Yeah, so I'm sitting there, I'm doing my podcast, right?
I'm up at like crack of six in the morning, well actually I'm up at like five because the one-year-old, you know, had something going on so we had to be up for him.
I'm doing my podcast, then I'm hosting War Room Pandemic for Bannon because he was out today, and I get done that and suddenly I find out that I hate America.
So anyone who criticizes MAGA Month, well, they're racist.
It's the only way to explain it because the core of making America great again is to embrace the love.
So that's what it's all about.
But we got news.
We'll talk about news.
It is the Friday before the 4th of July weekend.
So I imagine many people are probably just Not watching podcasts live on Friday night, as they usually don't, but we're chilling.
We're gonna have a good time.
We got a lot to talk about.
More than one in four Americans say it may soon be necessary to take up arms against the U.S.
government.
So that's kind of freaky.
We'll talk about that.
CNN's ratings have imploded.
At the same time, Daily Wire's ratings are through the roof and they're signing more and more people.
I just, I just, I really love saying that over and over again, that CNN Plus collapsed and Daily Wire is exploding because that's, that's good.
It's like the right thing is happening.
It is, um, It's a good day.
How about that?
So we'll talk about that.
We also got Jordan Peterson's nuclear response to Twitter saying he'd rather die than take down his tweet.
And he also made an interesting point.
I talked about this earlier.
He was talking about the fat chick on Sports Illustrated.
And you know, because he was like, this is not beautiful.
And then he made a point about confused kids, and then I realized something.
I'm like, if orientation is not learned, but it's ingrained, and then you have a little kid, and you show the little kid a trans woman, and you show the little kid a fat woman, and the kid says, I'm not attracted to either of these women, and then they go, oh, you must be gay.
Like, these are the kind of things that are confusing to kids, because, you know, if they have an attraction towards a specific thing, they're told they're transphobic, or they're fatphobic, and all that stuff, it's probably confusing them.
So we'll talk about all that stuff, my friends, before we get started.
Head over to TimCast.com.
Become a member to help support our work.
As a member, you get access to our exclusive segments from this show, Monday through Thursday at 11 p.m.
Not so family-friendly.
It's the TimCast IRL After Hours.
And you're supporting our expansion.
We've got a couple documentaries in the preliminary stages.
We're, of course, working on a bunch of music.
We are, of course, expanding Cast Castle.
We are hiring more personalities.
We are doing more.
And, uh, hopefully, One day soon, we will be where the Daily Wire is.
But congrats to those guys.
They're certainly setting a standard that we all should be striving for in growing and dominating culture and winning.
So with your support, we will continue to do that.
So don't forget to smash the like button, subscribe to this channel, and of course, you already noticed, Jack Posobiec's here.
I'm here supporting MAGA Month, where not only do I have the American flag in my profile superimposed on my face now, I've got my Turning Point USA, USA branded t-shirt here with me.
And somebody mentioned to me that I actually haven't been here since we got back.
So we were in Davos, you know, where they don't celebrate MAGA Month, getting detained, getting detained at the World Economic Forum.
And we were working on a whole documentary about that, which will be coming out soon.
More than one in four Americans say it may soon be necessary to take up arms against the U.S.
government.
And actually, a plurality of strong Republicans said it.
Yeah, it's kind of freaky.
The poll was released on June 30th by the University of Chicago's Institute of Politics.
According to their findings, 28% of voters, including 37% who have guns in their homes, agree it may be necessary at some point soon for citizens to take up arms against the government.
The funny thing is, I bet that stat stays true for, like, strong Republicans forever, like, no matter what, because they say it all the time.
So I don't know if this is actually, like, an increase in the number.
So does the story, and I know I sent this to you guys when I was on my way in, but does it break down in the poll, right, left, right, party distinction, any of that kind of stuff?
Well, Thomas Jefferson was pretty clear, you may have to take up arms against the corrupt government.
Like he said that blatantly, just so you know, everyone be as part of being American, you may have to take up arms at some point if the government becomes tyrannical.
Well, and this is Jefferson, by the way, and this is the same Jefferson, by the way, who goes over and sees the beginnings of the French Revolution and is like, Yeah, this is great.
Let's continue to do this without, you know, kind of realizing which forces exactly were being unleashed.
And this is why you have these huge differences between, you know, sure, both were armed uprisings against a central government, right?
A monarchy.
But the American Revolution's character was far different from the French Revolution's character.
So there's a revolution and the radicals and then the moderates are like yelling at each other and then the moderates get crushed and then Robespierre's like, off with their heads!
And then they offed with his head and, you know, the whole thing was just kind of crazy.
Robespierre turned on his buddy, the number two guy, D'Antone, who then said it would have been better to have been a poor farmer than a metal in the politics of man.
And that's what people, you know, it's funny because we talk about how people don't want to stand up and it's like, maybe they learned a lesson from the French Revolution.
Duck and hide.
The fires will rage and burn down your home and your life, but you may yet survive.
Yeah, you kind of want to, you want to build something that allows for the system to change, not so much be the leader and the speaker and feel good about yourself because everyone loves you.
They blame minority rule, saying it's not fair that these... But they don't understand California used to be very sparsely populated, so change happens.
The problem is right now, instead of being like, okay, we all agree to work by these rules, they're just saying like, screw it, burn it down, it's not fair.
You'll see more typically, like, it's, I get what you're saying, right?
And you see this in actually the Supreme Court ruling that just came out on the Remain in Mexico policy, right?
Where Kavanaugh caved on that.
But it was sort of this idea that, well, that was a Trump era policy, and even though we all disagree with it, we want to keep it in place for the integrity of the system.
Because that was the election, Biden's in now, and does he have the ability as the current president to rescind an executive order?
And the rule that he does, right?
So you'll see what I'm trying to say, and I'm not necessarily trying to get into that issue, whether or not I agree with that.
I'm just saying that was the thinking.
And so you'll see that more with conservatives saying, we want to keep the system so that everybody gets a fair shake, even if it doesn't benefit our side.
Whereas the left will say, nah man, just burn it down.
Which, by the way, it's the amazing thing on the Roe v. Wade ruling, which for 50 years stood as, see, that literally was the opposite of, right, quote unquote, democracy, right?
Because they went to the courts and said, we don't like that these Republicans are banning this thing that we want.
So we want you to make it a federal, not just law, right, that would you pass through Congress, but a federal rule, essentially ruling that there's a right to this that doesn't actually you know, appear anywhere in the Constitution, but we're
going to protect it as if it does, so that these states can't decide on their own how they
want to run their states. So it's, it's this really weird kind of situation where they banned
Most of the protests were in states where abortion will probably continue to be Right, overturning Roe is the most pro-choice decision because it just gave it to the states to do whatever you want.
So Roe basically said, the question with Roe and Casey is, Does the baby have its own privacy rights?
And the general idea was, at viability, it does.
Previability, it doesn't, because it's dependent.
And so states were allowed to pass laws restricting or regulating abortion.
And they all did.
So you had 51 governments.
The federal government just said, it is not up to the Congress.
The Supreme Court said, we do not have authority on this.
Congress will have to pass a law.
We out.
And now, one less government was making an imposition, and the 50 states that were in some way regulating just changed the way they were regulating, so they're all still involved.
Plus, it's like, it even goes down to the county and city level, too.
Like, it's not just one government, it's thousands of governments regulating all this stuff.
That on the right you will encounter periodically individuals who don't actually argue for something.
They're tribalist.
But it's the exception.
The actual ultra-MAGA, like fringe Trump diehards who believe crazy things like, come March 3rd, Donald Trump will be... It's like, okay, there's not very many of them.
They're not prominent in media.
There are some politicians that have pushed closer to the fringe of that.
But the mainstream conversation defined as the right, for the most part, is like, extremely argumentative, extremely nuanced.
Like, look at the show we did on the Roe v. Wade overturn day with Seamus and Austin Peterson and Will Chamberlain.
But this is the quote-unquote right, and it's like, it's funny when people on Twitter are like, Tim's right, right wing, and I'm just like, I'm center-left on like a lot of public policy issues, I'm just libertarian.
If that's the case, then what we call the left, with Nancy Pelosi, Democrats, they're not arguing for anything, they're not arguing anything, it is the rule.
But I think there's another angle to it as well that gets into the word rule itself, but in the other sense of the word rule as power, right?
And so I think that for 50 years, Roe v. Wade stood as a sacred cow for the left for a very long time.
It was one of the most powerful things.
Think of it, right?
They were able to impose by sheer force of will, right?
This was the culmination of the radical 60s, the sexual revolution, obviously.
That they were allowed to pass this, not just in their own states.
They willed an actual amendment to the Constitution into being through the courts without actually having to go through the constitutional process itself.
And it stood the test of time for 50 years.
And so I think that they realize inherently and even, you know, even the folks like Pelosi and Hillary who are around at that time, they realize that That level of power that they've had is starting to slip away.
What should happen is that at every sporting event, a large glass holographic screen comes up with Hulk Hogan playing the electric guitar with the American flag behind him and then fireworks start launching like crazy while we all sing the national anthem.
AOC, speaking on a video, was like, everybody call your reps, call their offices, send them messages and postcards, but she didn't quite say it that way.
I mean, there's a lot of things to criticize her for.
I just, we, the video, the video clip from this show, when she went on Colbert and just made up stuff, we called AOC, we called like, what is it, AOC Paul's Chad move?
AOC went on Colbert, and he was like, what should the president do in response to Roe?
And she goes, well, we're informed by history.
You know, look to the Civil War.
The Confederacy had taken over the Supreme Court and were ruling in ways that was impeding Abraham Lincoln, like Dred Scott, that ruled black people couldn't be citizens.
So what did Abraham Lincoln do?
He signed the Emancipation Proclamation.
And when I watched that happen, I was like banging my head on the table, because it's just like, Hodge podge, it's actually
There is an FBI report that will come out and talking about white identity extremists and racial identity extremists or whatever the latest term is for it.
and they will find all these things like somebody committed suicide, but then they'll consider
that a homicide or, you know, something is tangentially involved and they will call it
a white terrorist attack. And they will use this to create this like hugely inflated number
out there, which is coming out from the FBI saying that, um, that this is the greatest
unidentified
threat to America today. Let me, let me, let me write this down.
They're Ben and Jerry's pushed this racist idea. Uh, The issue is the left and the right will cite the same stat in the FBI to make the opposite claims.
The stat posted by Ben and Jerry's that the black population is 13% of the United States, yet incarceration rates among the black population is way higher, which is quite literally the exact same argument made by white supremacists.
So when AOC comes out and says white supremacy is a fact, It sounds like, out of context, she's saying it is real, like it is a true thing, like she's promoting it.
Well, because the woke identitarian left, the critical race theorists, are outright right racist.
So they look at everything and they're like, that's the only explanation, and they're making the same argument.
The difference is who they think is the racist person.
AOC's argument is, oh, this proves the police are racist because these people shouldn't be in jail, whereas white supremacists are like, it proves bad things about black people.
When in reality, they're looking at the same stat, asserting some racialized ideology, and just making everything worse for everybody.
But there's also an element of what Michael Anton at Claremont has written about this, and he calls it the Celebration Parallax, where he says if the left cites something, then we have to say, oh, it's happening, and it's good, and it's wonderful that this is happening.
But if the right identifies the same pattern or trend in society, it's a conspiracy and it's wrong and it's probably racist to even talk about it.
Right.
So you and you can say this about the Great Reset is a great example of this, right?
You know, where they'll come out and say, or even with the thing that was going out today, the liberal world order.
If you went on Twitter today and typed in liberal world order, you would think, oh, it's going to play that clip of Brian Deese, who is the White House economic advisor.
When they ask him the question, you know, why are Americans paying $4.85 a gallon going into, you know, the Fourth of July weekend?
He says, well, you know, I'm paraphrasing, but we have to protect the liberal world order.
And people are said, oh, well, at least he's honest, right?
You know, guy that comes from BlackRock, by the way.
And if you went to Twitter, And searched that earlier today.
I don't know if it's still there.
And so if you search it today, right now it's still there.
That if you search it, there was a fact check that was the first thing that you saw.
And it said, fact check, comments today about liberal world order are not the same as the conspiracy theory that a new world order is being instituted by the United States government.
They're saying until Ukraine wins, and they might not.
And if Russia wins, then your gas price is just going to stay up forever.
But here's the best part about this liberal world order thing.
It's not a conspiracy theory anymore.
Now, like you said, just a moment ago, they're arguing it's not the same thing as the conspiracy theory.
Yo.
There was a time, not even that long ago, a couple, like decade ago, if you said the Gulf of Tonkin incident was a false flag, you were a conspiracy theorist.
And I think it was the 2000s when they finally came out with reports being like, actually the U.S.
kind of staged the whole thing so we could enter Vietnam.
It's like, okay.
In my lifetime, I have watched the narrative break down and start crumbling.
And, I mean, kind of hilariously, Alex Jones being proven right more and more often, although he does say rather crazy and outlandish things, he ends up talking about things... Epstein.
That was a conspiracy theory.
Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years for aiding the trafficking with Epstein.
There was a period where, you know, probably only several years ago, if you claimed there was a powerful global elite with world leaders flying on planes and they were trafficking, they called you a conspiracy theorist.
Then Epstein, it all comes out.
Ghislaine Maxwell gets sentenced.
Epstein...
is shuffled loose the mortal coil, as it were.
Now it's just like, oh yeah, we knew they were doing that.
Now the crazy thing is, there was a story I saw and it said, you know, like 50% of Republicans believe global elites are running child trafficking rings.
And it was like, incredulous.
And I'm like, but- What's wrong with the other 50%?
No, no, but, right, but the issue is, it's like, they're trying to make it seem like it's a crazy idea to have when Ghislaine Maxwell was literally on trial at that point.
Let me show you this other story.
Take a look at this one.
I just, I saw this in the morning and, and you know, look, I normally, I like the Daily Mail.
They're not that bad, but they're not like the best.
Clarence Thomas cites debunked claim that COVID vaccines are created with cells of aborted children in dissent on SCOTUS decision.
There is so much wrong with this story.
Okay, they go on to say, Clarence Thomas suggested COVID vaccines are developed using cells of aborted children.
Underneath that sentence it says, cells obtained from elective abortions decades ago were used in testing during the COVID vaccine development process.
What?
How can you have these two sentences next to each other?
This here says that they were created with the cells, but you're saying they were tested on with the cells, but then did the final product use them too?
unidentified
Because there's the... Let's get as literal as possible.
The creation is the entire process of development.
Which requires testing before any kind of... If you're just talking about the final thing that they end up making, maybe all the things they tested aren't being used in the final thing.
Not only did he never say the words created with, he said development, and he was citing, he was quoting a group, they attribute it to him, they changed the word in the framing, and it's fake anyway because... How could you create a medication without testing it?
How would you know it did anything if you didn't test it?
There's a testing process in the creation of any drug.
So even if you want to get technical, Clarence Thomas would have been right should he have actually claimed it was created using these things.
It is just such a mishmash, garbage, nonsense media landscape.
Anyway, my point is, to go back to the liberal world order stuff, Today, if you talked about New World Order, even a month ago, they were like, it's a conspiracy, it's not real.
Right, so Biden has said it, and we were playing the clip earlier today where he was, this was 2017, he uses the exact same phrase, liberal world order.
And so you've heard also a phrase a lot lately, the rules-based world order.
But when you hear this again, liberal world order, and you realize that, okay, this is real.
Define world, by the way, because it doesn't seem like most of the world is in this.
But if you look at the countries that are involved with the Bank for International Settlements, which is the Swiss bank, governs like the Federal Reserve and all these other federal, these banks, you see the countries that are stuck inside of this liberal economic order.
And then they'll find the craziest claim and say, this is what the New World Order conspiracy theory believes.
Then you'll get a major politician like Biden saying, it's time we get a New World Order.
And what he's saying is we have a liberal world order and we need a new kind of world order, which means powerful global elites and interests are colluding for the sake of international governance, which is literally what the Council on Foreign Relations calls it.
And then if you say, oh, did you see that?
They're talking about new world order and they'll go, that means you believe in lizard people.
Try to debunk it.
Before the internet, it was easy to do because the media would just lie.
Now, we can talk to each other much more easily and they can't do anything about it.
There's also a world of thought that it's actually sort of an inheritance of the British Empire.
That where, you know, and maybe even 500 years from now when, you know, whatever America is at that point or whatever, you know, North America is at that point, that we may, that historians in the future may even just consider this order as a continuation of the British Empire, may not even separate them.
Yeah, I think what happened was when the Rothschild family in like the 1700s started their banking empire and this Bavarian banker, his three sons split up in each took a piece of the banking empire.
Basically, that's how they got it started.
One of the bankers went to England, and that guy started controlling England through the bank.
And that's the new world order is the banking part of it.
What so when you're saying it's an extension of the British Empire, the American Empire, which is really an extension of the banking empire, this Bavarian banking empire, now they're set up in Switzerland, with this Bank for International Settlements, which needs way more media attention.
We're gonna have to... It's not a conspiracy theory anymore, gentlemen.
The narrative's busted apart and it was easy when someone would, you could be a researcher and you can go, hey New York Times, did you notice that there's a bunch of documents showing that there's a bunch of international elites coming together for some kind of global economic order?
And they'll say, don't know, don't care, we won't publish it.
Now, you can actually publish documents and there's no denying it.
So this is one of the biggest things that we've seen this week.
And really nobody is talking about it.
And I'm just going to say it.
This is growing as a response to the liberal world order slipping.
And collapsing in upon itself.
You can look at potentially the turnover of Hong Kong as one of the early, you know, kind of precursors of this.
And then really though, just what, two years?
So today, right, Xi Jinping went to Hong Kong for the first time since the protests in 2019.
And those protests were over.
Okay, so Hong Kong, yeah, they changed flags in 97.
That's when the UK formally rescinded sovereignty.
But it was 2019 when they passed what they called the National Security Law, where the CCP essentially came in and just took essential total control, just total control.
And Xi Jinping today, this very day, visited for the first time, and he said, Hong Kong has risen from the ashes.
That's what he stated today, because he knows he's won.
So let's talk about the liberal... And so, not to cut you off, but to finish my point, BRICS is arising.
BRICS is on the way up.
Iran just stated that they put in a submission to join BRICS.
I don't know if they've changed the acronym then.
And if people know what BRICS is, Argentina is talking about it.
So BRICS, what is it?
Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, right?
Five of the world's biggest countries, and certainly population-wise, I'm wondering about the liberal economic order and the value of it because I trash it a lot.
But excuse me, starting economic, but they're talking, they're talking
military, certainly China, Russia, and they are moving to Ian's point in a
Well, so this is me the right this gets to me as as a populist, you know, and what I believe is that I think that we do need to go back to a system where and this is where the phrase America first comes from, right?
So people get the mistake that America first means American only or that America should just go and do do whatever they feel like and that no, that's not necessarily true.
It's just that our government should exist for the benefit of the people who live within the confines of the country, right?
Which is the opposite, obviously, of what Brian Deese said today.
And so it is in the benefit, obviously, of the United States to have military alliances, to have trade, to have economic relations.
But we shouldn't put those global organizations and transnational organizations ahead of the interest of our own people.
We need to go back to what might even be considered more of a 19th century type I feel like a lot of people are begging for that kind of world though.
And we just, and that's the opposite of what we've seen.
By the way, and that's the Great Reset.
That's what the Great Reset is.
That's what the documentary we're working on is about.
That's apparently why I got detained in Davos for having the audacity to just simply go there and talk about it.
We also went to Geneva and talked about the World Health Organization's pandemic treaty that they're trying to push on the 104 to 94 nations.
And so this is the problem, right?
The problem is that you have... For example, I just mentioned Hong Kong, right?
So when we were in Davos, we were going up and down the promenade, we went through a huge... So Russia's been kicked out, right?
Ukraine everywhere.
Everything's Ukraine.
Ukraine flags, Ukraine house, underwritten by Viktor Pinchuk.
Who's Viktor Pinchuk, by the way?
He was the oligarch who at one point was one of the top donors to the Clinton Foundation, right?
So one of the most powerful oligarchs within the Ukraine sphere.
Russia's been kicked out, Ukraine's everywhere, and we're told you have to support Ukraine because you support democracy.
We also went to Ukraine as well.
And we went down to Odessa, Mykolaiv, my brother was with me.
And the one thing though, the one word that I didn't hear anywhere, At the World Economic Forum in Davos, there was no house for it.
There was no speaker who mentioned it.
There was no breakout session on it.
And that was the word Taiwan.
The word Taiwan was completely omitted from the World Economic Forum.
And so my question was, Well, you guys care so much about democracy and freedom.
Where's Taiwan on this?
And it's simple, because the CCP has set up a situation where they're in this military slash economic alliance with Russia and the BRICS nations.
But they're also in an economic relationship with the West and the liberal world order.
Why?
Because we've been financing them with Western capital since the 1970s, essentially since the death of Mao and the rise of Xi Jinping.
And post Tiananmen Square, it was the Bush family and it was so many interests associated there to say, essentially, look, we're not going to push over the power of the CCP.
We're going to make a deal with you.
And Snowcroft goes over there and has the secret meeting.
Right, because the CCP could have been on their last legs if we just pulled the rug out from under them and cut FDI immediately on June 5th, 1989.
But that's not what Bush did when he was in office.
He said, we're going to make a deal.
We're going to make a deal with you.
Our manufacturing is going to come over here.
We're going to use your slave labor.
That's where that's going to go.
We keep the IP, right?
So we get to maintain the companies.
We get to maintain the power and the profits from it.
You guys get all the manufacturing.
And that's been the bulwark of this liberal world order because we've outsourced our manufacturing to Asia.
We've outsourced our energy to the Middle East, as it was.
And this was something that Trump, when he was in office, was whether he meant to or not, right?
That was what he was working to roll back.
That's what gave us American energy, not just independence, but dominance.
And that was why he was so opposed to NAFTA, TPP, so many of these deals.
The Large Hadron Collider in Geneva is restarting next week.
A lot of people think weird stuff is going on.
We have this story from August 18th, 2016.
Humans... This is from The Independent.
You can see their little pride symbol next to their logo, even though it's MAGA month.
What are they doing?
Humans sacrifice staged at CERN, home of the God Particle.
CERN says the ritual could undermine the actual science that goes on at the organization.
Now, they say a human sacrifice has been staged in the grounds of the European Organization for Nuclear Research, the home of the God Particle.
A video circulating online shows hooded figures apparently engaging in a ritual staged under a huge statue of a Hindu deity, at the end of which a woman is stabbed.
But the footage appears to have been recorded as part of a prank by scientists.
Then you get this on Wikipedia.
The CERN ritual hoax.
Okay, far be it from me to claim it was anything other than a prank.
But it reminds me of... Are you guys watching The Boys?
And so people often say that that pineal gland is like the third eye to help you perceive
the spiritual and stuff.
And by living in a world where we've neutralized our abilities because of fluoride, we've essentially destroyed our third eye or whatever.
And so there's that idea.
Then this is a funny one.
The double slit experiment, right?
You guys know about the double slit experiment?
You don't?
Let me explain.
So if you take a big sheet of metal, And then you, behind it, you put a big target board.
If you fire off a bunch of shotgun blasts at that sheet of metal with a single slit through it, when you go behind it, what will you see on the target board?
A straight line of pellets or, you know, or buckshot or whatever from the shotgun.
So the plate shields everything but that slit.
If you put two slits, what would you expect to see?
Two straight lines right behind it.
They did this with electrons.
Through the single slit, they got what's called a particle pattern, meaning a straight line of electrons hit the back sensor.
When they used two, the double slit, they got an interference pattern suggesting waves, which is more like water.
Hippies then went on to be like, whoa, that proves that the observer changes reality.
And it's like, well, no, it's like the method by which we measured it changed wave function collapse.
So it doesn't mean a whole lot, but.
A lot of people believe the double slit experiment proves that the observer plays a role in when reality collapses to a single point.
That is, there could be an infinite number of universes and that you as an observer observing something determine when it collapses to a single position as opposed to a superposition.
To oversimplify it again, your observation manipulates reality and creates it.
If that is true, then the conspiracy theory goes, there are too many people on the planet, and all of their observations are interfering with each other, creating a chaotic world, which results in a Donald Trump presidency.
So the conspiracy theory is global elites want to cull as many people as possible, not because of overpopulation, but to diminish the amount of observers who are affecting reality.
I think it's all magic talk mumbo-jumbo and might as well just be a science fiction novel.
I think what's happening in the double split, you got most of it right, but I think there's something about it was when they had two slits, if they fired the electrons through and no one was watching, they would come back later and they'd find two patterns, two lines.
But if they record it, I can be getting it backwards.
It's either they're going to try and reduce the population by making us have less kids or we're all going to start meditating and everyone's going to chill.
If you pray once and you think, healthy, you pray that, and then the pebble drops, then you have no thought and the ripples will go out and things will become healthy.
But if you keep thinking healthy, healthy, healthy, it's like dropping a lot of pebbles and the crease interference and you don't get the effect that you intend.
Yeah, I was reading I was reading I was I was actually I was reading some scientific study a while ago I could be wrong though, but it sounds like you read it.
I don't know the details on me right now, but you know just just stories like that and Studies like that and then and just just seeing the power of it in my life seeing the power of it in in my career politics you know, I undoubtedly right and with unreservedly believe in the power of prayer and And I've been teaching it to my children as just part, we make it part of our daily life.
You know, we do it before we eat.
We do it before we go to bed.
We sit, we pray the rosary, right?
That's, that's what we do.
Right.
And it's not something where I'm like, you know, screaming at them, you know, you got that word wrong or something.
And it works in the opposite direction too for doom, you know, like in the town that I've been writing about for the next book.
Although it's very religious.
There's a lot of people who've, they're deeply connected right to the civil war and the doom has never left this town.
And like, it's just one thing after another.
It's almost like they're manifesting it.
I don't think they are, but it's, you know, they're, they're praying and there's people there who are deeply religious, but the, the younger generation right now is so filled with doom.
I mean, it's, they're completely hopeless and like they're, it's like the town is inescapable.
It seems like a metaphor for the country at large, perhaps for that age group, but it's scary.
They summoned a an Egyptian chaos God Right, which no because people were and you know, because there was a certain Avatar meme that was very popular in 2015 and 2016 of a frog alt-right, you know, you know, of course, right which which again it had nothing to do with with So this is how crazy it is, right?
just sort of like it was it was the idea that and frogs have generally been associated with with
like chaos right for you know throughout history and they're they're just they're okay they're a
chaotic creature ever try to catch one and so people were looking this up and apparently the
egyptian god of chaos was actually a frog named kek named kek here's and this is how crazy it is
Right, and all these weird things started coming together.
And then there was just a whole bunch of 4chan posts where it was like, someone said something like, if I get trips, so when you post, you get a code, a string of numbers.
And they're like, if you get three in a row at the end, something happens.
And it was like all sevens or whatever.
It was like Donald Trump becomes president and the whole post was all sevens.
It legit, it's like...
Probably one of the funnest and funniest, I wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory, but like trippy internet video to watch that you want to believe is true.
You're making me think of pattern recognition and patterns because I don't think that we're as free and wild and chaotic as we seem, as humans or as reality exists.
Like it does seem like we're cycling towards a path, like involved in some sort of megastructure that we don't necessarily, or that I don't, Well, there's even the Egyptian hieroglyphic for Keck, if I remember correctly.
Well, this is why they had to get rid of the social media platforms because, and I'm saying this as a joke, because people were using them to effectively pray en masse to Keck, Egyptian god of chaos, and it was working.
So the powers that be, the big tech Silicon Valley people, banned them to stop the praying to Keck.
Tim, do you think that we are in, like, a vibrational Super struck like in like a simulation is a vague way of saying, but do you think we're in like a pattern?
It's like, have you, have you talked, whenever we talk to people who do DMT, they're like, the machine elves tell you that, I think Michael Mouse was saying this, that reality is like a song.
It goes in loops with like, here's the, here's the chorus and then here's the body and then it loops and it's just like music being played.
Every single person watching the show, one day, your time will come, and then as you pass, you will see a bright light in front of you that you'll rush through, and then all of a sudden you'll sit up from your couch, and you're Ian, and you're like, whoa.
DMT in it, but your body will destroy it and it won't be absorbed.
When they mix it, they're adding an MAOI inhibitor, which bonds to it and allows it to enter your body and then... So it's in the plant and your body starts producing it in excess, maybe.
Now I've only sipped on ayahuasca and it was delicious.
It tasted like grass.
Like if you ever chew on grass, it's very bitter.
It was really concentrated, dark brown grass juice.
And I sipped on it and immediately felt the DMT clarity.
Like when I go into, when I make an internet, YouTube videos or internet videos and I start channeling my thoughts and I don't even remember what I said, but that's why I started recording them in the first place.
Cause I was like, I remember it was cool when I said, I just don't remember what it was.
Just to clarify, I know the surface level stuff about ayahuasca, but just to pull it up, ayahuasca is notorious for its psychedelic properties produced from the combination of MAOIs found in Benisteriopsis, Coppivine, and NN-dimethyltryptamine from Psychotria viridis or diplopteris carborana.
Basically, it is, um, it's a, so MAOI inhibitor is a, um, what's, what's, what's, what's the word?
That, at the same time as DMT, allows your body to absorb it.
That's what people do.
I'm really fascinated by this.
DMT is such a fascinating subject, and especially with all the weird meme magic and stuff.
I don't understand how an adult human can't look at the scientific research on DMT Look at the history of ayahuasca and then look at the strange phenomenon around things like meme magic and deja vu and all of these strange things and not just conclude there is something magical to the universe beyond our comprehension.
And the history to put out there, I mean, this is South American, this is the Amazonians, this is Peru, this is something that has gone back And there are stories that have come out of the Amazon talking about these types of what we would consider hallucinations or hallucinogens.
And people essentially state that this was the shamanistic drink.
I was, you know, whenever I talk to people about religion and stuff, I always talk about how there are things that seem to be beyond probability, that it seems so incredibly rare that it's sure it could happen, or that perhaps it's as close as you get to a miracle.
But the meme magic stuff, you can explain away a whole lot of.
How did, you know, Pepe come to be the symbol?
It was a meme.
It was a meme.
Where did Kek come from?
Well, someone noticed there was an Egyptian deity, which was a frog, named Kek, and they said, hey, it's really funny that we use the frog meme and we say Kek.
So they make Kek the god.
Some of that can be explained away.
But a lot of that coincidence is just purely chaotic and magical in some sense.
I don't mean magic like a genie blinking and manifesting it.
I mean just like serendipitous.
Like, there is an ebb and flow to the universe and things that you'd think are rare are less rare than they really are.
Then you listen to these stories about the research on DMT.
How people trip on DMT but then share an experience.
And you're like, there's something else out there.
Something I encountered a lot in Georgia, in this town, was a coincidence all the time.
Every time I'd turn around, there was another coincidence.
One small one would be like, you know, having a general or a colonel in the Union whose name was Jefferson Davis.
But another one would be like, in this town, in Washington, this writer who I found her book.
She wrote like all like the straight reporting from like the early 1900s.
Everything was about, like, this stump has been removed, or this person has died, whatnot.
But one was, uh, this woman was sick, and it was, like, 1890, and she traveled 40 miles north.
And, uh, that night she woke from a fever and had a dream and told her husband, uh, that town has burnt down.
And she told him the direct path of the fire.
And then the next day, this guy came up on the train and said, uh, the, the town burned down and then the father went, the husband went down and it was like the same path.
And like, okay, that's, that's weird maybe, but like the fact that that lady had written so much straight reporting, like, I'm like, that's crazy that she had that.
I wonder if it's like pattern recognition, like you see the vibe subconsciously, you see the wind blowing through the trees and then that, you know, deep in your soul that that means that something is going to happen tomorrow.
Like a guy's going to say hello to you around 11 o'clock.
If it's that, or if it's more like we're tapped into some external vibration that... We are, but we're detached from it right now.
Well, I'm just imagining they're like, you know, they're flicking all the switches and they're like getting ready to fire it up and then all of a sudden they're like, are we ready?
All right, 10, 9, and then all of a sudden like a gasket blows and like, And they're like, what's going on?
But it's, it's, well, the ones that get me though is it'll just be someone, and you can tell that it's the first camera or certainly first video camera that anyone's ever seen because people are walking past it in the street.
And it's like this is what 1890s Paris looked like and people are walking past the camera Going like what the heck is that thing?
Why is it here?
Why are you filming us and the people have gotten really and there's one youtuber that does it and Because they were silent, right?
But he goes in and puts in like period-specific sound effects and it's one of the most trippy things that you'll ever see because you're looking at, and you know that everyone in this video is dead, right?
That's the one thing I always think, but it literally, to your point Ian, we are looking into a mirror, an image into the past through electricity.
No, but tied this back to what we were talking about earlier, right?
You know, governments have had this power for a long time, right?
The Gulf of Tonkin incident, right?
You know, you go back to the 1960s and straight up people were told, right?
We were attacked.
America was attacked and we need to go to war because this happened.
And you had people that fought, not just fought in the war, but also fought serious political battles based on that.
And for them, they believed that truth so inherently.
You could say the same thing for the Maine, the USS Maine in the Spanish-American War, which Was even a little bit less government intervention, more they consider it yellow journalism of the time and Hearst and gets into all that stuff.
And multiple, how many wars have been started because of something like this?
And so the question is, was this a power, right?
Was this a persuasion power that was used by governments and in some cases by media because they've basically understood that if you just tell that big enough, right, you do for all intents and purposes make it real.
It's just you've really got to break it down and understand what a lot of these things mean because they're foreign terms in a lot of senses, right?
But they basically say this.
Some have interpreted the result to mean that the delayed choice to observe or not observe the path of the idler photon changes the outcome of an event in the past.
Note in particular that an interference pattern may only be pulled out for observation after the islands have been detected.
Basically, the simple version of this, as much as I can simplify it.
The double-slit experiment was, we did this thing, and we noticed that when we were trying to measure it, we got a particle pattern.
When we didn't watch, we got a wave pattern.
With this one, they said the choice to observe it after the fact altered the event in the That's possible because if you think of a photon, it's a ball, it's a sphere.
And then you think of a light wave, it's a wave where it goes up and then down and up.
And I think what's happening is we're looking at a sideways cut of a bunch of beads of photons, but we're only seeing the top line above it and then the bottom line below the next photon.
So we're actually seeing like a two-dimensional view of the photon that's a string.
And if you wave one of the photons, it's waving the entire string, which would be the past string theory.
I don't know if that, I don't know much about string theory.
It was answered because someone pointed out there was a run of Berenstain Bayer books or videos that used EIN because they were really low-quality mass-produced garbage.
So there was no quality control.
Some people actually got Berenstain Bears, but there was very few of them.
Now that it's the future and we've digitized everything, the actual IP being Berenstain Bears confused those who got the garbage misprint versions.
It really is a simple observation.
Like, there was one, um, like the Shazam thing, where they're like, remember the movie where Sinbad was a genie?
It's like, no, you're just confusing the one where Shaquille O'Neal was the genie or whatever.
Like, it's very obvious you're just making a mistake.
From that idea, people have created this community about dimensional jumping, where they believe that if the Mandela Effect is real, meaning that you can inadvertently be transported to another dimension, then you can control transporting yourself to another dimension.
And so what they do is they say that you need sensory deprivation to isolate yourself from reality, so that you can go in and then visualize the reality you want to jump to, and if the reality is close enough to yours, you can enter it.
Speaking of which, also, look into that and then watch the movie Everything Everywhere All at Once, because that movie was really funny.
Yeah, there's not like multiple- These people believe that there's an infinite number of realities and that the idea is, you can only jump to a reality close to yours.
Because, let's say your, you know, Jack was over.
In your reality, a close reality would be you, but you didn't come to Timcast tonight.
That's a close enough universe to yours because the Divergence is only an hour away, that if you were to successfully dimensionally jump, you could jump to the reality where you didn't come.
See, I was even thinking about something more along the lines of like, You know, let's say one of your past relationships that was somebody you broke up with was the one that that stuck, right?
And so you did get married to, you know, the girl from high school or and that they're still together.
The old internet conspiracy theory, you know about it.
Yeah, yeah.
I think on Luke's, on We Are Change, Luke's website, everyone's byline is John Titor.
But the idea is that this guy came back and he was like, I'm from the future.
Here's what happened in my future.
Here's what I'm doing here in the past.
And if the future, if, if the universe is a whole bunch of probabilities and you're going down one path and multiple in the multiverse exists and every, every option you have creates a new universe, then it's entirely possible someone could come from the future and be like, in my future, You know, Trump Jr. gets elected president in 2024 and you're
like, but he's not even running.
And then you're like, well, my future was different because, you know, and then 2024 could
come around and then Trump Jr. doesn't even run for office.
And you're like, then how could that guy have been from the future? That makes no sense. Well,
because in his version of the future, it was different. So that's what John Titor was saying that
by coming to the past, they've already changed the future in ways they couldn't
even imagine.
So if what they say happens doesn't happen, it's not their fault.
We exist in four dimensions, we can manipulate three.
I think of time kind of like, if you were falling down an endless pit, you can't go back up.
It's a spatial dimension, we recognize it's a spatial dimension, up and down, but you have no control because gravity is pulling you straight downwards.
You can move around left and right, and you know, up, down, left, and right, or I should say forward, backwards, left, and right, but you can't go up.
However, if you drilled a hole all the way through the earth, minus the core, just got the core out of there, and then you fell down the hole, you'd fall, and you'd accelerate, accelerate, accelerate, until you got to the center, and then you'd keep falling, but you'd start to slow down, slow down, slow down, and you'd come out the other end, and then you'd fall back into the hole, all the way super fast.
If you're, like, falling at terminal velocity, and then you pass the point, you become weightless to the center, it ejects you out the other side, and then you go up, become weightless for a second, then come straight back down and just slingshot it.
Here's what you need to understand about time travel, though.
The patterns in your brain that have developed over time make you you.
If you were to go... If you were to, like, rewind time, your brain rewinds along with time.
So you need to isolate yourself from time, which means your time would have to keep going forward while all time went backwards.
That's probably why, like, time travel doesn't make sense.
Unless you went into a ship.
So the issue with people who don't realize that time travel When a person gets in a ship and then presses the button and it transports back in time, while time is going the other direction, or you're moving through a hole in space, you're moving forward through time while going the other direction?
That makes no sense.
It would be like saying falling while you're jumping.
You know what I mean?
That's probably why I think backwards time travel doesn't exist.
Like when they talk about traveling near the speed of light around the lip of a black hole, like your time up there would seem to say the same, but down on Earth or wherever you came from, it would go along without you.
So when you came back, you'd be the same age, but they would have rapidly aged.
And I was like, what if you could go back in time and then warn Trump?
And like, here's what you need to do.
I just thought about what would happen if you did you, you appear just in the Oval Office, like in a, like, and there's like a black ring of smoke around you and you stand up and you're like, Mr. President, I'm from the future.
This is everything that happens and what you need to do.
You need to take these actions.
He goes, excuse me, excuse me, no.
I'm not listening.
I don't know you.
I'm doing what I want.
You're like, no.
And you get dragged out and then he just does the same thing he was going to do.
The one that gets me though, Ian, to your point though about, you know, you can sense when someone's about to speak.
The one that gets me and having, um, you know, so we've got, uh, you know, I've got two little kids.
I got my wife, um, uh, my wife's parents live with us and we've got, you know, big household, right?
Um, Cass castle, right?
Big household, right?
But when you walk into a place and you know that it's empty, right?
And you know that no one's home, right?
You can sense it.
You can sense that I am in an empty house right now because there's something, And it's not just the noise, it's not just the, you know, there is a lack, right?
There is a lack of spirit, there is a lack of sense, and you know that nobody's around.
So we gotta go to Super Chats, but I wanna make one point, too, because we were talking about time, as we're falling through the dimension of time, we can't move.
And I was just thinking, like, Ian, you mentioned, what if, when time reaches the apex, it becomes weightless, and then once it reaches the other side, it gets pulled back into the direction, and everything rewinds rapidly?
And then I was like, I was just thinking, or, there's a brick wall, and the universe is just falling in.
If you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends, grill that like button, become a member at TimCast.com.
We only need about like 800 and some odd thousand more members so that we can beat the Daily Wire, which Alright!
If 800,000 of you were to sign up, we still wouldn't be beating the daily wire.
So thanks for your support though.
And you know, one day we will be a large company.
We'll expand to that point.
And we're really excited for what they're doing.
But we could use your support as well.
So again, share the show with your friends.
You can follow us at Tim Castellar on Instagram.
Let's read what you got to say.
Alright, Vanessa McCarthy Ledesma says, or is that what it says?
In reference to yesterday's IRL, if you made a $2 version, can you call it Timbuk2's?
And so with the ESG system, and this is starting to fall apart, and that's why we're seeing the economy overheating and the fakeness of our economy is coming apart at the seams.
It's similar to the quintillion effect, which is this idea that this French economist came up with in basically the Middle Ages, right?
And he realized that whenever a new goldmine was discovered somewhere in the kingdom, that it wasn't the people who lived around the goldmine or even the people who discovered the goldmine were the ones that benefited.
The ones who benefited from the new gold or the influx of new gold into the system were the ones closest to the throne.
And so this is the same thing you see now, because with money printing from the Fed, which is essentially what it is, and Spike was talking about the other day, that they've taken all the brakes off of this.
And that is disintermediated now through the big money market managers.
So your BlackRock, your Blackstone, Vanguard, State Street.
Those corporations, they get the money first, right, essentially from the Fed and banks in general, they get it.
And then the way they dole it out to other companies is not based on your shareholder value, which company is doing better.
It's through this ESG system, who's being the wokest out there.
And so you're getting your fresh injections of capital through this overheated funny money, because you are meeting your woke quotient.
So when Netflix puts out a movie like this, or when Disney puts LGBT scenes in Lightyear and kicks out Tim Allen, then you're increasing your ESG score.
So the Irish mob used to, so you know that part of, and not to get super into it, but that part of Philadelphia that everybody shows the videos of, that overpass, and then you see like the fentanyl zombies just kind of like shuffling around under it.
You haven't seen these videos.
So it's called Kensington, right?
And just look up Kensington, go to image search and you'll see you'll see exactly what I'm talking about.
So this it's and they go viral every time they're posted.
Well, that area in Philadelphia used to be called the Kensington and Allegheny intersection.
So it's called K&A, right?
That used to be those streets used to be run by what was called the K&A gang.
And that was the Irish mob.
And you may not have liked the Irish Mob's methods, or the K&A Gang's methods, and that's why they got broken up the same way the Five Families got broken up, etc.
But I tell you what, those streets were clean when the K&A Gang was around.
Yeah, we observed people who do blood magic and, you know, there were, and this is interesting, like, I wonder what Jack would think about this, but there's Catholic witches, Christian witches.
The book will be Ghosts of the Civil War, and that's just volume two.
Oh, okay.
So like the last book, we serialized, and it was just different essays.
They were all standalone essays.
Like the corpse in Hell's Kitchen was one thing, and then we did like a simulation story for another.
But this one all takes place in this town.
And I spend a few nights with this one family on their land, where they think maybe the gold could have been, and we sneak into cemeteries looking for gold.
But you know what we want to do is we want to make a sort of like horror thriller anthology sort of based off these books because it would be so legit.
Alright, so we'll read some more Super Chats, but when the book comes out we'll definitely have Shane back on and we'll be shilling it for sure and putting it everywhere and trying to get you to buy it.
Alright, let's see what we got here.
RedneckItalian1982 says, I wanted to share, I kicked off MAGA Month right!
Today is my 40th, and I'm at the Field of Dreams watching my two sons play America's Favorite Pastime while lighting things off and drinking beer.
Thank you for all you do, Timcast.
I am glad to hear it.
But MAGA Month is not just about American flags and drinking beer and grilling.
It's about doing right by your communities.
Cleaning things up, inspiring young people.
Maybe you've got like a big brother, big sister kind of thing where you could find some at-risk youth who need some leadership.
Maybe you got a dirty highway you could clean up.
Maybe you just want to put on a grill for your neighbors and bring people together.
Or even just, I used to call this, also, by the way, Tim, I forgot to mention that, you know, because you were so upset that I didn't have my, My profile picture up earlier with the flag, you know, on time, right?
And nothing against Panera Bread, but just, this is someone in my community that's trying to make it work, and we're better if we support those things.
And do so, obviously, while wearing your American flag.
To be in Congress would be really boring because you'd have to listen to everyone gets their time to talk but when they talk they decide to read something and then they're like not really charismatic so you're like oh I gotta do this.
So do you wonder why then it is that a certain type is attracted to that as opposed to somebody who may actually have more talent or more interest in the actual you know running the policies of running our country right?
So there is a certain type that totally understands, right?
How much, what the job entails and craves it more than anything else.
And then I went to actually some universities, I was hanging out and I was like in LA, and this physics professor, physics guy was like, let me explain for you why this is mumbo-jumbo.
Some of it was just, like, awkwardly boring, but then, like, you'd think it would be boring, where it's, like, a guy, and you'd be like, well, you have to understand, with the edge of the event horizon, and I'm watching, and I'm like, what?
I think that person said the delayed-choice double-slit, what they meant was the delayed-choice quantum eraser, because I can't find delayed-choice double-slit.
Alright, Kaslan Bukart says, Jack, I'm pro-life, but I'm concerned over the overwhelming amount of misinformation around Roe, especially with ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages.
How do we as pro-lifers help influence the change of culture around abortion?
I mean, it's, it's gonna, you have to do the work, right?
You just have to do the work, right?
Obviously, there's, there is a sea of misinformation on this topic in general.
People talk about it in emotional terms, but you know, I think what, even the, the comment just before when they were talking about authenticity, it's, it's just break some of this down, right?
With, with some of these pregnancies, you know, the, the number one reason that people get abortions is, is elective right now.
Number one by far right and so do not allow something that is 1% or 2% or less than 1% of Outcomes to dictate our policies Justin Allen says my first super chat ever cancelled Hulu Disney ESPN HBO and subscribed to Tim cast and daily wire The episode with Stephen Marsh was one of our was one of my one of favorites says I always share your videos Keep up the good work really really do appreciate it Yeah, so one of the challenges we have right now is, like, obviously our flagship program for TimCast is literally TimCast IRL.
The members-only videos are somewhat topical and relevant to the time period in which they are talked about, because it's politics.
Many of them aren't.
What we want to do, and one thing I've been thinking about, and I'm going to be talking to Shane about, because we have talked about doing the conspiracy talk show, so we have Pop Culture Crisis, which is pop culture, it's similar format to this.
What I want is, we could probably do this, we need to talk about it, but A similar talk format show.
You've got your deep investigations where you're like, go down to Georgia.
We're planning the next book already, but how could we do a show that's evergreen talking about mysteries, conspiracies, aliens, ghosts, PSYOPs, governments, and all this stuff.
We had a good, I mean, Ian was on the Members Only for Inverted World, we got into some of that stuff, and Chris Carr, our great editor who's been hustling on me sending this book to him, we went pretty hard on conspiracy theories and like, we should totally do that.
Jack used it and he swings through the trees to make it here.
All right.
Lone Wolf 36S says, something to chew on.
If we are inside the wake of a black hole, it would appear to us the universe is expanding, but really it's just that light takes longer and longer to reach us until there's no more light from outside.
You know, it's like Jerry Spence, you know, the lawyer, the defense lawyer, Jerry Spence guy, never lost a case.
He wrote books about this.
You know, he had a whole thing where he said, you know, if you're, if you're going to try a case about, you know, it's, it's, you have to, you have to put the person in the car, right?
If you're, if you're trying to case about a car crash, don't just tell the jury, Hey, there was a car crash and it happened on Tuesday and this, and the road was slick and the, no.
Put them in the car, give them the story and make it relatable.
And that is something that's going to be compelling and pull somebody in.
So the fact that, and this is why Paranormal Activity was such a popular movie because it's just what happens in your house when you're asleep, right?
Send in some writing samples and then have a conversation.
And the reality is, the unfortunate thing is, A lot of people don't want jobs right now, but of the jobs people want, they really want to work places like here in the Daily Wire, because we're culture warriors, we're trying to do cool things, we're trying to challenge the machine.
So it's almost like a lottery ticket.
We get 10,000 plus emails every month or something more, and it's just not possible to read every single one.
And that's the one thing we really got to launch, too, because at first we wanted Tales from the Inverted World to be more interactive with the audience.
But we ultimately discovered we have to focus on the heavy-hitting stuff, like you writing a book and then getting the stories out.
But I think the VOD version will be the long-form show, hour-long conversation.
Run, Hide, Fight, but there was the one with the woman in the room.
Yeah, locked up.
One of the things they're doing is they're buying movies that they can afford to buy and they're producing movies that are rather simple but good stories.
So Tear on the Prairie, look, it's costume, it's drama, but it's like in an open field so it's relatively low budget to produce.
But they make a good compelling story a movie worth watching because you got it.
You got to work with what you have We're doing the same thing.
I'm hoping that in five years the Daily Wire is bigger than Disney I'm hoping that we are as big as the Daily Wire or actually bigger than they are at the same time and that there's gonna be more companies like ours who aren't gonna be producing Garbage woke crap.
I will say what you do want is preachy ideological content However, you don't want woke, preachy ideological content.
You want things that represent your values.
An example is Matt Walsh made a book called Johnny the Walrus.
It's preachy.
It's got a message.
But it's a message you like.
So I think that when people say, like, I don't want politics in my TV show, and I'm like, no, that's not the case.
You want good values in your TV shows, and you want the substance of the story.
I don't like it when, like, Orville makes an episode that's so on the nose.
It's like, we get it, the lady's Trump.
Seriously?
Come on, add a little nuance and a little metaphor to that.
So you want it to not be nothing but preach, but you want your values represented in it.
So that's what I'm hoping to do and become a member at TimCast.com.
Let's, uh, let's grab one more.
Jem R says, did you see that Uganda found 12 trillion US dollars worth of gold deposits?
What's the odds the West will suddenly be very concerned about human rights in Uganda?
Look, you guys know where to follow me, Human Events Daily.
We are hiring.
Turning Point USA is hiring.
You can check that on the site.
Also, and not for myself to push out, but my wife is the special guest on the podcast, The Spillover this weekend.
She's telling her story for the first time ever, escaping communism, growing up in the Soviet Union, coming to America.
So you can find that on podcast Spillover.
And then we've also got Turning Point USA, SAS coming up end of July.
Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, same stage, maybe not the same time, but down in Tampa, Florida, tpusa.com slash SAS, use promo code POSO, all caps, 25% off.
I am really proud of this book, and I hope you guys will check it out.
The first episode is up now on YouTube, Apple, Spotify, if you want to see witches pull demons out of the thin air, and skeletons standing upright in the ground waiting to shoot the devil dead, and just hear really interesting stories about the war.
I've completely changed the way I view a lot of the things that happened in the war, and history in general.
So please check that out.
Tales from the Inverted World everywhere, and I'm Shane Cashman, everywhere online.