DHS KILLS Anti-ICE Woman, RIOTS ERUPT, Democrat WARNS National Guard Will FIGHT FEDS | Timcast IRL
Join CrowdHealth to get started today for $99 for your first three months using code TIM at http://joincrowdhealth.com - CrowdHealth is not insurance. Opt out. Take your power back. This is how we win.
Text TIM to 36912 to get 60% off the BAERSkin Hoodie today! Or click: https://baer.skin/tim
BUY BOONIES BOARDS - https://shop.boonieshq.com/collections/initial-pro-models
SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/
Join - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLwNTXWEjVd2qIHLcXxQWxA/joinShow more Hosts:
Tim @Timcast (everywhere)
Phil @PhilThatRemains (X)
Producer:
Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere)
Guest:
Podcast available on all podcast platforms!
DHS KILLS Anti-ICE Woman, RIOTS ERUPT, Democrat WARNS National Guard Will FIGHT FEDS | Timcast IRL Show less
She was obstructing ICE operations, DHS operations, with her vehicle.
They made an attempt to arrest her.
She made an attempt to flee with her vehicle, striking an officer who opened fire on her, shooting her through the windshield, killing her.
The vehicle then pulls forward and just crashes.
The woman is dead.
You now have this ongoing debate, which I would argue is completely fake, where liberals are saying she was executed.
The mayor of Minneapolis is saying there's no evidence it was self-defense.
It's a lie.
Now, this shouldn't have happened.
It's unfortunate that it happened.
I think it's fair if someone has the opinion the officer did not need to shoot her, but the fact is she did hit him with her vehicle, not at a high speed, but she did.
She appears to have been trying to flee and evade arrest.
She still put the officer in fear of death, and he opened fire on her.
And the fact is, law enforcement does have, and many, and any citizen does too, the right to use lethal force if they believe you are about to cause harm to someone else.
It's defense of yourself or others.
So I'll say it again.
We don't want these things to happen, but we're going to play the videos for you.
We're going to break it down.
And now things are escalating.
Governor Tim Waltz says the National Guard is being prepared, insinuating, saying, we're not going to let the feds use our state as a prop.
So what's the point of deploying the National Guard in that context?
He's not saying we're going to stop the riots that have kicked off.
He's saying we're going to fight the feds.
That's where things are going.
I think that the president needs to federalize the National Guard in Minnesota to prevent this from happening.
But some are saying that this may actually kick off into greater riots.
And this is a massive story that's probably going to dominate the majority of the show today.
All of that being said, this morning the U.S. seized two oil tankers, one of which I believe was Russian-flagged, at least one.
I'm not sure about the other one.
And I thought that news was crazy enough.
Now we've got people claiming Iran's in a revolution.
And while all that crazy foreign policy stuff is going on, I'm sorry, ICE shooting and killing a middle-aged white woman in Minnesota who is attempting to obstruct and flee law enforcement, who actually struck a federal agent with their car is one of the craziest circumstances of escalation we've seen in whatever it is you want to call it's going on and everyone's got a word for it.
And they're waiting for me to say it, but we'll get to that.
We're going to talk about that and a lot more, my friends.
Before we do, despite the seriousness of everything, we do have a great sponsor for you.
It is CrowdHealth.
Go to joincrowdhealth.com.
Use promo code TIM.
It's open enrollment.
The season where health insurance companies hope you'll blindly sign up again for overpriced premiums and confusing fine print.
Don't just take someone else's word.
Trust yourself and take control of your future with CrowdHealth, the healthcare alternative for people who make their own decisions.
Healthcare for under $100.
You get access to a team of health bill negotiators, low-cost prescription and lab testing tools, as well as a database of low-cost, high-quality doctors vetted by CrowdHealth.
And what if something major happens?
You pay the first 500 bucks and the crowd steps in to help fund the rest.
It feels like the options we used to have before Obamacare messed everything up.
And of course, you'll join the crowd, a group of members just like you who want to help pay for each other's unexpected medical events.
The system is betting you'll stay stuck in the same overpriced, overcomplicated mess.
And this year, it's even more complicated because most of the ACA subsidies expire, which means your prices are going sky high.
So far, CrowdHealth members have saved over $40 million in healthcare expenses because they refuse to overpay for healthcare.
This open enrollment, take your power back.
Join CrowdHealth to get started today for $99 for your first three months using code Tim.
Go to joincrowdhealth.com.
Use promo code Tim.
CrowdHealth is not insurance.
Opt out.
Take your power back.
It's how we win.
Joincrowdhealth.com.
Don't forget to also smash that like button, share the show with everyone you know.
And while this is not a formal sponsor, Chris Pavlovsky of Rumble does have an announcement that we want to get right at the top of the show.
So we just launched the Rumble Wallet, which is the, we're the first large platform to introduce Bitcoin tipping for creators.
Not only with the Rumble Wallet, can you tip Tim, you can also buy and you can swap and you can obviously tip your favorite creator in Bitcoin, USDT, which is backed by the US dollar, and XAUT, which is backed by gold.
And that's kind of Bitcoin obviously is my favorite, but I like the XAUT gold.
So we'll jump back to the riots, but we've got a lot going on here.
We've got the governor threatening to deploy National Guard against the feds, saying they're not going to let the feds use them as a prop, and he's preparing the National Guard.
He called it a warning.
But the question is, what happened?
We've got this video.
This is from Ashley Team Trump.
Justin Minneapolis shooting video has been released with footage slowed and zoomed in.
DHS states the officer fired in self-defense.
Despite what Mayor Frey and Governor Waltz have said, the woman behind the wheel was killed.
So we have this video that zooms in and slows things down.
I want to say a few things as we get into this.
The mayor and the governor are saying it wasn't self-defense.
It was.
It's not perfect self-defense.
There's arguments, and I think it's a fine argument to say the officer did not need to fire, but he was struck by this vehicle.
We'll play his for you.
Donald Trump, however, additionally said that the man was run over.
She said she violently, willfully, and visually ran over the officer.
And then he says, based on the clip, it's hard to believe he's alive.
That's ridiculous.
That's not true either.
This is how insane things are getting.
But I will say this.
You know why Trump?
You want to know why I think Trump said that?
Because they have continually lied about everything.
And Trump's attitude is: if they're going to lie and manipulate people who don't pay attention, I'm playing the same game.
I'm not a fan of that.
I'll always tell you what I think is true based on the evidence we have.
And I believe that's why Trump is doing it.
Here's the video slow-mode in question.
Normally, we don't play videos like this.
Viewer discretion is advised.
But this is one of the most substantial circumstances we've seen in a long time.
ICE killing a U.S. citizen, a woman who's obstructing law enforcement.
And it's become the subject of great debate as to whether or not this officer was actually struck or was justified.
We have a photo of the vehicle after the fact.
We have witness statements.
So I'm going to show you, and we're going to break down what's true.
here's the video clip.
This is a secondary video that's grainy and hard to see, but the officer is right here.
Uh, what?
We'll go back.
I just want you guys to watch it first before I provide context.
So the audio is clearly desynced on that last one.
But let's start here.
I want you guys to pay attention to one thing.
First of all, the vehicle is driving straight forward right now.
Take a look at the direction of the wheels.
They are aimed left.
Many liberals have said she was clearly turning right.
She is not clearly turning right.
If you are the officer standing in front of the vehicle, you see her wheels turning to your right, to her left.
She then begins to pull forward.
You can see the wheels spin out.
Look at that front wheel.
It's front wheel drive spins out as she goes directly forward.
Then the wheels start turning to the right.
Watch the officer.
Let's see.
Watch the officer's foot right here as I play this very slowly and you'll see it slide.
See his foot sliding?
Both his feet are sliding.
How is that possible?
Can he moonwalk with both feet at the same time?
No, he's being pushed by the car, swiped.
I'm not going to sit here and pretend that she slammed into him and he went flying through the air, but she did hit the officer who then opens fire, shooting her through the wingshield.
He continues to fire afterwards.
Now, there's an argument to be made about whether or not he should have, but law enforcement does have, in a circumstance where they believe an individual is a threat to others, the legal right to use lethal force, by all means.
You can say, well, I don't agree with that in this instance.
Fine, but there are people pretending like it's not the case.
When we go to this video here, you can clearly see the same thing again.
The car makes contact with the officer who then slides backwards.
He is being hit by that vehicle, for which he then opens fire.
The vehicle then pulls forward, crashes, and just goes out.
The woman's gone.
This is the vehicle having crashed into a pole, and you can see where the bullet went through the windshield.
The officer was clearly in front of the vehicle.
Now, I got no problem saying it doesn't appear that she was trying to kill the officer.
In this video, it appears that what actually happened is they approached.
She was obstructing law enforcement.
They made an effort to pull her out of her vehicle, and they said, stop the car, get out of the vehicle.
She attempts to flee.
She does, however, drive straight at an officer.
So let's just, I want to make sure this is very, very clear for everybody because I am sick of the propaganda and the lies.
And there are even people on the right that are trying to act like this was not self-defense on the part of the officer.
By all means, call it imperfect self-defense.
That's fine.
But watch the front tire of this vehicle.
I'm going to show you this one more time.
It spins out.
See that?
If you're the officer standing in front, you hear a as the wheels are pointed straight at you.
This is not the car trying to turn left and turn around.
I got so many tweets pulled up from all the different stories.
Wikipedia in one of these posts, we've got more videos.
Where did I put that?
There we go.
On Wikipedia, they initially wrote, actually, it's easier to see if I don't zoom in.
It says, the shooting took place on Portland Avenue between East 33, 33rd and 34th Street.
According to witnesses, a total of four ICE agents and two vehicles, a Titan, Zerubbin, surrounded a Red Hunted pilot.
The woman was trying to turn her car around when an ICE agent fired into the vehicle.
So let me just stress again how important this is, that her wheels spin out directly aimed at the officer.
Is it fair to say, especially if it shows to a jury, this officer feared he was about to be struck and killed?
Yes, I certainly think so.
There's a lot more to break down.
Instead of me ranting for another 20 minutes, I'll just throw it to you guys and ask you what you think and open up the conversation, but then we'll get into all the National Guard, the riots, where this goes.
Yeah, well, this goes back to like this conversation that us on the right have had a million times with the left is which comply with police officers.
It's really not complicated.
It's not rocket science.
These sorts of escalations happen because these people just are not following simple commands.
And the blood is really on the hands of Democrats who have been for months, for years saying, don't comply with ICE, resist ICE, these sorts of things.
They've been putting this idea in these people's heads that this is some sort of like Gestapo going around and blackbagging people.
Not what's happening.
This is all being done by the book, by popular mandate, by the way.
So this sort of stuff is going to happen when you're just implanting in these people's heads this idea that like you're resisting fascism.
And if you don't go out there and obstruct these police officers or these officers of the law, then this fascist takeover is going to occur in the United States.
So it's just completely ridiculous.
Trump's framing is great.
I mean, he could maybe say the, you know, I don't know if he got brutally ran over, but it's certainly true that the officer is lucky to be alive because if this car did, in fact, ran over this, run over this officer and kill him, they would be celebrating this.
I genuinely don't believe she was trying to kill an officer.
I think she was a 37-year-old white awful, right?
Affluent white female liberal.
That's the acronym.
I'm not trying to be a dick.
I think she was trying to flee.
However, that doesn't matter.
If you're in a vehicle and you press the gas and you're aimed at somebody, she does, the wheel does turn right.
She is trying to evade arrest.
If in the course of committing a crime, you attempt to evade arrest, killing or almost killing an officer, you are getting charged for that attempt.
And they're going to say, it isn't, listen, first, it's not incumbent upon the officer who's watching the tires spin out, pointed straight at him, to stop and go, let me use my psychic powers to determine her intent.
She doesn't want to kill me.
No, he's like, holy crap, I'm going to die.
And then you can argue when he sidesteps, he shoots two more times.
Now, by all means, I think there's a fair debate to say who's on the right side of the vehicle.
Is there a real perceived threat from this woman?
I want to make sure this context is clear.
Law enforcement can shoot you in the back as you run away if you are a threat to other people.
There are tons of videos of guys with guns running towards someone and the cops shoot them in the back.
You can watch these.
They're on Instagram.
They're all over the place.
The other thing to understand in this context is the one thing that the liberals and the progressives are lying about, we've had multiple terror attacks against ICE already.
So the presumption is, if you're in a car and you slam the gas and the wheels spin out pointed at you, meaning if it wasn't for the ICE, you'd be dead, a cop is going to make the assumption this is another terror attack from the far left and this person may kill someone else.
Or in icy ground speeding away from law enforcement may kill a bystander in the street.
That's the reality of what we're dealing with.
The left wants to celebrate Charlie Kirk's death.
They want to mock the death of Ashley Babbitt.
And then when this woman tries to flee law enforcement, and we've got witness testimony, she was, they're calling her a legal observer.
She was an active participant of coordinate witnesses.
They're lying.
I'm just going to say it, guys.
When the governor and the mayor come out and say they're ready to fight the feds and they lie about what happens, civil war.
The left wants those women out front because then this kind of stuff happens.
Not because they're going to not make a joke about women drivers, but the point is: if you have women on the front lines and they're out there, they feel like they're above the law.
They feel like, well, they wouldn't do anything to me because I'm a woman because they've been basically fed that line for their entire life.
And so they think they can get away with whatever they do.
They're not going to be charged or that, you know, the justice system will be lenient on them.
And the left wants them out front.
They do this kind of stuff.
They were doing it during the George Floyd riots.
They had moms out front of some of the rioters.
They had, you know, holding up signs and stuff.
They do that because they want that kind of imagery where an ICE officer is beating up a woman or shoots a woman or something like that because it's really, really good for the propaganda.
It's similar to when they have people dress up in those silly costumes because what they want is the cops grabbing a guy that's dressed up in a Pikachu costume because it looks absurd.
So start from the middle, but basically, what he said is: we're prepared to deploy the National Guard, and we will not allow the federal government to use it as a prop.
For what purpose would the governor deploy National Guard right now?
Is he going to deploy the National Guard against the protesters angry at ICE when he said ICE get out?
No, he's making it clear that he intends to use National Guard against the federal government to remove ICE.
Jacob Frey said, get the F out of Minneapolis.
I fear that if Donald Trump does not immediately move to federalize the Minnesota National Guard, they will be dispatched, maybe not directly, but intentionally to fight the federal government.
Yeah, I mean, this is how you can tell that this isn't actually a debate over the legitimacy of the shooting or what the legality is.
He had the talking points ready to go.
He had his strategy ready to go, and he was just waiting for a cause has finally come about where I can actually, you know, grind this axe that I have with the Trump administration over.
It has nothing to do with this lady.
I mean, this lady is just the cannon fodder for what he's actually trying to do.
And he's like, he's probably relieved when he saw it.
Following this week, seeing what's happening in the backdrop of a show hearing in D.C., my job is to govern, and my job is to see what the facts are.
This happened a couple of hours ago, and we're already pitting American against American.
All of you saw a video in your eyes.
We have a chaotic situation caused by the largest deployment in American history of federal agents into a community with no communication to locals.
We had a chaotic situation where an individual is in their car shot and killed.
And so, look, I want to be very cautious here because Donald Trump will make this about me.
He will make this about politics.
This is about public safety and this is about normalcy.
To Americans who are watching this, if you're in Portland or you're in L.A. or you're in Chicago or you're wherever they're coming next, stand with us.
So, my question to you guys is: I mean, like, what would you call it when a governor threatens to deploy the National Guard to stop the federal government from using them as a prop?
And then he calls on Portland, LA, Chicago to stand with us against this.
I know it's just more rhetoric, and maybe it fizzles here, but we have already seen efforts to stop Trump deploying National Guard, which is within his rights and per view as president, into various states to enforce the law in areas where he's allowed to, or under the protective principle, which is not to enforce the law, but to protect federal buildings.
That's largely what Trump has been doing.
The federal agents, I should say, to clarify, were deployed for law enforcement.
Now, this is, once again, we've already got blue state governors trying to stop Trump from taking control of the National Guard, stop him from deploying law enforcement to enforce the law.
And now Tim Waltz calling on other blue areas to stand with them because they're coming next.
You know, what I can say is, as we've been talking about the rift between the right factions of the right, the retard right and the regular right, I guess we can call it.
That was you, right, Satan?
Yep.
Yeah.
A lot of the retard rights taking the side of the woman.
Yeah, yeah, well, they're just they're spiritually leftist, they don't actually acknowledge sort of the actual undercurrent of right-wing thought, sort of hierarchy, these sorts of things.
These are people that, you know, the right, I said it yesterday, the right-wing thought, you know, for a while was kind of sexy and edgy.
And there it was, in some regards, low risk to believe in because you actually, for the longest time, we didn't expect us to be ruling again.
Like during the Biden winner, it kind of felt like it was over in a lot of ways.
And then now the Trump administration has emerged, Trump 2 never surrendered, these sorts of things were in power again.
And these people go, oh, wait, no, I didn't think we were actually going to be in power.
I wanted to be a contrarian for the rest of my life because it feels good, makes me feel like I know something that everyone else doesn't.
The whole contrarian thing is something that I think we need to pay attention to because it doesn't matter who's in charge.
They're just going to be saying, well, I don't like them.
And that's one of the things that drives me nuts about libertarians.
It's like they're so anti-government that even when there's an administration that's in office doing good things, they're still going to find something to complain about because their whole identity is wrapped up in, well, I'm against the government.
I'm against the government, period, which means they don't even like when the government does good things or when there are good things happening for your country.
They can't even accept wins.
And it's really, really detrimental to the whole country, totally.
There are some personalities that strangely on one platform are pro-Trump and on other platforms are anti-Trump.
And I know I get a lot of comments.
They're like, Tim, say who these people are.
And it may be in good time because we already have, you know, I'm not a big fan of drama and I already have enough drama because I've been ragging on a certain individual quite a bit.
But there's a handful of prominent conservative personalities that on X have been going pretty anti-Trump.
And the reason is management companies run their social media.
And so full disclosure, on Facebook, it's really funny.
I was arguing with this guy and he was like, you put this video up on Facebook that said this thing.
And I was like, I don't run my Facebook.
It's a management company.
Like we have a management company that when I post shows and we make clips, they will take them and then post them when they think it makes the most sense.
I don't have them change my opinions or pretend to be me.
They post clips of my show with a quote from me.
However, this means that a clip from three months ago might be posted tomorrow because it works well on Facebook.
That's true.
People do that.
There are some people, however, who tell men that they have management companies that will post whatever gets the most interaction.
So you'll follow someone on Facebook and they'll be very pro-Trump like crazy.
You'll follow them on accent they'll be very anti-Trump because of management company running both their accounts and going whatever gets the most engagement.
And that's the world we're living in, in authenticity, and it's all for money.
So we say retard right because we're trying to be intentionally derisive, but it may just be the compromised right.
Look, I post all of my things on my X. That's why sometimes I post things that are stupid and offensive because I'm screwing with people.
But a lot of these guys you follow, and ladies, they're not actually posting this stuff.
Some of it's totally fine, right?
Like Benny Johnson clearly has a social media person who does breaking news for him.
Totally fine.
That's normal stuff.
We have a social media person who does our Tim Cast news, and we're talking about having him post breaking news on my personal page as well.
But I'm kind of like, it's a coin toss because it's my account.
I don't know.
Maybe we'll do that.
That's fine.
But when you hire a company to make opinions for you, that's where things are getting weird.
We're going to jump to this next story, my friends.
And I'm going to say this.
It looks like the incident in Minnesota where the woman was shot and killed by DHS was intentional, planned, and coordinated by leftists.
Now, I don't know if the left intended for her to be killed, but they certainly had planned an operation based on the evidence that we have now from Christy Noam, as well as statements from the purported wife of the woman who died.
I'll start with this from the Daily Wire.
Indeed, even better.
The Daily Wire says, Secretary Noam says the woman killed in today's Minneapolis shooting had been stalking and impeding agents.
It just worked throughout the day.
She then proceeded to weaponize her vehicle in an attempt to run a law enforcement officer over, an act of domestic terrorism.
Because of the adverse weather that Minneapolis has seen in recent snow, one of the vehicles became stuck and ensnared in the snow.
Law enforcement were attempting to push out this vehicle when a mob of agitators that were harassing them all day began blocking them in, shouting at them, and impeding law enforcement operations.
ICE officers and agents approached the vehicle of the individual in question who was blocking the officers in with her vehicle.
And she had been stalking and impeding their work all throughout the day.
ICE agents repeatedly ordered her to get out of the car and to stop instructing, obstructing law enforcement, but she refused to obey their commands.
She then proceeded to weaponize her vehicle and attempted to run an law enforcement officer over.
This appears as an attempt to kill or to cause bodily harm to agents, an act of domestic terrorism.
The ICE officer, fearing for his life and the other officers around him and the safety of the public, fired defensive shots.
He used his training to save his own life and that of his colleagues.
He was treated at a local hospital, has been released, and is now with family.
So I want to make sure that I want to show you one more thing before we get into, I want to exemplify what she's saying.
We have this post from Kenneko the Great, breaking the wife of Renee Nicole Good, the 37-year-old Minneapolis shooting victim, who appeared to run over an ICE officer.
I'm just going to pause there.
And with all due respect, I'm going to clarify the context here.
I wouldn't call the person a victim.
This is a perpetrator.
And you can make the argument all day and night about whether the cop needed to, but this is a person in a vehicle evading arrest.
Okay.
The wife of the individual appears to have been outside the vehicle filming as her wife blocked ICE vehicles, wearing a flannel shirt, saying, that's my wife.
There were multiple attacks against the, there was one at the Bortec facility.
They got into a gunfight with the lost a gunfight with the Bortak guys.
There was the shooting where there was, I think, three illegals killed because Dallas, right?
Yeah, and because Antifa decided they were going to post up and start taking pot shots at ICE officers.
To think that tensions aren't high and this kind of stuff is going to be just met with, okay, well, go on by, that's ridiculous.
Like you really need to understand the situation that the ICE officers are in.
They've been fighting with people all day.
They've got people throwing snow.
There was people throwing snowballs at them earlier in the day.
You know, I mean, look, if you're the ICE officer and this person hits the gas and you're in front of the car, you're going to do what you need to do to defend yourself.
She wasn't driving a Subaru, so I think the jury's still out in the lesbian thing.
Well, the interesting, I think what the ICE officer is thinking is what everyone in the audience is thinking is like, this is what normal people do, is if an agent draws a gun on you and you're sitting in a car, what you do is you put your hands up.
You're like, oh, please don't shoot me.
Oh, my gosh, please don't shoot me.
Put your foot on the brake.
Like, you better understand.
What you don't do is like turn into wheel man and try to get out of here.
That tells me this is someone that has been brainwashed so much by this propaganda that they literally don't view these people as real human beings.
They view them as like autonomous mega kill killbox.
Anyone that decides that they're going to fight the cops, and I was talking about this in the pre-show today.
Like, look, people love to say fight the power and say, oh, you know, you shouldn't be a bootlicker and stuff.
The term fight the power doesn't mean fight the cops because behind the cop that you're fighting is a bunch more cops, right?
Like you're not going to, you're not going to win.
Fight the power, fight it in court.
That's the only way to actually win.
Otherwise, you're just going to end up fighting all the cops.
And at some point, the cops are going to decide we're done fighting with you and they're going to put you on the ground and they're going to wrap you up.
Like the apparatus that's trying to conduct mass deportations because they're trying to mop up the mess of like the entire global elite who seek to flood the country with cheap.
Like that's, it's just like the incentive structures are completely like disarray.
They just see badge and they say, oh, badge.
I saw in a movie.
That's the power.
Like this was, I'm in a Marvel movie.
I'm like a hecking superhero and that's the enemy.
I want to highlight some of this commentary that we've been seeing on X.
This is Pedro L. Gonzalez.
He says, the best video evidence right now shows ICE shot a woman while she was attempting to drive away, away from rather than run over a federal agent.
As we've already proven to you, that doesn't appear to be the case.
And I've even said, I don't believe she was intentionally trying to kill the officer, but with the tire spin out, it does look like she was accelerating into him.
That being said, he goes on to say, unless something else comes out, a trigger happy Fed just executed an American citizen and the Trump admin wants to cover it up.
Cover it up.
This isn't partisan.
If you think it's partisan, demand transparency and accountability from government in case like these, you have terminal brainworms.
He then says, you're going to see the same people who say Ashley Babbitt.
Okay.
You're going to see the same people who say Ashley Babbitt was martyred insist that this woman deserved to be shot dead.
I am actually sympathetic to Babbitt because I think she was brainwashed into getting herself killed.
I did not and would never rejoice in someone like that dying.
And I am not now in this case, though many on the new right are all too happy about it.
To which my response was, looking through a window is not the same as driving an SUV.
And Pedro Gonzalez, he's like an eight ball where you just shake it up, you give him a Trump take, and it's going to be anti-Trump no matter what happens.
And it's like emblematic of the retard right, where again, the incentive structures right now point towards giving some edgy, esoteric criticisms of the Trump administration because we must be getting duped or then we must be fooled because there's no way our guys are in power.
Yes, our guys are in power.
It's not perfect.
It's not always going to be like a slam dunk.
But the reality is everything is directionally correct.
We are moving the football down the field.
And these guys panic because they're like, my money is made on being a contrarian.
So now I got to defend this lady who's trying to kill an ICE agent by all accounts or certainly was committing an action that would lead to the death of an ICE agent.
So it's just so ridiculous.
I'm just, I have no time for these people anymore.
All right, let's, let's, let's rag on Trump maybe a little bit because we've got this post from Trump on Truth where he says, I have just viewed the clip of the event which took place in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
It's a horrible thing to watch.
The woman screaming was obviously a professional agitator.
And the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE officer who seems to have shot her in self-defense.
Based on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now recovering in the hospital.
The situation is being studied in its entirety, but the reason these incidents are happening is because the radical left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting our law enforcement officers and ICE agents on a daily basis.
They are just trying to do the job of making America safe.
We need to stand by and protect our law enforcement officers from this radical left movement of violence and hate.
So let me just break this down.
He does play the clip.
Trump actually posted the clip, which we've seen.
And you can see here the officer, the vehicle slams into him.
He was discharged already because he probably doesn't have any injuries at all.
It actually does look like he might have twisted his ankle or knee or something because he was limping a little bit, but I don't know.
That's just maybe not.
Why is Trump overtly lying like this?
Well, here's what I'm going to say.
I understand the idea that the left is lying about everything.
So if you keep doing half measures and say they're lying, it's not what happened.
And the left just says, no, they're lying.
You have two versions of reality.
One where a cop probably shouldn't have shot her, but we understand why he may have feared for his life.
And one where Nazi Gestapo executed American citizen trying to turn her car around.
Trump is making this assessment, in my view, where he's like, if the debate is, no, no, it was a clean shoot, but, you know, maybe he wasn't going to get run over, or it's a Gestapo, you're losing the argument.
Trump's basically saying, nah, we're going to create our own version of reality the same way they are.
And we're going to say she ran him over and I'm surprised he's alive.
This is doing what they do against them.
The problem I have with it, I succeed in convincing people by proving the left lied, like the very fine people hoax.
The problem with a post like this, there's going to be some liberal guy who hates Trump.
He's going to say, do you see Trump claim that she ran him over and is lucky to be alive?
What am I going to do?
Show the video where it proves Trump wrong?
Yeah, this does not work against the left.
We have had this argument time and time again over the past several years when people have said, why doesn't the right do what the left does?
Listen, the reason why I can't lie to you is because you're not stupid.
Some of these people on the left and some of these people not paying attention are, but the average person consuming right-leaning media or moderate content, like not even conservative, like whatever you want to describe me as, know what's true and often correct us.
So if I came out and said, actually, something totally different from reality happened, you'd be like, no, Tim, you're wrong.
Here's what really happened.
On the left, they go, so Trump is going to get some people to believe it.
The only problem is the left will then say, I can prove Trump is lying.
And they're going to get a reverse Very Fine People hoax.
I'm going to take a different stance on that just slightly because when you showed me that when I watched that clip that he posted and then we looked at the slow motion clip, it was like two entirely different angles that showed me, like when I saw it, two entirely different scenarios.
You couldn't even really see the officer in the slow-mo clip.
But the one he posted, it looked much more, it looked a lot closer to being like run over in a way.
She definitely were spinning and they were going right at the officer and we saw that in the slide.
when i look at the clips it's like i i'd like to see more like i think it's too early to like if there's come on i that's that's the When I first saw it, when I first saw it, I was like, whoa, that's like pretty aggressive.
Can you imagine if they never outlawed snow chains?
Who knew what time?
We'd be in a civil war.
Yeah, what Trump's doing here is just framing.
That's what it is.
And over the last six months, I think Trump and Vance both have demonstrated the importance of framing, like of controlling the narrative, these sorts of things.
And so, yeah, you could pick apart and say, okay, well, did he viciously run over the house office?
That's not really the concern.
We're in a narrative war, and Trump accurately understands that his opposition, it doesn't matter what pitch he makes towards them.
They just see Donald Trump posted it and they're going to be against it.
So again, I mean, yeah, you could pick apart and say, is this useful?
Is this not useful?
I think the framing is useful.
I think the framing of like, hey, the one thing that is true is he's lucky to be alive.
Not necessarily because he got ran over, but because this lady would have killed him if it was the summer.
It's like JD Vance has demonstrated the importance of framing.
Like when that politico group chat leak article came out and everyone on the right was throwing these kids under the bus and JD Vance came out and said, don't really care about that.
He didn't even comment on what he thought of the text.
He just said, don't really care what they're up to when the AG candidate in Virginia is like threatening to kill Republicans.
That's the importance of framing.
When the catcher frames the pitch.
It's like, that's how this works.
And the Republicans have finally learned because Democrats have been doing framing for decades and they've controlled the narrative in every single turn.
You also have to remember, like, Trump doesn't use Twitter anymore.
He uses Truth Social.
So on Twitter feeds, everyone's Twitter feeds, it was videos of the incident.
On Truth Social, he's going to see commentary.
Like people aren't spamming the video.
It's for you page, so to speak, on Truth Social is just going to be different commentators probably saying, oh my gosh, they just ran over an ICE agent.
So, I mean, again, it's neither here nor there.
I think the framing is what matters here, but that could be the explanation.
I don't know.
It could have been a conscious decision.
It could be very much like, you know, screw these people.
Like, they're not going to like me anyway.
So I'm just going to let it fly.
And, you know, it is what it is.
I mean, again, if I'm going to frame it, I'm going to say what this lady did was far worse than Trump's tweet because a lot of people on the left.
No, I know everyone here agrees.
But a lot of people on the left are going to harp on on this.
There's a good point in the comments, sort of elaborating on the point that we had made earlier about the tires spinning, the officer sliding.
She actually did drive into him and he slid backwards.
If it were not for him staying on the ice, if it were not for the tires spinning out and then him sliding on the ice, I mean, she very much did try to run him over.
So I'm going to walk back.
When I was saying earlier that I don't believe she was intending to run him over, it looked like she was trying to flee.
This is a good point.
The officer slides backwards.
You can see this clearly in the video.
If he wasn't sliding, he's getting knocked over.
And if she wasn't sliding, she's ramming into him and running him over.
So, I mean, whether or not she intended to, the result would have been that he, you know, whether or not she was trying to kill him, the result would have been that he does get run over.
I mean, considering the result, you know, getting shot for trying to parallel park that's not.
But yeah, look, the point that Tate makes about the fact that the Democrats have been stoking the tensions in the United States ever since, definitely since 2020, right?
Since the George Floatie riots, you had Maxine Waters screaming that people should be out in the streets and they should be confronting conservatives and et cetera.
And this is something that is just boilerplate from the Democrats for the past five, six years now.
I said earlier on the show is like most of these Democrat lawmakers, these commentators, these talking heads, everyone on the Democrat apparatus, when they first saw the story, they obviously, whatever, but they had like joy stir up in their heart.
They were like, finally, it happened.
They've been waiting for ICE to have any, you know, blood in the water, so to speak, so then they could finally strike and they would have some sort of tweet or take ready to go.
As much as this has taken a backseat to the story in Minneapolis, this is the one that actually kind of really has global implications.
Oh, yeah.
This on the heels of the action in Venezuela, the fact that the United States went and just said, we're taking these, it kind of really shines a light on the fact that, and with no response from Russia, right?
Like, they're not going to do anything.
Again, we were talking before the, we're talking in the pre-show.
I really think that if Russia could do something, they would, but they can't.
There's nothing that they can do.
Because the United States, when it comes to conventional militaries, the United States is untouchable.
If Russia had massive military power, they would be able to beat little Russia.
But they've been fighting little Russia for three years now, we're waiting.
It's just a few people that are quite loud on the show today when I was like, American hegemony is not going anywhere.
These claims that we're sort of heading into a multipolar world were like premature.
And I was one of these people that speculated this a few years ago that, yeah, maybe we are entering a multipolar world.
Because after Afghanistan, it was hard not to think that after the disastrous withdrawal from Kabul.
But like Phil is saying, Russia is clearly incapable of conducting affairs in their neighborhood, so to speak.
Their special operation in Ukraine is like into year five now.
Meanwhile, the U.S. took out their regional opposition in 88 minutes.
So I don't know how you could sort of look at that and not sort of come to the conclusion that actually U.S. hegemony is not going anywhere unless you literally just have an axe to grind with America.
Our global adversaries are just incompetent at every level.
And like Phil said, we're still the top dogs when it comes to warfare.
Well, I think what's most likely is if you look at the videos from the invasion, so to speak, of Venezuela, the operation of Venezuela, is you really don't see much anti-air resistance.
And it could be that either they were waiting on a delivery from Russia or Russia already knew what was going to happen and took it out because they need that for their war.
It's just like this is another example of a topic that when exposed to the masses, you're just going to get like nuclear coal, like just horrific, horrific takes.
Like I made the point on the show that a consequence of us flooding the market with Venezuelan oil is it will negatively impact Russia.
It will negatively impact Iran.
I'm not saying Russia's entire economy is energy.
I'm saying a good chunk of their economy is energy.
And yes, it's going to slow down their machine in many, many ways.
And people are like, yeah, but what about Saudi Arabia?
They're an ally.
That's going to negatively affect them too.
I'm like, we don't care about Saudi Arabia.
We care about Russia.
That's our global adversary.
You can agree or disagree.
You can be in love with Russia.
I'm just saying, from the point of the Trump administration, they view Russia as an adversary, and this is a way to undercut them.
It's like very simple.
And so it's just like the masses trying to participate in this conversation.
I just, I, and I'm not a geopolitical expert, but I'm like not a researcher.
That's legitimately their argument because when they hear, oh, the world is shifting into a multipolar world and maybe we should account for that.
What they hear is America should just like just give up because Russia and China are like this, you know, the reality is they're like paper tigers in a lot of ways because every time they try to conduct affairs, it's a disaster.
China hasn't fought a war in like 30, 40 years, and they're certainly not making any moves on Taiwan.
If they thought it was a done deal, they would have done so by now.
And so it's like a meme at this point.
Like it's laughable, the idea that China is like this like emerging power and they're going to overtake the U.S. Where is that?
Because the U.S. just blackbagged a president in the middle of the night and it was easy by all accounts.
They were back home in Miami for the Friday Night Nightlife.
So it's like, I understand where these people are coming from.
Maybe they view America as being a global hegemon as bad for the world.
Even if that's your opinion, at this point, even prominent commentators who echoed this rhetoric prior are actually sitting back and saying, yeah, the U.S. still is the unipolar power.
To your point about the idea that the U.S. being the global hegemon being bad, they're saying that in a context where you don't know what it would be like if someone else was, right?
The U.S. has been the global hegemon for 75 years or whatever, since the end of World War II.
And you can't imagine how bad it would be if Russia were the country that were actually the global hegemon or if China were the global hegemony.
And when one of us make the like a sort of a criticism of America being the global hegemon, we're doing that because we are fundamentally like America first, so to speak.
So we were like, let's just focus on our own affairs.
Let's focus on domestic issues.
That's why maybe we should withdraw from the international scene.
When they are saying it, it's because they're fundamentally third worldists and they just really resent the fact that the United States is big and powerful.
And that really bothers them.
Like nothing angers these people more than seeing the Apollo mission and seeing the flag on the moon.
So it's like it has nothing to do with like, you know, like well-constructed critiques against like, okay, well, maybe we're overstretched internationally.
No, they just hate the fact that America's, that's why they hate the British Empire.
That's why they hate the French Empire.
They just hate like when Western powers do well.
They would rather, that's why they like celebrate like Burkino Faso.
I mean, you see these people like these Jackson Hinkle types online where they're just like glazing like Burkino Faso and they're like, whoa, they just figured out how to export tomato concentrate.
It's so over for America.
And it's just like, because these people aren't actually like giving well-level criticisms.
I mean, that's what, you know, that's what she saw.
She saw her father's face in the ice age and she was like, dad.
Yeah, I mean, look, the whole idea that the United States is not the military powerhouse that it once was, that is completely wrong.
The hit on Venice, on the Venezuelan president, right, to go and capture him.
To think that it would be difficult for the United States to do those kind of things.
Like getting in, I understand that that's actually fairly shocking.
Like getting in and defeating their air defenses and stuff, that's kind of impressive.
But the actual hit itself, we have been doing hits like this for the better part of 25 years, and we've become exceedingly good at it.
The United States, I was making this argument maybe a year ago when we were talking about what would happen if the U.S. actually had to deal with the cartels using the military.
And the cartels or Venezuela, they are just not prepared for what the United States can do when it comes to force-on-force kind of attacks.
The U.S. has been going in and nabbing terrorists or killing or capturing them forever.
Don't forget, 10 years, actually 14 years ago, 15 years ago now, right?
15 years ago, we flew into Pakistan without Pakistan being aware of it, killed Bin Laden, grabbed his body and left.
And that was like, they're a nuclear-armed power.
Like they have legitimate air power.
They just got into one of the biggest dogfights since World War II with India.
And they actually won the battles because they had Chinese equipment that works pretty well.
But at the end of the day, again, the U.S. has been doing hits like that for 25 years.
And the guys that, whether it be SEALs or it be Delta guys, those dudes know how to take a structure and go in and get the bad guy.
Even people that talk about, oh, the Raiden Mogadishu, the problem with the Raiden Mogadishu was the dude that fell off the Blackhawk, not the Delta guys.
The Delta guys landed, got the job, grabbed the guy they wanted to grab and got him out.
And then everything went to hell because the guy fell off the Blackhawk and they took an RPG.
But that wasn't because the Delta guys couldn't get in and get the bad guy.
This is something the U.S. has been doing for ages and it's something that the U.S. has become exceedingly good at.
That the idea of excellence is something that the United States has aspired to forever, whether it be, you know, putting a man on the moon or black excellence.
Yes, even black excellence.
But yeah, like the idea, you know, I want to be the best of the best.
I want to be able to beat everybody.
It's something the United States has always taken pride in being able to do.
Well, rank and file Democrats are starting to make serious noise about using the threat of a government shutdown to force substantive changes at ICE.
Their anger after an ICE officer shot and killed a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis, set them on a collision course with party leaders.
Chuck Schumer said earlier this week the showdown shutdown was not on the table.
Blah, blah, blah.
But progressive lawmakers see the end of January funding Cliff as a leverage point to exploit as they fume about DHS undersecretary Christy Noam.
So I'm just going to say this.
The Minneapolis shooting is an excuse.
There was going to be a shutdown at the end of January the whole time because if you paid attention to when they passed the bill temporarily averting the shutdown or ending the record breaking shutdown, it exempted them and a few other key areas.
Everything that they've been doing thus far is just them waiting on something they can latch on to then execute on their goals because the reality is they're out of power.
The reality is the avenues that they have back to power are rapidly being cut off and they do not have a monopoly on information anymore.
So all they can really do now is just set up plays and they just need certain like cards to be played, like certain cards for the dealer to lay down for them to be like, finally, I can execute on this plan because they don't actually have a lot of political viability right now.
The only pathway they have back into victory is if the right just completely self-destructs.
There's still historically low approval rates for Democrats.
So they need Republicans to do things that they can latch on to and infuriate their base.
Because right now, no one likes the Democrats.
They've got half the party thinks that they should be like Mamdani and AOC and Bernie, and half the party thinks that they're just completely and totally ineffect.
Because they're used to the Republican Party being the perpetual perennial opposition party and being the party of managing the decline in a little bit slower way.
They're not used to a Republican Party.
Well, really an administration because the GOP by and large is still useless.
But they're not used to a Trump administration or a Republican administration that's actually like actively pushing the country in a different direction.
That's actually providing an alternative vision.
And that freaks them out.
And they realize like, oh, crap, we don't have an admin that we can play ball with.
I also think they're losing a lot of funding from all the rackets they've had around the world.
Like whether it was through USAID, whether it was this Minnesota stuff that we saw over the holidays, like all their funding is kind of getting cut off.
Yeah, you know, that's going to give them a lot less legs going forward.
There's a huge crowd of people gathered within blocks of where this woman lost her life at the hands of an ICE agent.
And I can tell you, I went through the crowd today and there is anger.
There is frustration.
There is extreme sadness.
I spoke to a group of three sisters whose father had been deported during the first Trump administration in 2018.
And they expressed that they wanted to be here because they could not believe that they believed somebody was killed just trying to present their voices.
They didn't want anyone to go through the devastation of having to navigate what it's like to have ICE, they say, terrorize a community in a way that they had experienced.
Others in the community who were nearby expressed their frustration and shock at this being just a few blocks away from where George Floyd was killed.
They also expressed they had felt this way even before this tragedy happened today.
They were afraid that ICE would, one person telling me, in actuality, do more than what is required under the law just to satisfy the president of the United States.
Now, there has been mixed reaction in terms of the reaction of the administration state side in Minnesota, but also Secretary Noam and President Trump's own social media posting.
But the real frustration, the murmur you're hearing everyone talk about, is recanting exactly what happened.
And there is a consistent drumbeat in the through line here, Aaron, and that is they do not believe that they were entitled to shoot this woman.
They do not believe that there was any imminent threat of bodily harm.
And as you well know, there's a kind of a phrase, kill or be killed, that can govern the activity of law enforcement.
If they are in imminent bodily harm, of imminent lethal harm to themselves or others, they can take action.
Many of them are recanting how they could simply have sidestepped the vehicle and still have been safe.
It is eerie tonight to see how this has all transpired in a year that has always been so much tragedy here in Minnesota, from the shootings of a political lawmaker to, of course, Annunciation School recently and everything in between.
And of course, George Floyd looms large here, knowing that this is the very jurisdiction in Minneapolis where it was law enforcement who spoke up against the excessive use of force and got the conviction of one, Derek Chauvin.
You know, I was thinking, you know, Trump and Rubio and the administration and Stephen Miller talk about how we can reduce a lot of these like violent crimes and rapes by deporting these illegal immigrants.
Have they considered deporting white liberal women?
Andy knows, wear a mask, learn to shoot, do this immediately.
Antifa-linked far-left extremist accounts like Vitalist Int are telling comrades all over social media to recall the lessons of the 2020 BLM Antifa riots to engage in violence now after the anti-ICE car rammer was shot dead.
We have seen for the past several years zero consequences for far leftists.
Now, let me put it like this.
Why does someone think it's okay to chew gum and spit it on the sidewalk and stay in the sidewalk?
Because we don't care about that.
We don't enforce against it.
And there's literally no activists being like, ban bubblegum.
Singapore does.
Different culture.
The point being that the same way you feel about chewing and spitting gum, which is like, eh, whatever, I guess don't do it, is how these people feel about obstructing ICE.
They're like, eh, it's fine.
I guess no one really cares.
So they're going to, and they're going to escalate.
There's a question then that some people have been asking.
And I wonder, do you guys think leftists may actually stop after this?
Because some of these wack-aloon lefties are only going out because it is socially acceptable.
How many of these leftists are going to be like, I don't want to die?
I think they're going to use it to create more theater like they do with all the handmaid's tale role-playing, you know, like cosplaying stuff that they would do.
I don't know.
I think they're just going to be, they're going to use it to be like, oh, if we protest, we could die.
I do think they react to strong power in some ways.
I mean, it was like with Singapore.
What was this, like the kid, Michael Faye, I think was his name?
And he went over there and he like spray painted a bridge and then they gave him like six lashes.
And like his dad was like Bill Clinton's buddy or something, right?
We have a Singaporean here, so it helps.
And he like bailed him out because a lot of Americans, obviously, we have, and I think sometimes it's a good thing, but we do have a sense of entitlement to these sorts of things.
The big overseas like Brittany Griner and think we can just like do things the way we rock a ganja in Russia.
Yeah, and the next thing you know, you get smacked down.
Donald Trump, if you can hear me, please save me, Donald Trump.
Just kidding, disavow.
We shouldn't do that.
But it would work.
I think a lot of these people are talking and they view because you see at these protests at these riots, they have like photographers that take photos for Instagram.
That entire contingency, that entire group is gone.
Yeah, but there's always going to be the contingent of people with nothing to lose, and they've already cut themselves up or they've already, you know, wrote off their families.
So they just have nothing actually to fight for outside of their sort of vision for this communist utopia.
So, so DHS tries to book rooms at this Hilton hotel.
What is it, like Lakeview or something?
And then they say, no, no, DHS.
So then Hilton gets contacted and said, no, we've reached out to this company.
Everything's good.
Nick Sortor goes in and says, Can I book for DHS?
And the guy goes, no, I just talked to my boss.
We won't book you.
So Hilton excised this one hotel from the Hilton network.
And it might even be the company itself, because I think it was like some company owned a bunch of hotels in the Hilton network.
Hilton was like, no way.
So culturally, big companies are like, we do not want to get involved at this point.
CBS did this big shift.
CBS ran an article in early December before Nick Shirley went to the check out the Somali fraud stuff calling out the Somali fraud stuff.
CBS News did.
And now they have an article after Nick Shirley where they said there have been something like 96 indictments and 62 convictions.
CBS News saying, yes, tons of Somali daycare fraud.
They've been charged.
While all the other outlets are like, nope, it's a lie.
It's not happening.
And just lying to their audience.
I think the trend that we're seeing with big corporations after the Bud Light effect is largely, yeah, okay, we're not going to join the losing team on this one.
We actually see it like walking into agencies, talking to agencies, talking to advertisers.
It is changing.
And it's slow, but there is a real shift happening in corporate America where they don't want where they're at a point where they're completely boycotting like Rumble and that's done.
I think that might already have started to happen in some of these companies.
Like I'm getting that impression.
And a lot of people at the top of these companies are surprisingly, from what I'm starting to see, are, you know, more, maybe more on our side than we thought they were, but they were kind of being run by these HR divisions.
And there's no more tolerance for these HR divisions anymore with Hilton.
Have you seen on Instagram anytime there's an ad because you can comment on Instagram ads, no matter what the ad is, every comment, and you can go see this for yourself, every comment just says nice try, Diddy.
It's the most funny thing because a lot of people are kind of just fed up.
They don't take Instagram seriously.
They're just kind of forced to use it because it's just the public square.
Well, as far as advertisers coming to Rumble, I mean, surely it's just obvious math where they're running an ad on CNN and they're just not seeing traffic driven, and then they run it out on Rumble and they're like, whoa.
Yeah, no, like one of the things that we have noticed is that the audience on Rumble has been primarily like we've been existing on direct response with all our shows and you know, all the adverts, all our advertisers are direct response advertisers up until like 2025, which means we have to sell stuff.
We have to sell bags of coffee, we have to sell insurance, we have to sell things.
And if we don't sell things, we don't get ad dollars.
It's a very ROI-based advertising model.
In 2025, that starts changing.
You get crypto.com, you get Chevron, you get Morgan and Morgan, you get other guys walking in now, spending money on Rumble, where the ROI doesn't have to be the same thing on the other networks.
Whereas if you're looking at Twitch and Amazon, they're getting ads that don't care at all if they get conversions.
It's just pure CPM-based, it's pure eyeball-based.
And whether it's real eyeballs or not, it's a whole different debate.
But it's a completely different game.
So we're stuck really trying to provide the best experience for the advertisers and making sure that they get the best ROI.
But where these other platforms are fighting for, you know, just eyeballs.
Yeah, so the Rumble wallet is a non-custodial, meaning like we can't control the Rumble wallet.
If you lose your password, you lose your seed phrase, you're going to lose your money.
We can't even help you get the account back.
We can't freeze it.
We can't touch it.
We can't cancel it.
You own your Rumble wallet.
It's a real wallet.
It is a real wallet, non-custodial wallet.
When you look at Coinbase, you can't ban anybody from it.
Correct.
When you look at Coinbase, their main wallet, they have a non-custodial one that's not very popular, but their main one is custodial.
They can freeze it.
They can shut it down, suspend it, whatever.
So ours is different than theirs in that sense, their main one.
I would say we compete, we're fiercely going to compete against Coinbase with our non-custodial wallet and obviously, and then eventually compete against Venmo and all the other payment transmitters.
But the idea here is Rumble wants to create freedom finance.
We want to create freedom everything, whether it's freedom of speech with media, whether it's freedom of infrastructure for you to build on our cloud, or whether it's free, it's digital free finance where we can't touch your wallet.
We want everything that we do at our company.
We want to make sure that you own it and it's based on the freedom ethos.
And that's the vision that we have at Rumble.
And we want to build that across our ecosystem for everything that we do.
We want to get into AI, which you own, not what we own, but you own, you control with your biases, not our biases.
We just want to be the underlining supporting infrastructure for you.
And we're going to build an entire ecosystem to compete against the Googles, the Amazons, and Microsoft's and all the big tech companies.
The way I see them is that they're all about control, bias.
They're censorious.
They want to own everything that you do.
There's no privacy.
And we want to take the complete opposite approach.
Freedom, independence, decentralization, privacy, data sovereignty, et cetera.
And we think the world will go that direction.
Rumble is big because the world has gone somewhat in that direction.
The coolest thing about XAUT is that if you go in your stock trading account and you buy the GLD or you buy like any of these gold ETFs, there's like a 40 basis points management fee every single year.
So you're losing 40 basis points on the price of gold every year because the ETF is managing it.
There is no management fee when you buy XAUT.
And on top of that, if you want to go redeem your XAUT for physical gold, you can go to this vault in Switzerland and redeem it for physical gold.
You're not going to be able to do that with the GLD.
You're buying every single time you buy XAUT, Tether is going and buying the physical gold and putting it in the vault.
Then tell her that I told you to call her and she'll like the show and she'll be like, I like this.
He said, call mom.
Before we know that, we got a great sponsor for you.
It is Bearskin.
Oh, boy.
My friends, you've heard of the Bearskin hoodie because you watched the show.
You know, and you need to get one now.
Smart people are grabbing theirs now because when it's already freezing, you want the gear that actually keeps you warm.
Bearskin is running a 60% off deal right now so you can finally upgrade the sad excuse for a winter hoodie you've been suffering in.
You've been suffering.
Trust me.
These hoodies are built for serious cold weather.
It's got 340 GSM of bearskin fleece, 10 legit pockets, a muscular fit, and even zips into the heavy storm rain jacket to turn into full winter waterproof armor.
Whether you're into hiking, hunting, traveling, just hate being cold, it's the last hoodie you'll ever need.
You'll get the free U.S. ship.
You'll get free U.S. shipping, fast delivery, and you're finally kitted out properly for winter.
So it's a win-win.
Do yourself a favor, text the word Tim to 36912 to lock in your 60% off.
Again, text Tim to 36912.
You'll get a link sent straight to your phone so you can check it out later if you're busy right now.
And when you shop with Bearskin, you're not just getting killer gear.
You're also supporting the fallen outdoors and the Hope for the Warriors veterans programs.
Don't wait till you're freezing to realize your hoodie socks.
Get Bearskin now.
Wallet 60% off.
Text Tim to 36912.
You can also check out B-A-E-R.skin slash Tim.
Thanks for sponsoring the show, guys.
Now let's grab your Rumble Rants and see what y'all have to say.
Doobie McNasty said, we need to make an awful pulp.
Like, how much time is required to pass before it's not stealing?
Because what happened was, you know, after the British went to India, stole all their spices, brought them back, and brought people with them, some like 200 years later, some dude in Scotland was like, I'm going to make a dish that's kind of like Indian food and invented chicken tick and masala.
I used to think for every AI video of like an Indian with the deodorant or whatever, like we burned down an entire forest of like fun with a data center clearing out an entire Virginia suburb just to make this one video.
Ricada Law for president says, per Robert Guvier, even if they hit him with state charges, the officer has the right to transfer it to federal court because he was a lawful federal officer conducting work.
The question now is, does the ICE agent live in Minnesota?
Typically, feds who are working in there, they're going to live in that area and then just work for the federal government.
Got to live somewhere.
Maybe he was flown in because Trump was deploying 2,000 troops into the state.
This matters because if he's got a home and family there, you know the state's going to take everything from him and he will die in prison if he allows them to charge him.
So the question is, what is he?
Look, that agent should have been on a plane 10 minutes after that out of the state.
Because they're going to be like, hand him over.
And Trump's going to be like, no, this was federal law enforcement action.
We're not going to let you do this.
It's going to be interesting to see what Trump does and if this guy is sticking around.
Look, if he lives there and he's got family and kids, you think he's going to leave?
He's going to say no.
If he does, he better get that kid and his wife or kids and get him on a plane and get the F out.
I think the other protesters that were working with her should be charged with murder.
They should be arrested.
So I'll put it like this.
If you and a group of boys decide you're going to commit a crime and one of the guys in your crew pulls out a gun to shoot a cop and is shot and killed, they can charge the rest of you with murder, putting you at fault for the death of the criminal who tried to kill the cop, saying your crime created a circumstance in which someone died.
They should say, she's dead because you all conspired to engage in an illegal, felonious action, and now you're all going to bear the brunt of it.
And I say this because Rogue Atlas rumble rants.
Democrats are yet again trying to use this to incite a reprisal from their base.
If arrests are not made, I am done voting.
I will sit it out and watch it all burn.
I am tired of spineless Republicans, and I do not disagree.
There's got to be action.
These people broke the law, and what's going to happen is Democrats are going to blame the ICE agents who were aggressed upon instead of the people who are literally breaking the law.
So those riders and obstructed, you know, people obstructing law enforcement should be charged.
And maybe it could be a light charge, like obstructing an officer or whatever, whatever charge, maybe get three, four months in jail, but it needs to happen.
Yeah, I mean, the whole white guy thing, like, I mean, look, there's a lot of Somalis in Minneapolis, but like Minnesota is still a predominantly white state, right?
Yep.
And to sit there and basically disparage white guys, like, you're not going to win.
You're not going to, you know, cully favor that way.
I think the tether thing is what makes it viable for regular people.
Because one of the problems with all the crypto wallets is like the fact that I can open the wallet and I can literally just go to your Rumble account and send your Rumble account.
It's easy to find and it's your name.
Go to a regular person and say, here's my 16-digit hash code.
And they're going to be like, and then you have these scams now where people are making addresses that have the first three and the last three of your address.
So people, then they trick people into sending to the wrong address.
So it's like, you know, I look at phones and I'm like, yeah, actually, Tate, how many phone numbers do you know?
That is really funny, the criticism of these prominent conservative females, the trad, the trad cons, when it's like, shouldn't you be married and like focusing on your family and not running a business?
Like, I'm talking specifically about the content produced by women where they're like, women should be good mothers and shouldn't be masculine or running businesses.
And it's like, indeed, you're doing that right now.
The weird thing with Tokyo is Japan's population is dropping rapidly, but Tokyo's population is still increasing because everyone in Japan is moving to Tokyo.
So you're going to end up with a city.
We're going to end a situation where all of Japan is like a wasteland except for Tokyo.
I kept seeing these signs, like these big signposts that look like it's kind of, to an American, it's like, maybe it's a fast food restaurant because the way we have Taco Bell and Subway, McDonald's, and Post.
And so eventually I was just like, what is that we keep seeing?
And there's a, for those that aren't familiar with the term, do you guys know what a fixer is?