All Episodes
April 5, 2024 - The Tucker Carlson Show
01:07:37
Tucker Carlson - Ep. 89 Bryan Johnson is a very smart, very rich, very well-meaning man who wants to live forever. That sounds like a terrible idea. This is one of the most interesting debates we’ve ever had.
Participants
Main voices
b
bryan johnson
39:23
t
tucker carlson
27:01
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
tucker carlson
So it is the most basic truth of biology that the second you reach maturity, you exit adolescence and become an adult, you start dying, you degrade, and then you expire.
This is called the aging process, and you maybe first start noticing it in your 40s, long after it's already begun, because there are visible symptoms.
You get wrinkly and bald, and if you can't stay away from the pizza, you get a little fat, and that's kind of inevitable, or we've been told it's inevitable.
But a man called Brian Johnson has decided it's not necessarily inevitable.
He was a very large figure in the tech world, made a ton of dough, and then started thinking about his body and the nature of life and the future of human existence, and has become pretty famous recently for saying that he has, in a way, begun to reverse the aging process and maybe even cracked the code that limits the human lifespan.
But watch him explain.
unidentified
It's hard to believe tech millionaire Brian Johnson is 46 years old.
But no matter his chronological age, he's striving for the biological age of an 18-year-old.
His team of 30 doctors utilize all the latest tech.
The plan is rigorous.
At $2 million a year, a life like this is out of reach for almost everyone.
bryan johnson
And this is what I take on a daily basis of supplements.
It's alphabetized and we have a year's supply of everything we do.
unidentified
He calls his all-encompassing protocol Project Blueprint.
bryan johnson
Blueprint was born out of trying to fix my own problems, but then taking care of my family, my kids and my parents, my friends.
unidentified
It's generated a steady churn of shock headlines.
He once injected himself with his son's plasma.
It's part of his quest to live forever, which he believes may happen in our lifetime.
tucker carlson
Seems a little spooky.
But also interesting, and we're doing this interview because one of our smartest friends suggested, you've got to talk to this guy, Brian Johnson.
He's genuinely interesting.
And he seems to be.
He is the founder and CEO, among other companies, a company called Kernel that creates devices that can monitor brain activity.
And he joins us now on set.
Brian, great to see you.
bryan johnson
Great to see you as well.
Thanks for having me.
tucker carlson
So I've got a bunch of different questions, some practical, some philosophical.
Let's start with the practical ones.
How old are you, 46?
46. 46. You don't look it.
I will say, famously.
So how, as a practical matter, what's your regimen for slowing or reversing the aging process?
bryan johnson
What we do is we measure every organ of my body, my heart, my lungs, my liver, my pancreas, my brain, and we biologically age each organ.
So you say, how old is the heart?
So even though I'm 46, my heart is 37. My left ear is 64. My lung capacity is age 18. My cardiovascular capacity is the top 1.5% of 18-year-olds.
And so you need to know where your baseline is.
And so we've measured my entire body.
I've become the most measured person in history.
And once you have all those numbers, then you can go to therapies and say, can you slow the speed of aging?
And can you reverse the aging damage that has happened?
And that's been the project for the past three years.
tucker carlson
And you can, you think?
bryan johnson
You can, yeah.
For example, I slowed my speed of aging.
So inside your body, there's a clock with how fast you're aging.
And that clock is determined by DNA methylation.
I have reduced my speed of aging by the equivalent of 31 years.
So I now age, in a more generalized way to say it, 7.6 months for every 12 months that pass.
tucker carlson
Okay.
bryan johnson
So I get the remaining months for free, which is I've slowed down my speed of aging.
So the damage that accumulates in my body is much slower.
And so we've done this through diet and exercise and sleep and a bunch of other therapies.
But yes, we can quantifiably measure how fast my aging, what are the age of my organs, and then we can use therapy to go about it.
And so we do everything according to science and data.
This is not me offering an opinion.
This is my entire body on display for the world of what happens when you apply the world's best science into a body.
tucker carlson
So I'm assuming you quit smoking.
bryan johnson
Yeah, I never started, but you never started.
tucker carlson
Okay, good.
So that's like step one, quit smoking.
bryan johnson
Exactly right.
unidentified
Okay, fine.
tucker carlson
Just to make sure we have that on the record.
What specifically do you eat?
bryan johnson
I have three meals a day.
So breakfast is broccoli, cauliflower, black lentils, garlic, and ginger.
The next meal of the day is pea protein, pomegranate juice, macadamia nuts, walnuts, flaxseed, sunflower, lecithin.
And the final meal of the day is berries, nuts, fruits.
tucker carlson
Okay.
So pizza and Oreo is totally out.
bryan johnson
Yeah, they are not in supply at the house.
tucker carlson
So why?
Like if you could narrow down the foods that actually do reduce your lifespan and the quality of your life, what would they be?
bryan johnson
Yeah, what we tried to do with the diet is we said, if you take the frame that every calorie you put into your body has to fight for its life, what would that be?
And so we went through, we referenced all the scientific literature.
We said, what has the best evidence?
And then we put them to my body.
Then we measure.
So if a given thing is supposed to do a thing in the body, it stays.
And if it doesn't, it stays.
If not, it's out.
And so what I told you is where every calorie is precisely designed.
And these are population-level studies.
This is not just me.
This could be applicable to you as well.
And so, yeah, we are very particular about what goes into my body, and not a single calorie goes in that's not backed by science.
tucker carlson
What are the ones you definitely would not eat?
Like, period.
bryan johnson
Basically, the standard American diet.
tucker carlson
Yeah.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
tucker carlson
It's bad.
bryan johnson
It's really...
I knew it was bad.
Like, we all know it's bad.
I didn't know how bad.
Like, once you understand the biochemical processes of what happens in your body when you eat these things, it's awful.
tucker carlson
Like what?
bryan johnson
I mean, it increases your speed of aging.
Like, you've got this clock, and it's saying, how fast are you going to...
How fast until disease develops or something goes wrong?
And this clock, it will increase if you don't eat the right things.
If you eat the right things, it will slow down.
The wrong things speed it up.
tucker carlson
Let me just push you a little more on this question.
So like, what are the things you just would not put in your mouth specifically?
bryan johnson
I pizza, donuts, junk food, fast food, processed food.
tucker carlson
Pizza is number one.
bryan johnson
Yeah, I don't eat red meat.
I'm vegan, but nothing against meat, so people can add meat to their diet.
But red meat is not at the top of the things that makes the cut for science of wanting to extend life.
tucker carlson
Interesting.
How much time do you spend exercising?
bryan johnson
One hour a day.
tucker carlson
That's it?
bryan johnson
Yeah.
tucker carlson
What do you do?
bryan johnson
Cardiovascular, weights, and stretching.
tucker carlson
So would it be fair to say that someone who followed your diet and your exercise regimen...
Would have similar effects to the ones you've enjoyed?
bryan johnson
Yes.
So I've done this.
I've made my entire project open source.
It's for free for everybody.
I post my data, my recipes, my processes, my therapies.
Everything is shared with everyone.
And so tens of thousands of people around the world are doing this, and they're seeing remarkable results.
So I've tried to reduce what I do into very simple things that are affordable for everybody.
tucker carlson
Those would not include injecting yourself with your son's blood, right?
bryan johnson
That's right.
tucker carlson
Okay.
Why'd you do that?
bryan johnson
So we were looking into therapy.
So the way we approached Blueprint is we said, so humans have generated a lot of science over the past couple decades.
And we said, let's take all the science.
Let's rank them according to power laws of the best science ever done.
Let's grade the evidence.
Then we'll see what we can apply from those into my body.
And plasma infusions were one that was interesting.
And so I was looking at it myself.
And one day I was talking to my dad and he said, I need to tell you, I had this really scary situation where he's in the legal profession.
He said, I wrote a brief.
I walked away.
I came back and I saw that my words were a jumbled mess.
I was experiencing cognitive lapse and I wasn't aware of it.
He's 71. He said, I'm terrified of losing my mind.
tucker carlson
Yes.
bryan johnson
And I said, dad.
How interesting that you bring this up because right now the team and I are talking about plasma infusions and that some of the studies are looking at the effects on Alzheimer's and Parkinson's and other kinds of things like that.
And so I said, if you're interested, I'm happy to give you a liter of my plasma.
And then my 17-year-old son was there and he's like, hey, if you guys are doing it, I'm in.
Great.
We'll make this a family affair.
And so my son- Cheering the plasma.
Yeah.
So my son gave me a liter of plasma.
I gave my dad a liter of plasma.
And the data showed that in me, there was no effect.
That my biomarkers didn't change.
But in my dad, his speed of aging reduced by 25 years.
So he was aging at the rate of a 71-year-old.
And after the plasma infusion and continued for six months, it lessened to a 45-year-old.
So his clock dramatically slowed down.
tucker carlson
Interesting.
Did he feel better?
bryan johnson
He did.
And his colleagues were saying, what's up?
You're hot.
You're on fire.
What's happening?
tucker carlson
And it was plasma from his son.
bryan johnson
It was the only therapy that he did.
tucker carlson
Does it need to be a blood relative?
bryan johnson
No, it's just blood typed.
tucker carlson
Okay, so now we're getting into the theories about taking the blood of children.
bryan johnson
I mean, so this is very common.
We do organ transplants.
We all donate blood.
We've had that experience in our life.
So it's just in a slightly different frame, but it's very much a part of- Well, it's a recognizable frame.
tucker carlson
And by the way, I'm not endorsing any of this.
But there is a frame, to use your word, on the internet of super rich tech billionaires.
Living forever in the blood of children.
Not a super appealing frame, I would say.
This is that.
bryan johnson
Yeah, and we did it openly.
We made a video out of it.
We made fun of it.
We made a meme out of it.
So yeah, this is how we've done the entire project, is everything's open sourced.
It's always discussed.
We share all the data.
But yes, it definitely feeds into many of the...
There's a lot of theories about what happens behind the scenes with rich people.
tucker carlson
Yeah, and not all of them seem baseless, I guess.
bryan johnson
That's a lot of people said.
unidentified
We finally got a glimpse.
bryan johnson
So you're showing us what's happening.
tucker carlson
The tech oligarch taking the blood of children.
Interesting.
So I wonder, as I was reading about you, the effect on you and your life.
What's it like to focus on your body that much?
bryan johnson
Oh, I love it.
There's one thing about building a product.
We oftentimes think of our work as our immortality.
What we produce in our careers, our reputation, our accomplishments.
And when you think about it this way, you are the product.
You are your own best creation.
And so it's been energizing.
I've loved being consumed by it.
I think that, yeah, it's one of the happiest endeavors I've done in my life.
Really?
tucker carlson
I've taken the opposite approach, and I'm not claiming it's superior to yours, but I had my appendix swole up and burst, and I never, and I had it, of course, taken out.
I never asked, like, what the appendix is because I didn't really want to know.
I don't know what a spleen is.
Like, I've really made an effort to not focus on those things because it seems like a lot of self-focus, and it seems like a short trip from there to, say, narcissism, which is obviously death.
So are you worried about that?
bryan johnson
My observation really is philosophical.
I did this thought experiment where I was, when I was 21, I came back from Ecuador.
I had lived among extreme poverty for two years.
And I had this burning desire.
tucker carlson
You're on a Mormon mission.
bryan johnson
On a Mormon mission, yes.
And I had this burning desire to be useful to the world.
I didn't know what or how.
And so I thought, I'll make a whole bunch of money by age of 30. And then when I'm 30 years old and have a whole bunch of money, I'll decide what to do then.
And so I've been searching for this mission my entire life.
And upon doing that, I organized dinners with my smartest friends.
And I said, let's imagine we're existing in 2050. And this was 2016 at the time.
And the world is amazing.
What did we do in 2016 that would make that possible?
And then I listened very intently to everybody's responses.
And then I put them in a box.
And I made a rule that I can't do anything inside that box.
I have to do something outside that box.
And what nobody was working on was trying to solve death.
That it was always inconceivable that you could try to legitimately conquer death.
And that's what I set my side on.
tucker carlson
But what's interesting, I mean, now, and now, okay, so we're at the philosophical part of this.
And my friend who recommended this interview said, you know, he's really interesting on the practical stuff, the serum transfers and all that, but he's much more interesting on the philosophical questions.
And I think you will be.
So let me ask.
You grew up in a world, a Mormon world, that believed and taught you that it had already solved the question of death.
bryan johnson
Exactly.
tucker carlson
Through Jesus.
bryan johnson
Exactly.
tucker carlson
You no longer think that.
bryan johnson
It would be helpful if there was some evidence.
tucker carlson
Yeah.
Okay.
So you've abandoned that worldview, or at least you're agnostic, I guess, would be the word on that worldview.
Right.
Not to get too personal, but I'm just interested, because a lot of people would say, You know, religious people, Christians, would say, well, we've already solved death.
bryan johnson
Right.
tucker carlson
You know, don't need to solve that.
It's solved.
But there's also, of course, no evidence that eternal life is possible in a corporal sense, physical sense.
bryan johnson
Right.
tucker carlson
Because it's never been done.
So what gives you faith that you can do it?
unidentified
Yeah.
bryan johnson
If you look at the speed in which artificial intelligence is advancing...
We are gaining new abilities we've never had before in every domain of society.
You pair that with our ability that we now, in this moment, we can predictably design biology and the physical world, atom by atom.
You bring those things together for the first time in human history, one can say with a straight face that we may be able to go after death.
Now, I'm not saying we can.
I'm not saying it's guaranteed.
I'm saying that it is rational and reasonable and supported by where the realities are today.
And so with what I've been trying to do is to show a glimmer of hope that, because what I'm really trying to do is demonstrate age escape velocity.
That is so when one year of time passes, I remain the same biological age.
So we're never going to arrest aging altogether.
But if I, let's say I age 0.4.
And then I can reverse that.4 with therapies and stay the same age biologically.
Right now, I'm.64.
So I've already started at 1, and I'm all the way down to.64.
If we keep on inching down, it might change everything.
You know, it's one thing to have a philosophical conversation.
It's another thing to say, I can be youthful and have energy and feel great.
I think everybody wants that.
tucker carlson
100%.
Live long and prosper, for sure.
And that seems like a virtuous goal.
And what you're doing to that extent is virtuous.
I just wonder if, as someone who grew up in a religious community, if part of you, maybe deep inside, fears that when you start to say things like, we can defeat death, that you won't be smote down by the God of the universe for assuming his role.
Do you worry about that?
bryan johnson
Not in the least bit.
Never crossed my mind.
tucker carlson
You're either very brave or very foolish.
bryan johnson
Never crossed my mind.
tucker carlson
Really?
So when you say, I can defeat death, aren't you saying I'm God?
bryan johnson
I'm saying that the universe speaks in irony.
tucker carlson
That's for sure.
bryan johnson
And that the story we've told is that God created us.
And the actual story may be that we are going to create God.
tucker carlson
What kind of God?
bryan johnson
This is the question we face as a species.
I mean, right now, we have organized society around capitalism.
We strive to make money, have power and wealth.
We engage in warfare.
Everyone's angling for their best interests.
And I'm suggesting that this is not about me trying to live forever.
This is me trying to answer the most pressing question in existence.
What do we do as a species?
Now, when death is inevitable, you're going to have an answer like, well, I'm going to live fast and die young, or I'm going to conquer territories and be immortal for my quest, or I'm going to make up your meaning of life game.
But if death is not inevitable, we can extend our lifespans to some unknown horizon, the meaning-making games we have as a species all change.
tucker carlson
Of course.
bryan johnson
And that's what I'm suggesting, where this moment is that.
tucker carlson
I mean, many people through history have reached similar conclusions, but not with similar technology to affect those conclusions, or those outcomes.
But history laughs at those people, and the story of history is men addled with hubris, being humiliated.
Yes.
And so, I mean, I would say there's a great deal of evidence that you will be...
Crushed and humiliated for saying that.
And I hope that's not the case, of course.
But everyone, every other living person who's reached the conclusion that you've reached has been crushed and humiliated in the end, and we laugh at them.
So what makes you different?
bryan johnson
Yeah, I mean, I think it's likely inevitable that I will die the most ironic death.
That is guaranteed to happen.
tucker carlson
By the way, that's the message of the New Testament.
That's the Sermon on the Mount.
It's the irony book.
The first will be last.
The meek shall inherit the earth.
We agree on that.
bryan johnson
I'll get hit by a bus or I will choke taking a pill.
tucker carlson
You'll die of a broccoli OD. Yeah, exactly.
bryan johnson
It's guaranteed to happen.
So me aside, I think the- Okay, now I like you a lot.
tucker carlson
I think that's just a wonderful thing to say.
That is wisdom.
bryan johnson
It's guaranteed to happen.
And so hopefully this lives past me.
But I think if you have another, do another thought experiment with me.
Let's imagine we're hanging out in the 25th century.
We're listening to what they're saying about the early 21st century.
Now, in the same way we look at the 15th century, we compress that entire century into 10 things.
15 things.
tucker carlson
Yes, that's right.
bryan johnson
99% of what happened then is just washed away.
tucker carlson
Of course.
bryan johnson
We don't care.
tucker carlson
There's no record of it either.
bryan johnson
Exactly.
tucker carlson
Yes.
bryan johnson
And this moment, the same is going to be true.
We have more recording, of course, of our existence.
They did, but we're still going to be compressed in time.
And so 99% of what we do will be washed away.
There'll be a small fraction that actually matters to future generations.
tucker carlson
Yes.
Or they'll even know about or have any way of knowing about.
bryan johnson
Or they'll care about.
tucker carlson
Yes, that's right.
bryan johnson
So if you pose that question from the 25th century, and so that really, for me, creates this clarity of thought.
Like if you try to really clear your head of all the noise happening now, what do they say right now that we did as a species in this moment that allowed intelligence to thrive in this part of the galaxy?
And this is what I would say is this is when Homo sapiens realized.
That they reached a technological threshold where the only objective of existence was to continue to exist at the basic level.
So this is don't die.
That when we're on the eve of giving birth to superintelligence, and we have to ask all the basic questions of our existence.
Who are we?
Why do we exist?
How do we operate in society?
Do I have a job?
Do I don't?
What are the answers to these basic questions?
And what I'm suggesting is our existence is going to be compressed into one statement we can all say, which is don't die.
And don't die is the most played game by everybody on planet Earth every second of every day.
We breathe every few seconds.
We look both ways before we cross the street.
We throw out moldy food.
So don't die is played more than capitalism.
Don't die is played more than religion.
The most played game in existence.
And that's the thing we can rally behind in this moment.
tucker carlson
It's interesting, though.
I mean, the fact that you...
I think that's partly true, but the fact that you have to articulate it suggests it's not entirely true.
In other words, the way that people, human beings, differ from other animal species is not just language and the imposable thumb.
It's that humans are the only animal that kill themselves.
They need to be convinced that life is worth living.
And I wonder what you make of that.
I don't have the answer to that.
I don't know why, but that has always struck me as the main distinction between people and, say, dogs or pigs or horses or any other animal.
unidentified
Why?
tucker carlson
Or monkeys, for that matter.
Why?
Why do people kill themselves?
Why do they need to be convinced not to die?
bryan johnson
Yeah, we, I mean, in some ways, we're brilliant.
In many ways, we are idiotic and insane.
I had this problem where I would overeat every night at 7 p.m.
to deal with the stresses of the day.
I would eat too much food, junk food.
I was 60 pounds heavier than I am now.
Why did I do that?
Why did I inflict this harm upon myself every night?
And afterwards, I'd say, I'm changing tomorrow.
This is my last day.
No more.
But I did it anyways.
I just couldn't stop myself from these self-destructive behaviors.
It's such a weird thing.
And so now what I did is I... But hold on.
tucker carlson
What do you make of that?
I mean, and every person has experienced that, whether it's drinking or sex or food is very, very common in this country.
But why does that happen?
Because it kind of puts a lie to the, to use your term frame again, to the evolutionary biology frame that we use to explain human behavior.
bryan johnson
Yes.
tucker carlson
Right?
bryan johnson
Yes.
tucker carlson
Why do we act against ourselves?
And is it us acting against ourselves or is it a force outside of ourselves acting on us?
Like, so what's the answer?
bryan johnson
Agreed.
And we treat planet Earth the same way we treat our own bodies.
tucker carlson
Of course.
bryan johnson
We treat each other.
tucker carlson
But why?
bryan johnson
Exactly.
tucker carlson
I mean, I understand.
Look, evolutionary biology, common sense, explains why I might hurt you to steal your stuff.
bryan johnson
Exactly.
tucker carlson
And to make it more likely that my kids reproduce and my line continues.
I mean, it's not hard.
It's wrong, but it's understandable.
Why do I hurt myself in ways that don't bring me pleasure, that are purely destructive?
You can see why people believe in demons.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
tucker carlson
I don't think you do believe in demons, so what do you believe?
What is that?
bryan johnson
Yeah.
I mean, on this question...
There's probably many answers on why.
The solution that I've come up with is I endeavored to build an algorithm that could take better care of me than I can myself.
tucker carlson
But you still have to follow it.
You have to want to build it.
But you're alighting over, and I am too.
I don't have the answer.
I don't want to pretend that I do.
I think they're clearly demonic forces.
I think they're evil spirits that are doing this to people.
That's my view.
That's my view.
So I've kind of explained it without any evidence at all of the noticing.
But it seems to me that you have to explain it too.
Like, what is that?
How could we ever act knowingly, act against our own interests?
Where do those compulsions come from?
You say they're biological.
What does that even mean?
It doesn't mean anything.
What is the answer?
bryan johnson
I don't know the answer.
I would suggest it's a flaw.
tucker carlson
Yeah.
bryan johnson
And I would suggest that this is what...
We will solve with our technology.
tucker carlson
But it still requires the decision, which is a conscious decision, that that's a good thing that's preferable to self-destruction.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
Sometimes, though.
Think of this like Ozembic.
So let's just put a set-aside side effect profile.
Let's set aside any of those questions.
If I can take a pill that turns off my hunger, I don't have to be fat anymore, I'm in.
You know, like...
tucker carlson
Well, but if you're approaching, I mean, that's a whole separate conversation.
But if you're approaching it logically, you couldn't turn off the data of, as I think you put it, the side effect profile.
Like, what's the downside?
That's part of the calculation, is it not?
bryan johnson
Yeah.
I mean, let's assume the drug will get better, will minimize side effects in time.
But what I'm saying is, all of us understand that these self-destructive behaviors are not good.
tucker carlson
Why do we assume that?
Like, where's that moral framework come from if there's no God?
I don't get that.
bryan johnson
I mean, even the basics, like, we just feel bad in the morning.
We feel cloudy.
We feel grumpy.
We feel depressed.
We feel anxious.
And it's because we don't sleep well, and we're stressed, and we eat terrible food, and we don't exercise.
So, like, we don't do the positive things.
We know we feel great when we do it, and we do the bad things that make us feel bad continually.
So we all just know intuitively that this acts.
tucker carlson
We do.
I'm not...
Oh, of course.
And we all feel that way.
I felt that way this morning, actually, if I haven't mentioned it.
But I wonder if it's not reductionist to assume that they're all biological in cause.
And so maybe there's a spiritual component.
Maybe I'm not living my life the right way.
Maybe I have done wrong and haven't repented of it.
I mean, there are other potential causes, no?
bryan johnson
Agreed.
And this is what I'm suggesting, that no matter where someone is coming from, whatever your origin...
The game to play as a species right now, in this moment, is don't die.
Right now, we play capitalism and make money and earn.
tucker carlson
I'm with you there.
That's obviously a hollow, stupid dead end, and it's not actually even working.
So, I mean, it's not working by its own terms.
It's not working, right?
You don't have a middle class anymore, so clearly that's not working, right?
I couldn't agree with your skepticism more when you conclude that the current program is absurd.
Clearly it is.
We need a better way.
I'm just, but I do think it's like at the core of your assumptions is an unanswered question, which is why is living better than dying?
Why do people seek to kill themselves?
What the hell is going on there?
bryan johnson
Yeah, yeah.
tucker carlson
Why?
bryan johnson
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, so I have gone through my life in a series of moments that has led me to distrust almost everything, including my mind.
So initially growing up in a religion.
tucker carlson
Wise, wise.
bryan johnson
I mean, I grew up in a religion and then I found out that that entire thing had been packaged in a way where it's like, we're good and everyone else is bad.
And then I went through a process of behavioral psychology where I realized that I have all these shortcuts of hypocrisy and irrationality that I am a disaster as a human.
I'm blind to my own behavior.
I went through it with authorities that I trusted in other ways.
And so I don't know what to trust in reality outside of things that I find more stable like physics and math.
And so if I try to ground myself in reality of what can I trust, my mind is very far down the list of things I trust.
tucker carlson
I agree.
bryan johnson
And so when I pose a question to myself of do I want to live or do I want this or that, I don't trust what I have to say ever.
And so I don't know, are we really the authority on what we want?
Have we ever been accurate in making those guesses?
tucker carlson
No.
And I have to say, I... I disagree, I think, very strongly with your conclusions, but I so admire the way you're reaching them because I think it's...
I mean, the root of wisdom is knowing not to trust yourself.
I always say to my kids, the one guy I don't trust is me.
Because it's true.
And so I really admire your honesty.
You seem like you're coming at this as honestly as you possibly can.
But I... Anyway, whatever.
I have a lot of thoughts, but I don't mean to interrupt you.
So you...
What would happen if people lived forever?
Why would that be good?
I mean, the accumulated sadness of life is hard to take.
Do you talk to old people at all?
bryan johnson
I do.
unidentified
Yeah.
tucker carlson
And so there is like ships in a harbor, barnacles attach, and the weight of that over time becomes immense.
Memories, and there's just a lot in the human life that is hard.
And again, it accumulates.
And so why would you want to extend that?
bryan johnson
So imagine we travel back in time, one million years, and we're hanging out with Homo erectus.
They have an axe in their hand.
And we say, where's shelter?
Where's food?
And where's danger?
We listen.
If we say, now wax poetic on the future of the species, what is the future of intelligence?
We laugh.
They have nothing to say about computers.
Or the internet, or that there's a microscopic world, or how large the universe is.
They have no idea.
And in this moment, if we contemplate that we may be just as primitive as Homo erectus, we think we are at the apex of intelligence.
Is that true?
We're giving birth to superintelligence.
Could that intelligence, relative to us, make us caveman-like in a similar fashion, or more so?
And this is what I'm saying in this moment.
It's an absolute invitation for humility that we may know nothing about existence, or very little, or that what's coming our way may transform existence to ways that we can't even fathom.
That's how significant the change is going to be in the coming years and decades.
It's unfathomable to us.
tucker carlson
It's one of those interesting conversations I've had in a while because you're saying things that I think are almost beautiful in their wisdom.
This is an invitation to humility.
Yes, all of life is an invitation to humility.
That's the root of wisdom and the root of happiness.
But then your conclusion is let's live forever.
It's like I don't know.
bryan johnson
No, but no, no, no.
The conclusion is don't die.
That's it.
That is the sole objective.
And so I want to live tomorrow.
I've got stuff going on tomorrow.
I'm excited about tomorrow.
So it's not to live forever.
It's this, because we understand things on these short timeframes.
And, you know, humans will do things like a person doesn't want to die when walking across the street, but they'll smoke a cigarette while doing so.
tucker carlson
I've done it, yeah.
bryan johnson
So we have these really weird behaviors where we don't want to die, just not now.
tucker carlson
Yeah, I just, I wish, and I'll stop at this, but I just wish we had a better handle on why.
We have those impulses.
I feel like it's very hard to proceed with any assumption at all until we understand what just happened or what's happening now, why we're acting the way that we are.
And if we don't have a consensus on why people hurt themselves, pretty hard to make any future plans at all based on human behavior.
bryan johnson
I do wonder, though, if we could actually look at a self-destruction score across time.
Would our time and place have a disproportionately high level because of...
How effective food companies are at addicted to their food.
tucker carlson
There's no question.
bryan johnson
How good drug companies are making drugs and how, you know, social media that we basically are in this dystopic capture of self-destruction.
tucker carlson
It's 100% true.
Of course.
I mean, I'm not that much older than you are.
We both grew up in a country that was nowhere near this self-destructive.
I mean, you grew up in a Mormon community in Utah, not particularly self-destructive people, actually.
bryan johnson
Right.
tucker carlson
And I mean that as a high compliment.
But the whole country was less self-destructive.
Of course, we respond to our circumstances, our environment, and animals do too.
You cage them, they kill each other.
I mean, I get it.
But the impulse may be exacerbated in certain periods by the environment, but the impulse is constant through time.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
Okay, so let's ask this through another frame.
Here's a thought experiment for you.
So if you had access to an algorithm that could give you The best physical, mental, and spiritual health of your life.
But in exchange for that, you needed to follow the algorithm's suggestions.
Go to bed on time when it said.
Go to bed when it said.
Eat when it said.
Would you say yes or would you say no?
tucker carlson
Of course I would say no.
I'm not getting bossed around by a machine.
Sorry.
And I also don't think that any philosophy that doesn't include God can improve my spiritual health because, like, what does that even mean?
What does that mean, actually?
How can...
How can your spiritual health improve if you don't acknowledge the supernatural?
bryan johnson
Yes, I've been holding dinners at my house for the past couple years.
I get 10 to 12 people together, and I pose this question, and then we have a two-and-a-half-hour dialogue about the future of existence.
And your response is perfect, because you told me no way you're doing it.
And you gave me a list of things.
tucker carlson
I'm not letting the toaster oven boss me around.
I'm just not.
bryan johnson
Now, so what's interesting is the next question I ask in this conversation is now imagine the 21st century is observing our conversation right now and they observe your answers.
What do they observe are the characteristics and morals and ethics of the early 21st century?
So it flips people's mindset from the knee-jerk reaction of I hate this idea to being Observational on what are the characteristics of being human now.
And I do this because it is so hard to see time and place.
We look at the 15th century.
tucker carlson
That's right.
No, I agree.
bryan johnson
It's very clear and clean.
We're like, oh, they're idiots for this.
And like, maybe they were onto this.
But we have this blindness to ourselves in this moment.
tucker carlson
Yes.
bryan johnson
And so we have to do these thought experiments.
You have to tease yourself out very slowly.
People's responses, like they tell me they experience multiple existential crises.
In that dinner, they dip down, they come back up for air, dip back down, come back up.
It's a really challenging experience because it challenges everything you understand about existence.
tucker carlson
Do people keep accepting your dinner invitations?
I mean, if I know that I'm going to eat at Brian's house but have an existential crisis before the entree is served, that's a lot.
bryan johnson
People say it's the one of, if not the most consequential conversations of their entire life.
tucker carlson
Well, that doesn't surprise me, actually, because you have one quality which I, again, really admire, which is your dedication to seeing things outside of your own, the narrow tube that we all live in, seeing the bigger picture.
And I love that.
I think it's so important and wonderful to hear it.
You made a bunch of allusions to superintelligence, presumably the AI we keep hearing about.
And since you're in that business and this is what you think about, describe what that means exactly.
What will AI mean in 10 years, specifically?
bryan johnson
Nobody knows.
What we do know is that software can be programmed and mathematical functions can be organized to do things that we humans do, and they can do it much better, and even do things that we humans can't do.
So we've seen this where I just took my first self-driving car ride in San Francisco last week.
Held it, got in, entirely autonomous.
And that's a remarkable feat that is capable of driving a car.
It reads medical imagery, it flies airplanes.
So we know algorithms are very good at doing many things.
And they're getting better all the time.
And so what I'm observing is I'm saying that AI is progressing at a speed.
That is impressive, and maybe even unfathomable to how we can observe it much faster.
tucker carlson
That's right.
bryan johnson
And it's doing these things that we humans do, and it's going to increasingly do those things, and it will help us achieve our objectives, so we're going to say yes to it.
Now, when these algorithms become as good or better at being us than we are, then it creates an invitation to say, who are we?
And that's what I'm saying, is AI is going to create a series of existential crises for the species.
It'd be basic ones like, do we trust our government?
Who's in authority?
Who verifies identity?
All these basic things we've settled as a society, roughly, it's going to call into question everything at a speed that won't allow us cycle time to really fill it out.
And so we're going to have this feeling of bewilderment where it's moving very fast, we can't keep up.
How do we stop ourselves from falling into anarchy?
Now, when that happens, we say, what games do we play as a species?
What do we do?
And that's why I'm saying it's time to rally around this don't die concept.
Don't die individually.
Don't kill each other.
Don't kill the planet and align AI with don't die.
That our singular objective is a species.
Even though this sounds unimaginable right now, like from our vantage point, that's like, that's no way.
Impossible.
You just look at the underlying characteristics of how this is progressing.
To me, it feels inevitable.
Over some timeframe.
Is it two years?
Is it 10 years?
Is it 20, 50?
I don't know.
But it's basically now.
tucker carlson
I mean, there's no question you're right.
If the Industrial Revolution, the steam-powered loom in England gave rise to Marxism and the First and Second World Wars and Vietnam and Korea and every other conflict for 100 years and the deaths of hundreds of millions of people, technological change causes...
Yes.
The fall of religions, the fall of empires, the murder of millions.
So what will AI do?
bryan johnson
Exactly right.
tucker carlson
I couldn't agree more.
I just wonder, what does it mean to be a human being if you have no autonomy?
I'm an adult man.
What does that mean?
It's not just a measure of my age.
It's a measure of my ability to make decisions.
About what I want to do and what I think and how I live and how my family lives.
And so without that, what is the point of living?
In other words, I said I don't want to be bossed around by a machine, which is a pretty shallow answer.
bryan johnson
But I understand.
tucker carlson
I didn't explain it because I don't fully understand it, how I feel about it.
But something in my dog sense, my gut level, tells me I don't want to live that life.
I'd rather be dead.
Does that make sense?
bryan johnson
It absolutely does.
Absolutely empathize with your reaction.
And so the thought experiment is to provoke that exact emotion.
It's meant to say, I hate this idea and here's all the reasons why.
tucker carlson
Yes.
bryan johnson
And then once you get those on the table, you can then have some kind of detachment and say, why do I think those things?
Like, what is this concept of me making decisions?
Like, let's just break that apart.
And that's why it takes two and a half hours to get through this.
You need to hear other people's perspective.
tucker carlson
I agree.
bryan johnson
People need to say, I hate it.
Some people say, I love it.
But hold tight.
Here's an example that you do already that challenges your notion on this ability to make decisions.
You're like, oh, damn, good point.
So it really takes time to work through your own beliefs and understandings because oftentimes it's just packed so deep you can't get through it.
And we give each thought five seconds in our modern society.
tucker carlson
Yes.
bryan johnson
We can't get deep.
And so I understand your reaction.
And Tucker, if you come to the dinner.
I promise you'll leave with a changed understanding of existence.
This is not an easy topic.
It really takes time to cycle through it, to be open-minded, to hear other people.
But everyone gets there.
Every single time, everyone gets there.
tucker carlson
What do you serve?
Is it all broccoli?
bryan johnson
I do serve blueprint food, yeah.
So it's the two dishes I told you about.
tucker carlson
Yeah.
Well, I'm getting in and out before I come.
But whatever, that's just me.
So I said when you asked, would I be willing to follow the instructions of the algorithm?
And I blurted out without thinking about it, no.
And then I admitted in the interest of honesty that I don't really have any reasons for saying no other than my animal sense tells me, no, that's slavery.
You can't live like that.
You'd rather be dead, which is how I feel.
That was my instinct speaking, which I regard as a kind of co-equal.
With my rational sense, right?
I don't think it's just like some dumb impulse.
I think it's worth paying attention to.
Do you feel that way?
Do you have instincts?
Do you follow them?
Do you attach meaning to them?
bryan johnson
I do.
Every time I engage in a thought, I observe the first four to five thoughts my brain has, I'm incorrect.
tucker carlson
Interesting.
bryan johnson
They're usually almost always wrong.
And it's like, there's a bias attached to this one.
This one's coming out from a preconceived notion.
This one has some self-interest.
And so I'm constantly trying to be aware of what's wrecking my ability to see things clearly at all points of time.
And so, yeah, I learned this.
I was chronically depressed for a decade.
tucker carlson
A decade?
bryan johnson
A decade.
tucker carlson
The decade that you were succeeding in business?
bryan johnson
Yeah.
That's right.
I was building a startup.
I had three little babies.
I was trying to leave my religion.
I was in a challenging relationship.
So it just all packed into a tight.
Yeah, and that's when I was overeating every night to try to soothe my own.
tucker carlson
What were you eating, by the way?
bryan johnson
Well, we always had some sweets in the house.
My partner had a sweet tooth, and so it was always brownies or cookies or leftover cake.
So it was always like, you know, just one bite.
And then led to a second bite.
Then tomorrow we'll work out really hard and work off all the calories.
tucker carlson
Did that work?
bryan johnson
It didn't.
I failed every single night.
And the only thing that gave me liberation is one night I was just desperate.
I mean, I was so miserable.
I hated myself.
I felt so ashamed that I couldn't stop this terrible behavior.
I said, evening, Brian, you're fired.
You make my life miserable because in the morning I would work out.
I would eat a really great breakfast.
All day, I'd be disciplined.
Great.
And then nighttime would come.
I would bathe the kids, get them to bed, tell them stories.
And then that moment would come, like the brownies, you know?
Just one bite of the brownies because of all the pain.
tucker carlson
This is like the Mormon version.
You know what I mean?
You're not like going to the crack house.
unidentified
Oh, that's funny.
tucker carlson
You're an old stable of hookers.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
tucker carlson
You're eating the brownies.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
And so I basically created a character of myself.
And so I would say, all right.
When I saw Evening Brian pull up and he'd give me all these really compelling reasons, like tonight's the last night, you know, like tomorrow morning, we'll work out extra hard.
And I'd say, I'm sorry, that's not going to happen.
So I fired him.
So 5 p.m.
to 10 p.m., I removed my ability to eat.
He's like, no matter what, it doesn't matter what the occasion is, you cannot eat food.
And so I started playing with my different characters of Brian, like Dad Brian, Work Brian, Evening Brian.
And I found it really liberating that I'm not the behavior.
I'm not that actual practice.
And so this is what I started doing.
Blueprint as well, like, could I construct an algorithm that actually improved me?
Because I spent all day building technology in my company, Brainstream MO. You would write the code and the technology and improve it.
And then you would improve it again.
And again, version 2, version 3, version 4. So all day, my technology got better.
And every day, I got worse.
And I couldn't fix my own problems.
And it was such a weird juxtaposition where technology is improving radically, and I'm getting worse.
So it's like this difference.
And I thought, this is wild that as a species, we're so focused on the improvement of our technology, and we are this self-destructive species in every regard.
Like, what is happening?
tucker carlson
Well, that's the question.
That's the question that remains unanswered.
And of course, every religion answers it very neatly and sensibly, I would say, and every religion always has.
And it does strike me, if you're looking back into history, that this is the only period, post-war, post-World War II, where you've had a society at scale that assumes that there's nothing beyond itself.
And so that raises a lot of questions, but the first is, like, why did every previous generation assume there was a God, but we don't?
Like, were they all insane?
Like, where did that come from?
bryan johnson
You know, if someone believes in God or not, or an afterlife or not, that's great.
Like, I don't think...
I personally think everyone comes together on this.
We already agree on Don't Die.
All of us do.
So whether we have a story about what happens in the afterlife, it doesn't really matter.
What we do agree upon right now is none of us want to die right now, not in this moment.
So let's build upon what we agree upon in this very second.
tucker carlson
No, I don't know that we do agree, actually, because there's no meaning without a power beyond ourself, is there?
I mean, there's only this sort of like shallow, silly, or sets meaning that we attach to various things like sex or living longer or feeling good or whatever, but there's no meaning beyond our physical momentary experience, whereas...
A person who acknowledges a power beyond himself attaches ultimate moral meaning to events, right?
So you have no God, no meaning, or am I missing something?
It's like, what's the point?
bryan johnson
You know what I mean?
I guess I try to speak in the world that I can operate.
Practically.
And so your thought of meaning is a biochemical process in your brain.
It's a thought you have.
It's a biochemical state you experience, whether it's love or whether it's meaning making or whether it's belief in death, you're experiencing this thing as a human.
We can engineer this with predictability.
We can engineer atoms and molecules and organisms.
We can do this in the form of creating drugs today.
We do this in the way of creating, you know, Various medicines.
We do this in creating implants.
We're getting increasingly good at doing this.
And so much of our reality is going to become increasingly engineered.
tucker carlson
Oh, I know.
bryan johnson
And so we're heading down this path where our digital reality, our physical reality, all realities, now we have the source code to do this.
And this is why I'm saying that if you take any preconceived notion about being human, any ideas we have about reality...
They're a representation of what we've been doing for thousands of years.
Some of that may carry over, but maybe not.
And so I'm inviting the conversation to say, this moment is not like the previous moments.
Very, very different.
tucker carlson
But here's the practical, and I just want to restate, I respect what you're saying, and I think you seem really honest and open-minded.
So this is in no way a slight.
But the core problem, however, is that in a moment of...
Technological change, really revolution, unimaginable.
Everything you've said sounds right to me.
You need a framework by which, or with the help of which, you make important practical decisions.
We used to call them moral decisions.
bryan johnson
Yes.
tucker carlson
So if there's no acknowledged power beyond people, or only the power that we create through these machines, and there are giant data centers, then how can we say, if I feel like killing you...
bryan johnson
Yeah.
tucker carlson
Because it pleases me.
bryan johnson
Right.
tucker carlson
How can we oppose that?
How can we say that's wrong?
We can't actually say that's wrong.
We can say it's inconvenient or it detracts from GDP or it's unhelpful, but we can't say it's wrong.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
tucker carlson
How could we?
bryan johnson
Yep.
tucker carlson
Right?
bryan johnson
I agree.
Basically, we've settled many of these questions today.
If you want to kill somebody and you actually do it, there's consequences.
tucker carlson
But why?
bryan johnson
It's the way we resolve the moral and ethical questions in our society.
tucker carlson
On what basis?
bryan johnson
Agreed.
But we've solved it somehow.
tucker carlson
We haven't solved it.
The government has said you can't kill people.
bryan johnson
Right.
tucker carlson
But by your own description, governments are going away.
Clearly they are.
I don't even think they really exist now.
What are countries?
It's meaningless, right?
bryan johnson
I agree.
tucker carlson
Of course.
So some dude in a faraway city says, I can't do that.
Well, says who?
bryan johnson
Yeah.
tucker carlson
It doesn't have any meaning at all, except to the extent that you can punish me because you feel like it, but there's no way to say it is wrong.
Or right in an absolute sense.
There's no way to say anything is wrong or right in an absolute sense.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
Okay.
I agree.
What you're saying is, what I'm hearing you say is the technological revolution or disruption opens up the space for these questions to be asked anew, even though we don't even know where it came from in the beginning.
tucker carlson
No, what I'm saying is we're going to have a lot more questions, practical questions about how to proceed that need to be answered now.
bryan johnson
Yes.
tucker carlson
And without any...
Authority above ourselves.
On what basis are we going to answer those questions?
bryan johnson
I see.
Okay.
Okay.
This is what I am proposing is that just like when America was founded, it was this concept of, hey, the monarchy has been doing its thing for quite some time.
Not great.
We think we can do this really new, weird thing of democracy and vote people in.
We have these two representative bodies.
And half the people thought, that's insane.
Half the body's like, kind of cool, let's try it.
So we chose democracy as a form of governance that was supposedly better than the monarch.
And so in that moment, we chose a new form of governance in trying to do that.
Now, we've been trying to solve the thorny questions of democracy for over 200 years.
In fact, we fight about it every single day.
tucker carlson
Right.
bryan johnson
But it's still this basic idea that democracy was superior to monarchy.
And what I'm suggesting right now is we are walking into a new phase of existence where we have to answer these questions anew.
And we don't know what the answer is, but the foundational observation is don't die.
So don't die individually, don't kill each other, don't kill the planet, align AI with don't die.
After that, we're going to spend the next unknown period of time fighting about what it means to don't die.
Birth, artificial intelligence.
What do you use it for?
Is it to become better at war?
Do you become better at killing?
tucker carlson
Look, I couldn't agree with your conclusions more.
I mean, I strongly agree with them.
I'm just wondering about the basis upon which you reach them.
And so without God, how can we say and why would we say that life is better than death?
I mean, the religious person, the Christian, says life is better than death because God creates life.
And only he can.
And by the way, that's still true.
For all the tinkering we do to life, we can't create it.
There's no evidence we'll ever be able to create it.
So that might be a tell that we're not God right there, in my view, but you can disagree.
But we still can't create it, and there's no evidence we'll ever be able to.
So the Christian looks at this and says, life is better than death because life is God's creation.
But why would the atheist accept that as true?
On what basis?
Life is better because I've got an awesome life?
Some person might say, I've got a shitty life.
Like, death is better.
I don't understand if there's no common agreement that there's a force beyond ourselves, why we would reach that conclusion.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
Or, yeah, maybe reframed, it's a person's option to life, that they can choose whether they want to have that or not.
Whereas right now, death is inevitable.
We don't get to choose.
We don't get to choose disease or death.
tucker carlson
Okay.
bryan johnson
So it's the option two.
So in many ways, I'm currently working to create a don't-die nation state.
So if you're serious about not dying, and this, again, not for immortality, but just for the purpose of we're at the dawn of a new era as a species, and we're going to try to create some stable structure for birthing superintelligence, then you can walk into that, and no government in the world is helping its citizens not die.
Really basic things like blood draws and therapies and medical care.
It's very much treat the symptoms when they arise or when you're near end of life, let's keep you alive for some short duration of time.
But otherwise, we don't do a good job.
And so I'm trying to figure out how to create a new societal structure that has the sole objective, a nation state, of helping its citizens not die.
tucker carlson
Of course, the first order of business would be to...
Construct a military to defend yourselves against people who wanted to kill you anyway.
Because not everyone agrees that you should get to live, of course.
But let me ask you, maybe there's a shortcut to all this.
And I so admire your energy and your willingness to think about questions that most people don't bother to think about but can feel are important.
Everything you've said, I can feel it's important.
This is not nonsense what you're saying at all.
Why wouldn't it just be a lot easier to blow up all the processing centers, save ourselves the massive climate change-inducing energy draw that AI really is?
If you're worried about the planet, we've got to stop this crap immediately because we can't generate the power for it.
And arrest everyone who's getting rich imposing this revolution on the world.
That's a lot easier.
You could do that in an afternoon with nuclear weapons, and why wouldn't you if you thought it would help us, quote, not die?
bryan johnson
Yeah, I mean, the systems we have as a society today enables those things.
The ability to create a corporation, to make money, to use up money, to acquire more power, these are systems that humans have created.
It's how the world works.
Well, sure.
tucker carlson
So is Auschwitz.
I mean, so?
bryan johnson
So what I'm saying is that AI is going to improve at a speed.
That's going to challenge how these structures are.
tucker carlson
I couldn't agree more.
bryan johnson
And when that happens, there's going to be an opening.
There's going to be a power vacuum.
And it's not going to be very clear anymore who's in charge, who has authority, who can verify identity, where can you keep money, is money secure?
All these basic questions of society.
And so what I'm suggesting is, as a species, We increase our probability of surviving if we can rally around one thing that we can all agree upon.
Now, the don't die, if we disagree one layer above, great.
tucker carlson
I get it.
I totally get it.
And I hate to reduce everything to the if you could kill baby Hitler, would you?
But it is sort of a question like that because you would not disagree if I said, here's what we know.
We know that AI is likely to spawn some improvements also.
Certain to kill millions of people.
Millions will die because of this.
There's any doubt about it.
The chaos alone, right, will cause that.
I'd bet my house on that.
That's going to happen.
Why let that happen?
Want to just strangle this puppy in the crib?
Like, seriously, why wouldn't you as a rich guy fund a bunch of saboteurs to blow up the data centers and to take out the people pushing this crap and to try and end it?
Go full Unabomber.
Like, honestly, why couldn't you justify that?
bryan johnson
It would be a question What path do you think creates a higher probability of survival?
Do we think that technology or do we think we humans are a better path?
I mean, for example, I look at my own self-destructive behaviors and not trusting myself.
Do we really think that we humans are trustworthy to chart a path where we survive ourselves?
tucker carlson
I don't know.
I mean, it's, of course, hard to know.
Potentially not, for sure.
And I definitely don't trust myself, as noted.
But I have a soul and a machine doesn't.
And so that gives me kind of an advantage, I would say a moral advantage over the machine.
And therefore, I'm a preferable father, for example, to my children than my iPad would be.
Because I have a soul and the iPad doesn't.
But again, that's a theological distinction.
But as a practical matter, there's no way you can look into the camera and say, AI is not likely to kill millions of people, because you know that it is.
The effect of it will kill people, for sure.
The displacement that you described, the power vacuum you described, the chaos that you described correctly, you're predicting.
That's all that's real, in my view.
So millions will die because of that.
So why wouldn't you just take your money and try to blow it up in the name of saving millions?
bryan johnson
I think the probabilities of our survival Are higher with AI. Oh.
tucker carlson
Even though millions will die.
bryan johnson
I don't accept the premise.
tucker carlson
You don't?
You really don't?
bryan johnson
I really don't.
You know, like, millions are dying because of the food industry.
Yeah, for sure.
Millions are dying because of environmental toxins.
Millions are dying because it's certainly...
Death is happening at a societal scale for a lot of things that we humans are doing.
Now, sometimes it's not born of malice.
We're just trying to improve.
tucker carlson
I agree.
I totally agree with everything you just said.
That's all true.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
But I think this is back to your statement, though, Tucker.
tucker carlson
So you actually think AI... So I think I've misread what you were saying.
I thought you were saying this historically transformative thing is about to happen and we've got to prepare ourselves for it.
And the implication would be that's...
Kind of bad and scary thing.
But you're saying, actually, for all the displacement and suffering it's going to cause, it's still better than if we didn't have it.
bryan johnson
Exactly.
And specifically, I'm saying that when I listen to what the world is saying, so we're giving birth to the superintelligence, what do we do?
The only argument I've heard is universal basic income.
tucker carlson
Well, it's just childish.
bryan johnson
It's not a solution.
tucker carlson
That's the midwit solution.
I'm running for president as the fake smart tech guy.
unidentified
Maybe we should have UBI. We have no plan.
bryan johnson
We've given no thought.
tucker carlson
I agree.
bryan johnson
And we don't even know.
We can't even fully comprehend how big of a problem this is and on what scale.
And so what I'm trying to do is get out in front of this to say it's big.
It's serious.
tucker carlson
Wait a second.
You're contradicting yourself, Brian Johnson.
You just said a minute ago you think it'll be an improvement over what we currently have.
bryan johnson
Yes.
tucker carlson
But then you're saying a sentence later that it's such a huge problem that we need to mobilize all forces to fix it.
bryan johnson
It's a problem because it's going to create chaos among humans.
tucker carlson
Yeah!
bryan johnson
And humans in uncertain circumstances are very dangerous.
tucker carlson
I totally agree.
bryan johnson
And so what I'm suggesting is if we're trying to improve the likelihood that we survive as a species that we do, our children do, their children do.
And I'm trying to say, how do we optimize that?
Then, yes.
tucker carlson
But I still just want to go back to, like, why not save ourselves?
I mean, there's something sort of classically American or Western or overfed, too much money passive about the society that I live in and all of us live in.
We're just like, well, it's going to happen.
It's like, why doesn't somebody stop it?
Why even go through all this drama?
These are just machines.
Like, let's go full Luddite and just take him out.
I'm serious.
Arrest these creepy people who are trying to impose this dystopia on our children.
bryan johnson
So there's another way.
I understand what you're saying.
There's another way to think about it, though.
tucker carlson
It doesn't include blowing up data centers and arresting these people?
bryan johnson
I mean, okay, so let's just say at what point in time have humans known all things?
So we walk back through history and say, what did humans know then?
And what do we know now?
And there's been a track record of we haven't known all things.
In fact, we've known a very shallow set of things.
It's like even if you said how big is reality a few hundred years ago, you wouldn't be able to say, oh, there's a microscopic world down to the nanoscale and beyond.
There's this big universe on this scale at this size.
You wouldn't say there's an electromagnetic world that's a trillion times bigger than what we can see.
You wouldn't be able to say reality is like trillions of times bigger than what we experience.
And so if you say, what could our conscious experience be?
What could existence be in a few decades?
It may be orders of magnitude larger than what we have now.
So I realize we come at this now with this fear response.
We're saying we can pattern things we've seen, but going forward, we may be cavemen and have no idea what we're talking about.
tucker carlson
Right.
unidentified
date.
tucker carlson
I mean, I think that's where we are now.
We don't have any idea what we're talking about.
We can't anticipate the future.
We're limited in our foresight, in our knowledge, and particularly in our wisdom.
I completely agree with all of that.
But the idea that harnessing the computing power of machines...
We'll inform us to a greater degree, ignores what just happened over the last 30 years where everyone now has the Encyclopedia Britannica, as we used to call it, in his pocket in the form of an iPhone where all human information is available and people are way more ignorant than they were 30 years ago.
And moreover, any machine we create will never be able to answer the questions that actually matter like, why is my wife mad at me?
No machine can ever determine that with certainty or even explain how does life begin?
bryan johnson
Right?
tucker carlson
Can AI tell me why my wife is mad at me?
bryan johnson
Yes.
tucker carlson
Come on!
bryan johnson
You give it some time, and you're going to get a readout.
Here's her hormone levels.
Here's her biochemical state.
This is her sleep score.
This is her diet.
Here's her exercise protocol.
Tucker, given these variables, here's the best course of action.
tucker carlson
But that's the mechanistic answer.
bryan johnson
But it translates to, Tucker, what would be nice is words of encouragement and of softness and of inquiring.
tucker carlson
Sure, but again, I guess we're back to where we started.
And I'll stop at this before I make reservations to come to your house for a broccoli dinner and have five existential crises before the dessert.
There's no dessert, right?
bryan johnson
There's no dessert.
tucker carlson
I'll come anyway.
But anyway, the point is, this ignores an entire...
Universe, which may be the most important universe, which is the spiritual universe.
And every civilization that left any trace of itself has believed in that universe.
But for the last 80 years, we haven't, and we're proceeding into the future on the basis of no belief in that.
And it seems like questions of right and wrong, of sin and virtue, of redemption.
All of those are totally missing, and that plays a role, too.
It's not just how much exercise did you get, how many hours did you sleep, what did you eat.
Feelings are not just the result of biochemical processes.
They're the result of forces that exist outside of us.
No, spiritual forces, unseen forces.
bryan johnson
I agree with you, and this may be the most spectacular spiritual existence in our history.
This is absolutely, like, you and I have the same conscious experience of reality.
We may have different ideas about reality.
But we experience it in a very similar way.
And what I'm suggesting is the promise of this time and point is we may be on the cusp of the most spectacular existence in this part of the galaxy.
We don't know that intelligent life lives anywhere in the galaxy.
We can't find it.
Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't.
We're the only life we can see.
And we're now giving birth to superintelligence.
This moment may be the time to set aside our petty little things and say, really?
It's us in this moment, and we get to experience a spiritual nature that is just mind-boggling.
This is our moment.
tucker carlson
Is there any—I'm so rooting for the future you describe.
I really am.
I just—speaking—you said at the outset that you were no longer a believer because there's no evidence, which I think is a fair thing to say.
I disagree, but I respect your evidence-based standard, okay?
Where's the evidence that technology has ever— Brought people closer together.
Has ever done anything but enable people to be people, which is to use it in part for good ends, you know, better food, more food, and evil ends, nuclear weapons.
I just don't think that there's any evidence for what you're saying!
bryan johnson
Yeah, it's because humans have been playing the game Die.
So it's not that technology has virtue or is without virtue.
Technology is neutral.
Humans have used it.
For their purposes of war and power acquisition and wealth.
It's what we've always been doing.
And that's what I'm suggesting.
That's what we need to eliminate from society.
The causes of death.
And that includes warfare.
It includes fast food.
It includes all the things we do to ourselves and to each other and the planet.
tucker carlson
But until we can account for why we do it to ourselves, we're probably not going to change it.
But I think the most obvious explanation is we're being acted on by demons.
And this is how every religion I'm aware of has described it correctly, in my opinion, acted on by demons, whose goal is to destroy and kill people, and they're counterbalanced by God.
But if you don't agree with that, then you need to substitute another explanation in its place in order to proceed in the hope that we can change.
Otherwise, we're just in this cycle with more powerful technology that allows us to do the same evil things, but at a greater scale.
bryan johnson
I mean, am I not a demon?
tucker carlson
Are you not a demon?
You don't seem like one.
My demon assessment abilities aren't great.
bryan johnson
Have we correctly labeled ourselves angels or the good guys and incorrectly labeled the demons the bad actors?
Am I not the demon?
tucker carlson
I don't know.
I guess what I'm...
I mean, you know, it's all in the definition.
But I guess the core observation remains the same, which is...
People are subject to forces outside of themselves which are unseen.
Not all of this is the product of sleep cycles or carb intake.
bryan johnson
Or maybe it is.
tucker carlson
I don't see any evidence of that because it's remained constant throughout all time that we're aware of.
This pattern has never changed, and it's existed in times when people are getting massive amounts of aerobic exercise because they had to walk through the fields all day, when they were eating no carbs, when they were hunter-gatherers, or whatever.
It's like it's always been true.
So why?
bryan johnson
What's your guess?
tucker carlson
Well, my certainty is that we are being acted on by spiritual forces that we cannot see, that there is a war going on all around us, out of our sight, not perceived by our senses most of the time, between good and evil.
bryan johnson
Yeah.
tucker carlson
And that's hardly an original insight.
bryan johnson
I'm with you.
tucker carlson
You're with me!
bryan johnson
I'm with you.
What I heard you say is there's more to reality than we can see.
tucker carlson
Yes.
bryan johnson
There's forces which we can't identify.
And we should address those.
We're on the same page after the same thing.
tucker carlson
What are those forces?
bryan johnson
Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
That's what we need to figure out.
That's the whole objective of this endeavor is to identify what we cannot see and reconcile with and eliminate the forces that deteriorate our life experience in all of its capacity, spiritual, physical, all of it.
We're saying the same thing after the same objective.
tucker carlson
It's going to take me a day to process that.
bryan johnson
It does.
tucker carlson
Brian Johnson, I will see you at dinner.
bryan johnson
Great.
tucker carlson
Thank you for that conversation.
Export Selection