All Episodes
Previous Next
April 3, 2024 - Tim Pool Daily Show
01:18:16
Over 23,000 Dead People REGISTERED TO VOTE According To US Gov, SHADOW CAMPAIGN 2024 HAS BEGUN

BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/ Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/ Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL Over 23,000 Dead People REGISTERED TO VOTE According To US Gov, SHADOW CAMPAIGN 2024 HAS BEGUN Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Participants
Main voices
t
tim pool
01:13:17
Appearances
Clips
c
charlie kirk
00:41
j
josh hammer
00:32
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Make sure to head over to TimCast.com, click join us, and become a member to support our work directly, because this show is made possible thanks in part to viewers like you.
If you like the work we do, become a member, and you'll also get access to uncensored, members-only shows from TimCast IRL, Monday through Thursday at 10pm.
You can also join our Discord server and talk with like-minded individuals.
Now, let's get into that first story.
You can argue that Donald Trump won in 2020 until you're blue in the face.
Joe Biden is the man in the White House.
Joe Biden is the man weaponizing the DOJ.
There are a lot of people that say Trump won in 2020 and that they cheated and it was fraud.
Well, it depends on your definition of those terms, for sure.
Like, what do you really mean by that?
But I'll just say this, Trump did not win.
Why?
Joe Biden took the White House.
If winning was who got the best score, sure, you can make the argument that Donald Trump, while playing fair and making an argument as to why he'd be president, convinced more people.
But Joe Biden got more votes.
Where'd those votes come from?
Well, that's up to you, I suppose.
The mail, I guess.
Now, largely, these were due to ballot harvesting initiatives.
And perhaps, I believe even Bill Barr said, there was fraud.
Not that we trust Bill Barr all that much, but how much was there, we're not entirely sure.
Ladies and gentlemen, right now, it appears that there is something suspect going on.
I can't tell you much of what it means.
There's probably something going on, but I can show you.
The Social Security Administration website, revealing that millions of people are registering without IDs in key states.
But more importantly, tens of thousands of people who are dead are trying to register.
I don't believe it at first.
We talked about it last night on TimCast IRL.
This viral tweet going around from EndWokeness saying the number of voters registering without a photo ID is skyrocketing in three key swing states, Arizona, Texas, and Pennsylvania.
Since the start of 2024, Texas 1.2 million, PA about 600,000, Arizona 220,000.
It's this system they call HAVV.
You don't need an ID to register to vote.
You can use your name, date of birth, and social security number.
When you do this, the Social Security Administration runs a verification on new submissions to see if this person actually exists.
What most people have been sharing on Twitter, slash, on X, is this.
Why are so many people in these states trying to register to vote without IDs?
Why are they literally registering to vote without IDs?
Who are these people?
Well, of course, you know, the media is going to dismiss this and say, not everybody uses an ID.
And you know what?
Fair point.
Maybe you went to register and they said you can register with your ID or social.
I gotta be honest, I'm gonna use the last four of my social.
It's easy.
Pulling out my ID?
Too much work.
So if I'm allowed to, and I'm personally registering, I just use my social.
And that will appear as a verification.
That is fair and that is true.
But in the course of going through the website, we discovered that in one week in Missouri, 23,000 dead people tried to register.
Now that doesn't make sense, does it?
Many are arguing that it's illegal immigrants, that they're registering them.
Well, that doesn't make sense, because illegal immigrants aren't going to be in the social security database.
Some argue, well, it's because they get work permits, so they're granted a social security number.
Perhaps.
But the number of deceased people trying to register is alarming any way you cut it.
Shadow campaign.
Now, I don't know what this means.
I'm gonna stress that.
For all I know that there is some logical explanation.
We've done a little bit of digging.
We have not gotten comments from these various states to ask them why this is happening.
But I will tell you this, my friends.
Whatever you think happened in 2020, if you think there is no shadow campaign in this, and I always got to pull this up because people won't believe me.
People don't believe it.
I gotta pull it up.
If you think there is no shadow campaign, I got a bridge to sell you.
Time Magazine, 2020, the secret history of the shadow campaign that saved the 2020 election.
Time Magazine actually wrote that a conspiracy, look at this, there was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs.
Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans.
Time Magazine published an article saying that they fortified the election with a secret shadow campaign that Time Magazine refers to as a conspiracy.
So let me just stress this one more time.
Time Magazine wrote an article that there was a conspiracy among left-wing groups to make sure Trump would lose.
I wonder what that means.
They say they had voter initiatives and things like that.
Well, currently right now in Wisconsin, they are banning Zuckerbucks.
They want to prevent shadow campaigns like this from happening.
I would assume that those that engaged in this shadow campaign know they can't do the same thing twice, and now they must try something different.
I get a lot of people and they say, Tim, don't you now understand the fraud that's going on?
Listen, I think it was largely ballot harvesting in 2020.
The evidence?
James O'Keefe.
He has video footage of people ballot harvesting, bragging about getting these ballots.
You wonder why it is many of these ballots were for Joe Biden, but Republicans, but there were no down ballot voting.
It was just a vote for Joe Biden and then nothing else.
And it could be because ballot harvesters are not smart, are not political, and they go to people and they say, just vote for Biden, give me back the ballot.
Many of these people were going to nursing homes and they were just telling people, fill this out, fill this out.
Certainly I believe fraudulent ballots exist and there is miscounting and things like this.
There's a lack of chain of custody.
All of those things matter.
But I believe largely the ballots they got were not manufactured in a lab or in China.
I think most of them were likely mass ballot harvesting initiatives.
There were videos and stories about ballots being found in dumpsters and things like this.
I don't know how many there were, but I think right now we should look at something much more alarming.
This End Wokeness post.
Let's dive in to the link here from SSA.gov.
It's the HAVV, they call it.
Help America Vote Verification Transactions by State for the week ending January 13th, 2024.
Well, okay.
Well, I don't care about January 13th.
Let's do this.
Let's go to the week ending March 23rd, the previous week.
And we'll take a look at some numbers.
California, 3,760 people filed to register to vote, and they did not have IDs.
There were 2,148 matches, 1,612 non-matches.
Now, let's start here.
How could there be non-matches?
That means someone filled out a registration form, sent it in, and said, nah, this person's not real.
Maybe they got something wrong.
Name was misspelled, wrong date of birth, who knows?
Don't know why someone would get those things wrong, but it could happen.
That's, what, a third of them?
A little bit more than a third?
28 of those deceased.
Now, how could that happen?
Well, that's actually, it could be explained, honestly.
If somebody fills out a registration, and then before that registration makes it to the Social Security Administration for verification, that individual dies and is listed as dead, that's a possibility.
Although, that is a very tight time frame.
But I gotta be honest, I don't care about California.
I don't care about 3,000 transactions, 28 deceased people, because California is deep blue as it is.
As we move now, we see something very interesting.
Notably, Missouri, with 46,438 transactions.
42,000 matches found.
Okay.
This is not that big a deal.
This could be a mass voter registration initiative.
As I said, many people probably just vote, just register with their social, because it's easier, right?
I mean, come on.
Do you want to pull out your ID, this stupid ID number, just put in the last four-year social, you're done.
This makes sense.
1,321 being deceased?
Now that is very strange.
That is a very small percentage, but that's a lot of... That's a lot of people registering.
Let me make sure I show you.
It says single match deceased right here.
That's a lot of people.
Who filled out a form, and then died before it could make it to the Social Security Administration.
Perhaps verification takes several months.
I really doubt it, considering this is a weekly basis.
Meaning, in all likelihood, and again, I could be wrong, someone filled out a form, sent it in, and then croaked immediately, so that the doctors could list them as deceased, they could make it to the SSA, and then they could go, oh, this person just died.
unidentified
I doubt it.
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet and greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet and greet tickets.
See you on the tour!
I doubt it.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Interestingly.
We don't have any information on any of the states, but let's do this.
We'll jump down to March 16th.
Texas reporting comes in only every other week on this system.
We can see here Arizona with 26,000 transactions.
Now again, this just means people are registering to vote.
We don't know who or why.
Many people are arguing, this proves illegal immigrants because they don't have IDs.
No, I'm gonna say it again.
Most people probably don't use their ID to register.
They use their social.
That's not what's really alarming to me.
We go to Missouri again.
50,000 transactions, 45,000 matched, 4,000 didn't match, and 1,337 were dead.
Okay, but wait.
I'm just building up the suspense for you, ladies and gentlemen.
In Texas, in one week, 227,000 people.
And to be fair, if Texas only appears every other week, it's possible.
It's possible.
This is actually two weeks combined, fine.
4,571 dead people registered.
Now, when we were on the show, Nick Freitas, he's a Virginia delegate, said, maybe this is voter roll purging.
Maybe they're doing these verifications to see if these people... I said, you know what?
You're right.
That must be it.
It has to be, right?
How could nearly 5,000 people, the total for that week, 6,698 dead people, they filled out forms and then died right away?
It must be that in these states, they're going through their voter rolls and saying, can you verify this person?
And they go, yeah, the person died.
They go, okay, so this person's dead.
Okay, we're going to purge them from the voter roll.
Makes a lot of sense.
Makes a lot of sense.
Don't worry, I'm building up the suspense for you.
That's not actually what's going on.
To shock you the most, I will jump to February 17th, 2024.
And this is where something weird happens.
In Missouri, there were 78,000 registrations.
5,938 were found to have no match.
72,000 were found to have a match.
And I'm gonna make sure we get this total matches.
However, And this is where things get very strange.
23,000 of these registrants were dead.
It says right here.
Single match deceased.
Now, okay.
Let me make sure I give the definitions.
This is from ssa.gov.
You tell me what it means.
Total transactions.
The total number of verification requests made during the time period.
Total matches.
The total number of verification requests where there is at least one match in our records of the name, last four digits of the SSN, and date of birth.
I mean, that's a pretty good verification.
Non-matches are obvious when there's no match.
Single match found alive.
The total number of verification requests where there is only one match in our records on name, last four digits, and date of birth, and the number holder is alive.
Single match found deceased.
The total number of verification requests where there is only one match in our records on name, date of birth, and last four of their social, and the number holder is deceased.
They also have multiple matches found, alive and deceased, but these are exceedingly rare and I don't believe ever actually come up.
In this instance, multiple matches alive only came up one out of 78,000.
However, we can jump over to Pennsylvania.
Interestingly, there were 12.
In Pennsylvania, with 62,000 transactions, only 29 came back deceased.
Well, what does that say to you?
Some people may die in between the process or something like this, perhaps.
Or someone...
Submitted the registration late?
I mean, it's possible that someone filled out the registration form and they didn't send it in.
That's true.
That's fair.
29 could make sense.
In Oregon, there were 569 transactions.
unidentified
83.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Now, what's fascinating is that we can make the argument, these may just be people registering to vote.
But why is it that in most states that don't matter, You don't really see it.
In Arizona, it matters.
unidentified
31,000.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Georgia, 7,900.
Illinois, 11,000.
So it does vary.
But in Maryland, it's 600.
Massachusetts, it's 159.
In Michigan, it's 113.
Mississippi, it's 44.
Missouri is very strange.
23,000 people who filed registrations came back as deceased.
Now again, you're sitting there thinking to yourself, it's got to be voter roll purging.
Because that's what we thought last night on IRL.
All right, let me break it down for you.
From ssa.gov, I will read for you verbatim what this is.
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 requires states to verify the information of newly registered voters for federal elections.
Each state must establish a computerized statewide voter registration list and verify new voter information with the state's Motor Vehicle Administration.
The states are required to verify the driver's license number against the state MVA database only in situations where no driver's license exists should the states verify the last four digits of the new voter registrant's social security number.
So I'm going to pause there.
I said over and over again, it's probably people just choosing not to use their ID, which many people do.
However, as they say, only where no license exists should the states verify the last four digits of the new voter registrant's social security number.
It may be that the states are just lazy and they're like, we don't care.
We'll just run it.
Scott Pressler mentions that many Amish people don't have IDs.
Sure.
But that means when the Amish person goes to register to vote, they say, you need your ID, I don't have one.
Okay, then we'll do your social.
But only, you are only allowed to do your social if no license exists.
Strange.
How are we getting hundreds of thousands then?
You see, this is where things start getting weird.
1.25 million people who don't have IDs in Texas?
Who could that be?
unidentified
Interesting.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Let me read more.
The state submits the last digits of the SSN, name and date of birth to the MVA for verification with the SSA.
In addition, SSA is required to report whether its records indicate that the registrant is deceased.
To ensure the privacy of the SSN, HAVA restricted the collection to only the last four digits of the social security number.
HAVA provides that these last four digits do not constitute an SSN.
What is Help America Vote Verification?
To comply with the requirements of Section 303 of HAVA, SSA developed a new verification system known as the Help America Vote Verification System in August 2004.
States must only submit a request to us for new voters who do not present a valid driver's license during the voter registration process.
HAVV verifies the accuracy of the name, date of birth, and last four digits of SSN submitted and sends an indication of whether our records show the individual is deceased.
Let me stress that for you one more time.
States must only submit a request for new voters who do not present a valid driver's license during the voter registration process.
One more time.
New voters who do not.
So this is not voter roll purging.
It could be large amounts of people who do not present an ID.
Maybe they have one, but hold on.
It goes to the MVA first.
You see?
States are required to verify the driver's license number against the state MVA database.
Only where no driver's license exists should the states verify the last four of the social security number.
Meaning, the states must submit the last digits of the SSN name and date of birth to the MVA.
That's the Motor Vehicle Administration.
And it's called different things in different states, of course.
But this means if someone has a license, and they decide not to use it, and they submit that verification to the MVA, the MVA should find in their database the driver's license number, and not need to contact the SSA.
This is, to stress, according to the Social Security Administration, only New submissions must only submit for new voters.
How are they all dead?
Explain that one to me.
I honestly have no idea.
That was the week of February 17th, 2024.
Missouri is popping up.
Let's grab Missouri here.
With 23,000 deceased individuals submitting new registrations and not having IDs in the system.
Why are there no IDs in the system?
Well, it's kind of obvious.
They're dead.
So someone filled out an application for a dead person, sent it in.
The MVA says, we don't got a license for this person.
Yeah, maybe it expired.
So they sent it to the SSA and they say, who's this?
And they go, that's a dead person.
So who filled out the application?
You know, many people think it's illegal immigrants.
I don't.
Because illegal immigrants may get work permits and things like that.
I don't know that we're at that stage.
No, I think this is largely... These are people who are alive, many of them, and they don't vote.
And you can take a look at voting records, and in some places it's not hard to find who's voting and who's not.
And then, The assumption is, even based on demographic, it may be that they go, look, 18 to 34 year olds, they don't vote that much.
So if you target these areas of low voter turnout, you're likely to be able to register people who normally don't vote.
And then you end up getting a list.
Here's what I think.
I think someone's got a list of names.
And they're told, fill out registration applications under these names and socials.
And they do.
Some of those people are dead and they don't know.
I don't think it's illegal immigrants.
I don't know exactly what this means, but I gotta tell you.
Shouldn't there be in the law that if at any point in a week more than 100 dead people try to register, it gets flagged to state law enforcement and to the federal government?
So I'll say this.
When you go to the website and you read what this website's about, Seems to make sense.
If somebody registers to vote, they send the information to the DMV, MVA, whatever.
If the person has no license, it gets sent to the Social Security Administration to be checked to make sure they exist.
They then kick back and say if the person is matched, dead, or not matched at all. 23,000?
Is there an explanation for this that I don't understand?
They did a mass get-out-the-vote operation, put all the registrations in a box, and forgot about them for a month, and then 23,000 people died?
Was there a mass casualty event we don't know about on February 17th?
I have no idea.
Let's do this.
We did this on the show as well.
We'll go back to 2021.
We'll go to March 20th, 2021.
So this is after the election, and here we can see in Kansas, 3,000 dead people.
38,000.
You wonder why these numbers exist.
In Missouri, it was 2,000.
I don't know.
No idea.
In Texas, 56,000, with 925 deceased.
6,000 with 925 deceased this isn't this is this is 2021 Now understand there's elections
2020, 2022, 2024, we have elections all the time.
So there's no reason not to continually try to register new voters because you're trying to win across the board.
But let's go back to March of 2020 and see what we have.
Here we have 2020 and we'll go March 14th.
In this year, Texas had 11,000 registrants.
Zero were dead.
Pennsylvania, 4,000.
week. Sorry. Texas had 11,000 registrants. Zero were dead.
Pennsylvania, 4,000. Zero were dead.
And let's do this.
A total of 271 for the week came back deceased.
Well, how does that happen?
Well, you had 90,000 registrations and a handful of them may have died before the registration went in.
Okay, fine, fair point.
And now we will jump to March 16th, 2024.
16th, 2024. And you have 6,698 dead registrants, 386,422 people trying to register with no IDs.
josh hammer ▲ ● ▼
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the
First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating and affecting the 2024 presidential election.
We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
It's America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
I don't know what to tell you, man.
I'd like an explanation.
I can't say much about this other than how very, very strange that in Texas, 227,000 people attempted to register and 30,499 had no match in the Social Security Administration's database.
and 30,499 had no match in the Social Security Administration's database.
4,571 were dead.
Call it whatever you want.
I hope you all are paying attention.
I hope there's a simple explanation to this.
I genuinely hope that 10 minutes after I publish this, a bunch of liberals and leftists break down why this is wrong.
Because I read the website.
I read what they said.
It seems pretty straightforward.
States may operate differently.
They may do things that aren't a policy or procedure, and maybe it really is voter roll purging.
They're not supposed to do it this way, but maybe they just said, who cares?
We're going to pay for it, they're going to write, they're going to check it anyway.
So maybe.
Maybe they're just purging voter rolls, and that's why there's so many of these numbers.
Even though the website says, no, only new voters and new registrations.
I still accept that.
Maybe that will be their answer.
The only thing I can tell you is we have to remain vigilant and pay attention.
How much you want to bet?
Texas goes blue.
I mean, it's hard to believe, right?
Because of so many people moving to Texas.
With the COVID lockdowns, Texas and Florida saw mass migration.
Perhaps the argument they'll use is, yeah, Democrats from California moved to Texas and then voted Democrat.
And then what?
Trump wins the key swing states, but he loses Texas and Missouri.
And then he loses the presidency.
I don't see how, with data like this, you can convince anybody.
This is SSA.gov.
I don't know what to tell you, man.
I read the website.
I read to you what it says.
What else could it mean?
Unless there is a misreporting, errors, typos, or something, it looks like something very strange is going on.
Make sure you get your friends to register.
Let's just leave it at this.
What's really happening is that we've all been so influential in convincing people to register to vote that it's working.
I guess.
Can't explain the dead people, but you know, okay.
We'll see.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment is coming up at 1pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
In this viral video, a guy completely loses his mind.
And it's crazy to me, but I think this is good evidence, my friends, it's a cult.
There are people who believe things that are not true about Donald Trump.
The whole of their being has been built for nearly a decade around lies and false narratives about Donald Trump.
What do you do?
How do you help these people?
I honestly don't know.
But perhaps by showing the derangement in full, some people might see this as a mirror and think to themselves, is that what I am?
Perhaps.
Don't be like that.
Try to be reasonable and rational.
Righteous indignation, of course, is okay, but if you're someone who doesn't read the news and has no idea what you're talking about, you look like a crazy person.
Unfortunately, I must confess, my friends, to these people, we look crazy because they don't read the news.
A large component of what is going on right now is hoaxes by the corporate press that they hear passively or see on Facebook and the rest of us who are actually showing sources and digging into this to prove things are or are not or at least give our best assessment.
That is to say, you watch a video like this and this guy loses his mind, people believe it.
You watch a show like mine, I will show you the news articles, I will show you the source material.
My early morning segment about deceased voters, I outright said I don't know what this data could mean.
Maybe there's an error here.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding.
I hope I am.
But the data we showed last night on TimCastIRL and this morning suggests that for the week ending February 17th, 23,000 dead people tried to register to vote in Missouri.
Something does not add up there.
Maybe it's a glitch in the system.
Maybe it's wrong reporting.
Maybe it's people trying to purge their voter rolls improperly using the HAVV system.
Or maybe there are people mass registering voters from lists of names, these are fake registrations, and 23,000 were dead.
But I leave it up to you.
I say we don't have the conclusion, just the oddity and the circumstance.
This man is a victim.
And I want you to see it because maybe many of you will, uh, many people who hate Trump, maybe you could share this with them and say, is this what you want to be?
And after this, I'm going to show you how the media hoaxes you.
Donald Trump, even Newsmax, I love this, is claiming he called immigrants animals.
He didn't.
He called murderers animals.
He called murderers and criminals animals.
I'm gonna break down the fake narrative machine and explain this to you.
Here's the video.
I may have to turn the volume down.
I hope you're ready for this.
unidentified
Are you kidding me, law enforcement?
Are you kidding me?
Tonight in Grand Rapids, multiple law enforcement officers stood behind Donald Trump as he spoke.
People that are elected officials like sheriffs.
Others hired to protect and enforce the law for the entire citizenry.
Not for a political party.
Explicitly forbidden from being a partisan authoritarian police force standing on stage.
Entirely unethical.
So, what are you seeing here?
on top of which Donald Trump has been indicted 91 times.
He's liable for sexual assault.
His entire business was found to be fraudulent.
And law enforcement has the fucking goal to stand on stage with him.
Enough is enough.
Are you kidding?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
So what are you seeing here?
First, we can talk about those of us who have actually looked into the indictments.
Several of the indictments have already been dropped in Georgia.
Donald Trump, of course, is accused of having classified documents.
What are the excuses as to why Joe Biden's handling of improper documents, Barack Obama's, Bill Clinton's, how come they are fine but Donald Trump is not okay?
Well, they come up with several reasons.
How about this, my friends?
They said Donald Trump did not cooperate when instructed to turn over these documents.
Okay.
Hillary Clinton had her staffers, or I should say, let's be very careful, Hillary Clinton's staffers destroyed public records and smashed phones with hammers.
You know what?
Let me make sure I get this one for you from Snopes, because otherwise people won't believe it.
Hillary Clinton, Snopes, hammers.
All right, here we go.
Here's the important breakdown.
Did Hillary Clinton smash her phone with a hammer?
According to FBI documents made public in 2016, one of Clinton's aides twice disposed of her old mobile phone devices, breaking them in half or destroying them with a hammer.
Now they say it's a mixture.
Why?
Hillary Clinton did not personally destroy her phone with a hammer.
Her staffers did.
Hillary Clinton staffers used a program called Bleach Bit that purged her hard drive and 35,000 public records.
She argues it's just about yoga and stuff.
It doesn't matter.
Donald Trump argues his documents were not pertaining to national security.
You're mistaken!
Doesn't matter.
But hold on.
35,000 public records on a private server and we get nothing from it?
You want to play double standards, play double standards.
But here's a guy who clearly doesn't understand police are allowed to stand alongside, in fact, let's just drop the act.
Law enforcement standing behind someone may be for their protection, but they're certainly allowed to stand behind a man at a rally.
He's very much mistaken.
He says he's found liable for sexual assault, a 30-year-old claim that has no evidence backing it up.
So if you want to argue these things, it's fine.
But you can see this guy clearly doesn't know what he's talking about.
Now me, maybe I just have a higher standard.
I look at Hillary Clinton, who does not get prosecuted.
James Comey says, well, we're not going to go after even though 35,000 emails were destroyed.
Okay.
Joe Biden.
Well, he did have the means motive and the intent to commit a crime, but he's too old and doesn't remember.
It's not an exaggeration.
The argument from the special counsel was that Joe Biden was for personal gain, maintaining records he should not have had, warned his ghostwriter this could be a problem, and did it for financial gain.
The only thing is he's an old man with a bad memory, so I don't think anyone's going to convict him.
Sure.
Well, certainly we're dealing with selective prosecution.
You want to talk about impartiality?
This is what you get when people fall victim to hoax narratives.
By all means, I can sit here with a good friend of Tim Castile, Dave Smith, He was, at one point, considered to be the front-runner for the Libertarian Party presidential nomination.
But he's not doing that.
He's a very smart guy, and we have some disagreements.
But we can certainly have passionate arguments over the issues.
Abraham Accord's being a good one.
Dave says, we've been over this Tim, the Abraham Accords opened the door to where we are now with Israel and Palestine.
It undercut Gaza and their ability to negotiate and it drove them to desperation and violent acts.
And my attitude is, and forgive me Dave if I'm getting part of your argument wrong, because I don't want to strawman him, but my argument is the Abraham Accords was a good attempt by the Trump administration to normalize economic relations in the Middle East.
I don't know what else you do.
We understand what real life is.
And then we have an argument about whether it was the right or wrong thing to do.
And there's interesting moral and philosophical questions about whether we should or should not do these certain things.
This guy doesn't even know any of the details pertaining to Trump's fraud cases, his indictments.
How about this?
In Georgia, they indicted his lawyers.
Why?
For literally being his lawyers.
Jenna Ellis, not that people are fans of her, was indicted on two counts and they were RICO charges.
Meaning, they just said you were part of a conspiracy.
What?
She was providing legal advice to Trump.
You're not going to argue to me successfully that because someone represented a client, they're part of a conspiracy.
Everyone's entitled to legal representation.
But here's where we're currently at.
Now, of course, this man's referring to Donald Trump in Grand Rapids.
Politico has the story.
Let me give you a little bit and then we'll talk about the hoaxes and how people end up becoming deranged.
Donald Trump says he'll talk more on abortion in the coming weeks.
He spoke in Grand Rapids, found refuge from the abortion wars.
Excuse me.
In an old standby on Tuesday, railing against Biden's border bloodbath in a swing county some 1,283 miles from the southern border.
In his first pair of visits to battleground states in 24 days, Trump declared every state a border state and every town a border town at an event in Michigan before jetting to Wisconsin for a rally in Green Bay.
So Trump, of course, is talking about the southern border.
But I want to talk to you about hoaxes.
And how do you get a guy flustered, sweaty and screaming?
Let's break it down.
For one, he could be faking it.
It could be an act to generate followers.
So he's putting on this air of righteous indignation, citing tidbits he heard in the news that researching it so that he can say, I'm mad at Trump.
Okay, there are a lot of people who might like that and probably follow him because of it.
He could genuinely be shocked just hearing this news beating over the head over and over again.
Trump called them animals and monsters.
Trump is a rapist and all of these other things.
And his brain finally broke.
Unfortunately for us midwits, individuals, maybe he's not even a midwit, they don't fact check these things.
They don't look at the case and say, I have some questions and concerns about what is or isn't.
The Covington Catholic Kids.
Ah, this was like six years ago, but it's a really good example.
There were so many people sending me this video of this kid standing on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial with a guy banging a drum in his face and they said, look at what this kid did.
And I'm like, what's he doing?
Everyone- I was inundated with messages.
Look at what this kid did!
And I was like, what did he do?
And they were like, don't you see?
And I'm like, see what?
And they're like, he got in the face of this Native American guy.
And I'm like, I didn't see that.
I just see two people standing in front of each other.
One guy's banging a drum.
I don't know what happened.
Sure enough.
Everyone jumped the gun.
Someone found livestream footage.
Many of us, myself and many others, started ripping, just going through this two hours of footage to find out what happened.
And sure enough, the Native American with the drum got in the face of the kid.
The kid had no idea what was going on.
That kid ended up winning money when the media defamed him.
Now, imagine that.
The people who believe Jussie Smollett.
That's why this guy is screaming.
Because this is a guy who believes Jussie Smollett.
I mean that figuratively.
I don't know what he actually believed about Jussie Smollett.
But the Democrats can come out in the corporate press and they can say, Trump was found guilty of this.
And then you look at the case and you're like, the fraud case?
Oh, the one where Trump warned the banks, here's a stack of filings on my personal net worth, it could be wrong, you need to check.
The bank said, OK, we do that anyway and we'll check.
Hey, some of this is wrong.
We're lowering your estimated net worth down by half.
Trump said, OK.
They then said, but we will give you the loan.
Trump said, OK.
Later, they said, we're concerned the loan we gave you may not meet its required payments because of how much you currently have in your account.
Trump said, don't worry about it.
Put more money in the account.
Bank was made whole, very happy, and say, the banker involved said, normal business, everything was good, no one was defrauded.
And the judge said, shut up, I already ruled summarily it was fraud.
And this guy goes, his whole organization was fraud!
That's just plum not true.
So why does he believe it?
Well, you have people like the Krasensteins, you have many of these leftists who march in lockstep with the corporate press, who are basically in alignment with Democrats for the purpose of winning elections.
Now, if this guy was perhaps inquisitive, he might say, let me look into these fraud allegations and figure out what they're really about.
And then you run into a very interesting problem.
Now, some people are so invested in this, like the Krasensteins, they'll lie to you over and over again and omit information to justify Why it is Trump is a fraudster.
But I won't omit any of that information from you, and I won't tell you I know definitively.
What I can tell you is this.
One of the most egregious things that is highlighted in the Trump fraud case is that he said his 10,000 square foot penthouse was actually 30,000 square feet in order to increase the value of the property and make it look like he was worth more than he was.
There's a problem with that.
First, we have to understand how does something like that happen.
The question is, did Donald Trump intentionally take a form himself, lie, sign off on it, submit it, and cross his fingers nobody would find out?
Maybe.
This is the problem with perjury trials.
Perhaps what happened is Trump has staffers who compiled all of this for him, gave him the documents, and they said, here you go, can you sign off on it?
And Trump said, we've got to make sure there's a provision in there that says these are subjective estimates which could vary wildly and could be wrong.
Trump testified to this.
When we provide the documents, we let them know, like, this information is subjective and you're going to have to go through it and figure it out for yourself.
Now perhaps that does not, as the court said, cover for fraud.
Meaning what maybe Trump meant was the evaluations were wrong and he actually claimed his 10,000 square foot property was 30,000 square feet.
There's still many more problems and why you need a trial for something like this.
So I've got a property right now that we're in.
If I was going to sell it as a house, livable square footage 8,000, total square footage 12.
So, how am I filing taxes?
How is it being assessed?
Up to the appraiser and the assessor, I suppose.
And I know that typically when square footage is included in a house, it has to be living square footage.
I bought a house in New Jersey several years ago, which I no longer own, and it was listed at something like 2,100 square feet.
Actually, it was 3,000.
Why?
The basement was unfinished.
So they had two numbers, finished and unfinished.
My point is this.
There's a lot to break down in this case.
I'd like to hear testimony about why this was the case.
What happened?
Was it intentionally misleading?
And as it turns out, it was not.
Or at least, presumably it was not, because the banks were aware of this.
And they liked the business.
They lowered Trump's... Here's the problem.
The judge said, I don't need a trial.
I've seen enough.
Bang.
Fraud.
That is not how you declare fraud.
You can't just... A judge can't just do that.
And the Krasinskis of course say, it's a summary judgment in a bench trial.
It's totally normal.
It's not totally normal.
It's extremely rare!
There should be an evidentiary hearing.
There should be a trial where witnesses come and testify.
What happened?
Summary judgment.
Fraud was committed.
Now we move on to a new trial for damages.
And when Deutsche Bank testified, they said, we were aware.
We lowered Trump's evaluation.
We did our own due diligence.
We were not tricked or defrauded in any way.
And the judge said, so what?
And that's where we are.
Now, I'm being hyperbolic.
I don't know the exact quote the bank said about being defrauded, but the banker testified, we reviewed all of his documents, we lowered Trump's assessment and his evaluation, we then decided we would give him a loan, the loan was good, we were made whole, and New York says it doesn't matter.
There was bad information in those documents, and New York's law doesn't require a victim.
Many real estate developers like Kevin O'Leary and others have said Trump did not commit fraud.
There was no victim.
There was no crime.
No one lost any money.
What is going on?
The issue there is that Donald Trump provided wrong information.
The assumption from the state?
He lied intentionally.
Prove it.
They didn't.
And there lies the problem.
For the post-millennial, Elon Musk slams latest hoax spread by Biden camp.
Trump did not call immigrants animals.
He was referring to Lakin Riley's murderer.
Yet another hoax in progress, Musk wrote.
ALX says, he's talking about criminal illegal aliens who murder innocent Americans.
Biden's propaganda account clipped that part out.
Yet another hoax.
Well, here we are.
From Newsweek, MAGA furious at Newsmax over Donald Trump coverage.
This one I find truly fascinating.
MAGA figures and Donald Trump supporters reacted with anger after Newsmax posted a tweet about a recent speech given by the former president.
Let's talk about the propaganda machine.
unidentified
Quote, the Democrats say, please don't call them animals.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
They're humans.
I said, no, they're not humans.
unidentified
They're not humans.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
They're animals.
And, uh, what Trump was saying, and he didn't actually say it like that, I'm just goofing off.
Uh, Trump is talking about the murderer of Lakin Riley.
Trump is talking about criminal aliens with records, they've committed rape and murder, that are entering this country.
He is not talking about your general immigrant.
Fascinatingly.
Newsmax, for some reason, said Donald Trump called immigrants in the United States illegally animals and not human in a speech in Michigan, resorting to the degrading rhetoric he has employed time and time again on the campaign trail.
Newsmax of all outlets.
Here you go.
Newsmax ran the story Trump calls migrants animals in Michigan stop.
Well, Technically, it's true.
The rapists and the murderers who are doing it are migrants.
But, uh, you see, the problem here is Trump is saying some migrants are animals.
That does not confer to migrants are animals.
Newsmax is lying.
Why?
Honestly, I have no idea.
But it's good to call out Newsmax and call out many of these other organizations because this is why you get unhinged man screaming in camera, losing his mind!
You know, in order to maintain the facade, they have to lie about me, for instance.
They have, uh, I want to say they, Democratic lawyers and activists have maintained this lie since 2020.
For some reason, they keep claiming that I said Trump was the real winner of 2020 and that Joe Biden committed fraud and all that stuff.
I never said that.
Not a once.
I debated Steve Bannon on the issue twice.
In fact, in one of the arguments where I said it wasn't fraud, Trump lost, Steve Bannon said that it's a really good, really good argument, really good argument.
What did happen?
I said Trump was anti-elected.
People looked at the enthusiasm for Trump, 92%.
Wow, how could he lose?
Enthusiasm for Biden was only 24%.
Trump's going to win.
What they missed?
Enthusiasm against Trump was 96%.
The various polls, and those are the general numbers.
Meaning, people hated Trump more than people liked Trump.
That being said, I've long maintained ballot harvesting, which is legal in most states, is how they pulled this off.
People say, but Tim, how come they brought in these ballots at four in the morning?
Ballot harvesting!
Why didn't they have them?
Like, look.
There's a video of people pulling ballots out from under a table.
Watch the full video.
You watch them put the ballots under the table.
There's a video of them running ballots more than once.
Interesting question.
Does that mean they were counted more than once?
I don't know.
Are there serial numbers on ballots?
That's an interesting question.
It is.
But I think it's fair to say, ballot harvesting is what they did.
James O'Keefe uncovered a guy doing ballot harvesting.
So I'm like, that's all legal.
Those are legal votes.
And they say, yeah, but they didn't do a signature verification.
Yeah, because it was this loose, rampant, low-quality ballot harvesting operation.
They lie and claim that I said Trump actually won in front.
I never did.
I told Bannon that Trump was anti-elected.
He goes, that's good.
That's good.
He was anti-elected.
I'm like, yeah, people hated him.
And so they went door to door.
They got activists.
They rallied people to do the groundwork.
I'm sure there's other untoward things, but yo, You gotta get past this.
They changed the laws.
They created universal mail-in voting so they could ballot harvest.
It's really 1 plus 1 equals 2, man.
Send everybody a ballot.
Sure, you get some stories where people filled out ballots for other people.
Absolutely.
But you don't need that!
Democrat activists knocked on a door and said, fill that ballot out and give it to me.
They go into one apartment building and they collect 2,000 ballots.
Republicans could not do that.
Now, don't get me wrong, the voter registration stuff we're seeing right now is freaky, and maybe that's because they truly have become very desperate, and the ballot harvesting tactics won't work when the Republicans have announced they're gonna ballot harvest as well.
So maybe now we're getting into that territory.
But this is the game they play.
They have to push the lies.
So when you see psychotic man screaming in an unhinged fervor, They can then make lies about people like me or other people to convince these people screaming that we're all lying.
Don't trust us.
What's fascinating to me is, you know, I hear this quite a bit.
Someone said, you know, a family member hit me up and they sent me a tweet you put out and they were like, how could you be a part of this and blah blah blah.
And they're like, that's not a real tweet from Tim.
But they don't know that.
See, I don't need to lie.
I can tell you exactly what for.
unidentified
Why?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Because I don't care about gaining power in the political system.
None of that.
I don't work for Trump.
I'd prefer it if you won.
I think it's better for this country.
But my net worth value, my mission in life, is not tied to whether or not one political party beats the other.
Joe Biden wins in 2020.
Call it whatever you want.
I mean, he's in the White House.
And we keep doing what we do.
We have Donald Trump's president.
We're critical of the corporate press and the lies and the manipulations.
And the same thing happens whether Trump is or is not in power.
And if Trump leaves and, you know, after a second term or if he doesn't get another one and someone else comes in, we do the same thing we do.
But these activists, these Democrats, live or die on this industry.
And this is what you get.
Unhinged lunatic.
Why?
Because the dude isn't smart enough to fact check.
He just sees this stuff passively and then gets angry about it.
And it's kind of sad because he truly doesn't understand what's really going on.
You take a look at someone like Anna Kasparian.
She actually reads the news and you can see how she's starting to break.
And I don't mean in a bad way, I mean like she's realizing the lies.
Trump calls migrants animals and Michigan Stop says Newsmax.
That's a lie.
Trump was referring to murderers as animals.
Here's Newsmax, 2018.
Reports on Trump's animals comment missed the point.
Yep.
Because Trump was talking about MS-13, and Newsmax pointed that out correctly.
Trump was talking about MS-13 and said these people are not human, they're animals.
He was talking about murderers and gang members and drug traffickers and sex traffickers.
At the time, Newsmax got it right.
This is where we're currently at.
You are going to be encountering many people with Trump Derangement Syndrome because they live in the hoax world.
I don't know what to tell you.
The machine is broken and it's crooked and only so many of us have seen through the facade.
But I do believe we are winning as the corporate press dwindles and they lose viewership.
Good.
But we'll see where we go.
Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out and I'll see you all then.
Recently, Charlie Kirk warned parents and grandparents to get their daughters off birth control.
The Democrat machine is outraged.
They're saying, what do you mean?
How dare you tell women what to do with their bodies?
Oh boy.
They're warning that after the Republicans come for abortion, birth control is next.
And be scared, young women, for birth control is what liberated you.
Well, the interesting thing is, there are many post-liberals, conservatives and libertarians, women, who are warning about birth control's effects on the brain.
And there's a really interesting phenomenon that when women are on birth control, who they're attracted to is different from when they're off birth control.
Naturally, this leads many women who are on birth control in a relationship, planning on getting married, after they get married and they get off birth control, they go, whoa, this guy is not attractive and he smells bad.
Because it's a dramatic change to your hormones.
I do think it's actually fascinating that we as a society here in the United States and many Western countries have begun to mass medicate teenage girls and women throughout most of their life under the guise of, it's liberating you.
I'm not saying it's wrong and women should or shouldn't do it.
That's up to them.
Personally, I lean kind of against the mass medication and hormonal change, like hormonal medication for people.
Because I know a lot of women who, for no reason, were told to get on birth control.
They were, you know, in their late teens, and the doctor was like, now it's time to get on birth control, and they're like, but why?
And they're like, just do it!
And so that seems kind of weird to me.
But for some women, it makes a lot of sense, and look, Hey, I'm fairly libertarian.
I ain't gonna get in your business.
It is what it is.
But there are concerns from conservatives that it is disruptive to the minds and lives of many people and bad for society.
Thus, welcome to the new debate!
From Mediaite, Charlie Kirk blames birth control for creating very angry and bitter young ladies while weighing in on women's prime.
The fascinating thing is, Charlie is giving you his opinions based on facts.
Fact.
Many studies have shown that birth control can cause depression.
Fact.
Birth control changes who women are actually attracted to.
These are things that women should consider when they take birth control, if that's what they want.
That's it.
They can still choose to do it, whatever.
Now Charlie, having seen that, says, this is bad, and in his opinion, women shouldn't be taking it.
So now you got a bunch of these Democrats being like, it's not true, birth control does nothing wrong, it's totally fine, everyone keep taking it.
So I can only tell you this, I don't think it's a coincidence that the people who claim there are too many people, that climate change is destroying the planet, there's an overpopulation bomb coming, I don't find it a coincidence that it's the same people who are saying, sterilize your kids, abort your babies, everything's fine.
It's very strange, huh?
Mediaite says right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk recently weighed in on various women's issues at an event hosted by his organization, Turning Point Faith, embarking upon an extended rant in which he declared that women in their early 30s were already past their prime and blamed birth control for making young ladies both angry and bitter.
Now, perhaps a bit of a broad opinion, but not inherently wrong, just perhaps broad.
There's a lot of things that make women mad.
A lot of things make men mad.
And I think, you know, Of course they're going to try and single this out as a blanket statement.
I'm sure in greater context, Charlie is referring to a specific sect of young ladies or a plurality of women, meaning it could be 30 to 40 percent.
But there are many women who have dedicated themselves to career, enter their 30s, we've seen numerous news reports where they can't find partners, men don't want to be with them, they want families, they can't have them.
There was one shocking story where this woman was, I think she was on the cover of a magazine, and she was like, I froze my eggs so I can be a girl boss.
And then like 10 years later, she wanted to have kids, and the eggs were all inviolable.
And she cried and broke down, would never have kids then.
unidentified
Yeah.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
There's an unfortunate reality that men don't face that women do.
And that is called the biological clock.
Dudes in their 70s can still get what I'm little boys through, but women at a certain point can't have kids anymore.
Think carefully and choose carefully about what that means.
Looking at all these videos where women are like, I'm single and 30 and having fun.
I watched one where it was like this girl doing van life.
And I'm like, There's no way you can be 60 years old and doing this.
It is going to be a catastrophe.
You're going to have a whole bunch of older people who are going to be homeless or dead.
But, I digress.
In one breath, Kirk triumphantly declared that young men are the most conservative they've been in 50 years.
Before averting, that young ladies present a great opportunity because they are not conservative.
After being asked why that is, he cited abortion and birth control.
Abortion's obviously part of it, but they've been sold a lie through culture, through media, through even some of their parents, that you basically have to go pursue this corporate trajectory, and that men are always the problem and suppress your biological impulses.
A lot of them are on birth control, too, and birth control, like, really screws up female brains, by the way.
Every single one of you need to make sure that your loved ones are not on birth control.
It increases depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation.
Birth control is the number one prescribed medication for young ladies under the age of 25.
They will give young ladies birth control for pimples, for acne, to control their moods, their period.
It's awful.
It's terrible.
And it creates very angry, bitter young ladies and young women.
Then that bitterness then manifests into a political party that is the Bitter Party.
I mean the Democratic, the Democrat Party.
It's all about bring us your bitterness and you know, we'll give you free stuff.
unidentified
Woo!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
I would say perhaps a bit broad, Charlie.
That's probably the best criticism, but at its core, I understand what he's saying.
We're not just making stuff up.
Healthline.
How does hormonal birth control affect your brain?
Some research suggests hormonal birth control can affect mood, stress, and overall mental health.
The potential impact varies by method and from person to person.
It says the disruption in your brain can lead to changes in neural signaling within the limbic system, affecting mood regulation, and potentially leading to symptoms of depression or anxiety.
unidentified
Yeah.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Let me just do this.
I will play for you the clip of Charlie speaking, and then we'll show you the criticism that we get from the left.
charlie kirk ▲ ● ▼
Control 2 and birth control, like, really screws up female brains, by the way.
Every single one of you need to make sure that your loved ones are not on birth control.
It increases depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation.
Birth control is the number one most prescribed medication for young ladies under the age of 25.
25, they will give young ladies birth control for pimples, for acne, to control their moods,
their period.
It is awful, it's terrible, and it creates very angry and bitter young ladies and young
women.
Then that bitterness then manifests into a political party that is the bitter party.
I mean, the Democrat Party is all about, bring us your bitterness and, you know, we'll give you free stuff.
It's like, we'll trade you, you know, bitterness.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Well, the funny thing is, millennial females, at least, this story's a bit old, but millennial females several years ago were found, I think it was Pew Research, 70% vote Democrat.
70% of millennial women are voting Democrat.
That's massive.
You don't see those numbers in men.
In men, it's 50-50.
For men, in the money old men, 55% Republican, 45% Democrat.
For Gen Z, they're actually swinging quite a bit towards more conservative values.
David Hogg chimed in.
David, who has no idea what he's talking about.
Says birth control doesn't screw people's brains, but you know what it does?
Listening to 30-year-old bigots who've made a career pandering to 13-year-old boys, telling them what makes them a man is hating women.
Yeah, Charlie Kirk is not talking about hating anybody.
David Hogg, however...
This is the grift.
David doesn't research this.
And he says things, and those who live in an emotional world will just say, yes, I want to be a part of this.
No.
There are many studies showing that hormonal birth control can cause problems.
It's not controversial.
Viva Frye says, The problem is not being young and ignorant.
It's about being young, ignorant, and confident.
Yes, David Hogg, birth control has definitive impact on brain function.
And he adds, NIH, effects of oral contraception pills on mood and magnetic resonance imaging measurements.
Using birth control pill effects stress, relativity, and brain structure and function.
How hormonal contraceptive shape of brain and behavior.
There are numerous studies that it does impact the brain, whether it is overwhelmingly negative or just a change in general.
You know, that's depending on the study you read.
But we even have this from Cosmo.
Can your contraception turn you off your partners?
We investigate post-pill clarity, they call it.
Post-pill clarity.
You don't have to spend a great deal of time on TikTok to come across the videos.
Scroll through Wynn's posts chronicling their dating lives, and you'll encounter all of the usual stories about great dates, terrible dates, and everything in between.
You might also find women who say they stopped fancying their partner after switching up their contraception, such as the pill.
Men, I am going to tell you something right now that is fairly difficult and the left will pull out of context in two seconds.
So I'll make sure to state this in a way that is understandable to those who speak English but cannot be clipped out of context.
With the issue of post-bill clarity, it is advisable to men, because of the issue of post-bill clarity, Meaning, women off contraception or on different contraception have different attractions.
Men should not date women, because of post-pill clarity, and because some women may not fancy you after a week of being off the pill, who are on birth control.
Let me stress that again.
If you date a woman on birth control, she may be attracted to you.
Due to birth post pill clarity, when she changes or gets off contraception, she may not be attracted to you.
This presents a risk to men wanting to start a family.
This is reality.
Perhaps the reason divorce rates are so high is because of this.
I often wondered this.
How is it that there are so many people who could get married and then get divorced?
It's just crazy to me.
It's like, I don't understand how these relationships break down.
It's sad, really.
But for a lot of people, it could be as simple as, they went on a date, they were really happy, woman was super excited, everything was great.
They date for several months, they're hooking up, they're having a great time, they're in the city, they got great jobs, and they're like, you know what, we love each other's company so much, playing video games, getting pizza and pod ty- We travel together, we vacation, let's get married.
We have to.
And the guy gets on his knees and says, would you marry me?
And she says, yes, yes, a million times, yes!
They get married.
And then she goes, I think it's time that we have a kid.
Let's have a family.
He goes, yes.
And she goes, I'm going to stop taking birth control.
And he goes, yes.
And then three weeks later, she goes, oh my God, I do not like this guy.
I can't stand him.
He's super annoying and he smells bad.
This is not, I'm not saying it's everything.
I'm not saying it's every time and it's every one.
But, as Cosmo points out, you scroll even a little bit on social media, there are many horror stories of women who are like, I got married, after a month or two we decided to have a kid, and I could not stand his smell.
He smelled horrible all of a sudden.
There are women who say, all of a sudden, every little thing he did was annoying to me and I hated it.
Uh-oh.
And this guy didn't know this.
This guy wasn't on any hormonal pills or anything.
He was genuinely attracted to this woman, and now she hates his guts.
Or maybe she doesn't hate him, but she can't stand being around him.
That's a problem.
They say it'll be no great surprise to learn couples can have a change of heart, but TikTok is prompting many to ask, could contraception be the cause?
Some women think the answer is yes.
On the app, there are numerous videos devoted to the topic, with these posts in turn prompting debate after debate.
Look, I read this in some women's... I think it was in Cosmo.
They said, if you're planning on getting married, three months before the wedding, stop taking birth control and make sure that's good for you and it's good for the guy.
But I say to guys, if you're going to date with a woman, and she's on birth control, don't be surprised if your relationship doesn't work out.
Because that's changing her hormones.
And same thing to women.
If you're going to go date a guy and you're taking this pill, you might not like him afterwards.
It's kind of a crazy thing.
They say contraceptive hormones are artificial estrogens and progesterones which work by suppressing ovulation.
It stands to reason they may have some impact on many aspects of a woman's sexual function, including her libido.
However, whether taking the contraceptive pill can affect which mate a woman is attracted to is unknown.
They do say, in one study cited by an expert, heterosexual women were asked to digitally manipulate an image of a man's face so that it looked like their desired partner.
The participants completed this process twice.
Once before starting the pill, and then again after taking the pill for three months.
Perhaps surprisingly, on the second occasion, women preferred men with fewer features stereotypically associated with masculinity.
Meanwhile, mid-cycle, women have been shown to prefer more masculine features.
I suppose many argue it's because when a woman is not pregnant, she wants the strongest guy who's gonna, a guy who's gonna punch a bear in the face!
But when she is pregnant, she wants a guy who's gonna be more submissive, provide for, and never leave.
A guy who is super masculine, all the women want him.
So, that could be a risk.
Honestly, I have no idea.
All I know is this has been an ongoing talking point amongst women for a very, very long time.
And so here we are.
Is Charlie Kirk wrong?
He says, we basically told a generation of young women, don't get married, don't have kids,
go get a corporate job. And it's created mass political hysteria. And then in their early
30s, they get really upset because they say, you know, the boys don't want to date me anymore
because they're not at their prime. And people get mad when I say that.
Well, it's just true.
You're in your early 30s.
I'm sorry.
You're not as attractive in the dating pool as you were in your early 20s.
But again, you have your corporate job and cats.
So I thought, you know, so I thought, you know, and I feel sorry for a lot of these young ladies.
They email me all the time and they say, Charlie, I'm broken down in tears.
I'm 33.
I earn $130,000 a year.
I travel a lot and I have no one to share my life with.
So what's their argument?
Quote, and I hope they find somebody in time, and that's the way they always frame it.
They're like, I'm running out of time, I'm running out of time, I'm running out of time.
It's like, well the culture did this to you, but you also made a decision.
You made a decision consciously to not date with the intent to marry, and it creates a lot of bad consequences.
Look, I'm fairly libertarian.
I mostly don't care what people do with their lives.
I can tell you, though, we're on a collision course with low birth rates.
The one thing I can say is, the people who are criticizing Charlie Kirk, by all means, he's got some opinions you don't like.
When it comes to birth control, though, these things are true.
Now, I don't know how many women are upset.
Maybe it's a minority.
Maybe most women are happier this way.
Okay.
Charlie's referencing the women who do tell him this.
Perhaps it's the data we need.
But, uh, eh, I don't know for sure.
I can tell you my personal opinion is I think it's overwhelmingly a bad thing.
Like, putting people on mind-altering hormones just seems like a bad idea.
I'll leave it at that.
Next segment's coming up at 6pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and we'll see you all then.
Black Swan!
That's what everybody keeps saying!
The Black Swan event!
What's it gonna be?
Earthquake in Taiwan.
China, an invasion?
World War III?
What is the Black Swan?
Perhaps it's bird flu.
We've long been worried about another pandemic.
Four years ago, we had one.
Basically crippled our election system and opened the door for some ballot harvesting.
And now we're getting news reports of measles, bird flu, and monkey pox.
Yeah, honestly, maybe nothing.
The bird flu is the most worrying because it has a very high mortality rate.
So we've got conspiracies flying wild.
People are saying weather satellites are down.
This eclipse is coming next week.
Episode 999 of TimCast IRL.
On the day of the eclipse, what could happen?
unidentified
Black Swan.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
The New York Times reports a person infected with bird flu in Texas after contact with cattle.
The case adds another worrying wrinkle to a global outbreak that has devastated bird and marine mammal populations and recently appeared in cattle herds.
I got a question for you.
The mortality rate of COVID was, I think, like twice that of the flu.
It was, um... It's funny, because if you called it a bad flu, they'd ban you.
But it was like twice that, I believe.
I could be wrong.
I thought, uh, COVID was pretty bad.
I don't know if it was as bad as they thought it was gonna be initially.
But, uh, it was the worst illness I've ever had.
I've had the flu before, and I remember being a teenager, and I'm like, you know, I was like 18?
No, I think I was like 17.
17 or 18.
Strapping young lad, had the flu, lost like 10 pounds in two days.
It was nuts.
I was shaking and shivering, and I was like, this is the worst pain I've ever felt.
Since then, of course, I've felt substantially worse pain than having the flu, but I was very young.
And then I got COVID.
Got COVID, uh, now, what is it, like, three years ago?
Jeez, two and a half years ago?
And it was so bad, I actually... I was actually thinking of going to the hospital.
And so, uh, I called, and they told me, it's a virus, do nothing, lay down, go to bed, and I'm like, this is crazy, like, I was, I was hyperventilating, my, my temperature was low, heart rate was high, and so, uh, you know, long story short, Talked to Rogan.
Uh, he helped me out quite a bit.
Shoutout Joe, he's a good dude.
And, uh, got over it.
Started to, uh, eat better and focus on my health and... Shit, you know, I did keto for a few years, lost a lot of weight.
I think, I think it was being 200 pounds, I was overweight.
That was causing the problem.
And, uh...
It's like the most I've ever weighed in my life, I think.
And so now I'm just trying to, you know, figure out how to do things better.
Recently, I switched from low-carb and moderate exercise to high exercise and full personal trainer routine.
So I just said, maximum burn, baby!
Let's roll.
But the reason I bring this up is, I got a question for you.
COVID as bad as it was.
You had people who were like... People still mask to this day.
It's crazy.
But knowing the mortality rate was... I don't know, like... It was still in the... It was lower than a single percentage point.
It was like 0.3 or something.
Many people were like, let me choose.
The mortality rate for bird flu is ridiculously high.
Let me pull this up.
Mortality rate, bird flu.
I think it's like, what is it?
unidentified
Like 30%?
56!
Whoa.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
That's crazier than I thought.
That can't be right.
Is that right?
From January 1st, 2003 to February 24, a total of 254 cases of human infection with avian influenza, H5N1, have been reported from four countries within the Western Pacific region.
Of these cases, 56% were fatal.
Now that's scary.
Yeah, I gotta be honest.
A greater than chance, percentage chance of dying Interesting question.
We talked about this on IRL, and this is why Ian is great.
A lot of people don't like him, he derails, whatever it is you might say about him, but he does often come up with things outside of the political sphere which we may not think about.
And we were like, the lockdowns are bad, they shouldn't mandate this, and he goes, what about airborne Ebola?
That's a good point, actually.
If they institute these lockdowns over bird flu, how are you going to feel about them?
I think most of us concluded in that conversation, lockdowns should not be allowed.
You choose to go out during a pandemic.
That is your choice.
Daddy government shouldn't say, mommy government, nanny government, because other people are scared you can't do a thing.
If you want to go out when people have bird flu and a 56% mortality rate, if there really is a pandemic with bird flu, you choose to do it.
What's the argument?
They'll probably lock things down.
I'll tell you this.
If we do get a bird flu pandemic, as this has been one of the black swans that people are scared about, we probably at Timcast, we probably will stop doing guests.
Timcast IRL in 2020, we actually didn't have guests for a long time.
We started with periodic guests.
It was mostly me and Adam.
That was mostly it.
And then we started adding guests.
And it was like one-on-one guests.
It was more like the culture war, to be completely honest.
We didn't really know what we were doing.
Now it's a nightly conversational topical news show with rotating guests who are typically political commentators.
And the culture war is more so our debate show.
If we were to get a lockdown and bird flu, I think, I gotta be honest, I don't agree with mandated lockdowns and mandated vaccinations or any of that stuff, but I would personally probably choose to lock things down and have most people work from home if they could.
To isolate.
I would absolutely do that.
But it should still be our choice.
That's always been the big issue.
If you want to quarantine, it's your choice.
If you want to mask up, it's your choice.
If you don't want to, and you get sick, that's on you.
You want the vaccine?
Your choice.
Should not be government mandate.
We didn't take COVID as seriously.
I got it.
It was bad.
But we still went out, didn't care to wear masks.
West Virginia, nobody cared.
I mean, there were very few places that actually cared.
If we went to Maryland or D.C., yeah, there was one place in Maryland that... I told this story before, where it's like, we were standing five feet from a table, and they were like, put your mask on.
And I'm like, but if I sit down, I don't have to wear the mask.
This is ridiculous.
If it's a bird flu, I am genuinely concerned about a 56% mortality rate.
I imagine it would get a lot lower.
The mortality rate we're looking at with bird flu is very rare cases, so there's special circumstances here, but I'm not a virologist or an expert.
I'd imagine the mortality rate would drop substantially due to medical efforts, but even if we're talking about 20 or 30% death, 1 in 5 chance of dying?
Yeah, I'm not really interested in that.
And while I'm not in a risk category, 38-year-old man.
Typically, those of us that are around this age aren't really at great risk.
I totally understand the argument about, I have loved ones who are older, and there are young children, and that's who I should be concerned about.
I don't think it made much sense for COVID, but bird flu is a whole other story if the mortality rate stands at 56%.
What would you do?
I mean it.
If we really got to a pandemic, I think what would happen is IRL would mostly go guestless.
Yeah, it would be probably just the TimCast employees.
We'd probably say, like, limit interactions because we want the show to keep going.
I know Joe Rogan tried doing, uh, Zoom, like, over, like, digital shows.
It doesn't work, man.
It really doesn't work.
You watch Bill Maher when they bring on a guest on the TV, and it doesn't work.
They're not a part of the conversation.
It's just not as good.
When you have people sitting here in front of you, there's just something totally different about that real conversation hanging out with friends.
So that's probably what we would do.
We really would.
And, fortunately, we're out in the middle of nowhere.
We have tremendous emergency supplies, so, you know, hey, that's how we'd handle it.
I'll see you, though.
But let me just let you know where we're at.
53 cases of measles in Chicago.
That's crazy.
On March 4th, what did they say?
Measles infections related to an outbreak at Chicago migrant shelter have proliferated from one case on March 4th to 53 as of Monday.
Measles?
You gotta be kidding me.
And now they're coming out in their blankets because people don't want to get vaccinated.
Dude, it's because they're bringing in people unvetted, okay?
Certainly, I hope you got your measles vaccine, but hey, I'm not a doctor, so talk to your doctor.
You do not want to get measles.
And then we got monkeypox!
Oh, come on.
Monkeypox cases nearly double what they were at the same time last year, CDC says.
There was a national year-to-date estimate of 511 cases of mid-March.
unidentified
Blech.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
Oh, that one's just bad.
What do we do?
Hopefully this is a one-off case of bird flu.
They say at least one person in Texas has been diagnosed with bird flu after having contact with dairy cows, presumed to be infected.
Now they're going to take our milk from us.
unidentified
They're going to say, you know, what do we do?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼
There were some chickens I believe they found to have bird flu.
So they culled the flock and they shut down like mass egg production.
Now for me, you know, being as smart as I am, and of course being a better man and the envy of lesser men, I have chickens.
And those chickens produce eggs.
And we eat those eggs.
And we bake with those eggs.
Yo, we went down to the river, got a fire going, got a pan, and fried some eggs, put it on, made little sandwiches.
There is nothing more delicious.
No one could argue.
There's nothing more delicious.
No one could argue against this.
Then, cooking food, out in the wilderness, over an open flame.
It's a dry piece of bread with egg and cheese.
No fancy spices or sauces, but nothing beats that.
And the egg came right from my own chicken's butt.
For many of you, you may go without chickens.
You may go without chicken.
Or eggs.
Us here?
Well, the chickens make more of themselves, and then we eat them.
We ate a bunch of the roosters.
I hope y'all are taking this stuff seriously because they are warning a black swan event is around the corner.
I suppose my final question on this before we wrap up for the day is just for the morning show.
How would you handle this?
And what do we do now in the event we do get the bird flu pandemic many have warned about?
Next segment's coming up at 8 p.m.
The actual segment is the TimCast IRL live show, so come hang out.
YouTube.com slash TimCastIRL.
▲
Export Selection