Tim Pool and Nick Sortor dissect a Virginia court ruling declaring redistricting unconstitutional, alleging a "deep state" plot to save Democrats after Trump's victory. They indict the SPLC for aiding white supremacists, debate mass deportations versus false official numbers, and explore conspiracy theories ranging from terraformed Earth and lost empires like Tartaria to suppressed anti-gravity tech. The discussion critiques corporate personhood, migration maps showing demographic shifts since 2008, and the hypocrisy of traditional values advocates, ultimately framing modern political gridlock as a battle between sovereignty and globalist agendas. [Automatically generated summary]
So last night, we were talking about how in Virginia, 51% of residents voted to strip away the Democratic voice of the other 49.
That's right, they passed a referendum saying they're going to redraw the districts of the state so that five districts stretch with tiny little strips into Alexandria and Fairfax, which basically eliminates four Republican seats.
Well, not even 24 hours later, a court has ruled it unconstitutional, barred it, and refused to issue a stay.
Pending appeal, the AG's pissed.
He's like, Well, we're going to appeal this.
And the judge is like, Yeah, go ahead and do it.
Basically, they went through all of that just to flop onto their faces.
I was a little black pilled the other day seeing this happening because it's like the deep state literally is taking over Virginia as their last bastion after being crushed by Donald Trump, but they're even struggling to get it done down there.
I'm an independent reporter, and unfortunately, I'm spending a lot more time here in the DC area because there aren't as many ICE deportations happening.
I guess we'll maybe talk about that at some point.
Well, yeah, because I think that mass deportations are, if we go away from that, then like, may as well just give up the country at that point because we've got, You know, the official number has been 20 million for like 30 years now.
And so we're saying that no illegals came in under Joe Biden.
Judge Barr's certification of Virginia redistricting results.
State AG promises appeal.
Well, heavens me.
They say a judge in rural Southern Virginia on Wednesday ordered the results of Tuesday's vote not be certified on several grounds, including the state lawmakers did not follow their own rules in passing the redistricting referendum.
Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley also called the ballot language put to voters flagrantly misleading.
I just want to stress.
You're like a conservative leaning guy in a rural area being told that 51% will strip you of your voice and you're a judge.
You're going to be like, I bet this dude was sitting there watching it happening.
He's like watching this show being like, I can't wait to get to work tomorrow.
And, again, if you have no idea what's going on, you're like, should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?
And then you have, like, again, John Cornyn getting his pot defended.
You have, like, Chris Lacevita coming out on Twitter, and, like, instead of showing you a little humility and being like, yeah, okay, maybe I fumbled this, instead he's, like, attacking, like, random guys on Twitter just because Chris Lacevita wasn't being paid to help with it.
I want to throw this map up there and just tell you.
So here's what happened.
I'm sitting on my couch watching Brett Baer, as one does.
He's a fantastic newsman.
I mean that sincerely.
It's not a joke.
He's great.
And right at the top of the hour, he goes, a Virginia court has struck down the redistricting efforts and is refusing to issue a temporary state pending appeal.
Then they gave you some of the context.
And I was just like, holy, it's not even been 24 hours.
And the deep state attempt to turn Virginia into a vassal of the deep state has failed.
To the districts that we live in, our crew here, and where we go for lunch and hang out.
They've turned Winchester, where we go for lunch, and Loudoun into one congressional district, basically, lumping Winchester, which is blue, with Loudoun, which is deep blue, eliminating all of the conservatives.
It's a deep conservative area.
If you take a look at the redistricting vote, let's get the results, VA, because you can actually see.
Check this out.
I'll show you exactly what they did.
So, this is what I'm talking about right here.
Frederick County, it voted no, right?
You take a look here at Shenandoah County, you take a look at Warren County, you take a look at Clark County, they all voted no.
And the Democrats were like, yeah, let's eliminate that.
Let's take away their voices.
These people said no to this map, and it was thrust upon them by this tiny little piece right here.
Here you go.
This is what it is Alexandria, about 50,000 yes votes.
Fairfax County, 140,000 yes votes.
That's what basically throws this into yes territory.
And I will tell you exactly what's going on right now.
Actually, I'll put it this way.
I have some theories, and I'm probably wrong about everything.
That being said, with the move against the SPLC, this is, in my opinion, one of the NGOs, it's a nonprofit.
We call them NGOs when they're at the international scale.
The government, through USAID and these crony legal schemes, were funneling government money to various lawyers and NGOs that were being used for political purposes and manipulation, running ad campaigns, propping up law firms that were fighting for political causes.
Finding their way through various donation platforms to get Democrats elected.
Trump crushed USAID.
He basically took a sledgehammer to the deep state.
The roaches of the deep state crawled like the scum they are into, well, they always lived in Fairfax, to be honest, and they're trying to form a last bastion in Virginia.
The remnants.
You know what?
I would say this to all of my liberal friends who can only understand politics through the lens of popular fiction like Harry Potter or Star Wars.
I would say the deep state.
Is the Death Eaters, Voldemort's henchmen trying to come back together, or the First Order from the sequel movies you all like despite them being miserably bad movies?
Now that you understand what we're talking about, you know why we don't like these people.
Yeah, well, what's interesting, at least, I mean, look, turnout, this record high turnout, if you compare it to the last gubernatorial election, I mean, Winston Sears got spanked by Spanberger.
So I think going in, I was anticipating a yes vote.
I actually ended up being a lot closer than I thought it was going to be.
I expected like a five point spread because I'd seen the fundraising numbers.
And then, in addition to that, I guess I do live in Virginia.
I won't say which county, but closer to DC.
And I was just getting like Obama ads on every YouTube video.
It was Obama ads nonstop.
Didn't see any Republican ads.
So I was thinking, like, we're going to get spanked a lot closer, which is just interesting, honestly.
But in addition to that, okay, this court, this judge has struck this down.
The Virginia Supreme Court actually tilts conservative.
This is according to Balladpedia, a few other sources.
I don't know if you guys heard this theory that they let the Democrats spend tons of money on this just because they knew it wasn't going to be crushed.
I was interviewing Seb Gorkha last year, and I asked him if the deep state had been crushed.
And he says, no, absolutely not.
They're still there.
And he's not wrong.
What I see here with the move against the SPLC, they're deep state.
I mean, they are now being, according to this indictment, they funded.
Part of, I'm not going to be as hyperbolic as some of these outlets.
They were providing resources to one of the organizers who helped secure transport for many people who showed up.
This was the SPLC, according to the indictment, helping to foment Unite the Right through organizing so they could then come out and fundraise against it.
And many other nonprofits fundraised against it as well.
What I will say is, I'm going to make it as personal as possible, is that the SPLC tried accusing me as well as several others in 2018 of being Russian assets, of being orchestrated or directed by the Russian government.
And it didn't work.
I have talked about this before.
After my coverage in Sweden, I received several emails from Russia Today trying to license my footage, despite the fact it was all fair use and you didn't need to license it.
So I rightly ignored their emails, as I'm not going to take their money.
Then I had people hit me up who were friends being like, oh, by the way, Russia Today wants to buy the footage from you.
And I said, finally, I snapped and I said, why would they buy footage that's free to use?
Then finally, Merrick Garland came out and he got his wish and he falsely accused me and many others of taking money from the Russian government.
They can't malign me in any other way.
They can't call me far right.
They can't call me a white supremacist.
They had nothing.
So the SPLC, strangely, along with eventually the smear they got through Merrick Garland, was trying to call me and many others as coordinated by the Russians.
And the reason why this matters the article that they wrote, which they did have to retract, was pointing out that leftists, like at the time in 2018, I'm like a liberal guy, I was like a pro Bernie guy before that.
It was me, Rania Kalick, Ben Norton, Max Blumenthal, all very clearly on the left.
And they could not call them fascists and they could not call them white supremacists because they were well known communists.
Like, not all of them.
I'm just saying, like, they're all pretty much on the left easily.
Similarly, Jimmy Dore.
So they tried maligning us as Russians and it didn't work, but they eventually did get their stupid play two years ago, which is fake.
These people must be crushed.
They did the same thing to Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel.
And I hope, I beg, and I pray that these people are utterly destroyed.
You know, because I will just say this.
I never did anything to these people.
I didn't know these people.
Literally, at the time in 2018, I'm just some random guy who worked at Vice, and I went to Sweden.
And I was like, I'm going to film stuff for a vlog.
I had no idea what was going on.
I wasn't promoting Trump.
In fact, I said, I'm going there to prove Trump wrong.
And these people tried to destroy my life.
They put out these fake reports claiming that, of all people, Chris Reagan, who does comedy sketches and plays video games, had collaborated with Richard Spencer.
They put me in the center of this nexus of the alt right networking.
With their alternative influencer network.
And I'm sitting here being like, it is the weirdest experience in the world to have academics, NGOs start accusing you of being a white supremacist and a Russian.
This is back in 2018.
And I'm like, I only have like 100,000 subscribers on YouTube.
But that system of globalization, that it's basically an international banking system that's through the Federal Reserve has tried to take the United States for 100 years, is trying to malign people that are like, no, American property rights, gun rights, free speech, fuck the corporation, pardon my language, but welcome to America.
And that's the system that is like, so, but I do like that they're working on it.
I mean, like, look, first of all, we need a truth and reconciliation committee for Charlottesville.
I mean, it's very, people have been saying it for years that it was riddled with feds.
Everyone kind of knew that implicitly.
And now we have like hard proof that it's the case.
They literally put names out.
In addition to that, I mean, there's something to be said about the fact that the SPLC tried to control, again, like voices that were sort of dominating the mainstream, pushing the mainstream in different directions.
No, they go after like dissident, you know, they infiltrate sort of the dissident.
Sphere because again, they don't, that's where they can play around.
That's their playground, that sort of thing.
That's just kind of proof to me.
It's evident to me that really the mainstream, the people that are careful, the people that keep their noses clean is actually where all like the decision making process.
I think Charlie Kirk sort of exemplifies this perfectly is why did they target Charlie Kirk?
You know, people made this point after he was shot.
They were like, oh, well, you know, why would they shoot him?
Why would they kill him?
He's not even like far right.
It's like, that's the point because he is the guy that stepped into the mainstream and then pushed it in the correct direction.
That's why they target effective people.
And the SPLC, this is just evidence.
It's like dissident nobodies, and it's just entrapment.
They're entrapping vulnerable people.
Everyone's known this for years, so it's great to finally see some movement on it.
First, Daily Wire, lefty anti-hate group paid white supremacists to plan infamous Charlottesville rally indictment.
Y'all heard the news yesterday, right?
That the SPLC was indicted because they were providing resources to a bunch of white supremacists, including an individual who was an organizer of Unite the Right.
According to the indictment, they were providing the transportation for these people, some of them, to arrive.
How about this one?
Georgetown Law, witness to tragedy, a victim of fake news conspiracy sues Alex Jones as well as others.
And what did this man sue Alex Jones for?
Gilmore is suing Alex Jones, InfoWars, former Congressman Alan West, and others for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress for branding him a murderous deep state shill and mobilizing an army of followers to pursue a campaign of harassment and threats against him that continues to this day.
From Sandy Hook to Pizzagate to Charlottesville, Las Vegas and now Portland.
The defendants thrive by inciting devastating real world consequences with the propaganda and lies they publish, said Gilmore.
Today, I'm asking a court to hold them responsible for the personal and professional damage their lies have caused me, and more importantly, to deter them from repeating this dangerous pattern of defamation and intimidation.
Gilmore, a Charlottesville area resident on leave from his career as a Foreign Service officer, had his phone camera running when a neo Nazi James Alex Field Jr. barreled his Dodge Challenger to a crowd of peaceful counter protesters.
After hearing some media characterize the attack as an accident or act of self defense, And fearing that other attacks might follow, Gilmore posted the video.
They say Gilmore was contacted by media outlets to discuss his personal experience and soon became the target of elaborate online conspiracies that place him in the center of a deep state plot to stage the attack and destabilize the Trump administration.
Now, I don't know who this guy is.
I don't know what Alex or anybody else said about him.
The interesting thing, however, as many people are pointing out, Alex Jones made the claim at the time that Charlottesville was staged by the SPLC.
That these people are actors and Democrat shills coming out to make these fake events.
Everybody right now is praising Alex Jones.
Can you put Ian on camera real quick?
And you can see, oh, we can actually see it.
But just behind Ian is an Alex Jones was right jar.
The issue now is, according to the news, Alex Jones and others settled with this person.
I will say this first and foremost I don't know who this guy is.
And if he was falsely maligned and is not involved in whatever the SPLC was doing, then yes.
You defamed some random guy who was just filming.
Don't do that.
However, it is interesting that the lawsuit is predicated upon the theory that the SPLC was organizing and fomenting this conflict, when in fact, now an indictment alleges just that.
It's like these people that go out and, you know, say Alex Jones makes an accusation and then all of a sudden he's being sued for it.
You have to ask yourself it's like a lot of these attorneys, it's like $2,000 an hour, right?
To pay attorneys, civil litigators to represent you when you're suing somebody unless they're doing it on contingency, which actually is less common than people think.
Like, who is funding that?
And so there's a huge.
Rabbit hole that hopefully the FBI is going to go down.
I'm hoping that we've just basically hit the tip of the iceberg at this point and they can dig further down, down, down, down to figure out, okay, who is enabling them to do this via really expensive, high powered lawyers.
Because it's all like, it's all a redistribution racket.
I mean, look at what the Biden administration pulled off.
You talk about PPP, you talk about all these different apparatuses that were set up to extract money effectively from patriots and redistribute it among a lot of newcomers, a lot of people that are sort of in the patronage network for the Democrat Party.
They set the table with Charlottesville.
That set the table.
It stoked racial grievance among Americans.
And it made it quite clear for everyday people that, oh my gosh, this is like there's an insurgency of white nationalists in this country.
I need to head to the ballot box and vote for Joe Biden.
And then what did Joe Biden do?
Just put money right back into the Patriots Network.
He got Katanji Brown Jackson on the Supreme Court.
Like all these different things that we now have to deal with.
You know, everyone talks about, you know, Trump was able to overturn all of his executive orders.
That's true, but there's a lot of systematic damage that Biden did.
It was all calculated, it was all set up.
Again, the SPLC aren't idiots.
You can go look at all these names.
These are like high powered, influential people.
These aren't just like random activists like we're used to seeing with like BLM.
These are people that like know what they're doing.
Again, they're being very cautious, being very prudent, being careful how to get the money moved again from point A to point B. That's how you do it.
Baker, Steve Baker with the Blaze, you know, the one that came out with this big, elaborate story on who the actual Capitol or attempted Capitol bomber at the RNC and the DNC was.
And it was this, I guess, this former Capitol police officer that now works for the CIA or whatever.
There's this firm, Claire Locke, right, that has now decided that they're going to jump in and represent her in a defamation suit against.
Steve Baker and the Blaze.
And then you go back and look to see who else they have represented Dominion voting systems, the president and first lady of France for the Bridget Macron is actually a dude case, Bill Gates.
That's a big one.
And you're like, okay, so again, who is paying for that?
I'm not going to for a second believe that a police officer is able to pay that $2,000 an hour rate.
Well, and I want to hit on the point again, and that's so true.
And I want to hit on this point again.
I made it earlier, but it's like people need to remember this.
And like, look out for this in the future.
Is again, there's a reason why the SPLC wasn't paying guys like, I don't know, Matt Walsh or paying guys like Charlie Kirk, because those guys can advance right wing ideas successfully.
And they like single handedly change the zeitgeist, they single handedly move the Overton window, move the mainstream to where they want it to be.
Again, they paid off these kind of dissident guys because, again, they're not threatened by them.
You wouldn't give money to someone you're threatened by, you would give money to people that you're not threatened by.
And like, seriously, like base guy number 454, who like spurred on Twitter all day.
That's not threatening to the mainstream in any way.
We just saw evidence of that.
They're paying them directly because, again, it ferments an environment that is actually bad for the right wing to actually succeed, for it to actually thrive.
And that's why, if you go to the SPLC, you'll see the guys that are actually movers and shakers are listed on the website as target number one.
And the SPLC is moving money to sort of apparatchiks that actually harm those guys, that target those guys' family, that take pot shots at them if you follow the money in a lot of situations.
So it's very obvious what's going on here.
And again, it's really great, you know, let's see a super base guy on Twitter, you know, drop a truth nuke or whatever, but it's like, These guys aren't actually threatening to the mainstream order.
They're not threatening the liberal regime as it stands.
It sounds kitschy and corny to say, but guys like Charlie Kirk were effective at doing so.
That's why they were put in the crosshairs of the SPLC, and that's why they weren't getting paid off by them.
Well, that was the best part it was a puppet president.
Guess who was staffing a lot of the Biden administration?
We all know now that the Biden administration was actually sort of being run and operated by a lot of his staff.
A lot of those staffers came out of activist networks.
We know this.
You can go to their LinkedIn's and look at their job history.
Like, I'm not making this up.
Like, again, they came in the activism world, again, the NGO, the nonprofit world, and then jumped into the White House.
And the PPO office during the Biden administration was literally rubber stamping activists.
That comes into the administration.
We're talking like labor bureau.
We're talking USDA.
Like everywhere you looked in the Biden administration, if you go through their LinkedIn's again, and I'm not saying this like, you know, harm these, you shouldn't do anything to these people.
I'm just saying, look at their career history.
They came out of these activist networks.
That's all this was, is one giant patronage network for the left.
And honestly, the reason I am not super angry to some degree is because we should be doing that.
We should be creating patronage networks for our guys.
And the Trump administration is doing a great job of that.
But like, let's put this in, let's kick this into overdrive.
If we're going to clear out the deep state, let's fill it with patriots who have the Best interests for this country in mind.
Hey, there's a congressman who's trying to make DC a square again.
And I'm actually in favor of it because Arlington should have never been separated from DC to begin with.
However, I will also stress this will give the deep state the federal government.
So, the big counter to what happened in Virginia, where they basically turned one small jurisdiction into five congressional districts, eliminating four Republican seats, many people have said, okay, first, a court struck it down.
But if they want to play hardball, then why don't we turn DC into a square and drag Arlington back into DC, eliminating that part of Virginia?
As much as we have Congressman McCormick here proposing it, as well as many others, that would mean that all of those Fairfax County deep state individuals would now be residents of Washington, D.C. They'd live in a federal jurisdiction.
I don't know that we want to allow them to fight for representation to the federal government directly, but I'd still argue functionally it's the right thing to do outside of any culture war issue.
So, the I agree initially, DC was when they created the federal district, it was 100 square miles.
Yeah, it's now down to like 60 something square miles, and that's because the Congress.
And there is an argument to be made that when Congress did this back in the 1800s, that it doesn't pass the constitutional muster for giving up part of the federal district, but it has never been challenged in court.
So, yeah, that's exactly how it wow.
And that's the way it should be right now.
It's still on the Maryland side, it's still the same.
We'll get a heat check for the Supreme Court on birthright citizenship because that also pertains to slavery related issues.
So, again, if they rule in favor of that, let's push with this because the whole reason Alexandria and Arlington were ced back to Virginia was because Polk was trying to.
So that was kind of the concession he had to make was to give basically Alexander and Arlington back to D.C.
So the Supreme Court's going to give us a heat check with birthright citizenship.
If they're saying no, like some stuff pertains to the slavery era and then not, we're actually going to get a little closer to determining if this could even be viable to make D.C. square again.
But I just don't think there's a chance in Haiti's anymore.
It's up to how hard Virginia would fight it, and they would fight it pretty hard as long as Bamberg is in power.
You know, you could have done that.
You could have done this when Youngkin was in charge.
It actually was a little bit more viable, but no, the DOJ is going to have to go after the state of Virginia.
You're losing that in the Supreme Court.
There's not a chance.
I don't know.
Maybe there's some lawyers in the crowd that have like a constitutional argument I didn't think about, but pretty much everyone I've talked to in the legal realm has said, yeah, it's a pretty open and shut case.
To your point, Nick, no one's even tried to challenge it in court because it just hasn't been.
I mean, it would have just been a mess because you would have incorporated millions of Mexicans into the country at the time.
I mean, you know, some people think the country's always been 20% Mexican.
No, that's actually a really recent thing.
The amount of people who the border crossed was actually very minimal.
Most Mexican Americans now can trace their lineage to the last few decades of more recent arrivals.
In addition to that, Polk, I think he wrote this actually, is that, or said this, is that occupying Mexico City would have been a nightmare.
I mean, the amount of guerrilla resistance you would have seen in Mexico City would have just been, I mean, it's totally, I mean, have you seen Mexico City now?
I mean, I can only speak for personal experience, so you're probably right.
But I would say my experience in Mexico City has been they treat wealthy Americans like royalty.
And I don't mean wealthy, like in my sense.
I mean, like a middle class American is wealthy when you go to Mexico City.
So you go to the finest restaurants.
And the attitude that I've found and the people that I've worked with have found is cartels and police will flay a man alive for attacking a tourist.
Because the story goes there was this somewhere in the Yucatan, there was like a resort town with a casino, and two dudes, I think they kidnapped, raped, and murdered some women, some young women.
And then all the tourists stopped.
State Department issued a warning saying, don't go here, it's dangerous.
So the cartel caught these guys, and I believe they flayed them in public.
Because after these two dumb guys murdered these women, the cartel lost $100 million a year in all the tourism money.
So they were like, we're going to make an example of anybody who would hurt a wealthy American coming here.
And so, if those aren't familiar with flaying, I assume many of you, they peeled their skin off in front of the public.
Well, didn't you see, what was it, Puerto Vallarta?
Like, not even that long ago, where it was like this, people were saying, oh, it's going to be the cartels are about to, you know, bomb the entire city of Puerto Vallarta at this point because one of their leaders ended up being killed in a raid or something.
Like, that would be a very bad idea for them.
And it's like, that's not in their interest, right?
So it's, I know a lot of people were pushing that, but that was.
We'll really see because the World Cup coming up this summer, they're playing seven or eight games in Mexico, in Guadalajara, I think Monterey, and Mexico City.
I mean, the police there are going to have to be.
On lockdown.
If any of these cartels are wanting to send a message, this would be the time to do it.
The interesting thing about Mexico is because of its proximity to us, we, I think, correctly so view it as quite a rough place.
But on the global scale, Mexico is actually quite developed when you compare it to Mexico City.
Like Americans are going down there and asking for tacos, and when they give them soft shell tortillas, because they don't have hard shell tortillas, they're like, I want Taco Bell.
This is my gripe with people that just like dunk on Canada all day it's because it's safe.
It's not threatening to like liberals at all to like make fun of Canadians or French people or British people because they're also white people.
That's fair game.
But people will like chess beat all day about Canada or Britain.
And then when India comes up, all of a sudden they have nothing to say whatsoever.
And it's like, if you ask people in middle America which country is like, which nationality is like actively destroying their standard of living, they'll point to India.
But yeah, people will just like go off all day about Canadians.
And then like as soon as like a third world country comes up, nothing to say.
It is getting, you know, to the point where the location feature on Twitter is kind of useless because I'm like, I'm thinking debating a Canadian, but I'm not sure.
And that's why I honestly think that we should be, uh, After we get this southern border wall done, maybe we try a northern border wall because I mean, don't let anybody in at this point.
It's wild.
The, the, uh, how far down the country has gone in such a short amount of time.
Uh, actual Canadians are going to be a minority sooner than later.
That's just what happens when you have like undisturbed Anglo neuroticism.
That's what you get a country like Canada, where America, like we had some other groups come in to like keep all the Anglos from going, you know, too introspective.
But when you leave them all alone up there and it's that cold, they start like really overthinking things.
And the next thing you know, they're like, we should bring 10 million Indians in.
The issue is this we here all right now agree that we like being on Tim Cast IRL.
If for some reason we made the mistake of inviting in seven people who are liberals and hate this show, we may then recognize it was a mistake to invite them in as they smash the cameras.
Then when we all say, let us vote to remove these people, they look at us and say, and who and you and what army?
Literally, someone will be walking through New York City, and then they'll see, you know, like an Indian restaurant, and they're like, Wow, I love Indian food.
I'm so glad these people are all here.
And then, if they see like a crime perpetrated by an Indian person, I'm just using any third world country in this example, they will say, Well, that's because of failed Republican policies.
Like, the only reason they're behaving like that is because my system hasn't quite been flushed out.
So, they will accept like the one, I guess, upside, which is, Wow, great, you have like more food options.
And then, everything that's bad that comes out of that is because, again, these chuds are holding things up.
They're holding up progress.
If we could finally get them out of the way, then we'll have our Obama, like wholesome chungus, you know, post racial democracy.
So I don't know if you saw today Chris Murphy, who went out on the floor, the same guy that said that the story ended up not being real, the story about Iran running the U.S. Navy.
And so he was on the House floor or Senate floor today saying, you know, complaining that the Trump administration wants to send back a thousand Afghan quote unquote refugees and not send back, actually send them to the Congo.
I mean, I guess you can go home or you can go to the Congo.
Those are your two options.
And, you know, I can't get over this fact.
It's like if I give you a bowl of jelly beans, 50 of them, and one of those jelly beans is laced with cyanide, are you going to eat any of the jelly beans out of the jar?
No, of course not.
And so he's trying to make the argument that even though, yes, there was one Afghan refugee that we brought in without any sort of vetting, and he, you know, he may or may not have killed a National Guard soldier in Washington, D.C., but, you know, the rest of them need to stay anyway.
I might think that, but I would, and I wouldn't, but I wouldn't bring the other 14 people because that one guy, yeah, but no, I'd be bringing 15 guys over.
The better way to describe it is if you invited 15 people over for a get together and one of them smashed your stuff, you'd be upset and say, maybe I shouldn't have get togethers.
It's actually much easier than doing that.
As you pointed out with Smash Em Up Steve, don't invite over a group of people called the Wrecking Bros, famous for going and smashing up people's houses during parties.
But I mean, so I know we, people have been probably, I mean, this was years ago now, the Afghan withdrawal, where they brought over all these people on C 17s, just plane loads full.
They were actually overloaded with people coming over from Afghanistan.
Well, the, and so we know that a lot of these people were not vetted.
That's already been proven.
DHS has come out and admitted that at this point, that That these people were not proper.
There was no way to properly vet them.
I mean, that was a lie from the start.
But when you look at these, the millions and millions of people that came across the southern border, what was the first thing they did when they crossed over the border?
They ditched their IDs so that you wouldn't know what their actual names were.
There are millions of them that are here that we don't even know the names of.
They were claiming that in the videos of Afghanistan, these were big inflatable fake planes to make it look like something was going on when it wasn't.
It's just there's so many I've lost count of which one's new and which one's not.
So, I'm going to tack onto this.
I wonder if these people aren't actually dead.
I wonder if they were recruited.
The story with this woman is that she was found dead of a self inflicted gunshot wound.
However, according to conspiracy theorists, because I don't know if this is true, she was quickly cremated and the father just stopped talking about it, which sounds pretty crazy and sounds like, okay.
She had texted a friend, check the story out, saying, let me read you the quote.
She said, If you see any report that I killed myself, I most definitely did not.
If you see any report that I overdosed, I most definitely did not.
If you see any report that I killed anyone else, I most definitely did not.
She was texting a friend this one month before she allegedly killed herself.
Then, according to, I say this according to Kidspace Theorists because from the news, this is what we have.
Then, from threads and independent researchers, they said she was quickly cremated by her father and he just dropped the subject.
He doesn't talk about it.
He says there's nothing to see here.
And maybe that's the case.
I don't want to drag a dad over his dead daughter or anything like that.
However, if you were going to recruit someone into black operations, They would die and then be cremated and their bodies gone.
Take a look at this.
Colin Rogg tweets A NASA nuclear scientist was found deceased in his Tesla after colliding with a guardrail, leaving his body so burned that he was completely unrecognizable, according to Fox News.
29 year old Joshua LeBlanc, who worked on nuclear propulsion projects, died in a fiery crash of the summer.
His family at the time said they feared he had been abducted when he left his phone and wallet at home.
Every one of these stories has involved an individual who, for no reason, left their phone and wallet before disappearing.
The fact that their bodies are like cremated instantly or unrecognizable, gone, that these people disappeared and their bodies, Unknown and all of them, minus 10 is all of them left their phones and wallets before disappearing.
Which, bro, you walk outside without your phone or your wallet and you're going, oh crap, what did I do?
Future people came back in time and are fomenting their own future.
So with advanced technology, we don't detect them.
The average person does not see them because they know with time travel where to travel to that no one will find them.
They can literally look in the time record and be like, if we go to this abandoned warehouse, no one will know.
Then, with advanced technology, they take over the government.
Then, Dan Bongino gets in there and he's all bright eyed and his eyebrows are blinking and he's got a big smile on his face as he walks in the DOJ and says, It's time to expose Epstein.
And then, a guy from the future appears and he hovers over to Bongino and says, No.
But didn't he say at one point when he was on Fox, he was sitting inside of the Hoover building saying that he has seen things that has changed him forever, you know, things like that?
I mean, I think that was one of the arguments that were made, like something paranormal or.
You know, it's one way humans use to coordinate movement, but these entities are always here, whether they see the entire battlefield, the entire threat.
So, like, they might be taking orders from another species that is throughout time.
But did you see today there was another paranormal researcher, our UFO researcher, that specifically tweeted in 2022, December 11th, 2022 I plan on living, not suicidal at all, just concerned about David Wilcock.
I don't know what's really crazy is Jeremy Reese was on the call with Amy Eskridge when she was talking about how they've already discovered anti grav tech.
I mean, like, if you go back and look at the initial Apollo missions, the people that were like the most vocally, you know, angry and speculated it didn't even happen were like Soviet sympathizers.
And I'm not trying to like go full McCarthy here, but also it was like leftists in America.
They like were furious.
Do you remember all the signs they would hold at like civil rights marches and they'd be like, all this money for rockets, but no money for like black youth?
And it's like, I think that's kind of like what drove a lot of it.
So imagine there's like 12 billion people that live normal human lives with advanced technology beyond our wildest dreams, and the inner continents are just a slave portion where we mine cobalt and stuff.
You know, it's like literally people that are like extracting cobalt in like the Congo right now are like, man, we're doing this all for these American overlords and they fly on planes and you know, they can like get lighter, you know, they have lighters that make fire out of nowhere.
Like, these are like really amazing like species and we're stuck here banging away in these mines.
Like, that's what they think.
They look at like this earth theory, like, that's how people in the third world think about the West, honestly, is like, they're like, wow, these people are really, they got something going on.
I asked Chad GPT what is greater earth conspiracy, explained it.
I said, make a picture.
And it made this, which it's not a very good understanding because it made it look Earth looks like an eclair or like a Boston cream.
You know what I mean?
It's like disc shaped.
But the general idea is this is what greater Earth theorists think that the seven continents are inside this ring of ice, and outside of it are vast continents.
And the reason why we can't develop anti grav technology and stuff like that is because the human beings outside of the ice wall who've been around for tens of thousands of years are way more advanced and just.
Now, that's a bigger take because we don't have evidence of humans coexisting with dinosaurs.
But 13,000 years ago, when Atlantis seems to have been dominating the planet, it's possible that they went, a lot of people went underground and then the meteors hit.
Maybe they unexpectedly, of course, but that they're still there.
But man, if you look at the Rakat structure in Northeast, West Mauritania, that's where they think the capital that landed was.
It was covered in mud.
And the Mu are the people in the Pacific.
The MU is how they spoke.
They were like a Pacific spanning civilization, apparently, that was just submerged during the flood because it's called isostatic change in the Earth's crust.
It was compressed by a bunch of ice in the northern hemisphere.
When the meteors hit, it melted all that ice.
So the decompression, the land itself came up because of that isostatic pressure was released.
So land elsewhere on the planet went down as it came up to compensate and they sunk.
So, not only were they hit with a flood, they sunk.
That's what happened, I think, to all these sieves.
I wonder if Gobekli Tepe was hit by a flood or if they just buried it because it's mostly underground and that's where they think civilization recovered 13,000 years ago in Turkey.
Expanding Earth theory is that the tectonic plates of Earth are not actually moving into each other.
It's actually a compressed ball with layers that's slowly expanding, opening outward.
And so the reason why they say the Sahara used to be submerged, the reason why Egypt used to be submerged as evidence of water damage in the Sphinx, is because when the layers of the tectonic plates are compressed, there's more water on the surface.
There's less surface area.
So the water gets thinner.
Deeper as it expands outward, less and less, it requires more water to reach those elevations.
And then the banished tribe on South America eventually lost their understanding of the world because after a few generations, it's just stories.
You tell your great great grandson that we had chariots in the sky, and they're going to be like, okay.
And in their mind, they're imagining a guy riding a horse in the air, and you're imagining in your mind a jet, but you can't, you can't, and then you die.
And then your great great grandson's like, yeah, they had like chariots flying through the sky.
I think they floated them up in little canals on water, and then they would lock the water off once they got to a certain elevation and then fill it up, and it would go up to the next one, and then they'd lock it off.
Um, Corin Nemec was saying they were sensory deprivation tanks, these sarcophagi that they would go in them, cover up, and then fill them with like salt water.
When you go into sensory deprivation, you isolate yourself from all of reality, everything becomes uncertainty, every electron, every function becomes probabilistic infinity.
And then in that sensory deprivation, you can manifest reality to be what you want when you emerge.
I view him the same as like Brian Johnson, where they're kind of like astronauts, where they're like, I'm going to sacrifice my body to like see what could happen.
Brian Johnson is like, bro, Brian Johnson's the guy who says, I'm going to eat a teaspoon of olive oil before dinner and live forever.
And it's just like, well, okay, let me know how it goes.
But there are these genetic engineers that have gone to private islands where they can't be stopped and they're injecting themselves with gene editing viruses and stuff so that their bodies literally are genetically altered and they live forever.
Well, he also said he'd never get yeah, and he also said you can have vantage points in your house, so there's like ledges around the house, yeah, like step up on it, look a little taller.
Yeah, he went to, they call him Vampire Skinned, and they say that he got an injection, experimental gene therapy developed by Mini Circle based in Austin.
The treatment took place at a Garm Clinic, a private stem cell gene therapy facility on the Honduran island of Roatan.
It's composed of a plasmid designed to combat frailty and lengthen the human lifespan by promoting the production of folastatin, a protein that supports muscle development and health.
The plasmid was engineered to be easy to inject subcutaneously, cheap to manufacture, and have the ability to carry any gene MiniCircle wanted to add to the body.
Plasmids are literally from Bioshock, where you inject yourself and then your hand starts on fire.
And then the funniest thing was when I went to France, there were a bunch of sub Saharan African dudes standing outside saying that we were lied and tricked into coming here.
I interviewed these guys.
They said we were told there would be jobs and places to live, but it's an inflatable tent.
Basically, It's like a bouncy house, right?
They put a fan on that goes and it blows up, and you go inside and it's really cold.
And what the guys told me was they'd never experienced winter before and it was terrible and they want to go home.
Like, they couldn't defeat the liberal economic order militarily.
Nobody could.
So they're like, how do we just destroy it?
I don't think that they, I don't even think that this new world order thing wants the liberal economic order to survive in the state that it was, like Bridget, British, you know, led.
I think this reinforces the liberal world order because, I mean, look, if you can sort of turn everyone into like a beige biomass, then it's much easier to control people that way.
Like, if you erode national sovereignty, that's actually makes it easier for like, like, Companies, massive companies, it's much easier to sell people products than for them to have identities.
As in, someone can put on a Captain America t shirt much easier than they could be a proud American or something like that.
So people find their identity in consumer products.
So, we've seen the videos and such of all these illegals come over on boats, especially to even places like the UK, right?
They'll go to France, they'll be like, this place sucks because France does suck.
And then they'll be like, okay, well, I want to go somewhere less sucky, so I'm going to go to the UK instead.
And so they'll take a boat to the UK and they'll end up on the coast.
They'll all run onto the shore and then they're just allowed to stay.
And then Valentina Gomez, I have lots of opinions on that whole thing, but she ended up.
Announcing that she had a visa approved, go to the UK to speak at an anti Muslim rally and was making a big deal about it on X.
And so the British government, understandably, went back and said, no, yeah, we're not going to approve a visa here because she was, they made the argument that she was talking it up a lot, like she was going to create problems when she was there.
And it's like, okay, I get that.
Yeah, right.
So she then decided, okay, I'm going to come, but I'm going to take a boat.
And see what you say when I come up to your shore with a boat, like all of these migrants from Africa do.
And so it's like, okay, well, I guess there's a little bit of a check.
It'll be interesting to see how that plays out, though, to be honest.
Yeah, that's usually what people that are like, you know, Americans or whatever, intending on protesting in Britain, is like, you don't tell them at the border, like, hey, by the way, I'm here to give you problems.
Yeah, I mean, if the goal is just to generate attention, like, sure, but like, let's not pretend that you're advancing right wing ideas and then Carl Benjamin's like, what's some hell fumble?
Like, what are we talking about here?
Like, Carl Benjamin, by and you know, has played a large part in why like reforms top of the polls, why restore is emerging is because he's like single handedly pushed the overgen.
When I'm not trying to glaze him, I'm just like trying to be realistic of like, maybe we don't attack figures that like are actually pretty, like contributing quite a lot to the zeitgeist.
No one, no British normie is going to see her like spurging out and they're going to be like, yeah, maybe, maybe like this migration thing needs to be.
No, they're going to like double down because they're going to see her just completely.
Especially because he was a glazing like a month ago with Joe Kent, where it's like, although they were like, you know, problems with the Iran were like, I still think Trump's great, da da da da, and like, oh, you know, pray for peace, et cetera.
And then all of a sudden, a month later, he's like, I'm so sorry.
I got to pay penance now for telling people to vote for Trump and Kamala.
The issue is that Timcast Media is a corporation, it has employees.
It's not possible to exist as a sole proprietorship.
The corporation has a right to publish this news and can't be stopped by the government from doing so.
That's free speech.
In that, the company can spend money to promote political campaigns, it can't give money to a candidate beyond campaign limits, but it can promote through its own enterprise a candidate that it likes.
A sole prop would be I, as a private individual, doing a show and then paying contracts to people would not be financially, structurally, or managerially possible.
The corporate structure is so that there is an entity for which people are employees of that serve the end goals of that entity.
No one can give, no money, no entity, no structure can give more money than the FEC limits to a single candidate.
What you're referring to with corporate personhood is through this company's free speech right, I can spend $1 million of corporate money making videos saying Trump is the best, putting up billboards saying Trump is the best, and airing commercials saying Trump is the best.
I can then go every single night on my show talking about why.
You should vote for that for Trump or any other candidate.
If I was not allowed to, if the company did not have free speech, we would not be able to talk about Trump at all because they would argue it's campaigning in any sense.
That's why the Supreme Court said corporations have free speech.
The New York Times, without free speech, could not do news, period.
So corporations have to be able to have freedom.
And in fact, freedom of the press is in the First Amendment.
The press is a company, companies have a right to say things.
So, just I was looking into this real quick just to see.
So, the reports of a 20, about $20 million commitment involving Miriam Adelson, John Paulson, and a guy named Singer through this Republican Jewish coalition pack to spend against Thomas Massey in Kentucky.
So, all you're arguing for in the end, the end result of this is Miriam Adelson will extract corporate profits under her name and then spend the money.
So, I mean, we can make this argument like, oh, yeah, no, if you're a service worker, you're not paying tax on tips anymore.
And then, you know, no tax on overtime, stuff like that.
But at the end of the day, especially right now, people are not feeling it.
They're not feeling it.
Everything is, especially gas.
I mean, that's one of the largest expenses.
I mean, I remember the days of being broke where it was like I had to make sure I had just like a dollar left on my credit card so that the pump would take it.
And I could run it up to whatever it is, and I would have to pay that down in order to get the next tank of gas.
Unless that is fixed, which I highly doubt it is going to be by November, there are a lot of people that are going to be too deflated to go vote.
Well, no, that's, that's, and that's been my number one problem with the war above all else is that it's rewarding the worst people in American politics.
Like, even if this goes swimmingly, even if this comes out, you still just basically rewarded literally the worst people in American politics were lining up to say, well, you know, I hate Trump, but he's making, you know, clocks, broke clocks right twice a day.
Marusia says Did you see Asmund Gold's lengthy rant against Mary Morgan, calling her a femme cell and worse for her post related to men who want to become fathers?
I think that I did.
He called her a femme cell.
It's funny because she's a tradcath who thinks universal literacy is a mistake.
So I don't, you know.
But her post was taken to the extreme end of her argument to go after.
I'm not saying that she's right necessarily.
There is a tendency, women tend to be more baby crazy than men are, and all of these guys got offended.
I think it has more to do with the fact that young guys desperately want to be dads, especially more so than women now, and it's very difficult.
Mary became the avatar of their anger when she said that men who want possession of children who are not their own are predators.
But When you think about that, like, why would a man want possession of a child that is not his own?
I think that's the point she's making.
People started countering with all sorts of stuff.
And then when I said that her point's being taken to an extreme and she's right in tendency, then all of a sudden people started spam blasting my name.
I think the issue is largely that there's a lot of guys who want to have families.
The data shows that men want to be dads more than women want to be moms today.
So, among Gen Z, especially.
And because of these structures, men are having a very hard time starting families because women don't want to.
So then Mary comes along and says, Men don't have paternal instincts to a bunch of guys who are buying a video game where they get to be the savior of a young child and be a father figure.
So, of course, they're going to get offended by what she's saying.
I guess, yeah, when you put it like, yeah, I don't know specifically what her argument was, but I mean, yeah, the state of young women right now, it's like, I mean, I'm taken and I have a lovely woman, but again, I feel like a lost shepherd of Nam.
Like the actual, I mean, I remember being on a hinge.
I mean, it's like literally like walking through a minefield.
Which, I mean, it's like, I understand it's like, okay, some scorned guy that, okay, yeah, if you're 70 years old and you want to date some hot ass young 29 year old or whatever, like, you're probably going to have to pay for it, right?
They don't come for free.
There's a trade off.
But, You know, you're the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Counterterrorism at DHS, and you know, you shouldn't be in that position.
It's like the most vocal people that are like, we need more traditional values are either men like covered in tattoos with ear piercings.
It's like, okay, dude, well, you sold out your traditional aesthetics.
That's besides the point.
Or it's women that are like 30, and then suddenly they become Christians and everything.
And now they're like lecturing everyone on traditional values.
And it's like, can everyone just like cut the LARPing for a second?
You're like, what is going on?
But, you know, again, no offense to like our tattooed friends.
There's plenty of them.
I love them.
But it's like, I'm saying it's difficult to like lambast the decline of traditional aesthetics when you are not representing that, you know, personally.
That's kind of the point I'm making.
With women, it's on the extreme where women have already kind of jumped the shark, so to speak.
And then now they're retroactively going and lecturing men for not participating in traditional values.
I think it's like, uh, I said Mary was right in tendency that, like, among across all generations, if you know, I walk down the street with my baby, guys do not bet an eye, they don't say anything.
Every single woman are, but among Gen Z women, where I think a lot of the young gamers are, women are like, Who wants kids?
The thing that really irks me on it is that instead of saying Mary Morgan said thing, people are posting Tim Poole's employee Mary Morgan said thing because they're trying to use my name for algorithmic optimization.
So Merrick Garland goes on TV, announces this claim that two Russians who currently live in Eastern Europe that no one's ever seen before were funneling money through a Tennessee company that no one knew about and were licensing a show at a below market rate.
And then a month after the election, told my lawyers that there is no investigation, there will never be one, and then issued a formal statement to Lauren Chen six months later that there's no current investigation and the case is dropped.
It remains cold and open, but there's no one to even investigate.
There's no evidence that ever happened.
There's no known individuals who did it.
The whole thing is just one day they claimed a thing happened with zero evidence, and that was the end of it.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to once again state on the record.
So, a Tennessee based company hosted by a prominent conservative commentator offers to license one of our shows, which still exists, by the way.
And so basically, they could run it live on their channel and then.
We would keep doing everything we were normally doing.
I do license deals all the time, and we said, sure.
And then Merrick Garland claimed it was actually Russians who were doing it the whole time, despite never producing any evidence it was Russians.
Not one tiny morsel of proof ever.
Because it was a psy op, they had been trying to game for a long time to go after someone like Dave Rubin, Benny Johnson, me, because how do you smear us otherwise?
Benny's not a white supremacist or even that far right.
He's a mainstream conservative guy.
I'm not a white supremacist, mixed race, kind of liberal in a lot of ways.
There's no real smear to go about it.
You can call a bunch of conservatives fascists or whatever, but not us.
So they tried to figure out some way to do it.
And I'm sure they would have liked to have gotten many, many more people.
And their stupid scheme did not work beyond that.
Let's grab one more.
Broadcast Mediocrity says Texas Republicans aren't responsible for the redistricting cascade.
Texas Democrats sued the Republicans in 2020 to delay redistricting.
This was resolved in 2025, creating a national opportunity for Democrats to shift blame.
Not only that, but the redistricting in Texas was too.
It made red districts somewhat redder.
So they would remain competitive in the midterm election.
And Virginia just wiped out four seats.
It's very different.
But we're doing the uncensored portion of the show.
Don't stop saying mass deportations, even though people are trying to convince you to stop saying it because it doesn't sound politically expedient anymore.
We don't save our country without mass deportations, guys.
I remember I saw this where somebody, one of the companies that were trying to do a promotion, said, the comment in the replies here that gets zero likes wins $1,000 or something like that and said, okay, I've got this.
And then they said, Faggot, and then it immediately locked the comment so that nobody could like it.
Yeah, I mean, like, you know, I do kind of agree with people that are like, you know, sometimes the GOP will dangle action on social issues in front of voters to sort of guarantee further votes for the Republican Party.
As in, you see this, if the Democrats get in charge, this is what's going to be widespread.
But then you actually, like, look into some of these stories and the policy that's being implemented, and you're like, oh, yeah, they actually are going to implement it.
Like, that isn't, and in some instances, yes, it's just like establishment GOP guys who, like, don't intend to do anything.
But it is true that simultaneously the Republicans probably won't do anything on this.
And it is also true that the Democrats actually do intend on ramping this up.
And every day till Sunday, you're going to get this kind of thing when you, again, and what O'Burgeville V. Hodges did is now in the eyes of the state, in the view of the state, sexes are now interchangeable.
So, again, You can't separate the T from the LGB in this instance.
If you accept gay marriage, just philosophically, you have to accept transgenderism.
Because, again, in the eyes of a state, now sex is interchangeable.
And they have people saying 22 year old women are victims of pedophilia because they're dating a 30 year old.
Like, that's like, if anything, I think it's going the other way.
I do agree, like, there is segments of the LGBT that, like, is trying to co opt the maps.
But I'm not as worried about that.
I'm more worried about, like, this, where clearly the transgender thing is probably, if the map thing is going to get, like, laundered into the LGBT, it's going to be through the trans thing because this is a guy just taking his fetish out and his kid.
It's like, you know, Milo, he said, you know, they develop this fanatical, you know, mind warp where they just try to figure out how, with whom, and when will I molest my child.
And it's like, actually, yeah, that's like probably a good chunk of those people.
They don't want to go there in their head because it's already been built in that, no, we can't touch that.
I'm afraid to touch that.
Because I can't tell you the amount of Republicans that come into the room and they freeze up when I start saying, actually, gay marriage is the problem.
Actually, Milo made a point when he got a tweet from Libs of TikTok celebrating Dave Rubin having surrogacy kids and then showed all of the conservatives who were congratulating Dave Rubin who are now criticizing him.
So I think like if Obergefell gets overturned, nothing will change because I think every Republican state will line up to protect same sex marriage.
I think that's the likely situation because look, you got to look at like the way the demographics are moving in this country.
The country, even though like the New York Post is like, you know, oh, Zoomer's the most conservative right wing generation or Christian generation in history, the trends show that the country is still further secularizing.
The country is becoming less white.
And I'm not saying that for anything except to say that the Republican base is shrinking as a proportion of the country.
So, it's going to be harder and harder to push socially conservative policies across the finish line because I'm told reliably that these newcomers from the Middle East or from Latin America are super instinctually conservative, but they vote for the Molested Children Party.
No, guys, I could literally talk about all this all day long.
I love hearing all these things.
I'm in Colorado.
So, I deal with, we just had 1312 pass, the trans.
The trans people out here are just, it's insane.
It's disgusting.
But, anyways, getting back into it, my question for the panel is going to get a little bit more esoteric, a little bit more off the rails.
You guys hit on it a little bit earlier, but talk all day about metaphysics, aliens, how it ties with the globalist agenda 2030, occult symbology, and planetary theories.
I listened to David Wilcock for almost 20 years and it opened my eyes to all kinds of stuff like this.
So, hearing that he Epstein himself, This past week is shocking and telling.
It ties right into with these other 11 ufologists, either dead or missing.
And Anna Paulina Luna and Tim Burgett actually posted on it yet this morning, too.
And interesting enough, David Wilcock actually lives in Colorado, in Boulder.
So I've been calling the Boulder County Coroner.
I'm trying to stay up to date because it technically hasn't been confirmed that it was him.
It's just kind of been an internet thing.
But, anyways, my question is.
It's very strange, but will this all lead up to a larger, maybe Project Bluebeam or something similar?
I know we have our own theories, but I think Project Bluebeam is a little bit outdated, but I think there's something new coming.
And how does this play with the unipolar push by Trump and his actions with Iran straight up Hormuz?
Oh, yeah, no, I was just kind of touching based on what you guys are talking about.
My question doesn't really tie with the trans problem, but more about the ufologists and the aliens stuff, because I think that there is this globalist agenda that's kind of tying in with the economy, the petrodollar, and this secret technology that I think a lot of these people were associated with.
And I just wanted to kind of hear your thoughts on.
The global scale or this fog of war and the ties with the UFO.
The UFO stuff, the scientists at Occam's Razor would just be that these are people who are touching on technology that the government doesn't want public.
That's it.
If you want to get crazy conspiratorial, we can go down a million and one different rabbit holes.
Like, you know, we can start from the most likely to the least likely.
The least likely is future people, I guess.
The most likely is researchers that are advancing technology that's like cheap, low energy propulsion will interfere with US military operations and, you know, hegemonic power, so they stop it.
The next conspiracy theory would be that they're being recruited and to build the technology or recruited and killed by China or whatever.
I don't know how it ties into anything to do with Iran, to be honest, other than military technology is not for the public.
And these people are being stopped from making it, I guess.
Well, I guess my thought was think about it like the SPLC, right?
Like the SPLC was paying for these people to be the agent provocateurs for their own engine, right?
Scale that up to a global level, right?
So with us $39 trillion in debt, with all this black budget stuff, With all these people, these whistleblowers or these free tech, these zero point energy people, I truly believe that there is this dark project that we have been funding this whole time.
And then when this blue beam, whatever you want to call it, this false extraterrestrial person or entity comes through, that is us.
We are funding our own quote unquote enemy to then kickstart a new economic engine to unify the world.
I mean, I'll say again that I think you people give way too much credence to people in power in terms of how intelligent they are and how good they are at keeping secrets and their ability to actually create a grand conspiracy like that.
And looking at these guys that have either died or disappeared, and I believe now that it is confirmed that David Wilcock is dead, that it would be as simple as in order to get him to quote unquote kill himself, it'd be easy enough to.
Nobody's going to convince me that the CIA doesn't have some sort of chemical that they can slip to you somehow.
And I think that the amount of laundering, the different shell games that they could play, it's very, it's very, Easy and you know, David Wilcock might have just been a 420 trip gone bad because he did die on 420.
Who knows?
Maybe he just got a bad batch of mushrooms and he kind of did, he kind of self checked out.
I don't know.
I'm just kind of, you know, fantasize, you know, playing off a little bit, getting off in the deep end, which is fun to do.
But, um, I appreciate you guys.
It's fun to say, and I appreciate all the work you got.
Well, outside of the fringe stuff, I do work in grounded reality in Colorado.
I do report on the NGO fraud, the homeless fraud, the immigration fraud.
I've been calling out all these politicians.
I'm keeping close tabs on the midterm and this governor's race that's heating up here.
I'd appreciate a follow from anyone.
My ex handles breakthechainsm.
I do live streams, I make shorts.
And I do think that we have to stay vigilant and separate the GOP from the R's because I think there are honestly Republican minded people who do not want to participate with the uniparty agenda.
I mean, honestly, this is perfect night given what you guys are all talking about.
Let's put on our tinfoil hats again.
And, okay, so instead of playing 4D, 5D, or 8D chess, what if he's playing quantum chess with the Senate?
And let's say that they let Virginia, I know the court had their ruling today, but let's say that all of these districts that are now light blue, what if other states follow suit?
And then at the last minute, they pass the Save Act, and all of those districts that were supposed to be projected blue then become slight red.
No, I'm saying that if they were to, okay, let's say like three other states decide to follow Virginia's lead, right?
And they break up their heavy blue districts to turn light red districts light blue, right?
And if the Senate decides to pass the Save Act at the last minute, then in theory, if there is that many, I doubt it, but if there is that many people that are voting that shouldn't be voting, then those light blue districts would be white red.
But the positive of this is it eliminates the woke.
Again, I'm telling you, the conspiracy theory I've heard of in the Beltway, I don't know if you heard this, Nick, is that the breaking from Trump with Tucker, Kent, and the rumor is Gabbard, though.
My sources directly say this is not correct.
Is that they're going to try and kind of break away from Trump to create a new Democrat anti war faction.
So they attract moderates.
If they, the splitting up of these congressional seats where they're capturing Republicans into, putting them into blue districts means whoever is going to win the primary has to convince Republicans to vote for the Democratic candidate.
So, like in that lobster district, right?
It takes two big red areas and connects them to Alexandria.
That means an Alexandria politician, if they want to win a primary, To maximize their votes, they have to find the median between those Republicans in the outer areas and the people in Alexandria.
So that's going to eliminate the AOCs and the squad types.
So the Democratic Party will get rid of woke, simply put.
In a Democratic primary, if they are creating light blue districts, there's going to be three, four, five Democrats all running to be the candidate.
The socialists aren't going to win because the Republicans in those areas or the more moderate people that are being sucked in those areas are going to vote for the more moderate Democrat over the communist.
And even then, like, you know, you got to look at what's the engine room of progressivism in America your AOCs, your Ilhan Omar's, and they're in deep blue seats, and that's not going to change.
And so when they're introducing legislation, they're trying to get stuff put across the finish line.
The so called moderate Democrats will vote in line with them.
You rarely see the Democrat House coalition break apart, the Republican House coalition breaks apart all the time.