You've gotten my attention and I suppose that was your plan with your little article you wrote.
Now I'm not an expert in Dutch, but from what I understand you didn't actually present a single solid argument against my teachings.
So I'm just going to take this opportunity to thank you for the glorious artwork and to point out some excruciatingly massive hypocrisies I see in a lot of feminists.
Now you take issue with my great struggle against pornography.
And now let me enlighten you to something.
Do you know what the porn industry is?
Or rather, do you know what the porn industry does?
Yes, it destroys the lives of young women.
I repeat, the porn industry is an industry that destroys the lives of young women.
I'm trying to fight this.
And I will present to you a really simple lesson in economics.
Supply and demand will almost always melt each other.
Now, if you want to get rid of the supply of something, porn, you have to get rid of the demand for it.
So for me, I'm trying the best I can, as often as I can, to strike blows against the demand of pornography.
Because then I know if the demand decreases, the supply will follow.
Simple economic principles.
This can be applied to drugs or alcohol as well.
If you want to get rid of something, it's always better to attack it from the cultural side to get people to not want it anymore.
Simple as that.
So I'm trying to destroy an industry which destroys the lives of young women.
And you are defending this industry.
And you claim to be a feminist who cares about women.
I don't buy it at all.
I don't trust you.
And I would like to present the question to all of my female followers.
I've gotten quite a few over this last year.
Who do you think cares most about you?
These hypocritical feminists or your great angel?
Yes, obviously me, because I'm intellectually honest.
And now, speaking in the broader sense about these feminists and the sexual revolution, you say that it is empowering for women to participate in porn or to be promiscuous.
Let me tell you something, that is not the case.
When a woman has sex, she's giving up her power.
That is the exact opposite of being empowered.
Now, you must realize that sex isn't on equal terms.
Simple stuff, this is not my rules, this is not something that I came up with, it is just the primordial truth.
It is the wishes of Mother Nature.
It is her ruse.
I'm just trying to give you the best and most profound advice.
And when we're on the topic of hypocrisy and double standards, there isn't a double standard because it isn't the same thing.
And this is an argument I get from feminists and women every once in a while.
Oh, sure, you're always without clothes and you have such a provocative pictures and aesthetics, etc.
Now, what you fail to realize is that I'm a golden monument to the gods.
There's nothing sexual about it at all.
So if you say that I'm a hypocrite, it is not hypocritical in the least because it is not the same thing.
My physique aims at a glorious and magnificent aesthetics.
It is nothing sexual at all to do with it.
So this is not an argument.
And yes, it might be regrettable that women can't be as lightly dressed as men at all times.
But it is what it is.
And yet again, this is not something I just came up with.
It's just the primordial truth that dictates the fact that men are more visual.
They will view women as objects more easily, especially if they are being dressed in a provocative way.
Simple stuff really.
You just have to adapt yourself to reality.
So if you don't want to be viewed as an object, stop dressing in a way that is sexually provocative.
So anyway, to conclude, I am the one who actually looks out for women here.
You feminists are apparently not caring about women in the least because you're not about empowering women at all.
