
		It's not like you get a guy who goes, let's seize all the farms and then shut everything down.
		They go, okay, more people need food, so don't sell food for more than a certain price.
		Then Food Hut's running out and they go, why don't we get any more food?
		Go to the farms and make sure... One step, dominoes falling over.
		Here we go.
		Megha Bobson says, if Kamala wins, opens the borders, cracks down on any speech opposed to her, etc., will Americans fight back or, just like COVID, bend the knee and obey?
		Well, that's another big message Donald Trump had the other day.
		He said, or I think today actually, we're not going to let them lock us down with the COVID lockdowns again.
		He got fact-checked for this one.
		So, you know, he is trying to, I guess, trying to get the Mises caucus votes.
		Let's do this.
		One like equals one fight, fight, fight.
		Let's go smash that like button, ladies and gentlemen.
		Tim, economy aside, Subway has sucked for the last few years.
		Their new menu that limits customization and their ingredients have gone down.
		Used to eat there all the time, now I won't touch them.
		I don't think they're doing those things because they're trying to harm the consumer or price gouge.
		They're doing them because prices are getting too expensive and they're trying to find the happy medium.
		I'm sure they would be happy to make a one cent profit per sandwich if they're selling a hundred million sandwiches.
		You know, they'd be happy because the profits are there, volume.
		If they're getting rid of things, it's because the costs are getting too high.
		There was a food truck near us.
		It's gone now.
		Surprise, surprise.
		And one day, it had barbecue.
		One day it said, we no longer have brisket sandwiches and brisket available.
		So all that was pulled pork and chicken.
		And I asked the guy why they didn't have brisket and he said, the price of beef has gotten too high.
		For me to actually buy the beef and then make the brisket and sell it, I'd have to sell it for like $20 per sandwich.
		No one's going to want to buy that, so I can't sell the brisket anymore.
		So I decided just not to buy it.
		And I was like, wow, that sucks.
		You can't have it because it's too expensive.
		You wouldn't buy it.
		There you go.
		And then the guy went out of business.
		It's not because he wanted to go out of business, I assure you that.
		All right, Michael says, Have you seen Zelensky knew about blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline?
		Greetings from the Netherlands.
		Great stream to end my working day.
		Ah, yes, yes, you guys are in the future.
		In the future.
		We'll grab a couple more and then we'll jump to this next segment here.
		Otherwise, we're going to go long.
		We're going to go long.
		This is a long first segment.
		DeBron says, Tim, it's fascism, not communism.
		Fascists control the means of production.
		Communists own the means of production.
		Both are socialism.
		Fascism is... Alright, let's try and break it down.
		So the issues of fascism and communism is they both had an authoritarian bent.
		The fascists took a strong anti-progressive position, so it was more culturally traditional with authoritarian systems.
		To say that fascism is communism or whatever, or they're both socialists, it's command economy stuff, so there is absolutely, yes, an overlap there.
		The problem is, when you're talking about left and right, are you talking about freer markets or command economies?
		So, to say that a group is right-wing, you need to explain what that means, because they call economics right and left, so it doesn't make sense.
		The left overlaps culturally.
		And economically.
		So when you say the left, you're talking about Marxism, communism, and socialism.
	Communism as a form of governance is progressive elements tied to command economy.
	To say that fascists are far-right gets confusing because they also say that laissez-faire capitalists are far-right.
	It doesn't mix.
	The fascists and the Nazis were centrist in essence.
	They were mostly about controlling and having a centralized economy, but they had extreme authoritarian and more traditional values.
	So like burning books on gender and things like that.
	Ultimately, anybody who wants a centralized command economy is left-leaning economically.
	So if you had, like, staunch traditional Christians who are pro-free market, I don't know, call it what you want.
	Let's go.
	We'll grab just one more here.
	John Baird says, can you say Civil War, please, Tim?
	Well, I just did.
	All right, Rich says, I really enjoy you, Tim, but I feel like you've been a little too blackpilled this last week.
	I don't know.
	I think blackpill is your interpretation.
	I don't know what you expect from things.
	Ultimately, I think things change very slowly.
	But as Eric Prince told me on the Culture War podcast, that gradually then suddenly.
	I asked him, With your experience in these foreign countries and dealing with conflict and crisis, in these countries that have collapsed, do you think the U.S.
	is on track in such a certain way?
	And he says, the one thing I can tell you is all the guys I know say that it happens overnight.
	One day everything is normal, then they wake up and the internet is out, the electricity is out, communication's gone, radios aren't playing anything, TVs aren't playing anything, you have no idea what's going on.
	Yeah.
	And people don't expect that.
	People don't expect that.
	I'm going to read this one because I saw it in the regular chat.
	It's funny.
	Tim posts a creepy, furry, bunny Trump picture and he thinks he's edgy and cool.
	Actual two-dancer meme with Trump and Elon is Tim Pool cringe.
	Backwards Tim.
	Hillary Clinton and Madonna dancing is cringe.
	And that's what they did in 2016 and Hillary Clinton was unliked and lost.
	I'm not running for office.
	So when I post Trump hugging a bunny with a stupid line and it generates millions of views, I don't care.
	I'm not running for office and I don't need people to like me.
	Donald Trump posting a similar meme to what Kamala Harris did with Madonna is—don't do that.
	It didn't work for Hillary Clinton and Madonna.
	I don't think it's going to work for you.
	Keep up with criticizing the machine and mocking those who failed us.
	But I do love that people want to defend, hey, by all means, if you like the Trump dancing meme, then give it up for Hillary Clinton and Madonna.
	That was great strategy from her, right?
	No, I don't think it was.
	Trump's memes back then were hilarious.
	People were posting, you know, pepes and things like this.
	Don't do what Hillary Clinton did.
	Look, and even if you think that the Trump dancing with Elon thing is funny, it becomes cringe by essence of it being too similar to what Hillary Clinton did at all, because everything Hillary does is cringe.
	I digress.
	We'll jump to this next segment, my friends.
	Smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, get your superchats in.
	Here we go.
	From the post-millennial, no votes for Bambala's genocide.
	14 arrested as agitators crash NYC rally for Kamala.
	Clash with cops.
	I love that they're calling Bambala, Kamala Bambala.
	Sure.
	Kamala's the VP.
	So she does very little, but she's still a part of an administration that is doing a pretty bad job.
	The far left is very anti-Israel, and the Democrats need the Jewish vote, and Jewish voters in this country are very pro-Israel.
	So they're between a rock and a hard place here.
	The funny thing is they called Barack Obama Obama-er.
	And I love that because British people, when they say words that end with a, they say er, and words that end with e, they say uh.
	I'm sorry, words that end with er, they say uh.
	It's the weirdest thing, how British people speak, but they go, Obama.
	Seriously, it was Obama who came in.
	Obama?
	I like that name, because that's who he was.
	They're not going to escape this one.
	The Postmillennial says, Anti-Israel activists crashed a Democratic rally supporting Vice President Conal Harris in New York City on Wednesday, where Mayor Eric Adams was speaking and wanted to trash the after-party venues, causing thousands of dollars in damage to the nearby restaurant.
	Agitators wearing keffiyehs set off smoke bombs, and some were taken into custody by NYPD officers.
	Here we go.
unidentified		Hey Gaza, they're fresh water!
		How dare you!
		I don't know if you can hear the annoying noises for those that are listening.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So you've got...
		They're intentionally annoying, and I love this because it's almost like they have no
		intention of winning any political goals.
		Then the whistles come in.
		The whistles are the far left.
		And they come in and try to make the most annoying sounds imaginable.
		Well, congratulations, I guess.
		Fourteen people arrested.
		Chaos descended on Bird and Hand, a restaurant in Harlem where prominent Democrats, including Governor Kathy Hochul and NYC Mayor Eric Adams, had gathered earlier in the day to show their support for Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz, neither of whom attended the event.
		Demonstrators interrupted Adams as he spoke and later stormed the restaurant during the afterparty, causing thousands of dollars in damages.
		We have this from Politico.
		NYC kickoff rally for Harris confronts pro-Palestinian demonstration.
		Hold on to all of that anger until after November.
		Now what I find really funny about this picture is, Ilad's right there!
		Look at him!
		Look at him sitting there looking exasperated as everybody films.
		All these protesters are angry.
		And Eric Adams is like, be mad at Trump!
		Or whatever.
		This was the beginning, and then you end up with this.
		This is a video from TimCastNews.
		Chaos and commotion as NYPD clears the sidewalk outside of the DNC fundraiser in Harlem of anti-Israel protesters.
		NYPD makes more arrests.
		Yeah, it's once again just loud noises so I don't know if they need to listen to that.
		But while we're playing this clip, you can see the police lining up.
		Police often do this.
		In New York, they'll seemingly form a barrier around nothing.
		And the protesters are as dumb as a box of rocks.
		So they often will then try to get at the nothing.
		It works.
		And the NYPD knows it.
		What is this far-left horde?
		Do they have policies?
		Do they have positions they want?
		Eh, they kind of just hate Israel.
		I can respect, to a degree, those that are saying things like, stop spending billions of dollars on Israel.
		I say, okay.
		Now, their motivation for it is that they hate Israel as a colonial state, and many of them just don't like Jews.
		My motivation is, I think Israel can do what it wants, it's its own country, it can defend itself, but we're America and we should secure our own borders.
		That being said, when you hear the squeaking, the horns, the whistles, the yelling, it's nothing.
		It's nothing.
		It's nothing coherent.
		What are you going to win?
		You know, the question I have for the Trump campaign and for anybody really is, are you earning votes?
		So when I see this thing where they like attack Joe Rogan, let's talk about the Joe Rogan stuff a little bit.
		Joe Rogan says RFK Jr.
		makes sense, and then he gets attacked by some of the most ardent Trump supporters.
		My question, did you earn any votes?
		No.
		Saying you don't like Joe Rogan doesn't really do much for you.
		Defending Joe Rogan and endearing yourself to his moderate fanbase might actually help you.
		That's the big question.
		Does it earn you votes?
		And what they're doing here on the ground ain't gonna earn them nothing.
		Showing up, attacking a restaurant, screaming, honking horns, and blowing whistles gets you nothing.
		That's why I call it chaos.
		The far left is a fire.
		The Democrats think they can wield fire, fire good, but they can't.
		You can't.
		The fire burns.
		And they try to use that against the right, but they can't control it.
		So what happens?
		Sure enough, the far left did support Joe Biden last time around.
		And they courted them.
	And they fanned the flames, hoping that the fires would hurt Donald Trump.
	And to an extent, it did.
	Although I think the ballot harvesting is really what got him home.
	Now the problem is, what do you do with a raging fire?
	Here's another video of a ton of cops just surrounding the protesters.
	You know, I'll tell you this.
	When Democrats get desperate and start entertaining these far leftists, allowing them to protest or giving them a voice, It does give the protesters, to a certain degree, some kind of advantage.
	Now, do I really believe that the left will get what they want?
	No.
	The Democrats are just going to entertain as much as they need to until the far left becomes useless again.
	That is the nature of Democrats.
	Here's an example.
	Reparations.
	For some reason, every four years, we debate reparations.
	And then we stop.
	It's almost like they only care about the election cycle.
	Democrats will promise you the world, and then, as soon as you vote for them, they will ignore you.
	Not like Republicans are much better, don't get me wrong, but these protesters, now that they're no longer useful to the Democrats, here you go.
	Kamala Harris had that rally where they were chanting, Kamala, Kamala, you can't hide, we charge you with genocide.
	And then she was like, do you want Donald Trump to win?
	Then keep talking.
	Otherwise, I'm speaking.
	I'm speaking.
	Yeah.
	That's it.
	Rockin' a hard place.
	I'm excited for this, I guess.
	So we went to the RNC.
	We set up a venue just outside of the RNC.
	And we were doing a live event.
	We interviewed several people who were there.
	We went down at the convention and hung out a little bit.
	Got some burgers.
	That was fun.
	Went on there a couple times.
	And now we're not gonna go to the DNC.
	I don't know why any sane person would go down right now.
	It's coming up this next week, and they're warning it's going to be like 68 with mass riots.
	People are going to get beaten.
	People are going to get hurt.
	I'm worried someone's going to get shot.
	The Democrats have installed Kamala Harris without a single vote cast for her.
	The delegates have decided she will be the nominee.
	They've reportedly— Kamala's using Joe Biden's FEC number, which I thought that was a crime.
	She's using it so that she can take his donations.
	The way it's supposed to work is, whenever you sign up to run for office, you get an FEC number.
	I could be wrong about this, because I read a report, but this is what it said.
	You get an FEC number that follows you for life.
	That way people can put the number in and look up all the donations that have come in to you and, like, disclosures you need to release.
	Kamala Harris is using Joe Biden's right now, despite the fact that he's not running.
	She's doing this so that all the donations that went to Joe Biden, that are attributed with that one FEC number, are now attached to her campaign.
	I think that's illegal.
	I think that, at the very least, should be illegal.
	I think that she should be in jail for using this money.
	I think the money should be immediately returned to everybody who donated.
	That being said, far-left protesters and rioters and extremists are not going to take kindly to what's going on in Chicago with the DNC.
	They're not going to take kindly to the Democrats ousting Bernie Sanders, who is now coming out and saying outright they took it from him.
	Let me pull up this tweet that I had, here we go, hotspot, of Bernie Sanders saying, I think, how long is this, two minutes?
	Let's play this clip.
	And this is from Hotspot Media Company.
	Bernie Sanders admits he got cheated at the 2020 election and acknowledges the DNC's shady fiasco of the 2020 Iowa caucus.
	We won the first three primaries, then the establishment got very, very nervous.
	Let me play this clip for you.
theo von ▲ ● ▼		...the best person to run against Donald Trump right now?
theo von ▲ ● ▼		Well, she is the person, and that's... And that won't change, probably, huh?
unidentified		No.
		She'll be the Democratic candidate.
		And, you know, I've known Kamala for a number of years.
		Not best friends, but I've known her.
		She was in the Senate for a short period.
		She's very smart.
		And she's determined, above and beyond her views on the issues, which I support most of them, not all.
		You've got to give credit to somebody, a black woman, to move up the ladder.
		There's a lot of resistance there.
		She's persistent, she's strong, and I respect that.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		You know, I actually will give it to Bernie Sanders on that point.
		Kamala is strong.
		She's done a lot of nasty things.
		She's been accused of a lot of nasty things.
		She's a vile person, but she's got a fire.
		She's got a fire in her.
		And I give respect to anybody willing to fight.
		A lot of Republicans ain't got that fire.
		A lot of Republicans will be like, but the Democrats are mean, and then they'll do nothing.
		So a lot of them, like Adam Kinzinger, man, they crack that whip.
		He dropped to his knees and says, you know, please, I will do anything you say.
unidentified		I think she'll be a good candidate.
		I was interested that Trump apparently backed out of a debate with her on ABC.
		I wouldn't, you know, I have debated her as a matter of fact.
		She's tough.
theo von ▲ ● ▼		She's tough.
		Was there a chance that you were going to get that nominee or as an independent?
		Can you get been plotted with the Democratic Party and put in?
		Was there even a call about it or anything?
unidentified		No.
		You know, I ran in 16.
		I ran against Hillary Clinton and I ran in 20.
theo von ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I remember.
theo von ▲ ● ▼		And I felt like you, I felt like you didn't get treated fairly to be honest with you.
unidentified		And that's what happens when you take on the establishments.
		What happened is we won the first three primaries and then the establishment got very, very
		nervous and they got a whole lot of candidates in the Democratic primary.
		And they said, Hey, be a good idea.
		Fuel dropped out, but Joe Biden be the one candidate people rallied around them.
theo von ▲ ● ▼		And is there a call that you get and it's like you're not going to move forward?
		Is it just like news articles?
		How does the establishment kind of work?
unidentified		Well, what happens is I won the popular vote in Iowa.
		I won the New Hampshire primary.
		I won the Nevada primary, and those were the first three.
		And then, front pages of the New York Times, Democratic establishment, very nervous.
		Bernie Sanders is going to win the whole thing.
		We were doing very well in the polls.
		And, you know, I think behind the scenes, people thought, you know, there were like 15 different candidates.
		And they were splitting up the vote, and that's how I was...
		I was not necessarily getting over 50%, I was getting more than other people, so I was on the way to victory.
		And they said, look, Bernie shouldn't be the candidate for a variety of reasons, we don't want him the candidate, drop out.
		And then on one day, a lot of people, one or two days, a lot of people dropped out.
		It was Joe Biden and me, and Joe had a lot of support, and all these people came behind him, and that's what happened.
		Let me also say, you know, having said that, Biden is a friend of mine.
		I think he's done a very good job over the last three and a half years, and I'm working very hard to see that Kamala is I am so, so happy this man did not win.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Bernie deserved to lose, and I'm glad he did, and I supported him in 2015.
		I'll tell you why.
		Let's go back in time.
		Let's go, uh, Bernie and Trump similar from Vox.com.
unidentified		Let's see, uh, where do we have the story?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		That's from 2020.
		Talking about Bernie Sanders being the biggest threat.
		Here you go.
		I'm interested what they say.
		2017.
		The Bernie voters who defected to Trump explained by a political scientist.
		Oh yeah?
		12% of Bernie Sanders supporters from the Democratic primary crossed party lines and voted for Trump in several key states, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan.
		The number of Sanders to Trump defectors were greater than Trump's margin of victory, according to numbers released Wednesday by UMass professor Brian Schaffner.
		Give a shout out to the Dilly guy.
		for basically saying, I tweeted, I was a supporter of Bernie Sanders.
		I did not vote for Trump in 2016, but after watching all these shows, people like Joe Rogan, reading the news and reporting on it, I decided I was going to vote for Donald Trump.
		These are the people we want to court.
		The moderates and even moderate, like, left-leaning individuals who can be convinced for populist reasons to vote for Donald Trump.
		And Dilley was just like, F you dork, you voted for Sanders or whatever.
		And it's like, if Trump loses, that's why.
		Because he's got these overly aggressive diehards who are acting like leftists, pushing people away.
		In an interview, Schaffer noted that in an election this close, any number of voting blocks, blah, blah, blah, Tell me why.
		Tell me why.
		The way to think about it is this.
		As several people have noted, this election was so close that any number of things could have proved decisive difference.
		So, what's he saying?
		One piece that's important to keep in context this year is that you always see the kind of defection between a primary and a general election.
		We get it.
		Is he saying why?
		Disagreeing that white people have advantages among Sanders' primary voters.
		Is interesting.
		There was a racial component to this, as defectors are much more likely to disagree that whites are advantaged.
		Let me break it down for you.
		I don't need some guy to tell you.
		I can tell you.
		Why I'm glad Bernie Sanders lost, why he deserved to loss, and that video of him saying, well, they took it from me, and I'm a friend with Joe Biden.
		Fine.
		Good.
		Good.
		I'm glad you lost.
		Luca Caskey and I met Bernie Sanders at an event in D.C.
		10 or so, 12 years ago.
		And it was just a normal guy.
		It was, oh, there's Bernie Sanders.
		How about that?
		I saw in Bernie Sanders a guy who said, no open borders.
unidentified		Open borders is a Koch brothers proposal.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		He said he wants to get rid of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
		He wanted to help working-class Americans.
		He wanted to bring jobs back to this country.
		He didn't want open borders.
		And I'm like, I like this guy.
		I like this guy.
		He's talking about Medicare for All.
		At the time, it was much more, not so much Medicare for All, but more of a universal health care plan.
		And there's nuances and debates to this.
		I'll tell you my position in a second.
		And so I was like, I like this guy.
		Donald Trump had similar policy positions.
		Vox.com said they were similar.
		But Trump was too weird.
		I'm just like, Trump's a TV reality.
		I'm like, I don't want to go idiocracy.
		I don't want the WWI Hall of Fame guy.
		And like, I'm just not interested.
		Well, a lot of people defected from Bernie to Trump because Bernie was a populist who didn't want open borders.
		And Donald Trump had similar plans.
		Bernie was anti-war.
		That was it.
		I was like, we got a guy who's staunchly anti-war right here.
		You know, I don't know what Trump's on about.
		I'm not a Republican.
		I don't like the Republican Party.
		Bernie is weak.
		He is a pathetic, frail, and weak man.
		He could not stand up for what he believed in.
		He still, to this day, bends the knee, and it is pathetic.
		And Donald Trump has just insulted and pushed back and challenged everyone around him, and that I respect.
		And world leaders respect it, too.
		So when Donald Trump becomes the president of no new wars, of securing our borders, ending the Trans-Pacific Partnership, I'm like, wow.
		Trump gave so many of these 1999 leftists who protested the World Trade Organization what they wanted, I'm actually surprised more didn't vote for him.
		Bernie Sanders, even though we know it was stolen from him, is still going, well, I'm gonna just get on my knees and lick their feet.
		Good for you, Bernie.
		You'd have been the worst president this country's ever seen.
		And I'm glad I dodged that bullet.
		Now, considering that even Bernie acknowledges they stole it from us, we've got this from news.wttw.com.
		Chicago Police will face a big test during the Democratic Convention.
		Here's what to know.
		The DNC is to take place from the 19th to the 22nd.
		Four days away, ladies and gentlemen.
		And the protests are going to be big.
		I mean, the 19th is what, Monday?
		This weekend's going to get bonkers.
		We'll pose the most significant test of the Chicago Police Department since the summer of 2020.
		The convention will take place as CPD continues to struggle to comply with a more than five-year-old federal court order requiring the department reform itself after decades of scandals, misconduct, and brutality.
		CPD will face intense scrutiny as it responds to what are likely to be massive protests fueled by intense debates over reproductive rights as well as the Israel-Hamas war that has devastated Gaza.
		That response will test a new policy that would allow mass arrests of protesters that was revised after a coalition of reform groups warned it violated the First Amendment and set the stage for chaos.
		Exactly how many people are headed to Chicago for the DNC?
		Well, what we're hearing now is that when you look at the permits requested, oh boy, the protesters are planning some shenanigans.
		More than 5,000 delegates representing all 57 U.S.
		states and territories will gather at the United Center and McCormick Place to celebrate the nomination of Kamala Harris.
		McCormick Place is effing massive, by the way.
		As the Democratic nominee for Vice President in all, city officials expect the convention to draw 50,000 visitors, including 12,000 volunteers and 15,000 members of the media.
		So, I'll tell you why I'm not going there.
		First of all, people inside are going to be extremely hostile.
		That would be fun, actually.
		And that's actually a reason to be there.
		That's when we get the opportunity to get all these liberals and be like, come on, bring it on, let's have a conversation.
		However, unfortunately, outside, you're gonna get caught in a riot.
		And you don't want to be in a car caught in a riot.
		That's just it.
	Someone's gonna get shot.
	This is Chicago, man.
	They say the United Center isn't big enough to accommodate everything that takes place, while the made-for-TV roll call performances and speeches will be at the United Center.
	McCormick Place will host meetings and briefings, officials said.
	The Republicans had a similar setup in Milwaukee, splitting the convention between the Fiserv Forum and the Baird Center.
	Actually, I think they had like three buildings.
	The United Center and McCormick Place are not close.
	How will CPD protect both and patrol the city?
	Yeah.
	That's going to be tough.
	I mean, simple question.
	They're not going to be able to.
	It's going to be a struggle.
	Why do people keep saying it's going to be like 1968?
	There are several coincidences.
	Like President Joe Biden, former President Lyndon Johnson dropped his bid for re-election, throwing the nominating process into disarray.
	But the similarities end there.
	Harrison Waltz have already secured the party's nomination via a virtual roll call, and Democrats
	are firmly behind them to take on former President Donald Trump and his vice presidential running
	mate, J.D. Vance.
	While 2024 has been a tumultuous political year, it is nothing on 1968, which saw riots,
	assassinations, and a fervid debate over the Vietnam War, which was at its height.
	Massive anti-war protests along Michigan Avenue triggered a police riot, highlighting the party's split over the war, and helping to elect President Richard Nixon.
	Those images indelibly stained Chicago's reputation as a home for political conventions.
	But the Democratic National Convention returned in 1996.
	It was peaceful, helping to boost former President Bill Clinton's re-election bid.
	They say, okay, forget the comparisons to 1968, let's talk about 2020.
	Two probes found CPD failed to protect the constitutional rights of thousands of Chicagoans during the unrest and protests that followed George Floyd's murder.
	His murder, really.
	Officers beat protesters with batons, doused their faces with pepper spray, used racial slurs, and mocked the protesters' demands.
	In many cases, the conduct violated protesters' First Amendment rights and involved unjustified and excessive force, according to the probes.
	So far, Chicago taxpayers have spent at least $6.8 million to defend and settle lawsuits.
unidentified		All right.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Let me tell you what I see.
		February 7th, 2014.
		Three convicted of some charges tied to 2012 Chicago NATO plot.
		Now, this is a contentious story.
		The activists argued, and I was there at the time, that these guys were framed, basically.
		They had beer-making equipment that the police claimed was actually to make Molotov cocktails.
		I'd assume the protesters are lying.
		These guys got charged with terrorism, though they weren't convicted.
		They were convicted on other charges.
		The police said that they... Here we go.
		The prosecutor said something like, do we have to wait... Do we have to wait for a Chicago police officer to be set on fire?
		Defense attorneys had described the three as drunken braggarts who had been egged on by older undercover officers, goofs.
		One guy said in the recording, are you ready to see a police officer on fire?
		Jurors began their deliberations.
		Ultimately, they said that these guys had weapons.
		They were accused of planning attacks using firebombs, other weapons targeting police stations, Obama's re-election headquarters, and Mayor Rahm Emanuel's house.
		Okay.
		These are far leftists who are accused of targeting Obama's house.
		Chicago is going to be nuts.
		I don't want to be there.
		I don't see the point.
		The Democratic Party is a chaotic party of nonsense.
		The Republicans may be cringe, often, most of them.
		But some of them are funny.
		The younger ones are funny.
		And you know what else I think is really interesting?
		The youth vote.
		The youth vote.
		Let's go back to 2016.
		We're talking 8 years ago.
		So, 2016.
		Wow.
		Really.
		Kind of crazy.
		You had a lot of 25-year-olds.
		These are people who didn't really care to vote, and they were online making memes and laughing and making jokes.
		There was a youth culture element for Donald Trump.
		Not that he won the youth vote, but there was a lot of energy.
		These people probably didn't go out and vote, but their memes probably helped.
		A lot of these guys now in their early to mid-30s, or for me, I'm 38, a lot of these people, they're not making memes anymore.
		There are new people making memes, but it seems that many of these people are overly aggressive, way too diehard Trump, and they're coming off like extremists.
		You don't want to insult people who voted for Bernie Sanders, and you don't want to insult Joe Rogan.
		Republicans are supposed to be the calm and collected types, and there's an alliance now with moderates and post-liberals who are saying we want security and function for our country and society.
		Instead, it's conflict and chaos.
		I can't predict what will happen, but I certainly hope people get the message.
		Chicago's gonna be fun, I guess.
		I'll leave it there.
		Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
		on this channel.
		Ladies and gentlemen, Joe Biden, I think he's going to drop out as president.
		The new poll says he will.
		Smash that like button, subscribe to the channel, share the show with your friends, become a member at TimCast.com, follow me on Instagram at TimCast.
		For those that are watching live, I'm going to read your Super Chats now.
		For everybody else, we will see you all at 4 p.m.
		We'll grab your Super Chats and let's see what y'all have to add to these conversations.
		And, uh, let's go.
		And, uh, let's see, let's see.
		Manuel Perez says, Tim, please look up how Gerald Ford asked how a woman becomes president in 1989.
		How did Gerald Ford know about Kamala in 1989?
		That's right, he said, the first female president would be a vice president, and the president steps down.
		I don't know that, uh, Kamala can win, to be completely honest.
		Give me a moment to take a delicious sip of my organic yerba mate tea.
		Every so often I gotta have a drink of water there.
		When I would do the morning segments before, I'd talk for 20 minutes and then I can take a break or whatever.
	On IRL, I usually gotta drink water, but now that I'm doing a monologuing to everything, I have to stop and take drinks.
	I try to do it when I'm playing videos, so you don't notice.
	I mean, you can watch me do it, but then I don't have to talk.
	All right, let's go.
	Chris Robinson says frocking would apply if Waltz completed the training and paperwork for the rank.
	Then he gets to frock until the official date.
	What else have we?
	What else have we?
	What is this?
	Rich says, oh, yeah, I read that one.
	Let's see.
	Three Nines Filthy says, Tim, if you haven't yet, shout out Turning Point's Commit 100 campaign.
	They're providing hotels for people who want to chase 100 ballots in AZ and Wisconsin.
	I signed up.
	We are men of action.
unidentified		Cool.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Glad to hear it.
unidentified		Let's go.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		What is this?
		What is this?
		Rabbit in the Hole says, could you help at Camelot331 with his PayPal campaign?
		What is that?
unidentified		I don't know what that is.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Is that?
		Is that Cody?
		I don't know.
		All right, we'll grab some more here.
		What's this?
		Goldilocks says, hey Tim, with there now being succession movements in 12 states, you mean secession, I think, right?
		I'm going to have to diss with your idea of a civil war being rural versus city.
		It's going to be state versus state.
		States are having enough.
		What do Democrats do in red states?
		But perhaps, in the Civil War, 1861, the states were not unanimous.
		In Virginia, the first vote was against secession.
		Then, after Abraham Lincoln was like, we're gonna go invade the South, then Virginia was like, it flipped.
		It was 2-1, no secession, then it became 2-1, yes secession.
		So there were many sympathetic forces and factions.
		Chris Robinson says, when I went from E3 to E4, and again from E4 to E5, I had to complete all the prerequisites.
		Then, the promotion was confirmed and would become official at a later date, including pay increase.
		Frocking equals use of rank between confirm and official.
		Interesting, so he was not.
		He was not frocking, is that what it is?
		Alright.
		Nick Connan says, Nick Merckx on the Culture War talking about Mr. Beast and Doc's situation would be great.
		That is a pretty good idea.
		Let's uh, let me let me see if we could make that one happen.
		I mean, it's tough.
		Nick Merckx is a is a is a hefty personality, right?
		Let me jump down to our, our booking agent and say, Nick Merckx talking.
		Oh, that's so stupid.
		Stupid autocorrect.
		Talking Mr. Beast.
		Let's see if we can pull that one off.
		Tomorrow's gonna be wild on the Culture War, because we got Tommy Robinson phoning it in.
		Only exception I make—I make rare exceptions.
		And for Tommy, who's literally unable to come to the United States, and with everything going on in the UK, I think that's particularly important to have his conversation.
		But we do have people sitting in for him, and Milo Yiannopoulos will be here, because the dude's absolutely hilarious.
		So it'll be a fun morning.
		But he's also British, we can talk a bit about this.
		And Milo's also been critical of mass immigration and Islam.
		Fundamentalist Islam.
		All right, Julian Bain says, Hi Tim, I'm a 24 year old and I basically survive off fast food and exercise.
		If they price gouge, it can just lead them to raising food prices rather than dropping them.
		I'm scared because my survival is in the balance.
		Competition is the best.
		Competition lowers prices.
		When the government intervenes to control prices, it makes shortages and then everything gets worse.
		Mr. Washas says Bernie actually lost because he had a heart attack.
		Is that what it was?
		I vaguely remember something like that.
		Is that what it was?
unidentified		All right.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Here we go.
		TheHybridHunter says Kamala Harris will be counting the Electoral College votes in January now.
		That should be interesting if she loses.
unidentified		Yup.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		That's right.
		All right, everybody, let's jump to this next story.
		Here we go.
		It's the conspiracy theory of the Democrats.
		October surprise.
		Joe Biden stepping down as president.
		Kamala Harris taking the role, getting a second honeymoon phase, becoming the first female president, as predicted by Gerald Ford, so they say.
		And now we got this poll.
		Six in 10 voters say Joe Biden should step down as president now.
		Duh!
		When Joe Biden was talking about not running again for re-election, every conservative was like, if you can't run for re-election, you can't be president.
		Ah, but one step at a time, folks.
		We don't want him to step down, do we?
		Kamala Harris, ooh, who does she choose as VP?
		Tim Walz.
		Kamala Harris becomes president, and then what?
		They appoint a vice president, so she chooses Walz, and then you've got Kamala Harris incumbent.
		She then says, it's going to be my day one right now as president, steals Trump's thunder, starts to enact policies that Trump says he wants, but doesn't actually get anything done because it's only an October surprise, and then once she gets elected, she doesn't do any of it.
		Here we go.
		The Daily Mail says, Joe Biden may have ended his re-election effort, but almost 6 in 10 voters think he should go further and stand down as president.
		The 81-year-old bowed to pressure last month and stepped aside as the Democratic nominee for the presidential election after enduring weeks of scrutiny following a disastrous debate performance.
		Now voters are wondering whether he is fit enough to lead the country.
		If he is not fit enough to run again.
		Are wondering that if he's not fit enough to lead the country, he has That's weird how they phrased it.
		A whopping 57% of likely voters polled by JL Partners said they believe the nation's oldest president should resign now.
		Those numbers include almost half of Democrats at 47%.
		Wow!
		Take a look at this.
		Who's the largest group?
		Republicans, 74%.
		Republicans should be the lowest.
		They should be saying, no, Joe, don't drop out.
		Everything he does with his bumbling, fumbling failures just reflects poorly on Kamala Harris, so Let it ride.
		Now, so, when you look at all voters, it's 57%.
		When you look at male and female, it's mostly the same.
		Mostly it's 57% say that he should stand down as president, and then the red is he should not stand down.
		There are more men who think he should stay than women, which is actually really interesting.
		18 to 29 year olds, 56% say leave.
		29 year olds, 56% say leave.
		30 to 49 say leave.
		That's interesting.
		30 to 49.
		Hey, that's where I'm at.
		That's my age bracket.
		We should get out.
		Non-graduates.
		It's all fairly comparable.
		Independent voters are at 52%, Democrats are at 46, Trump voters 73, RFK junior voters 68% say he should step down.
		That's interesting.
		You know, we had a really interesting argument the other day from one of our members on the TimCast discord.
		Become a member at TimCast.com if you'd like to call into the show.
		He made a great point.
		He said, I said, RFK should step down and endorse Donald Trump.
		And he said, no.
		RFK should stay in the race so that the far leftists vote for him because they don't want to vote for Kamala.
		That's interesting.
		It's an interesting argument, and we got to suss this one out.
		I don't have a good answer for you.
		Here's the question.
		If RFK Jr.
		is in the race, will he take more votes from Kamala Harris or Donald Trump?
		I guess the argument being made, and it's a good one, is that Donald Trump has a diehard base.
		Kamala Harris has cult members.
		Most moderates are probably leaning towards Donald Trump because of economic reasons.
	But then you've got elements of the left that don't want to vote for Kamala because of Israel.
	And so they might vote for RFK Jr.
	as a protest vote against the Democratic Party.
	It makes sense.
	If RFK Jr.
	drops out and endorses Trump, the far left just says, I guess it's Kamala.
	But I don't know.
	I don't know that they do.
	Because they don't like Israel.
	So they might just not vote for either of them.
	Jill Stein's still there.
	It's tough to say.
	It's a really interesting call.
	Rich Bear, as The People's Pundit said, RFK is taking from Trump.
	In which case, RFK Jr.
	is going to need to drop out.
	But I suppose if RFK Jr.
	comes out and gives some more far-leftist, wackaloon policy proposals, then it doesn't matter, right?
	The White House has already dismissed calls for him to resign as ridiculous.
	Karine Jean-Pierre, Biden's press secretary, said the President believed he could have completed a second term and had no intention of leaving the White House early, and he wants to finish the job that he started and delivering more historic results for the American people, she told reporters at the White House soon after Biden ended his election run.
	Even so, questions about Biden's age and fitness for office have dogged his three and a half years at the White House.
	They took on a new urgency last month when he froze up during his first campaign debate against Donald Trump on a stage in Atlanta.
	I bet in hindsight, hindsight being 2020, they really do regret that debate.
	Trump could have said, nah, I'm not debating Joe Biden, and it would have been a lot harder for him to pull out of the race.
	He watched slack-jawed at times when his opponent was speaking and seemed to lose his way when answering questions.
	Dude, he really did.
	The pictures of Biden just, like, standing there, like, with his mouth hanging open?
	Sad.
	Particularly brutal.
	Now, here we are.
	Cruz has predicted Harris will become the president.
	Interesting.
	I don't think he's wrong.
	Cruz predicted that Biden... Oh, there he is!
	There's the slack-jawed Joe Biden!
	We got that picture right there, and that's cnr.com.
	Cruz did predict this.
	He also predicted Biden would not be the nominee.
	To be fair, many of us predicted this.
	I said in September, I think it was September 13th, I took a screenshot of the video.
	It said, Biden will drop out.
	And I'm like, they're warning that he may.
	I'm saying, he can't be the nominee?
	How could he do it?
	That was in September.
	Well, ladies and gentlemen, Things are getting interesting.
	RFK Jr. tried to meet with Kamala Harris to propose a cabinet job.
	The independent presidential candidate reportedly reached out to the campaign to discuss dropping
	out and endorsing Harris.
	Really?
	I have.
	Kennedy sounds like a fun guy.
	Kennedy sounds like a fun guy.
	Doesn't sound like somebody who can win a presidency, but he sounds like a fun guy.
unidentified		What?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Is that a joke?
		Are you kidding me?
		What is this?
		Holy crap!
		team did not respond to the approach.
		In the past two weeks, Kennedy has apologized for an alleged sexual assault.
		What?
		Is it a joke?
		Are you kidding me?
		What is this?
		A woman who accused RFK Jr. of sexual assault says he apologized by text.
		Holy crap, how did I miss that story?
		He's been forced to explain why he staged the death of a bear cub in New York City Central
		Park and has had to deny eating a dog.
		Yo, RFK, you were invited to my parties.
		Just don't eat dogs.
		The staging the death of a bear cub thing is weird and illegal, but, you know.
		Also, the sexual assault thing, I didn't even know that happened.
		Maybe it doesn't sound fun, maybe it sounds creepy.
		Kennedy's attempt to meet with Harris comes after he met with Donald Trump during the Republican National Convention, reportedly to discuss a similar proposal.
		A video posted online on July 16th showed a phone call between Trump and Kennedy where the former president appeared to offer an opportunity for the pair to work together in the future.
		The Kennedy campaign did not respond to a request for comment.
		Earlier in the year, Kennedy was polling at around 10% nationally, but that has dropped to 5% over the past few months.
		That's right.
		The race is tightening up.
		This means that people who are saying, you know, you've got a primary, you had Joe Biden, nobody knew what was going on, and so people are like, eh, Kennedy.
		But now that things are tightening up and it's looking like Trump-Kamala, they're going to say, look, sorry, RFK Jr., not interested.
		When we think about the margins, excuse me, that states like Michigan, Wisconsin, any of those Midwestern states, were decided in the last election, every single vote is going to count.
		Emmett Riley, a professor of politics at African, of African and African-American studies, at Sewanee University, and the chair of, okay, I get it, told the Guardian last week, I hate when they do this, like, seriously, dude?
		This credentialism?
		You can just say a professor of politics at Sewanee University, bye!
		Geez.
		And so if it comes down to 30,000 votes, if it comes down to 5,000 votes, a small portion there for Kennedy would likely have a major impact on either Trump's ability to get to 270 or Kamala Harris's ability to get to 270.
		Here's what I think.
		I think RFK Jr.
		probably pulled more from Democrats when Joe Biden was the nominee.
		People did not like Joe Biden, and they were like, I'll take RFK, I guess.
		But now they've offered up Kamala Harris as a younger 60 years old.
		And she's 59, but you get the point.
		A lot of people are going to be like, I'll take it.
		Her brain works fine.
		And they don't like Donald Trump.
		RFK Jr.
		was the alternative to Joe Biden, but with Joe Biden dropping out, RFK is probably more an obstruction for Donald Trump.
		In which case, RFK Jr., you should drop out and endorse Donald Trump.
		Donald Trump will give you that position and is more likely to open up to your anti-Big Pharma positions.
		That's the opportunity.
		That's why I don't think it's good that he stays in the race.
		But if he does, I have more power to him.
		I like the guy.
		I think he's funny.
		And I think he's a wild dude.
		He's very serious about environmental toxins.
		Those are big issues for the right, and only a small issue for the left.
		The left doesn't really care about this stuff.
		Like, a little bit, but not really.
		It is the hippie, libertarian, right-wing element that are saying things like, don't eat seed oils.
		You know, what's the next thing they're getting on?
		I don't even know half the time.
		Don't eat seed oils!
		And then they're eating seed oils.
		But they try to avoid all this stuff.
		They try to be healthy.
		RFK Jr.
	represents that faction.
	If he endorses Donald Trump and says, If Donald Trump offers him a position at the EPA, or in some capacity of dealing with Big Pharma, RFK Jr.
	coming out and saying, Donald Trump may have gotten it wrong on COVID, and he may have gotten it wrong with Operation... I don't need to talk like that because people already don't like it.
	But he could say like, you got it wrong with Warp Speed, but now I'm coming in, and we're going to make sure that doesn't happen again.
	His numbers go up.
	Donald Trump recently came out and said they're not going to allow the lockdowns all over again.
	Okay, you need RFK, buddy.
	RFK Jr., Kamala Harris reportedly shot him down.
	So right now, what we're looking at is, Kamala's probably gonna be president.
	I think that's a strong probability.
	I think, uh, I think RFK Jr.
	should go for the Trump ticket.
	He should get a job at the Trump administration.
	Maybe he's hedging his bets and thinking Kamala might win.
	Fielding all of his options.
	We'll see.
	I'll leave it there.
	Smash the like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends.
	Head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member.
	And you can follow me on X and Instagram, at TimCast.
	Next segment will be up at 6 p.m.
	Let's talk about why people have gone insane.
	And why this woman is in an AT&T store pulling her pants down and making insane noises.
	People are asking.
	Dr. Deborah, uh, uh, Deborah Foshay says, what makes people do things like this?
	Yes, let me show you.
	And I'll break it down for you.
	I think it's a cyber attack from China.
	I really do.
	For everybody else hanging out, we'll get to your Super Chats now.
	And for everyone else, we'll see you at 6 p.m.
	We'll grab some of your Super Chats, and then I'll explain why this woman has pulled her pants down in an AT&T store, among many other insane things she's done.
	And it is...
	Yo, it's sad, dude.
	It's really sad how this woman is destroying her life and being tricked into doing it for no reason.
	Holy crap, man.
	Look, I'll save it.
	I'll save it.
	We're gonna go in the segment in a second.
	Let me read your superchats.
unidentified		All right.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Let's see.
		We got a couple superchats here.
		What's this?
		Zach Mattis says, Tim, have you seen Colors Don't Run featuring Laura Trump?
		Laura Trump?
		Song is awesome.
		I haven't.
		I'll check it out.
		Check it out.
		Mason Wolfe says, ever think about joining the guys over at the Unsubscribed Podcast?
		Who's that?
		Also, shout out to Theo Vaughn for the Bernie Sanders clip.
		That was Theo Vaughn.
		What do we have here?
		So, G8 says, have you seen the rumor going around RFK would drop out and support Harris?
		We pulled it up.
		We pulled it up.
		RFK denied Kamala's story on his Twitter.
		Oh, man, I wish I saw that.
		Really?
unidentified		Wow.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Uh, let me see if I can pull this one up.
		Well, kind of a bummer I didn't get that in the segment.
		Really?
		X.com, let's pull this one up.
		Uh, what do we have here?
		Wow, why can't I pull up RFK Jr.' 's X account?
		That's weird.
		You Google search it, it doesn't come up.
		Funny how they do that on Google, right?
		Man, I can't even pull up RFKJr on X. What's going on?
		There's too many of them.
		What's his user handle?
		Seriously?
		Does he not have one?
		Yeah, it's RobertKennedyJr.
		Would not come up.
		Wow, that's nuts.
		All right, what say you... Here we go.
		He says, VP Harris's Democratic Party would be unrecognizable to my father and uncle.
		I cannot reconcile it with my values.
		The Democratic Party of RFK and JFK was the party of civil liberties and free speech.
		VP Harris is the party of censorship, lockdowns, and medical coercion.
		Okay.
		I have no plans to endorse Kamala Harris for president.
		I do have a plan to defeat her.
		Wow!
		Bravo!
		I know I like this guy.
		Good for you, RFK.
		I like this guy.
		Excuse me.
		Let me grab a drink here.
		I'm coughing over here.
		All right, let's just grab another one.
		And then we'll talk about this woman pulling her pants down.
		I think you would like the book Beware of Chicken.
		You should check it out when you have time.
		Well, okay.
		All right, everybody.
		Let's jump to this segment.
		And I hope you enjoy it.
		So we got this tweet from Dr. Jebra Foshay.
		What makes people do things like this?
		Oh.
		I hope you enjoy watching this video.
		You won't.
		You're gonna cringe.
unidentified		Dick and Mikey yacht at AT&T, where everybody knows I have a pee-pee!
		Excuse me, excuse me.
		Yeah?
		You gotta put your stuff on and get out of here right now, please and thank you.
		But why?
		You have to get out of here.
		But I was dancing!
		I need you to get out of here, please and thank you, before I call the police.
		Not the police!
		Not the police!
		AHHHHH!
		Dick and Mikey Yacht at AT&T Where everybody knows
		I have a pee pee!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So why is she doing this you ask?
		this you ask.
		I believe that this is most likely a... There's two large probabilities.
		The one is that it's out my balls.
		People like watching this stuff, so they follow this woman and they do watch this stuff.
		The first thing I want to say is Dude, she's losing her mind over this algorithm.
		I will give her credit for this video right here, which I do respect.
unidentified		Hello, I'm 20, 23, we think everything is racist here.
		Hey look, it looks like I'm pregnant!
		That's too insensitive, dear.
		There are women who can't get pregnant, you might be triggering them.
		But first I'll need your pronouns, are they she, he, they, or them?
		Well, I don't want to be here anymore, this year can't take a joke, so don't you try to make me stick around, cause I would rather choke.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Oh, oh, you're not allowed to say that people struggle with self-harm, and if they see you make- Okay, so it's like, the video itself is kind of cringe, but the writing is actually fairly decent, in that, in this video, she's basically saying no matter what you do, trying to tell jokes, someone's gonna attack you, they're gonna call you, uh, you know, a bigot, an ableist, a racist.
		I actually like that one.
		But let me show you the real issue of why she pulled her pants down in an AT&T, and it's sad.
		It's sad as hell.
		Amber, if you see this, yo, let me explain this to you.
		I think it's important for you to see.
		You've got 518,000 followers on TikTok, a foreign-controlled platform that is algorithmically rewarding you for doing insane things like pulling your pants down in an AT&T store.
		And she's done it over and over and over again.
		These same cringe videos where she just repeatedly pulls her pants down.
		Why is she doing this?
		How do you go from making a rap about cancel culture?
		Or, I guess, I don't... I'm gonna find the date on this one.
unidentified		I don't wanna... Can I not play?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Just stop.
		Stop that for a second.
		So this was September of 2023.
		When she posted that one.
		I'm wondering when the rest of her videos are from, but we'll get into it.
		Okay?
		When you go to her YouTube, she has 58,000 subscribers.
		The videos, the last one she posted was seven months ago.
		It's got 23,000 views.
		Most of her videos only have a few hundred, maybe a thousand.
		Why?
		Her videos were not successful in the YouTube algorithm.
		Now that could just be YouTube saying, like, we don't like what you're doing, please stop.
		But hold on there a minute.
		Um, where are the videos of her pulling her pants down and making weird noises?
		Not here.
		She had Boomer vs. Millennial.
		But, uh, nobody is, uh...
		No, nobody's watching your stuff.
		You can see that she's trying to find different ways to get attention.
		Now let's jump over to Instagram, where she's doing a lot of these similar things.
		Guess what?
		16,800 followers.
		And these videos that she's posting, doing the weird things, 29 likes and 9 comments.
		It doesn't work.
		She keeps pulling her pants down in various places and making weird videos.
		But for some reason on TikTok, it does work.
		I'll tell you why.
		TikTok, in my opinion, and this is why there was a call to actually ban it, is rewarding behavior that causes social degradation.
		You're ruining your life, but so is everybody else, so what else can you say?
		Misery loves company.
		You'll all end up in the same pot.
		Let me play another video from her.
unidentified		I'm live right now at the grocery store.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So she went to the grocery store.
		She, that's not an eggplant, she's holding what looks like some kind of gourd, a squash of some sort, and then she pulls her pants down again.
		She's wearing shorts or whatever, like, I don't know, boxers?
		But, uh, this is it.
unidentified		I'm live right now at the grocery store!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
		And, uh, there you go.
		Fungal jungle with an arrow pointing down, and she's pulling her pants down again.
unidentified		I pooped!
		I pooped!
		I'm on live right now at the grocery store.
		Pooping!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Yo, this is just nuts.
		Okay, but I'll tell you this.
		There's, uh, there's probably these amount of people on TikTok who are like, ha, ha, because like, out my balls, you know, it's like, ha, look, look, she's in the girl, she's throwing her pants down.
		But I think there's a reason why on YouTube and on Instagram, nobody follows her.
		And she gets no views.
		But let's just go back in time.
		Let's go way back to the beginning.
		And you can see the evolution of how a person loses their mind.
		All the way down, all the way down.
		Let's go way back in time to the early stages.
		And, uh, man, we've gone way back.
		Hey, wait a minute!
		Look at these videos!
		These videos have less views, and she's not, um...
		She's not pulling her pants down in a grocery store.
		They are kind of weird.
		Maybe I could zoom out a little bit.
		It'll become easier to see.
		So, uh, here's just, you know, her doing comedy bits.
		And she did songs.
		You know, this one got a lot of views.
		It's Roll Call Video Whatever.
		And, uh, then at some point, she makes this video.
		Where she goes from making comedy songs like that one about 2023, and like here's another one, uh, 75,000 views?
		Probably not enough.
		So, uh, here you go.
		Here's this one, censored.
		Let's see if we can get to the, uh...
		We'll find the point in her life where she decided to pull her pants down, and it didn't start with her pulling her pants down and making weird noise and throwing things on the floor, it's just what she gets rewarded for doing, which is insane behavior.
		Help me protest live!
		And then you can see the views increase!
		So she's getting around, you can see her views are going up, some are good, 90,000, 100,000,
		and then she does this one, 180,000, 300, 300, 400, 400, 200, 700.
		She's standing outside of a pizza hut with a thing on her chest saying,
		She got a fake elf baby of some sort and her pants are half pulled down.
		The joke was probably that she was a vegan protesting Pizza Hut.
		And I can get trying to be trying to make jokes.
		And if people like it, sure.
		But again, it's not happening on other social media platforms.
		This stuff is considered weird to a lot of people.
		Maybe people like it.
		I don't believe it's real.
		So, after she does that, she does it several more times.
		This weird thing where she's out in front of stores, and then she's getting massive views for doing it.
		2.1 million views for having her pants half-pulled down.
		And then, over a long enough period of time, it begins to evolve in the content.
		She's getting more and more views.
		She's having massive success when her pants are pulled down, so she keeps doing it.
		Not all of her videos are like this.
		Eventually, she does get to the point where her pants are pulled down, and she just starts making more and more of this content.
		It's low-tier, easy to produce, standing out in front of stores, is working for her, so she keeps doing it.
		And then...
		There you go.
		Millions of views, nearly a million views, half a million, 2.2 million.
		She finds police cars, runs in front of them, and then stands in front of it like she's being arrested, continually starts making these weird, I'm-in-a-grocery-store-with-eggplants-making-weird-noises-no-longer-doing-songs, and just standing around half-naked.
		I think the half-naked thing works for, like, young guys who are into that, or people who have weird fetishes or whatever, watching them pull their pants down in public, It's not coherent comedy.
		It is very much ow my balls.
		And I will keep it simple for you.
		I think the reason that she's doing it is the reward she gets in follower count and likes.
		I think the reason she's getting rewarded because the TikTok algorithm is supporting deviant and degenerate behaviors.
		I'm going to tell you this.
		I've revised my stance on free speech.
		There is one group of people that I will say does not deserve any kind of free speech.
		No free speech for nuisance influencers.
	If you're a nuisance influencer, you get no free speech.
	I'm half kidding, but watch this guy.
	Let me show you this video that is also going viral.
	There's a guy on TikTok.
	This is what's going on with TikTok.
unidentified		Here's a guy.
		that they give it all oh well can I have more lobster or not here's a guy he's got several
		full lobsters on his plates oh well drop can I have more lobster or not
		I have to eat all this first.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Look at all of the lobsters he's brought to his table.
		He's got one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, 13.
		And then he's got one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, about
		13 or 14 lobster tails and bowls of butter.
		He's going up to the buffet and just loading up on it while filming himself doing it.
		Why?
		It's called nuisance influencing.
		That's what this woman is doing in the grocery stores, pulling her pants down.
		Nuisance influencing, bothering people and doing creepy things and getting rewarded by TikTok for doing it.
		Don't get me wrong, Twitch allows this too, and YouTube does to a certain extent.
unidentified		To be clear, the rules are that I have to finish a plate before I go back to the buffet.
		For the lobsters?
		Yes.
		We have a sign right over there.
		It says one per plate.
theo von ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
unidentified		It doesn't say you have to eat the plate before you come back, though.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		See what he's doing?
		It says you can have one lobster per plate.
		It's a buffet.
		They're being nice.
		And he goes, Dante, I gotta eat it.
		So he's putting one on a plate, going over, putting, and going back and forth.
unidentified		What was that?
		I wasn't even talking to you.
		Who are you?
		Who are you?
		I wasn't talking to you.
		Sir, will you just please...
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Look at these people taking pictures of it.
unidentified		The casino who be taking all y'all money has a problem with me taking some lobster all you can eat?
		Stop playing with me!
		So I'm here at the Palms in Vegas trying to put y'all on to the good spots, you know what I'm saying?
		And the manager comes over to my table like, um, excuse me, are you gonna eat all that?
		The rule said one piece per plate, so that's exactly what I was doing.
		I would get one piece, take it back to my table, and then go back and get another piece.
		Hey, listen, after all that, I ain't even gonna hold y'all.
		That lobster was busting!
		The butter has some seasoning that only $80 too?
		This deal is definitely worth it, but the way that they treated me made me want to leave immediately.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Look at this, and then he throws them all in the garbage.
		He throws it all in the garbage.
		Yo, that is wild, dude.
		This should be banned.
		People are making money off of doing this cringe... Where is it at?
		Here we go.
		This cringe... Uh-oh, TikTok's breaking.
		Did I break TikTok or did I break my computer?
		I think this should be banned.
		I don't think nuisance influencing should be allowed.
unidentified		There is a water spout in the middle of the produce section.
unidentified		You know I'm gonna do it.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Oh, seriously?
unidentified		Join my live to see what happens!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Nah, she won't.
unidentified		There is a water spout in the middle of the produce section.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, it's for produce.
		It's for cleaning off produce.
		Nuisance influencers, I do not believe, deserve free speech.
		You know, I'll correct that.
		Nuisance streaming is not free speech.
		It is... I don't know, it's... What would you call it, I guess?
		Disorderly conduct.
		Like, I can respect her criticizing and calling out cancel culture.
		I can respect her doing songs to be funny.
		I don't respect the nuisance broadcasting.
		Going to public areas, grabbing vegetables, and then doing this weird, disgusting, pants-pulling-down garbage.
		Everything else I think is totally fine.
		Look at this.
unidentified		Hey!
unidentified		I'm on live right now trying every fixture out at Lowe's.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		This is crazy. She climbed on top of a shelf.
		These things aren't designed to carry an extra hundred plus pounds of weight so you can sit in a toilet at a Lowe's.
		Nuisance stuff.
		I gotta be honest.
		I think that TikTok intentionally promotes these things because it's creating degenerate behavior that is bad for our economy and for our culture.
		Young people are watching this and they're thinking, if I wanna be famous, I gotta act like a psychopath.
		Surprise, surprise.
		It doesn't work on the American platforms.
		I think, to at least a certain degree, American companies are like, yeah, we don't wanna encourage this.
		TikTok doesn't care.
		So here you go.
		I feel bad for this woman, because she's clearly trying to do comedy, and the only platform that is propping her up is TikTok, which is not an American company.
		And then, you know what I think?
		I'll be completely honest.
unidentified		I'm on live right now at the grocery store!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		This is nuts.
		I don't think these are real views and likes.
		I could be wrong.
		I don't know.
		I think what's actually happening is that TikTok gives fake likes to people so that they think what they're doing is generating a positive reaction.
		I ask you this.
		I understand that TikTok is very popular.
		Instagram and YouTube are also very popular.
		YouTube is the second largest search engine, and it is one of the biggest social media... I think it's the biggest social media website.
		The biggest video platform.
		How come she's not getting any traction or attention on YouTube?
		Let's see how her shorts are doing.
		Maybe I'm wrong.
		Maybe her shorts are... Oh, look at this.
		33 views.
		71 views.
		Here's her with her pants down at a grocery store.
		94 views.
		It's not working on the large American platforms.
		Here she is standing naked with an American flag.
		She got 3,000.
		Congratulations, that one worked.
		This one with her pants down got 20,000.
		But the rest of them...
		Just not working.
		Why is TikTok working?
		Where is the organic reach?
		I ask you.
		It ain't there.
		Normally you can see a correlation between someone's presence on social media across all of social media.
		Take a look at me, for instance.
		On YouTube, between my three channels, I guess it's like 4.4 million subscribers.
		There's some overlap, so it might be actually like 3 million unique or something.
		On Twitter, I have 2.2 million.
		And on Instagram, I have 400,000.
		Instagram typically gets, you know, when it comes to politics and stuff, you have less.
		X, I said Twitter, X is actually a little bit higher.
		But there is a correlation.
		If you watch the podcast on iTunes and Spotify, Timcast IRL is in the top 200.
		It fluctuates.
		I think our peak position was top 35, but it usually floats around, like, between 100 and 200.
		Really depends on if people are watching on YouTube or iTunes.
		But there's a direct correlation across the board.
		Why?
		If people actually know who you are, and they like the content you produce, they will find it on other platforms.
		People will talk about you.
		The Washington Post writes about me.
		I'm not making content where I rip my pants off and do weird things.
		I'm talking about news.
		I've had people say, like, why don't you do more segments like this, that, or otherwise?
		I talk about what I care about.
		I don't talk about what I think will just generate tons of traffic.
		Now you look at an individual like this.
		She has no followers anywhere else.
		There's no linked correlation.
		It makes no sense.
		TimCast gets banned from TikTok, and so we make new accounts, and we have relatively few followers there.
		I think it's like, I think we were in the tens of thousands, not particularly active after we got banned.
		How is it inverted?
		That on this one foreign-controlled platform, she's got half a million, but on the rest of the platforms, it's very few with no views.
		In my opinion, it's probably fake.
		Or they prop it up.
		This girl is cray, are you Jojo Siwa?
		So, a lot of these comments, people are sharing it, are you okay, are you okay, emoji.
	How many of these comments are bots, I wonder?
	Hit the nail on the head.
	I actually think the emoji ones are fake.
	I think what TikTok does is intentionally reward bad and psychotic behavior, so these people think they're building up big followings and getting attention, but all they're really doing is burning themselves to the ground.
	Thumbs down, emojis, I don't think it's real.
	Genuinely do not believe it's real.
	Maybe.
	Maybe I'm wrong.
	It really could be they are real people, and the algorithm is just promoting psychotic behavior intentionally.
	But I tell you this, if people really liked it, Amber, they'd follow you on other platforms, and there'd be a direct correlation between your following on TikTok and other platforms.
	So for all these creators who are like, I've got a million followers on TikTok, but no followers anywhere else!
	Have you ever stopped to ask yourself why that is?
	Why don't people follow you on other platforms?
	Even Dylan Mulvaney has a lot of followers on other platforms.
	Dylan Mulvaney got a lot of press.
	It's because it's fake, in my opinion.
	Now apparently she's in West Virginia.
unidentified		Stop giving West Virginia a bad name, lady!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Maybe, uh, maybe we'll interview her on The Culture War, and we'll talk about this, like, I wonder where in West Virginia she's showing up and doing this ridiculous stuff.
unidentified		I'm on live right now at the grocery store!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Oh, dude, this is so sad.
		Like, what are your friends and family gonna think?
		You know, when your parents watch this, are they like, wow, I'm so proud of what you've become.
		Look, if you're a comedian, And you make comedy videos and you're doing stand-up, people are going to be like, wow, you're a comedian.
		Okay.
		If you're, if you're pulling your pants down in front of a Walgreens and you're like, yeah, but I get a million views.
		If you're acting like you're defecating with your pants down in front of people at a grocery store, you are like, man, just so brutal.
		Cilantro Industrial Complex Super Chat saying it's got to be kids watching this stuff.
unidentified		Yup.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		And that's why she's giggling and acting like a child.
		But this is creepy stuff to show to kids.
		It's just messed up cringe.
		YouTube got rid of the stuff that was targeting kids this way.
		I'll stress this one more time.
		One more time, dude.
		If there's no correlation in your following across social media platforms, you're not really generating a following.
		All you're doing is making this your legacy.
		Hey man, but I guess I can say power to her for Not feeling shame, I guess?
unidentified		I don't know.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Maybe we need it.
		I'm gonna wrap it up there.
		Next segment's coming up tonight at 8 p.m.
		over at YouTube.com slash TimCastIRL.
		Thanks for hanging out, everybody.
		Smash the like button.
		You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.
		You can become a member at TimCast.com to support our work.
		For the rest of you watching live, we'll go to your Super Chats.
		Thanks for hanging out, and we'll see you all next time.
		We'll grab a couple more here.
		We got a few more minutes.
		And, uh, let's see.
		What's-her-name says, I finally got TikTok and it's terrifying.
		I thought people were overreacting, but it's the most toxic, destructive thing in existence.
		It should be banned.
		Seriously.
		Maybe she really is getting the views, but the algorithm is propping up this degenerate insanity.
		Maybe that's the case.
		And this guy also, with the lobsters, also on TikTok.
		Bro, what are you doing?
		It's because it went viral.
		He knows he's being a nuisance, he's causing problems, and it's gonna get him views.
		And then he throws them all in the garbage.
		Yo, what?
		They treated me like trash and then he's like, oop, and throws it all in the trash.
		Man!
		Ban these people!
		This shouldn't... Dude.
		You get the point.
		Yep, you get the point.
		Mason Wolvey says, Unsub is Donut Operator and Eli Double Tap Show.
		Oh, shout out, right on.
		Donut Operator's rad.
		We gotta have him on IRL.
		We should have him skate!
		Donut Operator, come skate the park!
		We're gonna fly you out.
		We should get him out of here.
		Joshua029 says, Trump's 2016 campaign manager just got rehired.
		That's what I'm talking about, baby!
unidentified		Let's go!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Where's Steve Bannon?
		Oh, he's in prison.
		Yeah.
		Free Bannon!
		We'll grab a couple more here.
		Nixie says, if she was a man, she would be on a predator list.
		No joke!
		You can't pull your pants down in public like that!
		I'm surprised she's not getting criminally charged, seriously, for pulling her pants down in public.
		I guess the argument is she's wearing underwear or whatever.
		Man.
		Alright, I think we hit all them superchats.
		Yeah.
		Growhunt says, downvote that segment so Tim doesn't post any more like it.
		Well, uh, sometimes I do, uh, cultural segments.
		But you don't want me criticizing TikTok?
		Gonna do it.
		Yeah, Joni said, uh, Bernie Sanders just said Democrats backstab, and then he was like, put up fronts with Joe, and, and I know Kabbalah, and, uh, you know.
		Congratulations, dude.
		You reap what you have sown.
		My friends, smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with all your friends!
		This is the new morning show we've been doing for the past couple of weeks since the RNC.
		It's more fun to go live for two hours.
		There is an inverse correlation between the total amount of viewers, but the total watch time has gone up.
		So by doing the morning shows, when I break it up into four segments, one viewer becomes four views.
		So it's better monetarily, but the live show is more fun.
		More fun to do.
		So I think the only thing I really need probably is a live producer who's real time watching the news for breaking stories.
		And then I think it would be really cool to do guests.
		If we're doing the morning show, because we can still do the four segments, but we can throw in a guest segment where we interview somebody.
		And that'd probably be a lot of fun.
		Probably a good idea.
		We need a producer for that.
		So far, the show switching to live hasn't upped revenue enough to the point where I'd be able to do something like that.
		But we'll figure it out.
		Yeah, we'll figure it out.
		Smash the like button.
		Become a member at timcast.com.
		We will be back tonight at 8 p.m.
		over at youtube.com slash timcast IRL.
		Tonight's guest is Danny Polishchuk.
		Super excited.
		Danny's always fun and funny.

▲