Donald Trump survives a third assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, where suspect Cole Allen faces life imprisonment for charges including attempted murder. Guests debate security failures, refute staged conspiracy theories regarding Trump's time travel origins, and condemn media hypocrisy over age-of-consent allegations against the President. The episode further critiques narcissistic journalism during the shooting, analyzes a proposed 2027 autonomous vehicle mandate as a step toward eliminating car ownership, and explores linguistic mistranslations ranging from "Deuteronomy" to historical myths about JFK's "Berliner." Ultimately, the discussion highlights how misinformation and ideological polarization distort reality, from political violence to cultural narratives. [Automatically generated summary]
Now, admittedly, there were more plots, but this is the third actual attempt.
Security camera footage showing this man, identified as Cole Allen, charging full speed into the White House correspondence dinner before being subdued and right on cue, you know, exactly what you'd expect.
There are many people on the left that are saying it's staged, it's fake, no one believes it's actually real.
And these people are not the majority because when you check the search trends, my experience, I mean, I was out.
Doing what one would call touching grass when all of this went down.
I was actually at a bar and I saw people freaking out.
The conversations were pretty intense.
People are genuinely worried about this.
And it's reasonable to believe that this lefty guy from California, who wrote a manifesto saying he wanted to kill Trump and Trump administration officials, tried to do it.
Now he's been charged officially with an assassination attempt against the president, which carries upwards of life in prison, as well as many other charges in D.C. We're getting new information as, of course, this story is developing.
But we'll go through all of that as well as a few other stories.
But this one obviously is the big breaking news.
And the interesting, fun element of the story, surprising to say, considering it's a horrifying story, is that people believe Trump is a time traveler.
I know, right?
I said it was going to be weird and fun.
But there is a post online, a social media account with only one post from two years ago, the name of the shooter.
The image, the profile picture, is a Pepe the Frog wearing a black tie, holding a glass of Chardonnay or champagne or something.
And it looks just like Trump did in the C SPAN video.
I believe it's C SPAN.
Of when this shooting started happening.
Many people are saying this proves Trump is a time traveler, but there's a lot more than just that element of it.
One month ago, people found these old drawings from 100 years ago of an airship with a golden haired man, a blonde guy, piloting it.
An artist from over 100 years ago drew these weird airships with Trump written on them.
And so, of course, this proves, according to conspiracy theorists, that Trump is a time traveler.
But we'll break down the serious element of the story and then the serious nature of.
The left's response, saying that it's the right who's been violent.
We'll talk about that in a lot more.
Before we do, we got a great sponsor, my friends.
It's Pocket Hose.
You guys got to check out Pocket Hose, man.
This thing's amazing.
I'm excited to tell you guys about the number one expanded garden hose, the brand new product, the Pocket Hose Ballistic.
The number one expandable hose in the world.
Super lightweight, easy to manage, easy to store.
Turn the water on, it grows, turn the water off, and it shrinks back to pocket size.
The Pocket Hose Ballistic is reinforced liquid crystal polymer used in bulletproof vests, making the anti burst sleeve practically bulletproof.
And that liquid crystal polymer fiber is actually five times stronger than steel.
Comes the pocket pivot, which gives you total freedom of movement at the spigot with 360 degree rotation.
You move, it follows, and the water flows enhanced with an upgraded UV coating.
So the hose looks new year after year.
Re engineered thicker washers that resist leaks.
Pocket hose carries over 100 patents worldwide.
It's amazing.
Now, for a limited time, when you purchase a new pocket hose ballistic, you'll get a free 360 degree rotating pocket pivot and a free thumb drive nozzle.
Just text Tim.
To 64,000.
That's Tim to 64,000 for your two free gifts with purchase.
We got some big updates coming, but you got to get in the Discord community.
Tens of thousands of people hanging out, sharing news.
It's not what you know, it's who you know.
And if you're looking to start a project, you want to be involved, you got to check out timcast.com's Discord because as a member, you're supporting the work that we do and the community is supporting you.
But you'll also get to call in.
To the uncensored portion of the show coming up at 10 p.m.
So don't forget to smash that like button, share the show with everyone you know.
Joining us tonight, we actually have a couple of guests hanging out.
Suspect charged with attempted assassination of Trump at Washington dinner.
Cole Thomas Allen, 31, was also charged with two firearms offenses.
When he appeared in court in Washington, D.C. on Monday, he did not enter a plea.
He was carrying a semi automatic handgun, a pump action shotgun, and three knives as he charged past a security checkpoint at the White House Correspondents Association dinner on Saturday, say prosecutors.
A Secret Service agent was hit but not seriously wounded during the attack.
Now, we do have this footage posted by Donald Trump.
Many of you may have seen, but we'll play for you now.
There it is.
He runs full speed through.
They go after him.
Now, I believe he was mostly uninjured.
The story is that as soon as Trump announced he'd be at the dinner, this guy booked a hotel room, checked in the day before.
He wrote a manifesto outlining what his plans were, why he was doing what he was doing.
I don't want to read the full thing.
It's not really a manifesto, more I would call it a manifesto because it's basically a half page.
But he basically said, Who he was going to kill.
And he said from the highest ranking to the lowest, Trump admin officials, including Trump himself, and that he'd be willing to kill anyone who got in his way.
Strangely, for some reason, he said he would not kill Mr. Patel.
It's weird because in the manifesto, one of his main concerns was Trump being allegedly a pedo, in his own words, which is, you know, that kind of refers to the Epstein files.
And like Kash Patel dropped the ball just as much on the Epstein files.
He said, I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.
To be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I've had to do something about it.
I want to just stress without getting into great detail.
The first, there's two main reasons that you'll know this man is retarded.
First, he tried to kill a bunch of people.
Like right off the bat, something's wrong with his brain.
And the second thing is, in the stupidest way imaginable, this guy's saying that the first opportunity he has is to try and run full speed into a heavily guarded hotel that's like he was never going to make it.
This guy's really, really dumb.
There are people that are attacking law enforcement saying it wasn't secure enough.
These people are failing to understand the layout of this building.
You could not just run into the ballroom.
He had to run around and go downstairs.
It was a long corridor, and there was security at every layer.
So then we go, you have to take one escalator down, and that was part of the step and read the red carpet.
And at the escalator, somebody's saying, Where are you going?
We said, Oh, we're just going to a pre party.
No ID, no proof, no metal thing.
We go down, and that's where he ran in the first level down.
And that's where you see him running in because there's an entrance there with a step and repeat.
So he's on the wrong level.
A, he's on the wrong level because then Blair and I go down one more level through an escalator, and there's all these pre parties that start at 5 30, they go to 7 15.
And there were hundreds, I mean, probably a thousand officials, secretaries.
If that guy really knew what he's doing, he wanted to hurt people.
They never check for guns.
They never check for weapons.
He could have been in any one of those parties, right, Brick?
I don't think a guy who said in his manifesto he's not going to let a pedophile rapist coat his hands with his crimes would intentionally get caught at a party killing people where Trump was not.
Like, his manifesto makes it clear that he wants to kill Trump.
I don't think he's going to be like, let me not have that.
Like, clearly he didn't go to those because Trump was not there.
Having been there and like kind of seen the situation, and then going on my phone and like the whole world thinks it's fake, I don't necessarily blame anybody because there's been such a lack of transparency for the Butler shooting, for a number of things.
So I think people's trust in the government institutions is just.
Even if he wanted to get, not purposely just wanted to get Trump, it was very unsecure because we were in the ABC party, the Fox party, with the highest level official of the government, and never once they checked for anything, right?
Yeah, I was speaking to a gentleman who was like talking to Wolf Blitzer as the whole situation went down.
And he's like, I thought they were targeting Wolf Blitzer at first because it was like literally right in front of him as if he would have presumed that he was the target.
And then it took him a few seconds to kind of realize, like, oh, it's Trump thing.
And it's just like, and it was, and if you're a psychopathic lib, then you're probably laughing, thinking like, yep, because they all cheer for this and they're cheering for it now.
And I think it was Van Jones actually who said, this guy lived, which means the left will make him a hero like Luigi Mangione.
Could you imagine being a lefty who thinks you're going to be a hero for taking out Trump, but then everyone thinks you're a Fed who worked with Trump to help him out?
In response to this story, of course, we're getting a lot of people highlighting the left's call for violence.
Katie Pavlich saying, Outside the White House Correspondence Center, the dude on the right hit me with his sign and it says, Death to All of Them.
You can see the sign on the left, Death to Tyrant, just one, not more than one.
And this was posted about an hour after the shooting took place.
We've got this clip of Hassan Piker going massively viral.
And, you know, normally I wouldn't play a clip like this in the show because it is obscene and it's a call for violence, but I think it is the utmost of importance that you all hear.
Hassan Piker is campaigning with Democrat candidates.
He is being profiled by the New York Times.
This is what he had to say.
unidentified
Well, my understanding is that the property owners who have properties there choose just not to rent it at all.
That's just one clip from Hassan Piker that's gone massively viral as the left has continually advocated for violence, even at this event.
And my favorite thing, I want to make sure this is all clear to everybody, and you can share this with friends and family if they ever ask.
They like to say the right is more violent.
Most terror comes from the right.
The truth is, the left is where most violence comes from.
And I'll break this down for you how they lie with statistics.
Charlie Kirk had an event.
Look the video up.
A guy is in line asking questions, and he's a white nationalist.
And Charlie Kirk says, Get out.
You are not welcome here.
And everyone claps and cheers.
That's the right.
They say no to extremist ideology.
On the left, Hassan Piker campaigns for.
With the Democrats, and he has advocated for murder multiple times.
What they will then do is two things.
We have seen this with the SPLC indictment.
They will pay for Nazis to show up to conservative events so they can say, see, the right is Nazis.
Then, if some wackaloon white supremacist commits a crime, they'll say, that's right wing violence, despite the fact that identitarianism is prominent in the mainstream left.
So, if you have a guy who's a white identitarian and you're a black identitarian, you're something else.
The mainstream Republican, conservative, and moderates in this country do not welcome violent extremists to their rallies the way the New York Times platforms Hassan Piker and the way Democrats put him on stage.
So, if you want to talk about where the violence is coming from, you've got fringe wacko elements of disparate ideologies, and then you have the mainstream left that says Hassan Piker's call for death and violence is acceptable on stage.
I'll just be scrolling, and it's like 200,000 likes.
When will someone do it?
Or alluding to taking out the president.
And so it's like for people saying that it has to be staged because who would do this, who would actually, it's like the entire, not the entire, but like a huge portion of leftist culture right now is assassination culture.
Yeah, that's why I think like most of the, and I'm not saying, you know, it's not here or there if you believe in these things, but the people that believe in that all these recent assassinations or assassination attempts are staged, I think it's like cope ultimately because like you're basically downplaying the real threat, which is that like leftists, your neighbors, quite frankly, literally would prefer for you to die.
And that's like a really tough thought to wrestle with.
Like, that doesn't make you feel comfortable.
That really kind of breaks the social compact.
And so it's a lot easier to assume, like, no, no, no, there's some shadowy figure that's actually orchestrating all of this.
And, like, that actually brings you a bit of comfort.
Like, at least someone's in control.
But in reality, it's like, no, we're just rapidly descending into like score settling.
Well, I don't think it's that we've normalized it.
It's that the left is embracing it more and more.
And I think the issue is, you know, look, you got a nice little golden retriever and he's looking at you and he's wagging your tail and you don't really think twice about it.
Then you got a ravenous, rabid dog screaming and snarling at you.
You're like, I'm going to stay away from that one.
It's easy to reprimand the dog that's being nice and bop him on the nose.
But that ravenous, Rabbit rot while you're not going anywhere near.
And that's what we have in this country.
Conservatives don't want violence, don't want people who advocate for violence.
They denounce it, the left cheers for it.
It really comes down to one simple question If there's a run of the mill, regular person standing in the street, and one person is wagging his finger at them, they're going to, I'm going to yell at you.
The other person who's threatening to murder them, they're going to say, I'm going to avoid you.
Please don't hurt me.
That's what we get.
That's Antifa.
The cops, why do they let the criminals go?
Why does Antifa get away with whatever they want?
It's like I've said a million times, there is no fear.
From any of these big institutional, these big tech companies, that Carl Benjamin will lead a bunch of post liberals or classical liberals with pitchforks and burn down a social media headquarters.
It's not going to happen.
But it is a guarantee that Antifa will come with bricks and sledgehammers and kill people.
Bethany Mandel's got this tweet about Katie Porter.
She said, Imagine Barack Obama surviving three assassination attempts, and 18 hours later, Republicans sent a fundraising email like this F Trump, Katie Porter writes.
I'm Katie Porter.
Some of you know me as the whiteboard lady who held CEOs and billionaires accountable in Congress.
So today, I want to start with one simple, powerful message we all agree on.
Say it with me F Trump.
That's right, F Trump.
Together, we're going to kick Trump's A in November.
I mean, heck of a thing.
To send right after Trump was subjected to an assassination attempt.
I was thinking today, like, what happens next is technocracy, whether we want it or not.
It's either going to be a communist technocracy if this leftist crap takes over, or it's going to be hopefully an American technocracy with like, Free speech and gun rights and property rights.
Otherwise, I was, I've been having a, you know, we've brought up time and time again on this show my position, of course, that the Constitution does not exist.
The Constitution is a figment of your imagination.
And the reason I say that is because the Constitution, as we adhere to it today, is wholly different to what it was in 1850.
And I don't mean the Bill of Rights, I mean the articles of the Constitution.
We don't even have our government functioning the same way based on the structure of government of the Constitution.
The issue is half the country believes a Constitution that does one thing, the other half believes in a Constitution that does another thing, and they're arguing with each other about how they are the true heirs to the American fortune.
You don't convince either side that the other side is actually correct ever, never happens.
You will not convince an American constitutional Republican to give up their traditional view of the Constitution, nor will you convince a Democrat to let Republicans. AKA fascists in their mind take control of this government.
These worldviews are incongruous and they are large.
It is a multicultural democracy and a constitutional republic occupying the same territory.
And the end result is this.
And I don't see how we get anything other than an escalation of it.
Purely the confidence of the people that exists below it.
A constitution is what constitutes a people and their moral worldview.
And we do not have a constitution in this country.
So, right now, I'd argue that we are closer than ever to collapse due to one fact, and that is the point you're making that no one cares.
I mean, they care a bit.
Like I was explaining, I saw people crowding around being like, wow, I can't believe it happened again.
But I think for the most part, it's like, well, it's the third time.
The first time it was like, oh my God.
Now it's like, wow, the third time, huh?
The issue is this shows with three instances.
More and more people do not feel that they will be penalized by a government.
They do not feel that there is a system in place for which they would be wrong to oppose or that it could inflict something upon them.
You have governments where if you speak out in the wrong way, you die.
You go to the gulag and people fear this, so they shut up.
You have governments with just general strong law enforcement, and people say, well, if I were to go commit a heinous act, I will be killed, or the moral structure of, if I were to do this, everyone would hate me.
But you don't have any of those things right now.
These people not only feel that either you will not be held to account, you'll be let out by some judge, or you'll go and sit in a cell and they'll write books about you and sing songs for you, celebrating you.
They also just don't think there is a functional government they have to morally adhere to.
I want to pull up this clip that's going viral where people are claiming it's fake.
Well, he's completely fake because if you pull up 15 comments and think that's reality, I got a bridge to sell you.
We have long known about sock puppet opinion blasting on the internet.
So, for this guy to be like, it's fake, look.
And then he just shows you a bunch of comments.
I'm going to debunk this retard immediately by showing you Google Trends over the weekend with Cole Allen having, like, Five plus million searches on Google relative to the next highest at 200,000, which is Rutter Clipper.
Yeah, I wonder, do people care?
Well, what about a 1,000% increase in search volume on a guy's name?
I'd go ahead and say, yeah, that likely indicates people care because they're actively seeking out information on it.
Now, he makes the argument that many people think it's fake.
No, that's just you retards.
Most people don't think it's fake because they don't live in retard land.
I know because I was out at a bar when this happened and no one even thought to mention the possibility of a stage, staging of an event.
It wasn't until you go online and you find people like Kyle Kalinske, who, mind you, thought Trump would lose Iowa in 2024, and who doesn't know what a farm is.
These are not exaggerations.
He's saying it's fake.
I want to stress this to you guys.
Kyle Kalinske making the argument that this is staged and it's fake, or that nobody cares and everyone thinks it's staged.
This guy took a picture from an airplane at Farms and said, I wonder why it looks like that.
Well, because the only alternative to just saying it's fake is having to admit, if you're a partisan like he is and you're on the left, that your side is a side engaging in this.
Like, unless you want to pull out some bullshit both sides thing, but it's really not both sides.
Only one side's president's been shot at in recent history.
Only one side had a podcaster influencer murdered in cold blood, Charlie Kirk.
If it was both sides, there'd be leftist podcasters getting shot at.
And God forbid, I don't want that.
You know, Biden would have been shot at, and thank God it didn't happen.
But I made an offhanded comment about Gavin McGinnis about the Proud Boys, how I was concerned that it might, you know, when the Proud Boys and Antifa had been fighting in the street a little bit, I was like, it reminds me of the brown shirts and the black shirts, the Nazis and the commies going at it pre World War II.
So if even this, you know, quote unquote, as the narrative goes, this extreme group of Proud Boys, right, if they're willing to de escalate, We're not seeing that on the other side.
These groups don't deescalate.
And you don't even have to be a huge figure or all the president of the United States to have Antifa show up to your stuff.
But, you know, when I had like 100,000 subscribers on YouTube, I was doing live talks and I had people come up with bike locks that were Antifa.
I want to just take a look at the chronicle, the events, because Trump is called every name in the book, every day of the week.
And he finally decides to go in front of 50.
1500 of his most vocal critics, right?
He's cordially going to go there.
And the night before, we were at New York for a club.
And I said, How are they going to treat him?
I don't know.
Are they going to stand up and protest?
They're going to boom?
I wasn't sure how they treat him in the room.
But then another assassination attempt happens.
After that, he says, I want to keep going.
I don't want this thing to be closed down.
He really wanted to, he doesn't want these psychos to let him ruin the evening, right?
So he goes back and he's still really nice to the White House president, Wu Ji Zhang.
Was really conciliatory to her, really complimentary to her of the evening when she is so nasty towards him every day.
This woman from CBS, age one, but he still was kind and nice to her.
So, for all them to keep blasting Trump, and they're starting already the news media because Nora O'Donnell the next night in CBS had to read the manifesto right to his face, and I'm glad he gave it back to her.
I tell you, man, this conversation, this is a little bit of a tangent, but like, pedophile rapists, like, we were talking, age of consent in the United States is generally 16 in like 30 states.
And pedophiles, like, prepubescent rape, statutory rape is different than aggressive, violent rape.
So, like, these words, man, like, yo, if a guy hooked up with a 17 year old girl in a place where it was legal when he was 40, That's not a pedophile and it's not a rape.
Following the shooting, a ton of pro Trump accounts said, We need a ballroom, which helps ignite the conspiracy theory that Trump staged this to get a ballroom, which makes no sense because a shooting, they can advocate for a ballroom from it, but it's not going to create any legal standing for them to get a ballroom.
All of these people came to the conclusion that after they saw what happened at the White House correspondence dinner, their first thought was all independently Trump needs his ballroom.
The statistical likelihood of this happening in a vacuum, if we are to stipulate that these people are not coordinated, the statistical likelihood of this happening that they all came to the same conclusion.
I just want to stress that Meghan McCain is reviled by most of these people as well.
They're not in group chats together.
I would also stress that Ashley is correct.
There are group chats.
It's not that they are in, so there's a mixture.
One, group chats have always existed for a variety of reasons.
Some government officials will create group chats for the purpose of messaging, they do exist.
I don't think they're that big.
However, I had a group chat maybe like eight years ago that was like eight people, and it was like six people I did not know.
And it was just about politics in DC.
And everybody kind of argued with each other.
It wasn't really anything coordinated.
I was also in a group chat called a journalist back in, I think this is like 2014 or 2013 on Facebook.
These journalists were controversial because, as it turns out, prominent journalists in the corporate press were all in these same group chats.
And it wasn't that they were giving instructions to the journalists on what to write about, it's that they were all talking about the exact same things.
There is a secret cabal of journalists that mandate all of the companies run the same stories.
When in reality, all of these people are just friends with each other and they think the same things as they talk to each other.
I think it's also important to note that one of the main group chats in which they coordinate this messaging is literally called Fight, Fight, Fight after the attempt on Trump's life.
Ashley, I'll criticize you if I think you deserve criticism, as I would with anybody, be it Milo or anybody else.
This is, I would give it a good old 50% correct.
There are group chats, there are government officials in these group chats.
They don't create these group chats for the express purpose of, hey guys, I'm going to give you the official government narrative that you need to say.
These are just birds of a feather flocking together.
And it's more like if you want to be insulting, say it's a bunch of Lennings walking off a cliff.
That's one way you can describe them.
They're not.
Intentionally saying, Tell us, master, what to do.
They're all just saying the same thing, like, Man, if we had a ballroom, this wouldn't have happened.
And then someone tweets it, and then someone else retweets it, and then they're all talking about it.
I'm so mad they're blocking the ballroom, and then you get a narrative.
Because if you want to believe that the UK and Russia and China don't all have ballrooms for their officials, clearly they do.
Why America doesn't have one, I don't know.
I'm not like passionate about it, but clearly a conclusion if the Trump, if the president has to be at the Hilton and there's an assassination attempt, He probably shouldn't be like down the street at the Hilton.
He should probably be at a more secure location like the White House.
Yeah, as if that's like a crazy concept after this incident.
It'd be like, yeah, we need a book.
It's like if they came out and they all tweeted in unison, like, hey, this is why we need to pass the Hot Rotisserie Chicken Act, it'd be like, okay, maybe they're right.
I got to give a shout out to this guy, humbled voter, who says the hypocrisy and then posts an image of a ton of anti Trump leftists, you know, all posting the exact same thing about Trump.
Conservatives posting the exact same thing.
I don't believe that Awaken with JP or being libertarian coordinated their messages.
They're just all thinking similar things because that's what people do.
I had a group chat back in 2018 19 when I was talking about with DC journalists where I was telling them a civil war was coming and they told me I was crazy.
I voted for him, but I think he deserves criticism sometimes.
I've praised him.
I think he's the greatest president of our generation.
Even with the Iran war that everyone's mad about and I did not vote for, I still look back at all the other presidents and I'm like, eh, Trump's still a marginal victory.
But when I criticized Trump two years ago, no one says anything.
When DeSantis was running and we were in that weird space and I was like, I'm for DeSantis, no one in the media was like, Tim Pool breaks from Trump.
Today, all of a sudden, media outlets are like, Tim Pool mocks Trump, saying he's humiliated.
Well, I think what it is is the left is like locked out of the zeitgeist because what's dominated the zeitgeist for the last six months is the Magus Civil War.
Did you see what Tucker said?
Oh, did you see what Jack Pasopic, Rick Kahn, you know, like whoever they're going at it and everything?
And it's like, no, they're just, the left is completely locked out of the zeitgeist.
So the only way they can like participate is like, yeah, he's with us.
I got a call from the Wall Street Journal, like, we'd like to have a conversation about And then Reuters calls me, and I'm like, yeah, I think Trump's overall net positive.
See, criticism is like a complete, it's very autistic.
It's like a criticism means a complete condemnation.
It's like, or it's normal to criticize the person you voted for because that's what you're supposed to do.
Unlike if you want to be a Democrat and vote in a vegetable and then act like everything's perfect for four years, even though we don't have a president.
I'm going to say this I believe that the majority of people who have turned on Trump.
Are liars and hypocrites.
I believe that Tucker Carlson is a liar and a hypocrite.
And I will tell you why.
When Tucker first came out critical of Israel and saying the things he was saying about Qatar and Islam, whatever, I'm like, oh, Tucker's allowed to have his opinions.
People have opinions.
Sometimes I disagree with them.
Tucker is always, you know, he's had some good ideas.
Here's the thing Tucker came out and said that he is tormented by having supported Trump.
He is sorry for misleading people.
He didn't mean it, he didn't do it willingly.
And then his brother literally says, maybe that Miriam Adelson money came, you know, for some reason, and he laughs.
Tucker knew 100% because we all did.
That Donald Trump took an estimated $100 to $160 million from Miriam Adelson to support his campaign.
And it was reported far and wide this was money given to Trump as a quid pro quo to take the West Bank, that he would support Israel's effort to take the West Bank.
And that's why he got the money.
Literally every single person knew this.
Donald Trump hired John Bolton, fired 59 Tomahawk missiles into Syria, and killed Soleimani.
The idea that they are now shocked that Donald Trump is fighting in support of Israel.
Supports them.
He moved the embassy to Jerusalem in his first term.
The people coming out now going, oh my, I never knew.
They are liars, every single one of them.
If you want to criticize Trump for doing all of those things, please do so.
And with my blessing, Trump should not be launching tomahawks in Assyria or dropping bombs, whatever.
Not a fan.
But if you're going to come to me and claim you did not know when literally on this show we covered stories with your comments talking about how y'all actually knew, you are liars and hypocrites.
And I am sick of all of that.
All of these people.
Now, I can say this of Ashley.
She's always been nice to us.
She's been a friend.
Talked to her periodically, not really all that often.
Her coming out and saying all of MAGA is paid obviously comes from a place of rejection and animosity.
It is not correct that all of MAGA is paid and coordinated, but she's obviously pissed at a lot of these people.
However, many of these people in the inverse, seemingly coordinated, used to be pro Trump because it was the popular thing to do.
Woke was cringe.
Bud Light was boycotted.
And these people all jumped on board.
And now that the trend says don't like Trump, they're acting shocked.
That Donald Trump took money in support of Israel.
Yeah, there's literally, I was looking at the other day, there's literally a quote from him, or it was a clip from like 2012, and he was like, Netanyahu's like the greatest political leader in the Middle East.
Like, I'm the most ardent Zionist.
He literally said, I'm an ardent Zionist.
Yeah, he was like, going into the 2016 presidential cycle, he's like, I'm going to be the most pro Israel president ever.
And then all of a sudden, like, people are surprised now.
I mean, again, I, you know, I'm vocally opposed to the Iran war.
I think it's a bad idea, et cetera.
I've, you know, explained that on the show a few times, but I'm not like, Shocked.
I'm not like this is a scandalous.
It does on the No New Wars thing feel like, you know, a bit of a sort of renege, so to speak.
But again, the idea that he's pro Israel, you're shocked by that.
It's like, first of all, he's a baby boomer.
That's like all of them.
Second of all, he said it over and over and over and over again.
You kind of got to believe the guy when he like makes that his core foreign policy position for the better half of a century at this point.
I literally remember people were correctly pointing out that, you know, going into 2023, the Biden winner is that Trump, like all these legal troubles, he was running out of money and he had to start receiving donations from, you know, traditional Republican donors.
Yeah.
That's like not a surprising thing.
And I remember people that were commenting on that.
They're like, oh, that's interesting.
And then all of a sudden now they're like shocked by it.
I think it was less that he was undercover about it, but I think there's just been like a more in mass people are actually tuning into issues with Israel.
People actually care about it now.
I think people just didn't really care back then, too.
Most of what these people are saying, it's mass formation psychosis.
They're not talking about legitimate criticisms of Israel.
Some people are, like Dave Smith, is a really great example of somebody who has legitimate criticisms.
I am not talking about him.
I'll give you another example because Clint Russell's welcome on the show.
But he literally made a video called Israel Derangement Syndrome Debunked.
And I can only say that I believe that Clint is, I'll be nice, Clint, you're being untoward because you know that my statement on what Israel Derangement Syndrome is not you.
And I literally said my libertarian friends have legitimate arguments against Israel.
What he then did was, When I argue that there are people who think Israel is controlling the opiate drug trafficking trade in West Virginia, that's derangement.
He then claims he's debunking Israel derangement by making normal arguments about Israel.
He's doing that, in my opinion, Clint.
You're doing it, in my opinion, because it gets clicks because you're attacking me to the Israel derangement syndrome people because you want them to follow you.
And I think that's stupid, but you're welcome to come on the show, and then you'll be forced to agree with me because you know I'm right.
The point that I made is that every time one of these issues comes up with Israel and foreign funding, People just do not understand literally any of U.S. foreign policy.
It's just only Israel exists.
And so I'm like, yeah, you know, I've long said we shouldn't fund Israel and we shouldn't fund Ukraine and we should stop spending money.
But why all of a sudden now are the people who know my opinion is we shouldn't have foreign funding for Israel, Ukraine, or otherwise are acting like I'm in favor of Israel for criticizing people who are retarded for blaming Israel for opiate trafficking in West Virginia?
The conspiracy theorists argue that Charlie Kirk was murdered by Israel because he had turned on Israel, right?
Yeah.
He had this text message where he said that the donors are falling into every Jewish stereotype, giving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause.
For that reason, Israel killed him.
I then asked this question of several people.
How come Candace Owens is featured on YouTube, front page promoted, despite breaking the rules?
I have been told by all of these people it's because Israel wants to be hated.
They need the world to go to war with them so that the Messianic era will occur.
If that's true, then why did they kill Charlie Kirk?
Both cannot be true.
If Charlie was turning on Israel, isn't that what you just claimed they wanted?
They wanted the world to turn on Israel so that could foment a war from the world to go to war against Israel?
That would bring on the Messianic era?
If that's the case, why would they not just have Charlie Kirk do this?
And then, if the argument is, okay, well, they don't want to be hated, then why would Candace Owens be propped up and promoted by YouTube despite breaking the rules?
Who's in control of these things?
None of it makes sense.
It's all mass formation psychosis.
And the people who claim they're just now looking at Israel are lying for clicks because they're weak willed retards.
I was going to say something else, but I'll say that for the after show.
I think that aside from legitimate criticisms of Israel and involvement with other countries, I think also some of it, like we were mentioning, it's.
A lot of cope when people talk about how violence is or the shootings are all staged or it's a both sides thing.
It's kind of a cope to not admit how bad it is on the left.
I think some of it is a cope to not admit or acknowledge how corrupt the institutions in this country are and how the CIA has done a lot of fucked up things like this.
I would rather look at our own institutions if we're going to be looking at stuff first, but people seem to skip past that.
Like, it's not as if the CIA is above assassinations and stuff like that, you know?
Yeah, if someone asked me, Do you think there was a conspiracy to kill Charlie Kirk?
The answer is of course there was because people knew on social media that Charlie was going to be killed.
Something was going to happen.
They indicated foreknowledge.
There were reports of multiple vehicles outside of the alleged assassin's home.
There was a weirdly, seemingly scripted conversation.
Certainly did not seem like this guy acted alone, at least based on the surface level evidence that we have.
So then, if it was not just some wackaloon lefties who did it, but there was some capability behind it, who is the first group of people that it would make sense killed Charlie Kirk?
Uniparty Democrats?
Because Charlie Kirk is the one who got Donald Trump elected?
Turning Point USA rallied all of these people into voting for Donald Trump.
And if you want to stop Donald Trump, you need to stop Charlie Kirk.
Then you need someone who's going to prop up and push all, you need to prop up somebody who's going to push all of the conservatives who are weak willed away from Trump.
Hey, wow, there's a handful of people that are doing that conveniently.
Let's jump to this clip to carry on that story.
We've got this video from the White House correspondents that are shooting.
Then, when his wife tries picking up the slack to save his organization, she gets attacked in every possible direction by all of these people in the most insane way imaginable.
And I'm going to say psyop for a couple of reasons.
First, as I mentioned before, the RPMs on the phrase Erica Kirk are disproportionately high, meaning you will get more views and make more money attacking Erica Kirk than doing anything else.
Seriously.
You want to make finance videos?
You will make a comparable amount of money, but less views than if you just insult Erica Kirk.
And I think, unfortunately, it also is, in its own way, very organic.
I think a lot of people just are hopping onto it.
And this goes back to like, it's not okay in the eyes of like at least the psychosis on the internet happening to theorize anything other than Erica being behind it or Israel being behind it.
Like, there's no other options.
I personally don't think it was only.
The guy who's NGO for it right now or going to Entrava for it right now.
I think it was probably him and some other people.
I think there's reasons to think that.
I haven't seen anything that's convinced me Erica herself is behind it.
And so for me, I'm kind of like, okay, if you guys are right that Erica is behind it, then I suppose the hate is pretty justified.
But if you're wrong, if there's like any chance you're wrong, which I think is very likely you're wrong, then you're just abusing a widow.
Then on X, someone takes the video, slows it down a little bit, adds creepy music with like eerie violin, and then zooms in on her eyes and does a boomerang effect.
So she's going, And then it shows someone, there'll be like a person in the bottom corner, like a TikTok video going, This is weird.
Why is she so weird?
And that's all people ever see of her.
And I will give you an example going back to yesteryear.
I remember back, I remember when Sarah Palin was running, what was it, 2008?
And I was talking to someone in Chicago who said, Well, I mean, the problem with McCain isn't just that he's like a fascist.
You know, Sarah Palin thinks she can see Russia from her house.
And I went, That's Tina Fey.
She's like, No, Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her house.
I said, No.
Tina Fey on Saturday Night Live said, I can the right shit from my house, and it was a joke.
But people heard that and thought Sarah Palin literally said it.
What did Sarah Palin actually say?
She said when she was campaigning with McCain, she did an interview where she said, I would do great on, I'm paraphrasing, on foreign policy, especially as we're dealing with Russia, because as many people know, we are only about 50 or so miles away from Russian territory.
In fact, from the westernmost point of Alaska, you can actually see Russia.
So with the trade routes going through the Bering Strait, I've already negotiated these terms with other countries.
And I'm like, that's a great point.
She already, as governor of Alaska, has foreign policy experience.
Then Tina Fey makes a joke I can see Russia from my house.
And liberals were like, I can't believe Sarah Pilot said that.
That's the world we live in with mass formation psychosis.
So when these people make fake Erica Kirk videos, they go, Did you see that weird video where she was like making a weird face?
No, but I saw the edited one where they played eerie music.
You believe that?
Yes, they do, because it's an op.
When Candace came out and attacked Nick Shirley, it should have been obvious to everyone.
She dug up a year old video from Nick Shirley and accused him of fabricating his stories to discredit the work he is doing, exposing fraud from the Democrats.
The only conclusion I can make looking at the big picture.
And maybe I'm wrong, is that Candace is working with Democrats to destroy Turning Point USA after the fact to stop them from winning, not as a Democrat, but as a spoiler.
Erica Kirk is evil, don't support Turning Point USA.
Israel is bad for a million and one reasons.
The earth is flat.
I don't know.
That's what she said.
And all of this propped up on YouTube despite breaking the rules.
Now, you may be saying, I don't believe her a second.
Then why is Nick Fuentes banned despite them saying very similar things?
When you have this, like, I certainly can't understand the psychotic extremes that people are going to and attacking her, but it must be insanely difficult to have to decide between standing up for what Charlie built or just quitting and leaving because you know that's what they're trying to make you do.
And can I tell you how sad it is that it doesn't actually, for at least people like that, the middle aged women with no wives whose husbands probably hate them if they have husbands, unfortunately, it doesn't get more complicated than like she's a beautiful, young, blonde woman with beautiful children who had the perfect, seeming husband, perfect, like nuclear family life.
And a lot of bitches are jealous, and a lot of men are jealous.
I want to jump to this viral tweet from the shooting at the White House Correspondence Dinner from Olivia Reingold, where she is being mercilessly mocked because as this security incident was occurring, I'm making fun of Fox News, by the way, during the attempted assassination, she turns her camera on and films her own face the whole time.
She tweets, terrifying, a few ground shaking knocks by my seat at White House Correspondence Dinner, unclear of shooting, I am okay, we are trying to exit now.
The point is, we can see her face, but I want you to imagine what it's like to have been her sitting there, taking your phone and selfieing while this is going on.
Because if I was in the White House correspondence dinner and a shooting happened, the first thing I do is I click live on my phone and I'd hold it towards whatever was going on.
I would try and not hold it in a way that looked like a weapon, by the way.
And then I would start explaining what was happening.
Guys, we're at the White House correspondence center.
Reports are that shots may have been fired.
We're taking cover right now.
I'm not going to expose.
I don't want to.
And I would not be filming my own face.
However, it is fine if periodically you turn the phone around.
That's what I used to do.
You film the moment, you explain what happened, then you can turn it back to you and say, here's where I am right now.
In the age of deepfakes, that's actually a pretty good idea to verify that it's an actual video, even though you could deepfake your face into the thing, but it makes it a lot more like, you know.
There was a shot, and then four that Secret Service shot.
And I think they're saying, I don't know how confirmed it is, like you just said, that there was one Secret Service person who was shot, and he got hit in the bulletproof vest.
That's kind of the thing is like either she does one of like the 300 angles that we have already that has like 20 likes or she blows up, gets 10 million likes.
She's like, it would be really sad if like she did her hair and the whole reason for the selfie was that she wanted to turn her head back so you could see the whatever that's called.
I'm telling you guys, it's time to get some chickens, buy some land in the middle of nowhere, because our generation is cooked.
You can live in a city, you can have luxuries, but put bars on your windows and buy an in house cage like they do in South Africa, because it's just going to keep getting worse.
These are the people that are supposed to be providing news, and this is what our generation does.
Well, I remember when I was in Pretoria and I was talking to some local guys and I was like, you know, I don't remember how it came up, but I was basically explaining to them that in the United States, you can just walk up and like knock on someone's door, you know, and oftentimes people will answer it.
And some communities, they don't even lock their doors.
And they were like, what are you talking about?
Because they didn't even understand that like that's a South Africa is a unique situation in which you have like basically a prison that you live in.
They don't understand you can just like walk up and knock on someone's door.
So, what they'll do is they'll take a needle, prick themselves, and then prick a random person in like a touristy area because they believe that AIDS is a curse and that if they transfer the curse to you, it'll cure them.
They also have the highest incidence per capita of baby rape.
I mean, literal babies, because they also believe that you can transfer the disease, the curse, To like the pure baby.
So it's like this whole idea that like you can just, like accelerationism is going to, you know, create a more right wing environment in the United States is like, no, you just get crushed, actually.
I didn't want to believe it at first, but I do now.
I believe time travel is real, and I believe President Trump is a time traveler, Uncle John Tesla.
Image published on October 20th, 2021.
Butler assassination attempt, July 13th, 2024.
And so watch this real quick, and I'll explain it in a second.
People are claiming that the pixel art is some kind of like mashup of the Trump Butler photo, right?
And this has to do with the Henry Martinez post.
Two years ago, Henry Martinez posted Cole Allen and literally nothing else.
That's all the account ever posted, the name of the shooter.
He's wearing a black bow tie.
It's a Pepe with a wine glass, smiling at the camera, wearing a black bow tie.
And in the image that was published on C SPAN right before Trump was escorted off, he is sitting there smirking at the camera with a bow tie and a wine glass in front of him.
The banner image for the account was a picture from a website called Time Machine.
Which they people believe you can overlap the butler photo.
Now, that last one I think is a little bit silly, but it is funny that this black tie tuxedo Pepe profile picture from 2023 tweeted out Cole Allen.
What I will say is we know the tweet is from 2023.
That being said, the image could have been updated whenever, the profile banner could have been put whenever.
A lot of people are claiming this is proof that Trump is a time traveler.
Yeah, I think it was just like, you know, people just kind of, I mean, look, it's hard to index like all these dead accounts because they don't come up in searches, but there's a lot of these that are going around.
So obviously someone just searched Cole Allen, scrolled to the bottom, and this is.
Which, of course, proves Trump is a time traveler and went back to the 1800s.
To tell a story of his son to Ingersoll Lockwood.
And, you know, the reason why those drawings of those weird machines, see this one right here?
You see, what happened was Trump went back to 1890, where Charles Delshaw, the artist, was sitting on his porch and he sees this strange vehicle lands with Trump.
What if like the Mandela effect is just Trump string up accidentally the timeline?
Like they go back in time to like the late 70s, 80s, and there's like a manuscript for the Berenstein Bears, and he spills a coffee on it, and it like smudges the E, and he's like, oh crap, we gotta get out of here.
The real thing is time is it's not an illusion, it's a measurement of motion, and I mean, there are theories we talked a little bit.
I don't really know the scientific theory, but the time flows in two directions at once.
It's not really like a.
I think you said, Blair, our perception of motion is thus that we've written time and that we log with the things that have changed before, whatever that means.
And then they brush against each other and then go back.
And what happens is, in the 1700s, some guy builds a house and it's like, you know, near a church or a cemetery or whatever.
And he goes inside and he's standing upstairs and he's like, ah, built a brand new house.
And all of a sudden, He sees a translucent man in strange clothes look at him and go, and then he goes, it's cursed.
And then he writes down how the house is cursed.
Hundreds of years later, the story of the cursed house persists.
And then in the year 2020, some dude is going to the cursed house, being like, This is the famous cursed house.
And he goes upstairs, and then all of a sudden, a man from the 1700s appears and he goes, and screams.
And what they don't realize is actually what happened was not ghosts, but that the fabric of time brushed past each other very briefly and they both glimpsed each other in the same space.
Before moving away, and they both assumed each other were the ghosts, and that goes into like the cycles of things too.
How you can look at like the 1920s, and you can look at like wow, there was you know a pandemic then too, and wow, it was the same kind of stuff going on before World War II, and like you can see the patterns in time because I'm just kind of I think that's just that the writers are lazy and running out of ideas, maybe that.
No, you know, I will stress, we're all laughing, but it would be funny if she actually privy to classified information, and there have been 11 World Wars.
You know, I used to, my friends and I used to joke, like, we all make fun of North Korea because they think Kim Jong il was God or whatever and they believe dumb things.
But we'd be like, what if that's what we are?
What if we think that we're free and we make fun of North Korea, but actually, We are the exact same as there.
So, I give you one of my favorite conspiracy theories.
This is chicken coop theory.
For those that are familiar with Fermi's paradox, I believe you are familiar with that, Ian.
Fermi's paradox is a question if the universe is so vast and large, then why have we not encountered any other signs of intelligent life?
For which there are many, numerous conjectures.
One is that there is intelligent life, but we can't communicate, they're too far away.
One is that at any point intelligent life reaches a certain level, they destroy themselves with.
Getting too much technology.
And there's a bunch of others.
One of them, my favorites, is the chicken coop theory.
That is, Earth is effectively a chicken coop.
Aliens are like humans do useful things like mining cobalt and gold.
We can take that from them.
We won't let them leave, and they effectively cage us in in some way.
And this plays into, you know, the fake moon landing and all of these things.
People who believe that we never went to the moon, people who believe that we can't go to space at all, this is a firmament.
The chicken coop theory is that aliens don't really care what you do, live your life, just don't fight.
So, for instance, with a chicken coop, if you got a rooster that's causing problems, you will put blinders on them to try and stop fighting.
Maybe that won't work, so you'll take them out or eat them.
If a rooster is digging a hole trying to escape, you'll come in and patch the hole, eventually get rid of some of the problems.
So, for the most part, you leave the chickens alone and take their eggs.
Chicken coop earth theory is that aliens or future people or interdimensional beings have us encaged here and we are blissfully, blissfully ignorant of everything else in the universe.
We'll never know.
And we just live our happy little chicken lives while we look at the chickens and laugh, but we're no different.
Well, I think that it's like less about physical boundaries that we have.
Like, they don't want us to go certain physical places and more so like, We clearly have met intelligent life, even if you just think it's angels and demons.
That's like higher entities than humans.
If you want to think it's aliens, a lot of people in the government are saying that we have.
So I think it's more like they create boundaries on our mind and our spirit of like where we can go spiritually and mentally and intellectually.
Do you think the chickens understand you're taking their eggs from them?
Sometimes with their broody, but for the most part, you've got chicken coops where Like our first design for our old chicken coop, if they laid an egg, we could walk up behind the coop and open a hatch and the egg falls down and rolls.
They don't have any idea where it went.
They just lack the comprehension.
So humans have, like, I don't want to say half, but a bunch of them think the earth is flat.
So when you're like, to what end?
We mine gold, cobalt, other resources.
I'm not saying chicken coop theory earth is true.
I'm just saying aliens could be like, Jeffrey Epstein, we want your children their food.
You know what I mean?
Like, and then he'd be like, uh oh.
And most people are unaware.
Do you think the chickens are aware of what I do?
Like, when I walk into the coop, they're probably just like, I don't know.
That's what I love about Pad Thai in America because they don't make that in Thailand, but chicken Pad Thai in America is the egg and the chicken together.
So I wonder if the aliens or the spirit is trying to get humans to synchronize so that we can evolve our galaxy from a spiral into a spheroid.
We've already collided with something.
We have this plane in the Milky Way, this flat plane that goes through the middle of our galaxy, indicating that we're about to become a spheroid galaxy, either due to a past galactic collision, but something has set us up.
Chained us up to go to the next phase of galaxy.
I don't know if it's a purely energetic harvest or if they really want us to get gold because it's a superconductor to enhance the energetic conductance.
Metallic, like I bet there's a synergy between the physical realm and what lies beyond.
Based on what they do to people or what they influence people to do or what they feed off of.
So, like, if there's a demon influencing people to harm a child, then it would be, you know, for the sake of harming a child, that's like negative energy would be feeding.
In the pagan realms, back in like the Celts, the Celtics, they had a lot of demons, like house demons, but demon wasn't evil.
It just meant, look at all these feisty little creatures.
And if you knew the difference between the demons when they came to you, you knew how to.
This demon requires a bit of Brussels sprout.
If you feed this demon Brussels sprout, it will bless your family with a bountiful harvest.
But if you feed it anything other than Brussels sprout, it will poison your family.
And so.
It's not like a trick, it's more of like a trick.
Their trick, I don't know that it was less about good and evil and more about knowing what each demon is so that you can interact with it properly, yeah.
It's a secret to everybody, it's from The Legend of Zelda.
When you blow a hole in a wall and expose a Moblin secret layer, He gives you money and then it says, it's a secret to everybody.
And Americans were like, what the does that mean?
Like, I go into this room, he gives me money and says, it's a secret to everybody.
That means it wouldn't be a secret at all.
Because what actually happened is that in Japan, the actual Japanese is he says, keep this a secret from everyone and he gives you money.
The implication was that you found a secret hideout and he was paying you not to tell anybody.
However, it's a secret to everybody ends up becoming an accidental translation, which means something very interesting, which now means it is something everybody knows but no one will say.
Isn't that crazy?
We accidentally translated Japanese wrong, and now we have a phrase that means everybody knows it, but no one says it.
I was reading something the other day that was kind of talking about how unsophisticated English kind of actually is compared to older languages.
About how, when we're sad, we say, oh, I'm sad.
When we're happy, we say, I'm happy.
Whereas other languages translated will be like, I'm feeling happiness, I'm feeling sadness.
So it makes everyone kind of more depressed because you're calling yourself the embodiment of, like, Rather than saying, I'm feeling depressed today, it's like, I am depressed.
KO says, I prefer the funny retard conspiracy theories like Flat Earth, not the psycho retard theories like Trump faked an assassination to build a ballroom.
Evan for US says, Could the high volume of searches for Cole Allen imply that people are trying to see what he looks like, maybe to see whether or not to woo over him?
Well, I mean, maybe some people.
The fact is, when people hear about this, the search term wasn't Trump assassination.
The search term wasn't Trump shooter or White House shooter.
The search term was Cole Allen.
They were searching for more information on what was going on.
John says the vehicle you keep calling a cyber truck in Animal Farm is clearly a Lamborghini, there, Tim.
No, there is a Lamborghini.
That's one vehicle.
She is in a silver cyber truck that's driving backwards.
It is not a Lamborghini.
It's got a short back, flat, like angled, and then straight front.
And if it was driving this way, you'd be like, that's a cyber truck.
But it drives the other way.
So it's like not a cyber truck.
It has wheel wells, too.
Not a Lamborghini.
The scene you're referring to is when Napoleon drives in a Lambo, and some people have said it looks pointed like a Tesla.
But Elon Musk's mom in the film is driving a Cybertruck.
For that, the Animal Farm production crew would not come to debate, and the Angel Studio guys would not come to debate either.
The movie is pro communist slop, anti capitalist, and I'll give you the quick rundown now here.
I did a full rundown on my morning show channel.
The film is about a bunch of happy animals living on a farm.
The farmer can't pay his mortgage.
So the bank sells the property to Frieda Pilkington, Elon Musk's mom, who is going to liquidate the animals to a meat processing slaughterhouse to recoup some of the assets, effectively a private equity deal or auction acquisition.
The animals fight back and then promise the bank they will pay off the mortgage.
So they all team up to raise money by selling their goods.
When the pigs go to pay the mortgage off, the banker tells them they actually raised too much money and there's profit.
So the pigs go shopping with the animals, get mad that all the excess labor, all their profit is being taken by the pigs.
The main pig, Napoleon, then gets a credit card to pay off all the car and the clothes that he buys, but finds out in order to pay off a credit card, you need magic paper.
That's what they call it every single month.
So he enters into a private equity deal with Frieda Pilkington to liquidate the farm's assets once again, selling off the animals so she can build a hydroelectric dam that he'll get a clean payout on.
The animals then plant a bunch of explosives in the dam, blowing it up, killing all of her employees, and then basically say it's better to have nothing than have these oppressors.
And so what people have done is they buy those Homer Simpson glasses that have fake eyeballs on them and you put it on and go to sleep and the Tesla thinks you're driving.
There will be big charging stations where they've already discussed wireless charging for vehicles where the car can pull over a base with wireless charging plates and just sit there and it gets.
The Boxer Rebellion, it was a group called the Yehi Kwan, literal meaning the righteous and harmonious fists, or society militia united in righteousness.
And Westerners, British journalists, rendered it as something like I he chua an, emphasizing the fists.
There's a lot of them that I thought were awesome.
Like, there was this one for the longest time that was like kangaroo meant I don't know in Aboriginal Australian languages, but it turns out it's not true.
Dude, if you lived your whole life not knowing the spirit realm was there, Truly have and thinking it's impossible, they're lying like that would drive somebody fucking nuts.
Like, but they'd seem normal in a sick society, right?
But it's like once you start seeing like the really tangible evidences of it, like if you break it down to even something small, like the placebo effect, like everyone acknowledges like there's a placebo effect.
If you think something is going to heal your body, it can just happen, and people act like that's anything other than like magic, which is something spiritual.
It's like it's not normal, you should be able to just.
Think that a pill is going to help you and it's a sugar pill and it cures something.
You know what I mean?
Like, that's the power of consciousness in your thoughts, how you can change reality.
And clearly they're ideologically driven and that's like a really sick thing.
Um, And, you know, there used to be a lot of safeguards in regards to that.
Like, you couldn't just transition without going to therapy and getting pushed back and jumping through hoops.
And now it is pushed on people, which is really, really sad.
I feel like lawfare is the only thing that's going to fix it.
Like, these D trans people and people who are harmed by the medical stuff pushed on them, like, until they start suing and winning, which is starting to happen, I don't think it's going to resolve itself.
Especially because even with all the stuff the Trump admin has done to push back on it, like states like California are still quote unquote sanctuary states for trans kids, where like one parent cannot want it to happen to their kid and the other one can, and it still happens.
Just my concern was it was going to kind of be like how we treated lobotomies, where, you know, oh, we recognize now that it's evil, but back then we're like, well, we didn't know any better.
Proud Republican who happens to be gay, and yeah, he's was really grateful he did not get sucked into all that because he's like, I, you know, he admitted to me, he's like, I very easily could have been talked into being trans as a 20 year old gay man with trauma and everything else.
It makes the NGO argument when you're explaining to your liberal friends about like, bro, there are extra governmental foreign ops, foreign companies that are funding like, We live in a movie.
And like, they really want to topple the US to make their banking empire.
I'm really, I think that's the first thing that really the FBI has done, Justice Department, doing an indictment like that, right?
Because they've caused so much damage for a decade, accusing everybody, banning people, social media effect, accusing good citizens, and finally, something that I think that if I. Had it was betting, man, I wouldn't have thought they did it.
But thankfully, they finally did something like that.
So, I wouldn't say G.I. Joe because it gets too violent and it makes you think, oh, the terrorists, like it was prepping people for the war on terror, G.I. Joe.