Over 1 MILLION Democrats Quit And Join GOP, Democrats PANIC As Roe Ruling Escalates Civil War
Over 1 MILLION Democrats Quit And Join GOP, Democrats PANIC As Roe Ruling Escalates Civil War. The executive Branch is outright defying the judicial as conflict in the streets escalates.
But the good news is that Democrats are losing and the people of the united states have issues a repudiation of leftism and progressive politics.
The country is in shambles, gas prices are skyrocketing, and people are fighting in the streets. Joe Biden has failed and the Republicans are poised to dominate in the midterms.
#democrats
#republicans
#civilwar
Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
More than 1 million Democratic voters have quit the Democratic Party and joined the Republicans as a major change is taking place.
People are refuting the Democratic Party and leftism.
And while Roe v. Wade is inching us towards civil war, Executive branch is being split at the seams.
Many people are saying no.
And this may be a time for optimism, despite the fact that we are inching closer to conflict.
In our next story, Billy Joe of Green Day announces he's renouncing his citizenship.
Yeah, I don't believe it.
The performative outrage, and it is performative outrage, is driving the left insane.
They're making themselves crazy.
And then our last story, a stampede at New York and San Francisco Pride events.
This country is a powder keg ready to explode.
If you like this show, give us a good review and leave us five stars.
Share the show with your friends.
Now, let's get into that first story.
You know that meme of the guy in the classroom and he's got a vein bulging from his head
and he's like he's trying to refrain from doing a thing?
I don't know, you guys probably know what I'm talking about.
That's me right now wanting to be like, Civil War!
Because you know how I love to say Civil War over and over and over again, but no, no, we're starting with a white pill in this 4PM segment.
And for those that aren't familiar, it just means some optimism, something good.
Looking at what happened after the Roe v. Wade decision, the overturning of Roe and Casey, seeing the conflict, the insurrection in Arizona, where far leftists were trying to storm into a government building, seeing the violence, the riots, the fires, the attacks, the screaming, seeing the DOD, I believe, I don't know, this tweet got deleted, but seeing the executive branch come out defying the Supreme Court, saying no to their ruling, And I'm thinking, this country is being ripped apart and it's exactly as I described it.
Not literally exactly, but figuratively exactly.
Like, in 2018 I said, when the culture war reaches the highest level of government, this country will be ripped apart.
And people didn't think it would ever happen.
The security state is too powerful.
But now, Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, has come out in defiance of the Supreme Court.
This is the highest level of government.
Butting heads.
But that's not what I'm here to start the segment off with.
While I do want to talk about the urgency and the chaos that stands before us, we have this story from TimCast.com.
More than 1 million voters leave the Democratic Party and switch to the GOP.
It's something we have seen consistently over the past several years, but it is ramping up to an absurd degree.
Over 1 million voters!
At times they are a change-in, my friends, and this is cause for optimism.
While I fear at the highest levels of government people are ready to tear each other apart, and we're seeing conflict and violence in the streets, we are seeing a repudiation of the chaos.
The Democratic Party, in my opinion, stands for nothing.
And it's not just my opinion.
There are many on the left.
Jacobin Magazine.
Socialists.
But even they rag on the Democrats.
Look, we all rag on the Republicans, too.
But the Democratic Party establishment has the likes of Bill Kristol in their ranks.
He's a neocon!
Yes.
The democratic establishment stands for nothing but power.
And they were willing to lie and feign wokeness and promote these ideas if it meant getting votes.
But many of these people didn't know what they actually wanted or were talking about.
It was just a downward spile of chaos ripping this country apart and regular people have said no.
One million voters.
And you know what else?
How many voters haven't switched parties, but have internally prepared to vote Republican?
Excuse me.
I was just talking to a friend of mine.
Lifelong Democrat.
Big Obama person.
Said that because of cryptocurrency, she's voting Republican now.
And that to me was crazy.
I'm like, but wait, for cryptocurrency?
That's right.
A friend of mine switched parties because of Bitcoin.
I know all the Bitcoin people are hooting and cheering and high-fiving each other as if Bitcoin... No, the issue isn't necessarily Bitcoin.
The issue is the left hates it.
But people who believe in freedom, traditional liberals or otherwise, even people who are relatively woke but don't believe in authoritarianism, I know it's kind of a paradox, but there are many people who are like, oh, I think that's fine, just leave everybody alone.
They look at cryptocurrencies as a way past the Federal Reserve and there are leftist activists from the days of old, 2010 mind you, not that long ago, who hate the Federal Reserve and see crypto as an opportunity, but they're progressives.
Now they see Democrats and the progressive machine lining up against it and they're just like, I'm out, I'm out.
That to me was surprising.
That you would get someone to support conservative social issues because of what the left has become?
I know maybe cryptocurrency is not the biggest issue, but I think abortion really is a big issue.
How many people, like you or I, are pro-choice?
But the pro-choice side is now pro-abortion at eight months gestation?
Yo, that's not an abortion, that's just killing the baby.
Because you could remove the baby and it could live.
It's just crazy where we've gone.
Well, let's take a look at what's going on.
We'll take a look at what's happening with the Republican Party surging, and what is ripping this country apart.
We have an article from our good friend Stephen Marsh.
And I always say good friend somewhat facetiously, but Stephen Marsh is a cool guy.
We had him on the show, and I respect his opinions, but I think he gets a lot wrong.
He's written about the next civil war, and I agree with him on this point.
The end of Roe v. Wade is a major signal towards civil war.
So as much as I try to resist saying it, it comes out.
Let's jump to this first story from Timcast.
Before we do, smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this video with your friends, help support the work we do.
As a member, you will get access to exclusive segments from the Timcast IRL podcast Monday through Thursday at 11 p.m.
You will be keeping our journalists gainfully employed as we expand this operation.
You'll be helping fund the new documentaries we are working on.
We've got Federal Reserve and gun control as big issues we want to tackle in documentaries, deep diving on these issues.
And our infrastructure.
We are using infrastructure that is more resilient to big tech censorship to support the companies that believe in free speech.
That's what your membership is getting behind.
And share the video, smash the like button.
From TimCast.com, more than 1 million voters leave the Democrats and switch to the GOP.
Democrats urge Biden to change course to avoid being demolished in the midterms.
Oh, they're hoping!
That the issue of Roe v. Wade will muster up some votes.
It might.
But I think gas prices, it's just gonna be more prescient.
Here's the thing.
In the suburbs is where we are seeing the biggest shift.
Do you think these suburban women with their kids are worried about Roe v. Wade?
Or about, I don't know, baby formula?
Or, I don't know, five dollars a gallon gas?
Over 1 million voters across 43 states have left the Democratic Party and joined the Republican Party of the last year, according to voter registration data analyzed by the Associated Press.
The shift is most prominent in the suburbs, where swing voters who supported Biden are grappling with 40-year high inflation, record gas prices, skyrocketing crime, and the Democratic Party's focus on racial equity.
It's more so a rejection of the left than embracing the right, said Ben Smith, a 37-year-old professional counselor.
With 134 days until the midterm elections, no outcome is guaranteed.
But the new data is a fresh warning to Democrats who have already seen signs of major potential losses in November.
Some of those warnings have come from within their own party.
Quote, I support the President's efforts, but we need a bolder vision and faster action, said Rep.
Ro Khanna, a Democrat.
Michael Stratton, a Democratic strategist, told the Daily Mail, Democrats need to wake up here and smell the coffee.
I just want to point out, isn't there nothing better than waking up and smelling a fresh pot of coffee?
Trying to divert attention to unemployment numbers, that is not going to take away the average person's concern about inflation, said Chad Campbell, an Arizona-based Democratic strategist.
When you're paying five and a half dollars a gallon for gas, it doesn't matter what your job is, it's expensive, yo.
I'm gonna go buy another electric car.
Isn't that crazy?
Yeah, I can.
And I appreciate everybody who supports the work we do that allows me to say something like, I'm gonna buy an electric car.
Some people say it's a comparable expense.
Yo, it's not.
It is not.
I mean, maybe electricity is being subsidized or otherwise.
Maybe it can't last.
We're getting solar panels installed.
We have solar panels installed at our new facility.
I can charge my car off the sun.
And in the long run, we will save a little bit of money.
I know it's a big, complicated economic process.
But it is cheaper in the long run.
Driving, when gas is at five bucks, they're saying it might reach ten dollars.
It might reach an average of eight dollars.
Man.
So I do have an electric car.
They're like twice the cost of your average car, but car costs are skyrocketing.
I have my thoughts on that.
Not everybody can do it.
It's crazy.
What is their solution to regular people who aren't going to be able to drive to work?
We already have a labor shortage, a supply chain shortage.
It's only getting worse, and it is Joe Biden's fault.
Look, it's one thing to point to policies that Joe Biden has enacted that's hurt us in terms of gas prices, and there are.
And the left will try to say, oh, he doesn't control gas prices, then why is Biden coming out saying he's enacting policies to lower gas prices?
Because he can.
unidentified
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet-and-greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit Moms4America.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
And one simple answer is, many people say that Donald Trump would have come out, convened a meeting of the top executives at oil companies, and said, get these prices down.
How do we do it?
Rescinding regulations.
Drill, baby, drill.
Whatever the answer.
People would want it.
State legislators have recently called on Biden to reverse course on his environmental policies, which are constraining domestic energy production as part of his climate agenda.
Quote, we urge you and your administration to reject any well-intentioned but misguided calls
to curtail American crude oil and or petroleum exports in reaction to the high gasoline and
diesel prices currently seen at the pump. A group of Texas Democrats wrote, as you know domestic
gasoline prices are set up by an international benchmark, Brent, and restricting U.S. crude
crude exports would lower global supply and increase costs here at home.
Joe Biden explicitly stated his intent in getting us off of fossil fuels.
When I see all these people being like, we need electric cars, you know what I think?
I think these people have invested in electric car companies.
I think these people are just trying to sell more cars.
I think Honda and Ford and whatever, not directly, I'm just saying the car companies, they're probably thinking, how do we get people to buy more cars when they already have one?
I know!
Let's tell them they gotta stop using gas and we'll sell them electric cars.
Profit, baby.
I am not a staunch laissez-faire capitalist.
Never have been.
Here we go.
So people are quitting the Democratic Party.
It is a rebuke of the Democratic establishment for all that it entails.
And that's the good news.
I didn't want to leave with the bad news, even though I kind of did.
Here's the bad news.
This country is being gutted.
The Roe v. Wade decision shows the chaos boiling at the center.
From the Washington Post.
After Roe ruling, Garland gears up for the next legal battles.
In decrying historic legal decision, the Attorney General vows to fight on several abortion-related fronts.
Wait, wait, wait, hold on.
When the Supreme Court came out and said, here is our opinion on guns.
May issue states, you can't do it.
You are now shall issue.
The AG comes out, the DOJ, and they're like, we disagree with this.
What?
Many lawyers said, what are they doing?
Issuing a statement rejecting the federal government's own judicial statements?
That's crazy.
They're doing it again.
Attorney General Merrick Garland signaled Friday that in response to the Supreme Court's historic decision allowing states to limit or ban abortions, the DOJ is preparing for legal battles on a host of related issues.
From women traveling to states where the procedures are legal, to accessing pills that can induce abortions.
There is little the DOJ can do to alter the impact of the decision, which is now the law of the land and is expected to significantly restrict abortion across 13 states in the short term.
Quote, This decision deals a devastating blow to reproductive freedom in the U.S., Garland said in a statement.
But Garland, a former federal appeals court judge, also laid down important markers for how the Biden DOJ will handle any legal aftershocks to the decision.
Such as if states try to pass laws preventing women from traveling to other states to get abortions.
Garland said bedrock constitutional principles protect women's rights to seek reproductive care in the states where abortions remain legal.
New York's Democratic governor, Kathy Hochul, immediately declared her state a safe harbor for those seeking abortions.
I can only say you better stay there after going.
Some states probably will still go after women.
However, for the time being, I don't think any state is penalizing the woman for getting the abortion.
They're penalizing the doctors.
So what is this?
A virtue signal?
Yes.
That's what it is.
Okay.
Why is Garland coming out and saying this?
It's a virtue signal.
It's meaningless.
It's a bad idea.
And it shows the culture war is splitting the federal government in half.
Or at least, at the seams.
We'll see what happens in November.
The good news is, with regular people lining up to vote Republican, it is a strong rebuke of these policies.
It's no guarantee anything positive happens.
And then we have this.
The insurrection that's taking place over Roe v. Wade is not just in the federal government.
I'm saying that facetiously calm down, Media Matters.
I'm saying that there is a revolt.
That people are rejecting this.
And it's splitting this country in half.
From TimCast.com.
Pro-abortion protesters attempt to breach Arizona Capitol building, force Senate into recess.
The protesters were banging on the windows and attempting to break them to get inside, according to DPS, which prompted the Senate to go into recess.
Sounds like attempted insurrection.
Quote, Senate immediately bails out because of a security situation.
Area outside Senate filled with people protesting road decision.
They appear to have entered the building.
Cops were firing tear gas from the building.
Mary Jo Pitzel says, State Senate assembles in a hearing room to continue work on major water legislation because the fumes from tear gas outside is too thick in the chambers.
Police fired tear gas after people in an abortion rally pounded on the doors and window.
State Senator Michelle Ugenti-Rida posted videos from inside the building, though it did not appear that any protesters had actually made it inside.
Oh, thank heavens.
Only an attempted insurrection!
When the AG is coming out and they're like, no, Supreme Court, that's worrying.
A virtue signal indeed, but it results in this.
The people outside who are screaming don't know why they're mad.
I'm sorry, that is a statement of fact.
The people.
I'm talking about the plurality.
There are probably some who do know why they're mad.
Some might be mad for capitalism, you know, capitalist reasons, unrelated to abortion, and they're using it as an excuse.
Many of these people don't even know what happened.
But it results in the chaos we see today.
With the end of Roe, the U.S.
edges closer and closer to civil war.
Stephen Marsh.
The question is no longer whether there will be a civil conflict in America.
The question is how the sides will divide and who will prevail.
Steven is correct in a broad sense, and he's wrong in a direct sense.
He's wrong because his perspective is based on left-biased media.
On the right.
They argue for moderation.
On the left, they argue for domination.
Steven Marsh's perspective is rooted in domination, not moderation.
What I mean is, If you're listening to a conservative, they'll say something like, we don't want to ban abortion right now.
We want the Supreme Court to overturn Roe so the states can decide.
A compromise.
Now many pro-lifers, but probably not the plurality of the right, wants nationwide abortion bans.
The problem is, among the actual right-wing faction, whatever you want to call it, they're arguing only for the state's ability to decide for themselves, meaning blue states retain their rights and red states retain their rights.
So you can live in an abortion state or a non-abortion state.
Moderation versus domination.
Stephen Marsh doesn't get it.
He writes, The cracks in the foundations of the United States are
widening, rapidly and on several fronts.
The overturning of Roe v. Wade has provoked a legitimacy crisis, no matter what your politics.
For the right, the leaking of the draft memo last month revealed the breakdown of bipartisanship and common purpose
within the institution.
For the left, it demonstrated the will of dubiously selected Republican justices to overturn established rights that have somewhere between 70 and 80 percent political support.
Wrong!
Stephen Marsh.
You see, this is the issue.
From the point of domination, not moderation.
No.
The established rights do not have near 70 or 80% political support.
Technically correct, but mostly wrong.
Let's break this down.
When you look at the polls, you will get a wide plethora of statements.
Do you support Roe v. Wade?
70 to 80% actually say yes.
Okay, well it sounds like he's right, right?
No.
You need to ask them what they know of Roe v. Wade and what they really mean.
When you look at the general outline of the abortion issue, two-thirds of people believe there should be viability restrictions.
And that's what many states were trying to implement.
Only a small faction of around 10-20% believe there should be limitless abortion.
But that's the left conversation.
Democrats tried to codify abortion up to 9 months.
It's crazy.
They literally did.
And they said, in instances where the mother's health is at risk.
I get it.
But abortion is legally defined as ending a pregnancy in a way that terminates the life of the baby.
If a woman has a viable baby within her, but her health is at risk, removing the baby doesn't need to kill it.
So why would they attempt to legalize the killing of it?
That would be very important for Stephen Marsh to include in his breakdown of what's happening.
He says, accelerating political violence like the attack in Buffalo.
The Buffalo attacker was a self-described center-left authoritarian concerned about racial issues.
Racial issues are not left or right.
The left has their identitarians and so does the right.
He says, increasingly blurs the line between mainstream political conservative movement and outright murderous insanity.
The question is no longer whether there will be a civil conflict in the U.S.
The question is how the sides will divide, what their strengths and weaknesses are, and how those strengths and weaknesses will determine the outcome.
Alright.
He goes on to mention that the right has been imagining civil war publicly since the Obama administration.
Yada yada yada.
Mentioning people saying the roots of the tree of liberty.
Yeah, we get it.
I don't like those statements either.
I get the quote, the tree of liberty and all that stuff.
And I understand what Thomas Jefferson meant to say.
I don't like people saying violence and violence and violence.
I don't like them saying that it has to be done.
It doesn't have to be done.
Peaceful revolution is possible.
I don't like the fact that there would be a revolution or a civil war.
He goes into mention, Tucker Carlson has articulated the theory of white replacement more than 400 times on his show, and therefore the guy in Buffalo was conservative.
He certainly was not conservative at all.
He was a communist.
That's the crazy thing.
So ultimately I say this.
You know, it doesn't matter what you think.
It doesn't matter what Stephen Marsh thinks.
What matters is the conflict is real.
And he thinks it's inevitable.
How will they divide?
What are their strengths and what are their weaknesses?
I'm gonna lay it down very simply for you, my friends.
The right will win.
Let me tell you why.
The left will point out that they have the GDP.
They say, we're the ones who fund these red areas and these red states.
Look at all the money we give them.
I'm sorry.
What do you do in cities?
Do you make food?
You don't.
You're right.
The right gets access to schematics, intellectual property, machinery, movies, and all that good stuff.
But it's the red areas that, I don't know, are mining rocks for your cement, growing your food, harvesting natural resources.
It's not being done in urban centers.
Now, the mind work is.
Not all of it, but a lot of it.
If a war were to break out, what's gonna be more important to your survival?
Your ability to grow and maintain crops?
Or your ability to determine whether or not a certain pipe will fit a certain valve and allow the flow of a certain chemical to reach its destination?
Now, that's... that's an important thing!
Oh, but I should say this.
That work is also being done in rural areas by, like, petroleum engineers and chemical plant engineers, so maybe it's a better example.
What's more important?
Your ability to raise chickens, knowing how to breed them and how to feed them, or your ability to write an article about Brad Pitt's junk?
Sorry, dude.
It may make more money.
Raising chickens is not particularly profitable relative to running a media organization.
But if you're a CEO of a media company in New York and you know how to advertise, is that going to help you win a conflict or feed your children?
No.
Let's say you're the editor-in-chief of BuzzFeed.
When everything breaks down and roads are getting shut down and people are fighting, do you have the skills to survive?
Not every conservative does, but conservatives tend to live in rural areas.
People who live in rural areas are more likely to survive in a rural area than someone in an urban environment.
What will a city do if they're not getting food?
Therein lies the problem.
It doesn't matter who you think is right morally.
It matters who has the means to actually fight.
Now, if the left faction holds the seat of government, the army, the law enforcement, all that stuff, that's power right there.
But what if we get a red wave?
What if Donald Trump takes over in 2024 along with the Republican supermajority in the House and the Senate?
And they can steamroll through whatever they want.
Well then you're probably going to see the left get crushed.
Antifa will go super violent and you will see weird conflict.
Let me show you what they're posting.
I can't show you all of it.
Greg Price says, the Babylon Beast still does not have a Twitter account for saying that Rachel Levine is a man.
And I'm not going to show you everything said, I'm just going to inform you of this tweet.
Carlos Maza basically told people to commit terrorism.
Andrew Tarantola, verified, told people to commit an act of terrorism.
One Twitter user, retweeted by Carlos Maza, posted the home address of Brett Kavanaugh And there's more.
More tweets calling for terrorism.
Will these people be arrested?
I don't see it.
I don't see it.
The Republicans will need to get in and use power, which I don't think they will.
That's why I think civil war is inevitable.
I don't think you're going to see a strongman takeover.
Donald Trump was unwilling to use law enforcement and military to shut down the violent riots that swept this country.
There may be some reason people are mad at him.
Some people thought that Joe Biden would actually clamp down.
Seriously, they did.
Staten Island shopper describes moment she was standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Rudy Giuliani as he was hit by a grocery store worker and says the strike was so hard she felt it.
Rudy Giuliani was in a grocery store.
Someone asked to take a photo with him.
A worker walked up and slapped him on the back.
It wasn't a full forced swing, full cocked wham, into Rudy Giuliani.
Nah, it was a hard pat.
You can see Rudy Giuliani get, you know, jostled forward and he turns and the woman starts rubbing his back like, whoa, what the?
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating and affecting the 2024 presidential election.
We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
He was attacked by this guy who was angry about Roe v. Wade.
When people begin randomly attacking other people, yo, you see it coming, don't you?
Oh, and there's more.
Oh, here we are.
Libs of TikTok says they literally want you dead.
Okay.
In this viral post from Reddit, someone, uh, RipThrowaway, it's a fake account they just made, said, He goes on to say that people should show up and attack them.
These people are so dumb.
They have no cops and their firemen are volunteers.
They have to borrow cops and firemen from neighboring jurisdictions miles away in order
to handle anything big, and they think they're safe out there.
He goes on to say that people should show up and attack them.
These people are so dumb.
They are so dumb.
Do you think that radical Christian rural areas are defenseless?
Have you not read a single piece of news about the Second Amendment that's just come out?
Bro.
My neighbors and I talk about guns.
Not for anything other than like, oh, you got one of those.
Oh, how is it?
How does it handle?
Do you like it?
I've got a Chiappa lower bore 357 and I haven't used it.
I haven't used it.
And I was talking to my neighbor and I mentioned he's like, oh, you got one of those lower bore, right?
So the recoil is more direct.
How is it?
I'm like, I haven't actually got a chance to use it.
We'll take it to the range.
He's like, oh, okay.
And then he explains what he has.
And I'm like, really?
I talk about the 9mm Makarov Soviet, what is it, like a PA-64 or something it's called?
And I'm like, terrible weapon, terrible.
The Soviets, they did not care for making weapons that were good to use.
This one bites, right?
It's a 9mm, the Soviet bolts are called Makarov.
And I accidentally ordered them, so I got this gun.
It's a Cold War era gun, it's really cool.
And, uh, when you fire, it hurts your hand.
I got a Beretta, very comfortable.
But let me just point out, Bro.
Rural areas are strapped.
They are armed to the teeth.
The fact that somebody made this post, sure, probably one random person, but we are seeing a wave of people on social media call for terrorism, violence, and civil war.
You want to show up a hundred deep in a rural town?
Please don't.
Please, please do not do it.
Defenseless, you are wrong.
It is a scary day.
It will be a scarier day if a hundred random leftist antipatype show up to a rural town to commit violence.
Because the people in these small towns are going to walk out and they're all going to have AR-15s, Mini-14s, they're going to have M1s, they're going to have SCAR-20s, they're going to have all of it.
Someone's going to walk out with their Benelli, someone's going to walk out with their KSG, and they're just going to be like, you don't know anything about us.
We did not bring this to you, you brought this to yourself, and that will be bad.
You have to be a special kind of stupid to think you're going to walk into a rural area and commit violence.
Don't do it.
It's morally wrong, it's legally wrong, and it will get you killed.
This is where we are.
Stephen L. Miller pointing this one out.
This is great.
Bill Kristol talking about the radicalism of the majority's decision even though in 1998 he wrote Roe Must Go.
The reason I highlight this is to show you that the Civil War is not rooted in any principle among the left.
It is just, we want power.
And they will kill to get it.
Bill Kristol, a neocon, who wrote Roe Must Go, is now calling it, or quoting them, saying it's radicalism.
He does not care about what is true and what is principled, he cares about power.
the Supreme Court expansion after Roe is overturned.
Okay, here we go, baby.
They're trying to usurp power.
They're not satisfied with losing on constitutional grounds.
They don't know what they're protesting.
Many people are saying, keep your Bible out of my body.
Supreme Court did not assert any Christian moral value in their overturning of Roe and
They said, we do not have the constitutional authority to set this precedent.
It is overturned.
They don't.
The states have to decide, or Congress.
Some have argued Congress can't because it's not enumerated in the Constitution.
Technically, that's correct under the 9th and 10th Amendment, but I don't know if it's literally legal.
It depends on what the Supreme Court will say, and I'm not a judge.
What I can say is, the Democrats can codify these rules under the law.
Some argue they can't, and the states would have to do it.
So what's the end result?
The left doesn't care about states.
They view this country as one country, and it's weird because you live in New York, you're not going to Texas for an abortion, what do you care?
But there are liberals who live there, then don't live there.
I don't have to tell you.
The end result of this is that Democrats, liberals, and leftists want everyone to live the way they demand.
And the conservatives, libertarians, post-liberals, moderates want people to be able to live as they see fit in their own jurisdictions.
The end result is chaos.
One side is trying to force you to bend the knee, one side is saying, leave me alone.
So where does this go?
It's the perfect example.
The rural township thing.
Regular people minding their own business in their small town who don't care about what you're doing say, leave me alone, and you show up to commit violence against them.
That's the reality.
It won't work.
And that's why I think this country is headed towards some kind of... Well, I think the collapse happened already, and now we're just being ripped apart.
Stephen Marsh. His previous opinion piece in the Guardian was that civil war was coming and that
we're in civil strife. His position now is that there is no way to stop it. This is what he writes.
He says, let me make sure I get this.
Two essential facts of the 2020 election should give left-wing partisans hope.
Biden voting counties amounted to 70% of the GDP, while 60% of college-educated voters chose Biden.
That is to say, left Democratic wing of America is the productive and educated part of the country.
One way of looking at the American political condition of the moment is that the left-wing part of the U.S.
has built the networks that have left behind the right-wing part.
The networks are the left's strength.
That's true.
Communication is power and the left has it.
But they don't make food.
But they don't make resources.
The GDP of this country is in its IP.
It's in its ownership of stocks.
Meaningless in war.
I'll say it again.
Imagine this.
World War II breaks out.
There's fighting in France.
The Germans have gone completely around the Maginot Line, and they've breached the country, who's immediately surrendering, and the French president says, Quick!
We need someone who can write mathematics!
It's like, okay, I mean, math can help, sure.
No, what they're saying is, we need a bunch of dudes with guns to storm in and push them back.
We need la resistance!
No one's calling for an astronomer.
Now, okay, maybe that's not the GDP, but no one's calling for an electric car maker.
They're saying, I don't know or care.
We want to blow stuff up and fight people.
In a conflict, there is value in that.
If a civil war broke out, you may have, in a city, Electric car makers, and they say we can make powerful machines.
We know how.
Let's put together this machine that can fire missiles.
Okay, send it to the factory.
Sir, the factory is 60 miles outside of the city in a rural- in a suburban slash rural area, and it's been taken over within minutes.
Uh-oh.
The factories where all these things are made are not in the cities?
Who would have thought?
So what is in the cities?
The intellectual property, the organization.
Yo, you do not know what you're talking about, Steven.
You don't understand.
You're Canadian.
You understand the fighting is happening, but you don't get the realities of how this country is operating.
Water, power, chemical plants, they are not in cities.
The cities will have to try and target them, but... Yo, I'm just telling you.
You don't know how this will go, and neither will I. But suffice it to say, it's not so lopsided like you might think.
The good news is that Americans are actually lining up against the left.
And we may be inching towards civil war, but Stephen is wrong.
Suburban moms, they're voting Republican.
The liberal elites don't have this one, even with Roe v. Wade being overturned.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 8 p.m.
over at youtube.com slash TimCastIRL.
Thanks for hanging out, and I will see you Certainly there are people on the left who understand what the ruling means on Roe v. Wade.
But you look at these people protesting, they don't get it.
They're losing their minds.
Billy Joe Armstrong tells British crowd he's renouncing US citizenship after a row repeal.
He's lying.
I do not believe him.
This man, I am willing to bet, is a liar.
Now, he said he's going to move to the UK.
There's a good possibility he's not lying.
I'll say that.
But I just believe that the greater probabilities... He's not going to do anything.
He goes on stage and he goes... Virtue signal.
Screams his mind.
Screams his little heart out.
And then nothing's going to change.
Why would you want to get rid of U.S.
citizenship?
I mean, it's a good thing.
Granted, maybe he doesn't want to pay taxes anymore.
Because if you... The way I understand it is if you live somewhere else, like you live in the U.K.
You pay them taxes and then you pay the difference to the United States.
So you renounce your citizenship.
You can still come here.
You can't work here.
What does he care?
But I'd have to imagine it's just not something he can do.
And I feel like what he's doing here contributes to the psychopathy that is the current state of Western culture of the United States.
And it's not just him, of course.
We have a bunch of tweets from our good friends over at Libs of TikTok, and we have Cassandra Fairbanks and Ian Malmstrong.
The reaction to Roe v. Wade being overturned is something.
I'll play for you these videos.
Are these people okay?
Ask Ian Milestrong.
I want to show you.
Lookit, liberalism is a mental disease is trending?
Wow.
In this video, there's a woman clearly performing.
Clearly.
And that's the thing I want to explain that shows that almost all of this, in my opinion, is performative, it's fake, and they're just pretending to be angry.
I'm starting off with this because there's a lot of news that suggests civil war.
I know, here we go.
You guys are all gonna comment.
Everybody take a drink or whatever, because I said it.
Steven Marsh, who wrote the book The Next Civil War, writes a very, very interesting article for The Guardian saying, with Roe v. Wade being overturned, we are moving towards civil war.
Of course, his framing is all against the right, and the funny thing is, yeah, there are elements of the right that are violent.
But, come on, Steven.
How many pregnancy centers were vandalized?
How many had firebombs thrown at them?
It's remarkable that Brian Stelter comes out and says, the risk of political violence is here.
Look at all these right-wingers.
And we shouldn't just point at the other side because that makes it worse.
I just love the paradox.
That's exactly what you are doing, Brian.
How many pro-life politicians or pregnancy centers were attacked by extremists?
Y'all, I didn't see any pro-lifers go out and firebomb people.
And they're like, but protesters showed up to a drag queen story hour.
Okay.
Far-left protesters showed up to a women's sporting event in D.C.
Nobody was screaming that there was a threat of violence.
These people have lost their minds.
But, the reason I'm not going to start with that is because there's a much bigger story involving high-level politics, the D.O.D., the D.O.J., the President.
We're going to do a longer segment on that for my main segment, which would be, if you're listening to the podcast, you heard that first.
But I want to read this story about Billy Joe, and I want to show you some of these comments, and I'm going to tell you these people are pretending.
They are pretending.
It is fake.
They are not angry.
You have a combination of people who are too stupid to know what's going on, and thus, they're just screaming in rage because stupid people easily enraged.
When you lie to them, they believe the lies.
And then you have people like, well, I'll put it this way.
The stupid people are duped by people like Billy Joe.
He's a performer.
He's going on stage and entertaining a British crowd.
I'm gonna renounce my citizenship!
There's a Simpsons joke where there's a band, I think it was Spinal Tap, playing in Simpsons and they're like, how's it going?
And he looks at the back of his guitar, Springfield!
Like he doesn't actually know where he is.
And people always, the bands always say, this is the best town we've ever played in!
And everyone's like, yeah!
That's what it is.
The stupid people who hear this go, yeah!
Then they get angry too.
The stupid people are all going on social media and sharing stupid people videos to other stupid people and they don't know anything about Roe v. Wade.
Or Casey for that matter.
And they don't know what they're protesting.
Let me prove it.
I'd like to show you a tweet from myself.
I tweeted, SCOTUS has ruled that the federal government has no authority over women's bodies.
A huge win for liberals.
Ah, yeah, look at that, 5,000, everybody's losing their minds.
One person responded, I don't think they see it that way.
They'd rather be ruled over at the will of the government.
Okay.
The Supreme Court ruling basically said that we do not have the authority in this matter over women's bodies.
Currently, the federal government does not.
The federal government can, however, to elaborate on this, assert that authority through Congress.
I don't get that many characters on Twitter, so I just made the simple point.
They keep going out and screaming, government out of my body, and the federal government just ruled, we have no say in this.
Why are they mad?
Did they not realize what they were asking for?
That the federal government did assert authority over women's bodies.
Ruling on how and what the medical procedures can be provided or whatever.
Setting limitations on what can be done.
It's going to the states now.
Now, I get it.
They're saying we should be able to do what we want with our doctors without interference from anyone.
The issue is, you needed the federal government to assert its authority over the states and you.
In that instance, they said, you can.
That's them asserting their authority, putting restrictions in place.
Now, the inverse of that position would be if the Supreme Court said, a fetus is alive, therefore, you cannot ever get an abortion.
That's the pro-life version.
This is what they don't understand.
The pro-choice version of the Supreme Court precedent was Roe v. Wade.
The pro-life version doesn't exist.
That would be the Supreme Court saying, you cannot end the life of a human being.
Abortion is outlawed in this country under existing rules.
Instead, they came out and said, we do not have the authority.
It returns to the states or to Congress to assert that authority.
Well, okay.
Because the federal government is stepping away from this, it now means different jurisdictions will have different rules.
They don't know that.
They don't realize when they—my body, my choice.
It's okay.
The federal government will absolve itself of responsibility in this matter.
No!
We need you to assert that you agree with us.
That's what they don't get.
We had a progressive on TimCast IRL, and I said, Twitter banning people for saying, okay dude, and having trans rules is a pro-left bias.
And that taking that rule away is not a pro-right-wing bias.
He's like, yes it is.
I'm like, no it isn't.
A pro-right-wing bias would be saying, you cannot use preferred pronouns.
Instead, all we're getting is conservatives saying, the rules should be neutral.
And the left saying, the rules should favor us.
If that's the dichotomy, then what happens is, we'll compromise.
The rules slightly favor the left.
Now everyone's happy.
No, because the right never actually advocates for what their position is.
Not always, but, you know, I come out and I say, we should repeal all gun laws.
And then maybe you'll get a compromise where it's like, okay, we'll be neutral.
Instead, the right asks for neutrality, the left asks for favors, so you go halfway.
And this is what I tell people, when the right comes out on Twitter and they're like, you know, Elon Musk said, we need a solution that keeps everyone happy, which means both sides will lose in this.
Yeah, but when Republicans are saying give everyone free speech, including the left, and the left says ban Republicans, then Twitter says, okay, we'll meet halfway and we'll ban some of the Republicans.
Well, there you go.
This is the point.
The federal government asserted a neutral approach, and the left is furious about it.
The right wants—pro-lifers want abortion totally banned.
They didn't even get that.
Here's Billy Joe.
Let me show you what he said, and then I'll show you these videos.
Green Day's Billy Joe Armstrong told a British crowd that he's renouncing his American citizenship, and he's probably lying to rile up a crowd.
Performing at the London Stadium on the band's Hella Mega Tour with Fall Out Boy and Weezer on the night of the court decision, the American idiot singer said, F America, I'm effing renouncing my citizenship.
I'm effing coming here.
There's just too much effing stupid in the world to go back to that miserable effing excuse for a country.
As for whether he'd actually move to the UK, he insisted, Oh, I'm not kidding.
You're going to get a lot of me in the coming days.
Okay, maybe.
I'd be surprised.
unidentified
Every single person was like, If Donald Trump is elected, I'm leaving this country.
Bro, you could have left a long time ago and you didn't do it.
More importantly, Roe v. Wade returns the decision to the states.
In California or New York or wherever, I think he lives in California, nothing is going to change.
Not a thing.
In fact, I'm wrong.
The Democrats are probably going to codify an expansion of abortion in their states.
And the Supreme Court's like, don't look at me.
I don't believe there's a strong probability that should Republicans win in November, they will enact nationwide abortion bans.
It's possible, but I don't think very likely because as I mentioned, Republicans don't advocate on the extreme end for what they actually want.
They say the states should do it.
Okay, so Republicans who are pro-life, because not every Republican is pro-life.
Most of them are.
You're saying abortion is murder or abortion is wrong, but you're going to allow it in other states.
Right.
The compromise was Roe v. Wade.
You get that, right?
Where you don't get unfettered abortion, but it's some restrictions.
I just gotta say, it's really funny.
Assault on abortion access.
Field, England. Armstrong continued to lash out at SCOTUS saying, F the Supreme Court
of America prior to performing American Idiot, and he is one. Armstrong isn't the only American
artist currently, excuse me, across the Atlantic condemning the assault on abortion access.
I just got to say, it's really funny. Assault on abortion access, assault on Supreme Court
absolving its responsibility in the matter means Congress needs to codify this.
They couldn't do it.
Why?
They tried to codify an expansion and Joe Manchin said no.
That's it.
The Democrats could come out with an actual codification of Roe v. Wade, and which Joe Manchin would probably agree with, and they'd probably get by on a 50-50 vote with a tiebreaker from Kamala Harris, but they didn't do that.
What they did was they tried to enact a bill which would have nullified over 500 laws in various states.
That's not a compromise, it's an expansion.
The Democrats Love this.
They're already fundraising.
And they're lying.
It's hilarious.
They're saying things like, we've gotta, we gotta get out there and vote, everybody, because, you know, you see what, what happened, this midterm is so important.
Voting in this midterm will not change what just happened.
Now, to be fair, it's a possibility the Republicans win, and then they'll try to pass a nationwide abortion ban.
But Joe Biden has veto power, and there is zero possibility of a veto-proof majority.
In fact, there is zero possibility of a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
Therefore, quite literally Democrats, you cannot change this right now with a vote.
Still, I recommend every Democrat, every Republican, go out and vote for what you believe in.
The Democrats, of course, are trying to use this, but they're lying to you.
I still think you should probably vote for what you believe in if you're a Democrat or Republican, Libertarian or otherwise.
For me, this midterm will be important in terms of investigations.
If you want Joe Biden to stay in office and you don't want his son investigated, well then vote for Democrats.
And if they retain the House and the Senate, there you go, you win.
It is fair to say.
There is a possibility of changing this if they can somehow get... Look, let me put it this way.
Republicans are not going to get a veto-proof majority.
Republicans are not going to get a filibuster-breaking majority.
So you're not going to see a ban at the federal level on abortion.
That being said, Democrats also won't be able to accomplish those goals.
It's not possible.
And they will not be able to break a filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade.
It's just not going to happen.
So, a bunch of other people said some dumb things.
This woman mailed her period blood to the Supreme Court to protest the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
I don't believe she did.
In the TikTok video, she's seen bagging something, signing it, and saying, is this the life you're saving?
Putting something in an envelope and mailing it to Brett Kavanaugh at the Supreme Court and then showing a mailbox, but she never shows herself actually putting in.
Now, it doesn't matter in terms of the illegality of what she did.
I don't believe she actually did this.
It's all performative, politics is pop culture outrage to get clicks.
The left, this is it.
You talk to a conservative, they're not going out and doing this.
They're not burning things down.
That's like Brexit, people.
The left is doing it all for performative outrage so they can get more followers.
Did you know that young women have extremely high rates of depression right now?
The reason, they believe, is that on Instagram, they're trying to get more likes.
And when they don't, they get depressed because their worth is based upon these numbers.
This is why they do it.
It riles people up and it drives them insane.
And then politicians saying, whatever you say, go along with it, they are losing their minds.
So there's this article, and I'll read it in another segment, about the coming civil war, writes Stephen Marsh.
And he's like, 80% of people agree with pro-choice!
And it's just like, Stephen, you're so close.
We had him on the show.
We interviewed him.
I respect him for coming on.
And he's right on so much, but he's wrong on so much as well.
And I told him it's because he's not reading the news.
He's like, I do a lot of research.
And I'm like, bro, you are simply getting your opinions regurgitated secondhand and then writing what you see.
Because 80% of people do not agree with the left on this one.
Their approach was yes, but only up to the point of viability.
The people who are talking about being pro-choice in these polls think, overwhelmingly, after like 12 or 14 weeks, you should not be able to get an abortion.
You have to look at all of the polling data to see where people actually stand.
Not just ask them, do you agree with Roe v. Wade?
In fact, Roe v. Wade talked about viability.
That's why a lot of people agree with it.
But a lot of people don't even know what the court case was about.
Privacy rights.
So these people, they make videos where they pretend to do things, like, I really don't believe she actually mailed her period blood anywhere.
Probably thinking, you know, she didn't want to go to prison.
Of course, the Postal Service is now going to have to investigate every single mailbox, and in order to stop what may be biological terror.
So yeah, she committed a very serious federal crime.
Numerous federal crimes, probably.
We'll see if anything actually happens to her anyway.
But it's all performative.
SCOTUS has ruled the federal government has no authority over women's bodies, a huge win for liberals.
Yeah, I'm being a little snarky, but let me wrap with this, and maybe we'll talk a bit more about this.
I want to show you this from the readout.
Companies covering some, all, travel costs for abortions.
All of these companies Will pay their employees costs if they want to get an abortion.
You know why?
It is cheaper than paternity leave.
If you get an employee and you're paying her, you know, $60,000 a year or something like that, and maternity leave is going to be, I don't know, a month or two months, you're sitting there thinking like, what is this going to cost?
I tweeted, TimCast will not be covering travel costs for employees
seeking an abortion.
Instead, we offer fully paid maternity and paternity leave at the employee's discretion.
We trust them to take the time they need with their new children as long as that may be.
Now that means we may get people who exploit this company.
There may be people who come here thinking, like, I'm gonna get hired, get pregnant, and then just dip out for as long as I want because Tim Pool trusts people.
That's true.
They may do that.
But I do trust people.
And we vet people.
And the people that we hire here We believe are here because they believe in something and they enjoy doing the work they do.
So we have, like, unlimited vacation time, unlimited maternity and paternity leave, unlimited sick time.
In fact, it's kind of the opposite.
If you're sick, don't come here.
Like, you know, like when you're a kid and your parents are like, you're anti-grounded, go outside and play.
We're trying to sleep.
Something like that.
Like, we're napping.
I don't know if you've ever had that.
I remember when I was a kid, my parents would be like, get out of the house, go play.
And we'd be like, yay!
And then we'd, like, run out of the house.
Like anti-grounded.
Don't come back until the streetlights are coming on.
The way I see it is, the people who are here at Timcast working want to be here.
They're not deciding to take maternity leave because they don't want to work and they're lazy.
They're doing it because they have obligations to their families.
And that comes before company.
And I want to make sure that people who are working here feel like I believe in them too.
Now granted, we're not a very big company.
We do have several dozen employees, and some stuff around this has come up, and I just say, let us know when you're good, and we're gonna figure out how to keep working when you have to take care of your new family.
Because I think that's more important.
I do.
If we put family first, as a company, as people, we will have a healthy society.
We will have our values instilled in our children, and that is more important than writing an article about Brad Pitt's junk.
No, I mean this seriously.
There is no news article, no video to be made that is more important than someone's child being raised properly.
So, I tell people, like, within reason, you know, we're just trying to work together.
Like, bring your kids down.
Just, you gotta watch them.
You gotta be in charge of your kids.
I have no issue with that.
We have people who are like, I don't know if I can make it, you know, for a special recording session or whatever, because we don't have, you know.
And I'm like, feel free to bring your kids.
Man, we love kids.
Like, you know, there's tons of people here who would love to watch them for you while you're working.
I believe that you protecting and raising your children, your responsibility and family comes first.
So that being said, I want to mention.
I also said this isn't a new policy, but please allow me to tweet out this virtue signal.
It used to be the left that was fighting for maternity and paternity leave.
Now they're fighting for corporations to pay for women to kill their babies so that they can save money.
I don't know what the modern liberal or left is today.
Someone said to me, yeah Tim, well what if they want to get an abortion?
I'm like, that's their business.
Then they can go to their doctor and they don't got to tell me anything about it.
Their family choices, not mine.
If they don't want to have a kid or not ready to have a kid or there's something in the way, I am not getting involved in that.
I don't think the government should either, because I'm actually classically pro-choice in the sense that, like, there's limitations on what I think the government can and would be involved in.
And even conservatives have told me on TimCast IRL, there is a distinction between actual murder and an abortion, and they all agree.
As much as some people... Not everybody does.
Not everybody does.
I don't want to say everybody.
But some people are like, there's a clear distinction, and they're trying to figure out how to deal with this.
They don't like it.
They, you know... Anyway, look, I digress.
We are in a nightmare dystopia of corporate capitalism, where major corporations are like, it is cheaper for you to kill your baby than it is for us to pay for maternity leave.
And what that means is, on the grand scale, capitalism is incentivizing the destruction of humanity.
And that is why I am not in favor of laissez-faire capitalism.
Sorry, this is what you get.
Not that I think regulation solves this in any way.
This is cultural decay.
We need strong moral values.
We need strong communal bonds.
It is not just about unfettered markets or regulated markets.
It's about what we as a people are willing to tolerate in our communities.
And this, I don't tolerate.
But I'll tell you what, I ain't getting involved in that.
I just say this, if someone here is like, hey, you know, my wife is pregnant, is gonna have a kid, I'm gonna need time off to help her.
I'm gonna say, whatever you want, just let us know when you're out.
We'll find someone to fill in for you, no problem.
If a woman here says that she's pregnant, she's going to have a kid, we're like, hey, do your thing, man.
None of my business.
All you got to do is tell us, and we are good, and we will find someone to fill in for you.
No problem.
In fact, do what you want to do.
Some people might say, you know, I actually want to do a little bit of work.
I think I can.
I can't do a full load.
You know, I'll do some remote stuff.
I'll be in touch.
I'm like, whatever you want.
It's all on you.
Come back when you're ready.
There's no time limit because I believe the people who do the work want to do the work.
I believe that they're putting together videos, they're putting together podcasts, they're putting together news articles because they want to do it.
Cool.
Glad they're here.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 1 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out and I'll see you all then.
Over this past weekend, not only did we see the overturning of Roe v. Wade, we also saw some of the biggest pride parades and pride marches in the country, notably in New York City and in San Francisco.
I want to talk to you about what happened in these cities because there were massive stampedes.
People got hurt.
The simple story?
Not so proud, says the Daily Mail.
Stampedes at pride events in New York City and San Francisco after revelers mistake fireworks and a brawl for shootings.
These people are constantly being told they're the victims, when they're the dominant cultural force.
I don't want to say they're the majority, because they're not.
L-G-B-T-Q-I-A-A plus... I don't know the acronym.
But you get the point.
They dominate corporate press.
They dominate major corporations.
This is the establishment and accepted narrative.
Now, these people were panicking and screaming over fireworks because they are repeatedly being told by the media that they are the victims, that they are the ones under threat.
While Brian Stelter put out a video, or I should say he did a report on his television channel, talking about the risk of political violence.
Then he mentions some leftists, but mostly just goes on to attack the right, because that's what he does, because he's a sophist.
And he says, you had threats of violence at a drag queen event.
Protesters showed up.
Haha.
Okay.
Sure.
And people were, uh, are heated.
And there are threats of violence at many of these events.
But around 20 plus, a couple dozen targets, pro-life targets, including many pregnancy centers, the bulk of which are pregnancy centers, were vandalized and firebombed.
Some of them firebombed.
But these people turn the TV on and they are told they are the victims.
When they're not.
They're typically the perpetrators.
Not always.
Sometimes they're victims.
Here's what happens.
You look at the media.
And here's the way I explain it.
Fringe right-wing attacks or racist attacks or whatever.
Whatever ideology you want to ascribe it to.
There are rare high-profile instances where many people lose their lives.
Up in Buffalo, you had a man who wrote a manifesto.
In it, he talked about white replacement.
That's not a right-wing position.
I'm talking politically.
You can argue it's reactionary politics from a white majority.
I accept that.
And then you can argue reactionary politics are right-wing inherently, and that's where you get your overlap.
Absolutely.
I can accept that semantic definition.
But we're talking about economics, I mean.
We're talking about smaller government or freer markets versus stronger markets and stronger government.
It's not anywhere in there.
It's a weird cultural issue.
However, this man up in Buffalo, he was a leftist.
The media doesn't tell you that, though, do they?
They say, he's not a leftist, he's far-right.
He literally wrote that he was center-left authoritarian.
That he was a former communist, but now is taking race, you know, as an issue.
I would argue that it's more fair To say it's a left-wing individual because of his stated preference, because of his stated ideology and expression, and the fact that identitarianism is not left or right.
Therefore, this individual was on the left.
But they use this to cause fear among people.
As if there's going to be attacks at Pride events.
Thus, when fireworks go off, these people think they're being attacked.
And it's insane.
Causing a stampede.
Now, if you've no experience with firearms, you'd probably easily mistake fireworks for firearms.
A lot of people do.
Sometimes I still do.
I'm not that great, but it's kind of easy to tell the distinction.
And it's, you know, unless someone sets up their fireworks specifically to sound like a succession of a gun being fired, typically different.
But it is hard to know, especially if you have no experience.
I want to read about this.
This stampede, as you can see people running and screaming.
And they're saying, it was horrible.
Fell over in the stampede.
No buildings were open.
We were out in the street.
After what happened in Oslo, I didn't want to risk it.
The way mass shootings have affected New York City?
Yo.
You live in a big, urban, liberal city with gun control.
Why is this fear here?
Why is there gun crime here?
Something doesn't add up.
I want to point something out.
Take a look at the size of these crowds.
I was in New York.
Every business had rainbows.
Every single business.
This is the urban, culturally dominant idea.
I also want to point out, take a look at this.
There's actually a rainbow in this photograph.
Isn't that cool?
I mean, actually, it's kinda cool.
It's kinda, you know, weird.
You have all the people dancing around at Pride with the rainbows and flags and all that stuff, and then there's, like, actually a rainbow in the fountain.
I wanna show you this, uh, this image.
Andrew Doyle says, For some, these flags represent diversity and inclusion.
And these are the LGBTQIA2A+, or whatever, flags.
But for many they symbolize an ideological movement that is hostile to gay people and women's rights, opposes free speech, legitimizes violence and bullying, and hounds people out of their jobs if they fail to conform.
Andrew Doyle is correct.
And we have these images.
This one's from the BBC showing, um, which street is this?
I can't, I don't know the name of the street.
Downing.
You have all of these LGBTQ flags lined up in huge rows.
You've got, it just goes on, I can't even see how many are here, but there's like 50 just in this photo alone lining these streets.
Oppressed much?
Having something to fear?
You are the establishment.
Then, you have this next photo.
Now, I don't know where this one is, but this also appears to be in the UK, and you have, once again, the same, similar flags.
These ones don't have the, uh, purple circle for, um, I think the purple circle is intersex or something?
I'm not sure.
These flags lining this street.
Not oppressed.
Not an oppressed minority.
In fact, the dominant cultural force.
Of course, you are starting to get, I guess, reactionary, or you're getting angry factions, and there's a real threat of violence.
But for the most part, the establishment has accepted this as the norm.
So I tweeted facetiously, this is literally Nazi Germany.
It's funny because I'm partly hoping people think it's serious.
Where are these flags?
The pride flags.
There were also Union Jack flags in the UK and everyone's like, this is fascism!
Because they are putting up their own flag and I'm like, ugh.
That's the joke.
Not that I think this is literally Nazi Germany.
That's why literally is an asterisk because I mean it as sarcasm.
But I do want to point out something before we go to that stampede story.
It's just the brown and black stripe in this flag is just so weird to me.
Like, they're the only race represented on the flag.
There are other minorities.
It's just weird.
It's a gay pride flag, trans and intersex.
Why are black people on it?
Black people come in all shapes and sizes and all sexualities.
There's no white stripe for white people.
Is the yellow stripe supposed to be Asians or something?
Am I missing something here?
And they have the brown stripe too.
It's just culty.
It is culty.
So let's read the story about these stampedes.
And I want to talk to you about pride.
There are videos going around I can't show you.
Depicting one is a naked man, bouncing up and down, jumping in the street, naked, in front of children.
Or they say with children present at the event.
There's another one where there's an old man, and they're all like, you know, obese and out-of-shape men.
He's wearing a tighty-whities and he's twerking.
This time there are children nearby, you can see.
It's just, whatever, we'll talk about it.
We have this story from the Daily Mail.
With tensions at a boiling point nationwide following Friday's repeal of Roe v. Wade and the angry scenes in Phoenix, LA and Cedar Rapids that evening, Pride was being celebrated with a mix of defiance and trepidation.
So, we don't need your storytelling, Daily Mail.
I'll put it this way.
This country is a powder keg that we all recognize is about to erupt.
That's it.
The fact that fireworks went off That people celebrating at Pride lit fireworks to celebrate, and then everyone lost their mind!
It just goes to show.
This country is on the verge of imploding.
And my personal opinion of these Pride events is that they perfectly exemplify the collapse.
Yeah.
Now, right now on Twitter, liberalism as a mental disorder is trending.
I don't agree with that.
Classical liberalism, the true sense of the word.
It founded this nation and it was so great.
However, because of weak men, and I mean men as in humans, weak people, this country is on the verge of collapse.
Pride is a breakdown, in my opinion, of order.
A flowing into chaos.
I don't mean LGBT pride.
I don't mean people who are celebrating loving someone and having equal rights.
What I mean is that these events aren't doing that.
Sorry, they're just not.
Don't care what you think.
I have my whole life seen pride parades.
When I was 10 years old, my family had a cafe on Halstead and Waveland in Chicago, very briefly.
And that's Boys Town.
They actually have big statues with rainbows engraved in them.
They're like street posts or something.
And I've seen the Pride events.
My mom told me I wasn't allowed to go outside during the Pride events because she didn't want me to see what these people were doing to each other and what they were doing in the streets.
Overtly sexual.
It wasn't about pride for the sexuality.
It was about just chaos, lawlessness, or sex.
When I was told over and over again that these events were about celebrating who you love, I said, that's awesome.
You should be able to love whoever you want.
I know this lesson from Loving v. Virginia and coming from a family of different ethnic backgrounds, racial backgrounds.
So when I was watching all of this stuff in the debate about gay marriage, I was very much in favor of people should be allowed to love who they want, mind their own business, you should leave them alone.
They had questions.
I'm like, okay, so I support all that.
What I don't support is you walk outside and there's a bunch of naked people doing things to each other.
And I'm not saying they're having sex.
I'm saying there's, like, people, like, grabbing each other and they're dancing and smacking each other's butts and they're naked.
There's people on naked on bikes riding around waving to kids.
There's an old man twerking for children.
There are people walking up to cops and shoving their asses in the cop and the cop is like, get away from me, dude!
I remember being a little kid walking to the train and seeing anatomically correct mannequins perform in compromising positions.
And I'm just like, what does that have to do with love?
Any of it?
It doesn't.
And it pissed me off.
Because I felt like I was being lied to.
I don't care if you want to have a sex party.
Dude, I am very libertarian.
Go find your place to do it privately.
Mind your own business.
There's a certain degree of, look, if I don't like what you're doing, I'm just going to leave.
I'm not going to rain on your parade, dudes.
You want to have a pride event and you want to bounce around naked and, you know, tits flopping out and all that stuff?
I'm just like, do your thing, man, but I'm out.
Don't lie to me about it.
Don't go on TV and say, we're just doing this because we love each other.
That's why that naked guy is dancing in front of children.
Bro, spare me.
You're a creepo.
You wanna have an event where you celebrate your love?
I got no issue.
When they're parading around, there's like actual parades, and people are just, have the flag, I'm like, I don't care about that, like, do your thing, man, support yourself, mind your own business.
But when you have the naked people dancing, when you have, it's just debauchery, I'm just like, bro, I get it.
It's an excuse, and there's no enforcement.
I wonder why it is we can see videos of naked men and women dancing around in front of children, and cops don't do anything about it.
That's why I say this is the perfect example of the collapse.
For one, the hair-trigger panic of people screaming at the top of their lungs and running because someone, in their own event, lit fireworks.
Yo, these people are on edge, ready to snap.
The main issue is we have laws, right?
Right?
So when people are dancing around naked, you'd expect laws to be enforced.
They're not.
Right now.
Pride... What would happen if a dude in the middle of Manhattan took off his pants and started running around, flopping around?
Yeah, he'd get arrested.
Why then, during Pride in these cities, is it not happening?
It's a breakdown.
It's kind of like a purge.
It's not a purge in the sense where people are killing each other, but it's in a sense where certain things just aren't enforced.
They're not illegal anymore.
That's why I say it's a sign of the collapse.
It has little to do with two mannermen loving each other or a person being transgender.
Not at all.
I don't think those are signs of the collapse in and of themselves.
The collapse occurs when there's no more confidence in the system.
If someone goes outside and says, the police will not enforce, that's it.
There's no laws.
The police will enforce some things, they won't enforce others.
What do we see?
In San Francisco and other cities in California, people go to Walgreens and just steal garbage bags full of material because no one will do anything about it.
Confidence in government is collapsing.
And that's what we see here.
The police won't come in and arrest people who are exposing themselves to children.
And that is one of the grandest examples of collapse.
Because you'd think literally any person, anyone, would see a dude strip nude and dangle his meat and two veg in front of a child and you'd be like, enough.
Not anymore.
Not in these cities.
In these cities, people are clapping and cheering and dancing along and waving and smiling and appreciative of it.
In the video, there's a man wearing a Bugs Bunny mask and he's jumping and bouncing naked.
Nobody cares.
They cheer for it.
They are cheering for this.
At the very least, I can say this.
Maybe you live in a big city, and you don't care that this is the stuff that happens.
You say, ah, it's none of my business.
Fine, you know.
I'm sure the staunchest of libertarians would say people are allowed to be naked.
Perhaps that's the conservative position.
You shouldn't be nude in front of children.
Like, strangers' children, and things like that.
At a certain age, probably not even your own kids.
I understand that parents raising their kids, the kid obviously sees the parent naked, kids being born and stuff like that, that's my point.
You probably shouldn't get naked and twerk and dance around and do sexual things in front of children.
I should say probably, you literally shouldn't.
And so, at these pride events when they're doing it, or these grooming events with drag queens, you are being shown That the distinction between the worldviews of the left and the right are so profound, there is no reconciliation.
There's nothing to be done.
There's no law you can pass.
They're not allowed to do it, but they are allowed to do it.
They're not legally allowed to do it, it's against the law, but they'll do it anyway and no one will enforce it.
And that's all that matters, which is why I say cultural enforcement is the most important thing.
One person said, whoever set off fireworks in Washington Square Park and today's environment will go to hell.
They did it because they were celebrating, you idiot.
They're your people.
Here's what I see.
You come to a red area, get naked, and twerk in front of a child, and you will be beaten.
And the media will probably come out and say, anti-gay or homophobic attack.
If somebody went up to the guy who was jumping around naked in front of children and attacked him, and I don't mean like just like punching him in the face, I mean like grabbing him and trying to remove him, they would say it was a homophobic attack.
But regardless.
When cultural enforcement is such that one part of the country will not enforce something and one country will, even though it's illegal nationally, you get civil war.
It's exactly what we saw in the first civil war.
The Fugitive Slave Act I like to bring up all the time.
Not that I think it was a good bill, and I think it was the right thing to do.
The North defied it, but it did lead to a civil war.
And you know what?
We needed one.
We needed to end slavery.
Slavery needed to be stopped.
And thus, you get a civil war.
That was back then.
Today, we have different circumstances.
I wonder how many people on the right would say, well, abortion needs to be stopped.
And these blue states won't stop.
They keep killing babies.
I don't know, man.
I'm not going to pretend to have all the answers.
I do believe, however, that abortion will ultimately be made illegal nationwide.
And the reason is, those who have sought to deny personhood rights to human entities have lost historically every single time.
In which case, the end result of what we see?
I think we're going to see more LGBTQ stuff.
I think those rights will be codified, but I also think abortion will be made illegal.
Perhaps that won't matter so much because many of these people won't be having kids anyway.
Like, two dudes are not going to have a child together.
Two women are not going to have a child together.
Someone who's been sterilized by their parents, a child, a trans child or otherwise, will not be having children either.
Abortion will not be an issue for them.
I guess we can only just see where things go, but my point here is, the degree to which Pride is mainstream and accepted, it's expanded profoundly.
Especially since I was a kid.
The degree to which these people are just breaking the law and ignoring the law, and there's no enforcement of the law, shows it's not about LGBTQ.
It's about the police and the government's unwillingness to enforce what is clearly illegal, and thus, we do not exist as a cohesive nation.
Period.
Say what you want, my friends.
The collapse already happened.
We're just watching the slow motion fall.
If someone who lives in West Virginia, next to Maryland, you know, like where we are, When you have two distinct versions of enforcement, when one thing is illegal, you've got problems.
When you have, in Western Maryland, they say, we're a 2A sanctuary.
We will not enforce these laws or whatever.
The state will have to come and do it themselves.
But it is illegal.
You've got a collapse.
We're just watching it in slow motion.
There's no way for society to function when California skirts the law on immigration, and then Texas struggles, or when California gets extra electoral votes due to their illegal immigrant population, and then everyone else is just supposed to expect that their vote matters.
Sorry.
That's the collapse.
Either we are a nation with a federal government that asserts itself, or we are fractured, broken, and on the verge of fighting.
One may argue states have rights and federalism will be the answer to prevent civil war, and I say you are wrong.
It's one thing when Texas is like, here in Texas, you can drink beer.
And then, you know, Missouri is like, well, you can only drink beer if you're this age or, you know, have this criteria.
And then you're like, nah, it's just beer, right?
If there's a law that says, like in California, jaywalking is a fine of 500 bucks, and then in Illinois, it's like jaywalking is a reprimand.
No fine.
The laws are different.
Or they say there's no jaywalking law at all.
You're like, it's not a big deal.
Like, I'll give you an example.
New York, you can't turn right on red in New York City.
I don't know about the rest of the state.
In Illinois, you can.
That's not that big a deal.
You just make sure that if you're in New York, you know the rules of the road, and you might not, and they have no turn on red signs sometimes, you'll get pulled over, and you'll be like, I didn't know.
But you can carry on your life.
When some states are like, murder is okay, and other states are like, murder is not, people are eventually going to be like, the moral difference between us says to me that you are evil and you must be stopped.
Civil War I. Slavery.
The Northern states said, we will not allow the Union to be dissolved, and then abolitionists were like, it's time to go to war to end slavery.
The true catalyst for the Civil War was the dissolution of the Union.
That's why the war happened.
The true conflict before kinetic conflict, like, what led to kinetic conflict was slavery.
At what point do people fight over abortion?
I don't know.
Anyway, here's my point.
The fear, whether it's correct for the right reasons or not, at these events, it shows how ready we are to collapse.
How ready we are to just, how close we are to real violence.
And the fact that people break the law without enforcement shows that collapse may have already occurred.
