All Episodes
June 24, 2024 - Tim Pool Daily Show
01:09:25
CNN PANICS, Cuts Trump Press Sec Mic ON AIR After Getting Called Out For BIAS In Trump Biden Debate

BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/ Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/ Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL CNN PANICS, Cuts Trump Press Sec Mic ON AIR After Getting Called Out For BIAS In Trump Biden Debate Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Participants
Main voices
t
tim pool
01:05:46
Appearances
Clips
j
josh hammer
00:32
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
tim pool
Become a member at Timcast dot com by clicking join us to support the work we're doing and to get access to the uncensored Timcast IRL call in show Monday through Thursday at 10 p.m.
You don't want to miss it.
Now, let's get into the news.
In just a few days, Donald Trump and Joe Biden will be debating in a CNN hosted debate.
And already many people are saying CNN is afraid.
One of my favorite headlines coming out of the AP is that, Can Joe Biden perform?
And can Donald Trump be boring?
And I'm like, Wow!
That's a headline.
They expect Joe Biden to fail, and they expect Donald Trump to entertain.
I think that is a reasonable assessment.
But now we've got questions about whether or not Joe Biden will be hepped up on goofballs, as we all suspect.
And there is some speculation that he's on uppers.
And I think that's a fair assessment.
I mean, when even the AP is saying, can this guy really perform?
Well, they got to be giving him something, right?
Well, here we go, my friends.
The story this morning, uh, happened this morning.
CNN cuts off interview with Trump press secretary for trashing debate moderator.
I take issue with that headline.
I don't believe that it was trashing the debate moderator.
It was pointing out that Jake Tapper, who's going to be, the presumption is he's moderating, has compared Trump to Hitler on many occasions.
Now, how do you expect of a fair debate if that's the case?
Now look, if someone asked me to moderate a Trump-Biden debate, I think it's fair for me to be like, why?
I think Joe Biden's brain don't work and I've insulted him.
But you gotta get somebody who's like not in the spotlight, who's just kind of like, yeah, you know, let's try and be fair about this.
I think it's reasonable to say if I'm biased and I don't like Joe Biden, I don't moderate a debate.
But here we go.
Wait to see this video.
This is actually hilarious.
CNN cuts off interview with Trump press secretary for trashing debate moderator.
This is Cassie Hunt abruptly ending a live interview with Trump's press secretary Caroline Leavitt on Monday.
After the spokesperson questioned a moderator in the upcoming debate, Hunt had asked Leavitt what to expect from Joe Biden out of the first live televised presidential debate of 2024, scheduled June 27th.
This one's going to be fun.
We're doing a watch party, commentary, and laugh riot here at TimCast IRL.
In reply, Levitt said, well, first of all, it takes someone five minutes to Google Jake Tapper, Donald Trump, to see that Jake Tapper has consistently, and Hunt interrupts, says, I'm going to stop this interview if you continue to attack my colleagues.
Attack.
That's pathetic.
That's really sad.
CNN is so desperate.
When Levitt responded, I am stating facts your colleagues have stated in the past, Hunt cut her off and ended the interview.
Hunt later posted an ex about the exchange saying, you come on my show, you respect my colleagues.
Period.
unidentified
I love it.
tim pool
Well, I have the video for you and we got the responses.
Jack Posobiec tweeted this out.
This is the clip from the show.
Breaking.
CNN host, at Cassie, cuts off Trump spokeswoman.
Carolyn Leavitt, the second she brings up Jake Tapper spending years comparing Trump to Hitler.
This is a preview of how CNN will act during the debate.
Oh boy.
44 seconds for your enjoyment.
unidentified
It would take someone five minutes to Google Jake Tapper, Donald Trump, to see that Jake Tapper has consistently- Ma'am, we're going to stop this interview if you're going to keep attacking my colleagues.
Ma'am, I'm going to stop this interview if you continue to attack my colleagues.
I would like to talk about Joe Biden and Donald Trump, who you work for.
If you are here to speak on his behalf, I am willing to have this conversation.
I am stating facts that your colleagues have stated in the past.
Now, I'm sorry, guys, we're going to come back out to the panel.
Caroline, thank you very much for your time.
You are welcome to come back at any point.
She is welcome to come back and speak about Donald Trump.
And Donald Trump will have equal time to Joe Biden when they both join us now at next early later this week in Atlanta for this debate.
Wow.
tim pool
You say she got all flustered and was like, join us now for later and this week.
It's kind of wild.
Carolyn Leavitt didn't do anything.
She's like, Jake Tapper called Trump Hitler, and then she's like, if you dare attack my colleagues, I will end this.
And she's like, I'm just saying, that's it.
Now, anyway, Carolyn tried to move on.
But here's the real issue.
You wonder why something like this happens?
CNN is terrified.
Their ratings are in the gutter.
Actually, let's do this.
You know, I haven't done this in a while, but this, uh, you know, we could do this.
Adweek.
What do we got here from Adweek?
Friday, June 14th's ratings.
And, uh, let's see if we can get the... No, I think Adweek could've tried to block me from it.
Alright, well, I can see it right here.
Oh my God!
Holy crap, if this... Take a look at this.
Key demographic viewership for their primetime audience.
This is absolutely insane.
Ladies and gentlemen, I gotta point this one out.
Jake Tapper, 74,000.
74,000.
unidentified
Holy crap.
tim pool
I didn't realize it was that bad.
Look at this, 9pm CNN, 56,000 people.
Yo!
What?!
unidentified
Wow!
tim pool
TimCast IRL, it's like 3.2 million across all of our metrics.
That's absolutely insane.
I don't know about... Wow, man.
It's a different format, to be fair, right?
So because we are VOD, Video On Demand, versus live, we're gonna get better play.
But we do... Wow, that's absolutely nuts.
We are beating their primetime numbers.
So, when we're... Let me do some quick math.
When we're live, I think...
At night live, we do about 300k predominantly key demographic viewers on Timcast IRL, but it's split up over two hours.
Now, most of it is the first hour and a half because the last half hour is the Super Chats, so for about an hour and a half, We're getting around 300k, and yeah, I remember when it was like, I'd pull up CNN's ratings and it would be 500, 600, or millions.
Now to be fair, to be fair, you take a look, total live viewership, and we can see that it's comparable, it's comparable, right?
It's better than us, it's better than us.
I think in the long term, because we're on-demand podcast, We're gonna do way better.
You know, so the source gets 417,000 viewers in all age groups, which means, yeah, that's people over the age of 55.
55 and older.
Your average audience, I think, is like 65.
Key demo matters.
No, no, no, hold on, hold on.
That's for money.
That's for making money, which indicates this is the end of cable news, including Fox News, including Fox News.
I mean, Gutfeld, he's getting, what is this, Friday night?
260,000 in the Key Demo.
That's fantastic.
That's great.
I think it's indicative of... I think it's 2 million in the older age group.
Or this is for any age.
That includes the Key Demo as well.
This means 10 more years, these networks will have zero viewership.
They're already going to be struggling with ads.
And I mean, no disrespect to elderly people, but when you're retired and you're on a budget, You're not spending as much money as someone who's in their 30s, has a family, is trying to buy a house.
Maybe they want to get their windows redone with renewal by Anderson, because they do commercials on Fox all the time, right?
But that's mostly going to be targeting older people who are on fixed incomes and budgets.
When these older people pass on, average age is 65, so we're talking like 10-15 years.
No disrespect, it's just the reality.
They're not going to be able to sustain these networks on these ridiculously low numbers.
I'd be curious about their early morning numbers, but let's just be real.
If their primetime shows are getting this low, what do you think?
What do you think their early morning Monday show is going to be getting?
unidentified
$10,000?
tim pool
$20,000?
Maybe in all age groups, $100,000?
That's absolutely nuts.
Well, MAGA tears it to CNN after Trump press secretary cut off, afraid.
Everyone knows the meme of Neil Patrick Harris putting his hand on the giant bug from Starship Troopers and saying, it's afraid!
Everyone loves it.
Make America Great Again activists have slammed CNN for, we get it, we get it, but let's see, uh, what do we got here?
Rich Zoli, a Philadelphia radio presenter, who's interviewed Trump in the past, said, now that's just rude, CNN, throwing Carolyn Leavitt off like that?
Coward news network, oof!
When asked what to expect of Biden, this is what she mentioned, is that all they really have to offer?
One guy said one thing?
Well, okay, we'll take it.
I mean, obviously, this is true.
But here we go, ladies and gentlemen.
I love this headline.
Key questions ahead of high-stakes presidential debate.
This operates under the assumption that Biden can't perform and that Trump can't be boring!
I love it!
Trump can't be boring.
He just can't be.
The dude is, like, I don't know how to explain Donald Trump, but you get it, you know.
X Factor, they call it.
Whatever that is, Trump walks into the room and everyone is trying to run up to him and talk to him.
Yo, it's the weirdest thing.
It's the weirdest thing to be, you know, I mentioned this, I went to Mar-a-Lago, you know, a month ago or so.
Was it a little bit more than a month ago now, I guess?
unidentified
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms 4 America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms 4 America has the exclusive VIP meet-and-greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet and greet tickets.
See you on the tour.
tim pool
Bye bye.
I'm not one of those guys who's going to run up to somebody and be like, you know, try and shake everybody's hand and beg.
But the amount of people that want to meet this man, he walks in the room and like a magnet, everybody is just being sucked over to him.
And he knows it.
That's who he is.
And they all want to talk to him.
Here's the weirdest thing.
What can Trump do for you?
This is the honest question I have about this gravitas.
For what reason do you want Trump to know that, like, you bought a new car or that you're working on a new project?
Like, what do you think is going to happen?
I mean, this is an honest question.
When the people rush up to him and they're like, I just want to let you know I'm a big fan.
I work in, you know, water desalination and this plant.
It's like, great.
That's awesome.
Thank you.
It's like they just want Trump to know.
They need him to know that they're working on something.
Because there's something there.
I don't get it.
Me, I don't get it.
But I guess people really just are drawn to this man.
He cannot be boring.
I mean, he could try to be boring, but I kind of feel like if Trump went on the debate stage and just stood there and made a face, people would be laughing.
Like, I don't know how he does it.
Here we go.
Here we go.
This is what the AP has to say.
Rarely, if ever, has one candidate in a presidential debate had so much material to use against the other.
Oh my.
Republican Donald Trump has been convicted of 34 felony counts with serious charges and three other indictments still pending, as President Trump nominated three of the justices who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, creating a backlash even in conservative-led states.
And his sweeping second-term plans include promises of retribution against political enemies in both parties.
Certainly sounds exciting.
Yet the big question for President Joe Biden, fairly or not, is whether he has the physical and mental capacity at 81 years old to press the case against Trump.
Perhaps nothing matters more than the level of energy and strength the Democratic incumbent projects on stage.
I gotta say, I gotta say, this Thursday 8 p.m.
present their opponent with tremendous opportunity and risk.
They will face a huge national audience that will include many people tuning into their
2020 rematch for the first time, and who won't see another debate until September, magnifying
each success or mistake.
It's going to be fun.
We're going to have to make the popcorn.
And I believe we'll be joined by Alex Stein, primetime live on Timcast IRL.
At least that's who we have slated so far.
And the rest of the Timcast crew to watch and comment on the debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
Certainly will be fun.
Oh boy.
Can Biden perform?
I'm going to go ahead and say no, but I always, this is like the eighth time I've shouted out this meme.
Somebody tweeted when they, okay, so CNN tweeted out, We are going to see, they said, debate Thursday 27th.
Someone responded with, we are about to see the Manhattan Project of psychoactive stimulants.
And it's just like, yes.
Whatever the government's been cooking up to keep this guy functioning, he's gonna be hepped up on goofballs.
Biden's seeming low bar for success has been created in part by the 78-year-old Trump and his Republican allies, who have relentlessly mocked the Democratic president for apparent stumbles connected to his age for years.
Trump's allies have questioned whether Biden can even stay awake and stand up for the entire 90 minutes.
Democrats are hopeful that Biden can bring the same energy he did in the State of the Union address earlier in the year.
But a face-off on live television against an opponent who delights in verbal combat is very different from a scripted speech before Congress.
Biden's team is aware that he cannot afford to have a bad night with the nation watching.
This is why they're gonna be cutting off Trump's mic.
Those are the rules.
They're gonna cut his mic off.
How much do you want to bet they won't do the same thing to Joe Biden?
This whole thing is designed to be rigged against Trump.
You know, maybe this, I don't think CNN will be fair, but maybe this, with CNN's ratings in absolute gutter, you see people like Chris Cuomo desperately trying to redeem themselves in, you know, external space outside of CNN, going on Patrick, Bad Dave, and things like that, talking with Dave Rubin.
CNN may be so desperate, they may be thinking, if we give Trump a fair shot at this, we might actually get some audience back, and it's too bad, because they could, but now with this Cassie Hunt thing, She should have let Carolyn Leavitt say that Tapper called Trump Hitler.
And then she could have been like, well, I guess people have their opinions.
We'll see if Jake can do a fair job.
We'll press him to try.
That's the appropriate response.
No one's falling for this.
And here's the thing.
They don't want their audience to see someone point out that they will not do a good job with this debate, that they have been biased, and that there's reason to suspect this will be illegitimate.
And I think we can all agree that is very likely.
That is very likely going to be the case.
It's CNN will not be fair.
But the next big question outside of whether or not Joe Biden's brain works is can Trump be boring?
They say, having already locked up his base, Trump has an opportunity with persuadable swing voters and moderates who fueled Biden's victory four years ago and now express concerns about both candidates.
But to win over the so-called double haters, Trump cannot simply lean into the red meat talking points, red meat talking points, personal insults and conspiracy theories that typically dominate his public appearances.
Instead of more talk of retribution or lies about the U.S.
election system, he'll need to offer an optimistic vision for the future and a clear contrast with Biden on traditional kitchen table issues like health care and education.
He was widely panned for his outbursts in the first 2020 debate with Biden, badgering the then-Democratic nominee and repeatedly interrupting him.
Their second debate took a milder tone and focused on the sharply different governing visions.
In short, Trump needs to be somewhat boring on Thursday night.
Can he stay disciplined?
Some allies are hopeful.
History may suggest otherwise.
Navigating the criminal records, oh boy.
Trump's extraordinary legal baggage creates opportunity and risk for both candidates on stage.
Biden's campaign has signaled an increasing willingness to lean into Trump's criminal record in recent days.
But aside from a few jabs, Biden himself has largely distanced himself from Trump's prosecutions to avoid the appearance of political interference.
Trump, who has been alleging for years without evidence that Biden is responsible for prosecuting him, won't make it easy for the President to toe that line.
Recent polling shows that about half of U.S.
adults approve of Trump's New York conviction, and if voters don't think the specific convictions are troublesome, Trump's attempt to conceal an alleged affair with a porn actress is hardly bumper-sticker material.
Meanwhile, Biden is aware that Trump may go after his son, Hunter, as the then-President did on the debate stage four years ago.
Hunter Biden was recently convicted on three felony charges related to the purchase of a gun while allegedly being addicted to drugs.
Trump has also raised questions about Hunter Biden's foreign business dealings when his father was vice president.
Muted mics and moderators, oh boy.
As is often the case, the moderators and the ground rules will shape the debate's outcome.
Blah, blah, blah.
We get it, we get it.
Biden and Trump will debate at a CNN studio in Atlanta with no audience.
There will be no opening statements.
Each candidate's microphone will be muted, except when it's his turn to speak.
This is not even a debate!
This is why Tim Kast's IRL does not do videoconferencing.
Because you do video conferencing, it's hard to rebut and have a hard conversation.
So, you know, if someone's talking, and they say, like, you want other people to be able to interrupt.
And a lot of people are like, don't interrupt, don't interrupt!
This is the entire point.
Conversations don't work very well when it's a two-second delay over a Skype or a Zoom, and someone says, here's my opinion, with a pause, and the person says, okay, well now here's my opinion, and there's a pause.
It's like, dude, What you want is for someone to say something, they make their point, and then someone goes, yeah, yeah, yeah, but hold on, but hold on, and then someone else jumps in.
Like that, I know it might sound like a cacophony sometimes, but that actually is the raw of the conversation that you want to see.
It's true.
That's why a lot of people don't like the, you know, you can do Zoom and Skype, but it's hard because there's that slight delay.
IRL is always better in real life.
With them cutting off the mics, I don't see it being as entertaining or as like an actual debate.
I just don't see it.
But we'll see, we'll see.
unidentified
Rep.
tim pool
Ronny Jackson, echoing Trump, cast doubt on Biden's upcoming debate performance.
Jackson, Republican from Texas, who was Trump's White House physician until 2018, baselessly suggested that Biden might use performance-enhancing drugs.
I love NBC because they're so full of it.
Baselessly.
I'm gonna let that one stew for a minute.
Come on.
Even Democrats know this dude's not functioning that well.
Okay, let's not play these games.
Right?
Biden likely will be using performance-enhancing drugs.
That's just it.
Come on.
Well, let's take a look.
Let's take a look.
There is still this question.
This is from Trib Live.
unidentified
S.E.
tim pool
Cupp says, Biden Replacement Theory, Fact or Fever Dream?
This is from a few days ago.
This is from Friday.
And she mentions, Democrats are still stuck in denial and bargaining.
They're offering up speculative, baseless, and in some cases, delusional hypotheticals to soothe their anxious minds.
Talk of replacing Biden with someone like Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer or California Governor Gavin Newsom started way back in 2022.
I don't know what happens.
I don't know that they replaced Joe Biden.
But a lot of people think this is it.
This is the moment that they're going to have to... it's make or break.
If Biden can't get the job done on stage, he's done.
He will be replaced.
We've got this, uh, the latest polls.
RCP still has Trump up .9, so he's improved by .1.
And then we have this from 538, actually showing Biden taking the lead with 0.3 up.
So, hard to know for sure.
I don't know that I trust 538.
There's some polls they don't use that RCP does.
But in their simulation of what we can expect to happen, Who is favored to win the 2024 presidential election?
Well, it goes back and forth, but right now, they're saying there's one tie.
Oh, there's three instances where there's a tie.
Biden wins 50.
Trump wins 49.
I don't know if you can trust 538, but we will see.
In the meantime, if this is how CNN approaches this, That they're going to be shutting off microphones because they don't want people to hear the truth?
That their network has accused Trump of being like, at the very least, of being a modern Hitler?
We will see, we will see.
How many of you are actually confident?
I wonder.
Alright, but we'll see.
Next segment's coming up at 1pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
josh hammer
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the
unprecedented lawfare debilitating and affecting the 2024 presidential election.
We do all that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
It's America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
tim pool
The fight that has just kicked off, the Ten Commandments in schools.
Well, Donald Trump is endorsing the idea of putting the Ten Commandments in schools and many other places.
The ACLU has already leveled a legal challenge against a Louisiana law requiring the commandments go up in all publicly funded classrooms.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Cold Civil War.
The culture war, as many of us call it.
Here's the question.
Should the left be allowed to put up images from the progress pride flag, or images of the progress pride flag, which is an ideological symbol, not just some we-love-everyone statement.
It is an ideological symbol with stripes and colors that represent certain behaviors and morals.
Is that any different from the Ten Commandments?
Well, my friends, here's the issue.
The left would argue.
The ACLU would argue.
It is viewpoint discrimination to ban the pride flag.
And to put the Ten Commandments in the schools is also discrimination.
Well, to be fair, requiring it in the schools perhaps may be discriminatory because they don't require anything else.
But this is the issue you get with men on the left who would argue.
Outright, you cannot put the 10 commandments in schools, and they will put pride flags in schools.
Why?
Because morals over principles.
Now, one way of putting it, but I think the real issue is that there's underlying principles that we don't actually consider when we're discussing what our morals are, and our morals are informed by our principles.
A lot of what we see on the left will be the implication that you are not adhering to your stated principles of freedom when you challenge them.
Yet, they certainly don't.
We know this.
They say, free speech for me, but not for thee.
And now here we are.
Now, I'm not super concerned with Donald Trump saying there should be Ten Commandments in schools.
That's his opinion.
He's allowed to have it.
And so be it.
But where does it bring us?
Brian Krasinstein with the Philosophical Debate.
Now, Krasenstein is, I wouldn't call him the smartest guy in the world, Brian, if you're listening, but I would say he's a sophist, and he's the kind of guy who would endorse or oppose a candidate if offered the right amount of money.
I'd be willing to bet that if you went to the Krasensteins and offered them a million dollars, they'd be MAGA personalities in two seconds.
Brian tweeted this.
Hey everyone, I've got great news.
We will be pushing for the five pillars of Islam to be posted in every single classroom across America.
I'm so excited because I know that my conservative friends will be for this.
How excited are you about the initiative, MAGA?
This is great, right?
I'm just going to come right out and say it.
A sophist degenerate trying to play upon my morals and principles means literally nothing to me.
Your boos mean nothing.
I've seen what makes you cheer.
That's quite literally it.
Your point is garbage.
But, I would say this.
Many on the left, many liberals, many low-order thinkers, first-order thinkers, they're gonna go, haha, see, you know, you want the Ten Commandments in the schools, but, you know, you don't want the Pillars of Islam because you're a hypocrite, and if you want this, then why not that?
And it's like, um, Christians want Christian stuff in schools.
Next question.
Like, on the surface, it's really, really simple, right?
People who follow the Ten Commandments do not want the Pillars of Islam in school.
Thank you, and have a nice day.
There's no question of principles.
There's no question of hypocrisy.
There's a question of the moral foundation of an individual in pursuing what they desire.
So, if their moral foundations are in the Ten Commandments and not the Pillars of Islam, then they will advocate for, at a legal level, every step of the way, the Ten Commandments and not the Pillars of Islam.
Brian, I hope that helps.
But let's do this.
I'd like to dive into a deeper conversation.
People like Brian don't quite understand, between morals and principles, how principles inform morals and what your principles actually are.
And this is where it gets really interesting, because people don't actually understand.
Maybe a deep conversation or podcast could help them realize, but a lot of people get this wrong.
First of all, I understand the point you're attempting to make.
I really do.
I do not think that religion belongs in public schools, and if anyone wants to ask me why, I'm an open book.
However, comparing Islam to the Christian faith is ludicrous.
Biblical teachings spread love and truth.
Islam teaches to remove the heads of those who oppose them.
Well, I would say that Islam as a religion I don't agree with that.
Maybe the Hadith and the practices culturally do.
They do.
Brian responds, both religions teach love.
Both religions also push for horrible punishment on those who don't follow the religion if you read the Bible or Quran.
And Sarah Fields says, I have read both and you do not know what you are talking about.
I will defer to Sarah in that regard, but I will say this.
Brian Krasenstein, wanting the pillars of Islam in schools.
Alright, let's talk about morals, principles, and I'll start with a really simple one.
A question that shows you the moral divergence of the left and the right.
Should the government intervene to prevent medical malpractice against a child?
That's the question.
And you've heard me ask this question before, so for those that are fans of the show, you already know where this is going.
I will elaborate.
If a doctor prescribes a treatment to a child and the parents object to that prescription and say, you cannot do this, should the government be allowed to intervene and prevent the parents from blocking that treatment?
Here we go.
Let's say the child has cancer.
A really, really safe to remove cancer.
There's a tumor growing on him, and the doctor's like, this thing can be removed right now.
You give us a couple hours, safe procedure to remove this tumor.
If you don't, and it metastasizes, it spreads, it could become deadly, fatal, malignant.
Okay.
The parents say, no, we don't want none of your modern medical mumbo-jumbo.
You're lying to us and we don't know what this is all about.
So we here object.
And the doctor's like, look, he's got a tumor on the side of his neck.
We can show you the x-rays.
We can show you the proof.
If we remove it now, he's done.
He's good for life.
It could be done very easily.
And they're like, no, we object.
Let's just say, for the sake of argument, It is a fact.
The child has a 100% mortality rate in the next six months unless this tumor is removed.
And it can be removed safely and easily with no risk, zero risk.
But the parents refuse should the state intervene and say the child is getting the treatment to save its life.
It's a tough question, right?
Some people might not agree.
Some people say, no, the parents ultimately decide.
Because that's a principle of government non-intervention.
Most reasonable people, most people, I say being reasonable, would say, yeah, if some hippy-dippy parents are like, let's put it this way, they put their kid on a vegan diet, and the kid is dying, and the doctor says, you cannot eat soy, and nothing but soy, you will die.
Okay?
Should the government intervene to feed that child?
Vegan diet?
Give the kid a steak!
A lot of people would say, yes, the state should intervene.
I'm of the opinion the state should intervene.
I am not a big L libertarian.
I believe that community exists for a reason, and if there are psychopath parents who are going to harm their kids, the state should intervene.
The next question.
You say yes.
Now here's the problem.
The principle is government, non-intervention, and the rights of parents, right?
Let's talk about the morals there.
There's no easy answer on the principle of should the government intervene, because what if the child says, I'm depressed, and the doctor says, then the only prescription is a sex change operation?
No, then the state should not intervene.
But hold on.
They're the same thing.
Doctors prescribing what they say will save the life of a child.
Now you say, but Tim, that's absurd.
Cutting the kid's balls off isn't going to save his life.
That's a weird surgery.
That's nothing.
Agreed.
But the doctor disagrees.
And that's the point.
If the parents disagree with the doctor, when is it acceptable and when is it not for the state to intervene?
The underlying principle here actually is the betterment of the child.
However, the betterment of the child is formed by our morals and the things we believe to be true.
Thus, we come to Morals vs. Principles, something Bryan Crasenstein does not understand.
That is to say, if you came to someone and said, should religious text be allowed in schools?
The question is not yes or no.
The question is not it's free speech or not.
The question is, which religion?
Because our principles can only inform so far.
If our principle is, children must be protected from bad, from predators, from harm, and should be given information that benefits them.
The principle is the betterment of children.
Then a Christian is going to believe the Ten Commandments will benefit them, and Muslims will believe the Five Pillars of Islam will benefit them, and both will probably disagree on each other, based on what they believe in their opinions to be true.
So the underlying principle is simply, I want children to have the right information and moral framework.
What's the right moral framework?
Christians would say the Ten Commandments.
Muslims would say the Pillars of Islam.
Or maybe the Hadith or whatever.
I'm not a Muslim.
I'm not a Christian either.
And thus, when a Christian says we want the Ten Commandments in schools, what they're literally saying at the principal level is, children should be informed on what is right and wrong.
That's it.
That simple.
So when Krasenstein says, then you want the pillars of Islam in school, don't you?
No.
We want kids to be taught right and wrong.
And Christians will say, Islam is wrong and Christianity is right.
That's it.
And you'll disagree.
That's it.
Ultimately, here's the point.
Here's your opportunity.
Conservatives should actually file amicus briefs in support of the ACLU right here.
the pride flag alone would be a form of viewpoint or content discrimination prohibited by such
decisions as us v grace in 1983 and read v town of gilbert here's your opportunity conservatives
should actually file amicus briefs in support of the aclu right here and here's your game
plan your legal uh firm your activist group you file an amicus brief in support of the
aclu arguing that the 10 commandments should not be banned from schools nor the bible for
the same reason that it would be viewpoint discrimination That would mean teachers would be allowed at their discretion to put the Ten Commandments and give out Bibles in class.
The ACLU would vomit all over themselves at the thought.
Likely, it would create a really interesting problem for them in their argument.
The ACLU does not want the Ten Commandments in school, but they do want pride flags in school.
You can't have it both ways.
That's your game.
That's Brian Krasenstein's game.
So you simply say, no, we agree.
Pride flags should be allowed in schools.
And then we're going to put the Ten Commandments and Bibles in schools, then we're going to get a bunch of teachers hired, and these schools will be Christian.
That's the game you play.
That's the game they want to play.
It's the game they're quite literally playing.
I see things like this where he's trying to make a point about, if you want the Ten Commandments then we get the Pillars of Islam.
No.
They put up that Satanist thing in that city hall or whatever where that guy smashed it.
This is not... It's an unwillingness on the part of the left or an incapability to understand underlying principles.
And they are rudimentary.
What informs our morals?
Keep kids safe.
Not a complicated one, but what someone thinks will keep a kid safe is different from somebody else.
And that's it.
So if a Christian wants the Ten Commandments, it's unsurprising.
They view it as moral, foundational good that helps make kids safe.
And they view other things like pride flags in Islam as not.
Though to be fair, Brian, a lot of conservatives would probably prefer Islam to pride flags.
Not that they'd mostly prefer either, but I hope you get the point.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment is coming up at 8 p.m.
over at youtube.com slash TimCastIRL.
Thanks for hanging out, and we'll see you all then.
For a while, the number one issue in this country among voters was immigration.
Immigration still is a top issue.
It's currently number two.
Why?
Well, we're seeing a lot of crime.
And it's not all immigration.
It's illegal immigrants who are illegally entering the country.
Surprisingly, they don't care much for our laws.
So, in a lot of cities, we've seen many stories popping up in the press of, well, you had Laken Riley, lost her life after a man was attempting to force himself on her, and I guess she fought back.
The media actually, well, man, it seems like, because I want to be careful here, They're almost critical of the victims.
And that's what we're seeing now with MSNBC.
Once again, MSNBC panel erupts after Heritage President blasts crime committed by illegal migrants.
We don't use that term.
Listen, you come to the United States legally, I have respect for this.
You know, Donald Trump got a lot of flack when he said he wanted to give green cards to college graduates.
Trump is correct.
Everybody immediately assumes the worst possible thing, and this is the problem with that narrative.
Trump says, we want to give green cards to college grads.
It doesn't make sense that they come here, go to our schools, we kick them out, and they become billionaires in their countries.
Trump is correct.
You see, most people immediately assumed the worst.
Some communists showing up from Honduras, getting a scholarship, and then getting a green card.
Well, if that's how you want to interpret it.
The real answer is, point made by Trump, simple proposition, what are the parameters?
Well, I say, I agree.
If the parameters are reforming the college system first and foremost, getting rid of the predatory loan system, getting rid of all the Marxist garbage, Then, vetting process.
How many green cards are we actually allotting every year to college grads?
It should be between a hundred and a thousand, maybe, because what we want, industrialist billionaire opportunity.
We want to brain drain other countries.
Why?
So that we are number one around the world, and then we can maintain that beautiful, beautiful status as the top economy on the planet without using guns and bombs.
Quite simple, right?
But it is complicated, and there's no guarantee it could be pulled off very easily.
So that idea, I have no problem with, but the media, you look at the story, and I gotta get dark with it, because this is the reality.
The story here, you're asking, what is it about?
Post-millennial.
This is tough to read.
We don't use the term illegal.
MSNBC pundit interrupts panel on 12-year-old girl brutally murdered by illegal migrants to correct language.
They're undocumented individuals.
Seriously?
Here you go.
unidentified
What do you tell the parents of those people, those young girls who were killed?
The preponderance of these people, Michael, are male.
But what is the difference between an illegal immigrant who, unfortunately, engages in that activity— And we don't like that.
I want to be clear.
We don't use the term illegal.
Undocumented individuals.
That's sweet.
They're illegal aliens.
Undocumented individuals, versus anyone else who commits the same crime.
tim pool
Oh, I can answer this one.
It's really, really easy.
Alright, here we go.
What's the difference between an illegal alien who committed a crime and anyone else who committed the crime?
We are trying to prevent crime.
Thank you.
Have a nice day.
So, I'll put it this way.
If you come to me and say, what's the difference between someone who robs a bank and then murders the bank teller versus somebody who just commits a murder?
It's like, well, if we have good security on the bank, And we prevent the people from entering with the weapons in the first place, you reduce the probability that people will be killed in a botched bank robbery.
Next question.
If someone is willing to break our laws to enter this country, we prevent that, okay?
And we say port of entry.
It is a really simple algorithm.
It's absolutely remarkable.
If you create a path, it's almost like when you ban guns, only outlaws have guns.
I don't know that Democrats are capable of this multi-level ordered thinking, what happens beyond the first, but I'll keep it simple for you.
If you, I don't know, leave your door open, bugs will get in.
Then, you will have to use bug spray, right?
You close your door, and then there's no bugs, and you don't use bug spray.
And they say, but what's the difference between the fly that got in your room when the door was open and the fly that didn't?
Well, the fly that somehow manages to get in is still a problem.
We have to deal with that, and it is bad.
But it is the simple process by which we prevent them from getting in in the first place.
You know what?
I really love this, because this is pure Democrat thought process, right?
They say, You know, we tell young women not to walk down dark alleys late at night, or be careful about using the ATM late at night.
No!
We should tell men not to rape!
We already do that.
We punish it.
We have a TV show on, what is it, NBC?
It's been on for like 40 years.
I'm exaggerating.
Specifically about how bad it is to rape.
Law & Order SVU, by the way.
For those that didn't get that one.
And yet there are still bad guys who do it.
So.
Well, of course we recognize it's the murderers who are the problem.
We are trying to keep out people who are willing to commit the crime in the first place.
And the people who are trying to enter the country legally are substantially less likely to murder a 12-year-old than those who would enter the country illegally.
Now, when these people are coming to the United States, and they're coming from Venezuela, many of them from El Salvador, especially with the amazing, amazing transformation under President Bukele.
He's done an amazing job.
But of course, these criminals are terrified, so they flee.
They flee.
Well, these criminals aren't going to go to the U.S.
border, knock on the door, and say, please let me in legally.
I'll fill out my forms and wait a few years.
They're going to come in illegally.
And so many of the people that we see, and not all, I don't even know if it's a majority, who are crossing illegally are criminals.
Now, I will say this.
Hold on.
I'm saying criminals before they cross.
Anyone who crosses that border commits a crime.
That's a fact.
It is illegal to do this in the United States.
Anyone who is willing to commit a crime, there's going to be a higher preponderance, there's going to be a higher probability that those people will commit crimes later on.
I'm not saying all of them will be murders.
It could very well just be trespassing.
But the people who are willing to abide by the law are clearly, clearly by the algorithm created.
The New York Post.
MSNBC host chaffed at how to refer to migrants who enter the country illegally and commit crimes during a testy exchange.
The Liberal Network's hosts were eager to grill Roberts about Heritage Project 2025.
An initiative intended to outline an agenda for former President Trump should he win a second term.
It has become something of a boogeyman among progressives.
I'm specifically interested, as it relates, Dr. Roberts, in the deportation of immigrants in this country.
Just understanding sort of how it is going to work.
MSNBC anchor Alicia Menendez, the daughter of Bob Menendez, began.
Well, one thing I will add, too, is the president of the Heritage Foundation says they're illegal aliens.
That is a legal term, and it is a fact statement.
You can be like, we don't use the term illegal here.
It's in the law books.
It's just the term.
Shut up.
They're doing this because they're trying to lie, cheat, and steal.
When you talk about folks on the interior, how you see a future administration utilizing the National Guard, ICE, police forces to deport something like 11 million people.
Roberts said the first objective is to close the border, followed by the biggest mass deportation system ever in the history of America.
Here's what I absolutely love.
So there's that show, Evil, on CBS and Paramount Plus.
I've mentioned it on TimCast IRL because they have this scene where the mom, so it's like frozen on a show, Three people.
There's a priest, a woman, and a tech guy, and they're investigating possession and other weird, you know, demonic things.
They work for the church.
They work for the Catholic Church.
It's a very woke show, and it's kind of hilarious.
And despite the fact that it's being very Catholic.
So anyway, the mom has four daughters.
And she's like, I'm gonna make a list of commandments for my daughters.
The ten mom commandments.
And the first one is, thou shalt not lie to mom.
And she's like, don't lie to me!
And then the one girl is like, can we lie to other people?
And she goes, no.
And then one of the girls goes, what if we're hiding Jews in the basement like with Hitler or immigrants with like Trump?
And the mom's like, OK, those are great points, but we'll talk about that later.
And it's like, hiding immigrants in your basement like Trump?
Jesus, people are nuts.
But you know it.
You know that's what they're going to do.
Let me break this down, because that's the narrative they're trying to build.
But I can tell you the difference.
First, I will say this.
Donald Trump better be very, very careful.
It is already thin ice for moderate types like me when dealing with something like mass deportations.
It's going to be difficult.
There may be shootouts, seriously, from criminal gang members and cartels and things like that.
I need to know.
That's why I asked Trump this personally.
When it comes to this operation, it is going to be done as humanely and through the appropriate legal processes, properly as possible.
And there will be no mistreatment Now, I say mistreatment.
Assuming someone's a criminal with a gun who's like a cartel member, well, that's a wider berth than, say, it's some woman who came here 15 years ago.
She's here illegally.
She's got her kids.
This person should be gently placed in the back of a police car and driven to a deportation center, or however they handle it.
And then, you know, we send them back to their homes.
And it should be comfortable.
It should.
And it's a challenge, too, because you've had people say on Tim Cast IRL, maybe we should just pay them $1,000 to leave, and I'm like, why?
They'll come back and they'll keep doing it.
It's a perverse incentive.
You don't want to do that.
But I tell you this, the difference, my friends.
For the people who are trying to come here illegally in violation of our laws, this is the big meme.
AOC called detention centers set up by Barack Obama concentration camps.
Someone made a comic where a bunch of Jews were rushing to get into one of these concentration camps.
And it's like...
And then the Nazi guard was like, hey you, you get out of here!
Don't come in here!
The difference is, Germany was a country with citizens.
Citizens who lived there.
Who owned businesses.
Hitler comes to power and blames a religious ethnic minority for their problems.
And then they go around smashing things, loading them up into train cars and things like this to send them to work camps and death camps.
Killing them.
What we have now in the United States is people breaking our laws to enter the country and us saying, please go home and don't break our laws.
Very different.
But that's why I say it is thin ice.
It's a difficult position.
And there will be very little tolerance for failure in this regard.
That is to say, the first thing that's going to happen when Trump gets elected, assuming he does, and he begins this mass deportation project, Project 2025, the left will use every opportunity to try and make it look like, try and associate it with Hitler and the Nazis and things like that.
That means Trump's already on thin ice.
This has to be done so properly and perfectly that while people are going to be sad, the videos show people comfortably being brought back to where their homes are, and then they can apply legally.
That being said, I do believe Joe Biden's going to try and do mass amnesty before that happens, so don't be surprised.
But take a look at this.
This is the nature of politics, where things are going.
Politico says immigration fears are pushing centrists to the right in the U.S.
and Europe.
As elections loom in the U.S.
and U.K.
and France, the fraught politics of migration are a key issue animating voters on both sides of the Atlantic.
Well, yeah.
Look, man.
We have a 12-year-old murdered.
There was a woman who went out for a run, and an illegal immigrant criminal, who was a known criminal with a criminal past, tried to rape her.
That's the presumption from the media reports.
He tried to drag her off to rape her, and she fought back, so he smashed her head, killing her.
No one wants that.
And it is not an excuse to say, what's the difference between this murder and any other murder.
You get jail, right?
And you put all the murderers in it.
You start letting them out into one area.
Don't be surprised if murder goes up.
And the issue with illegal immigration is, on the surface, yeah, it doesn't matter.
Murderers are murderers.
They're all bad.
Lock them up.
But hold on.
Hold on there a minute.
If somebody who lives in my house and has lived there for a long time, and we know them, decides to, I don't know, steal my cookie jar in the middle of the night, I'd be shocked!
I'd say, I can't believe it!
Jim stole my cookies!
Jim, how long have you lived here?
Wow.
I don't know how this could have happened.
Thought Jim was a good guy.
Now here's the alternate scenario.
I leave the door open, and in the middle of the night, a guy I don't know comes in, steals my cookie jar, and I go, oh!
Some guy I don't even know stole my- How could this have happened?
What, you left your door open?
Opportunist criminals are gonna come in!
How are we in this scenario?
So this, of course, is leading people to be like, uh, yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and say, uh, no.
I'm gonna go ahead and say, we don't want that.
And now the right is winning across the board.
This could be the issue.
That actually drives Donald Trump to victory.
That pushes Joe Biden out.
You take a look at this from Gallup, something I like to reference quite a bit.
Non-economic problems.
75% of people cite this.
Okay?
When you have, and this is as of May 24th, now the numbers don't add up evenly, I don't know what they're, how they're at doing this math.
Economic problems, 36%, right?
The economy in general, as a single issue, is 17%.
When you ask people, 17% say it's the most important problem.
Government and poor leadership, number one.
It was immigration before that at 27%.
And then 28% before that.
We're going back to February.
Immigration has dominated.
Well, thanks to Joe Biden's, let's just call it, incapabilities, immigration has taken a back seat.
People are more concerned about Joe Biden's brain failing at this point.
But it doesn't mean they don't care about immigration.
Just because the number's gone down doesn't mean that people don't care about it.
They care about it as much as they always did, but now they're really worried about Joe Biden's brain being broken.
This is where we're at.
Immigration is the second issue as of right now, and it was the top issue for four months.
Before that, it was tied.
Before that, this is amazing.
Even going back to November, immigration was still number two, with Joe Biden's brain being broken at number one.
Immigration briefly took number one.
This is a problem for Democrats they're not going to win on.
And going on MSNBC and saying, we don't say illegal, doesn't mean anything!
You're saying nothing!
Well, here we are.
Now, Trump, of course, has rightly pissed people off.
Rightly.
Maybe the wrong people.
Take a look at this.
I love this.
From the New Republic.
Lefty publication.
Trump's surprising promise to immigrants quickly retracted by campaign.
No, it wasn't.
You're lying, but sure.
Donald Trump made a shocking pledge to help international students only for his campaign to immediately add some caveats.
unidentified
Uh-huh.
tim pool
That was always the case.
Here, what are the caveats, okay?
Because they don't really mention it, but the New York Times says that Trump offered green cards to college grads.
But hours after Mr. Trump's remarks aired, his campaign press secretary, Carolyn Leavitt, walked back the former president's comments, saying in a statement that there would be an aggressive vetting process, exclude all communists, radical Islamists, Hamas supporters, America haters, and public charges.
He didn't do that.
The policy would apply only to the most skilled graduates who can make significant contributions
to America.
And that was always the case.
Nowhere did Donald Trump say, I want to give green cards to every single one, all of them.
He didn't do that.
All of these Trump supporters, like shout out even Laura Loomer, who is Trump's, there's
no one who supports Trump more than Loomer.
And even she was like, Trump, this is not a good policy.
I respect it, that Laura Loomer has criticized people for criticizing Trump, saying now's not the time, Trump needs to win.
Trump says this, and she goes, wait a minute.
Bad policy.
Now I respect that the immediate backlash happened because people were like, if you don't specify, we assume the worst.
Me?
I never, never assumed build-the-wall Trump was like, I'm going to give all of these people green cards.
I think this.
We have war.
I don't like it.
It's bad.
We need alternatives to war.
How can we maintain our status as the dominant global economy?
We have an advantage.
Power attracts power.
The more money you have, the more money you invest, the more money you make.
Everybody gets it.
Well, right now, We're on top.
And we may be about to lose it.
But here's the advantage.
Everybody wants to be here.
So how do we take advantage of that?
The smartest people in the world, in their various countries, they want to come here too.
So what do we do?
We should be offering tax incentives to foreign millionaires and billionaires.
I mean, imagine you're a Chinese millionaire and, like, what's that guy?
I can't remember that guy's name who disappeared or whatever.
What do you say I tell you what?
You come here and we will give you 10 years at a lower tax rate to bring your money and invest in America.
That'd be great.
Colleges.
We tell this young guy, let's say he's from China.
We gotta be careful, because China's Communist Party.
I get it.
But there are good people who want to get out of China because of this.
Let's say they're from South Korea.
You know, ally of ours.
We got military bases and troops over there.
They're smart.
They're hardworking.
They're inventing things.
You can tell.
They score really high on tests.
First thing, these colleges gotta be totally reformed.
Nothing else matters before that.
Gotta fix the schools, gotta fix the loan system, but let's say we weed out the garbage, we seize the endowments, whatever it may be.
Let's say it's only specific fields, okay?
So we got this dude from India, high IQ, super smart guy, and he's like, I want to study, you know, I don't know, mechanical engineering or computer sciences.
So we say, okay.
He comes, he pays.
Let's say, in the course of his four years in college, this dude has shown himself to be exemplary.
He's working on a startup already with some buddies.
This is where we go, okay, this dude, if he goes back to India, and he takes all of this knowledge and these resources there, he will build up their economy.
Then we have to compete with them.
So long as we vet these people for Islamists, Hamas supporters, and all the stuff they've pointed out, reforming the colleges, we want to brain drain other countries.
If everybody wants to be here, and we bring in, let's say the number's 10,000, 10,000 per year, that's it, of the highest skilled, cream-of-the-crop people, they start their companies here, everyone else in the world is begging us for access.
We don't need bombs.
We don't need missiles.
They will simply need to buy from us because we got it.
That, in my opinion, is the dream.
Because right now, the Democrat vision is, blow them up.
And steal their oil, and that'll maintain our economy.
That won't work.
Trump knows it.
Trump's plan here is, we've got to drain the brains of these nations, take their most valuable assets, build the technology in America, and then everyone will beg us forever.
I love it.
I want America to be on top.
I don't think the Democrat, Uniparty platform, the liberal economic order of military bases everywhere is going to sustain that.
No, we do it through trade.
Good deals.
We bring in some guy, he goes to school, he invents a new product, and he keeps it here!
And then what happens?
We control it, that dude becomes a wealthy American, he employs Americans, that's the plan.
And then, in India, they say, we would like to buy some of this invention from you, America, and we say, what do you have to offer?
That makes our economy stronger, it means the American people will live better, and you need only one thing.
To represent the shining city on the hill.
You need only be the place to be and nothing else.
I think it's a good idea.
But it's got to be done right.
Not going to be easy.
In the meantime, you can sit back as people are freaking out over this crime and thank MSNBC for making the problem worse and for helping Trump get elected.
We'll see if he does.
Next segment's coming up at 4pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out.
We'll see you all then.
A bloody riot outside of an LA synagogue.
The videos are crazy.
Far leftists are very mad.
Of course they're mad.
Many of these people are outright pro-Hamas.
They're playing politics and lying to you and they say they're not pro-Hamas.
That's a fact.
I am not saying that every single liberal person concerned about Israel loves Hamas.
I am saying that the far left extremists who are going outside and physically assaulting and attacking people These people, when they claim they're not supporting Hamas, they're lying to you.
But you know what?
Many of them are outright willing to admit that they are.
Oh boy.
I guess we had to get into the Israel-Palestine issue, but not so much.
This is domestic.
The first thing I want to say on this is what most people have said.
Could you imagine if a bunch of Trump supporters showed up outside a black church, or even a Hispanic church, and engaged in this kind of behavior?
The media would lose its mind.
They're between a rock and a hard place now, I tell you what.
Because you've got these Democrats facing primary challenges, and they know they can't lean—like this Bowman.
Bowman's going hardcore.
Anti-Israel, anti-APAC, and all of these things.
I am not saying he's outright wrong.
I'm saying he's leaning into this to attract an activist voter base to save him in his primary.
It's a direction they're going.
So these people are in a difficult position where they're going to lose Jewish voters.
They know it, and they need to make them up some way.
But too many Run-of-the-mill progressives who don't know too much are not going to side with Israel.
Thus, Jewish Democrats are going to vote for more moderate or Republican politicians.
And that's what really matters to me in this story.
Not so much that we're getting another riot, but how this will impact the election.
This, of course, it's going to make Jews in the United States who predominantly vote Democrat, they're going to vote Republican.
Let's check this out from the Postmillennial.
On Sunday, a California synagogue was targeted during a violent pro-Palestinian demonstration that turned into a bloody riot.
Rioters assaulted journalists, deployed chemical sprays, prevented Jews from entering their house of worship, and brutally beat multiple Israel supporters outside the synagogue.
At least one was left bloodied, video footage shows.
Violent clashes occurred outside the Adas Torah Synagogue in Los Angeles around 1.40pm.
Pro-Palestinian demonstrators surrounded the house of worship and called for a bloody revolution.
Jews formed a line in front of the synagogue to protect it and the LAPD was forced to deploy crowd control munitions to deter unruly ceasefire agitators according to video footage.
There's just a beautiful bit of irony in someone screaming ceasefire while mercilessly beating other people.
But, um, can't say I'm not surprised.
Look, look, look, look.
If you don't talk about foreign policy, Israel's military actions, Palestine, etc., the death of civilians, and what this conflict means and how it should be solved, that's tough, man.
I don't got good answers for you.
I can only tell you that the people in the United States do not represent either of those groups.
It's the weirdest thing, okay?
Some dude in L.A.
who lives in L.A.
and is Jewish and is waving an Israeli flag is not typically dictating military policy.
The far left is screaming pro-Hamas stuff, is not working with and dictating Hamas military strategy.
It is so weird to me to see these people on the other side of the planet screaming and beating each other, representing their respective ideologies.
Don't get me wrong.
As it is to be expected, the Israel side, they're not typically the ones that go around smashing and beating people.
And so, here you have it.
It's going to be the far leftists.
Multiple brawls broke out between the groups as the pro-Palestinian mob prevented Jews from entering the synagogue.
At least one pro-Israel supporter was beaten by the pro-Palestinian mob.
He was pummeled to the ground outside the synagogue and was left bloodied.
Video footage shows.
Now, apparently even... I should pull this up because even Joe Biden... Let me see if I can find this story.
Even Joe Biden.
Actually, do we have it right here, actually?
Yes.
unidentified
L.A.
tim pool
Times.
Biden, Bass, and Newsom blast abhorrent violence outside L.A.
Synagogue during protest.
I think we have the, uh... Actually, I'll pull up the tweet so you can see his direct statement.
They might have it in here.
Here we go.
The tweet from POTUS himself saying, I'm appalled by the scenes outside the Adas synagogue in LA.
Intimidating Jewish congregants is dangerous, unconscionable, anti-Semitic and un-American.
Americans have a right to peaceful protest, but blocking access to a house of worship
and engaging in violence is never acceptable. I'd like to give a shout out to our good friend,
Andrew Cuomo in New York, who blocked people from worshipping during COVID
and many other Democrat governors who did much the same thing.
To remind Joe Biden that the use of violence by police to stop people from entering their house of worship, yeah, that very much happened under your political party.
I'm not going to be wrong, even after Biden got elected, we still saw this.
Americans have a right to worship.
Well, you've got everybody involved now.
The LA Times reporting, a violent clash Sunday between pro-Palestinian demonstrators and supporters of Israel engaged outside the synagogue.
We know this.
The incident, in which there were shoving matches and punches thrown, resulted in one arrest.
Now, I want to stress, this is far leftist showing up to a synagogue.
Okay, you want to argue, yeah, well, the people with the Israeli flags, they were fighting too.
It's like, but they're at a synagogue.
Like, don't go to their church and start a fight with them.
Take a look at this.
They say, no details were released on the individual, but the person, one person with a weapon, who was arrested, is facing a misdemeanor charge in connection with carrying a spiked flag.
Whatever that means.
Putting nails in it or something?
There is no excuse for targeting a house of worship.
Such anti-semitic hatred has no place in California.
Bass called the violence abhorrent, adding that blocking access to a place of worship is unacceptable.
I want to be clear that LA will not be a harbor for anti-Semitism and violence.
Those responsible for either will be found and held accountable, she said.
President Biden also took issue with the protest tactics.
Intimidating Jewish congregants is dangerous, unconscionable, anti-Semitic, and un-American.
We did read this.
Pro-Palestinian activists began gathering in front of the synagogue on Pico Boulevard.
Why?
Why are you going to a synagogue?
Like, what are you doing?
Well, look, I just gotta say, man, I think most of these activists, purely anti-Semitic.
They hate Jews.
you going to a synagogue? What are you doing? Well, look, I just gotta say, man, I think
most of these activists, purely anti-Semitic. They hate Jews. That's it. I am not saying
once again, I can already hear the America First people saying like, Israel is doing
Yeah, don't care.
I'm talking about the far leftists, specifically who hate Jews, okay?
I'm not talking about the liberals who are critical of Israel, as they're allowed to be, or the America First Gropers who are critical of Israel, as they're allowed to be.
And, in fact, I think these people should be critical of Israel.
I think we should all be critical, very much so, of Israel.
They should not be getting our money!
Long story, long story, but it's a foreign policy question.
I am saying there are far leftists in this country, and there are people on the right as well, who outright hate Jews, and that is why they are doing this.
And they will use the mask of Middle Eastern conflict to cover up the fact that they just hate Jews.
Jewish Derangement Syndrome.
Don't get me wrong, there's also Israel Derangement Syndrome, because I'll give you my opinion on the foreign policy.
No immediate reports of injuries, though there was a video showing someone seriously injured.
Well, I shouldn't say seriously, but someone was injured because, you know, serious implies, like, going to the hospital and stuff.
Video appeared to show two pro-Palestinian demonstrators taken from an SUV and detained.
Rabbi Herzl Illunion Funny, isn't it?
I'm not going to blame Muslims.
KCAL News, the protest doesn't belong in front of a synagogue.
I don't think the Jewish would go in front of a mosque or the Christian people would
go in front of a mosque and do such a thing.
Funny, isn't it?
I'm not going to blame Muslims.
I'm not going to blame a person who is a Muslim.
These people are bad people.
There are people who claim to be Christian, they're bad people.
I'm not going to blame Christians because bad people do bad things.
I'm not going to blame Jews because bad people do bad things.
I am not going to blame Jews because Israel is doing a thing these people don't like.
So why go in front of a synagogue?
Can't say I'm surprised, and I'm willing to bet most people are not surprised this is what they're doing.
That being said, the people with Israeli flags are supporting a country, Israel.
It is what it is.
But I'll tell you this, I'll tell you this.
As we wrap this one up.
We'll have more on this probably tonight on IRL.
You know, the Israel Derangement Syndrome, as most of you know, really gets me.
I'm really interested in anybody coming forward with maybe Saudi Arabia Derangement Syndrome?
Like, maybe a little criticism for Saudi Arabia?
I'll take that.
The Saudis dictate U.S.
policy to an extreme degree because they can dump oil and screw the dollar over.
They just dumped the petrodollar.
The agreement expired and there's no plan for them to re-up, which means they're going to start trading now in foreign currencies, which will undermine U.S.
petrodollar.
The U.S.
has been beholden to Saudi Arabia for too long!
So much so that we are acting as their military in Yemen!
It's nuts!
Drone strikes, commando raids?
Why?
Because the Saudis could dump oil, and they could screw over the U.S.
economy.
So, these Saudi interests, they're deeply entrenched in the United States.
I mean, take a look at the Saudis involved in 9-11.
Oh boy, yes, right, there were lawsuits and that.
And the funny thing is, you get these people claiming Israel did 9-11.
I'm not kidding, like, they're on Twitter saying this, and I'm like, dude, we know the Saudis were involved!
Okay, I just gotta do this.
I'm doing this.
We'll get one more minute of this.
Come on.
Come on, man.
The Atlantic.
New 9-11 evidence points to deep Saudi complicity.
Two decades of U.S.
policy appear to be rooted in a mistaken understanding of... And let's do this.
I'll do a lawsuit.
Let's pull up the lawsuit.
Uh, let's see, let's see.
Uh, breaking down the 9-11 families lawsuit, focus on Saudi student who may have been a spy.
Like, there's a lot going on here, okay?
There's a lot.
I'm not literally trying to come down on Saudi Arabia.
I'm trying to make a point.
The U.S.
is beholden to many different countries on foreign policy, so pay attention to it.
That being said, don't go in front of churches and mosques and synagogues and attack, but of course, it's just the far left.
Next segment's coming up at 6 p.m.
on this channel.
Export Selection