Dr. Michael Kirk Moore’s legal battle exposes how Utah prosecutors weaponized fraud charges against him for offering saline placebos and fake COVID-19 cards, despite no patient coercion—yet he faced 20 years in prison while eBay sellers of similar cards escaped penalties. Moore, a surgeon who treated patients with the Zelenko protocol (hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin) with zero deaths, argues vaccines lack long-term safety data and were rushed via Operation Warp Speed’s military-backed contracts, potentially worth billions. His 2023 FBI raid, two jail stints, and DOJ prosecution—including a January 2021 trial date timed to preempt Trump’s return—reveal a pattern of silencing dissenting doctors, with Utah AG Pam Bondi dismissing charges only after national pressure from Marjorie Taylor Greene. The case underscores how vaccine mandates, backed by compromised journals and redacted DOD-pharma deals, prioritize compliance over evidence, leaving physicians like Moore as the sole defenders of patient autonomy. [Automatically generated summary]
I just want to say that this is not going to be an objective interview.
I want to thank you for everything you've done and I want to hear a story, but I want to begin with a statement from the president just out now.
This is Donald J. Trump on Truth Social, and I'm quoting, it is very important that the drug companies justify the success of their various COVID drugs.
Many people think they're a miracle that saved millions of lives.
Others disagree.
With the CDC now being ripped apart over this question, I want the answer and I want it now in all caps.
I've been shown information from Pfizer and others that is extraordinary, but they never seem to show those results to the public.
Why not?
They go off the next hunt and let everyone rip themselves apart, including Bobby Kennedy Jr. and the CDC, trying to figure out the success or failure of the drug company's COVID work.
They show me great numbers and results, but they don't seem to be showing them to many others.
And I want them to show them now to CDC and the public and clear up this mess one way or the other.
I hope that Operation Warp Speed was brilliant, as many say it was.
If not, we all want to know about it and why.
Thank you for your attention to this very important matter, President of DJT.
Being physicians practicing, but not all physicians practicing.
We talked about this earlier, you know, where a very small percentage of us actually quote unquote know.
Okay.
Yes.
And but to hear that coming from him, where he may actually be questioning the Operation Warp Speed numbers that were put behind him and that were given to him before is a really, really interesting twist.
It's pretty unbelievable that he has to send something like this out, considering that companies like Pfizer and Moderna and their executives are all billionaires because of federal tax dollars.
So like this, these are not really, I mean, they're publicly traded companies, but they're not in some kind of private sector business.
They are government contractors.
We're forced to take their products.
We have no recourse if those products hurt us because they have full immunity.
And so they're getting rich from our tax dollars, but we don't get to see the numbers.
Like maybe someone should go to jail like right away.
Oh, and Donald Trump has called him out saying, hey, this is my best friend or not best friend, but this is a really good friend of mine, you know, Borla and, you know, and kind of praised what they've done.
And that's, that's, like I said, that is the first time that I've heard him maybe somewhat question the effectiveness or, you know, what actually was behind Operation Warp Speed.
You know, Operation Warp Speed was a DOD operation.
It was run by a general, okay, General Perna.
And, you know, there's a lot of evidence out there and Sasha Latipova and Catherine Watt and a lot of people have put out information that essentially the DOD is who developed these jabs, these COVID vaccines.
And then they in turn asked Pfizer and Moderna to slap their label on it for money and then distribute them because it was a military operation in terms of this whole What's the U.S. military doing in my healthcare?
look, there's all kinds of agencies that are out there and they have all these acronyms, ASPR, BARDA, DARPA.
I couldn't begin to tell you what they stand for, but it's crazy how much, it was a change in biological warfare.
When we back, I think I want to say in the 70s, when chasing or biological warfare became a crime and we said we were going to get rid of everything that we do and all of these biological weapons and all of these things here that we could use to kill people with clouds of germs.
And, but what happened is just like, just like the scientists from Operation Paperclip went to the tobacco industry.
Okay.
And then from the tobacco industry to the food industry, the scientists that went from these biological weapons development programs went to essentially a, an umbrella organization that was used to combat biological warfare.
So they used it under the auspices of we are going to develop these things as an antidote or as a treatment for the potential bioweapons that somebody else is going to use.
So the PREP Act in 2005 further extended that, that when they declare a state of emergency, then everybody, there's no, there's no liability.
So now everything done under EUA has no liability.
And as a matter of fact, the law even says that our judicial branch can't even review that law.
So how is that constitutional and how has that not been challenged?
We're talking 20 years here where we had a legislative body in 2005 and signed by the president, George Bush at the time, that basically said that anything that's passed under emergency use authorization has no liability and the judicial branch of our government can't review it.
It is a company with one mission, improving your sleep.
And it's changing the way people do that, the way they get a good night's rest.
We just got word that their team is launching a new product.
It's called the Pod 5.
It's an original and innovative mattress cover plus a blanket that uses precision temperature control to regulate your body's sleep cycles and give you the perfect sleep, which really, really matters.
It can range all the way from 55 degrees to 110 degrees, meaning that you're covered no matter what.
It's like an electric blanket to the next level, but also a cooling blanket.
So it makes you sleep better.
Temperature has a massive effect on the way you sleep.
By the way, it also detects snoring.
And then it adjusts your bed position to reduce or completely stop it.
So there are a lot of ladies in America who are going to be grateful for this product.
Everybody who works here will tell you, because they all use it, that there's no better way to be alert, productive, and happy than by sleeping well.
And 8 sleep really does help.
Visit 8sleep.com slash Tucker.
Use the code Tucker to get 350 bucks off your Pod5 Ultra.
If you don't like it, you return it within a month.
That won't happen.
We think you'll love it, but you can if you want.
8Sleep.com/slash Tucker.
So there are all of us U.S. citizens, the little worker bees who keep the thing going.
And then there are our leaders, but then above even our leaders, above the Supreme Court of the United States, sits the vaccine industry.
And they're like the gods.
They're Zeus and Jupiter.
Right.
And there's literally nothing we can weaken to them.
I actually listen to podcasts, probably listen to a lot of your shows.
You know, 2020, I was probably listening to a lot of Dan Bongino.
And, you know, and I also follow a guy that I used to do a lot of options trading with, and he used to trade his options based upon current world events.
And so he was talking about the whole COVID thing.
So all through January, February, and early March, you know, he's doing trades and he's talking about, you know, all of this stuff that was happening with COVID and all of the people that were killing over in China and all the lockdowns that were happening and how it expanded into Italy and now it was into Spain and all this stuff.
And I had, I'm busy.
Okay.
And so I don't have a lot of time to do a lot of my own research and look into all of this stuff.
I mean, I'm conservative by nature anyway.
I mean, I'm, you know, Republican, probably more libertarian than I am Republican.
But I, you know, I had no reason to doubt what was going on.
So on March 17th, Tuesday afternoon, I get home.
I must have seen something on the TV.
We'd already had some lockdowns in some of the states in this country.
We'd already had Italy had gone into complete lockdown in Spain.
And so at that point, again, without knowing anything anymore, I called my office manager and I said, hey, we're not going to, we're going to cancel all surgeries.
We're going to close the doors.
I can't risk getting sick, bringing it home to my kids.
And so let's just have somebody just have one person in the office.
Let's lock the doors, have one person there answering the phones.
I got online and started reading about viruses and refreshing myself on microbiology and going back to kind of basic, what I felt was basic science and trying to understand, hey, how do these things work?
How does it, you know, how does an epidemic happen?
How does a pandemic happen?
You know, and then you realize that they changed the definition of pandemic some time before that so that it would apply.
I realized that at the time that they declared, it wasn't the pandemic yet, but they declared some sort of kind of international emergency in like in the middle of January.
And then the WHO declared their fake P-H-E-I-C pandemic, okay, the public health emergency of international concern.
So then I started going, okay, well, what can I do about it?
So I knew it was a lie, but what can I do about it?
And the first huge flag to me was when we were told that as physicians, there's no treatment.
You can't treat this.
Well, last I'd heard COVID is a flu-like illness.
Nausea, malaise, fever, chills, loss of taste and smell, which happened in the flu anyway.
Nothing was, you know, nothing was pathognemonic, which means nothing was directly attributed only to this one disease.
And so what did we used to do for the flu?
Treat them symptomatically.
Give them, I, you know, give them something for their fever, give them something for their flu symptoms, give them something for the sinus infection, give them something for whatever it is that, you know, whatever their problems were.
If they're having diarrhea, then you give them something to help with their diarrhea, whatever their symptoms were, you would treat those symptoms.
Well, why weren't we treating those symptoms?
We just weren't.
It was like, all of a sudden, there's no treatment.
So I did that in order to supplement my income, but it also gave me a lot of experience.
And it gave me, you know, a lot more primary care experience than what we typically would have gotten out of, you know, another surgery resident or plastic surgery resident.
So I just fell back on my experience.
And, but again, I hated microbiology in medical school.
Okay.
Just I despised it, didn't like it looking at, you know, bugs in a microscope and reading.
And so I always relied on the pathologist to say, hey, this is your lab test.
This is what we grew out of your microbiology sample.
And then this is what it's sensitive to.
And so I go, okay, well, you need that antibiotic.
That was my microbiology experience through practice.
Okay.
But I had to go back and review all that stuff.
So I, so I did.
And I just, I got online because nothing was online back then when I was in school, but I was just able to get back on there and read articles and read journal articles and get on.
I was pulling things from libraries, you know, because I have privileges at a hospital or I did then.
I don't anymore, but I did then.
So I had access to their library.
So I would, I would send them, hey, I want to see this article.
Give me the, because I would read the abstract online.
I'll go, I want to read this article.
So they would send me the article and I'd usually get it within 12 to 24 hours.
And so that's what I was doing.
I mean, I did that throughout this whole time.
And I realized that there were a lot of, you know, a lot of discrepancies, let's say, and a lot of lies that I was getting out of Fauci and Burks and all the people that were, you know, that were talking about it.
Every once in a while, you would hear something, you know, like a little bleep from Scott Atlas or Paul Alexander, who was in the White House at that time, who were kind of like, you know, like they're on our side, I guess.
where they would say, hey, this really isn't what's happening.
So, I mean, I use the analogy a lot with what they told us about COVID with what I had a lot of experience with at that time, and that was breast cancer.
So the analogy to me about no treatment for this disease was analogous to somebody coming to me as a plastic surgeon, as breast cancer surgeon saying, hey, you have a lady here who's got a small little nodule on her breast that we've either seen on mammogram or we've felt through a physical exam, but we're not going to do anything about that until it's a big fungating wound and it's eroded through her skin.
And now you see and you can feel lymph nodes in her groin and we can do a CT scan and see, you know, that she's got metastases to her brain and to her, you know, to her lungs.
That was the analogy that I was using in explaining this to people when we're telling people that there's no treatment for it.
But anyway, but why didn't, I mean, that's so I got kicked off of Facebook.
I got kicked off of Twitter.
I was, you know, posting articles of things that I was reading that at the time I could find.
I've since gone back and without going back through the Wayback Machine, it's not there.
So they've taken things, they've just completely whitewashed a lot of this stuff.
And they were doing that.
They were shutting us down.
All these docs out there, Vladimir Zelenko, who passed away from a, you know, a pulmonary angiosarcoma, but, you know, he was one of the first people that I listened to.
He's the one that sent that video to Donald Trump.
He's the one I believe that Donald Trump saw the video of and came out and spoke in favor of hydroxychloroquine.
And then right after that, Fauci, the little gnome, gets up there and goes, oh, this is just anecdotal and hydroxychloroquine doesn't work.
Do you know that he wrote an article back in 2007, 2008, espousing the benefits of using hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in the treatment of SARS?
Okay.
And SARS-1, which is the disease in the early 2000s, has a 73% homology with SARS-2, the virus that they claim that is out there right now.
So 73%.
They actually did a study back in 2020 and they took a number of people.
I want to say it wasn't a very large number.
It might have only been 10 people, but they had 10 people, then they checked their serology.
They checked their blood for antibodies to SARS-1.
And they found out that all 10 of those people also had immunity to SARS-2.
Okay.
There was an article that was published out there.
I can't find it anymore.
But they checked their blood and they checked antibodies and they checked to see whether in a lab test, obviously, okay, they didn't infect these people or find the virus, but they checked it against a blood sample with somebody or a blood sample of the COVID disease and they found that they killed the COVID disease, all 10 of them.
So if you survived SARS-1, okay, and you had antibodies to it, which I'm sure it was circulating widely, okay, and it's a reason why not a lot of people died.
They had, they had immunity to SARS-2, but they didn't want that out there.
And that was the whole objective is they don't want that information out there.
Because if there's treatment, okay, you can't announce for you can't declare a state of emergency and get the emergency use authorization and then launch the COVID vaccine.
I mentioned before that I had three things that I saw that were red flags to me.
The first one was the treatment.
Okay.
The second one was every single country, every single government in the world was doing the exact same thing.
You and I can't agree on whether you want baked potatoes or sweet potatoes for Thanksgiving dinner.
Okay.
But yet you have 208 countries that are going to do the exact same thing when everybody was in lockstep.
Okay.
Absolute everybody is doing the same thing.
They're taking these drugs off the market.
Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are over the counter in France and they got taken off the market.
Oh, yeah.
And, you know, we got the, I was ordering hydroxychloroquine for my office.
Okay.
And for about six months, eight months, I couldn't get it.
It was gone.
Just, I couldn't order it.
I was on back order.
It was, you know, I had ordered some because I was having my patients come in and I was treating them in the office with hydroxychloroquine.
And I'm not allowed to dispense medications, but I was having them come in because they couldn't get it.
I was writing so many prescriptions for hydroxychloroquine in March, late March, early April of 2020, that the pharmacies, the Walgreens pharmacies that I used a lot of in the town that I'm in right now, they called me and they said, we don't have any more.
We can't get anymore.
I had wiped them out of all their hydroxychloroquine without just writing it from my patients, my family, my friends, and everybody else.
Cause I was just like, hey, here's Zelenko's protocol, okay?
Hydroxychloroquine, Zithromax, vitamin C, vitamin D, and zinc.
And I was just telling everybody, I just, I took exactly what he did and what he was treating because I think he treated 800 patients by that time.
And he'd only had one patient die.
And that patient had only come to him more than three weeks out from starting to, you know, from getting sick.
None of his patients had died.
None of my patients died.
Everybody that I treated, and I treated people from 2020 until 2022, 2023.
Okay.
And I'm still treating occasional patient for COVID.
I'm not sure it exists, but I treat the symptoms and I treat them all the same way.
Not one of my patients died.
Not one of them went to the hospital.
Not one of them got intubated.
Not one of them got any more sick.
As a matter of fact, I had, I can't tell you the number of times that somebody would call me and they would take a dose of ivermectin or take a dose of hydroxychloroquine.
And within hours, they were like, I can breathe.
I can feel better.
Okay.
Is it a placebo?
I don't know.
But my point is it happened over and over and over again.
I've heard that from other physicians, the small number who prescribed that protocol and had similar results.
What's interesting about what you're saying is that you believe that the treatment, specific treatments for COVID were banned by governments because they were effective.
Yeah, because if they have a treatment, then they can't and they can't announce or they can't declare a state of emergency and have an emergency use authorization.
That law requires that there is no treatment for them to then put the third flag to me was the vaccine.
Nothing's going to get back to normal until you put a needle in everybody's arm.
8.4 billion people on this earth need a needle in their arm in order to survive and to be a member and contributing member of society.
I remember very early in 2020, there was a study out of China that showed that heavy cigarette smokers had a lower mortality rate, which was like kind of unforgettable.
I mean, what?
This is a respiratory illness and smokers are doing better than not.
Like, what is that?
And the conclusion that they reached was that nicotine has some kind of prophylactic effect.
I never followed up.
But I did notice that the European Union almost immediately banned online sales of nicotine pouches.
But I get this huge patch of shingles that hurt like hell.
And, you know, so I just, I refused any other vaccine.
And, but I, at the time, we're talking, you know, 1989, nobody's chasing me.
Now you see people that are kind of like, you know, you see the military, you know, you see here stories.
I just heard a story the other day of a guy who was in the army, ROTC, did nothing but want to be in the army for his whole life.
And he joined the army and he was kicked out of the army because he was standing there with his CO with paperwork that said, if you don't get this vaccine and we have to fire you or kick you out of the army, you are going to owe all this money back or you can take this needle.
So anyway, but because he's so into the army and really liked him, he actually ended up joining again.
But my point being is, what a nice guy.
It's, yeah, I mean, certainly nicer than me.
But, but yeah, but that's the, you know, that, that was the, that, that was the mentality back then where it was just kind of like, okay, you don't want it.
You don't have to have it.
We're just trying to do it for your best interest, you know, but there was no coercion.
There's no, nobody's forcing me to do anything.
You know, flip that around, okay, where, you know, the first person that I see is Bill Gates saying that, well, nothing's going to be back to normal unless you get a needle in your arm.
So well, so that's like kind of the irony here is that we were told, you know, for several years to trust the science and to listen to people who actually practice medicine.
And you're a man of science and you practice medicine.
You're a surgeon.
So I would think that your opinion would have more weight than Bill Gates, who's like some autistic rich guy who is really close to Jeffrey Epstein.
Cozy Earth's pants and joggers are perfect when it starts to get chilly out to wear them at home, running, indoors, outdoors, even to work or on flights.
And best of all, they are comfortable, really comfortable.
We didn't know joggers could feel this way.
We didn't know what joggers were.
But Cozy Earth taught us and redefines how you will lounge and live.
The feel stays consistent no matter where you go.
They're lightweight, breathable, flexible, yet still polished enough to wear out.
Take our words of fashion icon for it.
The everywhere pants move with you and keep you looking good.
It's the perfect balance between comfort and function.
Everyone on our staff who wears them agrees they like it.
Visit cozyearth.com.
Use the code Tucker for up to 40% off joggers, pants, shirts, everything.
You get a post-purchase survey.
If you get it, tell them how you heard about Cozy Earth on this show.
Well, and not only that, but why not even more credence than, and I'm not saying that I have any more, you know, I mean, I'm no more of an expert than anybody else is from the standpoint of being a doctor.
Okay.
But why are some doctors being shut off in some areas?
Well, if that's you know, look, Anthony Fauci never took care of a patient in his life.
I mean, she did some stuff in the military, but I think she was all kind of all administrative, never took care of patients.
And so all of a sudden, we're supposed to trust these people that never been on the front lines, never took care of patients, have never seen an illness, are just looking at it from the standpoint of reading a book or reading an article or listening to some podcast or listening to some, you know, going to some meetings or something like that.
Okay.
And we're, and all of a sudden, these are, you know, that they, you know, kind of like the media proclaimed experts in all this.
I'll tell you, before 2020, I'd been in practice exactly 19 years.
Okay.
I graduated from, I graduated, well, so let's count medical school.
I graduated from medical school in 1993.
All right.
And then from 1993 to 2020, I had been to the CDC website to ask them advice on what I needed to do for my practice exactly zero times.
Okay.
Zero.
There's never any reason for anybody, at least my perspective, to go to the CDC.
I'm reading articles.
I'm listening to my colleagues.
I'm talking, you know, I go to meetings.
I, you know, I kind of review cases with some of my friends and some of my colleagues about certain things, but I've never, never gone to the CDC.
Well, and you mentioned, boy, you just made me think about something and now I can't think about it.
I can't remember what I was.
Because you're making the very first, one of the very first articles that was even put out on the CDC website about COVID, okay, about COVID, said that of all the people that had supposedly died of COVID, okay, only 6% of them did not have a comorbidity, meaning that only 6% of the people that they claimed had died from COVID actually died just with COVID.
Well, so for me, the vaccine was fine because I was just telling all my patients, all my friends, all my family, just like I was doing from previous vaccines.
So my daughter was only partially vaccinated.
My son was not.
I've only had one vaccine in the last 20 years, and that was a yellow fever shot so that I can go on a humanitarian trip to go to Ghana.
That was it.
I tried to bribe the nurse to not give it to me and squirt it in the garbage, and she wouldn't do it.
But I figured, hey, one shot, maybe, okay, I'll be all right.
I think I am.
Some people argue.
But when it came out, I was just, you know, I'm just telling everybody, don't take it.
It's not worth it.
You know, we've been trying to try to, we've been trying to find a vaccine for cancer for 100 years.
We've been trying to find a vaccine for AIDS for the last 40.
And now all of a sudden we're going to find the vaccine for the common cold virus in less than nine months that's been with us since the dawn of time.
No.
So I was just really happy just to tell everybody, don't, you know, don't take it.
It's not worth it.
It's too risky.
It's experimental.
Just stay away from it.
And I thought we were going to be just fine.
And nobody wanted to give Donald Trump credit for the vaccine prior to the election.
I'm sure you remember that.
I do.
And then as soon as Biden gets elected, they're like, I'll never take that vaccine.
Biden, Kamala Harris are like, oh, that's the Trump vaccine.
No way.
I'm not going to touch it.
January 20th of 2020 comes around all of a sudden.
Oh, it's, you know, everybody should get it.
It's the greatest thing, you know, and all that.
And then, and then when they found out that people were not, did not want it, they started forcing it.
And they started talking about, well, it's free.
You should get it.
You see, get your free donut, get your free happy meal.
You know, all of this stuff that was out there trying to just convince people to get it.
California is trying to pass laws so that 13-year-old kids could get it without their parents' permission.
I mean, there was a case in Virginia, I believe, where a 13-year-old kid or 16-year-old kid actually told the doctor that he didn't want it.
The doctor gave it to him anyway.
And they ended up filing a lawsuit.
And I think they lost that lawsuit, actually.
The family won the lawsuit, let's say.
The doctor did lose that lawsuit.
But, you know, that's, you know, but I was okay.
I'm just telling everybody, don't do it.
Then the mandates happen.
You're not going to be able to go to school without a shot.
You're not going to be able to have a job without a shot.
You're not going to be able to travel without a shot.
So people whose job depended on them traveling, you're not going to be able to stay in the military without getting your COVID shot.
And the worst case to me was people that were mandated to get a potentially dangerous.
Well, I already knew it was dangerous.
I'd already met a number of people that had already been vaccine injured.
Actually, physicians are actually required to report complications.
It's a law.
You're required to do that.
They'll get around it because they'll say, well, I didn't really think that it was because the vaccine.
I mean, we didn't really know, so I didn't report it.
But there were 700 reported cases.
There was a Harvard study done in 2010, 2014, something like that, that said that the VARES reports under, the VARES, you know, VARES underreports things by at least 1% to 10%.
Okay.
So that means we could have had in the month of January, we could have had 7,000 deaths or 70,000 deaths at a 1% rate.
And there's over 40,000 that are not over maybe.
I think we're right at 40,000 now dead that have been reported since January of 21.
Okay.
So that means we either have 400,000 or 4 million deaths.
Okay.
According just according to those numbers, um, but again, so the mandates come out, and I said that the last straw for me, not straw, but I mean, the last thing was when they were requiring people to get a transplant.
If you want a transplant, you need a kidney transplant in order to survive.
And you unfold it and it says intentionally left blank on the front and back.
And so you have doctors that are taking that vial that's in the same box, reconstituting it, and then injecting it into people's arms.
What did you just inject?
What did you just give them?
How do you know that it's safe?
Where's the information?
Where's the data?
Because we're talking 2021, right?
There is no science, no data.
Nothing has been published, and nothing was going to get published until Aaron Siri filed that FOIA request and that lawsuit, and the government required it to be published over the course of the next nine months.
So none of this information was even available until 2022.
And now, you know, nine months later, a year later, okay, we're injecting it into 844, 8.4 billion people on this earth when it's not ready for human use.
And yet we've transitioned to giving it to every human because Anthony Fauci says that the science is settled and that he is Mr. Science.
Truly thought that this was just a decision between my patients.
They were giving me a product to use that they want me to use, but I chose not to use it because I didn't think that the science supported it.
And my patients were coming to me and agreed with my assessment.
And therefore, they, you know, they gave them full informed consent.
And I would show them the sheet, the piece of paper says intentionally left blank.
Do you want me to inject this into your body?
Okay.
And anybody who's got any common sense is going to say no.
All right.
And that's exactly right.
So you come to me as a patient and you say, Hey, I have questions about this vaccine.
Should I take it?
Okay.
And I give you my opinion, my professional opinion is all of the animals that they treated mRNA products with lipid nanoparticles died.
They said that it wasn't ready for human use.
Nine months later, saying now it's ready for human use in spite of the fact that we don't have any human studies in between this and we don't know what the studies are that they have done.
And here's your product data sheet that says it's intentionally left blank.
Would you like me to inject this into your arm?
Anybody with common sense is going to say no, thank you.
And so I didn't.
And I truly thought that I was taking care of my patient.
Full informed consent.
I'm abiding by my Hippocratic oath because, like, we just talked about this.
We already knew that a lot of people had died.
Okay.
You knew somebody personally in January 21 that, you know, killed over dead.
I didn't know anybody personally at that time.
I knew some people that had been injured from it.
I did not know anybody personally, but I'm looking at the numbers.
I mean, the average number of people I think that have been reported deaths reported for all vaccines combined per month was probably in the low double digits.
Okay.
Prior to January of 21.
All right.
In one month, we have 700 that are reported, 19,000 adverse events.
By April, that number was 1,700.
Okay.
And I went back to dead.
Okay.
Reported to VERES at a 1% to 10% number.
Okay.
So we're talking about 17,000 or 1.7 million people or 170,000 people.
Sorry.
So 17,000 to 170,000 by April of that, of just three months later.
And we learned that the Nazi medical program, which really was one of the worst things about Nazi Germany, was the way physicians treated patients, murdered a lot of them.
But after that, the American Medical Association made a really clear statement about the moral requirement and legal requirement for doctors to tell their patients the potential consequences of the treatment.
I have an obligation to tell you, not just the right.
I have an obligation to tell you: hey, look, this is what I think your treatment should be.
First of all, you're coming to me with these symptoms.
Okay.
And I'm telling you what I think that it is.
And then this is what I propose as a treatment.
Okay.
And this treatment has these side effects and has these potential benefits.
That's that's informed consent.
Okay.
Across the board.
And I've been doing that for years.
I mean, I can't go to surgery without informed consent.
Okay.
I have a five-page informed consent form for my surgeries, whatever surgery it is that I'm doing.
This is the risk.
This is what I've, you know, this is what I'm doing.
And this is the reasons why we're doing it.
This is what you agree to doing.
But these are the risks that are involved with that.
Okay.
I do it every single day.
And that's part of medicine.
That's part of what we were taught.
It's part of the legal side of medicine, too.
If I don't do informed consent to my patients and then they have a complication and they sue me and there's no informed consent on the chart, well, I'm screwed as you should be.
And, you know, but why aren't we, why was nobody in this case?
Nobody's given informed consent.
How do you give informed consent on something that you don't even know what's in it?
I mean, that to me is the one of the number one things.
They get another one a month later and they get another one six months later.
And that's because it's a captive audience.
That's the only reason.
How many babies are going to be IV drug abusers or go out have unprotected sex or get a blood transfusion from somebody who's infected?
And by the way, some of the pediatricians will tell you, well, mom could have had hepatitis B, and therefore you're trying to, you know, prevent the baby from getting it.
Well, mom was tested for hepatitis during her pregnancy.
So you would have known if they had hepatitis and hepatitis B. And so then you would have been able to either treat it or do something about it or maybe prophylax the baby.
Why are they allowed to practice medicine with those attitudes?
No, I'm serious.
Why doesn't the FBI raid their offices?
If they're giving infants treatment that the infant doesn't need that has potentially harmful consequences and they're doing it for money, then they're criminals.
And Ronald Reagan, I think he, there's a quote saying that it was probably one of the one, one of the one laws that he signed that he regretted signing for what it's worth.
And when they put it on the childhood vaccine schedule, they will then use that fact that it's on the schedule as an ethical moral foundation that if you don't, because they've declared it safe and effective, they will use that as a moral foundation to say you cannot withhold.
You cannot safely or ethically withhold it from tautological.
So I always say of doctors, and again, there's no, probably no group I dislike more in the world than doctors, just because I think they've really misused their authority and fallen so short.
But I always say to myself anyway, having known a lot of doctors, they're all they're all smart.
I mean, it's pretty hard to get into med school.
It's hard to go get through residency, all the rest.
But now you're convincing me that a lot of them must not be smart because that's just like basic logic right there.
You end up, you know, you kind of get into this, you get into this routine in your life where, you know, you trust the people that are coming to you and trust them that the studies that they're giving you are appropriate and that they're true and they're not fake.
And the evidence that they're showing you is, you know, is the correct evidence.
We already talked about half of the evidence, at least half of the evidence that is being published.
Look, it's a captured industry.
Okay.
The people that are making the drugs are the ones that study the drugs and then are the ones that publish the results.
Okay.
The New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association, the British Medical Journal, and the Lancet, all those top four journals from 2020 to 2022.
When you go through a peer review process and you submit your journals to them to be reviewed, to get published, those reviewers were paid $1.06 billion in three years by the pharmaceutical industry.
And that's a number that's out there that's just recently been published.
$1.06 billion was given to those people that reviewed those journal articles for publication.
They collate the data and pay the people that are reviewing it for publication in the journal that they own.
Essentially, they own.
Because the journals get money on the majority of their money that get money is on preprints or on reprints.
So the pharmaceutical companies will pay the journal X amount of money for a reprint.
And they give those reprints to then give them out to doctor's offices through their pharmaceutical representatives that go out to the offices, go walk into a pre, you know, into a pediatrician office and hand out six preprints or sorry, reprints.
And they give them these reprints that they've paid for from the pharmacy or from the journals.
And that's how these journals, the majority of their money comes from these reprints.
I just want to reorient your moral universe a little bit.
You, doctor, are the criminal.
So the mandates come.
You are registered with the state of Utah as a vaccine dispensary.
Vaccine provider provides vaccines.
Your patients come, you give them, at least you can, all the information that you have about these products.
There's not a lot, but you tell them what you know, and then you give them the option because it's their body, their choice, about whether or not to take the vax.
Where's the okay?
So, this is obviously you're serving your patients.
It's kind of like, hey, what's wrong with this contract here?
But, you know, and he was, he was good.
He just said, hey, look, Kirk, don't say anything.
Just, you know, and so we gave him my phone.
And like I said, they never got into mine.
They do have a program that can kind of get into phones, but it takes probably three or four years of the operating system in order for them to hack into it.
So my phone was still new enough to where they weren't able to get into it even up to January or July of this year.
No, you heard about that once in, was it Israel, whatever, where they actually had something in it where they could actually make the thing catch on fire?
So there was something that they did that they put in the cell phones.
I don't know if it was Apple phones or if it was Android versions or what, but they had something in there that they had supposedly put in the phones and then given them to some terrorists or something.
And they were able to kind of make the phone blow up.
You can, if you, if you lose your phone, you can get, if it's an iPhone, then you can actually get on it and you can, uh, and you say, I lost my phone.
It's permanently lost.
Um, and you can erase, you can erase everything on there.
Um, a week later, um, I learned about it in a email that I got, um, from a reputation website that published a article by heavy.com that had seen something on the DOJ that the DOJ had announced the indictment.
I never got served.
I never got paperwork.
I never got a subpoena.
I never, nope.
Um, and I, you know, I actually, uh, none of us did.
person you should hire us you should hire us to help you seriously yeah so it was a heavy.com article that was kind of regurgitating what the doj had said in their press release but no one had ever sent you the press release or informed you no what what country is this i think we still live in the united states barely yeah wow wow wow yeah by the way do you have any patients in the office when the fbi barged in uh we oh that's a good question on wednesday yeah we would have had patients in the office they must have been surprised yeah
Well, as a plastic surgery business, I typically don't have a lot of patients in there all at once.
So it's a pretty private kind of scenario.
We have one or two patients per hour that kind of come in at any given time.
Sometimes we're a lot busier, but on a Wednesday, on our consult days, it's typically pretty slow.
So I don't remember, but they're probably only-I bet they remember.
Counterfeiting because I filled out cards when I didn't put the COVID vaccine lot number and the date that it was supposedly injected and then signed it.
So this was like, there were a lot of cases like this in the 1850s where like a runaway slave would show up at somebody's house and they'd harbor the slave and they would get charged.
Right.
And there was a huge theological debate about this at the time, of course, culminating in the John Brown murders.
And I mean, there was a lot of debate.
It wasn't just John Brown, but about whether it's ethical to violate an immoral law.
And that must be a conversation you had, at least with yourself.
As a matter of fact, I, I mean, Carrie, my office manager, she would order the product.
They would, it would get delivered to the office by UPS or FedEx or whatever.
She would sign for it.
And then she told me, and I didn't know this at the time, but in order to keep anybody from actually using them, she would take them home immediately.
And then from home, she would just throw them away.
So we had, there was another employee of mine that supposedly had told the FBI in something in her interview that she didn't agree with what it was that we were doing and thought that her daughter should have gotten her COVID shot.
And so she went in there and drew one up and gave it to her herself because we weren't going to give it to her.
And that was a total lie because we never had any of the COVID vaccine in the office.
The way they found out about it is a lady was completely anti-COVID and anti-vax, told her office, told her staff, told everybody that she worked with her PR, her HR department, everybody, that she would never get the vax.
She'd rather quit, get fired, whatever.
And then one day she shows up with a card from my office.
And so then they called the Utah Health Department and said, Her office did.
And, you know, so they called the Utah Health Department and the Utah Health Department then, I guess, in turn, called the FBI.
And we found this out during the trial that the first thing that the Utah Health Department was supposed to do upon hearing that somebody was not using their COVID vaccines properly was they were supposed to shut us down.
And if they weren't going to shut us down, then they should have at least done a site review on us.
But eventually we got convinced that, you know, look, we got to start screening people.
And so that's where Chris comes in, my other co-defendant.
And so she starts screening people.
And in addition to that, we had people that were saying, Hey, you know, Kirk or Dr. Moore, you know, you're not taking any payment on this.
What can we do to help, you know, help you?
And I said, well, look, there's this organization that is trying to change the laws here in the state of Utah to prevent this from ever happening again.
And I'd been to their meetings and I was kind of doing what I could to help.
I was testifying in Congress or at our state, you know, state house and Senate committee hearings to try to get laws passed to take away the right of our health department and our county council to force mandates indefinitely on anybody.
And so we had passed some laws.
And so I knew what this organization was doing.
And so I said, look, if you have, if you want to do something, please donate to this organization.
And they said, well, how much?
I said, well, typically people are charging their insurance companies about 50 bucks for a shot.
So just donate $50 to this organization.
And I would have them put a little orange.
I don't know where I came up with an orange.
I have them put an orange in their Zell or Venmo payment or whatever HIA, who was the organization, would know what it was.
And so we did that.
And the government claimed that I did that for everybody.
So all 1,937 patients that got listed to the Utah State Immunization Information System USES were claiming that those were people that had come to my office that we had put their name on the list and said that they got a COVID shock.
So they were saying that out of that at $50 a piece, it's like $96,000 plus the $28,000 that they gave me in product was $128,000 worth of or $124,000.
I couldn't have a lower opinion of FBI agents in general, not all, but most.
But if they tell you, okay, we're going to do a sting operation on a physician who's decided as a practicing medical doctor that he doesn't want to give the COVID vaccine.
Your job is to bust him.
If you're going along with that, it's voluntary.
You don't have to do it if you don't want.
You're a low person.
Like you're a disgusting person.
Like, check yourself.
What am I?
Is this why I got into the FBI to bust doctors for not prescribing an untested vaccine?
It didn't matter that I was, um, that I'm a plastic surgeon doing house calls and I'm saving people's lives.
Okay.
And that I literally take people out of the hospital, get them off the remdesivir that they were in, give them high-dose steroids, give them ivermectin and everything else.
And now they are still alive and not six feet under.
If I add up the bills, it was somewhere between $700 and $800,000, which is not as expensive as what some other cases are, but I lost a lot of money out of my business too.
I mean, just think about the time and effort and the lack of, you know, the loss of focus.
I mean, I used to just work, right?
I mean, I just, I'd go to the office.
I'd take care of my patients.
I'd advertise.
I'd market.
I would, you know, be there for them and do everything.
I didn't have anything else.
I didn't have all this extraneous stuff that I'm thinking about.
But now I'm the only thing I'm thinking about is how do I keep myself out of jail?
How do I provide for my family?
Yeah.
So, yeah.
Oh, so you asked me before.
So, and we got off subject.
So, when that officer got caught, all the data and evidence and everything that they had in the original indictment had to be removed.
But then, what they did was, is they added another charge of destruction of government property and evidence tampering, which added another 20 years to my sentence.
They claimed that even though they gave me a product, so the ultimate Indian givers, okay, they gave me a product and that it was sitting in my freezer that they had given to me.
Um, and that until I injected it into a patient's arm, that they own that product because they gave it to me because they paid for it and they gave it to me as the custodian, I guess.
Uh, they were going to put me in jail for, yeah, if I destroyed that property, correct, they were going to, that was an additional 20 years of property, you know, of what kind of prosecutor, and you're in your late 50s by this point.
Well, they, I don't know if you heard about that one case that they had where they, there were people that were selling COVID cards on eBay.
There was a guy in Utah.
Of course, I was a guy in Utah and a guy in New York.
And between the two of them, they sold 140,000 cards on eBay that they had just printed.
They had gone to Kinko's.
I don't know if Kinko still exists, but my point, you know, they went to a printing company where they printed them at home, made COVID cards, stamped them, and were selling them for $10 a piece.
I asked people to donate to an organization that was helping pass laws in the state of Utah that I, you know, that we supported as an organization and everything else.
And yet he, you know, they never offered me a plea ever.
I would not have taken one if had they, but I, but they never even came to me.
I had it suspended for, well, on paper, suspended for two years, but they, but it was, um, uh, but so they suspended, but gave it back to me under probation.
And so I did an 18-month probation and never got in trouble.
I've never been in trouble prior to that at all.
So I got accused of, I had a trailer that was stolen from my office parking lot.
Um, and the trailer had a whole bunch of stuff in it, um, some of which I knew, some of which I didn't.
I had just moved into my office and we were moving stuff in, moving stuff out.
I came from an office that was 5,800 square feet to an office that was just under four.
So we had a lot of stuff that just didn't fit.
And so I had my sister out who's kind of helping with interior design.
And so we're moving stuff in and out.
And I didn't know what was in the trailer, what was not, and everything else.
And so I put a lot of things on the insurance claim.
And some of which I took off later, some of which I didn't.
But my staff that I had fired accused me of, you know, fraudulently making claims on my insurance.
And I didn't.
If I did, it was a mistake because I didn't know, you know, I didn't really, I truly didn't know what was on there.
I do know that there were at least, you know, there was a couple of boxes of medical charts on there.
And there was a whole bunch of medical supplies and, you know, and those kinds of things.
I was even accused of being a of being a consider of continuing my conspiracy theory because I was told that I said that my ankle monitor probably had a microphone and transmitter in it and I was covering it with a towel so people couldn't listen.
So did you ever, because I'm a few years younger than you, we're basically the same generation and went to some more high schools in the Simmoor region.
So I get, I know what your world, I mean, I know the world that you grew up in.
Did you ever think like, I'm just not going to participate?
I'm not going to do this.
Like I'm armed and come and get me, bitch.
unidentified
Well, by this time, well, no, actually by that, yeah.
So they have a rule when you get into jail at Logan, the Logan County Jail there that you have to do 48 hours.
Your first 48 hours is in solitary confinement because they want to make sure that you're not tweaking on drugs and that you're not going to freak out.
And so before you go to your regular cell block, that tweaking on drugs.
I didn't get any special treatment there either one way or the other.
Okay.
But the rule also said that it's 48 hours.
They did this to me on the Friday afternoon before Memorial Day weekend.
So my 48 hours didn't start clicking until Tuesday morning at 7 o'clock.
So I was in solitary confinement Friday night, Saturday night, Sunday night, and Monday night.
Okay.
I got out of my cell for one hour a day.
And because I was in this, you know, this whatever state, I can't remember what they called it, what the state, you know, what they do for that, that solitary confinement state for that 48 hours, but it doesn't start till then.
So then they gave me a benefit is that on Tuesday afternoon at like four o'clock, they said, okay, well, you know, we'll move you to your cell block.
And so then they moved me from there to kind of a ward, a pod with a bunch of bunk beds and 26 or 27 other, you know, cellmates in there, which was obviously a lot better because you can have some communication and talk to people.
And I had phone access and, you know, everything else.
You know, you got out of, they would bring you out of your cell to eat literally for 20 minutes and then they'd send you back in.
And then they would combine your lunch or your dinner on alternating days with your one hour of time where you could just kind of walk around in the cell block.
Just plastic trays with a plastic fork that, you know, if you put too much on your plastic fork, it would collapse because it couldn't be stiff enough for you to use it as a weapon.
You know, it was just green beans, corn, hot dogs.
I think there were a couple of times where we had a burger.
But it was, so that was my first time in jail.
My second time in jail was I got the marshal service showed up.
So following that, we had a motion to, we filed a motion to dismiss my case based upon the Chevron doctrine and how the CDC was overstepping their bounds.
I mean, that's exactly my I had almost the same exact motion was emotion, which was I laughed and giggled and was like, I thought I lived in the United States and I'm allowed to present any defense that I want to.
But no, in this case, a necessity defense was not permitted.
So that means I couldn't bring any vaccine injured patients in to talk about who decides the judge decides decided this.
So I had a magistrate judge and he was, that was Judge Bennett who threw me in jail the first time.
Okay.
And then we had this motion to dismiss.
So any dispositive motions go to your actual district judge.
Okay.
So the district judge that heard my case is, you know, is different than the magistrate judge.
And then his name is Howard Nielsen.
And so Judge Nielsen heard my motion to dismiss and heard their motion for necessity.
He denied my motion to dismiss and he and he upheld their motion for the necessity defense.
So that means I could not bring in any patients that wanted the treatment that they got and have them tell their story why they came to me.
I could not present any data or evidence in support of the reasons why I treated people the way I did.
I couldn't bring in any experts to also support all that.
So I couldn't bring in the Peter McCulloughs and the Mary Tally Bowden's and Pierre Corey's and anybody else in there to help me with my case.
And a real good friend of mine, Jim Thorpe, wouldn't, you know, none of these people.
I couldn't bring anybody in as an expert witness on my behalf.
And then I couldn't bring in any patients that had been vaccine injured.
So all the people that I know that were vaccine injured to kind of help prove my case.
So the day before we had trial, sorry, the day before we had the hearing.
So on October 18th, I sent a text message to two of my co-defendants because I knew that they were struggling with their attorneys.
They weren't, you know, communication wasn't the greatest and they didn't know about the hearing.
And so I texted them and said, hey, we have a hearing tomorrow.
It's our motion to dismiss their motion for the necessity defense.
I think you should be there with your attorneys.
Rah, rah, let's go.
Our case can go away.
You know, whatever.
Okay.
That's it.
All right.
We go to the hearing.
They are at the hearing.
I told you, you know, we lost both motions essentially.
The day after Donald Trump was elected, I had two marshals show up in my office and Perp walked me out of my office for communicating with my co-defendants about the case.
And, you know, like I said, I'm barely surviving in my practice anyway.
And with a federal indictment hanging over you, nobody wants to really have a lot to do with you.
So it's, you know, it was hard.
It's really hard.
Had to sell.
I owned a house, a summer house with a really good friend of mine and had to sell out my partnership on it that I'd owned for 17 years.
Um, and it was, you know, it was a getaway for us.
We loved it.
It was a place up in Bear Lake.
Um, and, uh, you know, I had to sell out from that.
But I, you know, the money that I got from that went, it was all gone in like three weeks.
lawyers all to lawyers or to pay off my business expenses i mean i you know i was in jail for you know 22 days i didn't get any income none um i'm not able to advertise and so i can't you know i you know all my money all my discretionary money was going towards my attorneys or fees or this or you know running my business or you know anything um and uh you know so it was um you know it was that those 22 days were really hard um i I got out the,
so here's more, here's more of an example of them coming after me.
Okay.
I told you that in May of 2023, I filed that motion kind of as a state national sovereign guy, you know, government doesn't have jurisdiction over me.
I filed the same motion as Carrie did, the exact same motion.
Todd Bouton, who is still, I'm really going to try to make a note to myself to just say his name as often as I can until he loses his job and doesn't get hired at a big white shoe law firm and rewarded for this, Todd Boughton.
The last time I told you, remember I had like four days in solitary and then I had the other eight days or so kind of in a ward where you're out and you can talk to people.
This time I was in I was in the Salt Lake County jail system.
Same sheriff's department, but they just had different rules.
And all federal employees, all federal inmates in that jail can never get below medium security.
Medium security is four hours a day out of your cell and the rest is in your cell.
And you can't go outside.
You know, you get books delivered once a month.
You get commissary that you can order online or whatever.
You have a tablet that you have access to during your four hours of out time.
But they had some sort of an electric, electric problem in the grid with control of the cells, doors and everything else that they had cut our time down to two hours a day.
So I was in my cell 22 out of 24 hours for those full 22 days.
You know, that it just didn't matter what they're going to do to me, that I'm going to fight back.
And then the second thing that it did is it made me realize how much of a scam the fucking jail system is because my first cellmate in there was an illegal, nice kid, didn't speak much English, who's only my cell for 24 hours.
But that poor guy had supposedly had two DUIs that he didn't even know about.
They never pulled him over for driving.
They just issued a DUI warrant out for him.
He didn't even know that those DUI warrants were out for him.
The third time, he did get pulled over for a DUI.
And for some reason, they felt like he was a maximum security guy.
They put him in maximum security where he was in lockdown for two and a half months.
Okay.
A guy who's 23 years old who made some mistakes driving a car once.
Don't even know about his first two cases.
They're not even cases that they, he never got pulled over.
They just, somebody said, hey, he's been drinking and that's the car that he was driving.
But they put him, how is that guy a max security risk?
Okay.
It's a scam.
These jails go around and all they do, it's a per capita count.
Okay.
And morning and night, they want to know how many people are in each ward and in each, you know, medium, moderate, I mean, you know, minimal security, medium security, and high security or max security, whatever.
And they get more money.
That's all it is.
It's just a money scam and a money grubbing operation.
That's all it is.
The day that I got released, there were 17 people in my time block.
And I think I want to say there were about two hour time blocks for get release because they get, they let you get out of your jail.
You either have to go full 1984 and just facial recognition to go to the bathroom.
Like you have to have like totalitarian control or you wind up with this where it's just people get crushed in the gears.
And no, wow, this is a really racing story.
So you get out of jail the second time.
Again, I just want to remind anyone who's made it this far in the conversation, your crime was not prescribing the COVID vaccine, not giving, administering the COVID vaccine.
And but they did all of this before Donald Trump was inaugurated because they were worried.
They actually wanted me to go to trial before the inauguration and because we were originally scheduled for to go to trial on January 15th.
So they wanted the trial to start before Trump was going to be inaugurated because they felt that Trump was going to pull a plug on this.
Well, Donald Trump gets inaugurated after the superseding indictment and he announces that weaponization workgroup that was for the January 6th people.
And then Pam Bondi comes in and she kind of puts the weaponization workgroup together and she assigns the people that are supposed to go on this committee.
It's the deputy attorney general.
It's the attorney, the assistant attorney for civil rights, the assistant attorney for legal services, and then a number of other people that are on this committee.
So as soon as they do that, we submit a packet to them to this weaponization workgroup for, because one of the things in that, it wasn't an executive order, but the announcement was that we're going to go after any of the weaponization cases of the previous administration.
And I was just like, well, we fit in this category.
I mean, they've weaponized the whole.
So we go through that.
We submit this packet.
We get an answer back.
We had to then go to the acting U.S. attorney in the state of Utah to say, ask him whether he would dismiss the case voluntarily without sending it to the weaponization workgroup.
He said, no, we're not planning on dismissing it.
So we sent that off back up to the DOJ in Washington, D.C. The Assistant Attorney General of Utah was not going to dismiss it.
So the acting attorney general, John Viddy, was not going to dismiss the case.
But again, this is a system that's built on winning.
It's not built on the justice.
It's not built on truth.
Okay.
It's built on winning.
And when they see a case that they can win, okay, then they're going to go after you.
And they really thought that they were going to win and they really wanted to win because they really wanted to show, don't fuck with us because this is what's going to happen with you.
It was, I got my email from the DOJ in D.C. or my attorney got the email probably within a few days or within a week of, and I don't know if it's just coincidence.
I don't think, you remember Ed Martin, right?
Ed Martin was nominated for the DC service court.
And one of our senators, Comer, I think, said he wouldn't vote for him.
Doctors have an inalienate right to choose the treatment they deem most effective for their own patients.
Like that's just a foundational fact of American medicine and it has to remain that.
So, and by the way, they've lectured us on that for like my entire life, 40 years.
It's between a doctor and his patients.
Okay.
All right.
All right now.
And they not only strip that right from you and from your patients, they threw you in jail twice and then try to send you away for life for exercising a foundational right.
So that's all I would need to know if I was on that working group or that committee or whatever they fucking call it.
Just like, no, this is outrageous.
And anyone who prosecuted this guy is fired immediately.
Carrie Ann Lisenby, Kristen Chevrier, gave her support.
And there were a couple of people that had run for the House, U.S. House, that were there.
So people that were pretty well known.
And they, you know, they formed a rally for us and, you know, with signs and everything supporting us.
We had jury selection for three days.
During that time, Ed Zahl, who was one of the producers for the movie, died suddenly, was there and he was documenting everything.
He was doing video and pictures and cameras.
He was writing down notes.
He was in the courthouse for all five days.
And he published an article midweek that basically accused Pam Bondi of personally prosecuting me because it's her DOJ that was letting this go and she should know better.
That article went viral, got picked up by Marjorie Taylor Greene, got picked up by Thomas Massey and Senator Lee.
unidentified
And then we had a huge members of Congress I love.
One of his speeches went viral, 1.7 million views.
And then later, and so we're by this time we're in trial.
I actually got accused of jury tampering because we reposted the links to the rallies that were happening.
The prosecutors accused us of jury tampering.
Thankfully, the judge shot them down and said, I think we still have a First Amendment in our country.
And so then trial goes through Friday.
I thought we had done a really nice job.
I mean, their witnesses were the director of the CDC COVID task force, a guy by the name of Chris Duggar.
And he called us the enemy.
The people that were vaccinated.
I think the vaccine people were the enemy.
He said that in court, that we were the enemy, that they had to, that they had to change their policies because the anti-vax people were the enemy, the enemy of the American citizens.
We had the director of BARTA, Gary Disbrow, the director of BARDA, the bio, gosh, I wish I could remember these acronyms, what it stands for.
But essentially, they were the ones that were in charge of in charge of the pharmaceutical companies getting the COVID shots and determining whether they, you know, who was going to get what and everything else and looking at quote-unquote safety and all of the stuff of these COVID vaccines and giving them the license to be able to distribute these products.
And he was the director of that.
The interesting thing was, is that he came all the way across from Washington, D.C. to testify in my case.
And there was a contract that he said that he was intimately involved in negotiating with between the Department of Defense.
Okay.
Again, this is what we mentioned earlier, the DOD and the pharmaceutical companies.
They tried to submit this contract, redacted.
We objected, and you can't submit a redacted contract.
The judge said, You're right.
Get the contract unredacted or you can't do it.
They actually got the contract unredacted, and then they decided to not present the contract.
And then it showed how involved our government was and our Department of Defense was in terms of development and manufacture and everything else of this vaccine.
And I believe that it showed that they did everything and then they just slapped the labels on it for the pharmacy.
So we will assign you an attorney for your arraignment only.
Okay.
When I showed up for my arraignment, there were exactly zero mainstream media people there.
We had a rally that day too.
We had a couple of hundred people that were out on the steps that were there supporting us and everything else because we had put out the word.
But I truly believe that even though we were told that the media was supposed to be there, they didn't want to delay it any further because they didn't want to give us the opportunity to get more media publicity to have more people there.
So they didn't want media.
That's why they were going against the necessity defense.
They didn't want us to put the COVID vaccine on trial.
They didn't want us to put all this evidence that we could have put into.
Right before trial started, the prosecution filed four more motions.
And basically, they were a motion.
So in our country, fraud requires intent.
Okay.
You have to intent, you have to intentionally defraud somebody.
You have to have the intent that you're taking money from somebody that you're telling you we're going to do something and you didn't do it or you're going to use it for some other reason.
And that was your intent.
Okay.
So they filed four more motions that the judge actually didn't deny to preclude me from, if I got on the stand, from even me talking about what my intent was.
So if I'd had to get on the stand, it's very likely that I wasn't even going to be able to tell the story that I just told you.
In other words, the judge was going to keep me from saying, well, Dr. Moore, you can't say why it was that you're doing this.
Well, so that Friday at the end of court, with all of the publicity, Marjorie Taylor Greene getting a hold of, she said, I am sending a letter right now to AG Bondi.
She's moved by a sense of justice coming from the state of Georgia with me in the state of Utah.
Okay.
Thomas Massey put out a really nice tweet about us that went viral as well.
Senator Mike Lee did.
Senator Mike Lee finally contacted Attorney General Bondi as well.
Friday, so Saturday morning, our case got dismissed.
Attorney General Bondi put out a tweet and said, you know, Dr. Moore gave his parents a choice or gave his patients a choice that the federal government did not.
I am dismissing this case on my at my direction.
This ends now.
Those three words.
And so, and then five days later, I'm in her office meeting her, MTG, and Mike Lee.
So from just to restate the timeline really quick, from the day the FBI showed up at your office, scared the hell out of your lone patient until July 17th.
I mean, that's that's the question that I struggle with every day because 99% of the people out there believe that I didn't do what was right or that I was not, that what I did was wrong.
So if you got a bunch, just a cross-section of American physicians and said, you know, knowing the evidence, does Dr. Moore deserve to be sent to jail twice, you know, with MS-13 and then do life in prison, how many do you think would agree?
So it turns out that YouTube is suppressing this show.
On one level, that's not surprising.
That's what they do.
But on another level, it's shocking with everything that's going on in the world right now, all the change taking place in our economy and our politics with the wars on the cusp of fighting right now.
Google has decided you should have less information rather than more.
And that is totally wrong.
It's immoral.
What can you do about it?
Well, we could whine about it.
That's a waste of time.
We're not in charge of Google.
Or we could find a way around it, a way that you could actually get information that is true, not intentionally deceptive.
The way to do that on YouTube, we think, is to subscribe to our channel.
Subscribe.
Hit the little bell icon to be notified when we upload and share this video.
That way you'll have a much higher chance of hearing actual news and information.