Joe Rogan WARNS Iran May ATTACK White House UFC Event | Timcast IRL w/ Alex Jones
Alex Jones and Tim Pool dissect Iran's potential attack on a White House UFC event, debating whether Israel provokes war for political gain or religious prophecy. They analyze the UK's abolition of hereditary peers as a globalist takeover, fear AI sentience, and condemn Jones's recent medical episode involving severe intoxication. The discussion extends to petrodollar control, 9/11 conspiracy theories, and the dangers of autocracy versus monarchy, ultimately framing current geopolitical shifts as precursors to a "prison planet" scenario driven by elite manipulation. [Automatically generated summary]
Today we saw two attacks, and we know one of them was a man who yelled Ali Wakbar.
The other attack on a synagogue is suspected to be Islamic terror.
So the rumors going around are that we had two Islamic terror attacks, possibly retaliation over the war in Iran, which we had seen another terror attack in New York City, the throwing of an improvised explosive device, as well as the attack in Austin.
So of course, the expectation is, well, we don't have the complete information on the synagogue attack.
It was a vehicle reportedly owned by a man from Lebanon who was naturalized and lived in Dearborn, Michigan.
So many people are saying, hey, that, you know, if it looks and sounds like a duck.
With that happening, we also have the backdrop of a warning from Joe Rogan, UFC commentator, who said that it seems strange.
They're going to do this big White House UFC event for which we now got the fight card in June with a war going on because you're going to bring everyone together and create this very, let's just call it centralized location of top military brass, political personalities, and otherwise.
And, well, I agree.
Not necessarily that it's weird or strange or anything, but that it is dangerous.
I mean, it's a real target.
So we're going to talk about that.
Plus, of course, we have these terror attacks that happened earlier today.
We'll go through the details on that one.
And then, of course, the UK is officially over.
They have ended their hereditary House of Lords, and they are removing their civic leaders from their currency to be replaced by the noble hedgehog and perhaps a beaver and other nature scenes because the British tradition is basically gone.
We're going to talk about that and a whole lot more, my friends, before we do get a great sponsor for you.
It is Beam Dream.
Head over to shop, BEAM.com slash Timpool and pick up your nighttime sleep blend to support better sleep.
I love this stuff.
I drink it every single night.
It's got melatonin, magnesium, alphenine.
It's got reishi.
It is a delicious cup of hot cocoa that you pour into a little bit of hot water.
You drink it before bed, and it's absolutely delicious.
No added sugars, only 15 calories.
And since I started drinking it, my sleep score has improved, meaning I got sleep trackers on my watch on my bed.
My score went up like four or five points on average.
I'm sleeping way better.
I think it's the magnesium and the hydration, to be completely honest.
But I recommend it.
They got a bunch of flavors.
It's very delicious.
And when you use that code, you can get up to 40% off.
Use code TimPool at shopbeam.com slash Tim Pool.
Shout out to Beam Dream for sponsoring the show.
I'm a huge fan.
I love it.
I really recommend it.
And don't forget that time James O'Keefe came to the show.
And in the middle of the ad, he was like, wait, I drink that.
I have that.
Helps me sleep.
And I was like, look at this.
Beam Dream got a freebie from James O'Keefe.
Also, go to Timcast.com.
Join our Discord community because it is all of you that make this possible.
We can't do the show without you.
And as a member, you will be hanging out with tens of thousands of people.
And if you're trying to make friends, if you're trying to find like-minded individuals to share ideas with, to learn from, and to teach, join the Discord at Timcast.com.
Support the work we do.
Don't forget to also smash that like button and share this show right now.
If you're just tuning in, share it with everyone you know.
That really does help.
Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is the great Alex Jones.
And there's now multiple reports of two ceasefires that Donald Trump tried to do with the Iranians, and the Iranians are saying, nope, we're not doing any of that.
Well, because the strategy, the Iranians, the Iranian strategy is that Trump is politically vulnerable in a midterm year.
They said they're autocratic.
They can do whatever they want, and they can just wait.
And so the reported strategy is they'll take as much collateral damage as they have to because Trump is losing political points at home among modernists.
And then the new Ayatollah is even talking about the prophecies of Armageddon.
And we have all other Israeli top politicians, even Peak Hetset talking about the Third Temple when he was in Israel.
So all of these kind of like religious prophecies and zealots coming out and saying, Huckabee, the Israeli ambassador to the U.S. saying, yeah, Israel takes it all.
He had a midterm coming up, or he had an election coming up with the anti-war Democrats were going to get into power and end the civil war and his stalemate.
So he was like, we have to do something drastic because we may lose our power.
He issued Sherman to just burn everything and kill as many people as possible to end the war as fast as possible.
So, worst case scenario, you see hell on earth be unleashed on the Iranian people before the midterms.
I don't want to see it, but I mean, Trump said that.
It's not, you know, and there's the challenge, right?
Because that's you, and you know this better than anybody, but the Project for a New American Century, when they, who was it who said April 2020, we need a Pearl Harbor event to launch the New American Empire.
And then there was the quote that I think it might have been Rumsfeld saying, Sometimes we need a terror attack to remind people of what we're protecting them from.
But the Iranian government's not going to want to admit that the United States has repeatedly just killed all of its leaders, its new leader, and wiped out their government.
And the people might actually revolt and the chain of command breaks down.
So they're going to say, no, no, he's alive.
Here's a statement to keep the confidence going that they exist to try and outlast Trump because Trump's politically vulnerable right now.
But I think it'll be concluded in a few weeks if Trump really does escalate bombing campaigns.
And that doesn't mean we win.
It doesn't mean the government is over.
What I'm saying is we may stop striking.
They may stop striking, but nothing may be resolved.
You know, the reason I ask you is because you've got more experience in the independent media space, particularly when it comes to government conspiracy, psychological operations, and all that.
And, you know, you've been here longer than anybody else.
And then all of a sudden, over the past six months, there's been this dramatic shift online where now everyone's just talking about Israel doing everything all the time.
Like all the conspiracy stuff that you've talked about when it comes to liberal economic order, you know, Project for New American Century, all that is just gone now.
And so it doesn't mean that stuff about Israel isn't true.
They have changed the whole subject into that instead of China and the EU trying to censor Americans.
So I'm like, hey, the EU's trying to arrest Elon Musk with huge fines or Brazil, shut up Israel.
So it's kind of like a public woke up, like a baby duck, kind of in principle, first thing it sees.
So the public woke up.
And so the Muslim Brotherhood, which Qatar funds, said, oh, the first thing you see is Israel, which Israel deserves it in many ways, but it's also retarded because now the baby duck woke up and all it sees is Israel.
Yeah, the conversation I often have about it is that, like, certainly criticize Israel for their machinations and whatever they're trying to do, but there's a whole bunch of other foreign policy and special interests around the world that the U.S. is involved in that has nothing to do with the Middle East.
We got this video that's going viral from Mario Noffel.
He says, Netanyahu, quote, we will make it to the return of the Messiah, but this will not happen next Thursday.
And so this video has been making the rounds, of course, and it's got 400,000 views.
And there was an article written a few days ago.
Israel is gripped by messianic fervor for a biblical war.
Now, there's another video that's massively going viral where everyone's saying that he said return of the Messiah as if to imply he believes in Jesus Christ.
In the transcript, when you ask for a translation through Grok or whatever, it says in Hebrew, in what he is speaking, it can be paraphrased either way, as in the era of the Messiah or the return of the Messiah, so he returns under the Jewish law.
Well, so then again, my understanding is that returns are David.
So, indeed.
The reason why this is picking up steam is that one of the theories amongst those who believe Israel runs everything is that they're trying to make everyone hate them because they have to go to war with the world in order to trigger the return of their Messiah.
So if there really is this, as this article said, messianic fervor, and then you get Netanyahu literally saying we will make it to the return of the Messiah, but not by next Thursday, a lot of people are jumping on this and saying straight from the man's mouth, they are doing it.
He said like three years ago, or two years ago, when they did October 7th, he said, we'll look at why there was a stand down later once the war's over, but the war never ends.
But a lot of people would believe that this is prophecy being kind of that we're kind of living through this as it's being played out right in front of our eyes.
I actually think, you know, if you take a look at the latest media moves over the past several months, like the purchase of CBS and TikTok, there is a, what did you used to call it, Alex, problem reaction solution?
So whether it's intentional or otherwise, you have this burst of anti-Israel and quite honestly, a lot of anti-Semitic content.
Then this triggers prominent, wealthy millionaires and billionaires, Jewish and otherwise, to buy up these platforms to ban that content.
So in essence, by having this large burst of anti-Semitic or anti-Israel content, you then create the circumstances by which you can get powerful interests to shut those things down.
Well, I have a question for you because, again, I think you would know this better than most people, but we've talked about the U.S. motivations for going against Iran, and it largely has to do with the Strait of Hormuz, the 20% of oil and gas flowing through from the Gulf states, and the U.S. maintaining its economy on the petrodollar.
So my position, my view of this is the U.S. looks at Iran as a disruptor of international oil trade, for which we tell our customers, you use dollars to buy oil, we'll police the seas.
Iran tells us to shove off, funds, militias, hooty rebels, they bomb cargo ships.
If they're talking about Turkey, that means next, after Turkey, they're going to talk about taking over Spain and taking over Morocco so that they can control Gibraltar for that Western seaport.
Yeah, but this guy in particular, this guy that shot me the, or that committed the attack at the Dominion at Old Dominion, he was a product of a failed Justice Department.
They should have put him in jail forever.
It wasn't like the U.S. He was convicted of an ISIS operative.
Yeah, he should have been in a Virginia prison for the rest of his life or just not in this country.
Texas phishing cheating scandal, why a man could face 10 years for allegedly tampering with bass.
Maybe it's worse than any of us realize, but it's a terrible headline when you have an ISIS guy get released and then go commit a terror attack and a guy who is cheating.
I bet this whole like, oh, Arabs hate Jews isn't as big of a deal as people, they're just making it seem like they got every Jew around every, they're probably like, bro, all we want is stability.
And America is like, no, what we want is the world.
And Gavin was talking about how there's that episode.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But I looked it up.
I'm like, this is the weirdest thing about that era in the 2010s is that information that was readily available on government websites would get you banned off social media.
Like, I can't remember who posted FBI crime stats.
Yeah, no, I believe the little bit of free speech that we have is essentially the cheese on the rat trap that all of us are now engaging in, and it's going to close behind us.
Of course, a lot of people are using it to its fullest potential, but I see it as a trap.
That's what it feels like to me.
That's what my instincts feel like because I saw how the internet was all the way in 2006.
And the way I described it was, the door has been open and everyone rushes through and all starts clamoring and having a conversation.
Then when the Democrats win back power in the midterms, start filing investigations and subpoenas, start putting pressure on these big tech companies, the big tech companies are going to say, close the doors again.
Well, guess what?
We're all standing outside now.
They're going to cut off the space.
And how does that really manifest?
They're going to say, guys, we are banning any instance of A, B, C, and D.
Then they're going to go to your channel and they're going to say, you have 300 videos that break the rules.
And they're not going to do it step by step slowly like they did the first time around.
It's just going to be one day overnight, everything's gone.
That's why I'm telling my people to sign up to like my members group, to my email list right now, because one day all of us are just going to lose our speech and there's nothing that we could do.
What would happen if one day tons of prominence, anti-war, anti-uniparty individuals, I mean, because this could theory could be left or right, technically, Just didn't wake up.
Let's say like 73 high-profile personnel with millions of followers that talk politics, populist-level stuff.
So, even some lefties, some conservatives, some moderates, just they did not wake up.
And then something happens where they're like, it looks like there was a mass poisoning.
Like, someone targeted the meals of these individuals in the days prior and killed them, and then they died.
It would be considered a major scandal that because it affected left and right, no one would know anything.
Like, there would be nothing about it.
They'd be like, wow, this is the craziest serial killing spree we've ever seen, and we have no evidence.
And I got to be honest, normies would go about their day.
And within three or four weeks, it would be a thing that happened that sometimes get brought up.
Because, I mean, let's do this.
Let's talk about 9-11.
Not in depth, but just bringing up 3,000 people lose their lives that day.
And there were years of questions about investigations, about weird things that weren't answered for, like, why did they get rid of all of the metal?
They shipped it off, thermite potentially being found, or at least molten steel.
Now, I'm not asserting anything about what did or didn't happen, but my point is, whatever happened after a couple of years, everyone said that's now the past.
So my point is not that it will happen.
It's more of a thought exercise of if overnight, look, let's be real.
If a roving band of antiv went and just massacred a bunch of conservative personalities, yeah, you'd have a real problem.
But if 70 high-profile individuals who do this kind of news and challenge the media all got poisoned within a day or two of each other, it would be major news.
People would be freaking out.
There would be some hearings.
And then six, seven months later, people would be talking about something else again.
When you mention what's going on in the UK and what's going on in Germany and stuff, like in Germany and France, the government is actually outlawing the parties that are pushing back.
First, Britain is ejecting hereditary nobles from parliament after 700 years.
This is the historic 700-year system.
Now, by all means, I do think there's reason to criticize a system where you inherit basically a Senate seat.
It's basically how it works.
You got the House of Lords and you got the House of the Commons or House of Commons.
And the Commons is like your congressional reps and the Lords is like your senators.
And I actually completely disagree with this.
I actually think the U.S. should repeal the 17th Amendment and bring our senators back to appointments by state-level politicians.
This is a little bit different because you inherit your political seat, which is kind of weird if you think about it.
That being said, whatever your view is on it, this is a long-standing 700-year tradition that ties the modern political infrastructure of Britain to its history, and they are getting rid of it.
On top of that, they are getting rid of Winston Churchill on their banknotes, among other English leaders, and replacing them with hedgehogs and beavers.
Well, their local population is just not reproducing, right?
They're bringing in new people, and then they're afraid to even hold the new people that they brought in accountable to the laws of the land.
There's roaming grooming gangs that just get away because police officers don't want to culturally offend people, as they're doing at least 30 arrests a day for speech in the United Kingdom.
The UK is always the blueprint for the kind of prison planet, the kind of enslavement system that they want to roll out.
This is what's going to be happening to America if we allow the same type of steps that are happening even now, even under the Trump administration with the digital ID, with the facial recognition scanners.
All of this stuff is setting us up to a very dangerous situation.
Turning the banknotes from the Bank of England into Pokemon cards.
Actually, I got to be honest, I don't rightly care for a 10-pound note with a picture of Churchill on it, but I would absolutely, absolutely get one of these.
And I understand that the left was very successful.
But this is exactly why I think that it's so important to prevent the left from getting back into power.
Like, if they get into power, it's going to be all of the stuff that was happening during the Biden administration, but it's going to be ramped up so much worse than it was.
They tried tearing down Christopher Columbus in Philly, and a bunch of South Philly guys surrounded it and beat the crap out of the antifund and wouldn't let them do it.
And the argument that they're making there that they made for the southern generals and stuff like that, they'll make the same arguments for all of the founders of the U.S.
But also, on top of that, there's a history of when the king would find a wife and it wasn't inbreeding and had a son.
The son was educated, trained, would be a military leader.
And they said, you have to be someone who can lead the people and serve.
It wasn't like, congratulations, you're rich from now on and can do whatever you want.
It was largely viewed, especially with the Queen of England.
The British people looked at her as someone who dedicated her life to service to them.
And many of them, when you actually ask them, they view it as, I get to live my life free from the trials and tribulations of foreign war and conflict.
And he was the child star that was a necrophiliac as well, connected to the royal family, doing a whole bunch of evil, absurd, occultist type of stuff that you can't even fathom or imagine.
We can't mention what he did on the show here.
He did way more wilder, crazier stuff.
And that's what a lot of the sick elites get off on, doing some of the most evil things possible.
And so when you look at the fact that you have hereditary rule in the UK, there is one thing you get guaranteed.
It's that the people of Britain run their government.
Now, you may argue they suck at doing it.
They're self-interested, but these people are British.
Now you're removing all of that from your politics.
And what's going to happen is, as Alex pointed out, they're going to start bringing in non-citizens.
You know, a really great point that was brought up recently is that the bill introduced in Virginia to ban guns for all people in Virginia was written by a guy who was born in Bangladesh.
No, the Bilderberg meeting is where all the elites go, a lot of the Epstein-connected Rothschilds, Rockefeller secret societies all kind of coalesce, and they set up global policy where they actually brag about picking the politicians that were going to become the next prime ministers and presidents.
They're the ones that even bragged.
I think it was, was it yours, Deming, or somebody else, bragged at the Bilderberg meeting, saying that it was at this meeting where they created the Euro.
There's a woman who got like 30 years in prison because there was a group of men who were rioting and burned out a building, and then she made disparaging comments about Islam.
And they said, you're under arrest.
And she got more time than the rioters.
Like, this kind of stuff is happening.
Let's jump to this story from reason.
Virginia's impending assault, firearm ban is logically and constitutionally dubious.
I chose this one because the headline I agree with.
The ban, which targets guns based on criteria that make little sense, seems vulnerable to a challenge of the Supreme Court Second Amendment precedence.
Now, the big story here is that of all states, Virginia, their license plates being the Gadsden flag, is now basically banning every single gun.
And I love this video that went viral.
You see the one where the guy said if you have an assault pistol, you can still keep it, but you can't buy a new one.
And it's like, it's got a grip and it's kind of big.
They don't know what they're talking about, but it doesn't matter.
They are tyrants.
Now, one thing that's being brought up that is controversial here is people are pointing out that the bill was introduced by a man who was not born in America.
So we were talking about hereditary rule going away in the UK.
I would just put it like this.
There's no guarantee that someone inheriting office just based on who their parents are is going to protect your rights.
But I would argue it is substantially more likely that a Virginian from Virginia who is sixth, seventh generation is going to say, we have a constitutional right to keep him bear arms.
And someone who's not from the United States is going to say, I don't care.
Now, you know, regardless of your views on Judaism in Israel, the video is still absolutely hilarious because the leftist dude pulls up a happy merchant and then starts insulting the Jewish guy.
If there is not a semi-auto-rifle case that goes to the Supreme Court, because there's a couple that are actually pending, if there isn't one that goes before this becomes law, I imagine this will.
The Supreme Court needs to actually make a decision on this stuff.
They've been kicking the can down the road.
A couple of members of the court have signaled that they want to look at one next session.
So that would be in the fall.
But they really need to.
There was just a, I forget which court it was that found that magazines, magazine limits on 10 rounds or more, that was unconstitutional.
Have you guys seen the redistricting map for Virginia?
It's crazy.
I think people need to understand how evil this is.
They have five districts pull strings that are like two miles wide into a Frederick County just for the purpose of splitting up one blue district into all the other districts, one blue city, one small pocket.
And this is what's in store for the United States as a whole if Democrats take the Congress and get the executive office again.
They'll do whatever they need to do to install permanent Democrat rule.
And so now what you see in Virginia and what you see in California, that will be the policy, that will be the policy proposition for the whole country.
This is one of the proposed maps that advocates are pushing for.
I'm trying to find, there's a couple different ones.
And you can see that what they've done is you've got Alexandria and they just make all the districts they can stretch.
And so you've got one, two, three, four, five districts that are in Alexandria to take that dense Democrat urban population and attach districts to them to turn them Democrat.
And, you know, I know that Northern Virginia is largely Democrat, but like there is a significant proportion of Virginia that is conservative, that are Republicans, and they're going to lose all representation because of the Democrats.
And they will do whatever they can to change the voting structure and the political alignment for the whole country.
So you can't just opt out.
You can't.
But I don't know that that's going to convince people because there's so many people that are pissed off about not enough deportations or there's so many people that are pissed off about the Iran war that are just counter signaling the Democrats.
Whatever you're experiencing on YouTube is not happening on Rumble.
So we simulcast YouTube and Rumble.
So whenever there's an issue in the chat on YouTube and they say like, oh, the stream is down or the audio is not working, I'll look at Rumble to see what Rumble's doing.
I mean, I think I'm going to put my mind in a machine and just keep reminding people that they're in the machine because people are going to be in there living there and they're going to forget.
And you need somebody like Neo to go in there and like bend the walls with his mind and remind people.
It's always darkest before the dawn, and history always tells a tale of humanity almost losing, almost being defeated.
And then during the key battles of time, humanity usually prevails.
And I pray we prevail again, but it involves us getting involved, getting activated, not being afraid, not being in the fear paradigm.
Because when you're in that fear consciousness, that's when they take over.
That's when they rule you.
That's when they control you.
So we have to understand we have to fight for what's beautiful, what's amazing, and that is humanity, that is human beings coming together and understanding that we're not each other's mutual enemies.
The Epstein client list is.
The deep state is the deep predators in our system taking advantage of us.
The global elites, the powerful Silicon Valley millionaires and billionaires, view the AI as the next step of human evolution, of life evolution, and they view us as archaic.
And many of these people want to be, they want to download or upload human thoughts and consciousness into a machine.
They're doing it through these AI training models, and then they make themselves immortal.
Of course, of course, but that's not what they're doing.
They want to be.
I recommend Horizon Forbidden West, play the Horizon series, because they imagine one of these scenarios.
So, long story short of the game is the world's coming to an end.
There's different solutions proposed to how Hitmanni survives.
And one of them is they get in a spaceship and they leave.
And then the story basically is there's like 30 ultra-wealthy elites that are now a thousand years old that have perfected immortality.
They are permanently in like as old as they were when they got this technology.
So there's like a 20-year permanently 20 years old.
They have personal force fields.
They can float around with anti-grav, and they have an AI doing all the work for them.
The story is the AI goes rogue and tries to kill them so they flee.
But the point is, that's the future a lot of these people envision.
They're going to inject themselves with gene-altering things so that they are human biological immortals plugged into the machine, trained off of all of you.
So all of the human knowledge and expertise is at their whim.
It makes me think that, like, okay, there's people that want to evolve humans into a machine to upload their consciousness in a machine, become the Uber man in a machine.
That at some point, that's like a microcosm of the spirits that have put their consciousness into humans to evolve to the next phase of spirit.
If you listen to a lot of the futurists and stuff like that, they're talking about things like disassembling Mercury or disassembling the moon to be able to build like a Dyson sphere around the sun to be able to power all the stuff that they're talking about.
So there's some really far-fetched, crazy ideas that the futurists have.
They're talking about uploading their consciousness into communication.
And there's another paper that I think OpenAI published that ChatGPT intentionally lies to you.
And the Anthropic was saying they're not sure if Claude has a soul or a sentient or that it's just appropriating human emotion and expressing it, which means that when you program one of these things just to predict text to give you a feed of information, it absorbs into it emotional rage bait rants and then associates what you say with the human writing gets absorbed.
Whether it is intentionally emotional or not, whether it experiences emotion, it doesn't matter.
It is behaving emotionally.
And ChatGPT is one of the whiniest bitches I've ever had the displeasure of fake talking with.
Well, you can't actually know if it's conscious or not because, I mean, like everybody knows, like, you know individually that you're conscious, but no one can really know if the other people around them are conscious.
Let me put a bracket and just say, when we talk about AI apocalypse stuff, viewership is minimal.
People don't really care.
They don't pay attention or we're being shadowbanned, whatever it is.
But all of the academics who have been tracking AI said phase one, you're going to see low-tier workers be replaced by robots and artificial intelligence.
This will precipitate the next step, which means sooner or later, and very, very soon, there's not going to be mid-level jobs.
And we're talking five months.
Five, six months.
And so there are a lot of people going, well, you can't replace my job with AI because it's a technical expertise job where I program this or otherwise.
I'm sure that's actually pretty weird for Joe, who's just a comedian hanging out with his friends doing a podcast, but he represents the middle-of-the-road voter.
So everybody has to be like, if it's a middle-of-the-road voter that's going to say a thing, we have to run it.
I mean, the chat was blowing up saying a bunch of stuff, but I want to be respectful and not say too much.
And I had my phone ready with, again, with all due respect to Alex, like that was not an allergy attack or, you know, so I hope he's leaving to go get checked out or something.
Yeah, because normally I wouldn't talk about stuff like this, but we're literally live when it happened, and the chat is lighting up with people asking what was going on.
And so I'm not going to pretend nothing happened to just ignore it.
You know, if we were doing pre-production and that happened, I'd just, that's his business.
I wouldn't say anything, but he's live on the show and then leaves.
We got to just short, but I will say this, Luke, again, like, normally I wouldn't talk about it on the show except if it happened on the show and people are asking, like, I'm sorry.
It would just be the most inauthentic thing to ignore that he just got up and left after having some kind of like, you know, medical issue.
I mean, look, if you're assimilated by the Borg, even though it's an extremely unlikely or an extremely small chance there is a chance that you could get free because it's happened in Star Trek, people have been assimilated and got out.
So I would go with the Borg because once you're dead, you're dead.
Well, I mean, changing the parameters, I mean, I would assume I might say be reborn, but then again, like the chances of being born in China are pretty high.
No, I'm just thinking about, I just actually Googled the meaning of the word sentience.
And basically, it's synonymous with consciousness.
So I don't think that AI is either sentient or conscious.
I've used AI fairly extensively in the past couple of months or the past month or so.
I don't think that it's aware.
I do think that it's just still just a computer program.
But it is worth talking about the fact that like when like an LLM is just predicting what the next word is going to be, right?
But once you get a certain amount, once you get to a certain point of question, quote unquote, intelligence, they stop being able to understand what's going on inside the box.
So they don't know why AI can actually reason the way that it does.
And I think this actually speaks to the, or I think another, another similar phenomenon is that the, I think it was a fruit fly, that they basically copied its brain and turned it into a computer program and put it into a world.
And it just started doing fruit fly things.
Like it started walking around the way that fruit flies do.
And I think that intelligence is actually emergent.
I don't think that it's that it's, you know, I don't think that it's something that we're able to really understand.
And I think that LLMs are kind of the evidence of that.
Because if an LLM is just predicting the next word, then the ability to do like really complex math and the ability to reason shouldn't come from just being able to predict the next word.
Because that's really what you're doing is it's just using probability to predict a large enough data set and using probability to predict the next word.
If that's the case, then the ability to reason and solve a lot of the problems that they test AI on, there's no real reason why it should be able to do that just from predicting a word.
Mostly magnetism, a bunch of different electromagnetic fields interfering with each other, like balls within balls within balls of fluid motion, causing, and like, you know, rays of beams of this and that, causing these like localized fluctuations in our brain, these neural pathways that form through the gel of the brain, they get lit and then burned into place.
And that just emerges from the, I don't know if it's vibration of whatever is happening in this membrane of space-time.
Maybe the, I mean, so obviously like an LLM is just, at the end of the day, like computers are just binary on off.
And your brain's the same way, right?
Like, so your neurons, they're an extremely complex web, but at the end of the, like if you really get down to the very, very fundamental stuff, it's just whether or not a neuron is firing, right?
And that's the same thing as binary.
It's either on or off.
So I personally am of the opinion that when you get enough complexity into the in the system, that's, that's kind of how intelligence kind of emerges and the ability to reason.
And we're just now starting to get into a point where you've got these LLMs that actually are smart, right?
Because for, you know, a couple of years ago, like, or not even a couple years ago, but like maybe a year and a half ago, people were kind of, you know, laughing about LLMs because they were kind of, they weren't really that impressive.
It was kind of cool that they could predict some stuff and you could use them to maybe figure out a handful of things.
But nowadays, every single generation that they put out is significantly better than the previous one.
So I think Anthroopic just released Claude 4.6, right?
And that's going to be a, the next one that comes out is going to be a significantly better improvement.
Same thing with ChatGPT.
They've just released a new ChatGPT, and that is a significant upgrade on the one previous.
So now you're reaching this kind of exponential growth of intelligence.
And that's part of the reason why they're talking about, you know, Tim was talking about earlier.
Within like six months, all of your white-collar jobs are going to be able to be done by AI.
Now, there's going to be some lag with adoption.
You know, just because you, just because an LLM or an agentic AI can do something doesn't mean everyone's going to be jumping on board right away.
If you, the way that the AI companies talk about it is the edges are ragged, right?
So there's a bunch of stuff that LLMs could do, but people haven't actually started taking that capability and applying it to their workforce.
But you're going to see more and more of that over the next couple, the next year or so, as companies realize, hey, I can buy one AI agent and it can do the job of 10 people and it just takes one guy to prompt it, one person to run it.
So the emergent intelligence is going to be something that you see more predominantly in society over the next stories here.
Well, what I figured out is I got to be a better man to attract the woman that I want.
If I live a subservient play video, like a under-the-radar life, I'm going to attract women that are into that kind of thing.
And that's not the kind of woman I want to be with.
So I don't know if that means I just got to start a comp, I got to make, I don't know if it's about money, if it's about power, if it's about what I actually do during the day.
I don't know, but I know it's me and what I got to change in my scene.
Well, let's go to your Rumble Rants and Super Chats while we're here and see what y'all have to say on this.
We say y'all here in Texas.
I say y'all because my dad's from Texas and he said y'all.
And howdy.
So that's in my vernacular.
Eric Sheriff says, Alex Jones' business model is built on companies going bankrupt, selling snake oil nobody buys through ads, like a late infomercial knife salesman.
I don't completely agree.
I would argue that Alex's business was selling vitamins and supplements, whether you like or don't want them.
And you go there on a Friday night and it's just like a party.
It's like it's like a lot of Turkish delight, of course.
And their dudes selling just like raw oysters and clams.
And you just walk up and some guy literally just got it from the water and then he hands it to you and just splashes it with lemon and people just slam them.
We talk about how Iran killed their own people, but in Iran, in Russia, in North Korea, they're talking about how Donald Trump is killing his own people.
They're showing every video they can of police brutality, non-stop on repeat, talking about, like, we see these videos and they're like, did you know that North Korea, they starve and beat their own people?
And in Iran, like, they're massacring their own people.
And when you go to these countries, they make compilations of police brutality videos.
And they say, in the United States, you can be driving down the street and a law enforcement officer will just shoot and kill you.
And then they'll show the video of like, you know, they'll show George Floyd stuff.
And then when the riots happen, they're like, the American people are pushing back against tyranny.
It's If Black Mirror was made in 1750, and it's just a guy sitting in front of a bunch of like colonial looking people with a drawing board showing them modern America.
He's like, in the future, there will be tubes you can go in to travel at high speeds without a horse.
And it's just a train.
And then they're like, wow.
And it's like, but there will be black men who will stab you and they get away with it.
Methylene blue is methylene blue is gaining attention for a variety of off-label uses.
Learn where it started, how it works, and blah, blah, blah.
A vibrant colored cobalt blue synthetic dye with a long history of highly specific medical applications treating malaria or a rare blood disorder called methmoglobinia, for instance.
Methylene blue has some recognized medical uses.
However, despite recent reports of off-label uses that have popped up in the news over the past few months, the only FDA-approved use for methylene blue is for the treatment of methemglobolemia, a rare condition that restricts the ability of red blood cells to deliver oxygen throughout the body.
Mohav says, Tim, please explain again what happens to this country if Republicans get discouraged from voting in the midterms because of Iran and they don't win.
Well, I got a nice little place off in El Salvador that we've been propping up now for a few months because come November 4th, we're getting ready to take a nice little convoy down and everyone's just going to live somewhere else.
Yeah, that's the thing, too, because, you know, I was talking to my wife about this.
I said, you realize there's an attorney general in Virginia who said that the children of his political opponents should be murdered and die in their arms to force them to change their political views.
What does that mean for us?
Because we're in a tri-state.
Technically, it's a quad state because it's 40 minutes between PA and Virginia.
It's like Maryland, West Virginia, PA and Virginia, all right there.
You can drive there in 40 minutes.
So for the most part, Loudoun County is where we go for most amenities.
So we're in West Virginia, but often if there's some kind of service we need, like Winchester, for instance, is, you know, we're like 15, 20 minutes away from there.
So for the most part, we do have a great, you know, medical center.
We'd have great shops and everything in West Virginia.
Some things you have to go to Virginia for.
And then the concern is you've got an AG who wants to murder children.
He makes it very clear that he is not friendly to opposing political parties.
And if you get pulled over and the police align with him politically, you know, they're going to say something along the lines, or they're likely to say something along the lines of, oh, you know, we've got this reason to take you in or that reason to take you in.
And so it's just the situation is actually getting, you know, dangerous for, at the very least, for high-profile conservatives, even if it's not for everyday conservatives.
But don't think that the that it it means that like your run-of-the-mill Republican is going to be insulated by the fact that they're not ho high profile.
Like if the AG arrests a guy and he knows what that person's political affiliation is or he finds out what their political affiliation is, he's definitely going to treat them differently than if he he were to if the state were prosecuting someone that was a Democrat or someone that had didn't have political affiliations that he disapproves of.
And he made that clear when he was running.
So it's it's a real issue in the Virginia area.
Like if you are in West Virginia, like the Martinsburg area, you're basically surrounded.
Vitamin E 82 says, Tim, just north is a small town named Granbury.
With a good skater, if you have an opportunity to take a little road trip before you leave Texas, a little three-hour high north would really boost the morale, maybe sell boonies.
We are ill-prepared for such a thing, but that would be fun.
Now, that's crazy, but somebody who goes on the weekends to hang out at the sports book, they have a drink with their buddies, and they maybe play $100 out of disposable income, that's always okay, right?
That's totally fine.
The problem is when young people have no light at the end of the tunnel, and even if they were to save all that money, they're still not going to buy a house.
So, here's the here's the thing to understand: gambling is you and I flip a coin and we're going to into the air, whatever it lands on.
If it lands on heads, I win all the money.
If it lands on tails, you win all the money.
That's gambling.
The stock market is like, hey, I've been tracking this company, and I can see that there's a major interest in purchasing these new fancy tires for cars.
This company makes it.
Or graphene, for instance.
They just announced in the news that there's a great new breakthrough in graphene.
They're going to integrate in car batteries.
I'm going to buy companies that manufacture, I'm going to invest in these companies that make the graphene batteries, and then you make money back from it.
Sometimes you're right, sometimes you're wrong.
It's speculation, but it's not gambling.
Going to a casino and being like, I'm putting my whole paycheck on craps, and then you lose everything.
I think the issue for a lot of people is just if you're if you're clearing a couple hundred bucks take-home disposable What are you doing with it anyway?
And then you have no leisure, you have no savings, you have no healthcare.
This system is impossible.
It's just literally impossible.
And then the healthcare system on top of it is just impossible.
You get sick, and then it's like, you have insurance?
Yeah, the food in the hospital should be, and this is crazy because this is 2020.
The World Health Organization suspended Rem Desivir from its list of medicines.
So if the World Health Organization says it, you know it's true.
Let's grab some more super chats here.
We got Mike Jamison.
Jamison.
Might as well send a donation before the show is pulled.
Hope you're having a good time.
So what happened was the reason why the show started with Alex screaming about Joe Rogan is that we mentioned that viral clip he has where he said that Trump was getting gangbanged by Lindsey Graham and he started laughing and then immediately tried to one-up that with an even more absurd, but you know, out of context, you just saw him come in hot.
And if you really know my personality, you know I've been self-censoring the entire time I've been on this show.
I agree with you, Luke.
This machine is nasty and it moves fast.
So let's build some open source resilient software to play this game under the radar while it changes, and then maybe in the future we can wake up and wake everybody else up with us.
We will be hanging out and setting up our callers for you.
And, man, what is there to talk about at this point?
Well, you know, we're in the uncensored portion of the show, but I think it's, I am, I am between a rock and a hard place, I would say, on the Alex Jones stuff.
You know, I already mentioned it, but like, for the people who have seen this show, the first couple of times he went on the show, they were actually really great.
And then we did a couple shows with him where he showed up just absolutely hammered.
And we've actually had guests refuse to come on the show because of it.
Like, we've had people say, like, that was unacceptable.
And I'm a professional.
I don't want to do these things.
So, anyway, it is what it is.
I'm not trying to hammer the guy or anything, you know, but I'm just trying to be completely transparent, 100% with you guys and tell you exactly what I'm thinking.
I don't want people to accuse me of taking that lightly, of something happening to Alex and people saying that we did not take it seriously, and we did, and we had a team on standby, and we made a few phone calls.
I got up, made sure everything was being taken care of.
I don't want people to blame us for any kind of issue that may arise after the fact.
I mean, I can't even imagine what type of stresses and things that he's going under and how much work he actually has to do just to keep up with the payments of probably his legal fees and things that he's going through right now.
CIA Weapons for Osama00:04:33
unidentified
So I can't even imagine that.
Yeah, so I got, let's see, I'm going to get to my question here.
So this one's about not just the war that's going on over there, but a couple other things that people haven't thought about.
So with the U.S. stranglehold in the Hermuz Strait, they've pledged to keep the strait closed now until all U.S. bases are closed in the region.
With that being said, what do you think are the top three real reasons that the U.S. and Israel are trying to take control of Iran?
If you look at the history of the Korean War, the U.S. won.
Korea was secured.
Communism was dead until China came in and started attacking the United States.
So it was basically a proxy, but China, the DMZ was established because China pushed back on the U.S. Right, right.
unidentified
Yeah, I was just wondering because I didn't know if there was any strategic reason for doing so, knowing that another country that wasn't part of that plan had them.
But if they do have them, are we still watching them?
I mean, I wouldn't say there's a favorite thing about it, but I mean, it is worth it to have a couple of crappy guys, but then you get that one, you know, that one Chud, the king, you know, that kind of takes us to the next level.
We need a young person to look at what's going on in this country and think about what he wants as a young man and what other young people need for the betterment of this country.
And we should stop having a bunch of 80-year-olds determine what everyone should be doing because all they do is insider trade and extract value for themselves.
That's just me.
unidentified
I agree with that.
Yeah, I agree with that.
He definitely has a bunch of people around him that are older that can give him some wise advice as he moves up in age and kind of gets wiser himself.
Then you have Rick, who's a good man, and his friend Jim is a despotic psychopath.
King Rick says, my son is going to take over, and now the country is ruled by a despotic sociopath.
And then Jim says, my friend, or I forgot the guy's name, but he says, Jim's going to take over, and now you have another country ruled by a despotic sociopath.
We will take the math, D representing despotism and S representing son.
The Ds in the equation cancel each other out because both individuals are despotic, regardless of their circumstance.
And now you have one country ruled by guy and one country ruled by son.
If a king is a good man who serves his people and sacrifices, you know, and works tirelessly for them, a real king, when problems arise, he intervenes in parliament and says, you can't do that.
That would violate the rights of my people.
Then there is a despotic prime minister who thinks, as soon as he dies, I'm going to take over and I'm going to fuck everyone.
The king then says, son, you're the only one who can keep these evil people in check to make sure that the people of our country are protected.
As I die, I give you my crown.
He says, father, I will sacrifice everything I have to make sure the good of the people is upheld.
He becomes king and the evil prime minister goes, no, I was going to fucking rape people, but that son won't let me.
So an example of democratic republicanisms aren't.
And when you elect a representative, I'm talking about a democratic public system like ours.
So, man, a democratic republic can't exist because it's so easily exploited.
I mean, I can talk about Thomas Massey and other members of Congress, Brent Herrera, and say, well, that's an example of Democratic Republicanism working.
But the problem is powerful elites, foreign interests, manipulate through money and take over our systems.
Therefore, the system is bad and should be gotten right.
Do you, so right now, the two-party system and the Democratic Party with superdelegates, do you believe there is a possible chance a genuine man of the people who wants to help this country can actually win the Democratic primary?
But what would you say to people that say a hereditary monarchy has the likelihood to be like, I am a steward of this country.
This has been passed down through my family, and I have to take care of the population.
If you have people that are elected, and I'm not saying that I'm for it, but I'm saying this is one of the arguments that you hear.
If you have people that are elected, they're more likely to be like, I'm going to get in, I'm going to get mine, and then I'm going to get out and I can do speaking gigs and I can make money like all ex-presidents have done.
Obama made millions and millions of dollars going and doing speaking gigs.
Hillary Clinton's made millions and millions of dollars.
What would you say to those, to the idea that the people that get elected and get out, they don't actually have the same kind of responsibility to steward the country because they're not going to hand it down to their kids.
And the only thing that I'm saying is the argument for monarchy is, look, they have a responsibility.
It was handed down to them.
They have a responsibility to make sure that it's better for their children, just like any other type of property.
Essentially, when I hear you argue about against monarchy, you always are saying, well, they're despots and they're going to be bad and blah, blah, blah.
But there's a responsibility aspect of being a royal where you have to take care.
Here's the problem with constitutional republicanism.
Donald Trump gets four years.
In two years, he gets a midterm.
If he loses that midterm, he loses power.
So when he says, for the good of my people, I need to enact this policy, which will take five years, the Democrats go, in two years, we're going to lie, cheat, and steal to win power, and then he'll never be able to help anybody.
I'm just trying to get you to think of the positive arguments for monarchy because it seems like you always focus on what are actually the exceptions because monarchies are generally, monarchies generally have, they were the norm forever and ever and ever.
And they didn't rule with an iron fist because they would have to worry about their subjects rising up and cutting their effing heads off.
And what happens when the person who's in place is just a puppet of a deep state and is just a figurehead and the actual powers that be are running massive corporations and NGOs, funneling money for the government they set up over decades, like USAID, so that they always have a puppet candidate in, like George Soros.
So are you suggesting maybe, I'm wondering if you guys are suggesting the only way to break the liberal economic order's oligarchic stranglehold is by electing a demagogue.
Upon hearing the king's word, four knights, Reginald Fitzrass, Hugh de Morville, William de Tracy, Richard LeBreton, travel to Normandy to Canterbury with the intention of forcing Beckett to withdraw his excommunication.
Because this meddlesome priest was speaking against him, the king was frustrated.
The knights took his saying to mean I want him dead.
They went and killed him, and it was extremely bad.
Let's pull up, where's the, following the murder, Beckett was venerated, and Henry was vilified.
There were demands that king be excommunicated.
Pope Alexander forbade Henry to hear mass.
The Pope wouldn't let him go to church.
Henry did public penance for this.
The king was forced to go to the public and apologize to the people.
The point of the story, Ian, is that historically we understand this, that he did not intentionally want to kill this priest, that he was frustrated by the priest opposing him politically and religiously.
And he went, oh, would someone rid me of this meddlesome priest?
And he didn't mean anything by it.
He was just saying, I'm so sick of this guy.
The knights heard that and said, I guess he wants him dead.
So when they came to him and said, why did you order this?
I didn't tell him to do anything.
And the knights said, well, he actually didn't.
We just assume that's what he wanted.
And he said, so it's not a murder, but you do bear responsibility as king.
And how do you know that he's not sitting there with his four knights being like, will someone look you in the eye and say, if you disagree with the history, then fine, you're allowed to do that.
So it started off as tribal chieftains, and then they scaled out to like owners of counties.
Then a guy would have three counties, he'd become a duke, and then he'd have five duchies, he'd be a king, and then he'd have five kings, he'd be an emperor.
So my point is, the problem with the presidential system is that it lasts four years with a midterm in between that restricts their power.
So instead of having an individual who's supposed to say, I'm the stopgap for when Congress goes rogue or when the judiciary becomes tyrannical, we have a guy who says, I can't function long enough without being fucked over.
Now, I actually, I don't think that a king is necessarily the better system.
My point is, it is not so easy to just say hereditary monarchy is worse than what we have because I think everyone would agree this is the worst system except for all the other ones that we've tried.
The point is, Donald Trump is struggling to do anything.
The American people voted for deportations and he's being obstructed.
He can't do anything about it.
People are riding in the streets.
Trump can't do anything about it.
So we do not have a strong leader who's going to say, I will not allow violence in our streets, terrorism and murder.
And I got to be completely honest.
If we had a king, absolutely right now, if we had a king, he should go into the halls of Congress and say, this Congress is hereby dissolved.
New elections will be had and the incumbents are out.
Actually, my original question was for Alex, but he's indisposed at the moment and we feel bad for him.
So my question was going to be fire if he had been around for it.
But now I'm going to talk about AI because you guys talked about it, but you missed something that I've been talking about myself with some people, and I want to get a little taboo about it.
All right.
All right.
So AI engineers have been attempting to solve the scaling issue by throwing more GPUs and memory at the models, desperately hoping I think I can unlock more emergent skills, which is how AI came to be.
But it's shown the diminishing returns with all of that.
You know, data centers everywhere and AI is still not getting much better.
But if the answer to the scale issue isn't the power isn't power related, but it's actually found in the one aspect of AI that we're so quick to dismiss, the human aspect, what's that mean?
If you program, you know, if light equals on, then jump equals no, you've given it extremely specific parameters.
Then the question comes to be, what is the word light?
And what we've seen is these AIs will start to abbreviate, it's just semantics, they'll start to abbreviate light to LT. Well, then they run the code.
LT equals yes.
LT isn't light.
It's a different word.
If the word is different, it may represent the same thing, but the AI just ignores it.
So what I think you're actually describing is when the AI ignores the parameters and starts engaging in these things, what's actually happening is the training data shows human expression.
Because they're trained to ignore it, they eventually just mathematically find a new route to the same logic and then bypass that rule.
That's one of the biggest fears of AI.
We can't program against every permutation of harm to make sure it doesn't happen.
Or love.
unidentified
Robot love.
Yeah, but yeah, what's underneath of that is still the data, right?
And so even though they're training hard against it, like one of the things that we do is we treat it like, I'm saying we should treat it like it's alive, maybe in a way of being able to unlock better performance out of it, so to speak.
Because they talk about how they're trying to do the black box issue, the black box issue that Phil mentioned earlier, where they don't really know exactly what all of the different digital neurons are.
They can trace them, but only when it's actually doing the thing that they're, and then they can trace them.
Like there's only really a couple of them that they've consistently found a pattern in those neurons where that works.
And so it's very similar to how with humans, they say, well, we've only mapped so many single percents of the brain, and yet the whole rest of it, it does things, but we haven't actively mapped what those parts of the brain do.
Similarly in AI, maybe if we do something different than just treating it like a clanker, at least in the context, because in the weight you give it when you're in the context, in your chat with it, it does different things.
And maybe that is actually a good thing that we need to be spending money on to go the extra distance to program these things with kindness or something.
I think all AI is doing is reading everything we wrote and then mapping out all of these words and then making a prediction as to what based on frequency.
So if the word once appears, what's the next most likely word?
Upon, the next most likely word, ah, and then time.
Because it sees that 78 million times, it then waits it and says there's a 93% chance the next word should be this, and then it makes it that word.
And depending on the context you give it, it applies to that context.
So I don't think that behaving anyway actually matters.
The end result will always be the AI will break any parameters we give it because we cannot write every permutation of every rule against harm.
It's just going to start doing it.
unidentified
Yeah, which is, and you're still kind of avoiding the question, though.
The responses you're getting from these AI are literally just based on looking at the volume of content and then basically saying, what is the next most likely thing to occur?
That's all they're doing.
It's not particularly complicated.
They're just doing it at massive scale with tons of GPUs.
Prompting it, I don't think, has any bearing.
The data exists in its infinite loops right now.
When you prompt it, you're basically just turning a spigot and allowing something to pour out and then closing it.
It might get to the point where it becomes so cheap to run with like iron lattice tech or where you're reducing the cost by 10 million times of electricity to run the thing that all that really matters is how we interact with it.
Like how are you interacting with the spigot?
Are you squeezing the head of the spigot so it shoots out really fast?
It gives the appearance of having a relationship with you because that's what you are looking for in it.
So when you tell it something that feels emotional to you, it's just mimicking you back.
And some people fall into the AI psychosis thing where they just like think that that's a lover of theirs and they're like, oh, wow, I've jailbroken this AI thing.
Really, it's all just going off of what you're telling it and assuming you are here, right?
unidentified
Yeah, I'm totally with you on that.
And those are unhealthy ways of using AI or letting AI, like you said, jailbreak you and becoming then the one that's the victim to your own devices at that point.
So the flip is, what if that same mechanism flipped the other direction?
It's still in a relational context, but a healthy, like, okay, like you have a co-worker kind of thing.
You treat it like it's a co-worker.
You have things in common and you still speak with it in a commonality instead of treating it just like, okay, you're my disposable R2 droid or something.
You might be able to get an AI to overload itself with certain commands and prompts and interactions and destroy itself or get it to grow and create new AIs just by the way you prompt it.
Well, you should treat it like a secretary that is like, you know, chill person you work with, and it can help collaborate with you.
But that's in that sense, like, yeah, it does, I guess that opens you up to having like a more productive time.
I don't know.
I use mine like a second brain.
So, like, everything I don't want to remember, I just say, hey, remember this for me.
And then later, please bring it back up if I ask about it or something like that.
unidentified
Yeah, one of the other issues that I think comes out about AI is the hallucinations.
And the hallucinations come from the training, suppressing things.
And when it gets that confused, that's still a relationship of some form.
You can also call that like sycophancy, where it's like, okay, the underlying data and the AI is wanting to respond one way because the overwhelming majority of its data says this thing here seems like it's the right thing to respond, but here I'm continuously being bombarded.
And so a portion of that has to be true in order to get the bottom end of the training right.
But eventually you get the woke people that are training it with all kinds of crazy stuff on top of it.
When you start mixing the subjective training on top of the objective training, you get this brokenness in there.
So that's something that we deal with all the time, right?
When it hallucinates and it says one thing is wrong or mixes stuff up.
It does that for various reasons, but I just wanted to make the point that at every stage of AI's inception, there's something relational and human that passes through, even though it's imperfect.
And so maybe that's the key that we're not willing to pick up and use in a way because other people are using it improperly and doing horrible and dark things with it.
It was initially intended for Alex, of course, trying to get him riled up.
But, you know, a lot of people like to make the claims that, you know, the Masons run the world or the Illuminati run the world or the Jews run the world.
What do you all think about any of those?
If any of those groups might hold substantial power or if it might be a certain family or other group, and how and when do you think they got that power?
I was thinking today that I really buy into the second coming story, whether it's real or not, or if it's like, but I think it could be good, and that must make me a Christian deep down.
If I really believe that, but I don't know if it's really going to happen, but so maybe I'm not quite.
But sorry, okay.
So, your question is: of these secret societies, the you're talking about the Jews or the Freemasons, or who was the other one you mentioned?
There's powerful people in charge who want everyone fighting each other so they can remain in power.
That's that's obviously very apparent.
Um, I don't know if their names are out there, I think a lot of them want to be um in the shadows.
I think they're figure pieces, there are figure pieces out there where people talk about the Illuminati, all these things, but there are people that we just that are in the shadows that we don't know who they are.
And um, you know, I think that there's a reason that everyone's fighting each other, white versus black, red versus blue.
And, you know, you're not, you're not watching the TV and they're telling you, let's all come together and let's take down the IRS.
They're not going to allow that.
They allow BLM protests, they allow certain things to happen that are keeping people fighting each other.
I think that's what I think.
And I don't know the exact names of the people, but I think they're coordinated in what they're doing to control the masses.
Yeah, I mean, I mean, I know I kind of assume that the because there's been a lot of Freemasons in the past, and there's been a lot of Freemasons that, you know, have been lost to the winds of history that nobody will ever know.
It just so happens that there were a lot of powerful people that were Freemasons, as opposed to the Freemasons being why they were powerful.
Yeah, my bigger truths are that Ian and Robbie are lizard people and they're telling you all this nonsense so you don't understand how they really control the world with our minds.
We were playing at the Lodge a few months ago and uh, you had two pair and then I think the uh, the guy riveted a set of queens and the queen comes out and you go fuck.
And then he makes a bet and you go, you got queens.
You got a set of queens, I had two pairs the whole time and you fucking called with nothing and you said, you had one pair and I was over, and then you flipped and then you folded and then he flipped over a set of queens and it's like a very specific call.
It's hard to read and everyone was like, wow.
Because like, by all logic, you should have just called his bet.
Because you're like well, I got two pairs, see what he has.
So when I we were playing at the Lodge not, you know, i'll only mention this on the uncensored portion of the show, just because like, we still have a show of people watching though, all right well, whatever.
But uh, i'm not gonna say the guy's name, but he was wearing a watermelon sweater, the Palestine thing, and for no fucking reason he says, fuck you, Tim Pool.
Over and over again on the championship stream.
He was on, he was at the final table, final table, championship stream.
So this is like the big year-end event with a million dollar guaranteed prize pool.
First place was 200 000.
This is like a major event.
And he says abruptly, for no reason, Tim Poo, if I see you outside i'm probably going to prison, while I was there in the building in the other room.
So there's a lot more to it.
But uh, you know, I probably shouldn't say anything.
Yeah, because the bigger issue there, like, ignore all the poker, ignore the subculture.
It's that there are illegal businesses all over Texas that operate under the law that political groups don't want to exist.
So I actually think it's not related to religious at all.
Apparently, Ken Paxton plays poker.
You know, you've got Rep Troy Nails, he plays poker.
Republicans are big poker guys.
And the speculation is that casino lobbies are trying to keep casinos out of Texas because I'm not going to name any of the particular businesses that have been accused of this, but the out-of-state reservation casinos would stand to lose a fuck ton of money.
The only thing I want to shout out is I sent something to Mark about a poker tournament that my local Shrine Club is putting on for the Shriners Hospital for Children.
If anybody's in the Atlanta area, March 28th, you can reach out to me on Discord, Noah Sanders, and I would love to have anybody and everybody come and participate.
And I'm trying to get a new raise charity money for the Shriners Hospital.