Democrat Conspiracy EXPOSED, Dems Fund Over $1M For Dan Cox & MAGA GOP Then Claim Its the Apocalypse
Democrat Conspiracy EXPOSED, Dems Fund Over $1M For Dan Cox & MAGA GOP Then Claim Its the Apocalypse. Democrats hope playing both sides will allow them to seize power in the Novermber midterm elections.
Democrats are outright funding Trump supporting candidates then claiming its the end of Democracy knowing that their voters are too ignorant to read the news and realize the scheme at hand.
Republicans are even crying foul as Larry Hogan of Maryland slams Dan Cox.
The plan will fail in all likelihood as the economy, inflation, and gas prices are so significant that voters would vote for a ham sandwich if it had an R next to its name
#democrats
#republicans
#maga
Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
For the past several weeks, we have learned they were secretly funding Trump-supporting candidates, hoping they could beat them in the general election.
Dan Cox has won the primary for Maryland governor on the Republican side, with $1 million in support coming from Democrats.
But the Democrats are simultaneously saying these people are an existential threat.
They're lying.
It's one big con to steal power.
In our next story, Colbert's affiliates and staffers, who aren't being charged even though they broke into the Capitol building, it turns out they caused such a commotion, a Democrat staffer called for emergency assistance, and these people lied about having credentials.
The double standard is obvious.
In our last story, Merriam-Webster has changed the definition of female.
How strange.
A young woman claims she's a cat, so let's talk about social contagion and the weird cultures that are emerging around identity issues.
If you like the show, give us a good review, leave us five stars, share the show with your friends.
Now, let's get into that first story.
Why yes, this one is literally a conspiracy, a scheme between Democrats for some harmful
purpose.
The Democrats are actually spending money to prop up Trump loyalist candidates, something we've known about for several weeks now, and their idea is that if they can fund the people they claim are destroying this country, they will easily defeat them come November.
It's insane, and it's outright evil.
Here's what they're doing.
Insider reports that Democrats spent over $1 million to boost Dan Cox, the Trump loyalist and 2020 election denier who just won the GOP primary for Maryland governor.
Democrats think with him as the nominee, when it comes to the general election for the gubernatorial race in Maryland, they'll win.
Then they go on the January 6th committee and say it's people like this that are destroying this country.
They are funding it.
The Democrats are funding what they claim is destroying this country.
Right there, right in front of you.
Insider.
Businessinsider.com.
Fact.
So for all the people that have said this, I'll say it outright first and foremost.
Everybody who says Trump and all these people are bad.
Fine.
Fine.
Explain why Democrats are funding them.
Do you think that if Dan Cox loses the gubernatorial race in Maryland, he ceases to exist?
No.
You have given him substantial power.
Now, if you have friends and family who think these people are wrong, at the very least, you can say, okay, then why are Democrats funding it?
Why are Democrats funding these individuals?
Now I can say this.
Previously, I said it backfired.
It backfired because they tried propping up a dude in Colorado and he didn't win.
So they dump all of this money into a race to get the guy they view as being extremist to win.
He doesn't win.
All they did was raise his profile and set the tone of conversation in a direction they claim is wrong.
Well now, they actually helped get Dan Cox the victory.
We will see.
In the general election, if the Democrats' plan actually works.
And I think the whole thing is just downright dirty.
They know they can't win, so they're playing dirty games.
They have done polling, and they have found that American people don't like MAGA.
That's what they believe.
We'll see.
We'll see how it plays out.
I'm willing to bet that because the economy is so bad, because gas prices are so high, that people would vote for a ham sandwich if it had an R next to it.
Because the Democrats have run this country to the ground.
So when they fund the Trump-supporting, Trump-loyalists, claiming it's the end of democracy or whatever, I think people are going to vote for these candidates no matter what.
I don't think they care.
I think Donald Trump could come out and make his sole speech about shooting someone on Fifth Avenue and people would be like, at this point, if it gets gas prices down, yeah, maybe.
It's just so dirty and so filthy.
Well, right now, we've got polling coming out showing, we get it.
Joe Biden, nobody likes the guy.
His polling is in the gutter.
The American people think that he's not paying attention to what he needs to pay attention to.
He's giving our oil away.
Diesel prices, shortages, it's all bad.
And now we've got one individual speaking to CNN saying, Joe Biden's going to continually hinder fossil fuels.
So when you look at what's happening, even on CNN, Joe Biden is gutting this country.
So fund anyone you want.
The Democrats could prop up literal ham sandwich and I'm going to vote for it.
I'll tell you another reason why.
There is nothing that will get me to support any Democrat because they actively have supported sex change operations for children.
Period.
So when a Republican comes out and says, we're not for that, but we want to lower taxes, I go, I guess.
Because what's the alternative?
Vote for those people?
Never gonna happen.
I mean, that's what they're thinking.
They're thinking about it that way.
Like, the Republicans could be funding all of those Democrats, I guess, because regular people would say no to it.
It's a ridiculous scheme.
And I think it's disgusting and it's dirty, but you know what?
Fine.
Trump supporters are probably cheering now that their guy won, thanks to Democrats spending the money to help him out.
Let's read the story.
Before we get started, my friends, head over to TimCast.com and become a member to help support our work, but also to watch our new shows.
Tales from the Inverted World, a TimCast exclusive with a new hour-long episode.
Season 1, Episode 3, The House of Seven Ghosts.
Shane Cashman went down to Georgia to try and find the lost Confederate gold.
What he found was something substantially crazier.
Mysteries, UFOs, witches, someone threatened to kill him.
We've made this really great audio-visual experience.
The episodes are 40 minutes to an hour long, and if you want to watch the show, check it out at TimCast.com, but you're also going to get access to the TimCast IRL uncensored after-hours show.
You'll be supporting our journalists, and we have dumped PayPal off the site, If you want to be a member, you will now use Parallel Economy.
Dan Bongino is affiliated with, well, one of the co-founders of this anti-censorship payment processor.
We are putting our money where our mouth is as we expand and build our own streaming video company.
In five years, people won't be talking about signing up for Disney+.
They'll be saying, you check out that latest episode of Tales from the Inverted World over at TimCast.com.
So good!
With your support, we're going to displace the woke companies who hate you.
Stop giving your money to people who hate you.
To quote Jeremy Boring of the Daily Wire.
You can give it to those who are fighting to make that difference.
TimCast.com is.
We're not perfect.
We're certainly opposed to all of that woke garbage.
And so, check out Tales from the Inverted World, but don't forget to smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this video if you really want to support us.
Here's the story from Business Insider.
Democrats spend over $1 million to boost Dan Cox, the Trump loyalist and 2020 election denier who just won the GOP primary for Maryland governor.
They say.
The Democratic Governors Association funneled $1.16 million into TV ads for Cox, betting that the far-right candidate would be easier for the state's Democratic candidate to beat, the New York Times reported.
In an ad paid for by the DGA, the group calls Cox Trump's hand-picked candidate, says he's 100% pro-life, and will protect Second Amendment rights at all costs.
Messages that likely resonated with Trump loyalists in the state.
Now, the ad tries to feign being negative, but you wouldn't say someone's going to protect 2A in a negative ad.
You would say something like, he supports, you know, rescinding gun restrictions, which could lead to more violence or something like that.
No, they come out and they're like, he would protect the Second Amendment at all costs.
Yeah, that's a pro-Republican ad right there.
I like the idea that he would.
That'd be great.
Hey, Dan, fix this state!
We're planning on getting out of here for the most part.
In a statement to Insider, a DGA spokesperson said Cox's win reaffirms it was the right choice to run the ads and hold him accountable for his radical MAGA stances.
What?!
That's not what you did!
You gave him free money!
The Democrats are giving Trump candidates free money!
We'll continue to use the same message to defeat Cox and his dangerous agenda in November.
The state's outgoing Republican governor, Larry Hogan, has been outspoken about his disdain for Trump and blamed him for what he sees as a sure loss for the Republicans in Maryland.
Trump lost Republicans to the White House, the House, and the Senate.
Hogan, a potential 2024 presidential candidate, tweeted July 20th.
He's selfishly colluded with the National Democrats to cost us a governor's seat in Maryland, where I ran 45 points ahead of him.
He's fighting for his ego.
We're fighting to win.
And the fight goes on.
45 points ahead?
That doesn't sound right.
Spokesperson for Hogan told Baltimore Banner reporter Pamela Wood that Hogan won't be voting for Cox in the general election.
The Times reported that Cox also chartered three buses from Maryland to D.C.
for the January 6, 2021 Stop the Steal rally, the Times reported.
He has also said Biden was installed in the White House and baselessly claimed voter fraud occurred in his home Frederick County, Maryland, the Times reported.
You know, I don't live in Frederick County.
I actually live in West Virginia.
But we do work out of, and I own property in Maryland, in Washington County.
So, not that district.
Fine.
I'd be really interested to see what he had to say about Frederick.
I go there to eat, like, all the time.
Frederick is like 10 minutes away.
Kelly Schultz.
The GOP candidate endorsed by Hogan called out the DGA's funding of Cox earlier this month, the Washington Post reported.
unidentified
Hey it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet and greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
Spend a million now and save five million dollars by not having to face me in the general election, Schultz told the Post.
She called Cox a lying conspiracy theorist who is a danger to our party and our state.
Yeah, I don't know if I care, Kelly.
I don't.
I may not agree with Cox on a lot of issues, but I genuinely don't believe you would do right by this state, or by the American people anyway.
And you know what that means?
I really don't agree with Cox on a lot of the things he said, but I'll take two-way.
That's it.
You come to me with your rhino garbage, you come to me with your Democrat uniparty garbage, and I'm just gonna say, don't know, don't care, not gonna vote.
You come to me, Dan Cox, and you say, eh, we'll protect the Second Amendment, and then a bunch of other things, I'll be like, I'll take what I can get.
Granted, I don't vote here, so, you know, it is what it is.
Although, many of my employees do.
We'll see how that plays out.
The DGA has used this strategy in other states, too.
Darren Bailey, another Trump-backed far-right gubernatorial candidate, secured a spot as Illinois' Republican candidate in June.
The DGA ran an ad about Bailey with some of the same talking points as Cox's ad, the Chicago Tribune reported.
You know, can I just point out when he says he's pro-life and would defend the Second Amendment?
Those are popular positions.
You see, the Democrats spend so much time wrapped up in their psycho bubble, they don't realize those are popular.
Ah, what's that?
I could already hear the left being like, Tim's so wrong!
Most Americans are pro-choice!
Did you read the polls?
Because you're wrong.
Most Americans support some restrictions, and their view of pro-choice is not what Democrats are offering.
Now, are the Republicans smart enough to play a similar game?
I don't think so.
I don't think so.
I'd laugh if it happened.
I'm not a fan of this dirty politics.
Republicans start paying for far-left candidates so that, you know, whatever.
Maybe they've done something like that in the past.
I've not seen it.
Jonathan Swan noted this.
He's a journalist over at Axios, I believe.
Is he?
We're gonna get the, I guess, I'm pretty sure he's at Axios.
The Democratic Governors Association funded Trump ally Dan Cox with ads supporting his candidacy.
They succeeded.
As they have in other races, helping stop the Steel Republicans.
Now comes the pivot to Democrats' fall message.
These candidates are threats to American democracy.
By the transitive property, my friends, Democrats themselves are funding the threat to American democracy.
Therefore, they are also a threat to American democracy.
Michael Tracy points out, D.C.
Dems spent $2 million boosting Maryland GOP Governor candidate Dan Cox, a Jan 6 organizer, because they figured it'd be easier to beat.
Cox just won the primary.
Either way, he'll be hugely elevated in stature, which January 6th-obsessed Dems are always telling us is so dangerous.
If these Democrats really believe their own rhetoric about the calamitous existential threat of January 6th, they would be spending millions of dollars to elevate GOP candidates whom they claim pose such a profound danger.
Almost like they don't believe their own rhetoric.
A similar strategy was also executed in Pennsylvania, among other states.
Dems spend big money to boost the very insurrectionist Republicans they claim are such scary threats.
Something to bear in mind during the next January 6th-related meltdown the Dems inevitably contrive.
It's quite simple, my friends.
At the very least, the bare minimum, if Cox loses in the general, they have still helped him gain tremendous prominence.
The Democrats consistently have said they are willing to burn this country down for short-term gains.
You know, most people don't actually care about a lot of these issues.
Most people don't care about January 6.
Democrat hardcore activists do, and maybe they're hoping they'll light them up and get them to go vote.
Maybe.
I think regular people aren't paying attention to that stuff, and they're just like, yo, why is gas expensive?
This strategy has failed in the past.
The Colorado Sun says why the millions of dollars Democrats spend in Colorado's Republican primaries didn't work.
All of the more extreme GOP candidates Democrats wanted to see win on Tuesday lost most of them by significant margins.
So I don't want to say it's backfired just yet.
We'll see what happens in the general.
I think it's fair to say at this point this part of it already backfired.
They put a bunch of money into the more extreme GOP candidates who lost.
So all they did was prop up Trump supporters and give them prominence.
Give them political influence.
That ain't helping you dude.
Those people will use that influence in ways the Democrats don't like.
But that's... that's the story of Democrats, right?
Remember when Harry Reid nuked the filibuster, and then all of a sudden Donald Trump got three Supreme Court justices installed, and then Roe v. Wade got overturned?
Hey, how about that over the span of ten years?
As Democrats talking about doing away with the filibuster, the Republicans lick their lips and slap their hands together.
Looking forward to November, when they win, and then come January 3rd, steamroll everything.
The Democrats can't seem to think long-term.
Well, here's the reality from the Daily Caller.
New CNN poll might be the most glaring indictment of Biden and Democrats yet.
Yeah.
Americans questioned President Joe Biden's priorities in new CNN polling released Monday that highlighted widespread displeasure with the direction the country is heading.
The latest CNN poll showed that 68% of U.S.
adults believed Biden's priorities are wrong, and the president hasn't paid enough attention to critical issues facing Americans, like the economy and inflation.
This is up 10% from November 2021, when the data was tracked according to the poll.
Okay.
From TimCast.com, soaring diesel prices put pressure on truckers, farmers, consumers.
The tight diesel supply could send the average price to $10 per gallon by the end of summer.
Do you know what that would mean for the cost of goods?
Tripling?
What it would mean for your food?
What it would mean for even the availability of goods?
You're not going to be able to get some things because they won't be able to transport them.
Let's put it this way.
Maybe.
Maybe.
It will just be more expensive food.
Okay?
But maybe, what may happen is, the cost of transporting strawberries in the winter exceeds the amount they could reasonably sell them for.
And so what happens is, you go to the grocery store, there ain't none.
You shouldn't be eating out of season fruits anyway, in my opinion.
I'm not a fan of that.
Strawberries in the winter, it means they come from very far away.
But the truckers are going to be like, look, the cost of gas, how fast we got to get strawberries to the store because they go bad.
We're going to sell these things for like 20 bucks a little cart.
Nobody's going to want to buy that.
So we just decided it's not worth it.
During the COVID lockdown, there was a barbecue joint not too far away from me.
They just stopped selling brisket.
I wanted a brisket sandwich.
I wanted that slow cooked sweet brisket so good.
And I went up and I said, I'll have a brisket sir.
And they said, we don't have any.
And then I was like, oh, okay, I guess I'll have the chicken.
And I was like, how come no brisket?
You're a barbecue, you're a barbecue stop.
And they said, the cost of beef has gone up so high, we would have to sell it for like 20 or 30 bucks a sandwich in order to make money off it.
No one's going to spend that and we don't want to waste the money on the expensive beef.
So we decided not to sell it.
And I was like, You ain't wrong about that.
Chicken was 10 bucks.
I'm not spending 30 bucks on a sandwich.
Just go home and make a PBJ or something.
So they said, no beef.
That's what we may be looking at.
Now, I don't know exactly how it'll play out, but this is what we may be looking at.
Take a look at this level chart.
The cost of diesel fuel on July 19th was $5.52 per gallon, up 68% from just a year ago.
The highest recorded average price for a gallon of diesel was $5.81.
It rounds up to $82.
is 81 cents. It rounds up to 82. June 2022 according to AAA.
Quote, people pay less attention to diesel prices because people aren't going to the pump
and using it.
I mean, we do because we have a truck we use for materials and it's diesel.
Says Matt Smith, lead oil analyst at Kipler, a research firm.
He told the AP.
But diesel has a far more reaching impact and is already having a real big impact across the economy.
Unless prices are reduced, high diesel costs could worsen the supply chain and inflation issues the U.S.
is seeing.
As many trucking companies are declining jobs unless their customers are willing to pay more for the increase in fuel.
It breaks my heart because I have to say, no, I can't afford to, or I can, but you're going to have to pay some of my fuel to get me there.
Said Deb Labrie, a long-haul trucker who delivers pharmaceuticals.
In order to mitigate high fuel costs, Labrie tries to minimize driving an empty truck between deliveries to customers.
If the client cannot pay the higher cost for diesel, she simply turns the job down.
There will be more logistical shortages, says Phil Verlager, a longtime energy economist.
Americans will find more empty shelves and higher prices.
A lot of truckers just won't be able to operate, he said.
If you're a farmer, you may have to leave some acres fallow or won't fertilize as much.
The macroeconomists don't get this.
It's going to come back and haunt us all.
Food shortages, fuel shortages, hungry people, a lack of goods, a lack of medicine.
When all of that hits and smacks you in the face in the next month or two, I assure you, Dan Cox could take a dump on the stage and then laugh and say, I'll do the economy better.
They'd still vote for him.
I'm not going to say what Trump said.
I'll be a little bit more crude.
But you will be hard-pressed to find someone who's got a Republican next to their name who could lose.
Now, I don't know.
I don't know.
I'm not a psychic.
I just believe it's reasonable to suggest that with all the problems we're seeing from the Democratic Party, or I should say those who have power now failing, people are just going to be like, don't know, don't care, Republican, boom, I'm out.
So maybe You get some Republican candidate who gets up on stage to debate and just takes a big ol' dump on stage in front of everybody and then laughs and says, that right there is a better economic plan than my Democratic rival.
What's gonna happen is, yeah, some people are probably gonna be like, yo, I don't wanna vote for that guy.
And then everyone else walks into the voting booth and says, not the Democrat.
And they don't even know anything about the Republican.
They will just say, things are really bad under the Democrats, I'm voting Republican, boom, there it is.
And the point I'm making here is, Democrats think by propping up Dan Cox, it's going to hurt him.
No.
He might win by default, just because people hate you.
Let me drive it home.
Talking about the fuel surges, the fuel shortages, the food shortages, and ladies and gentlemen, I give you, from the Daily Mail, Biden to warn Congress that if lawmakers don't act on climate change, then he will, during Massachusetts' trip to highlight the wind industry, after Joe Manchin torpedoes his green agenda.
Uh-oh.
Joe Biden, to an already crippled fuel economy, is saying, I'm gonna make it worse.
So yeah, you think people are going to vote for this?
Maybe.
Maybe people just don't read the news.
But maybe enough people don't need to.
Because they will feel it.
Whether they want to or not.
They say the ultimatum will come during the President's trip to Massachusetts, where he will visit Brayton Point Power Station, New England's largest coal plant, which is being transformed into a factory producing cables for offshore wind farms.
The President will make clear tomorrow that climate change is an existential threat to our nation and to the world.
And he will also make clear that since Congress is not going to act on this emergency, then he will.
In the coming days, he will continue to announce executive actions that we have developed to combat this emergency.
Biden's threat comes after Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia torpedoed the president's green agenda on Capitol Hill when he said he could not support billions of dollars in new climate spending as part of a larger economic package.
Well, there you go, baby.
Biden has vowed to use his executive powers since Manchin, who represents a state with a major coal industry, made his intentions clear.
Quote, The climate emergency is not going to happen tomorrow, but we still have it on the table, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said at Tuesday's daily press briefing.
I don't have a date circled in the calendar.
But the president will announce federal funds to help heat-ravaged communities in his remarks.
He'll announce new initiatives to bolster the domestic offshore wind industry.
Last week, Biden said he would start taking executive action on climate issues after the talks between Manchin and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer came to a standstill.
There's a viral post going around where they're like, a wind turbine was damaged and spilled oil all over the place.
And everyone was like, what?
How did a wind turbine spill oil?
And then people are like, dude, they have to lubricate it, man.
They've got oil in those things.
Now, of course, it takes less oil to spin because it's spinning because of the wind, right?
They still use oil.
So maybe it is more energy efficient, producing less emissions.
They don't burn the oil.
They use it as a lubricant, for the most part.
But many people were surprised to see it.
This is where we're headed, my friends.
In this clip from RNC Research, Biden climate advisor Gina McCarthy says Biden will, quote, move forward with every power available to him to get rid of fossil fuels.
Okay.
Well, we've been over this before.
Reasonable estimates suggest that if fossil fuels are ended, you get 60 million deaths overnight, or somewhere around that number.
I'm not an environmentalist or an energy economist or whatever, but I was reading about it and that's what they expect.
If you ended it right now, just outright, and the reason is heat stroke deaths, people's insulin would go bad, power shortages, outages, all of that stuff, hospitals, very bad.
Some have argued that over the span of a few years, without oil, you see a billion deaths.
And, uh, um, well, Bill Gates is probably happy about that because they're mostly in Africa.
Bill Gates has issued statements about how poverty is growing rapidly in Africa, so we need to stop them from having kids.
And it's like, wow.
You don't like these people because they're poor, and it's kind of a crazy thought.
Look, I think overpopulation is an issue.
I think expanding population density is an issue.
I don't know if I would ever go so far as to be like, in this region of that race.
That's kind of like, uh, dude, come on.
Calm down.
I suppose, though, if you're a wealthy elitist, you probably look at impoverished communities with disdain.
Those people don't produce computers for your company?
No, I think people are people.
So the idea of this culling, or whatever, among the poor is horrifying.
I will say though, there are many people who point out it is the survival of the fittest.
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating That just means people in the U.S., I guess.
People in Europe.
presidential election. We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial
with Josh Hammer. Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts. It's
That just means people in the US, I guess. People in Europe.
And it means that people in South America, people in Africa, people in parts of the
Middle East. Yeah, those people are likely going to die first in the event that there's a
major famine.
With Ukraine not producing as much food, with Russia not producing as much food, with Russia not getting out fertilizer, that's the direction we're headed in.
I don't know what to tell you, man.
EU natural gas.
Take a look at this one.
Usually trading around €25 since 2010, it's now at €154.
Complete disaster coming in.
No matter if Nord Stream 1 comes back online, in my honest opinion.
I hope you're ready for what's to come.
I don't know how bad it would get.
It might not get that bad relative to how we live in America.
It may just mean that your gas is really expensive and it sucks for a while, but what I mean is you're not going to starve to death.
Some people might.
I think most Americans will probably just complain about having expensive gas.
That's the reality for America.
Europe is probably going to be reeling from this too.
There'll probably be a lot of rioting.
But in countries like Turkey and Lebanon, in Africa, people, they're going to starve.
They're going to starve.
Sri Lanka is already imploding.
And we're going to see more of that.
If Biden brings those policies to the U.S., it's going to be Mad Max.
Look, if people can't get food, they'll find food.
No one's going to roll over and die.
If a man can't feed his child, he's not going to let his child starve.
He's going to find food.
However, he has to.
So what are the Democrats focused on?
Democrats propping up Trump-supporting candidates because they know they can't win.
But I tell you this.
I don't think when someone looks at a MAGA candidate and a Democrat, they think negative things.
The Democrats seem to think that by propping up Dan Cox, they're going to get more votes.
Like, maybe.
They were like, hey, look, people hated Trump, so we won there.
How is that going to matter when Joe Biden has failed this country and Democrats are gutting it?
Yeah, it won't.
Someone's gonna walk over and be like, I don't care what you believe about Trump or 2020, tell me you'll get the gas prices down.
And it'll happen.
And here's the best part.
From Pointer.
Most Republicans still falsely believe Trump's stolen election claims.
Here are some reasons why.
In poll after poll, about 70% of Republicans say they don't think Joe Biden is the legitimate winner of the 2020 election.
It's amazing.
So they're propping up people that Republicans will vote for anyway.
And they're propping up people who represent Trump.
When Trump brought us the best numbers of our lives in 2019.
It's just downright crazy if you were to ask me.
Now, I don't know if that will translate.
In this article at Six Months Old, they say more than 40% of the U.S.
do not believe Biden legitimately won.
Now, that's crazy.
Trump said something around half the country, and it's like, okay, that is around half.
I don't know exactly what he said, but 40% just shy of half.
That's crazy to me.
Axios' Momentum Poll also finds majority of Americans fear repeat of capital attack in next few years.
Yeah, but this time it'll be the far left.
When Donald Trump wins, you think that the far left is going to sit back and do nothing?
They tried storming the White House.
There wasn't even an election going on.
The Gravel Institute tweeted that they thought what happened on January 6.
In their minds, they thought it was good.
The only problem they had with it was it was the wrong people doing it.
So, Gravel outright advocated for the far left to stage an insurrection.
Do you think they will not do that?
I mean, they've already done it over and over and over and over again.
2024 comes.
Donald Trump is running.
He's leading, and he wins.
The Republicans control everything.
The House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, and now the presidency.
Do you think that Antifa and BLM are just going to sit back and be like, we'll get them next time?
Or do you think it will get really bad?
The gloves are off now.
And it's gonna be different.
I ask people, why didn't they know about the 529 insurrection?
They say, they say, I don't know what that is.
I say, yeah, why, why is that?
Why is it that you don't know that far leftists tore down the barricades at the White House, set fire to St.
John's Church, torched a White House guard tower, injured dozens of officers, and forced the president into a bunker?
Why didn't you know that?
And they go, oh, wow, I had no idea.
That excuse is not going to work in 2024.
The far left won't care, and the right already knows.
So if the far left were to engage in any kind of insurrection, they probably will.
Then what?
You think the media's gonna come out and be like, it's the police's fault?
How could this have happened again?
I mean, they probably will.
But the regular Americans are gonna be like, nope!
The Democrats tried claiming that Trump stole the election with the help of Russia.
It's quite amazing to say that, right?
The Mueller probe proved that Donald Trump didn't collude with them.
But they still try and push those insane narratives.
Now, I think it's fair to say that Russia did try to interfere in the U.S.
election.
Sure.
But my understanding is, from the reports, it was negligible.
They barely spent anything and barely did anything.
What really made it work for Trump is meme magic.
Yes, right.
Memes.
Independent commentary.
People like Alex Jones.
So they've been purging that.
They can't let it happen again.
The cat's out of the bag.
You can't stop it.
You can't.
You know, they try to smear me because I am the milquetoast moderate, yet here I am saying, like, there's a reason to vote for Trump.
Personally, I like DeSantis substantially better.
But Trump is the bull.
DeSantis is a leader.
Trump is a bull.
He's going to storm in, romp about, and just wreak havoc.
Good in a lot of ways, I don't know if it's the right thing for this country moving forward.
If I could trust that DeSantis would drain the swamp, now that Trump has exposed many of the swamp monsters, and that he would do right by the culture war and he had good foreign policy, I'd say hands down, why vote for anybody else?
So we'll see.
We will see.
These woke, cringe, and establishment Democrats are trying to smear DeSantis as worse than Trump.
I'm like, oh please.
One of these guys wrote an article and he was like, Ron DeSantis is more skillful and articulate than Trump.
That makes him more dangerous.
Oh, right.
The dude's got military experience.
The dude has... He was in Congress, now he's a governor.
He helped out Florida's economy.
He saved Florida during the lockdowns.
Dude has proven he can lead effectively.
Donald Trump did great things as well.
But, yo, come on, man.
You know the kind of guy Trump is.
They try and tell him, like, here's the brief on what's happening.
I don't want to hear it.
You read it and tell me about it later.
And it's like, oh, come on, man.
You gotta pay attention to this stuff.
Now I will say, I don't know if I trust the media when they write those stories anyway.
Donald Trump seems to care a whole lot.
He seriously does.
I think he's a blowhard.
I think he's arrogant.
And I think the media lied about him left and right, and because they did, I don't trust them anymore.
So I'd rather have Trump than Biden.
Hands down.
That was true in 2020, it's true now, and it'll be true when the next election happens.
But maybe it won't even be Joe Biden.
Who knows?
Here's what I think we're going to see.
I think Democrats plan to fund Trump Republicans, isn't going to do what they think it's going to do, and the Trump Republicans are going to gain prominence and even start winning.
Then the Democrats are going to lose and be like, but the far right!
And you're going to be like, I think you overestimated people's issues with the quote-unquote far right, and you made it happen.
They are hypocrites, they are evil, and their schemes are being exposed.
A literal conspiracy.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 8 p.m.
over at youtube.com slash timcastirl.
Thanks for hanging out, and we'll see you all then.
We're learning more details about Stephen Colbert's crew that illegally entered the Capitol complex and were arrested for it, and who will not be charged for committing any crime.
It turns out the behavior of the crew was so egregious that it resulted in a Democrat staffer calling for emergency help.
We've got more, too.
From this story over at Yahoo News, Colbert Late Show staffers lied about having credentials before arrest, U.S.
Police Chief says.
It's fascinating.
These individuals who are romping around, screaming, banging on doors, saying weird things, threatening to slide things under doors, no charges.
On January 6th, there are people who have been locked up awaiting trial for trespassing.
Now, there's that one famous story back from April where a man was acquitted of all charges because he showed the court the police waving him in.
He was acquitted.
They said, no charges.
They said, charges dropped, you're free to go.
Sorry about that, good sir.
Sure.
There's another guy who had some trespassing charges, and that was upheld, but I think some of the charges were dropped when they were like, yeah, it looks like cops opened the door and waved people in.
However, you, bro, like, you then went on to, like, walk over a rope or something or cross the barrier.
You knew you weren't supposed to be crossing, so it was like a minor, like, some of it got dropped.
I think what we're going to end up seeing with this Colbert story is I don't want to jump the gun.
I think we might actually end up seeing this be used as precedent in the trials of many of the J6 defendants.
Many of the individuals who entered the Capitol building on January 6th who are bumbling around confused will probably be able to use this To get off.
Because it will be a crazy trial when they all start citing the Colbert crew and then saying our people, like the January 6th people, some of them were riding fine.
Those guys, lock them up.
As I've always said.
But there are some people who were just walking down the street, saw people walking up to the Capitol, and the police had opened the doors and were even fanning people in.
As per that acquittal story that I mentioned.
And you know what?
I don't even want to waste words here.
Let me just show you to make sure you can see the facts are all here.
Take that one, Young Turks!
You want to take my videos out of context?
Judge issues the first outright acquittal of a defendant charged over the January 6th riot.
I think there's good news coming.
A lot of people are upset that Colbert's crew did this and got away with it.
Yeah, okay.
I mean, I'm not the one to be like, no, everyone should be punished banging on the table.
Lock them all up!
Okay, I think immediately, right now, The lawyers for the January 6th defendants, just for trespassing, should immediately start citing this and saying, we move for outright dismissal.
Now, some of the people did trespass.
There's a combination of factors here in January 6th that you're not going to get from people like the Young Turks.
I like to call them out because I was right.
They're like, oh Tim was wrong.
No, I was right.
I said, how will you charge someone with trespassing if the doors were opened by police and no one told them to leave?
Turns out I was correct.
A man's already been acquitted.
Let's see what happens at the rest of the trials.
But there's varying degrees here.
There are people who fought their way in, fighting with cops.
Riot.
Violent.
Lock them up.
And worse than just a regular riot, they were disrupting an official government proceeding.
That I get.
Then you had people who saw the doors were open, but still bypassed barriers or signs.
Good reason to believe they knew they were trespassing.
There's one guy who's being charged for that still.
And then you had what people refer to as the MAGA meme hauls.
People just walking down the street, saw a group of people walk in a building, or cops fanning them in.
If they cannot prove the individual broke a barrier, crossed a barrier, or in any way had reason to believe they were trespassing, this should be the catalyst to get them all acquitted.
And I think that may be the case.
Justthenews.com reports, Stephen Colbert's comedy crew was warned several times they could not trespass on Capitol grounds.
And its behavior in a congressional office building during an unauthorized nighttime visit was so boisterous, it caused a Democratic congressman's staff to fear for his safety and call for emergency help, police say.
That is way worse than many of the J6 defendants.
The description that authorities provided to members of Congress this week, loud, banging
on doors, talk of a cocaine orgy, and threats to place something under congressmen's doors,
is far different than the light-hearted account of first-degree puppetry that CBS television
comic offered last month's high-profile arrest of his team.
The decision by the Biden Justice Department to decline prosecution of nine Colbert staffers
for unlawful entry clearly upset the department, according to an official letter from the department's
chief obtained by just the news.
It is unfortunate that despite all the evidence the department presented, including that the group or its leader had been told several times they could not be in the buildings without an escort, that the U.S.
Attorney's Office declined to prosecute any members of the group for unlawful entry.
All right.
We're gonna say two things.
The first thing is, my friends, head over to TimCast.com if you want to join us, help change the world, and make great content.
Click Members Only or click Join Us.
Sign up.
10 bucks a month is membership, but we have, you know, other tiers if you want to just support our work.
Proud to announce that we have gotten PayPal off the website.
We don't use them anymore.
If you're a member through PayPal, you're fine.
But we are now using Parallel Economy, co-founded by Dan Bongino, associated with Rumble, anti-censorship payment processor, because we want to challenge the machine and be able to speak up and call out the lies.
We're making shows, tales from the inverted world.
These episodes are like an hour long.
It's crazy.
Shane Cashman going down looking for the lost Confederate gold, amazing ghost stories, true crime, all that stuff.
Become a member at TimCast.com to help support our work.
I'm going to keep shouting it out because we just launched Parallel Economy and I think it's really important.
I'm already forgetting the other point I was going to make, but let's read more and then we'll come back to what's going on with censorship.
Or I should say, let's just read the news.
The decision by the Biden Justice Department to decline prosecution of nine Colbert staffers for unlawful entry clearly upset the department, according to an official letter from the department's chief obtained by the news.
So I mentioned that.
Great.
Now I remember where I was before I did the shout-out.
This is the reality of law enforcement.
You know that we've been dealing with this here at Timcast.
We've been dealing with threats, death threats, bomb threats, all of that stuff.
Let me tell you about the reality.
The reality is when I talk to my lawyer and I say, what do we do?
How do we do it?
How do we deal with these issues when I talk to police?
Well, we have to check to see who appointed the official.
The U.S.
District Attorney, the judges, all of that stuff plays a huge role in whether or not we think we will get justice.
So when I talk about Civil War and stuff, there's things people don't entirely know, but let's just bring it up here.
I'll mention it now.
Probably shouldn't to a certain degree, because we have security issues we're trying to deal with and active investigations.
But one thing that more than one lawyer tells us is, okay, which You've got to consider that you operate of multiple jurisdictions.
We've got West Virginia.
We've got Maryland.
We have a presence in some other states.
And then you've got to consider that the crimes in each jurisdiction are going to have different outcomes based on who appointed the attorneys in those areas and the voting tendencies of these areas.
This is also true for civil litigation, too.
They say, you know, oh, in your area, if you file a lawsuit here, the jury is going to be composed of mostly Democrat voters who will probably do X. And the judge was appointed by a Democrat, so they will do X. And it's just like, hold on, hold on.
The reason why Colbert staffers and associates are not being prosecuted is because the U.S.
Attorney said they couldn't get a conviction, and they're not wrong.
A D.C.
jury is not going to convict people they like, period, even though they commit crimes, serious ones.
January 6th defendants, that you'll see.
Because the D.C.
people are going to be like, we don't like you, you don't live here, and we're going to lock you up.
Okay, we can't get fair trials anymore, can we?
The people who live in DC have such a divergent worldview, there will not be a fair trial.
We've already seen this with Chauvin in Minnesota.
We knew.
The judge said, there's nowhere in the state you can go where people haven't heard the story.
Okay, well if you can't have a fair trial, charges are dismissed.
Because it is better that innocent persons go free than the guilt- I'm sorry, it's better that guilty persons go free than the innocent suffer.
That's not the way the world works.
Probably not the way the world has worked for a while now.
A good lawyer.
Actually, you know what?
Go watch SVU Law & Order.
And you will see periodically, the prosecutor will be like, we got Judge Farnsworth.
And that means we're going to be really good on these issues.
Yeah, that's the reality.
Lawyers know the judges and they'll say, this judge really hates doing X. And it's like, huh?
Does the law say you can't do a thing?
Is the judge going to say dismissed or we move forward based on what the law says?
Or are they going to be like, meh, I personally don't like you.
That's reality.
So, it's not just about the judge.
It's about the district attorneys too.
The U.S.
Attorneys are the ones who decide to prosecute.
And right here, my understanding, I could be wrong, is that it's the same U.S.
Attorney prosecuting January 6th defendants and Colbert who said, these guys, not going to be convicted.
These guys, you better believe it.
Take a look at this.
Colbert Lecho Steffers lied about having credentials.
I mean, look.
You've got people on January 6th who did bad things.
I get it.
Prosecute them.
Lock them up.
I don't think those people should be in solitary.
And I don't think there should be cruel, unusual punishment or anything like that.
But if you committed a crime, fine.
Like, I don't like the people that were riding at the Capitol, and I want to know who the cops were, opened the doors, and why.
But the MEMAs, the people who charged with trespassing, just walking in?
They're getting the book thrown at them.
And all they did Many of these people, they were walking down the street.
They saw a crowd of people walking towards the Capitol.
The police had opened the doors and even fanned people in.
And this guy, this guy, let me pull this guy up right here.
This is, uh, U.S.
District Judge Trevor McFadden issued the verdict from the bench after hearing testimony without a jury in the case of Matthew Martin.
Matthew Martin was fanned in by the cops.
He had to get arrested and go through this ordeal.
It sucks.
But I'm glad justice was served, right?
This guy didn't pretend to have credentials.
This guy didn't scream and bang on doors and try and slip things under doors or threaten to, and didn't freak out Democrats so that they were like, oh no, help, help, this guy's coming at me.
Now, I get it.
Many people were scared about the crowd in general.
Hard to discern between who was smashing windows and who was just bumbling about.
But why do we not have, at the bare minimum, minor charges brought against these individuals for lying about credentials, for causing a ruckus, for defying police orders, and just trespassing?
How could you not get a conviction?
Scary, isn't it?
They wouldn't get a conviction because the people in D.C.
would be like, we love our Democrat propagandists.
We're not going to convict them.
Imagine.
I mean, you know, I'll just tell you reality, man.
When I talk to lawyers about what's going on, they say, when it goes to court in West Virginia, the residents of West Virginia will likely just side with you because they share your worldview on things.
And when it comes to the crimes in Maryland, you're lucky that you're in a district that is mostly red and wants to secede because that's a potential too, but you may end up with many Democrat voters who are going to say, don't know, don't care, you will not win because we hate you for who you are or who you associate with.
This is the reality that's probably been true for a long time that people don't realize, and it's why people can petition for a change of venue when it comes to court cases.
But that's just crazy, isn't it?
You know, when we were a more cohesive culture, it was less of an issue.
Sure, you wouldn't want to be in the city where you're being accused because people have heard rumors, but you go somewhere else where people maybe haven't heard it, and we all kind of agree on a lot of these issues.
Today, the cultures are so divergent, the left is so cultish, they don't care.
I saw some reports that a juror said, maybe it was from Jack Posobiec, I'm not sure.
Fact check me.
That a juror in the Steve Bannon case said, I don't care what he has to say, I won't believe him because who he affiliates with.
And it's like, dude, how can you be on a jury if you're going to say something like that?
That's the reality.
Steve Bannon is being tried in Washington, D.C.
All Democrats.
You think they're going to come out and be like, I'll be fair to this guy.
No.
They're like, Bannon's a fascist, white supremacist, let him burn!
Let's talk about what reality is.
This is a very famous story.
69-year-old woman with cancer.
Now, I've criticized giving her two months, considering she's a 69-year-old woman with cancer.
But a lot of people, I think, need to hear some of the full context.
Law and crime.
Long crime's decently, you know, fairly decent.
And this woman, when she was tried, it wasn't just that she walked in.
So, correction on my past statements.
You know, I did what I should have done a while ago, and I just decided to fact check and dig up older stories, see what had happened.
She's on video, according to prosecutors, encouraging people to go in.
Okay, well, you get criminal charges for that.
This is not the same thing as this other guy, Matthew Martin, who just walked in because the cops fanned him in.
But hold on there a minute.
Hold on there a minute.
Let's get real.
Pam Hemphill.
She said, you know, people should come down.
She reportedly, or at least according to prosecutors, encouraged people to go in the building.
Colbert's crew lied about having credentials, were told to leave the building, snuck back in, were banging on doors.
Nothing?
I have no problem saying this woman did encourage people to come in, and she was charged because she encouraged people to trespass.
She said, it's your house, you can go in.
Okay, she got two months.
Colbert's crew got nothing.
Let me tell you about the world we are entering.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz slams woke leaders for abdicating their responsibility to fight crime, causing his chain to shutter a string of profitable stores because of assaults on staff.
I just... I'm just over it.
Okay?
It is clear now.
Clear.
Beyond a reasonable doubt.
Beyond the shadow of a doubt.
That while I can outright say Pam Hemphill should not have encouraged people to enter, she told them, I'm a journalist, I'm a citizen journalist, I just wanted to film.
They say, however, Hemphill did not take refuge, and a subsequent video appeared to show her encouraging the crowd to press forward, saying, just come on in.
It's your house, whose house does it belong to?
You just come in, come on in and have fun, you just come in, it's all you do.
This is your house.
Okay.
She said, you know, I think the prosecutors probably hammed it up, but this is the point.
Did this woman, is she on camera smashing things, attacking people?
Apparently they're charging her because she trespassed and encouraged people to do so.
What that does show to a court, if I'm to be fair, That people around her knew something was wrong, and she was encouraging them to come in anyway, showing that she had some kind of warning something was amiss.
But is that it?
She gets two months for this?
She has cancer?
Yeah, come on, man.
House arrest for two months or court supervision.
Colbert's crew crossing the line in a much more extreme way?
You know, it's just, I'm not surprised by any of this.
And this is why I tell people you've got to get out of the cities.
Because when you get arrested, you will be tried by a jury not of your peers.
And that's the issue.
They will claim it was your peers.
They'll say, oh, they're your peers, they're American citizens.
And you're like, yo, these people believe Jussie Smollett.
They believe Jussie Smollett.
I'm not, I'm not gonna, those people should not be Hearing this out and sentencing me?
These people believe the media's lies about the Covenant Catholic.
They believe the media's lies about every single fake news story.
So what do you do?
Get away from these places.
And then what?
I mean, we need to be able to go to D.C., the seat of power in this country.
But here's the real issue, my friends.
Washington, D.C., part of why it was created, a federal jurisdiction unto itself, Was because the states didn't like the idea that the federal government would operate in a state.
If D.C.
was Maryland, it was part of Maryland and Virginia, if it was just Maryland or Virginia, then the states could exert undue authority on the federal government and put pressure on other states.
The federal government would be operating in Maryland and Maryland would come and say, yeah, we're cutting your water off.
And the feds would be like, yo, and they'd say, or you can do this for us.
So they don't want that.
They needed their own jurisdiction.
Here's the problem.
The jurisdiction is now 97% Democrat or some ridiculous number.
I mean, maybe not, you know, 80% or so, maybe it's 75.
So what does that mean?
It means all the people who work and provide services in there will support the Democratic Party.
It means the law enforcement there, who live there, likely are Democrats as well.
It means their worldview is going to be predicated upon one political party's worldview in the mainstream press.
And it means they are going to be completely at odds with more than half of this country.
Yo, we are now seeing undue influence on the federal government.
And where this goes?
Someplace dark.
It's all I can really say, man.
Someplace dark.
It's a scary thought.
It's a scary thought.
It's a scary reality.
But it's the reality we live in.
I've got some civil issues that we're dealing with.
They're not really big deals.
Nothing like the death threats or anything.
And I'm talking to a lawyer about, like, you know, trademark and copyright, and he was like, well, look.
The judge in your area was appointed by this, you know, by Biden or by Clinton or whatever, so they're going to side with the megacorporations.
You've got to consider a different jurisdiction.
And I'm just like, really?
Like, it's a clear, it can be clear cut, but the judge is, that's reality.
And you know what?
Lawyers know this and have known this for a long time.
That's why they'll ask judges to recuse themselves.
It's why they'll try and get certain jurisdictions because a certain judge they might want.
That's why they'll try and get a venue in a certain area because they know the jury will be swayed by certain things.
It's remarkable, isn't it?
It's not fair.
It's not justice.
Justice would be a logic to the morality in the law.
You cannot trespass.
Did you trespass?
Yes.
Okay.
Charges.
Did you trespass?
No.
Okay.
No charges.
Instead, we have faking credentials, breaching a building unlawfully with a warning.
No charges.
Then we have old woman walks in building and says, come on guys, go in the building, go in the building.
Two months.
I don't know, man.
I feel like this country is going to be ripped apart because you can't have a two-tiered justice system.
People will eventually just snap and say, uh-uh.
If this is how things keep going, eventually people will just view the government as illegitimate.
And they'll say, you're not really seeking to prosecute for crimes, you're just attacking innocent people.
Eventually you get to the point, like in V for Vendetta, When the inspector says, eventually someone does something stupid, and it shows the finger man, the cop, shoot a little girl.
And then all the residents come out and just, with weapons, and they, and he's like, no, no, I'm a, I'm a law officer.
Yeah, eventually.
You'll get a law officer doing something and people are gonna say no, and we're seeing it in cities.
When Antifa attacks cops and de-arrests people, we're already moving in that direction.
The only issue right now is the right isn't doing what Antifa does, but when they start to, because of this, Then there's going to be two distinct political factions with power in this country.
We already can tell that in the U.S.
Attorney's Office in D.C., it's hyper-political.
We can already see Biden administration is arresting former Trump administration officials.
Can I just point that out to you guys?
And I hope you're paying attention.
The Democrat administration is arresting the Republican administration officials.
Okay, that's huge.
Do not be the frog in the pot boiling.
What else can I say?
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 1pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
They're making it worse!
You mean the dictionary is making it harder to understand the word instead of doing what a dictionary is supposed to do and explain what the word means?
I'm not surprised when you live in a postmodern dystopia.
Female is now defined partially as having a gender identity that is the opposite of male.
Okay, well, hold on.
It's not so bad.
Perhaps if we understand what male means, we can then come to understand what the opposite of that would be, and then we'll know what female means.
Okay, well, I guess they didn't include it, but the definition of male to Merriam-Webster is having a gender identity that is the opposite of female.
What?
That's like, they might as well say one is the opposite of zero or something.
I mean, it's not.
Light is the opposite of dark.
You're not telling me what light is.
Define the word right.
The opposite of left.
That doesn't actually describe anything to me.
The purpose of the dictionary is to help me understand the world.
Alright.
You know, this is what's been happening because we live in a post-truth reality.
It's funny that so many journalists actually wrote about post-truth for a long time, as if it was the far right that were spreading misinformation.
But it's the institutions doing literally the same thing.
Here's the reality, my friends.
We do live in a post-truth reality.
That's it.
Merriam-Webster isn't defining the word.
Okay?
You can't define something as the opposite of something and that thing is the opposite of the other thing.
That doesn't tell me what it is.
Are you left-handed or right-handed?
I use my right hand, which is the opposite of my left.
What does that mean?
Did you ever actually think about the definition of the word right as in your right hand?
There's actually a really simple way to define what it means to be right or left.
I mean, I'm talking about like your right hand or your left hand, left-handed, right-handed, your right foot, your left foot.
Now think about it for a second.
I'm sure many of you actually know how to define it.
I decided to look it up because I was like, it's really interesting.
I've never actually tried to define a base concept in that way.
How would you do it?
It's quite simple.
Because the purpose of a definition is to help you understand a concept.
So if you went to someone who did not speak English, you could grab their right hand and say, this is your right hand and your left hand.
And they would say, as a base concept, these words represent, I get it now, right?
Left side, right side.
Check this out.
Because instead of just saying, the right is the opposite of left, Google right here from Oxford says, on, toward, or relating to the side of the human body or of a thing that is to the east when a person is facing north.
The word right has a lot of definitions, mind you.
But reality is completely breaking down.
You can't look in the dictionary and try and figure out what it is.
So, I don't normally do this.
You know, I don't normally do reaction videos.
I decided to do some reactions to a couple of videos to just talk about where the future's going.
And perhaps it'll give you a laugh.
Because this is not the only story about reality collapsing all around us.
And it's honestly a simple story.
I mean, we understand, to a certain degree, that Merriam-Webster has been doing weird, woke garbage like this, that Dictionary.com has as well.
And they have no real answer for these words other than feels and subjective reality and things that can't be defined.
So, if you tried explaining to someone what male or female was and they looked it up, you'd be like, this makes no sense.
Now, granted, Merriam-Webster does say, of relating to or being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs.
In botany, having or producing only pistils or pistilet flowers.
Okay, so they've only included a B section that makes no sense.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the video you've all been waiting for.
The breakdown of reality.
This is a video from Libs of TikTok that says, this individual identifies as a cat, and she and her fellow cat friends meow at each other to signal various things.
I gotta be honest, I refuse to believe this is real.
But part of me, part of me just says, it's probably real, isn't it?
Now, I don't think, I don't know.
And that's the scary thing.
This video is so shockingly absurd and hilariously insane, it sounds like someone actually mocking people who think they're cats or have weird ideologies.
But it could actually be real.
Alright, now I gotta correct libs of TikTok.
I'm pretty sure she identifies as a kitten.
Okay, not a cat.
As a baby cat.
Because these people are weirdly pedo-ish or whatever you want to call it.
Let me play for you this video and then talk about the degradation and collapse of society.
And we'll react to this because it's funny.
unidentified
...teaching you guys some ways that my friends and I meow to one another to communicate when words just seem a little too difficult.
I just want to pause real quick and I want you all to imagine like you're at your friend's house watching movies and you know you're watching I don't know Iron Man or something and then he does the thing with the Jericho missiles and the explosions and then all of a sudden all the people in the room go you'd be like okay that's very weird but it gets crazier Okay, then one of the most important ones for our kitten family is that I want to go potty meow.
Kitten family?
Your kitten family?
Now all of a sudden the adult people who are pretending to be cats are children!
unidentified
It took me a really long time to master this meow because it needs to be really specific in order for my kittens to understand.
I understand the possibility that something like this is real, but I just can't believe it.
Now again, I don't normally do reaction videos like this, but I have to talk about this because I don't know if this video is real, okay?
Because, like, it's really weird that he's talking about being a kitten who needs attention, which is, like, weirdly pedo-ish.
And, like, I don't know why- Why would she need to holler to someone she needs help wiping?
Sorry.
But I have seen videos that are like this, that are real, and some of these people are just plum nuts.
And why is this happening?
Well, Bill Maher kind of He kind of puts it a certain way.
We've talked about this story before.
Bill Maher said, shockingly, we're literally experimenting on children.
Bill Maher challenges transgender craze.
He says, if this spike in trans children is all natural, why is it regional?
Maher asked.
Either Ohio is shaming them or California is creating them.
Well, that's it, right?
Let's break this down.
And then we've got other stuff I want to point to as well, and where all this goes.
We've got this story from the New York Times.
Times, report reveals sharp rise in transgender young people in the U.S.
New estimates based on CDC health surveys point to a stark generational shift in the
growth of the transgender population of the United States.
There's a few arguments here.
One, because of trans acceptance, people who are trans feel comfortable speaking out, and
now it appears there's an increase when in reality it's just people being honest.
It's possible.
I don't think that's a fair assessment completely.
I'm sure that is true to a certain degree.
I wouldn't know how to quantify that.
That is to say, there's probably a lot of people who are trans who are scared to speak out.
And now that there's a movement supporting them, they do.
So maybe that's the case.
But that wouldn't explain the regional shift, now would it?
Or I suppose maybe it could.
Maybe Ohio is shaming them.
But then you see that there is a big difference in the young people today.
And there are social issues that have resulted in detransitioners.
Many people who are, I suppose, There are many people who transitioned, who felt like they were trans, and then later on came to be, well, not trans.
They underwent a reverse, they underwent a detransition.
That was potentially social contagion.
Now, I don't know for sure.
I'm not... I can't tell you what each individual... We've interviewed some individuals like Helena Kirshner, who was a detransitioner.
That suggests to me that there is a big social component to this.
Which brings me back to our good friend, the cat lady!
If this woman said that she was a guy, she's clearly not a cat, okay?
But she's experiencing some kind of identity dysphoria or some kind of social-cultural behavior around being a cat.
Now, if she was saying that she was a guy, all of a sudden you would have a big wave of people supporting her, saying she should undergo surgery and do all of these things.
If it's social, right?
If it actually is social contagion-esque.
Now, with this woman, who believes she's a cat, What we're seeing is... Well, no one's gonna tell her to get surgery to identify as a cat properly.
No one's gonna tell her to get species-affirming care.
See?
Let me break it down for people.
And I'll start by saying this.
I know trans people.
They do their thing.
I got no issue.
I know people who have engaged in body modification.
They do their thing.
I really don't care.
But let's talk about the appropriate assessment of what is going on.
There are certainly some people who are legitimately transgender.
Many, in fact, and potentially most of those who experience gender dysphoria.
It's a legitimate Phenomenon in their mind and psychological and physical development.
I'm not a scientist or a doctor, so I'm not going to tell you how or why these things happen.
I know it's in the DSM-5 and they call it a mental disorder.
Now, would we say this woman has a mental disorder?
I don't know.
What if she starts, I don't know, splitting her lip?
What if she starts fusing her fingers or getting weird nail implants or getting whisker implants?
We've seen that happen.
Someone like that would be heavily criticized.
So, one trans identity, when it comes to species, is not acceptable, and one is, and requiring affirmation and care.
This is an important issue to bring up.
If we can recognize that people who believe they're trans species and identify as kittens, kittens who need love, which is kind of creepy, well, then we can certainly recognize that not every single person who is transgender is experiencing gender dysphoria and may actually be social contagion.
I'm not saying everybody.
I'm not saying, uh, most.
I don't know.
I'm just saying, if you have Otherkin who think they're dragons, dragons aren't real.
If you have people who think they're secretly trapped here from a mythical universe and they're elves, not real.
There's no question about it.
Someone says, I'm actually a dwarf, you know, wizard, and I'm trapped here.
You're gonna be like, okay, dude, you're not, okay?
You're a human.
That's crazy.
And we're not going to give you dwarf affirmation surgery.
If someone then says, I'm actually a dolphin, we're not going to give you dolphin affirmation surgery.
Because we know.
But let's bring it to the human experience.
You could come out and say you're transracial, and you still aren't getting support from people.
They say you're not really of that race or cultural background.
So transracial people like Rachel Dolezal have been smeared and slammed and attacked for it.
She stands by it.
But someone who claims to be the opposite gender, well now it's downright, do not disparage them, do not criticize them.
You're transphobic, you must date them, and they must get the surgery.
Well, okay.
Legitimate question.
Why that line?
Someone who's biologically male, 100%.
Functioning organs, everything.
Secondary sex characteristics.
Why do we then say...
To prevent harm to yourself or suicide, we will give you gender affirmation surgery and hormones.
But we don't do the same thing for a body dysmorphia.
We actually tell people who are anorexic or bulimic, it's wrong, and you need help to correct that.
Why don't we affirm the anorexia?
Well, because it's bad for you and you could die, right?
Okay, I guess.
Same thing with bulimia.
Same thing with people who eat too much.
They have eating disorders, they call it.
Why don't we have eating affirmation?
Well, we sort of do.
With the body positivity movement.
It's very unhealthy, but we are actually affirming people to be morbidly obese.
Well, okay.
It's not the same, right?
They do get some affirmation, but what about transracial?
Taboo.
You get my point.
Clearly, there is a social contingent element to a lot of this.
Now we know, as Bill Maher pointed out, it is regional, and maybe it's something to do with shame, but let me point to this video right here, that I want to play, and move on to where I think this is all going.
Ah yes, young woman, let's hear what you have to say.
unidentified
Look, at this point, we don't need to talk about whether or not an unwanted parasite in the womb of a female is considered a baby or not.
It's irrelevant.
Let's talk about Darwinism, you know?
Survival of the fittest!
I'm not gonna be the one to disprove this theory, right?
So if I get knocked up and, like, I don't want it... Boom!
So, obviously I haven't seen the full context of what her video is.
Maybe she's joking, maybe she's not, I don't know.
But to the point made, I will address it.
She says, the baby in the womb is a parasite, tough love, and if it gets removed, boom.
Darwinism.
Lady, the Darwinism ain't about the baby.
It's about you.
You're not surviving.
This is funny.
She goes, I'm strongest.
I survive.
No, you cease to exist because you have removed your offspring from the gene pool.
Get it?
Survival of the fittest does not mean that a giant, seven foot tall, super ripped, adamantium Superman Who can't have kids survives.
It means that those who are strong enough to reproduce survive.
So in the question, survival of the fittest, madame, you are not the fittest.
You have removed your child and in 20 years you won't exist.
Okay, 30 or 40 years because she looks like she's in her 20s.
The point is, The strongest survive.
That means they're children.
If you don't have children, your genes die with you.
So this is the future.
The rise of trans kids and what we've learned from detransitioners means the left is substantially more likely to sterilize or terminate their own children.
I know I bring it up quite a bit, but this is the end result.
You want to be a cat and whatever and talk about that weird stuff?
I suppose so long as you're having kids, this lady's talking about getting rid of them.
And with trans surgeries on children, which happens.
I don't know to the earliest age they've done it.
I know like 13 year old girls have gotten double mastectomies.
So how does this all come to be?
Let's bring it all together.
Cat lady.
If she's real, maybe it's a joke, I don't know.
Maybe it's a performance.
There are people who do that kind of stuff.
You see, back in the day, if you felt like a cat, there was no one for you to talk to.
And the internet came along.
And you saw forums on Tumblr, and people posted on text, I feel like a cat, and they went, me too.
Let's meet up.
And share that.
And they build a community, and now, a community of transspeciesism emerges.
These people then demand resources, access, and civil rights protections.
Things we wouldn't have seen before.
Well, there you go.
I mean, it's similar of the gay community.
There were people who've probably felt like cats for a long time, and they've never come out and talked about it because they knew that they would be shunned.
But now with the internet, anyone of any persuasion can meet anyone else of the same persuasion and form a community around it, even if it's small.
This results in people feeling confident to come out and express themselves even if they have strange identities.
I don't care if you think you're a cat.
With or without the internet, if you come out and told me that you thought you were a dragon or a cat or a wizard or whatever, I'd be like, I don't care, man.
I don't care.
Here's what I say.
I don't care if you're walking down the street juggling bananas.
Just don't throw the bananas at people and we're fine.
If someone thought they were a cat and ran around, I'd say, I don't care.
If someone thought they were a cat and ran around and they tried to bite people, I'd be like, lock that person up.
They're dangerous.
There is a danger in that thought as well, though.
Because the end result of all of this is some kind of cultural decay and collapse.
No cohesive culture, no cohesive goals, no shared experience results in people just fighting each other, thinking each other's crazy, and then it falls apart.
But here's where I think we're going, and why I included this woman from Libs of TikTok talking about aborting her baby.
Because there may be conflict and strife for now, but if the left is willing to fight tooth and nail to terminate their own bloodline, I shrug and say, guys, in 40 years, there won't be a left of this persuasion because they're eliminating their own offspring.
As she put it, survival of the fittest, I guess.
Now, I think it sucks.
You probably shouldn't do that to your kids.
But if they do, and they fight for the right, and Joe Biden defends it, and the government says it's allowed, it's like, okay, sterilize yourselves and your children, and the rest of us will just carry on.
Because the fittest, they're not getting rid of their own children.
Quite literally.
Any species that would terminate their own children is the opposite of the fittest, as per Darwinism.
So be it someone who thinks they're a cat, or someone who has surgery that removes their ability to reproduce, or someone who terminates their own children, I'm just like, the likelihood that you reproduce and share these ideas and ideologies is very little.
It's very little.
And you know what?
I've thought about how dark that sounds for a long time.
But I just don't care anymore.
I'm like, are they gonna get mad if I point out they're excising themselves from the gene pool?
Probably not.
They're proudly doing it.
So you, ma'am, you say they're the strongest?
You should read what Darwinism means.
Because the Darwin Award is for people who die in dumb ways.
But I have to say, if you think you're the fittest, you deserve a Darwin Award for terminating your own genetic line from the gene pool and then thinking that makes you fit.
Everyone else, all these conservatives are gonna have kids.
The future will be conservative because conservatives have kids and you don't.
