All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 13, 2021 - RFK Jr. The Defender
27:31
British Funeral Director John O'Looney

British funeral director, John O’Looney, shares his stories with RFK Jr from the front lines.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, everybody.
I'm joined today by British funeral director John O'Looney, who is from Northampton.
John gave an interview, I think on September 14th, that a lot of people paid attention to about the unprecedented number of deaths that he would see following vaccination that, of course, were not being Thank you so much for joining me today, John.
Can you talk about what you saw and what brought you to go public?
First of all, thank you for talking to me.
I really appreciate it.
My first experience of COVID was back in 2019 at the end of November, beginning of December.
I had a family that came to see me who'd lost a loved one in Northampton.
And I would just say that I'm actually from Milton Keynes, which is like the next borough over.
But I attended the hospital in Northampton and collected their loved one and one of the complaints they made to me was that the hospital would not allow them to see their loved one in the chapel of rest that's joined on to the mortuary and basically the way this works when someone passes away In hospital, they come down off the ward into the mortuary and they have a little viewing chapel next door to the mortuary.
They can take people in, you know, if they want to spend a couple of minutes or whatever with their loved one.
And the hospital weren't allowing that.
So I went over there and collected their loved one and asked them while I was there, you know, why wouldn't you let this family see their loved one?
And they opened the viewing room door into the chapel at rest and there was kind of an inflatable pandemic tent.
It's the only way I can describe it.
It was black and silver and had about 20 kind of slots in it.
And they said, this is why.
And I kind of said, well, what's that?
And they said, there's something really horrible coming, we've been told, and this is like an isolation tent.
So the word COVID wasn't used.
I collected the deceased.
I left.
In early 2020, the news of COVID broke.
The hysteria began.
What month is that?
So that was the end of November, beginning of December, that kind of, that week, that overlap.
Of 2019?
Yes, yes.
Okay.
That's before anybody knew that COVID was out there.
Yes, yes, that's correct.
Yeah, that's correct.
So, I kind of told family and said, you know, this is what I'd seen and perhaps you might want to stock up on a few bits and I didn't really know what to think, you know.
So the news broke early in 2020 and we were kind of told there was this terrible pandemic coming and they were showing pictures of people falling over in China.
And I kind of believed it, but I was a little bit sceptical.
And it wasn't too long before the BBC local regional news crew contacted me as a funeral director and they asked to come and do an interview with me.
So I was happy to help, you know, kind of thinking that I was doing my bit to help things along and raise awareness.
And they came, they sent a reporter with a camera and a cameraman.
And this lady briefed me for about 20 minutes on what she, the questions she was going to ask me and what she wanted me to say.
The responses, more importantly.
They got me to dress up in full PPE with a face mask and that, which is not something I would usually do because as a funeral director you don't really use a face mask, it's not normal practice to do that.
So I managed to find one because everyone was panicked buying them and I wore this mask for this interview and it was well orchestrated and I kind of gave them the hysteria they wanted and I kind of beat myself up now because obviously many months later it's not it's not true you know I fear that it's just not the truth.
Not long after, I had a family come to me who'd lost a loved one, and it was a little girl of six, and she'd died of cancer.
And this was at a time when all the other funeral directors were taking coffins directly to the hospital.
There was no viewing, no dressing, or washing loved ones.
They were literally putting to see straight in coffins and sealing them at the hospital, which I kind of felt wasn't right.
And this family wanted to see their little girl, and I couldn't bring myself to say no.
You know, I've got kids myself.
So I've got a child and I can only imagine their pain.
I mean, this little girl had a brother of five and a sister of seven.
They wanted to see their sister.
So I washed her and dressed her and had her embalmed and gave her family that kind of time.
And then I kind of thought, you know, if I could do that for them, I could do that for everyone.
So I've washed and dressed everyone, even those with COVID, because they've streamlined the process to collect them, i.e.
there's no doctors in attendance now for I've been able to bring them into my care often still warm.
So I'm sure if they're infectious, I would have caught COVID because I've addressed over 100, 150 maybe people that have been labelled with COVID without any doctor present, no COVID tests, but they're all COVID. And then the other thing that happened that started raising My suspicions was I had a guy who rang up early in 2020 and he introduced himself as John.
His name was John as well and he worked for a company, he said, that were a pandemic agency and they were contracted out by the government to ring all of the local funeral directors and they were going to do that every week on a Monday and there were several questions he asked me.
He asked me what my capacity was as a funeral home, how many bodies could I hold, how many I collected that week And where from?
And how many were COVID deaths?
Now, it was almost instantly the guy started deliberately steering me.
And by that, I mean, the conversation went much like I picked up a guy from the local hospice.
He was a terminal cancer patient.
He died from cancer.
I spoke to the family as well documented.
There was no COVID test.
No doctor in attendance.
And he said, well, that was a COVID death.
And I would kind of say, well, why was it a COVID death then?
And he said, well, we heard there was COVID in that unit.
So it must be, I have to put it down as a COVID. And I kind of said, but the guy wasn't COVID. He was a terminal cancer patient.
It was well documented, you know.
And then there would be, I'd pick up a gentleman from a care home.
He was in his 90s.
He'd been in the care home for five years.
He had onset dementia and he was in the fetal position when I found him.
There was no Covid test, no doctor present.
But again, he was instantly labelled as a Covid death.
And it seemed that everyone possible they could possibly get away with, they were labelling as Covid deaths and they weren't Covid deaths.
And I'd hasten to add, you know, I was washing and dressing them all as well.
So these are people that loved ones have lost over a Zoom call or standing there in a hazmat suit, you know, saying goodbye to your mum or dad.
It's not acceptable.
It's not acceptable.
So I refused to do that and I washed and dressed them all.
And even one guy that was run over, you know, he had tyre marks from his shoulder to his hip.
He was in ICU for a couple of weeks before he passed away from his injuries.
He was a COVID death.
You know, you couldn't make it up.
It was a disgusting...
Lies, just lies.
And many of the families that came into my care walked through the door extremely angry and upset.
One, because they felt they knew that their loved ones weren't COVID deaths.
And number two, because they were frightened because they'd been labelled COVID deaths that I wouldn't look after them and watch them address them.
You know, so I had to kind of reassure them, you know, I would do that.
Don't worry.
You know, and this, I had other funeral directors recommending me to clients To come to me because I was the only one that would wash and dress these poor people.
So there was that.
The death rate didn't pick up at all.
There was no pandemic death rate.
And the vast majority of funerals that we do here in the UK are cremations.
Probably 95% of the funerals that we do.
And the cremation figures speak for themselves.
Last year, the cremation figures in my area were less than 2019.
Then in March and April of 2020, it was well advertised on the media that there was going to be a lot of deaths in care homes and, you know, they were transferring these COVID patients to care homes to die a good death.
And I kind of remember thinking, well, that's really strange.
You know, how can a virus target a building?
It's either in the community or it's not in the community, you know?
I kind of, sure enough, the phone began ringing and it was exclusively care homes, care home after care home every night.
And I didn't get a full night's sleep for...
Probably three weeks because I was called out every night exclusively to care homes.
Now, I would hasten to add that all of these calls, there was never a doctor in attendance.
There was never a COVID test done on any of these poor souls.
And all I came across was deceased and occasionally a vial of midazolam that had been left on the side or put in a bedside bin.
Now, midazolam is a drug.
It's a brand name in the UK. This particular drug is used.
It's a sedative.
It's also used, I believe, in lethal injections in your country as one of the cocktail of drugs that are used.
Now, midazolam is a brand name, so it'll be called something else in your country.
It'll be easy enough to find out just simply by Googling it.
It's simpler to Valium.
And it's used, I think it's used, and I could be wrong about this, but I think it's used in surgery.
It's In our country, I think it makes you lose your memory.
Yes, yes.
Well, obviously the main body of people...
It was used in pregnancies and deliveries and it was one of the things that made women lose I have no memory of the birth.
I could be wrong about that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Well, the primary use in the UK is obviously when you've got people that have got dementia or Alzheimer's, they may be physically very fit.
Their minds are gone though and they become very agitated as their condition deteriorates and they become quite anxious and quite violent.
Obviously not deliberately, it's just a sad side effect of the condition.
And gone are the days where we tie these people to the bed now as they did Many years ago, they do it chemically and they do it using primarily this drug, midazolab.
Now, very interestingly, since going public, I've had a large number of people reach out to me, yourself included, and some of those people have furnished me with some of the missing pieces of the jigsaw.
Now, many of these care homes are run by local health authorities.
So there is taxpayers' money being spent, and as such, you can put in a Freedom of Information request to find out what this money's been spent on, and there's a paper trail there for that.
Now, I've spoken to people that have requested, via Freedom of Information requests, the past five years' records of midazolam purchases, and the increase in the purchase Of midazolam at the time these deaths were taking place went up in different areas between 350 and a thousand percent and it's all been used.
To give you an idea sir, I've been an undertaker for 15 years and 10 of those years were spent working for one of the industry leaders they called the Co-op Funeral Care.
Now in England they have around 60 percent market share so they're very busy funeral directors And in the 10 years that I worked for them, I used to be on call in the evenings, one week and three.
Now, in this week that I was on call, 24 hours a day, I was never, ever called out to a care home three successive nights.
Ever.
It's statistically impossible.
As a society, we're very good at getting people to pass away in hospital in the UK. So if I had 10 people pass away, eight of those would be in hospital environment, one would be in a residential address, and one would be in a care home.
And yet for this brief period, when they were buying 1000% more sedative, I was called every night to a care home for nearly three weeks.
So I'm in no doubt what's happened and that is as a very small family-run funeral home.
So I would imagine the large funeral providers, the guys must have virtually lived in those care homes for those weeks.
Well, let me interrupt you for a second because you have made this claim before and people have been skeptical about it and trial site knows which does not like you and has basically has a And the pharma skew to it has fact-checked you.
And here's what said.
Your claim that there was a surge in the purchase of metazolam over 100%.
And they found that claim to be true.
And they said metazolam prescriptions Used outside of hospitals in England were an average of 15,000 every month over the past five years, but in April of 2020, there were 38,582 prescriptions of midazolam written out, and that is over two-fold greater than February figures.
They go on to say the drug diazepam, also known as Valium, Much stronger, they're describing what midazolam is.
According to the Mayo Clinic, midazolam injection is used to produce sleepiness or drowniness and relieve anxiety before surgery of certain procedures.
When midazolam is used before surgery, the patient will not remember some of the details of the procedure.
Midazolam injection is also used to produce loss of consciousness.
Before and during surgery.
So that may be the reason that they give it to, that it's in the lethal injections, which I'm not sure I'm taking your word on that.
But anyway, it is a curious thing, and fact-checking by possible fact-checkers has actually confirmed your Very interestingly, when I engage with my families, I'm finding that the vast majority of them didn't actually go into hospital with COVID. They went in with minor things, totally unrelated, and then caught COVID in the hospital environment.
Now, the way they determine that is using, obviously, as you'll be aware, the PCR tests, and they're running those on 45 cycles, and the guy that invented these tests.
Of course, it's Gary Mullis, who died before the pandemic, who won the Nobel Prize for creating the test, and he said that it was not useful for detecting illness.
It was useful for detecting the degree or artifacts of illness that could Occur in millions of people, many of whom, or most of whom, have never gotten ill.
And Tony Fauci himself has said that the test is worthless when you use it in 45 cycles, and it's really odd.
They allowed, and the WHO encouraged, and the public health agencies in Britain, the United States, and Western democracies, It encouraged the use of PCR tests at amplification levels that everybody agreed were worthless.
A couple of months ago, CDC acknowledged that the PCR test, even when using at lower amplitudes, was incapable of distinguishing between flu infections and COVID infections.
So there are a lot of unanswered questions about the use of the PCR. There are a lot of things that...
Well, you kind of have to wonder what clinical basis did they put people on palliative care?
If they discredit these PCR tests, and I'm aware, fully aware, having listened to the testimony of many a nurse and many a doctor that reached out to me, people were put on palliative care, end-of-life care, based on the PCR tests that they've now openly discredited.
Except that I... I mean, I would have to say, when you're in a hospital and you can't breathe, they're going to put you on a ventilator.
And they were told very early on in our country that remdesivir was effective as an antiviral.
And so they put them on remdesivir, which is a deadly drug.
Yeah, of course, of kidney failure and death.
Right.
I don't think that the doctors...
In our country, in England, who were the frontline doctors who were treating these patients, I think it's incredible to believe that they were not seeing something that was very, very unusual in these patients.
Yeah, I would agree.
Yeah, I would agree.
My feeling is, though, that a vast number of these patients were killed by medical neglect and malpractice.
I have a large number of people coming to me who are only presenting at stage four because nobody is seeing them.
Nobody is seeing them, but they're presenting to a GP early.
They're refusing to see them.
They're prescribing Gaviscon for 18 months.
They're making appointments for scans that GPs are constantly cancelled.
GPs are sitting in their front rooms at home working from home remotely on twice the money so the situation suits them very well.
It's a battle being fought on many fronts but I'm seeing a general medical neglect and this has been confirmed to me by a number of medical professionals some of them still working.
To give you an idea I have a lady reach out to me a Ghanaian lady called Michelle.
She's a nurse who was working as an agency nurse.
So she's been in a number of different hospital environments up and down the country.
She's got 29 years of service.
And she told me that they were taken in in one hospital she worked in.
They were taking people in.
They were giving them a chest X-ray.
And then based on the chest X-ray alone, they were put in on end of life care.
There was automatic DNRs on everyone, do not resuscitate, without any consent at all, no informed consent on any of them.
A number of the families that have come and seen me have confirmed this, and they saw it on the end of the bed on the clipboards, and they questioned it and then retracted it.
So it's been a concerted effort, I feel, to generate a lot of deaths, and those deaths have led to the hysteria that's promoted a life-saving injection.
I'm now seeing a large number of people coming into me, an unnaturally large number of people having suffered a thrombosis heart attack or thrombosis stroke or interestingly organ failure.
I've lost count of the amount of people, 28 year olds, 32 year olds, 33 year olds, 40 year olds, people that just Wouldn't normally be dying.
You know, in 15 years as a funeral director, this is really an unusual pattern, enough for me to be concerned.
And very interestingly, I went out of my area to a hospital called Stoke Mandeville Hospital, and they're over in Buckinghamshire.
They're a centre of expertise in Burns and spinal injury.
And now and again, I do go there once in a blue moon.
I hadn't been there for a long time.
And I know the staff in there.
And I had a really interesting conversation.
So I kind of said, guys, are you seeing a greater number of thrombosis?
And the mortician said openly, yes, there are loads of them.
And the injections, they're turning their, this was her words, it turns their blood to glue.
I said, well, why haven't you said anything?
She said, we have told them.
They're not raising the alarm up.
Why would you not raise the alarm?
Why would you not want to talk about that and let everyone know so that people will stop taking it?
And they shrug their shoulders and that's it.
It seems to me as though, and certainly from the professionals that I've spoken to who have reached out to me, They're being told not to say anything.
They're being warned.
And then if they carry on, they'll get rid of them and they will strike them off as well, you know, if they're too vocal.
And as in the case, for example, of Dr Sam White, you know, you'll be well aware of his case and his position.
It beggars belief.
You know, this is a big hospital and a big mortuary.
And they confirmed what I've said openly to me.
And she actually laughed and said, well, it keeps us in work.
I really don't think that's funny.
I don't think it's something to joke about or laugh about.
And here we have a big mortuary in a hospital in England confirming these injections are turning people's blood into glue.
And that's what's given them the thrombosis.
I'm getting a number of people come into me where they've been cut.
By the coroner from ankle to hip, where he's searching the ephemeral artery, the arteries in the leg for these thrombosis.
And it's ever-growing numbers.
I spoke to a nurse who had 12 patients on her ward with blood clots in their arms.
That's unheard of, you know?
A blood clot used to be an extremely rare occurrence, do you know?
And they're every week now.
In fact, very interestingly, when a paramedic attends the scene of a collapse now, They asked key questions, like triage questions, when they arrive on scene.
One of the questions is, are you a vaccine recipient?
Because that is obviously relevant to their diagnosis and what they do next.
You know, something really terrible is happening here, and loads of people are aware, nobody's being listened to.
And people say, oh, you know, you're an anti-vaxxer.
I'm far from an anti-vaxxer.
I've had all of the vaccines over my lifetime, with the exception of this one, because I see the damage that it is doing.
And you have to ask yourself, you know, 12-year-old children now, they're vaccinated in schools in England.
These are children who can't buy a beer.
They can't get married.
They can't get a job.
They can't have sex.
They can't legally give consent, yet they're being coerced behind their parents' backs.
Why?
Why is that?
Do you know how many children I've had in my care in the last 20 months have died from COVID? None.
Not a single one.
But now, up and down the country, I'm hearing of child deaths.
Those are the cardio information.
And also, I was called to a meeting with a guy called Sir Graham Brady on the 21st of September.
Now, Sir Graham is a commissioner of the 1922 committee.
You'll probably be aware of him.
He's a very senior Tory politician.
I attended this meeting, it was at two o'clock in number one birdcage walk in Westminster.
Very, very posh, lovely setting, big boardroom.
I sat at the table with 12 or 14 other scientists and legal minds, and there was at least six or eight via a Zoom call.
And to give you an idea of the caliber of people there, there was people like Dolores Cahill, who was advising the British government in her 20s.
She's run level 3 bio labs.
She's worked in level 4.
She's really at the top of her game.
And you'll be well aware of Dolores.
Tess Laurie was there.
Stephen Frost was there.
Dr Sam White.
There were loads of people.
Sukharit Bhakti was there.
And we were all asked for our testimony by Sir Graham in our respective fields.
We introduced ourselves, we gave him that testimony and he barely blinked.
It was quite apparent to everyone in the room, he was well aware.
We were only telling him what he already knew and it was actually felt that he probably gave us audience to see what we knew and perhaps report back.
Because he was told, I mean, the science was wads of A4. They were slapping down on the, and here's the science, you know.
It wasn't just unverified claims.
And it was widely reported in the Times and the Guardian that it was a group of anti-vaxxers.
Dolores Cahill built her career on vaccines.
She's not an anti-vaxxer, you know.
This guy knew.
He knew.
He wasn't.
Same with Tess Story.
A veteran advisor at WHL. Exactly that.
One of the world's leading pharmaceutical clinical trials and she's Pro-pharma girl.
Yes, yeah, definitely.
I just want to be careful about what we know and what we do.
Yeah, of course.
I fully understand.
Fully understand.
So now I'm hearing of children dying up and down the country, not in great numbers, thankfully, and I haven't had any in my care, but I've spoke to a number of people who have confirmed these deaths, including classmates, parents that have rung me up and reached out to me.
Yeah, I mean, there's actually an article...
In children's health events this week, one of the key metrics that the CDC committee and the FDA committee are required to look at before they approve a vaccine is called number needed to vaccinate.
In other words, how many people do you need to vaccinate to avert one death from the disease?
And with the Based upon Pfizer's clinical trials, they were able to save one life from COVID and 22,000 people, but those were all adults.
The number needed to vaccinate, you need to vaccinate 22,000 people to save one life, according to Pfizer's own data.
And by the way, there were five heart attacks in the vaccine group, deadly heart, you know, mortal heart attacks, and only one placebo group.
For every one person they saved, Yeah, and what basis are these decisions being made on?
I would suggest money, but some people are terribly wrong.
I'll tell you what people need to understand.
What I think is driving this is that in the United States, and I don't know if this is true in Britain, a vaccine gets immunity from liability, but only if it's emergency use Authorization is immune from liability under what we have in the PREP Act or the CARES Act in our country.
But once you approve that vaccine for adults, it is no longer an approved vaccine that is automatically immune from liability.
The only way to get that immunity legally is to get it recommended for children.
And then it becomes, then it gets liability not just for For children, but for adults.
And that's what I think is motivating the push in the United States for children because it's the only way that they can get it protected.
And the one vaccine in the United States that's now approved is the Comrade vaccine, the Pfizer vaccine.
Pfizer will not sell any of that in the United States until it's shielded from liability.
So they're waiting for it to get recommended for children, and then they can sell it to adults and get protection.
I believe that that is the reason that there's this insane push to mandate this for kids, even though children will get no benefit out of it and huge costs.
Dr.
Joseph Looney, thank you so much for joining us today.
You're most welcome.
God bless you.
Take care.
Thank you for your courage, because I know that you are taking a big beating for talking in the way that you're talking.
I am, but I'd be honest with you, I'd be more concerned if I didn't speak out, because I will go down in history as a man who was honest and was on the side of good.
I refuse to be complicit with this darkness that has taken us all globally.
Thank you very much.
▲
Export Selection