Trump DOJ INDICTS Liberals For Secretly Funding White Supremacists, SPLC CAUGHT | Timcast IRL
Tim Pool and guests dissect the DOJ's indictment of the SPLC for allegedly funneling $3 million to white supremacist groups via fictitious entities, framing it as a victory against manufactured racism. They debate Virginia redistricting results, accusing Democrats of fascist gerrymandering while noting illegal immigration boosts their congressional seats. The conversation shifts to Tucker Carlson's potential VP run with JD Vance and eschatological theories predicting a 2027 tribulation where AI and UFO declassification frame Christ's return as an alien invasion, positioning Trump as an unwitting instrument of divine will. [Automatically generated summary]
The Department of Justice has secured a grand jury indictment against the liberal nonprofit, the Southern Poverty Law Center.
If you're not familiar with this group, they smear any and everyone on the right with the most insane of lies.
And I can speak to that as they once accused me of traveling to Iran for a Holocaust deniers conference, which is something insane to claim, considering it's very difficult to go to Iran, let alone to go there to attend a Holocaust deniers conference is something so easily proven false.
Well, let's just say reckless disregard for the truth doesn't begin to describe it.
They've also accused our friend Luke Rudkowski of being a crazy far right anti government extremist.
They have been indicted for funneling three plus million dollars to white supremacists themselves, including the Klan.
Now, the argument is that this is fraud.
Imagine you're a donor and you're giving money to a nonprofit that's claiming to fight against white supremacy and racism while secretly funding these groups.
The accusation, they were propping up the very groups they were claiming to fight against, sounds like fraud to me.
Now, it was a grand jury that returned this indictment.
It's not like Donald Trump just rubber stamped to indict them.
And the DOJ said, okay, a group of individuals looked over the evidence and said, we think that there is a preponderance of evidence that a crime was committed.
And thus, they have now been indicted.
They will get their day in court.
But let me just say, we're going to go over some of the history of this organization, and I'm going to give you my thoughts and opinions on all of this.
I'm going to go ahead and say right away this is a massive, massive victory for the Trump administration, something we have been begging for for a long time.
I hope people do not disregard the victories that Trump Edmonds had, particularly with eliminating USAID and now the indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center.
These are the dirty, dirty smear merchants that we have talked about for some time.
The network of NGOs funded through these illicit government programs that smear honest individuals and alternative media now getting some comeuppance.
Doesn't mean they'll be convicted.
We don't know exactly what this means for their leadership, but it's still massive.
I want to break that down.
Of course, we've got more news in Iran.
Trump says the ceasefire is staying on despite saying Iran has repeatedly violated the ceasefire.
So suffice it to say, no one has any idea what's really happening.
And anyone claiming they do know what's going on is probably trying to sell you something.
That and Tucker Carlson has issued an apology.
Saying that he's tormented for having supported Trump and he's sorry for misleading everybody.
Of course, leftists aren't accepting the apology, they're still condemning him.
And then the big election today in Virginia results are coming in over the redistricting effort.
Basically, you told me that if Trump gets an injury to the right side of his face or arm, he may be the Antichrist.
And we were like, well, you know, now he's got this spraying bruise on his hand.
It's getting bigger.
And of course, he had.
What some people are describing, and it's always a stretch, but with Trump getting shot in the side of the head and coming down and then rising up, some people have called it a false resurrection.
So, you know, we'll talk about that later on, but good to have you and get some updates on this conversation.
Federal grand jury charges Southern Poverty Law Center for wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
This is massive.
They say a grand jury in Montgomery, Alabama, today returned an indictment charging the Southern Poverty Law Center with 11 counts of wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank, a conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering.
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Alabama Northern Division filed two forfeiture actions.
To recover alleged proceeds of the organization's fraud scheme.
The FBI investigated this case with assistance from the IRS.
I would just like to say shout out to Kash Patel.
Grand slam with this.
I didn't even know it was coming.
Here's where it gets crazier this investigation began during the Biden administration and they shut it down.
They tried to cover this up.
This is a part of the scheme.
The game they play is they will smear you and lie about you.
That way, it can be laundered by news organizations.
So, the goal would be this NGO says we did important research and found out that Ian Crossland kicked a dog.
Then, media organizations can then report an academic institution and researchers found Ian Crossland kicked a dog.
You can't sue the news organizations because they're just referencing what an NGO said.
And the NGO just says, oops, if you actually force them to take it down.
You can't sue them because they'll claim Times v. Solo bin precedent.
You got to prove actual malice.
So, check this out.
Todd Blanch says the SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence.
The SPLC allegedly engaged in a massive fraud operation to deceive their donors, enrich themselves, and hide their deceptive operations from the public, said FBI Director Kash Patel.
They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups, even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes.
That is illegal.
And this is an ongoing investigation against all individuals involved.
I want to stress this.
The FBI is accusing the SPLC of providing material resources for federal crimes to white supremacy groups.
It's exactly what people have been accusing these groups of doing for a long time intentionally manufacturing the crisis they can then fundraise off of and smear everyone else in the media.
And I got some examples for you.
Here's an article from the SPLC from 2018.
Explanation and apology.
The Multipolar Spin, how fascists operationalize left wing resentment.
What does it even mean?
Well, they took it down.
They said, On March 9, 2018, we posted an article on our Hate Watch blog entitled The Multipolar Spin, how fascists operationalize left wing resentment.
Shortly after its publication, we received complaints registered by or on behalf of several journalists mentioned in the article that it falsely described one or another of them as white supremacists, fascists, andor anti Semites, and falsely accused them of engaging in a conspiracy with the Putin regime.
To promote such views, because neither we nor the article's author intended to make such accusations, we took it down while we re examined its content.
No, the reality is it opened them up to a serious lawsuit.
And I think I was actually the linchpin on this one.
Let me explain.
They say this We extend a sincere apology to those who believe that they have been falsely described, including Max Blumenthal, Ben Norton, Tim Poole, Rania Kalick, and Brian Becker, and disclaim as clearly as we can any intention to suggest that any of them are white supremacists, fascists, andor anti Semites.
that they hold such views or that they are engaged in a conspiracy with the Russian government to promote such views or otherwise.
They have been intent, intentionally trying, they and the other ilk in this network of NGO smear merchants to malign people as pro-Russian for years.
And you see how this manifests when the Biden administration actually gets the power to do that and they go after people like me once again.
They took this down and described me as an individual On the left.
Now, the reason why I think I was a lynchpin in why they pulled this down is that the author claimed I had traveled to Iran for a Holocaust deniers conference, which by any person, even if you're like a hardcore lefty, you are going to be hard pressed to claim that's not reckless disregard for the truth.
Because they're simply going to be like, is there ever been any post?
Or like, when do you think Tim Pool went there?
When did he ever go to Iran?
It's just something they literally fabricated out of thin air.
Well, he's not in this article, but I'll find it in a second.
Give me a second.
They have smeared Luke Rudkowski to an insane degree.
And if you guys know Luke, he's kind of politically unassuming.
He's not a staunch Trump supporter, he's actually fairly critical of Trump.
He's more so anti establishment and anti authoritarian than anything.
And they continually try to frame it as though he's the leader of some far right white supremacist group.
So, this is a massive victory for, let's just call it truth in this country.
Now, what we're looking for after this is an actual conviction.
But let me just point out the DOJ alleges between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled more than $3 million in donated funds to individuals associated with the Ku Klux Klan, United Clans of America, Unite the Right, National Alliance, the National Socialist Movement.
Aryan Nations affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club, the American Nazi Party, and the American Front.
They say in order to covertly pay the individuals, they opened bank accounts connected to a series of fictitious entities.
The covert nature of the accounts allowed the SPLC to disguise the true nature, source, and ownership and control of the fraudulently obtained money.
The SPLC paid the individuals.
In order to keep the scheme going, the SPLC made a series of false statements related to the operation of the accounts.
A conviction will result in the forfeiture of financial gains from the alleged illegal activities.
And I want to stress as much as people are pissed about Donald Trump and the war in Iran, whatever your arguments might be, to ignore the dismantling of USAID is to ignore one of the biggest successes that we've seen from any administration.
This was an illicit network of NGOs doing things like this, and they were shut down.
And now they're going after the SPLC.
I hope they go after a handful of other organizations that we could, well, I won't name them specifically.
Yeah, you know, I almost feel kind of vindicated as like a conservative leading black man because, like, I'm like a black sheep in my family because my family's mostly Democrat.
And, like, I've always said, like, man, I feel like this racism, this white supremacist thing is kind of overblown.
I feel like it's almost a vindication for like me, you know, in a way.
I wonder how many, you know, I have another, I have a question about one organization I can bring up, and that's the ACLU.
And the reason is the ACLU actually defended Unite the Right in Charlottesville until they started bleeding a bunch of donors and then they flipped on a dime.
I'm wondering if something changed at a lot of these NGOs or organizations.
I'm also wondering if there was government or what's it called, intelligence agency or deep state pressure put on these organizations to become weapons.
Probably during COVID, it felt like the whole world decided to play their hand.
Or, like, the whole world, the World Economic Forum, the people that wanted to corporatize the globe and destroy governments is like, and they went full in, but they couldn't beat us because we have the internet and people like Brett Weinstein and Robert Malone and people that were just fearlessly, you know, just the tip of the.
And ever since, I think this is part of it, like, probably big bribery kicked off around that time, you know, the printing of the, what, 10 trillion in money since that happened.
No, I mean, I think this is the end result of when demand for racism outstrips the supply and.
The SPLC had to manufacture more racism because the Democrats run on the racism industrial complex, right?
If you need a fear monger around white supremacy, if that's your goal with your narrative and spin, and you're lacking that, then you really need to manufacture it.
And that's what I guess these guys have been doing over the course of, what, seven years now?
People who were former Ku Klux Klan guys, and all these guys are just feds.
F9 was affiliated with the neo Nazi organization, the National Alliance, that's what it says in the indictment, and served as an informant for the SPLC for more than 20 years.
And that's where, over the course of 2014 and 2023, they secretly paid him over $1 million.
Here's the thing to understand the argument that they make is that, no, no, these are informants to us because we're trying to stop them.
The only problem is the indictment is that the money was being given for the commission of federal crimes.
So, my response to, because I guarantee you the response from liberals is going to be Trump's weaponized DOJ is going after people fighting white supremacy, and this proves it.
My response is how do you think the SPLC would fund federal crimes through white supremacy groups?
Do you think they're going to just claim they were directly giving money to white supremacists?
If it were true that they had informants for the intention of disrupting these groups, they wouldn't have created fake bank accounts for fake entities.
They would have tried to obfuscate this.
They would have outright just paid the guys and said, You're an informant for us.
This is a conveniently timed win, I will say, though, for Kash Patel, who's been, I think, desperate for a big win like this for some time.
Let's hope to see this indictment actually go here.
There's obviously a lot of allegations in here, but we have seen the DOJ come forward with a lot of these different indictments towards a lot of different lawmakers that. hasn't gone anywhere that's been kind of disappointing.
They say, honor of the dates listed below, the following false or misleading statements were made to an FDIC insured financial institution.
I, employee one, certify that I am the sole owner of the above name proprietorship, federal tax ID number, redacted, engaged in business under the trade name of Center Investigative Agency.
So they had people opening bank accounts masquerading as sole props that were funneling money from the SPLC to white supremacists.
Yeah, I'm pretty, yeah, like I said, I mean, it's crazy.
Like, I really hope my Democrat family members see this, and like, I hope it wakes them up to some degree, because like, you know, I'm always misaligned as like Uncle Tom or whatever by them for, you know, being conservative leading and like, you know, not going hard enough against white supremacy or whatever, like, whatever it is.
Whenever I get into it with like people with different political alignments, I refocus them on the liberal order of banking that's kind of like pulling strings, at least.
When you see things like this, you realize, oh, the money's pushing, and I don't know, then they start to understand like, no, it doesn't matter what side of the aisle you're on, a corporate government would be horrible for everybody.
I really want to stress, guys, you need to understand that the name of one of the fictitious entities was the CIA.
They created a sole prop, according to the indictment, called the Center Investigative Agency that was funneling money, according to the indictment, funneling money to white supremacists.
I'm going to wrap this all up for you guys and just.
Give a brief overview of what I think is going on based on my experience.
At the time when this article was published, March 9th, my birthday, by the way, 2018, the article that the SPLC was forced to take down was attacking individuals who were critical of US involvement in Syria, of which I was passively critical of it, mocking that the media only praised Trump as presidential when he fired 59 Tomahawk missiles into Syria.
The purpose of this article, back then, the phrase alt right.
Initially, this is in 2016, it meant an alternative to the conservative base.
So there were many individuals who were traditional conservatives, not white supremacists, who identified as alt right.
Then along came the Associated Press, issuing their guidelines saying that alt right means white nationalist.
At that moment, retroactively, anyone who ever claimed they were alt right, there was now proof they admitted they were white nationalists.
That was the psyop.
So.
There are some individuals, I'm gonna leave people's name out of it because it's kind of an old issue, but this matters for where I'm going.
You go on X and people say, We are no longer the conservative base, we're an alternative to the right, saying that Trump represents something other than Bush and the neocons.
Someone would then tweet, I stand with the alt right or something like that.
Then the AP changes the definition to mean white nationalist.
Journalists then grab tweets from a year prior and wrote new articles saying, Remember when conservative admitted they were a white nationalist?
That was the psyop.
This article was a desperate attempt to link leftists like Max Blumenthal.
I don't even call him a leftist, but he's a lefty.
They wanted to link Max Blumenthal.
They wanted to criticize him and discredit him.
The problem is, people like him and Jimmy Dore that criticized the US involvement in the Middle East were not lining up with the Democratic Party.
Many liberals that used to be anti war were just anti Trump at this point.
So these individuals that were anti Trump were also anti intervention and were massively critical.
Including Rania Kalik as well, who still is.
This was a manipulation by the SPLC to say they're the same.
So they put my name in it.
This is actually an archive of the article, The Syria Connection.
Let me add to the mix.
Tulsi Gabbard at the time was being smeared much the same way over her criticism of U.S. involvement in Syria.
I believe that we're going to see something from Tulsi in this capacity.
I believe U.S. intelligence agencies were intending to discredit as many individuals as possible.
By doing two things, calling them white supremacists, fascists, or Russians.
Now, obviously, they failed in this regard because we all got together for a major lawsuit.
And let me see this.
Let me show you where I appear.
Hands off Syria Coalition Steering Committee member Issa Chair joined Mason on a panel at the second New Horizons Conference in Iran in 2012.
Conference speakers that year included World Workers' Party member Caleb Maupin, alt right journalist Tim Poole, Holocaust in Iraq.
Let's see if Web Archive actually has the old website.
Look at this.
I don't care about whatever your funding garbage is.
This is the website.
I'm going to go ahead and say this, guys.
I would not be surprised to find that US intelligence spooks made a fake Iranian website, put names of people they wanted to smear, laundered an article through the SPLC so they can claim that I went there.
And then, if we sued, they'd make the argument don't look at us, the website exists.
And it would be impossible for me to track down a website made by proxy in some foreign country.
I think what we're looking at is a psyop from the get go to destroy independent media and personalities who opposed the US.
The machine, what the Democratic Party had been doing.
Tulsi Gabbard, of course.
So they're calling me alt right and claiming that I was at an event.
Now, here's the thing the source they have, the website doesn't even exist.
It was an archive of an Iranian website claiming that I was a speaker.
Look at this.
I guess this is the website.
And 9 11 Truth, History of False Flags, Zionist Fingerprints.
Fund and plant the story, report on it, then fundraise from it and fearmonger based on the informants that you set up going there.
So I think they were involved for some of the Unite the Right stuff.
Dude, that was a sick propaganda win for the left.
All of that.
And then the following implications with the presidents, the lie of there are fine people on both sides hoax.
So this really just snowballed into a crisis for Republicans that was.
Manufactured in part by the SPLC.
So they were very effective in their anti right wing propaganda.
And I'm sure from their perspective, they'd say the ends justify the means.
I'm sure they don't give a shit about whatever integrity or what have you.
If they were able to move the needle and help fear monger that the Republicans or there is a white supremacy issue in our country, then they succeeded in spreading their false message.
And they, I mean, again, I can use the example of this weird article where they, like, this is what they're doing, right?
Like I mentioned, the AP guidelines, let me see if I can pull up AP guidelines alt right and show you exactly what they created.
I got it right here.
So, this is, I wonder if there's a date on this.
There isn't.
Okay, November 28th, 2016.
They said the term alt right, alternative right, is a name currently embraced by some white supremacists and white nationalists, refer to themselves and their ideology.
So, you had a handful of prominent Trump supporters who are not white nationalists.
They opposed foreign intervention, supported populism, Donald Trump, and they had claimed that this phrase alt right was being used initially.
There's a dude I know who's a comedian, not a political guy.
Back in like 2017, like early 2017, I'm hanging out with him.
I think it was in DC.
And he mentions that he was alt right.
And I said, Yeah, but you don't mean that in the way they're using it in the media.
And he's like, What do you mean?
And I said, Well, AP said it means white supremacists.
I said, No, not that.
I thought it just meant like I oppose the Republicans.
And I was like, Yeah, that's what it used to mean.
So the AP changes it.
They create this guideline.
Then, as I mentioned, a bunch of news outlets start going, Here are people admitting they were white supremacists.
Notably, they went after Jack Posobic.
For this reason, as well as a handful of other people.
This is laundering.
This is psyops.
So, again, when you can't smear people like Rania Kalick or Ben Norton or Max Blumenthal, you have to write a weird article that does this Russian state media through think tanks and botnets and influence groups and mainstream media to try and claim how fascists operationalize left wing resentment.
They needed to find a way to claim that people who were left were actually in line with white supremacists so they could smear.
Again, Rania Kalick, me, Max Blumenthal, et cetera.
This, I think it's intelligence agencies.
They were trying, I'm just so offended by how bad they were at it that they had to take it down and apologize.
Well, let's jump to the next scheme that we got going on.
We've got this from the New York Times Interactive.
They say how both parties are slicing urban areas to tilt the house.
Well, my friends, as of right now, we are currently waiting for the election results for Virginia redistricting's referendum.
With 78% of the votes in, no is currently at 50.46%, to yes at 49.54%.
It is neck and neck, and it is closing.
Initially, no had a strong lead, but that lead is shrinking now to only about 22 or so thousand votes.
As more urban districts come in, it may shift.
But for the most part, we are getting reporting from almost all the districts.
Now, for those that are not familiar with what this is, Virginia, in response to Republican states redistricting mid decade, are trying to pass a referendum to allow the state to eliminate.
All of their right leaning districts.
Currently, it's a six to five map, considered to be fair and balanced.
For the most part, right now, I believe you've got slightly lean Democrat districts that could swing Republican.
With the new map, they will completely eliminate all but one Republican district.
So you take a look at this, and I'll show you why this is so egregious.
You take a look at the map of Virginia, and you can see this right now the current makeup of Virginia.
The new map would put five Republicans.
Districts into Arlington and Fairfax County, which is just right here, this giant Democrat cluster.
Currently, there's one cluster here for Arlington that's a district.
You then have the rest of Fairfax.
The 10th and the 7th border that.
They all lean Democrat, but these two are massive Democrat districts.
Seems pretty fair.
What they're doing now, take a look at this.
This one, the 7th district, is called the lobster because it stretches up like a lobster claw and has this little thin strip that goes straight into Arlington.
That way, they can saturate Democrat voters into this conservative district and eliminate their voices.
Now, you may say, but Tim, they did it in Texas.
Sure did.
By all means, make that argument.
I won't argue it with you.
Liberals, you win.
Now, let's go to Virginia, where Democrats are voting to strip the Democratic rights of conservatives in the state because they're mad about what some other state is doing.
Tell me you don't believe in democracy without telling me you don't believe in democracy, and that's what you get.
Yeah, that is the core argument I do hear from Democrats that the president started this by pushing Republicans in Texas to redistrict, which ultimately ended up failing.
That didn't stop the Democrats from trying to push the same thing in Virginia.
What's fascinating, too, is that former President Obama is actually pushing this as well.
If this does, if this does, I think it's going to go yes.
I'd need to look into the law to make sure of this, but I feel as though this would get challenged and probably go up to Virginia Supreme Court and then.
The Supreme Court of the United States.
And there is allegedly a conservative majority of right wing members.
A resident of Virginia has a right to be heard in the federal government.
Democrats deciding to take their voices away just prove that they are power hungry fascists more concerned with fighting far away individuals than they are allowing the individual to have their rights to speak.
If you want to make the argument that Texas did the same to Democrats, Agreed.
Thank you, Democrats, for pointing this out.
Wow, Republicans are bad people.
Does that mean you have a right to be fascist too?
If you want to get partisan, Democrat gerrymandering in the Northeast, like Massachusetts, what is it?
It's slightly greater than the third Republican with zero Republican seats.
Democrats have been doing this forever.
So when Republicans finally say, okay, we're going to redistrict right now to push back on Democrat gerrymandering, and they respond by just stripping the voices of conservatives, it's just fascism.
Take a look at Illinois.
Do I have this stupid Illinois map?
I love the Illinois.
Watch this.
You're going to love Illinois's congressional districts.
Take a look at this one.
I love the 13th, which takes Champaign Urbana and combines it with Springfield and East St. Louis in a thin little strip.
But you know what?
I got to give the 17th, Illinois 17th, a big shout out.
Bloomington, Peoria, and then it wraps around and grabs Rockford.
Illinois is one of the most corrupt states in the country.
It is a vile and disgusting political place.
You've got dirty cops with black sites, you've got mafioso politics for sale.
Illinois is as dirty as it comes as far as states go.
Is illegal immigration really a democratic plot to sway congressional apportionment?
So, Third Way purports to be, I think they're like their shtick is that they're Democrats, but they're not woke, they're trying to be reasonable.
It is a fact.
Illegal immigrants give Democrats extra congressional seats.
It is mixed whether they get extra electoral college votes, and I will explain.
When you look at this assessment, they say, take a look at Pew.
And the Center for Immigration Studies, which created the mirage that Democrats get more congressional seats based on illegal immigration.
They point out that while it is true, illegal immigrants do create seats and redistribute seats, meaning there's a finite amount of seats.
So if New York gets an extra one, another state's going to lose one.
So you can see Alabama loses a seat, California gains a seat, Minnesota loses a seat, they're Democrat.
New York gains a seat, they're Democrat too.
Ohio loses a seat, Texas gains a seat, Republican, Republican.
Therefore, it's zero, right?
Based on that math, it bears out that there is zero to one extra seat for Democrats.
I was worried for a minute.
Oh, wait.
Track any data source, and you'll find that illegal immigrants are centered around sanctuary cities, which are deep urban environments.
So when a Democrat or Republican state gets an extra seat, it's going to be a Democrat seat.
Get it?
So let's say you've got in New York, for instance, New York City has 836,000 illegal immigrants.
That means the city itself gets one extra congressional seat.
That seat for New York State is going to be in New York City.
That means there is a whole seat in New York City just because of illegal immigration.
Now you can go to Texas.
Ah, Texas.
They gain a seat from this as well.
Yes, that gained seat is going to be around Houston or Austin, it is going to be around liberal centers with a high density of Democrats.
It's giving Democrats another congressional seat.
So, this is a lie.
When you actually base the extra seats on where they are, because congressional seats are not by state, the number becomes an average, according to their data, around two to four extra congressional seats for Democrats based on illegal immigration.
I bring this up.
When Democrats come to me and say, well, Republicans started it, I say, no, that's a lie.
Democrats have been getting around two to four extra seats through illegal immigration.
Gerrymandering, which I experienced in my home state of Illinois, which is a nightmare, and you can see it in the North Atlantic in the Northeast.
Now, Texas finally says, okay, we're going to redistrict to deal with this, and all the Democrats rush out to silence democracy.
These people are evil.
That's it.
You know, I think the Republicans and the Democrats were the same thing until Trump came along.
It was the deep state.
The independent media voices that were rising up were viewed to be bad, so they ran psyops against me and many other people.
They started losing, and now some of the people they went after are in the government.
Namely Tulsi Gabbard.
I hope, as DNI, she is contributing and she helps Kash Patel dismantle these crony scumbags.
Then a few hours later, he goes, we're going to keep the ceasefire.
And I'm just like, there isn't one.
Like, what?
Trump, you said they violated the ceasefire.
Again, I think the intended condition is just what you see and not what they say.
Actions speak louder than words.
If you come to me and tell me something and then I watch you do something else, I just don't believe you.
And I've been saying this the whole time.
I've told this story.
I've had friends.
They would say things to me like, I want to do what you do when I was working for Vice.
How do I travel the world?
I say, save up your money, buy a ticket, and go do it.
And they'd say, Well, but my apartment, my rent is so expensive.
And I'd say, I don't have an apartment.
I was working for Vice, sleeping on a couch.
They'd say, Well, I like my apartment.
I'm like, Indeed.
You want your apartment more than you want to travel and do journalism.
That's fine.
But stop pretending otherwise.
That's the truth.
So when Trump says we're going to open the straight, but then blockades it, And then says we're not like, and then takes every action to keep it closed.
I don't think his intention is to open it up, which indicates a new hegemonic power structure, largely not centered in Europe like it used to be, where Trump is controlling the Western hemisphere and now cutting China off from their energy.
You then point to what Cash is doing with the SPLC, the dismantling of USAID, and it does look like the Trump administration is actually gutting the deep state.
I think people are mad because they want to see Hillary Clinton locked up, but I think what they're doing.
Is, and I hope, I don't know, I could be wrong, is going after the root structures.
It's almost, and sometimes those boring, seeming boring things where it's like, we went through and itemized 17 billion in fraud waste, and you're like, oh my God, numbers, databases, guy I don't know telling me is way more important than getting Hillary Clinton to get embarrassed.
A lot of people are acting like Trump's losing and in all these fronts, but I think there's a lot going on sort of behind the scenes, and he's doing things that are probably much more effectual than people might seem to realize at the time.
I don't think it's largely just, I'll do whatever I want now.
The midterms do matter, but I wonder if, like, I'm just going to say this the indictment against the SPLC is like the white pillist of white pills.
It is like a white suppository glowing on a pedestal floating before our very eyes that when you grab it goes, and it plays that beautiful fanfare from The Legend of Zelda.
I am hoping this indicates there are actually more moves behind the scenes to dismantle these mechanisms that they use.
Yeah, I like that you called it the Trump world order.
I mean, I don't, I'm not, I didn't come up with it.
I'm not like a cultist or anything, but they're, the old order, I did not come up with that.
I'm, I'm citing, but the old, the old New World order seemed to be like a business strategy out of Davos.
The new New World order is getting rid of that Davos taint with this global economic money.
They're going to reset the economy.
I know that still sucks.
It'll still be devastating.
And then they're going to turn it into a crypto economy and then do the tracking technocracy, which you still get the technocracy, which was the problem, but at least it won't be a Swiss.
Thing, it'll be an American thing, I think, is the goal.
Yeah, I've said for a long time, you know, I think Trump is going to essentially take down that deep state, you know, old world order and kind of build up a new one that's like just totally different.
And I've been saying that for years, that I think that's going to happen, you know.
Democrats are willing to do power plays, they're willing to mog and be unapologetic about it.
And while Republicans stand on principle, the Democrats are openly talking about packing the Supreme Court, they're openly talking about bringing in new states.
And they don't, they're talking about getting rid of the filibuster as well.
And while the Republicans try to stay principled, it's like, oh no, we're packing the Supreme Court, by the way.
It's like, oh, we're adding states.
And the Republicans, John Cornyn's fighting about, oh, you know, I don't want to get rid of the filibuster.
It's been a hundred years that they've been entrenching banking cartels running our economy.
It's supposed to be Congress.
In 1913, they gave it to the Federal Reserve.
That's antithetical to the United States in totality to have a private quasi bank running our monetary supply when we, the people, are in control and protective of it through Congress.
So it's been a hundred years they've been entrenching it.
They tried with the business plot to overthrow the government with a direct fascist coup in the 30s.
They tried with Smedley Butler, it didn't work.
Now they're just economically building a system where these people get voted in, and then they're like, oh my God, I'm in a web.
Like, we're, there's a few towns that we're very close to.
Leesburg is very close to us.
Winchester is very close to us.
And we already have security concerns going to Loudoun County and Winchester because Democrats are psychopathic, violent lunatics.
Not every single one of them, but enough of them.
You know, there's an old saying that feminists like to make about men.
When people would, when the hashtag not all men was going viral, the feminists went, Imagine I give you a bowl of MMs.
But only three of them are poisoned.
Go ahead, eat a handful, would you?
And everyone's like, no.
And they go, see?
And the argument is made for literally every single group ever to justify, you know, separating whatever group by whatever group.
But I would still say this the security concerns that we have, my family, going into places like, you know, Loudoun County and Winchester specifically, is that I don't believe, like Winchester, for example, their vote right now is about 50 50.
So it's, uh, 3,600 yes, 3,038 for no.
So it's fairly split down the middle.
I am not worried about the 50% of people that vote no at all.
They probably would agree with me on a lot of things.
In fact, we go down there, there's a lot of people who are fans.
I am not concerned about the 3,000 individuals who voted yes.
I'm concerned about the 600 people who voted yes, who are deranged, violent leftists who would physically attack me or try to kill me and my family.
That's the problem with the left.
We have body camera footage that just got released.
And it shows the ICE facility when people, when the cop walked outside and they were launching fireworks, and within seconds, he's shot in the neck by leftist terrorists.
I have no fear in any.
Any Republican jurisdiction of a right winger threatening me or attacking me or being violent.
There are overt, like, there are fringe right wing white supremacist dudes who would condemn me for being mixed race and call me a Jew who I do not fear at all.
I could walk up to them and they would yell at me and argue with me.
There are leftists who have already threatened and tried to kill me, they said as death threats.
So when I look at these jurisdictions and I see what Democrats are doing, This is particularly worrisome because we know what Democrats, what the left is capable of doing.
Even if you want to point out it's 1% agreed, that's fair.
I don't go to these cities terrified all the time.
I'm not like sitting there shaking like, oh, leftists are everywhere.
I will tell you this, though.
I avoid any business with a pride progress flag.
You got a pride flag?
I don't care.
A progress pride flag?
I'm not going in there because these people are violent and dangerous.
There was a viral meme where a teacher put up hate has no place here.
In her classroom.
And then it was, I think it was Jeremy Kaufman said, ironically, this sign indicates her willingness to kill you.
And then leftists were like, You really think that leftists want to kill people?
And then it's like, List every terror attack by the left in the past six years.
We go down, it's a bunch of restaurants we like in Winchester.
It's a beautiful city.
And they have a big protest that looked to be about like a thousand people, maybe 600.
And as we're getting out of the car and walking, people are just staring at us.
I'm assuming many of these people knew who I was and they're deranged far leftists.
So I'm like, okay, let's leave.
Like these people are everywhere and they're holding their creepy signs.
And I'll tell you this story about when I was in Hamburg, Germany with Lauren Southern, Lukarkovsky, and a handful of others.
So, it's the biggest Antifa protest in history.
I think it was the G20 or something.
And someone takes a picture of Lauren Southern.
In the foreground of the photo is a German journalist and an American journalist.
The American journalist doesn't know Lauren.
We knew who he was because we had seen him at various protests.
They found him, started punching him, and stole his camera simply for being in the foreground of a picture of Lauren Southern.
Like Lauren Southern is walking off in the distance, and he is just in the foreground.
They went after him.
Luke was walking with this German journalist, this guy Max, and they yelled Nazi Schweinhund and ran up and started punching Luke and bashing the guy Max.
And he like tore a ligament in his knee.
They did not know who Luke was or this other guy Max, neither a white supremacist, doesn't matter.
They were in the photo.
So we end up meeting, like we all meet up for like coffee or something.
And then we came to a decision, like what should we do?
And I said, look, I'm done covering this protest.
I got no reason to be here.
I'll leave.
Lauren should probably leave because they're going to murder her.
And so I said, I'll get an Uber and go back with Lauren.
You guys can stick around if you want.
We'll dip out now.
On our way back to the Airbnb, regular people walking down the street were stopping and taking pictures and staring at us and tweeting our location.
So Lauren and I had to duck into a Mexican restaurant.
So I remember one of the creepiest things on Twitter, at the time it was Twitter, you would track the hashtag and they would say, Lauren Southern spotted.
Here's the address.
Here's the street location where we spotted her.
And I'm walking with her, like, let's get out of here.
Two people are riding on bikes, and as they're passing, they do this.
Just like the head turns staring at us.
And I'm like, that was weird.
Next to me, no one else just spotted Lauren Southern.
Here's her location.
So we went inside a restaurant, called an Uber, and said, let's wait here until the Uber comes and get the F out of here.
And even the so called assimilated ones in our country, I have found to be still very radical.
And, you know, we have people in our country, I don't know.
I mean, there's pearl clutch.
It's interesting to see the reaction of, like, the Catholics pearl clutching, some Catholics pearl clutching over the recent post from the president, allegedly depicting himself as Jesus.
If he did that, like, depicting himself as Muhammad or something, the, There would actually probably be violence.
Like I said, of Democrats, I am not concerned with 99% of Muslims who would just tell me, Tim, why would you offend us like that?
That's mean.
Like, there's no reason to do that.
I have said things about Islam in the past, and I've gotten emails from people saying, I like your show, I respect you, but I just don't think it's fair that you are disrespecting us.
And that's all I have to say about it.
And I'm like, that's fair.
That's fair.
And so I try not to be disrespectful.
It's the 1%.
Now, the right doesn't have that.
They don't even have the 1%.
There are fringe wackos with traditionalist or certain conservative values that are not aligned with mainstream American politics.
The left likes to claim some wackaloon who goes and shoots up a gay club is a conservative.
And it's like there is no group on the right that tells people by any means necessary and advocates for things like this.
The left has numerous groups that go out and march and kill people and they celebrate it.
Apparently, the left was funding white supremacy the whole time as well.
So, if left means white supremacist, violent extremists, and communists, well, then the left is all of it.
There are many Democrats who explained the reason they lost Michigan was because their unwillingness to go full steam for Gaza.
So, this is the Democrat autopsy, the refusing to release indicates that they lost youth voters and swing state voters in Muslim areas because they were wishy washy on Israel Gaza.
I think it was the there's an Arab Muslim Senate candidate in Michigan now who, I think, on a leaked phone call said he didn't want to talk about the killing of the Ayatollah because it would upset people in his district.
Like, really, you again, it comes back to the obligation that he has, not just to Donald Trump, to everybody else in the country, well beyond Donald Trump.
So the enormous amount of money he got from Miriam Adelson now seems, it seems suspect to a lot of people at the time, but you know, there's a lot of money in politics to run.
The reason why Tucker just laughed, and that's why I'm wrapping it there, is because every single Person in politics knew exactly what Miriam Adelson's money meant.
And the reporting at the time was that it was a quid pro quo that Israel would take the West Bank if Trump, if she donated to Trump and he got that money, that's what was to happen.
I do not see anything Tucker is saying as sincere in this.
What grown man says I will be tormented for this?
Let me just stress.
Everyone knew.
We talked about it on this show.
Is Tucker, does he have amnesia?
Did he just one day wake up forgetting everything that had been discussed during the campaign about Trump's intentions?
How about in Trump's first term?
He wanted to move the embassy to Jerusalem.
He killed Soleimani.
He hired John Bolton.
Everybody acting surprised by what Trump is doing is lying.
And I'll give a shout out to my libertarian friends.
Of course, this does not only reflect on Dave Smith, but does involve him.
My question then is Did you forget that Trump went to Israel and did all of this stuff for Israel and that he hired John Bolton in the first place, had said he would stop Iran from a nuclear weapon, and killed Soleimani?
I wasn't surprised by anything we are seeing.
I'm not a fan of it.
I just voted for what I felt is slightly better than the death, well, actually, largely better in a lot of domestic reasons.
Than Democrats.
And now all of a sudden, Tucker and these other people are like, well, I had no idea.
You know, there's a world where Tucker is legitimately a neocon psyop because he's consistently supported Republican administrations that have been very hawkish.
He famously supported Bush and Cheney in the Iraq war, and now he obviously contributed a lot to President Trump winning, and the president invaded Iran now.
I think what's also fascinating, though, is he's sort of burning all of his bridges with the president.
Tucker had a lot of access to the president before the Iran war, actually.
He visited the White House something like four, five, or six times.
They had a memorial at the White House for Charlie Kirk after he was assassinated.
Tucker Carlson was there.
They've obviously had a major falling out since.
It might be a little bit awkward, too, because Buckley Carlson, Tucker's son, and I guess the name of his brother as well, was the press spokesperson for JD Vance, making things a little bit awkward.
He left recently to go do some political consulting, which is fascinating.
But you really have to wonder about that relationship.
Tucker Carlson obviously knew all this stuff.
At the time, I just think he's wise to what he thinks will be the future political wins.
He's seeing some uproar and some fracturing in the MAGA coalition, and he's trying to claim the future of MAGA because I think people like him see a post MAGA environment, and he's trying to capitalize on it.
It's me, a normal person who you mocked and bullied when we tried to warn you about all of this, who doesn't have your wealth and privilege to insulate himself from the consequences of your support for a criminal.
Aside from if Tucker will run for president in the future, I think, again, a lot of these other nerds are posturing in on the sidelines, preparing to run for something down the line.
People like, again, Joe Kent.
I don't think we've seen the last of people like Marjorie Taylor Greene.
I think they're waiting for, you know, two, four years out where they're going to pop their heads back up and more of those characters.
Because he's getting tons of liberal organizations have been praising him, and far left organizations have been warning the liberals to stop praising him.
I do believe that if you had a wackaloon far lefty Democrat and Tucker Carlson, young Turks would vote Tucker.
We're probably talking about 80 million different people that want 80 million different things, but this push to create and control the Middle East with like taking Iraq and Afghanistan.
We're taking Iraq now?
Yeah, we've had it for 20 years.
They want so, like, anybody that's not like the reason they wish Mary Madison is because it aligns with that goal, which has been there since the 1990s or whatever.
Additionally, again, Libya had nothing to do with Israel.
NATO and Western forces killed Gaddafi because he was trying to trade golden dinar, among other things.
The U.S. was deeply involved in fomenting the Arab Spring.
We wanted to get rid of Bashar al Assad, not because of Israel, because we wanted to build the pipeline from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Turkey, up to the water, through the Gulf, through Turkey, through Ukraine, into Europe to offset Russia's gas monopoly.
The argument that the West or WF wants to give Israel control of the Middle East is something made up by wackaloons on the internet.
And I will say this with 100% confidence because we on this show, since its inception, have been tracking conflict in the Middle East and Eastern Europe and Europe.
And I have personally been following this for 20 years.
And I can tell you what you're saying is fabricated old cloth by retards who we call the retard right.
So again, to go to modern and contemporary military structures outside of what Britain and France did, which is immaterial to US foreign policy for the most part these days.
Libya's strike had nothing to do with what Israel wanted.
Barack Obama and Operation Timber Sycamore, I think, was that what it is?
Where it provided weapons to various rebels, which eventually fell into the hands and became ISIS, had, again, nothing to do with Israel.
And the intention here is that Iran has been operating outside the petrodollar system for decades, and the U.S. has struggled to get them to fall in line.
Even right now, it would seem, whatever Trump's plan is, he's struggling to get Iran to fall in line.
It is not some backwards desert nation, it is 90 plus million people heavily developed.
I think if you're arguing that the United States has an interest in setting up democratic allies in the area, And, like, that's the WEF's plan.
Like, yeah, that makes sense to me.
I think that was the general goal in Iraq to set up a democratic ally.
That was the general goal, I believe, with whatever regime change we do in Iran.
We used to be allies with the Shah in Iran.
So, if the idea was we wanted a democratic ally in the Middle East, and that's why we're continuing to support Israel, yeah, I think that's a large part of it, too, because we like our democratic allies.
Even if they're not democratic, we like having our allies in the region, but the democracy helps, too.
So, you know, we had that woman on who claimed that the reason Zelensky is running Ukraine is because he's a Jew and Netanyahu wants a corridor to Ukraine.
It's just like.
When a retard makes something up, ignoring 30 years of US foreign policy in the region, USAID operations, as well as like Russian negotiations with the EU, Ukraine, it's like insane.
And the thing that really irks me about this greater Israel conspiracy that the reason we went to Iraq and Afghanistan is because Israel made us do it is that it absolves the World Economic Forum of their true influence and the liberal economic order's manipulations and injection of gay communism into these countries.
I asked Secretary Hegseth about this actually last week about reports that during this ceasefire, China might be sending over weapons.
Allegedly, the president and Xi Jinping had a conversation and said that that's not going to be happening.
But.
Given how involved we are with Ukraine and Israel, and how involved China is with Russia and Iran and North Korea also being involved, I think there is a loose argument really to be made that we've been in a sort of loose world war for the past few years.
I think that it's way more likely now, but not for the same reasons that Tucker Carlson and all of them say.
And, like, I want to say, too, I think I might have even influenced Tucker a little bit.
I mentioned a little bit earlier on the show before, one of my friends, Daryl Cooper, mentioned me to Tucker a couple years ago.
And so I don't know if there's maybe some influence there, but Tucker Carlson and all these people completely missed the mark about the end because they associate Israel and Antichrist.
And they're like, oh, the Antichrist is pro Israel.
But it's like biblically, yeah, temporarily, but that's supposed to shift.
Maybe not the beast, but I think AI could probably have like a big part in like, because like Trump's pushing the AI thing, like, Pretty tough, isn't he?
Exactly, because if I start to believe this philosophy of the second coming and the end of the world and the anti, that it will become reality and there will be a horrible war that kills whatever it is.
So, Antichrist, okay, so there's the spirit of Antichrist, right?
So, there's been many Antichrists throughout history, whatever.
But, you know, in Revelation, it talks about the beast, and people call him the Antichrist.
So, in Revelation, it doesn't actually say the Antichrist, it says the beast.
And the beast is this guy, right?
He's a strong Gentile warrior from the West who helps Israel and, you know, defeats their enemies and is like, you know, speaking great, boisterous things and then, And then, you know, the Israelis are like, wow, like, this is our guy.
Like, this guy is so awesome.
He's defeating our enemies.
He's doing what we want.
And then at some point, you know, he allows them to build their temple and he allows them to do their sacrifices.
And then he flips.
He flips.
He takes control over the holy city, over Jerusalem.
Revelation 11, 11, 2.
The Gentiles will trample the holy city for 42 months, right?
So it's three and a half years of the tribulation and launches the biggest persecution of Jews.
So bad that, according to Zechariah, two thirds of Jews will die.
And the last third of them will literally cry out to God, and all of their hope and pride and their military and their human might will be crushed.
And then, in that moment of humility, they'll cry out to God.
And then that's when Zechariah 12 says that they will mourn for the one they pierced.
So they'll recognize Jesus as the Messiah.
That's when Jesus comes back.
He defeats all the Gentile armies of the world, he dashes the kingdoms with the breath of his mouth, and that's when he establishes his kingdom in Jerusalem.
That's like basically the short version of Revelation.
We got Mariusia says Tim, please read the book, The Red Amendment, about the evil implications of 14A beyond just birthright citizenship in terms of eroding our rights and state sovereignty.
Mariusha also says, read a post talking about how early settlers came to America for abundant wild meat in a time when most lived on veggies and grain.
Subsistence peasants would risk much to live like lords.
Missy Kin says, Tim, now do you believe that Vice News and El Reeve were likely partnering with ACLU to embed and provoke Nazis in Charlottesville to build their narrative?
I don't know.
I mean, maybe she works for, does she still work at CNN?
I don't know.
I don't know.
I think a lot of these people are CIA.
The way it works is that the CIA will go to like a 22 year old like intern and say, hey, I'm going to be your source.
Go to your boss and tell them you've got a source in the CIA and the FBI and we'll feed you stories.
They go to their boss.
This is how they cultivate a journalist.
They can then leak information to the young journalist is really excited to be like, I have a source in the CIA.
Then the news organization loves it because they can't be sued because they have a source in the CIA who's claiming these things.
And they'll be like, Shield Buzz, you'll never figure out who the person who's leaking to us is.
Well, technically, in Revelation, I mean, Jesus coming back isn't really the end of the world, but it's sort of a new beginning, right?
Because, like, Jesus comes back.
It's basically the beginning of a new world order, really, because Jesus is supposed to come back and he's supposed to basically take over the world and establish a new government over all the Gentile nations, right?
And my theory is that all the conspiracy theorists and all the people who talk about the New World Order are actually falling into the deception because they're unwittingly being set up to oppose Christ's return and reign when he does come.
Yeah, we're training AI for the next generation of governance, which might last a thousand years.
And I think what sets the United States apart is its morality, the people's morality that we've extrapolated laws, which comes from Christianity.
So to have a profuse speaker that exalts or extols the virtue of morality through the United States lens, because I've always been like, Yo, my three dudes are Jesus, Einstein, and George Washington.
Like, we need a George Washington that's like Jesus.
And then, and then, and that's when, and he's going to come, and he's literally going to kill, like, a lot of people, like, according to Revelation.
And he's going to, he's going to, it says he's going to dash the kingdoms of the world with the breath of his mouth.
So, like, the West, you know, a lot of these nations, you know, according to the Bible, all these kingdoms are going to basically fall and capitulate to Jesus, his kingdom.
So basically, it makes the case that, okay, so it talks about how, you know, how it talks about in Genesis that God created the world in six days and he rested on the seven.
So basically, they make the case that human history is actually a, there's 6,000 years of humanity struggling against sin and then a thousand years for the millennial kingdom, right?
And it's based on this thing called the thousand year principle, which is in 2 Peter, where it says that a day is like a thousand years to the Lord.
So, like in the Old Testament, it talks about during the thousand year kingdom, it says that the nations will be forced to go on a yearly pilgrimage to Jerusalem to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles.
And if they do not do that, they will receive no rain, right?
Meaning that there will be still rebellion in the millennial kingdom, right?
So, there will still be, you know, forces that, you know, and Zionist?
And that's why I think the anti Zionist thing is becoming so popular right now because I think what's happening is.
It's essentially a deception to prepare people to oppose Christ's return when he comes because he's going to be seen as the final boss of the Zionist New World Order.
I made this prediction all the way back in 2021 that when Trump comes back, there's going to be a big focus on the, there's going to be a big thing about the UFO declassification.
And you're going to see a lot of people saying, talking about how aliens are demons and how all this stuff.
Because What's happening is it's the setup for when Christ comes back, he's going to be seen as a hostile, alien, or demonic force coming to invade the earth that humanity must unite to fight against.
So I actually think a lot of Christians are also going to be deceived by this because a lot of Christians are already taking this very staunch anti Zionist position, right?
And when Jesus comes back, he's going to come back as the king of Zion, he's going to come back as the rightful.
King of Israel, right?
And to take and to fulfill the Davidic covenant and take David's throne.
So, the tribulation is a 42 month or three and a half year period where all the Gentile nations coalied around the beast, right?
To essentially seize control of Jerusalem, to seize control of the Temple Mount, Mount Moriah, where literally the throne will be, and the city of Jerusalem.
This is talked about in Zechariah 14.
This is talked about in Revelation 17 and in Revelation 19.
And then at the end of the 42 months, and then that's where we see the two witnesses come out, and they'll be most likely Messianic Jews, Jews who believe that Jesus is the Messiah.
They'll be preaching to Israel, hey, Israel, this is your last chance to repent.
This is your last chance to acknowledge that the Messiah is actually Jesus.
So, a lot of the pagans that I talk to, I talk to a lot of like pagans and they think what's happening because I've actually forced them to watch Messiah 2030.
And they can't deny, they're like, this is kind of crazy.
So, they're like, so what if it's actually an AI Jesus, essentially?
And that like the whole point, like that was the whole goal of Christianity the whole time is to like.
If your AI could give you better moralistic teachings than 98% of the parents in the United States because it's coded to be Jesus or like a teacher, people would follow it.
They would dive in to that new thousand year realm in the pod.
But the thing is, you also got to remember what happens too is that when Jesus comes back, so all the believers, all the genuine believers, are supposed to.
Literally rise, and anyone who's ever died, by the way, any Christian who's ever died, any genuine believer, and any Christian alive will literally be lifted up and be given a brand new, glorified, perfect body, impenetrable, incorruptible.
Yo, if some alien ship came down and all the cemeteries just opened up, opened up, and people rose up with perfect young bodies, it'd be like, it's happening.
What do you think about Romans 11, verse 5, where it says that God has preserved and will always preserve a remnant of Jews who do believe the Messiah?
I believe that that remnant that Paul is talking about there is Messianic.
Because it's, again, Christians want to prophesize people.
So, I don't know if by any means, but in general, that's the goal of the religion.
And if, you know, Messianic Jews is the way to prophesize Jews, then.
Then, yeah, but I think they're, again, like, I've spoken to a few of these messianic Jews before, they'll, you know, and they'll say they're Jewish, but also believe in Jesus, although that is a contradiction.
I had concerns that Israel would be actually be the catalyst of World War III because they're nuclear powered.
They're hyper radical.
They're militarily vigilant.
They're on the offensive, on the offensive, on the offensive to prevent being attacked.
And that everybody would turn on them and then they would go to nuclear war.
And I'm like, and this fucking aligns with what you're talking about about Israel being rallied around the beast, people rallying around the Gentiles, rallying around the beast, and attacking Israel.
Yeah, there's definitely an element of that for sure.
The whole point of the end times is to basically break the pride of apostate Israel, to get them to recognize that their strength doesn't come from military power or pride, but in God, and then bringing tribulation unto them.
So, I'm a 10 year ad vet, and the FTC is now pushing for the top advertising agencies in the world, as well as their top clients, to start playing ball with conservative media.
And my question is do you think they're just going to find ways around it, outlast the Trump admin, or do you think they're actually going to play ball?
Well, that's the whole point because Zechariah 12, verse 10 says that in the last days, the Jews will look upon the one they have pierced and mourn for him like a mother mourns for her child.
And the whole point of everything we're witnessing.
I had a post the other day that did really well.
I said that I think that Jesus's first coming was a stumbling block to the Jews, and I think that his second coming will be a stumbling block to the Gentiles.
So that nobody can boast, right?
And that, like, and that essentially, essentially, like, how a lot of Jews were deceived and, like, into not believing in the Messiah when he comes back.
Because they're, because why?
Because they're looking for the son of David.
They're looking for a king that's going to reestablish and restore Israel, right?
But that's not what he came as the first.
He came as a suffering servant, right?
So when he comes in his second coming, a lot of Jews are going to see that and they're going to be like, oh, that is the Messiah.
He's restoring David's throne, right?
So, and a lot of Gentiles don't understand that.
A lot of Gentile Christians, they don't get, they don't really understand that part, right?
So, like, if a state has 12 seats, right, and the Republicans win 42% of the vote, well, you would get essentially four to five seats there because you have.
Yeah, I guess we have the way the system is set up in our Constitution, and then the people elected based on that system wouldn't want to change it.
I've heard of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, NPV, which was states saying they would give their electoral votes to whatever the national popular vote was.
I know people have brought that up.
As an alternative, but I think that's like antithetical to what we had laid out on our Constitution.
We weren't meant to be a pure democracy.
I think I liked the way that we have these set up.
There's a way to have us set up the gerrymandering in such a way that the seats would be competitive.
But if that's the way the state governments want to set it up, like.
And I think also what we forget about this gerrymandering stuff is that it actually contributes to extremism in Congress.
If you don't have to worry about a general election and you're just running in your primary, then you get to placate your base as much as you need to because you know you're going to win in a general.
But if you have to run a competitive general election campaign, then you have to moderate a lot of your positions.
If you know all of your states are ruby red or deep blue, yeah, I brought it up on the main show, and I know it's a weird kind of a new thought for people.
So, the usually they just shut that off and shut down ideas when they're new.
But, like, is this heat map voting by heat map?
So, like, your locality it's not about where what state you're in, even or what city, it's about where you are located, and you only affect a diameter around you or a radius around you.
But, like, because, like, I live on a border of a state, so I should be, I feel like my vote should be affecting people across the border because those are my neighbors and not the people at the other end of the state I live in that I never see.
Well, look, you get to vote for president and that impacts somebody across the whole country, but it's just weird that a city in the far west of a state can influence the farmers in the far east.
It doesn't feel right.
It feels like those people in the far east are more akin to the people that are near them than they are.
And the way they draw state lines also is a form of gerrymandering, and the states are essentially in.
The internet is like the opportunity for people to organize and to take control, but it's just a matter of are they going to do it or will they just quietly allow people.
It's like, I feel like more people could name bullshit from the Jeffrey Epstein files than they can about the real life politics that affects their lives.
Like, they could name everybody on the Lolita Express, but they can't name two local politicians.
So, at the beginning of the year, I went to school to get acquainted with heavy equipment.
And also, when I stopped in at the operating engineers, they told me, hey, you know, if you know computers, you know, Get in here because you know AI is taking over this whole thing, and uh, so my question is is there truly a career safe from AI?
With the singularity and artificial super intelligence, we could probably make fully functioning robots that could do plumbing in maybe three to four years.
Well, it's going to get challenged, and the Virginia Supreme Court's going to rule in their favor, and somebody's going to bring another lawsuit, and then it's going to be.
Because when Jesus comes back, well, if you're actually like a believer, if you're counted as one of the saints, Then, yeah, you're going to get a new glorified body that's impenetrable, perfect, incorruptible.
And on top of that, you'll be given authority over whatever province you're assigned, right?
So, all the saints will be assigned different provinces and be given authority over them.
Donnie, you called Trump the Antichrist before the shots of the head and the withering arm.
Can you connect the dots for us from the present to the fulfillment of your prophecy and drop some bold Trump specific predictions on what's coming next?
I think Trump believes there's a God, and I believe that he thinks that he's a vessel.
For God, which in a way is true because the beast in the Bible is actually a vessel for God's wrath against Judah and Jerusalem in order to bring tribulation unto them so that they can be purged and purified in preparation for the kingdom.
So that's the whole point is like the beast is an instrument of God's will.
And I believe Trump believes he's an instrument of God's will, just not the way he thinks.