Jordan Peterson DROPS NUKE On Twitter Over Suspension Saying He'd Rather Die Then Delete The Truth
Jordan Peterson DROPS NUKE On Twitter Over Suspension Saying He'd Rather Die Then Delete The Truth. Dr. Peterson issued a scathing rebuke over the censorship he experienced on the platform.
And the Doctor brings up important points about trans kids and the culture wars. Young kids are being confused by seemingly chaotic ideologies and it is causing real world harm.
Democrats have seemed to wholly embraced leftist ideology and its backfiring as seen in Loudon country. Republicans will see major gains as people reject the failed policies economically and culturally.
#jordanpeterson
#democrats
#biden
Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Jordan Peterson issues a powerful response to his suspension on Twitter, saying he'd rather die than delete his truthful statement for the cancel mob.
Now, he's talking about Elliot Page and trans kids.
So I take a look at some of his statements, and I think he's making really good points.
In our next story, outrage as Disney's Baymax shows a trans man offering up pads to a robot who is trying to help a young girl with her adult issues.
There's a lot to break down here in this story, so we will.
It's a culture war kind of day.
And in our last story, the Biden administration says high gas prices are important To protect the liberal world order.
Oh boy.
It's not a conspiracy theory anymore, is it?
If you like the show, give us a good review and leave us five stars.
Share the show with your friends.
Now, let's get into that first story.
Jordan Peterson has been unleashed by the Daily Wire.
Now that they've signed him, and he is probably financially secure, he's just going ham.
Recently, Jordan Peterson was suspended for Twitter over comments he made about actor Elliot Page and top surgery.
After the suspension, he said, uh, I'm not gonna take the tweet down, and now he's issued a decently long response, along with the Daily Wire, about 14 minutes where he says, I'd rather die than delete truthful tweet for cancel creeps.
And there's more.
In an interview that he did, along with the Daily Wire, he goes on to explain some of his other ideas.
In a simple tweet, not that long ago, about a month ago, or actually only a couple weeks ago, Jordan Peterson referenced a Sports Illustrated cover with an obese woman.
And we all kind of ribbed at him because most of us didn't really care.
Jordan Peterson took the tweet down.
He said this morbidly obese woman was not attractive.
Now, on Twitter, you can't really get the full idea out there.
And this, well, it did a disservice to Jordan Peterson.
Because I said, I responded to Jordan Peterson as I said, look, some people like fat chicks, right?
Let them have their day.
But Jordan Peterson went on to explain.
Sports Illustrated showing this woman.
This is not a positive thing to be showing young people.
And he's going on to basically comment on cultural decay and how all of these things are effectively, or as my interpretation of it, leading to the collapse.
I think we're in the collapse.
And I often on this channel talk about politics and how political issues are taking shape in this country.
And I often leave the cultural issues to my other channel, but seeing Jordan Peterson's return and his powerful statement related to Elliot, aka, formerly known as Ellen Page, I thought we should actually dive into these issues and take a look at what's going on with transgender sports and trans kids, because this is what Jordan Peterson is getting into.
And we also have a video coming out from the Daily Show with Trevor Noah addressing trans women in sports.
In a statement from a transgender athlete, Veronica Ivy, They basically go on to say that transgender women, those that are born male, are actually female.
And I think it's important to discuss this and what Dr. Peterson is saying, because we can see how the shift takes place.
It was not that long ago they said gender and sex are not the same thing.
That a trans woman, someone who identifies as a woman, is actually a male.
Like a trans woman is someone who was born male, Wants to be a woman, goes to the transition, but is still biologically male.
That's no longer the case.
On national television, this is what is being told to young people.
And it's becoming an issue because we need to understand medical terms.
We need to understand medical science.
It's often the left that says, trust in science.
Well, the science shows us there's a very serious risk to female humans, also known as women, when it comes to medication and testing.
And that's why it's important that we know if someone is biologically male or biologically female.
It wasn't until the 90s that we actually had a law passed saying clinical trials must be performed on males and females because drugs have different effects on different biological sexes.
But because of the modern transgender ideology, it's resulting in hot politics and inability to communicate, and the language battle is quite culturally destructive.
But let's do this.
We'll get started by taking a look at what Jordan Peterson had to say when he said he'd rather die.
The political ramifications.
And also, I think what really made me want to talk about this is Jordan Peterson's view on the morbidly obese women, because he kind of makes an interesting point.
If a young boy is told to look at a morbidly obese woman, and he is told this woman is attractive, But the young boy doesn't agree.
They say, well, maybe it's because you're LGBTQIA+.
When in reality, maybe the kid just doesn't like obese women.
And this is where the confusion comes in and the debate starts to arise.
But as you know, having a conversation around these issues is impossible.
Even Trevor Noah says it.
If you ask simple questions, you're labeled transphobic.
So let's take a look at what Dr. Jordan Peterson has to say in his powerful return and entrance with The Daily Wire.
Before we get started, head over to TimCast.com to become a member and help support our work.
Guys, we can't just let The Daily Wire claim the top of the hill.
As much as a major shout-out to the crew of The Daily Wire and their massive expansion, I'm a big fan.
Go to TimCast.com, click the sign-up button on the top right, join TimCast.com to allow us to grow to rival The Daily Wire.
I'm glad they're displacing corporate press.
I, too, would like to displace the corporate press.
We've got a lot of awesome shows in the works.
Cast Castle Vlog is starting to take off.
We're doing more bits.
We're trying to make it more like a vlog-style sitcom.
We've also got the new season of Tales from the Inverted World dropping tonight, and the new book.
With your support...
In a year or two, or who knows, we'll be putting out movies, documentaries.
We've got two documentaries in the preliminary stages, and it's thanks to you at TimCast.com.
So don't forget to smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends.
Let's talk about Jordan Peterson's stance on his suspension and what's going on with the trans issue.
Jordan Peterson was recently suspended because he made a reference to Elliot Page.
Formerly known as Ellen Page, after coming out as trans and changing her name to Elliot Page and identifying with he him pronouns, Dr. Jordan Peterson said that Ellen Page had her breasts removed by a criminal physician.
I believe he said physician, but let's actually let's read from the Daily Wire.
Jordan Peterson says, and I'm not going to read the entirety of his statement, it's actually quite verbose, but I'll bring up some key points, and then I want to talk about how our children are being affected in the culture war.
He says, a few days ago I penned an irritated tweet in response to one of the latest happenings on the increasingly heated culture war front in response to the decision of an actress, actor, named Ellen Elliot Page.
I am employing this awkward and impossible multiple naming style because it is now apparently mandatory, and probably doing it wrong.
Nonetheless, as you're doing it wrong, is the whole point of what has been made mandatory, but also to make a point.
I have essentially been banned from Twitter.
I say banned, although technically I have been suspended.
But the suspension will not be lifted unless I delete the hateful tweet in question.
And I would rather die than do that, and hopefully it will not come to that, although who the hell knows in the increasingly strange days.
What was it that I said that caused such a fuss?
And even more importantly and complexly, what exactly was it that I said that resulted in the ban?
Here's the tweet in question.
Dr. Jordan Peterson said, Remember when pride was a sin?
And Ellen Page just had her breasts removed by a criminal physician.
Now, my personal view of this, we've talked about it last night, I talked about it a little bit at one, it was referring to it as criminal.
Because it's illegal.
And I think Jordan Peterson actually points that out.
He says, according to the rules, you may not promote violence, threaten, harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, orientation, identity, or gender, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.
By clicking delete, you acknowledge that your tweet violated the rules.
He goes on to say that if you appeal to it, they'll keep your account locked.
Now, he goes on to break down in great detail What this really means.
And trying to dissect why he was banned.
I'll give you the simple version.
Remember when Pride was a sin.
Referring to Pride Month in a derogatory manner.
Calling Ellen Page because deadnaming I believe is a violation of the rules.
Ellen instead of Elliot.
Saying criminal physician.
I think there's many issues here.
But.
The bigger picture, in my opinion, is that he's not harassing, he's not threatening, he's not insulting, he's not targeting Ellen over LGBTQ issues, but perhaps because calling pride a sin?
These are the issues at play here.
No, look, I don't know or care, to be honest, about Elliot Page's life.
That's for Elliot Page to decide.
I don't know or care about what Elliot or any of the producers on Umbrella Academy should do.
I understand the issues around children, and that's where what Jordan Peterson's talking about starts to get more interesting.
He's saying he refuses to take that tweet down.
He'd rather die.
I've made the argument that he could take the tweet down and then put up a big message saying, follow me to a different platform.
Leave this platform and let's go somewhere else.
But okay.
He'd rather die.
Hope not, Dr. Peterson.
You're a good voice.
The Daily Mail has this story, referring to an interview Jordan Peterson did.
did. Not the ideal of athletic beauty. Dr. Jordan Peterson doubles down on criticism
of Plus Size Sports Illustrated model and says confused gay kids are being convinced
they're transsexual. I saw that headline. And I'm not entirely sure that Jordan Peterson
was trying to combine these ideas.
unidentified
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet and greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
There is an article from Salon saying we need to redefine what born this way means.
For the longest time, as I was growing up, I was told that gay people were born that way.
That they didn't choose to like people of the same sex.
I have friends who are LGBTQ who say they wish they were straight.
That no one wishes to live a marginalized life.
I certainly think there are some people who do because it's not so marginalized anymore when they're flying the pride flag.
You know, cities are actually doing it.
But then I noticed something interesting.
In a recent tweet, this was May 16th.
Okay, so this is actually two months ago.
Jordan Peterson said, sorry, not beautiful, and no amount of authoritarian tolerance is going to change that.
He was talking about this morbidly obese woman on the cover of Sports Illustrated.
Yumi knew.
Now, I responded saying, look, some people like fat chicks.
But then I see an interesting point here.
An interesting point.
If it is true that we do not choose our sexuality, as many on the LGBTQ have said, then you need to consider that there are going to be children who are going to see this, they're going to be told it's beautiful, they're not going to agree, and then you're going to have teachers and groomers and whatever else saying, if you don't think that's beautiful, you must be Homosexual.
Maybe you like men.
The issue is particularly confusing for young people when maybe they just like slimmer women.
Because they don't choose their sexuality, right?
It's also entirely possible the kids may turn out to be gay, but the issue is, the gay population is in the single digits.
It is substantially more likely that the kid just doesn't find these kinds of women attractive.
And this is where things start to get confusing for children.
And it starts to lead to, in my opinion, cultural decay.
Before I read what they say about Jordan Peterson, I want to jump back to the story from Bill Maher to exemplify my point.
Salon writes, Bill Maher messed up bad with the LGBTQ community.
On the latest episode of Real Time, Maher made a comment about trans kids that landed him in the hot seat, May 22nd, around the same time that Jordan Peterson was making his point about these women.
Bill Maher was buried under an avalanche of criticism on Saturday after using his Friday night closing comments to ridicule trans kids and their need for gender-affirming care, saying they are only doing it because it's more trendy than being gay.
After suggesting the LGBT population of America seems to be roughly doubling every generation, Maher added, according to a recent Gallup poll, less than 1% of Americans born before 1946, Joe Biden's generation, Identify that way.
2.6 of Boomers do, 4.2 of Gen X, 10.5% of Millennials, and 20.8% of Gen Z. Which means, if we follow this trajectory, we will all be gay in 2025.
of millennials and 20.8% of Gen Z, which means if we follow this trajectory, we will all be gay in
2025. He then glibly joked, if this spike in trans children is all biological, why is it regional?
Either Ohio is shaming them, or California is creating them.
Before making a few more crude comments.
First, the leftist view of this.
The leftist pointed out that it was not socially acceptable to write with your left hand.
And there were religious institutions that would whack your hand with the ruler if you used your left, because left was wrong, you must use your right.
Once people were free to be left-handed, the amount of left-handed people skyrocketed and then plateaued.
The belief in that argument is that 20% of Gen Z will be LGBTQ, but it will probably stay around that point.
And the issue is that, forever, 20% of the population was LGBT, but they were not allowed to express it socially.
I'll make this point with the internet.
Why is it that there are so many people of strange fetishes or identities?
Why are there so many people who want to dress up like cartoon animals?
I was talking with Seamus Coghlan of Freedom Tunes about this over at Timcast IRL, and he made the point, the internet.
It's allowed people to find each other.
I agree.
Before the internet, if you identified as a furry, you had a harder time finding other people who you could interact with as a furry.
For gay people.
You need to go to a gay bar, and that was a safe space where you knew everyone else, most people there, would probably share your desires.
With the internet, now, you're safe.
Because there's no threat of physical harm to you, and it's easier now for people to find other people who share their identities or desires, and thus, we see an expansion of this.
However, I don't completely agree with the leftist argument.
I do think it's obvious.
If people are allowed to express themselves, you will get more people doing so, and thus the numbers will go up.
But I also think that Bill Maher makes a very important point.
Why is it regional?
Ohio?
Look, California may be more accepting and have laws, but it's not even about Ohio.
It's about there are many states all over the country who have similar protection laws, but we don't see comparable rates of self-identity.
We don't see this pronounced.
I mean, I'll put it this way.
We should be seeing many people in red states coming out now that it's become more socially acceptable.
We see it a little bit, but not at the same numbers.
Thus, I think there's a mix here.
And that's the point when I jump back to Jordan Peterson's point.
He says, speaking to The Telegraph, The use of that model, this is the morbidly obese woman, who is not athletic, remember Sports Illustrated, was manipulative economically and in relation to the model herself, although she participated in her own exploitation.
He told the Telegraph, beauty is an ideal.
Almost all of us fall short of an ideal.
I'm not willing to sacrifice any ideal to faux compassion, period, and certainly not the ideal of athletic beauty.
He added that he deleted his Twitter account from his personal devices to prevent him from reading comments from anonymous trolls that insisted he was a white supremacist and transphobe.
You don't need to delete your Twitter to do that.
You can just ignore it.
But I started thinking when he pointed this out.
Perhaps one of the reasons we are seeing a rise in kids identifying as LGBTQ is because they're consistently told that morbidly obese women are attractive, and maybe they're just not attracted to her.
But what do we hear?
We're hearing from the left that if you're not attracted to a trans woman, you're transphobic.
Or you might be gay.
It's one of the things they've actually said.
So imagine this.
Imagine you're a 13-year-old boy.
You have an idea, a desire.
You have an orientation.
You were born that way.
They come to you and say, here's a big fat woman.
Are you attracted to her?
This is real beauty.
And they say, no.
And they go, really?
Here's a trans woman.
A trans woman is a woman.
Are you attracted to her?
And they say, no.
And they say, it sounds like you aren't attracted to women.
And then they say, maybe you're gay.
Many of these kids are probably confused by this.
Maybe the reality is they're just attracted to traditionally attractive women.
Maybe they're attracted to someone more their age or someone to go to school with.
But if you're consistently told that a trans woman is a woman and is female, but then you say you're not attracted to that, they ask you maybe it's because you don't like women, which would make you gay.
I have to say, this is probably very confusing for young kids.
Which brings me now to the evolution of the debate.
This video here from The Daily Show with Trevor Noah.
Veronica Ivey, a transgender athlete who competes in cycling, speaking with Trevor Noah.
saying at one point, it's all about, I'll put it this way, quote,
it all boils down to, do you actually think that trans women and intersex women are real women
and are really female or not? And if you do, it's very simple. Just stop policing who counts as a
real woman. The idea then would be, we don't need testosterone checks, we don't need body checks or
If someone says they're a female, they're allowed.
But hold on there a minute.
I thought the argument was that trans women weren't female, they were women.
That women is anyone who identifies as a woman.
Which is a circular definition.
But now they're saying female is social.
Female and male are scientific terms.
Male is the sex of the species that produces the mobile sperm.
What is it?
Spermatozoa or something?
I don't know.
And female produces the non-mobile ova.
Those are distinct categories.
Now, of course, intersex exists, and there is a question of how we can better protect intersex people and make sure it's fair to compete.
But are they really female?
Trans women are not female.
And I don't mean that in any way disrespectful, it's just reality.
That's why you're a trans woman.
That's why we have the word trans, because you were born male, but identify as an adult human female.
You're not really female, you identify that way.
You're a trans woman.
But now the narrative is shifting.
This video with 22,000 views, as of today, it's got tons of thumb... We can't see the dislike ratio anymore.
But this is where things start to break down and become confusing for young people, which I believe will ultimately result in more confusion and more harm to kids.
There are a lot of videos that I think are scary.
Detransitioners.
We've interviewed them.
People who are coming out and saying they regret their decisions.
And it's tough.
How do you protect these kids?
Market Watch reports.
I'll do anything to keep my family together.
Trans kids' parents are draining their savings to flee conservative states.
States like Alabama and Texas have moved to block transgender kids' access to gender-affirming treatments and forcing families to weigh expensive relocations.
I am of the opinion minors should not be allowed to undergo transgender therapies or surgeries.
That's my personal opinion.
What I mean by therapies, I mean medical.
If a kid is, you know, if a person is underage, they're a minor, and they're going in for, like, therapy in general, like talking to them to try and help them, good thing.
We don't want people taking their lives, and that is a risk.
I'm worried about that.
People who are having identity crises, regardless of whether it's gender, racial, or otherwise, we want to make sure we can help them.
I don't think minors should be given medication or surgeries, but that is what's happening.
Now, that's just where I stand.
The left believes they should do this, and many minor females have been getting their breasts removed.
That's permanent.
That's absolutely permanent.
Puberty blockers are permanent, these things are permanent, and they're damaging, which is why I think once you're an adult, you're at that point where you can start making decisions for yourself.
There's a question then, at what point can the parents make decisions for their children?
I don't have all the answers.
I would like to reference John Money, who you may have heard of.
John Money, he really expanded the use of the word gender.
The word gender had been around for a long time, but he really took that word and expanded its use to refer to the social constructs around biological sex.
For a long time, gender just referred to your biological sex because they were seen as mostly the same thing.
John Money is famous for taking two twin boys.
One had a botched circumcision.
So the parents, with money, decided to do a forced sex change operation on the baby.
John Money then, in my opinion, effectively tortured these kids, made them simulate adult activities on each other as they were children, made the biological male who underwent a forced operation to undergo hormone therapies trying to raise this male as a female without the male knowing.
Ultimately, it's a terrible story.
Both committed suicide.
But, while many people point to this being an example of why you shouldn't put children under, uh, have them undergo transgender surgeries or whatever, it's also an argument used by the left to explain that gender identity is real and cannot be forced on a child.
It is not so simple.
In my opinion, my view of it is, at that point then, if we recognize that gender identity is, you know, within a person, there should be no irreversible procedures until the person is old enough to make an accurate decision.
And honestly, there are real moral questions here, but it may not be until 24.
Let me break this down.
This young child, this baby was born male.
Forcefully made to represent as female, but still male.
When this young man found out what they had done to him, immediately detransitioned.
Because within them they knew they were male.
They retained that identity regardless of what was imposed upon them.
The left argues the same can be true for any child.
Someone can be born, they can develop trans, and then say in much the exact same way as this other child, they are in the wrong body and they are trans.
And then there's a fear.
If this young man who has forcefully transitioned committed suicide, there is a fear that a young trans child would do the same thing.
And thus the logic follows, the parents feel they are better off sterilizing the child than having the child die.
And that's a real question.
I mean, honestly.
I don't want anybody to die.
And so what do you do?
Everybody thinks they have the answers.
I'll put it this way.
An irreversible procedure can result in the same circumstances in which this young man who was victimized by John Money took their own life.
In which case, the best thing we can do for kids we believe to be trans is to let them grow up.
At 18, they can make their choices.
If someone is 12, 13, 14, or even 15 or 16, and they feel trans, and they undergo irreversible medical procedures, you are increasing their risk of taking their own life.
They may have a higher risk there, but what do we do?
We let them make the decision at 18 with proper counseling, with legitimate explanations for how these medications will affect their body.
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating and affecting the 2024 presidential election.
We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
Which brings me to this story here from the Daily Mail, June 30th.
Doctor who ran clinic for transgender children and failed an 11-year-old transitioning from female to male by not fully explaining drugs could make them infertile is suspended for just two months.
Helen Weberle was suspended for two months for gender treatment failures.
She was said to not have provided follow-up care to two children on testosterone.
Her husband Michael was struck off for putting patients at risk for serious harm.
Michael diagnosed patient W as gender dysphoric without consulting their GP.
Patient W later killed themself while transitioning from female to male.
And this is my point.
The best thing we can do is psychological therapy, but no permanent medical alterations.
We don't have all the answers.
I believe trans kids exist.
I don't know what the left's point is.
I take a look at Jordan Peterson's anger and ire.
I take a look at his powerful statements and his refusal to bow to the censors.
And I respect it.
I understand why he's angry in his statements about Ellen Elliot Page and these physicians.
A patient, an 11-year-old, was not given the proper explanation of what these drugs were going to do, took their own life!
Is it the doctor's fault?
Many would say yes.
The doctor should not have given permanent life-altering drugs to an 11-year-old.
The risk of suicide is real.
I have friends who have taken their own lives for a variety of reasons.
I had a trans friend who took their own life.
And it is heartbreaking.
We want to do whatever we can to make sure people don't take their own lives.
I mean, first and foremost.
You just don't want it to happen.
And I'm sickened by the people who even meme about telling people to do it online.
And for those that are more religious, it's a mortal sin.
You don't want anyone taking their own lives.
I don't think any sane and rational and good person really does.
There are bad people who do.
But this doctor contributed to it.
Thinking they were doing good, the path to hell is paved with good intentions.
I don't have the answers.
But you can't just assume that, you know, someone who's 18 Who is experiencing dysphoria or who was regretting their transition.
We can't assume we could have done anything.
Sometimes non-intervention is the answer.
And what I mean by that is keep an eye on these individuals you think are at risk.
Talk to them, be there for them, be their friends, inspire them, make them feel good about themselves and all that stuff.
But be wary of what you're doing to children because children don't know everything.
They say a doctor who ran an online clinic for trans patients has been suspended from practicing for two months.
Helen Weberle, founder of GenderGP website, was found to have committed serious misconduct by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service.
The tribunal, which started to hear evidence in July, found she had not provided proper follow-up care to two patients, aged 12 and 17, who were prescribed testosterone.
And failed an 11-year-old patient by omitting to discuss risks to fertility before prescribing GNHRA puberty blockers.
This is terrifying.
All it was was a suspension.
This woman simply was suspended after destroying the life of a child.
You see, she was trying to do good by that child.
So sayeth Twitter, they're trying to do good as well.
Those of us who are actually trying to do right, do good, and do well, want to make sure that all of these kids are properly informed.
But because of censorship policies, the banning of people like Jordan Peterson, you're not giving them proper information.
They say in the Tribunal's view, an informed member of the public would be surprised if a finding of impairment on public interest grounds were not made in those circumstances.
It therefore finds Dr. Webley's fitness to practice is impaired on a wider public interest grounds.
Jaden Lowe, a trans teen, took his own life in 2018 by stepping in front of a train after being prescribed hormone treatment.
The treatment didn't do anything to save this individual.
The patient had become unhappy at the long waiting lists for NHS treatment and said in an email that they wanted to transition as soon as possible as it would have a massive positive impact on their mental health.
I have been waiting to go on hormones so long now, and it means so much to me.
I am so happy it's finally happening.
But Dr. Weberle diagnosed patient W degenerative dysphoric without checking information with their GP.
Patient W had been diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome and had complex and long-standing mental health issues, but did not appear that Dr. Weberle was aware of them, and he'd failed to obtain the patient's medical records.
Sadly, patient W took their own life just three months later.
Patient W is believed to be Jaden Lowe, who was prescribed treatment by the gender GP clinic and subsequently stepped in front of a train.
There's two ways to look at this, because it's hard to break down what the story really means.
Either this individual I believe it was the 11-year-old who didn't understand the infertility.
But this individual received the hormones, it appears.
They were prescribed testosterone.
It didn't help them.
If we want to have an actual conversation about helping these people, we cannot allow bullies to silence these questions and silence these statements.
We cannot allow them to suspend the likes of Dr. Jordan Peterson, a clinical psychologist who's probably more qualified to speak on this than many medical doctors.
Yet, that's what's happening.
The Daily Wire is doing great work.
And so, you know, it's Friday.
I just, I gotta be honest, I'm looking at this political news and it matters.
You know, Democrats don't want Joe Biden.
I said Jordan.
But I just thought this was more important.
Talking about these social issues and just doing a deep dive on the stuff that's happening.
What can we do?
To make sure we legitimately want to help kids who are undergoing an identity crisis.
The way I've read it is, you need to bring them to a nurturing community.
Now Bill Maher entertains the possibility of a social contagion element.
Salon says this is wrong and it's nonsense.
I think it's half true.
I think for many kids they are probably just saying these things because they want to fit in.
Some kids have Asperger's and they don't know what to do to fit in properly and they're told this will make you happy.
Some kids look at morbidly obese women and say I'm not attracted to that and then they're told maybe they're gay.
Maybe they're actually trans.
Young women similarly.
Many lesbians in the lesbian community fear that young lesbian girls are being told they're actually trans because they're attracted to girls.
We want to get this right.
The problem is we have bullies and we have censorship making it all worse.
If we're going to get to the bottom of this and make sure we help everybody and truly progress as a society, we can't ban Jordan Peterson.
We need to ask him questions.
We need to have real conversations about what he is saying and what it means.
Well, The Daily Wire is giving space to that, so props to them.
I am jealous.
Maybe one day TimCast.com will have the means to sign on people like Dr. Peterson, perhaps.
I think we're going in that direction.
And maybe then, with the expansion of The Daily Wire, their success, the success of TimCast.com, we won't have to worry about the censorship, which is ultimately the point, and why I thought this was interesting and important.
Jordan Peterson's ability to speak has not been hindered.
I mean, on Twitter it has, but his voice has never been louder thanks to what The Daily Wire is building.
That's what we need.
So support us over at TimCast.com, support The Daily Wire, and then we can have these real conversations.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 8 p.m.
over at YouTube.com slash TimCast IRL.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
The machine is struggling.
The machine is crumbling.
I have good news for you guys.
The narrative is collapsing.
The international organizations and elites that are trying to subvert your rights are failing.
And what was once considered grand conspiracy is now just considered mainstream fact.
This is fascinating.
From RealClearPolitics, Biden economic advisor on high gas prices, quote, this is about the future of the liberal world order.
He just came out and said it.
You're not supposed to say that on CNN, dude.
What are you doing?
You know what it is?
You get, you get these, these hardworking guys, right?
Hardworking guys back a hundred years ago, and they set up the liberal world order.
Okay.
This is more, I think this is like 70, 80 years ago.
And they know how to make their new world order, which they call the liberal world order.
They also know you can't tell the public about it because they'll feel like you're subverting their national and sovereign rights.
So they keep it a secret.
And anybody who comes and talks about it, well, you're a conspiracy theorist, you crazy person.
But eventually, they must pass down the crown to their children.
And so these men, Who built a liberal world order?
Tell the next generation.
We bestow upon you the duty of maintaining our liberal world order.
And then these younger generation just come out and say it.
And what was once a conspiracy theory is now just a fact.
I mean, let's talk about Epstein, yo!
They're spiraling.
These are people, these are powerful elites who are trying to organize on the world stage.
You've got the Davos Group, you've got this, and it's being exposed every single day.
And I wonder why it is.
I think it has a lot to do with the internet.
I think with the internet, you get regular people, you get people like me, Talking about it.
Sharing these ideas and exposing this.
You get people like Luke Rutkowski of We Are Change.
I mean, Luke's been chasing after a lot of these stories for 15 or almost 20 years.
Almost 20 years this guy's been doing that work.
And he was called a conspiracy theorist.
Because the establishment narrative in the mainstream press was that if you dare talk about things like the liberal world order, you are a conspiracy theorist.
I remember when Alex Jones was talking about Epstein and what Epstein was doing.
Ghislaine Maxwell was just sentenced to 20 years in prison.
We now know, it is established fact, these people are doing these things.
Here's a funny thing.
There was a poll and it asked people if they thought there was a cabal of child abusers running the government.
And among Republicans, they overwhelmingly say yes.
I was watching the show The Voice.
Have you guys watched The Voice?
I like that show.
Although it's a little too on the nose.
In the show... I guess it's a spoiler alert, so... It's a side point.
They're basically making a lot of allusions to modern politics.
And there's a scene where they're, like, accusing a character of trafficking kids, and it's very much supposed to be, like, Hillary or whatever.
And it's like... Are you trying to act like Maxwell wasn't doing this?
There are people who believe that powerful elements of the government are trafficking kids because Epstein got caught!
He got put in jail and then...
Shuffled off his mortal coil.
And then, of course, Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted for assisting in this.
And we know that Epstein was flying world leaders and powerful interests on his plane to his island.
This stuff's not conspiracy theory anymore.
They prosecuted these people for these things.
But they still try to make it seem like that.
All right.
What's going on here?
Real Clear Politics says, Brian Deese, President Biden's Director of National Economic Council, defended the administration's energy policies on Thursday in an interview with CNN.
Victor Blackwell said.
The military analysts, the Director of National Intelligence, say this can be a long war measured in years.
I think everybody understands why this is happening, but is it sustainable?
What do you say to those families who say, listen, we can't afford to pay $4.85 a gallon for months, if not years, that is not sustainable.
Victor, just say $5.
$4.85, say $5!
Because you know that $5 smacks people in the face harder, that's probably why they toned it down, even $0.15.
Brian Deese, Biden advisor, responded, What we heard from the president today was about the stakes.
This is about the future of the liberal world order, and we have to stand firm.
But at the same time, what I'd say to that family, to Americans across the country is,
you have a present administration that is going to do everything in its power to blunt
those price increases and bring those prices down.
No, no, no.
I was told by Democrats that the president doesn't control gas prices.
So there's nothing he can do about it anyway, right?
Oh, wait.
He simultaneously cannot control gas prices while having the ability to lower them?
If that's the case, lower them more, dude!
Why are they high?
Good news over the past two weeks.
We've seen the price of the pump come down 20 cents.
But it is still unacceptably high.
That's why the president earlier this week was working to bring the G7 allies together around exploring something around a price cap.
To cap the price that can be paid for Russian oil, which will actually target the pain more directly on Vladimir Putin and not the rest of the world.
The liberal world order.
This is about protecting the liberal world order.
I thought that was a conspiracy theory.
Dude, man, it was crazy.
I remember when the Gulf of Tonkin incident was exposed as, like, actually a conspiracy theory.
As it goes.
In Vietnam, the U.S.
needed to enter the war, or wanted to, to stop the Soviet expansion.
So, they staged an attack on a U.S.
It was a destroyer.
It was called the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.
They said, help, help!
We're under attack!
We must invade!
It turns out that it is mostly believed to be a conspiracy theory.
Or, to be a conspiracy, that they staged it so that we would have public support for entering a war.
A false flag, as it were.
You may be saying, wait a minute.
There's a liberal world order?
Yeah, the Council on Foreign Relations talks about it.
Take a look at this.
What is the Liberal World Order?
This, from the Council on Foreign Relations, News Guard Certified, 100 out of 100, explore the organizations and agreements that have promoted global peace and prosperity for 75 years, as well as the challenges that now threaten to undermine those gains.
Oh no!
What's this?
After World War II, the deadliest conflict in human history, countries sought to ensure the world never again devolved into such horrific violence.
World leaders created a series of international organizations and agreements to promote global cooperation on issues including security, trade, health, and monetary policy.
The United States has championed this system, known as the Liberal World Order, for the past 75 years.
During this time, the world has enjoyed unprecedented peace and prosperity.
I'm going to go ahead and dispute that claim, dude, because, uh, Obama Blup kids!
That was the greatest thing about Obama's presidency.
He was like, if you vote for me, I'm gonna go and blup kids!
And everybody was like, yay!
And they all screamed.
Now, I mean, he didn't really say that, but he may as well have said that in 2012.
And that's why I didn't vote for him the second time and I just laughed and I said, it's all one big joke, isn't it?
Barack Obama campaigned in 2008 on universal healthcare, never got that.
He campaigned on getting our troops out of the Middle East.
And then in 2012, after years of blown up kids, he's like, vote for me again!
And then everyone's like, yay!
And then they voted for him again.
And then I'm just like, you wanna call that unprecedented peace and prosperity?
Yo, they were blowing up young men in the Middle East, and when people were like, hey, uh, Mr. President, you're killing civilians, he went, uh, actually, these people, they are military age males, and therefore, enemy combatants.
Uh, they need to be blown up.
They're, you know, gotta blow up the kids.
There's too many of them.
Gotta get rid of them.
That was Seamus' joke.
He's like, gotta get rid of them.
Too many.
Too many kids.
Yeah, dude, Obama killed so many people.
Like, the dude was just smashing the button and blowing people up.
Peace and prosperity.
Amazing.
They say, but these institutions are far from perfect.
Okay, fair point.
And today they are struggling to address new sources of disorder, such as climate change and a deadly pandemic.
What's more, democracy is on the decline around the world, authoritarianism is on the rise, and countries like China are deliberately chipping away at the liberal world order, creating parallel institutions of their own.
Faced with these challenges, will the liberal world order survive?
If a new system emerges, what will that mean for freedom, peace, and prosperity worldwide?
If you're calling this freedom, peace, and prosperity, I don't know what to tell you, man.
I guess, you know, blowing up kids relative to World War II is technically more peaceful, but still rather nightmarish.
But I'm not- I'm no fool, I understand.
If the U.S.
doesn't fill the vacuum, China does.
And it's not like we think they're going to do a good job.
So welcome, my friends, to the rock and the hard place.
Should the U.S.
rescind its international influence and then allow China to fill the gap and then start blowing up kids on their own?
Or does the U.S.
try to assert a unipolar world with the U.S.
at the top?
I don't have the answers, man.
But I will tell you this.
The United States government, the liberal world order, have never justified to the public why it is what they do.
And if they don't want to give those answers, then so be it.
You do not deserve the benefit of the doubt from me.
You can come out and tell me all the things in the world about how evil China is, and I've seen some bad stuff.
But you've not explained to me what your goals are.
And so I don't trust you.
Why?
Because I look at these people, they're liars, they're deceivers, they're manipulators.
Now, if we had an administration that was honest with the American people, talked about the crisis that we faced internationally, and legitimately sought to engage in international conflict through Congress, through approval of the American public, okay.
But they don't do that.
They don't.
They spit in your face, they lie to you, and they tell you blindly support them as they plop kids.
Why isn't Obama being put on trial for this?
They say, well, we were targeting a terror leader and it was an accident that he died.
Okay, if you're a cop and you're trying to stop a bad guy, and then you shoot and kill an innocent bystander, you still get in trouble.
I'm not saying you go to prison, but you'll still get some accountability, right?
Shouldn't Barack Obama... I mean, it's not even that.
I mean, he blew up a civilian restaurant, killing an American child.
Yo.
Yeah, if you're a soldier, and you shoot and kill a civilian, thinking you're attacking an enemy combatant, you will be brought up on charges.
These things happen.
Not always, I guess.
They say, in this module, we will outline the authority and limitations of the UN Security Council.
Blah, blah, blah, blah.
Liberal world order.
Okay.
Here we go, ladies and gentlemen.
You ready for this?
Quarter of Americans say they are ready to take up arms against the government.
Poll also finds more than a third of those currently own guns.
This is a fake news headline.
Daily Mail's far from perfect.
Though they are NewsGuard certified, I have no problem calling them out when their headline is incorrect.
But it's somewhat correct.
They say.
25% of voters across the party lines agree that it may be necessary, they spell necessary wrong, at some point soon for citizens to take up arms against the government.
That doesn't mean they're ready.
That doesn't mean they want to.
Among the strong GOP, the majority of strong GOP believe it is necessary to take up arms against the government.
Yikes!
Among strong Democrat, 21% agree, 74% disagree.
This is obvious though.
The strong Democrats, they're the ones in power.
Soft Democrats agree slightly less.
That's amazing.
Independents, one third of independent voters think it may be necessary to take up arms against the government.
That's crazy.
But what is this question really asking?
We know Republicans say this.
They've been saying this for decades, as long as I've been alive.
They're like, we have the Second Amendment to protect ourselves from the government, and it may be necessary at some point.
Okay.
I don't necessarily think so, to be honest, because I think confidence will be rocked in the federal government, and then I don't think you're taking up arms against the government so much as people just start fighting each other.
See, the poll comes as the U.S.
House Select Committee's investigation into Trump's role in the violent January 6th insurrection against the Capitol is being publicly broadcast across the nation.
If you believe that stuff, you are dumber than a box of rocks.
The January 6th committee stuff is just mindless trash.
It's non-adversarial.
There's no cross-examination.
It's a waste of everyone's time.
And this Lady Cassidy Hutchins, Hutchinson or whatever, she has been called out so many times for lying.
I just can't believe anyone would believe any of this stuff.
However, my friends, still, I think you should heed these numbers because let me show you some statistics.
From Statista.
American Civil War Statistics and Facts.
The American Civil War was the deadliest military conflict in the history of the U.S., claiming almost as many American lives as all other wars combined.
Almost 10% of the entire population enlisted in a four-year-long conflict that would shape the future of American history. 10%.
10% of the population were involved in the Civil War.
That's crazy, yo.
2.5% of the population died in the war.
Many young men.
10% was all it took.
And there was a Civil War.
That's it.
It wasn't half the country fighting half the country.
Pay attention.
Because when I talk about Civil War, people are like, no, it'll never happen.
Most people don't want it.
Most people didn't want the first one.
Only 10%.
Right now, you have more than that, who have advocated for secession of their regions.
There was one poll that found 37.2% of Americans believe their region, their respective region, should break off from the U.S.
to form their own union.
You had, like, the Midwest, the South, the Northeast.
They're like, we should break off and form our own country, split into five countries, basically.
37.2% wanted that.
Okay.
10% fought in the First Civil War.
I wonder how many.
You know, because that's willingness to fight, to enlist.
That's not the same thing as wanting to succeed, because a lot of people will say they want to, but will they really?
Here's the crazy thing you need to understand.
The Civil War didn't really ever end.
This is just not true.
Take a look at this.
100,000 plus the number of Civil War Union corpses found in the South through a federal re-internment program from 1866 to 1869.
1866 to 1869. The Civil War formally ended on April 9th, 1865, the formal
surrender. Nearly four, just shy of four years of war.
Yet, for some reason, you had people dying.
Union soldiers.
Their corpses being found.
1866 to 1869.
That means in the South, they were still killing Union soldiers.
They didn't stop fighting.
The war never ended.
Reconstruction happened, and obviously the war literally ended, but what I mean is the resistance remained in the South during Reconstruction.
And it wasn't until 1876 that there was an official end to Reconstruction, when the North and the South convened a committee and said, let's just appoint the president because we don't know what's going on.
And that was the agreement between the North and the South to end the Civil War.
Did it ever really end?
The South still waged their political battles, and it just morphed over time.
You know what's fascinating?
Today, the strong moral issue is abortion.
Are unborn babies persons, and should they be granted personhood rights?
The Democrats are on the side of saying no.
You know, I was gonna make a joke.
I was like, the Democrats are denying personhood to the unborn today.
You know who also denied personhood?
And then I typed out the Confederacy, and then I was like, wait a minute, the Confederacy was still the Democrats!
So I was like, actually, the Democrats.
I wonder.
I wonder if we will view these things in the same way.
Slavery was autonomous human beings that were captured and forced to do work against their will, had no rights, no freedoms.
Unborn babies are different.
Unborn babies are attached to another body.
So there is still a difference in how we break these things down.
But I wonder.
Throughout history, those who have tried to deny personhood have lost.
Will we see the same thing?
In these Democrat-controlled states, they are claiming a right to kill unborn babies.
My question here is, there are two women who conceive at the exact same time.
Those babies in the womb grow and develop.
Then, at eight and a half months, one woman has a C-section.
Not labor.
They open up the woman and take the baby out.
Why does that baby have rights and the other baby does not?
The one that's still in the womb.
They are of the exact same age.
One is surrounded by body.
One is not.
Both are capable of surviving on their own.
I don't know.
I've never gotten a good argument from the left on that one.
So I don't believe abortion after viability should be allowed.
I believe that after viability, just take the baby out.
You don't gotta kill it.
Terminate the pregnancy.
Preserve the life of the baby.
And there are some circumstances where I still, you know, fairly pro-choice, like instances of rape become particularly difficult because a woman didn't choose this.
It was forced upon her and the state can't mandate that she be, her body be harboring someone she never agreed.
It's tough because then if the baby dies, like, what do you do?
But if the baby can survive on its own, there's no reason to kill it.
So at any point at which the baby can survive, you can take it out and help it live.
Why kill it?
I don't know, man.
But maybe this is the strong moral issue that we're looking at.
Only 10% of people actually enlisted.
7 million people died.
That's crazy.
Number of Americans lost if 2.5% of the population... Oh, I'm sorry, sorry.
7 million if the war were to happen today.
It was 750,000 total number of deaths from the Civil War.
500 people died per day.
2 million Northerners mobilized.
880,000 Southerners mobilized.
That's crazy.
The North... Man.
They were just not okay with slavery.
I mean, that was really it.
So they had this strong moral fight on their hands.
How many people on the left would fight to a bloody death to protect abortion?
How many Democrats would do that?
I don't think very many.
If a war were to break out, I'd imagine you'd have many more people on the right willing to lay down their lines for the personhood rights of the unborn than you'd have among the left, those willing to defend the right, to terminate the lives of the unborn.
I think we're headed in a dangerous direction, my friends.
Because right now, 37.2, at least in one poll, said, break apart.
That would be something very different in the Civil War as we saw it.
Five different regions, and that makes more sense.
It's hard to know if it could play out the same way.
But I view it as more likely to occur as it did in a true Civil War sense, that various factions rip the country apart.
Not just one versus one, right?
North versus South.
No, in most Civil Wars, it's actually a bunch of different factions that are fighting each other.
Like in Syria, for instance.
The liberal world order is failing.
They're coming out and saying it.
We'll see what happens.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 1 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
Transgender ideology is losing in this country.
A new poll from Pew Research shows that trans ideology is on the decline.
People are slowly disagreeing with the idea that your gender can be different from your biological sex as quote-unquote assigned at birth.
Now, while Pew Research still uses the assigned-at-birth idea, people are rejecting it.
But first, I want to talk about this story from New York Post.
Disney's Baymax features transgender man buying period pads, sparking outrage.
Well...
For one, this is the culturally relevant story in this news cycle, but I do think it's worth pointing out that as Americans start to reject this idea, the question is, why is Disney including a person wearing a transgender shirt offering up pads to an android who needs menstrual products for a female?
The whole thing is just weird!
People are coming out and they're saying the trans man issue, and I'm like, I don't care about the trans issue.
There's a few questions I have pertaining to this video clip, but I should probably show you the video clip and then address it.
The first thing I just want to point out, why does the trans person need to be wearing a trans flag t-shirt?
Like, you can be trans and wear, I don't know, like an Allman Brothers t-shirt.
You don't have to be, like, it's so on the nose, right?
I just want to say this.
In this clip, the android is asking women about what periods they like, and all of these women, and even a dude, they're like, here's what we all like, and I'm like, that's just weird in and of itself.
But, uh, okay, let's read the story first, and then we'll talk about the decline of trans ideology.
Conservatives expressed outrage online after leaked video of an episode of Baymax, the new kids show streaming on Disney Plus, features a transgender man who buys tampons at a supermarket.
Wrong!
It is a transgender man offering a suggestion to a robot to use pads with wings, not tampons.
Christopher Rufo, the conservative academic from the right-leaning think tank the Manhattan Institute, said he had obtained leaked video on Tuesday from an upcoming episode of Baymax, which is a six-episode spinoff of the popular hit film Big Hero 6.
In the scene, the protagonist, the Marvel Comics superhero nurse robot Baymax, oh, really?
Baymax is Marvel?
I didn't know that, is in the aisle of a supermarket in the fictional town of San Fransokyo browsing women's hygiene products.
I wonder why.
Baymax, who serves as a personal healthcare companion for the residents of the city, is trying to help a 12-year-old girl named Sophia who, in an earlier episode, confided in her superhero friend that she was having her first period, the Houston Chronicle reported.
Sophia told Baymax about her menstrual cycle during an intimate conversation in an all-gender bathroom just before she was supposed to perform at a school talent show.
Okay, look.
Parents, you want this stuff for your kids?
I really don't care.
Christopher Ruvo tweeted, I've obtained leaked video from Disney's upcoming show Baymax, which promotes the transgender flag and the idea that men can have periods to children as young as two years old.
It's all part of Disney's plan to re-engineer the discourse around kids and sexuality.
Well, I do believe Disney's outright creepy.
I don't believe they ever actually say that person is trans, and the person doesn't say they're a man.
I don't... Let me play this for you, and then let's talk about this clip in general.
Here we go, everybody.
unidentified
Excuse me, which of these products would you recommend?
Oh, um, well, these are the tampons I usually use.
Now that's the one that made me say, hey, wait a minute.
Okay, first of all, I do think it's kind of weird that they're doing this scene where a bunch of random people are telling the robot, like, ooh, buy these pads, buy these tampons.
Hey, look, I'm not a chick.
I have no idea what goes on in the tampon aisle.
Perhaps it is normal that women all cluster together and talk about which tampons they think works best.
I would assume it'd be more like toilet paper?
Maybe I'm wrong, but maybe it's not a one-for-one analogy.
But if it were me, I wouldn't go into an aisle and lean over to someone and be like, which toilet paper do you think works for wiping your butt?
And then having people being like, ooh, ooh, get this one.
This one's double quilted.
Okay, maybe tampons are different.
Maybe women are much more communal than men, and so they do huddle around this market and talk about which menstrual products they want to use.
The one thing I notice, though, is the dad who says, my daughter loves these.
And I'm like, wait, what?
I suppose it's not that bad.
Maybe he's a single dad and he knows that, like, his daughter's asked him at some point, like, Dad, I need your help.
Can you run and grab these?
These are the ones I like.
So he's like, my daughter loves these.
I'm just, I just think it's funny, this idea.
It's, I don't know, it's just weird.
I'm imagining, the first thing I imagined, because, because I'm a dick, is like this dad going through his daughter's room and finding, like, a ton of these tampons.
Thinking that it must mean she loves them, but actually she's just like boofing with her friends.
Not family-friendly, by the way.
I just think the whole clip is stupid!
I don't care there's a trans person in it.
Americans are rejecting this stuff, and that's what Pew Research shows us.
So, fine.
Do a show where everyone crowds around and suggests to a robot which tampons or pads makes the most sense.
I wasn't prepared for this, an anxious Sophia tells Baymax.
And the dispenser's empty and I don't even have a thing, a tampad, a padpon, a maxi padpon with wings.
Eager to help his friend, Baymax heads to the supermarket to go shopping for some products.
He then asks a woman in the hygiene aisle to recommend a product for her.
Okay.
And then someone tweeted, I wish Baymax was my father.
Look, Here's the reality.
You know, women have menstrual cycles, and so they need products.
And there are young girls who are going through these things and need guidance, I guess.
I think it's between the parents and the kid.
I don't know if you need Disney to do this kind of thing.
Like, imagine it this way.
What if Disney came out with like a wet dream episode of Baymax, and it's like a little boy being like, yo, I woke up, eh, I don't know, probably not appropriate.
But whatever, man.
You know, we often see, I see these art pieces on Instagram where like women will walk, will like, there was a woman and she posted a photo of herself like, covered in blood.
And I'm just like, okay, look.
I get that, like, guys don't go through that.
Guys have a kind of cycle, like, you know, wet dreams or whatever.
Here we go.
Not for kids, right?
But, um, I just don't know if you need to put that on Instagram and... I'll put it this way.
Women do, guys don't.
Guys aren't going around talking about their functions.
Women do go around talking about their functions.
Not every woman, but...
I just look at this and I'm like, I don't know if that's appropriate in general, regardless of whether a trans person's in it.
But either way, I was just laughing at the thought of the dad being like, my daughter loves these!
And I'm like, hey, far be it from me to know exactly what young daughters do with their dads, okay?
And I don't mean that in a dirty way, I mean like...
I just didn't assume young women would be like, Dad, these are my favorite.
Can you grab me some?
But I'm sure it's not completely unreasonable.
Probably could happen.
Here's what I want to point out, though, now that you've made it through eight minutes of me talking about this stupid show.
A trans man buying periods, I just want to point out, I knew this was weird because my understanding is that masculinizing hormone therapy, testosterone, inhibits menstrual cycles.
And so I just pulled up the Mayo Clinic, which is of course, I'm news guard certified, okay?
And I looked up a bunch of other sources, but I settled on Mayo.
They say, if masculizing hormone therapy is started before the changes of female puberty begin, female secondary sex characteristics, such as breasts, can be avoided.
Masculizing hormone therapy is also known as gender-affirming hormone therapy.
During masculinizing hormone therapy, you'll be given male hormone testosterone, which suppresses your menstrual cycle and decreases the production of estrogen from your ovaries.
Changes caused by these medications can be temporary or permanent.
I read on a bunch of different websites, they all say the same thing.
So maybe it's not everybody.
But this is one of the issues I bring up with this stuff.
Disney doesn't know what they're talking about.
A trans man who has completed transition, this individual, assuming it's a trans man, flat-chested, gone through gender affirmation, and all that stuff, likely would not be experiencing a menstrual cycle.
However, It's possible.
That's not the insinuation they're trying to make, or this individual isn't completely gone through it, or some people still will have a menstrual cycle.
Fine.
It could also be this trans man is saying, when I did have a menstrual cycle, this is the one that I preferred.
In which case, why are they in the aisle?
I think the whole thing's just stupid.
Irrelevant.
And what we're getting from TV shows is ham-fisted jamming into culture these things.
They're saying, like, watch the movie The Craft, the new one, and you'll be like, what?
In the comics, she can stretch and grow and embiggen, it's called.
I played the Avengers video game, Ms.
Marvel as a character.
It's cool.
It's a fun game.
I think it's cool that they made a female Muslim superhero.
I think diversity in these games stuff, it's cool.
Here's what I don't like.
First, you don't need to take a character and turn them into a female Muslim.
Like, Iron Man, but now it's a young black woman.
Riri, whatever her name is.
Okay, make a new character.
War Machine's daughter.
I mean, War Machine was a black dude and he had an Iron Man suit.
How about you make a new character, a young Avenger, and it's not Iron Man?
I suppose that's what they did to a certain extent.
Fine.
So, looking at all this, I'll tell you what I don't like.
I don't like it when they jam the ideology into something that doesn't need it.
So, Ms.
Marvel, right?
In the show on Disney+, they say partition every five minutes.
I'm exaggerating, but wow!
I get it!
Partition happened!
Like, show me a show.
Introduce cultural ideas.
Show the Pakistani Muslim family eating their food and speaking the way they speak.
I'm totally down.
I think it's great.
And then lay off the ideological whinging about history.
We get it.
So here's what's happening.
In this article from Pew Research, this is where it gets interesting, Americans' complex views on gender identity and transgender issues.
Most favor protecting trans people from discrimination, but fewer support policies related to medical care for gender transitions.
Many are uneasy with the pace of change on trans issues.
This is fascinating.
Most favor protecting trans people from discrimination, even as growing shares say gender is determined by sex at birth.
Yeah, I agree with that.
I think Blair White agrees with that.
I think the issue is, where does that line go?
percent saying they would blank laws or policies that would protect trans people from discrimination
in jobs, housing, and public spaces. Most people agree with that. Yeah, I agree with that. I think
Blair White agrees with that. I think the issue is where does that line go? Where is the barrier on
what it means to not discriminate? If you're talking about forcing someone to engage in a
certain practice they don't want to, we're getting dangerously close to the line.
If you're talking about saying children should get sex change operations, I don't think you're actually helping those kids.
They say percent, whether a person is a man or a woman, can be different from the sex assigned at birth.
See how they say that?
Excuse me.
In September of 2017, 44% believed it.
In May of 2022, only 38%.
The percentage of people who think it's determined by your sex assigned at birth, 60% today.
It's gone up 6%.
It is going up!
Gender ideology is faltering, yet Pew uses the assigned at birth.
It's observed at birth, not assigned.
Yo, I think it's a fair point.
When activists say a doctor makes their best guess, that's true.
A baby is born, the doctor looks at the baby and says, it's a boy.
It's possible they could be wrong.
Not because of ideology, but because maybe you've got, um, the baby, maybe the baby is just developed in a certain way or the doctor made a mistake.
It happens.
Maybe the baby could have a certain syndrome, or just look wrong, or the doctor could be wrong.
I think it's less likely the doctor's wrong, but it might happen, right?
In which case, there is a fair point to be made that the doctor does their best to properly observe, but sex is observed at birth.
Observation is not infallible.
In which case, a doctor sees a baby and says, that's a girl.
Then later on they're like, actually it was a boy, but there was some kind of developmental abnormality.
In which case, the baby actually turns out to be a boy and requires some kind of treatment to correct or something, if that's what the family deems necessary.
Now, that's where things get interesting.
Because the argument that arises, oh, but you said... Let's say there's a boy.
He's born.
But the doctor thinks it's a girl because something didn't develop properly.
So they say, we can do surgery to, you know, help the boy develop properly.
They say that's gender affirmation.
Yeah, yeah, okay, I would agree with that.
But it's in line with the biology of the baby, so there's no... Here's the issue.
The left tries using these arguments where they're like, you must adhere one-for-one with the logic.
When in reality, there's nuance, and it's not so simple.
There's an argument about cleft palates.
We saw this in the Orville.
If a baby is born with a cleft palate, you'll give it surgery to correct, right?
Why not just leave it alone?
Okay, well that's not the child making a decision, that's the parent making a decision for the child.
In which case, it's the inversion of what we actually see with trans kids, where the parents say, don't look at me, it's the child's decision.
It's not easy, it's not absolute, and this is where you need to understand that morality is in flux.
Some people think some things are absolutely right or wrong, but the truth is, we just decide where the line is.
And for everybody, the line's in a slightly different place.
For me personally, I don't think that we should perform sex change operations on minors.
This is my opinion.
I don't think that opinion is going to change.
I think minors do not understand, and they'll make bad choices.
I've heard many stories from women who said they wanted a hysterectomy or some kind of permanent sterilization, only to say later on that they're glad they never went through with it.
In fact, we've had people on TimCast IRL who said that when they were younger, they wanted to get their tubes tied or get a hysterectomy, and their doctor refused to do it, so they eventually didn't get it done, and then they had kids, and they're glad they had kids.
That's why I'm like, we shouldn't do permanent things to children.
Now, therein lies the issue.
A cleft palate reconstruction is a permanent thing.
A young boy born with a developmental issue, and you performing surgery on it, that's the parent's decision.
A circumcision.
Yeah, there are real challenges here.
Maybe we should curtail a little bit, like circumcision for instance.
Parents shouldn't just arbitrarily decide they're going to do that.
I don't know.
It's heated and contentious issues.
What I can say right now, regardless of your opinion, some people think children should be getting sex changes or top surgeries, it's waning.
The American people are rejecting this ideology.
This is why I think Jordan Peterson gets suspended.
The story from the post-millennial, Jordan Peterson was suspended after saying that Ellen Page, now going by Elliot Page, had her breasts removed by a criminal doctor.
I believe calling the doctor criminal is probably what did it, but I believe the reason we see limitations on tweets like this is that those who support this ideology and want to push it They know they're losing.
Now, they'll come out and they'll say, oh, it's because people self-harm and things like that, but I think it's because they know they're losing, and they're losing because of people like Dr. Jordan Peterson, who was one of the most prominent figures challenging much of this, and he's really pulled out all the stops.
He doesn't seem to be holding back anymore.
He said he will not take the tweet down, because that would be a tantamount to an apology, and so he's just gonna leave it up.
I think he should take it down.
I think Jordan Peterson should take the tweet down, get his account back, and then post, find me over at Truth Social, and take all of his two million or whatever followers to a new platform to show Twitter we don't tolerate this.
However, fair point, if Jordan Peterson holds out, and Elon Musk secures the platform in but four months, that's what they're saying, maybe in four months, could be sooner, could be a month, if Elon Musk comes back on the platform, He might just reinstate Jordan Peterson.
And if he does, Jordan Peterson will have won on that hill, not died on that hill.
So, okay.
Alright.
You do what you want to do, I suppose.
As for the common, as for the mainstream media and all that, I don't care about Disney.
I think it's fine to call it out and tell people you think it's wrong that they're showing a person with a trans flag if you don't like it.
Fine.
The Daily Wire is launching their own new shows.
I think it's called Chip-Chilla.
Kids' show with, like, chinchillas, I guess?
Looks cool!
I'm looking forward to it.
Looks really, really well done.
They're putting a lot of money into this stuff.
Very, very nice.
If you have an issue with what Disney is doing, here's what you do.
Voice your concerns, express your opinions.
Well-respected.
Stop spending money on Disney+.
Give your money to The Daily Wire or TimCast.com.
Now, to be fair, The Daily Wire doesn't have the Kids Program up just yet, nor do we.
We do have Chicken City over at ChickenCityLive.com.
Chicken City, I think, is important for kids because you want to understand a bit of nature, and seeing chickens do chicken stuff is important.
And I mean all their chicken stuff.
You can hear them yelling, you can hear them laying eggs, you can see them making more chickens, all of that stuff.
And we also have the Chicken City cartoons, which are mostly for kids.
The reason I say mostly is because the one we just released about the Federal Reserve kind of would go over a kid's head, but they might still find it funny anyway, and you can watch it with your kids.
It is totally family-friendly.
We're just ragging on the Federal Reserve.
I'm not sure the children would understand that.
But we're making cartoons for Chicken City that you can share with your kids.
We're hearing from a lot of families.
They love Chicken City.
And we ultimately want to expand it to be an educational family experience.
And it's a livestream of chickens.
We're working on it.
We're expanding it.
It actually does make good money.
Here's what you do.
You take a look at Disney.
You say, okay, stop giving them money.
Start giving your money to TimCast.com and The Daily Wire and anyone else you think is doing a good job and expanding on these fronts.
Now, The Daily Wire has announced they're going to do like $100 million in kids programming.
We haven't done anything like that.
I can announce we're going to spend $100,000 in kids programming.
Substantially less money than The Daily Wire is committing to theirs, but, you know.
For the time being, I mean, I could honestly say we're gonna put a million bucks into it or something like that, but all that really means is, like, over a long period of time as we make money, we're gonna fund this stuff.
We have a kids' show that we're working on right now.
It's very preliminary.
And my goal with the kids' show is not making, like, blues clues where it's like A, B, C, but more like fairly odd parents.
Just funny cartoons that are meant for kids that can have jokes in it that adults will laugh at.
But we want to incorporate positive lessons.
So I want to create stories.
The one thing that we're working on in the preliminary stage is it's going to have a merch line and everything.
The idea is like 5 to 9 year olds probably would get a kick out of it and the adults would probably find it fun as well.
And then we want to do like a 9 to 13 year old kind of thing where it's like superheroes and positive lessons about standing up for what you believe in, staying true to yourself, not telling lies, all of that good stuff.
You know, I grew up and I watched Static Shock when I was younger.
Static Shock was very preachy, but it was done well.
Showing life lessons like Static's friend turns out to be gay and his dad is kind of racist and things like that.
I'm like, those are great.
I thought they were well done.
And that is a kids' show that is very preachy.
I am not opposed to preachy kids' shows.
Not at all.
So, when I look at Baymax, I just look at it like, There's no real message there.
And if you don't like it, find the show that has the message you do like.
Kids shows, in my opinion, should be preachy.
Hands down.
You know why?
Matt Walsh.
Johnny the Walrus?
It is preachy.
It's telling the kid that you can't be something you're not.
That is ideological.
So find the ones you like.
We're going to make more like centrist, moderate, libertarian content.
The goal is to inspire young people to be stronger, better versions of themselves, to be leaders who care for others and want to bring about fairness and responsibility and freedom and all that good stuff.
