Topics discussed:
Debate Between Nick Alinia and Angry Foreigner.
My Integration Policy.
Sacrifices and Bitterness.
Macron's Greatness (Or Lack Thereof).
Amerindians – Psychoanalysing My Admiration.
Aztec Brutality & Spanish Conquistadors.
The Two Spirits of America (Heroic vs Ellis Island).
The Solutrean Hypothesis.
🎙️ Listen to the full episode by signing up: https://thegoldenone.se/podcast/
🧵High-Thumos European Clothing: https://legiogloria.com/
📚Dauntless & Demigod Mentality: https://legiogloria.com/
🌱Jotunheim Nutrition
🇸🇪 Sverige: https://jotunheimnutrition.se/
🇪🇺 🇬🇧 🇺🇸 Europe & US: https://jotunheimnutrition.com/
Whey for US Customers: https://www.prozis.com/16y6Y (use code TGO10 for a discount).
Social Media
👑Telegram: https://t.me/thegoldenone
☀️Homepage: https://thegoldenone.se/
𝕏 https://twitter.com/TheGloriousLion
🪐Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thegoldenjarl/
https://www.instagram.com/jotunheimnutrition/
🐸Gab: https://gab.com/TheGoldenOne
💡Minds: https://www.minds.com/TheGloriousLion/
Financial Contributions
https://www.subscribestar.com/thegoldenone
https://thegoldenone.se/contact/
The greatest podcast of all time, the greatest insights of all time.
As you can see in the show notes, we have a good few juicy and interesting topics to discuss in this fine episode.
And as always, if you want to listen to the full episode, you can do so by signing up to the greatest podcast at Subscribestar, Gumroad, Substack or Spotify.
Good stuff, good stuff.
Then you will gain access to the previous full episodes as well.
So you can become enlightened and enjoy my various ramblings over all of these years.
So anyway, we have a good few topics, as I said, to get into.
So let's get straight to it with an update.
A metapolitical update from good old Sweden.
I watched a debate between a handsome and sensitive young man, Nikalinia, and a veteran of the game, Angry Foreigner.
Perhaps many of you will recognize the name.
Perhaps you've watched some of his videos.
And I will straight up say that I've had, you know, a good appreciation for him over all of these years because he was quite early about talking about the dangers of mass immigration into Sweden.
So I will always have a certain level of gratitude towards him for that.
Now, however, I do believe that he has been possessed by possessed and corrupted by vicious demons of chaos.
So now he's starting to sound a bit strange, to be honest.
So essentially, they debated integration and immigration into Sweden.
And Nikolinja, I can just summarize his takes because he said basically what I usually say or what I would say and what any sane person would say that Sweden has taken in far too many individuals from the very worst countries on earth.
So import the third world, become the third world.
So very simple stuff.
And of course he correctly identified that the solution to the problem is to initiate a large-scale re-migration process.
So this debate, by the way, took place at the RICS.
So that is the media house of the Sweden Democrats.
So you see, re-immigration, it's making its way into the spirit of the Sweden Democrats.
So essentially good work by Nick, definitely.
By the way, you can of course watch the debate if you want.
If you understand Swedish, you can just search for Ricks on YouTube.
Silk and you shall find.
Also, big shout out to whomever at RICS, whomever is an enjoyer of the Horus Heresy.
I saw some of the books in a bookshelf there.
So good stuff, good stuff.
The Sweden Democrats, they are now for re-migration and they're enjoyers of the Horus Heresy.
And you're blackfilling.
So yeah, I thought it was fun.
Anyway, on to the performance by Angry Foreigner.
I will be straight up honest and say that it was quite painful to watch.
It was quite painful to listen to.
His takes were absolutely horrendous, being honest.
So to just use an example, he said that it was the Swedes' fault that immigrants have not integrated, which is of course laughable.
If you come to another country, it's up to you to integrate.
It's not up to the host population to cater to your needs.
You have to fit in.
So my immigration policy is the following.
Fit in or F off.
It's super simple.
So if you don't fit in somewhere, then go somewhere else.
Go back to your own country if you don't like it.
Imagine how cheeky you must be to come to a different country and then demand that the host population should alter their mentality and their social codes to accommodate for you.
It's yeah, it's very much not the attitude and behavior of a nice person.
So anyway, this is no news for anyone who's listening to this, so I'm not gonna ramble on about it.
I just wanted to give my take on the debate because of course it's a happening within the Swedish metapolitical sin.
So that's my take at list.
That Nick won fair and square, no doubt about it at all.
He presented realistic arguments in a calm and concise fashion.
And Angry Foreigner did not bring his A-game at all.
It was, you know, a bunch of very bad takes which do not hold up under scrutiny.
And also, to be perfectly honest, Angry Foreigner came off as quite anti-Swedish and very bitter.
Now in fairness to him, and I've said this in a post on X before, in fairness to Angry Foreigner, I can understand that he is bitter because, as I said, he's been at it for quite a long time.
And this is the situation in all of the West.
That if you engage yourself on behalf of European civilization, on behalf of law and order, you will get hit constantly in every which way.
You enjoyers of my content, you've known how many hits I've taken over all of these years.
It's been constant, a constant freaking bombardment of various hits over a long period of time.
And I can just tell you that it's not pleasant.
It's not fun.
It's tiresome in the long run.
And then if you don't get support, which, by the way, you don't get so much support.
So I understand that he is a bit bitter.
I could have been bitter too.
So essentially, if you engage yourself for left-wing ideas, if you engage yourself for anti-white ideas, you will be showered with money.
You have all the financial backing in the world.
You will have, you know, benefits when it comes to career and everything like that.
You will get pats on the back from people in high positions in society.
If you engage yourself for Europe, for European civilization, for the Swedish people, you will just take a lot of hits.
And I can say this from a personal experience.
Again, I don't like to talk about this because I don't want to come across as bitter myself, but I understand that others can be bitter.
Now, of course, I have a different mentality that makes me happy instead.
But I don't blame those who become bitter.
So again, if you engage yourself for European civilization, you will only take a lot of hits.
You will have precious little support.
You have older white men who've made their fortune in peace and calm, they don't want to give you any support because they want to, you know, decide what sort of wine they want to drink for dinner this evening.
Meanwhile, you're taking all of these hits and hit.
So anyway, you get my point.
Actually, I will use one other example that I saw today.
A group of Muslims here in Sweden.
They celebrate the fundraising of 600,000 euros for a mosque.
And, you know, would that be a group of Europeans trying to fundraise?
You wouldn't get particularly far at all because there isn't really that support.
And if you go out and take hit and hit over a long period of time without support, then you will become bitter unless you have magical abilities to use that term.
So if you have mental abilities to try to overcome that sense of bitterness, to try to, you know, look on the bright side of life.
But anyway, this needs to change.
Otherwise, people will not want to engage in pro-European activities.
Then you can just as well sell your soul to the devil to get some money and do left-wing work.
So yeah, it's what it is.
It's not so pleasant to talk about because it's a great shame for most Western men, for most white men who are paying taxes to a system that is actively replacing them and then they are not particularly keen on contributing to various initiatives that try to do what is good for European civilization.
I've talked about metapolitics before about the moral framework, about the overturn windows.
I'm not going to go into it right now.
But anyway, I've seen far too many bitter individuals over all of these years, and I understand them completely.
I do.
I do.
And it shouldn't be this way.
So, anyway, I'm not going to blackpill more about that.
We're moving on to another take I shared the other day.
We're talking about Emmanuel Macron of France.
And I said that if you look at him, you can see that he has greatness within him.
And that is the great tragedy of him.
It's a great tragedy that he does have potential.
He could have been something more, but he isn't.
I don't know exactly what it is.
I don't know what happened during his childhood.
Perhaps some sort of trauma has stifled his inner fire.
I don't know.
But I shared on X a video his addressings on soldiers, and he looks, you know, he looks good for the purpose.
He looks good.
He looks like a statesman.
He looks like he has gravitas.
He looks like he has thumos.
He looks like he has all of these qualities that could make for a great leader.
But there is something within him that, you know, makes him a subservient slave to some hidden masters.
So the French deep state, the deep state of liberalism has been in place ever since the French Revolution.
So, you know, I've talked about this before.
I'll say it again, just a brief recap.
A human is made up of many different parts.
So usually I summarize it as follows: that you are a soul and you have a mind and you have a body.
And we can even go further.
So in Germanic metaphysics, your soul is also divided in many different parts.
I will make a separate episode on this because it's super important.
But anyway, you as a human, you have many different parts in you and they can be competing against each other.
So sometimes you have the good spirits they are prevailing, and sometimes you have lesser and lower and more vicious spirits.
And I think in Macron's case, that he has, you know, the capacity for greatness within him, but the lower spirits they might have come there as a result of some sort of trauma.
I don't know.
I don't want to speculate too much, but I think his marriage is an indicator of something that is, you know, a bit sinister.
Something sinister is going on in Macon's case.
So competing spirits within him, some spirits of greatness, he has the capacity for greatness.
Just looking at his physiognomy, it's a physiognomy.
I would say, in my humble opinion, now we shouldn't overestimate physiognomy because, you know, you can it's only an indicator.
But anyway, looking at his mannerism, his body language, his confidence in many videos and pictures, you can see that there's a spark of something within him.
Then, of course, you can look at different pictures when he looks, you know, in a very, how shall I put this politely?
He looks at some semi-naked African men in a very strange way that might suggest some sort of sexual deviancy.
I don't know, but I'm just speculating.
So there are spirits within him that, you know, compete with the spirits of greatness.
So anyway, that was my schizo take on Emmanuel Macron.
But he has given voice to certain, you know, sound ideas that Europe needs to become strong on our own so we can resist pressure from the US and Russia.
I don't know if it's been that explicit, but he has said at least that Europe needs to become strong.
The elephant in the room is, of course, that France is in a very bad state internally.
So they have large enclaves of non-Europeans in France and they don't have control of their own country.
So when he says that France is strong and everything like that, it's hard to take serious because they can't even control their own country.
So if he were actually serious about making France strong, about making Europe strong, then yeah, start deporting people.
Really simple stuff.
Deport people who are actively detrimental to France.
Now, anyway, my point with this schizo take is that you have different parts of you.
So you are made up of many different parts and they are constantly vying for supremacy within you.
So you can probably have different voices in you if you have a voice saying that you know it would be really nice to skip the gym today.
And then you probably have a different voice saying we should not skip the gym today because that's not what we're about.
Then you have a young guy still addicted to porn.
He has a lower voice within him saying how nice it would be to watch porn and then he has a higher voice saying it's not a good idea to watch porn because it's not what we're about.
And this is also where influences come in.
So you can have a you can have a picture of me on your wall.
You can look at it every time and then, if you struggle with pornography, you can just look at the picture of me and ask yourself what would the great compassionate angel here say about this behavior?
And I would, of course, say no, that you should absolutely not do it.
So then you get reinforced the good spirits in you, they will get reinforced by me.
So yeah, this is also why I don't recommend atheism to anyone, because if you believe in a god, some sort of gods, then you will have an easier time letting the good spirits within you, letting them be on top.
So you can think of it in this way that if you expose yourself, if you expose your mind to bad things such as pornography, the malicious spirits within you they grow stronger, and if you live a virtuous life, the good spirits within you they get strengthened.
Now a last note on Macron as well.
I saw that some guys were commenting on his height, and of course, it's good to be tall to a certain extent and it's good to have physical power and everything like that.
But when it comes to this level of power, so being the leader of a still very powerful nation because France they're still powerful to be, to be honest, despite not having, you know, territorial control in their own regions.
But anyway, it's a powerful country.
Emmanuel Macron is a powerful man and uh, height doesn't really come into play here.
Uh, that's not what's stopping him from becoming a great man.
What's stopping him from becoming a great man is, as I said, these other malicious forces and, of course, the uh, the social setting, the friends, deep state and everything like that.
But the point here is that when we come to a certain level of power, it's more about the divine energies within you.
So height yeah, it's good if you want to attract a female, but if you come to a certain level of power, it doesn't really matter.
So you can look throughout history, many short men and if you look at heads of state today, many of them are actually quite short.
So yeah, height doesn't come into play when we're talking about this type of leadership, about being a great man in this sense.
And also a last note on height, I posted about this on X as well, that commenting negatively on another man's height, it's not a behavior that befits a European gentleman.
Now, that all being said, we must travel from Sweden and France.
We must travel to the New World.
We're gonna talk about the two spirits of America.
But before talking about those two spirits, I will share some personal perspectives growing up.
So we're gonna talk about the Amerindians growing up.
I was an enthusiast of Amerindians.
So Aztecs, Mayas, Incas, Sioux, Iroquois, all of this, the old tribes we all know.
So I have psychoanalysed myself to try to understand my appreciation for these tribes.
So I would say that there are two aspects here that made me appreciate them.
And the first aspect is that they were of course defending their land.
And that's something I've always been able to sympathize with, especially given the situation in Europe, that you have a tribe defending against an invading tribe.
So that was the first aspect that they defended their own.
The second aspect is at least how you received the framing.
And yeah, I will completely admit that, of course, I was influenced by pop culture and everything like that.
So watching Last of the Mojicans, you had the sense that the, well, primarily the British, they were this force of a very civilized force.
And then they fought against the more almost noble savage, the guys who were more in tune with nature, who lived in forests and fought in a different way.
So it was more like wilderness versus civilization.
And the more nature-oriented guys, they appealed more to me.
Something else about the weaponry, it always appealed more to me with, you know, running around in the forest with perhaps an axe or a bow and arrow instead of a musket.
So that is something as well.
So I'm just psychoanalyzing a young Marcus here.
So then also I will say that Age of Empires 2 of course had a huge impact.
So therefore I started liking the Mayans and the Aztecs.
Speaking of which, an ever so brief side note that Age of Empires 2 is a great game and I owe a lot to it.
I grew up with it and yeah I can honestly say that I do love the game.
When it comes to power gaming in the here and now however H V Empires 3 is the better game.
So Age Vampires 2 popular among many normies but true sensitive young men prefer H Vampires 3.
It's just a better game to play because there are so many more tactics and just more a more dynamic game in every which way and more historically accurate.
You know in Age Vampires 2 if you play it you can play as the Saracens or Mongols and then you run around with European looking knights.
So it's not super good in that sense.
I'm still grateful for having grown up with H Vampires 2 but yeah in The Here and Now H Vampires 3 is a better game.
Anyway a side note and autistic side note I couldn't help myself I just want to say that so yeah anyway I grew up with a certain appreciation for the Mayans and the Aztecs simply because of H Vampires 2.
Now then you might wonder why did I stop being an enthusiast of Aztec culture?
Yes it's because of the reality of situation.
They weren't particularly nice guys the Aztecs to put it mildly.
The Mayans as far as I understood it weren't particularly nice either.
So I've actually started reading Fingerprints of the Gods The Quest Continues by Graham Hancock and I am thus far 200 pages in and I stumbled upon a passage which I thought to share with you all to illustrate the situation.
So I'm quoting now from page 105 quoting good old Graham Hancock.
The Olmecs are the earliest recognized high civilization of ancient Mexico, and human sacrifice was well established with them.
Two and a half thousand years later, at the time of the Spanish conquest, the Aztecs were the last, but by no means the least, of the peoples of this region to continue an extremely old and deeply ingrained tradition.
They did so with fanatical zeal.
It is recorded, for example, that Ahusiotl, the eighth and most powerful emperor of the Aztec royal dynasty, celebrated the dedication of the temple of Huitsulopochtli in Tenochtitlan by marshalling four lines of prisoners past teams of priests who worked four days to dispatch them.
On this occasion, as many as 80,000 were slain during a single ceremonial rite.
The Aztecs liked to dress up in the flayed skins of sacrificial victims.
Bernardino de Sahagun, a Spanish missionary, attended one such ceremony soon after the conquest.
The celebrants flayed and dismembered the captives.
They then lubricated their own naked bodies with grease and slipped into the skin.
Trailing blood and grease, the gruesomely clad men ran through the city, thus terrifying those they followed.
The second day's rite also included a cannibal feast for each warrior's family.
Another mass sacrifice was witnessed by the Spanish chronicler Diego de Duran.
In this instance, the victims were so numerous that when the streams of blood running down the temple steps reached bottom and cooled, they formed fat clots enough to terrify anyone.
All in all, it has been estimated that the number of sacrificial victims in the Aztec Empire as a whole had risen to around 250,000 a year by the beginning of the 16th century.
So yeah, I'm not going to moralize too much, but suffice to say it's, you know, not perhaps a culture that is particularly admirable.
So when the Spanish came, it's quite easy to see that the Spanish were the good guys and the subjugated tribes, so the tribes the Aztecs had subjugated, they were quite willing to ally with the Spanish to cast off the yoke of the Aztecs.
So essentially my own journey as an observer of Aztec culture is that I started with, you know, liking them to a certain extent and then not liking them so much when I understood that the Spanish were the more the nicer guys in this particular drama.
Now another aspect, of course an insight I came to a lot later is that Spaniards they are Europeans so bioculturally a lot closer to what I would be as a Scandinavian.
So for example a Spanish guy and a Norwegian guy they are closer than a Spanish guy and a North African guy by far.
So you know we have this European cluster and we have a shared story, shared ancestry and everything like that.
I've talked about it many times before the three population groups that make up modern Europeans.
So we have that aspect as well that our guys versus their guys, same thing when it comes to the Crusades, it was our guys versus their guys and this is the absolutely simplest take on any conflict and usually the right take as well instead of moralizing about who's right or who is wrong.
So yeah, of course sometimes you have a quite clear right and wrong but in most human conflicts it's the case that you take your own side.
So we can look at Ukraine again.
I've said this before I'll say it again because it's a good example.
Who is right?
Who is wrong?
According to one side they are right, according to the other side they are right.
So it's a matter of two tribes competing for land and resources.
Now this applies mainly in geopolitics so we're talking more geopolitics and history there.
So when you're looking at something like the Spanish conquest it's yeah the Spaniards versus the Aztecs.
If you are Aztec, I suppose you root for your own.
If you're European, I suppose you root for the Spaniards.
Quite normal and natural stuff.
And this is, by the way, how other ethnicities operate in the West today.
So again, I've already mentioned the case of the fundraising for a mosque in Sweden.
Yeah, they take their own side.
So that's their morality to bring power to themselves.
And I just wish whites would do the same.
So to put themselves first.
Then we would be in a better situation.
Now we're moving from Mexico and Central America.
We're moving a bit north to the Amerindians of today's USA and Canada.
And I would say also, if I'm just continuing my psychoanalysis of myself, is that there might be something, some blood memory in me, an Aryan blood memory.
So when I see this, or when I saw rather, this Amerindians on horsebacks with feathers in their hair riding, galloping over a plain, perhaps it stirred some sort of blood memory in me that made me appreciate it.
Now, of course, I'm talking about the Aryan origin on the Pontic steppe, so in Eastern Europe.
So Western steppe, that is the perhaps more scientific word for Aryan.
Or you can say Proto-Indo-European or whatever you want, but the image of a warrior on a horseback riding, you know, the sense of space, the sense of openness, the sense of freedom, I suppose it calls to our blood in some way and that we can recognize ourselves in some of it.
And also, by the way, we're gonna get into the genetics of America in a bit, so after the music break, but I can say now that Amerindians have around 35% DNA from the ancient North Eurasians.
And this is an important population group for us Europeans as well.
So the R1B and R1A haplogroups, which, you know, the most common ones in Europe.
So R1B, more common in Western Europe, and R1A, more common in Eastern Europe.
So anyway, this is where those haplogroups come from.
So you have some similarities between Amerindians and Europeans.
You can see from various myths as well.
Good old Survive the Jive.
He made a good video on this as well.
So some comparative mythology.
So anyway, that was my take, my psychoanalytical take on my own appreciation for North American Indians.
Then also, again, blood memory, you see a culture, a warrior culture that stepped up to fight.
Yeah, you sort of have to respect it.
So even though they weren't perhaps always the nicest guys, you know, they went hard at each other.
So it's absolutely not the case that the British or the Americans came to subjugate peaceful natives.
They were anything but.
They were extremely warlike and most likely not particularly nice to each other.
So that's something to say as well.
So if anyone tries to guilt trip whites in America for taking land, it's, you know, you conquer another tribe.
It's nothing strange.
Just as this Amerindians, they conquered land from each other.
But anyway, my point is that you sort of have to respect a tribe that, you know, they at least gave a good fight.
And yeah, that's how history goes.
So that all being said, we'll go to a music break.
And after that, we will talk about the two spirits of America.
So the heroic settler spirit and the downtrodden Ellis Island spirit.
And then we'll also talk about the Salutrian hypothesis and the first peoples of America and the genetics of America.
Now, if you have listened to this on YouTube, you listen to an episode titled The Two Spirits of America without me actually getting into it.
But yeah, it's after the music break.
And as already noted, if you want to listen to the entire episode, you can subscribe to the podcast.
It's also a great way to support my holy work and to make me happy.
So I feel that I'm appreciated and so I feel that I have a lot of support.
