Download Rumble Wallet now and step away from the big banks — for good! https://rumblewallet.onelink.me/bJsX/timcastirl
SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/
Join - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLwNTXWEjVd2qIHLcXxQWxA/joinShow more Hosts:
Tim @Timcast (everywhere)
Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) | https://allthatremains.komi.io/
Brett @PopCultureCrisis (everywhere)
Libby @LibbyEmmons (X) | https://thepostmillennial.com/pod
Producer:
Carter @carterbanks (X) | @trashhouserecords (YT)
Guest:
Robbie Bernstein @RobbieTheFire (X)
Podcast available on all podcast platforms!
For advertising inquiries please email [email protected]
EPSTEIN ARRESTS HAVE BEGUN | Timcast IRL #1453 w/ Robbie Bernstein Show less
Prince Andrew, or former Prince Andrew, has been arrested.
And this is in direct relation to the release of the Epstein files, where it's been revealed he was arrested for potentially releasing information to Epstein on foreign affairs.
And it's a big deal.
He is facing life in prison, which is pretty dang wild.
Now, Thomas Massey, you know him, you love him.
I don't know, maybe not.
He tweeted out an image of all of the different hoaxes and scandals for which no one has been arrested save Epstein files, which he changed the zero to a one.
Now, this guy, Andrew, he's not being arrested for trafficking or anything like that.
Some are speculating that it's because they can't, because the statute of limitations would be up at this point.
No, I think they're getting him because he was leaking state secrets to Epstein, which is actually, honestly, in my opinion, much more interesting.
And I don't mean to downplay the severity of what Epstein is accused of, but Prince Andrew leaking state secrets to Epstein, the question is why.
The speculation has been for some time that Epstein was working for foreign intelligence.
Perhaps, as Dan Bongino stated on this show, Middle Eastern intelligence.
We wonder which country.
Why then would Andrew be giving privyed information to Epstein?
It makes you wonder.
Could it perhaps be blackmail?
That's the longstanding theory that Andrew was being blackmailed by Epstein or not necessarily Andrew, but that Epstein was blackmailing powerful world leaders for access, information, or otherwise.
But my favorite story actually is that Trump confirmed aliens are real.
And I got a community noted, or no, they're trying to community note me on X because Trump was asked on Air Force One about Obama claiming aliens are real.
And Trump immediately goes, that's classified information.
He shouldn't have done that.
And then Ducey is like, so they are real.
And he's like, well, I don't know, but it's classified information.
And so everyone's like, well, Obama saying a thing, you know, aliens existing, and then Trump just blurting out that was classified implies it's true and you're not supposed to know.
So we'll talk about that.
There are a bunch of other interesting stories, of course, we have throughout the day that we'll get into.
Before we get started, my friends, I got a great sponsor for you.
It is Rumble Wallets.
Guys, you're tired of people banning you, blocking you, shutting you down.
They want you to own nothing and be happy.
Well, Rumble Wallet is a non-custodial means of holding value, storing value, and transferring it to other people trading.
So if you're watching on Rumble and you want to tip, you can use the Rumble Wallet.
Rumble's the only company that has stood the test of time, deserving our support and fighting for free speech and freedom to transact and exist as we want.
Banks can cancel your account.
They can freeze your card.
That's why Rumble has launched the Rumble Wallet.
It's a wall that no one can cancel.
Supporters can use to instantly tip creators like us here at Timcast without any middleman taking cuts.
You control your money.
Not a bank, not a government, not a tech company.
Not even Rumble can touch it.
It's yours, only yours, yours to protect your future and your family.
You can buy and save digital assets like Bitcoin and Tether Gold in one place.
Tether Gold is real gold on the blockchain with ownership of physical gold bars.
It's not only a wall to buy and save, but also allows you to support your favorite creators by easily tipping them with a click of a button.
And there will be no fees when you tip my channel or others when we receive that tip instantly, unlike other platforms where you got to wait for payouts or there's a lot taken out.
So support this show and check out the Rumble Wallet.
Make sure you guys download it by going to wallet.rumble.com.
Download it today.
Open an account.
Step away from the big banks.
Use wallet.rumble.com or you can search for them in the app store.
Shout out, Rumble Wallet.
Also, my friends, go to castbrew.com and we launched something amazing yesterday.
It is the Cast Brew Vault Black Cold Brew Concentrate.
It is lightly sweetened, only lightly.
And we've got the larger glass bottle.
We got the small 50 milliliter single servings and we got a six pack.
So here's how it works.
You buy our cold brew concentrate, crack it open, you pour it in a cup, you mix in eight to 12 ounces of water to taste, and you got yourself a glass of cold brew.
See, the thing is, we were trying to figure out ways to produce cold brew cans and get them out.
It's very, very difficult.
For one, shelf life.
When you produce these, you've got to move them really, really quick.
And shipping weight.
We found a way that we can do it as a little guy.
We're not a big company.
We're a small company.
But by doing a cold brew concentrate, we can ship more to you for cheaper.
You just add the water and the cream that you want, and you got yourself an instant cast brew cold brew cup of coffee.
So check out castbrew.com and support the work that we do.
That's worse than your family disowning you by a guy like King Charles, who cheated on Princess Diana of all people for a very long time and then married that weirdo.
Yeah, you know, I just got to stress to anybody who's only listening to audio, you are missing out because his picture of Prince Andrew would, well, it'll probably freak you out, but we had some good descriptions.
Like if you accidentally got unplugged from the Matrix and saw the real reality, and then they had to pull you out of your home and instantly get you to the psych ward, that is the face of.
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor has been released under investigation following his arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office.
This we understand, but let's jump to the meat and potatoes here.
It's the first time he's been arrested.
He consistently and strenuously denied any wrongdoing.
Indeed, indeed.
And what is the misconduct?
I'm going to have to jump down because they are really laying it on thick.
So he's always denied wrongdoing in his association with Epstein.
These files get released.
And now we've got this former UK minister Gordon Brown has told the BBC he has submitted a five-page letter to several UK police forces providing new and additional information from the Epstein files.
So let's see.
A former, we got Jufre.
This is just a very, very poorly put together article, I must stress.
From here we go.
In 2010, Andrew appears to have forwarded government reports from visits to Vietnam, Singapore, and China to Epstein.
Files relating to the late financier recently released by the U.S. Department of Justice appear to show.
The documents also appear to show Andrew forwarded information on investment opportunities in gold and uranium in Afghanistan to Epstein.
Now, this is fascinating.
And I know a lot of people are saying, oh, you know, you got a lot of Trump supporters and you got a lot of strangely weird, not Trump supporter, moderate people who are like, the Epstein files are a nothing burger.
It's all exaggerated.
Virginia Jufrey is a liar.
And now they're saying Andrew wasn't even arrested, related anything to the girls.
And the argument for a long time, the conspiracy is that Epstein would bring on underage girls.
The play that Epstein, the conspiracy is this.
He says, hey, I got a private jet.
You want to fly?
I'm going from, you know, California to New York.
And you're like, oh, wow, private jet.
So you're some politician.
You're some corporate boss.
You get in the plane and then you're flying.
When all of a sudden you see this young lady come up and Epstein says she can take care of you.
And then the powerful person says, okay, you know, don't worry, she's 18.
Then after she takes care of him, Epstein goes, she's 16 and I own you.
And if you don't do as I say, I'm going to release the videos of the photos.
Now, I don't know if that's true, but that's one of the theories.
So when you have this picture of Prince Andrew with a 17-year-old girl, these young women reportedly were hired on as masuses, but they were just underage prostitutes.
And then Prince Andrew, it's revealed as arrested for leaking privy information to Epstein.
It does lightly corroborate this claim.
It doesn't mean it's proving it, but it does lend itself to this theory that Epstein was getting access and information from powerful global elites after they had, you know, now it's possible Andrew's just a slime ball and was leaking information to Epstein, his buddy, because he was giving him underage hookers.
The whole Epstein thing really does seem to be taking a toll on the UK.
It took out one of Starmer's top aides, who I think he'd appointed as ambassador to Washington.
It's taken out like some other people in the Labor Party.
And I got to say, I find that kind of funny because here you've had, you know, Jamie Raskin and all of the rest of them howling for months to release these files despite the efforts to release the files.
And then it turns out that it's actually just taking down Democrat allies in the UK.
But I love it because, you know, if other countries are taking this seriously, it plays into the reality of something actually happened here.
And I think that puts more pressure on the United States government to actually investigate it and start bringing some allegations and some lawsuits against these people.
Because if the first person you see that gets arrested for most, by the way, it's not one, it's two technically, if you count Ghelain Maxwell, I suppose that counts as arrest number one.
But in general, if the first person you see, you know, when the whole of the scandal seems to, at least at its face, took place in America or started in America and the first arrests are happening overseas.
It's like just how deep is the rot in the corruption in the U.S. government that it finds its way to the UK before any of it finds its way here.
And I do think one of the problems with all this going on right now is like people are getting blackpilled because you're following the story every day.
It feels like it's kind of re it's like retold to you and you see the horrors or you hear about the horrors of what is going on and every day goes by, you don't see anything happen.
And it's really easy to lose faith in anything when that continues to be your reality each and every day.
Sometimes they'll like get you on something smaller so they can build their case around something bigger when they know they have it, but they need time.
That's why I actually see this as a giant white pill because I feel like we're educating the general American public to the actual corruption of our government.
And typically speaking, when it comes to these corruption storylines, they aren't that sticky.
They go away.
But I feel like the public's demanding that this is looked into and people are held accountable.
And so the fact that the elites have to pretend like they actually represent us and now the UK is folding and actually arresting Andrew, I think that's starting to, the wheel's starting to turn.
And I actually think that this is a very, in my opinion, a very promising storyline because it's not going away.
And honestly, I think that's largely because of all of the people online that are really just kind of hammering it away.
There are constantly people talking about this.
This doesn't, you know, whether it be on podcasts or just in chat rooms talking on X and stuff, like this is something that actually ignoring it isn't going to make it go away.
It's something that has to be addressed by the administration.
I mean, fair enough, but like that's a fair criticism.
But the thing is, like, I don't think that that's, I think that the people that are Donald Trump fans that are just like trying to brush it off, I think for the most part, their argument is just, well, Donald Trump isn't actually accused of these things in the Epstein files.
He's all over the Epstein files.
Yes, he was, you know, like he was friends with Epstein at some point or to one point, but like, it's not like there's, you know, really legitimate credible accusations in there that are like, oh, Donald Trump did this recently or what have you, you know?
There's files, FBI cold tips from five years after Epstein's dead.
What is the purpose of submitting a tip with no corroboration in 2025 about Donald Trump?
They're wild and outrageous.
And I really do recommend when read them.
Read these claims against Donald Trump because they are the epitome of the absurd.
When Brett Kavanaugh was going through confirmation, these stories started emerging from these accusers that Brett Kavanaugh was involved in parties in college where the men would line up outside of a bedroom where a woman would be held captive during the party.
And these men would take turns forcing that woman while she was trapped in that room.
Okay, I'm being very light with the language in case there's children.
And it was the most shockingly insane thing.
Because if you have 100 people in a frat house and there's a woman trapped screaming as guys take turns lined up outside, everybody would know that was happening.
I think the accusations against Trump trying to implicate his involvement or anything with kids is completely unsubstantiated, is not a valid criticism.
I think criticizing this administration for taking part in covering this up, not wanting to investigate it, and not digging in more and being, you know, not that the other administrations did a terrible job with this too, but he's the most recent administration.
And I don't think they just fumbled on it.
I think they took a look in there and realized, hey, we don't want any part of cracking this door open.
And I think it's fair to criticize the administration, Kash Patel, and Dan Gongino for that.
Look, anytime you're in government, you're opening yourself up to criticism, right?
I mean, everyone, you know, everyone has some kind of beef with the government to some degree.
So if you're in a position in the government, you're opening yourself up to criticism, and it's perfectly fair.
And as for the administration's handling, it's probably, I mean, it's incredibly obvious that this was the biggest blunder that the Trump administration has done.
Like the handling, whether it be the binders when they came out, all of that stuff, like all like, and a lot of it falls on Pam Bondi, I think, personally.
But Donald Trump definitely has his fair share because of the way that he treated it when he says, when he says things like it's a Democrat hoax, I understand what he meant, as in it was them saying, it was Democrats saying that Donald Trump is in the files and had done inappropriate things in the files.
That's what Trump was talking, or that's what I think Trump was talking about when he said the hoax, that it gets another Democrat hoax, just like the good people on both sides implied that he had said something that they do so many of them.
He said, I will effing kill you if you answer another question with more than five words.
Okay.
Now, it does seem like it could just be a joke.
For those who are not familiar, Les Wexner is a potential co-conspirator in the Epstein case, and his name was redacted in a document of potential co-conspirators.
They argue the FBI argues they don't have evidence to actually take him down.
He's giving his deposition, and he says, I will effing kill you if you answer another question with more than five words.
And again, it may be jokey.
There are a lot of people on X that are trying to make it seem like they're threatening to kill him for talking.
There's one where they're like, Wexner's lawyer just threatened to kill him if he answers questions.
And it's just like, oh, these people are just lying.
Okay.
We could be reasonable about this.
It's a creepy thing to say to somebody.
It might just be a joke.
But considering what's going on in the background, it is possible it was more like a, I'm not really joking.
But the idea that you're running a Victoria Secret fashion show and you're trying to pretend you don't know Donald Trump and you don't know why he was at the event you met him at because there's no reason for him to be there.
The point of people saying on X with like complete certainty that this is why he did that is because that's the benefit to gather more clicks for your content, right?
If you say, well, it could be this, but the context might say something else, like we're saying right now, it could be a lawyer movie.
It could just be saying this because you've been answering the questions too fully.
I keep telling you not to.
But if you make it seem like you're actually threatening his life, if you talk at all, that's more salacious.
So you make the more salacious statement because more people will click on it.
It's why I think ad revenue is one of the worst things to happen to X because it disincentivizes giving nuanced takes on anything, at least for the initial post.
You might get into it more once people start debating it, you know, underneath the actual post.
But if you want to get the eyes on it, the best thing you can do is to be as dubious as possible.
He knows he can't write I will effing kill you because what Wexner needs are those attorneys from the Tyler Robinson case who make sure that there can't be a camera or a mic or anything even within like five feet, 20 feet, 100 feet of the.
Well, Democrats and Republicans who are leaders, you know, I mean, once you get into government, I feel like you get completely corrupted by power.
Who doesn't get corrupted by power?
You know, I mean, that's a huge reason to have term limits because people get corrupted and then they don't have the best interests of the people at heart.
And you have to get them out and get somebody in who actually has some hope and optimism for the country.
I would love it if the next election cycle is people running with slogans and satanic rituals in D.C. I'd be like, all right, we've made some progress as a country.
I feel like I'm still of the mind that the idea of term limits is a double-edged sword, right?
Like if you've got someone that is in there for a short amount of time, then you end up with the bureaucrats that are installed even with even more power and doing more running of the government.
Technically, but we saw this when Trump was kind of out of the limelight for a bit in like 23, when Ron DeSantis had become the frontrunner in all the prediction markets.
They immediately started writing articles saying DeSantis is worse than Trump.
If you thought Trump was bad, oh no, DeSantis is coming.
And I got to be honest, like DeSantis is, he's pretty good in Florida, but he was pretty much vanilla yogurt everywhere else.
And they were acting like he was neo-Mecca Hitler.
I mean, look, as of the beginning of next year, they're going to be talking about whoever's running for president because that's when they're going to start, people start announcing, and they're going to just start sliming them all as worse than Donald Trump.
And they'll actually, they'll ease up on Trump for the last two years.
I mean, obviously the House will still be doing the impeachment stuff, but the actual, the rhetoric surrounding Trump.
If Iran, I mean, I don't think they are going to nor do they have the capability, but if they did, yeah, I think that would probably get people excited for more military action against Iran, and that would probably help Republicans.
If there was a terror attack where most people agreed or felt that we should go to war, would that give Trump the power to then rally and say, vote Republican, and then they would vote congressional, you know?
I think that would, I mean, I think you'd get pretty close, but I do think you're right about the district situation because New York State eliminated Nicole Mallee Toxis's district, essentially.
You get the reaction to the Venezuela raid, right?
Like that is almost ubiquitously on, you know, a positive thing to most Americans.
They're like, okay, we didn't actually lose any Americans.
We showed how strong we are, blah, blah, blah.
Most Americans are like, that was actually cool.
Like, whether I understand that libertarians don't have that same perspective.
So I get where the criticism would come from.
But most, I mean, libertarians are like 3% of the population or something like that.
Nobody wants to be free.
They want to control other people.
So if Iran turned into some kind of military action, if there is some kind of strikes or even if there is a ground war, if it's not something that turns into a quagmire where Americans are coming home in slew of caskets and stuff, if the United States goes in and essentially loses almost no one, the American people are going to be like, actually, that's kind of cool.
I really, and whether or not, again, the chat's probably going to chew me up for this, but I really do think that most of your normies will be like, actually, that's kind of cool because I think most Americans like winning.
I think where Iran might differ from Venezuela is, for one, there's a lot more risk factors on the table, such as how China might react, whether or not there's going to be disruptions in oil trade, whether or not you're going to see Turkey or other people get more aggressive with Israel.
But also, there's a lot of discontent in this country right now for how aggressively this administration is supporting Israel.
And I don't know that when Venezuela had more of a pitch for America first, even though it was all lunacy, I think a lot of people will see a strike against Iran as being for and in Israel's benefit and not in America's benefit.
And I don't know that even a quick strike, depending on how successful it is, but assuming the best case scenario, I think some people might still say, I don't like that we took this risk and that we did it for another country.
Yeah, and I think young people are typically anti-Israel to a certain degree.
We've seen this in the Pew Research.
Based on the swings from young people and a little bit from the middle-aged generations, it is around like 54% in opposition to Israel.
But that is a weaker voting bloc than all of the old people.
And they largely support Israel.
I do think in 10 or so years with boomers dying, you're going to see support for Israel basically evaporate.
Not because it's going away, but because it's already gone among younger generations.
When the older generation that supports Israel dies, you have largely just the right wing, we don't care about your country and we don't want to support you.
And the left wing, we hate Israel.
So the right is going to be much more moderate.
Like, whoa, whoa, we don't hate Israel.
We just don't want to be involved.
And the left is going to be like, well, we absolutely hate them.
You were talking about potentially disrupting oil in Iran.
And I'm not in favor of going into Iran because I'm not really in favor of any foreign conflicts of any kind.
But the thing with Venezuela, where Trump was basically like, okay, your oil is ours now, might mitigate any fallout from an oil disruption from Iran.
And also, to your point, Phil, the Pentagon at this point, like I was on this Pentagon trip yesterday.
We went to Missouri and visited Boeing.
And it's like the second time I've traveled with Pentagon.
And they are so intent on buying all of these kinds of autonomous weapons and things like that.
They're really into it.
So we're sort of at a point where our guys can stay home and play video games with, you know, autonomous weapons and take people out and take out entire nations without anybody batting an eye.
He says, based on the tremendous interest shown, I will be directing the Secretary of War and other relevant departments and agencies to begin the process of identifying and releasing government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena, and unidentified flying objects, and any and all other information connected to these highly complex but extremely interesting and important matters.
God bless America.
Of course, this comes shortly after Donald Trump has confirmed the existence of aliens.
Trump is asked about Obama saying aliens are real.
And Trump's response is he gave away classified information.
He accidentally confirms the existence of aliens.
Now, apparently, what people are saying is that the actual story that Trump is referring to is that Obama made references to Area 51 that he's not supposed to mention.
That was actually given with classified information.
Or it could be some have spawned as by confirming or denying the presence of aliens at Area 51, he's not supposed to do that.
Some people believe that the myth of aliens at Area 51 was a U.S. PSYOP to terrify our enemies, particularly the Soviets during the Cold War, to make them fear that we may have advanced technology they don't know about.
And it may just be that there are aliens and Obama admitted it.
But the government quasi-admits aliens are real like every couple of years when they need to, you know, I honestly think the probability that they announced the existence of aliens and we actually see aliens is going up a lot.
And I'm not saying it's a great probability at all.
I'm saying it's like, you know, more than people would actually imagine, not impossible.
But the general idea is over the past decade or so, they've been giving out more and more information, having more discussions about it.
It's becoming boring.
When Obama said aliens are real, literally nobody cared.
Like, if aliens actually showed up, you don't think we'd unify?
hell no I don't think we'd be like the left would be like are they communists They're the leaders to come together and be like the Federation of Planets.
The only way this could end up being worse for Trump is if they actually came here because they needed a place to live and we had to deny them entry because they're actual illegal aliens.
It's obvious that the aliens have returned and they want control of Israel because that's the original site where they started creating the hybrid humanoids to mine gold for them.
The theory, the conspiracy theorists believe that life, intelligent life generally understands the nature of existence because it seems odd that you would be intelligent but not know why you're here.
And that humans are actually not a fully intelligent race.
They're a hybrid, semi-intelligent race that are smart enough to be programmed to do any job.
You take a human child and you can make it a specialist, but not smart enough to fully comprehend the nature of reality.
And that is the conspiracy theory about why we like gold.
But I mean, if you look, I mean, if you look at the Old Testament, it's sort of, it discusses essentially how human beings cannot achieve God knowledge and cannot fully understand God.
And so the people who make up this theory about the Nibiru and the Anunnaki read the Bible and then said, what can I make up to extrapolate from that statement?
One of the things I love is how the left spent decades telling us that you're not actually of German, Italian, Irish, Polish heritage.
You're just white.
And now AOC is going, whiteness is just a myth.
You're actually just all these other things, and there is no such thing as white culture.
And it's like, you just spent the last, you know, 75 years explaining to us why everything is every Euro-descended person is homogenized and just plain white and white culture, and that white culture is bad.
You know, you know, one of the things about me is I can't stand watching someone do something wrong.
And so if I see somebody trying to like put a doorknob on and it's taking a long time and they're doing it poorly, I'll be like, just get out of the way.
Sort of because sometimes it does sound like, what is he even talking about?
But it's the weave.
He can dodge difficult questions and he can simplify things to the point where he gets away with it.
AOC can't.
Okay.
You can't have a stuttering, rambling nonsense.
The rules-based order thing was so much worse than the Taiwan thing.
She was just basically saying a bunch of words strung together, not even making any sense.
You need to, you need to set.
I've had people say to me, they say, Tim, you know, you're really, you really, I watch your videos.
Like, you're a really smart guy.
And I'm like, no, I sound like I'm really smart.
There's a difference.
I'm probably knowledgeable in a lot of things, but understanding that what works in media is sounding intelligent, not being intelligent, and then you'll understand basically how politicians actually win and why their policies tend not to work.
But that Taiwan answer, she could have literally, I mean, I got to be honest, if AOC's response was, you know, that's a very difficult question, and I'm not sure I have a really good answer for you.
When asked about ending the Ukraine war, he says, he goes, we're going to end it on day one, day one.
And that's blovy idiots.
That's arrogant.
He didn't get it done.
But that's okay.
He's a salesman, right?
Do you want to buy a product from the guy who says, I'm not sure it'll work?
Or the guy who says, I guarantee it'll work.
So when Trump is asked, how do you get it done?
He says, listen, listen.
He says, these guys don't want to be fighting.
Putin and Zelensky don't want to be fighting.
We're going to go in there and we're going to stop the fighting.
And that's a very, very, very simple answer.
He's giving you 1%.
Basically, I'm going to tell them to stop fighting.
That's the answer that he's giving you.
There is the smallest of substance there.
Kamala Harris, her answers are like, you know, fighting is like when you're up against someone and they're trying to make you do something and you're not letting them.
And you're fighting and you're just like, oh, she's not even telling us what she's going to do.
She's not giving us the lightest of morsels of, I will tell Putin to stop.
So Trump at least gives you that little bit.
And I think the strategy with Trump, as with many presidents, is to target the lowest common denominator because that's how elections work in this country.
You try and sound smart.
Congratulations.
7% of people are going to vote for you.
You try and sound as simple as possible.
Listen, Putin and Zelensky, they don't want to fight.
So I'm going to tell them stop.
And then unfortunately for this country, the lowest common denominator is going to be like, well, I think it's good that Trump's going to tell them to stop fighting.
And this is quite possibly the worst thing that ever could happen anywhere in all of human history.
And it is because of these pieces of trash Democrats who have lived on the south side of Chicago our whole lives.
So now we have two options for the Chicago Bears.
They can go to Arlington Heights, which is okay, fun, still Illinois, but it's a northwest suburb, or Indiana.
Okay, we can talk about that in a bit.
I just had to bring it up because I'm not even a big football guy.
And I see this woman being like, I have lived here.
F I saw abolished, you know, them and Trump is bad.
And I'm like, you are why everything is falling apart in our state.
And people like me and my friends fled because y'all burned it to the ground with 100 years of Democrat supermajority rule and your crackpot gerrymandered garbage districts.
And now the city is turning to garbage.
And it's miserable.
They won't fix it.
I see this lady.
You know what she may as well have just said?
I put on my they live glasses and she goes, buzzwords, buzzwords that you've heard.
A couple years ago, there was a story that came out that was basically saying that there was evidence to suggest that people who curse more are smarter.
And did you notice a lot of stupid Democrats start cursing way more all of a sudden as soon as that study came out?
And a lot of times the swearing has to do with when they feel threatened.
So I talk a lot about on our show about like, there's something about the average celebrity when ICE comes up, they have to say F ice and they say it with their whole chest because and they say the same thing about AI.
They say F AI because they're so scared of what it's going to do to their industry that all they can muster is to say a swear word alongside it because they don't have an actual coherent argument against it.
And any coherent argument is going to fall in the face because it's not going to work.
The technology is already evolving.
In this case, ICE is already doing what it's doing.
They're not able to stop it.
And so the only thing that they can muster is to swear.
It's, you know, I mean, I assume that there is a portion of the electorate that is going to appeal to, you know, the Democrats that really hate Trump, of course, and stuff.
But like, you know, she's not just running in Chicago.
She's running to represent Illinois.
And that's a very, like that, that ad is very, very narrow.
I think everybody should leave where they're being overcharged.
You know, I mean, all of the people in New York did this thing with Mamdani where he's trying to extort Albany into paying a whole bunch more money to the city for his promised social programs.
And what he's saying, which, you know, everybody already heard already, but like, what he's saying is if you don't do it, I'm going to raise property taxes almost 10%.
And the thing is, if you look at the way the property taxes are calculated in New York City, there's four tiers.
There's private homes, like one, two, three family homes.
Then there's apartment buildings.
Then there's utilities.
And then there's commercial, right?
Like hotels and office buildings.
Private homeowners are already paying over 19% in property taxes, 19% of the assessed value of their home and property.
So he's talking about raising property taxes on New York City homeowners by another 10%.
That brings them to like almost 30% of their property taxes.
People are going to have to sell their homes and be able to afford the property taxes.
And basically, his goal to eliminate private property in the city will be much faster on the way anyway, because their idea, his whole administration's idea, is to create not just a city full of renters, but a nation full of renters.
And they want them paying their rent to the government.
And if you look at it, Mamdani's had this whole thing where he was like, oh, we're going to let tenants come in and complain about their housing and complain about their landlords, but they're not allowed to complain publicly.
You know who's not going to be able to complain publicly in those hearings?
Residents of New York of the New York City Housing Authority.
That's public housing.
That's projects.
So if you live in the projects and you don't like your housing, you can't go to this like rental thing and start complaining about how the city is a crap landlord.
And the city is the biggest landlord, the city is the biggest landlord in the city, and their housing stinks.
And all the time during the campaign, he was like, oh, we'll change light bulbs in the city housing, you know, because the light bulbs are out.
And he didn't even mention the elevators, which like our open shafts half the time.
He didn't even mention that.
And then he's like, but you know, for you private property owners, we're going to raise your taxes and drive you right out.
And I think all those private homeowners should get the hell out of that city.
I think a lot of them because, you know, he's talking, and if you look at what he wants to spend his money on, meanwhile, Albany just gave him another 1.5 billion like five days ago.
If you look at what he wants to spend the money on, it's pretty much entirely social programs.
I think all of them, because the way our political system works, is who can lie to the best during the campaigning process, and none of them can pull through on what they're saying.
The thing that I'm shocked people are upset about is that I guess part of his campaign promises was that New York City could keep their homeless.
And I can't believe that that's the pitch that they're mad at him about is that he promised not to clear them out of the parks.
And now because they're freezing to death, he realized he has to, and they're upset at him of you broke your promise to us of letting these people stay in the parks.
You know, I got to be honest: if they set up a digital internet kiosk for free use of looking things up, anything you wanted, literally anything, and it was at a ski resort, you would not have a gooning problem.
The teachers that organize this stuff should be suspended, actually, because you know that it's like the kids, kids are going to be like, I get to go outside and screw off with my friends and holler and make a big stink about something.
Yeah, I'm going to do that.
Heck yeah.
Like, for the most part, kids don't have like real strong convictions about this kind of stuff.
But if they do, they get them from their teachers.
They get them from their guidance counselors, you know, or possibly from the parents.
But, you know, like teachers organizing this stuff, because you know all the schools of education are completely inundated with leftists.
Growing up, unless I showed up to school and my teacher wanted to tell me about the situation that was going on in Minnesota, that's not something that would have came up at my dinner table.
It's not something my parents were telling me about.
It's like Sheldon walked in and goes, Oh, what are you doing?
And then I'm just sitting there being like, What's the laughing for?
Like, nothing was done.
And so they made these edits where they removed the laugh track, and it's really just psychotic people where it's like he'll walk up and be like, a hot dog.
It's like the show started just like I intro the show with like claptor as if there's like a bunch of people watching us live from in studio, but it's just me.
There are programs that can auto-generate anything.
So if you want to make a YouTube channel, you'll need some capital to get started because the scale does get expensive.
But you're not competing with anybody.
We're not competing.
It's as simple as this.
If I want to make a two-hour podcast, it's going to take me two hours.
It's going to take me other people, production, whatever it might be.
If I want to do a two-hour podcast entirely on my own, which I do for my morning show, it takes me at least two hours.
Now, here's the thing: I got to do research, I got to find articles.
So it actually takes me like five hours to make a two-hour podcast.
There are programs already online you can sign up for to varying degrees of expense, some relatively cheap.
And you type in, you click a button and it'll show you all the top YouTube videos for the day.
You will then say, copy.
It'll then prompt you to what title do you want?
It'll say, here's titles based on this video.
You then copy the title.
It'll then auto-generate a script, auto-generate the voiceover, auto-generate all the visuals, auto-animate them, and then create a backing track.
And it renders it all for you.
And then all you have to do is click upload, and you can produce a two-hour podcast in literally with 15 minutes of labor, rendering time, maybe an hour.
So you do the 15 minutes of work, you get up, you leave, you go play video games, you come back, it's done, you upload it, boom.
And I would argue that a good portion of YouTube right now is all AI.
And the only reason you, dear viewer, don't know is because you are in YouTube's algorithmic bubble.
That is, as a long-standing YouTube viewer, you are seeing things you're used to seeing, but newer viewers are being fed all AI slop because it's being mass produced.
The other thing to point out is Gen Z doesn't actually make content anymore.
They make their algorithm farming.
So an example of this is they don't actually need to say anything in a TikTok video.
So the example that I gave on the Pod Millennial was: you'll see a young woman, you'll swipe, and she'll go, You will never believe what just happened to me at Wendy's.
I can't even believe it happened.
So, right away, she's shocked you without saying much.
So, you're waiting.
She's got a big piece of lint right here on the top of her head.
And what happens is the people sit there and they see it.
She then starts saying, You're never going to believe this.
The story is totally mundane and pointless.
So now you've got at least 10 seconds.
For YouTube, it's 30.
But the lint results in them commenting.
Everyone's spam blasting.
She gets 50,000 comments.
Now the TikTok algorithm or Instagram or YouTube says, Wow, this must be a good video.
That's the content Gen Z is making right now.
They're spam blasting AI slop because they don't got to do any work and it requires no talent and it's making them money.
Or they're doing algorithm farming where they make fake videos with engagement tricks to trick you into liking.
There's the really obvious stuff where it's like, I'm going to do this thing.
Click the like button and then you'll see.
And then stupid people go, oh, and they click the like button.
Or they say, double tap the screen right now and you'll see the reveal.
And that makes you like the video.
So they're engagement baiting.
But the algorithm farming is hilarious.
They'll misspell a word on purpose.
The comment trick, the comment baiting is really, really interesting.
Doing something like wear a button-up shirt, but have one button unbuttoned.
And then what happens is people watch the full video because the video is rolling, but they comment and they're typing, you need to learn how to button your shirt.
What's wrong with you?
And then you get 10x comments and the algorithm promotes you and makes you famous.
Well, sure, but the reality is they're intentionally misspelling words to bait people because they know that other people will see the misspelled word and then comment.
And it doesn't matter what the comment is.
YouTube just says they're getting a lot of comments and a lot of likes.
Like we looked up, so when Usha Vance announced that she was pregnant, we were like, oh, I wonder how many second ladies have been pregnant while their husbands were in office.
And we looked it up.
And AI, like Google AI, told us that she was the very first one.
Well, the thing is, if it's on YouTube and people are getting paid, then people are watching it.
You know, like if you're making money, if you're making YouTube videos that people are watching, the ones that people aren't watching are the AI ones that are like stuff for sleep.
So like science for sleep, which I've actually listened to a bunch of those.
You just go and get some topic about physics or about space or whatever, write up a big long, go to ChatGPT and have it write a big long script.
Take that script, you plug it into Mid Journey or whatever, and it makes the video for you.
I will say I've seen some videos that are actually doing the opposite, where there'll be like human-read stories for four hours or like human-read history of this, this, and this.
And sometimes I'll listen to those for like sleep.
Not like that, but it's like you make a two-hour long, you know, something to sleep to, and it starts really nice where it's like story, fairy tales to fall asleep to.
But as it slowly goes on, things gradually just get darker and more, more like the story gets more horror and discordant.
What I've been told is that Lex Fridman, a lot of people say they fall asleep to his show, which massively boosts them in the algorithm because then they end up watching the full podcast.
And for those industry people have said this, they said that it's a very calm and relaxing show to listen to where they ask questions very lightly.
And so people turn it on and just pass out.
And as far as YouTube's concerned, that works.
You know, it's funny though, YouTube has been completely derelict in their duties because there are people buying ads on videos for sleep.
I can't believe you would even want to watch a video about, you know, if you're trying to watch a video about sleeping and then you know that there's going to be an ad coming, why would you even click on that video?
Like the bunks, it's your own little apartment or whatever, and you've got everything set up the way you want it to, you know, want it to be or whatever.
Climb in there and watch videos on your phone for 10 minutes or whatever, and you're out.
But yeah, he was in Nashville, Tennessee to deliver remarks at the National Religious Broadcasters Freedom Celebration.
And he was also in Nashville.
And then he went to Fort Campbell.
Oh, on Friday, he's going to Fort Campbell.
So I'm not sure if they're heading back because they've been doing so many of these Arsenal of Freedom trips.
And of course, I'm sure that they're talking, they're referencing like the World War II Arsenal of Freedom and not Star Trek TNG season one, episode 21, the Arsenal of Freedom.
But yeah, they do all these trips and they're like, it's like a half hour.
So for press, they tell you show up at Andrews at a certain time and then you take off and then you get back that night.
It's kind of crazy.
That was yesterday.
I went to St. Louis and I was excited about it because I'd never been to Missouri.
I feel like if they actually confirmed aliens were real, we'd have substantially, we'd have much more, we'd have more substantial things to worry about than whether or not we're selling ads and the nature of our reality would shift dradically.
You know, I think that if like you can have evidence and whatnot, and that's one thing, but I think if there was actually like communication with an alien species that could teach us how they have like, you know, managed to travel from a different star system, whatever.
That's the thing that I'm interested in.
It's like, if there are aliens here, how did they get here?
I want to see a movie where he orders a pizza, but it comes and the cheese is slightly shifted to the side because the delivery driver put it on the back seat and when he turned, the cheese shifted.
So then he puts it down and opens it and he's like, what is this?
So then he goes and just wipes out the entire pizza chain franchise.
You know, actually, what would be good is Jason Statham is a pizza delivery driver, but then communists take over, and then he goes and he just beats all of them up.
You'll get like, you know, it'll be enough to make you laugh, not actually hurt you, but it'll be funny because then people will be like, Ian's on the show.
Zuzu's pedals, they need to be this angry for all the young girls gang-raped and trafficked by rape gangs and even sold by care home employees to their rapists.
Yeah, you know what's funny is the Epstein stuff is crazy.
We want the answers, but there's rape gangs in the UK.
We got that place that I am says, why didn't the U.S. government release this information pertinent to Andrew to the UK government before the release of the Epstein files?
I bet they did.
And the UK didn't do anything because they protect the elites.
And with the release of the files, they said, uh-oh, we're in trouble.
I mean, there's times like on the show where I'm like making a point and then just like I'm halfway through and then something just clicks and goes away and I'm like, crap.
If you're ever making a point and then you lose your train of thought, but you want to sound like it's not, get frustrated and change the subject, acting as though something just bothered you.
But if you really don't have anything top of mind to snap to, like, so let's say you're thinking of saying something, you're in the middle of your train of thought.
Like my final point is going to be that, you know, Trump is a great business person.
You weave a little bit to give an example, then you forget where you're going.
If you're quick-witted, you can just, you can just do something like, you know, no, I should even say this.
What I should say is, like, I forgot my train of thought.
So I'll just, you know what?
not gonna go there but if you're not quick-witted you can always just go you know right in the middle of your phil what are you doing And then it's like, I didn't lose my train of thought.
So the way Starbucks and all these other companies do it is they make millions of cans.
So if like we're talking about making, here's the challenge.
Are we going to sell 5,000 cans?
Probably not in a short amount of time.
The coffee will go bad.
So we can't have just coffee wasting away on a shelf.
So what if we did 1,000 cans?
We could probably sell that before they expire.
Okay.
That's not a very large order, which means it's going to be very expensive every time you do it.
And the first order goes through.
We don't know what our sales are going to be.
So we can't just say, we're going to sell these in four weeks.
So two weeks in, we need to have the next order.
You know, we've got to have a lead time on it.
So the easiest way to do it was concentrates.
So you can buy one bottle that's going to last you a lot longer.
It's a little bit more, it's like a comparable price, one bottle, whereas you'd normally get a can or like a six pack or something, you know, whatever.
Yeah, I actually, if you guys live in this area, Perryville, Maryland at Fifth Company Brewery, I'm opening up for Sam Tripoli Friday night and then Dave Smith Saturday night.
Dave Smith sold out, but a couple tickets left for Sam Tripoli and Eddie Bravo, which is going to be a great show.
Guys, if you could go follow me, I'm on Instagram and X at Brett Dasovic on both of those platforms, but you should also go check out Pop Culture Crisis.
We are on YouTube and Rumble.
We are getting dangerously close to 400K on YouTube.
And we just did our 1,000th episode.
You can go back and check that one out.
We are also live Monday through Friday, 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, which is New Pacific.
My fear was always like, if I leave during the show, that I'm going to get locked out.
The other one that I used to have back because I used to live over when we were at the castle, I had these dreams that I would walk into IRL with that while it was going on and not know that it was going on.
And I would just absentmindedly walk into the studio and Tim would look at me like, what the hell are you doing?
If you're going to be cartoonish with conspiracies, it's fun to think that this jolly guy that we loved his whole life is actually running the whole scheme.
It's like in that Simpsons episode when it's like the cabal of Mr. Burns and a bunch of other people, and they're like, who made Steve Gutenberg a star?
There's an argument that if it were to be enacted, it would hurt Democrats because right now we don't count Republican votes in places like California for the most part because it's two to one Democrat.
But this would mean that The argument is there are more red state voters in blue states than blue state voters in red states.
So if we went popular vote, Republicans would actually come out in a much, much higher turnout.
The reason why the Democrats are always like, oh, the Republicans never win the popular vote, it's because California Republicans don't bother.
And so you've got, what is it, like 10 million Republicans in California just don't bother voting.
Like they largely are just like, hey, what's the point?
We can't win.
You add those to the mix, and there's an argument that it could actually change things for in favor of conservatives.
But I mean, it's possible that the, you know, someone would take a, take it, you know, come up with a lawsuit, go to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court might find it unconstitutional.
You know?
So, because the way that the, you know, the structure of our government is laid out is supposed to have the Electoral College.
So if you just go around it, they might be like, well, that's defeating the purpose of the Electoral College.
In California, it's like, why am I going to go and stand in line?
Especially in LA.
I mean, obviously, if you're in Orange County, people in Orange County go out and vote consistently.
But at the same time, it's like if you're anywhere, if you're up in Cupertino, I mean, I'm not going to vote.
Like, we know what's going to happen, you know?
So it does make sense that they would be like, hey, I'm going to stay home.
And if there was a national popular vote, it might actually change.
But not if they allow illegals to vote.
unidentified
Yep.
Yeah, and that's the big concern because I frankly forgot about how many Republicans there are in California, like today, that just don't vote because they're like, what's the point?
And for a few years, I was one of those guys that was stationed in San Diego.
But like, so that's, I've been kind of like basically blackpilling the thought of that.
Like, oh, wow, well, all right, they're just kind of our, you know, structure of elections at the federal level if they do that.
But that's, that's reassuring.
And the, the concern, though, is like, if we can't clean up voting state by state and they just flood illegals into places like Minnesota and California, like, okay, well, then they can just do what they want anyway.
I mean, that's, that's the argument that I always make when people are like, oh, you know, I'm not going to go vote because the Republicans didn't do this or didn't do that.
And it's like, I mean, I get it.
I understand being pissed off that they didn't do, you know, they haven't done what they said they were going to do.
But at the same time, it is only right now.
We're like not even a year and a half way, you know, or a year and a half through the first through the term.
And like people are already blackpilling.
It's like, I mean, look, the government moves slow.
That's just the way that it is.
It's the way it's always been.
And to think that like Donald Trump was going to come in and be a dictator, that was never going to happen.
Like he's not a king.
He's not a dictator.
Our government actually, you know, prevents the executive from doing a lot of stuff.
And he's actually done a lot of things considering the restraints put on the executive office.
So this idea that he was going to come in and just like, you know, make these dramatic changes, that was never realistic.
So if people voted for him thinking that was going to happen, as much as I hate to, you know, say it, it's like that's their fault because they didn't understand the way that our government works.
And to, like I said, I hate to blame people and be like, well, you know, you're dumb or whatever.
But it's like, come on, man.
You have to understand that the government works slow and that's the way it's supposed to work.
I mean, all the criticism that most people have of Donald Trump, it's legitimate, but it's also, you know, it's also like, well, I mean, what did you expect?
Like, did you expect him to, you know, be a dictator?
Because that was never in the cards.
It was just never going to be possible.
You could, I, I think that a lot of this could have been a lot of the anger with the Trump administration was brought on by themselves because of the way they handled the Abstinene files.
And I think that I think that it's also a small but vocal portion of the population that are worried about that.
I'm still one of those guys that thinks that kids table issues are what people listen to, you know?
I mean, it was a huge story a few years ago because it's looking like it might happen.
But now with the exodus from California and New York and the redistricting efforts, there's so much worse stuff going on.
unidentified
Well, yeah, but like with how they're doing, with what they're doing in Virginia, like they've had the bill on their deck and they're going to ran that through.
Pennsylvania has a bill pending, and so does South Carolina of all places.
But I mean, like, if it turns out that more Republicans are like, oh, wow, I matter now, then it might not be all that bad.
But yeah, that's like I said, I've been kind of like black pilling on this point because of, you know, what I mentioned just a couple of minutes ago.
Yeah, I mean, I mean, when it comes to, look, I'm one of those guys that's very pro-AI and very pro-technology and stuff.
Like, I'm one of, like, there's probably like only like two of us here, two, maybe three of us here at Timcast that are like that.
And so I don't, I think the changes that are going to happen in the next three, four years are going to be so dramatic that it's impossible to predict like what the future is going to be five, 10 years out.
So, I mean, I intend to homeschool my kid.
I also intend to have a lot of help from AI doing that because that's, I think that that's literally what it's going to be.
I don't know if you know, but like ChatGPT just bought the Open Claw.
Basically, they hired the guy that came up with the Open Claw software.
Apple has not been doing anything for AI because it looks like they're just going to outsource it.
So, everyone that has Siri, like everyone knows that if you say, I won't do it to anyone, but you can activate Siri.
And it was supposed to be able to do things for you.
Well, Apple got out of the AI business and they just worked on the hardware.
And now they're going to outsource it to one of the existing AI companies, if I understand correctly.
So in the next couple of years, your Apple phone is going to be able to do things that agentic AIs can do because the technology is there now.
So the world is going to change a whole lot in the next couple of years.
So trying to predict, I don't even bother.
I like Tim said, it's like I'm worried about, can he sit up by himself yet?
And people are always fearful of new technology and it displaces some industries, but makes things more efficient and actually leads to wealth and prosperity.
So unless the machines become self-aware and we were the dumb people that created the thing that was here to replace us, then I think we'll be all right.
So you either won't exist or your child's going to live in a much more wealthy and prosperous world, prosperous world.
Yeah, I mean, he might, but like, if you've got a kid that's like, like my kid who's only a few months old, like, I don't expect to have to worry about him going to college.
Yeah, I mean, the colleges might all collapse, you know?
I mean, that's a concern too.
But I mean, it's hard when you are part of a, you know, it's hard when you've like grown up and existed in a specific kind of social order to imagine what it will be or to prepare for what it will be.
You can only, it's like, you know, with my son anyway, I've been preparing for what it was when I was coming up, which it's not like that at all.
I can't even buy for him the education that I got.
Like, it's not that I can't afford it.
It's that it literally doesn't exist.
And probably I couldn't afford it if it did, but it doesn't exist.
If you're going to pay attention to technology, which I think you should, you really should listen to the optimists.
There's plenty of people out there that are blackpilled that say that, you know, blah, blah, blah, everything's going to be terrible and we're going to be in a dystopia.
You got a kid, like listen to the optimists because there's so many people that are negative on it.
It's actually kind of hard to find the optimists.
So at the very least, search out the optimists, listen to what they say.
There are going to be really disruptive changes and there's going to be probably some issues that we have to deal with as a society as a society.
But you should at least expose yourself to the optimists, not just the pessimists.
Yeah, I mean, I think we've talked about it a million and one times.
It's implications for people who are in major companies, threats to the stock market, international treaties, powerful global elites who are engaged in untoward activities from around the world, destroying and disrupting their businesses and making the U.S. look bad and disrupting the liberal economic order.
It's like the release of the documents was one of those things where it's like, there's a reason why that information doesn't come out usually before a prosecution happens, right?
Is they release the information now.
And if you can't get any type of conviction for that, first of all, the U.S. government doesn't take somebody to court unless they know they are going to get a conviction.
Now, obviously, that is the very, very rose-colored glasses version of this.
And the more pessimistic version of this is obviously all of the evil that it entails involves all of the same people.
So they're not going to want to prosecute their own.
But it does call into question, you know, whether the release of the documents may have hindered some of that to begin with.
I don't necessarily know if that's the answer, but it definitely could have played a role.
I bet if I spent a day and looked into all of the potential financial crimes and other crimes that these individuals engaged in, we could find some laws that were broken that you could still prosecute.
I can't imagine that every single crime that is alluded to in those documents are all past the statute of limitations.
Then is it possible that they could go, like what they were doing with Prince Andrew, right?
Is the idea is that he's not going to go down theoretically for any crimes involving minors.
He's going to go down for something like selling state secrets, that they could get some of these criminals on those charges.
And then, like, if you were looking at it from the government's perspective and they're trying to satiate the people who want to see these people prosecuted, is like you were talking about Al Capone earlier.
That would still fall into what Tim was describing, that there's enough of an embarrassment or that it would turn the American public against the basically intelligence agencies that the government's not actually interested in digging into it.
So that would still kind of fall into the category of a cover-up if they decided to get everyone on the lighter, more palatable crimes to the general public.
So with everything that's going on, if you were the PR team for the White House, like what do you do to get people, like what commercials or whatever would you suggest that they could do to get people and the public back into favor of like ICE, abstain any of this stuff, tariffs, Iran?
I mean, I think that it might take firing Pam Bondi.
I think that, you know, great.
Yeah.
I mean, I think that it would take some changes at the administration.
And I like, you know, like we were saying, if they put some people in jail that were on the Epstein list, if they, I mean, nothing's going to be done before the midterms anyways.
But if they had, you know, people in, if there was a process beginning regarding people that were on the Epstein list, that might help.
But I think that they've kind of dug their own grave.
I'm not sure exactly how they get out of it.
Like I've said it a million times.
I'm still of the opinion that it will boil down to the economy, how people feel about their economic situation and how the actual candidates themselves are actually performing their campaigns.
I don't think that Donald Trump can save anyone.
I don't think that doing a bunch of stuff at the DOJ and arresting people is going to actually activate people because I think that the people that care most about that are mostly young people.
Not that there aren't people older that care, but I think they're mostly young people and they're low propensity voters anyways.
So these are just kind of like they're boring DC kind of talking points, but that's kind of the way that it works.
As far as ICE goes, they've run into such PR trouble given the fact that they've become under so much fire for incidents with the general public.
Somebody like me is wondering why they're not going after factory farms or looking to punish the businesses that make it attractive for people to come here.
And I just don't know if there's a way to work your way back into the public's good graces with that sentiment right now.
I think the way that Minnesota was handled was pretty bad, obviously.
And you wonder if they're going to take a fresh look at that blueprint before they roll out operations in other places.
But I think that the right is really, I mean, not the right, the Trump administration is really good at messaging to the right.
They're much better at that.
And they have absolutely no messaging for the left whatsoever.
Like they're not even seeking to get people who hadn't voted for Trump in the past or hadn't voted GOP in the past.
They're not even hoping for that.
And they're barely even trying to hold on to what they have.
I find it very bizarre some of the policy measures that are rolled out and what we see from the official Twitter accounts and how they're treating what's going on.
I mean, I even think the whole Board of Peace thing was kind of tone deaf, you know?
Trump brought it all on himself when he got into it with Kimmel and them, which was a message that he could have, it's a, it's a problem he could have completely avoided if he just didn't talk about it.
I think they kind of talked themselves into believing that more, like some of the moderates were more right than they are, the people that were willing to hold their nose and vote for the Republicans because they were upset with immigration with under Biden and all of the other things that happened.
And they lost a decent amount of people because they're messaging to people that are farther right than they are.
Which is a little distasteful when you're talking about like, okay, you know, Predty and Good were definitely doing stuff you shouldn't be doing, but these are also people's lives.
And then you saw people that were saying like, look, you know, when Charlie Kirk was murdered, you know, and people were celebrating his death and they're like, the right would never do that.
Like, I'm just, and I'm not like, if you're going to say that, then stand on business and actually own up to your, you know, to what you're saying and don't talk crap about people that it happened to, but they did.
Better would have been like, we really, we seriously mourn this death.
We wish that this wouldn't have happened.
You know, we hope that Tim Waltz and other sanctuary state governors take a closer look at their policies and maybe allow our federal agents to work with their local officers.
Yeah, because I was thinking, I think the best way at least to get people back on the especially criminal deportations would be to have Homeland Security literally create a tab for every sanctuary city with all the people that they're willing not to give up that are doing crimes and put how much,
like, how many crimes, like some of them have like, what, 20 arrests, 20 plus arrests, and then put the budget of how many times it costs to arrest that dude, put him through, you know, the courts, and then the courts just keep releasing them back out into the city and just blur that out, especially before the elections, because then people will be like, wait, you're using money and just not kicking this dude out.
It's like, if you were the PR team, it's like, you know, what would you do to get positive PR back to them?
And especially with ICE, because all these sanctuary cities keep on saying they're not going to release even their criminals to ICE, which is ridiculous.
He's like the Bill Clinton to Delaney's Hillary Clinton.
She's actually the agent that everybody's been trying to figure out, like, you know, Mossad and all the MI6, all that shit, because she's having sex with the teenage girls.
And that's how they keep us down is by socializing the rest of us to hire women so that we can't compete with these intelligence agencies who know better.