Trump Official RESIGNS Over Iran War, MAGA SUPPORTS War | Timcast IRL w/ Roseanne
Joe Kent's resignation over the Iran war sparks debates on MAGA fractures and "woke right" infiltration tactics. Guests analyze the SAVE Act, urban violence linked to TikTok trends, and proposals for mandatory national service to restore discipline. The discussion extends to conspiracy theories regarding YouTube view manipulation, intelligence operations targeting anti-Israel voices, and dystopian future warfare involving autonomous robots. Ultimately, the episode suggests that elite social engineering and media control are reshaping political coalitions and societal stability. [Automatically generated summary]
Joe Kent announced his resignation today, citing Israel pressuring the United States into the Iranian war, saying he cannot support this, and that he was backing Donald Trump because Trump said no new wars.
However, many people who support Donald Trump pointed out that Joe Kent said Trump was right in the past about Iran being a threat, and even he pointed out that Iran was trying to kill Donald Trump something like a year and a half ago.
So, of course, this has been quite contentious with the media saying that MAGA is breaking apart.
And then my favorite was when Nicole Walls and MSNBC, I'm sorry, MS Now, said Tim Poole called Pete Exeth a war criminal, for which I absolutely have never done.
And they should apologize and retract that statement.
These people are liars.
And then to make it worse, the Independent wrote that Tim Dillon said actually what I said.
Because apparently me and Tim Dylan are interchangeable, which is not correct.
But hey, there's only one Tim allowed in podcasting, I guess.
And it's going to be one of us because the media can't figure out what's going on.
So we're going to talk about that.
And basically, this is the big news, but there is news on the Save Act.
It has advanced in the Senate.
And that means largely nothing.
It means they've decided they're going to vote on it.
And it is presumed that they will not pass the Save Act.
We'll talk about that.
And then another bombshell from Nick Shirley tracking fraud in California.
And he shows up to hospice care facilities where there's no people.
And everyone's fleeing as soon as they see him.
And it looks like, or at least he's reporting, he's uncovered a lot more fraud to the tune of $170 million.
And sure enough, Gavin Newsom is attacking him for doing so.
I think actually, on top of that, I can add a former Biden advisor saying outright that Democrats have destroyed our cities after 200 teenagers in Washington, D.C. ran around fighting, firing a gun in the air.
And this has been an ongoing problem, especially in spring break in Florida, but also with D.C.
So we'll get into all of it.
But before we do, we got a great sponsor for you, my friends.
Is Ghostbed.
Not all mattresses are the same.
They're just.
They're not just furniture.
That's why you should check out Ghostbed.
Ghostbed doesn't build mattresses like furniture.
They build engineered sleep systems.
Their beds are serious health equipment, beds designed for relief and recovery, not looks, not fluff.
Your body should be healing while you sleep, not fighting for comfort.
It's easy to tell the difference between a ghost bed and a regular old mattress if you're waking up stiff, tossing and turning, sleeping hot, even reaching for a pain reliever before bed, hoping tonight will be different.
That's not aging.
That could be your mattress talking.
And here's another thing that's awesome about Ghostbed, you get 101 nights to try it at home.
If you don't feel the difference, you can send it back risk-free.
Ghostbed is offering my audience their lowest prices of the season, plus an extra 10 off.
So check out Ghostbed.com slash tim.
Use promo code tim.
That's ghostbed.com slash tim, promo code tim.
And as I say whenever we talk about good sleep guys, your testosterone and hgh are produced by your body during rem and deep sleep.
So if you're sleeping like crap, you're going to be irritable, fat and tired.
You're not going to feel good.
So take your sleep seriously, check it out, but don't forget my friends, head over to timcast.com and click join now to get involved in the Timcast Discord community, where people are coming together to network, to build, to create, to share stories.
Maybe there's something you want to do and you don't know how.
This is a community that can help you.
Maybe there's something you know how to do and you want to help.
This is where you can help others and, as a member, you are supporting the work that we do and you also get to call into the uncensored portion of the show, monday through thursday at 10 p.m on Rumble.
You don't want to miss it, so don't forget.
Smash that like button, share this show right now with everyone you know joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more.
Here's a story from the NEW YORK Times, Joe Kent, a top?
U.s counterterrorism official, resigns over the Iran war.
Mr Kent is the highest ranking Trump administration official to quit in opposition to the conflict.
He is also known for his support of conspiracy theories.
One of the?
U.s top counterterrorism officials resigned on tuesday, sending his opposition to the war in Iran and what he said was Israel's influence over the Trump administration's policies.
A sign of emerging divisions in the Republican coalition.
The official Joe Kent is the first senior member of the administration to quit over the war.
The seemingly open-ended nature of the U.s-Israeli war in Iran has created strong divisions among Mr. Trump's supporters, an anti-interventionist wing of the coalition which Supported President Trump because of his criticism of long overseas conflicts, has quickly become uneasy with the war, which has lasted 18 days with no immediate sign of ending.
Quote: I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war with Iran.
Mr. Kent wrote, Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful America lobby.
Now, I will say outright, those that identify as MAGA and Republicans overwhelmingly support Trump and this war.
Well, I mean, America and its ally, Israel, are taking out the threat to our freedom, our liberty, our future, you know, our safety, women's rights, children's rights, and a destructive octopus that seeks to control everything on earth.
So, yay, I'm glad they both got their balls back and stopped listening to libtards tell them, oh, no, America doesn't want to get involved and all that bullshit that only the blindest, most ignorant people on earth would say at this time.
I was talking with Dan Holloway a couple days ago about friendship and alliances.
They're not the same thing.
You can be deeply allied with someone that you can't stand, that you think is egregiously awful human that's a traitor and evil, but you have a great alliance with them because there's a purpose.
I think that's sort of what's going on with Israel and the United States, whether you like the people or not or like what they're doing or not.
Setting up and patrolling the Suez Canal and the trade routes and the land bridges and stuff is very important for the world order that we know, that we've come to all grow up in.
There's a few added points to bring up now, especially the response from the Trump administration, Carolyn Levitt, et cetera, and many others.
Tulsi Gabbard put out a statement saying that Donald Trump assessed the intelligence that she provided and determined there was an imminent threat from Iran.
She didn't issue a personal opinion on this, for which people are criticizing her because she has previously sold t-shirts saying nowhere with Iran.
But more importantly, the administration is saying that Joe Kent had been cut off from intel related to Iran for leaking information, and they were quite upset about this.
So he had been cut off from these meetings, which many people find shocking because he's one of the heads of counterterror.
And they were so concerned about him potentially leaking that they did not include him in these meetings.
Then he ultimately resigns.
I'm going to go ahead and say I think this is, I think there's more personal issues here than most people are seeing on the surface.
Joe Kent previously, and look, he's been on the show several times.
I got no personal issues with the guy.
He had previously stated that Iran was trying to kill Trump.
Clearly, that would indicate an imminent threat.
We on this show with many, many prominent individuals, even anti-Israel individuals, we ask the question, if Iran succeeded in assassinating Donald Trump, should we go to war with them?
And this was well before we engage in any military entanglements.
Like, if Iran's, so when you're talking about an imminent threat to the United States and you have an assassination plot that even Joe Kent agrees with, I find it then interesting when he comes out and says this is wrong and Israel is influencing us, they pose no immediate threat.
Perhaps he would make the argument that upon assessment of the internal intelligence, there is no assassination threat against Donald Trump.
Maybe that's the case.
Considering we've already seen a couple and an individual who I believe was he was Pakistani, but apparently funded by Iranians, there is a threat that has been reported quite a bit.
That would indicate a threat.
Then there are others that would say, well, our bases and our allies in the region being threatened by militia groups and the Houthi rebels, it's a direct threat to us from Iran.
In which case, I think that this is largely lacking nuance.
I would just stress that based on what we're hearing internally, and there's a lot of rumors, stuff that I can't necessarily report because I don't know how true it is, but they started fighting a while back, Joe Kent and others in the administration, resulting in, let's just call it, you know, a personal rift.
And now he's come out and seemingly has an opinion counter to what he had previously stated.
So this sounds to me like what happens in Hollywood a lot, where there's a falling out personal, you're fired, and to save face, you give that person an opportunity to either transition or say something like, I need to go.
And Whitney did that.
Whitney left and said, I have to leave because of Roseanne's faith.
It's funny because you see a lot of people, liberals, leftists, you know, the gay rights for Palestine or whatever, you know, and it's like, no, that's actually Israel.
If you go to Israel, they're going to let you live your life.
But what's really irksome to me is we have been tracking foreign policy on this show since the show's inception.
I've been tracking it on my other morning, my other channels, my morning show, since I've been doing media content.
I was in Egypt during the revolution.
I have a certain degree of experience, less so than many others.
But we have been tracking U.S. oil interests in the region on this show.
I've been doing it my whole life because of the Iran, I'm sorry, the Iraq war and the war in Afghanistan.
And Iran is a component of this because they disrupt the liberal economic order and the petrodollar system.
What's irksome to me is that there are people who have watched this show and have learned everything about Joe Biden's illicit dealings with Barisma in Ukraine because they're competing with Russia for natural gas.
The removal of Bashar al-Assad has to do with getting natural gas into Europe.
And then one day in the past six months for seemingly no reason, all of that gets ripped from their minds like they're pulling it out with a magic wand in Harry Potter and it gets replaced by actually everything's been Israel the whole time.
Ignoring Joe Biden, sending his son, we presume, to be a board member along with a CIA director of an energy company in Ukraine to offset Russia's gas prime gas monopoly.
Now they go, no, it's Netanyahu.
And I'm like, he literally has nothing to do with what's going on.
And that is what Trump has, you know, pretty much kicked in the guts of.
And that's because of Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein and all the banks of City of London.
That's what's really coming down.
And of course, Iran is a great money laundering center of all of that.
And it sells 20% of its gas to China.
So Trump has put them all, including Cuba.
He's put their whole network that nobody ever talks about because they don't want to know the truth of how it's just British imperialism.
Standard oil is a better word for it than British imperialism.
They'll go anywhere for the oil.
They'll make up fake states all over the world and then sell weapons to both sides of every skirmish because they make money for their stock markets housed in Basel, Switzerland, at the Bank of International Settlements, where they decide and fund every war because they make money on war.
They are the military, industrial, pharma, whatever, medical, every kind.
And so these people matter because gone are the days when endorsements or normal political things make a difference in an election or issues, heaven forbid.
These people we're talking about are why Trump wins the second time.
And for Tim Poole, who's one of them, to call Hagseth a war criminal, let's not breeze past that.
So apparently, if you have a show with the name Tim in it, you are the same person all the time.
And so I have called on MS Now to issue a retraction and apology for that egregious lie.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is a gentleman and a scholar.
I know a lot of people don't like him, but I have a tremendous respect for him, though I do have reservations about our involvement in Iran.
I am not going to be hard extreme on one side or the other for the sake of attracting viewership or otherwise.
I'm going to tell you the truth.
And the truth is this.
The MAGA coalition is fractured.
Now, does that mean that MAGA is broken or dead?
No.
It means that the group of people that refer to them as MAGA still do, the group of people that refer to themselves as Republicans still do, and they still support Donald Trump and what is going on.
But we've got poll after poll showing that independents are breaking from Trump over this issue, with Tim Dylan being a good example.
But more importantly, he's always been kind of anti-Trump.
Joe Rogan as sort of this representation of the middle ground of the regular guy.
YouGov says more independents disapprove of how Trump is handling Iran than did so last week.
I understand our military assets in the region, and I understand shutting down oil trade in the Gulf, but to the contiguous United States, I don't see Iran being a threat.
I want to segue this a little bit into the podcaster feuding and says that's going on.
And I know you guys were eager to talk about James Lindsay earlier.
So he had a post in response to my post to which I said the MAGA coalition is shattered.
Trump can say I am MAGA all he wants.
And it may be true, but lost support means MAGA is meaningless.
Let me explain what I mean by that.
Trump won 49.8% of the vote in 2024, and he succeeded with the help of libertarians and disaffected liberals.
These people are breaking.
Dave Smith was the frontrunner for the Libertarian Party.
He decided not to run for office because he had family concerns and security concerns.
They ended up nominating gay communists for the Libertarian Party, and so these libertarians broke and voted for Donald Trump.
Trump came and spoke at the Libertarian Convention.
But most of these people, even Clinton Russell, who was running to be VP, I believe with, not with Dave, but he was running to be VP.
It was going to be with Dave.
He is very, very now critical of Donald Trump.
He is losing this coalition, which was never just Republicans.
Now, obviously, it's fair to say, as I've covered on my channel and the show, Republicans overwhelmingly support this.
Former never Trumpers are now pro-Trumpers.
And the core Republican MAGA base is 100% behind Trump on this.
So they're enjoying about 90% support.
But again, Joe Rogan's been relatively critical.
He says some people feel betrayed.
You've got Dave Smith, who's come out very heavy against Trump over this.
And that's a small percentage indeed of Trump's overall vote.
But if MAGA doesn't have this coalition, the well-organized Democrat machine will succeed because the right's going to be worn down.
Now, James Lindsay responded to my post saying, haha podcasters, showing that, yes, Republicans support Trump.
But this is not a poll about the coalition of former liberals, libertarians, the politically disaffected in general, and Republicans together.
It is literally just highlighting that Trump supporters and Republicans overwhelmingly support Donald Trump.
Now, I will stress this.
Even among MAGA supporters, he's got 6% disapproval, and among Republicans, 12% disapproval, which again, if the election were held today at those numbers with a loss of independence and with double-digit loss of Republicans, Kamala Harris, she only lost by about one point, like 1.4 points in the popular vote.
Don't get me wrong, she lost every single swing state, but she would have taken the popular vote at least.
And this, she's a terrible candidate, by the way.
So they were not going to win.
But this is apocalyptic for the midterms.
James Lindsay is doing this, in my opinion, to manipulate, as is his MO and always has been.
Infiltrate a group, convince them to say stupid things.
That way you disrupt their support base.
So Trump supporters who are following this guy and believe what he is saying are going to lose the midterms.
When I would like to point out my intention has always been to adequately inform you of what is going on.
And if you're a Trump supporter and you are a diehard MAGA and you want Trump to win, you need to pay attention to the fact that independent voters are breaking from Trump over this.
And if you follow James Lindsay, he is lying to you to lull you into a false sense of security to believe that Trump is doing better than ever and can't lose because then the libs are going to win in the midterms and they're going to cut Trump's power off.
Like that's the thing that he made it an incomprehensible term that cannot be used in any meaningful way.
So there was a woke right that was used among disaffected liberals to describe an element of the right that have a mass formation psychosis and believe in critical theory and oppressed versus oppressor and things of this nature.
And then James Lindsay infiltrated, destroyed that, and now it's an incomprehensible term that you cannot use to describe anything more.
Well, the reason I ask you that is because a lot of the independents and libertarians that are leaving the party, I see a correlation with the woke right, whether you believe they're real or not, as the driving force behind that.
And why I always defend James Lindsay, because he's the one that's been calling attention to that group, because that's where I think it is split.
I think the independents are leaving en masse because of Israel and all the woke shit.
And I think he's on to it.
I know you and I disagree on Lindsay, but that's why I love him because it's like, hey, these are the people that are splitting MAGA.
I am warning you right now: the man's MO is to infiltrate groups, convince them to say dumb things.
And if you are blind to the fact that he is poisoning your worldview to all of these people, all the people who follow these individuals, you're going to lose.
I don't have a strong opinion on him either way, but just an alternative hypothesis that came to mind is that he is just basically like a pathological contrarian and is like allergic to watch whoever has the dominant power.
There are just some people who are like, I would entertain that and say quite possibly, except his MO has consistently been infiltrate organizations, trick them into saying stupid things, and then watch them immolate themselves.
So that's how he got started.
He worked.
So here's what I see with this guy.
And congratulations, getting more airtime.
He's so desperate for it.
He works in academia and he gets upset that it's being taken over by Marxist ideology.
He's a social liberal.
He's in a polyamorous relationship with, and he talks about how he and his daughter go check out chicks together and stuff like this.
This is a traditional social liberal view that it's not overly leftist, you know, no trans in the kids and stuff, but sexual liberation, feminism, et cetera.
The conservative movement opposes those things.
He doesn't want either the Marxists or the conservatives to win.
So the first thing he does is he infiltrates the Marxists, makes them look like morons by publishing Mein Kampf, but the words are feminist terminology instead of Nazi terminology.
tricking conservatives so that they immolate themselves is despicable can i just okay let me ask you because i'm listening to you and i i get it But isn't that what Tucker and Candace are doing too?
I questioned when he said that Mossad was caught planting bombs in Qatar in Saudi Arabia, which has never been reported.
There's no indication of that ever happening, nor evidence.
And it's been denied by these governments who seemingly are, you know, have no, like, I mean, we are working, the United States, with these countries and Israel.
So the argument then is that they're covering up for Israel.
But if they're covering up for Israel, they support Mossad planting bombs.
The story just doesn't make sense.
Then he came out and said the CIA was planning a criminal referral against him, to which the White House said, that's not true and it didn't happen.
So I don't know who his sources are, but they seem bad.
What I can say of Tucker Carlson right now is I disagree with him to a certain degree, but he's allowed to be critical of Israel.
He's allowed to oppose the war.
And apparently he has very bad sources.
Now, James Lindsay, he's done this in the past.
He's doing it again.
And he lies about me as well.
Candace Owens lies about me, very different from Tucker.
Candace Owens claimed my brother tried to kill me, which is an egregious lie.
I have gone on 20-minute tirades about the past 20 years of U.S. Middle Eastern policy pertaining to the petrodollar on this show with sources and facts.
We've played the videos from Obama and Joe Biden.
And then for some reason, in the last six months, people's brains fly out of their heads and they decided everything that we've already proven to them and exposed doesn't matter anymore.
Joe Biden is innocent of all wrongdoing.
It was Israel the whole time.
So when Joe Biden gets 10% for the big guy and Tony Bobielinski comes out and says they were cutting illicit deals and they have a CIA director working in an energy company in Ukraine and they removed Bashar al-Assad because he wouldn't let us build the gas pipeline and Tulsi Gabbard calls this out eight years ago and we have tracked these stories and Obama was arming ISIS, well, some say inadvertently because he wanted these terror groups to destabilize the Assad regime.
All of that gets erased and they go, Israel put a Jew in control of Ukraine to build a corridor.
And I'm like, yeah, that's never been supported any of the intelligence reports.
Not even Russia has been claiming that or China.
When you look at these foreign countries like the BRICS nations, they will outright say the United States is lying about Bashar al-Assad because he would not allow them to build a gas pipeline to compete with Russia.
So they armed terrorists to kill him.
And they removed Muammar Gaddafi from Libya because he wanted to trade oil and gold dinars and create an African Union.
Because woke right isn't, because James Lindsay creates environments like this.
In response to my tweet warning Republicans that independents are breaking, this is the kind of stuff that they're posting in response to James Lindsay, equating me with the exact people you're criticizing.
So why is it that James Lindsay is creating an environment where he's trying to loop me in with the people claiming that Israel is running the world?
Could it be that when I warn Republicans you are losing independence, James Lindsay is trying to make sure people don't listen to what I have to say?
No, this is the one example I'm making because Homeath?
HomeMath doesn't even talk about this.
He does commentary on feminism.
James Lindsay has attacked these people to create a catch-all term by his own admission.
I got to tell you guys again, you need to just read what he talks about.
He has publicly stated the term woke right was created as a catch-all term akin to alt-right so that you can poison the well and lump everyone into the same category.
Alt-right originally was coined by individual, but was used by individuals to mean an alternative to the mainstream Republican Party.
And then the AP came out with a style guideline saying alt-right means white nationalist.
Then retroactively, they went to people like Mike Cernovich, who is not a white nationalist, and they found a tweet from six months before this and then said he admitted he's a white supremacist.
This is what James Lindsay admitted to doing with the term woke right.
So if you've got these people right here, which is Candace Owens, Brett Weinstein, Megan Kelly, Nick Fuentes, Dave Smith, Glenn Greenwald, and Tucker Carlson.
He made it impossible for you to identify these people because initially, moderates were pointing out a group of people that were utilizing similar thought processes.
That is critical theory, the oppressed versus the oppressor, and the idea of Jewish supremacy.
Thanks to specifically, not Constantine, you know, trigonometry guys, because they've been repeatedly referring to them, but specifically James Lindsay, when you say that word, it is meaningless now.
I believe that he, I believe he is just like the left.
He hates Israel.
He hates Trump.
And he wants social liberalism back.
He wants Pete Buttigieg to be president.
He wants Gavin Newsom.
He may not like them, you know, personally, but I tell you, this is a guy who would rather have Gavin Newsom than Donald Trump.
But he knows you will not win by going to someone and advocating for Newsome who's advocated for child sex changes.
So if you want sexual liberation feminism, let me put it like this.
The reason why this is really easy for me to point out is that when I did nonprofit fundraising, the first thing I would train as a manager and one of the best in the country, you always must approach the individual you're trying to sell as them.
So if you are in downtown Chicago in the financial area and you see a guy wearing a suit and Ian walks up to him, that man's going to say, back the F off.
But if you walk up to him wearing a suit and immediately reach for his hand and shake and say, sir, but a moment of your time.
And you behave like a businessman, you can sell on anything.
However, if you want to go to Columbia a few blocks away and sign up college kids, don't send a guy in a suit, send Ian with a cane and a top hat because every college kid's going to stop them.
James understands this.
This is social engineering 101.
In order to manipulate someone, you have to be them.
So he approaches conservatives and says, I'm just like you, feeds them disinformation, distorts their worldview, tricks them, and disrupts.
And so when we look to the things that please them, their aesthetic or otherwise, we call it woke.
A good example of this I often cite is the Jaguar commercial, which was just postmodern art.
Nothing about it was trans.
It was just people dressed in weird clothes, but they called it woke, and the car brand failed.
Another example of this would be Concorde, the video game, where it's the biggest media flop in the history of mankind.
$400 million.
They made $0.
The characters were all woke aesthetic with pronouns.
Nobody wanted to buy it.
So this country has two countries within it.
One, I believe, is largely born from the internet.
So it's relatively, it's organized digitally, but disorganized physically.
And they can easily coalesce in cities for riots and things like this.
However, the bulk of this country is the Constitutional Republic.
And so when you say something like woke right, all you're doing is referring to a different cultural identity that is not the dominant Republican Party.
And it is not the left cultural identity.
Unfortunately, as I already stressed, that word has become incomprehensible as literally everybody is woke right now.
Well, like people that think they're part of the cult of the TV news on the left and people that think they're part of the cult of the church on the right are both equally woke.
Like if you don't have evidence to back up the data, you learned this through COVID.
I think I reject what you are saying because there's a big difference between the left deciding to sever the genitals of children and someone coming to a faith-based justification for their worldview.
So again, let me stress the difference here.
Someone says, I have witnessed things in my life that are hard to explain.
I have developed a personal relationship with God.
I'm going to have faith in the things that I find to be good, just, or otherwise.
And it is true that when you step outside of individuals, different people have different religions, and that is a challenge.
There is no grand philosophical question over cutting off a child's breasts, a prebubescent girl.
For someone who says, I have had deep contemplations about existence, spirituality, and I know it's hard to conclude, but I do believe, to the best of my understanding, that Christ is Lord, et cetera, et cetera.
That's very different from someone being like, I don't know anything about it, but we should sterilize children.
They outsource their thinking to the group belief.
It's like low-rung thinkers.
You know what I mean?
They're not people who are thinking from first principles.
They're not people who are approaching things particularly rationally, or at least they just outsource their beliefs to what the current thing is of their in-group.
When we brought on prominent liberal thought leaders to explain their position on gender, they had literally no answers and nothing made sense.
We have brought on numerous deeply religious people and theologians who have explained in great detail the structures of their worldview and why they believe what they do.
Michael Knowles being one of the greatest examples who can talk your ear through ad nauseum about his faith-based moral worldview and his belief structures.
So again, I will stress, we have brought on prominent liberal proselytizers of gender ideology and Marxism, and they cannot explain to you what they're talking about.
They can't even define the words.
Then we bring out a theologian and he explains his moral worldview around Christianity and the logos of the universe, his faith-based structure rooted in historical accounts of various religions and what they have wrought as a country, meaning life has been good under these things.
We have seen great success, developed our civilization, and there are historical accounts that I do agree with.
I'm going to pause again and say, there is a difference from woke, which we refer to on the left, where they say things like, a woman is an idea, which is a nonsense statement, and a theologian saying God is the logos of the universe, and my belief is rooted in historical account, the trust I have in others, the readings of scripture, the faith I have in the history of humanity, as well as the science as it relates to these things.
So again, if there's an individual who explains something to you that you don't understand, you can't just say it's dogma.
And what I'm telling you right now is what I'm saying very specifically is we have brought on individuals like Michael Knowles who has explained in great detail and with tremendous logic his worldview.
And if you did not understand that, that doesn't mean he's wrong.
My argument is do not criticize a learned theologian that you don't understand when you yourself has not sought to understand your own worldview.
My point is, while I think it's fairly obvious considering the monitor before my eyes that LED screens and LCD screens exist and my cell phone transmits data and I've actually personally built remote control objects, I understand the components behind these things, so I believe them to be true, which means I will then infer largely that most of the engineering in science probably is true as well because I've actually experimented with it.
Then when I communicate with someone like perhaps Michael Knowles, a great example of this, who explains in great detail why he believes what he believes, and it is logically sound, but it doesn't have, there's no like microscope vision of what God or logic is.
The argument that he makes is that God is the logos of the universe.
The logic that dictates everything that we exist in is in fact God.
He's saying the word logic and God are interchangeable.
Okay, but that doesn't mean that your interpretation, your interpretation misconstrues what he is saying, and you have not sought to understand his point, so you've called him woke.
No, but I mean, I could say I believe I could believe anything and say it gives me great comfort, and therefore I believe it, but that isn't the same as proven fact.
Well, we're going to go to the save act and say, I just want to say, I see the division as people that are over-emotional and people are logical, which this debate is proving.
To me, that's the dividing line.
Whatever Lindsay's talking about, woke right, Tucker, all this stuff.
When Gaza happened, it was like, oh, the children, the children, that was an emotional response for a lot of people.
And I think that's the division.
Some people are purely emotional and not logical, and other people are logical and not emotional.
The SAVE Act has advanced in the Senate 51 to 48, and this is tremendous.
It means they're going to waste our time for a week, won't get 60 votes, and then go, oh, geez, we tried.
Because once again, they're going to spin in our face.
I'm going to stress this.
The SAVE Act is one of the most popular pieces of legislation in our lifetimes, enjoying over 70% support among Democrats, 80 among Independents, and 90 among Republicans.
Yet for some reason, liberal pundits and Democratic politicians are pretending nobody wants it.
So Republicans, they could have nuked the filibuster and changed the rules, and this could have passed like that, but they're also playing dirty games and cutting backroom deals, and they're not going to pass a bill.
I think the real reason is because what we have is a populist uprising.
And the SAVE Act legitimately would correct a good portion of our elections.
But the Rhino branch of the Republican Party and the Democrat Uniparty Alliance want to be able to manipulate elections in ways we can't tell so they can maintain power and this would disrupt that.
Well, I'm asking you a question to get to the point of what you're saying.
So now think of, so George Carlin famously said, think about how stupid the average person is.
Now realize half of them are stupider than that.
I understand the Democratic Party.
I understand why Adam Schiff lies on TV.
I understand why he's lying in the media.
I understand why the MSNBC or MSNOW lied about me because they have decided the American people are too stupid, so they have to be told what to do and manipulated.
And the populist uprising is speaking genuinely to people.
The reason they don't want to pass the SAVE Act is because these people are going, are you nuts?
Do you have any idea what this country would look like if these retards actually voted?
So they don't want the American people to actually have the ability to vote.
Because in their minds, the way you feel about Tucker and Candace, they feel about everybody, or at least the majority.
So they want to have a system they can manipulate to make sure Candace Owens can't lead a grassroots uprising and get a politician in.
If everyone in this country, one day, if you woke up one day and Tucker Carlson was standing in D.C. and literally 70% of voters in the country were all screaming, talker, talker, and they're about to vote for him, would you, and you had the ability to press a button that would make it so that the votes wouldn't count.
And also, when we were getting in all the election fraud, the Biden's 81 million votes, a lot of the people that cheated, no one ever talked about it on our side, were Republicans.
Like Lindsey Graham, I believe, cheated.
So I just think this is for them to also stay in power.
It is a uniparty thing.
And we all were on election integrity and blah, blah, blah.
There was a viral meme that said when they had psychologists go into prisons, they were doing evaluations on many of these murderers, and they found that many of these violent criminals could not comprehend conditional hypotheticals.
So they asked the question, if you did not eat breakfast yesterday, how would you have felt?
The mistake Republicans made was assuming that China was manufacturing ballots to steal the election when instead Democrats were mass printing ballots and then sending ballot harvesters to go collect them.
Then when it came to signature verification, they were very lax on the signatures.
And the reason why there were limited down ballot votes is because they'd go and knock on a door and say, just check for Joe Biden and then hand off the ballot.
And they were collecting them all.
And James O'Keefe caught them dropping off the ballots that they were collecting.
James O'Keefe filmed at a nursing home old people saying the Democrats come here and tell us all to check the box and hand them the ballot.
So then when they said they're all fraudulent, nobody could prove it because they were, well, it was COVID.
It was a different time and universal mail-in votes.
So when everyone's like, how did Joe Biden do so well and Kamal Harris didn't?
They didn't have COVID this time.
I told Steve Bannon this.
This guy I know is a skateboarder, dumb as a box of rocks, has no business being in politics at all, filmed himself dropping off a ballot to a mailbox, saying we all got to do our part.
And if you asked him what a Supreme Court justice was, he would assume it was a law.
Hey, guys, this morning, and there has been an increased police presence here at Navy Yard all morning that we've been seeing.
It's still this incident, though, we can tell you there were laws changed this past summer trying to address what's been going on really since the pandemic.
Now, this is some of the video showing the chaos that happened this past weekend shared to social media.
D.C. police saying Saturday night may have included a 15-year-old firing a gun into the air, getting stopped by the National Guard, one child getting robbed of their shoes and a jacket, another person going to the hospital after being assaulted and robbed, and a 16-year-old taken into custody after Secret Service says they stopped a rideshare vehicle and saw the teen try to ditch a gun from that vehicle.
We're told groups of teens started to gather in the park near the Navy Yard Metro at around 6:30 Saturday night.
And then two hours later, the crowd had grown to around 200.
Two weekends ago, Navy Yard was one of the areas designated as a juvenile curfew zone, part of the newer law that limits the number of teens that can gather in a public space from 8 to 11 at night.
So over the weekend, 200 largely black male and slightly less black females rampaged through the Navy Yard area as they do quite frequently and caused lots of damage.
Fights broke out.
There were several arrests, and one of the individuals fired a gun several times.
It may have been the same individual, but someone was caught trying to ditch a gun.
We've also had a shooting, or I believe there may have been shots fired in Daytona Beach.
Again, overwhelmingly young black males with some black females.
And I highlight that because this is the issue that we are dealing with right now.
The phenomenon we are seeing of raids on stores and these teen meetups are predominantly coming from the black community.
Now, of course, this is generating a ton of racism online where the response is overtly about race as opposed to the crime.
I would argue, whatever you think, how do we as a society solve for this problem when the laws don't change anything and the department store raids, the mall raids, and the teen meetups are always young black men?
Is it because the black community, I generally don't make generalizations, generally don't make generalizations about the black community, but that they're anti-war generally because of the way their culture.
The Black Panthers were a huge target of Nixon.
They were really anti-Asian.
I don't know that culture, like, because their ancestors were oppressed in slavery.
If you have a child, but you have a responsibility.
agree get rid of no-fault divorce then you're saying that women have to live if they're writing the parents should go to jail i agree with that well no i'm saying if you have a child you have a responsibility to take care of that child if you abandon that child you how does that how does that function legally like if there's a woman who says i can't live with this man he's abusive no i don't have the answer i'm just saying a lot it's very easy and i'm talking about i'll i'll you're not in trouble i will It's very easy for people to leave their children, especially fathers, especially fathers in that community.
It's way too easy because it happens all of the time.
If you're living in a poor urban area and gang culture is rife, it's very hard to make your kid, who is probably bigger than you at this point, stay home.
It doesn't have to, you know, whether it's military or it's community service, but something where it's like actual strict.
A lot of these kids are just desperate for structure.
They have no structure.
They have no authority figures in their life who are at least reasonable, sane people, you know, and so they leave, you know, they're just in this like anarchic condition, which is probably what that thing was.
They get on their bikes, they do wheelies, and they charge at people and then swerve real quickly right before they hit them, try not to crash while they film it.
Again, Ian asked the question, this is coming out.
Why would you say it's coming out of the black community?
Because all of the people doing it are black.
Now, you can deny that and say, no, no, you can't.
That was the point that I think Michael was trying to make.
When I point out that we are watching large groups of black teenagers rampage through malls, through Chicago, through Magmile, in the D.C. Navy yard, in Daytona Beach, and some of them are Latino and white.
Obviously, there's always going to, nothing is literally absolute and everyone already understands that.
The point we're making is that the phenomenon of swerving and of teen takeovers are born predominantly from the black community.
It's a trend that exists largely along, like swerving is almost entirely young black teenagers.
Like black teenagers, you don't see white people doing it for whatever reason.
And I think it's because in these areas, the people they follow, the music they listen to, the trends they have, this is a part of that culture that does not exist in other neighborhoods.
The videos they're putting out from the Navy Yard show young white men peacefully walking past National Guard while black men are screaming obscenities.
Again, I'm not saying all black people because that would not be correct, right?
We have tremendous leaders in this country.
Clarence Thomas is our best member of the Supreme Court, and we should clone him and fire all the rest of them.
But the issue is you are going to see this.
It is already online that you are seeing a massive increase in racism where accounts are pointing out that most of this violence and chaos is coming from young black men, and they're saying that they don't want to live near black people anymore.
Well, I do think that my son was saying something kind of profound about abandoning a whole class and race of kids and not giving them any structure, not giving them anything to hope for.
I mean, that really is bad.
Something should replace that.
Something our country should do something to build up instead of just accept destruction.
When someone is that sort of disenfranchised from society and that antisocial, effectively, you need stick.
You need some kind of punishment to an extent, which is to an, I guess, you've lost your liberty for a few months because you're put into this, you know, national service training camp, whatever you want to call it.
But you also need to have a carrot.
Like there need to be rewards where they actually feel like, oh, damn, I achieved something.
And they get some self-worth.
It is a combination.
I know this probably sounds like, you know, slightly woke sounding, but there is truth that you also need to reward someone when they have done good work.
You can do like a stage show at the end of the three weeks of service where they get like a certificate and come up on stage, have like a graduation when they're 12.
You know, it's good for, like Roseanne was saying, for young kids before puberty, you kind of get the wiring.
The Democrats historically have always been racist.
And if you look at everything they've been doing since Jim Crow, it has just made things worse for black people in the United States.
So creating a welfare system where the mothers will get more money for their kids if the father is not present is literally resulting in women being like, you can't live here because I'll lose my money.
Yes, but you have to not only get the fathers to stay, but you also have to make the fathers good in the first place.
And if you've got like this multi-generational problem where it's like young guys who have not had good fathers, so they've never had that good influence.
They've never learned how to be responsible men.
Then having kids, it's just like you're seeing multi-downstream effects of that.
I also think we need to get rid of all these unconstitutional gun laws.
Because I saw a video out of New York where it was like five black teenagers who robbed a bodega with guns pointed at some dude's face who's just like got his hands up.
And I'm like, why do we just punish the victims?
That's all the Democrats do in these cities.
The innocent guy who was running a business who has no intention of robbing anybody can't have a gun.
And the criminals who don't care about breaking the law are going to do it anyway.
So then you watch, there are videos where, you know, in Brazil, someone will come into a store to rob it, and then seven people just start unloading on them.
And don't do that.
Then in the United States, people just get mercilessly beaten and everything taken from them by these criminals.
And that story from New York where it was like a 19-year-old woman was exiting the train to go to her dorm, and a group of like 12 and 13-year-old black kids stabbed her to death to steal her stuff.
The headline was, it was like a Daily Mail headline, and it was like a group of asylum seekers arrested for gang raping a woman and filming it.
And my point, my comment was something to the effect of like, at what point do we stop calling men like these asylum seekers and start calling them what they really are, which is an invading barbarian horde?
Because yeah, it's, I grew up, when I grew up in the UK, I was able to just walk the streets late, whatever time, as a young girl.
And I was, I mean, okay, I'm not saying that crime never happened.
Of course it did, but the rates at which crime is happening has never been seen before.
And I hate to say it, but it is disproportionately, like massively caused by James Lindsey.
I think generally my rule of thumb is don't attribute to malice what can be attributed first to incompetence.
And by and large, the grooming gang rape crisis was more a product, obviously it was malice of the gang rapers.
And it was definitely malice of some police who would hear about it and just like usher the problem away because nothing is lower on the totem pole than poor white trash British girls.
I hate the word white trash, but like that's the opinion of them.
Okay, so it wasn't the royals or the government or anything that made the laws that we were going to bring in all these people from other countries who thought rape was okay.
No, no, it was the government's fault for allowing this kind of But I think we need to be careful not to completely oversubscribe it to intentional malice and not give where I think most of the blame lies, which is that people became so scared, and this is relating to wokeness, so scared of being accused of being racist that they would rather sweep under the rug an obvious, horrific,
very much race-related crime of mostly, I mean, various countries, but Pakistani immigrant gangs grooming little low-income white girls, children on mass scales.
And people were so scared to admit it because it was more of a heinous moral ill to be accused of being racist than to let this mass rape go on.
I do think that's a very different thing to drafting people into a war that may or may not be justified versus making people do six months of, when you say draft, what do you mean?
But I mean, could you see going to them and saying, since you've made yourself a, you know, voice of all womanhood, you know, and some women do have penises, yes, and men can have babies and all that.
You're a voice of that.
So as a voice with responsibilities, you need to sign up for the draft.
And I think because the issue is we don't actually, we haven't drafted in 50 years.
And here's the point.
I get a lot of people said, yeah, but then you're, they'll sign up.
I'm like, no, no, no, you don't understand.
The people who sign up for, go to your average enlisted soldier or combat infantry or whatever.
They're going to tell you, we do not want war.
I've seen it.
You don't want it.
Those are the people who vote.
And they're going to be like, no.
And then if you sign up for the draft and then you're going to vote for a politician who's like, I want war, you'll be like, hell no, I'm in the draft line.
I'm not voting for that.
You will get a strongly anti-war government only when it truly needs it and the people truly agree.
And the people who are unwilling to put themselves in the line for their country don't get a say.
They get all their rights.
They get free speech.
They get two-way.
They get three, four, five, six.
Nobody's going to, no soldier's going to go live in your house.
We're going to make robot soldiers and they're going to start dancing on the battlefield.
And then we're going to go to the bottom of the water.
Real quick, just think about how crazy it is.
The idea that like in the future, we're going to say like we're declaring war in Iran and we deploy like 10,000 Optimus bots running through the streets and then Iran deploys 10,000 Optimus bots and then both the fat Ayatollah watching soccer and the fat President of the States watching football are sitting there clicking the button while robots just punch each other?
And there's a bunch of robots with smiley faces and there's no humans.
And then they find a bunch of skeletons.
And it turns out that the robots were designed to keep people happy.
It was a colony of humans.
They were colonizing a planet.
They were growing vegetables and stuff and trying to live.
And the robots were programmed to always keep the humans happy until one of the older females of the colony died of old age.
And the humans got sad when they saw this woman die.
And the robots, try as they might, could not make the person happy anymore.
And then the robots discovered something terrifying.
If an unhappy person came into contact with a happy person, the happy person became unhappy because they learned about the death.
So the robots viewed it as a contagion.
And then the only way to stop the spread was to kill the people that were unhappy and spreading it around, which of course created more unhappiness and created a feedback loop.
So then the doctor and assistant walk around with big, fake smiles the whole time because if you get unhappy, they kill you.
If you got like drone surveillance, like Larry Ellison wants to have, or David Ellison, really, total surveillance so that you don't have deviation from the order.
Manhattan Island's a great place to like test that out.
Seven Legion Suits as storms this weekend nearly blew my tree onto my neighbor's property, so it had to be cut down, which cost my entire paycheck with bills to pay.
And the reason I bring this up is that Tucker in the game, it's Tucker Katarlson because they're all parodies of individuals.
And so the base set is one through 11.
Is it one through 11?
Or is it?
No, I'm sorry.
It's one through nine, I think.
Yeah, one through nine are just generic gags.
Like we have racist and racist on the left and the right, but they're just racist.
You know, like the Democrats are the real racist and the right-winger is the racist.
But then once you get to the higher levels, then they're specific personalities.
And then we have the ability set, which are, for instance, the level one right-winger is bankrupt Alex Jones.
And it says he's sitting down on the street corner holding a sign saying, we'll call frogs gay for money.
And the card says, this card may be played as any faction of any level.
Effectively, Deuce is Wild.
And so we have different functions of the special card so you can customize your game.
Thus, it is a collectible card game, which, to my legal understanding, going through my lawyers, means it's not, in fact, poker.
And it's carved out, an exemption is carved out for collectible card games where children, children are allowed to wager money to play card games for cash money.
And I asked, why are children allowed to gamble?
And they said it's not gambling.
It's a collectible card game.
And I said, if a child puts $20 down for a game of Pokemon to win $40 in cash prizes, that's not gambling.
And they owe no.
And I said, okay.
So we have a game coming out soon called Debate Me, where if you're lucky, you will get a golden foil one of 10 God Emperor Trump card.
So let me just clarify the common cards that we made that are largely just gags on the Culture War.
It's literally just a poker set.
Like, it's playing cards.
There's four factions.
There's 52 cards.
There's 13 of each.
And they're gags.
And you shuffle it up and you can play and you can play any card game you can play.
However, the game actually does include rare versions, limited edition, special abilities.
So the God Emperor Trump card, the way it works is it says, if it is your turn, or I'm sorry, it says at showdown, you may choose to play this.
You may choose to play this card as if it was a pair of prime debaters and disregard your second card or disregard any other card.
Meaning that Trump himself is pocket aces, but you don't have to play him that way.
You can choose.
Now, here's the question.
We talked about balance in the game when we were designing it.
Doesn't matter because it's a shared deck game.
You can put a card in the deck that literally says you win the hand because you'll shuffle it up and everyone has an equal chance to get it if you choose to play that way.
If you want to play Deuce is Wild, everybody has an opportunity to get it.
There's four factions.
So each of them has their willing to say or do anything card.
And if you want to play with that, you can.
Or you can make the deck basic and it plays basically like a poker deck.
And what she does is she makes everybody shuffle up their cards and then so everybody's hands get shuffled together and re-dealt out because she's drunk.
So it's like, oh, and I got to get so confused.
And then we have the, it's funny because there's no queens, kings, or whatever.
They're just called like 10, 11, 12, and then 13 or prime, it's called.
But our queen equivalent on the right is named Queen of the Right.
So there's already the clawed rent a human where it's like if an AI needs a task done in meat space, they will, you can say, I'm a person, I'll work for this much.
My point was that there's going to be an app where the AI will be, let's say the AI is building a car.
It is substantially faster to decentralize all of the work of that car.
Actually, let's go McDonald's times 10.
McDonald's revolutionized food because you had a bunch of people doing one simple thing instead of one person trying to do all of these things.
It is easier to teach 10 people each to do an individual task than one person to do 10 individual tasks well.
The AI is going to amplify that by a thousand.
So instead of getting one guy who knows how to design a car, it's going to get 10,000 people to all design one tiny piece or to construct one tiny piece.
They won't know exactly what they're making because they can't see the big picture.
That was my point.
All right.
Based Buzz says millennial men can't find jobs to provide for their family.
Women are killing their own children, and everybody is afraid to go out in public because of all of these attacks.
This war is for Israel.
Donald Trump has been trying to get a handle on oil prices, and he's trying to get Saudi Arabia back on the petro dollar.
The contract ended.
Certainly, Israel is a motivator and pressured us to kick this war off because that's what Rubio said.
That's all true.
But the reason the U.S. wants to be involved is because Trump is desperately trying to get Saudi Arabia to stop selling oil in yuan to China and other countries.
And so Saudi Arabia says, we want guarantees and we hate Iran.
And Trump says, I will do whatever you say.
Just do the petrodollar deal again.
This is why you had that journalist get killed and the U.S. doesn't care.
This is why you've got a handful of Saudis implicated in 9-11.
And the U.S. government protected them for decades.
And they're only now being sued.
So by all, like I said for a million times, we shouldn't.
I don't think we should be funding Israel.
I don't think that's their business if they want to be involved in it.
I don't want to get involved in wars for any country, be it Ukraine, be it China, Taiwan, whatever it may be.
But the people who are claiming the only reason is Israel are allowing the military-industrial complex to get away with whatever they want because they're no longer part of the argument.
If concurrent viewership is lower, then you're going to have to have a lower amount of views or you're going to have to have a lower average watch time.
Like behind the scenes, YouTube says, promote the video to this amount of people.
And I'll give you an example of why I feel that way.
When we started this show, we saw a meteoric rise in subscriber growth and it stopped at 1.4 million subscribers.
Despite new viewers, tens of millions of views and all of that, we were rapidly getting subs and they just turned off.
As if the machine said, this channel shall have 1.4 million subscribers and no more.
Then when I said I'm going to start doing marketing for the show, the Google ads blocked the marketing and won't let us run the commercials, calling them election ads, which is very strange.
When I finally complained after like two weeks, they relented, allowing the ad to run, and the episodes we featured in the ad got deleted for bullshit reasons, which is also very strange.
I will also add that many people have accused Rumble numbers of being fake, but we can see the analytics and we can compare it to the numbers that we've gotten on YouTube and the numbers all remain constant, meaning we see marginal growth.
Before on YouTube, we track our growth.
When we split to Rumble, the growth is identical between the two platforms, indicating that there is a natural trend of slow growth.
And whether or not Rumble or YouTube, we see this comparable growth.
However, Rumble has questioned, or I shouldn't say Rumble questioned, but we look at other shows that get massive viewership, which doesn't track with the podcast industry.
And again, it looks fake.
So I have a couple of theories.
And one theory is that if you were in the CIA, if you were Mossad or MI6, and you saw this burgeoning anti-Israel, anti-Jew sentiment growing on 4chan and other social media, how would you get rid of it?
Well, I just looked at what Alex Jones said back in the 2000s, problem, reaction, solution.
So you create the issue, you then generate a reaction and then provide that solution.
So in other words, you got to ban Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes.
Alex Jones is anti-warrant establishment.
Nick Fuentes is anti-Israel.
If you don't want them, you got to get rid of them.
A prominent personality who all of a sudden is being featured on the front page of YouTube while screaming the Jews.
This converts Nick Fuentes' audience into a new area.
That individual is the Pied Piper who will lead those people away and then start preaching about why, you know, follow them instead.
YouTube props them up to make sure they capture as many of these people of this political persuasion as possible.
Then you either whack the head off, shutting the channel down or banning them, or if they're in on it, you have them shift, slowly shift the conversation away from those topics.
So instead of talking about Israel, they talk about something like, I don't know, Erica Kirk's leather pants.
They launch a new series about Erica Kirk instead of Israel.
And now all of a sudden, tons of prominent personalities who were once Israel critics are just screeching about Erica Kirk, who has nothing to do with geopolitics and couldn't if you wanted her to.
Complain about Erica Kirk will not change whether there's a war or not.
And this is exactly what we are seeing happening.
So again, I'm not saying it's definitively true that it's an operation, but it's exactly what I would do if I was working for an intel agency and they said to me, we want support for the military-industrial complex and support for War with Iran.
I'd be like, okay, well, first of all, you got to get rid of the voices you can't control.
But then you prop up another voice who you can control to say these things.
Then, after a month, have them slowly start incorporating other content, promote that content, which is nonsensical, conspiratorial, and shift those viewers in that direction.
And by promoting it and getting massive viewership, other weak-minded and weak-willed individuals will follow and produce similar content.
And then you will capture that audience and convert them into retards.
I wonder about the aspect of the conspiracy theory that the Jews want to be seen as the victims, that they'll prop up people like to like shit talk them to make them be like, hey, now we have no choice but to ban anti-Semitism because we're on our heels again.
And I'm not saying they're doing it, but like, wow, what a great fucking tactic that would be if you were a military commander.
Why is that Nick Fuentes, who is just some scrawny white dude from the suburbs of Chicago, who lives in, he lives in a house and records out of his basement, he's banned.
Candace Owens, who's married to a British lord whose lawyers work in a building with federal agents, is on the front page of YouTube.
If you are not smart enough to question that, well, then maybe you shouldn't, I guess.
I just have a little silly, goofy question about keeping the American empire alive.
If, assuming we can't stop, fully stop at least the corporations from using slave labor and sweatshops in China, could we potentially just invest in South America and kind of go down the Monroe Doctrine to have better control and influence just for the menu?
I think that Trump taking down the city of London is the end of slavery, and a whole new golden age is going to be born that has nothing to do with that very specific pyramid of fiefdom royalty.
Something new and better is going to come, I think, this year.
I think that prominent donors that support the military-industrial complex and the liberal economic order, some of whom are Jewish, but not all of them, are going to start buying up the media space.
And a lot of this anti-Israel stuff is going to get completely crushed.
I think it's going to be used as a Pied Piper to basically destroy the populist movement.
AI is going to create a massive amount of static noise on YouTube, making it impossible for independent personalities to make channels.
And then the big networks are going to buy up shows, and the front page is going to be all of the chosen podcasts.
Netflix is already doing it, and so are other platforms.
Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Kimmel and Fallon are out, and they are going to replace those kinds of shows with prominent podcasts where they have authentic conversations from personalities that they believe are going to be authentic, appearing, and intelligent.
And the Israel posting stuff will be relegated to social media channels where individuals won't be able to start channels because of too much AI content.
Thus, they will create, once again, the narrative machine like we had in the past, where opinion only came from five channels.
I would prefer that it was done on the table, but we need to build decentralized mesh networking and social media networking because to resist whatever's the overmind.
I'd love to do it on the table with them in plain sight so that we know we're not giving up our gun rights, property rights, free speech is sticking around.
But I have a feeling that there's going to be at least a period where a lot of that stuff has to happen underground.
Well, here's what I think about the Jews: there's good Jews and there's bad Jews, like there is everything else.
And a lot of Jews are commies, and that's bad.
That isn't even being a Jew because being a Jewish person who practices Judaism, that's about individual growth.
So communism is antithetical to Judaism.
So, you know, when they say the Jews, when you see everybody working on the Oscars, and you know, most of them are Jews, writers, producers, and they're all pro-Palestine.
Those are, those are not, I mean, that's what people have to realize: that there is more than one kind of a Jew and more than one kind of Jewish opinion.
But I know that my kind of Jew with my kind of Jewish opinion, I got fired by Jews who are all leftist.
And, you know, I don't like leftist liberal Jews.
And I would like to personally, what do you call it?
Yeah, they need to be excommunicated from the body of Judaism.
They cause all the problems towards Jews in the world.
I don't like them, and I don't like them self-appointing themselves as spokespeople for the Jews like me because you ain't, you never was, and you never will be.
You should be liking slavery, especially that's coming up on Passover.
And you said you're a Christian.
Think about leaving slavery, especially slavery of the mind, and not thinking about being an American imperialist who uses cheap labor in South America.
That would be great.
God bless you.
I didn't know you were still on, or I would have said that.
They always name stuff the opposite of what it is because people, you know, don't have time to really study and look into what stuff is, but they better do that.
And the last thing, you know, instead of a shout out, what I'd like to just ask for is anybody that's interested or religious or whatever, please pray for my brother-in-law, my wife's brother.
He was at Ali Al Salam Air Base in Kuwait when it was bombed by Iran last week.
He's a civilian contractor, and he had to drive the bus to evacuate everybody.
He's currently stuck in Kuwait in Airbox in a hotel.
And they're like running short on supplies and stuff.
But we talk to him once a day.
But just, yeah, just pray for the civilian contractors and the military members over there.
So my question is, basically, especially for Tim, what are other people in your position going to start taking some of these leftist influencers a little bit more seriously.