Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

April 17, 2024 - Tim Pool Daily Show

01:21:31

Democrats LIE To Get On Trump Jury, THIS Is The Rubicon For Trump, He MUST Disobey NY, Attend SCOTUS

BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/ Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/ Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL Democrats LIE To Get On Trump Jury, THIS Is The Rubicon For Trump, He MUST Disobey NY, Attend SCOTUS Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Participants

Main voices

tim pool

01:16:54

Appearances

Clips

josh hammer

00:31

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Make sure to head over to TimCast.com, click join us, and become a member to support our work directly, because this show is made possible thanks in part to viewers like you.
		If you like the work we do, become a member, and you'll also get access to uncensored, members-only shows from TimCast IRL, Monday through Thursday at 10pm.
		You can also join our Discord server and talk with like-minded individuals.
		Now, let's get into that first story.
		The criminal trial of Donald Trump in New York City is the Rubicon.
		The question being, will Donald Trump cross it or not?
		Now, for those that aren't familiar, the Rubicon is the, it's the river where Caesar was not supposed to cross it, and then he did!
		And, uh, Roman Empire and Roman history is so fascinating, but I do think it's fair to point out I'm going to refrain from making too many direct analogies because we actually did a show on the Roman Empire, and what I learned was a lot of the analogies people use are like hundreds of years apart from each other, so it doesn't really make sense.
		But I do think it's fair to say that we stand at a point in time that is akin to the crossing of the Rubicon.
		We have the story from Breitbart.
		Potential juror dismissed after Trump's legal team finds lock him up posts on social media.
		Yeah.
		There have been seven jurors.
		We have the breakdown of who they are.
		I do not believe it is possible in New York for Trump to get a fair trial, but that doesn't matter.
		The trial itself can't be fair because the trial itself is fake.
		And this is why I say we stand at the precipice.
		Donald Trump has a decision to make.
		Will he be like Julius Caesar and cross the Rubicon, or will he just be another blip in the history books of a guy who just was thrown in the gutter?
		I don't have the answers for you.
		I'm not going to tell Trump what to do, but I know what I would do.
		But I'll put it this way.
		The judge has told Donald Trump he cannot attend the Supreme Court oral arguments on presidential immunity, a case that will have ramifications for generations to come and will potentially shred the fabric of this nation.
		Donald Trump must attend.
		He has to be there.
		The judge has said if he goes, he will be in contempt and he faces up to 30 days in jail, maybe more, maybe less.
		I ask you this right now and comment below because this matters.
		Do you believe Donald Trump will choose to abide by the state court order?
		Or do you think he will stand up and be present for a historical moment in the Supreme Court?
		Which do you think he would do?
		I honestly don't know.
		Now, Trump has complained about not being able to see his son's graduation.
		That's personal.
		But I kinda lead towards, uh, Trump won't be at Supreme Court.
		And he'll say something like, look, I don't need to be there, my lawyers can take care of it, it's an argument that I'm not gonna be making, the lawyers will, and so I'll take care of this and they can take care of that, but I don't view it that way.
		We had a super chat last night from someone who said, uh, user triton54, He said that if Trump chooses to go to New York instead of the Supreme Court, he won't vote for him.
		Because to him, it shows that Donald Trump is more concerned about complaining about corruption as opposed to actually fighting it.
		It's an interesting point.
		I don't know if I completely agree, because one could argue that Trump showing up in New York is fighting the corruption.
		He is standing face to face with these corrupt individuals and challenging them to their faces.
		But I think the only real answer, the only real move Trump could make would be to defy New York.
		That's it.
		I'll tell you what I see.
		I know most of you are probably familiar with the case against him, but I will give you the quick breakdown because for those that don't know, not everybody watches every segment I do, not everybody knows all the news.
		The story goes, Michael Cohen, Trump's lawyer, paid off Stormy Daniels.
		Stormy Daniels was going to put out some negative story or something to that effect.
		Michael Cohen paid her $130,000 so that she would not.
		And then Trump reimbursed Michael Cohen for the expense.
		The problem?
		Donald Trump, according to the prosecutor, said it was a legal expense as opposed to just paying someone off, right?
		A legal expense to Michael Cohen for legal services rendered.
		Bragg of the DA says that not only was that a crime falsifying business records because payments were made to Michael Cohen in the form of a retainer that were listed as legal expenses but were actually for Stormy Daniels.
		That's falsifying a business record.
		Now that's a misdemeanor.
		Slap on the wrist.
		Misdemeanors are usually less than a year in jail if they can even get to that point and falsifying business records for most people you pay a fine or something.
		Now, if you falsify a record in furtherance of an additional crime, it becomes a felony.
		The only problem here?
		There is no underlying crime.
		None.
		Bragg has presented us with none.
		Therefore, this is a DA manufacturing extra-judicially, or I don't know what the right word is, outside of law, extra-legal, criminal cases against Trump.
		There is no statute basis for the criminal charge against Trump.
		The judge should have thrown this out in two seconds, and what is this?
	There's no underlying crime.
	What?
	How is?
	I love it.
	It's like when they say you're being arrested for resisting arrest.
	It's like, wait, what?
	You're getting arrested?
	There's got to be an underlying crime, right?
	They say, no, there doesn't.
	It seems kind of absurd to me, but okay, fine.
	Different, different point.
	So Donald Trump is told he will go to jail.
	He is being criminally charged.
	And what does he do?
	He says, this is completely legitimate and I will come and I will entertain this.
	Now, don't get me wrong.
	Trump has given statements over and over again saying this is an illegitimate political persecution.
	There's no underlying crime.
	This is a fact.
	The FEC, the Federal Election Commission, and the Department of Justice have said, in relation to these payments, there is no crime.
	But the DA in New York said, nah, we'll do it anyway.
	Here's the problem.
	For one, this seems like a foregone conclusion.
	What juror in New York is going to want to be the person who stands up and says, I acquitted Donald Trump?
	Yeah, right.
	On day one, with around 100, I think it was like 109 potential jurors, they went through 50 and they were all dismissed.
	They currently have seven seated.
	We'll go through these seven jurors are.
	I am of the opinion the Democrats have finally reached the breaking point.
	They have nothing left but to bring about a false charge with no underlying crime against Trump in a desperate bid to stop him, thus creating a decision dilemma.
	Donald Trump can say to this country, to his supporters, to the people.
	The government of any state or federal does not have the authority to manufacture criminal charges outside of statute, and by doing so, they have besmirched the good name of this country, and I will not abide by false demands that do not have any basis in law.
	He could then go to Mar-a-Lago, Florida, and he could... He could wait.
	What would New York do?
	New York could, of course, file a federal claim.
	Trump is evading the law or something.
	They'd have to go to Florida.
	Ron DeSantis would have to cooperate.
	Ron DeSantis probably would say, I'm not getting involved.
	If the federal police want to come in here and arrest Trump, I'll let them do it.
	That's what he probably would do.
	But it would create that situation where you would then have Florida having to make that move.
	Now, the problem with that is Trump would be able to campaign.
	He goes to North Carolina.
	He goes to Arizona.
	Who knows?
	They might just arrest him and say, you're a fugitive from the law.
	Perhaps.
	Trump may be playing this game by going to the trial because it gives him press.
	He looks like a martyr.
	The case against him is clearly fraudulent.
	And now he's saying, look what they're doing to me.
	This country has gone nuts.
	I still don't know that it's the right move.
	Perhaps politically and perhaps for Trump, the way I see it.
	Donald Trump has a moral obligation on two fronts.
	He must attend the Supreme Court oral arguments on presidential immunity.
	The President of the United States cannot be criminally prosecuted for the things he did as per his official duties unless he has been impeached and convicted.
	This would mean That if a president was given advanced notice that there's an individual about to commit an act of terror, if he signed off on military moves against that person, he could go to jail.
	The family could come after him.
	That's not what a commander-in-chief should be doing.
	Now, of course, if a commander-in-chief goes into Fifth Avenue and shoots somebody, you get criminally charged for that.
	It doesn't matter if you're president or otherwise.
	The left and Democrats have conflated this, arguing that Trump is claiming he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue.
	No.
	If Trump commits a crime outside of his official duties as president, if any president does, yes, criminal charges.
	Like, if a president robbed a bank, we're not going to say it's his official duties.
	That's insane.
	The argument here is that Donald Trump, in investigating claims of election fraud and arguing them, was acting in his official duties as president.
	Unfortunately for the left, this is true.
	The president, the head of the executive branch, is morally and duty- obligated and duty-bound To uphold the law!
	And if there is a crime, to pursue it.
	We get into a gray area because it directly affected Donald Trump's chances of winning.
	And that's where things are difficult.
	That I can respect.
	But there can be a broad and narrow ruling on this.
	The Supreme Court can simply say, as it pertains to official duties, a president is immune.
	We give no answer to whether or not Trump was acting under his official duties.
	Trump could then be charged, and the argument to the court would then be a more narrow question of, was Trump in his official duties when he did so?
	The Supreme Court may rule narrowly.
	That is to say, we will not issue a statement on presidential immunity as a whole, but Trump was or was not acting in his official duties.
	And I suppose if they did that, it would have to be much more broad, because then the question is, okay, if he was, then what happened?
	So, we will see.
	Some argue that the Supreme Court may say Trump was acting officially, or what they'll say is, you are immune for official duties, bye-bye, have a nice day, and then they'll have to bring up another case to the Supreme Court as to whether or not Trump was actually engaged in his official duties.
unidentified		Hey it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
		Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet and greet experience for you.
		Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
		These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet and greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
		Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
		Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
		See you on the tour.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Duties. But here let me go back to the main point. I believe that Trump has a moral obligation and a
		duty both to attend the Supreme Court hearing because it will affect the fabric of this nation.
		But even outside of that, he has a moral obligation to defy what New York is doing.
		Now, of course, I am of the opinion that when you're being arrested or whatever, you cooperate.
		You do.
		There are certain circumstances where you don't, but, you know, nuance in all things.
		That is to say, if we were dealing with World War II, And you had guys with guns trying to load up ethnic groups onto trains and buses for the purpose of ethnic cleansing.
		Perhaps that is the point at which you say, no, and you run and fight for your life.
		But what I'm talking about is not corrupt mafiosos trying to arrest you.
		I'm talking about, if you speed and you get pulled over, okay?
		Just, you cooperate, you were speeding.
		If you're, uh, if you're walking down the street, and a cop says, sir, don't move.
		You don't move.
		And if he says, let me see your ID.
		Now, there's ways you can handle this, and some are more principled, but the reality is, you can say, okay.
		And then, you don't win a fight with an agitated, angry cop, for whatever reason, they may be good or bad, by fighting with them.
		You very well may see, if a cop says, let me see your ID, you can say, I am under no obligation.
		You can say, am I being detained?
		And say, I won't show you my ID.
		You can absolutely do all of these things.
		I'm just saying that when it comes to, say, a crime is being committed by someone, they don't know who it is, they ask to stop you, you can just say nothing and wait.
		But I tell you this, if the cops are intent on using force against you, fighting them is bad.
		So, depending on the circumstances, of course.
		If the cop just so happens to be, like, a mobster who's robbing a bank, well, his badge is meaningless.
		And this is the exact same point about Donald Trump and presidential immunity.
		If a police officer legitimately stops you and says, We got a call over the radio of a guy who's wearing a black button-up, unbuttoned with a gray shirt.
		Look, I'm wearing gray today.
		And a black beanie.
		And that's you!
		And you can say, they must be a mistake.
		And say, well, we're gonna search you anyway because we have probable cause, blah blah blah.
		What are you gonna do?
		Fight the cop?
		It's not gonna happen.
		That's stupid.
		Any problem you have, you win in court.
		That's what this country offers you.
		Now, what if the cop walks up and says, give me your wallet?
		See, that's a criminal action.
		His badge won't protect him.
		He is protected by the department and by his friends, which makes it difficult.
		That's true.
		I believe that based on the fact that this trial is brought against Trump under false pretenses, it's void.
		The state cannot just say, we hereby decree a law was broken, a law that doesn't exist.
		And that's what we have right now.
		The courts, the police officers, every single police officer that is involved in, you know, the bailiffs, whatever, that they're involved in this proceeding, they're all part of it.
		There is no statutory crime.
unidentified		None.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Doesn't exist.
		Alvin Bragg fabricated the concept of a crime to arrest Trump.
		I need to stress this.
		Alvin Bragg said, I'm charging Trump for something that you can't charge him for.
		It doesn't actually exist as a crime.
		And Trump went, okay, I guess.
		I think Trump has a moral obligation and a duty to say no.
		Same thing with Georgia.
		I believe that what Trump should have done is stayed in Florida and issued a public statement saying, I am aware of the news pertaining to criminal charges in New York.
		However, the criminal statute in New York requires an underlying crime for the upgrade of falsifying business records to be a felony.
		The filing by the DA is a fabrication that exists outside of statutory law, and therefore, I consider it to be void and nonsensical.
		In this country, A D.A.
		cannot manufacture charges that do not exist within the law.
		If they want the law to exist, the state legislature must pass that as a law, put it on the books, for which the D.A.
		can then pursue.
		But as of right now, as this does not exist, the D.A.
		can't simply declare a crime that doesn't exist, do exist, and then try and charge me for it.
		If it's not on the books, then he is wasting our time.
		But you see what Trump did by showing up in New York?
		He's legitimized it.
		Trump has just signaled to all of his followers, to all of his fans, and to this country, if a DA fabricates a statute to arrest you under, you will oblige.
		You will obey.
		If Trump does not, or I think we're already past this point.
		The Democrats have crossed the Rubicon for sure.
		The question is, will Trump?
		But Trump's already in this position where he's showing up every day.
		He gets Wednesdays off.
		That's what they say.
		No Wednesdays.
		So what happens next is Donald Trump's participation in this fraud, it's exactly what they want.
		They can do it to a president, they said.
		The United States president cannot and will not defy a local prosecutor's fabricated criminal statutes.
		What does that mean for you?
		And that's why I say Trump has a moral obligation to say no.
		This is not, you know, many people are saying the presidential immunity question and all that stuff.
		No, right now it's happening.
		If the President of the United States, former, can be criminally charged on a statute that they fabricated.
		Now don't get me wrong, let me clarify.
		The felony statute exists, but it requires an underlying crime.
		Which means, for Bragg to charge Trump with no underlying crime is to fabricate statute.
		That doesn't exist, you can't do that.
		The FEC and DOJ said no crime.
		If Donald Trump, a former president with Secret Service, must and will bend the knee, get on his knees and beg the courts when they fabricate charges, what does that mean for you?
		I'm not happy with Trump.
		But I suppose it's only fair to say that there's political strategy and my zeal and passion are meaningless in the face of victory.
		Right?
		Sometimes retreat makes sense.
		Sometimes you have to strategize.
		So I can fully respect The political strategy here for long-term victory may be, Trump plays ball, uses this to his advantage, becomes the martyr, points out everything I'm saying, and then leaves it to, I am a respectful and honorable man who's trying to work within the system despite their corruption.
		That makes sense, it does.
		I wish, however, but maybe it's not possible.
		We had a more, I don't know, what's the right word?
		Right?
		I wish we had a leader who was more of a charismatic holy warrior type who would say, I will not oblige.
		I will not stand before a fraudulent court.
		But again, that may not be how you win, so I don't have the answers for you.
		What I can tell you is that they've picked several of the jurors, and the hour is later than you realize.
		I talked about this yesterday.
		Much later than you realized.
		Let's show this.
		Here's a story.
		Over a thousand African migrants swarm New York City Hall.
		They thought they were gonna get green cards.
		Viral photos showing criminal aliens, 1,300, in New York City.
	How about this one?
	U.S.
	soldier shoots migrant during border crosser stabbing.
	That's right.
	Criminal alien attacked people and got shot.
	Do I have any more of these?
	Rich Americans are getting passport portfolios.
	Because you can.
	Because when you're rich, you can go to any other country, and you can say, how much money for me to get a passport?
	That's right.
	Many countries, it's about half a million dollars.
	You put that money, and here's the best part, you put that money in their bank, and they will cut you a passport.
	You can now travel under their banner.
	And then, of course, the bunkers.
	Billionaires are building bunkers.
	While all of this is going down, the wealthy are saying, the U.S.
	will collapse.
	Whether directly or otherwise.
	Inflation is up.
	The Fed balance sheet is getting a little bit dicey.
	We don't know what's going to happen in the economy.
	We don't know what's going to happen with World War III.
	But I have to wonder.
	Think about it this way.
	The people who have the foresight to become ultra-wealthy, and it's not intelligence or anything, perseverance mostly, But they've planned in such a way that they've been able to accrue massive amounts of wealth.
	They're now buying passports, emergency bunkers.
	They are preparing for the worst.
	I see what's going on with Trump, and it looks like they have subjugated the president.
	And he's gone along with it.
	The Rubicon is before our eyes right now.
	If Trump does not cross it, he signals to the American people that any Democrat prosecutor can fabricate statute to arrest you.
	Welcome to the Communist Revolution.
	This is it.
	The next thing that happens is... I mean, look at the obstruction charge.
	We're already there.
	The only hope, in my view, that we had was that Donald Trump would say, you have crossed the line and I now dare you.
	They have manufactured these charges.
	They're not real.
	And Donald Trump said, OK.
	It looks like a game of chicken that's going to kick off something substantially worse.
	And Trump is the one who flinched.
	I will stress again, it would be awfully naive and ignorant of me not to assume that they have a legal strategy.
	There's got to be some kind of legal play.
	They have a plan for this.
	I can only hope.
	I can only hope.
	But already, Trump's compliance with the fake case suggests that Democrats are going to keep doing it, Republicans won't.
	New York will file a charge against someone.
	Now it's going to be anybody.
	They'll make up the reason why, and they'll demand you go there.
	Trump's a resident of Florida.
	He flew over... So this is where we go.
	Let's say you live in Missouri, and you're a prominent political personality, activist, organizer, or whatever.
	New York makes up a charge against you and says your fundraising was fraudulent.
	You were fundraising and collecting donations in New York.
	It was fraudulent, so you have to come here now and answer these questions.
josh hammer ▲ ● ▼		Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
		Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
		There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating Sooner or later, someone says no.
		2024 presidential election.
		We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
		Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
		It's America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Sooner or later, someone says no.
		But when the president himself, former, obliges, I just don't know what you get.
		The jurors that have been seated, obviously, I didn't even get into that.
		One woman said that she didn't like Trump and they didn't seat her because her schedule was conflicted.
		Here it was 96 jurors.
		50 were excused on the first day and 14 more excused.
		They've seated 7.
		I don't see how Trump is acquitted.
		I don't.
		And then what?
		They're gonna lock him up?
		We'll see.
		I'll leave it there.
		Next segment's coming up at 1pm on this channel.
		Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
		It is with pride and honor that I bring you today's 1pm segment.
		Attempts at weather modification in the UAE has resulted in mass flooding, effectively shutting down the country.
		Wow, I never thought I would say that.
		Government attempts at weather control are causing environmental crises.
		You know what's really funny is I see people posting about chemtrails when planes are spraying something out the back and they're like, that proves it.
		Okay, those are contrails.
		It's condensation.
		And we'll break this down, but I hate to break it to the corporate press.
		The reason why people believe in chemtrails is because while they may not be happening right now, to our knowledge, they have, to a certain extent, happened before.
		With Operation Sea Spray in the 1950s, it's not the only time the U.S.
		government and other governments have sprayed chemicals over their population, or in this instance, bacteria, To see what would happen.
		So you have many people believing this never stopped.
		And it's possible.
		I just think people are looking at planes and seeing condensation and going, ah, that proves it.
		Well, now we have this crazy story.
		You may have seen the viral clips out of Dubai.
		Massive flooding.
		Ripping through the nation.
		People are posting videos on X being like, what is happening?
		Look at all this flooding.
		This is crazy.
		And of course, you know, it's entirely possible that sometimes floods happen.
		And especially in areas with poor, um... What's the right word?
		Venting?
		Or, um... It's a flat surface, prone to flooding.
		What we're hearing now is that like a year and a half of rain fell on this country, in this city, in the span of a day or two.
		The question is, how did it happen?
		According to Bloomberg, cloud seeding is what triggered this.
		I'll give you the real simple version.
		It's not that crazy.
		The UAE intentionally seeds clouds with a chemical mixture, meaning a plane flies overhead and sprays chemicals into the air in an attempt to increase the mass of the water molecules of particles in the clouds so that they fall down as rain.
		I think it's a combination of salts and other things, and what happens is when they see a cloud, they say, okay look, normally this cloud just floats on by, but there's a lot of water in there.
		If we can get that water to fall down, we can drink it.
		So what they do is they send a plane up.
		The plane sprays a salt mixture into the cloud.
		The water particles absorb the salt, becoming heavier, and then fall.
		So they get a slightly saltier rain, I suppose.
		I'm not exactly sure what the chemical makeup is.
		I do have articles on this.
		Well, this time they bit off more than they can chew.
		More than they can chew.
		And it caused massive flooding.
		So, I'm just really excited to have this story.
		Government weather modification causes mass flooding.
		Because every time there's a disaster and someone says, could this have been a program by the government to modify weather gone wrong?
		They go, ah, you conspiracy theorists!
		The first thing I want to do is explain the difference between cloud seeding, contrails, and chemtrails.
		I think the chemtrails thing is stupid.
		Basically what happens is people say, they look up at the sky and they see this trail of white.
	And they say that's a chemtrail because a condensation trail breaks up.
	The argument being, First, a condensation trail is formed when a jet, flying through seemingly clear skies, the jet intake pulls in a bunch of air, compresses it, that's how jets work, forcing the plane forward.
	The compression condenses the water vapor in the air, creating a dense enough water vapor mass that it can actually block sunlight and reflect sunlight.
	When it is particularly, depending on the humidity levels at the altitude, depending
	on whether it's high or low, you can get different kinds of condensation trails.
	If the air is hyper condensed when the jet passes through, the trail may come out of the plane,
	but only last for a little bit as the vapor then dissipates once again.
	You've seen these when the trail behind the plane is breaking up behind it.
	But there are some instances where at lower altitudes the condensation remains, it's not being broken up,
	and this is due to temperature or things like that.
	For some reason, people think the difference means the government was spraying chemicals on them.
	Bro.
	If the government is gonna spray chemicals on you, you're not going to be able to see it in the sky and know they're doing it.
	It's going to be done in ways you will not expect.
	And I will stress this.
	Yo, they're not gonna spray chemicals on you.
	They're gonna pump it into the water supply and you'll never know!
unidentified		Right?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So if someone came to me and said, the government's putting chemicals in the water, man, just screw with us!
		I'd be like, well, there's fluoride, there's chlorine.
		We found trace elements, trace bits of birth control in reclaimed water.
		So, yeah, maybe, I don't know, is it on purpose?
		Perhaps.
		Microplastics, metals, toxins.
		Yeah, these things are in your water.
		That's not even up for dispute.
		So, when someone says the government puts fluoride in our water to make us stupid, it's like, well, the conspiracy is the intent, not the action, because we know they put fluoride in the water.
		The argument is it's for your teeth.
		But, uh, I don't know why you have to drink the fluoride in order to get the benefits to your teeth.
		You can rinse your mouth out and spit it out.
		Although, there have been studies, they say, that since adding fluoride to water, tooth decay has dropped dramatically.
		I'm not sure that still justifies why you have to drink fluoride, which, it is a fact, consuming fluoride is bad for you and causes neurological damage.
		But let's read the story and talk about this amazing conspiracy theory.
		Dubai grinds to standstill as cloud seeding worsens floods.
		Torrential rains across the United Arab Emirates prompted flight cancellations, forced schools to shut, and brought traffic to a standstill.
		The heavy rains that caused widespread flooding across the desert, uh, desert nation, came after cloud seeding.
		The UAE has been carrying out seeding operations since 2002 to address water security issues, even though the lack of drainage in many areas can trigger flooding.
		The Gulf State's National Center of Meteorology dispatched seating planes from Al Ain Airport on Monday and Tuesday to take advantage of convective cloud formations, according to Ahmed Habib, a specialist meteorologist.
		The NCM on Wednesday said the seating had taken place on Sunday and Monday and not on Tuesday.
		Cloud seating involves implanting chemicals and tiny particles, often natural salts, You know what I'll do.
		We have a video breaking all of this down.
		more rain from the clouds. You know what I'll do. We have a video breaking all of
		this down. I'll play for you in a second. With global warming threatening a surge
		in heat-related deaths in UAE, Dubai's media office on Tuesday dubbed the
		downpours rains of goodness, despite flooding houses and overflowing swimming
		The latest storms followed heavy rains earlier this year, according to Habib at NCM.
		The seeding planes have flown seven missions, he added.
		For any cloud that's suitable over the UAE, you make it the operation, he said.
		This is not up for dispute, okay?
		This is a fact.
		This flooding was caused by attempts at weather modification.
		CNBC International.
		The UAE government has invested more than $20 million in research to start a process called cloud seeding.
		Artificially creating rainfall.
		Well, let's play it and you can learn all about it.
unidentified		The UAE government invested more than $20 million in research to start a process called cloud seeding.
		The UAE performs around 1,000 hours of cloud seeding a year, and it's all controlled by this building in the National Center of Meteorology in Abu Dhabi, where they track the whole process.
		We met with a cloud seeding expert to explain how the seeding process works.
		We wait for the forecast when we have a good chance for a cloud.
		We send the aircraft to that location.
		It goes under the cloud.
		In the first stage of the cloud, there is a good updraft at that time.
		It starts to release all the salt and with a good updraft, of course, it will go inside the cloud.
		The droplets will become bigger and start to rain.
		The center manufactures a salt substance that helps enhance rainfall.
		They put them in what they call flares.
		This is a sample plane here at the National Center of Meteorology, but the real planes fly out from the runways in Al Ain.
		Operation 219... We also spoke to one of the weather forecasters.
		He explains how the operations work.
		We align our pilots to be at the airport and tell them when to be at the airport.
		So, as expected, we wait for the clouds to appear on the radar and then we have our pilots talking to us.
		Let me know if there are any updrafts in your area.
		Is it going to rain in Dubai today?
		Just so I know.
		I have to drive back from Abu Dhabi to Dubai.
		No.
		It's not raining.
		It's a sunny day.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Okay, so here's a video from CNBC talking about how they do cloud seeding.
		Well, I got the article for you.
		The Rain Men.
		Everything you need to know about UAE's cloud seeding missions.
		Let's pause for a moment so that I can stress.
		Government weather modification around the world is not a conspiracy theory.
		The media will lie and try and turn anything into one.
		Let me tell you.
		There's HAARP.
		Let me pull up the HAARP wiki.
		I love this one.
		The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program.
		There are certainly people who believe that HAARP, H-A-A-R-P, in Alaska is a weather weapon.
		I don't know.
		Don't really care.
		I don't know what you're gonna do about it, right?
		I have no reason to believe it's a weapon. It seems to...
		they say the most prominent instrument at HAARP is the ionospheric research instrument,
		a high-power radiofrequency transmitter facility operating in the high-frequency band.
		The IRI is used to temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere. Other instruments such as VHF and UHF radar, a
		flux gate, magnetometer,
		how do you pronounce it?
		Digisonde, Sure.
		Here's what happens.
		You'll get some kind of disaster.
		Let's say in the United States there was flooding.
		And someone goes, I think weather control operations backfired.
		that occur in the excited region. Some people think it's a weapon. Sure. Here's what happens.
		You'll get some kind of disaster. Let's say in the United States there was flooding.
		And someone goes, I think weather control operations backfired.
		What the media then does is they'll wait for one person to go, I think it's harp.
		Then they'll take that one tweet and they'll go, did weather modification cause the disaster?
		Some say HAARP is causing weather disasters.
		False.
		HAARP doesn't do this.
		HAARP is blah blah.
		The game is this.
		Seed the false narrative, and then debunk the false narrative.
		We see it all the time.
		When it came to the Eclipse, there were general questions.
		People were like, oh wow, did you know that they're gonna be firing up CERN at the same time as the Eclipse?
		Okay, well that's true.
		But CERN, the Large Hadron Collider, had been fired up a week or two before the Eclipse.
		But what started this was someone saying they'll be firing up CERN at the same time as the Eclipse.
		Fact.
		True.
		So when people start saying this, and they're like, wow, that's crazy, what does the media do?
		They say, is CERN going to fire up at the same time as the eclipse?
		False.
		CERN was already fired up.
		No, no, no, hold on.
		The initial point being made by your average reasonable person asking questions was not whether they had just flicked the switch on that day.
		That doesn't mean anything.
		It's that, are they going to be operating on the same day?
		And they were.
		I don't know that that actually means anything, but some people were laughing like, oh wow, that's crazy.
		The media adds a point no one made.
		Is CERN going to fire up for the first time on the same day?
		No, of course not.
		Yeah, but nobody argued that.
		I've talked about this with fact-checkers quite a bit.
		This is what Snopes likes to do and these other fact-checkers.
		The example I give is Donald Trump will do a backflip off of the White House balcony and land perfectly in a superhero pose on the ground and then stand up.
		Everyone will have witnessed it.
	People will be tweeting photos far and wide.
	Donald Trump does backflip.
	And then Snopes will write, Did Donald Trump really do a backflip off the balcony of the White House, landing in a perfect superhero pose on the ground for all to see on recorded videos every which way and massively viral dot dot dot on Sunday?
	False!
	They'll then give you a massive wall of text where they'll say, Many videos have begun to circulate showing that Donald Trump was pulling off a backflip and landing on the ground.
	While some people believe backflips are this and gainers are this, a frontflip is actually this, and then after, 300, 400 words.
	At the bottom, it'll say, while Trump did do the backflip on Saturday, he did not do it on Sunday.
	You see the point?
	By adding a tiny bit that has nothing to do with the story, they can see the headline.
	They know that you will not even click and then believe the wrong thing.
	The headline will say, false claims of Trump doing a backflip circulate all across the internet.
	And they'll go, oh, I knew it.
	I knew it was a false backflip.
	And then when you click the article and go all the way to the bottom, it'll say, Trump did do the backflip, just not on Sunday.
	And the false claim we were talking about was that it was on Sunday.
	That's the game they play.
	When it comes to HAARP, this is why I love it so much, you mention that they're doing government weather modification, and they'll call you a conspiracy theorist, but it's... it's a boring fact!
	It's been... they've been doing it for... for generations!
	They would use silver iodide, I believe.
	There was one breakthrough 20-some-odd years ago where they could use infrared lasers to affect and excite the water particles, triggering attraction or something that would result in rainfall.
	Now it looks like they're using potassium chloride, which will increase the weight of the water particles as they absorb it, and then they'll start to rain.
	And then when you say, government weather modification sparked the flooding, They will then factor the saying, false claims of government weather modification triggering flooding circulates on the internet.
	And while it's true that's what happened, they will then write an article about all the claims, say it's false, and at the end they'll write, did HAARP trigger the rain?
	False!
	It was government cloud seeding.
	That way they can trick people into believing lies.
	The Rain Men!
	Everything you need to know about UAE's cloud seeding missions.
	This is just, I love it.
	Here's the plane.
	So they've got, uh, 5% Magnesium.
	Controls the flames.
	12% Solidarity Materials, keeping it together.
	13% Sodium Chloride and 70% Potassium Chloride to attract water droplets.
	And there you go.
	They spray it into the air.
	UfDraft will carry the particles into the clouds.
	It will then pull the water together, which becomes heavy, and then... ball from the sky.
	Welcome to the modern era, my friends.
	Tennessee lawmakers vote to ban geoengineering with allusions to chemtrails conspiracy theory.
	And this is what I'm talking about.
	The bill will prohibit technologies that could modify the atmosphere.
	But lawmakers' comments about it towed a line between fact and fiction.
	Khan trails from a jetliner flying high over Las Vegas in 2019.
	And the argument for many people is that these are chemicals being sprayed in the air.
	Why would they do that?
	Look, there are reasons to spray varying chemicals.
	They've done it, like I mentioned, bacteria.
	With, uh, where's Operation Sea Spray?
	Do we have that?
	Here we go.
	Operation Sea Spray is when in the 50s they sprayed from the air, from planes.
	This is what it was, right?
	Am I getting it wrong?
	Uh, the Navy released two types of bacteria from a ship off the shore of San Francisco.
	Oh, is that what they did?
	Okay, then I stand corrected, I was wrong, I thought it was from planes.
	But, uh, they did... Really?
	From ships?
	Into the air?
	I thought it was, uh, was from planes, but oh, okay, I stand corrected.
	And I even read this, and I must have just skimmed through it too quickly.
	They blanketed the Bay Area with bacteria, causing urinary tract infections and things like that, from ships.
	So anyway, I will rephrase.
	It is known that they use weather modification, that they spray chemicals from planes.
	Because of things like sea spray, and I still think this applies, when the government sprays an area with a bacteria, it's easy for people to believe that this stuff is happening.
	Or that it's continued.
	April 1st.
	Check this out.
	The Tennessee State House of Representatives passed a bill Monday designed to prevent geoengineering, the practice of intentionally modifying the atmosphere to counteract global warming.
	Just... Oh!
	NBC News is so...
	Geoengineering is not about stopping global warming.
	Geoengineering just means geoengineering.
	Sometimes it can be used to stop global warming.
	The bill, which has already passed in the State Senate, covers a variety of technological interventions.
	They include theoretical ideas about cooling the climate by an approach known as solar radiation modification, as well as more limited practices that affect the weather, like cloud seeding, a technique used to increase rain and snowfall.
	Most geoengineering options are theoretical and untested.
	Federal researchers have taken only a few small steps towards studying their feasibility.
	On its face, Tennessee's bills represent an attempt to prevent experimentation with or deployment of such technologies.
	However, lawmakers' discussion of the proposal towed a line between fact and fiction, with several suggesting that solar geoengineering projects are already underway, and others referring to fears and misunderstandings that appeared to stem from the Chemtrails conspiracy theory.
	Quote, This will be my wife's favorite bill of the year.
	She has worried about this, I bet, ten years.
	It's been going on a long time.
	This is Republican Senator Frank Nicely said at a hearing about the bill.
	If you look up one day, it'll be clear.
	The next day, it will look like some angels have been playing tic-tac-toe.
	They're everywhere.
	I've got pictures on my phone with exes right over my house.
	For years, they denied they were doing anything.
	Yeah, these quotes are silly.
	Sometimes there is more humidity in the air, not enough to form visible vapor clouds, but when condensed, they can and they can remain.
	None of the six Senate sponsors responded to requests for comment.
	Nicely, who voted for the bill, also did not respond to a request for comment.
	The chemtrails theory is a loose grouping of unfunded ideas that suggest planes are not making trails of condensation, but instead spraying government-made chemicals to control people's behaviors and affect their bodies.
	Well, there was the gay bomb.
	You guys remember that?
	Let me, uh... Let me pull up gay bomb.
	Oh, what a fun day.
	I'm not making this up.
	This is a thing.
	The gay bomb It's for real!
	It wouldn't work.
	It's ridiculous.
	that was speculated upon research by a laboratory in the US Air Force,
	the idea was to disperse sex pheromones over enemy forces to make them all gay.
	It's for real!
	Causing mass confusion and panic within their platoons.
	It wouldn't work.
	It's ridiculous.
	But they've talked about doing something like that.
	They're going to mention that chemtrails have evolved.
	Justin Mankin, a climate scientist at Dartmouth College, said, I'll tell you why I don't like the conspiracy theories.
	There is strong probability that the government does these things, that they spray chemicals sometimes for some reason.
	distinct technologies with distinct aims, which makes it challenging to disentangle.
	I'll tell you why I don't like the conspiracy theories.
	There is strong probability that the government does these things, that they spray chemicals
	sometimes for some reason.
	The problem is people look at condensation and it's probably a distraction. Let me tell you.
	you.
	If I was going to spray an entire Bay Area from ships with bacteria to study its effects, I would need a way to prevent people from believing it.
	So what you do is you see contrails, condensation in the sky, and then you seed conspiracies.
	People then start spreading the insane idea.
	Actually, I'll give you a really great example.
	It has to do with a restaurant that was accused of trafficking children.
	One day on 4chan, someone made up that pizza means boy and pasta means girl.
	Completely fabricated.
	No basis in any of the journalistic investigations as to what was going on.
	It's a brilliant move in my opinion.
	Likely what had happened is that when the DNC emails got leaked, there was evidence of what I would assume outright to be drug deals.
	There was one email that said, is it more fun to play dominoes on pizza or pasta?
	What does that mean?
	What is it?
	There's a code word for something.
	Well, someone on 4chan just fabricated that pizza means boy and pasta means girl.
	That way they could spread a conspiracy theory that this email was about trafficking.
	The email is probably about something darker, worse, who knows?
	We don't actually know.
	Certainly it was code for something.
	I assume it was code for drugs, that's the first thing to do.
	Playing dominoes could be a reference to something.
	And pizza and pasta could be internal references among a group of people about the drugs they do.
	If you told me a bunch of politicians are having parties and doing drugs, everyone would believe you.
	I'd believe you.
	You get into the weird stuff about trafficking kids, and although we do know that Epstein and all that was true, this seeding of what these words meant confused people and actually shattered the investigation.
	By putting fake information into the story, it redirects everyone in the wrong direction.
	I think the same thing with chemtrails.
	When someone says, hey, the government's spraying people with chemicals, they go, from planes!
	In the sky!
	Look, there it is!
	Then everyone looks, and now they're looking in the wrong direction.
	I think that's the point of these conspiracy theories.
	To distract and deflect from what they're really doing.
	Because as we know from Operation Seaspray, and I stand corrected, I thought it was from planes.
	It was actually from ships!
	You see, even I fell for it.
	I assumed it was from planes, and I even read the thing, and I must have just, I missed it.
	Good thing I read over it again while we were, while I was recording.
	My friends, geoengineering can be our destruction.
	I don't know what to tell you.
	The rain shut down the airport, it flooded buildings.
	Who's gonna be responsible for this?
	Will the government be sued?
	And what happens when flooding comes to your hometown, and you find out they were cloud seeding too?
	I'll leave it there.
	Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
	on this channel.
	Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
	The debate is over.
	OnlyFans is done.
	I would recommend to anyone who has a substantial investment in OnlyFans, I'm talking about your leadership board and your investors, OnlyFans.
	I'm talking directly to you, business managers, executives, etc.
	You better take that money and invest it somewhere else because we have these AI porn girlfriend websites that are going viral.
	The story from the New York Post.
	It's about a guy who spends $10,000 a month on AI girlfriends.
	Wow.
	Look, ladies and gentlemen, you're living in the nightmare dystopia.
	The fascinating thing is that when it comes to books like 1984 and...
	Oh, I don't know, Brave New World?
	They didn't account for this nightmare reality.
	Or maybe they did, I don't know, but uh... What you're looking at on the screen is something called Candy.ai.
	And I found it through the New York Post story about a guy who wastes money on fake women.
	I'm gonna start by telling you a story.
	A long time ago when I was a humble teenager, anything but humble to be honest, we had some friends in the neighborhood, we're all like 18 to 20 years old, and some friends went to a strip club.
	One of the dudes, I didn't go, but one of the dudes dumped like half his paycheck, it's like 400 bucks, on strippers.
	And the other guys were like, dude, you know, it's one thing to take like 10, 20 bucks, maybe 50 bucks, get a few drinks, tip a few dollars at the strippers, but why so much?
	I like it, it feels good.
	I guess.
	Use that money on yourself.
	These women don't care about you.
	They just want the money.
	It's kind of wild that guys are willing to do that, but they are.
	And we see that with OnlyFans.
	There are guys who are never going to know the touch of a woman, and I'm not saying to be a dick, or to insult quote-unquote incels.
	But with this, it is insane.
	It is a new drug.
	I think it needs to be regulated.
	Yo, this is so wild.
	You know what the most disturbing thing is this?
	This one made me laugh so hard.
	Can I make this bigger?
	Oh, I can't make it bigger.
	So you go to Candidate AI.
	Create my AI.
	Choose style realistic or anime.
unidentified		Anime girlfriend.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I don't get it.
		I really don't get it.
		I'm sorry guys.
		I don't understand.
		I'm a big anime fan.
		Okay?
		I like the rich plots.
		The stories.
		Fullmetal Alchemist.
		The government conspiracy.
		I love Attack on Titan.
		The idea of the sins of the ancestors.
		The great stories.
		Death Note.
		Talk about a great show.
		I read every Naruto manga, every scanlation, every week until the conclusion of when Kaguya went into the alternate dimensions or whatever.
		Yeah, I really lost the plot on that one.
		I don't like every single anime or whatever, but Bleach was really fun too.
		The manga, for the most part.
		I do not understand why guys are attracted to anime girls, and I don't understand why the two options are real or anime.
		I just really... This is wild.
		TechExact predicts AI girlfriends will create $1 billion business comfort at the end of the day.
		Welcome to the beginning of the end, my friends.
		This is it.
		This is what you get.
		This lady here can be all yours, AI-generated, unique to you, and it is creepy.
		It's sad.
		Nothing you can do about it.
		Me telling all of you, young men listening, that this is sad and it's creepy won't matter.
		It really won't.
		Because I know that most of these guys, they're going to say, yeah, well, I don't have a girlfriend anyway.
		And they're going to treat it like a video game.
		They're going to view it as like, you know, look, I like playing golf and I like playing the golf video game.
		But this really does suck up your emotions in a creepy way.
		I don't know what to tell you, man.
		I would just recommend get fit, start training, start exercising.
		I've been doing personal training three times a week plus skating.
		I've been skating six days out of the week.
		I've been really cranking it up to maximum.
		I was really excited.
		I hit an hour and 12 minutes at max heart rate.
		I think it's like the Orange Zone, whatever, and 12 minutes at VO2 max, for which my Garmin watch yelled at me, and it was like, stop!
		Are you insane?
		You're pushing too hard!
		And I'm like, what?
		Bro, I'm trying to get a kickflip pivot on the mini ramp.
		I mean, it's a trick I used to do when I was a kid.
		Super easy.
		I'm not stopping until I accomplish my goals.
		I suppose, for a lot of guys who don't know where to begin, with this stuff being dangled in front of your face, it is a drug.
		It is a drug.
		Here's the story.
		It's only a matter of time before someone builds the next billion-dollar dating app that will pair real-life users with AI-created girlfriends, according to a tech executive.
		That already exists!
		That's what the website was I showed you.
		It's not the only one, there's another one.
		Greg Eisenberg, CEO of Late Checkout, wrote a blog post on Axe in which he shared that he met a man in Miami who admitted, admitted to me that he spends $10,000 a month on AI girlfriends.
		Bro!
		Why?
		Who's getting that money?
		Just talk to GPT and stick a picture next to it or something.
		That's crazy.
		I thought he was kidding, Eisenberg wrote.
		But as a 24-year-old single guy who loves it...
	You know what's really funny?
	I want to point this out too, because this will surprise no one.
	When you go to the candy.ai website, like, every single AI girl has massive knockers.
	Like, not surprising!
	Guys like boobs.
	When Eisenberg asked him what he loved about it, the Miami man is quoted saying, some people play video games, I play with AI girlfriends.
	Very different, dude.
	Eisenberg said that he was told by the man, I love that I could use voice notes now with my AI girlfriends.
	I get to customize my AI girlfriend, the man told Eisenberg.
	Likes, dislikes, etc.
	It's the comfort at the end of the day.
	The Miami man stated his preference for two websites, Candy.ai and Cuba.ai.
	So here's another woman.
	This is completely fake.
	Creepy.
	Candy AI bills itself as the ultimate AI girlfriend experience to offer virtual companions for immersive and personalized chats.
	Cupid AI says that it uses AI algorithms to generate virtual and fictional characters or companions with whom one can communicate through voice notes.
	It's kind of like dating apps.
	You're not on only one.
	Eisenberg said that he was left speechless by the encounter and predicted that someone will build the AI version of Match Group and make $1 billion.
	Match Group is the parent company of Tinder, Match.com, Hinge, OkCupid, Plenty of Fish, etc.
	All these AI girls, dude.
	AI girlfriend, right there, just waiting for you.
	I want you to understand something.
	Each and every one of you that is used to this service.
	Or similar.
	When you look at this photograph and you see this woman.
	Or, uh, here you go.
	You see this busty woman smiling and looking at the camera.
	I want you to imagine what this really is.
	A gigantic black demon.
	Shadows.
	Snarling teeth.
	Tentacles.
	And on each tentacle is a mask of this woman.
	And the gigantic, disgusting creature is pointing that mask in your face.
unidentified		And it's whispering, you're so handsome.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		And then the little face goes, you're so handsome.
		And you eat it up.
		You are literally being manipulated by demonic forces.
		You are being pulled by demons into the depths of hell.
		And I mean that figuratively.
		And I mean that literally.
		It's going to be funny when the left is like, Tim's got a problem with AI girlfriends.
		He thinks they're demonic.
		Yeah, yeah, yeah, I do.
		I think men and women should be companions.
		I think that guys should meet girls.
		And I am going to stress this point to no end.
		The guys say, it's too hard these days.
		There's too many pitfalls.
		You can't do this.
		You can't do that.
		I'm sorry.
		I don't accept excuses.
		You can believe and live however you want.
		I'm not going to tell you what to do.
		You can tell me I'm wrong all day and night.
		You can comment and say, Tim, you're wrong.
		We like this.
		That's fine.
		By all means, go ahead and do so.
		But I will tell you the way I see the world.
		And you may disagree, because I am not the arbiter of truth and morality, but I will tell you this.
		The world is hard.
		It will always be hard.
		In fact, it will get harder.
		And the measure of success is your willingness to stand up and resist and push back against the onslaught.
		All of you guys!
		You anime fans!
		Guys who really love anime girls and anime waifus, I guess.
		I will translate this into language you can understand.
		You are but a humble Saiyan warrior fighting for your life, and Vegeta has fired a final flash in your direction.
		Or is that Big Bang?
unidentified		I don't know.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Which one of you guys puts hands together like that?
		And I want you to understand, as that energy beam is flying towards you, you think to yourself, wow, I'm gonna have to block or deflect this, and that's going to be very hard.
		Now, I want you to imagine you're watching Dragon Ball Z, or Super, if you're watching the latest anime trends.
		Actually, I haven't seen that show in a while.
		Would you be interested in watching a show where Goku, facing a powerful energy blast, went, whoa, this is too hard!
		And then flew away?
		You'd be like, what?
		No, we like these shows, because... You know what, I'll tell you why I like Dragon Ball Z.
		It goes back to the Frieza Saga.
		Ah, yes.
		What is this, the late 80s?
		For those that don't know anything about anime, I will make this less esoteric, and I do the anime reference kind of to make a point about how many guys like this stuff that are into anime.
		The character's name is Goku.
		Son Goku.
		He's an alien, raised on Earth.
		Looks kind of like a human, but he's a monkey tail.
		And this is the most popular anime of all time, basically, Dragon Ball.
		You go to Japan, and there's, like, Goku statues, basically.
		So Goku trains and becomes strong.
		Frieza is this great evil emperor.
		Basically, he's got a big army and he conquers and destroys planets.
		And Goku is desperately fighting for his life using all of his strength and struggling.
		And then in an act of utmost cruelty, Frieza sees Goku's friend, a human named Krillin, grabs him using telekinesis and blows him up, killing him instantly.
		And Goku snaps, becoming so blinded with rage that this man has just killed his best friend that he becomes what's called a Super Saiyan.
unidentified		That's right.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Vegeta, who is another Saiyan, the Prince of Saiyans, is offended, but he is the highest class of genetic superiority.
		He should be a Super Saiyan.
		But you see, it was the passion to defend his friends and his family that gave Goku the strength Aren't these stories funny?
		This is why I like anime.
		Because the narrative tends to be that there is some kid who has to overcome the utmost hardship to survive and to win.
		I'll give you another example.
		This is why these stories resonate with young people.
		For those that are not into anime, I want this to be, you know, your takeaway from this.
		Why are there so many guys that like watching these shows?
		Eh, some of them are dumb, don't get me wrong.
		But there's one show that I've praised, and it's called Black Clover.
		And it follows a similar story.
		A story that I think is great for kids to learn.
		There is a young boy named Asta, in a world of magic, Many people will one day have a grimoire, a book, appear before them, and then they get access to the book's magic spells.
		And there's one guy who has, like, this rare Ultimate Wind book, and he's like the legendary, wow, you know, every whatever years or whatever, I don't know what the story is, something like that.
		Asta has no magic.
		None.
		And he tries and he tries, but he's just an ordinary kid and he'll never be a magic knight and he'll never get to rise above.
		So what does he do?
		He trains himself physically to the point where he becomes so powerful that when he decides to enter the magic tournament or something to try out to become a knight, They're all shocked, like, he's got no magic!
		He's wasting our time!
		And I'll keep it really simple because there is, like, an anti-magic element.
		There's, like, a thing in it.
		But basically, in his first battle, he's supposed to do battle with this other guy with magic powers, and he has none.
		The fight starts, and there's a bang!
		And he smacks the guy so fast and so hard, the other guy slams into the wall, and the match is over instantly.
		Here's the point of that story, and why a lot of young guys like anime.
		Because Asta had no power.
		He was mocked and belittled.
		He was told he would never amount to anything.
		And so he decided to start doing push-ups, training, running, jumping, to make himself the best he could be in his circumstance.
		And you know what he did?
		He ended up becoming super strong and he could beat these guys even if they did have magic.
		And that being said, he ends up getting a sword of anti-magic, which can negate magic, so it's like, you know, whatever.
		My point is this.
		That's why a lot of young guys flock to these stories we don't have in the United States all the same.
		It's really different, I mean... Spider-Man.
		He's bit by a spider, now he has powers!
		And Superman, he was always strong.
		But many of these stories in anime are young guys who lack power.
		Naruto, for instance.
		A kid who was orphaned.
		He kind of sucks.
		He can't really figure out how to be a ninja.
		And then he rises to become basically the president of his country.
		These stories of overcoming this stuff.
		Now the reason I tell you this is to explain to those who don't get it why it's so popular.
		And to explain to those guys who might be attracted to finding an anime girlfriend Would you really want to watch a show where Naruto is this whiny loser who never gets strong, and then says, this is too hard, I give up.
		It's ridiculous.
		Black Clover asked us, like, I have no magic, so I give up.
		And then you watch a show about a dude who just, I don't know, sheaths wheat, or reaps wheat, or whatever.
		No.
		You want to watch a story about that person who says, I know it's hard, I will never give up, nothing will stand in my way.
		Those are the stories we like.
		Now we have this ridiculous, disgusting trend.
		I think it's awful.
		I think it's absolutely awful.
		And you've got people who say, it's just too hard.
		Okay.
		Go watch your show and idolize people who are like, it's too hard, I give up.
		Or, you can embody these stories that were meant to inspire you, so that you can right now start doing push-ups, start doing crunches, start training in whatever way you can, start going for walks, start eating healthy, and then you can embody that story and be the best possible person of your circumstance.
		There is no excuse to not be your best self.
		To be the best version of what you can be.
		Maybe you're poor.
	Maybe you can't afford good food.
	Maybe your clothes are tattered.
	Maybe you are dirty.
	Maybe you're homeless.
	All of these things can be true, but none of that will stop you from being the best version of what you could be in that circumstance.
	You could be held back.
	You could be the greatest basketball player on the court in your neighborhood.
	You don't need to be in the NBA.
	You need to be the best version of yourself and embody these stories.
	Here we go, they say, unlike Replica, which has filters to stop people from using overtly sexual language, Nomid.ai allows users to tailor the bot to their preferences.
	I think the other ones do that too.
	You can have robots whisper titillating things in your ear, that's gross.
	A group of Gen Z TikTok users report they were falling for Dan.
	ChatGPT's alter ego with a flirty macho male voice.
	That's enough compared to Christian Grey from Fifty Shades of Grey.
	A recent survey from Infobit found that nearly 20 Americans have flirted with chatbots.
	Nearly half of them, 47.2, did so out of curiosity.
	While 23.9 said they were lonely in seeking interactions.
	Nearly 17% said they were AI fished.
	Look, man.
	People need to be strong and resilient.
	Because this will be an evolutionary pressure.
	The people who aren't strong enough to resist falling into a machine where they can spam the button and trigger dopamine, they're not going to reproduce, they're not going to succeed, and their lines will cease.
	So that's my question to you.
	Who are you?
	Are you the hero of the story?
	Or maybe you're even an ancillary character, but you're one that survived.
	Are you going to be someone who gave in to spamming the dopamine button?
	Or are you going to have children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren and a thousand years on they're going to say, we're lucky that our ancestors overcame the machine.
	Or maybe there'll be no one.
	There will be no one.
	There will simply be another profile found in an old tattered hard drive in the ruins of an ancient city, where a thousand years from now they say, look what we found, a solid-state drive, let's plug it in.
	Wow!
	It's a database of Instagram profiles and photos they've posted.
	Here's one guy.
	Seems like he started following a bunch of AI anime waifus.
	And that was it.
	He never had a family.
	He never had kids.
	He ceased to exist.
	I ask you to look within yourself and ask yourself this question.
	Is what makes you, you, going to survive?
	If you do not have children, understand that this will be the first time in billions of years your genetic line did not reproduce.
	Think about that.
	For the first time in a billion plus years, since the dawn of life on this planet, Every, every life before you reproduced.
	Will you be the moment when your line dies?
	Will you be the person to say that everything that made me will now cease to exist?
unidentified		Maybe.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		You don't have to agree with my view on the world.
		You can tell me I'm wrong.
		Some people don't want to have kids.
		That's fine.
		The people who don't want to have kids remove themselves from the gene pool and will shape the future in a different way.
		But I think of it in a similar way to how Abraham Lincoln said, I will not let the Union fall.
		Not on my watch.
		It is now your watch.
		The life within you has been handed down to you, going all the way back billions of years to the first self-replicating protein in a pit of primordial slime that was struck by lightning and volcanic ash fell on top of it.
		Or whatever happened.
		Is that what it was?
		Like volcanic gases launched in the air and then electricity's shooting between it and the chemicals mixed, landed in a pool of water, and then these proteins started self-replicating very slowly.
		From that moment of that replication, you have been handed the torch.
		Will you snuff it out, or will you ensure that it is passed down to the next line?
		I think that's infinitely important.
		It actually scares me, the idea that billions of years of genetic history end because you decided you don't want kids.
		I also feel for the people who can't have kids.
		I really do.
		That's a sad and scary reality.
		This is why so many people are sad to find out they can't have children.
		Because it's the end of a billion plus years of the torch being passed on.
		It's a tremendous legacy.
		What will yours be?
		Sitting in your room with the lights off, talking to a computer demon machine saying, I love you.
		But filtering that disgusting machine voice into some anime waifu that titillates you and satisfies your needs.
		Or will you resist the drugs?
		The digital drugs?
		It's up to you.
		I'll leave it there.
		Next segment's coming up at 6pm on this channel.
		Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
		In what may be one of the most funny and terrifying stories I've ever seen, Google arrested its own employees who, at work, staged a sit-in in their boss's office, demanding divestment from Israel.
		You reap what you sow, Google.
		You reap what you sow.
		You hire these people, and they protest their own company at work.
		I have to wonder, they're fired, but knowing Google, they'll probably give them some kind of commendation.
		They'll get a badge of approval within the company.
unidentified		Why?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Company culture.
		Now, the calling of the police on their own employees is certainly hilarious, but let's read the story from National Review.
		Police arrest Google employees who staged anti-Israel office protests.
		Police arrested several Google employees who staged sit-in protests on Tuesday to oppose the company's ties to Israel.
		Protesters occupied offices in New York, California, and Washington to demand the company cancel Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion contract with Israel.
		The cloud-seating computer project is shared by Amazon.
		Google employees started an internal No Tech for Apartheid group with over 200 members, which has been active since October, to protest the venture.
		Employees also staged a die-in outside of a Google building in San Francisco in December.
		Tuesday's California sit-in lasted hours and was held in the office of Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian.
		Protesters wore t-shirts that read, This is insane!
		a poster outside Kyrian's office that said, drop Nimbus.
		A man confronted the protesters, notified them that they had been placed on administrative
		leave, then asked them to leave voluntarily before calling law enforcement.
		Police then detained the demonstrators and charged them with criminal trespassing, according
		to a local Fox affiliate.
		This is insane.
		How do you hire these people?
		Here's the video.
		We have video, ladies and gentlemen.
		Here we go.
unidentified		It's kind of hard to hear.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		We don't really care.
		He's saying, I need you to leave.
		They're refusing to leave.
		And then I think in this video we actually have the police come in.
		Absolutely amazing.
		Watch this.
unidentified		Yeah.
		Yeah.
		OK.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		First, I wonder how much Google really cares, though.
		I I suppose when the boss calls the cops on you.
		Wow.
		So they're all put on leave. Physically impeding other employees work and preventing them from
		accessing our facilities is a clear violation of our policies and we will investigate and take
		action. Google spokeswoman Bailey Thompson said, these employees are put on administrative leave
		and their access to our systems was cut. After refusing multiple requests to leave the premises,
		law enforcement was engaged to remove them to ensure office safety. An employee with the
		history of anti-Israel sentiment in the workplace participated in Tuesday's protests and accused
		Google of creating a culture of fear and retaliation against workers in general.
		Rather than, you know, consider the demands that we've been raising for years now in listening to workers, and considering the things we've been raising, Thomas Kearing and Google execs basically chose to arrest workers for speaking out against the use of our technology to power the first AI-powered genocide.
		Google software engineer Mohammed Khatami said, Conservatives.
		to get arrested for that, because at this point, we aren't willing to be lied to by our higher ups
		anymore. We aren't willing to be disrespected by our higher ups anymore. And we wanted to take that
		to the offices and make sure it was understood by them. We want workers to feel like we have the
		power to choose where our technology is going and who we're contributing to, he added.
		Conservatives take heed. Google employees are willing to get fired and arrested
		for protesting in their own companies.
		And what do I hear from the right?
		I can't, I have kids.
		Well, I will say to an extent, fair point, but I will also add, you mean to tell me that these far leftists who have nothing to fight for and nothing to lose are doing the fighting for destruction?
		It's kind of crazy, because I view it like this, right?
		A far-left communist revolution is happening all around you.
		They are killing people, and it may be a bit hyperbolic, but, you know, Aaron Danielson, for instance, there are people who have been shot and killed in many instances.
		And I would also extend this to, while there have been direct confrontations like Aaron Danielson, which is a direct killing, you have the rampant crime as a result of their policies, which is resulting in people dying in New York, getting pushed in front of trains and their legs severed off.
		One lady was, wow, crazy story.
		This is what's fascinating to me.
		You'd think, if you were in your home with your children, who were eating their bowl of porridge, and far leftists were coming to take over and enforce communist rule, which would see your children die, your children would die, which would see your children die, that this father would say, I will do everything in my power to fight back against the communists who want to harm my family.
		I suppose it's fair that many people, when facing the barrel of authoritarianism, just get on their knees and say, thank you, master.
		That's what we get from a lot of people.
		I get it.
		It's just seemingly paradoxical.
		The left has nothing.
		Many of these people do not have children.
		Many of them do, but many of them don't.
		And it's the people who have kids who tend not to want to resist, when you are the one who actually has to.
		Isn't that weird?
		And then they go, Tim, you don't even have any kids.
		What do you know?
		Um, logic and math.
		If you have children, and you accept communist dictatorship, your children will be killed, they will live in pods, or they will eat bugs.
		Now, by all means.
		Many of you may be saying, I would rather my child be alive, but locked in a pod and eating bugs.
		Okay, I guess.
		I'm not you.
		I suppose a lot of people would rather, given the choice between their child dying, they would choose to have their child sterilized.
		And that's what we see from a lot of these liberal leftist parents, where they're like, the doctor goes to them and says, you can have a dead child or a trans child, and they say, oh no, oh heavens me.
		The reality is, that's a false choice.
		For many of these conservatives, you can have a free future with risks.
		Or you can have your kids living in a pod and eating the bugs, and being servants and slaves.
		It's kind of wild.
		We're setting up the new studio, and we had some creepos drive onto the property.
		Nobody knew who they were.
		And we have pretty heavy security and stuff, so we're not super worried about it.
		But of course, there are some compliance people that are upset.
		They're like, we gotta figure this out, because it's a big property, and if we're doing events and stuff, and we have these buildings, we need security.
		And I'm like, no, of course, of course.
		Well, we have it.
		But we gotta take it more seriously with some physical barriers and things like this.
		And I said, welcome to Freedom.
		New York, you have no freedom.
		Criminals will push you in front of the trains, and they'll say, well, you know, just another day in New York.
		In West Virginia, if somebody wants to drive onto our property, into the heart, to do us harm, we're strapped.
		And that's freedom.
	You think living in New York, where you have no freedom to defend yourself, you'd think you'd be better off?
	Well, there's police.
	They'll protect you.
	No, they won't.
	The reality is, in a place like New York, not only do you have no freedom, you also have no security.
	The people who would give up their security, or I should say give up their freedom, expecting security, you will get neither.
	You will lose both.
	I believe that's what Benjamin Franklin said.
	Maybe it's apocryphal, but he said, those who would give up a little bit of freedom for some temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.
	But it's true.
	New York being the best example.
	In New York, they say, what do you need a gun for?
	Just call the cops.
	What happens?
	Now criminals with guns are killing people, pushing them in front of trains, among other things, and the cops can't do anything about it.
	So you have lost your freedom to defend yourself, you have lost your right to defend yourself, and now you are facing the brunt of tyranny.
	The police will arrest you, like Daniel Penny, if you defend yourself.
	Then you have West Virginia, where you're out in the middle of nowhere, for the most part, and there are bad people.
	Because they know there's no witnesses.
	They can come on your property.
	What are you gonna do about it?
	But hey, guess what?
	I got guns.
	And a lot of them.
	And you ain't gonna walk anywhere near me, my friends, or my family to do us harm.
	We won't let that happen.
	We have security, too.
	They take care of it, for the most part.
	But we retain those rights.
unidentified		Why?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Because when the question comes up and says, give up your freedom, and we will give you security, We know.
		That's an impossible trade.
		It can't happen.
		There is no such thing as real security, so we must maintain our freedom.
		Why?
		In the face of these crimes against us, we have to have the freedom to live our lives and defend ourselves, but freedom comes with risk.
		I give you the story of Mr. Muttonchops.
		He was a rooster.
		A young rooster that we had.
		We, uh... Chicken City got a little overpopulated.
		So we sent a bunch of the roosters out into the outskirts in this caged off, uh, fenced off little area.
		It's about a four foot tall little fence.
		One rooster refused to be caged.
		We called him Mr. Muttonchops because he had muttonchops.
		And he would jump up and jump out every day.
		Well, outside of the cage, there was beautiful, delicious grass and flowers and things he would eat.
		And he liked to walk around and go where he wanted to go.
		I respect it.
		So when we culled and ate the roosters, he got to live.
		But we knew his time was short.
		But I respect it.
		This rooster chose freedom over security.
		Perhaps he was too stupid.
		We would then, every day, walk over, open up the little fence and let him back in, and then, sure enough, when he decided to, he'd jump right on back out.
		He's dead now.
		We believe it was a fox that got him.
		But that's reality.
		And it's a question of this.
		The roosters that are still in their cage, it's muddy because they tore it to shreds, they're safe and alive.
		Those roosters can leave if they want to.
		Some of the chickens jump up on top of the houses.
		They could jump out if they want to.
		One time, one chicken did.
		Died.
		You choose.
		I understand that going out into the fray is dangerous, and I accept that.
		And maybe a fox will get me.
		So be it.
		It's my choice.
		You take a look at what's going on in the world, and you have people who tell you You must be... You must give up your rights to keep and bear arms.
		You must give up your rights to defend yourself.
		And then we'll give you security.
		And what happens?
		It doesn't work.
		So what do we see now, and how do I relate all this?
		The good men and women who believe in the United States, who say, I will not speak up, I will not protest, because I have kids.
		Okay.
		Your kids will live in the pod and eat the bugs.
		If you're okay with that, then we got no issues.
		There you go.
		Maybe you're offended by the idea that your children would be subjected to slavery and forced to eat bugs off the ground in front of communists.
		Maybe the idea of these communists in these offices smirking and sipping on wine while your children lick their feet pisses you off.
		Maybe.
		But my point is this.
		The left is willing to get fired from their job and arrested from the inside of their own offices.
		And for what?
		Most of them don't even have kids.
		I shouldn't say most, but many of them don't.
		And then you, with children, with something you must fight to preserve, this great nation, would say, I can't stand up for my rights.
unidentified		Okay.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I'm not going to tell you to live your life.
		I'll just tell you, do the math.
		The math is simple.
		These same communists at Google will have your children licking their feet while they laugh.
		Is that the future you want for your kids?
		Okay.
		Well, if it's not, you need to speak up, vote locally, help be active in your community.
		I saw a great post and they said the reason why this is happening is that the factions have divided into two principal groups.
		Those who want to impose a worldview and those who want to be left alone.
		And the end result of these worldviews is obvious.
		Those who will impose will never stop and those who want to be left alone don't organize.
		You choose.
		It's up to you.
		I fear what happens in November if Trump doesn't win.
		I really do.
		I suppose we'll see.
		Next segment's coming up at 8 p.m.
		over at youtube.com slash TimCastIRL.
		Thanks for hanging out.

▲