Numerous outlets reporting that MSNBC and CNBC are going to be cut off from Comcast, spun off into their own companies.
And the rumors are, well, their ratings are in the gutter.
CNN still claims, no, no, they're making a lot of money.
Don't worry.
Yeah, despite the fact their weekend ratings were 28,000.
So I don't know how they're afforing to pay these personalities, but carriage fees, I guess?
Well, they're going to get spun off, separated from Comcast.
And another rumor is that the politics of this channel are very unfavorable.
My friends, not only has Jon Stewart come out and defended Trump's victory, Joe Scarborough and Michael Brzezinski of MSNBC met with him despite Joe in a viral video before the election saying there's no middle ground with this man at all to thunderous standing ovation.
Charlemagne the god is now even supporting Donald Trump's actions to a certain degree.
All of these people, they couldn't say a single word before the election, now coming out and saying, we're totally on board.
That's why the popular vote mattered so much.
But of course, MSNBC staffers are calling for a boycott.
They're furious.
They're outraged that Joe and Micah would meet with Orange Hitler.
And this is why the company has to be spun off.
MSNBC and CNN's ratings have been continually getting worse.
So we'll dive into all of that.
And then we got some other crazy stories.
Oh, World War Three, I guess.
Russia is building nuclear bunkers, mass producing them.
They've updated their nuclear doctrine.
They've said that if a nuclear power assists a non-nuclear power in launching missiles into their territory, they will consider that an act of war.
And they could theoretically use nuclear weapons in that regard.
They're basically saying they're getting ready to do so.
So that's great, I guess.
Hopefully Donald Trump can get in and put an end to all this.
And then we got a crazy story.
Nancy Mace has proposed a bathroom bill that would bar males from using female bathrooms in Congress because there is a member of Congress entering who is biologically male but identifies as a woman.
This has caused a huge controversy where a transgender individual has threatened the life publicly and overtly on various social media platforms.
Public threatened Nancy Mace's life.
And she's responded to this.
This is a wild story.
Before we get started, my friends, head over to MyPillow.com slash Tim.
You know MyPillow.
We love MyPillow.
Well, once again, my friends, MyPillow, they've been canceled by another big box store.
So they're passing an incredible offer on to you, our listeners.
The standard MyPillow retails for $49.98.
And now for a limited time, you'll receive one for only $14.98.
There's a limit of 10 on this offer.
So do not miss out on this amazing deal while supplies last.
Modernizing promo code Tim, the best promo code.
Everyone agrees.
MyPillow is made with patented adjustable fill.
It adjusts your exact individual needs regardless of your sleep position, helps keep your neck aligned, and holds its shape all night long so you get the best sleep of your life.
That's not all.
Get their six-piece kitchen or bath towel sets for only $25.
The brand-new mattress topper as low as $69.98.
Get their famous MyPillow bedsheets for as low as $25 and so much more.
So go to MyPillow.com slash Tim.
Use promo code TIM. You'll get huge discounts on all the MyPillow products, including the standard size MyPillow for $14.98.
That's the lowest price ever.
Don't delay.
Order today.
And shout out to Mike Lindell.
You know we're big fans.
We appreciate his work.
We've had him on the show several times.
Hope to have him back soon.
Don't forget also casprew.com Unfortunately Ian's Graphene Dream has been sold out We sold all of it So we're going to be launching coffee pods whole bean versions It's a very popular blend But in the meantime pick up Stand Your Grounds Another big favorite a medium roast And we do have Ryes with Roberto Jr.
If you aren't following me, then follow me, hotepjesus.com.
I'm here representing electiondaygames.com.
We got the crowdfunding website up now.
This is an amazing game that teaches people How politics works in America, but it's fun, educational, and yeah, you guys should definitely check it out.
I think I help people because I do a show called The Griff Report on Kik and last week somebody said to me, "You've changed my life." I hear that a lot.
"You've changed my life.
You've changed my life." So I think I just share my life experience with people and just help people get to the next stage of their career or life or whatever it is, relationship, business-wise, et cetera, The majority of my audience is around 30 to 35 years old.
Sometimes I got kids in college and stuff like that.
So, you know, my life experience, I'm 44 years old, so I share my life experience and yeah.
And, you know, I chose CNN on purpose because they're also in the gutter.
But this should be fun.
Comcast to spin off its cable channels, including MSNBC and CNBC, into separate company.
So it's now confirmed.
The rumors have been bubbling up.
They trickled this one out.
At first, they were like, the ratings are really bad following the what do we have here?
Is this—do we have that one over there?
No, no.
The ratings got really, really bad.
And so MSNBC's weekend ratings were like in the 20,000s in the key demo.
It's a worthless channel.
This is likely why Joe and Micah went to go meet with Donald Trump and beg because they're talking to no one.
But now CNN confirms it.
Now, CNN, of course, wants to play defensive for them.
They say, The NBC broadcast network.
The separate cable channels will have the same sort of ownership structure.
They say, well, observers may view the spinoff as an attempt to shed cable channels that are losing value in the streaming age.
The channel still contributes strong profits to Comcast's bottom line.
I'm going to pause there.
This is the game they play.
This is why I wanted to use CNN. Strong profits because of carriage fees, meaning that if your channel is on a cable network that's being carried, you get a piece of all of the subscriptions for everybody who has cable.
So that's guaranteed revenue over a certain period of time.
The reality is the channels themselves, nobody watches.
CNN, look at this, from, this is, I'm sorry, this is right here, New York Post.
Leftist viewers deal MSNBC and CNN a Trump slump ratings crash.
And they try to go and explain why, but regardless, they say, at MSNBC, the home of the most unhinged commentary and analysis we've ever seen in the history of television, and that's saying something, more than half its audience, 53%, is no longer tuning in compared to October.
They're going to mention that Rachel Maddow dropped off a million viewers.
They don't mention her key demo ratings, however.
They say in the key demographic, the advertisers most covet, Maddow's numbers marked the smallest audience her show has seen since April 2022.
Jon Stewart says presidential election was a repudiation of liberal government he spent years propping up.
An overly regulated system that is no longer responsive or delivering for the needs of the people.
So you got Charlemagne the God coming out, changing his tune, saying, maybe the Democrats lied to me about Trump being a fascist.
You got Joe and Micah trying to meet with Donald Trump.
You got Bill Maher coming out and saying, oh, these Democrats, oh boy, I can't stand them.
All of these liberal personalities begging to be let into the fold and the ratings of these channels collapsing.
I'd be willing to bet Jon Stewart's ratings are in the gutter.
You know, he resurrected his daily show to come back for this election cycle.
I bet his ratings are gutter trash and he knows it.
CNN's are in the gutter.
New York Post confirms.
We've seen all that data.
MSNBC's in the gutter.
Meanwhile, Fox News is up.
Conservatives are up.
And once again, we'll shine a light over on our good friend David Pakman, who put out a video after the election saying he was losing subscribers like crazy, as were many of these other liberal personalities.
I think that the people that have been vehemently anti-Donald Trump and anti-right, saying the right is full of all these bad people and all of this just negative opinion about anyone on the right, I think that they realized...
Because of the, not just because of the election of Donald Trump, but the fact that everything in the country had a right lean this election.
So the House was taken, the Senate was taken.
If you look at all of the districts and all of the people that, all of the elections that went on, everything swung to the right.
And I think that Even if they're not like, oh, we're going to be right wing now.
We're going to start, you know, just saying, you know, supply side economics are good and family values are important.
Even if they're not going to do that, they realize that they can't just continue to call the right racist bigots.
You're terrible people.
You're all Trumpers.
Trump's a Nazi, etc.
I think that they see the writing on the wall.
And if you want to survive, especially in legacy media where...
The writing is on the wall that podcasts are where it's at today, that alternative media, that the internet, that's where it's at.
It's no longer on cable news.
If you don't adapt, then you're going to be left behind.
And we're seeing it with what's going on at NBC, with MSNBC, and even CNBC. Typically, it's not very...
It's not really, really strongly left-leaning because it's all business, right?
There are people that are going to have left-leaning opinions, but you're not going to have people that are just like, oh, we got to get rid of private property and we have to tax, you know, it's a good thing to tax unrealized gains and stuff like that because that just isn't going to fly on a business channel.
Even they're seeing the effects from NBC. So I think that it's probably, writing's probably on the wall.
It's not really fun, but it definitely feels good.
Because it's like, if you ever know a bully, and what they do is a scare tactic.
They'll flash something on the wall and everyone will freak out.
And then they do it again and again and again.
Because they feel powerful when they get that reaction.
But then eventually people are like, they're doing that same thing now, and it's annoying now.
It's not even scary, it's just bright and it's annoying.
- What?
- Stop doing, - What? - A bully that's using a scare tactic to get everyone's reaction, and they're feeling good at controlling the people's reactions.
Eventually that scare tactic becomes obvious, a scare tactic, you're like, I know he's just flashing a light on the wall, I'm ready for it now.
The culmination of believing their own refuse or whatever is when they said Trump is a threat to democracy.
Our candidate has been installed without a Democratic primary.
By our superdelegate, whatever, imperial strategy was like, okay, this is great because I was actually talking with my mother who was very much like, hey, she was of the ilk of like, Trump's a jerk, mean tweets.
Don't want to vote for the jerk.
But I was like, I'm not going to vote for...
First of all, they're saying that he's a threat to democracy while they install a candidate and become a very big threat to democracy.
Accuse your opponent of what you're doing, which was a Nazi tactic.
Not only are they doing that, but...
Not only are they blaming them, but they're doing it.
And she's now fully on board, fully understands the manipulation of that sect, that weird minority in the American population.
Because I'll give credit to every single Trump supporter and every single post-liberal or disfected liberal who had no problem saying after Joe Biden won the election...
I'm not on board with the, oh, there were servers and Dominion and all that conspiracy stuff.
That felt like a big cope.
I certainly don't think it was...
Let's just say the bellwethers were off.
There's a lot of questions about the 2020 election.
I'm fine with.
But I do think Democrats largely just ballot harvested and changed the rules in order to win.
After that happened, I didn't say, oh, I supported Joe Biden the whole time.
I mean, Democratic Party is what it's always been.
I was like, Trump is still right.
Joe Biden is terrible.
He's a warmonger.
I have no problem saying that, even if we're losing.
But look at these people.
We come around and we win the popular vote.
We advocate for Trump the entire time.
We have a primary process with strong candidates.
We're fans of Avake.
Initially, we were fans of DeSantis, but his campaign went weird.
And no one liked Nikki Haley.
But it was a fierce primary.
Trump ends up winning, and we say, okay, we're going to get behind the candidate.
Then, after Donald Trump wins, the other liberals all of a sudden now have found Donald Trump.
They have found the absurdity of Democrats.
They are moral cowards.
And I say this— We want their audiences and we want them giving us whatever power or support they can.
But we always must remember that these people are not to be trusted.
Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, Micah and Joe, they'll sell you out in two seconds when the wind changes.
But for the time being, if they're going to sing the praises, it's a yes, you can go on one knee now like you had all these athletes do and accept that we were right the whole time.
Look, for someone like Michael Rappaport, and there's a lot of people like him who are Democrats who hated Trump, you could literally have evidence of Trump being falsely framed and prosecuted, and they're going to be like, don't care, Donald Trump is bad!
And then the moment some leftist comes out and burns an Israeli flag, they're like, I'm a Republican now.
Anna Kasparian's perspective was shaped by multiple actual events.
So there was the fact that she was...
She was sexually assaulted by a homeless person outside of her house.
She said, I'm not a birthing person, and she received all kinds of online hate from people on the left, calling her all the terrible names that you get called.
Um, she looked into the, she, for a long time, believed the narrative about Kyle Rittenhouse.
And then she finally went and looked into it and watch the videos.
And she was like, oh my God, I'm wrong.
This is like, he was actually defending himself and it's clear.
And she's taken Cenk to task on a lot of that stuff.
She said that after she got assaulted by this homeless guy, leftists started making fake videos of her statements out of context to accuse her of things she hadn't done or said.
And it's, that was like that for me, when they put Kamala in and they just tried to install a candidate, it was definitely like, I mean, I'm definitely for truth anyway, but seeing the deceivious nature of that organism, that imperial tentacle within the United States is...
Exactly, and I've written 13 books and been a professor for 51 years, so I know better than you.
But this clip is excellent.
See, Cenk Uygur and Anna Kasperin, they get it.
I think they've been seeing the writing on the wall for some time.
There are some liberal personalities, I think, like Free Press and Barry Weiss.
They saw this a few years ago and they're like, guys, the left is going crazy.
And then obviously there's people like Carl Benjamin, there's people like me or Joe Rogan, varying degrees of individuals who were on the left or liberal and then being like the left, the Democratic Party's gone nuts.
Cenk Uygur is now sitting here being he was saying this before the election.
He he didn't.
He thought Trump was was going to win.
He was making these predictions.
However, he, like many other liberals, have only started becoming more aggressive in their description of things, now realizing just how how wrong they were and how badly they lost. - Biden's dementia.
I don't know if he actually has dementia, but when he...
It finally came out in all of the news media.
When they all acknowledged his decline, that was when everybody was like, the jig is totally up now.
And I think Cenk has always desired the truth, but being in an echo chamber sometimes, your truth is distorted by your chamber, so he's seen what he's seen.
And for a lot of people, it was hard to accept that the avatar of truth in this system, the least worst situation, was an entertainer with a potty mouth.
Because it's like, I want a good guy that makes me feel nice, not a guy that screams she's a fat pig and like...
Gets all the attention, and he gets to win, and he was the bully on the plate.
I don't know if Trump was actually a bully or not.
I don't think he was, but I don't know.
It was hard for some people to accept, but I think that's why some people are slow to come around to it.
And the final thing I want to say about Piers Morgan's show...
Great people.
Great guests.
I love peers.
You need to fix your lag, buddy.
Because these guys are overlapping because there's a two-second lag.
They can't hear each other for two seconds.
It makes this a fucking clown show.
So fix that shit.
You get a million views a video.
I still love you, but fix that.
Unless you want them to look ridiculous on purpose, because the thumbnails have them all with their mouths open looking like idiots.
Like, if I had to wait two seconds to hear what you said, and you're like, he's not responding, I'm gonna keep going, and then I start to talk over you, and we're like, what in the hell?
Well, this is one of the reasons we don't do digital interviews like this.
It really doesn't work.
And I did this, like, two and a half years ago, I did a show with Ben Shapiro for his show, and we...
We recorded it, and then I had to mail a disk because it was a heavy 4K file or something, and we didn't have the internet.
We only had 20 megabits up.
Yeah, it was only 20 megabits.
That's crazy.
So when we were doing it, it's like you talk for a little while and you wait, and then you have to decide when to stop talking so they can then respond.
But when you're in a room with someone, you can see what they're going to do or whatever.
I'm just here to bask in the—there are two sides to this post-election cope and seethe.
There's the Bill Maher, Jon Stewart's, Cenk Uygur's, and Charlemagne.
They're all being like, oh, wow, oh, geez, you know, oh, Trump, we knew it.
The Democrats are crazy.
And then you have the inverse, which is the Kyle Kalinskis, the Alan Lickmans, the screaming and refusing to back down, saying, we got to go harder on woke.
I'm going to play a little bit of devil's advocate, and I'm sure that the chat's going to have a field day with this.
But...
This is actually the goal, right?
To change people's minds.
Now, I'm sure that there are plenty of people that are changing and they're doing it for money, they're doing it for monetary reasons, they're doing it to save their jobs, they're doing it to save face because they want to be on the right side.
I'm 100% aware of that.
I totally agree.
I'm not saying that that's not happening.
But you don't change hearts and minds without that happening as well.
When you actually are successful, when you have, when you have, when you put in the effort to say, no, our opponents are wrong and they're wrong here and they're wrong here and they're wrong here.
And then you actually convince the voter and you see it play out in the actual election, the way that we just did.
That's a victory and it's going to create downstream effects.
And some of those downstream effects are going to be people that are grifters, people that are looking to save their butts, looking to just be on the cool guy side.
They're going to say, oh, we have to change.
But this is a symptom of victory.
And I'm not saying we're done.
I'm not one of those guys that's like, the woke is destroyed.
We saw a huge culture shift directly after the results of the election.
One of them was raging feminists practicing abstinence.
That's what we've been wanting, right?
And then what was the other example?
Oh, another guy said, oh, we have to arm ourselves.
And then in the black community, we were saying this for a really long time.
They kept grouping us with other groups of people and calling us POC, POC, POC. And you get Joyanne Reed and others saying, it's no longer POC. It's just black people.
And I'm like...
Thank you.
So Trump's already made America great again, and he's already made feminists great again, and he's made black America great again.
Just in those three examples, it's like they've turned into conservatives by losing.
I also think that, kind of along what you were saying, Phil, with...
The way people are, maybe not shifting allegiance, but the way people are like, now I'm supporting whatever's happening, the new popular thing.
You've got to be discerning about who you elevate to positions of power, either in your own life, who you're going to pay attention to, who you're going to believe when they talk.
Because the people that were saying one thing four months ago and they're saying a different thing now, you've got to question.
Before I do, I want to mention this one super chat.
Scott House said, place time clocks behind guest and your head to prevent clips out of context.
This is a fix from last night's conversation.
I got a better idea.
I'm going to make an analog random number generator.
So it looks like a standard analog clock, but it will every minute just jump to random positions.
So no matter what happens, anytime someone pulls up a clip of me, the clock will be changing into random ways.
So it always looks like it's out of context.
Anyway, let's jump to this story from the New York Times.
So this is the headline they use.
Trump confirms plans to use the military to assist in mass deportations.
They then go on to mention building detention centers.
And this is where the story gets hot.
In it, they actually write.
Let me read it for you.
One major impediment to the vast deportation operation that the Trump team has promised in his second term is that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement lacks the space to hold a significantly larger number of detainees.
That has sometimes led to allowing asylum seekers into the country while they await court dates with immigration judges, a practice critics deride his catch and release.
The Trump team believes that such camps could enable the government to accelerate deportations of undocumented people who fight their expulsion from the country.
The idea is that more people would voluntarily accept removal instead of pursuing a long shot effort to remain in the country if they had to stay locked up in the interim.
Asked about the proposal, Sabrina Singh, a spokesman for the Pentagon, declined to comment, calling it a hypothetical.
But this is where the story is now being seeded.
The narrative created by the New York Times is to nudge in a...
Detention facility, then camp.
Next, you will see activist outlets start reporting.
New York Times says Donald Trump will build camps to round up asylum seekers.
And this is the birth of their new narrative.
You have seen it here first, ladies and gentlemen.
So should this blossom into a big fake news hoax like they often do, you know where it came from.
So I think this might be the clip that's been going viral.
Let me play it.
unidentified
Zero tolerance was interpreted as the policy that separated children from their- If I get arrested for DUI and I have a young child in a car, I'm going to be separated.
When I was a police officer in New York and I arrested a father for domestic violence, Mr.
Yeah, she said people in her district voted for Trump and her.
And she was like, how is that possible?
And then she says this thing about, like, we got to go knock on doors because the Internet, if you think everybody just lives in this world, you're wrong.
And I'm like, look, if you solicit a subset of people in your audience, you'll find it.
If I said to the audience, if you guys out there are eating celery with peanut butter and raisins on it, I want to hear from you because that's disgusting.
I'm getting a bunch of messages from people who are going to say they love, what is it called, ants on a log or something?
The echo chamber has been shattered and that anyone of relevance from that community is now open to communicating across platforms.
There are still segments of people that are just locked in their brains, but I don't know any of them that have any relevance socially beyond like their little Facebook group of getting 68 likes on their comment from their cult of friends.
And there was like 80,000, 90,000 ever since the election.
I don't know if the people, if Alphabet's like, it's time to just lay off all this weird censorship stuff, or if more people are coming, or if it's a combo.
This is from Fast Company from earlier in the year.
Is the dead internet theory suddenly coming true?
Here's my proposal to you guys.
One of the reasons perhaps we are seeing the left lose so many viewers and subscribers and why these channels are losing ratings, could it be that dead internet theory was true and that it was a mechanism by corporations and governments to prop up far-left ideologies to create the perception that they were popular?
So when you make a post and you're like, I don't like waffles, all of the responses are automated bots who are trying to sell a product or convince you of something to control your opinion.
Let's pause and go back to the late 2000s, early 2010s, with the Anonymous Hacker Collective and Lulzac and groups like this.
We discovered through the work of Barrett Brown of Project PM and some hackers who exfiltrated data, The U.S. Air Force was creating sock puppet social media accounts to be sold.
They create them.
They have a single individual operate 50 accounts to control public opinion.
Assumptions were that in Libya, one of my favorite, one of the favorite points brought up by activists during the time of the Libyan revolution slash civil war was there sure are a lot of Libyans that speak English and around American social media.
But you'd see these Libyans saying, we must stop Gaddafi, freedom.
And the Americans would be like, retweeting it, like, wow, look at this.
And it was generating public support in the United States for NATO to go in and do airstrikes, no-fly zones, whatever.
Hillary Clinton then says, we came, we saw he died.
If dead and dead theory is true, and corporations and governments are largely controlling bot accounts, what you'll end up seeing is a couple things.
The first, when Elon Musk bought X, what did we see?
When it was announced he was going to buy X, leftists lost tons of followers.
Conservatives gained tons of followers.
How does that make sense?
Well, some speculated that it was because there was a thumb on the button.
That Twitter at the time was propping up left-wing channels and holding back right-wing channels.
Could it be that bots were largely being operated to prop up these left-wing channels to make it look like they were more prominent than they really were?
Well, following Elon's takeover, users started complaining they weren't getting the same views and clicks anymore.
Why is my engagement so down?
I mean, for me, it was kind of like every tweet I put out have thousands.
Now it's like sometimes they have a thousand, sometimes a few hundred.
Well, when you get rid of bots, which is what Elon's whole plan was, your engagement will go down.
Your engagement was fake the whole time.
But people can't tell the difference.
They see 10,000 likes, they feel good.
They see 1,000 likes, they feel bad, even if they aren't real.
Following the election, David Pakman says, Brian Tyler Cohen, he, all these liberals are losing followers.
They're losing subscribers.
Now we're hearing that the left, these liberals, are bleeding followers on X like crazy followers.
And perhaps because they're all fleeing to blue sky.
That makes no sense.
I don't believe it for a second.
Because didn't they already flee to threads?
What's wrong with that?
They already fled to threads.
How are they now fleeing again?
Doesn't quite make sense.
Unless dead internet theory is correct.
Following the election of Donald Trump, the machines that were propping up these bots turned off.
The accounts deactivate, the money stops flowing, no one's paying these people to run sock puppets anymore, so they all just shut it down, and then we see the left burn a bunch of followers.
So the reason why it happens immediately after the election makes perfect sense.
If they're running these bot accounts, one person running 50 followers to make it look like a liberal's got a big following and making lots of money.
How is this one guy getting a million views per video?
They're not going to shut it down before the election in case Kamala wins.
If Trump wins, who's going to pay the bills?
Hillary Clinton cut a bunch of deals.
You know, what was it?
The Clinton Global Initiative and Foundation shuttered as soon as she lost the election and the donations stopped coming in because we know what the point of that was.
So if you are being paid to run 500 sock puppet accounts to comment, to post, to view videos, and they've got a team of 10 running, you Once the election's done, you're like, okay, the contract is up.
We're done paying this.
All of a sudden, the views drop, the subscribers drop, cancellations hit.
A lot of bots that operate on X and other platforms do it to create the image that they're real.
So one of the first things bots will do is they'll follow prominent social media accounts so that if somebody investigates, they see what looks like a normal user following Brad Pitt and Rachel Maddow.
Could it be perhaps then that a lot of the followers were passively following what was assumed to be prominent mainstream voices – CNN, liberal commentators who get lots of views because it made the bots look legitimate – I
don't see that as bots because that's the ratings tracking agencies.
So what happened was everybody was accustomed to a certain product.
That was extremely leftist.
I have family members that said they're angry at CNN. They are angry at MSNBC because they've had a more balanced take and they are no longer watching these channels.
So some of that drop-off is attributed to the fact that people don't want to hear anything positive about Trump because they've been so programmed with Orange Man Bad that the thought and sight of them enrages them.
Joe and I went to Mar-a-Lago to meet personally with President-Elect Trump.
And for those asking why we would go speak to the President-Elect during such fraught times, especially between us, I guess I would ask back, why wouldn't we?
And being so pragmatic and trying to be like, I'm okay, you're okay now.
Where can we meet in the middle?
On this question, we're past that.
You can't meet if they...
Listen, if they voted for Trump in 16, whatever.
They voted for Trump in 20, they knew exactly what they were doing.
If they vote for Donald Trump in 2024, and I've said it on my show, I'll say it here, they're knowingly voting for a fascist.
They're voting for a racist.
They're voting for somebody that wants to put this country 200 years in the back.
And so, I'm not trying to figure them out.
I'm trying to figure out how we get people out who love democracy, who love freedom, who love the rights of all Americans, how to get them to the voting booth.
Anytime someone throws out that word from now on, and these days, I'm going to ask them to define what they mean by that, because calling someone a fascist might have a different meaning to one guy as it does to another guy, like corporate government collusion, like the Federal Reserve.
Our whole system's built on that fascist thing right now, unfortunately.
Right around the formation of Mussolini's fascism is when the Federal Reserve came around.
And somebody had access to that algorithm because the same thing happened to me as soon as it announced.
And I think they went in and they took out whatever was nefarious in that algorithm because they were afraid that when they purchased a platform, it would get exposed.
And I don't know if Elon has gone in and looked at previous code, but I think they went in and changed the algorithm so they wouldn't get in trouble.
Yeah, it's impossible to say for sure, but it is such an easy tactic for a government-funded agency or corporate agency to do that, a fascist agency in that instance.
If the government was outsourcing it to a corporation, that would be very fascist of them to do.
It's such an easy battle tactic of the mind to create tons of fake, especially with artificial intelligence now.
The advanced AI that the Navy and the military is working with that they have access to, I could imagine...
You'd have a variety of communication weapons.
I call them weapons because they're shaping people's minds without them knowing.
You can consider that a sort of weaponization.
Man, so it is like a very, very path of least resistance assumption.
I don't want to publicly make the assumption and start claiming it, obviously.
We can't do that without evidence.
But yeah, it seems like a damn fine possibility, and it wouldn't surprise me in the least, and I would say we should be on guard for it regardless.
I'd actually...
I want a button on YouTube where I can delete all my subscribers that haven't logged in in two years or something.
All my dead accounts, because they're making my algorithm look bad.
I put up a video, I got 30,000 followers, and it gets 600 views.
Like...
Probably 10,000 of those people aren't even logging in.
When Donald Trump was still running in 2016, before he won the election, there was a time where someone called into, or Joe Scarborough was talking to someone, and I don't remember who it was, was, but they made the point that they were thinking that Joe Scarborough might be Donald Trump's vice president pick because he had been so complimentary on Morning Joe.
Donald Trump was a staple on Morning Joe.
They had been friends.
Joe and Trump had been friends.
They were they constantly were talking.
They constantly had Donald Trump on after Donald Trump was elected.
I heard a ton of people complaining about how the reason Donald Trump got elected was because of Morning Joe because they gave him so much free advertising and so much time But the fact of the matter is, Donald Trump will call anyone.
Donald Trump will call.
No presidents do this, but Donald Trump will call into Fox& Friends and be like, yo, I want to talk.
Put me on the air.
That's just how Donald Trump is.
Now, Joe didn't have to have him on, which is fair enough.
But it's probably a situation where he overcorrected because he was being accused of helping Donald Trump to get elected.
And so the powers that be didn't like that.
The left-leaning media didn't like that.
And so they were like, you know, Joe, you need to do something to help discredit Donald Trump.
And then when he realized that obviously Donald Trump's approval rating is at now 54 or whatever, and And like I said earlier, people are seeing the writing on the wall.
And so he's just swung back.
But I mean, the fact of the matter is, everyone kind of sees that Trump is popular.
However, I'm like, based on the numbers, based on the polling, Trump should win.
But based on the deep state shadow campaign, Trump should lose.
So I really can't tell you.
What I will say is, several months before the election, a year before the election, we have discussed on the show the prospect that the deep state has lost control as the grandchildren of those who created the liberal economic order.
They don't know how to operate this machine they've inherited.
And so they've lost this control and it was only a matter of time.
It looked like about a month out, one thing we talked about was that the rats may be jumping ship.
And so let's say you have 100 deep state, 51 deep state spies who want to push a narrative.
As long as they all believe they're going to win, they have that combined force to screw up an election in their favor.
But if at any point they start to feel pressured, like maybe Trump is going to win, then they falter, they jump ship, and then without any combined strength of deep state, Trump ends up getting through, and now they're scattering panic.
Yeah, you know, if there was malfeasance in 2020, which has always been a hotly debated topic, and Trump had won, he would have had access to investigate that.
I actually said on the show, if everything was on the table and was legit, Trump would win, and I used the word landslide.
74%.
I thought he was going to just take everything, but I thought in my soul, in my heart, that the deep state or whatever would manipulate the digital voting, would flip the votes 51-49, it would be very close, Kamala would come ahead.
And I thought the same thing in 2016, and it was like a gut punch when I woke up to Trump winning.
This is the second time that my...
My black-pilled cynicism has not won.
And that's a reason to take the momentum and go forward.
Words cannot even describe the opportunity as sovereign citizens that we have to create something beautiful, something real for this planet.
The United States is the best country on Earth, the best government ever created known to man, where the citizens govern themselves.
It's...
And I think this is an opportunity to spread that, not through war, but through culture, through love of country, love of what we've done and what we can do.
To me, the shift to the right, everybody's like, oh, it's organic, we're winning, we're winning, and I'm over here biting my nails like, oh, you know this is part of the plan, right?
He said he was putting a libertarian in the cabinet.
Rogan was talking about getting Dave Smith and Trump on the show together, the three of them, and I think Trump can help guide his Middle East policy, or Dave Smith can help him.
Here's the conspiracy that I've talked about quite a bit, but I'm not saying it's true.
It's a conspiracy theory.
Donald Trump has always been the choice of the deep state.
In the late 2000s, I remember this, Alex Jones was becoming more and more prominent and popular.
Libertarians were rising up around Ron Paul.
They opposed war.
They opposed the IMF, the SWIFT payments, and all of these things.
Alex Jones had been talking about the Amero, a North American currency, rejected because people were in revolt against it, real ID, all these things.
There's the guy where the Liberty dollar gets raided.
And so the conspiracy theory goes, the deep state says, guys, people hate Romney.
Obama was not enough.
We've got Occupy still.
Tea Party and Occupy, we have the makings of a populist uprising.
How do we capture this?
Well, these guys, assuming they're not stupid...
Say, okay, look, we tried the Obama route.
He's not an old white man.
He's hoping he's changed.
He came out of nowhere.
He challenged the machine.
It didn't stop the Tea Party and it didn't stop Occupy Wall Street.
So that doesn't work.
What we need to do is have a champion defeat the evil that the populist movement fears.
How do we do that?
So they say Donald Trump's a billionaire.
He's a friend of ours.
Let's get him.
We will prop him up as this upstart outsider.
He's a billionaire, by the way, who challenges the machine.
We'll try to destroy him, but never really.
We'll put him, you know, he'll be in on it with us.
And then we'll set him up to be the champion who defeats the evil machine empire and what ends up happening.
You'll get the likes of Alex Jones cheering on the executive branch.
You get the likes of Luke Rudkowski.
And you will get those Ron Paul libertarians voting Republican.
They will line up next to the American flag to strengthen this country, strengthen its ties to government, and champion its president in his authority to...
helps, you know, control everything.
So that's the conspiracy theory.
I'm not saying it's true, but people believe that Donald Trump, who was friends with the Clintons and friends of these people, they chose him to be this, I'm going to challenge the machine.
They play the heel.
Trump defeats the bad guy and Dave Smith votes Republican.
Now, right?
It seems like, how do you get plausible to me?
It's It's like I mentioned the CIA saying, how do we get Dave Smith to vote Republican?
And they're like, here's the plan.
You know, I'm not a fan of conspiracies, though, because a simple solution tends to be the correct one.
The people who create the liberal economic order have long since passed.
The grandchildren who have inherited this thing to the CIA have no idea what they're doing.
The BRICS nations are growing out of control.
The deep state has no idea how to maintain the narrative machine.
The ratings are collapsing.
And Donald Trump rises up in the wake, along with other populist movements, makes substantially more sense.
Making black powder with, like, bat crap and other things like this, your average person can find a book in an old library and that knowledge will persist.
It'll probably become fairly common and there will be small groups that try to make black powder.
In that case, it's going to be makeshift blunderbuss.
There may be caches underground that people have lost, and maybe you'll find powerful, wealthy people at that time, if you can define it as wealthy, will probably be wealthy because they have found access to these things.
The average person is probably going to have blunderbusses, and they jam garbage in it.
It's okay if you have a cheeseburger or if you have a McDonald's once in a while.
If you have it like once a month, that's fine.
If you have people that like to...
I don't drink really, but even though I don't drink, I had a champagne on election night and I had a cigar the night after and I haven't smoked cigarettes.
I don't smoke cigarettes anymore and I quit smoking cigarettes in 2019.
You can do things that are not particularly great if you're doing them in moderation.
The Mitt Romney picture that you may be thinking of...
Do you remember the Mitt Romney?
So after the election, Donald Trump had dinner with Mitt Romney and after Donald Trump said some terrible things about Mitt Romney and Mitt Romney was looking back at the camera like...
He wants to make America healthy, but he's eating McDonald's.
He's opening up a burger.
It looks like he might have some chicken nuggets or something right there.
Look at that.
He has a Coca-Cola with high fructose corn syrup.
Look what people are saying.
Help.
A lot of people made the joke where they were like, RFK, no!
No!
So, I say this, okay?
There is absolutely nothing hypocritical about RFK Jr.
having McDonald's, and I also don't think his face is being like, help, he's sitting, I'll tell you this, they sat down there on the plane, they said, guys, we got McDonald's, and he went, oh great, I'll take a Big Mac, and then they put the Big Mac down, and they go, hey everybody, look, and then he takes the burger and he looks up, take a picture of his face, and now everyone's claiming they know exactly what he's thinking, he's a hypocrite.
The dude probably ate the cheeseburger and said, it was great.
So first of all, all dyes, I think the first thing you can do is you can probably just ban the dyes and be like artificial dyes and coal tar derivatives we don't put in our food.
If he doesn't want to go that hard that fast, he can say...
He can require, I guess through the FDA, he can require food labeling to be the name of the product, not some marketing brand, Red 40.
No, no, no, call it what it is.
Yellow 5 Tartrazine.
Put that on that and tell your kids you're feeding that to them.
I don't know how this would go because this would be something that the Department of Agriculture has something to do with as well.
But I imagine if you could get rid of corn subsidies so that way it was actually more beneficial to put in real cane sugar as opposed to high fructose corn syrup.
The reason that everything is made with high fructose corn syrup is because corn subsidies.
The government pays farmers to grow corn.
I'm not sure why.
I don't know the whole reason, but I know that it makes it cheaper to use high fructose corn syrup than to use regular cane sugar.
gum maltodextrin acetylame potassium sucralose lactase enzyme vitamin a palminate vitamin d3 okay so let's talk about acetylame potassium fake sweetener not interested Sucralose, that's Splenda.
That's a sugar molecule bonded to chlorine, not interested.
So there was a study that came out recently that said colon cancer...
The reason why tons of young healthy athletes are getting colon cancer is because of emulsifiers, which is the cellulose garbage and the gum that they put in our drinks.
The reason they put the gum in it is because people like things to feel thick and creamy because they like cream.
So instead of putting fat in your food, they put gum in your food to make it thick.
And I find that disgusting, and I don't want to eat it.
I can't stand, no matter where we end up going, we go to any convenience store, any gas station, whatever, we want to get some of the drink, it's all garbage.
I guess the band hammer, if RFK is really going to make things, it's like you can't have that thing anymore, because that's the elimination diet at the global scale.
But it's going to affect the petroleum industry, for instance, like Red 5 Lake or Red 40 Lake and Yellow 5 Lake.
They used to be Yellow 5.
Now it's Yellow 5 Lake.
I think they used to be derived from coal tar.
Now they're derived from petroleum.
Could be wrong about that.
So that would technically affect the bottom line of the petroleum industry, which you know is a challenge.
The oil industry is very influential and powerful.
So what I can't stand is they're putting this lab-made fake sugar in the drink and then telling you it's safe, and I'm just like, I'd rather just not have that.
I'm not telling you that you should, but the point that I'm saying is, I don't think that just because something was manufactured doesn't mean that it's automatically bad for you.
That's true.
So it's like, I understand that you want to be concerned about what you're taking in.
Like I said, right now, there's 100 studies that say that it's safe.
Again, I just don't think that it's a good idea to get wrapped up in something that I'm unfamiliar with or it was made in the lab, so we have to reject it out of hand.
I am very familiar with sucralose and have been for decades, and that's why I have always avoided it.
So the issue I take is that—well, I'll put it like this.
I hear this from everyone who travels the world.
When I'm in Europe and I eat food, I lose weight.
When I come to America, I eat the same food, I gain crazy amounts of weight.
I've heard that from everybody.
People from Mexico, Puerto Rico, France, whatever.
They're like, man, I was in Korea for a few months and I just lost tons of weight.
And then I came back to America, I'm eating the same things and I'm just gaining weight like crazy.
And I'm like, yeah.
How about this?
It's actually simple.
Instead of trying to figure out how safe sucralose or butylated hydroxy toluene is, we just don't eat lab-made chemicals that don't need to be in food.
And look, I get it.
Maybe some people can't afford to not eat these things, but I go to the grocery store.
If I'm broke, buy tortillas, ingredients, corn, salt, whatever, and vegetables, and I'll eat that if I have to.
We've got to go to Super Chat, so if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, share the show if you like it, and if you are watching, become a member over at TimCast.com.
So go to TimCast.com right now, click Join Us, get involved in the Discord server.
There's a lot of people that hang out.
We've got meetups, pre-shows, after-shows, but you get access to the uncensored members-only show, and it's going to be pretty brutal tonight.
Because Nancy Mace's life was threatened, and I think, you know, we want to talk about it, but considering it is so serious, I think this one's going to have to be uncensored so we can get to the nitty-gritty of, you'll hear, like, so we can talk about, like, the threats are public and online.
It's crazy stuff.
She's apparently reported to the sergeant-at-arms.
Hopefully there's some action taken against this person threatening to assassinate a sitting member of Congress, but we'll talk about that in the members' show.
For now, we'll grab your Super Chats.
All right.
Hal Gailey says first.
Indeed, you win.
Scooby Dragon says second.
Yes.
And Polypure with third.
Wow, you guys coordinate this?
All right.
Jacob Paradis says, Hey guys, please consider supporting my niece's business on Public Square.
It's called Narbar's Candles.
She uses a coconut-based wax instead of paraffin or soy.
Remember, Christmas is coming up.
That's a good point.
Christmas is coming up.
We gotta get gifts.
James Thompson says, Tim, please tell me you saw Jenks' takedown of Alan Lickman on Piers Morgan.
Even Harry Sisson was laughing at him.
I know!
It was so good!
Dude...
If Lichtman owned up to it and was just like, I think I was fed incorrect information and I think I was wrong about this, we'd all be saying like, yeah, man, the fake news is terrible, isn't it?
Instead, he keeps doubling down.
No, I wasn't wrong.
It's everyone else who's wrong.
That's cringe.
The deplorable Mrs.
Drake says, if Matt Walsh joined The View like he offered, I'd watch it every day, just saying there are ways they can save themselves.
The View.
But it would be hilarious if Matt was there.
Oh, what do we got here?
The deplorable Mr.
Drake also says Trump has had 999 days to think about Russia and Ukraine.
I feel confident in a plan A, B, and C. Putin is probably also impatiently waiting for Trump.
Hear, hear.
Jason Dixon says, Tim, without your leadership, I have no interest in Infowars or TMG. Never was part of my interest.
I make companies profitable.
It's my genius.
Did you guys see that Infowars, the bid from Onion, was $1.75 million for Infowars?
So, according to NBC News, there's a company that put in a bid for $3.5 million, and they're contesting it because they claim Onion only offered $1.75 million, but colluded with the families.
That's what their claim is.
When I found out it was that low, I thought the bids were going to be way higher than that.
Death from afar says, Tim, what would happen to the legal migrants that are actually in the state legally?
And yet the Democrats literally made a bad name to the people reside before the border existed.
What do you mean?
Like, if someone's here legally, we got no beef.
And I'm pro-asylum.
I'm pro-immigration.
I'm just pro-legal asylum and immigration.
Yeah.
So, like, if an immigrant comes to this country and they knock on the door and say, I'd like to come here because, you know, life is better, and they say, you have felt this form and we'll let you know, I'm like, that's wonderful.
We like that.
We do it legally to make sure that everything is running smoothly and we don't disrupt the lives of the American people and the economy can expand.
But the Democrats are like, open up the border and decriminalize it.
They literally raised their hand saying they would open the border and decriminalize it in 2019.
And you're like, I'm not gonna eat if I don't have to.
But...
Look, I think any real man who wants to, like, go out in the woods and survive, and I'm not saying I'm a survivalist, I'm saying, you gotta recognize that if you're gonna survive and you gotta do what it takes, you're gonna eat bugs.
That being said, for the time being, I got chickens.
And what I'll do, the chickens will eat the bugs.
We have probably 800,000 crickets in this building.
It's insane.
So we just bring the chicken in, the chicken will eat them all, lay a neck, I eat the egg.
Yeah, one of the shirts we wanted to make, we never did and we should, is a chicken saying, I will eat the bugs, I will live in the pot, and I will give you eggs.
Magnus Rex says, I saw a doctor speaking on, I think, Rogan, that Splenda, that's sucralose, and such changes your gut biome and actually makes you more likely to store fat.
I wonder if this is it.
The reason why people get fat eating American food, not other foods, is the chemicals kill your gut biome?
And so then your body is not absorbing nutrients properly.
The free radical damage on the mitochondria causes the mitochondria to stop digesting fat for energy and start digesting sugar for energy out of your bloodstream.
And so not only are you not digesting your fat properly, you start to crave more sugar because you're losing sugar.
And that might be what's happening with sucralose.
We have our own Noah Tropics company, menofwater.com.
And in flow...
That's what we're dealing with, is the microbiome in your gut and having good gut health is part of helping you create focus in your mind and brain health.
Because the gut is the second brain.
So once you have poor gut health, everything starts going up.