The DOJ Civil Rights Division is launching this investigation because Portland police arrested journalist Nick Sorter after he got attacked.
However, when Katie Davis' court was attacked, beaten, and left with a black eye, they did not arrest Antifa.
Now, I can only just say, my friends, I've been warning for some time that the police in Portland are communists.
So this is not surprising, but it's good to see the feds are ramping things up.
We'll be talking about that.
We got a bunch of other news.
Donald Trump's got a major Supreme Court victory, allowing him to remove protected status from a ton of Venezuelan illegal immigrants.
And the Treasury is going to be making a Trump coin with him raising his fist by the American flag.
So that'll be fun.
We'll talk about that and a lot more before we get started.
Oh, actually, there's one more big story.
Holy crap, I can't miss this one.
We actually were thinking about leading with this story.
Turns out, we were personally attacked by China.
Yes, so the Blazes report that that sim site, the fake cell tower network that was discovered in New York, was actually targeting, among many others, me.
This is a weird story.
China was not very happy with me targeting Steve Bannon, Cash Patel, and others.
That story is pretty massive.
We'll get to that one as well.
Before we get started, we've got a great sponsor, my friends.
It is Americanfinancing.net/slash Tim.
The Fed has finally dropped interest rates, and that's great news for American homeowners.
Expenses have been a major burden on families.
Wages are flat.
Prices keep climbing.
And for many, the only way to make ends meet is to lean on credit cards.
That cycle of high-interest debt makes it hard to stay ahead.
If you're a homeowner, I want you to call my friends at American Financing right now.
Interest rates have dropped.
Many homeowners are seeing options in low fives.
Compare that to credit cards charging rates in the 20s or higher.
There's an easy path to say you can finally put your hard-earned equity to work for you.
American Financing can help you pay off that expensive debt, free up your cash flow, and keep your budget under control.
Their salary-based mortgage consultants are saving customers an average of $800 a month.
And if you get started today, you may even be able to delay your next mortgage payment.
Take control.
Call American Financing today at 866-890-7811.
That's 866-890-7811 or visit AmericanFinancing.net/slash Tim.
And then, my friends, we've got one more sponsor for all you guys.
It is Block Trust IRA.
Cryptocurrency is here to stay.
Block Trust IRA is making crypto accessible to everyday Americans looking to build retirement wealth.
Their white glove concierge service walks you through the entire process.
No overseas call centers, just real American crypto specialists helping you invest safely.
You want to go to blocktrustira.com/slash Tim.
What truly sets them apart is that Block Trust IRA believes Bitcoin changed the game, and now AAI has changed the strategy.
Their exclusive access to the award-winning Animus AI Tech, recognized by Bitcoin Magazine as the number one crypto platform among 1,500 global competitors.
This system works 24-7, executing sophisticated strategies that outperform traditional buy-and-hold approaches by a significant margin, minimizing risk and maximizing opportunity.
With over 60 cryptocurrencies to choose from and military-grade security protection for your investments, and $200 million in insurance, you can diversify with complete peace of mind.
Whether you're rolling over an IRA, 401k, or just getting started in crypto, Block Trust IRA has you covered.
For a limited time, get up to $2,500 in free bonus crypto when you open an account.
Again, blocktrustira.com/slash Tim.
Don't forget, invest responsibly.
Make sure you're making the right decisions for yourself.
And also smash that like button right now.
Share the show with everyone you know.
Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Catalina Lauff.
DOJ Civil Rights Division investigates Portland police over response to Antifa attack on Katie Davis Court and the arrest of Nick Sorter.
For those that missed this, many of you may be aware that Katie Davis Corder, reporter for the postmillennial, was bashed in the head, giving her a black eye.
Just last night, or early this morning, depending on where you live, Nick Sorter, a conservative journalist, had been attacked by Antifa.
And when he went to the police to report the crime, they arrested him.
I've said it before.
I said it this morning.
I'm going to say it now.
The cops in the Pacific Northwest are communists.
I'm saying that somewhat to be a dick.
They are far leftists.
They are aligned with the left.
They protect Antifa.
Antifa are there under the protection of the police.
That is why when Katie was attacked, they did not arrest them.
That is why when Nick Sorter got attacked, they arrested him.
Now, you can make any argument in the world you want.
Actions speak louder than words.
But the big news is: check this out.
Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, Harmeet Dylan, has launched an investigation into the assault of Katie Davis Court and the arrest of Nick Sorter.
I believe we actually have this tweet from Harmeet Dylan saying, Portland, it's FO time.
Buckle up.
And then we have this letter published by Harmeet Dylan saying, Portland signed, sealed, and delivered.
I'll just read some of this.
It says, Dear Mr. Taylor in Chief, Day, your immediate attention to this matter is required.
We are writing regarding Portland Police Bureau's response to incidents surrounding the ICE facility in Portland and specifically the city of Portland's use of its policing powers in a manner that may be based on viewpoint discrimination.
Specifically, three issues have been brought to our attention.
PPB reportedly arrested individuals who may have been involved in an altercation, choosing to arrest Nick Sorter, but not others.
PPB reportedly failed to identify or arrest individuals who allegedly assaulted Katie Davis Court, even after briefly detaining the individuals.
And the city of Portland reportedly has attempted to use its policing powers through a zoning enforcement action to limit ICE's use of its Portland facility.
She goes on to say, Well, we have not reached any conclusions on these allegations.
We note a consistent theme in these three allegations.
All three would choose one viewpoint over another.
Moreover, the allegations implicate the city's performance under the settlement agreement in the above-referenced case.
They're going to mention, Harmeet Dylan mentions more to address our compliance concerns raised by these allegations.
We request the following by no later than October 10th: the original unredacted BWC recording of the officer, body-worn camera, involved in the arrest of Nick Sorter, the body-worn camera of the incident involving Ms. Davis Court, all unredacted incident reports for Ms. Sorter and Ms. David Court,
all complaints received about the incidents involving Mr. Sorter and Ms. David Court, Ms. Davis Court, or the decision to target the ICE facility for zoning enforcement, all non-attorney client privilege communications regarding their decisions, all non-attorney client privilege communications regarding directions to PPB responding to those protests, and any documents or explanation the city wants to provide to the U.S. in response to the above listed allegations.
Now, it sounds fun, but do y'all think this actually has teeth or it's just talking?
The police officers, if they were doing their job, they should have intervened right away when people were attacking him, not wait after the fact to arrest all the parties.
heard that other people were arrested here as well.
So I don't know if that is true with what Harmit Dylan is saying, but obviously, clearly, we've been talking about this for the last few days.
This has always been going on.
People get attacked.
You defend yourself because I think Nick admitted to trying to swing back as well.
And then you get arrested for disorderly conduct, which is ridiculous.
I think it does because for so long, we have seen these groups being completely emboldened by being allowed to get away with this stuff.
Everybody turns a blind eye, especially under Democratic administrations.
Finally, now that President Trump is laying down law and order and defending, rightfully so, conservative voices, I really believe this is a, I don't want to say, I do feel that this is actually going to set precedent to future moments of this because it has to stop.
I mean, it's unbelievable the violence that has been being caused against people who are like Nick just trying to spread facts.
Thank God for social media because look at the video.
Had we not had that, had we not even had evidence, none of this would even be talked about.
And thank God for the movement, because think about everybody who came up to his defense that even it even got to the eyes of the AG.
There was Joe Rogan mentioned this, and I had this critique throughout the week that he said these people really thought that Charlie was a bad guy and that they were good people.
Joe is incorrect in that assessment.
The reason why the lies about Charlie were able to work on the left is because the left never heard of him before.
So another good example is: I'm walking around the city today, and I get recognized all the time.
And I've got security.
We'll keep it at that.
And in these conversations, one points out, I'd say, oh, you know, people seem to notice that whenever someone comes up to me, they're a fan.
That's right.
Because in the actual political space, the people who are apprised of politics know what they're talking about, see me and say, I know who you are.
You are Timpool.
I'm a fan.
Liberals see me and don't know anything.
So the instances where I encounter someone who doesn't like me are exceedingly rare in public because the average liberal has no idea what is going on in politics.
And you need only look at politics.
You know who's a great follow when he unlocks his account?
It's Jess Margera.
Steve Bennon talks about how you got to watch MSNBC so you know what they're thinking.
And he's right.
I like to follow Jess Margera.
He's Ban Margera's brother, but he locks his account from time to time.
And he makes posts where you're like, okay, I see how they're thinking.
They've not even Google searched this.
The example being the reason for this shutdown.
Very simple.
If you turn on MSNBC, they're going to have Democrats going, we are, like Schumer or some Democrat will go, there is no healthcare benefits for illegal immigrants.
We are not requesting it.
We are not offering it.
There I said it.
Case closed.
And the liberals go, well, there it is.
Why are Republicans lying?
If they actually were telling liberals the truth, they'd say, and the reason is because we deem that anybody who enters the country illegally and then makes an assertion of legal status, we pause and say, this is now legally permitted.
So the Democrats don't actually tell liberals what's going on.
They just lie to them.
That's the important thing.
The people who are out on the ground at ICE don't know what ICE does, don't know what CBP is.
If you went to these people and said, what does ICE stand for?
They'd say, get out of here.
If you said, what does CBP stand for?
If you said, what is USCIS?
They'd go, huh?
That's the point.
They're not fighting fascists.
They are just devoid of thought.
The people who organize these rallies and the liberal high priests who communicate and rally them online know they are lying intentionally.
Like Hassan Piker posing in front of what kind of car did he buy?
I would argue that many of them are useful idiots to an extent.
There are some revolutionaries.
But when you take a look at the, here's a story for you guys.
We had Naima Trout scheduled, confirmed for the Culture War Live.
When we reach out to people for this debate, hey, we want liberals, we want conservatives.
Liberals always say, here's my fee, because they don't care about a cause making the country better.
Their whole job is, their whole life is, here's how many followers I have.
Here's how much money I am owed for this appearance.
That's why, if you notice, I'll keep some names out of this, but some of these bigger podcasts, which seem to get prominent liberals on their shows, pay them.
And then you'll find that these prominent liberals who are now being paid by these other podcasters change their opinions.
It's pretty obvious.
When we book conservatives, actually, we barely have to try.
We'll cover your travel accommodation and give you 500 cash.
Nobody else is getting paid.
They emailed us yesterday saying, we want $5,000.
Can you do that?
And we said, no, we can't.
We lose money doing this.
And you know what?
Part of me says, I get it.
They're claiming, like, she got another offer.
It's going to pay her a lot of money and she has to take it.
Totally fine.
Who am I to tell you not to take that money?
But conservatives do it for the love and for the cause and for the movement, and liberals do it for the money.
So in terms of these people on the ground that are being antagonized by people, I said that figuratively, who are being riled up by the likes of Hassan or the Krasensteins.
The only reason Hassan is saying the things that he says is so that he gets more clicks and makes more money.
And it's evidenced in the fact that he has no consistent logic behind what he says.
These people on the ground are attacking Nick Sorter, not because he's Nick Sorter.
They don't know who Nick Sorter is.
They wouldn't know if he was a fascist or anything.
All they know is they were told, bad guy, hit bad guy.
There's nothing you can say to them.
I asked you this yesterday, Ian, I'll ask you again.
If you were standing on the gallows with one of these guys standing behind you, could you say anything that would change their mind about them about to hang you?
Max was working for the German mainstream media, and they still decided to single them out, beat the crap out of them.
Max had to have knee surgery afterwards because they kept stomping him.
Luckily, I was able to get away with a few lumps, but still, it wasn't a pleasant scenario where they were literally following us throughout the entire city and then following us home as well.
They shut down the train systems by blocking all the railroads.
Then they were shutting down the airport.
Then they were literally marching around just burning cars and stores as they pleased.
As police officers literally were just like, yeah, we're not going to do anything here.
That's the type of scenario that we were in as we were literally waiting inside of our Airbnb trying to figure out if they figured out our location or not because help wasn't coming.
The reason I would only make an appeal to people, the green shirts, the people that don't know on a show like this is because there's something different about when you're in the wisdom of a crowd.
When you're in a crowd, I would never make an appeal to a crowd.
It's useless.
They have mob mentality, but individuals that catch a clip on the news might hear something and be like, I'm not going to the next rally.
So the way it works is the, was it the Open Society Foundation?
Yeah.
They make contributions to a bunch of NGOs.
That's it.
What those NGOs do is it's different.
So what ends up happening is when you want to simplify it for a conservative and you say, George Soros is providing a lot of the funding, not all of it, but a piece of it to various NGOs, which finds its way into the hands of these protesters.
The left then says, because this doesn't actually help inform the average person, because then what you end up hearing is like on the ground during Occupy, people going, I wish I was getting a Soros check.
You know what really bothers me is that no matter how many times I've said over the past few years, like, okay, to be fair, obviously the people who watch this show agree with me to a great deal.
Not on everything, but I kept pointing out back 2018, these cops are communists.
The chief of police is appointed by a Democrat.
The Democrats don't like you.
And so we've learned this hard lesson when proud boys were sentenced to prison for four years after Antifa attacked them.
And this is not the first time we have seen the police target the innocent and let the criminals go.
It happens on a daily basis.
I keep hearing from conservatives, even recently, saying it's not the cops' fault, Tim.
It's the DAs who let them go.
Maybe now, those naysayers watching Nick Sorter get arrested after they attacked him and Katie Davis Court got attacked and they would not arrest Antifa.
Maybe now you're like, oh, Tim was right the whole time.
Communists can get hired as cops all the same.
The Soviet Union had police, okay?
All of the communist countries, China has police, and they are commies.
Kavanaugh's attempted assassin sentenced to eight years in prison.
That's it.
He attempted to assassinate not just a sitting Supreme Court justice, but his family was threatened as well.
Eight years.
I mean, that's pretty wild.
So the message being sent with the assassination of Luigi Mangayan, I'm sorry, the assassination allegedly by Luigi Mangion of Brian Thompson, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and the attempted attempt on Kavanaugh's life is that you're going to get a slap on the wrist.
You are going to be venerated and praised.
So just a moment ago, you were mentioning the culture that brought us to this point.
You've got a variety of factors at play.
One, these liberal judges live in a liberal world and they want people on the right assassinated.
Come on, I'm not playing stupid games anymore.
When they say to this guy, you're free to go, okay, it's not literally eight years in prison, but for attempting to kill a sitting Supreme Court justice, that's insane.
There are people who are in prison longer than that for marijuana, just having pot.
Well, as of recently, there has been a sharp bifurcation with the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Many entrenched themselves, solidifying their position in the cult, and many others broke away.
And I predicted this.
I could be wrong because there's data to this, but basically what I'm seeing is what I expected to happen.
That is, many default libs were shocked by the killing and are scared by it.
And so there have been prominent individuals who have been speaking out in support of Turning Point and for Charlie, despite being what you'd consider default libs.
They don't pay attention to politics.
So I'm talking about celebrities, athletes, and otherwise.
However, a decent amount of these people have gone hard at celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk.
So my view is, and my prediction for the next year is another, I think there's going to be a terror attack or a major assassination within the next year.
And the reason is exactly this.
The right coalition has just expanded by double digits because of the assassination of Charlie Kirk scaring people.
But default libs, many of them, entrenched themselves in the left cult.
So I'd look at it like maybe 50% are leaning right with a decent boost.
And now you've got 30, some odd percent in the left camp boosting their numbers from what was actually like 10% a decade ago to like 20 in the past several years.
These people have basically entrenched themselves in the woke ideology cult, whatever you want to call it.
That means they are going to believe there's fascists taking over.
They are going to believe, like Gavin Newsom said, there will not be an election in 2028.
And they are not going to accept Republicans winning.
With the killing of Charlie Kirk pushing a little bit of support towards the right, because it certainly didn't go the other way, the Republicans probably have an edge to win in many new locations, potentially in New Jersey.
Maybe not.
I'd estimate there's a strong probability that they actually survive the midterms, which would be shocking because usually it goes the other way.
If the Democrats are looking like they are going to lose in just shy of a year's time, I believe that the entrenched, large size of this cult is going to get extremely violent.
Dude, I'm concerned about false flags, like a foreign operative making it look like they're part of this liberal cult, whatever, and doing another assassination attempt.
I mean, if you look at the first civil war in America, there was other countries that were involved in it.
If there's going to be another civil war, you could bet your bottom dollar, China, Russia, Iran, North Korea.
Sorry, when?
You know, when the inevitable happens, I think we're in a non-kinetic type of war, and we see that when people doubled down after the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Today, I made a video and I said it was a non-kinetic?
Yeah, yeah, non-kinetic.
I would argue that it wasn't just the assassination of Charlie, but the response to it that really kind of woke people up to just how close we are to Bedlam and utter chaos in our society.
And I think it really kind of ripped off the face and the mask of the establishment.
And now people are finally seeing it to be as horrendous as it is.
So this is a make or break moment for America that is going to be a key deciding factor to see where we're going from here.
I don't see a path away from this because the way I look at it, there are a lot of people that watch this show and watch my morning show, and I'm not right about everything.
I'm wrong about a lot.
But the predictions that I have made have been, let's just say it vaguely correct, right?
So the example that I often give is in September of 2020, I said if Trump loses in November, his supporters are going to storm the White House.
They are going to bust it down.
They are not going to accept this.
I was told that I was crazy, paranoid, et cetera.
November came and went.
Nothing happened.
And liberals made videos saying Tim Poole is crazy.
He's a conspiracy theorist.
Then January 6th happened.
These same liberals made videos saying Tim Poole had foreknowledge of January 6th.
They couldn't accept that, no, I just saw the temperature and saw what was going to happen.
We are not the biggest show in the world, nor do we reach the most people.
And while many people watch the show for a long time and have probably been saying, I think Tim is actually right about the path that we're on.
Convincing you guys doesn't change the direction of the river.
So right now, where we're at is we are cognizant of what is happening.
We have been cognizant of it for seven years, and there's little we can do to stop it.
And the point is this.
Dana White gave an interview where he said, I don't like cancel culture.
People shouldn't lose their jobs for what they're saying about Charlie Kirk.
That is the perfect example of why nothing will stop this.
Now, maybe I'm wrong because I'm only, like, I say I'm vaguely correct.
Obviously, nobody stormed the White House in November, but you get how I was kind of close to it.
Dana White gave us a great example of prominent, moderate individuals who support Trump do not understand what they are supporting.
When Dana White says we should allow people to celebrate the assassination of Charlie Kirk, he's saying, I'm not really involved in politics.
I'm for free speech.
A society where its most prominent business magnates and personalities defend the right to celebrate assassinations is a society headed down the path of Rwanda, which is exactly what happened when people would go on the radio and on the TV and say, other tribe, I think it was the Tootsies, right?
The other tribe are a bunch of demonic evil, and they got to be purged and killed and mocking them and laughing.
And then finally, one day, people woke up and said, okay, we're doing it, and started massacring the other tribe.
We have opened the door to civil war because we celebrated, I don't say we, but this country defended the right of people to go on social media and go on TV and defend the assassination of Brian Thompson.
Less than a year later, Charlie Kirk was assassinated, and the left is still celebrating it, sending the message that if you're a liberal and you try to kill somebody, worst case scenario, you'll get a slap on the wrist, eight years maybe if you're caught.
If you are and you go to jail, they will make sainthood candles for you.
They will celebrate you and praise you.
We recently saw a comedy show at a university where in their thank you at the portion at the end, it said Charlie Kirk's killer.
So when Dana White says this must be allowed, cancel culture is bad, he has said green light for 50 million people in this country to create an economy based on murdering your political opponents.
Yeah, I mean, it's like you want to irrigate a canal.
He's like, just open the damn floodgates.
We need the water in the canal.
Like, bro, there's a way to irrigate the canal.
Obviously, we need free speech, but you also have to be just about how you allow society to warp people's minds.
Like, but here's the thing about prediction.
And I think a lot about, are we predicting the future or are we creating the future?
Like, if I go on TV and say, there's going to be a party on Friday at that place, and there are all these people here, and they're like, oh, and then they all show up.
I just manifested a party.
I didn't even.
So if you say there's going to be a civil war, people are like, oh, oh.
I will say from the political side of things that, yes, it does, in a way, it does embolden people when they get a slap on the wrist.
At the same time, though, I do believe that it wakes up a lot of people who have been silent.
There is a sleeping giant in this country.
We saw it in this last election, I believe, that people finally got involved.
And as a candidate and things like that, we get sometimes it's like you want people to be able to get involved into the process because so many people are not.
But now, because of everything that's been going on, all the hate that's happening, reasonably minded people on both sides of the aisle look at this.
I think there are a lot of reasonable Democrats that look at the assassination on Charlie Kirk and horrific things that happened to conservatives.
I think I want to believe, and I truly believe, and the data does show that people are waking up and there is still this sense of Americanism that, whoa, whoa, this is not who we are as Americans.
We are not the people of Rwanda.
This is, we have values and virtue in this country.
And I do believe that we are seeing the change because so many people are getting involved in the political process.
You know, I just maybe anecdotally, but I get messages all the time that are like, hey, look, I'm sick of sitting on the sidelines.
I want to help out.
I want to get involved.
I want to run for office.
I'm not afraid to speak out anymore.
And so I think for every time that we are, we're living through these really rough times.
We do all have a choice, though, of what our country, what do we want the country to look like?
This is still our country at the end of the day.
And there is still a lot of Americanism there that I think is the guiding light to the future.
I do, look, our country has gone through so many more hard times.
You look at the Civil War.
You look at World War II.
Like, we, yes, we have lived in our own gilded age in a sense.
We're now seeing chaos and all that.
However, our country has survived tremendous trials.
And how we survived them were moments like this where we all did come together and we did revive of what it meant, the revival of what it meant to be an American.
And I do believe, I still believe that everybody, even on our worst day, we are still the greatest country in the world and we will turn this around.
But it takes everybody to get involved.
It takes people to stop sipping on their Starbucks lattes and just pretending like everything's fine.
You have to get involved.
And I always say this, it will become personal to everybody.
If it hasn't become personal to you yet, it will become personal.
Whether that is the transgender movement or whether it's illegal immigration, all these policy issues that this enemy within has created in our country, one day it will get personal to people.
And when it gets personal to enough people, are enough people going to stand up and say, this is not what we're going to do anymore.
We've been through some tough times as a country, but I think the problem was in the 60s and 70s, like you mentioned, with Weather Underground and this sort of leftist paramilitaries that we saw.
So we never actually sufficiently beat them.
I mean, you saw like Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dorn like advising like, you know, modern liberals and these sorts of things, the Obamas.
And so it's like, I agree, but it's part of the problem we're dealing with now is that we never actually sort of successfully put these people away when we had the chance, you know, 50 years ago.
And now we're having to deal with it again.
And now, I mean, like, to Tim's point, we're going into a midterms that look like it's going to be favorable for the Republicans.
The only way that happens, though, we have such a slim majority.
And this is why everybody who's listening has to get involved because we have such a slim majority.
If the Democrats do win, we will not be able to pass anything from the Trump agenda, which has been remarkably better than obviously the Biden administration.
But the reason for that is because normally in these off-cycle years, Republicans, the people who we rely on, sometimes unfortunately don't come out.
And so it costs a ton of money to get people to get out and vote because sometimes we become complacent.
I don't think that that's going to be the case this now, especially after everything that's been going on.
There has been, this was a mandate that happened with the reelection of President Trump.
So much bad happened prior to that that I think people now understood the cost and the consequences of not waking up.
And so I think that we are going to take the House back, but it takes, again, the silent majority to get up, to knock doors, to volunteer, to contribute.
Everybody has a skill set or everybody has a role in this movement to make sure that we do win the house.
So I have obviously been in politics for quite some time now.
And my original inspiration, I always say, was AOC because I look at somebody like that and I looked at how there weren't enough people on the Republican side speaking out against women like her and these young women who were completely manipulating so many minds, especially of the younger generation.
And I'm like, why don't we have a counter voice to a lot of these people?
And so I was honored to be able to get a lot of support in my candidacy.
And now that we're running in Florida, people are really fed up.
They want people who actually care about them.
And we have, even on both sides of the aisle, we've had people in Congress who are not working for the people.
You know, you see it, unfortunately, sometimes on the Republican side.
And it's time that we bring back servant leadership.
It's time we bring back a representative democracy, which is what we were founded upon.
Your congressperson is supposed to care about you.
They are supposed to be a lion for your values and a voice in Washington for you.
And so for so long, people have been fed up about that.
You know, ultimately, it's up for his constituency to decide.
That's not for, you know, I do agree with some of what in the past, especially, but I'm a little bit more pragmatic when it comes to everything that's going on from a political perspective.
You know, there are a lot of quote-unquote hills to die on in politics.
And sometimes it's better that we do remain united as a party in a lot of ways, because when you break out into these factions, which is what Republicans sometimes do because we're just more individualist thinking, you know, the left always stays together.
They mass organize.
They're unified all the time.
I'm not saying that we should, you know, be like them.
However, I am saying that we have to be, we need to be a party that is on the same page.
If we are not, if we are divided as a party, then that allows the subversion of the Democrats to be able to, A, infiltrate our party, but also to then be the stronger, to then rebuild and be strong.
And then they do what they do.
And so I think ultimately it's up to his constituency to decide on how they feel.
I feel like with the Epstein style, he's going hard on release the Epstein files that he thinks this is what my people want.
I don't care about the Republican Party.
I don't care about the federal government.
I'm representing 700,000 people.
They want the files.
So I'm going to vote to do it.
And it's like, it does kind of break away from the party in some ways because a lot of people are like, hey, I think we're using this data as blackmail against the deep state right now.
Don't unleash.
That's what Alex Jones said last night.
Let's not unleash it because we're using it.
But like he's adhering to this people.
And the people aren't all on the same page.
People in Kentucky are different than people in Florida and Colorado or wherever you're coming from.
Anyway, I guess to tap it off, I get concerned about people marching in lockstep, but I understand your point that if you don't, someone else might.
Yeah, look, at the end of the day, you have to always be, as a representative, you have to do what you're there because of the people.
You don't send somebody to Washington because, oh, well, this is the way I feel about something, which is unfortunately, we have too many narcissistic politicians that go to Washington.
They not only not vote for what their constituency wants, they also are sitting there insider trading, doing whatever they want.
They never get, you know, they're never held accountable because they always get re-elected.
Whatever that might be, at the end of the day, you should do what matters for your district.
Right now, the economy is huge.
Thank God we have President Trump turning things around from an economic perspective.
The border crisis was, I mean, everything that was happening in our country was destroying it.
And Biden did destroy our country in such a short amount of time.
We're now trying to reverse that in the Trump administration.
And so ultimately, to your point, we have to be in lockstep from the president.
I think he is the commander in chief.
He was historically re-elected.
We need to be delivering on his agenda, which is what the people historically, from a mandate perspective, voted for.
I would, first of all, I would appreciate that what someone like Massey should do and what I think what most representatives should do, why don't you take a poll of what matters in your district?
Why don't you take a poll for what your constituency wants?
The initial bill that was put forward by Rokana, I heavily criticized because it would require the release of all the evidence, which includes videos of children.
And so I said, this is a trap.
Democrats put forward something they know Republicans can't vote on.
Roe Conna then, I interviewed him and he said, okay, you're right about that.
That was not my intention.
I appreciate you bringing that up.
I appreciate that you brought it up.
We're going to change it.
So he and Massey got together and they drafted a very, very simple, I think it's like two pages, very clean.
Release what of the Epstein's information that you can without exposing any ongoing investigations, evidence, you know, that would depict children and women being trafficked.
So I think his bill actually looks pretty good.
Trump has not given us a real reason as to why he does not want it released.
So were I to be in Congress, I would vote for it to be released.
I'm not going to comment on anything until I've seen the actual bill because if you have an option to release the Epstein list, but Trump tells you no, what do you do?
I think sometimes there's so much sensationalism that happens in politics.
And ultimately, like, why don't we, if the constituency wants something to be passed when it comes to economics, the border, things that the kitchen table issues, why are we focused?
Why don't we focus on that instead of, at the end of the day, trying to be sensationalists?
And I'm not saying that this particular situation is sensationalist.
However, from overwhelming conversations on the ground, I will tell you the majority of people are focusing on how they can feed their families, why they can't afford homes, what's going on in our district when it comes to hurricanes.
Those are things that really matter to the constituency and set up some of these people that look at Twitter and things like that.
I think there's a lot of internal pressure from the intel agencies telling them you're not going to talk about this.
And that's it.
And I think that really shows us the true structure of power in Washington, D.C., because it also highlights how it's not just Trump who's in charge here.
There's been some actual reporting behind the scenes that the issue is, and I think this makes the most sense because this is what I was arguing beforehand.
It's not so much that he's using this against the deep state or whatever.
What it is, is that, as we already saw with the news saying that Elon Musk was named in it, it's bad for the stock of these companies to even have your name in any way in it, even if it passively mentions your name.
There are people who associate with Epstein but didn't go to the island who are going to be named in these documents as having traveled with Epstein or partied with him.
And Trump, my understanding is the reporting was Trump said it's going to hurt a lot of people.
A lot of people are going to get hurt who didn't do anything wrong.
Do you think that was right, though, from the media perspective to include Elon in that particular article that they did, where he specifically fought back and said, this is ridiculous.
They tried to paint him as the villain of this story when that wasn't the reality.
So I talked about this latest release, and it was heavily biased against Republicans.
And I said, this is why Trump needs to release it because the Democrats picked out Steve Bannon.
They picked out Peter Thiel.
They picked out Elon Musk.
Those people should have some answers.
But there's other people that were also involved here that are major Democratic donors, major big players.
And for some reason, we're protecting Bill Clinton, who, according now to two sources, knew children were being hurt and was there and was an accomplice to the crime.
Yeah, because you guys are, you're completely, you're completely discounting the fact that the average American person, again, we have huge crises that were happening that were now being solved by this administration.
When you have a family that couldn't afford groceries, you have seniors on fixed income, you have families whose children have been killed by illegal immigrants.
However, the obvious reason why Trump is withholding them is because he wants to maximize political power by any means to go up against the deep state.
I wonder if when he went to Ghelane in prison and he was like, okay, first she came out and said Trump never did anything on Torr, and then they moved her to minimum security.
I wonder if she gave him the other part of the puzzle so now he has all the info for the blackmail.
They're going to open the border to 20 to 40 million more illegal immigrants.
They're going to finalize the criminal charges against Trump, which are still pending, arrest him and put him in prison.
They're going to go after his lawyers.
They're going to arrest Bannon.
They are going to go after everyone like they did the J Sixers.
They have shown us that they are capable, willing, and they will do it.
This is not a defense of Trump's handling of the Epstein files because my position is Massey and Rocana are correct in doing this.
I also, however, recognize the underlying motivation that Trump has in almost everything he does is to make sure that he defeats the Democrats and they never regain power.
Hence, mass deportations and instructing his DOJ to go after these ballot harvesting schemes and mail-in ballots.
If we defeat them there, they will not regain power in this current form.
Democrats may win in the future if their party changes and they actually start getting rid of the lawfare.
But I believe, based on what we've already seen, like the arrest of Steve Bannon, like the arrest of Trump's lawyers in multiple states, the false criminal charges, the false rape civil case, the false fraud case in New York, the raid on his home, the 20-year sentences for Proud Boys who weren't even in D.C. at the time.
If Democrats win again, they will do everything to destroy you and me and everyone else.
So that being said, Trump has mishandled this.
And by his mishandling and Dan and Cash and Pam, there is no other position but, sorry, guys, Rokana, Massey, roll.
I think a lot of people make that argument, and it's entirely possible.
I'm giving a much more simple argument in that collateral damage will hit powerful business magnates that provide resources to Republicans in some way.
If you deserve to fail because of your associations to predators and your association to hurting children and going to islands where children were hurt, you deserve to fail.
Yeah, if you give me that hypothetical score, I guess, but I don't think it's probable at all.
I don't think that's a realistic question.
I think exposing the predators in our society who are still out there walking in the streets hurting more children now as we speak because they have the means and the ways and the money and the influence to do so.
And we excuse that as a country, is something that, of course, we voted against this last election.
We were promised justice.
We were promised that we were going to actually hold these powerful people accountable who pull the strings in Washington, D.C., that they were finally going to have a reckoning because we're going to stop them from being lawless, right?
We were going to say we're going to be a country of law and order, right?
All of this, though, we have to also remember that that sentiment from the American people didn't start in the last four years or whatever.
Like, this has been a long time.
Look at JFK.
I mean, this, and that's fine to ask questions.
I don't, you know, I don't want to live in this world where you can't ask questions and you can't be passionate about what you believe and all this stuff.
But at the same time, so that sentiment didn't happen, you know, over the last just because of this FBI and this administration.
This stuff has been going on, if not worse.
Like, I actually, I trust these guys, I trust these guys.
Like, I trust my president.
I trust this FBI and doing what they need to be doing.
I think when it comes to Congress and things like that, I think your constituents, their will should matter with something like this.
So I don't know about the influencer world and all this stuff.
If people are working behind the scenes, I think ultimately, when it comes to like legislation and things like that, again, if it's something that your people are asking about and all that, that, then, okay.
And then you have conversations, but you don't just sit there and look at what Twitter is saying.
And there's a lot of BS out there.
And I'm not saying that this situation is entirely BS, but there's a lot out there that a lot of it is driven by sensationalism.
China launched an international attack on critical American infrastructure and personalities, which included me.
This is pretty crazy.
This is wild.
So the discovery of Sim Farms that threatens cellular networks in New York City is only the tip of the massive nationwide network run by Chinese communist government that poses an immediate threat to critical infrastructure and has led to terrorist attacks, including hoax SWAT raids at the homes of national leaders.
Blaze News has learned.
So DHS located this.
Look at this.
There's tons of them.
Check this out.
They say this is absolutely an act of war, according to a top intelligence official speaking with Blaze News, a direct threat to our nation and needs to be shut down today like ASAP.
Only five of them have been taken down so far.
Let me just read let me find where in the article.
It says, recently, these sim farms are believed to be responsible for dozens of hoax SWAT raids, including a senior U.S. Secret Service official, FBI Director Cash Patel, members of Congress, including Marjorie Taylor Greene, and media influencers such as Tim Poole and Steve Bannon.
Well then, what do I get?
Do I win a prize?
Is the federal government going to give me a cookie?
Yeah, I have to wonder, too, with a lot of the threats that we get.
Because as I mentioned, recently I've been in direct contact with the FBI, like actual over the threats we've been receiving because they've ramped up substantially.
And one question has always been: are these actually foreign state actors?
And my argument in response to this story is two things.
Yes, I believe them when they say China is behind this.
However, we also have evidence that not all of the SWATs were from the same source.
And we do have evidence, and we've submitted this to the FBI in the previous administration, that it likely came from a leftist.
And I have evidence that I can't speak publicly about.
It would compromise any investigation.
But we have evidence.
Additionally, when we get these death threats, and then you go online and see the people saying them in videos, we know it's Americans doing it.
So I do believe that there are foreign actors that are trying to fan the flames by sending us death threats and launching these hoax SWAT raids.
We also know for a fact some of it is coming from leftists.
Beautiful western mountains of the ancient Shu Empire.
I'm there with you.
It's easy to copycat.
So you get one crime in America and then foreign actors are like, let's replicate that and make them think that it's coming from within, psych them out, you know, get them to turn on each other.
The more that we are divided, whether it's politics, culture, whatever it is, you're allowing an open door for the enemy within and without to completely take their chance.
And that's been, that's historically been the cycle.
And that's why it's so important that to your point, we do remain united and we do uncover these things when they happen.
But it's important that we don't show that we're, you know, everything that's going on, the weakness, you know, sometimes is caused by, again, the media, unfortunate circumstances, like horrific circumstances that are done by horrific people.
But at the end of the day, what we can control is to remain united as much as possible.
Yeah, well, I think people, like Americans are, Americans with the right are really burnt out with foreign entanglements.
They hear the GOP, they're, you know, these swamp creatures like banging on and on about the CCP.
So they kind of roll their eyes and say, okay, this is a boogeyman.
But like legitimately is.
I mean, this story is a good example of like, no, they actually are our leading global adversary.
Yes, they are trying to undermine our country.
Yes, they are threatened by the Trump administration's efficiency and their ability to sort of show strength globally.
So it's like, yeah, I understand.
I see a lot of people typically, they kind of just roll their eyes at the CCP dooming or they kind of hand wave it away.
But they are legitimately, and they're, I mean, this story proves they're, they're, they have a lot of, they're making a lot of plays in the United States.
Well, the story that I'm reading is talking about how they were bot farmers, how they could have capabilities to send out 30 million texts per minute under the type of equipment that they had.
They had more than 100,000 SIM cards that were also seized.
And I think there's a lot more to this.
And automatically, I would love to see some evidence highlighting how China was involved here because I think there's a possibility for a false flag potential too, especially with how just angry the intelligence agencies have been within the last few years, especially under the Biden administration, against independent media, against content creators.
And they have acted against them like we saw with what happened at Steve Bannon, Roger Stone, and James O'Keefe.
So I wouldn't be surprised if the swatting actually came from inside the house and that China's just being blamed right now for it, personally.
Yeah, it's definitely not past the CCP to be bot farming.
I mean, there was, I think it was during, during, it was like right before, right during COVID, when Twitter removed like tens of thousands of profiles that were just spamming like pro-CCP stuff all the time.
And it's like, I mean, yeah, you saw it, you saw a lot of it during COVID, was a lot of, I guess, disinformation, which is a bit cringe, but I guess all this to say, it's really not past the CCP to be bot farming.
And I think in this article, it said that this specific battery farming has been going on since like 04.
You know, When we got leaked information that they were killing civilians in a foreign country that we never declared war on and invaded anyway, that was terrifying.
But there's legitimate purpose of military use, which is not nation building in Afghanistan.
So when Trump says we're going to secure our border, oh, look, narco-terrorists are driving in.
Here's the video of it.
I go, well, I don't necessarily just trust you, but there is a world of difference between collateral murder when the U.S. killed a Reuters journalist overseas and then tried covering it up and Trump being like, I'm going to show you what we're doing in international waters because these guys are drug runners.
The question then becomes, okay, all right, I would like to see evidence of this beyond just the video.
I'd like to see documentation, whatever proof they can afford.
But I'm actually willing to give them the benefit of the doubt on this one.
It's very different.
The question I would have, the first question I ask is, what are these boats doing otherwise?
Is it a group of fishermen enjoying a nice speedboat to the Caribbean and Trump just blew them up?
But honestly, I would love to have seen them let them land and then take them and take the cargo and show people instead of just blowing up all the evidence.
It's all just the cover for the kind of oil-rich nation that Venezuela is, a failed communistic state.
But there's a reason Trump declared Maduro a drug trafficker and then recently declared war on drug traffickers and how Venezuela is becoming very closely aligned with Russia, China, and Iran.
And now we're flying military jets and fighter pilots and naval assets.
I'm asking what your spectrum of a decision by the commander-in-chief, what is what to you, what level to you is complete war or doing what it takes to make sure that our adversaries know not to mess with the United States?
That's a very kind of fine line, and I could answer that in many different ways.
But obviously, you could use the carrot and the stick.
I think we've been using a lot of stick.
I think we need to use carrots.
I think we need to promote diplomacy.
And I think a lot of the problems could be solved through just economic free trade capitalism and deals that could be made right now that could promote more prosperity rather than this kind of war footing that we're on that I think is incorrect.
I just said the stick and the carrot, and I said it should be a two-pronged approach where we're strong, but at the same time, war should be a last resort.
Diplomacy should always be used.
Trump, this time around, has been bombing a lot of countries.
He bombed Yemen, he bombed Iran.
Did you support the bombing?
But I want to ask you a question: Did you support the bombing of Iran?
Everybody was wrong that all the doomsday people said it was going to lead to war.
We're in World War III.
It's like we didn't even give the administration a chance to do.
They have more intelligence.
They have more intelligence than any of us again at this time.
It's disingenuous when somebody trusts, I trust the president of the United States and making decisions, especially when it comes to foreign policy and what he needs to do to get things done.
Why is all of a sudden it has to be sensationalized that we're going to World War III?
You're also assuming that these people, that's that people, that terrorists in particular, are going to come to the negotiating table when it comes to economic sanctions and things like that.
I'm running as a servant to my district that overwhelmingly supported President Trump and supports his decision as commander-in-chief.
If we have intelligence that a foreign adversary is directly impacting the United States and Americans and our interests, why shouldn't the commander-in-chief then make us an example a logical decision to then do what he has to do?
Iran literally goes to China after we dropped bunker busters on Iran that were designed 20 years ago specifically for bunker bustering Iran, and that would not inflame tensions.
taking out Soleimani for example do you believe that there is do you believe what I I asked you a bunch of questions and you still never answered them.
You're being dramatic, completely manipulating what I said.
I said, I'm not support peace through strength.
And I don't believe that all these decisions from the commander-in-chief, given the intelligence that he receives, that is, again, above all of our pay grades here, ultimately, he makes a decision that doesn't lead to war, that doesn't fuel the military-industrial complex.
Believe me, I'm the wife of a veteran who served in the global war on terror.
I'm completely against the military-industrial complex.
However, I'm not against peace through strength, which is a cornerstone of American foreign policy.
No, see, gunboat diplomacy was this decision late 1800s, sometime where they're like, we're going to roll up our ships on the coast to park them right in front of the city and be like, now you're going to do some diplomacy with us.
There's a reason why so many people voted for Donald Trump when he, even when he was talking to you directly, Tim, he was like, Yeah, why are we involved in Yemen?
Why are we doing this?
We should be taking care of our own problems at home.
So, if you're arguing, yes, we have to be the world police, yes, we have to bomb countries for peace, that is a ridiculous, idiotic notion that doesn't make any sense, doesn't add up when we have clear priorities here at home that need to be prioritized because guess what?
But I will tell you, people like you make it hard because you want to have a substantive conversation, but yet you sit there and say, you're completely twisting my words.
When Trump was running in those early days and saying, we never should have been there, he was ignorant to a lot of geopolitical strategy of taking the Suez Canal, holding it, using Israeli nuclear force, you know, eradicating radical Islam and whatever that means, whether or not you agree with that.
But when you get into office, now you're like, oh, I have to decide who lives and who dies.
We're going to grab one last segment before the weekend.
We got to do it because this one is, how do I say this?
I am emotionally triggered and personally offended and biased.
I got this tweet.
I tweeted this.
90% of liberals we try to book demand money.
0% of conservatives ask for money.
In fact, conservatives sometimes drive themselves even though we cover travel and accommodation.
Liberals are grifters.
They don't care about ideas.
They care about money and they will say anything for money.
And I believe it.
So we have an update for you guys for the Culture War Live event, which is coming up in a couple of weeks.
We had booked Naima Trout, who is notable because she debated Charlie Kirk on Jubilee.
She had agreed to come on the show in exchange for $500.
This is the Culture War Live ticketed stage event.
We have never offered money for Timcast IRL.
We have been offered money.
We have turned it down every time.
We do not offer money to appear on any of the shows that I do.
Naima was invited to come on the debate show about dating, and she said, how much?
So apparently she had negotiated, her team had negotiated with Alex, not someone from our team.
And she was offered $500.
And we never pay.
The events lose money.
We do this because we're trying to, it's for the cause, for an impact.
They came back to me, to our team, yesterday saying she had received an offer for $5,000 and would be backing out of the event unless we could match or offer more, to which we responded, no, we can't do that.
Now, I'll grant some respect.
If I was asked to go to an event and I said, sure, I'll do it, whatever.
And then like a week later, someone said, Tim, we're going to pay you to do another event.
I'd hit him up, like, guys, look, I got to take the money.
Sorry, like it's a paid gig versus, so I'm not completely bent about that.
But it is a reality that conservatives never ask for money.
I think to be fair, 0%, it might be 0.01% because we may have had one personality who's not a conservative, but is a prominent, is like a celebrity who kind of agrees with Trump.
So anyway, here's what ends up happening.
I tweet this.
It's got 4,000 retweets, 811,000 views because it's true even Bill Maher said the same thing.
And everyone's favorite, Olivia Juliana, she is a liberal personality, tweeted, 10,000 likes, and I'll post screenshots of Tim's team offering me money to collab with him.
I love the word collab.
Because that literally never happened.
Collab, but I guess semantics.
People who are invited to come on the Culture War debate show, which I will also add, I wouldn't be there, as we already announced, I wouldn't be for security reasons, and we don't know yet if I will be there.
She said, 10,000 likes and I'll post screenshots of Tim's team offering me money.
And this just so beautifully exemplifies the point.
She wouldn't just do it.
She wouldn't just say, oh, yeah, look, Tim offered me money.
No, she says, you give me clicks and help me build up my personality and my career and my job.
And maybe I'll consider being honest, of which she wasn't because Lisa, who does our booking, Patriot, posted the screenshots on X showing everything.
And never was she offered money.
Hi, Olivia.
Tim Poole is a new show, The Culture War War 2, guests with opposing views.
Hi, Olivia.
The Temple is hosting an event, July 26th, in Washington, D.C.
No offer of money.
She said, Hi, I have a prior familial obligations and will be unable to attend.
Thank you for the invitation.
Then an email: We would like to invite you to the Culture War, the Comedy Loft.
No offer of money.
And excuse me, the other half of the email, here's the date.
Here's who's going to be there.
Kat Tim, Kyler Turner, Myron Gaines will be there.
And then she even went further to include a text message with another staffer who said, We never offered her any money.
So maybe she's just a lunatic who is, I don't know, talking to some random cactus and thinking it was me offering money.
I don't know, but we never did.
These people lie.
It's what they do.
I am genuinely convinced that about 90% of liberals are literally just saying whatever they have to say to make money.
People like Jimmy Kimmel are no exception.
Sam Cedar, well, to be fair, Sam did the show for free.
So I'll give him some respect.
Hassan Grifter, Krasnstein's, they never asked for money.
They came on the show, respect, despite not respect in other areas.
Have you guys ever fallen into that place where you just decide, I'm going to start lying now, and then you kind of just justify it for yourself and you become that person?
Dude, I mean, I find that actually really insulting.
Who does he think he is?
I think it's actually, you know, no matter how much someone likes to argue here, I'm really grateful that you have people on and people like myself.
You know, we're really honored to be able to have a platform and for you to invite us on and to have these dialogues and this conversation because we're reaching an audience that, you know, we might not normally.
And so thank you.
And I'm really insulted that people ask you for money to be on here.
There are some prominent podcasts that pay people to come on the show.
And we don't do that.
We won't give people money to come on Tim Cast IRA.
We've talked about it.
Like if there's a celebrity who's not a political figure and we want them to comment on something, but we're like, that's what culture war is for.
Because if they're not a news, if not a person who's in politics and news and doesn't know what's going on, we get specialists sometimes on the show who will be like, you know, we had like white coat waist project.
And they're not news guys.
They're specialists.
So they don't have a lot to say on like politics of Yemen.
You know what I mean?
So we try to reserve that stuff for culture war.
The only culture war events we've actually offered money for is literally this one time for Naima.
Because it is a stage event, we've talked about it.
And I said, well, it's not the same thing as asking someone to come and sit down and have a conversation.
We're asking them to be in public with an audience, selling tickets.
So I think it's fair that the people who do request some kind of compensation, we would offer something.
But Cat Timf didn't ask for money.
Myron didn't ask for money.
Michael Mouse didn't ask for money.
Literally no one's asked for money.
In fact, even Alex Stein.
Alex did it for free, right?
Even Alex co-hosted for free.
We lost money doing those events.
I think we lost a little bit.
Like we made back a good amount and we do it for the love.
My point is, you don't go on your show, mock people, and praise, mock people whose friend just was murdered, praise the assassinations after you suffered criminal charges, I think.
I don't know the full details, where your kid is going online and insulting you and your wife left you.
And then you say, hey, guys, I'm going to go stand in public.
Let me ask you this, though, when it comes to the financial incentive.
When you come on here, especially as a candidate, this is just from my perspective, right?
Or anybody, you're subjecting yourself to a, if somebody disagrees with you, horrible, you know, comments.
I don't even want to see the comment section here.
You're subjecting yourself to vulnerability in terms of anybody can take a clip or misconstrue what you're trying to say, manipulate what you're trying to say when that's not actually what you're trying to say.
There's a huge liability in doing that, yet people still come on here to have these discussions because that's worth the ultimate backlash.
Do you think in their mind they think that it's only worth to come on?
It's not right.
But when there's a financial incentive because you're putting yourself in that.
Yeah, because you've got like two years of money for a guy making 50K and he's like, all I got to say is some lie, and then I can spend the next couple of years making up for it.
I think about lately how you create order by using evil once in a while and then you repent along the way.
And this power of blackmail, this level of power that you could exert over big money.
And you know, big money is the problem, the Swiss banks, bank for international subtleties.
I mean, if you've got dirt on those guys and you can somehow circumvent the World Economic Forum's attempt at turning this into a corporatocracy, you know, basically every super chat is anti-Luke.
Not a bad says Luke would burn down the country to get the Epstein list.
Fallen Angel says, Luke, justice takes time for it to work so it won't crumble under examination, especially with the corrupt judges in the court system.
That's actually true, too.
It's the judges that are blocking.
They're judges blocking the release of these files.
If you want to open the door to Congress remote voting under the Civil Rights Act, then the Democrats are going to say, then you have to allow everyone to vote remote no matter what.
Any idea dare say I should get a special class provision to vote remotely is so shockingly offensive to me.
I called on her to resign.
And I like her.
I think she's a great member of Congress, one of the best.
But if you're going to stand up there and be like, I should get to work remote, the tidal wave of corruption that opens for her personal issue is so shockingly offensive to me.
My response is: how dare you go into Congress and say, I had a baby, so I'm going to vote on bills remotely when we already have a problem of Congress not showing up and spending most of their time fundraising instead of doing their jobs.
It's more offensive to me to lose a lion like Ana over something that she felt so passionate about.
Out of all the members of Congress, she's one of the few people who actually sit there and fight for the American people every single day on a national platform.
She defends the president.
She does her job more than, you know, more than 90% of the representatives right now.
No, I don't want some loser from a member of Congress that does absolutely nothing, sits there lining their pocketbooks, doing whatever they want, and being silent on the issues that matter.
And it's shockingly offensive that she would dare to say, okay, well, I think it's shockingly offensive that we would completely disregard somebody like her over everything that she wants to do.