Biden Grants MASS AMNESTY To Illegal Immigrants, 3.5M NEW CITIZENS Granting Voting Rights Since 2020
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/
Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/
Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL
Biden Grants MASS AMNESTY To Illegal Immigrants, 3.5M NEW CITIZENS Granting Voting Rights Since 2020
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Become a member at TimCast.com by clicking join us to support the work we're doing and to get access to the uncensored TimCast IRL call-in show Monday through Thursday at 10 p.m.
You don't want to miss it.
Now let's get into the news.
The shadow campaign may be upon us.
And what is that you ask?
Well, You know, with Donald Trump doing as well as he's doing, despite the convictions, they're saying he raised over $200 million since they found him guilty, many people are wondering if he's surging so much in the polls, Americans overwhelmingly want Donald Trump.
He's raking in all this money.
What are Democrats planning to do to win?
Some are actually suggesting the real conspiracy is that it was supposed to be Trump the whole time.
And they're making him out to be a victim so that you all support him.
Yeah, no.
I think there's another shadow campaign afoot.
And it may be related to non-citizens becoming citizens.
The breaking report from the New York Post.
Biden admin offers mass amnesty to migrants as it quietly terminates 350,000 asylum cases.
Do you know what that means?
It means that when these people illegally enter the country, They say, OK, what's your name?
What's your number?
We're going to set up a case for you.
Have a nice day.
Come back for your asylum hearing to make sure you qualify.
Then they crumple up the paper and throw it in the garbage.
And that person is now in this country forever.
Why does that matter?
Maybe the shadow campaign isn't for this year, I don't know.
They're saying, NPR says, and I pulled up the data on this, 3.5 million new citizens have entered this country, have been naturalized in the past four years.
Which, well, more than half will favor Joe Biden, but the issue with the amnesty cases It's nothing to do with these people voting.
Now, many people on the right will say, illegal immigrants are going to vote.
Maybe.
There have been instances, and I don't know to what degree it actually could scale up, but there have been instances where non-citizens have voted because they got an idea or something, and then it registered them to vote, and then they did.
Sometimes they get caught.
The question is, is it going to be millions, and will it directly impact the election?
Well, that matters none, my friends, because the real issue is that when Democrats take these people and put them in cities, they are giving themselves extra congressional seats.
And that's it.
Extra congressional seats means extra electoral votes for president.
So they don't need to vote because you don't vote for president.
The individuals don't vote for president.
The Electoral College does.
So if they take a million illegal immigrants and put them in, I don't know, Austin, Austin gets an extra, maybe even two, congressional seats, two extra electoral votes, and the funny thing is those non-citizens can't vote.
Have you ever stopped to ask yourself why it is that each district has 750,000 people, but only a couple hundred thousand show up to vote?
Now, of course, many people make the argument, it's because people are lazy.
They don't want to go out and vote, and they should, but they don't care.
I believe that's probably true.
But that accounts for what?
A little bit more than half of the voters?
So you've got 750,000 people.
You've got about 280k votes in a district.
You get about 280k that we can say, or 300, don't really care.
votes in a district, you get about 280k that we can say, or 300, don't really care, what
are the rest?
In these big cities, what are the rest?
I have to wonder how many of the people who are in a district can't vote.
And that means Democrats are going to win every single time.
And they will give themselves extra votes.
Now, the reality about this 3.5 million number, it's actually fairly common.
Yeah, and with that, and with the fact that these people favor the Democratic Party, and the Democratic Party only cares about getting more voters, the United States will dissolve if this trend stays the same.
Let's start by reading this post from the New York Post.
Before we get started, head over to TimCast.com.
Click join us to become a member and support the work we do here directly.
If you're listening on Rumble, We would love it if you would become a member at TimCast.com.
On YouTube, we can get ad revenue.
On Rumble, we don't.
No disrespect to Rumble.
We love Rumble.
But if you're watching on Rumble because you believe in free speech, we want to make sure our shows are there.
Then please go to TimCast.com and support us directly so we can continue.
The New York Post says...
Well, the Biden administration is attempting to look like it's getting tough on the border.
Behind the scenes, it's operating a program of a mass amnesty for migrants, Post can reveal.
Data shows that since 2022, more than 350,000 asylum cases filed by migrants have been closed by the U.S.
government if the applicants don't have a criminal record or are otherwise not deemed a threat to the country.
Yeah, that's what the libertarians call an Ellis Island-style approach.
Let them come on in and do whatever they want!
We don't care about the economy.
We don't care about regular working Americans' jobs.
This means that while the migrants are not granted or denied asylum, their cases are terminated without a decision on the merits of their asylum claim.
They are removed from the legal system and no longer required to check in with authorities.
The move allows them to legally, indefinitely roam the U.S.
without fear of deportation, effectively letting them slip through the cracks.
Yes.
But this means that they will count on the census.
It means they are second-class citizens the Democrats will use for cheap, under-the-table labor and political power.
The New York Post says, With a record number of people seeking asylum in the U.S., the Biden admin is increasingly just letting people go with no decision.
Meaning they aren't granted asylum, but not deported either.
They're just allowed to stay in America with no status.
Take a look at this.
And the funny thing is, major spike!
Huge, huge spike under Joe Biden.
Who would have thought that?
Take a look at this.
The blue bar on this graph, there's three colors, green, blue, and red, not adjudicated, had gone way down during Donald Trump.
Granted, asylum actually did go up a little bit under Trump, but then started to dip down.
And now, ordered removed, which was massive under Trump, has dropped down, actually increased a little bit.
So, asylum granted and removal orders actually are both up, but not adjudicated is skyrocketing.
They're literally just saying, come on in, we don't care.
This is just a massive amnesty under the guise of prosecutorial discretion, according to Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge who now works for the Center for Immigration Studies.
You're basically allowing people who don't have a right to be in the U.S.
to be here indefinitely, he added to the post.
Ice officers, they've seen an increase in cases of such immigrants committing crimes after their asylum case have been dismissed, forcing agents to restart removal proceedings, which typically takes years.
Please let everyone know what's really going on, an ice officer told the Post.
In 2020, during the Trump administration, 48,000 migrants were ordered removed by the U.S.
Immigration Court judges.
Fewer than 20,000 people were granted asylum, and 4,700 people had their cases closed or were otherwise allowed to remain in the country, according to data collected by Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse.
Let's go through the numbers.
We have big news.
They say, Really?
I thought Biden didn't have any authority on the southern border and he couldn't do anything about it.
to allow cases to be dismissed for migrants who aren't deemed national security threats.
Let's go through the numbers.
We have big news.
They say Biden executive action on the border could come as early as Tuesday.
Really?
I thought Biden didn't have any authority on the southern border and he couldn't do
anything about it.
Well, apparently he can.
But I got bad news for you all.
His executive action is a lie, meant to manipulate cultists and people who don't pay attention to the news.
It's fascinating to me.
It just really is hard when I see people like the Krasensteins or Kyle Kalinske or whatever.
I just feel like they have to be intentionally lying because I can't imagine people are that Let's just be very nice.
Lacking knowledge.
Very nice about it.
Because I like Kyle, he's a nice guy.
But they keep calling it, and I don't mean the... I'm talking about liberal pundits in general, but the left, Democrats... I shouldn't say the left so much, but the Democrats keep saying it's a border security bill.
That Joe Biden's trying to bring security to the border, but the Republicans are stopping him.
Biden's executive action would actually codify his plan, allowing non-citizens into the country, which makes no sense because we don't do that.
Take a look at this.
Politico says, President Joe Biden is set to sign a long-anticipated executive order as soon as Tuesday that would allow him to shut down the southern border should crossings surge, according to four people familiar with the administration's plans.
While those people cautioned that plans are fluid, the expectation is that Biden will issue the order before heading to France
in the middle of the week for a ceremony celebrating the 80th anniversary of D-Day.
The order Biden is slated to announce would use section 212F of the Immigration and Nationality
Act to dramatically limit migrants' ability to seek asylum at the southern border
once encounters reach a new threshold. Administration officials have discussed
4,000 daily border crossings over the course of a week as the metric.
So let me just, um, let me get this clear.
Let me get this straight.
Make this clear.
unidentified
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet-and-greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit Moms4America.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
Four thousand people can illegally cross the border.
We're talking about Eagle Pass.
We're talking about walking through the desert.
We're not talking about people knocking on a door at a port of entry and saying, I'd like to fill out a form and come to your country.
4,000 people will be allowed to enter in, and then they'll say, okay, quote, that is not border security.
That is codification of illegal immigration.
That is saying it's no longer illegal immigration.
That is saying it is now legal immigration of the 4,000 people.
Joe Biden is trying to permanently open the southern border.
Amazing.
The White House has long been eager to show more action on the border, a long-standing political weak spot for the president.
It supported a bipartisan border security bill tied to Ukraine.
Ah, this is absolutely incredible.
You know what it is.
Okay, here's the real issue.
Uniparty establishment types know that our population growth has stalled.
Fertility rates are in the gutter.
Yep.
And so they're concerned that by 2033, seven years from now, Social Security may begin to unwind and collapse.
By 2037, it is estimated that Social Security will be completely insolvent save a mass injection of cash.
Now, I'll overly simplify the whole issue for you.
People are living longer and they're not having kids.
Currently, the way Social Security works, I think it's what like 900 bucks a month.
That's given to older people who are on Social Security.
$900 a month.
How do you come up with that much money?
Well, you've got to siphon it away from young people who do work.
Younger people.
So you've got a lot of young people, and they're paying the bills of older people through Social Security taxes.
The only problem is there's no longer enough young people to pay those bills, which means they're going to have to increase the taxes.
But sooner or later, young people will be taxed at 60-70% of their labor, and they're not going to be able to live themselves.
Or, you don't tax them, Social Security becomes insolvent, and the older generation now has no money, and you get another major crisis.
Ain't no easy answer here, is there?
Well, for these people, they say, just let as many non-citizens into the country as possible, and then that will bolster the tax base.
That's really it, isn't it?
I think so.
Now, Texas has announced a permanent presence on the southern border.
This was coming just a couple days ago, as they mentioned that they've deported migrants to D.C., New York, Chicago, Philly, Denver, and L.A.
To huge numbers.
12,500 to D.C., 45k to New York, 36,500 to Chicago, 3,400 to Philly, 19,000 to Denver, 1,500 to L.A.
Operation Lone Star continues to fill the dangerous gaps created by the Biden administration's refusal to secure the border.
It's going to keep happening.
Biden's going to sign some executive order and say, we're doing it anyway.
We are going to allow 4,000 people.
He's going to say, everybody, come on down, line up.
It is official and legal.
It's not, but that's what he'll do.
Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you to Shadow Campaign 2024.
NPR reports, it's not just young voters.
New citizens will head to the polls this year, too.
They say an estimated 3.5 million adults of voting age have been naturalized in the U.S.
since the 2020 election, according to data from the U.S.
Immigration Policy Center at the University of California, San Diego, with over a third from Asia, followed closely by North and Central America, and nearly 11% from Africa.
New citizen voters are a group that advocates say could wield political power in the presidential race, especially in key swing states with sizable migrant populations, and where just a small portion of votes can determine a winner.
That said, with lower levels of recorded turnout compared to U.S.-born voters, challenges remain in getting new citizens to show up to the polls.
I'm not sure if this is a population that thinks of itself as we're a block of voters in the way we oftentimes talk about Latino voters or Black voters or Asian voters, said Mark Hugo Lopez, Director of Race and Ethnicity Center at Pew Research Group.
But it is a notably growing group.
Well, the issue is, it's a different group of people.
People from Asia, people from Africa, people from Mexico or Central America.
They're not unified.
They're not meeting together and talking about voting and their influence.
But they do vote.
I'd like to jump over to my good friend Chet GPT for a series of questions that I'd like you to see.
First, I asked our good friend, how many new citizens get naturalized each year?
They say, well, in 2023 it was 878,500.
The number is part of a trend in recent years where naturalizations have increased after a drop during COVID-19.
2022 saw 969,000, nearly 1 million people.
2019 it was 843,000.
And so I said, all right, let's let's break it down.
69,000, nearly 1 million people.
2019, it was 843,000.
And so I said, all right, let's brace it up.
Give me a list.
In 2020, 625k, 2019 was 843k, 756, 707, 753.
Suffice it to say, it's fairly average, around 700 to 750,000 people per year.
843k, 756, 707, 753. Suffice it to say, it's fairly average around 700 to 750,000 people per year.
In the last four years, it's been a bit higher than that at around 800 or 900.
So there's been an increase.
In 2008, we saw 1 million new citizens.
we saw 1 million new citizens. In 1996, we also saw 1 million new citizens. In 2021, it was
In 2022, it was 967.
In 2023, it was 878.
I'm showing you this to say, it is not that we are seeing a dramatic increase.
We're seeing an increase, a little bit.
But it is fairly average that we bring in nearly 1 million new citizens every single year.
Chat GPT says, searched four sites.
Pew Research Center, KFF LA Times Survey of Immigrants, New citizens, newly naturalized, favor the Democratic Party.
56% voted for Joe Biden, while 29% supported Donald Trump.
Shadow campaign.
Perhaps this is why they have millions pouring through the southern border.
Joe Biden is going to find a path towards citizenship for them.
The first step, now I don't know that something like this could be done in five months, so maybe not.
But here's what I see.
350,000 asylum cases terminated.
So these people are just in limbo.
With their case being terminated, how many of them are going to now seek permanent citizenship?
Permanent residency or citizenship?
How many of them will go for a driver's license?
The city will give them one because they don't know or care or check.
And then how many of these people will be accidentally registered to vote?
I see dark days, my friends.
I see dark days indeed.
Now, there's a lot of good news on the horizon.
Donald Trump raising tons of money.
Those things are tremendous.
And we'll see if he can win.
But I will tell you this.
If citizens of this country Do not take this election seriously.
I don't know that they will have a country in the next four years.
This trend that we are seeing with mass amnesty and mass illegal immigration means that four years from now, the likelihood that you as an American citizen have a majority in your own nation is dropping dramatically.
That's right.
The analogy that I often like to use is, you know, you have a house and you have a roommate And then one day, your roommate asks if his buddy Jim can sleep on the couch.
And you're like, oh, I don't know, man, like, we don't got a lot of room.
And he's like, come on, I'll let him crash here for a little bit.
He's got nowhere to go, you know?
His wife is screaming at him, and you know, he needs to find refuge somewhere away from her.
So you say, okay, fine.
You say, alright, I agree, I agree, we'll let it happen.
He's like, okay, great.
Then the day later, You know, Jim and your roommate are sitting there, and another dude walks in.
And he's playing video games, like, who's this?
Like, oh, he lives here now.
And you go, what do you mean he lives here now?
It's like, well, we said he could live here.
No, I say no to that.
And they go, we'll put it to a vote.
All in favor of new guy living here?
Jim and your roommate raise their hand, and you go, hey, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, he's a guest.
If we keep allowing non-citizens to come into this country with no test and no desire to be American.
They love to go, oh, this island-style immigration.
Yeah, back then, the migrants that were coming here wanted to be American.
These migrants don't.
They want to be in America.
There's a big difference.
Allowing anyone in, I'm in favor of immigration, too.
We do a legitimate immigration where people come to the border, file the paperwork, wait their turn, get integrated properly, find jobs, learn the language.
Fantastic.
Brain drain.
We take the best people from all around the world.
We say, you can come be here.
What they're doing now is they're saying anyone, literally anyone, can come.
And now we got this report out of New York.
An illegal immigrant from Venezuela shot two cops.
Yeah.
And Michael Rapoport is like, Trump was convicted!
He's off the table now!
Are you insane, dude?
I think so.
That dude's gonna be voting for Trump.
Ain't nobody falling for that.
You will not have a country, and I don't know if this country can last another four years.
Four years from now, if we add another five million illegal immigrants... I don't know.
You know, look.
Every year, new citizens are added, and those are Democrat voters.
That's what the data shows.
So Donald Trump, who represents the interests of the working class in this country, and not of the foreigner, is losing!
New citizen comes here.
Donald Trump says, this country should be for America.
And what do we find?
56% say, no way.
I'm voting Democrat.
Why?
Because Democrats say, we're going to give you free stuff, and we're going to give your family free stuff, and we're going to bring your family here, and that's what they want.
So I got to tell you, Biden's plan, it feels like the shadow campaign is the long con.
Maybe they know Donald Trump will win come November.
And their attitude is we will paralyze him.
He will be unable politically to do anything.
And then once his term is up, this country flips never again, never again to be allowed to be populist like Donald Trump.
So Trump says we have to have the largest mass deportation ever seen.
Local police will be doing it.
It's worrisome.
How do you pull that off?
We got a lot of news from the weekend and a lot more news coming up.
Fauci's going to be testifying so I'll wrap it up there.
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating And affecting the 2024 presidential election.
We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
The guilty verdict against Donald Trump appears to be backfiring, at least for now, as Donald Trump has reportedly raised over $200 million since they found him guilty.
Now, to be fair, about $100 million is coming from various donors.
I believe it's estimated that around $55 million is small donors.
It could be the $100 million, but that's a newer reporting, so we'll have to read through this.
But I can tell you, $100 million is coming from one person.
And so, making that distinction is very important.
Because what we're seeing now is small donors, first-time voters, and even big-name elites are throwing their weight behind Trump because the Democrats have lost the plot.
Interestingly, there's reports that the CEO of, I think Blackstone, let me make sure I get this one right, I think it's Blackstone's CEO, has come out in support of Donald Trump.
This is, yeah, Blackstone's CEO, Steve Schwartzman.
Donald Trump being targeted by the Democrats with these ridiculous cases is resulting in not only a poll boost that we're seeing in some, not all.
I think, you know, Trump has certainly highlighted polls showing serious favorability.
There's one with like a six point advantage, especially among independents, but in aggregate, You know, we're not seeing a whole lot of movement, but he is, you know, you can see some of this pertaining to this criminal trial benefiting Trump in the minds of many Americans, and that is the only polling that matters.
Hard cash going to Trump's campaign.
Now, interestingly, the only poll that I think matters is there's this commercial going around of the President Prison Collection, they're calling it, and you can choose between one of two coins, or both, One's got Biden winning with Trump in prison on the back, and one's got Trump winning with Biden in prison on the back.
Pure silver!
Seriously, pure silver coins.
Wow.
Well, let's read the news and we'll talk about what's currently going on with this $200 million raised.
We got this from the Daily Wire.
Former President Donald Trump has reportedly raised more than $200 million since a Manhattan jury returned a guilty verdict against him in court last week.
The revelation was made by one of the President's sons, Eric Trump, whose wife is a Republican National Committee co-chair, Laura Trump.
Eric Trump was asked by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures about how much money the former president has raked in since last Thursday's verdicts.
Quote, this might be a little inside information, but as I was leaving my house about 37 seconds
ago, I asked my wife, what are we up to now?
And Laura said, in terms of small dollar, we're well over $70 million.
This is $21 donations, $43 donations, right?
Small dollar donations.
If you add the large dollar donations to it, you're over $200 million.
Wow.
Eric Trump noted that 30% of those people who had never been, who have never been, I mean these are Americans who are pissed off.
They're coming out of the woodwork and they want to support a guy that they just believe is getting bamboozled by a system.
That's right.
We have this from Vaas, pointing out that $100 million is coming from Miriam Adelson, philanthropist and widow of casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, already pledging $100 million to the Trump campaign, highlighting her continued commitment to Republican causes.
And of course, CEO of Blackstone, that's interesting, Steve Schwartzman, Yeah, look guys, I gotta tell you.
I think Donald Trump is doing pretty good.
We got Politico reporting on this.
Blackstone CEO Steve Schwartzman will back Trump.
Our economic, immigration, and foreign policies are taking the country in the wrong direction, he said.
Blackstone Group CEO Steve Schwartzman announced on Friday that he will back Donald Trump in the 2024 election, giving the former president the support of one of the biggest names on Wall Street.
That right there.
I tell you, I think Trump's winning.
I think I think Trump will win.
And I'm hoping that's the case.
Okay?
There are some people who believe it is a grand conspiracy, that Trump has already been selected.
I don't know.
Whatever.
I don't care.
I think Trump won.
I think we are now seeing everyone start to line up behind him, realizing the Deep State, Wall Street, etc.
You're not going to win.
You can't win.
And so, your best opportunity is negotiation with the King Deal maker himself.
Donald Trump's policies in his first term, man, look, there's a lot of ways to view the world, I suppose.
I remember when Obama was coming into office and they said he's going to end the wars.
And I was like, why do you think he's going to end the wars?
I mean, well, I voted for him.
In the end, I broke down and I was like, all right, whatever.
I think it was the first president I ever voted for, to be honest.
Yeah, I think that was, I think it was Obama.
And then he blew up a bunch of kids right away.
And I was like, yeah.
And then he bolstered our troop presence in Afghanistan.
And I'm like, this is not ending war.
There's nothing different here.
Many of these leftist activists that I knew abandoned the cause completely after Obama won.
They're just like, yay, we did it, we won.
And then I'm like, hey, war's still going on.
It's getting worse.
Obama's starting more wars.
And they're like, we don't care.
Occupy Wall Street was interesting because it was critical of the Obama administration.
And it was just generally populist.
Well, here we are now.
Donald Trump's first term, no new wars, peace agreements, bolstering our national security, getting rid of TPP.
He was kicking the international crackpots in the bum.
I want to see more of that.
I want to see a 2024 Trump presidency where he says, we are securing our border, we are shutting this down, we're deporting the criminal aliens who have entered this country, we're bringing jobs back to the Midwest, we're not going to have these ridiculous trade agreements with China, we're not going to spend 100, 200 billion dollars in Ukraine, it's over!
That's what I want to see.
And I think more and more people are starting to realize, you're not going to beat him.
They're not going to beat him.
They're trying.
When we look at this conviction, there's a lot of people, it's frustrating, guys.
Come on.
They're like, I see these comments and they go, Tim thinks we're winning.
Donald Trump is going to be put in jail.
And I'm like, dude, they're only doing this because we are winning.
Like, that's the reality.
You don't lock up the frontrunner for the presidential election when you're winning.
If Biden and the Democrats were actively winning, they'd be like, Trump can do whatever he wants because he can't beat us.
This is the issue right now.
A lot of people want to see Biden be impeached.
They want to see Biden be put in jail.
And my response is, yeah, but Trump is winning.
You know what I mean?
So it's like, if you take Biden out of the running by locking him up, does that just mean they can easily swap him out for someone to actually give the Democrats a better chance?
Not that I think at this point they're going to be able to pull anything off.
Trump's winning everybody over.
Here we go.
We have this from Maddow Blog.
Oh, Rachel Maddow.
What does she think?
This is Steve Bannon writing for Maddow's blog.
Post-conviction polls offer hints about the impact on the 2024 race.
And, of course, they just choose, like, a couple polls.
Ones that show that Trump's not doing so well.
This is interesting, though.
There is some interesting information here that I think is worth pointing out.
ABC News Ipsos.
A 50% plurality said the jury in Trump's case made the right call.
51% concluded that Trump did intentionally do something illegal.
49% believe he should end his candidacy.
This means there's 51% who think he shouldn't.
Or presumably it's like 50 and then there's like some unsure.
But this means, and the funny thing is that 49% plurality, yo, if 51% think he did something intentionally illegal, that means 51% believing that he may have done something illegal or that he intentionally did, are also kind of like, he either should run or it's none of my business.
Like, this is funny.
This implies there's a substantial amount of people, assuming this poll does represent the national feeling, That are like, yeah, Trump did something illegal and he should definitely still run and be my president.
I wonder how many people are like, yeah, I don't care.
I think so.
Sure.
Don't care.
Because if you really break it down, so they might ask you, like, do you think Trump really did, you know, insert falsification of records or whatever?
And they go, yeah, I think so.
And I don't care.
It's an administrative error.
Hillary Clinton did substantially worse.
It's the funding of the Steele dossier, the smashing of the phones, the bleach bed on the server.
No accountability at all.
Here we go, Reuters.
They say in the survey, 10% of registered Republicans said they were less likely to vote for Trump now that he's been found guilty of felonies.
Similarly, 25% of registered independent voters said the same thing.
The data also found Biden leading by two points.
We'll see how things change among independent voters around the time the conviction is shortly after.
I believe it was a day later.
I think Trump was up like 13 points among independent voters.
Morning Consult says 54% approved of the verdict.
15% of Republican voters of the former president should end his candidacy.
Roughly 7 in 10 voters in the poll said Trump's other pending criminal trials should be resolved before voters cast their ballots.
And then they show YouGov.
54% agreed the trial was fair.
57% majority agreed with the jury's verdict.
51% said Trump is unfit.
Now, the reason I highlight this is I'm not going to play the same game.
The polls are actually relatively mixed.
Trump has some beneficial polls.
Like I mentioned, there was one Daily Mail put out.
Trump was up massively.
I think six points on Biden.
There have been several polls showing that among independent voters, he's doing particularly well.
So, we have the data here.
The reality is I don't think it's conclusive.
I don't think we have any conclusive information.
Trump is currently enjoying a 1.1% lead in aggregate.
We can take a look at these polls, so let me make sure I have the date correct here.
It was the 30th.
That... I believe the 30th, right?
When Trump was found guilty?
Let me make sure... Trump... Make sure I get the date right.
I'm pretty sure it was the 30th, right?
So we can track this.
Let's see.
Trump found guilty.
This was... No.
Let's see.
Let's do this.
I want to make sure we have the date right because we're tracking the...
So this was May 31st, I think.
So let's take a look at the polls we have right now.
Right now, we don't really have strong data.
We have these polls from May 29th to the 31st showing Donald Trump up.
May 31st, 31st, he is up.
We've got one from Ipsos showing that it's even.
And then Biden has four polls with an advantage.
Two points, two points, one point, one point.
I think we're gonna have to wait a week or so before we know exactly.
But, like I said, I think the only polling that really matters is the hard cash that is flying in from first-time donors.
According to FiveThirtyEight, it's actually been pretty good for Trump.
I mean...
Before the trial, take a look at this.
From mid-May, Quinnipiac, Biden's up 1.
You've got NPR-PBS-Marist, a biased, probably, poll.
Pre-conviction, up 2.
Emerson shows Trump up 2.
Then you get to May 30th, 31st, and you've got Biden up 2.
Forbes has Trump up 2 in the same time period.
This is when they're convicting him.
And then you have Biden up one from Morning Counsel.
It is not absolutely definitive.
Now, that's just Trump v. Biden, which is not fair, in my opinion, because you have to put Kennedy into the mix.
When you do, what do you see?
Even after the convictions, Trump is maintaining a two-point lead, 1.9 to be fair, with a TIPP poll tie.
Forbes, two points.
Economist, this is just before the conviction, one point.
Emerson had Trump up five points.
You cannot count Kennedy out of this.
We'll have to wait and see exactly how this plays out, but my friends, the only poll that matters.
Let me play this video for you.
I wish I could frame it better.
Here you go.
unidentified
Trump coin features a victorious Trump sworn in as president on the front and Biden in prison on the back.
The pro-Biden coin features a victorious Biden sworn in as president on the front and Trump in prison on the back.
Each private-issue commemorative coin has been minted in exquisite detail and layered in pure .999 silver.
The artistry and intricate detail are stunning.
Each magnificent piece comes with a custom, double-sided display case that showcases both sides for preservation and protection for years to come.
A signed certificate of authenticity assures it is part of this official collection.
Democratic blue and Republican red are symbolic of each piece.
Alright, so let me break this down for you guys.
to get your choice of the pro Biden or pro Trump coin for just $39.99 protected by our
All right, so let me break this down for you guys.
This is you can buy one of two coins.
One coin has Biden being sworn in and Trump in prison on the back.
The other has Trump being sworn in with Biden in prison on the back.
And how do you think the polling breaks down?
You guessed it!
According to their website, presidentprison.com, this is amazing, 64% of sales are going to the Donald Trump winning coin.
The people who are deciding to buy this coin overwhelmingly want to see Trump winning.
It is 2-1!
You know what the reality is?
The people who are paying attention to the news are more likely to vote for Donald Trump.
The people who are not paying attention to the news are more likely to vote for Joe Biden.
I think that's just the reality of where we're currently at.
I wonder what it means.
You know, you've got these people who watch MSNBC garbage cable news or whatever.
And they believe lies.
And then here, take a look at this.
Biden in prison or Trump in prison.
Yes, I will disclose I have purchased these coins.
They're hilarious and I'm going to have them.
But take a look at the media lies.
We have this from the New York Post.
I'll tell you the other polling that matters.
Trump shows up to UFC 302 in Jersey.
Amazing UFC fights, by the way.
Dude, I don't know if you guys watched the fight, but Kevin Holland, man.
It was looking like he was getting beat, but then he annihilated that dude's arm.
Anyway, more importantly, Kevin Holland, UFC fighter, wins, immediately jumps out of the octagon, and shakes President Trump's hand.
Sean Strickland did the same thing.
Same thing.
Both those guys, amazing fights.
I had some money down on Sean Strickland.
He came through.
He's an amazing fighter.
It was awesome watching.
And I want to stress, I'm not a big UFC guy, but it's not the same without Joe Rogan.
You gotta have Joe Rogan.
He really is good.
Really is good.
The Strickland fight was absolutely incredible.
But take a look at this.
Aaron Rodgers is there, right?
Trump walks into UFC, the crowd goes nuts!
They're chanting, we want Trump!
They're chanting, FJB!
And what does the media do?
Look at this.
New York Post.
Aaron Rodgers, Sean Strickland have different reactions to Donald Trump's UFC appearance.
This is a lie, by the way.
Here's the reality.
jets quarterback and Rogers, who has been considered a running mate for RFK, didn't
look at Trump who nodded in his direction when he was going to his front row seat if
he entered Trump blah blah blah.
Ron Philip Kowski.
Oh, we love this guy.
He's always lying.
Aaron Rogers remains in his seat and ignores convicted felon Trump as he walks by tonight
at the UFC fight.
Here's the reality.
Let me see if I got this right here.
Aaron Rogers walks up to Trump, shakes his hand, gets it on camera, posts it on Instagram,
says, handshake paper with the president Trump.
Priceless.
This is wild.
This is the game they play.
And then you got, oh yeah, I got the photo here, right here.
We got UFC fighter Kevin Holland celebrates victory with Trump after he appeared to snap opponent's arm.
Yo, I'm watching that fight.
It looked like Holland was yelling at the ref, call it dude, because he was like, I've got his arm, I'm going to break it.
And the ref like...
It looked like Kevin Holland was trying not to destroy this guy's arm.
Amazing fight, dude.
That guy's awesome.
I love that.
Man, shout out to Kevin Holland.
That was amazing.
But here's what you get.
Now, now hold on.
Why are they lying about Aaron Rodgers?
Why are they claiming he snubbed Trump?
Well, because Trump walked past him and he remained in his seat.
You're supposed to jump up from your seat, block the president before he gets to his seat?
That's insane.
I was at Mar-a-Lago a couple weeks ago.
Sitting in a chair, we're hanging on the patio, and Trump is walking by, and I smiled and I waved and said, Mr. President, I'm not gonna bother the guy!
He's leaving, he's getting on a helicopter or something.
And it's like, there's no way.
Aaron Rodgers was being respectful, and then when he had his chance, he walked up to the president to meet him and shook his hand and got a picture and called it priceless!
Priceless!
But the media lies!
Why?
The only way they win is by tricking you into thinking you're on the wrong side of history.
That's why the activists scream, you're on the wrong side of history.
They want you to be scared.
They want you to be scared that in 10-20 years, the neobolsheviks and the communists have power, and then they're going to come and they're going to redguard you.
They're going to put you in a struggle session.
They're going to put a dunce cap on your head.
They want you to fear that, but they are losing.
Trump walks out to a massive UFC, massive stadium, everyone's screaming, cheering for him.
Remember when he did that in New York City?
Now hold on.
You might be saying, yeah, but it's UFC, it's a men's sport.
Sure, maybe, but it's still New York City, which is what, like 75% Democrat?
And the crowd goes wild.
Same thing happened here in Jersey.
They don't want you to realize that Aaron Rodgers was shaking his hand.
They want to put that word out.
They're going to go to all their friends and say, do you see how even Aaron Rodgers doesn't want to associate with him now?
They're going to be like, wow, Aaron Rodgers, after Trump was convicted, now he's not getting any support.
B.S.
It is a lie.
They lie, they cheat, and they steal.
This is what they do.
I'll make it personal, and I'll stroke my own ego.
We had that skateboarding event in D.C.
Well, actually, what happened first was, I showed up to Freedom Plaza in D.C.
It's a plaza, and people skateboard there.
And I was hanging out with my girlfriend, and, you know, we were riding around, just having fun.
And there were some pros there we ended up meeting.
So these guys, one person started stalking me, basically, taking pictures of me and posting them on Instagram.
It was weird and creepy, this woke chick.
And then some dude goes on the skateboard forum claiming that I can't do any skate tricks.
They were like, yeah, no, he can't actually skateboard, and they tried it this whole time.
I know, it's like, I'm not trying to make it about me, but I do think I can speak to this personally, and I can explain the fear they have.
What we are seeing right now with Nitro Circus, if you're not familiar, this is... Nitro Circus is action sports, rollerblading, BMX, scooters, skateboards, you know, all that stuff.
I think they do motocross, I'm not sure.
I think they do.
And it's a tour where they go around the stadiums and they build these massive, huge ramps that are like 70 foot long gaps and they're like 40 feet in the air.
It's like the X Games stuff.
And people pay to see dudes do cool flips.
Public Square sponsors Nitro Circus.
The Nitro Circus guys are based, not cringe, they're on Public Square.
I think Travis Pastrana, I think he's sponsored by Black Rifle Coffee.
And so you have, in this space, the wokeness is being crushed.
We got the boonies coming up soon.
A bunch of pros are coming out.
We're negotiating a contract with some pro skateboarders and other pro athletes, because we're winning.
Culturally, we are winning.
And this is what they have to do.
They have to claim that they own culture and you are on the wrong side of history.
So when I go skate somewhere, people say, oh, was Tim able to skate?
They go, no, he's really, really bad.
He's a poser.
You want to be cool and good at skateboarding, you don't want to be like him.
Because they want to make sure people think, oh wow, it's fake.
They lie to you.
Unfortunately for them, we film ourselves skating.
And it's the craziest thing because, you know, when I was skating there...
I was doing, like, pretty gnarly tricks.
For them, the lie was so blatant and insane.
But they have to maintain the facade to keep people in the cult.
Aaron Rodgers didn't meet Trump.
He snubbed him!
Because even Aaron Rodgers— Aaron Rodgers got up and shook his hand.
They're lying about everything!
Look at this New York Post!
Come on!
The New York Post running the same lies because they don't fact check.
This is the point.
Ron Filipkowski lies.
Well, to be fair, he did remain in his seat, but he didn't ignore Trump.
That's a gross understatement.
A gross overstatement.
It's a lie.
It's a lie.
He remains in his seat and ignores Trump.
Ignored him?
He got up and went over to shake his hand.
They need you to believe it.
Otherwise, you'll break out of their cult.
Well, Donald Trump seems to be doing tremendous.
He was asked by the Fox & Friends hosts, you know, what if he goes to jail?
He says, I don't care.
I don't care about that stuff.
So be it.
If Trump actually goes to jail, I think they're going to put him in jail.
The rumor, what is it?
Let me make sure I got this right because I'm hearing like the prosecutors are recommending jail for Trump.
I don't know if that's true though.
Let's see.
True.
Trump is trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn it.
We'll talk about that later tonight.
I was hearing that there's some recommendation that Trump actually serve jail time from the prosecutors.
I don't know if that's true, though.
Just some rumors that are going around.
But this is where we're currently at.
You put Trump in prison, he's going to raise $400 million.
Now, me personally, I already donated the maximum to the man.
And that's about it.
That's what I'll do, because I'm shocked and appalled by this.
But you'll notice a lot of people are saying they're pledging like $300k or $100 million.
These are to probably super PACs, political action committees, and even their own campaigns.
I mean, if you have money, you can put up a billboard somewhere saying you should vote for somebody.
You're allowed to do it.
So I think, in the end, this is I think they're going to get out of it what they want to get out of it.
I think Democrats are trying to trick moderate people who aren't paying attention.
They need that convicted felon thing because now they can, they're going to keep lying.
They're going to keep hammering the lies.
They're going to say Trump is now a, he's been sexually liable for sexual abuse and crimes.
What is wrong with you people?
Because they're trying to go to a regular guy, regular woman, and say, you really want to support that person?
Are you crazy?
They are poisoning the well.
But I ask you this.
What's their policy proposals?
What's their plan for 2025?
Oh, what's that?
They don't have one?
Their only plan is Orange Man Bad again?
Yeah, I will happily vote for the convicted felon.
Next segment's coming up at 4pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
The Fauci hearing is currently underway, as I record this.
We've got some spicy news already.
Marjorie Taylor Greene has called for a criminal referral against Fauci for crimes against humanity.
I can say at the very least, the man lied to Congress and the American people, and this is confirmed by Newsweek three years ago!
We knew that Fauci was lying about funding gain-of-function research and his involvement.
He lied to Rand Paul.
It was ridiculous how they allow him to get away with it.
And I'll put it bluntly when I say, I want to see criminal prosecution.
I'm done with this.
Watching Donald Trump get, you know, run over the coals.
Watching Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, you name it.
You get these leftists being like, look, the fact that all of Trump's political allies are being criminally charged proves they're bad people.
No, it doesn't.
It proves that you are fascists!
Fauci is testifying before Congress.
Rand Paul says, I have a document here that says literally gain-of-function research on it.
And Fauci's like, we didn't do it.
Gain-of-function research, what is that?
What does that pertain to COVID?
Okay.
So there's some other big news, too, before I get into the finer details.
Dr. Fauci confesses he made up the COVID rules, including six-foot social distancing.
Wow.
Amazing.
And we have one exchange I can pull up for you, where when asked, Fauci says, there were no studies done that showed masks did anything.
You have to respond to the pandemic before you have the data.
Incredible.
Saying, hey, it was a tremendous opportunity to impose restrictions without evidence and then see what happens afterwards.
There's a word for that.
When you subject something to a circumstance to collect data, what do we call that?
We call that an experiment.
Now, look, I'm not suggesting it's the same thing as, like, kidnapping a bunch of kids, locking them in a box, and then doing weird tests on them.
I'm saying that Dr. Fauci proposed rules not knowing whether or not these things would have any impact.
People were losing their jobs over this.
Kids were forced to do it.
It was causing social and learning problems with no evidence.
Trust the science, they said.
The science they made up on the spot.
Can't believe it's been four years.
Four years.
But gain-of-function research.
I'll address this briefly so you can understand for those that aren't familiar.
I think many of you are, but gain-of-function is when they take a virus and they want to have it gain functions.
It's really that simple.
So how do they do this?
There's a variety of ways.
One, they'll take a virus that typically infects, say, chickens.
And then what they'll do is, they'll take the infected chickens and they will put them in close quarters with another animal until some element of the virus will mutate and be able to infect the other animal.
So here's what they were doing with bats.
They take a bunch of bats, they infect them with a coronavirus.
This is what they do in Wuhan.
Put them in a cage and let them all infect each other.
They then track the symptoms that are happening in each animal And they say, here's something new.
This one's, you know, this one's gagging and wheezing and struggling to breathe.
They then isolate that one and make it infect a bunch of other bats so they've isolated a more virulent strain that can cause a specific symptom.
Now, you have caused it to gain function.
The general idea is that in close quarters, these viruses can mutate and gain these functions.
They just accelerate the process by doing as I explained.
Fauci was funding it.
And so when Rand Paul said, were you funding gain-of-function research?
unidentified
Fauci goes, no, we were not.
We were basically just making viruses more virulent by push... What do you mean?
We were doing lab work where we put an animal in this room and then we gave it a virus.
And then Rand Paul's like, Dr. Fauci, you're explaining gain-of-function research to me.
The document here says you did it.
And he goes, no, we didn't.
The way I always described it is like, Rand Paul's going, Dr. Fauci, is there a door on your house?
unidentified
There is no door!
There is simply a large piece of wood with a knob on it, and when you turn the knob, hinges swivel, and the wood moves outward, and it's like, dude, you're describing a door to me!
It's absolutely insane that these people are able to get away with lying and committing crimes!
Well, here we are.
Take it away, Marjorie Taylor Greene.
What's the latest?
She ended her time by calling for a criminal referral against Fauci for crimes against humanity.
She did not provide Fauci time to respond.
Her remarks were preceded by criticisms against Fauci's attendance at a baseball game where he was seen not wearing a mask.
Green referred to a photo of him at a game as evidence of his repulsive evil science.
I wouldn't put it that way because the left will weaponize that and they're gonna be like, evil science!
Dr. Fauci confesses he made up the COVID rules.
Oh boy.
Bombshell testimony from Dr. Fauci reveals he made up the six-foot social distancing rule and other measures to protect Americans from COVID.
Here we go.
Republicans put out the full transcript of their sit-down interview with Fauci from January, just days before his highly anticipated public testimony on Monday.
They planned to grill him about COVID restrictions he put in place, that he admitted didn't do much to slow the spread of the virus.
It's actually fascinating.
They ask him about the vaccine, and he goes on to say, Initially, it did slow things down, but, you know, later was not as durable.
That's how he described it.
Well, I'll let you hear his words.
They plan to grill about COVID restrictions he put in place that he admitted he didn't do, that didn't do much to slow the spread.
Kids' learning loss and social setbacks have been well documented, with one National Institute of Health study calling the impact of mask use on students' literacy and learning very negative.
Dude, I don't know if y'all have been paying attention, but I know many of you are probably teachers or no teachers.
The stuff I'm hearing from teachers.
Kids who are in like 8th grade who can barely read.
That is a complicated issue because in the beginning, the first iteration of the vaccines did have an effect, not 100%, not a high effect, they did Prevent infection and subsequently obviously transmission.
However, it's important to point out something that we did not know early on that became evident as the months went by is that the durability of protection against infection and hence transmission was relatively limited.
Whereas the duration of protection against severe disease, hospitalization, and deaths was more prolonged.
We did not know that in the beginning.
In the beginning, it was felt that, in fact, it did prevent infection and thus transmission, but that... I'm gonna pause real quick and just note that he said, felt.
And then he's like, listen, I'm not saying you should have been forced to take it.
I think that's wrong.
No one should have been forced to take it.
He said, but in the beginning with the first strains, I did see when we started giving out the vaccines, I'm paraphrasing here, but he's like, an effect where people were less likely to come in sick and with serious conditions.
The problem is, twofold, mandates forcing people, that's wrong.
But here's the other component of it.
It was private businesses making the decision to do it.
So when the Libertarian Party comes out and says, private businesses should be allowed to mandate whatever they want, I'm like, okay, well that's how you got the vaccine mandates, dude.
So no, they shouldn't.
There should be limits on what businesses can and can't do, in my opinion.
I'm not going to sit here and scream free market capitalism and Fiat Puccini or anything like that.
I think that there's got to be reasonable limits to prevent collusion between systems of power to deprive the rights of individuals, be it private or public.
That being said...
I thought it was absolutely hilarious that you've got a libertarian guy on stage saying, no vaccine mandates.
In my experience as a doctor, I did see a positive effect in the beginning.
They booed him for it.
I'm like, why are you booing him?
You don't know.
You're not a doctor.
You don't know.
This guy's a doctor.
He said in the beginning it worked.
And I'm like, okay, that doesn't justify mandates.
That doesn't justify boosters or anything.
I think it's just, the guy's a doctor.
It shows that people get their news and information and adhere to it on a tribal and moral line.
The libertarians that were booing a doctor who said he saw a positive effect from it, I'm like, I don't understand.
You'll see a doctor go online and say, I see bad things, and they'll go, wow, he's so smart.
Just don't force me to do it because I don't know what's going on.
You can believe whatever you want to believe.
Just don't hurt people and don't take their stuff.
How about that?
But that was funny to me.
Now Fauci?
Fauci hurt people and took their stuff.
Figuratively.
I mean, and indirectly, literally.
But here we go.
The hearing's currently ongoing, so we'll wrap this one up here, and we'll come back to this later tonight with TimCast IRL.
So smash that like button, become a member at TimCast.com.
I'll wrap it up there.
The next show will be coming up at 6 p.m.
on the channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and we'll see you all then.
It's a backfiring kind of day, from Trump's guilty verdict backfiring to now pro-Palestine protesters block the route of the Philadelphia Pride Parade.
Wow.
They have a big sign saying, no pride in genocide.
Arguments actually broke out between these people where, no joke, people were screaming, Palestine, they're the most oppressed people!
It's settler colonialism taking over, killing these people.
And the Pride Parade people were like, are you nuts?
unidentified
LGBTQ people are the most oppressed people in the world!
And I gotta tell you, I gotta tell you, the Pride Parade people are the least oppressed.
All the major corporations changed their logos to flags.
Congratulations, guys, you're not oppressed.
You're in the institutions of power.
Here's a story from TMZ.
Here we go.
Pro-Palestine protesters block the route, call out pride and genocide.
Here we go.
Pro-Palestine protesters faced off with marchers during Philadelphia's Pride Parade, stopping the flow of the annual event and creating a pretty chaotic scene.
Video circulating on social media captures the moment the two groups met in the city of brotherly love, with the LGBTQ plus walk halted in front of pro-Palestinian individuals yelling out, Palestine will live forever!
Well, how about that?
the river. Well, how about that? Drummers in the LGBTQ March are beating away on drums
while protesters on the other side scream their chants, and a few people started getting
testy with one person seemingly held back from approaching the Palestine protesters.
You know, look, man, I take this one back to, um, where was it?
Was it Birmingham?
Where was that?
No, I don't know.
It was in the UK.
And you have this group of Muslims protesting LGBTQ lessons in school.
And then you had gay people coming out and being like, we're doing this for you!
We're doing it for you!
And the religious conservative Muslims with women in niqab are like, how dare you!
You keep this away from my children!
And I'm like, These woke people think Islam supports them.
It's like their brains don't live in reality.
I don't know where their worldview forms.
Quite incredible.
Here we go.
Worth noting, many of the pro-Palestine protesters have LGBTQ plus friendly clothing on, so it seems they may be celebrating pride while still protesting for Palestine.
Okay.
The protesters defaced a couple pride flags, writing, No Pride in Genocide across them, a move that may raise
some eyebrows in the gay community.
Wow. Tensions have run high between Palestine protesters and other groups,
pro-Israeli demonstrators and conservative groups, with protests exploding on college campuses
in recent months. Meanwhile, the U.S.
government has urged Americans both here and abroad to be vigilant this month, fearing terrorist activity at events for pride against LGBTQ individuals in general.
So, both groups are almost certainly stressed.
Thankfully, no violence broke out this time, and everyone got to say their peace.
Sure.
Well, let me tell you this, my friends.
The left have hitched their wagon alongside a religious conservative group.
Islam is an Abrahamic conservative religion.
Thank you and have a nice day.
I mean, I don't understand how... I take it back.
Okay, I do get it.
It's just funny.
It is a cult.
Are you in the cult or not?
If you're in the cult, then... hear the rules, I guess.
They don't make sense.
Look at this video.
unidentified
A bunch of young kids here with their Arab parents, and they are stomping the pride flag here at the protest.
The Arab community is sending a message, I believe, to the woke that they are not accepting of this, ladies and gentlemen.
Yes.
Yes.
Any message you'd like to send today?
Leave our kids alone!
Leave the kids alone, she says, ladies and gentlemen.
Leave the kids alone, she says, ladies and gentlemen.
Conservative religious folk do not like the pride stuff.
Look, man, I gotta be honest.
There are videos I'd love to play for you.
Can't do it.
I can't do it.
You play these videos of adult men in their underwear, thrusting their genitals in children's faces, and YouTube takes your video down.
Yet it's supposed to be acceptable in public.
There's one video of a guy buck naked, wearing a Bugs Bunny mask, jumping up and down in front of a little girl.
Buck naked.
I mean, I guess it's not Buck naked, he's got a Bugs Bunny mask on, but he's naked.
And this little girl's watching.
And that's legal?
It's not.
But no one is doing anything about it.
You know, I say this all the time.
It's been this way since I was a kid.
I remember Pride events in Chicago when I was a kid, and they're naked and they're doing sexual things in the street.
I remember when I was in my early 20s, hanging out in LA, and I had a bunch of friends that were going to Pride.
And it was funny, let me go back, when I was a kid, my mom wouldn't let me go outside during Pride.
She's like, no, no, you guys, people are doing sexual stuff and they're all naked.
And I was, and I genuinely didn't understand.
Because people kept telling me, it's about love.
And you know, my dad's like, look, you can love whoever you want, right?
Just keep it in the privacy of your own home.
And then what happens?
Everybody keeps telling me that pride is all about just being able to love.
And you want to get married.
And you want to just be able to have a family with who, you know, you can't choose this.
I walked down North Halstead.
It's near Wrigley Field.
And anybody from the area knows this.
There were mannequins in the window of one store with junk.
Anatomically correct mannequins.
And they were in sexually suggestive positions.
And I was like 12 or 13.
Walking down a public street in the city and that's in the window.
And so I ask, if it's about love, how come literally all of it is sex?
All of it.
Because it's a lie.
That's what it was.
It was sex.
For some people, sometimes, it was love.
But almost all the times I saw this, sex.
They had a store that sold genital macaroni and cheese.
And I'm like, why?
Why?
Why is it always sex?
Because they say it's about love because they're lying to you.
They are preying upon your goodwill And that's the problem with Christians in this country.
The average Christian hears a person says, won't you just let us love each other?
We're not doing anything wrong.
We're in the privacy of our own home.
And they went, yeah, I suppose that's fine.
And then what do they do?
Went out in public, got naked, started doing weird sex things.
There's a video from, I think, two years ago, or it might have been last year.
Two guys engaging in an overt sex act on a truck in front of full view of the public.
Now, not, I won't call it a hardcore act, you know, but it's basically a sex act.
For that matter, man, I gotta tell you, the stuff that's on Instagram, you know, we've got this story over on SCNR, let me see if I can pull this one up.
X is allowing users as young as 13 to view hardcore adult content, including photographic, AI-generated cartoon, hentai, or anime.
Kids can see it.
There's one account, and it's everywhere.
I don't understand why Elon allows this.
I think he should be pressed on it.
Because he did a lot to get rid of a lot of the predators, but now there's this.
Dude, you can't allow 13 year olds.
Make it 18 and up, I don't care.
Blur it.
Make it so you gotta log in and provide an ID to prove your age to be able to see it.
I think that's fine too.
And it's blurred, you can't see it.
It's an Instagram.
Instagram, I think, is worse.
Well, they're both equally bad.
The issue with Instagram is that they do this... It's overtly sexual, but it's not crossing the line kind of content.
And you guys probably know what I'm talking about.
You've probably seen it.
You've got... Let me see if I can just... I'll just pull up my Instagram right now.
Instagram always does this.
What do I watch?
I watch skateboarding.
I watch poker.
And Nitro Circus, but I got a bunch of Magic the Gathering stuff.
Dude, I don't need to see, but they always try to inject this stuff in the Instagram search.
The weirdest thing to me, yesterday, I'm on Instagram, and what do I see?
Bondage.
And it's art.
It's called art.
Women who are wearing almost nothing.
The bikinis they're wearing are almost not even clothes.
You can't see them.
There was one where a woman was actually naked, but the ropes that had bound her and gagged her were covering her up.
And I'm like, how is this allowed on here?
Children are on this platform.
Yep.
They don't care.
No one's doing anything about it.
So look, man, I tell you.
It's bad out there in the streets, but you gotta take your, don't give kids phones.
If you got kids, don't give them a phone.
Don't give them a phone.
Give them a candy bar phone, not a smartphone.
But their friends are gonna be showing that stuff too.
Cause other parents are gonna give their kids smartphones and those kids are gonna watch that weird, weird stuff.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up tonight at 8pm over at youtube.com slash timcastIRL.